HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-02-06 Minutesr _ �
Release Deed
Tomlyn Valley
Apprinted seven
members to Parks
& Recreation
Advisory Gommisdion
111
Director McFerran moved.that the City Clerk be, and he is, hereby authorized to execute a release deed
for the Tomlyn Valley View Addition described as follows, to -wit:
All lots and blocks in the Tomlyn Valley View Addition Section 2 and replat of lots 8, 9,
10, 11, and 12 of the original Tomlyn Valley View Addition, an Addition to the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, as per plat of said Addition on file'in the office of the Circuit
Clerk and Ex -Officio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas,
The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously.
nder authority contained in Ordinance no: 1526, passed & approved.January 3, 1967,
Director McFerran moved to confirm the appointments t•pcbmmended by the'Fayetteville Youth Center of
Bill Brandon, David Lashley, and Mrs. Frank Broyles to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission,
and that the Board appoints Claude Sutton (Standard Register), Dr. Rodney Ryan (University of Arkansas),
Mrs. Newell Shaw (Adult Center), and Ben Winborn (Fayetteville Schools) as members of the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Commission.
He further moved that the seven appointees draw lots for the ones to serve on the one and two year terms.
The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously,
To Advertise for Director Melton moved that the City Manager be authorized to advertise for bids for six truck beds for
Bids for Truck the new trucks just purchased.
Beds. I The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously.
There being no further business, Director McFerran moved to adjourn.
` The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimousl , whereupon the Mayor declared the
meeting adjourned,
APPROVED:
ATTEST: DON TRUMBO, MAYOR
!;� & � L_.
1.
GEORGE J DA , 90 CITY CLERK
The Board of Directors of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, February 6, 1967, in
the Directors Room in the City Admihistration Building at 7:30 P. M. `
Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and Directo
Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn,
Absent: None,
The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, January 16, 1967, a copy of which had been mailed to each
the Directors were approved as written.
To advertise for The City Manager reported that the City Board of Directors had authorized that bids be received and
bids for new opened on February 28, 1967, for the Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant and Outfall Lines, but the Consultin
Sewer Plant & Lines. Engineers had requested that the bid opening be delayed for two weeks(??arch 14, 1967),
(Changing date) Director Melton moved that the City Manager be authorized to advertise for bids to be received and opcne
,for the Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant and Outfall Lines on Tuesday, ,larch 14, 1967, at 2:00 P. M. CST,
as requested by the Consulting Engineers.
The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously.
y
To advertise for The City Manager reported that the Consulting Engineer, U. E. McClelland, had completed plans and
bids on street specifications for street improvement projects on that port.of Sang Avenue and Hartman Avenue leading to
project near Ramay and adjacent to the new Ramay Junior High School, and the City Manager recommended that the project be
JR, High School. advertised for bids to be received and opened on February 24, 1967, at 2:00 P.M. CST.
Director Melton then moved that -the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to advertise for bids to
be opened on Friday, February 24, 1967, at 2:00 P. M. CST, on the Street Improvement Projedt on Sang and
HartmannAvenues leading to and adjacent to the new Ramay Junior High School according to plans and
specifications as furnished by the Consulting Engineer, J. E. McClelland.
I The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously,
Ordinance No. The City Attorney int$oduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety
c 1528 entitled, "AN'ORDINANCE DISSOLVING STREET IMPROVEMEIIT DISTRICT 110, 56 OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS, AND TERMINATING THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS PRESENTLY BEING LEVIED IN SAID DIS'RICT".
Director Dunn then moved that the Ordinance pass. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and upon ro:
call the followidg vote was recorded, "Aye" 'Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran,-Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn.
"Nay" None.
There being Seven "Ayes" and No "Nays",'the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE N0. 1528
AN ORDINANCE DISSOLVING STREET IMPROVEIn.NT DISTRICT NO. 56 OF THE CITY OF FAvETTE?iILLE,ARKANSAS, AND
TERMINATING THE BENEFIT ASSESSME6ITS PRESENTLY BEING LEVIED IN ASID DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 951, the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, established Street
Improvement District No. 56, and bar Ordinances No. 973 and 981, the City Council levied assessment for
benefits in the Street Improvement District No. 56 and provided for annual assessment and collection
thereafter until the whole of said local assessment was paid in full, and
REAS, a petition was filed with the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on
uaiy 25, 1967, by the Commissioners of Street Improvement District No. 56, reporting that the bonded
ettedness of said District had been retired and that all refunds of surplus assessments had been sub-
ntially completed, and that the only funds remaining to the credit of the District are those necessary
wind up the affairs of the District, and
REAS, said petition requests that the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, enact
ordinance didsolving Street Improvement District No. 56, of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and removing and
minating the benefit assessment presently levied against the real property in said District,
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED B" THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITv OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. Street Improvement District No. 56 of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby didsolved
and the benefit assessments presently being levied against the real property in said District for the
purpose of retiring the bonded indebtedness of sild District are hereby terminated and removed.
SECTION 2. A copy of this Ordinance duly certified by the City Clerk shall be filed in the Office of the
County Collector of Washington County, Arkansas.
ON 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this
lance shall be in full force and effect from and after its rassag , appr val and publication.
;D AND AFPROVPD this 6th day of February, 1967. APPROVED: 10
ATTEST:�BcGlf DON TRUNBO, MAYCR ,
GEORG J. fDAVIS2 CITY CLERK
solution
o. 2-67
The City Manager introdubed ii d -'read a proposed 'resolution -in its entirety entitled, "A RESOLUTION
AMENDING RESOLUTION N0, 28-66 OF OCTOBER 17, 1966, TO CHANGE THE URPAN RENEWAL AREA AND TO CHANGE THE
ESTI14ATED COST OF FREPARING SURVEYS AND PLANS FOR .AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT:"
Director Melton moved that the Resolution be adopted.
The motion wasseconded by Director Kerlin and passed unenimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the
Resolution adopted,
RESOLUTION N0, 2-67
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 28-66 of OCTOBER 17, 1966; TO CHANGE THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA AND TO
CHANGE THE ESTIMATED COST OF PREPARING SURVE'S AND FLANS FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 28-66, of October 1,7, 1966, the Board of Directors of the City of Fayettevi
Arkansas, approved the undertaking of surveys and plans for an urban renewal project and the filing of
;\ application for advance of .Federal funds, and
4,'�REAS, prior to the filing of said application, Public Law 89-754, the Demonstration Cities and Metr
Development Act of 1966, was adopted, containing a number of significant amendments to the basic urban
renewal laws; and
3-67
WHEREAS, it is now deemed advantageous to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to change the area and the
estimated cost in the application for survey and planning funds in order to benefit from the amendments
contained in Public Law.l89-754
1`?O.41 NTHE?.E.T4'ORE, BE IT -RESOLVED EY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Or THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKAnrgt S;
SECTION 1`. That Resolution No. 28-66, of October 17, 1966, be amended--by-changing t e description of the
proposed urban renewal area to read as follows: ____ .... .... _-__ _: _. _. _.
Part of�%the East 112 of Section 15 and part of the West 1'2 of Section 16, Township 16 North,
Range 30 West, more particularly described as'f_ollows, to -wit: Beginning at the Northeast
corner of Lot One (1); Block One (1), Hendry's Addition, thence West along Rock Street right
of way line thirty-eight (38) feet, more or less, thence Nerthatonl;het4renter line of Center
Street, thence West along the centerlline of Center Street seventy (7G)'.feet, more or less,
04'thence North.fibe hundred seventy-eight (578) feet, more or less, thence?- ?est to the center
line of,''College Avenue, thence North along the center line of College Avenue forty-five (45)
feet, -more or less, thence West one hundred eighty (180) feet, more or less, thence South
thirty-five'(35) feet, more or less, thence West to the center line of East'Street, thence
North along the center line of East Street seventy (70) feet, more or less, thence West to
the center line of Block Street, thence South along the center line of Elock Street twenty
(2C) feet, more or less, thence West one hundred ninety (190) -feet, more or. less, thence
South seventy-five (.75) feet, more or less, thence West to the center line of Church Street,
thence South along the center line of Church Street thirty (30) feet, more or less, thence
West two hundred sixty-five (265) feet, more or less, thence South to the center line of
Meadow Street, thence East along the center line'of Meadow .Street ten (10) feet, more or
less, thence South one hundred eighty (180) feet, more or less, thence East to the North-
east corner of Lot 3, Block 18, original town plat, thence South to the Southeast corner of
Lot six (6), Block 32, original town plat, thence East fifty-four (54) feet, more or less,
, thence South to the center line of Rock
Street, thence East along the center line of Rock Street fifty (50) feet, more or less,
thenceSouth three hundred seventy (370) feet, thence East to the center line of Archibald
Yeib Boulevard, thence South ninety-five (95) feet, more or less, thence East three hundred
forty (340) feet, more or less,`thenoe South thirty (30)'feet, more or less, thence East
tb the center line-'of.Squth College Avenue, thence North along thelcenter line of South
College-Averiue fifty (50)_feet,'more or less, thence East two hundred twenty (220) feet
more or less, thence North three hundred twenty-five (325) feet, more or less, thence Last
three hundred eighty (380) feet, mere or less, thence North one hundred twenty (120) feet,
more or less, to the point of beginning.
SECTION 2. That Resolution No. 28-66 be further amended by changing the estimated cost to prepare st
and plans for.the urban renewal project to $182,844.00 instead of $101,704,00.
SECTION 3. That all other provisions of Resolution No. 28-66 shall remain in full force end effect.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 6th day df,Felbruary, 1967.
ATTEST: `u;
C
GEORGE J S, CITY CI:JEiK
APPROVED:
(P aJAA10
DON T ,UMBO, 1^AYOR
The City !Manager introduced and read a proposed resolution in its entirety entitled, "A RESOLUTION
AAENDING RESOLUTION N0. 27-66 OF OCTOBER 17, 1906, TO CHAA'GE THE DESCRIPTICA.' OF THE GEP'ERAL NEIGHBORHOOD
RE109AL AREA AND TO CHANGE THE ESTIMATED COST OF PREPARING THE GE'NTERAL NEICHF.ORHCrO'D RENSIAL PI,LMf 11
Director Swartz moved that -the resolution be adopted.
The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 3-67°,!
A RESOLUTION At-MDING RESOLUTION N0. 27-66 OF OCTOBER 17, 1966, TO CHANGE THE DESCRP,TION OF THE GENERAL
NEIGHEORHCOD RENEWAL AREA AND TO CHANGE THE ESTI;,'.ATED COST OF PREPARING THE GENERAL NEICFBORHOOD RENEWAL
FLAN.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 27-66 of October 17, 1966,'the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, approved the undertaking of a General Neighborhood Renewal Plan and the filing of an applicatio
for advance of Federal funds; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing of said application, Futlic Law 89-754, The Demonstration Cities and Metr
Development Act of 1966, was adopted, containing a number of significant amendments to the basic urban
renewal laws; and
WHEREAS, it is now deemed advantageous to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to change the area and the
estimated cost if the application for General Neighborhood Renewal Planning Fuhds in'order to benefit
from the amendments adopted by Public Law 89-754.
idOW, THEREFGRE, BF, IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAN"EfTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That Resolution No. 27-66, of October 17, 1966, be amended by changing the description of
general Neighborhood Renewal Area to read as follows:
tal
1
1
113
Resolution) No. Part of the West 1!2 of Section 22, part of the West 1/2 of Section 15, part of the East 1/2
3-67 (Continued) of Section 16 and part of the East 1/2 of Section 21, all being in Townhhip 16 North, Range
30 West, more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the SE corner of the
RE 1/4 of.the NW 1/4 of Section 22, T -16-N, R-30W,_thence North to the NE corner of the SE
1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 15, T -16-N, R-30-14, thence West to the NW corner of the SE 1/4
of the SW 1/4 of Section 15, .T -16.-N, R-30 W, thence North to a point on the North boundary
of Rock Street right of way, thence East to the Southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 4, Hills
Addition, thence North three hundred eighty-five (385) feet, more or less, thence East to
a point 247.3 feet South of the NE corner of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 15, T -16-N,
R-30-14, thence North to the NE corner of_Lot 5. Block 4, M,cIlroys Addition, thence West to
the center .line of Rolston Street, thence North along the center line of Rolljston Street
to the center line of Watson Street, thence West along the center line of Watson Street to
the centerline of Campbell Street, thence North.along the center line of Campbell Street
to the center'.line of Lafayette Street, thence West along the center lin@ of Lafayette
Street to a point located in the center of railroad right of way, thence Southeast along
the center line of railroad right of way, three hundred sixty feet (360), more or less,
thence South one thousand sixty feet (1,060 ), more or less, to a point in the center of
the railroad tracks, thence in a southerly direction with said railroad tracks to 9 point
located at the intersection of said railroad track and a creek more particularly described
as being 110 feed East, more or less, and 30 feet South, more or less, of the NE corner of
the ITr1 1/4 of Section 21, T -16-N, R -30-W, thence South -70 feet, more or less, thence East
to the Southwest corner of Lot 6, Block 15, Ferguson's Addition, thence South to the South-
west corner of Lot 13, Block 17, Ferguson's Addition, thence East to the Southeast corner of
Lot 8, Block 6, Ferguson's Addition, thence North six hundred sixty feet (660), more of less,
thence East to the Southeast corner of Lot 6, Block 4, Ferguson's Addition, thence North
three hundred eighty (308) feet, more or less, thence East three hundred eighty (380) feet,
more or less, thence East eight hundred (800) feet, more or less, thence South twenty-six
hundred.forty (2640) feet, more or less, thence East eight hundred ten (810) feet, more or
less, thence North to the NW corner' of the NE 1/4 of the SI -11 hj1 of the NW 1/4 of Section
220 T -16-N, R -30-w, thence East to the point of beginning.
SECTION 2. That Resolution No. 27-66 be further amended by changing the estimated cost to prepare a
' General Neighborhood Renewal Plan to $94,8 5.00 instead of $551836.00.
SECTIOCNT 3: That all other provisions of Resolution No. 27-66 shall remain in full force and effect.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 6th day of February, 1967.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:4�
DON T R `l% .0, MAYOR
GEORGE -J .D' 15, CITY CL tK
Ordinance Cleft The City Mangger introduced and, at the request of the Directors, head a proposed ordinance in its
on first reading. entirety entitled, °A1•I GRDIArANCE REGULATING DANCE HALLS :;'HERE LIGHT WINES AND Fr R ARE SOLD, PROVIDING
FOR LICEdCPiG.THEREGF, AND IhiPGSIidG h .TAX, AND FOR OTE;1 R. PURPOSES."
A: loUg discussion was held, but no further action was taken at this time and the proposed ordinance was
left on its first reading.
Purchase of The City Manager reported that under authority given by the P.oard of Directors in the regular meeting on
gasoline, etc. Tuesday, January 3, 19672 he had caused a notice to be readvertised for bids on gasoling, Diesel Fuel and
Kerosene for the City vehicles and equipment through June 30, 1967.
He further reported that bids had been received•and tabulated and he recommended that the purchases be
made as follows:
Regular Gasoline Brom Cities Service 031 Company @ $ 0.199 per gallon.
Premium Gasoline " if it it It 0 $'0.221
Diesel Fues " Continental Oil Company @ $ 0.1075 "
Kerosene " Lion Oil Company ---- C $ 0.119.
Director IrcFcrran moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and purchase the gasoline,
' - diesel fuel, and kerosene as outlined above.
The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously.
Bids on COPY OF BID TABULATION
gas,diesel� fuel,
& kerosene Lion Mobil Cities Continental Stout Sundrgy Present
Oil Oil Service Oil Oil Ce. Petroleum ,DX Oil Prices
Approximately 8,500
gallons of Gasoline
per month
Regular per gal. $0.2042• i$0.2022 $0.199 $0.2015 $0.2073 $0.209 $0.2025
Premitm per gal. 0.2211 0.2260 0.221 4$0.2235 0.2372 0.239 0.2245
Approximately 1,000
gallons of Diesel Fuel
per month $0.71 $0.11$5 $0.112 $0,1075 $0.1245 ---- $0.1075
Approximately 100 gal-
lons of,Kerosene perN
month $0.119 $0.1275 $0.736 $0.129 $0.1295 ---- $0.1190
Contract fromw•February 1
to June 30,"1967.
Purchase ofd The City Manager �.eported that bids had been taken for the purchase of Tractor -Dozer for the Street Dept.
Tractor -Dozer and he recommended.the purchase of a Cat D-5 from E. A. Martin Machinery Co. for the total sum of
' • $31,231.66 less trade-in of $5,250.00 or a net cost to the City of $25,981.66,
Director Kerlin moved to accept the recommendation of the.City Manager and purchase a Tractor -Dozer from
E. A-. Martin Machinery Co. as outlined above.
The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously.
Bids on Tractor- COP`_' OF BID TABULATION
Dozer I I ANGLE DOZER -TRACK
See next page.
r\
�I
Bid Tabulation on Angle Doser-Track
Clark. E, A, E. A, Little
Equipment - Martin Martin Rock Road
Company Mach, Co. Mach. Co. Mach. Co.
t Diesel Powered, track
hydraulically operated
angle dozer with ripper
as per specifications $34,748,82 $29,988945 $31,231.66 $32,504.74
Trade of 1954 Cat D-4 6,529,86 5,250.005 ,250.00 6000.00
Net Cost 28 218.9 X24,738.45 $25,981,66 2 '504.74
Make and Model HD-1 T. Cat Cat TD -15B
Allis Chalmers D6 -B D-5 International
Terms Net Net Net Net
Delivery : --- 30 Days 40 Days 21 Days
e of *Includes Sales Tax
The City Manager reported that bids had been received for the purchase of a 20 cubic yard Packer for the
Sanitation Department and that he recommended the purchase of the low bid which was the one by Pak Mor of
Arkansas, Pak Mor Model H, 20 Cubic yds., Short Stroke. -for the sum of $4,197.25•
Director Kerlin moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and purchase the 20 cubic yard
Pak Mor Model H, Short Stroke, for $4,197.25 as outlined above.
The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously.
COPY OF BID TABULATION
on 20 CUBIC YARD PACKER
ALTERNATE
1
Moody
Dealers
PakMor
PakMor
8.00
operated garbage packer as per
Equipment
Truck
of
of
specifications with capacity including .
Model
Compares
Equipment Co.
Arkansas
Arkansas
1
Twenty Cubic Yard hydraulically
Duncan
Duncan
$4,197,25*
Terms 19 2%
operated garbage packer as per
5m
Make and Model SeaLl Press
Yak -Mor
60 Days
60 Days
specifications with capacity
Mark 20
Model E
50-50 divi
of revenue
independent of hopper
$4027.40
$4,575.26
$4086.83
$5,433.25
Delivery 2 Weeks
2 Weeks
per month
4._ _
chase
$4,511.28#
per month
Make and Model
Seal Press
Hyd-Pak
Pak -Mor
Pak -Mor
20 Cu. Yd.
ers
Mark 24
M-25
Model E
Reavi Loader
The City Manager reported that bids had been recieved for the of 500 parking meters
and he
24 Cu. Yd.
,purchase
recommended that the purchase be made from Duncan Parking Meter Corp.
Delivery
2 Weeks
30 Days
2 Weeks
Four hundred twnety-tyro hour meters of the Model !x`60 Duncan @t$60.35
less trade-in $6.00
or net cost of
*PakMor Model
Fifty ten-hour Model #50 Duncan (� $50.35 less $8.00 or a net cost of
$42.35.
H, 24 Cu. Yd:
ALTERNATE
500 Manually operated parking
meters as per specification $59.00
1
Twenty Cubic Yard hydraulically
$79.00
1 00
6.00
8.00
operated garbage packer as per
4$ 5.5054.354$
2.35
T73-00
specifications with capacity including .
Model
Model
Mi -Co
hopper.space. $3,968.96 ---
$30898.55
Duncan
Duncan
$4,197,25*
Terms 19 2%
5`:
5m
Make and Model SeaLl Press
Yak -Mor
60 Days
60 Days
30 Days
Mark 20
Model E
50-50 divi
of revenue
of revenue
20 Cu. Yd.
of revenue
3, $2,00 per meter
$1.50 per meter
Delivery 2 Weeks
2 Weeks
per month
4._ _
chase
of
per month
king
*PakMor Model H.
20 Cu. Yd.
ers
The City Manager reported that bids had been recieved for the of 500 parking meters
and he
,purchase
recommended that the purchase be made from Duncan Parking Meter Corp.
to be allocated as
follows:
Four hundred twnety-tyro hour meters of the Model !x`60 Duncan @t$60.35
less trade-in $6.00
or net cost of
$54.35. •Thirty ten-hour Model.00 Duncan @ $60.35 less.$6.00eor a net cost of $54.35. D
Fifty ten-hour Model #50 Duncan (� $50.35 less $8.00 or a net cost of
$42.35.
Director Melton moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and purchase the
Duncan Parking
Meters as outlined above.
The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed.unanimously.
.
s on
Parking
COPY OF BID TABULATION
ers
PARI;ING METERS
Hl'ancock Duncan
Duncan
Rockwell
Incustries Parking
Parking
Manutacturing
Inc. Meter Corp,
Meter
Corp.
Company
500 Manually operated parking
meters as per specification $59.00
$60.35
$50,00
$79.00
1 00
6.00
8.00
6,00
4$ 5.5054.354$
2.35
T73-00
Make and Model SL -801
Model
Model
Mi -Co
60
50
Duncan
Duncan
Terms 19 2%
5`:
5m
5%
30 Days
60 Days
60 Days
30 Days
2. 50-50 division
58-50 division
50-50 divi
of revenue
of revenue
of revenue
3, $2,00 per meter
$1.50 per meter
$1.50 per
per month
4._ _
per mol#h
Ityacss Kflvenues Over
1g6S it 16 iMonys
per month
# I
L�
1
1151
The City Manager further reported that bids had been received for the purchase of Dump Beds for the Street
Purchase of ept. and he recommended the purchase of four ten -twelve Cu. Yd. truck bodies to be installed on four Forc
Dump Beds 1 800 tendem trcuk chassis, from David Trailer.& equipment Co. Q $1,701.00%Model H-11 2774 Heil, and two
15-6 Cu. Yd. truck bodies to be installed on two9Eandem F-600 truck chassis, from Truck Equipment Company
$1,266.98, Model U-730 Gallion Custom.
Director Melton moved to purchase the six dump beds as outlined above.
The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed lunanimotisly.
Bids on Dump COPY OF BID TABULATION
Beds D•JMP BEDS
Davis Star Truck
Trailer & Body Equipment
Equip. Company Company
4 10-12 cu. yd. truck bodies as per
srecifications to be installed on
four Ford T-800 tandem truck chassis.$1,701.00 ---- $12827.22
Model H-11 U-6660
2744 Heil 50CUU66691lion
2 5-6 cu. yd, trgck bodies as per
specifications to -be installed
on four Ford T-800 tandem truck•
chassis $1,516.25 $1,462.00# $1,266.90
Model 1721 Custon Custom U-730
Heil Gallion Custom
[Delivery
erms Net Net Net
30 days, ---- 2-3 weeks
101% of manufacturers cost for Federal Excise included.
The City Manager introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a proposed resolution entitled,
"A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS INDICATING OPPOSITION TO THE PASSAGE OF S01ATE PILL 146."
IDirector Dunn moved that the resolution be adopted.
The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the
Resolution No.
The
adopted.
4-67
RESOLUTION N0, 4-67
RESOLUTION BY THE CITY FOARD CF DIRECTORS INDICATING OPPOSITION TO THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL 146.
.EAS, Senate Bill 146 has been introduced in the 1967 General Assembly which would make it mandatory
all fire departments in cities of over 15,000 population to have three platoons of firemen, each
oon observing shifts of 24 hours on -duty and 48 hours off-duty; and
AS, the passage of this bill would require the City of Fayetteville to eithbr reduce the level of
ce by having less men on duty during daylight hours or employ an additional 15 firemen to keep the
level of service as presently maintained during the daytime; and
lMiEREAS, a reduction of the level of service would endanger our attractive fire insurance rating and the
employment of 15 additional. -firemen would cost the City of Fayetteville over $60,000 additional annually;
WHEREAS, the State Legislature, as a part -of this Bill, is not providing any additional revenues for the
cities to carry out its terms, and, in:fa,ct,_such legislation is an infringment of local authority to
handle a purely local matter,:
[purely
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE FOARD CF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILiE, ARKANSAS:
E!CN 1: That this Board go on record as vigorously opposing the passage of Senate Bili 146 because of
tsgreat cost to the taxpayers of this city and because of its tendency to further erode lacal power ove.
local matters; and
2. That copies of this resolution be provided to all members of the Washington County Legislati
on and the Governor of the State.
ITTEST:
ASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1967.
APPROVED:
LLCA.M".
DOE,; TRUMBO, MAYOR
FORGE YIS, CITY CLERK
Payment f dues
to Municipal Director Melton moved to authorize the payment of the annual dues to the Arkansas Municipal League in
LeagueI amount•of $1,403.95. The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously.
Employ J. D. The City Manager reported that a petition to annex certain territories along Highway #16 West to and
McClelland for including the new Ozark Cooperative Center and they had requested that water rains be extended to that
extension of area. (He reported that the petition to annex had been approved by the County Court).
water mains After a brief discussion Director Melton moved to authorize the City Manager to employ Consulting
Engineer J. E. McClIlland to prepare plans and specifications for the extension of water mains along
Highway #16 West to the new Ozark Cooperative -Service Center.suSuch land to be annexed under the City
prior to the extension of said.water mains.
The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously.
i
There being no further business, Director Dunn moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director
Kerlin and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:
ATTEST*
DG11 TRUMB , MAY
GEORGE AVIS, CITY CLERK