Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-11-07 MinutesNo. 15: (Contii 1 from the Finance I Comm 91 Ordinance No. 1519 (Continued Ordinance was then read°for the third and last time. Acting Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" n roll call the following vote was recorded, "AYE" Kerlini;, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Y" None. re being six "AYES" and No "NAYS", the Acting Mayor declared the Ordinance 13assed, ORDINANCE N0, 1519 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0.-1517 OF DCTOBER 3, 1966s TO CORRECT THE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PROPERTY = ANNEXATION BY ORDINANCE NO. 1517. and . AS, through oversight certain of the descriptions of the properties shown on the annexation map, ved by the Planning Commission and the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, inadvertently omitted from Ordinance No. 1517, submitting the question of annexation to the Voters, EAS, it was the intention of the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to include property shown on said map in the proposed annexation, and to that end the Board of Directors has n wide circulation and publicity to reproductions of said map, and - it is the desire f the Board of Directors to amend Ordinance No. 1517 so as to conform the ons of the propert therein contained to the aforesaid map, in order to confirm.the Board's that all of the properties shown on said map be included in the proposed annexation area. , THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: 1. That Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1517 of October 3, 1966, be amended by adding thereto the g paragraphs and descriptions: "16. All of 1he.v,14tHalf (WJ) 6r Section 1.3 1, Township 16, North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal ! Meridian, except that portion of said lands within the present corporate limits of Fayetteville, Arkansas, _� - --.lyipe-- §RtF- nd-areaZ"of the'saidl-lzresent corporate limits line South of State Highway No. 16. 17: All of Sections 14; 15;'11i.18 -and 29 , Township 16 North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, except that portion of said lands within the present corporate limits of FAya+-teville, Arkansas." _. That Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1517 should be further amendAd and corrected by deleting from paragraph 119:' the word "30" between "Range" and "West" and adding "31".and deleting "Half(NE1/2)" after "Northeast" and adding "Quarter (NE 1/4)". so as to read: 11 9. All of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4), the South Half (S 1/2)of the�gortheast Quarter (NE J), the utheast Quarter,!.( SE•b)of the Northwest Quarter (NW Jy),^,,and the East Half (E �), of. ttye.Southwest Quarter (SW ) of: Township 16 North, Range 31 West, of the 59h Principal Meridian, except that portion of said lands presently within the corporate limits of Farmington, Arkansas." That Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1517 should be further amended and corrected by deleting "Southwest er (SW 1/4) following the word "Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4)"efntparagraph 15 and adding "Southeast er (SE 1/4)", so as to read: 1115. All of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4), the West Half (W 1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4)2 the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and the North Half (N 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 34, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, of the 5th Principal Meridian." SECTION 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, a publication, and the City Clerk is directed to publish this ordinance in the Northwest Arkansas each day of regular publication following the date of adoption until the date of election. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of October, 1966. " . APPROVED: �ATTEST: WSIA SWAZ, GEORGEW, DAVISo CITY CLERK being no further business, Director Melton moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director and passed unanimously, whereupon the Acting Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: , The Board -of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, November 7, 1966, in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M. Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox,6City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and Kerlin', Swabtz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. Absent: None. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, October 17, 1966, and of the special meeting on Wednesday, October 26, 1966; copies of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written, Mr. James N. Moore, of the M&dcipal Finance Advisory Committee , appeared before the Board of Directors and reported that the Municipal Finance Advisory Committee had, after a long study, recommended additions: Municipal Revenues from the following sources: 1. A levy of $3.00 Court Cost on each case in Municipal Court, 2. A Municipal Vehicle Tax of $5.00 on each motor vehicle in the City. 3. A City Occupation Tax. 4. An update of Utility Franchise Tax(provided this is permissible by the Public Service Commission. 5. Updating of tax assessments by employing professional Tax Appraisors. No further action was taken at this time. *a 92 The City Planning Consultant, James Vizzier, appeared before the Board of Directors and presented the petition of Basil and Betty Dunn to rezone certain property located o6 the Northwest corner of the intersection of Ashwood Avenue and Hendon Street, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE) ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 280 19622 TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT." Director Christie moved that the Ordinance pass. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and upon roll call the following vote was recorded: "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay" None. dinance There being seven "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. . 1520 ORDINANCE N0, 1520 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0, 1239, AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, AR APPROVED MAY 28, 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. I- WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the M7 Of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on October 25, 19.66, on the petition of Basil E. Dunn and Betty Jo Dunn requesting that the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property from R-2 Two -Family Residential District to R-3 Multi -Family Residential District, to -wit: Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20. in Block 3 in Meadowvale Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter(SW 1/4) c the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 20 in Township 16 North, Range 30 West, as per plat of sal Subdivision on file in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex -Officio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas.. • - • and ERREREAS, N6tice of, said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of hearing, and location of property, was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulati in said City, more than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and F, WHEREAS; following said public hearing, said Planning.Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, ArRansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above- described property from R-2 Two -Family Residential District to R-3 Multi -Family Residential District, After the first year of employment with the automatic salary increases, the top of the'range for each class can be reached in either of two methods or a combination.of the two. The trwo methods are through merit or through longevity. Exhibit B (Wage Plan - Merit Increases).provides for•five annual salary increases in each class of about 4% each. Under the merit increases, an employee could reach the top of range after six years of employment. Merit increases wbuld be given, upon recommendation of the individual's department head, and if funds are available to finance the increases. An employee rating system will be instituted, if found practicable. (Continued on next page) 1 F C NOW, THEREFORE,�BE IT. ORDASNED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the above-described property be and the same is hereby rezoned from R-2;Two=Family Residential District to R-3 Multi -Family Residential District, SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and afteritts passage, approval, and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of November, 1966. APPROVED: ATTEST: J ,, DON TRUMBO, MAYOR GEORGE AVIS, CITY CLERK 'etition to The Planning Consultant, James Vizzier, then presented the petition of Denver Samples to rezone certain tezone property located at tpeccorner of Lonnie and West Berry Street from R -LA to R-3 which had been approved Rejected and recommended by the Planning Commission. The City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a proposed ordinance in its enti: entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 12399 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYEfTEVI' ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 280 1962s TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-lA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT -IAL DISTR: TO R-3 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT". Before a vote was taken, Mr. Bill Martin appeared before the Board of Directors with a petition signed b; 96 property owners and residents of that area opposing this rezoning. He read the petition in full,outlining a number of reasons for the opposition to this property being rezoned ; also stating the reasons why they were not present at the public hearing on the petition to re After a brief discussion, Director Keflin moved to disapprove the recommendation of the Flaming Commis to rezone thepropertyof Denver Samples located at the corner of.Lonnie and West Berry Street as request The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. fags and The City Manager presented a Proposed Wage and Classification Plan for the City Employees which was aprei ,lassificat- on the minutes and read as follows, to -wit: .onl Plan for 0itq The proposed plan establishes twelve classes in which all city jobs are placed, based upon skills and Iployees education required, authority and responsibility of the jobs and also somewhat upon the present relative positions in the scale. Exhibit D gives a breakdown of all city jobs and the class in which they are placed based uponthe above c`riieria'(Classification Plan). Exhibit A is the General Wage Plan which indicates the starting salary for all•Classes, and automatic 6 months and 12 months salary increases for each class (probationary period) and the top salary scale and longevity plan. The lowest beginning salary for city jobs whuld be raised from $1.25 per hour to $1.38 per hour with automatic salary increase to $1.50 per hour after one year of service. This should put us in a good competitive positions to obta. the laboring class employees which are now so difficult to recruit and retain. After the first year of employment with the automatic salary increases, the top of the'range for each class can be reached in either of two methods or a combination.of the two. The trwo methods are through merit or through longevity. Exhibit B (Wage Plan - Merit Increases).provides for•five annual salary increases in each class of about 4% each. Under the merit increases, an employee could reach the top of range after six years of employment. Merit increases wbuld be given, upon recommendation of the individual's department head, and if funds are available to finance the increases. An employee rating system will be instituted, if found practicable. (Continued on next page) 1 F C NL Exhibit C (Wage.Plan — Seniority Increases) provides for approximate 1% salary increases annually for the employee lf;i;he remains on the job. This would mean that an employee could reach the top of range after 21 years of employmant. This plan would essentially replace the present longevity increases. It would in effect, more than double the present longevity increases provided-. For instance, a $280 per month employee would realize the following under the old and new longevity system -5 years of employment $290 old, $295 new; 10 years.of employment $295 old, 310 new; 15 years of employment $300 old, $325 new; 20 years of employment $305 old and $340 new. This would be similar for all classes and salary ranges. After a brief discussion, Director Melton moved to approve the proposed Wage and Classification Plan as recommended by the City Manager. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. EXHIBIT.A a - WAQE PLAN General © $240 I l 250 260 270 280 310 325 335 350 375 390 A K7 ME 1310 QNS Ton of Range $315 330 340 350 365 395 410 425 " 445 470 485 E $315 330 340 350 365 395 410 425 445 470 93 6 Months' 12 Months Class I $250 $260 Class II 260 270 Class III 270 280 Class IV 280 290 Class V 290 300 Class VI 320 330 Class VII 335 345 Class VIII 345 355 Class IX 360 370 Class X 385 395 ClAas XI 400 -_ 410 Class XII To Be Determined By City Manager and City Board EXHIBIT B WAGE PLAN Merit Increases B C D Class I $280 X90 $300 Class Il 290 300 315 Class III 300 310 325 Class IV 310 320 335 Class V 320 335 3504 Class VI 350 35 380 Class VII 365 380 395 Class VIII 380 395 410 Class IX 395 410 425 Class & 420 435 450 Ton of Range $315 330 340 350 365 395 410 425 " 445 470 485 E $315 330 340 350 365 395 410 425 445 470 93 Class XI A B C D E 421 486 491 401 490 Claes XII ' To Be Determined by City Manager and City Board. 4 4A ri WAGE PLAN RANGES = SENIORITY INCREASES 10 1 YEARS 0 /0 Exhibit C t 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17• 18 1 19 21 Class I 262 1264 266 268 2701 273 276 279 282 285 288 291 294 2 30 306 0912 Class 2 297 300 303 3Q6_ 309 3J.L 315 An _ 321, 12L 32Z 3M Class III 283 86 289 292 295 298 301 304 3071111 116 119 3 Class I9 2 2 02 0 08 11 1 i -Clus V 3-03 30912 1115 1118 321 1'32LL 1127 110 Non #A'AA 1040 104).9 1 11, 4 1110 191 UK Class VI f _ 369 372 0479 178 181 184 387 390 391L 19EI,2Class VIII 199 Al 141, IA7 17n q71 I 17A 170 200 ligg igo i Goa 1,20PY I ).no ).1i 06 ' a ._Class IX 371 176 047() 0492 325. 199 M1 OAQ7 )-n, tag 409 41317 421 425 4291 C sa X 8 1 0 0 434 438 442 446 450 454 458 62 66 74 Class XI 1 6 449 453 457 461 ,465 489 473 77 St 85 EXHIBIT D Classification Plan , Class I Class IV Class VIII Laborer, Class I Light Equipment Operator Police Corporal Clerk Typist Class I Relief Tender Truck Operator Fire Captain Cashier Water Plant Operator Garage Foreman Accounts Receivable Clerk Crew Foreman I PBX Operator Planning Administrator Class IX Secretary Mechanic Police Sargeant Claes II Meter Foreman , Class V Assistant Street Supt. Laborer Class II Assistant Sanitation Supt, Cl9rk Typist Class II Heavy Equipment Operator Billing Clerk Tender Truck Operator Animal Control Officer Plant Foreman Class X Sweeper Operator Crew Foreman II Mechanics' Melper Services.Clerk Assistant Fire Chief Train Driver "` Transmission & Distribution Class VI Foreman Class III Equipment & Maintenance Assistant Plumbing Inspector Foreman Truck Driver Parking Meter Repairman Lead Train Driver Storekeeper Class XI Incinerator Operator Crew Foreman III Matron -Records Clerk Assistant Police Chief Cashier6Licenser Electrical Inspector Bookkeeper - PBX Class VII Plumbing Inspector Building Custodian Meter Reader- Police Patrolman Class XIII Dock Operator Fireman Meter Repairman All department heads and Disposal Plant Operator unclassified personnel - 1 -mqq 95 The City Manager reported that bids had been received for the lease of approximately 150 acres of land Bids on Land Lease; owned by the City*for'the Sewage Disposal Plant and he recommended that the bid by Turner Brown(No. 1) Authorize Lease be accepted for the lump sum of $821.00 per year for a five year lease. agreement. After a brief discuAsion, Director McFerran moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and lease the'unused property of approximately 150 acres located at the New Sewage Disposal Plant to ' Turner Brown,on his No. 1 bid, for the sum of $821.00 per year for a five year lease,and that the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to execute the contract. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. Lease Bids LEASE OF CITY LAND BID # 14 Lease of approximately 150 acres Bidder Lump Sum per year of land owned by the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, for Doyne Hamm $705.00 Sewage Disposal Plant, Norman Murphy 251.00 Turner Brown #1 821.00 Turner Brown #2 1126.50 * *If given an option to renew lease at end of five year period for an additional Neil Rubles 800.00 five years, same terms, same'pribce. Purchase of two radios for The City Manager reported that bids had been received for two$ Two -Way Radios for the ambulances and he ambulandes recommended the bid by Motorola C & E for the sum of $854.00 plus $30.00 for installation. He further reported that this was not the low bid but it more nearly met all the specifications than any other -bids and would have better servicing and installation. Director Dunn then moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and purchase two (2) Two Way Radios from Motorola C & E for the sum of $854.00 plus $30.00 for installation and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to complete the transaction. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. Bids on Radios BIDS FOR MOBILE RADIOS FOR AMBULANCE SERVICE Two (2) Mobile Radios, Bidder Bid Price Installation Motorola•Motrac, 110 Watt, two channel transistorized unit Motorola C & E $854.00 $30.00 Motr*c or equal General Electric 716.10 30.00 G.E. W',76 TCS 66, Mastr Progress* R. C. A. 729.00 35.00 RCA, CMCA 7 -MBH, Super Carfone** * General Electric unit -does not meet specifications in (1) an 80 watt output instead of 110 watts; and (2) Three tubes in transmitter instead of two tubes. Out-of-town servicing and installation. ** R.C.A. Unit does not meet specifications in: (1) An output of 100 watts instead of 110 watts; and (2) Four tubes in parallel instead of two tubes. Out-of-town servicing and installation. Reject Bids for „ Animal Shelters iThe•City Manager repotted that bids had been received *on'the'construction of buildings for animal shelter according to plans and specifications prepared by Architect Warren Segrabes and he recommended that all bids be rejected since these bids were too expensive for the City at this time, and to instruct IMr. Segraves to prepare plans and specifications for less expensive buildings. After a brief discussion, Director Melton moved to reject all bids on the construction of buildings for !animal shelter and to instruct Mr. Warren Segraves to prepare plans and specifications for cheaper buildings. Director Melton further moved that the City Manager be authorized to discuss with the veterinarians the possibility of their providing quarters for impounding -on a fee basis. IThe motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The City Manager read a proposed Ordinance to its entirety entitled, "AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 6-68 and 6-69 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; ARKANSAS, AND ADOPTING SECTIONS ' 1104.5 AND 104.7 OF THE NATIONAL BUILDING CODE (1955 EDITION)." r ;Director Dunn moved that"the"Ordinaiice.pasa; .i"'`.n •; :f;;l•11. n:1;?. J n.:i.: n fn r 1 o vnr; �n a nn.. '1 �1 0. °r' n•.n re The motion was'"seconded=bjl2Director Sxartz and Upon roll Ball the fo7ilowin vote was recorded:: "AYE" i i 1 .r...I •. c4 :, .1 Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, ehristie; 'Melton; TiIabo; and Dunn: ilgfth-None. There being seven "AYES" and No "NAYS°, the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. Director Christie moved that the Emergency Clause be adopted, The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and upon roll call the following vote was recorded: 11AYE11 Ordinance No. Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dumm. 11NAY" None. 1521 There being seven 11ATES11 and NO °NAYS11, the Mayor declared the Emergency Clause adopted.' ORDINANCE N0. 1521 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 6-68 and 6-69 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,•'�• • ARKANSAS,AND ADOPTING SECTIONS 104.5 AND 104.7 OF THE NATIONAL BUILDING CODE (1965 EDITION). WHEREAS, on December 17, 1956, the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, adopted as a part of its ordinances the National Building Code (1955 Edition) as recommended by the National Board of Fire Underwriters, and said code with'certairi amendments and deletions now appears as Sections 6-34 through 6-91 of the Fayetteville Dode of Ordinances, aid WHEREAS, at the time of the adoption of the National Building Code, Sections 104.5 -and 104.7 of the Natiol Building Code whre expressly deleted by the provisions of the adopting ordinance, and the sections I for such deletions now appear as Sections 6-68 and 6-69 of the Fayetteville Code of Ordinances, and WHEREAS, said deleted sections authorize the building official (inspector) to undertake at.the City's I xpense certain emergency work where there is immediate danger of the failure of collapse of a building ' so as to endanger life or property, and authorise recovery of the costs of such work by proper action against the property owner, and WHEREAS, such an'-emerg€ncy'';ha's:-receritlIF'occurred from which it appears to ,the Board of Direptors that the eleted provisions should' be'adop>sed`for'fie protection of the public. •i 1.1 n ria n . i •'n `aF 1� .: 1 ..i • ,? NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: i 96 Brdinance SECTION 1. That Sections 6-68 and 6-69 of the Fayetteville Code of Ordinances are hereby repealed. No. 1521 (Cont). SECTION 2. That Sections 104.5 and 104.7 of the National Building Code (1955 Edition), as the same are 'I hereinafter fully set forth, are hereby adopted and made a part of the ordinances of the City of Fayetteville Arkansas: "Section 104.5 Emergency Work. In case there shall be, in the opinion of the building official, actual and immediate danger of failure or collapse of a building or structure or portion thereof so as to endanger life or property, the building official shall obtain the necessary funds from the City treasury, purchase such material and employ such labor and cause the necessary work to be done to render said building or structure or portion thereof, temporarily safe, whether the procedure prescribed in this,section shas been instituted or not." "Section 104.7 Recovery of Costs. • The corporation counsel shall institute proper,actions against the woner of premises for the recovery of costs incurred by the building official in the performance of emergency work." SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy ofthis ordinance to the publishers of the Fayetteville Code of Ordinances for inclusion in the next quarterly supplement to said code. SECTION 4. That this ordinance being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall be -in full force and effect foom and after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of November, 1966. ATT APPROVED: / D� i • q 4 140�/Lr/ �/ -DON TRMIB02 JR., MAYOR GORGE J AV , CITY CLERK There being no further business, Director McFerran moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: ATTEST: DON TRUMBO, JR., MAYOR GEORGE go D CITY CLERK The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville. Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, November 1966; at 7:30 P. M. in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building. Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kincaid, and Directo: Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. Absent: None. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, November 7, 1966, a copy of which had previously been m Loan to each of the Directors, were approved as written. ed The City Manager read a letter from the Fayetteville Youth Center with reference to the City's contri to the Youth Center for the year of 1967. They requested the sum of*$6,000.00. A long discussion was held but no action was taken -at this time. The City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a proposed ordinance in its ent entitled, "AN ORDINANCE ORDERING THE REMOVAL AND RAZING OF A BUILDING LOCATED AT 701NN0. COLLEGE AVENUE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, AA.KANSAS', AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES". After a long discussion, Director Christie moved that the Ordinance pass. The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and upon roll call the following vote was recorded: "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn, "Nays None. There being Seven "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. Director Christie then moved that the emergency clause be adopted. The motion was seconded by Director Melton and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton,Chris Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay" None. There being Seven "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the emergency clause adopted. 1522 1 ORDINANCE N0, 1522 ORDINANCE ORDERING THE REMOVAL AND RAZING OF A BUILDING LOCATED AT 701 N0. COLLEGE AVENUE IN THE CITY FAYET TEVILT.E, ARKANSAS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the owner of a tract of real estate located at 701 North College Avenue, in the City of Faye Arkansas, has allowed a structure situated thereon to become run-down, dilapidated, unsafe, unsightly 8angerous, obnoxious, unsanitary and detrimental to the public welfare of the citizens of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and AS, the condition of such building constitutes a serious fire and health hazard, and hazard to the c safety, and unless immediate action is taken to remedy this situation, there is great likelihood the surrounding property will be damaged or destroyed by fire originating from such unsafe and dous structure, and that life and property will be harmed and lost by the collapse and fall of ons of said structure, and through unsanitary conditions existing there. , THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: I. That J. B. Randolph is the vener of the following described real estate and the said owner is ordered to remove and raze the building or structure Row standing upon said real estate within (30) days fro* the•effective date of this ordinance. P 1 fl