Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-06-20 MinutesFinancing right-of=Qi rector Melton moved to finance the right-of-way project for highway No. 16 bypass by closing out way for Hi ay 16 t ee general fund contingency and by borrowing the balance to be paid •from i mill capital improvements Bypass 1 vy along with, or after borrowing for airport extensions. I he motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. There being no further business, Director Swartz moved to adjourn. rhe motion was seconded by Director Christie and passed unanimously, whereupon the mayor declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: ATTEST:�Y� RE^ DOId TRiiMT30, JR, I�;A'- GEO E J ,)AVIS, CITY CLERK Ordinance 1501 . u The Board of Directors of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, June 20, 1966, at 7:30 P. M. in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building, Present: City Manager Gerald Fox, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney hugh Kincaid, and Directors: Swartz, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. Absent: Directors:Kerlin and McFerran. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, June 6, 1966, and of the special meeting on Monday, June 13 1966, copies of which had previously been mailed to each of the DirectoEs, were approved as written. The City Attorney introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1239, PASSED AND APPROVED JUNE 13, 1960, AS A:1211) BY ORDINANCES N0. 1284 and NO. 1425, TO PERMIT MORTUARIES AND MEMORIAL GARDENS (CEMETERIES) WITHIN A-1 ANNEXED TERRITORY DISTRICT AND 0-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT". Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the ordinance be placed on its second reading The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, Director Christie movedtihit the rule`be further suspended and the Ordinance placed on the third and final reading. The'motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Swartz, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay" None. There being five "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 1501 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0, 12390 PASSED AND APPROVED JUNE 13, 1960, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCES NO. 4 and N0. 1425, TO PERMIT MORTUARIES AND MEMORIAL GARDENS (CEMETERIES) WITHIN A-1 ANNEDED TERRITORY TRICT AND Q-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, nsas, on June 1, 1966, for the purpose of considering amendment of Zoning Ordinance No. 1239, passed approved June 13, 19600 as amended by Ordinance No. 1284, passed and approved January 22, 1962, and nance No. 1425, passed and approved November 23, 1964, in order to permit establishment of,mortuaries memorial gardens (cemeteries) within A-1 Annexed Territory District and 0-1 Open Land District, and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said ing was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said City, than 15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, and further consideration and study of said proposed amendmenI ts June 14, 1966s said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville.1 :ansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted, amending as hereinafter set out Articib IV, and ltion 5 of Ordinance 1239, as amended by Ordinance No. 1425, and Article V, Section 14 of Ordinance 1239, amended by Ordinance No. 1284. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That Article IV, Section 5 of Ordinance No. 1239, as amended by Ordinance No. 1425, be adding subparagraph "i." to paragraphe 1, as follows: 1. Uses Permitted X X X X i. Mortuaries and memorial gardens (cemeteries),( SECTION 2. That Article V, Section 14 of Ordinance No. 1239, as amended by Ordinance No. 1284, be adding subparagraph "h" to paragraph 1, as follows: 1. Uses Permitted H. Mortuaries and memorial gardens (cemeteries). section 3& That Article Vp Section 14 of Ordinance 1239, as amended by Ordinance No. 1284, be further sadding ing subparagraph d to paragraph 3, as follows: 3. Area and Bulk Regulations yr A Y yr d. Uses involving public assembly and other nonresidential uses.. Minimum Lot Area 1 acre Minimum Front Yard 35 feet Minimum Rear Yard 50 feet Minimum Side Yard 50 feet SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause the amendments hereby ipted to be incorporated and published in the supplements to Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances, City Fayetteville, Arkansas, SECTION 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith shall be and the same are hereby oyp( 1502. repealed, and this ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of June 1966. APPROVED: • e+a iZAVISs CITY CLERK The City Attorney then introduced and, at the request of the Directors, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 282.19623 AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-lA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO 0-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT". Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the second reading. the motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the second time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no further discussion, Director Swartz moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final r The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass"? Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Swartz, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay"N There being five "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE N0. 1502. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS APPROVED MAY 280 1962, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -]A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DIST TO 0-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT.. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on June 14, 1966, on the petition of Clay Yoe and Wanda Yoe, requesting that said Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the Board of Directors efiactrl•an ordinance rezoning the following described property, presently zoned R -LA Single Family Residential District, to )-1 Open Land District, to -wit: The Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 12, and the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 1, and all that part of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 1, lying South of Hifhway No. 45 East, all in Township 16 North of Range 30 West. . WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes of said hearing and location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation in said city, more than_15 days prior to said public hearing, and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its redommendition that an ordinance be adopted rezoning only the following described portion of said property from R-lA Single Family Residential District to )-1 Open Land District; to -wit: The Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 1 and all that part of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter ( SW 1/4) of Section 1 lying South of Highway 45 East, all in Township 16 North of Range 30 West. That said Planning Commission further recommended that the remainder of said property remain zoned R -1A Single Family Residential District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the follwoing described property, which is presently zoned R- IA Single Family Residential District, be and the same hereby is rezoned to 0-1 Open Land District, to -wit: The Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4Y of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 1, and all that part of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/0' of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 1, lying South of Highway 45 East, all in Township 16 North of Range 30 West, SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this ordinance shall be in full force and of effect from and after its passage, approval and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of June 1966. APPROVED: e! DON TRUNBO, JR., MAYOR ATTEST: GEORG J. MAVIS3 ITY CLERK Hearing The Mayor reported that this was the date, time, and place set for a public hearing on the petition of Earl R. Garrison and Norma L. Garrison, husband and wife, to vacate and ab6ndon two alleys in the Mountain View Addition in w to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, The City Clerk reported that he had caused a notice of the public hearing setting forth the date, time, place* and purpose to be publiShed in the Northwest Arkansas Timetl, a daily newspaper published in Washington County . Arkansas, and having a general circulation in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, once a week for two con6ecutive weeks; also that he had caused an Abstractor's Certificate showing the owners of Record of all the real estate abutting upon said alleys,and that he had received A lettter from each of the utility companies stating they had no objection to the said alleys being vacated and abjndoned.. r Public hearing ' The public hearing was held and, there b6ing no objections, the City Attorney introduced and, at the reque Phe Directors, read a proposed ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE VACATII CERTAIN ALLEYS IN MOUNTAIN VIEW ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS". Director Christie moved that the rule be suspended and that the ordinance be placed on the second reading The motion was seconded by Director Swartz and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the Second time. The Mayor then declared the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, Director Swartz moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance be placed on the third and final reading. The motion was seconded by Director Melton and passed unanimously. The Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then adked the question, "Mll, the Ordinance pass"? Upon roll call the following vote was recorded, "Aye" Swartz, Melton, Christie, Trumbo, and Dunn. "Nay" N There being five "Ayes" and No "Nays", the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed. Ordinance No. 1503 ORDINANCE N0, 1503. ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN ALLEYS IN MOUNTAIN VIEW ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. WHEREAS, a petition was duly filed with the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, on the 1st day of June, 1966, asking the Board of Directors to vacate and ab/ndon tthehfoll-hying described alleys in the Mountain View Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, to -wit: A 10 foot alley commencing at a point on Company Street between lots 4 and 5 in Block 2 and running thence, North terminating at Trust Street, and another alley commencing at a point between lots 7 and 8 in Block 2 and running thence East terminating at North Sequoyah Drive. Ate, WHEREAS, after due notice as required by law, the Board of Directors has, at the time and place mentioned in the notice, heard all persons desiring to be heard on the question and has ascertained that t I hereinbefore described have heretofore been dedicated to the public use as alleys; have not been I used by the public generally for a period of at least five years subsequent to the filing of the I that all the owners of the property abutting upon the alleys to be vacated have filed with the Board of Directors their written consent to such abandonment, and that the public interest and welfare will not I affected by the abondonment•of such alleys. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby releases, vacates and aWdons all its ri ther with the rights of the public generally, in and to the aforedescribed alleys in Mountain View tion to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, reserving unto said City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its essors and assigns and easement or right of way ten (10) feet on either side of any existing public ity now located in or upon said alleys, such easement or right of way to be on, over, under and across alleys hereby vacated for the purpose of operating, maintaining, relocating and relaying all public ut located in or upon said vacated alleys by said City, or any corporation having a franchise or right of from said City. As a condition to the closing of the above-described alleys, the City shall be held and harmless from liability as to any claims of the abutting owners for damages to the property ribed herein, which may result from the City or other utility companies operating, maintaining, reloca relaying all public utilities now located in or upon said vacated alleys, and further the petitioners e that they will refrain from altering or changing the grade of the terrain, which would cause damage ity lines located in that area. SECTION 2. A copy of this Ordinance duly certified by Lue C.tyClerk shell ue filddlinft of the recorder of the county and recorded in the deed records of the county. ISECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and publication. PASSED AND APFROVED this 20th day of. June 1966. APPROVED: N TRUMBO, JR., MAYOR 'GEORGE AVIS, CITY CLERK ReleaselDeed Director Melton moved that the City Clerk be and he is hereby authorized to execute a Release Deed for the part of part of the John Smyth As herein described: John Smyth Addition Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 62 8, and 9 in the John Smyth Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkan as per plat of said Addition recorded in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex -Officio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas. Authorize procedure The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously. of Regional The City Manager discussed a memorandum from chairman L. M. McGoodwin of the Steering Committee outlining Planning Commission their proposal for the creation.of a Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission. After a long discussion Director Swartz moved that Director Melton be authorized to proceed with the init: formation of the Regional Planning Commission for a two county (Washington and Benton) Northwest Arkansas Area and expressing such approval of intent -'to the Stetring Committee. The potion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously. The City Manager reported that bids had been recieved and tabulated for Tires and Tubes for the City vehicles 1 After a brief discussion Director Dunn moved that the City Manager be authorized to purchase tires and til Authorize on the low bid wherever �pratieal with the exception of the Police Depart�t� which shall be of premium Puzi,cgrade. Tires and Tubes The motion was seconded by Director Christieand passed unanimously. 331 P The City Manager read a proposed ResolutiHES" its entirety entitled, "A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHL'BG CERTAINIRULES, .. REGULATIONS AND POLICIES CONCERNING IMPROVEMENT OF CERTAIN EXISTING STREETS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CURBS AND GUTTERS". Director Dunn moved that the Resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Director Chtisti and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared adopted. , solution RESOLUTION NO. 1546 A`RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CERTAIN RULES, REGULATIONS AND POLICIES CONCERNING IMPROVEMENT OF CERTAIN EXISTING STREETS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CURBS AND GUTTERS. WHER$AS, there are a number of existing unimproved street& in the City of Fayetteville which are in need of paving and curbs and gutters, and a number of existing improved streets which are in need of being widened, and WHEREAS, many of the property owners abutting said streets desire to contribute toward such and WHEREAS, in order to encourage such improvements and provide standards for same, it is the Board•of Directors to adopt certain regulations, rules and policies governing such improvements, said and policies having heretofore been approved by the City Manager and City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY BE FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. Paving of Existing Unimproved Streets (Gravel or Dirt). Property owners on existing gravel or dirt streets may secure paving of said streets under the alternatives and limitations: A. Concrete curb and gutter; street paving consisting of 6 inch base and 2 inch asphaltic having an average width of 27 to 32 feet, where possible. (1) Construction Standards. All construction shall meet minimum standards ished for subdivisions as contained in Resolution No. 10-619 September by Resolution No. 745, April 5, 1965. (2) No project shall be undertaken unless it consists of a minimum of one full between.two street intersections.. of the P ently establ"h 1% 1961, as amend's (3) Petition, Plans and Specifications and Contract. Petitions must be filed with Manager in which the property owners indicate their willingness to share (on a basis) the full cost.of the project based upon the contract costs for curb and construction and base material preparations, together with the cost for materia prime coat and asphaltic surface at ten cents ($.10) per square foot. A,Ideposi representing 10% of the estimated property owner cost shall accompany said pet shall be applied to defray engineering costs in the event property vwnere do no pay in their full cost so that the project may be completed. If property owner in their full cost, the deposit will be considered as part of their payment. U a petition, the City will prepare plans and specifications for curbs, gutters a material and request bids from contractors. The low bid price, together with t per square foot•for the cost of materials for the asphaltic surface, will be us a per fron foot cost. A representative for the petitioners shall be notified o Petitioners shall then have thirty days within which to deposit the full amount required for the project with the City. When the petitioners have paid in to t amount of money required for the project, the City will let contracts for curb, materials preparations. Good engineering practice will determine whether curb should be required on both sides of the street. City t footage of the of money ion and pledge and do fully Pay in receipt of base cents ($.10) 1 to determine the cost, if money City the full utter and base A gutter In requesting bids as provided above, the Gity will also solicit bids for prime coat and asphaltic surface material and'work. If contractor's bid for such material and work is ten cents ($.10) per square foot or less, City will contrast for prime coat and asphaltic surface as well, rather than.undertake the work with City personnel and equipment. In su such case this lower cost will be used in computing front footage cost to property owners. (4) City Inspection and Work. The City will do all prime and asphaltic surface work excepted when contracted as defined in A (3), supra. The City will also inspectlthe contractor's work and upon completion of the project will assume full and complete maintenance of the street. (5) (5) Prioriti s gnd'City Contribution to Property Owner Cost. A project will be carried out if of the total estimated property owner cost is pledged and paid in, and in such case the City shall ausume the remaining 10% of the property owner cost.) How- ever, those projects in which 100$ of the property owner cost is pledged and paid in by the property owners shall receive first priority for construction and completion. l B. Barrow ditch drainage system; street paving consisting of six inch base with two inch asphaltic surface, of an average wi8th of 20 feet to 24 feet. (1) Construction Standards. All construction shall be in conformity vdth Paragraph 7171, su a, txcusptefor the barrow ditch drainage system, the standards for which shall be established by the City Engineer. (2) Minimum Size of Project. Same as Paragraph A(2), supra. (3) Petition Plans and Specifications Contract. A petition must be filed with the City Manager as provided in paragraph A 3 # supra, in which the petitioners agree tolshare (on a front footage basis) the full cost of the project based upon the contract costs ' for grading, culverts, drainage system, ditch work and base materials preparation, together with.the cost for materials of the prime coat and asphaltic surface at ten cents.($.10) per square foot. Upon receipt of said petition, the City will prepare the plans and specifications, and the same procedures and requirements established by Paragraph A(3), supra, for taking bids, determining and notifying petitioners of the costs, depositing funds and letting the contract will be followed. (4) City Inspection and Work. Same as in Paragraph A(4), supra. (5) When Alternative "B" May Be Used. The improvement plan provided for under Paragraph B hereof may be used only when in the judgment of the City Manager such plan is the only way economically feasible for the street to be paved. (cont) l 35 Resolution (con't) No. 15-66 (Cont) In the event alternative B is used, a minimum right-of-way of 40 feet, including drainage system adequately bounded by ditches, shall be required. If alternative B is used, the ' full 100% of the property owner cost must be paid by the participating property owners. SECTION 2. Curb, Gutter and Widening Por Exis6ing B"bda8dr6etber. A. Widening Streets With Existing Curb and Gutter. Where there are existing paved streets with curb and gutter, and sufficient rightAof-way is on hand, property owners may request widening of the street by filing a petition as prescribed in Paragraph A(3) of Section 1, supra. Petitioners must agree to share (on a front footage basis) the cost of removing existing curbs and gutters, installing new curbs and gutters.and base materials preparation between old pavement and new gutter line. The City will install new pavement between old pavement and new gutter line at no 'cost to the property owners. The City will prepare plans and specifications and the same procedures and r8quirements established in Paragraph A(3) of Section l,supre, for securing bids, determining costs, depositing funds and letting the contract, will be followed. , Be Installing Curb and Gutter on.Existinn Paved Street. Where no curbs and gutters exist on an existing paved street, and sufficient right-of-way is on hand, property owners may request installation of curbs and gutters by filing a petition as prescribed in Paragraph A(3) of.Section 1, supra. Petitioners must agree to share (on a front footage basis) the cost of curb and gutter construction and base materials preparation between pavement and gutter line. City will install new pavement between old pavement and new curb and gutter. The City will prepare plans and specifications and.the same procedures and require- ments established in Paragraph A(3) of Section 1, supra, for securing bide, determining costs, depositing funds and letting the contract, will be followed. Provided, this work will be done only if curb and gutt section can fit in with upper and lower drainage from curb and gutter section with the paved street section as it exists. If the curb and gutter cannot be engineered into existing condition, then propert owners will have to abide by the requirements of Paragraph A of Section 1, supra, which would require com re -working of the street with attendant costs to be born by property owners. ' Co City Inspection and Work. Same as in Paragraph A(4) of Section 1. D. Construction Standards. Same as in Paragraph A(1) of Section 1. E. Minimum Size of Protect. Same as in Paragraph A(2) of Section 1. SECTION 3. Paving to Mator Thoroughfare or Collector Standards. A. Where existing paved or unpaved streets are designated by the major thoroughfares plan as collec or thoroughfares which should be paved to 40 feet or 48 feet, according to established standards for such streets, and sufficient right-of-way is on hand, such streets may be widened or paved i accordance with said standards upon the filing of a petition as prescribed in Paragraph A(3) of Section 1, supra. Petitioners must agree to share (on a front footage basis) the cost of removin any existing curb and gutter, installing curb and gutter, base materials preparation up to 32 fe in width, together with cost for materials of the -prime coat and asphaltic surface at ten cents ($.10) per square foot up to 32 feet in width. The City will bear all base and pavement costs of widths over 32 feet. Up&n receipt of the petition, the City will prepare the plans and specifications, and the same procedures and requirements established in Paragraph A(3) of Sectio supra, for securing bids, determining costs, depositing funds and letting the contract will be folleodd. Be City Inspection and Work. Same as provided in Paragraph A(4) of Section 1. C. Construction Standards. Same as provided in Paragraph A(1) of Section 1. D. Minimum Size of Project. Same as provided in Paragraph A(2) of Section 1. SECTION 4. General Regulations. A. All funds collected from property owners for such work shall be placed in a fund called "New Construction Revolving Fund." The City will place in this fund the difference between property owner contributions and actual costs. All contractor, engineering and material costs for such projects will be expended from this fund. The City contributions from this fund will be paid o s J of the public works fund. Be All intersections and front footage of City owned property will be paid for by the City on a footage basis. C. All property owner contributions for a particular. -project must be paid into the City prior to letting contracts and commencement of work. D. The front footage cost alongside yards of corner properties, as such would be determined accordi to normal subdivision platting, will be paid by the property owner on the basis of one-half (1/2 the regular front footage cost for all improvements except curb and gutter; all front footage of curb and gutter will be paid fully by the property owner. The City will assume the remainder of the front footage cost along the side yard. E. The City reserves the right to limit the Street Improvement-Rpopert Owner Program (as the,same is hereby designated) each year because of limitation of funds and/or personnel and equipment. PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of June, 1966. ATTEST: GEORGE i gkVIDlr CITY CLERK APPROVED: DON 0, JR., MAYO ill 36 I Of of R_ J.W The City kanager reported that the next regular meeting date of the Board of Directors would fall on the fourth (4)'of July and be recommended the date of the regular meeting be changed to July 5th. Director Melton, moved that the next regular- meeting of the Board of Directors be held on Tuesday,eJuly 5t The motion was seconded by Director Christidand passed unanimously. 'There being no further business Director Melton moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Director Dunn and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. APPROVED: GEORV,&Uffj:-LjVISs The Begvdavf Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Tuesday. July 5, 1966, at 7:30 P. M. in the Directors Room in the City Administration Building. Present: City Manager Gerald Fox, City -Clerk George J. Davis, City Attorney Hugh Kdncaid, and Board Members: Kerlin, Swarts, McFerran, Melton, Christie,'and Trumbo. Absent: Director.Dale Dunn. The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday, June 20, 1966, a copy of which had previously been mailed each of the Directors, were approved as written. The City Manager recommended that -the following be appointed toInformation Committees: Board Member Technical Advisor University Labor PTA Citizens.Aeeociation Civic Club Chamber of Commerce Jaycee Board Member Technical Advisor University labor FTA Women Citizen's Association Civic Club Chamber of Comerce Jaycee B6ard Member Technical. Advisor University LAbor FTE Women Citizens'Association Civic Club Chamber of Commerce Jaycees Water and Sewer Streets and Highways Jim Kerlin Arnold Christie Catl Smith Loren E. Heiple George Branigan Wayne Bayley Quentine Farmer Jack Hall Mrs. Bob McKinney Mrs; .Kent McVey Mrs. Willard Whitcomb Ernest Lancaster -Clifford Mayer W.R. McNair Marcus Walden Leroy Sharp Harry King PLANNING. URBAN RENEWAL, CIVIC CENTER. PARKS AND PUBLIC HOUSING & RECREATION Garland Melton Sylvia Swartz Jim Vizzier John G• Wilbourn Paul M. Young Robert Parker Mrs. George M. Williams Mrs. Bill Parette Mrs. Bobby Hanna' Mrs. Russell Benedict Mrs. Richard Hipp Miss Suzanne Lighten Mrs. Wade Burnside Ellis Burgin Morrie Collier Bill Hudson David Lashley TRANSPORTATION MUNICIPAL BMXCE Joe McFerran Dale Dunn Al Jones R.E. Wertmeyer John.Carney G.N. Henderm Rex Rice Mrs. Phil Deal James N. Moore Mrs, Walter Richards Mrs. Ed Bisho* Lester Howlek Bill Dalton Hal Douglas Ellis Sheitem Jim Robertson Bob Jernigan The City Manager r3ad the Tabulated Bids on a farm tractor and mower and recommended that the purchase be made from Davis Equipement Company at the low bid of $3,265.00 net cost. Director McFerran moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and purchase a.farm tractor and mower form Davis Equipment Company, Springdale, Arkansas for the sum of $4,495.75 less a trade in of $1,230,75 or a net cost of $3,265.00 to.the City. The motion was seconded by Director Kerlin and passed unanimously. Bids on or and [ower Base Bid Discount or Trade Net Bid Model Bid Terms Delivery Diesel Powered Farm Tractor with sickle mower as per specifications. Trade-in of one sickle mower. BID TABULATION FARM TRACTOR AND MOWER June 27, 1966 Huenefeld O'Rcard Equipment Ford Company Tractor $49136.33 $49271.00 150.00 100.00 $3,986.33 $4,171.00 1020 LU # 50 Mower Net 31014 E Net Net As Soon As Possible $4,495.75 1,230.75 $3,265.00 430 Case #20 Mower Net 30-40 days $5,154.05 996.73 $4,157.32 424D Net .In Stock , 1966. 1