Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-06-05 Minutes14 After much discussion, it was unanimously decided that this meeting would recommend to the governing bo land county judges that appointments be made to a steering committee composed of eight members with a ni. member to be be by the eight. This nine member steering committee would prepare'and recommend to five cities and two counties.an Agreement to create, fund and designate powers to a Northwest Arkansas ' Regional Airport Authority. •It was anticipated by4those at this meeting that the nine member steering committee would become the first regional airport authority with the same representation as now designs lAppointments to the steeting committee would be as follows: one each by the governing bodies of Bentonville, Airport Steering Fayetteville, Rogers, Siloam Springs and Springdale for five members; one by the Benton County Judge and TWO Committee I by the Washington County Judge for three and a total of eight. This would be.divided four from each counties. (Continued) These eight would then select a ninth member. City Manager•Gerald Fox was also asked to act as temporary chairman of the steering committee until it can organize and select its own presiding officers. It would be my recommendation that the City Board of Directors proceed with appointment of one person to Regional Steering Committee. Because the initial stages of this Regional Airport Authority are going to ' the most impobtant, that is, formulation of the agreement, site selection, financing of construction, etc it would seem to me that someone directly connected with the city ought to be appointed. This could be someone from the City Board- itself or someone from the administrative stagg. Your action on this matter (will be appreciated. Workable Program -� for Community Difector Melton moved that the Workable Program for Community Improvements Recertification be approved fo. •Improvements - submission to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. (Recertification) The Motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. There being no further business, Director McFerran moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed•unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. ATTEST:APPROVED: o ' gif DON TRUMBO;•MAYOR GEORG J. BAVIS, CITY CLERK Regular The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on,Monday, June 5,19 Meeting in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M. CDST, Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and Director Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "N Absent: None. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, May 15, 1967, a copy of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written.. Rezoning Deferred (Cleveland Street) The City Manager presented the petitions from the Delta Nu House Corporation of Kappa Alpha Theta and of the Phi Mu Alumi Chapter for rezoning certain property on West Cleveland Street from R-lA to R-4, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. A large groxo of citizens living in that area appeared before the Directors in opposition to the rezoning and after a brief discussion, Mrs. Fowler and Mrs. Broyles, representing the Sororities, requested that the petitions be tabled until a later date. Director Christie then moved that both petitions be tabled and that a notice of two ireeksbbe given in the Northwest Arkansas Times before being brought before the Directors again, as requested by Mrs. Fowler and Mrs. Broyles. 1 • The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. Director Melton then, with the unanimous approval of the other Directors, requested that President Mullin Select Commihttee on Planning be contacted and that a written statement be obtained from them as to where they visualize the proper location of new Sororities and Fraternities for•the future development are ' supposed to be located. The City Manager presented a petition from several property owners to rezone certain tracts of real estate along Highway No. 16, West, from A-1 to I-8. Ordinance Np: After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a 1546 proposed ordinance in its entirety entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISE: ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICT TO I-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT". Director Christie moved that the Ordinance pass. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay" None. . There being Seven "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinanceppassed. ORDINANCE N0. 1546 , AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0, 12399 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 19629 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICT TO I-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Blanning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, eppKaye16, 1967, on the petition of Catherine Rebecca Hatfield, Emma Lorene Jack, -Leonard B Kendall, et all, requesting that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of Fayetteville, Arkansas, thattthe Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property presently zoned A-1 Annixed•Territory District to I-2 Heavy Industrial District, to -wit: TRACT "A" t ' A part of the East half (E 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter $SW 1/4) of Section 7 and the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 181 Township 16 North, Range 30 West, County of Washington, State of Arkahsas, being more particularly described as follows: t 148 Ordinance No. 1546(Continued) Ordinance No. 1546 46gNorth, inning ata point which is 2264.81 feet East and 60 feet South of the Southwest Corner of Section 7, Township Range 30 West; thence North i.degree 31' 00" West 2701.3 feet; thence North 89 degrees 14' 00" East feet; thence South 1 degree 31 ' 00" East 1276.3 feet; thence South 9 degrees 53' 30" West 417.41 feed; thence South 4 degrees 05' 00" West 513.08 feet; thence South 1 degree 23' 30" East 503.61 feet; thence South 89 degrees ' 14' 00" West 667.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 41.96 acres, more or less TRACT B A part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 7 and a part of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 18, Township 16 North, Range 30 West,•County of Washington, State of Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 1763.11 feet East of the Southwest Corner of Section 7, Township 16 North, Range 30 West; thence North 89 degrees 14' 00" East, 171.70 feet; thence North 01 degrees 31' 00" West, 2136.62 Meet; thence North 20 degrees 13' 30" West, 535.19 feet; thence North 89 degrees 14 ' 00" East, 501.70 feet; thence South 01 degrees 311-0011 Fast, 2701.30 feet; thence Scpth 89 -degrees 14' 00" West, 501.70 feet; thence North 1 degree (31' 00" West, 60.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 21.70 acres, more or less. .TRACT C A part of the SW 1/4 of Section 7, Towhship 16 North, Range 30 West, County of Washington, State of Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 1,934.81 feet East of the Southwest corner of Section 7, Township 16 North, Range 30 West; thence North i degree 31' 00" West 2,136.62 deet; thence North 20 degrees 13' 30" West 535.19 feet; thence South 1 degree 31' 00" East 2,641.3 feet along the East line of a proposed 50 foot Road; thence North 89 degrees 141,00" East 171.7 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 9.41 acres, more or,less. Iand p WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said public hearing and location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said city, more thqn 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors Iof the Cit City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that) an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above-described property, presently zoned A -i Annexed Territory District to I-2 Heavy,Industrial District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above=described property, which is presently zoned A-1 Annexed Territory District, be and the same hereby is rezoned to I-2 Heavy Industrial District: SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and thio ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval,and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 5th day of June ; 1967. APPROVED:. • �. 2/.t ATTEST: DON, n, _ GEORGE DAVIS, CITY CLERK Ordinance No/ 1547 The City Manager presented the petition of V. H. Gregg to rezone certain real estate located on Phillips Brfie from R-2 Two Family Residential District to C-1 Neighborhood D6mmefctg1 District, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. The City Attorbey then introduced and , at the request of the Mayor read atproposed.ordinance in its entirety entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AEN= ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETPEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 19622 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-1 , NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Director Kerlin moved that the Ordinance pass. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: "Aye", Kerlin, Swartz,;hScFerran, Melton, Christie, 4rumbo, Dunn. "Nay2,1 None There being seven "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed/ ORDINANCE N0. 1547 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239; AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY'RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-1 IIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on May 16, 1967, on the petition of V. H. Gragg,•requesting that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the eity of 86yeetbyille, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors dnact andordinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned R-2 Two -Family Residential District to C-1 Neighborhood Cc= ercial District, to -wit Lot 3 of the Gragg Addition, a replat of the North 500.14 feet of Lots 4 and 5 of Lewis Subdivision in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas; being more particularly described as follows:. Beginning at a point 225.0 feet North and 260.12 feet East of the Southwest Corner of•the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West'of the 5th principal Meridian; thence North , 140.14 feet; thence East, , 85.6 feet; thence'South, 140.14 feet;*thence west, 85.6 feet to the point of beginning. and, WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hewing , and location of the property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said city, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS,following said public hearing,isaid'Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville,, Arkansas, its'recommendation taht an ordiance be adopted rezoning the above-described property, presently zoned R-2 Two Family Residential District to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE,CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: C, SECTION 1. That the above-described property, which is presently zoned R-2 Two Family Residential ORDINANCE N0: 1547 (Continued) 1 . Ordinance No. 1548 1 No. 149 strict, be and the same is hereby rezoned to C-1 Nvighborhood Commercial District. SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 5th day of June, 1967. APPROVED: TTEST: lit ' DON TRUMB , MAYOR - GEORGE AVIS, CITY CLERK he City Manager presented the petitioA of Parker D. Rushing and Marie M Rushing, husband and wife, to ezone certain real-estate from I -1B Light Industrial District, to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District hich had been approved by the Planning Commission. he City Attorney then introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read's proposed ordinance in its ntirety entitled " AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING 9RDINANCE NO. 12399 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF AYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 280 19622 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATB FROM I-iB IGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT." irector Dunn moved that the Ordinance pass, he motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, Dunn. "Nay", None here being seven "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the Hrdinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1548 ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINNNCE N0. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKAN 'ROVED MAY 28, 19622 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM I -1B LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO ghborhood Commercial District. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, May 16, 1967, on the petition of Parker D Rushing and Marie* Rushing, requesting that said Planning mnission recommend that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following descbibed :)perty, presently zoned I-iB Light Industrial District, to C -i Neighbothood Commercial District, to -wit: Part�of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter mn Township 16 North, Range 30 West, in the etteville County Court Plat, located at 345 Government Avenue, and more particularly described as fol. inning at the intersection of Pradrie Steet and Government Avenue, and running thhnce east, 30 feet mo: less to the Western boundary of South Gregg Avenue, thence North 163.21 feet, thence West 98.8 feet, th, 113 feet more or less to an alley, thence Bast 68.8 feet, then South 50.21 feet to the point of b, inning. WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date , time, place and purposes of said location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper_ of general circulat said city,'more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Direct the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the ve-described property, presently zoned I -1B Light Industrial District to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial trict. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property,presently zoned I -1B Light Industrial District,be the same is hereby rkzoned to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict kerewith are hereby repealed, this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and ication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 5th day of June, A967. APPROVED: TTEST: DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEORG FTAVIS, CITH CLERK City Manager read a proposed resolution in.its entirety entitled " A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND CTING THE CONDEMNATION OF EASEMENTS IN CERTAIN LANDS IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, FOR USE IN TRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A O6 INCH, SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL LINE, WPC -ARK 216, APPURTENANCES THERETO." ctor McFerran moved that the Resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Director Melton upon roll call, the lbllowing vote was recorded:."Aye", Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, bo, and Dunn. "Nay", None. e being seven "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 1047 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZENG AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF EASEMENTS IN CERTAIN LANDS IN WASHINGTON 'INSAS, FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTION , INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A 36 INCH, SANITARY SFdER OUTFALL LI , AND APPURTENANCES THERETO. WHEREAS, THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,'ARKANSAS, is in the process of constructing Sanitary Sewer Imprc act, WPC ARK 216, necessitating right-of-ways and easements over certain lands in Washington County, construction, installation and maintenance of a 34 inch sanitary sewer outfall line to connect with tment plant being constructed under said project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That for the purposes of constructing, installing and maintaining (and as more fully set the contract documents) a 36 inch sanitary sewer outfall line and all appurtenances thereto, pursuant dtary Sewer Improvement Project WPC -ARK 216, the necessary easements and right-of-ways in the lands of iers designated in Exhibit "A" to this Resolution be entered upon and taken and the City Attorney is he: horized and directed to institute condemnation proceedings to acquire said easements and rijht-of-ways mer required by law. Section 2. That as the questions in controversy in such proceedings are likely to retard the d construction, the City Attorney is further authorized and directed to petition the Court for 1vide appropriate deposit& with the Registry of the Court for making compensation and payment of order that immediate possession of said lands may be secured and construction proceed 'prior to payment of damages. PASSED AND'APPROVED this 5th day of June, 1967 APPROVED: ATTES� ` 06 -IA 4- p(C'A.^ Y r -o DON TRUMBO, MAYOR 7 GEOPPE J DAVIS, CITY CLERK tion 11-67 ` The City Ittorney introduced and, at therequest of the Mayor, read a proposed resolution in its entirety entitled, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN LANDS IN THE CITY OF FAYETT'. ARKANSAS,.FOR USE IN WIDENING AND IMPROVING HIGHWAY 265." Director Kerlin moved that the Resolution be adopted. The motion wars seconded by Director McFerran and u roll call, the following vote was.recorded: "Aye", Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, ai "Nay", None. There being seven "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 11-67 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN LANDS IN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, FOR USE IN WIDENING AND IMPROVING HIGHWAY 265. WHEREAS, the Arkansas Highway Commissioniis in the process of widening and improving State Highway 2 (Job No. 9497) in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in consideration of which the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, has agreed to provide the necessary right-of-way for this work; and certain lands in the City o. Fayetteville, Arkansas, are immediately necessary for the completion of this work. left on First heading. (Pawnbroker Authorized Construc- tion of. 2 Sewer Extensions. NCW, THEREFORE, BE IT BESBLYED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY .OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: t Section 1. That for the purposes of widening and improving Highway 265 in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, including construction of necessary bridges, abutmenta, and approaches thereto, the necessary I of the owners designated in Exhibit "A" to this Resolution be entered up6n and taken as right-of-way for purposes and City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to institute condemnation proceedings to acs sadi lands in the manner provided by law. LN A ., WPC -ARK ' _. new the of to LLE, Dunn, Section 2. That as the questions in odntroversy in such `proceedings are likely to retard the progreds of said construction, the City Attorney is further authorized and directed to petition the Court for permission to provide appropriate deposits with the Registry ffiB the Court for making compensation and payment df damages, in order that immediate possession of said lands may be secured and consgructiah'proceed prior to assessment and payment of damages. PASSED AND APPROVED this 5th day of'June,'1967. iTTEST:Vi// i.� EO 7 D. i CITY - -- CLERK APPROVED: f',! , ",�DON TRUMBO, MAYOR City Manager read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE REGI NBROKERS IN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS AND AMENDING THE ETTEVILLE,CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ADD SAID PROVISIONS THERETO." further action was taken at this time, and the Ordinance was left on the first reading. City Manager reported that bids had been received and opened for the construction of two Sewer Extens: jests, and that upon tabulation of the -bids, the low bid was the one by Tune Construction Company, etteville, Arkansas for the•sum of $3,289.80 on one project and $5,419.24 Qn the other, and he recomme t the contract be awarded to the Tune Construction Company. t ector Melton moved to accept the recommendation of the -City Manager and award the contract to the Tune struction Co., Fayetteville, Arkansas, at the low bid price of $3,289.80 and $5,419.24 respectively, a: t the Mayor and the City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized to execute the contract upon the appri the contract by the City Attorney and the 8onsulting Engineers, the approval of the Cost & Performance the Consulting Engineers, and evidence of proper insurance, motion was seconded by Director Swartz qnd passed unanimously. , I 151 TABULATION OF BIDS (FOR TWO SEWER PROJECTS) P WBNU I PROJECT II TUBE CONSTRUCTION CO. 700 W. North Fayetteville, Arkansas $32289.80 $5,419.24 very 30 days 30 days " I The City Manager read Administrative Memo #58 recommending that some remodeling be done in the Authorize some City Administration Building* The Memo was spread on the minutes and reads as follows: remodeling of City Administration Administrative Memo #58 Building ADDITIONAL REMODELLING OF CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING In 1964-65, the City Administtation-building was remodelled on the east side of the building on the firstflooa. The west side of the first floor was remodelled in 1962.- Since that time there have been employees added to the staff housed in the administrations bbSldtng and some organizational changes, • Because of this, I am recommending that some remodelling be done, primarily in the City Clerk's Office and Board of Director's Room, in order to create some three offices and a publication room from these areas. Out of the Building Inspection and City Engineer's Office, we are now tryingtbo house and operate two clerks, three inspectors and the City Engineer(Water Superintendent) from space designed for a total of four desks. Also, the City Engineer has no privacy in these quarters. To alleviate this crowded condition and to gibelsome privacy for the City Engineer yet to be able to used �h� clerks for City Engineer as well as Building Inspection, I would propose to divide the City Clerk'OXfi�o space for two offices, with connection from one to theBuilding Inspection office. The City Engineer CAPWELL CONSTRUCTION CO. . 925 Bel Air Fayetteville, Arkansas $3,584.50 $51690.40 BICO ASPHALT CO. Hwy 45 East FI yetteville, Arkansas $49230.00 $$0,552.00 REBCO , INC. P.O. Box 236 Rogers, Arkansas $38795.30 $6,261.74 Authorize the Purchase of Street Signs The City Manager reported that bids had been received and opened for Street Signs and.Posts and that ' and Posts. upon tabulation of the bids, the low bid was the one by Vulcan Sign and Stampings and he recommended the acceptance of their bid. ' Director Kerlin then moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and award the contract for Street Signs and Posts to Vulcan Sign & Stampings Company as tabulated in their bid, and thAbrtheo- EhIyorv:Md the City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized to execute the contract . Themotion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. BID TABULATION STREET SIGNS AND POSTS Bids on June 1, 1967 Street Signs & Posts. ALL VePed Sargent Vulcan Mirro QQWTY Traffic Sowell, Sign & -Flex, Inc. SIGN CO. 86ntrols Inc. Stampings . 200 Ohannel Iron Posts 2.30 2.0 2.i5 2.05 2.18 7 1/2 feet ?,Do Not Enter, Black on White 2.28 2.61 2.15 1.95 - 2.58 i No Parking, Red on White 2.28 2.61 2.15 1.95 2•�B Above 1811x2411, 16 Gauge steel, baked No Parking Anytime, Red on White 1.28 1.60 1.30 1.22 1926 ' 50 No Parking Between Signs, Red on White 1928 1.60 1930 1.22 1.26 25 No Parking Here to Corner, Red on White 1.28 1,60 1.30 1.22 1.31 Above 12" x 1811, 18 Gauge steel, baked Terms 1%-10 days *8 ft. Net posts very 30 days 30 days " I The City Manager read Administrative Memo #58 recommending that some remodeling be done in the Authorize some City Administration Building* The Memo was spread on the minutes and reads as follows: remodeling of City Administration Administrative Memo #58 Building ADDITIONAL REMODELLING OF CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING In 1964-65, the City Administtation-building was remodelled on the east side of the building on the firstflooa. The west side of the first floor was remodelled in 1962.- Since that time there have been employees added to the staff housed in the administrations bbSldtng and some organizational changes, • Because of this, I am recommending that some remodelling be done, primarily in the City Clerk's Office and Board of Director's Room, in order to create some three offices and a publication room from these areas. Out of the Building Inspection and City Engineer's Office, we are now tryingtbo house and operate two clerks, three inspectors and the City Engineer(Water Superintendent) from space designed for a total of four desks. Also, the City Engineer has no privacy in these quarters. To alleviate this crowded condition and to gibelsome privacy for the City Engineer yet to be able to used �h� clerks for City Engineer as well as Building Inspection, I would propose to divide the City Clerk'OXfi�o space for two offices, with connection from one to theBuilding Inspection office. The City Engineer 52 of Etc. r Water be provided with the office closest to the hall and the City Clerk to the rear. The Building Insp ,ment will therefore have two desks for three inspections and the entire office for their business. have recently employed anaccountant to assist the City Controller. As its have no office space for him, he been working our of the City Clerk's office. I propose ro provide a small office for him in the billing m area next to the vault. I have also recently employed an Administrative Assistant as budgeted. I pose to take the south ten feet of the Board of Directors room and make an office for him with direct nection to my secretary's office.,;Also within the area closest to the hallway, I propose making a lication room for our duplicating equipment, photocopy machine and files. This would remove the duplicati ipment from the Building Inspectors office, the photocopy equipment from the Accountant's office and files m my secretary's office, stimated cost df the wo* proposed is $1.800 to be done by labor contract, with•Ahe city to purchase the 3terials. Iwwould request your authorization to proceed with this work. hector Melton moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and remodel'ethe City Administration iilding as outlined abovd and that the City Managertb8 and he is'hereby authorized to proceed with the work, is motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. is City Manager presented an Administrative Memo in which he recommended that the MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 0 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF BEAVER WATER SUPPLR FACILITIES as prepare( 7 the Beaver Commissioners, be authorized. irector Kezliri then moved that the Mayor and` City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized and directed to recute the MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF AVER WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES and to.request that the Memorandum be executed by all members of the Beaver) kter District at an early date so that plans for completing necessary water improvements to effectuate the. ;reement may proceed with due haste. is motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed uhanimously. is MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING was spread on the minutes -and reads as follows: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND CONTRACT FOR ODNSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF BEAVER WATER SUPPLY FAILITIES HIS CONTRACT, made and entered into by and between Beaver Water District of Washington and Benton Counties, rkansas, hereinafber called the District, and the Cities of Bentonville, Fayetteville, Rogers and Springdale, 11 of the State of Arkansas, hereinafter collectively called the Cities, and individually referred to herein by WITNESSETH THAT: each of the respective eities has owned and.operated its separate and individual water supply,*atbtibnpply ies and distribution system, and REAS; through the years each of thq respective Cities has spent•great sums of money developing various water ,plies, each og which in turn eventually became inadequate in quantity, and REAS, every supply now being used by the various Cities (with the exception of.the Beaver stpply now being used the City of Springdale) has been determined to be inadequate for present requirements in case of extended uth; and further, that the rapid growth ofthe area and the increased usage of water makes it imperative that itional or new supplies be obtained in the immediate future, and !EREAS, each of the Cities has. -,.already spent considerable sums and contracted to spend additional monies oviding.for and the development of the Beaver water supply, and , EREAS, it has been determined that the Beaver water supply and the rights of Beaver Water District to t .pply are adequate for all foreseeable needs, and that such rights have been or can be allotted to the v ties as required, and REAS, the quality of water from Beaver Reservoir is excellent for all domestic -and industrial uses, and REAS, Beaver Water District has acquired lands a:d rights of ways and constructed water supply and treatment ilities whith can be expanded to meet all the foreseeable water -supply needs of the Cities --and other prospective rs within the area served by the District, and REAS, in the acquisition of said lands and right of ways, and the construction, acquisition, and expansion of d Bacilities, the District has issued and isrequired to issue additional bonds to provide funds for the uiAtion and construction and expansion of said facilities, and REAS, the total water requirements of the District when furnishing water to all of the Cities will be in excess the pumping and treatment capacity of the existing fadilities, it is required that the facilities be expanded the earlies practical date, and REAS, the acquisition and operation of said facilities by the District will require that provisions be efficiently operate the system, including souad financing and fiscal control, efficient operation and cedures and plans for orderly expansion of facilities as required, and 1 1 1 REAS, the total cost of acquiring, constructing, maintainipg,operating and expanding the facilities must be Owe , the users of water produced through the system, it is required that the diirision of said costs between the •eral users be equitable; and that adequate use and production records be kept and that sound fiscal and lbook- ping procedures be followed, and REAS, the District having heretofore issued bonds in the sum of $400,000 for the construction of the intake ucture and the purchase of lands and right of ways, of which a net indebtedness of approximately $350,000.00 still outstanding, the purpose of the construction of such facilities and the purchase of such lands and tight ways being a direct part of the water production facilities of the District, it is deemed that such facilities uld be paid for on the same basis as the rest of the system investment, Memorandum Beaver Water Dist. (Continued) 1 153 NOW THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows: 1. The District will purchase and operate thrBeaver water supply facilities and reimburse the City Springdale for said City's investment in such facilities, in accordance with a Memorandum of Understai etofore made between the District and the City of Springdale. A copy of said Memorandum of Udderstan attached hereto and made a part hereof as included herein. 2. The District will issue revenue bonds as required to acquire the system, expand the facilities, provide reserves as required in the bond sale. 3. The District will operate, maintain and expand the system as required to meet the present and future needs of the Cities. 4. The District will furnish water to the Cities and other approved users at the Beaver water treatment plant site. through the pumping Saci.1ities of Beaver Water- District; delivering water -into the user's pressure,mains,at such pressures, and in..such amounts, and at;such rated "of flbw, and at such times: ,as are required by the users:; and.will:£urni'sh such-water..totthe respective users at costs such cost to inclu 'but not ,be limited to, amortization.of District indebtedness,"operation and maintenance, and•a reasonable loperating fund. In case of insufficient treated water to meet system demandp due to system breakdown or for any cause water shall be delivered to the various users on a fair and equitable basis. 5. The District will make a continuing study of the water, needs and expected future requirements of the Cities ( and other users, if any) and provide punt expansion as required. Plant expantions shall be financed from a surplus of the operating revenues, revenue bonds, Federal grants, or other authorized monies. 60% The District may furnish water throughMm facilities to rural water didtrict and other possible users, when the member Cities cannot or will not supply such areas through their distibution facilities. Payment for such water used by rural water districts and other users furnished by the District shall be as hereinafter set out for member Cities.* In addition, such users shall pay to the District a share of the water storage charges in direct proportion to what the other cities are paying.asddBtarmined by contr already entered into between the various Cities and Beaver Water District for water rights. Such right furnish water shall not extned to areas immediately adjacent to the city limits of the 'Cities. Further, all such water systems shall be constricted and maintained to standards at least equal to those of the Cities, with such addition controls and conditions as follews, A. The limits of the areas to be served shall be clearly defined. B. Competent and legal operating agencies shall operate the system. C. The transmission or distribution system shall be designed and constructed in accordance with thei State Board of Health standards. And provided durther, if it is the opinion of the Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission that such areas would be evedbually incorporated into a nieghboring City, con- struction plans would also bear the approval of that City. D. All users of every type shall be metered and charged for water used. E. Provisions for maintaining and operating the system in compliance with the State Board of Health requirements and in compliance odth the Arkansas State Plumbing Code shall be assured. F. The District shall not finance water transmission and/ or distribution systems without approval of the Cities. 7. The District will keep all necessary fiscal records and will furnish to the Cities not less than once each year a full and complete ;report of activities and system costs, -including a complete audit by a certified public accountant. s ` 8. The District will provide and maintain high quality metering equipment and meter all water delivered to each and all users taking pater at the treatment plant site. Tfie meters shall be checked and calibrated on a regular schedulb. This schedule shall be as to insure that the accuracy of the meters is maintained within the limits set forth in the specifications governing the purchase of the meters. Any city may ask for a meter check. 9. Shehmember Cities shall build and maintain their own water supply lines from the point of meter discharge at the water treatment plant to their respective distribution systems, and further that: A.Such water supply lines, water storage facilities and other appurtenances may be constructed by the District in accordance with Federal grant applications. In this event, the construction plans will be first approved by the City for which the improvements are contemplated, and construction contracts shall be awarded by the District only with the advice and consent of said City. B.In the event the District constructs such water supply lines, etc., the City(s) will provide the District the necessary additional funds along ttbh the Federal funds necessary to construct such facilities. The City(s) will deposit such funds in banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The :- banks shall be approved by the District and Cities, and such banks shall pledge securities for the amount dbpeeited above legally insured; fu nds:--Funds.-deposited shall'be-pledgdd'to the -payment ofAhe_local•shaIe of -the costs iof the project, such payments to. be made to the District on demand as required to meet contract obligations. C.The provisions of this section in no manner limit any of the Cities in serving, through their systems, other smaller cities or other approved legally constituted rater distribrtion Avencies..":.Water "supply amounts to other ditiesagrrlega`lly_cons-titutediwater-distribution agencies;-shall-nof:_b.e_counted=°as••part of the amount for which -the -supplying City has:water storage rights in Beaver.Reservoir as evidenced by previous contract. _ It is understood -and agreed that this provision -shall not apply to storage facility ' charges.a- 10. If any of the respective Cities choose to produce part or all their own water through their existing facilities, they shall meter all such water so produced with the same degree of accuracy as required of the District. Systematic reports of the quantities of water so produced shall be'furntshed the District. 11. Payment shall be as set out below: Case A. All water used by the Cities to be obtained through the Beaver facilities: The total District cost, including but not limited to amortization of indebtedness, operation and maintenance, and expansion of the system, on an annual basis, to be borne as a direct cost against the water delivered to the users. Case B. Water used by some of the Cities to be obtained through the Beaver facilities, with some all of the water used by other Cities to be obtained and produced through their own facilities under t. own supervision: The total district cost of amortizing its bonded indebtedness to be apportioned to the various cities (ahtf other possible users) in the proportion that the total amount of water produced by each city or bttier possible user from any and all sources bears to the total amount .of treated water produced from all 54 Memo. of Understa ing,Etc. Beaver Water Dist. (Cont.) by all cities and other possible users. Cost of District system operation and maintenance to be charged directly against the water produced and delivered the various users. I Increased electrical and maintenance cost, if any, which is occasioned by providing standby service for Cities which ' produce all or part of their requirements through facilities other than the Beaver plant. shall be paid for by such Cities, e. g. , if excess minimum power demand charges are imposed due to enlarged rinstalled facilities, thereby' increasing power cost to'the:DistrictC'such-increased cost-sha31_be"borne by. the Cities _using the Beaver facilities for standby service. Likewise, the cities woifld-,pay the_excess cost,occas16ned-by intermittent use of water which increased monthly power demand charges without.using offsetting amounts of electrical energy delivered in the lower bracket millage rates. 12.The annual bond -indebtedness cost shall be estimated by the District and included in the charges to the users on the basis set out in the Section above, the charges to be. based on the previous year's water usage. At the end of each year, on the basis of the certified public accountant's audit, each user will be charged or credited, as the case may be, with the previous year's over- or under- payment by the respective users. 13. Plant and system operation and maintenance costs will be estimated from time to time, as required by operation conditions, and the cost of water delivered tothe respective users shall be baeed upon such estimates. At the end of each fiscal year the total usage and total system operation and maintenance costs shall be detezinined by a certified public'accountant's audit,'and the several'users charged•or credited -with the 'required adjustm9nt to reflect their proportionate costs in relation to actual water delivered to the users. 14, The District's remaining bonded indebtedness (now approximately $350,000.00 of the $400,000.00 bond'ideae with which the intake structure was built and landseand right of ways purchased) shall be included in the system indebtedness and the bonds retired as provided dor in Section 11 and 12 above. The inclusion of this section in this agreement and the payment 6f the debt service by this method will not invalidate the existing contract requirements with the respective cities for the payment of the above issue. It will, however, relieve the individual City payments ed tbag;.bo•th6jr.ate made by the District under this provision. 15. The District will bond ips employees to their limit of access to District funds through adequate IorporAte sureties. It will retain all accumulated funds in Federally guaranteed securities and in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured banks. All surpluses shall be invested from time to time in order to produce a maximum return Io surplus monies in securities guaranteed by the Federal Governmant, or in Federally insured banking or savings -=^ institfitions. 16. Each of the Cities will from time to time furnish to the District such information as is required to ass isl� it evaluation of �rospective6future water requirements. 177 Nothing in this agreement altersthe right. of any City to supply non -potable water to users within the limits Df its jurisdiction 18. The Cities shall in no way be either individually or collectively responsible or liable for any.4acts of negligence of theeDistrict in the District's operation of.the water facilities, and to this end the District agrees to hold the Cities harmless therefrom. However, nothing herein shall be constructed as a waiver by the Cities or any of them of their immunity from tort suit under the laws of the States of 4rkansas. 19. The treated water furnished to the Cities and other users by the District shall at all times meet standards set forth in the latest edition of the United States Rablic Health Service "Standards for Drinking Water Quality" Ind the rules and regulation set forth by the Arkansas State Board of Health for potable water. The District shall naintain and operate a bacteriological and chemical laboratory for the purpose of maintaining the necessary quality control checks to comply with the above standards and insure efficient operation of the treatment process. The District shall maintain and keep on file bacteriological and chemical records, reports, add analyses of sufficient detail and le to permit an accurate evaluation of the daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly operation of the water treatment plant. these records sha1T be availableat any time for review bjpythe user Cities and the District shall furnish copies of these reeords to the user Cities apdn written request. Me'District shall produce a treated water which will neither corrode nor scale the tranemdesion line) or distrie xition system of the user Cities under the normal range of domestic operating conditions: 20. The service areas for the respective Cities shall be as shown on the attached plat, hereby made I part mereof, and such service areas as shown are hereby designated as the exclusive service areas of the respective Cities, unless said areas are 'altered by mutual agreement between tyeCities concerned. 21. This agreement is made in good faith for the well-being and betterment of the parties hereto and all of iotthwest Arkansas. This agreement mma7 be amended by mutual agreement of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the administrative officers of the respedtive parties hereto have on authority of their governing bodies, signed and aealdd this agreement on the dates shown. BEAVER WATER DISTRICT CLAYTON N. LITTLE, -SECRETARY (SEAL) CITY OF BENTONVILI.E. ARKANSAS VIDA SIMPSON; CITY RECORDER G. J. (SEAL) CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS l GEORGE JU DAVP9; CITY CLERK (SEAL) W. E. BLAND, CITY CLERK (SEAL) CITY OF ROGERS, ARKANSAS LDLI . WLWa.awa., MAYOR MLI 1967 1967 1 VIM 1 uthorized Ci to continue for relocati University F �7 (T.J.Keith N.W.Times, present) Ordinanee 1 CITY OF SPRINGDALE. ARKANSAS rnnn rnia.a.t r.,, ru.ivi LETHA BROGDON, CITY CLERK (SEAL) , 1967 A long discussion was held regarding the relocation of the Fire Station near the University on Maple Street. Manager Director Melton then moved that the -City Manager continue negotiations with the University to see if a site on otiatien niversity property can be found which would be suitable to relocate the fire station now located eb Maple l of treetsfrom the standpoint of fire service;also for University and other commercial,high•value districts Station&nd residential coverage; topographic oondiWl fi; regulations of the rating bureau; and possibleconformance Yii;h the University master plan,and annexation proposals of the City. If a suitable site on University land I be found, then the City Managerbbe and he is hereby authorized to consider other sites for purchase employ an architect to design the structure and -proceed to move from the present station by December of 1967. Finds for fire station relocation to be'authorized from the"Capital Improvement Fund". The motionvasseconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. There being no further business,Director Kerlin moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Directo;Swartz and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting APPROVED: / �d ��yitl ii. ing. The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, June 19, 1967; in the -Director's Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 p.m. C.B.S.T. Present: City Manager, Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk, George J. Davis, City.Attorney,.Hugh Kincaid, and Bbrec Rep. of 8 Rutz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. Absent: Director Kerlin. so The minutes of the regalar meeting on Monday June 6th, 1967, a copy of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written. The City Manager presented the petition of Helen Edminton and Jere F. Block to rezone certain real estate located between Ash Street and Sycamore Street and West of the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad from I -1A Light Industrial District, to R-3 Multi -Family District, which had been approved by the Plannin Commission. 1549. After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced, and,at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety entitled,"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 19622 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM I-tA LIGHT INDUSTRUAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTI -FAMILY DISTRICT." i Director Christie -moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Oridnance open for discussion. After a brief discussion, Director Christie m that the rule be further suspended and the Ordinance placed on the third and final reading. The motion wasseconded by Director McFerrandand passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read1br the third and last time. The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: "Aye", Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and L "Nay", None. There being six "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. . ORDINANCE N0. 1549 AN 9RDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO, 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT.MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE; A: KAY 28, 1962, A9 AMFNDBB, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM I -1A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO R-3 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. FJ WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas,) on June 6, 1967, on the petition of Heldn Edmiston and Jere F. Block, requesting that said Planning Commissi recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Argansas, that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property, present],y zpned I -1A Light Industrial District, ti R-3 Muti-Family District, to -wit: The Easb one-half (1/2�,of Lots Four (4)s and nine (9)s and all of Lots one (1), two (2), three (3) ten (10), eleven (11), and twelve (12), all in Block eleven (11), of Parker's Plat of Valley View Acres Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, etting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hearing location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of General circulation in said City, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, M WHEREAS, following said public hearing, acid Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of t' City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that ordinance be adopted rezoningtthe above-described property, presently zoned I-tA Light Industrial District,,to R-3 Multi -Family Residential Distrieg.