HomeMy WebLinkAbout1959-06-23 Minutes (2)207 (Conti
409.14
3
a
I plea of not guilty shall be entitled to a trial as authorized by law. The payment of a
• fine to the traffic clerk shall be deemed an acknowledgment of conviction of the alleged
I
ffense, and the traffic clerk,. shall issue a receipt to the violator acknowledging
payment thereof.
11 6. The following duties are hereby imposed upon the traffic clerk in reference to
traffic offenses:
(a) He shall accept designated fines, issue receipts, and represent in court such
violators as are permitted and desire to plead guilty and waive court appearances.
(b)He shall receive and issue receipts for cash bail from the persons who must or
wish to be heard in court, enter the time of their appearance on the court dicket, a
notify the arresting officer and witnesses, if any, to be present.
(c) He shall keep an easily accessible record of all violations of which each per-
son has been gthilty during the preceding 12 months, whether such guilt was establishe
in the court or by plea of guilty, waiver of appearance and payment of fine to the
traffic'clerk.
(d) He shall keep records and submit summarized monthly reports to the Judge of t'
7
1' Fayetteville Municipal Court of all notices issued and arrests made for violations of
Ifthe traffic laws and ordinances of this city and of all the fines collected by him, a'
the final disposition or present status of every case of violation of the provisions
said laws and ordinances. Such records shall b)e so maintained as to show all types of
violations and the totals of each. Said records shall be public records.
7. The traffic clerk shall exercise the powers and duties as provided in this ordinance
nd in addition thereto shall perform the duties of Clerk of the Fayetteville Municipal
ourt as same are now prescribed by Sections 221-713 and 22-719 of Arkansas Statutes of
947, Annotated, or as shall hereafter be prescribed by lawn.
S. The traffic clerk,, before entering upon the duties of said office, shall make and
le with the City Clerk a good and sufficient bond for the faithful performance of his
ties as traffic clerk and as 81erk of the Fayetteville Municipal Court in the sum of
,500.00;; said bond to be approved by the City Council and the premium therefor, if a
rety bond be approved, to be charged as an expense of operating said municipal court.
9. That Ordinance No. 1134 is hereby repealed as well as all other ordinances or
parts of ordinances in conflict herewith.
DATED THIS 23rd day of Oune, 1959.
APPROVED:
Jo AUSTIN PARISH9
ATTESTGE�%�
ORGE j VIS,^CITY CLERK
The Mayor recommended that Mr. Alford Glenn, who had been working in the court room for
Alford Glenn the past week, be employed as traffic clerk.
employed as Alderman.iSmith moved to accept the recommendation of the Mayor and employ Mr. Alford
traffic Clerk. Glenn, as traffic clerk at a salary starting at $200.00 per month.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Burgin and passed unanimously.
City
Engineer
authori?Fe to
prepare Tans &
spec. andjadv.
for two new
pickups and
radios. 1
3 street lites
authorized.
Special
Se$kion.
•
Alderman Lunsford moved to authorize the City Engineer to prepare plans and specificati
for two new pickup trucks (one to., -bb' -used by the City Building Inspector and the other
by the Water Department) and two new radios for these pickups and to advertise for bids
on this equipment.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Walker and passed unanimously.
Alderman Smith then moved that three street lights -be installed as follows: Une at the
intersection of Lunsford Avenue and Hammond Street, One at the intersection of James
Street and Mt. Comfort Road, and One at the intersection of Vandeventer Avenue and Hol
Street The motion was seconded by Alderman Lunsford and passed unanimously. Q
There being no further business, Alderman Walker moved to adjourn. The motion was aecon
ded by Alderman Lunsford and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor declared the meet-
ing adjourned.
APPROVED:
'GEORGE/ j.Id7lVl,NITY C7=i
f
The City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas met in special session on Tuesday, June 23,
1959, at 3:00 P. M.
Present: Mayor J. Austin Parish, City Clerk George J. Davis, City Controller Albert J.
Jones, City Attorney A. D. McAllister Jr., City Engineer W. C. Smith, and Aldermen:
Barnhart, Smith, Burgin; Lunsford, McClelland, Hatfield, Kent, and Walker.
f Absent: None.
The Mayor reported that the gurpose of the meeting was to receive and open bids for the
purpose
of
second and last section of Water Main Extensions of the 1958 Water and Sewer Expansion
meeting.
Project and that all members had been notified by U. S. Mail and by oral announcement
at the regular council meeting on Monday, June 22, 1959.
The bids were opened by the City Clerk and read by Consulting Engineer L. M. McGoodwin.
Bids opened.
The Mayor than declared the meeting in recess while Consulting Engineers Jbhn Mahaffey
and L. M. McGoodwin made a complete tabulation of the bids.
Upon reconvening, Engineer McGoodwin reported they had not completed a tabulation of al
.the bids but a tabulation of the bid of Danco Construction Co., North Little Rock,
Arkansas, for the su4i of $216,912.25 was complete and was the low bid according to the
quotations from the other bidders.
410
C
Const.
Co.
ds.
Engineer McGoodwin recommended that the contract be awarded to the Danco Construction
o. subject to the audit of the bids.
lderman Lunsford moved to award the contract for the second and last section of the
ater Main Extensions to the-�,Danco Construction Co., North Little Rock, Arkansas, subjec
o the audit of the bids, for the sum of $216,912.25 upon t?.e acceptance of the Performa
and by the City Attorney and the evidence of proper insurance,
he motion was seconded by Alderman Hatfield and passed unanimously.
complete audit showed the bids to be as listed below:
Bidder Address
Worth James Construction Co. Little Rock, Arkansas
Danco Construction Co.
Forsgren Brothers
North Little Rock, Arkansas
Fort Smith, Arkansas
Total Sum of Bid
$255,829.12
$216,912.25
$227,283.90
re being no further business, Alderman Smith moved to adjourn.
motion was seconded by Alderman Burgin and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor
lared the meeting adjourned.
ATTEST 0
O.H D,CTEE.�
APPROVED:
Special
The City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in six cial session on Saturday, June 27
Meeting
1959, at 1:00 P. M.
ofl
Present: Mayor J. Austin Parish, City Attorney A,. D. McAllister Or., and Aldermen:
ouncil
Ralph Barnhart, Lynn Smith, Ellis Burgin, Bruce Lunsford, Edd McClelland, Herbert
Hatfield, Dale Kent and Bryan Walker.
George
Absent: City Clerk J. Davis.
In the absence of the City Clerk, City Attorney A. D. McAllister Jr. acted as clerk.
purpose The Mayor reported that the purpose of the.meeting was to inspect the real estate
I
f concerned in the new lake project which had not been purchased and that all members of
meeting, the Council had been notified by mail•and by telephone.
nlpection The Council then spent the afternoon=insi.ecting the real estate concerned in the new
I lake project which had not already been purchased but no action was taken.
(Estate by IThe purpose of the meeting having been accomplished, the Mayor declared the meeting
Council. ladjourned.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
A :D.:_IMdALLISTER JR: ACTI CITY CLERK
Special The City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in special session on Monday, June 29,
Meeting. 1959, at 7:00 P. M.
Present: Mayor J. Austin Parish, (pity Clerk George J. Davis, City Controller Albert J.
Jones, City Attorney A. D. McAllister Jr., and Aldermen :Ralph Barnhart, Lynn Smith,
Ellis Burgin, Bruce Lunsford, J. E. McClelland, Herbert Hatfield, Dale Kent, and Bryan
Walker, P
Absent: None.
e• The Mayor reported that the purpose of the meeting was for the construction purposes of
land at the lake area, and that all members of the Council had been notified by mail an
by _telephone.
After a brief discussion, Alderman Lunsford moved to exercise the option and purchase
Five the Musselman Property for $35,000.00. The motion was seconded by Alderman Walker but
tracts more discussion followed and Alderman Lunsford, with the consent of Alderman Walker,
of land withdrew his motion.
Alderman Hatfield then moved to exercise the options and purchase five tracts of land
listed as follows:
One tract known as the M. L. Musselman tract , listed on the map as M-1, consisting of
164.8 acres, more or less, for the sum of $35,000.00
t
One tract from C. A. Phillebaum and Mary Phillebaum, husband and wife, listed as tract
P-2, consisting of 97.75 acres, more or less, for the sum of $9,803.75.
One tract from Phania L.Bowen Miller and Turner Miller, wife and husband, listed as
tract M-3, consisting of 82.0 acres, more or less, for the sum of $12,325.00
Cine tract from Randall E, Roberts and Jane B. Roberts, husband and wife, listed as tract
R-2, consisting of 46.6 acres, more or -less, for the sum of $8,783.50
One tract from Harold•JA.Roberts and Ruth H. Roberts, husband and wife, listed as tract
R-1, consisting of 58.8 acres, more or less, for the sum of •$149700.00.
with no reservations whatsoever in any of the above options.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Smith and passed unanimously.
Alderman McClelland then moved to exercise the option and purchase one tract from Adriar
Fletcher and Marie Fletcher, husband and wife, listed as F-1, consisting of 40.0 acres,
more or less, for the sum of $112 340.00 with no reservations whatsoever.
• The motion was seconded by Alderman Barnhart and passed unanimously.
(Note: a misunderstanding over reservation of water rights in previous option, resulto
in the above option. See pages 360 and 363)j/�!
U