HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-03-11 - Agendas - Final AGENDA
Airport Board Meeting
1 :30 p.m., March 11, 2005
Airport Conference Room
1 . Welcome and Agenda Review — Chairman Bob Nickle.
A. Comments from the Public.
2. ; I., Minutes of the February.10,2005 meeting. r
3. - . Receiving of the Reports.: .
y:�,A. .Bob Nickle, Chairman •_ r � '
:
t$F"Ray Boudreaux, Duact'`rW
.- James Nicholson, Fmanci Coordinator.
.w)< ouise Powers, T Hangar eport.
`,Construction Repoit ": . T
=4E`. Maintenance Report.
G. Report on Self-Serve Fueling Facility
5. Old Business.
A. Electrical Upgrade Project T-Hangars.
. Action: Approve re-bid of project.
B. Update on RFP
6. New Business,
A. Task Order #5 — McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Action: Approve forward to City Council
Task Order #6 — McClelland Consulting Engineers,Inc:
Action: Approve forward to City Council
` C. Contract Renewal - McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Action: Approve renewal of Agreement
D. 2005 DBE Goal Update
Action: Approve forward to City Council
E. Renew Phoenix Rising Lease
Action: Approval of Lease
F. Temporary Lease for Dave Renfroe — Vehicle Rollover Testing.
Action: Approval of Lease
7. Other Business.
A. Items from the Public
( 1 ) Professor Betty Loewer, University of Arkansas
B. Items from the Airport Board.
8. Adjourn.
March 1, 2005
MONTHLY REPORT
Director, Aviation and Economic Development
Fayetteville, Arkansas
February 2005
AVIATION:
Operations for the month of February continue to languish. Fortunately, sales have been strong.
The first meeting of the fuel and line service FBO selection committee was held. Following much
discussion, it was determined that a meeting of all customers would be beneficial for the members of
the committee to help them determine the level of service expected. Darrell Rosen of Proctor and
Gamble agreed to facilitate the meeting which has been scheduled for march 5, 2005 in the airport
conference room. Once the results of the aviation community meeting are evaluated, the selection
committee will meet to evaluate the proposals. Three proposals were received: Millionaire out of
Houston; BGI, LLC out of Dallas in partnership with AMP Mechanics of FMA Drake Field; and
Executive Aviation Services based at FMA Drake Field. Our Board Chairman, Bob Nickle, our past
Chairman Doc Wallace and the Airport Director are on the selection committee along with Alderman
Don Marr, City Finance Director, Steven Davis and City Director of Operations, Gary Dumas.
The T-Hangar "H" construction project continues to progress well. All of the sheet metal is up.
Remaining is the fire wall of concrete block and the electric. The contractor expects to be ready fo
final inspection mid March with turn over to the City April 1 , 2005. These dates are only as good as
the contractor's performance which is being observed daily.
The USDA Forest Service final inspection was completed February 9. Discrepancies were, two light
fixtures not working and the pavement edge dressing too low. The lights were repaired on the spot.
The dirt work will wait until dry weather. There has been some delay in the design of the rest of the
project due to the wet ground. The company doing soil testing has not been able to get their
equipment into the site.
The Airport Board met in strategic planning session to discuss the Master Plan scope of work.
Bennard Dunkelburg representatives and representatives from McClelland Consulting Engineers
attended the meeting. The final document will be presented to the Airport Board for approval at the
March meeting before forwarding through the City staff to the City Council. Final estimate is
$ 122,742.00. We will formally apply for 95% FAA funding and 5% State funding for the project
after approval by the airport board and the City Council.
McClelland Consulting Engineers have initiated design for the West Side General Aviation Ramp to
finalize the numbers with the FAA for the funding. We will submit a task order to the Airport Board
for approval at the March meeting. The current working estimate approved by the FAA is $ and is
within the amount reserved by the FAA for the project.
F
Monthly Report for February
Dated March 1, 2005
Page Two
The 2005 hangar roof repair program is underway. T Hangar `B" is complete. T Hagar "C" is out
for quotes and we hope to have it done in March. AMP Maintenance building continued to have
two small leaks following a return trip by the contractor. Our maintenance repair team made some
repairs that stopped the leaks. We received instructions from the contractor and used the materials
he recommended.
The Post Office is open for business and the Postmaster is very happy. - There are still a few
problems that the contractor will fix but for the most part the project was a success.
Professor Betty Loewer reports some great ideas coming from the members of the interior design
class doing the redesign of the terminal building. She has invited the Board to attend the class.
We have had meetings and discussions concerning the T-Hangar rewiring project. Hugh Brewer is
back on the job to insure the design meets all codes and is the best value for the money. He will
provide a recommendation to the Board at their April meeting. Following approval by the Board, he
will provide new stamped drawings for the next round of bids.
Economic Development:
The City Council approved the Van Asche cost share project in February. The agreement between
the developers and the City allows the project to move forward with the developers paying their
portion of the cost share as the property is sold and developed. This project is a major step in the
right direction for surface access to the NWA Mall and retail district.
We continue to have meetings on the rail project for the siding to the industrial park north of the
airport. Progress is slow but steady.
I represented mayor Coody twice during the month of February. Once to present a proclamation to
the 100`h Birthday of one of our residents and once to present keys to the City for members of the
FHS cheerleading squad.
At the monthly meeting of the Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee, we discussed the
goals of the committee for 2005. Several projects were considered. We will prepare a list and offer
it for approval at the march meeting. The group is very supportive of our airport and transportation
infrastructure and will be willing to issue a resolution to support City wide transportation projects.
We have included the City engineering staff to insure cooperation.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ray M. Boudreaux, Director
,Tayve eiii1e
ARKANSAS
FBO Report
TO: Fayetteville Municipal Airport Board
THRU: Ray M. Boudreaux, Director
FROM: James Nicholson, Financial Coordinator
DATE: March 11 , 2005
SUBJECT: FBO Status Update
Tower Operations: This graph compares monthly totals of aircraft operations since
February 2000. The operations count in February has fallen off 30% compared to the
previous year.
OPEKATION5 - CUMULATIVE 2000 - 2005
0 50
Q
e
°0 40 132000
O 2001
30M 2002
132003
02004
20 11 W05
10 I I I
• ire ��e �P� Pa- ��+ �� ��. r� y�e a� �� a�,o
FBO Fuel Sales: Despite a drop in operations, the fuel sales volume in February
continues a trend of growth. The February sales level is approximately 94% of the FBO's
monthly average volume of 31 ,531 gallons for the past 12 months. By comparison, the
current average represents a 1 .6% increase over the monthly average volume in February
2004 of 31 ,039 gallons.
FUEL 5ALE5 - CUMULATIVE 2001 - 2005
400
e 2001
o ❑ 2002
300 EI 2003
a 250 M 2004
c ❑ 2005
'0 200
150
100rili
I
60nEW
M1I
• Local Prices: Following is a comparison of regional retail fuel prices as of 3/10/05:
Regional Jet Center (XNA) Avgas: 3.60 Jet-A: 3.38 Mogas
Pinnacle Air (ASG) 3.32 3.27
Beaver Lake (Rogers) 3.51 3.26
Hughes Aviation (Bentonville) 3. 15 (SS-2.75) 2.99
Siloam Springs (City-run) 2.50 (SS-2.25) 2.75
Fayetteville Municipal 3.06 (SS-2.57) 3.27 2.00
Regional Prices:
Sparks Aviation (Tulsa OK) 3.35 3.05
Ronson Aviation (Trenton NJ) 3.80 (SS-3. 10) 3.98
The Graph below illustrates wholesale fuel price fluctuation since January 1 , 2005.
Wholesale Fuel Price Trend
25%
tl 20% 'X Chg JnA
C Chg 100LL
L
0 15%
a,
10%
tl
u
`tl
a 5X
• 0% U1 (S (0 N N (D N Nz t0
9
Week 2005
FYV Fuel Ops Facts:
February 2005 fuel sales: 24,531 Jet - 82.2%
5.032 Avgas - 17.8%
29,563 Total
Jet-A sold to FYV-based customers in February: 129907 - 52.6%
Jet-A sold to transient aircraft customers in February: 11 ,624 - 47.4%
Avgas FYV- based truck sales in February: 717 - 14.2%
Avgas transient aircraft truck sales in February: 1 ,677 -
33. 3%
Avgas sold to Self-Serve customers in February: 21638 - 52.5%
87 MoGas gallons sold to Self-Serve customers in February: 314
•
•
Q
N
O U
O 0
N �
7-Mar
5..,
28-Feb
V 21-Feb
�L
• 14-Feb
/ 7-Feb
31-Jan
0
24-Jan N
m
0
17-Jan N
Y
U
3
10-Jan
� 3-Jan
�] J
U Q
7 �
J 27-Dec
0
-] O L O U) C) o
s t s s N
U U U U
• ❑• o ■ o a6uey� a6�.ua��ad
•
0
O 7=
N m
C
R
M
W O }
C Cl
�j T Yd 3L, itt . yt- i
Eli
7-rt-4z.•�-
N
0 (CO) M 4 •Yr^t� O) h C4 M f0�-s ' .
r5. f O ' N{
V h O e V GO N V' vi".L. „+++ � Y r . .
ri of ri id 'O m N ci fo `3,�.:.�Vi are . .. r^ .
.. N . . - - ' .1 `hud
¢
{}. O W M yMy N M O 7 ' M 0) �
C)
M (0 N O 40 (D
CO qq 0) M f` N 10 CO V N 0
NO N r N
CD
00 80 0) 0 M Iq M ' O (� _,co
.. (0 0) O (O M (D 0) M OD V O It 0
ON � N 0 N � N h 40- CO OD O 'W .. .
O O 00 In r. O (D 47 IA N 0 (O M TZ
010 N 00 N 0) M r� r cq N N O (D
Nm qt co M (DN O N
M r 000 O co
0) (D 7 CO th 0 r, O) N
er l0 OrrM co 00 V 0) NN V (O
. .-__00.2 V N (O M - (O . _—..M.^ O fO 0 -. (O .--C .._
NM Q 1� 0 � M N CONOO � W) h h V'
O O N N M (O N
M
co
O
C
0 CD n
0 N c
N C N L N W
•L 0) 0) c d J ... y c c
¢ 'O C C d J 0 > 0) J a L c0 a 0 0) (0
J
LL E c a�0i E K c — e066 DU 0UU lu m
LL 4) C O) 0 N y 06 .) O 0) N
ami Co y c w ° ¢ TD m w o 0 ¢ °� m H )i
m
m0 rn0 mc � . Z in a`� U c
LL c c d .> ui a M c 0) > 0) 0 n H a m
• De" m " d a� m E
<U Q O (i 0 F O F 0
to
N
(o
Lf)
O
N N
❑ ❑
w (o O CO '�-:to � " ' N ' O O (D..•. l ' ' O 6 U)
} (o O (o - . .+trio ' : ' 00 { O O 'O• • O (O O) N
O U) O V to, • O O O O ' " • O (o ( ) (O
.d.. d 'at � O i0 (O O co O
N N �j T (O O V w w w a
. 'ICD _ c.unuJz' : _ .'1
y �_L
tia
OD
LL
(o to GNco o O cn N
f` N O O O (o (O N co
(6 V O ( O N 6 O
c
� O
U
T
N
V c
G
d
Po > O
O �
o 'c m Eam � L" .
.9 cUWJ nL. (oo m d � .m an d v
� d xJ xrn a - � •Srn c
�m
to o yc o mxxwoxoom mjco (i
r y gwwwL@ @) 0 d d 1 o
°o ¢ a ¢ (N w O
_ c
0
� O
C N
� mm `m �Zim mm00 -Crnamv � d m
C o o > d 'm 3 3 w U' `m 3 c E• m e o. v 6 � E Q 0 N
a o S y (7 d Fw (0 H m V) m F- m o °' w E o m d o. d y E N
CD o v d o = ) U c p m c o
c Q a coo. N cao .- .,>__, v2 = °' > o 'mE' � � ("> � mZ d
m c m > d Q y aci nw v a N = a u x04 a o Ctc w d
¢ v_ E C > C o c N w U a a x m (D m a a x O O N y a a y D N C W N
d d d 'O a •p _ z ❑ 0� ¢ ¢ w w (n OD Da w '- m Z Qh• ¢ a W d (f1 l0
.> '� tow c ti � o a x v Q
U. _ w c
N N S C lL Y LL
-= O N LL
�` ❑ c o L 0 eC
. d m d c c
LL i LL C O d p J _ LL
0 o d c ¢ F- ¢ U F dcm
o o c E c
DEE. mom d
UQQ (i m oU w
t
fj.� 1Fyj1 ate. `)1-. f Nj f 4 J'X 5
w .4 n r 4ftda5 �k n � n'k$snS'� {abu
7 -� -0 h CJ In
7' co
cn Nc "�ux .
�u• a
H Cl
N
L .
LL
a �
O
y
U) (3) v
O N
t0 N COCD
-
— N M
r O
0 � �
N
Z
Q a o
C7 m v
LL
p c
} y O
LL' l0 l0
Q a ¢
c a m
m �
� C7
m N y
2 _ cocn Q
H co m J
0
O >` # # Q
n m a a 0
Q co Q Q
Cruzen Equipment Co., Inc.
160 West Mallory Avenue
J3111. Memphis. 8431
013
H 901-774-3130
(/ fax: 901-777 4-6431
1-900-238.2513
Jackson - Tupelo Little Rock AR Fayetteville, AR Mobile 0
601.372.1531 601.642-0480 601374-1526 5014423008 251366.2600
fax: 601.3734366 fax: 601342.1712 fex: 501374-1515 fax: 501.442-7257 ho : 251-666-2563
1.800.938.8792 1300445.1576 1.8004825662 1.886-800-5503 1300.3463116
Lw
j I ;
VA
1 11
I
r 't-y \5m� .� a- r . j • ti - .:. tiur3 - 1 c, G t$-.
rOle
kliA 7Z4ILL
1 •rs•,ct•sr �• a " _ ,1, b. ^tet,+.'* - k - -%
3 � r y
ie.
0 0 � a IJ34 4 I � �--
I -
EMBER /
- - aPEI -
SERVING THE INDUSTRY FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Cruzen Equipment Co., Inc.
• 160 West Mallory Avenue
V / V Memphis, TN 38109
1-naal3o
tax: 901-774-8431
1-8-800.238-2513
Jaokeon Tupelo Little Rock, All Fayetteville, AR Mobile
601-072-Ml 601.842-0454 601.1741526 501142-6008 251-666-2600
tax: 601473.8366 f= 6014142.1712 fax: 601-V4.1515 tax: 501.442-7257 fax: 251-666-2593
1400.938-8782 1400.445.1576 1.800-4825662 1.668-8005503 1-800.346-5116
I
A" b
nx
511COM
o
OVA 144 41 ma. 1
I
OW FFF
a
EMBER /
PEI
SERVING THE INDUSTRY FOR OVER 50 YEARS
•
iMay I0, 2005
Dear Wayne —
Please see the attached estimate for the various alternates regarding bringing the
door switches in the old hangars up to code. I had Delano Cotton of Northwest Electric
give me the labor estimates so they should be pretty close. We went down to the airport
together to make sure he understood what was involved
The least expensive option would be to move what we've got out of the hazardous
area and that is what I recommend to the Airport Board that they do. There will probably
be two objections to this from the lessees:
1 . The occupants of Hangars At, B and C will have to walk a little farther and
around their airplane to get to the door switches;.however the cost difference is so
great that rfthe ,.had to raise the rent to 1% h, it may not seem such" '
,t inconvenience , after the relighting is done3hey will have plenty of light to
see byro
' f 2. Unless Altera j A were accepted, theya , a511 have the old Fumas}
momentary Contac[�rt� switches that must belheld up or down during the r r
operation of the door. There is a chance that these drum switches can be
converted to maintained operation. I know that the drum switch made by Square
D can be converted, Even though Fumas says that these switches are not field-
convertible, it might be worth having the maintenance man experiment with
removing the sprang inside the switch and test it to see the switch would then stay
in the open or closed position without being held. If that doesn't work they might
want to consider purchasing new, maintained contact switches, especially since
some of the old switches show evidence of considerable arcing over the years.
New, maintained-operating drum switches cost about $150.00 each.
It's unfortunate that all four hangars were not furnished with contactor type
controls as was Hangar.D.N Tbis meant " for AptionsI wand 2A, a completely new
control scheme for Hangars A, B and C had to be designed requiring installation of
_ contactors. As you can see,.this is an expensive option,,. .-,. . .
You may have questions from the Board as to why it requires so much redesign
just to replace the drum switches with pushbuttons. The reason is that the drum switches
have six heavy-duty contacts that must carry a large amperage at one time or the other in
the reversing scheme. The load is too high amperage for a pushbutton switch and too
complex in the way it switches the leads to reverse the motor for any sort of simple
switch too operate. By operating through contactors (relays) the switch has only to carry
the load of the relay coils and may be operated by simple pushbuttons with single sets of
small contacts.
I am not aware of any switch that would replace the drum switches for a
"pullstring" type of operation. Also, the Intrinsically Safe method of switching would
cost more than any of the options listed above.
Best regards,
I
I
ESTIMATES
ALTERNATE 1 — Rtplace existing switches with explosion-proof pushbuttons
Hangars A, B and C - This option requires installing contactors (relays) above the
hazardous area to be controlled by a new explosion-proof
pushbutton station.
Material and Labor per-
Hangar
space: Sla][45.00 .
Hangar D In theyp}q, the contactors we**Win place. Work requu ed �;
r s t is to:rep]aoE'.the'6dstingpushbuttonswrthitew;explosionproof : .
^t_" pushbirftbn stations in the same lac�tion '�� �
' � f.c_lr #�'Cr•srt * -� _ -. t. �'sr' � �� � � /y_� ` +" � _
« ;
15-
j-a ,� . i �r - �1'IBtC.f181 end Lauri space:
,. arnG-z r L :•:�'i�w.Cc 'e�.:': _ [yam - .
ALTERNATE 2 — Relocate existing switches and disconnects out of hazardous areas.
Material and Labor per hangar space: $676.00
ALTERNATE 2A
Same as Alternate 2 except replacing existing drum switches with pushbutton
stations in Hangars A, B and C. This would require installing contactors (relays)
above the hazardous area in these hangars.
=:
Material and LaborPeii" ar
, • _ .�, -_':;-,,.':.. , hang space: 20
i
i
'f
i
1
f------------------------------------1
SOD &502SBC2W3/9999586/9999W OR EOU7"
P
,
210 VOUS STOP up i UI i
PUSNBURON PUSHBUTTON '
U ly—r—
S
ti
___ U2 i
i UP COIL
U4 r
1 2 1 / -'------------'------- -_
Imo '•dam �_
- 60 7 .6s DwN� .B � 01 � . . .
. PUSHBUrMN 20 .
UP, 61W2 to 5,1* 7 E 3 to 1
pFE ;ppp�tpp
D t- ..,�-i - I•t
,.. OdM� 'T?sSQ9is3;;6n4 1 to 7 ' , a• ii ., -- US.: I'- a3�' # Dx ; _f'F ••} • ' -
EIOSINO ORUY AIIi06 NR/MS R 2453 � e(�1g�y. a
•�c:> c"S`t.c •fie.tii'Ste^�'.'t`'' s-_ r-._- f"4h�� ---- -:.. ' � wy :'s
. K .� .` 4- „-gn i �r • NUMBER$ REFER R1k&tw
m uQg ..':
" s xmim ORA socae(SEE:um. .
WIRING DIAGRAM FOR CONTACTORS IN HANGARS A. B AND C
N.T.S.
LIMIT OF
HAZARDOUS AREA
GALV RIGID, CONDUIT
RELOCATED
DOOR SWITCHES SEAL❑FF FITTING
GALV RIGID CONDUIT 1F.F.
4' A.
18 MAX
CONTACTORS
(ALTERNATES 1 EXPL-PROOF PB STA
AND 2A)
N.T.S. 48,
FLOOR
N.T.S.
REWIRING DOOR SWITCHES IN OLD HANGARS A , B , C , D
HHB 5 /8/2005
I
I Wb
v .
yy R aa+ � • R-
wto
00
\ . 7
A
` Y C
I _ ;
Wma OVA
w �
b I isi l,�
0
� �
9 _ .
J
a ® a
4m
LJS .
%5M 04
pen
N
o D a:
n
60
U a
w _
Kim
n _
ire
< 1W1� JJ
W 2 /f{F £ �\ rrtitC
�FfNGA�2 D
I � ,
TASK ORDER NO, 5
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE
FAYETTEVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
STATE OF ARKANSAS '
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
This Tas Order is written pursuar)t�to;the basic agreement;e ed AGREEMENT FOFZ �
ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN;McCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, "n3
1 .ate s � ���`
INC.INCAND IMI CITY OF FAYETTEVILCE, ARKANSAS, executed on-April
T 30, 2003 �`.
The referenced basic agreement pertains to proposed improvements to Fayetteville
Municipal Airport. This Task Order entered into and executed on the date indicated
• below the signature block, by and between the City of Fayetteville and McClelland
Consulting Engineers (MCE) sets forth the project description, project schedule, and
professional fees related to the preparation of an Airport Master Plan Update.
SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The description of the project is as described in Exhibit "A" to this Task Order.
SECTION II - PROJECT SCHEDULE
From the time the City of Fayetteville issues the Notice To Proceed (NTP), MCE will
endeavor to provide the draft Airport Master Plan Update within 9 months. After review
and comments by the FAA, MCE will endeavor to complete the final Airport Master Plan
. Update within 90 calendar days.
1:\DRAKE FIELD\CONTRACTS\2003-2006\Task Order 5.doc Pagel of 3
SECTION III - SCOPE OF SERVICES
MCE shall, generally, provide those services listed in the basic agreement which are
applicable to this specific Task Order. Specifically, the Master Plan project is to include
the Program of Services as•outlined in Exhibit "A".
SECTION IV - FEES AND PAYMENTS` "
A Lump_$u ; ee of $ 122.742.000 js to,t e,;paid to McClelland,fo e wwork associated '.W
with the 'descfibed project. The basis for this fee is presenteddn Exhibit B.
nN"rsrfs,tscnFQ� � �
SECTON V - BASIC AGREEMENT IN EFFECT:
Except as amended specifically herein, the basic AGREEMENT shall remain in full
• force as originally approved and executed .
JADRAKE FIELD\CONTRACTS\2003-2006\Task Order 5.doc Page 2 of 3
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be duly
executed as of the date and year first herein written.
FOR THE CITY. OF FAYETTEVILLE:
By.
Mayor .-.. ,
Attest: ,; t
Date:
•
FOR McCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. :
By: -
____. Pr sident , ___ ._.
Attest:
Vice Pr id t
•
JADRAKE FIELD\CONTRACTS\2003-2006\Task Order 5.doc Page 3 of 3
• TASK ORDER NO. 6
WEST SIDE HANGAR COMPLEX
STATE OF ARKANSAS
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
.This Task Order is written. pursuant to the basic agreement entitled CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING ,SERVICES, executed on April
2003. The referenced basic agreement pertains t proposed improvemen%J
Drake Field, FayetteviIW46 Municipal Airport. This Task<Order entered into and executed
r ...
=' on the date indicated below the signature block, by-and between the City of Fayetteville
l
and McClelland Consulting Engineers (MCE) sets forth the project description, project
schedule, and engineering fees related to the West Side GA Apron Improvements,
• Drake Field.
SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is to consist of the West Side GA Apron (9400 SY) and sewer line
replacement. The services to be performed include: Surveying ; Preliminary Design;
Preliminary Cost Estimates; Detailed Design; Construction Admin and Observation
services; Construction Materials Testing; and review fees for State or Federal Agencies.
SECTION 11 - PROJECT SCHEDULE
From the time the City of Fayetteville issues the Notice To Proceed (NTP), McClelland
• Consulting Engineers, Inc. will endeavor to execute the project within the following time
periods:
JMRAKE FIELD\CONTRACTS12003-2006\Task Order 6.doc 1
Task Completion After NTP
A. Surveying: 20 calendar days
B. Preliminary Design & Cost Estimates: 50 calendar days
C. Detailed Design, 90 calendar days
D. Advertise -for bids: ' . ; , 100 calendar days-'
SECTION III - SCOPE OF<SERVICES
r r..
MwCClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc. shall, generally,,OrbVide those services fisted.1
the basic agreement which are applicable to this specific Task Order. Specifically,. the
project is likely to include:
• A. Surveying for the Corporate Hangar Complex.
B. Geotechnical Investigation
C. Performing preliminary engineering services for the Hangar Complex;
formulating preliminary construction cost estimates, and meeting with the City
to discuss the project.
D. Performing the detailed design of the Hangar Complex.
E. Assist the City of Fayetteville advertising for competitive bids and
recommending the award of a construction contract.
F. Construction Administration, Observation and prepare "Record Drawings" for
the completion of construction based upon the Contractor's mark-ups.
G . Construction staking of a baseline.
• H. Construction Materials Testing .
JADRAKE FIELD\CONTRACTS\2003-2006\Task Order 6.doc 2
• SECTION IV - FEES AND PAYMENTS
The following fees are to be paid to McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc. as
compensation for his services:
A. Surveying: a lump sum of $ 3�750.
B. Geotechnical Investigation a lump sum of $ 2,550.
':'C. Preliminary Engineering; Cost
Estimates, and Application a lump sum of $ 22,500.
Detailed Plans & Sp&cser' ` ` lump sum of $ 24,900
�. . ..
s
µ E. ;Bidding Service r -� a lump sum of k $ 3,200 .
F Construction Administration. & Inspection. =:hourly rates, estimated to`be
Contr. Admin $ 5v550. .
Observation $32,500.
Record Drawings $ 1 ,950. .
• G. Construction Baseline Staking : a lump sum of $ 650.00.
H. Construction materials testing : hourly rates & unit prices,
estimated to be $4,850.
1. Ark Health Dept Review Fee Fee Amount NTE $500.00
Appendix B presents hourly rates for personnel anticipated to be assigned to this,
project by McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Appendix A presents the basis of payments to the ENGINEER.
SECTON V - BASIC AGREEMENT IN EFFECT:
• Except as amended specifically herein, the basic AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING
SERVICES shall remain in full force as originally approved and executed .
JADRAKE FIELMONTRACTS\2003-2006\Task Order 6.doc 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be duly
executed as of the date and year first herein written.
FOR THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE:
Attest.
q Mayor
Date
• FOR McCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. :
r
By: Attest:
President Vice President
Date: -.. �/ / .. _. _._.. . --._.._ .
•
J:\DRAKE FIEMCONTRACTS\2003-2006\7rask Order 6.doc 4
88 8 8 $ $ 58888888888p8p8 8Q8p8888p8p000008 8 88O8C8 8 8 8
O a S O S Y
yFZ� p MmN P e N N (O `YSY P Nh OOG4 m P11�gm Ph0 N $ d{ P � N m
O
• Y 88 s sss d o s s s ss m s g
w $ gi or $ m " o 0 0 � n $
8 8 8 $ 8
o 0
m
uS �
S
IN
1191111111
A.a
,.kms, t
.
2��111 n
2 �
' I tpt
N
~ miOJZ p0 m e e
• Q p O < 111 ry m Y Y N �j � � m m Y m F O � � e
0 � o
oFggs
a �11���1gg
W � V �p6S n rvry NmYN YS Yv o
w7 0 N e
F 'u"
58 N n N m m Y O N m N \ O N m
O 3ai - 0 b
LL z
M
(Q 2 S Ille
0 �
6
111
2e
N �� 1'1 "I I
Q N < � Y N O n O N Y Y N 1m.� m h N •- � 0
6 S
~Ke
W o n o e
n
0
Z P> m
W
>O O Z P 9 m
OW K K Zwm_1 zF<F pE
U. F N J W 0aaW � W N g W PS
z z aaw z Q � � J qao i EEE $
N � � LL � O OIL Nm Z 6 rC S
? W p Z3Z ~ M w mmQPU5 2UP O F = y E
u LL' W F pga aJP ¢ waw Sao uz p a
1/1 p Z a 2 O LL W g W 2 W o LL 7 i W e o N G W Q O M z $
W G_I p U' (9Q aU _ Q � wrc - c� c� W w imw yFQ p rc A
O IFq W JAZ K fLf W2 ZZOyM Z1' HCNJ CZ 2 W $
1Yi1 Fa T+i y>� wQ_ o ; oaa wz' � c�_ F >> ; W 33 a5 Q� �$1FF1G 02 zr p o � z 8 z
• tl1F 0 2 OF g < E' IwIiWLLWWOy LL' 6' WW W � JPGI F- ZLLO ZZZU
• rL U W O O O S P W W U H w ,L n O O O N O W W Z >- m F- a - W 3 0 Z H
� w Z J WW ) .: .: .: .. .: .: .: W aSFJ 2 ' : O � WEOa Om a W QU
O a ZJJJJJ nQQ a s060NlgNP sx' w Z � O O J p
Z g U 1•' M O a W W W W W W w f J W W W W W W W N P 1' _' a - O � a
Q � cv8 z ao > � �u �uTiiww �ii "IUUi � c90 nQpp0000 yoga p ¢ rcQ ° v
FJ ZU $ Z � W � OO00000J� 1- O � m YOIJJ JJJJ JLL > U V5 afrWpm ¢0 > O O
a y)1 g yU1 O C W 41 n n P n P N 1' p< 2 J F 6F F<F a F<F a y<y.� FFa W S Q JQ >W> ; M Z IN- 2 U N F O 'p
J > O F J O J W W W W W W W W 7 1 W a W W � W yl W LL T Z y1 W WHO u� P Z
aY j ~ W SPP M1OOO000005MM � OOOOOOO P ? LLKK 0 ZQQ z z W
a ` P 0 6 O 0 U U U Q yW
77 W a
a 0 U O W O Z liLU O
• APPENDIX B
TASK ORDER NO.6
Hourly Rates for Personnel
Fayetteville Municipal Airport
CATEGORY BILLABLE HOURLY
RATE RANGE
Project Director $115 to $130
Protect.m'
tNanager zU $90 to $120
Protect Engineer }}I��-. � 4;E $75 to $90all
_ .
Design'Engineer II *`'" $65 to $75
Design Engineer 1 $50 to $65
• Registered Surveyor $60 to $80
Computer Technician $45 to $60
Senior Engineering Technician/Observer $55 to $70
Engineering Technician/Observer $40 to $55
Junior Engineering Technician $35 to $45
Survey Crew (2 man) $85 to $110
Clerical Support $35 to $45
CADD Technician III $55 to $65
CADD Technician 11 $45 to $55
CADD Technician 1 $35 to $45
Soils Lab Supervisor $40 to $50
• Soils Technician II $35 to $45
Soils Technician 1 $30 to $35
JADRAKE FIELD\CONTRACTS\2003-2006\Appendix B TO 6.doc
• APPENDIX C
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LABORATORY
FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ORDER NO. 6
GENERAL:
Laboratory Field Technician " $ 35.00 per hour
Laboratory Engineering Technician $ 40.00 per hour
Engineering Technician a 50.00 per hour
Senior Engineering Technician 68.00 per hour
Lab Supervisor 50.00 per hour • -
Milea9e 0.36 per mile
Consultation: .
Lab Supervisor 50.00 per hour
Field Engineer 75.00 per hour
Project Engineer z 85.00 per hour
_ Projecf.Manager _ ;• ' 115.00 per hour _
Principal Engineer 130.00 per hour
Lab Reporf,Preparation (per report) t,S 1-14
F ` i 40.00 per hour
SOILS.
Soils Field Technician (1 -hour minimum) 35.00 per hour
In-Place Compaction Test-Nuclear Gauge ASTM D 2922
Sample Pickup, or Stand-by Time
Nuclear Density Gauge Fee: (per Density Test); [Minimum $15.00 per trip, per project] 5.00 each
Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index ( 3 point) ASTM D 4318 50.00 each
• Sieve Analysis-Washed No. 200 (Wet) ASTM D 1140 35.00 per sieve
Sieve Analysis-Dry ASTM D 422 8.00 per sieve
Hydrometer Analysis ASTM D 422 90.00 each
Specific Gravity ASTM D 854 50.00 each
Soils Classification, Unified or AASHTO ASTM D 2487 or AASHTO M 145 110.00 each
Laboratory Maximum Compaction Test ASTM D 698 or AASHTO T 99 120.00 each
Laboratory Maximum Compaction Test ASTM D 1557 or AASHTO T 180 135.00 each
Potential Volume Change-Swell Pressure 100.00 each
California Bearing Ratio-CBR ASTM D 18831 (3 point) (Proctor curve additional) 150.00 each
Shrinkage ASTM D 427 50.00 each
Soil Bearing Capacity (Engineering Tech., 2-hour minimum) 50.00 per hour
Non-ASTM Procedures Available On Request .._ .
CONCRETE:
Concrete Mix Design Price on Request
Review Concrete Mix Design (Lab Supervisor) 50.00 per hour
Confine Concrete Mix Design Price on Request
Concrete Field Technician ' (1 -hour minimum): [For any of the following 6 items:] 35.00 per hour
• Concrete Cylinder or Beam Molding ASTM C 31
• Concrete Cylinder or Beam Pickup
• Concrete Slump Test ASTM C 143
• Concrete Air Content Test ASTM C 231 or C 173
• Cement Mortar or Group Sampling
• Stand-by Time
Unit Weight and Yield of Freshly Mixed Concrete ASTM C 138 50.00 each
Compressive Strength of Concrete Test Cylinders ASTM C 39 (pad cap) 15.00 each
Compressive Strength of Concrete Test Cylinders ASTM C 39 (sulfur capped) 25.00 each
Spare Cylinders Specimens Processed but not Tested 15.00 each
Schmidt Hammer Testing (Engineering Tech, 2-hour minimum) 50.00 per hour
ACI Grade I Concrete Field Testing Technician
J ADM FIELDCOWMCTSVMY]CMNPPE MC TM.D'JC Page 1 of 2
• APPENDIX C
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LABORATORY
. FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ORDER NO. 6
CONCRETE (Continued):
Flexural Strength of Concrete Beams ASTM C 78 or C 293 30.00 each
Spare Beam Specimens Processed but not Tested 25.00 each
Compressive Strength of Grout Cubes 25.00 each
Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar Cubes 20.00 each
Concrete Coring (3" or 4"):We Machine & Lab Technician 65.00 per hour
Additional Lab Technician, as required 35.00 per hour
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cores.(3" or.4") 30.00 each
: .'.' Other,Core Sizes , ':- s risk o , ,. . Price on Request• w.; >r
Aggregate.Sieve Analysis: . :: • :.: ::.
Dry Sieve ASTM C 136 - :_ �r• 8.00 each ^_
Wet SleveASTM C 117
r - r 35.00 each r -
f r " Fineness Modules s� +2 '• 25.00 ach
Dentation ? . 35.00 each
ce
DeleteriousMateiials 60.00 each
Specific Gravity and Absorption of Aggregate ASTM C 127 & C 128 85.00 each
Dry Rodded Unit Weight of Aggregate ASTM C 29 60.00 each
Sodium or Magnesium Sulfate Soundness (5 cycles) ASTM C 88 300.00 each
Additional Cycles 50.00 each
ASPHALT:
• Asphalt Mix Design (Marshall Design Method) Price on Request
Review Asphalt Mix Design (Sr. Engr. Technician) 68.00 per hour
Asphalt Field Technician
In-Place Compaction Test-Nuclear Gauge (Lab Technician) 35.00 per hour
Sample Pickup 35.00 per hour
Marshall Test including Stability, Flow, Laboratory Density, Percent Air Voids,
Percent Voids in Mineral Aggregate (3 specimens per test) 350.00 each
Extraction Including percent Bitumen and Aggregate Gradation 275.00 each
Laboratory Density of Cored Plugs including Depth Measurement 25.00 each
Asphalt Coring (3" or 4"):
Core Machine & Lab Technician 65.00 per hour
_ . Additional Lab Technician, if required . _ .. ._... _ _ _ __. 35.00 per hour
Sample Pickup 35.00 per hour
FIREPROOFING:
Unit Weight, Bonding Strength, Thickness and Sampling
(actual time required for Lab Technicians) 35.00 per hour/Tech.
Report Preparation (Lab Supervisor) 50.00 per hour
STRUCTURAL STEEL:
Bolt Torque Testing: Lab Technician(s) 35.00 per hour
Field Engineer 75.00 per hour
Pneumatic Torque Wrench Calibration (twice per day) 50.00 each
Visual Weld Inspection Field Engineer 85.00 per hour
• Services not Listed are Available on Request
JYIWE FFLOLpAlUCTWDMa2OJTAPPE"CIX C TOO DOCIM Page 2 of 2
1 '
McCLELLAND PO. Box 1229
fAX
MCECONSULTINGFayetteville, Arkansas 72702- 1229
479-443-2377
DESIGNED TO SERVE
ENGINEERS, INC. 479-443-9241
March 4, 2005
Mr. Ray Boudreaux
Airport Director
Airport Department
4500 S. School, Suite F
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Re: West Side GA Apron Complex
Fayetteville Municipal
"Dear Mr. Boudreaux:
K
The estimated cost for this project is as outlined below:
Estimated Project Construction Cost
West Side GA"Apron $750,460.00
Access Drive 42,000.00
Sewer Line 140,365.00
Subtotal $ 925.825.00
5% Contingency 46.292.00
Total Estimated Const. Cost $ 972,117.00
Engineering Fee
Design $ 50,500.00
Const. Admin 5,500.00
Const. Observation 34,450.00
Application & Review Fees 1 ,250.00
Topographic Survey 31750.00
Geotechnical Investigation 29550.00
Materials Testing 4.850.00
Total Engineering Fees $ 102.850.00
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1 ,074,967.00
A copy of the apron layout is attached. If there are any questions regarding this cost estimate,
please contact us.
Sincerely,
PAND CONS IIN_GnENGINEERS, INC.
ne E.ant
Enclosure: Layout
JMRAKE FIELDICOHRUCTS=032OWboudr =430/.M9dw1
' 1 8• �, z I
X o " 4 5
4
5 '� 6
Z4
FF
y h x
w
-.s \\
1k a
1247. 3 1 44.
/ k 12
12
2 ' 9 / 0
X
/
24 ;7. \
X " �
1 7. 8 / 245. 24. 1
0 I
I
/• 3 1248. 1244. ( 1 11244. 5
25XX244. 5
� � �
7 /6 I 1 1, p
X1244. k
24 / l CP 8
RSP
r
AMENDMENT NO, 2
TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
FAYETTEVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
STATE OF ARKANSAS
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
The basic agreement entitled CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, AGREEMENT FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES, is hereby amended. The referenced basic agreement
pertains to proposed improvements to Fayetteville Municipal Airport, Drake Field. This
Amendment entered into and executed on the date indicated beneath the signature
blocks, by and between the City of Fayetteville and McClelland Consulting Engineers
(ENGINEER) extends the duration of the contract for the second of a possible three
years, as allowed in the first paragraph on page 1 of the basic agreement. This action is
taken to allow the ENGINEER to undertake design and construction administration
services beyond contract expiration date of April 30, 2005. As a result, the amended
contract expiration date becomes April 30, 2006.
SECTION I = PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The types of projects to be undertaken by the ENGINEER during this extended period
include the type of projects listed in Section II of the Basic Agreement and any
additional services related to the Fayetteville Municipal Airport as may be included by
the City of Fayetteville.
J:\DRAKE FIELD\CONTRACTS\2003-2006\Amend2toBAS AGR.doc