Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-06-19 Minutes1551 CITY OF SPRINGDALE, ARKANSAS ATTEST: PARK PHILLIPS, MAYOR LETHA BROGDON, CITY CLERK (SEAL) , 1967 A long disctission was held regarding the relocation of the Fire Station near the University on Maple Street. (Authorized City Manager Director Melton then moved that the City Manager continue negotiations with the University to see if a site on to continue negotiation niversity property can be found which would be suitable to relocate the fire station now located on Maple) for relocation of treet,from the standpoint of fire service;also for University and other commercial,high•value districts University Fire Stationi nd residential coverage; topographic conditt6ns; regulations of the rating bureau; and possible conformance with the University master plan,and annexation proposals of the City. If a suitable site on University land I be found, then the City Managerbbe and he is hereby authorized to consider other sites for purchase; I mploy an architect to design the structure and -proceed to move from the present station by December of 1967. Funds for fire station relocation to be'authorized from the"Capital Improvement Fund". The motion vas seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. e being no further business, Director Kerlin moved to adjourn. motion was seconded by Directo,;Swartz and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the APPROVED: ATTEST: DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEORG J. VIS, CITY CLERK Regular Meeting. The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, June 19, 1967; in the Director's Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 p.m. C.B.S.T. Present: City Manager, Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk, George J. Davis, City.Attorney,.Hugh Kincaid, and D:Srectors: (T.J.Keith, Rep. of 8isntz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. Absent: Director Kerlin. N.W.Times, also present) The minutes of the regalar meeting on Monday June 6th, 1967, a copy of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written. The City Manager presented the petition of Helen Edmiston and Jere F. Block to rezone certain real estate located between Ash Street and Sycamore Street and West of the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad from I -1A Light Industrial District, to R-3 Multi -Family District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. Ordinanee No. 1549. After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced, and,at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety entitled,"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962; AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM I -1A LIGHT INDUSTRUAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTI -FAMILY DISTRICT." i Director Christie -moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading.) The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Oridnance open for discussion. After a brief discussion, Director Christie moved that thexule be further suspended and the Ordinance placed on the third and final reading. The motion wasseconded by Director McFerrandand passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then readibr the third and last time. The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: "Aye", Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay", None. There being six "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1549 IAN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT.MAP OF FA.YETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVEDAy pg� 1962, A9 AM6NDBD, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM I -1A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTI I- MAY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on June 6, 1967, on the petition of Heldn Edmiston and Jere F. Block, requesting that said Planning Commissi recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Argansas, that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned I -1A Light Industrial District, to R-3 Muti-Family District, to -wit: The East one-half (1/2f.of Lots Four (4), and nine (9), and all of Lots one (1), two (2), three (3) ten (10), eleven (11), and twelve (12)0 all in Block eleven (11), of Parker's Plat of Valley View Acres Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, etting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hearing location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of General circulation in said City, more than 15 days prior to said iblic hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, &aid Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of t' City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that ordinance be adopted rezoningtthe above-described property, presently zoned I -1A Light Industrial District,,to R-3 Multi -Family Residential Districg. f156 nance No. 1549 (Cont.) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned I1.1A Light Industrial same is hereby rezoned to R-3 Mutti-Family Residential Bistrict. SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and t. ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND A PPROVED this 19th day of June, 1967. APPROVED: ATTEST: DON TRUNBO, MAYOR GBORGE D S, CITY CLERK finance .1550 The City Manager presented the petition of the Fayettevillae Industrial Foundation, Inc. to rezone certai located North of Cado Springs Road and known as the Riding Club Property from R -1B Single Family Resident to I-2 Heavy Industrial District,rrwhich had been approves by the Planning Commission. After a brief Discussion, the City Attoreny introduced and, at therequest of the Mayor; read a proposed c its entirety entiblbdd"IFN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 12399 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP C ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1B SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE DISTRICT TO I-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT." Director Melton moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion -vas seconded by Director McFerran and upon roll call the following vote wasrecoreed: "Aye", Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Trumbo; and Dunn. "Nay", None. "Abstaining", Christie. There being five "Ayes" and no "Nays" with only one "Abstaining", the Mayor declared the motion passed. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open dor discussion. There being no discussion, Director Melton then moved that the rule be further suspended and thattthe Ordinance be placed on the thin final readdgg. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and upon roll call,the following vote was recorded: "Aye", Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay", None. 'Abstaining", Christie. There being five "Ayes", and no "Nays" with only one "Abstaining", the Mayor declared the motion passed. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call, the -following vote was recorded: "Aye", Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Trumbo, and Dunn. 1% :"Abstaining",:Christie. There being five "Ayes", and no "Nays" with only one "Abstaining", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passu ORDINANCE N0. 1550 AN ORDINANCE AMENDINGAORDINANCE N0. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AP 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN RE -AL ESTATE FROM R -IB SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIAL.DISTRICT TO I-2 HEA DISTRICT. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville , Arkai 1967, on the petition of the of the Fayetteville Industrial Foundatioh, Inc., requesting that said Pla recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that'the Board of Directors ordinance rezoning that portion of the following described property, presently zoned R -IB Single Family District,to I-2 Heavy Industrial District, to -wit: A part of the Southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest quarter (SW 1/4) and a pabt of the Southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southeast quarter (SE 1/4)of Section twenty- one (21)0 in Township sixteen (16) North, : ' Range thirty (30) West of the fifth (5th) Principal Meridian, and more particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point six and three -fourth (6 3/4) chains East of Southwest.corner of said first mentioned forty acre tract, and running , thence East eight hundred fifty-six and five tenth (856.5) feet; thence North 50 Eastfive hundred forty (540)feet thence East -five hundred feet to the center line of U.S. Highway No. 71; thence Borth 90 East fifty (50) feet, thence West fourteen hundred eighteen and five -tenths (1418.5) feet to a poiht due North of the Beginning point; thence South five hundred eighty-seven (587) feet to the place of beginning, containing twelve and thirty-three hundredths (12.33) acres, more or less. WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes ofsaid pub and location of propeetjry was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circula city, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and be and the is ordiani real estate .1 District, inance in FAYETTEVILLE, a nd I None. VED MAY 28, INIi1STRIAL s, on June 6, ng Commission act an sidential 1 hearing i in said WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors bf the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning that portion of the above-described property, presently zoned R -IB Single Family Residential District, to I-2 Heavy„ In dustrial District. _ 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1., That the portion of the above-described property, which is presently zoned R -1B Single District be and the same is hereby rezoned to I-2 Heavy•Industrial District. 41 SECTION 2. That all ordinance or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 19th day of June, 1967. APPROVED: ATTEST: DON TRUMB09 MAYOR GEOWE J4eOAVIS, CITY CLERK _ 1 A long discussion was held regarding the Sycamore Street Improvement Project but no definite action was taken at this time. Proposed Pawn- Director Melton moved that the proposed Pawnbroker's Ordinance entitled, " AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PAWNBROKERS 'broker Ord. IN THE CITY OFF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION AND AMENDING THE FAYETTEVILLE CODE withdrawn from OF ORDINANCES, TO ADD SAID PROVISIONS .THERETO," be withdrawn from the records. Records The morion was seconded by'Director McFerran and passed unanimously The City Attorney then introduced and, at the request of the Mavor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety Proposed Ord, entitled, " AN ORDINANCE REGULATINGGPAWNBROKERS IN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,'ARKANSAS, PROVIDING FOR lefton first LICENSING THEREOF, AND IMPOSING A TAX, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." reading.I No further action was taken at this time and the Ordinance was left on the first reading. (New Pawnbroker) I I r t • The City Manager reported that bids had been received and tabulated for the purchase of fuel for the city I ehicles during the period of July 1, 1967 to January 1, 1968, and he recommended the purchase from the low Authorized bidder on each.item. .purchase of fuel Director Melton moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and purchase the fuel for the City for City vehicles. yehicles from the low bidder as given in the tabulated bids. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make the The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. purchases. The tabulation of the bids were as follows: Bids on fuel for City vehicles. e ' BID TABULATION FUEL Sunray Cities Ser- Stout Continental Mobil Lion DX Oil Vice Oil Petrol. Oil Oil Oil Present Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. Prices ' Approx. 8,500 Gal of Gasoline Per Month Regular .205 .204 .212 .213 9202 .2026 .199 Premium .235 .221 .242 .238 .224 .2145 .221 Approx. 1,000 Gal. Diesel Fuel Per Month No Bid .129 .125 0075 .122 •115 .1075 Approx. 100 Gal. Kerosene Per Montb No Bid 01175 .135 .129 .1275 •1156 .119 o Be Delivered to City Shop and Water Operations Center As Needed. *Purchases to be made from the underlined bids. Contract From July 1, 1967 to December 31, 1967 Authorized purchase of oil & greases The City Manager reported that bids had been received for the purchase of oil and greases and he recommended for City vehicles. that purchases be made from the City Service Oil Company From July 1, 1967 to 8une 30, 1968,forall City vehicles. The Cities Service Oil Company was the low bidder on most all items. Director McFerran moved to accept a recommendation of the City Manager and authorize the purchase of oil and greases for the city vehicles from the Cities Service Oil Company from July1, 1967 to June 20, 1968. ' The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. The tabulation -of the bids were as follows: Bids on Oil & @rease BID TABULATION OIL AND GREASES Mobil Lion Cities Stout Continental •Oil Oil Service Oil Pdtrol. Oil Present Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. Pri Approx. 100 Gal. Per Month, Car & Truck Oil Drum •83 •57 *55 •75 •57 Case 1.05 .77 .75 .94 --- .77 Approx. 25 Gal. Per - Month Diesel Oil 1.01 .86 85 .72 .85 •86 Approx. 50 Gal. Per Month Hydraulic Oil .55 .59 .55 --- •57 .59 Approx. 6 Gal. Per Month Non -Detergent Oil .94 .69 .66 .71 -- .69 ' Approx. 120 Lbs. Per 1 Month Gear Grease .2125 ..1175 .12 .15 .14 .1175 Approx. 60 Lbs. Per Month Transmission Grease .1679 .17 .16 915 .68/gal. •17 For Delivery as needed. Contract from July 1, 1967 to June 30, 1968 x158 No 1551 e No 552 The City Manager introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for he first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE SALARY OF THE MUNICIPAL JUDGE OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, RKANSAS, AND AMENDING FAYETTEVILLE,CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 14-3" drector Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. 'he motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously, whereupon the Ordinance was then read ' 'or the second time. 'he Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. 'here being no discussion, Director Christie moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance s placed on the third and final reading. 'he motion was secbnded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. 'he Ordinance was than read for the third and last time. 'he Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was becorded, "Aye" Swartz, McFerran,Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. 'Nay" None. 'here being Six "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE N0, 1551 ORDINANCE FIXING THE SALARY OF THE MUNICIPAL JUDGE OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AND AMENDING FAYETTEVILLI DE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 14-3. WHEREAS, by Act 278 of 1967, Acts of Arkansas, the General Assembly has authorized the Municipal Judge,of the ty of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to receive an annual salary in the sum of $11,500.00, upon the approval•oflthe .County urt of Washington County and the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and WHEREAS, by reason of the increased work load of the Municipal Court in recent yearsyp and the steady increase the cost of living, the Boafd of Directors deem the present salary of the Municipal Judge inadequate toi compensate d officer for the work and services required of his office and believe it is in the public interest to increase d officer's salary to the amount authorized by the General Assembly, and WHEREAS, the County Judge of Washington County, Arkansas has approved said increase in salary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT•ORDAINED BY•THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That Section 14-3 of the Fayetteville Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read: Sec. 14-3. Same -Salary. • The annual salary of the Municipal Judge is hereby fixed at Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($11 which salary shall be payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments. SECTION 2. -That said -salary change shall be•effective as of July 1, 1967. SECTION 3. That all ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and 1 be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 19th day of JuAA 1967, APPROVED: , s Ordinance The City Manager introduced and, at the request of the Mayor,read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the ' first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FAYETTEVILLE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR THE COLLECTION OF FEES FOR CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS TRIED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES." Director Melton moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion w aseeconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was thenxead for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, Director Melton moved that the rule be further suspended and the Otdinance placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?"* Upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: "Aye", Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay", None, There being six "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared•the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1%j2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FAYETTEVILLE CODE OF•ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR THE COLLECTION EW FEES FOR CRIMINAL PROSECUTL TRIED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES. WHEREAS, by Act 431 of 1967, Acts of Arkansas, the General Assembly has authorized cities df the first class to provide by Ordinance for the assessment of fees for all prosecutions tried by the City Attorney for violations of Ordinances of the City and for all prosecutions tried by the City Attorney for violations o£,state laws comnitted within the corporate limits of said cities, such fees to be the same fees as are allbwed Prosecuting Attoineys in the State in all criminal cases, and WHEREAS, Act 43;j. further provides that in cities of the first class, where the City Attorney is paid a salary, I the City may collect said fees and apply the same as the governing body may direct. NOW2 THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF. THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the Code of Ordinances, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended by adding i section to be numbered Section 14-7, which,soctibn shall read as follows: Sec. 14-7 Fees in Prosecution Tried by the City Attorney: (a) For all prosecutions tried by the City Attorney for violations of Ordinances of the City t;y 159 Ordinance No, and for all prosecutions tried by the City Attorney for violations of State laws committed within the 1552 Continued corporate limits of the City, resulting in conviction, the defendants shall be taxed the same fees as are allowed prosecuting attorneys in this state in all criminal cases. ' (b) All fees collected under this section whether the case be tried in the Municipal Court or on appef to the Circuit Court, or Supreme Court, shall be paid over to the City Treasurer for applicationas the Board of Directors may direct. SECTION 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 19th day of June. 1967 APPROVED: l� ATTEST: of �Pdgga Q�p�J DON T -01 MAYOR 'GEORGE V D S, CITY CLERK Discussion on The City Manager presented an Administrative Memo in which he gave a complete analysis of the Sanitati, Sanitation system with recommendations for improvements. After a long discussion, Director Melton moved to expand present residential collection routes from se' Instruct City. to nine, expand service area and work on a 40 hour week continuing to collect twice,a week from the Attorney to ;prepare rear of homes using brush truck for trash collections from street on a call...basis and expanding this Ordinances regarding to two vehicles and crews. Each of the nine crews would be required to service 825 customers twice Sanitation a week on a five day basis and that $50,000 be obtained through second lien bonds or other borrowing for equipment and facilities, and that a 25® permonth increase inresidential rates be approved $1.50 ' to $1.75) and a 15% increase in commercial rates, except container.rates, to amortize'present and proposed debt and increased operating costs. He further moved that the City Attorney be and he is hereby instructed to prepare an ordinanceraccordi The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and upon roll call,,the,'following vote was recorded: "Aye", Swartz, McFerran, Melton, and Trumbo. "Nay", Christie,'and Dunn. There being four "Ayes" and only two "Nam". with one absent and not voting, the Mavor declared the motion passed. There being no her business, Director c erran moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mavor declared the meeting adjourned. ATTEST: APPROVED: IIITTT DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEORGE (i AVIS, CITY CLERK 'Regular Meeting The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, July 3215 in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M. CDST. (T.J. Keith,News Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, Citv Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and Representative Directors: Kerlin, Swartz, Melton, Christie, Tuambo, Absent: Directors McFerran and Dunn. N.W.TiI es) Also Priesent, The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, June 19, 1967, a copy of which had previously been mailed t each of the Directors, were approved as written. Authorized Purchase The City Manager reported that bids had been received and tabulated for the purchase of some traffic of Traffic signals and he recommended the purchase from VePed Traffic Signals Co. at their Alternate Bids both Signals No. 2 and No. 3. Director Melton movedto accept -the recommendation of the City Manager and to authorize the City Manager ' to purchase the necessary signal lights from VePed Traffic Signals Co. at the low bids as tabulated in Alternate Bids No. 2 and No. 3, at a total of $2,098.70 (No.II) plus•$11.50(No.III). The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. Bids on Traffic BID TABULATION TRAFFIC SIGNALS Signals Municipal VePed Equipment Traffic Econolite Company signals Corporation ALTERNATE I 2 Adjustable two way three and four section signals 1 adjustable four way tkpethi ,section signal I Semi -actuated controller 1 Directional loop detector -"$1,543.84 $1053.10 $1,602.18 Installation ,,� $ Total 2 0 03 23 1 803.10 2 252.78 l i U ALTERNATE II ' Same as above except Solid state controller $1,863.84 $12448.70 $1,883.63 Installation Total 4 2. E3�Q00 6 06 0.00 2,35 .23 $2,098.70 2,5$ 33.63 l i U