HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-02-19 Minutes243
The City Manager presented the petition of 011ie Tackett to rezone certain proprety located on East
Ordinance left Rock Street from R-3 Multi-Famildy Residential District to C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District,
on first reading. which had been approved by the Planning Commission. The City Attorney introduced and , at the
(Rezone 011ie Tackett request of the Mayor read•a•propedddOrdinance in it entirety for the first time entitiedd, "AN
Property) ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 12390 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE; ARKANSAS
APPROVED MAY 282 1962, TO REZONE CMAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO
C-2 THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
Director Melton suggest that the Ordinance he left on the first reading and that the City Manager
and the Traffic Engineer make and inveestigation of the traffic problems at that location and to make
their recommendation At the next regular meeting of the Director.
This suggestion meet the unanimous approval of the board of Director.
Frontier AirlineOfficials of the FBrontier Airline appread before the Board of Director and discussed the Air Service
Officials made to Fayetteville,no action was taken.
visit.
James Vizzier, The City Planning Consultant appeared before the Director and gave a long preliminary
discussion of Community Renewal Program from the data which he and his associates had compiledd.
Discussion by No further action was taken at this time.
Planning Consultant
(James Vizzier) City N.anager reported that, under authority granted by the Board of Directors at Its regular meeting on
January 2, 1968, bids had been received and tabulated for the expansion of the City Shop Building and
he recommended hhe acceptance of the low bid by G. W. Shirlpy"onstructionCo. for $20,461.00 less the
Authorized alternate bid (air conditioning) fof $2,407.00 or a net bid of $18,110.00.
Contract to Director McFerran moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and award the contract to the
expand City Shop G. W. Shirley Construction Go. with alternate bid, at a total cost of $18,110.00 and that the Mayor
and City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized to exentbe the contract upon the approval of the
contract by the City Attorney and The City Engineer, the approval of the Cost and Berformance Bond
by the City Engineer, and evidence of proper insurance.
The Motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously.
Bids on expansion
of City Shop. TABULATION OF BIDS
Name of Firm Ease Bid Alternate
Brennan=Boyd Construction Co. •25,491.00 22177.00
Griffin Construction Co. 22000.00 2083.00
Martin Johnson Construction 219500.00 2,156.00
ShirleyConstruction Co. 20,517.00 2,407.00
J. L. Starr Constuction 203461.00 23270.00
Tune Construction Co. 21,829.00 2,300.00
Hearing on Kappa The City Manager reported that he had received a letter from Kappa Alpha Theta Sorority requesting
Alpha Theta to be another hearing on their petition to rezone their property on Celeveland Street to be held sometime
held March 18,1968. in March, 1968. 1 1 P�\.,L
(Rezoning) The Director agreed to hold this hearing at their regular meeting on March 18, 1968.
City Managerlto The City Manager requested permission to attend the International City Managers' Association and Public
attend City Managers Automated System Services sponsoring a program on Computers from March 17 to March 23, 1968.
Institute. Director Melton moved to authorize The City Manager to attend the one-week Institute as requested.
The Motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously.
There being no further business Director McFerran moved to adjourn.
The Motion was seconded by Director Christie and passed unanimously, where upon the Mayor declared the m
meeting adjourned.
AApE86V8U:
ATTEST: ,7�
>ys�'�'^ — DON TRUMBO, MAYOR
GEORGBrJAVISI CITY CLERK
The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, February
Regular Meeting. 1968, in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M.
Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and
Directors: Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn.
T.J.Keith, Rep. Absent: Director James Kerlin.
N.W.Ark.T' es
alho present. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, February 5, 1968, a copy of which had previously been maile
to each of the Directors, were approved as written.
The City Attorney read a proposed ordinance for the second time, which had been left on its first reading
Ordinance to rezone at the last regular meeting of the 13bARp._, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 12392
011ie Tackettl's AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 282 19620 TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL
property defeated. ESTATE FROM R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-2 THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT".
After a long discussion with reference to the traffic problems of this locality, Director Melton moved
that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading.
The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously.
The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time.
The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was
recorded, "Aye" None.
"Nay" Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn.
There being No "Ayes" and Sig "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance defeated for lack of a -majority.-
vote.
majority.vote. .Messrs Ben Kimpel, Lyle 'cyan, Franklin Williams, nobert Hay and Mrs. Bassett weresstrongly opposec
to the regoning of the above property.
IThe City Manager reported that, under authority granted by the Board of Directors at its regular meeting
ion January 15, 1968, he had advertised for, received and tabulated bids for a Motor Grader, a Tandem
Steel Wheel Roller, and a Tilting Trailer and he recommended that all three be purchased from R.A. Young
' 1& Sons as follows:
One Motor Grader at a net cost to the City of $22,543.14,
One Tandem Steel Wheel Roller at a net cost to the City of $9,157.32
One 20 Ton Tilting Platform Trailer at a�I net cost to the City of $4,017.27.
" (The above costs were all the net costs after the 2p discount had been taken.)
iDirector Christie moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and authorize the purchase of
all three items from R.A.Young & Sons at the net cost price as listed above.
IThe motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously.
The tabulated bids on each were spread on the minutes and are as follows:
r uc7y� e
c BID TABULATION ON MOTOR GRADER
,
Bidlon Motor
on Tandem
!el Wheel
Little Rock E.A. R.A.
Road Martin Young and Son
Machinery Machinery Incorporated
One MOTOR GRADER, Diesel,
BID TABULATION ON TILTING PLATFORM TRAILER
Moody E. A. R. A. Young
Equipment Martin and Son,
Company Machinery Incorporated
One 20 ton tilting platform
trailer as per specifi-
115 HP, with cab,
cations
$3,895.00
scarifier and other
$49315.00
accessories as Der
Model
Wisconsin
H•yster
Miller
specifications
$222124.40
$23,659.36
$24,161.74
Terms
Model
Gallion 104H
Cat 120
Autin Westen
Series B
pelitrery
300
30 Days
Terms
Net
Net
2% Cash
$4,228.70
Delivery
3 weeks
3 weeks
2 weeks
With Discount
$22,124.40
$23,659.36
$22,543.14
BID TABULATION ON TANDEM
STEEL WHEEL ROLLER
Little Rock
Moody
R. A. Young
Road
Equitment
and Sons,
Machinery
ComDantr
Incorporated
One
5-8 Ton Steel Wheel Roller
w/trade as per specifications
Base Bid with 3 cylinder
diesel and pressure water
$10,135.95
$ 8,796*00*
ffi 9,836,00
Model
Gallion
Huber T-58
Ferguson
Ro11a0-Static '
:Alternate=# 1
One
5-8 Ton Steel Wheel Roller
w/trade as per base specifications
except the unit shall be
equipped with a 4 cyl. gasoline .:.*.
and
engine and pressure water
$ 8,335.95
$ 79446.00*-
$7,570.00
Model
Gallion
Huber T-58
Ferguson
Roll -0 -Static
ALTERNATE #2
One
5-8 Ton Steel Wheel Roller,
w/trade as per base speci-
fications except unit
equpped with 4 cyl.gasoline
engine and gravity water
system
$89255.95
$7,186.00*
$72252.00
Model
Gallion
Huber T-58
Ferguson
Roll -O -Static
ALTERNATE N3
One
5-8 Ton Steel Wheel Roller;
w/trade as -per base speci-
fications except that gravity
water system provided
$10;055.95
$ 8,536.00#
$ 9,518.00
Model
Gallion
Huber T-58
Ferguson
Roll -O -Static
Terms
Net
Net
2% Cash
Delivery
3 weeks
60 dairs
2 weeks
*T'as not included
BID TABULATION ON TILTING PLATFORM TRAILER
Moody E. A. R. A. Young
Equipment Martin and Son,
Company Machinery Incorporated
One 20 ton tilting platform
trailer as per specifi-
cations
$3,895.00
$4,961.82
$49315.00
Model
Wisconsin
H•yster
Miller
1900
HP20T
OT
Terms
Net
Net
2% Cgsh
pelitrery
30 Days
30 Days
30 Days
With Discount
$3,895.00
$41961.82
$4,228.70
.I
I�
Purchase of
for Water & S
Dept.
' authori
EUds
on
Loader -Digger
Purchase
Concrete Cu
Pipe
authorized
Bids on
Concrete
Culvert Pipe
The City Manager also reported that bid had been received and Tabulated for the purchases of two(2)
tractorswith backhow and front end loader and he recommended that the.purchase be made from the Hailey
Sales Company, Fayetteville,.Arkansas, at their. ALTERNATE #4 bid for the total cost of $14,839.00.
Director Christie moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and authorizes', the purchases
of two(2 ) tractors with backhow and front end loaders from the Hailey Sales Co. for the total sum
of $14,839.00.
The motinon was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously.
O'Roark Ford
2 Tractors w/backhoe Tractor
& loaderas per base
specs w/trade, 55HP,
6000 lbs. $14,123.36
Model Ford 45021G
751 "ackhoe
740 loader
2 Tractors w/.backhoe
and loader as per
base specs except
for a 40HP engine,
w/trade, 5300
Pounds.
Model
1 Tractor.w/backhoe
and loader as per
b�se specs, 55H8,
W trade, 6300
pounds
Model
1 Tractor w/backhoe
and loader as per
base specs, except
for 40 HP engine,
53001b. w/trade
Model
$ 9,333.96
Allis Chal-
mers I-600
2 F400'hoe
Company
ALTERNATE #1
$12,088.68 $ 8077.21 11,680.00
Ford 35021 G Allis Cha l ase 580
753 Backhoe mers, I-4 3 Backhoe
735 Loader Tractor, Loader
Loader &
Backhoe
$ 7,061.68 $4,66.98
Ford 45021G Allis "hal.
751 backhoe I400 with
740 loader I-400 'hoe
ALTERNATE #2
ALTERNATE #3
Company
$41,194.80
Ford 44021G
753 Backhoe
735 loader
$13,396.80
Ford 35021G
753 Backhoe
735 Loader
$ 7,097.40
Ford 44021G
753 backhoe
735 loader
Harvester
$14,146.62
IH3514
31211 hoe
3000load.
$12,829.32
IH 3444
3121 'hoe
3000 Load.
$ 7,073.31
IH3514
3121 'hoe
3000 load.
245
HuenefeldI
Tractor Co.
$15,00.00
John Deer
94 Backho
7400 load
$12,000.
John Dee
92-4 Bac
7300 Loa
$ 7,500.0
John Deer
94 backho
7400 load
$ 62044.34
$ 41188.60
$ 61698.40
$ 6,414.66
$ 6,000.
Ford 35021G
Allis Chal.
Ford 35021G
IH344
John Dee
753•backhoe
I-400 Tractor
735 backhoe
3121 'hoe
92-4 bac
735 loader
Loader &
735 Loader
3000 load.
7300 loa
Present
Backhoe
Service
740 Loader
Pipe
ALTERNATE # 4
2 Tractors w/backhoe
BID
TABULATION
CONCRETE CULVERT
PIPE
and loader
R & K
$14,839.00
Shearmon
Joplin
Tune
Ford 450210
Super Mar-
Cities
Choctaw
Concrete
753 Backhoe
Conttruc-
Present
kets, Inc.
Service
740 Loader
Pipe
Company
tion co.
Prices
$1.89
$1.88
Terms
Net Net
Net
Net
Net Net
Dei➢etiyery
60-90da. 10 da.
45 da.
30da.
30-60 da. 30-45 da.
The City Manager further
reported that bids had
been received anti
tabulated for
the purchases of
ConcreteCBulvert Pipe and that the tabulation
of the bids were as
follows:
3.34
300 ft. 15"
200 ft. 18"
200 ft. 24"
Above Class II,
unreinforced,
e
4 feet
100 ft. 30"
100 ft. 36"
42
48"
Above Class II,
reinforced, 4
feet joints
Terms
Net
Net Net'. 2%-10 1%-10 Net
The City Manager recommended the purchase: of items one, three, four, five, six, and seven, from the
M. & M. Cities Service and to purchases item # two from Tune Construction Co. all at the price as
listed in the tabulation above.
Y
BID
TABULATION
CONCRETE CULVERT
PIPE
R & K
M. & M.
Shearmon
Joplin
Tune
Super Mar-
Cities
Choctaw
Concrete
Cement
Conttruc-
Present
kets, Inc.
Service
Inc.
Pipe
Company
tion co.
Prices
$1.89
$1.88
$2.35
$2.CO
$2.I0
$1.96
$1.54
2.64
2.63
3.00
2.80
2.90
2.52
1.99
3.69
3.69
4.75
3.90
4.20
3.70
3.34
5.68
5.68
6.75
6.0o
6.08
5.70
8.06
8.06
9.50
8.50
8.53
8.53
6.89
10.67
10.67
12.50
11.25
11.50
10.91
13.04
13.04
15.75
13.75
13.90
13.73
10:49
Net
Net Net'. 2%-10 1%-10 Net
The City Manager recommended the purchase: of items one, three, four, five, six, and seven, from the
M. & M. Cities Service and to purchases item # two from Tune Construction Co. all at the price as
listed in the tabulation above.
Y
1246
Director Christie moved to accept the recommdation of the City Manager and authorized the purchase of the
concerte culvert pipe from the M. & M. Cities Service Co. except the 200 £t. 18" pipe to be purchase from
the Tune Construction Co. 0.$2.52 . "ti•
The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimou�,r .
Authorize The City Manager reported that bids had been received •and tabulated for the Relocation of Water and
Contract for I Sewer Lines for U.S. 71 Loop Bypass, and he recormnend6Hthat the contract be awarded to the Tune Constructi n
location of
Co. , Fayetteville , Arkansas, in the amount of $104,419.05•
ter & Sewer Director Christie moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and award the contract to the
Lines Tune Construction Co. for $104,419.05 and that the t'layor &. City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized
onl71 to execute -the Contract upon the approval of the Contract by the City Attorney and the Consulting
Bypass Engineer, the approval of the Cost and Performance Bondd by the Consuiting Engineer, and evidence of
proper insurance;and concurrence by the Arkansas State Highway Dept.
The motion was sesconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously.
The tabulated bids were spread on the minutes and reads as follows:
on relocal TABULATION OF BIDS
of RELOCATION OF WATER AND SEWER MAINS, U_ S, HIGHWAY 71 LOOP - AND JOB 9447 - FAP F-011-3(16)
er & Sewer
Item Dance Const.
Forsgren Bros,
Fraser Const.
Northside
State Const. Tine
Const.
N. Little Rock
Ft. Smith
Ft. Smith
Ft. Smith
Leewood, Kans Fayetteville
Total Bid, all
items except alt. G
G -2a & G -2b; Using
Bid A, D, & E. 1339762.98 1069485.75 1022625.25 108,609.25 114,412.05
Total Bid, Same
As•Above, Using Alt,
Area A & Bases Bid,
Areas D & E 134,222.98 105.694.55 110,000.25 108,136.25 104,718.55
The City Manager presented his recommendation for the operation of the Little League Of Baseball Diamonds '
in Administrative Memo No. 93 which was spread on the minutes and reads as follows:
eo ttleFebruary 16, 1968 Administrative Memo No. 93
Li • 93 LITTLE LEAGUE OPERATION ON BASEBALL DIAMONDS
I
eague From 1960 through 1963, the Sherman Lollar Baseball League, Inc. constructed three baseball diamonds at
seball Walker Park. These diamonds were constructed at a cost of $12,935. In September of 1960 the City Councill
agreed to underwrite a loan in the amount of 1112,00 for this construction. This loan was obtained from
the banks in the name of the City in 1960 and 1963. By agreement dated November 30, 1960 betweenthe City,
and the Sherman Lollar Baseball League, Inc. and by minutes of the City Council of August 29, 1960,
theSherman Lollar Baseball League, Inc. agreed to repay the City for interest and principal of the
$12,000 at the rate of $1,000 annually.
The two notes were to run through 1071 with total principal and interest payments being 014,080. All
notes were fully paid in 1966 with the total principal and interest amounting to $13,560. The Little
League made total payments to the City of $4,870 from 1962 through 1965. Since that date, no payments
have been made. In 1965, the Mayor allowed .the Little League a credit of $1,255 on the amAunt due,
because the group had spent some additional money for improvement, Therefore, as of this date, there
is•a total due from the Little League of $7,435 for the principal and interest which allows credit for
cash paid and credit given.
The reason given for no payments in 1966 and 1967 and for an $800 payment in 1965 was that the League
was in "no position to make any payment on the indebtedness." The League receives revenues from
(a) entrance fees, (b) concession stand, and (3) "hat passing". Expenditures are mad for (1) equipment,
(2) umpires, (3 ) electricity Wminor maintenance and (5) concession supplies. During the past few
,years, revenues have not been sufficient to cover all expenditures and to make payment on debt. For
the 1967 season, the City agreed to mow and drag thethree diamonds at Walker and one at the City Park. I Through better management also, in 1967 a small profit was realized in the current operation which
was needed to pay off past due debts.
The narks and Recreation Director has requested the use of the City Park lighted diamond or the
construction of another diamond for use of our summer recreation program and to begin adult softball
leagues during evening hours. This diamond has been used by the Little League for practices and for
make-up games. With this in mind, I would make the following recommendation That the Sherman
Lollar Baseball League be absolved of the present outstanding debt to the City ($7,435). In return, the
City will be allowed to use and modify the City Park diamond for any use it deems advisable under its
recreation program. Further, that the City will pay for electricity bills at the City Park diamond only;
the City will grade only a space for the construction of a fourth diamond at Walker Park and that the
Little League pledge any future profits made toward.construction costs of a fourth diamond at Walker Park.
Little Director Melton moved to approve the recommendations of the Citv Manager and to authorize the City
eague "'anger to negotiate with the SHerman Lollar Little League Baseball and present his recommendation to
ecommendationsthe Board of Director at the next regular DirectorsMeeting for anproval.
Accepted. The motion was seconded by Director Christie and passed unanimously.
The City, Manager introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed resolution in its entirety
entitled, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN LANDS IN WASHINGTON COUNTY,
ARKANSAS, FOR USE AS EASEMENTS FOR RELOCATION OF WATER AND SE.IER LINES NECESSARY FOR HIGHWAY 71 LOOP
CONSTRUCTION".
Director Swartz moved that the Resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and
upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn.
"Nay" None.
There being Six "Ayes" and No ",Nays", the Mayor declared the Resolution adopted.
esolut68 '
Nod. 6-68 RESOLUTION 6-68
See Next Page.
No.
1
2471
RESOLUTION 6-68
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE
CONDEMNATION OF
CERTAIN LANDS
IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS,
FOR USE AS EASEKENTS FOR
RELOCATION OFWATER
AND SEWER LINES
NECESSARY FOR
HIGHWAY 71 LOOP CONSTRUCTION.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to institute condemnation
proceedings to acquire the necessary lands for easements for relocation of water and sewer lines as
described in the final construction plans of J. E. McClelland, Consulting Engineer, as fouthd necessary
for U.S. 71 Loop Job #9447, named property owners:
C. Lorain Barnes and Dena Barnes, husband and wife
Frank S. and Martha Leach, husband and wife; Martha Shipley.Leach, in her ewn right; Frank S. Leach
Jr., a single man; and Emily Grace Leach, a single woman.
SECTION 2. That as the questions in controversy in said condemnation proceedings are likely to
retard the progress of the proposed construction of said water and sewer relocations and consequently the
71 Loop, the City Attorney is further authorized and directed to petition the Court for permission for
the City to provide appropriate deposits in court for making compensations and payment of damages, in
order that immediate possession of the said lands may be secured and in order that construction may be
commencedand proceed prior to assessment and payment of damages.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 19th day of February, 1968. ^
APPROVED: `/ \
ATTEST: n ,
DON TRUMBO, MAYOR
GEORG J DAVIS, CITY CLERK
There being no further business Director Dunn moved to adjourn.
The motion was seconded by Director Christie and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the
meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:
ATTEST: 4 q a1, 10
aLc DON TRUMBO, MAYOR
GEORG J. OAVIS, CITY CLERK
Regular Meeting.
The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansgs, met in regular session on Monday, March 4,
1968, in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building, at 7:30 P. M.
T.J. Keith, Rep. Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and
of N.W.Times also(Directors: Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn.
present. I (Absent: Director Sylvia Swartz.
Ordinance No. 1587 Cont.
The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, February 19, 1968, a copy of which had previously been
mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written.
The City MAhagarypresented the petition of McGoodwin, Williams, and Yates, Inc. to rezone certain property
in the Oakland Hills Addition, which had been approved by the Planning Commission.
Petition by
Several Citizens of that area together with their attorney, John E. Butt, appeared before the Directors
McGoodwin &
Co. in opposition to the rezoning and requested more time (two weeks) in which to prepare their arguments for
to rezone certain
their opposition to this rezoning.
property in
I Mr. L. M. McGoodwin presented maps showing the location of the property in question and the preliminary
Oakland Hills
plans for the building to be located on the property. (An office building for his Consulting Engineering
Addition.
Company)
After a verkylong discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a
proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO
1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN
REAL ESTATE FROM R -IB, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND C-29 THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO AL
C-1NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT".
Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading.
The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye"
Ordinance No.
Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn.
1587
"Nay" None.
There being Six "Ayes" and No "Naps", the Mayor declared the motion passed.
The Ordinance was then read for the second time.
Director Christie then moved that the rule be further suspended and the Ordinance placed on the third and
final reading.
The motion was seconded by Director Melton and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye"
kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Trumbo.
'Nay" Dunn.
There being Five "Ayes" and only One "Nay", the Mayor declared the motion passed.
The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time.
The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion.
After another long discussion, the Mayor asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call th
following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, McFerran, Melton, Christie, ande Trumbo.
,'Nay" Dunn.
There being Five "Ayes" and only One "Nay", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 1587
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0, 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, .ARKANSAS'
APPROVED MAY 280 19622 TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R=1B, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND
C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALL C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, on Tuesday, February 20; 1968, on the petition of McGoodwin, Williams and Yates, Inc., requestinj
that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
that the Board of Directors enact an orcinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned
R -lb, Single Family Residential District,and C-21 Thoroughfare Commercial District, to all C=19 Neighborhot
I
ommercial District, to=wit: "
Lot One (1) and Two(2), Block Six (6), Oakland Hills Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
Ordinance No. 1587 Cont.