HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-02-24 MinutesMotion to r
Planning Co:
Defeated
Regular The City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas met in regular session on Monday, February 24, 1964, at 7:30
Meeting P.M. in the Council Room of the City Adminstration Building.
Present: Mayor Cu .y E. Brown, City Clerk George J. Davis; City Controller Albert J. Jones, City Attorney
Bass Trumbo,'City Engineer W.C: Smith, Chief of'Police Hollis Spencer, Fire'Chief Burl Skelton and Alder.
men: Heflin, Christie, Watson, Wheeler, Thomas, Burgin, Faucette and Short.
Absent: None
The minutes of the regular meeting on Monday,JEebnugry 10, 1964 and of the special meeting on Friday,
February 14, 1964, a copy which had previously been mailed to each of the Aldermen, were approved as
✓.,r written.
Execute a Alderman Burgin moved that the City Clerk be and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute a re -
Release lease deed to Thomas C. Comley, J.W. Eoff, and Marie Eoff, on a Sub -dividers contract on Lots 14 and 15
Deed of Block 3 and Lots 1 through 5 inclusive of Block 1 of the Bel -Air Second Addition to the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Chr3ietie and passed unanimously.
The Building Inspector presented the petition of Hugh W. Dill and Kathryn Dill, husband and wife, to
rezone certain property from R-2 Two Family Residential District to R-3 Multi -Family Residential Distric
Which had been approved by the Planning Commission.
The City Clerk then read a resolution from the Planning Commission recommending the rezoning of this
property.
After a brief discussion, the City Attorney introduced and at the request of the Council, read a propose
ordinance in its entirety, entitled,"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING
DISTRICT M&F OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, APPROVED MAY 28, 1962s TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2
TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTI=FA14ILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
Alderman Heflin then moved that the ordinance pass, the motion was seconded by Alderman Faucette and
passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the ordinance passed. i
ORDINANCE ORDINANCE N0, 1383
NO. 1383
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MU OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKAN-
SAS, APPROVED MAY 289 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO
R-3.MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Ark-
ansas, do January 28, 1964, on the petition of Hugh W. Dill and Kathryn Dill, requesting that said
Planning Commission recommend to the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that the City
Council enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property, to -wit: Lots numbered Six (6),
Seven (7) and Eight (8) in Block Numbered One (1) in Fairground Addition to the City of Fayetteville as
designated upon the recorded plat of said addition, from R-2 Two -Family Residential District to R-3
Multi -Family Residential District, and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing, setting forth the date, time, place and purpose of
and location of property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general
in said City, more than15 a;s prior to said public hearing, and
1.7HEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission cerbifibdato the City Council of
City of'Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted rezoning the above des-
cribed property from R-2 Two Family Residential District to R-3 Multi -Family Residential District;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That the above descrtbedbpdoperty presently zoned as R4 Two Family Residential Di
be, and the same is hereby rezoned ho R-3 Multi -Family Residential District.
SECTION 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed,
and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and public
PASSED AND APPROVED:this 24th day of February, 1964.
APPROVED: win
���/J/� GUY E. B , MAYOR
ATTEST • Q�LGO4z 29L:=
GEOR ()AVIS, CITY CLERK
Petition IThe
Bui.Iding
Inspector
presented the petition of W.C. Rogers and Cleada Rogerp, husband and wife, to re-
W.C. Rogj
Zone certain
property in the Borth part of the City from R -1B
Single Family Residential District, and
Rogers I
0-1 Open Land District
to C-2 Throughfare Commercial District,
which hhd been approved by the Planning
to
Commission, however, a number of residents in that area had also signed a petition opposing the rezoning
zone
of this property. Several of the residents,appeat•6drbuftheRitha Council and spoke in opposition to this
rezoning.
Mr. Rogers and his attorney, James Cypert, expikined the reason for the request and the advantages there•
cion
After a very long discussion, the City attorney introduced and at the request of the Council, read a pro•
posed ordinance in its entirety fotitEedf2Dett14mnrehtit1ed, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE
NO. 1250 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS APPROVED MAY 282 1962s TO REZONE
CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1B SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT XND O�NOPEN LAND DISTRICT TO C-2
OUI FARE COMMERICIAL DISTRICT."
Alderman Short moved to refer the petition back to the Planning Commission for further study and recom
recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Wheeler and upon roll call, the following vote was recorded,"AYE"
Heflin, Wheeler and Short. "NAY" Christie, Watson, Thomas, Burgin and Ehucbtte.
There being only three °Ayes" and five "Nays", the Mayor declared the motion defeated for lack of
orvote.
Alderman Burgin then moved that the.ordinance pass.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Heflin and upon roll,call, the following vote was recorded: "Aye"
Heflin, Christie, Watson, Wheeler, Thomas, Burgin and Faucette. "Nay" Short.
There biing'seven "Ayes" and only one "Nay", the Mayor declared the motion to -pass the ordinance was
defeated for lack of a unanimous vote.
Alderman Burgin then moved that the rule be suspended and the ordinance be placed on the second reading.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Heflin and•passed unanimously.
The ordinance was then read for t he second time.
Alderman Bergin then moved that the rule be further suspended and the ordinance placed on the third and
final reading. .
The motion was seconded by Alderman Thomas and passed unanimous.
The ordinance was then read for t hb third and last time. -
2so
The Mayor then declared the ordinance open for discussion.
There being no further discussion, the Mayor asked the question, Shall the ordinance pass? .
Upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: "Aye" Heflin, Christie, Watson, Wheeler, Thomas,
and Faucette. "Nay" Short. '
There being s7r_ "Ayes" and one "Nay",.the Mayor ddclared the ordinance pass. r
ORDINANCE NO.. 1384
AN ORDINANCE A1SNDING ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 1239 AND REVISED ZONING DISTRICT.MAP OF. FAYE'iTEVILLE, ARKAN
APPROVED MAY 282 1962, TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1P SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND
0-1 OPEN LAND DISTRICT TO C-2 THROUGHFARE COMMERICAL DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning .Commission .of the City of Fayetteville, Ark-
ansas, on January 28, 1964, on the petition of W.C. Rogers and Cleada Rogers, requesting that said Planni:
Commission recommend to the City Council of the City of Fayettedille, Arkansas, that the City Council
enact an ordinance rezoning the following described property, to -wit: Beginning at a point 300 feet Eas'
of the East line of U.S. Highway 71 and 102 feet North of the North line of the Northeast Quarter (NE�)
of the Northeast Quarter (NES) of Section 35, Township 17 North, Range 30 West; thence East 600 feet;
thence South 1,422 feet more or less to the South line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeaht Quarter
of said Section 35; thence West to a point 300 feet East of the East line of U.S. Highwat 71; thence in
Northerly direction 300 feet from, and parallel to, the East line of U.S.Highway 71 to the point of be-
ginning, all in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, from R -1B Single Family Residential District and 0-1
Open Land District to C-2 Thoroughfare CommerelUlDistrict, and
WHEREASMnnotice-of said public hearings, setting forth the date, time, place and purposes bf
and location off property was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general c
in shid City, more than -15 days prior to said publue hearing, and
WHEREAS, folllowing said public hearing, said Planning Commissioh certified to the'City Council of
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, its recommendation that an ordinance be adopted as follows, to -wit: .Be-
ginning at a point on the South,line of Harold Street 900 feet East of the East line of U.S. Highway 71
and 102 feet north of the North line of the Northeast Quarter (NE4) of.the Northeast Quarter (NE�) of
Section 35, Township 17 North, Range 30 west; thence South 140 feet; thence West 400 feet, more or less
to a point in line with the East line of Lee Avenue; thence North 140 feet, more or less to the South
line of Harold Street, thende East 400 feet, more or less to the point of beginning; from R -1B Single
Family Residential District and 0-1 Open Land District to C=2 Thoroughfare Commerical District;
NOW, THEREFCRE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY.OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That the above described property presently zoned as R -IB Single Family Residential
District and 0-1 Open Land District be, except that portion of real eestate the Planning Commis§(hnn
delted from their recommendation, and the same is hereby rezoned to C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial District
upon the condition that the petitioners dedicate to the Oity an easement for street purposes, across the
following described real estate, to -wit: Beginnifig at a point on the south line of Harold Street Vr ich
is 102 feet North and 150 feet west of the Southeast corner of the SE� of the SEf` of Section 26, Toiini- .
ship 17 North, Range 30 Westp thence West 1125 feet more or less to the East line of U.S. Highway 71;
thence South 20 feet; thence East 1125 feet more or less to a point 20 feet south of the point of begina
and also that the petitioners dedicate to the City an easement for street purposes, dufficl:sht to provid
a street sixty feet in width, running from U.S. Highway 71 and.connecting to the Old Missouri Road, as
proposed in the plat of the real estate submitted to the Planning Commission for rezoning.
SECTION 2. That all oddinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed,
this ordinance shall be in &11 force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of February, 1964.
WIRIF1,111
1
ATTEST
GEORGE' J. DAVIS, CITY. CLERK
The City Attorney reported that the legal description on the proposed annexation ordinance which was rea
at the last regular meeting of the Council on February 10, .19642 had been corrected and the ordinance wa
now ready for approval.
Alderman Heflin moved that the ordinance pass.
The motion was.seconded by Alderman Buigin.and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the Ord-
inance passed.
ORDINANCEI ORDINANCE N0. 1385
1385
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING TERRITORY ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: ASSIGNING SAID
TO WARDS: AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the County Court
of Washington
County, Arkansas, did on
November 25, 1963, make an order
annexing the following described.territory
to
the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, to -wit:
A part of the Northeast quarter (NE4) of the Southeast quarter (SA) of Section 21 in Township (16)1
North Range (30) West and being more particularly desdribed as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner
of said Northeast quarter (NEk) of the South sat quarter (SEJ) and running thence South (420) feet; thence !1
WEst (210) feet, thence -North (420) feet; thence East along the North line of said forty -acre tract to the
R
place of beginning, containing,TWO ACS, moreoor less.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVICLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That the Annexation of the above-described territory to the Corporate limits of the
of Fay4teville, Arkansas, be and the same is hereby accepted.
SECTION 2. That all of the above-described territory is hereby assigned to and•made a part of
1 of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
SECTION 3. That this .Ordinance shall take effect and be in force and effect from and after its -
passage, approval, and publication.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of February 1964.
W Xy
241
The City Clerk read a proposed resolution concerning a contract for a sewer easement with the St. Louis -
San Francisco -Railway Company.
Alderman Heflin moved that the resolution be adopted.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Wheeler and passed unanimously whereupon the Mayor declared the re-
solution adopted.
RESOLUTION RESOLUTION 6-64
6-64
WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas will construct a Twenty-four (24) inch sewer across
property of the St. Louis -San Francisco Railway Company toeatedyin the Southwest Quarter (SWk) of the
Southwest Quarter (SWC) of Section Twenty (20), Township Sixteen (16) North, Range Thirty (30) West of
the Fifth (5th) Prinicpal Meridian, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to obtain a pipe -line contract with the said St. Louis -San Francisco
Railway Company before constructing said sewer mains. I •
NOW, THEREEME, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
1. That the Mayor and City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute a
pipe -line contract in behlaf of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas with the St. Louisan Francisco
Railway Company for the purpose of constructing said sewer mains.
nA0CT.n AIM .nnnnircn au_ nlaU a_.. .nf)
ATTEST
Alderman Wheeler reported that the Water Superintendent had recommended that a new contract form be
approved forthe construction of new water mains within the City Limits,
Alderman Wheeler discussed the changes as recommended in the contract form by the Water Superintendent.
After a brief discussion, Alddman Wheeler moved that the recommendation of the Water Superintendent
be accepted and that a new contract form for the construction of water mains inside the City Limits be
approved as presented by the Water Superintendent.
The motion was seconded by Alderman-Faucette and passed unanimously whereupon the Mayor declared the
motion passed and the new contract form adopted.
The new form was spread in the minutes as a permanent record.
Agreement A G R E E M E N T
(For Construction of Water Mains Inside the City Limits)
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 1"19 , by and between the City Wat$r Depart-
"" ment of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, through their agent, y , Superintendent,
-hereinafter called the Farty of the First Part, and ;
Party of the Second Part.
WITNESSETH:
That the karties hereto, for an inconsideration hereinafter set forth, agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. The Party of the Second Part proposes to construct and/or install water mains, valves, and
fire hydrants and join the water mains now served with water from the Water Department.of the City of
Fayetteville, for the purpose of distributing water to the following area ot+ areas,
ARTICLE 2. That the Party of the Second Part will construct and,or install t-hbee water mains, valves,
and fire hydrants.in accordance with the requirements of the City Water Department of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, and the Arkansas State Board of Health. The written approval of the plans and specifications
will be secured from both of these two agencies before any contract is let and/or construction is com-
menced.
ARTICLE 3. That the plans and specifications for the proposed water mains' valves, and fire hydrants
are attached to this agreement and shall become a pert hereof. That no changes or alterations will be
made in the plans or specifications without written consent of the Party of the First -Part, and that the
work will be done in stbict accordance with the plans and specifications as furnished and attached to th
agteement.
ARTICLE 4. That the Party of the Second Part agrees to permit the Party of the First Part to make
inspections of the work as it is being exeettmdtafid that any failure to construct mains, valves, and
fire hydrants in accordance with the attached plans and specifications will constitute sufficient
rhason for the Party of the First Part to refuse water service to be turned into any or all proposed
mains.
ARTICLE 5. That the Party of the Second Part will pay all costs for the construction of said mains,
valves and fire hydrants and other costs incidental to said construction. That the total actual cost
for said mains, valves and fire hydrants installed willbe $ for construction,
costs, and 0, 1 ' for engineering costs, making a total cost of $
ARTICLE 6. That the Party of the Second Part will maintain all the mains, valves, and fire hydrants for
one year, at his own expense, from the date of this agreement, after which the title to said mains,
valves and fire hydrants shall be vested in the City Water Department of Fayetteville, Arkansas, for and
in consideration of the perpetual maintenance of said mains, valves, and fire hydrants.
ARTICLE 7. The Party of the First Part will reimburse the Party of the Second Part as service conne
are actually made to existing buildings or buildings under construction on the following basis:
(a) Two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each•service connection made into a six inch water main or
(b) One hundred dollars ($100.00) for each service connection made into a water main of less than six
inch inside diameter.
(c) Three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each fire hydrant after four buildings connected with water
service are locatedwithin500 feet of a fire hydrant. Out -buildings are not to be counted. Any one
building shall not he used to count more than one fire hydrant.
(d) Upon completion of construction and final acceptance of the work, the Party of the First Part will
I
ay the enginnering costs only on the work actually constructed.
282
(8) The total of all reimbursements fort he Party of the First Part to the Party of the Second Part
shall not exceed the total costs forthe.work as set out in Article 5 above,.
(f) No reimbursements shall be made to the Party of the Second Part for service connections made to the
water mains extended from the mains constructed under this contract or for fire hydrants not installed
under this contract.
(g) In the event any water main in the plans has to be greater than six inches inside diameter in size
to meet the requirements of a master plan for the City Water distribution system, the Party of the First
Part will reimburse the Party of the Second Part the difference in cost of six-inch pipe and the cost
of the required larger pipe, upon completion and acceptance of the works and as evidenced by the pipe
suppliers,invoices showing the costs of the respective sizes cf pipe.
ARTICLE 8. That the Party of the First Part shall be the only authorized to tap siad mains for the
puppose of making service connections and that the Party of the First Part will not make a tap for
services until all plumbing to which said service vUllbe connected had been installed in a ccordance
with the City of Fayettevill2e, Arkansas, Plumbing Code in effect at the date and time of making such
connection.
ARTICLE 9. That the charges and method of payment for water service to consumers shall be as now
established or as may hereinafter be established and that all parties connected to and receiving water
service shall abide by anyt and all ordinances, and/or Rules and Regulations of the City of Fayetteville
Arkansas, as are then in effect or which may be thereafter adopted governing the Water Department of th
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
ARTICLE 10. That the Party of the Second Part grants to the Party of the First Part an easement or
easements of sufficient width on each side of each main for the purpose of inspecting, connecting ser-
vices, installing meters, and repairing and maintaining all mains, valves, fire hydrants andembter
installations and such other purpose necessary for the proper operation of these mains, valves, fire
hydrants and metOr installations. Five feet oneeach side of the.center line of a water pipe and/or
fire hydrant shall be considered a minimum easement width.
ARTICLE 11. That failure to comply with any of the provisions of this agreement by any or all parties
connected'to said mains, or the Party of the Second Part, shall be full justification for discontinuane
of service to any or all parties connected to said mains, by the Party of the First Part and any such
discontinuance of service will in no way make the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas and/or the Party of thi
First Part liable for damage or damages which may be occasioned by reason of the discontinuance of such
service.
ARTICLE 12. That this agreement shall expire and be voided ten years from date hereof, or when the total
sum of all reimbursements made by the Party of the First Part tothe Party of the Second Pant equals
the total cost of the work, as stated in Article 5 above, whichever date occurs dirst, at which time the
mains, valves and fire hydrants bhall'become the sole property of the Party of the First Part, with all
provisions concerning easements to be retained by the Party of the First Part. The Party of the First
Part, after the expiration of this agreement, shall have the right tb make service connections to ssid
mains without any reimbursement or payment to the Party of the Second Part for aany such connectiohs.
ARTTGLE 13. That other parties not a part of this agreement may connect to and extend any of said mains
to other properties and areas without any payment to the Party of the Second Part for such purposes.
ARTICLE 14. That the Party of The First Part shall have the right to connect and tie in other water
mains in order to complete grids, circuits and extend mains to other areas vrithout cost to the Party of
the First Part, and that Party of the First Part will have the right t6 make taps into the mains cons
strutted under this contract for serving afiy of the properties which may be owned by the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, without cost to said City of Fayeteville (example: to City Fire Stations).
ARTICLE 15. For and in consideration of the covenants and agreements by the Party of the Second Part
and upon completion and acceptance of said water mains, valves and fire hydrants, the Party of the Fir
Part agrees to receive water service upon the aforesaid terms and conditions, and upon no other condi-
tions.
ARTICLE 16,
The Patties hereto for themselves, their successors, executors, adminstrators and assigns, hereby
to the full covenants herein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, they have executed this agreement the day and year first abovemmentioned.
PARTY OF THE FIRST PART
City Water Department
Fayetteville, Arkansas
PARTY OF THE SECOND PART
By
Superintendent
6UBSMIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of , 19
My commission expires 19 0
283
Consulting Engineer W.R. Holway and Associates appeared before the Council and reported that bids had
been received and opened for the Lake Sequoyah Improvement. He reported that the bid of the. Tune Const.
Co. was the low bid and he recommended they be given the contract.
He further recommended that items 3,4, and 5 be deleted from the specification thereby reducing the
cost of the improvements $9,050.00.
After a brief discussion, Alderman Thomas moved to delete items 3,4, and 5 from the specifications and
award the contract to Tune Construction Co., Fayetteville,�Arkansas for the sum of $54,147.00 less
$9,050.00 or a net cost to the City of $45,097.00 upon the approval of the contract and performance
bond by the Water Superintendent and City Attorney and evidence of proper insurance.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Wheeler and passed unanitfloualye
py ofI COPY OF THE BIDS -1064 LAKE SEQUOYAH WATER
Bids
Frazer Const. Co., Ft. Smith, Arkansas
Items 1. $69900.00 2. $2MOO*00 33.$7,800 4. $2,750 5. $2,3oo 6. $60800 7. $12,600 Total Bid $599
Tune Const. Co., Fayetteville, Arkansas
Items 1. $5,617.00 2. $20,495.00 3.$4,550.00 4. $2,500 5. $2,000 6. $62990 7. $11,995 Total Bid $540
Skyco Const, Co., Hot Springs, Arkansas.
Items 1. $9,755.00 2. $22009.00 3. $8,110.00 4. $5,400 5.$910.00 6: $92810 7. $12,265 Total Bid $680
baseAlderman Faucette reported that the City had received bids on four pieces of fire equipment and after
of referring to a recommendation of the Fire Chief, moved that the City purchase a Snorkel from the Pitman
Manufacturing Company for a total of $47,250.00, a rescue unit for a total of $20,978.95 and a 750 G.P.
pment Pumper for $13,63$.62 from the Seagraves Corporation.
The motien was seconded by Alderman Short and passed unanimously.
7-64
Alderman Faucette reported that bids had been received and opened for two Cushman trucksters and for
three new cars for the Police Department.
After a brief discussion, Alderman Faucette moved to adopt a resolution authorizing the purchase of
these vehicles fv-om the Replacement Fund.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Short and passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION N0, 7-64
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FCR THE REPLACEMENT OF THREE POLICE. VEHICLES AND ONE POLICE MOTOR SCOOTER.
WHEREAS, one of the provisions of Resolution Number 4-64, passed and approved February 10, 19643
requires a resolution be passed and approved by the City Council for all expenditures from the Replace-
ment Fund;
NOW, THEREFORE, BETIT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. The net bid of the Lewis Ford Sales Inc, in the amount of $3,946.00 to furnish and
deliver three 1964 Ford Custom four door sedans is hereby accepted by the City .Council.
SECTION 2. The net bid of the Sports Center in the amount of1 000.12 to furnish,and deliver one
model 781 Cushman Truckster is hereby accepted by the City Council. '
SECTION 3. An appropriation for any and all sales tax due on.the purchases in Sedtion 1 and 2 abo
is Herebjnbmdde and the expenditure for same shall be evidenced by an official receipt from the Arkansas
Revenue Department.
SECTION 4. After its passage, and approval, this resolution shall be attached to and become a part
of the purchasing documents issued for th$ items in Sections 1,2, and 3 above.
A;
ATTEST
Bids on Cushman
Scooter
BIM ON CUSHMAN SCOOTERS
Total
Less
Net Cost
Bidder
Toatl
Trade-in
to City
Wilson Outboard Inc.
$1,367.61
$268.61
$19099.00
Ft. Smith, Arkansas
The Sports Center
Fayetteville, Arkansas
$12400.12
$300.00
$12100.12
Bids on Police
Cars
BIDS ON POLICE CARS
Total
Less
Net Cost
Bidder
Cost
Trade-in
to City
Green Chevrolet Co.
Fayetteville, Arkansas
$8,237.40
$32815.40
$42422.00
Lewis Ford Sales Inc.
Fayetteville, Arkansas
$8,296.50
$4050.50
$3,946.00
Reccomendation
Engineer W.N. Holway appeared before the Council and
after explaining the
reasons therefore recommended
of Eng. Holway
that the City of Fayetteville not consider joint construction with the. Springdale Water System to bring
on Beaver Water
treated water into Fayetteville from the Beaver Water
Project.
Project
Alderman Wheeler moved to accept the recommendation of Consulting Enginner
W.N. Holway, and not consider
joint constfiuction with
the Springdale Water System to bring treated water
into Fayetteville from the
Beaver Water Project.
The motion was seconded
by Alderman Thomas and passed
unanimously.
.W 1
284
ons
I
r s
The City Clerk reported that the Mayor had vetoed the amendment to the contract of Sublirban Water Distric
No. 7 (Elkins) and had filed the reasons for his vetoein the City Clerk's Office on February 132 1964,
which was on the third day after the passage of the amendment by the Council.'
The City Clerk read the reasons giiren by the Mayor for this veto which weresgpcead in the minutes of the
Council.
REASONS FOR MAYOR'S VETO
• February 13, 1964
The City Council, in its meeting on the evening of February 10, approved a motion which altered
the original contract entered into by the City and Suburbhn Water District No. 7 (Elkins). Since that
time, certain events have occurtcad about which the Council has had notofficial knowledge, and I, under
powers vested in me as Mayor, am vetoing the action of the Council for the following reasons:
(1) Voluntary action on the Fart of the people residing near the City to petition for annexati
to the City is the most satisfactory way of extending our corporate limits.
(2) A •sufficient•number of•people in the Baldwin area have petitioned for immediate annexation
to the City to make this annexation possible.
(3ry It is more advantageous to the City to have this area annexed voluntarily than it is to ag
to the contract alteration specified in the Council's motion.
(4) This does not change the terms in any way of the original contract entered into between the
City of Fayetteville and Suburban Water District.No. 7. t:
There being no further business, Alderman Short moved to adjourn.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Faucette and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the
meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:
GUY HT BRUIN, KkYOR
ATTEST:
GEORGE DrAS, CITY CLERK
1'
r