Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-05-06 Minuteserald Fox to Committee to study feasibility 1 Civic 49 Bonds or disapproval of the EDA grant needed for said project or for some other cause. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: That the assignments of said options to purchase land (copies of said assignments and options being ereto) are hereby accqted and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the cceptance of said assignments in behalf of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, SSED AND APPROVED this 30th day of April, 1968. \6!: • • • DWIS3 CITY CLERK APPROVED: i�9z, ��✓( DON TRI MAYOR ctor Swartz moved to appoint the City Manager, Gerald G. Fox, as the City's Representative on a iittee which would study the':advisabilitycof_having a, professional firm make -a feasibility study for a. c Auditorium. The.motion was seconded.:by Director Melton andypassed unanimously. e being no further business, Director Kerlin moved to adjourn. motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meetir, urned. a' i �� APPROVED: DON IRUMBO, MAYOR he Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, May 6, 1 eetang. at 7:30 P. M. CDST. Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, City Clerk George J. Davis, and Dire T.J.Keith Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. Rep. N.W.Absent: Director Dale Dunn. imes, also Absent at roll call but later entering: Director James Kerlin. present. The minutds of the regular meeting on Monday, April 15, 1968, and of the special session on Tuesday, April 30, 1968, copies of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as ,' ;written. .1 etition to The City Manager presented the petition of Paul E. Sullins and 011ie E. Sullins to rezone certain propertl rezone, located at the Southeast Corner of the intersection of U. S. Highway No. 71, South, and 22nd Street, from ;Sullins) ^-1 Open Land District, to C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District, which had been approved by the Planning After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 1239, ance N0. AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 281, 19621, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL 1599 ESTATE FROM 0-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT, TO C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT". Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading, The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. "Nay" None. There being Five "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the rule suspended. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. Director Christie then moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Swart cFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. "Nay" None. There being Five "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Cmdtionce passed. The Ordinancewas then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, the Mayor asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. "Nay" None. There being Five "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE N0, 1599 ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKA ROVED MAY 282 1962; TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM 0-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT,' TO C-22 THOROUGHFARE MERCIAL DISTRICT. WMEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, nsas, on Tuesday, April 16, 19681 on the petition of Paul E. Sullins and 011ie E. Sullins requesting said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned Open Land District, to C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District, to -wit: A part of the NW 1/2 of Sec. 28, T -16-N, R -30-W, ofthe 5th P.M., described as follows, to -wit: Be at a point which is 29 5/6 rods East and South 140 West 14 1/6 rods from the Northwest corner of s forty acre tract; thence South 700 East 418 feet; thence North 140 East 184 feet; thence North 78 West 418 feet; thence South 140 West 7 1/2 rods to the place of beginning, except a strip of equal and uniform whdth 100feet off the North sideof said described tract which is reserved for road purposes. WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said ha ng and location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general lation in said city, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, fdllowi.ng sa3o public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Di f the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the escribed property, presently zoned 0-1 Open Land District to C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned 0-1 Open Land District, be the same is hereby rezoned to C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District. SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and ordinance shall be in fullf force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVEDththis 6th day of May, 1968. I u �I J 2691 ATTEST, APPROVED: 'O DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEO GE . DAVIS, CITY CLERK The City Manager presented the petition of 0. U. Green and Grace I. Green to rezone certain property located on 5th street from A-1 Annexed Territor,v District to R-2 Two Family Residential District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. After a brei£ discussion the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the '''ayor, read a propose Ordinance No. ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "Aid ORDINANCE ANIENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0.12392 1600 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, to REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICT TO R-23 TWO FAI4ILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT," Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second readin The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, I'Aye" Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. "Nay" None. There being Five "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the rule suspended. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. Director Christie then moved that the rule be further suspended and that t he Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran. Director Kerlin entered at this timl and was noted by the Clerk. The Clerk explained the question before the House to Director Kerlin, and then upon roll call the following ro:avote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Uhristie, and Trumbo. "Nay" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the motion passed. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, the Mayor asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo, "Nay" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the.Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1600 ' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AN REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 19623 TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICT TO R-21 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on Tuesday, April 16, 1968, on the petition of 0. U. Green and Grace I. Green requesting that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned A-1 Annexed Territory District to R-2 Two Fimily Residential District, to -wit: Part of the SW. 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 14, T -16-N3 R -30-W, being more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point 565 feet North and 413.45 feet West of the Southeast corner of said 40 acre tract and running thence West 246.55 feet; thence South 104.9 feet; thence in a southeasterly direction to a point 165 feet south of the beginning point, thence North 165 feet to the point of beginning. . and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time,place and purposes of said hearing and location of property, was publiched in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said city, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directo of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above-described property, presently zoned A-1 Annexed Territory District, to R-2 Two Fgmily Residential District. ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION1. 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned A-1 Annexed Territory Distri be and the same is hereby rezoned to R-2 Two Family Residential District. Section 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full forece and effect from and after its passage, approval and public PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of May, 1968. APPROVED: ATTEST: 4 "tu 2L4 DON TRUMB02 MAYOR GEORG J. WIS. CITY CLERK The City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in it6s entirety for the first time entitled, " AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE NAME OF A STREET IN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILI Ordinance No. ARKANSAS."D 1601 Directore Melton moved that.the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. Director Melton moved that the rule be further suspended and the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion, there' no discussion the Mayor then ask ' the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. "Nay" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE No 1601 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE NAME OF A STREET IN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. WHEREAS, a certain road within the present corporate limits of the City of Fayetteville was an open, existing county road prior to its annexation into the city in 1966 and said road currently appears to have no name and 12 r0 Ord. 1607( cont.) WHEREAS, said road is located and situated as follows: Beginning at a point on the South side of State Highway 16 East, where the road herein described nue No. intersects said Highway, which point is approximately three hundred (300) feet South and two (Cont.) hundred (200) feet West of the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 16 North, Range 29 West, and running thence.Southwesterly along said road 300 feet to the existing corporate limits of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: That the above-described road situated within the corporate limits of fFayetteville, Arkansas, be a: the same is hereby named Van Hoose Drive. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 6th day of May, 1968. APPROVED: ATTEST: A DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEOXVrE J AVIS, CITY CLERK The Cit-., Manager presented Administrative Memo No. 105 recommending a WARNING SIREN SYSTEM which was spread onthe minutes and reads as follows: Administrative Memo No. 105 WARNING SIREN SYSTEM No. 105 Several months ago the City Board requested that the City investigate the possible installation of warning sirens.in the City. Civil Defense and vendors of these items have now been checked and I would make the.following report., The City of Fayetteville has no type of Civil Defense or disaster warning system sirens or other deviced. For about twenty years we have had a single siren operating off the roof of t9e Cit•% Administration Building. This siren has been primarily used to recall volunteers and off-duty firemen. It can be used for weather alerts but not with much coverage. There are 50% Federal Civil Defense matching funds available fora warning system project. This would include both cost of equipment and installation costs. In discussion this program with engineers for signal firms, it is believed that.electronic sirens mounted on poles with coverage of about 4,000 feet in all directions would be the type to use if a program is initiated. Approximately seven (7) would be: required to cover most all of the built up areas of the city. These units would be controlled by a remot control to a central operating switch probably located in the Police Department. The sirens and remote controls list at about $3,900 each with installation estimated at $1,100 each. Each unit would then.cost abort $5,00 if list prices are used for a total installed cost for seven (7) units of $35,000. It would be my.guess that the entire program could be carried out for about $33,000. If Civil Defense funds would be made available for the program, the City's cost would be about $16,500. If the program is to be carried out, I would recommend that the Board authorize an application for Federal Funds to be submitted to the Office of Civil Defense, Department of Commerce, in the amount of $16,500 and that if this application is approved, the City proceed to install three (3) units during 1968 at a cost to the city of about $7,500 and four (4) units in 1969 at a cost to the City of about $9,000. Director Kerlin moved to accept the recommendation as outlined in Memo. No. 105 above and authorize the City Manager to make applications for Federal Funds through the Civil Defence Director and that the the City's share be paidwt with the unappropriated surplus funds. The Motion was seconded Director McFerran and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "A,ye@ Kerlin, McFerran, and'Melton. "Nay" Swartz, Christie, and Trumbo. There being Three "Ayes" and Three "Nays" the motion failed to pass for lack of a majority vote, The City Manager presented Administrative Memo No. 106 recommendingn some Proposed.Budget Changes which was spread' on the minutes and reads as follows: Administrative Memo No. 106 PROPOSED BUDGET CHANGES In the approved 1968 Budget for the General and Public Works Funds, Utility Service for Street Lights zed ($25,660) and Utility Service for Traffic.Signals ($500), Maintenance of Traffic Signals ($''500) and Traffic Signal Improvements ($5,500) were all transferred from General Fund Expenditures to Public Works Fund Expenditures. Charges for all these items during 1968 have therefore been assessed against the Public Works Fund. We had estimated a beginning unappropriated surplus in the General Fund at January 1, 1968 for budget purposes of $40,174. Audited figures placed the unappropriated surplus at $51,942. Further, we had estimated an unappropriated surplus of $19,487 in the Public Works Fund. Audited figures placed this surplus as of January 1, 1968 at $17,457, including inventory. Because of this improved picture in the General Fund, I would recommend that most all items con2erning Traffic Signals be transferred back to the General Fund for the 1968 fiscal year's expenditures. Some adjustments in other Public Works Accounts are also recommended. 1 General Fund Expenditures 1968 1968 Acct. No. Item Anoroved Adjusted Traffic Signals & Fire Charges 5664 Utilities Power -0- $ 1,200 5671 Maintenance -Traffic Signals -0- 300 5690 Improvements -0- 000 Total 88 16;388 Grand Total - General Fund $691,00 $697,500 Public Works Fund - Streets E66enditures 7521 Asphalt Oil and Mixes $100,000 $105,000 7223 Street Marking Material 23000 2,500 7223 Signs 4,000 4,500 7565 Utilities - Traffic Signals 500 -0- 7571 Maintenance- Traffic Signals 500 -0- 1 Budget Changes Reappoint Mrs. H.J.Meenan to HospitaliBoard. Purchase of Striping Ma Bids on Striping 2711 7590 Improvements $ 5,500 -0- 7590 Buildings 102000 10.500 Grand Total $464,000 $464,000 Your approval of these adjustments is requested. Director S"artz moved to approve the Proposed Budget Changes in the 1968 Budget as recommend by the City Manager. The motion was seconded b.: Director Christie and passed unanimously. The City Manager reported that, the term of Mrs. H. J. Meenan on the Hospital Board expired on May 1,1968 Mrs. Meenan is presently serving as secretary to the board and as the only woman on the Board. Mr. Kenneth Sanders, Hospital Administrator, strongli• recommends the reappointment of Mrs. Meenan. I would concur in the recommendation to reappoint Mrs. H. J. Meenan to the City Hospital Board for a term to expire on May 1, 1978. Director McFerran moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and reappoint Mrs. Meenan to the City Hospital Board for a term to expire on May.11,1978. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The City Manager reported that bids had been received and tabulated for the purchase of a Traffic Line Striping Machine, and he recommend the purchase of the one by VePed Traffic Controls, Inc. for the total cost of $13736.50. Director Melton moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and authorize the purchase of a Traffic Line Striping Machine from VePed Traffic Controls, Inc. for the sum of $1,736.50. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. BID TABULATION TRAFFIC LINE STRIPING *LSCHINE Wald VePed Kelly- Moody Industries Traffic Creswell Equipment Inc. Controls, Inc. Co. Company Alternate 2 (For Moody Only) Model 8000 Mark Rite Also meeting specifications $12696.17 Purchase of Stop Signs & The City Manager reported that bids had been received and tabulated for the purchases of Stop Signs Channel Iron and Channel Iron Posts,and he recommended the purchases of 75 Stop Signs from Vulcan Signs Co. Posts. e $3.40 and 200 ChannelIron Posts N�o83'004,ia100 Channel Iron Posts @ $2.50, and 1CO Channel Iron Posts C $1.87all, from McRaney Enterprises Co.. Director McFarren moved to authorize the purchases of the Stop Signs and Channel Iron Posts as outlined above. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. Bids on Stop Signs BID TABULATION & Channel Iron Posts. Ve-Ped McRaney Miro-Flex V@lcan Traffic Lowen Sargent Traffic EnterorisescCo. Inc. Signs Controls Co., Inc. Sowell Supolie 75 Stop Signs 2411, white on red as per speci- fications $3.81 $5.90 $3.40 $4.37 $ -- $4.50 $ -- 200 Channel Iron Posts, 12 feet, as per specifications $3.00 3.15 3.36 2.99 3.19 3.18 3.56 100 Channel Iron Posts, eet, as per specifications 2.50 2.65 2.63 2.51 2.65 2.75 2.90 100 Channel Iron Posts, '1 112 feet, as per specifications 1:87 1.95 2.11 1.89 2.00 2.20 2.30 Terms Net Net Net Net Net Net Net Delivery 30 days 30-120 days stock 30-90 days stock 12 days 90 days All or -nothing on posts 1. Traffic'Line Striping ' Machine, Two line, one ;.':._. ,.:J ; color, as per speci- fications and with accessories as indi- cated $1,516.00 $13736.50 $19468.55 $1,970.60 Model Wade #16 MB Line Kelly Cres- Mark Rite Line Reflecto+ Master well B-4 Marker #9000 kine Delivery 12=15 days 30 davs 18 days 30-45 days Terms Net Net Net Net Alternate 1'(For MoodyOnly) With Differential Model 9000 $2,184.35 Alternate 2 (For Moody Only) Model 8000 Mark Rite Also meeting specifications $12696.17 Purchase of Stop Signs & The City Manager reported that bids had been received and tabulated for the purchases of Stop Signs Channel Iron and Channel Iron Posts,and he recommended the purchases of 75 Stop Signs from Vulcan Signs Co. Posts. e $3.40 and 200 ChannelIron Posts N�o83'004,ia100 Channel Iron Posts @ $2.50, and 1CO Channel Iron Posts C $1.87all, from McRaney Enterprises Co.. Director McFarren moved to authorize the purchases of the Stop Signs and Channel Iron Posts as outlined above. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. Bids on Stop Signs BID TABULATION & Channel Iron Posts. Ve-Ped McRaney Miro-Flex V@lcan Traffic Lowen Sargent Traffic EnterorisescCo. Inc. Signs Controls Co., Inc. Sowell Supolie 75 Stop Signs 2411, white on red as per speci- fications $3.81 $5.90 $3.40 $4.37 $ -- $4.50 $ -- 200 Channel Iron Posts, 12 feet, as per specifications $3.00 3.15 3.36 2.99 3.19 3.18 3.56 100 Channel Iron Posts, eet, as per specifications 2.50 2.65 2.63 2.51 2.65 2.75 2.90 100 Channel Iron Posts, '1 112 feet, as per specifications 1:87 1.95 2.11 1.89 2.00 2.20 2.30 Terms Net Net Net Net Net Net Net Delivery 30 days 30-120 days stock 30-90 days stock 12 days 90 days All or -nothing on posts 2'72 [: I No. to at No. Kase of F I Name he City Manager reported that bids had been received and tabulated for the •rurchase of Street Name es & Plates and Hardware and he recommended they be purchasedGfrom VePed Traffic Controls ,,?since they were the low bidder. ware. Director MaFerran moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and Durchase 560 Street Name Mates Cy $1.28 each and 175 Four Way Hardware, Miro-Flex B -4P oi• Equal Q $2.80. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. BID TABULATION STREET NAME PLATES AND HARDWARE on Street McRaneyMiro-Flex Veped Traffic Sargeant Plates & Enterprises Comnany Controls Sowell, Inc. ware 60 Street Name Plates ' Embossed, as per speci- fications $1.57 $1•.60 $1.28 $1.50 75 Four Way Hardware, Miro-Flex B -4P or Equal $4.11 $3.50 $2.80' $3.25 Terms' Net Net Net Net Delivery 45 flays 45 dais 310 days 45-60 days chase of The City Manager reported that only one company had bid on the sale of Nuts, Bolts and Washers and he Bolts, recommended that these be purchased from Premier Fastener Company for the next twelve (12) months begin fl shers. M•y--1 -1968. Direc�or Melton moved authorize the purchase of the Nuts, Bolts and Waspers_from-the Premier Fastner Company according•to their bid, for the next twelve (12) month's begire%kv,1,-1968. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously: MfLj!<J_/9_6-F The City Manager introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its inance entirety for the first time entitled , "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1572 OF OCTOBER 16, 1967 1602 TO CORRECT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED THEREIN." Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended andthat the Ordinance pe place on the second reading. The motion was seconded by Director I McFerran and uppassed unanimoubly, The Ordinance was then read for the second time. Director Christie moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be place on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion, There being no discussion, the Mayor asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass"? Upon roll call the following vote was recorded "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. "Nay" None There being six (6) "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE N0. 1602 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1572 of OCTOBER 16, 1967 TO CORRECT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED THEREIN. WHEREAS, the first "Whereas" clause of Ordinance No. 1572 of October 16, 1967, ommitted the phrase "of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4)" from the description of Tract B contained therein, and WHEREAS, the correct description of Tract B should be as follows: TRACT B: A part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section Nine (9), in Township Sixteen (16) North, of Range Thirty•(30) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point which is seven hundred forty (740) feet South of the Northwest corner of the said forty acre tract, and running thence South sixty (60) feet; thence East one hundred sixty (160) feet; thence North sixty (60) feet; thence West one hundred sixty (160) feet to the place of beginning, and being situated in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. NOW, THEPXFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: That the first "Whereas" clause of Ordinance 1572 of October 16, 1967, be and the same is hereby amended by chaAging the legal description of Tract B contained therein to read as set forth in this ordinance. PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of May, 1968. APPROVED: ATTEST: DON TRUM.BO, MAYOR tt GEORG J. AVIS, CITY CLERK tition of to Nu. Director Melton moved that at the next regular meeting on May 20, 1968 that the zoning plan for the a Cor pl area around the campus be discussed and then proceed to the petition of Delta Nu House Corporation orityJ of Kappa Alpha Theta to rezone their property located on Cleveland Street, which had been tabled at s heard the regular meeting of the Board of Directors on August 21, 1967. ext The motion was seconded by Director•Swartz and passed unanimously. Lar Lng. The City Manager read a proposed Resolution in its entirety !. w entitled , "A RESOLUTION C014MENDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE Lution SEQUOYAH VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL AND THE PLANNED EXPANSION OF SAID SCHOOL BY APPLICATION FOR 15-68 FEDERAL GRANT THROUGH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION OF THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. r 1 273 Director Melton moved that the resolution be adopted. . The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the Resolution No. Resolution adopted. 15-68 ' RESOLUTION NO. 15-68 A RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE SEO,UOYAH VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL AND THE PLANNED EXPANSION OF SAID SCHOOL BY APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL GRANT THROUGH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Fayetteville School District through development and operati of the Sequoyah Vocational Technical School have contributed immeasurably to the task of better educatin more people for better jobs, providing skilled employees for industry and reducing unemployment in Fayetteville and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, said Board of Directors have further demonstrated vision and sound planning by application for a Federal grant through the Economic Development Administration of the U. S. Department of Commerce, in order to permit needed expansion of said school which will enable the school to provide even wider educational opportunities for skilled and semi -skilled workers, and WHEREAS, said application has been undertaken as a part of the Growth Center Activities of the City of Fayetteville within the Economic Development District of which it is a part, thereby helping to discharge the responsibilities of the City of such Growth Center, NOW, THEREFORE, -BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: That the Board of Directors of the Fayetteville School District be and they are hereby heartedly commended for their sound vision, planning and ability in the development and operation of the Sequoyah Vocational Technical School, and for their sound judgment in seeking to expand said school through application for a Federal Grant from the Economic Development Administration of the U. S. Department of Commerce, as a part of the Growth Center Activities of the City of F^yetteville within the Economic Development District of which it is a part. PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of May, 1968. APPROVE: ATTEST c DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEOPGFZX. DAVIS, CITY CLERK 4 Resolution No. The City Manager read a proposed Resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION SETTING A HEARING ON A PETITION 16-68 TO VACATE A CERTAIN STREET AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF SAID HEARING. Director Christie'moved that the Resolution tinbe adooted. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 16-68 RESOLUTION SETTING A HEARING ON A PETITION TO VACATE A CERTAIN STREET AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF ID HEARING. Whereas, a petition has been filed with the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, by John W. Vinzant and Elise R. Vinzant, requesting the Board of Directors to vacate and close the following described street in Elmwood Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to -wit: ' An unnamed street commencing at the North edge of Overcrest Street running thence North between Block 3 and Lot 1, Block 4, Elmwood Addition, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to the North edge.of said subdivision. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: That the 3rd day of June 1968, is the date set for the hearing on the aforesaid petition; that said hearing shell be in the Board of Directors Room of the City Administration Building at 7:30 o'clock P.M. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City Clerk of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby directed to give notice of such meeting by publications once a week for two consecutive weeks in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. ' PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day 'of May 1968. APPROVED: DON TRUMBO, MAYOR ATTEST• "0 GEOR J. DAVIS2 CITY CLERK There being no further business, Director Meft6n moved to adjourn. ' The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and pass unanimously, whereupon the Ma*:or declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: ATTEST•2&f� ' DON TMMO, MAYOR GDORGE . DAVIS, CITY CLERK