Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-10-16 Minutes2011 Appoint Albert Jones The City Manager reported that he wished to attend the International City Managers' Association in acting Cita Manager. New Orleans, Ia., on October 9 to October IJ, inclusive and he recommended that Albert J. Jones be appointed as acting City Manager during his absence. Director Dunn moved that City Controller Albert J. Jones be authorized to act as City Manager from October 9 through October 11 during the absence of City ''tanager Gerald G. Fox. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The City Manager reported that City Engineer W. C. Smith had retired on October 1, 1967. Director Melton moved to adopt a resolution commending Mr. W. C. Smith for his long and faithful service to the City of Fayetteville. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. Resolution 15-67 RESOLUTION NO. 15-67 (Commending Carl Smit}i) WHEREAS, W. C. (CaEl) Smith has retired as City ''ngineer, Water and Sewer Superintendent, and Traffic Engineer after more than sixteen years of faithful services to the City, and WHEREAS, Carl has always been loyal to both the City and his men with the motto, "If a fob isrrth. it is worth doing right" and 11 The little jobs are what make the big jobs work", and oing WHEAREAS, by his_dedication:.and"iu'ntiiangE-Efforts in the many projects he has helped construct or improve, including the Lake Sequoyah projects,hEeaver Water Supply, Waste ''ater Disposal Plant, South Mountain Booster, Drake �ield Airport, dater and Sewer Operations Center, and many others, he has erected a permanent monument to himself and his posterity as well as making the City of Fayetteville a better place in which to live. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That a vote of appreciation be extended to C. (Carl) Smith for his loyal and faithful service to the citizens of Fayetteville. ' Section 2. That a copy of this Resolution be mailed to Carl and that this Resolution be spread the minutes and made a permanent record in the PROCEDURE of THE CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of'October. 1967 APPROVED: ATTEST: � DON TRUMB09 MAYOR GEOR J. VIS, CITY CLERK There being no further business, Director Melton moved to ddjournl. The motion was second by Director McFerran and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. • ATTEST GEORGE �./ DAWS CITY CLERK PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of October, 1967 APPROVED: DOr• •�• Regular Meeting. The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, October 1967, in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M. CDST. Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and Board T. J. Keith, Rep. Members:Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dunn. N. W. Times News also Absent: Board Member and Mayor Don Trumbo. yrcaot�. In the absence of Mayor Don Trumbo, Assistant Mayor Sylvia Swartz acted as Mayor. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, October 2, 1967, aecopy of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written. The City Manager presented the petition of J.Austin Parish and Ethel R. Parish, husband and wife, to rezo certain property,located just north of the Oak Plaza Shopping Center, from R-2 Two Family Residential Ordinance So. 1569 District to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Acting Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AI4EIJDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTP.I Director Melton moved that the rule be suspended and that the ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time._ The Acting Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, Director Melton moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by.Director Dunn and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then,read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dun "Nay" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Acting Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1569 ' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS APPROVED MAY 282 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT". WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on October 10, 1967,,on.a petition'of J. Austin_;Parish:andoEtheltlt, Parish, requesting that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance reapning the following described territory, 13resently zoned :R7-2 Two ."amily Residential District to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial "istrict, to -wit: A part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section Nine (9) Township Sixteen (16) North, Range Thirty (30) West of the 5th P.M., beipk more particularly described r202 as follows: Beginning At a point 685 feetSouth and 180 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Forty (40) acre Tract; thence running North 50.0 feet; thence East 348.0 feet; thence South 50.0 feet; thence West 348.0 feet to the Point of beginning, Washington County, Arkansas, and WHEREAS, notice of said.Dublic hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hearing and location of the property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of genera circulation in said City, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Cotmission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of i•avetteville,.Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above-described territory, presently zoned R-2 Two Family residential District, to -C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Oistrict. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE POARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY. OF•FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described territory which is presently zones R-2 Two Family Residential District -be, and the same is hereby rezoned to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District, SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. J. DAVJS, PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of October, 1967, APPROVED: 4- AsAt Mayor ACTEid3 MAYOR No: 1570 The City Ranger presented a petition from Barker E. Adair and Carol R. Adair, husband and wife, to rezone certain real estate located North of Highway #16 East from A-1 Annexed Territory District to R-2 Two Family Residential District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Acting Mayor, read a Proposed ordinance in its entiltefor the first time entitled, "AN ORDINACE AMENDING ZONING ORDINACE 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT AP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 280 1962, AS AMENDING, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE.FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITOR)P DISTRICT to R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT." Director Dunn moved that the rule be suspended and that the ordinapdebe placed on the second reading. The motion was second*y Director Christie and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Acting Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. After brief discessing, Director Dunn moved that rule be fiVVFer suspen@ddand that the OrdinanceA$tflaced on the thdrd and final reading. The motion rias secondyby Director K&Ilin and passed unanimously. Ther Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then askddtq%estion, "Shall the Ordinance passx" Upon roll call the following vote was recorddd, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dunn, "Nay" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nayd", The Acting 4vor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1570 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO.•1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSA; APPROVED MAY 281-1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICT to 1 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. I - WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on October 10, �1%.,7,.On the petition_of_Barker.`.E;�Adair and -Carol R. Adair, requesting that Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of lirectors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described territory, presently zoned A-1 Annexed TerritoryDi strict to R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, to -wit: Part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section Twenty (20) in Township Sixteen (16) North of Range Twentv-Nine (29) Nest, described as beginning at a point on the East side of the ''ounty road, which runs along on the East side of said forty acre tract, three hundred (300) feet North fo the Point of intersection of the East line of said load and the North line of said State Highway No. 16 near the Southwest corner of said forth acre tract, and running, thence North with the East Line of said county road five hundred fifty (550," -bet; thence East -two hundred (200) feet; thence South Five 11 fifty (550) feet, more or less, to the Notth line of a tract conveyed to William K. narris; thence West with the North Line of said tract two hendred (200) feet, more or less to the place of beginning, containing three (3) acres more or less. , and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hearing and location of the property wa' publishec..inithe Ndrthwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said Citv, more than 15 days priop to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said�anning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recormeddation that ah ordinance be adopted rezo the above-described territory, presently zoned A-1 Annexed Territory District to R-2 Two Family Residential District, NOW) THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned A-1 Annexed Territory District, be and the same is hereby rezoned to R-2 Two FAmily Residential District, SECTION 2. That all ordinaners or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are bereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. ATTEST: PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of 666ober, 1967 Approve 4 E c a 1 t. Mav4wo* t A5 CITY %AC NG MAYOR this . 123u t re- �h 11 1 Ordinance No: 1571 1 Ordinance 1571 Ordinance 1 2031 The City '•`anger presented the petition of Bethel Heights Baptist Church to rezone certain property located on James Street and West of Gashnds Avenue from R -IB Single Family Residential District, to P -1A Special Church District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. The City Arrotney introduced and, at the request of the Acting Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitleds"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE'NO, 1,239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 281•19622 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1B, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO P -1A SPECIAL CHURCH DISTRICT." Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion was seconded by Director: Melton and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the Second time. The Acting Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. After brief discussion, Director Christie moved that the -rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed 'on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded Dv Director Melton and passed Unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance -pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "AYES" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dunn. "Nays" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Lays", the Acting Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1571 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZOP?ING ORDINANCE NO. 0 23% AND REVISED ZONNING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTE'VILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 282 1962, AS AKENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1B3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN^tIAL DISTRICT TO P -1A SPECIAL CHURCH DISTRICT. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on October 10, 1967, on the petition of Bethel Heights taptistChurch, requesting that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoningethe following described property, presently zoned R -1B Single Family:Residential District, to P -1A Special Church District, to -wit: A part of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, Described as follows; Beginning at a point 431.4 feet West and 759 feet South of the Northeast corner of said 40 acre traft, said point being the Southwest corner of Lot 10 of McCormick Addition to the City of Fayetteville, and running, thence North 160 feet to the South Line of a 40 foob street (James Street); thence West along the South line of said street 180 feet; thence South 160 fbbb; thence East 180 feet to the point of begining, also Lots 6,8,9, and 10 of McCormick's Addition to the City of Fayetteville as shown upon the recorded plat thereof, M WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, sebting forth the date, time, place and purpose,$ of said hearing and location of the property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said City, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing,,said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Di of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above-described property, presently zoned R -IB Single Family Residential District, to P -1A Special Church District, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property, presently zoned R -IB Single.Family Residential District, be and the same is hereby rezoned to P -1A Special Church District., SECTION.2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after -its passage, approval and Publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of October,1967/ APPROVEDF Asst t'`ayor Acting YOR ATTES GEORGE JV DAWIS2a 1572 The City Manager presented the petition of the Skull Creek Development Company, Inc., to rezone certain real estate located on North Leverett•Avenue between Eagle Street and Berry Street, from R-3 Rulti-Family Residential District, to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. • The City Attorney then introduced and, at the request of the Acting Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYEITEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 282 19620 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT". Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading The motion was seconded.by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Acting Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading The motion was -seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then asked the question,"Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dur, "Nay" None. . There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Acting Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. r204 No. 11573 ORDINANCE N0. 1572 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO, 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS; APPROVED MAY 280 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-1 , NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Blanning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on Oc#ober 10, 1967, on the.petition of Skull Creek Development Company, Incorporated, requesting that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Dirkctors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described territory, presently zoned R-3 Multi -Family Residential District, to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District, to wit: TRACT A: A part of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section Nine (9), in.Township Sixteen (16) North, of Range Thirty (30) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point which is six hundred sixty(660) feet South of the Northwest corner of said forty acre tract, and running, thence South Eighty (80) feet; thence East one hundred sixty (160) feet; thence North Eighty (80) feet; thence West one hundred sixty (160) feet to the place of beginning, and being situated in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. TRACT B: A part of the Northeast Quarter ONE 1/4) of Section Nine (9), in Township Sixteen 1 North, of RangeaThlrty (30}.West of the 5th Principal Meridian more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point which is seven hundred forty (740) feet South of the Northwest corner of the said forty acre tract, and running thence South sixty (60) feet; thence East one hundred sixty (160) feet; thence North Sixty (60) feet; thence West one hundred sixty (160) feet to the place of beginning, and being situated in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and , WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hearing and loeation of the property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said city, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above-described territory, presently zoned R-3 Multi -Family Residential District, to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1: That the above-described property, presently zoned R-3 Multi -Family Resdidential and the same is hereby rezoned to C -i Neighborhood Commercial District. SECTION 2: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of 2ctobe;.1967. APPROVED: ATTEST: % AG PO MAYOR GEOR J. $IS, CITY CLERK V i The City Manager presented the petition of J. Austin Parish and Ethel R. Parish, husband and wife, to amend Zoning Ordinance No. 1239, to permit movie theaters in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Acting Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1239 PASSED AND APPROVED JUNE 130 1960, AS AMENDED, TO PERMIT MOVIE THEATERS IN Cl, NEIGHBORHMD COMMERCIAL -' DISTRICT." Director Melton moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The ordinance was then read for the second time. The Acting Mayor then declared the Ordiaance open for discussion. ` After a brief discussion, Director Melton moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The motion was.seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then asked the .question,'"Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll till the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dunt "Nay" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Acting Mayor declared the Ordim nce passed.. ORDINANCE N0, 1573 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, PASSED AND APPROVED JUNE 13, 1960, AS AMENDED, TO PERMIT MOVIE THEATERS IN C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on October 10, 1967, on the petitibn of J. Austin Parish and Ethel R. Parish, requesting amendment of Ordinance No. 1239 (Zoning Ordinance), as amended, to permit movie theaters in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District, and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place, and purposed of said hearing was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said City than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted, amending No. 1239, as amended, to permit movie theaters in C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. to be 9 1 2051 Ordinance No. 1573 Continued Ordinance No. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: 1573 (Continued) SECTION 1. That Article V. Section 6, Paragraph la of Ordinance No. 1239, be amended by adding the following after the words, "Variety Store": ' "Movie Theaters". SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause the amendment hereby adopt to be incorporated and published in the supplements to Appendix A of the Fayetteville Code of Ordinances. SECTION 3• All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of October, 1967. APPROVED: ATTEST: o i G au Ass / VIA SWKR.TZ, . AC I G MAY GEORGVJ*.DAVISx CITY CLERK The City Manager made a recommendation regarding the SPRINGDALE SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT in Administrative Memo No. 78, which was spread on the minutes and reads as follows: , Admintstrative Memo # 78 SPRINGDALE SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT Authorized Springdale Sever Service The City of Springdale has recently constructed a sanitary sewer line through City of Fayetteville Contract. property to serve property in Springdale just north of Lake Fayetteville. We approved an easement for the line across our property just recently. This sewer line will be able to serve properties within the City Limits of Fayetteville as well as our lake Fayetteville property. I would recommend approval of the Contract with the addition of items 7 and 8 above. Director Melton moved,to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and approve the SPRSNGDALE SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT as outlined in Administrative Memo No. 78, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they ' are hereby authorized to execute the contract upon the approval of the amended contract by the City of Springdale, Arkansas., The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and,passed unanimously. The City Attorney introduced and, at the request,of the Acting Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its Ordinance No. 1574 entirety for,the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF WAUNETTA AVENUE IN ROCHIER HEIGHTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSISS". A public hearing on the petition to vacate and abandon this street was held ab a regular meeting of the Board of Directors on Monday, September 18, 1967, there being no objection at said public hearing. Director Melton move that the rule be suspended and the ordinance placed on the second reading. The motion was secondeWDirector Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time., The Acting "ayor then, declared, the Ordinance Gpen for discussion after a breif discussion,Director Melton moved that the rule be fWoer suspended and the ordinance be placeion the third and final reading. The motion was second*y Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then ask%the,question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded "AYE" Kerlin, Swartz, McFarran,Melton, Christie, Dunn, Ther being Six "AYES",and No "NAYs", The Acting Mayor declared the Ordinance Gadded. ORDINANCE NO, 1574 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING A PBRTION OF WAUNETTA AVENUE IN ROCHIER HEIGHTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. WHEREAS, a petition was duly filed with the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas on the 28th day of August, 1967, adking the Board of Directors to vacate and abandob the following portion of Waunetta Street located in Rochier Heights Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to -wit: That part of Waunetta Avenue lying between lot One(1), Block One (1), and Lot Eleven (11), Block Two (2) of Rochier Heights Addition to the City Of Fayetteville, as per the recorder plat thereof, in the Circuit Clerk and Ex-Oddicio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas. `HGEREASY0 after due notice as required by law, the Board of Directors has, at the time and place as forth in the notice, heard on the question and has ascertained that the. portion of the street hereinabove described has heretofore ,been dedicated *to': the public useas a street,;f has not actually been used by the public subsequent to the filing of th plat that all the owners of the property adjoining and abutting ipon the street to be vacated have consented to the abandoment, and that public interest and welfare will iot be adversely affected by the abandonment of such street: Because of this possibility of serving City of Fayetteville area, the City of Springdale has presented ' to us for consideration a contract to establish proper relationships. This contract would provide: 1. -That sewer service could be provided into Springdale facilities along this sewer line upon written. request of City of Fayetteville. 2. That such service and tapping cost would be according to,Springdale policies. 3. All construction permits (building, electrical, plembing, etc.) would be issued by Fayetteville. 4. Fayetteville shall bill for monthly sewer service charges according to our rates on our water bill. 5. Once each quarter, Fayetteville shall remit to Springdale all sewer service charges collected from such customers less 25% cost for billing and Collecting. All losses shall be incurred by Springdale. 6. Any future extensions of such seer line shall be approved by both Fayetteville and Springdale. 7. Stoppages shall be corrected as soon as possible so that Lake Fayetteville shall not be contaminated. Add to agreement -"and Springdale can be held liable for damages to the Lake." 8., There will be added to their submission - a hold harmless clause for any damage to private property as a result of sewer service. I would recommend approval of the Contract with the addition of items 7 and 8 above. Director Melton moved,to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and approve the SPRSNGDALE SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT as outlined in Administrative Memo No. 78, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they ' are hereby authorized to execute the contract upon the approval of the amended contract by the City of Springdale, Arkansas., The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and,passed unanimously. The City Attorney introduced and, at the request,of the Acting Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its Ordinance No. 1574 entirety for,the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF WAUNETTA AVENUE IN ROCHIER HEIGHTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSISS". A public hearing on the petition to vacate and abandon this street was held ab a regular meeting of the Board of Directors on Monday, September 18, 1967, there being no objection at said public hearing. Director Melton move that the rule be suspended and the ordinance placed on the second reading. The motion was secondeWDirector Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time., The Acting "ayor then, declared, the Ordinance Gpen for discussion after a breif discussion,Director Melton moved that the rule be fWoer suspended and the ordinance be placeion the third and final reading. The motion was second*y Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then ask%the,question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded "AYE" Kerlin, Swartz, McFarran,Melton, Christie, Dunn, Ther being Six "AYES",and No "NAYs", The Acting Mayor declared the Ordinance Gadded. ORDINANCE NO, 1574 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING A PBRTION OF WAUNETTA AVENUE IN ROCHIER HEIGHTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. WHEREAS, a petition was duly filed with the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas on the 28th day of August, 1967, adking the Board of Directors to vacate and abandob the following portion of Waunetta Street located in Rochier Heights Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to -wit: That part of Waunetta Avenue lying between lot One(1), Block One (1), and Lot Eleven (11), Block Two (2) of Rochier Heights Addition to the City Of Fayetteville, as per the recorder plat thereof, in the Circuit Clerk and Ex-Oddicio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas. `HGEREASY0 after due notice as required by law, the Board of Directors has, at the time and place as forth in the notice, heard on the question and has ascertained that the. portion of the street hereinabove described has heretofore ,been dedicated *to': the public useas a street,;f has not actually been used by the public subsequent to the filing of th plat that all the owners of the property adjoining and abutting ipon the street to be vacated have consented to the abandoment, and that public interest and welfare will iot be adversely affected by the abandonment of such street: No( I& ase of .signs on Signs NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby releases, vacated and abandons all.its rights together with the rights of the public generally in and to the above described portion of waunetta Street in the Rochier Heights Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, reserving unto said City of Fayetteville an easement or right of way ten(10) feet on either side of any existing public utility now located in or upon said street, said easembnt or right ofway to be on, over, under and across the portion of Waunetta Street hereby vacated for the purpose of operating, maintaining, relocating and relaying all public utilities now located in or upon said vacated street by said City or any corporation having a franchies or right of way from said City. As a condition to the closing of the above described portion of Waunetta Street, the City shall be held free and harmless from liability as to any claims of the abutting owners for damages to the property described herein, which may result from theCity or other utility companies operating, maintaining, relocating and relaying all public utilities now located in or upon said vacated street, and further the petitioners and owners agree that they will refrain from altering or changing the grade of the terrain, which would cause damage to utility lines located in that area, SECTION 2.• A copy of the Ordinance duly certified by the City Clerk shall be filed in the Office of the Recorder of the County and recorded in the deed records of the County. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval sand publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of October, 194F& / 4 /9 Asslt Mayor ACTING MAYOR ATTEST • GEORGE J. , CITY CLERK The City anager reported that bids had been received and tabulatedifor the purpose of st/Ret signs and post6and he reco*men44that the purchases be madd from All Quality Sign Co. and Vulcan Signs & Stampings[ according to their bid, After a brief discussion, Directors Dunn moved to authorize the City $(anger to pu*hasey all Street signs and postsfrom All Quality Sign Co. according to their bid except, 10 One -Lane Bridge Signs© $ 3.25, 10 Street Closed Signa ® $3425, 300 Channel Iron Post 121 P $200, &oe;.9J 50 Channel Iron Posts 10' 6 $2145, which shall be purchased from Vulcan Signs & Stampings Co: at a total cost to the City of $1627.40. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and padsed unanimously.• STREET SIGNS -BID #39 . Above shall be 24" x 2411, 16 Gauge Seel, silk screened and baked enamel finish 25 Dead End.Street Sargent Miro-Flex Traf. VePed McRaney Vulcan Lowen 2.15 3.09 Sowell Company Sup . Traffic Entgrpri§es Sign & Compa 4.40 3.24 3.62 22663 4.23 2.50 15 Green River Ordinance 4.10 3.96 3.40 iG and Holidays 1.14 1.80 1.37 Enforced . 1,88 10 One - Lane Bridge 3.78 .00 4.2 4.88 3.52 4.94 3.75 10 School Zone Ahead 2.98 3.80 3068 3.62 2.88 3.32 2885 10 Street Closed 3.78 6.00 4.$6 4:88 3.52 4.94 3.75 10 Men Working 2.98 3.80 3.08 •3.62 2.88 3.32 2.85 . Above shall be 24" x 2411, 16 Gauge Seel, silk screened and baked enamel finish 25 Dead End.Street 1.88 2.80 2.21 2.59 2.15 3.09 1.90 20 One Way Do Not Enter 2.48 4.40 3.24 3.62 22663 4.23 2.50 15 Green River Ordinance 4.10 3.96 3.40 4.70 and Holidays 1.14 1.80 1.37 Enforced . 1,88 2.80 2.21 2.59 2.15 3.09 1.90 10 Thru Trucks Prohibited* 1.88 2.80 2.21 2.59 22155 3.09 1.90 10 2 Way Traffic Ahead 2.48 4.40 3.24 3.62 2.63 4.23 2.50 10 Speed Limit 30 2.48 4.40 3.24 3.62 2.63 4.23 2.50 50 Slow Children at Play 1.88 2.80 2.21 2.59 221$5 3.09 1.90 Above shall be 18" x 2411, 16 Gauge steet, silk screened and baked enamel finish •10 15 Minute Parking 1.14 1.80 1.37 1.88 1,50 1.90 2.37 1.15 20 No Park. Except Sun. • 3.25 2.16 4.10 3.96 3.40 4.70 and Holidays 1.14 1.80 1.37 1.88 1.46 1.90 3.09 1.15 10 10 Minute narking 1.14 1.80 1.37 1.88 1.50 1.90 1,15 in the Total $12660.20 $2053.10 $1,037.50 $1,805.90 $1,918.30 $1,682.40 $1,682.40 $19946.102 $639.50 Terms All or none Net 30 da. Net 20 Net 30 jet 30 Net 30 Delivery Date 30 da. 45 da. 90 da. signs 2-3 wk. 30-40 posts 90-120 days 20-30 ga. 2-4 wk. 30 da. days 1 J Above shall be 12" x 18", 18 Gauge Steel, silk screened and baked enamel finish 10 Dgtour 1.10 2.16 1.37 1.58 11285 2.37 1.15 50 Stop • 3.25 2.16 4.10 3.96 3.40 4.70 3.20 300 Channel 2ron Post 121 3.00 4 43;02 3.02 3.09 3.69 2.80 NO BID 50 Channel Iron Posts 109 2.60 3.3:112.63(2.52 2.57 2.45 2.56 NO BID in the Total $12660.20 $2053.10 $1,037.50 $1,805.90 $1,918.30 $1,682.40 $1,682.40 $19946.102 $639.50 Terms All or none Net 30 da. Net 20 Net 30 jet 30 Net 30 Delivery Date 30 da. 45 da. 90 da. signs 2-3 wk. 30-40 posts 90-120 days 20-30 ga. 2-4 wk. 30 da. days 1 J 2071 Director Kerlin moved to reseind the actions of the Board of Directors at the last regular meeting of Release Deed the Board October 2, 1967, whereby they authorized the City Clerk to excute a Release Deed for Lot Two, Rescinded I Stubblefield Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkanasas, and that the City Clerk be and heiis hereby (Stubblefield Add'n) directed not to excute a Releade Deed on this property until futher authorized. IThe motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. {Director McFerran moved that the City Clerk be and he is hereby authorized to excute a Release Deed ' Authorize for the Lee Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas,'being more particularly discribed as follows: Release lDeed (Lee Addition) Lots One (1), Two (2), Three (3), Four (4), Five (5), Six (6), Seven (7), Eight (8) and Nine (9), in Lee Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, as per plat of said Addition on file in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex -Officio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas. The motion was seconded by Director Relton and passed unanimously. Release Deed !Director Melton moved that the request for a Partial Release Deed for Rolling Hills Addition be tabled Request tabled until a cash bond is posted. (Rolling Hills) The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The City Attorney read's proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1512 OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1966, AND RESCINDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE PLAT OF BLOCK 1, WOODLAND PARK SUBDIVISION, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES". Ordinance No. Director Melton moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. 1575 The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Acting Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, Director Melton moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. IThe motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. iThe Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Acting Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" ' Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dun "Nay" None. There being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Acting Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1575 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE N0. 1512 OF SEPTEMBER 69 1966, AND RESCINDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE PLAT OF BLOCK I, WOODLAND PARK SUBDIVISION, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES: WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1512 of September 6, 1966, the Board..of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, accepted the plat of Block I, Woodland Park=Sibdivision and the dedication in the streets, alleys and easements therein, and WHEREAS, it now appears that as to the bulk of the tract described in said plat that the persons certifying themselves to be owners thereof, did not have title to said lands at the time of certificatio: and are unable to acquire same; and that the record owners of said land do not desire to subdivide said ,�,• lands but wish to have their title cleared of the potential encumbrance created by said plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 1512 of September 6, 1966, be and itis hereby repealed. SECTION 2. That action of the Board of Directord in approving the plat of Block I, Woodland Park Subdivision, and accepting dedication of the streets, alleys and easements therein contained.11s hereby rescinded and said plat rendered void. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy.of this Ordinance in th office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex -Officio Recorder of Washington County, and further directad to cause a notation to be made upon the recorded copy of said plat that same has been rendered void by this Ordinance. SECTION 4. That his Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approv and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 16th day of October, 1967. �L T ATTEST:l ACTINZ MAYOR Cl' GEORG S, CITY CLERK Release Deed for Woodland Park Director Melton moved that the City Clerk be and he is hereby authorized to execute a Release Deed for Subdivision) Block I - Woodland Park Subdivision being more particularly described as follows: Block 1 of Woodland Park Subdivisiod described as follows: A part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 15, Township•16 North ;,('Range 30 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, County of Washington, State pf Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point that is 1,848.95 feet East and 1,657.44 feet North of the Southwest Corner of said Section 15; thence N 08052' E, 125.00 feet; thence N 00030' E, 203.43 feet; thence S 75030' E, 436.34 feet; thence S 83000' E, 312.55 feet; thence S 08053' W, 140.07 feet; thence N 70048' W, 142.27 feet; thence S 41021' W, 36.41 feet; thence N 83000' W, 157.56 feet; thence N 75030' W, 265.57 feet; thence S 14030' W, 161.69 feet; thence N 85008' W, 120.04 ' feet, to the point of beginning, and containing 2.75 acres, more or less. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. Memo No. 79 ' The City Manager presented Administrative Meme No. 79 entitled "Adult Winter Recreation Program" whicbh Authorized was spread on the minutes and reads-as'follows: r? 1;" Adult Winter ADMINISTRATIVE fMEMO #79 Recreation Program ADULT WINTER RECREATION'PROGRAM the following memo from Parks and Recreation Director Jim Brown. x208 Noy. 16-67 Hearing by m Hills , TO: Mr. Fox, City Manager FROM: Jim Brown SUBJECT:Parks and Recreation Winter Adult Program Monday, October 2, the Advisory Committee for the Parks and Recreation met for th61 monthly board meeting. , The following members were present: Benny Winborn chairman, Mrs. Newell Shaw, David Lashley, Claude Sutton and William Brandon. At this meeting it was recommended that the Parks and Recreation Department sponsor a winter program for adults. This program would be conducted at the old Hillcrest Gym, which we have permission to use at no cost. The program would consist of women's basketball leagues, men's basketball and volleyball leagues and either aI university men's basketball league or a church volleyball league. It was recommended that this•program be conducted for four nights a week for twenty weeks starting 30th. We are asking the city to pay the salary of a mate adult to be in�charge of the leagues at $30 a week foo the 20 weeks, a total of $600.00'and to purchase the equipment. The equipment would consist of volleyballs, basketball, nets and scorebooks, which would cost approximately $260.00. During the 20 week program it will be possible to have a four team league of women's basketball which will run one night a week for ten weeks, eight team league of men's volleyball running two nights a wee#f.6r_ten weI,ks and eight team league for men's basketball running for two or three nightsaa week for twelve weeks. The remainder of the time would be used for either church or university students' leagues. We believe this program would provide wholesome and much needed recreation for abbut 230 adults. The remainder of the cost of the program such as references, awards and etc. would be paid by the sponsor of the teamsmem the team members. As you will notg,we have worked out arrangements with the SchooldDistrict to use Hillcrest Gym at no cost Ifor ' night time recreation activities for adults. This will free the Youth Center for teenage recreation activities at night.- Volleyball and basketball for both men and women are scheduled for a 20 week period between November 1 and April 1. 1 The City would employ a recreation supervisor for $30 per week ($7.50 for each of four nights) and pay for the needed equipment. .This would run $600 annually for salaries and about $250 annually for equipment. Mr. Brown estimates that over 200 adults would particiapte in this program. All other costs of the program for referees, trophies, etc, would be met by charging entrance fees sufficient to cover these expenses. I would recommend approval of this program. There is sufficient money'budgeted in the salary and accounts 6o cover the sum necessary for 1967 fiscal year in the Parks and Recreation budget. Director Melton moved to approve the Adult Winter Recreation Program as outlined above, and that City be authorized to proceed with the program. He further moved that the City Manager be authorized to write a letter to the Fayetteville Schools coo them for the use of Hillcrest School Gymnasium. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The City Planning Consulatant, James Vizzier, gave a lengthy discussion on the Planning Program Progress. The City Manager then read a proposed resolution requesting assistance for the -Planning Program from the State Planning Commission. Director Melton moved thatthe Resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed uhanimously, whereupon the Actin Mayor declared the Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 1647 WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, recognizes the need.to insure its continued proper and orderly growth, and WHEREAS, City Planning is recognized as being of primary importance to the further growth and of the City of Fayetteville, and • WHEREAS, Arkansas Planning Commission, as a state agency for planning assistance, can provide the p services,and can apply for financial assistance from the urban Renewal Administration Department of Hous and Urban Development; N9WiTHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY,OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. The Board of'Directors of the City of .Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby requests that the Planning Commission provide plknning services for the following planning prograty. The undertaking of basic planning studies.pertaining to community i'acilities, neighborhood plans a capital improvements program. SECTION 2. The. City of Fayetteville will make available upon the request of the Arkansas Plann a sum not to exceed $3,000 to aid in defraying a portion of the cost of unddrtaking the above -stated program in the event the Commission's application for a Federal urban planning assistance grant is a PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day`of October, 1967. APPROVED: ATTEST: T GEORGE 41AVIS, CITY CLERK The City Manager read a letter from the Evelyn Hills Shopping Center,Inc., requesting a new hearing on rezoning of property near the Evelyn Hills Shopping Center bec'Gase there were no proponents at the hea on the appeal from the Planning Commission's decision said hearing being held at the last regular meet: of the Board of Directors on October 2nd, 1967. After a brief discussion, Director Kerlin moved that a new hearing be held on the appeal of the Evelyn Shopping Center, Inc., to rezone certain property near the Evelyn Hills Shopping Center which had been by the Planning Commission and that the hearing be held at the next regular meeting of the Board of Di. ssion r. J 209 I on November the 6th, 1967. The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. Audit of Water & . . Sewer, 1966-1967 Director Dunn moved -that the 1966-1967 Audit Report of the Water and Sewer Department as prepared by the accepted & Firm of Myers, Scarbrough, and Baker be accepted and filed. filed. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. Director Melton moved that the City Manager be authorized to increase contributions toward construction o Authorize the road Easb of Lake Fayetteville for drainage from $1,100 to $5,564, this additional cost to be used t additional contribu- purchase pre -cast concrete bridge decking for two bridges found necessary to construct over Mud & Clear tions for expense of 8reeks, the County to install the decking and construct all abutments. road East of The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. Lake Fayetteville. There being no further business, Director Melton moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously, whereupon the Acting Mayor declared th metting adjourned. Regular •T. J. Keith,IRep. of N. W. Times also present.) Appeal by Evelyn Hills Shop. Center from Planning Com. degi�ss�iDon, ML )irectorlin entered meeting. Proposal of the Telephone Company IProposal of Telephone Co. Tabled APPROVED: ATTEST 4�'`a ASSISTANT MAYOR . SYLVIA SWAR ' CTING MAYOR •GD'JRG J. XVIS2 CITY CLERK . he Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, November 967, in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M. CST. resent: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and Binedto wartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dunn. bsent: Mayor Don Trumbo.' bsent at roll call but later entering: Director James Kerlin. minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, October 16, 1967, a copy of. which had previously been each of the Directors, were approved as written. the absence of Mayor Don Trumbo, Assistant Mayor Sylvia Swartz acted as Mayor. he Acting Mayor reported that, at this time, consideration should be given to an appeatt by the Evelyn Hill hopping Center, Inc, on a petition to rezone certain property adjoining the Evelyn Hills Shopping Center nd located along Hillcrest Avenue, which had been denied by the Planning Commission. his hearing had been set for the regular meeting on Monday, October 2, 1967, but the petitioners stated hey knew nothing of the time set for the hearing, and requested they be heard at this time. ttorney E. J. Ball, representing the Evelyn Hills Shopping Center, Inc., appeared before the Directors add escribed the area and property in question and the reasons for the request to rezone. ttorney Lewis Jones, representing the opposition to the rezoning, appeared before the Directors and utlined the reasons for the opposition.Both sides expressed willingness to work out an agreement, fter a very long discussion, Director Dunn moved that action on this be tabled for one hundred twenty(120) ays and request that the interested parties work out an agreement to be presented to the Planning Commissi or.their approval and recommendation. he motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. Kerlin entered at this time and was noted by the Clerk. City Manager outlined the proposal of the'SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY on their proposed ice and rate change in an Administrative Memo No. 81 which was spread on the minutes and reads as ower strative Memo # 81 PROPOSED SERVICE AND RATE CHANGE SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. The City Board of Directors has been contacted by the Manager of Southwestern Bell concerning a proposed service and rate enhangeefoorFa�atbavi&&d telephone customers. This service charge is called "extended area service" and would result in the free calling between all Fayetteville and Springdale telephone. In turn, this would necessitate a monthly rate increase for all classes of service on Fayetteville and ,Springdale telephone users to amortize the initial investment cost and toll charge loss to the telephone t was explained that this study and proposal for extended area service was completed at the request of ersons in both cities and the State Public Service Commission. In other words, it wads nott initiated he telephone company. y. The telephone company claims that it will take about $250 o improve their plant to protide circuits for extended area service. This type of service would not be vailable until mid -1969 if approved now. one month period of service was studied by the telephone company. This study indicated that less than $ of £Avetteville_residential telephone users had a Springdale, tb&ttghlaagkland just slightly over` % of the business users. In Springdale, though, well over 504 of both residential and business users 1 yetteville toll charges. It is proposed that the oneparty rate in Fayetteville be increased 55 cents nthly to $6.20 and in Springdale 75 cents to the same figure. The one party business rate in Fayettev uld be raised to X14.25 or $1.75 more than now. "r. Sells indicated that the Fayetteville rate would obably have to be raised to $5.95 from $5.65 for one party residential service if the extended area rvice is not adopted because the increase in numbers of phones has now placed the city in the next cb either event, there would also be corresponding increases in all other classes of users also. In dition, in either case the rate increases would result in the city receiving $1 per telephone in anchise taxes instead of the present 93 Cents. proposal has received publicity on October 26. I would suggest that the Board(andeavor to get as much .ic reaction to the proposal as possible pr&or to November 6. If it is blieved that the.proposal will fit the majority of Fayetteville telephone subscribers, it sould be adopted. A resolution to this !ct will be presented for your consideration on November 6. r a long discussion, Director McFerran moved to table the proposal until the next regular mebting of Lirectors on Monday, November 20, 1967. motion was seconded by Director nhristie and passed unagimously. Approve I lAfter The Rity)_anager presented administrative Meno No. 80 in which he and the City Attorney recommended sModifications to changes in the proposed Refional Airport Agreement. proposed Regional a long discussion, irector Melton moved to approve, the modifications of the proposed Regional Airport Agreement. I Airport Agreement as recommended by the City Ranger and Pity Attorney and to resubmit the agreement tegtheaRegional Airport S*ring Committe for revisions. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. in 0 orize The City Manager reported that bids had been received for the consturction of the new Fire Station on Noi ract Garland Avenue and he recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bid which was the one by the new Shirley Construction 'ompany at a base bid of $45,777.00. Station. He furfher recommend4that the alternate bid (air condition) not be accepted. Director Melton moved to accepbaV?6recommendation of the City Manager and awardeeY the contract'to the Shirley Construction Company, Fayetteville, Arkansas, for the construction of the ne1K ire Station to be located on North Garland Avenue at a total cost of $45,777.00 and that the Mayor and pity Clerk be and they are hereby authorized to exbute the contract upon the approval of the contract by the City Attorney and Architect, the approval of the cost and preformance bond by the Architect, and evidence of proper insurance. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. on Station cy in Contractor COPY OF THE BIDS .Tune Const. Co. $48,900 Brennan Boyd Const. Co. 53,455 Martin Johnson Loonst. Co. 47,997 Shirley �'onst. Co. 45,777 Griffin const. Co. 539000 fQie. City Manager recommend0the folOAn__ol:?.il�ng�-changes in the personnel nistrative Memo #83 Alternate .Air�itioninp. $1,440. 1,217 1,230 847. 1,160 policy of the City: he City ta_Personnel Policies were adopted by motion of the Board of Directors under authority of 098 on September 19, 1966. Below.you will find three'(3) changes recommended at this time: 1. Under Sick Leave, change Section (g) to read: (g) Sick leave shall be granted to employees only after they have completed three (3) month of employment with the City, but sick leave shall accrue foom the date of employment. 2. Add to paragraph on Fanergency Leave: The department head may grant emergency leave of not more than one (1) day for an employee to be a pall bearer or attend a funeral of someone no within the immediate family. 3. Add a section.called Maternity Leave: Maternity Leave Female employees will be allowed to coninue work until through the seventh month of a pregnancy. Thi will be granted only if, in the judgement of the department head, the pregnancy does not interfere r The City cannot guarantee that the job will be open for re-employment, but first consideration will be given for re-employment with the city for individuals after taking maternity leave, ictor Kerlin moved to approve the changes in Personnel policy as recommend by the City Manager. motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. City Manager recommend the following changes in Classification Plan of the City, also in Administratii #83. Wage and Classification Plan of the City was approved in November of 1966. Find attached a modified sification Plan for your consideration: Changes are as follows: 1. ANIMAL Control Officer moved from Class II to Class fti, 2. The following new Classifications added. Sewer Plant Operator Class III Utility Equipment Operator Class V Executive Secretary Class V Crew Roreman IV Class VIII Sewer Filter Operator Class IX Housing Code Enforcement Officer Class IX Building Inspector Class IX Sewage Lab Technician Class XI Transmission and Distrubtktibnn Superintendent Class XI Clerk'I Clerk II Clerk III Clerk IV Clerk r Clerk VI Accountant Class XII 3. Following Classification eliminated: Shop Superhtendent Class IX Constnuctloni& Mainteaane!�upertR>Endent Accounts Payable Clerk - `'lass I Cashier - Class I Assistant Plumbing Inspector Class VI Billing Clerk - Class II Transmission and Distribution roreman Class X Cashier Licenser - Class III PBjf Operator Class I Service Clerk - Class V Shop Superintendent Class VIII changes are recommended at this time in the Salary (Wage) Plan portion of the Wage and Classification an. rector Dunn moved to a0opt changes in Classification Policies as recommended by the City Manager. e motion was seconded Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. long discussion was held in regard to Ambulance Service Charges but no further action was taken at is time. . work. lu Ll