HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-08-28 Minutes82
The Building Inspector reported that he had three requests for building permits which he
Tree
uests could not issue under the Major Street Plan unless it was amended.
re
q These three requests were as follows: bne on West Dickson Street between Arkansas Avenue
for Bldg.' and Gregg Avenue on the North side of Dickson Street..
Permits. One on South School Avenue just south.of the St. Paul Railroad crossing, and one on
East Fifteenth Street and Washington Avenue.
After a long discussion, Alderman Walker moved that a Resolution be passed amending the
Major Street Plan (Resolution 7-60) in order to permit Mr. Emil Sonneman to construct a
building on West Dickson Street. ,
The motion was seconded by Alderman Short and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor
declared the Resolution adopted.
Resolution RESOLUTION 9-61
9-61
Am ding .RESOLVED, that "Resolution 8-59, passed and approved by the City Council of Fayettevill
Maj or St. Arkansas,-on.May 119 1959, together with the Major Street Plan and maps and regulations
attached thereto, be amended to reduce the projected width of Dickson Street between Ozalk
Plan. Avenue and College Avenue from seventy (70) feet to sixty (60) feet except that part
which lies between. Arkansas Avenue and Gregg Avenue on the North side of Dickson Street I d
that part of Dickson Street which lies between University Avenue and Gregg A*enue on the
South side of.Dickson Street which shall be fifty-five (55) feet and that a certified co)y
of this .Resolution be filed in the Office of the City Clerk and in the Office of the
Circuit Clerk and Ex -Officio Recorder for Washington County, Arkansas,
PASSED ARID APPROVED this 14th day of August, 1961.
APPROVED:
ATTEST: e W#
n
MAYOR
EO ITY-U`LE'
Bldg Permit
to Cy Alderman Hatfield then moved that the City Building Inspector be and he is hereby author -
Carney ized and directed to issue a Building Permit to Cy Carney Jr. to construct an addition t
Jr. a building located on South School Avenue(U.S. Highway No. 71 South) on the west side of
the Avenue and immediately south of the St. Paul Railroad Track, according to plans as
presented and discussed at the Council Meeting.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Walker and passed unanimously.
Bldg Permit,
for The Building Inspector reported that a Mr. Willard Henson had applied for a building pe it
Willard for a proposed residence to be located on East Fifteenth Street and South Washington Avenue
Henson The Building Inspector stated that under the provisions set forth in the Major Street Plan,
discussed. the proposed building would be extending on the future street right-of-way on Fifteenth
Street, therefore he could not issue a building permit without.Council action.
A long discussion was had but no action was taken by the Council at this time.
There being no further business, Alderman Smith moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded
by Alderman 6hort and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned.
APPROVED:
Vernon
Wilson -
Buillding
Permit
Planning
Commission
to study
eli ination
of !Mt.Com-
fort Road
from
Maior St.Pl
The -Building Inspector and'aMr: Vernon Wilson presented a plat plan for a proposed tom
martial" -building to be located on -property lying between Mt. Comfort Road and West Nort
Street and bordered ori the West by Lindell"Avenue-:-
The'Building Inspector stated that the -existing Major Street Plan, in effect at this ti.
provided for the future widening of Mt.'Comfort Road and West North Street and that a
motion passed by the Council on June 12, 1961 prohibited the issuing of building permi
for b.uildings which' -would front -on the' Mt:: _Comfort- Road.
After .a long dis_cussion,.Aiderman-.Burggin moved ttiafthe Planning _Commission be authoriz
to make a study of the Major Street Plan with reference to eliminating- the. Mt. _Comfort
Road between Oakland -Avenue anis Garland'Avehue from the Major Street Plan,
The motion wad'seebrided'by Alderman Thomas and'upon.roll.call the-following.vote was
recorded: ""Aye" Walker, Christie, Hatfield, McClelland, Thomas and Burgin. "Nay" Smit
There b6ing six "Ayes" and only one "Nay", the Mayor declared tie motion passed*
P
The City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Monday, August 280
1961, at 7:30 P.M:
Present: Mayor Guy E: Brown, City Clerk -George J: -Davis, City Controller'Albert J. Jones
City Attorney Bass-Trumbo..-Ci-ty Engineer -W. C. Smith, Chief"of Police Pearl Watts, Fire
Chief Burl Skelton, and Aldermen: Walker, Christie, Hatfield, McClelland, Thomas, Burgin
And' Smith.... - ------
Absent: Alderman Carter Short.
Thb minutes of thew regular meeting on Monday; August' 14* 1961' copies of which had been
previously mailed to each member of the Council, were approved as written.
Protest
of
lAttbrney E.'J.-Ball,appeared befdre the Council-representing'a group of residents in the
T.E:--SheltonHotz
Addition" to -the City'of- Fayetteville -who were protesting -the moving -and remodeling
moving'&
-
some-old*buildings-from the former Caiep`Neil- Mart in- to-that:'area, and requested'tte City
remodeling
to assist them in their' legal -proceedings agaiiis-C tli bizilder",'Mr: T. -E. ' Shelton:'
Tuildings
Attorney W. B:"Putnain appeared before the Council representing Mr. T. E. Shelton, who is
from
moving acid remodeling the buildings in question.
Camp
After a long diacussion,`Aldermaii Thoinis-moved-to ref6r this problem to the Planning
Neil
Committee of the" City Council -"for -study"and- recommendation: -
Mirtin.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Burgin and passed unanimously.
City
The City'Building Irispector'then asked the -City Aftorriey, if; in his opinion, the Board
-on
Atty.
of Appeals could take action" this matter with reference to the alleged violations of
asked
if
the'City Building Code -Ordinance No. 1120:-._
Board
of
He stated -that he had received a written request from Attorney E. J. Ball that the Board
Appeals
of Appeals act- ori this 'rimatter.
could
The City Attorney stated--that*he would need more-�time to study the problem in connection
take
action.
with the Building Code Ordinance No. 1120 and that he would then report to the Building
Inspector. wN - -
Vernon
Wilson -
Buillding
Permit
Planning
Commission
to study
eli ination
of !Mt.Com-
fort Road
from
Maior St.Pl
The -Building Inspector and'aMr: Vernon Wilson presented a plat plan for a proposed tom
martial" -building to be located on -property lying between Mt. Comfort Road and West Nort
Street and bordered ori the West by Lindell"Avenue-:-
The'Building Inspector stated that the -existing Major Street Plan, in effect at this ti.
provided for the future widening of Mt.'Comfort Road and West North Street and that a
motion passed by the Council on June 12, 1961 prohibited the issuing of building permi
for b.uildings which' -would front -on the' Mt:: _Comfort- Road.
After .a long dis_cussion,.Aiderman-.Burggin moved ttiafthe Planning _Commission be authoriz
to make a study of the Major Street Plan with reference to eliminating- the. Mt. _Comfort
Road between Oakland -Avenue anis Garland'Avehue from the Major Street Plan,
The motion wad'seebrided'by Alderman Thomas and'upon.roll.call the-following.vote was
recorded: ""Aye" Walker, Christie, Hatfield, McClelland, Thomas and Burgin. "Nay" Smit
There b6ing six "Ayes" and only one "Nay", the Mayor declared tie motion passed*
P
83
Building, The Building Inspector explained that Building- Permits had been issued for two buildings
Permits in to be located on Lots 2'and 3, Block 1 of the proposed Tate Addition to the City of
Tate Addit on. Fayetteville, located on -15th Street and at a later date -discovered that errors had been
made by the Building -Inspector and builder with regard to the front building -setbacks
_.
required by the Major Street Plari.
The Building_Inspector_read the minutes of the Planning- Commission meeting on August 25,
1961"vihereby'they recommended- that"the"-City Couincil--permit Mr.-Milton'H. Tate to finish
the" construction of the -buildings -located ori Lot"s" 2 -arid -3' in Block 1 as outlined above.
Alderman Smith then moved that"Mr.'TAte be granted permisbiori'to'complete the buildings
on L6t's-2-and 3 in Block 1 of the proposed Tate Addition as recommended by the Planning
Coimmissi6fi
The motion was seconded by Alderman Christie and passed unanimously.
The City Attorney -"then introduced and read in its entirety for the first time a proposed
ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND CONFIRM THE DEDICATION -OF ALL STREETS,
ALLEYS AND EASEMENTS IN THE PLAT OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, BLOCK 1, BLOCK 2, AND.3 OF TATMS
Ordinance ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS":
No. 1272 Alderimn'Smith-moved that the rules be suspended and that the ordinance be placed on the
second reading."
The motion was-sedonded by Alderman Burgin and passed unanimously.
The ordinance was then read -for thesecond-t me.
Aldermari-'Smith hien moved that the rules be further suspended and the ordinance placed o:
the third- and fins -reading.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Walker --and passed-ginanimously.
The ordinance -'was -then read fd"r the'third and last-tiirie,'
The"Mayor then declared -the ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, th
Mayor'asked the "question,'"Shall the--Ordinancefpase"?
Upon roll-'call'the •followingvote"was�recorded, "Aye" Walker, Christie, Hatfield,
McClelland, Thomas Bur iii, and Smith.''Nay None.
-. --- - - ._
..
There being seven 'Ayes" and no "Nays",'the Mayor declared the Ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO, 1272
AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND CONFIRM THE -DEDICATION OF ALL STREETS, ALLEYS AND EASEMENTS I:
THE PLAT OF LOTS 1: THROUGH 4, BLOCK 1, BLOCK 29 AND 3 OF TATE'S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS.
WHEREAS; there -has been duly presented to the City Council of the City of Fayette-
ville,'Arkansas, a plat of Lots l'through 4; Block 1, Block 2, and Block 3 of Tates
Addition'to'the -City of Fayetteville, Arkansas', dated August 28, 1961, by which the
owners of the platted real estate have dedicated for public use the streets, alleys, and
easements shown upon said plat, and
-.. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, has
recommended the, acceptance of the plat, subject to the following provisions:
(1) %hat no new- structures be built on Blocks 2'and-3 until said blocks -are replatti
into lots and blocks and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council.
(2) Structures to be erected on Lots l- and .4, Blook l,'to be set back to comply wits
the Zoning Ordinances and Major Street Plan for proposed 84 foot Fifteenth Street,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby accepts and confirms the
dedication -of all'streets, alleys; aiid easement§, and the said City Council hereby assur
the care, control, and jurisdiction of the same.
SECTION 2: That-the'recommendations of0the Planning Commission as above stated, are
hereby adopted by the'City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, thus restricting the building of
new'structures on Blocks 2 -and --3 until said Blocks are replatted"into Lots and Blocks a
approved by the Planning Commission and the'City Council$ and that new structures to be
erected on Lots'l and 4,-Bl6ck 10 be set back"to comply'with the Zoning Ordinances and
Major Street Plan for proposed 84 foot Fifteenth Street.
SECTION 3. That this ordinance shall take effect and be in force and effect from an
after its passage, approval and publication.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Walker and passed unanimously.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 28th day of August, 1961,
APPROVED:
(y�
ATTEST: Azatsiolawliss
MAYOR
GEO G S, CITY CLERK
Improve
Alderman Hatfield reported that the landing apron at the new Airport Terminal Building
apron at'
Airporti.
was badly in need of an additional heavy coat of asphalt for reinforcement,due to the
heavier' -planes which ware now landing��:,and that the Federal Government would help finance
the project. - -.. „
After a long discussion, Alderman Smith moved tb authorize' the' improving of the runway
apron -at -the Municipal Airport; the installation'of-the light: controls"in the FFA Buildi
and'that the money be appropriated for this in-a"sum not to exceed 45,000.00.
City
Eng.
Themdtion was seconded by Alderman Walker and passed unanimously.
Gave report
on
Sewer
The City Engineer gave a report"on "Sewer -Lines for'Meidowlark Addition" as authorized a
Lines
the" last'regular"Council meeting on -August 14, 1961. He reported that it might be possib
forl
to'rece1V6 Federal Aid on the collector sewer which'should be built before this Addition
Meadowlark
can be served -and that he recommended a collective sewer line be laid at this time and
Addition.
afterwards when funds are --available, re-evaluate"the areas in the vicinity of Meadowlark
Addition for the -feasibility of providing sewer service.
-discuss
After a long ion;: Alderman Christie moved to refer this to the Sewer Committee
or further study and recommendation. -
The motion was seconded by Alderman Walker and passed unanimously.
B:
tg Permi{
Joe
Lt on
icussed.
C ity, not
to� enter
into
lawsuit
VS T.E.
Shelton
.i0-
RM
1273
ding
ivisi
1273
There being nofarther business, Alderman -Walker moved to adjourn. The motion was secon
by Alderman Smith and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meeting adj
APPROVED:
ATTE ST:
QSGF6ja DAVISO CITY CLERK
. uLtvan,
The City Cou#eil of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in regular session on Mondays: September
1961; at 7:30 P. M. "
Pr6ient:"M4y6r Giiy E',"Brown, City' Clerk- J: Davis, City Controller Albert J: Jones
City Attorney Bass"Triumbo, City Engineer'W. C. -Smiths -Chief of Police -Pearl Watts, Fire
Chief Burl Skelton, and Aldermen: Walker, Christie, Hatfield, McClelland, Thomas, Burgin
Smith, and Short.
Absent: None.
The minutes of the regular meeting on -Monday, Augui t 280 1961, copies of �*hich had been
previously mailed to the Aldermen, were approved as written.
Mr: Joe Hinton appeared before the Council in regard to i'buil ding -pei^init for an exten-
sion to"reface-his'building (cafe) located --on the south -bide 'of Dickson Street and
immediately vgest of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad tracks.
T�.e BuildinggInspector explained the proposed extension ifid-reported it would be in vmo:
tion of the Master Street Plan now in effect, and -kis recommended -this to be referred to
the Planning Committee for study and recommendation.
After a -long discussion, Alderman Burgin moved to referthis to the Planning Committee
for study and recommendation:
- -- . ...
The motion was seconded by Alderman Walker and passed unanimously.
Pt
Aldertirian 'McClelland reported that the-Planniing Co'M*mittee'"kiad 'recommended- that the' City
not -enter into a•lawsuit with citizens in their lawsuit against Mr: T. E. Shelton, who
is moving;•some-old buildings to the. HotaAddition'and remodeling them.
After -'a brief discussion,"•Alderman" MBClelland•inoved that the -City not' -enter
into`"a liwsuit'as'co=plaintiff-with-citizens"vs-T."E.-Shelton,-Defendant, over some old
buildings being•"moved -to -the Hotz"Addition and remodeled by Mr. T.'E. Shelton:
The"motion was seconded by Alderman Walker and upon •roll call'the following vote was
recorded: "Aye" Walker, Christie, Hatfield, McClelland, Thomas, Burgin, and Smith.
"Nay" Short."'
There being seven•"Ayes" and only one "Nay", the Mayor declared the motion passed.
Alderman Christie reported that the Street Committee had recommended the amending of a
portion of the Subdivision Regulations Ordinance No. 1245, passed and approved September
1960. -
After a -brief discussion, Alderman Christie introduced a proposed ordinance which the C'
Attorney read in its entirety entitled, "AN -ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 12450 SUB-
aDIVISION:REGULATIONS, APPROVED SEPTEMBER 129 1960, MORE SPECIFICALLY TO AMEND ARTICLE 11
MINIMUM DESIGNS STANDARDS; PARAGRAPH F, BUILDING SETBACK LINES; SUBPARAGRAPH 2 AND 3, A]
AHtICLE V, IMPROVEMENTS; PARAGRAPH D AND E; PERTAINING TO STREET GRADING, SURFACING, CII.]
AND GUTTER, AND BUILDING SETBACK LINES".
Alderman Walker moved.that the Ordinance -be -passed:
The motion was'seoonded by.Alderman Christie and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayo:
declared the ordinance passed.
Alderman Walker then moved -that the emergency clause -be adopted. The motion was secondee
by Alderman Christie and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the emergency
clause adopted.
OEDINANCE N0. 1273
N INANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 12451, SUB-DIVISION"REGULATIONS, APPROVED SEPTEMBER
1960, ARTICLE IV, MINIMUM DESIGNS STANDARDS; PARAGRAPH F, BUILDING SETBACK LINES;
SUBPARAGRAPH 2 AND 3; AND ARTICLE V,,IMPROVM1ENTS; PARAGRAPH D AND E; PERTAINING TO
STREET GRADING, SURFACING, CURB AND GUTTER, AND BUILDING SETBACK LINES.
WHEREAS;
a piiblio hearing -was
held'before
the -Planning Commi's"cion of
the City of
Fayetteville;
Arkansas,
on -August
16; 19619 for
the purpose of discussing
proposed -
amendments to
Ordinance
No. 1245,
Sub=Division-Regulations,
Article IV", Minimum Designs
Standards, Paragraph F.
Building Setback Lines,
Subparagraph 2 and 3, and
Article V,
Improvements,
Paragraphs
D and E,
and
WHEREAS, -notice of said public hearing, -setting forth tie date, trine, place and
purposes of 'hearing, and location'of.-property was published -"in the Northwest Arkansas
Times; a newspaper of general circulation in said City, more than 15 days prior to said
public hearing, and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said Planning Commission certified to the
City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, the following amendments to Ordinanc
No. 1245, which are herein adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSA
-SECTION 1-.-That-Art-isle IV "Mihimum Design Standards", Paragraph F. "Building Setb
Lilies", subparagraphs 2 and 3, be and the same are hereby amended to read as follows,
to -wit:
2;.Side building setback linea on corner lots shall not be This than twenty=five(4
feet from the property line on the intersecting street side. However, in case tk
subdivision is'l6cated in a zoning"district in'which"the minimum side building
setback-lines'are"more`or"less"thari those required by these regulations, the
zoning ordinance minimum requirement shall apply.
3.' Side biiilding--setback-liiies on"inside lots shall not be leas than ten (10) feet
from the property line. However, -in case the subdivision -is located in a zoning
district in which the minimum side building-setbaok lines are less than required
by these regulations, the zoning ordinance minimum requirement shall apply.
12,
9