Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-04-04 Minutes24'7 RESOLUTION 6-68 Resolution A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN LANDS IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, No. 6 68 FOR USE AS EASEMENTS FOR RELOCATION OFWATER AND SEWER LINES NECESSARY FOR HIGHWAY 71 LOOP CONSTRUCTION. ' BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to institute condemnation proceedings to acquire the necessary lands for easements for relocation of water and sewer lines as described in the final construction plans of J. E. McClelland, Consulting Engineer, as fouhd necessary for U.S. 71 Loop Job /9447, named property owners: C. Lorain Barnes and Dena Barnes, husband and wife Frank S. and Martha Leach, husband and wife; Martha Shipley.Leach, in her own right; Frank S. Leach Jr., a single man; and Emily Grace Leach, a single woman. SECTION 2. That as the questions in controversy in said condemnation proceedings are likely to retard the progress of the proposed construction of said water and sewer relocations and consequently the 71 Loop, the City Attorney is further authorized and directed to petition the Court for permission for the City to provide appropriate deposits in court for making comnensations and payment of damages, in order that immediate possession of the said lands may be secured and in order that construction may be commencedand proceed prior to assessment and payment of damages. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 19th day of February, 1968. APPROVED: ATTEST: 1 n J, DON/TRUMBO, MAYOR GEORG J DAVIS, CITY CLERK There being no further business Director Dunn moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director Christie and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: NnA' ATTEST: ' allJro 9, DON TRUMB02 MAYOR GEORG J. VIS, CITY CLERK Regular Meeting. 1The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, March 4, 1968, in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building, at 7:30 P. M. T.J. Keith, Rep. Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and of N.W.Times also (Directors: Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. present. I Absent: Director Sylvia Stiartz. ORDINANCE N0, 1587 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSA APPROVED MAY 289 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R=1B1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND C-29 THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALL C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COrMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on Tuesday, February 201 1968, on the petition of McGoodwin, Williams and Yates, Inc., requesti, that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors enact an orcinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned R -lb, Single Family Residential District,and C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, to all C=13 Neighborhi I District, to=wit: 14 Lot One (1) and Two(2), Block Six (6), Oakland Hills Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, Ordinance No. 1587 Cont. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, February 19, 1968, a copy of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written. The City MAfiagerypresented the petition of McGoodwin, Williams, and Yates, Inc. to rezone certain property an the Oakland Hills Addition, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. Petition by Several Citizens of that area together with their attorney, John E. Butt, appeared before the Directors McGoodwin & Co. in opposition to the rezoning and requested more time (two weeks) in which to prepare their arguments for to rezone certain their opposition to this rezoning. property in I Mr. L. M. McGoodwin presented maps showing the location of the property in question and the preliminary Oakland Hills plans for the building to be located on the property. (An office building for his Consulting Engineering Addition. Compang) After a ver�ylong discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NC 12391 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 289 19621 TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1B, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND C-20 THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO AI C-1NEIGHBORHOOD COiOIERCIAL DISTRICT". Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" ; Ordinance No. Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. 1587 1"Nay" None.' There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the motion passed. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. Director Christie then moved that the rule be further suspended and the Ordinance placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director Melton and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo. "Nay" Dunn. There being Five "Ayes" and only One "Nay", the Mayor declared the motion passed. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. After another long discussion, the Mayor asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call th following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and*Trumbo. May" Dunn. There being Five "Ayes" and only One "Nay", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE N0, 1587 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSA APPROVED MAY 289 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R=1B1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND C-29 THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALL C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COrMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on Tuesday, February 201 1968, on the petition of McGoodwin, Williams and Yates, Inc., requesti, that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors enact an orcinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned R -lb, Single Family Residential District,and C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, to all C=13 Neighborhi I District, to=wit: 14 Lot One (1) and Two(2), Block Six (6), Oakland Hills Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, Ordinance No. 1587 Cont. 1248 1587 "Iola] WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time place and purposes of said hearing and location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said city, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing and Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the abo described property, presently zoned R -1B, Single Family Residential District and C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District to all C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned R -1B, Single Family Residential District and. C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, be and the same hereby is rezoned to all C-1,Neighborhood Commercial District. • SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from a nd after its passage, approval and publication. `r' PASSED AND APPROVED this :.4th day of March, 1968. ATTEST: GEO E J(/DAVIS, CITY CLEidC APPROVED: jam( 4" DON TRUMBO, MAYOR The City Manager presented a petition to rezone certain property in 08klarld Hills Addition from C-2 to R -IB which had been approved by the Planning Commission. a` The City Manager introduced and , at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance fmn it'e,a entirety for the first time entitled, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDI14ANCE NO 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 19620 TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO R -1B, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Director Melton moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the seconded reading. The Motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, Director Melton Moved that the rule he further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The Motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. • The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn, "Nay" None. There being six (6) PAyes" and No "Noyes" the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1588 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO 13392 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO R21B, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, • Arkansas, on Tuesday, February 20, 1968 on the petition initiated by the Planning Commission'to recommenc to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property presently zoned C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District to R -1B, Single Family Residential District, to -wit: FR1 A part of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 35, T -17-N, R -30-W, mored particularly descrived as beginning 150 feet east of the Southwest corner'of said 40 acre tract, at a point where the south line of said 40 acre tract intersects the West right-of-way line of Oaks Manor Drive and running thence East along the South line of said 40 acretract to a point where said South line intersects with the South right-of-way line of Rolling Hills Drive; thence West in a Northwesterly direction along the South right-of-way line of Rolling Hills Drive to a point where said right-of-way line intersects the West right-of-way line of Oaks Ilanor Drive; thence South along the West line of said right-of-way line to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said ng and location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general ulation in said city, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Direct of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above-described property, presently zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District to R -1B, Single Family Residential District. NOYi, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District,be and the same hereby is rezoned to R -1B, Single Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewithaare hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of Marbl, 1968. • APPROVED: D ATTEST: DON TRURO, MAYOR GEORGEroge 44VISo CITY CLERK 1 1 1 249 Authorize purchases The City '•tanager reported in Administrative i•'emo No.95 thatTires and tube bids were opened on 2-15-68 of Tires and Tubes with bids being received from four bidders. You have the tabulation which was submitted with the February 19 agenda items. 1'tany of the tires bid did not completely meet our specifications. Therefore, the recommendation for award is based upon the lowest bid meeting our specifications. In the case of tubes, the award would be to the tire awardee. Below are my recommendations by item tooe as on the left ' of the tabulation: A. To Uilbow Ore Company supplying Goodrich Tires, Items 2,5,8015,16,29,30,31,32,33,35,37238,40,41942, 43,414 and 45. Be To Goodyear service Stores supplying FGoodyear Tires, Items 1,3,4,6,7,9,10,11,12,143,14,17,18,27,28, 34,36, and 39. C. To Central Tire Company supplying Gillette Tires Items 19,20,21,22,23,24,25, and 26. Director Melton moved to authorize the purchase of tires and tubes as recommended by the City Manager and outlined aboved. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. BID TABULATION ON TIRES AND TUBES Bid on Tires and Tubes Tire Description Montgomery Gilbow Goodyear Central Ward Co. Tire Co. i Service Stores Tire Co. 1. 8:25x2©, M&S, 10 ply $ 55.09 $ 56.33 $ 40.00 $ 46.95 2. 8:25x209 10 ply 50.30 37.39 40.38 17.65 3. 8:25x20, lug. 10 ply 55.09 51.44 48:76 48.30 4. 8:25x20, tubes 4.84 3.91. 33.63 3.68 5. 9:00x20, 10 ply, 60.15 46.48 50.20 42.72 6. 9:00x20, lug, 10 ply 63.77 62.03 58.79 55.39 ' 7. 9:00x20, tubes 5.42 4.64 4.30 4.27 8. 10:00x20, 12 ply 76.17 60.56 63.67 58.06 9. 10:00x20, lug 12 ply 82.04 78.61 74.54 68.36 10. 10:00x20 Tubes 6.20 5.06 4.67 4.40 11. 7:50x16, 6 ply 32.50 23.14 22.73 18.19 12. 7:50x16 tubes 3.05 2.68 2.49 1 2.36 13. 7:00x15, M&S, 6 ply 20.22 29.03 21.10 18.19 14. 7:00x15 tubes 2.62 2.09 1.95 2.29 15. 7:00x16, 6 ply 21.47 17.18 ,20.02 17.90 16. 7:00x16, tubes 3.05 2.15 2.49 2.28 117. 7:50x15, 12 ply 48.83 63.27 6o.56 46.45 18. 7:50x15, tubes 3.18 2.42 2.25 2.30 19. 13:00x24, lug, 12 ply 122.77 173.81 151.43 86.32 20. 13:00x24 tubes 12.48 8.647.20 8.80 21. 14:00x24, lug, 12 ply 133.23 199.98 174.80 106.86 .22. 14:00x24, tubes 12.40 8.64 7.20 8.80 23. 14:9x24 tractor. 6 ply 70.68 70.31 64.40 62.86 241 14.9x24 tubes 9.50 6.51 6.04 8.29 25. 16.9x24, tractor,6 ply 85.39 78.15 63.69 26. 16.9x24 tubes 8.34 7.70 8.35 27. 6:50x16, M&S, 6 ply 19.52 24.09 16.29 17.22 28. 6:50x16 tubes 2.06 1:'84 1770 1.69 29. 6:00x16, 6 ply 17.13 11.55 14.15 14.65 30. 6:00x16 tubes 2.06 1.51 1.40 1.59 31. 7:00x13. 4 ply 14.12 10.81 16.63 11.95 32. 7:00x13, M&s, 8 ply .14.87 17.00 18.25 33. 7:00x13 tubes 2.78 1093 1.07 1.28 ' 34. 7:75x15, 4 ply tubeless 12.21 11.45 11.99 35.7:75, 8 Ply, tubeless, M&S 17.22 18.64 12.79 36. 7:35x14, 4 ply 15.06 12.02 11.27 11.59 37. 7:35x14, !%S 8 ply 16.44 17.79 18.75 38. 7:35x14 tubes 2.78 1.&2 1.14 1.22 39, 8:15x15, 4 ply 17.72 13.99 13.06 12.50 40. 8:15x15, M$S, 8 ply 19.14 20.72 13.25 41. 8:15x15 tubes 2.78 1.10 1.12 1.22 42. 8:15x15, M&S, 4 Ply 22.05 18.62 18.62 18.62 43. 8:15x15, Recaps, M&S 9.75# 9.50# 8.00# 44, 8:45x15, Recaps, M&S 9.75* 9.50# 8.00# 45. 7:75x15, Recaps, M&S 9.75* 9.50# 8.00# 2% - 10 2% - 10 Net Deduct $2.75 Add $3.00 for Add $2.00 for for carcass 4 ply; 4 ply; $3.50 for $5.GO 6 ply for 6 ply The City Manager presented a petition to rezone certain property belonging to the Country Club Estates Ord. 1589 Corporation which had been approved by the Planning Commission. The City attorney introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed Ordinance in its's entirel for the first time. entitled. "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DIS- TRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 283 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICT, AND 0-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT, TO R-lA, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT." Director Dunn,moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the seconded reading. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. Ther being no discussion, Director Dunn moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then asked the question,"Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Ave" Kerlin, McFerran, Christie,Tntmbo,and Dunn. "Nay" None "Abstaining" Melton. There being five (5)"Ayes" No "Nays", with only one "Abstaining", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passe( Ordinance No. 1589 on back 250 !S8 ORDINANCE N0, 1589 ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0, 12399 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAI ROVED MAY 289 1962, TO REZONECERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICTjAv'D 0-1 OPEN LAND TRICT,-TO R-lA, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT,'AND R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkan: Tuesday, February 20, 1968, on the petition of Country Club Estates Corporation, requesting that said nning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the rd of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned A-1, exed Territory District, and 0-1, Open land District, to R -LA, Single Family Residential District, all said real estate except the two tracts described :as Tract "A" and Tract "B!' which are to be rezoned to Multi -Family Residential District, to -wit: Bart of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) and part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) and part of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) all in Section 27, and part of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) and part of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4)• of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) and part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) and part of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) all in Section 28, T -16-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the ,southwest corner of the NE 1/4 of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of said Section 28 thence S 860141406 E, 794.96 feed along the South line of said NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 to the centerline of an existing road; thence NC05 58'58" E, 69.89 feet along the centeplinedgf an existin9oad; thence N 05058' 58" E, 285.47 feet along the centerline of an existing road; thence N 05 bb'42" W, 83.91 feet along the centerline of an existing road to an intersection with the centerline of Country Club Road, said intersection being at a point of curvature in Country Club Road; thence Southeasterly along the centerline eof Country Club Road along an are having a length -of 395.42 feet with a radius of 309.32 feet to a point of curvature in Country Club Road; thence•Southeasterly along the centerline of said road along an are having a lehgth of 187.33 feet and a radius of 216.23 feet to a point of curvature ; thence S 28037102" E, 49.97 feet along a tangent section of said Country Club Road; thence S 280371021' E, 45.30 feet to a point on the South line of'the NE 1/4 of saidSection 28; thence,S 86014' 40" E, 69.51 feet to the Southeast corner of said NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 28, thence S 87011120" E.•1323.22 feet along the South line of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 27 to the Southeast corner of said NW 1/4 of -the Sw 1/4 of Sedtion 27; thence N 030 06'40" E., 849.55 feet -along the East line of said 14W 1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 27; thence N 70003130" W, 350.19 feet; thence N 44043'001! W.332.31 feet; -thence N 22016'001' W, 423.66 feet; thence N 1303&'33" W, 379.20 feet; thence N 13 27'49" W, 170.85 feet; thence N 11044100" W,227.99 feet; thence N 07001120" E, 331.63 feet to the -North line of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 27; thence N 86052110" W, 264.93 feet along the North line of said SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of -Section 27; thence N 03010100" E, 873.56 feet; thence N 86035120" W, 183.39 feet; thence S 03003'40" W, 916.03 feet to an intersection with the centerline of an existing road; thence S 28032114" W,-97.91 feet along said centerline to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along the centerline of said road alohg an are having a length of 196.98 feet and a radius of 463.74 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 04011159" W, 109.91 feet along the centerline of said existing road to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along the centerling of said existing road along an arc having a length of 284.60 feet and a radius of 183.30 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 86050'29" W, 670.41 feet along the centerline of said existing road to an intersection with the centerline of Country Club Road; thence N 080001,27" E, 204.41 feet to the centerline of Country Club Road at a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Country Club Road along an -arc having a lengt of 171.91 feet and a radius of 280.72 feet to an point of curvature; thence N 47023'38" E, 142.67 feet along the centerline of Country Club Road in a tangent -section; thence Northerly along the centerline of Country Club Road along an -arc having a length of 186.02 feet and a radius of 70.76 feet to a point of curvature; the$ce N 13013140" W, 36.95 feet to the North line of SE•1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section. 28; thence N 86 5211011•W, 409.28 feet to the Northwest corner of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 28; thence S 03009'10"'W, 655.16 feet along the West line of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 28; thence S 03.17'20" W, 326.77 feet along the West line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 28; thence S 64 11110" W, 313.91 feet; thence S 03028'40" W, 177.91 feet to the South line of the SW 1/4 of the Ne 1/4 of said Section 28; thence S 86058'40" E, 278.73 feet along the South line of said SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 to the Southeast corner of said SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 28; thence S 03041'50" W, 1315.77 feet along -the West line of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/L of said Section 28 to the point of beginning. Containing 119.42.net acres. The following Tract "A" portion of real estate is to be rezoned from 0-1 Open Land District, to Multi -family Residential District. TRACT "A" A part of the SE 1/4 ,-NE 1/4, Section 28, T -16-N, R -30-W, 'Via shington:County, Arkansas, More particularly described -as follows: Beginning at the NE corner of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/49 thence S 86052110", 409.28 feet along the North line of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, thence S 130 13140" E, 66.95 feet to the Southerly right -6f -way line of West 24th Street, thence Southerly along the West right-of-way line of W. 24th Street and Country Club Drive, thence S740201201, W, 191.34 feet, thence N 42035"04" W, 226.41 feet to its intersection with the West line of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, thence N 03017120" E, 326:77 feet along said West line, thence N 03009'10" E, 655.16 feet along said West line to the point of beginning. The following Tract "B" portion of real estate is to be rezoned from 0-1 Open Land District,to R-3 -Family Residential District. TRACT "B" Part of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 27, T -16-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas , and more partic8larly descrived as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/49 thence N 87 11'20" W, 337.33 feet along the South line of saig NW 1/4 of the SW, thence N 02048'40" E,318.03 feet, thence N 28 00100" E, 127.96 feet, thence N 57 05100" E, 353.07 feet to a point on the East line of the said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4,, thence S 03006'40" W, 640.00 feet along the East line of said NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 to the point of beginning. and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hearing and location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said City, more than 15•days prior to said public hearing, aid WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above- described property presently zoned A-1, Annexed Territory District,and 0-1 Open Land District, to R -LA, Single Family Residential District, except Residential District. (.Ordinance No. 1589 cont. on page 251) , 1 �I 251 Ord. 1589 cont. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned A-1 Annexed Territory District, and 0-1 Open Land -District, be and the same hereby is rezoned to R-lA Single Family Residential ' District, except for Tracts "A" and "B" which are herby rezoned to R-3 Multi -Family Residential District. SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are herebyrepealed, and I ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 4th day of March, 1968. APPROVED: AP • ,IJ(44DAVIS; CITY CLERK DON UNIDO, MAYOR The City Manager recommended that the City Controller Albert J. Jones be appointed to act as City Man ADD. Albert Joneq during the absence of the City Manager from March 17 to March 23, 1968. to act as City . ligirector Melton moved to that the City Controller Albert J. Jones be appointed and authorizedto act as Manager I City Manager during the absence of the -City Manager March 17 to March 23,1968. iThe motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously . e being no further business, Director Christie moved to adjourn. Motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unaminously whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting ATTEST : APPROVED: vTC DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEORGE9, JOVIS, CITY CLERK ' Regular Meeting. The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in reguXar session on Monday, March 18, 1968; in the Directors' Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M. CST. T. J. Keith, Rep. Present.City Controller and Acting City Manager Albert J. Jones, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorne N.W.Times Newspaper Hugh Kincaid, and Directors: Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. also present. Absent: City Manager Gerald G. Fox. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, March 4, 1968, a copy of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written. Director Swartz gave a Report On Growth Cities Seminar which was spread on the minutes and reads as follows: REPORT ON GROWTH CFffiE8 SEMINAR Report o l Director Swartz, on Growth Tulsa, Oklahoma - March 3 and l„ 1968 of Cities. In the present overwhelming trend toward urbanization, some of the great needs of cities are greater involvement of citizens in government and increased concern in the needs of people. City governments must learn to be more efficient in their use of revenues. Sources of revenues for cities need to be re-examined and increased. Sources of revenues were explored and these suggestions were made: A city income tax was suggested as a desirable and valuable source for additional income. Only eight states permit its use at the present. It is usually one percent of, monies earned (with very, few, exemptions or deductions). It is levied against in- come earned within the city and therefore reaches people who use the facilities and benefit from the advantages of the city. It ,yields about 1/2 to 1/3 of the amount produced by the property tax. It is used by 141 cities in Ohio and Fennsylania, where it is most widely used. A city sales tax is permitted in 18 states. It is usually collected with the state sales tax and refunded to the city. There is not as much dissatisfaction with a sales tax as with other taxes. It is relatively simple to collect. People pay a little at a time, they are accustomed to pay on the installment method and do not resent it as much as other forms of taxation. Property taxes yield about 57% of tax monies. It was suggested that the assessments of land be increased and assessments on buildings be decreased. Buildings depreciate rapidly in value, land values are more stable and are easier to assess equitably. This would tend to discourage urban sprawl which has become a problem in U. S. cities.. It would help alleviate some other city problems. There is constant need however for equalization of assessments. It was brought out that private capital should accept more responsibility in government and should be more concerned about the needs of people. Many crises have arisen in our cities because of the indifference of business toward the needs of people. There is a definite trend toward urbanization caused by the growth of.business::>Business and capital therefore need to accept their share of responsibility toward a-l-lev'iating or solving some of these problems of the cities which are of their creation. '4e can no longer be indifferent toward the government of cities and the cultural development of their citizens. If GROWTH CITIES continue to grow, they must face some of these problems realistically. Sylvia Swartz Director Melton requested that appreciation of the Board of Directors to Mrs. Swartz for her efforts in preparing the above report be expressed in the minutes of this meeting.