Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-08-01 MinutesApproved bu for Region& Commission for 1966 J Authorized 47 Planning City Manager reported that the Regional Planning Commission had adopted a budget for the remainder Director Melton moved that the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to exercise the options IThe of the fiscal year of 1966, and that Fayetteville's share would be $3,650.00 and he recommended this be AAggrreement with o,,,...,, o... Director Melton moved to approve the budget for the Regional Planning Commission as recommended and to authorize the payment of $30650.00 by the City of Fayetteville for the remainder of 1966. QDec. 31, 1966) The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. The City Manager reported that the FAA had requested a Supplemental Agreement in lieu of the original' Agreement dated March 22, 1962. Director McFerran moved that the City Amager and. -City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized to execute a Supplemental Agreement with the Federal Aviation Agency modifyiAg the original lease Agreement dated March 22, 1962. The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. Authorizedpiu chase The City Manager reported that some of the optionstfor right-of-way for Highway No. 16 Bypass would of real estate for expire soon unless the City exercised the options and purchased this real estate. Highway 16 Bypass Director Melton moved that the City Manager be and he is hereby authorized to exercise the options ' Ordinance obtained andtparehase the real estate for the right-of-way for Arkansas State Highway No. 16 Bypass upon the approval of the Abstract of Title by the City Attorney. The motion was seconded by 8irector McFerran and passed unanimously. Indefilitely. Discussion Attorneys Md Davis appeared before the Board of Directors in behalf of Duane Nelson, who had made an for new cemetery. application for a Permit.fbomathe Arkansas State Cemebery Board for a cemetery to be located on the Borth side of the City of Fayetteville. k Attorney Davie stated that he and Mr. Nelson had tried in every way to follow the Arkansas Statute in making this application. He read the Statute with beference to this and explained thdr'••'�procedure. Attorney Tom Pearson appeared beforetthe Board of Directore, representing the Fairview Memorial Gardens in opposition•to the increased speed along this road. I • Inc., and opposed a new cemetery. Authorized Mayor He requested that the Board of Directors rescind the action of the City Manager and Mayor An signing to write lbbter a letter of recommendation to the State Cemetery Board for this new cemetery.. to Cemetery A long discussion followed as to whether or not the Mayor had the authority to sign this letter without Board the expressed authority from the Board of Directors. Director•Christie moved that the Mayor be requested to write a letter to the State Cemetery Board There being Six "Ayes", No "Nays", with only one abstaining, the Mayor declared the motion passed. stating that he wished to withdraw his signature from the letter of recommendation dated June 21, 1966, on and bearing the signatures of Gerald Fox, City Manager and Don Trumbo, Mayor, because it was an,. First Reading Administrative Function and the City Manager, only would sign the letter.. entitled, "AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE'BUSINESS OF TRANSPORTING PERSONS WITHIN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE BY The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. . e being no further business, Director Melton moved to adjourn. motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously, i ddjourned. APPROVED PION TRU O, .., MAYOR vc•vnvn V+�s rJ via l ..,.ca n whereupon the Mayoo declared the The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, August 1, 1966, in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building at 7:30 P. M. Present: City Manager Gerald G. Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, and Directors: Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. Absent: City Attorney Hugh Kincaid. , The minutes of the Special Meeting on Tuesday, July 12, 1966, and of the Regular Meeting on Monday, July Proposed 1966, copies of which had previously been mailed to each of the Directors, were approved as written. ' Ordinance TabledThe proposed ordinance entitled,"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 19-68 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE Cr Indefilitely. OF FAYEPTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, TO INCREASE THE SPEED LIMIT ON OLD WIRE ROAD TO 35 MILES PER -HOUR" was again brought up for discussion. This ordinance was left on the first reading at the last regular meeting of th Board of Directors on Monday, July 18, 1966. Dr. Spencer Albright III presented a petition signed by several property -owners and residents of that are in opposition•to the increased speed along this road. I • After a long discussion, Director Dunn moved that the -proposed ordinance be tabled indefinitely. The motion was seconded by Director Melton and upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Kerlin, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Christie, and Dunn. "Nay" None. "Abstaining" Trumbo. There being Six "Ayes", No "Nays", with only one abstaining, the Mayor declared the motion passed. Ordinance left on The City Manager introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a proposed Oridnance in its entire First Reading entitled, "AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE'BUSINESS OF TRANSPORTING PERSONS WITHIN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE BY (Ambulance) MOTOR AMBULANCE FOR COMPENSATION TO BE A NECESSARY PUBLIC SERVICE UTILITY SUBJECT TO REGULATION BY THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF AMBULANCE SERVICE OPERATORS AND DRIVERS; PROVIDING FOR REGULATIONS ON OPERATING AMBULANCES; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF RATE SCHEDULES; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; AND FOR CTHERPBURPOSES. No further action was taken at this time and the ordinance was left -on the first reading. Mobile Home Ord. • left on second The MOBILE HOME Ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE DEFINING AND REGULATING MOBILE PARKS; ESTABLISHING Reading. MINIMUM STANDARDS GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF MOBILE HOME PARKS; ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS GOVERNING THE PROVIDED UTILITIES AND•FACILITIES, AND OTHER PHYSICAL THINGS AND CONDITIONS TO MAKE MOBILE HOME PARKS SAFE, SANITARY, AND FIT FOR HAMAN HABITATION; FIXING THE RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF 0WNERS AND OPERATORS OF MOBILE HOME PARKS; AUTHORIZING INSPECTION OF MOBILE HOME PARKS; AND FIXING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; AS AMENDED," which was left on the first reading at the last regular meeting of the Directors on Monday, July 18, 1966, again came up for discussion. Several amendments had been added to the proposed ofdinance and after a long discussion Director Christie moved that the ordinance be placed on the second reading. The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The ordinance was then read for the second time. Another long discussion followed but no further action was taken at this time and the ordinance was left on the second reading. , Ordinance Left on let Reading.The City Manager introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a proposed ordinance in its entire Ifor the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 15-259 FAYETTEVILLE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PR FOR THE USE OF CERTAIN PLASTIC WATER PIPING IN LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS WHERE AN APPROVED VACUUM BREAKER IS ,No further action was taken at thka time and the ordinance was left on the first reading. of urchas• of treat signs & posts. 0 of on e Trucks 0 ie City Manager reported that he had authorized the Sanitation Superintendent to start an additional nig vch beginning during the week of July 25 at the cost of about $1,500 for salary and benefits during the rAinder of 1966 for one additional man and that he and further authorized the Sanitation Superintendent put a new train crew with two additional men to work on a seventh train route beginning duting the ek of August tat. Additional salary and benefit costs for the remainder of 1966 would by about $2.800 would also like authorization to order one (1) pick-up truck and three trains to equip the new crew at ist of $49500. (The City Manager outlined a complete picture of the Sanitation Department in 9IINISTRATIVE MEMO #15). .rector Kerlin moved to approve the action of the City Manager as outlined above. s motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. City Manager reported that bids had been recieved on street signs and posts and the low bidder was ;ent Sowell Inc., except two items on. which Vulcan Materials Company was the low bidder and he recourse , all signs and posts be purchased as outlined in their bids. ictor McFerran moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and purchase all signs and posts i Sargent Sowell Inc. and Vulcan Materials Company according to their bids. motion was seconded by Director Milton and passed unanimously. City Manager reported that bids had been recieved on the sale of nine garbage trucks, but only one aany had bid on all the trucks. This was the Refuse Equipment and Supply Company who bid $3,500.00 the nine trucks and he recommended the sale of the trucks for that amount. etor Keflin moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and sell the nine garbage trucks t Refuse Equipment and Supply Company for the sum of $33,500.00. motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. Bid Tabulation dor the sale of garbage trucks reads as follows: Above Units are Mostly Junk and Unoperable $12000.00 No. BID TABULSTION Refuse Sale of Following Trucks Equipment Gene and Packer Units and SuPOY Price No. 1 1960 International No. 2 1957 Ford No --3 1960 International No. 5 1957 Ford No. $ 19$5 International No. 8 1960, International No. 10 1.956 Ford Above Units are Mostly Junk and Unoperable $12000.00 No. 6 1961 Dodge $275.00 No.. 9 1963 International 2,500.00 3.75.00 Above are Operable Units The City Manager reported that about three years ago the city began a street light improvement program in conjunction with Southwestern Electric. Part of the over-all program has been completed and part has not. The City Manager further reported that he had reviewed the present street lighting system and the proposed system for upddting it -and he recommended that the City Board authorize Southwestern Power Company to prepare a work program in order to accomplish the foll&wing street light improvements at the earliest possible date. A. In residential areas, replace all existing 1,000 lumen and 4,000 lumen incandescent street lights with 4,000 lumen mercury vapor fixtures. There are approximately 105 1,000 lumens incandescent streetlifghle and 270 4,000 lumen incandescent street lights presently in use. Rater are $1.00 per month for the 1,000 lumen and $1.65 per month for'the 4,000 lumen incandescent. The 4,000 lumen mercury vapor carry a $1.40 per morith rate. Peplace all existing 1,000 lumen and 4,000 lumen incandescent street lights with 89000 lumen mercury vapor lights on the following streets and locations (primary streets.) 1. Lafayette from College to Arkansas 2. Arkansas from Dickson to Maple 3. Maple from College to Lindell 4. North Street from Missi on to Garland 5. Leverett from Maple to Kelly 6. Gregg from North Street to Township 7. 15th Street from Gollege to Brooks Be College from Yell Blvd. to 15th St. 9. 6th Street from School to Willow 10. Willow from 6th to Huntsville Road 11. Assembly.from Mission to Skyline 12. Rockwood from Mission to Crest . 13. Old Wire Rd. from Mission to Township 14. Ash from Rayview to Old Wire Road 15. Township from College to Old Wire Rd. 16. Center-California.Blvd,-Florida and Stone beginning at Center and Church; ending at Stone and Hill 17. School St. from Yell Blvd. to Dickson 18. Cleveland and Sang from Garland to Wedington The rust of the 8,000 lumen mercury vapor is $1.65 per month. There are about 45 1,000 lumen and 100 4,000 lumen incandescent. B. Replace or remove 19000 lumen incandescent street lights in downtown alleys with 2,800 lumen mercury vapor where necessary. Cost of the 2,800 lumen mercury vapor is the same same as the 1,000 lumen incandescent or $1.00 per month. There are 20 of these lights. C. Install 8,000 lumen mercury vapor lights on Huntsville Road: 1. One 500 feet east of Wood Avenue 2. Four lights between Morningside Drive and the edge of your jurisdiction evenly spaced. These are all new inshailations. . :, m e D. Install 20,000 lumen mercury vapor lights on existing poles with long mast arms on Highwas 71 North at: 1. Intersections of Rolling Hills Drive, Milleap Road and Stearnes Road, 2. Four (4) Between Township Road and Rolling Hills Drive spaced about 800 ' feet -apart. Cost of the 20,000 lumen mercury vapor is $3.75 per month on wooden poles. E. Install 20,000 lumen mercury vapor lights on existing poles with long mast arms on Highway 71 South at: 1. Intersections of Bailey Drive and Sunrise Mountain Road. 2. In fromt of EPC of Arkansas Plant F. Provide a lighting plan to more adequately light "Clay Yoe Hill" and other developments to the west and south. Also, a plan for Maplecrest Addition and the additions south of Ash (part of Whiskey Flats) G. Install 8,000 lumen mercury vapor on Popular and Easy, Birch, Chestnut -ant Leverett; On Leverett at Davis and Bel Air Drive; on O1dWire Road at Broadview: Slmwood and Overcrest. also recommended that Ozark Reral Electric Cooperative be authorized to proceed with the following vat light improvements. A. Install 8,000 lumen Mercury vapor lights on Huntsville Road with long mast arms at: Approved Street Light 1. Intersections of Happy Hallow Road, Ray Avenue, Jerry Avenue and Buckner Braden Improvement Program Road, 2. One about 600 feet west of Happy Hallow Road 3. One about 500 feet west of Buckner Braden ' B. Install 8,000 lumen mercury vapor lights on Township Road at: 1. Intersection of Austin Drive 2. 500 feet east of Austin Drive C. Install 4,000 lumen mercury vapor lights on Rolling Hills Drive: 1. At intersections of Oaks Manor Drive and Sheryl Avenue 2. Between Oaks Manor Drive and Sheryl Avenue Pilton moved to approve the street lightiA*g1&JmgvimpnbvWhbm as recommended by the City ecl-. • motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. There'being no further business Director Dunn moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director Christie and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVE . ATTEST: / I�J AA �2t DON TR 0, , MA GEORGE JW UVISO CITY CLERK Special Meeting The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas met in special session at its regular ' meeting place in Fayetteville, Arkansas at 7:30 o'clock p.m., on the 8th day of August,.1966. The following were present: Mayor Don Trumbo; City Clerk George J. Davis; and Directors Sylvia Swartz, Joe McFerran, Garland Melton, and Dale Dunn. Absent: Directors James T. Kerlineand Arnold Christie. Purpose of Meeting OrdinancelNo. 1508 The Mayor stated that consideration should be given to an ordinance providing for the issuance of Waterworks and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1966, and providing for the financing of the cost of constructing improvements to the Waterworks and Sewer System of the City, and other related matters. This was a matter with which the Board of Directors was familiar and after a discussion, Director Melton introduced an ordinance entitled:"AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WATERWORKS AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 19669 BY THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE COST TO THE CITY OF CONSTRUCTING EXTENSIONS, BETTERMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WATERWORKS AND SEWER SYSTEM OF THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THE BONDS, PRESCRIBING OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY" and the City Clerk read the ordinance in full. Director Melton, seconded by Director Swartz moved that the rule requiring the reading of an ordinance or resolution in full on three different days be suspended and that the ordinance be placed on its second reading. The Mayor put the question on the adoption, of the motion and the roll being called, the -following voted Aye: Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Trumbo, Bunn, and the following voted May: None. Thereupon the Mayor declared that At least two-thirds of all members of the Beard having voted in favor of the motion to suspend the ruld, the motion was carried and the rule suspended. The ordinance was•then read by the City Clerk, Director Melton, seconded by Director Swartz, then moved that the rule requiring the reading. of an ordinance in full on three different days be further suspended and that the ordinance be placed on ' its third reading. The Mayor put the question on the adoption of the motion and the roll being called the following voted Aye: Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Trumbo, Dunn, and the following voted Nay: None. The.Mayor declared that at least two-thirds of all members elected to the Board having voted in favor of the motion to suspend the rale, the motion was carried and the rule suspended. The ordinance was then read by the City Clerk. Director Melton, seconded by Director McFerran, then moved that the ordinance be adopted. The question was put by the Mayor on the adoption of the motion and the roll being called, the following voted Aye: Swartz, McFerran, Melton, Trumbo, Dunn, and the following voted Nay: None.