HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5287 ' I �'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllll I�`I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Doc ID : 0132VO50003 . Type :_ REL Kind : ORDINANCE Recorded : 01/05/2010 at 02 : 35 : 34 PM Fee Amt : $25 . 00 Pace 1 of 3 Washinqton Countv . AR Bette Stems Circuit Clerk File2010-00000363 rat ORDINANCE NO. 5287 o `- TI N r AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBES ANNEXATION PETITION ANX 09-3409 (CC2009-4), FOR PRO - �.J LOCATED AT 3231 NORTH OLD WIRE ROAD THE NORTH E5 ' CORNER OF OLD WIRE ROAD AND ROM ORCHARD RAI ' w CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 39 ACRES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1 : That the City Council hereby confirms the annexation to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, as shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2 : That the official map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to reflect the change provided in Section 1 above. Section 3 : That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is hereby amended to assign the zoning designation of R-A, Residential Agricultural to the subject property. Section 4: That the above-described property is hereby assigned to Ward No. Three. PASSED and APPROVED this 1st day of December, 2009. APPROVED ATTEST: BdELDIOJO GBy: Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, Cit ., . blY 0000 G 'a ; FAYETTEVILLEdd� • v�y-pRKarts,Po�� .,,^A(3 �,.�• EXHIBIT "A" ANX09-3409 BROYLES Close Up view o SUBJECT PROPERTY y , BRIDOEWATER.k:Ns�y� Ca li t �rxl� z r $ ¢i, e•t �.+ ~ -_ --ROM ORCHARD Cm ❑ F x4 I� FF 2 RSFi t — - -- - -- o Overview 1 0 150 300 600 000 1,200 Foot EXHIBIT "B" ANX 09-3409 DESCRIPTION ( PARCEL NOS . 001 - 15604 - 000 , 001 - 15605 - 000 , 001 - 15606 - 000 , 001 - 15608 - 000 , 001 - 15608 - 001 , 001 - 15609 - 000 , AND 001 - 15610 - 000 ) ALL OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEEDS RECORDED AS FILE NUMBERS 93 - 3908 , 2005 - 18120 , 2005 - 18121 , 2005 - 18122 , 2005 - 18123 , 2006 - 22924 , AND 2009 - 9274 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK ' S OFFICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY , ARKANSAS RESIDING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 30 , TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH , RANGE 29 WEST OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING ALSO DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 ; THENCE NO2026 ' 06 " E , ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 , A DISTANCE OF 1315 . 03 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 ; THENCE S87016 ' 1311E , ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 , A DISTANCE OF 1319 . 96 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 ; THENCE S02029 ' 32 " W , ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 , A DISTANCE OF 1016 . 73 FEET ; THENCE 518021 ' 47 " W , LEAVING THE ABOVE SAID EAST LINE , A DISTANCE OF 116 . 92 FEET ; THENCE 53403912611W , A DISTANCE OF 96 . 67 FEET ; THENCE 552001 ' 42 " W , A DISTANCE OF 94 . 13 FEET ; THENCE 569002113 " W , A DISTANCE OF 95 . 91 FEET ; THENCE 586030 ' 36 " W , A DISTANCE OF 46 . 95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 ; THENCE N87011 ' 42 " W , ALONG THE ABOVE SAID SOUTH LINE , A DISTANCE OF 1028 . 91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 11713 , 107 SQUARE FEET OR 39 . 33 ACRES , MORE OR LESS . 0J \71 � CENTRE FOR DESIGN September 17, 2009 Jeremy Pate Development Services Director City of Fayetteville _ 125 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Re: Old Wire Annexation - Appeal of Planning Commission denial Mr. Pate: On behalf of our client, we wish to appeal the September 14, 2009 City of Fayetteville Planning Commissions decision to deny ANX 09-3409 - Broyles/ 3231 N. Old Wire Road. We request that this item be place on the next available City Council meeting. Respectfully, �vvv Todd Jacobs Director of Design Appian Centre for Design 509 West Sprint Street, Suite 420 Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Office: 479-442- 1444 Lotco, and �(.eadt2a 1u� � 71o9 ec ntesf� . City Council Meeting of October 6, 2009 Agenda Item Number CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor and City Council Thru: Jeremy C. Pate, Development Services Director From: Andrew Garner, Senior Planner Date: September 16, 2009 Subject: Annexation for Broyles (ANX 09-3409) RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend denial of annexing the subject 39.33-acre property, located at the northwest comer of Old Wire Road and Rom Orchard Road. The applicant has appealed the Planning Commission decision to deny this request to the City Council. BACKGROUND Most of the property in this annexation request was included in annexation and- rezoning requests that were heard by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2005 and again on May 8, 2006. Planning Staff recommended denial of all requests. The Planning Commission denied or tabled both the annexation and rezoning requests in 2005 and 2006, expressing concern about the extension of the city in this area, development patterns, density, and compatibility, and the resulting extension of the boundary. The meeting minutes from these previous Planning Commission meetings are attached to the staff report. The applicant proposes to annex the subject 39.33 acres into the City. The applicant has stated an intent to propose a 200-acre master plan for a traditional neighborhood development, including the subject property. DISCUSSION This item was heard at the regular Planning Commission meeting on September 16, 2009. The Planning Commission voted 5-4-0 (commissioners Winston, Graves, Kennedy, and Trumbo voting "no") to deny this rezoning request. Several neighbors in the area spoke against rezoning the subject property to RSF-4, however, the applicant has withdrawn the rezoning application. Written comments from the neighbors are attached to the staff report. BUDGETIMPACT None. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN ANNEXATION PETITION ANX 09-3409 (CC2009-4), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3231 NORTH OLD WIRE ROAD, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OLD WIRE ROAD AND ROM ORCHARD ROAD, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 39 ACRES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1 : That the City Council hereby confirms the annexation to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, as shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the official map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to reflect the change provided in Section 1 above. Section 3 : That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is hereby amended to assign the zoning designation of R-A, Residential Agricultural to the subject property. Section 4: That the above-described property is hereby assigned to Ward No. Three. PASSED and APPROVED this of 12009. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: By: LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" ANX09-3409 BROYLES Close Up View rSUBJECTPROPERTYT ({tj -" BRIOGEWATER.LN— RArl u ' 4 z • z � ROM ORCHARD RD. f " RAUm b1 is k4 RS 4 qV RS < Overview 0 150 300 600 000 1,200 Foet EXHIBIT "B" ANX 09-3409 DESCRIPTION ( PARCEL NOS . 001 - 15604 - 000 , 001 - 15605 - 000 , 001 - 15606 - 000 , 001 - 15608 - 000 , 001 - 15608 - 001 , 001 - 15609 - 000 , AND 001 - 15610 - 000 ) ALL OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEEDS RECORDED AS FILE NUMBERS 93 - 3908 , 2005 - 18120 , 2005 - 18121 , 2005 - 18122 , 2005 - 18123 , 2006 - 22924 , AND 2009 - 9274 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK ' S OFFICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY , ARKANSAS RESIDING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 30 , TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH , RANGE 29 WEST OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING ALSO DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 ; THENCE NO2026 ' 06 " E , ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 , A DISTANCE OF 1315 . 03 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 ; THENCE S87016 ' 13 " E , ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 , A DISTANCE OF 1319 . 96 FEET TO THE . NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 /4 ; THENCE S02029 ' 32 " W , ALONG THE EAST LINE OF , THE ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 , A DISTANCE OF 1016 . 73 FEET ; THENCE S18021 ' 47 " W , LEAVING THE ABOVE SAID EAST LINE , A DISTANCE OF 116 . 92 FEET ; THENCE S34039 ' 26 " W , A DISTANCE OF 96 . 67 FEET ; THENCE S52001 ' 4261W , A DISTANCE OF 94 . 13 FEET ; THENCE S69002113 " W , A DISTANCE OF 95 . 91 FEET ; THENCE S86030 ' 36 " W , A DISTANCE OF 46 . 95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE 'ABOVE SAID SOUTHWEST 1 / 4 ; THENCE N87011 ' 42 " W , ALONG THE ABOVE SAID SOUTH LINE , A DISTANCE OF 1028 . 91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 11713 , 107 SQUARE FEET OR 39 . 33 ACRES , MORE OR LESS . ayve ee PC Meeting of September 14, 2009 ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain St. THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Fayetteville, AR 72701 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479) 575-8267 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM : Andrew Garner, Senior Planner THRU: Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director DATE: September- Updated September 16 2009 ANX 09-3409: (BROYLES / 3231 N. OLD WIRE RD., 217): Submitted by APPIAN CENTER FOR DESIGN for property located at 3231 N. OLD WIRE ROAD, NW CORNER OF OLD WIRE ROAD AND ROM ORCHARD ROAD. The property is in the Planning Area and contains approximately 39.33 acres. The request is to annex the subject property into the City of Fayetteville. Planner: Andrew Gamer Background: Most of the property in this annexation request was included in annexation and rezoning requests that were heard by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2005 and again on May 8, 2006. Planning Staff recommended denial of all requests. The Planning Commission denied or tabled both the annexation and rezoning requests in 2005 and 2006. The meeting minutes from these previous Planning Commission meetings are attached to the staff report for the associated rezoning (RZN 09-3410 Broyles) also being heard at this planning commission meting. Property: The property is located northwest of the intersection of Old Wire Road and Rom Orchard Road. As depicted in Table 1 , the site is surrounded by rural residential and undeveloped pasture, with unincorporated Washington County to the north, east, and south, and property zoned Residential Agricultural (R-A) in the City of Fayetteville to the west. Table 1 Surrounding Land Use and Zonin Direction from Site Land Use Zoning North Rural residential pasture Planning Area South Rural residential pasture Planning Area East Rural residential pasture Planning Area West Rural residential; pasture R-A, Residential Agricultural; Planninn Area The nearest developed subdivision is Paradise Valley Estates in the Planning Area, located approximately 1 ,600 feet east of the subject property and developed for single-family use with a density of approximately 1 unit per two acres. Proposal: The applicant intends to annex and rezone this property and stated intent to develop a traditional neighborhood. If the annexation for this property is approved, the request is to rezone the property from R-A, Residential Agricultural to RSF-4, Residential Single-family, 4 units per acre. However, the applicant stated intent to propose a 200-acre master plan for a traditional neighborhood K.,Reporu120091PC ReporuQO-September 14WNX 09-3409 (Rroy(es).doc development, including the subject property. Request: The request is to annex the property into the City of Fayetteville Public Comment: Staff has received several phone calls, emails, and letters in opposition to the proposed rezoning. The opposition cites concern that a density of four units per acre is not compatible with the surrounding rural residential character and would result in adverse impacts to traffic safety and property values. INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: Currently the site has access to Old Wire Road. With development, road improvements and dedication per the Master Street Plan would be required. Surrounding Master Street Plan Streets are shown on Table 2. Table 2 Surrounding Master Street Plan Streets Direction from Site Street Name Master Street Plan Classification South Old Wire Road Collector Street East Old Wire Road Collector Street Southeast Rom Orchard Road Local Street Water: Public water is adjacent to the site. There is a four-inch waterline along the south side of Old Wire Road. Public water will need to be upgraded to the property to provide domestic and fire flow for any proposed development. Sewer: Sanitary sewer is not adjacent to the site. The nearest sewer main an 18-inch public main about 2,500 feet west of the site at the intersection of Old Wire Road/Crossover Road. Public sewer mains may need to be extended to the property to serve any proposed development, depending on the nature and density of the development. Fire: The subject property is located 1 .5 miles from the Fire Station No. 5 at 2979 North Crossover Road. Projected response time at full development of this property is projected at 4 minutes to the beginning of this development. Police: The Fayetteville Police Department stated concern that this application may cause substantial call volume increase and will effect traffic congestion in the area. The Police Department also commented that this annexation would result in one side of the road inside the city while the other side is outside the city. This may cause confusion among officers and residents living in the area as to which law enforcement agency to call in an emergency. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the requested annexation based on the findings included in this report. K.I Repons120091PC ReporU120-Seplember 14UNX 09-3409 (Broy(es).doc PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES ❑ Forwarded X Denied Date: September 14, 2009 Motion : Mures Second: Zant Vote: 5-4-0 (Graves, Winston, Kennedy, Trumbo votm_ g "no) CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required YES ❑ Approved ❑ Denied Date: October 6, 2009-(1" reading if-recommended) CITYPLAN2025 FUTURELAND USEPLAN. City Plan 2025 Future Land Use Plan designates this s ite as Rural Area. Rural Areas consist of land in an open or cultivated state or sparsely settled These areas only have infrastructure and public services to .support low-density zoning. They do not have adequate transportation or public services to support urban development patterns at this time. This area encourages conservation and preservation in any development pattern. The Guiding Policies for Rural Areas also discuss that if developed, these areas should encourage alternative development patterns to achieve compatibility with surrounding rural areas. This property is also identified as an Intended Growth Sector in City Plan 2025. Growth sector areas were initially identified during the City Plan 2025 charette process by citizens as areas with potential for population growth in the future. After the initial data was compiled and growth sectors were identified, additional input and analysis was completed in order to prepare the future land use map. This involved analysis ofthe actual development potential and public meetings where desired development patterns were analyzed and discussed The growth sector map . was an aid in preparation of the future land use map, which was ultimately adopted by the City Council. This area was identified as a Rural Area. FINDINGS : 12.3.4 POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS The potential annexation areas should be identified by the City using the following criteria: I . Areas that are already urban in character. Finding: The subject property is surrounded on all sides by sparely populated rural residential land uses. This area is not considered urban in character, and has not previously been identified by the City for annexation. The property is within the City's Planning Area. 2. Areas that can be developed at urban densities. Finding: The subject property cannot be developed at urban densities at this time. The roads accessing the property are two-lane unimproved roads and sewer is not in the immediate vicinity (approximately 2,500 feet to the west). Unless significant improvements occur, the property and surrounding area will likely remain in a relatively low density state for some time, until and unless development occurs along K:IRepor&s 2009WC Reporul20-Seplember 14WNA 09-3409 (Rroyfes).doc Crossover Road and moves in an eastern direction. 3. Immediate areas are those that are peninsulas or islands, where municipal services have already been extended. Finding: Municipal services that would accommodate future development have not been extended to this area. The proposed annexation would extend a peninsula of property approximately 1 ,300 feet into the county that is not served by city municipal services. The subject property and surrounding areas do not have adequate water or sewer service. There is an existing four-inch water line available to the subject site on the south side of Old Wire Road, however, the water line would have to be upgraded to provide domestic and fire flow for future development. Sewer service is not available and is located approximately 2,500 feet to the west and would have to be extended to serve development on the site. City police and fire service are provided to areas to the west. 4. Vacant lands that are subject to development pressure. Finding: This site has been proposed to be annexed approximately three times since 2005 and a conceptual subdivision layout was proposed then withdrawn in that timeframe. These applications and the developer's communication with staff indicate that this area is under development pressure, though this is certainly questionable at this time, given the reduction in building permits and development projects, and vacant subdivisions in the region. The site is less than one mile from Crossover Road (State Highway 265), which is the major north-south transportation corridor on the east side of Fayetteville, also providing connection to Springdale. The site is relatively cleared of vegetation and flat, and is not in a floodplain, without natural constraints to development. 5. Areas where urban services are already provided. Finding: Water, fire and police protection are currently provided in undeveloped areas to the west but not to the density to the proposed RSF-4 in this area. The subject property is not being served by city utilities that could support an urban development at this time. The level of service for this property may be reduced in comparison to surrounding subdivisions located in closer proximity to the more densely populated areas of the City. Also see Finding 12.3.5.a, and the attached comments from the Police Department expressing concerns with emergency service provision. 6. Areas where urban services are needed. Finding: As discussed above in Finding No. 5, water, fire, and police service are provided adjacent to the west, however sewer service is unavailable to the subject property and surrounding areas. Sewer service would be needed to serve development on the kWeportA2009WC Reports120-Sep(emher 14UNX 09-3409 (Broyles).doc OZ. IN THE:COUNTY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LANDS TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVI L.LE,ARKANSAS NO.CC2 9-4 ORDER PE ANNEXATION Now on this 2e day df June, 2009, this cause comes on to be heard, Old Wire Investors, LLC,an Arkansas limited liability company,and Thomas Cooper Lee and Barbara C. Lee,husband and.wifc(collectively the"Petitioners")who are represented by James E Atwood,Attorney at Law, P.A.,after announcing the hearing of the cause and there being no protests.or objections,whereupon, the matter is submitted to the Court upon the Petition filed herein, and the oral and documentary evidence having been adduced,the Court being well and sufficiently advised finds, 1. The Petition in this.cause was filed on the day of May,2009 and therafter this Court fixed the 26�h day of June 2009,at 9.00a.m..as the date and time ofhearing for said cause,and that a full notice of this hearing was given as required.by law and the proof of publication of said notice is now on file with the County Clerk ofthis Court and the Court has jurisdiction of this cause. is 2. The Court is satisfied that the allegations of the Petition are sustained by the proof that the limits ofthe territory to be annexed have been properly filed,that the property owners have freehold interests in the property hereinafter described iinthe Petition and. constitute the real owners of the area affected. E, 3. The.land proposed to be annexed:to the.City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Page l of 2 �dij yr Arkansas,in this cause is described on`.`Exhibit A"attached hereto. 4. The area is not unusually large and it is contiguousand.adjacent to and adjoins the present corporate limits of.the City of Fayetteville, and it is adapted for urban purposes and this territory should be annexed to and made a part of the City of Fayetteville,Arkansas. ff IS THEREFORE,CONSIDERED,ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the aforesaid real estate situated in Washington County,Arkansas,is hereby annexed to and made a part ofthe City ofFayetteville,Arkansas,in accordance with Acet.No. 1 ofthe Acts ofthe Legislature of 1875 ofthe State of Arkansas, and all Acts amendatory thereto,.particularly including Act 142 of the Acts of Arkansas for the year 1953,as codified in Ark Code Ann.§14-40-601,et seq.,and this Order shall be duly recorded by the County Clerk of Washington.County. IT IS SO ORDERED.this �& day of 2009. The H6norabk Marilyn Edwards Washington County Judge Page 2 of 2 9 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY,ARKANSAS IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE..WASHINGTON COUNTY,ARKANSAS . q r� PETITION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE WASHINGTON COUNTY ARKANSAS Old Wire Investors,LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company, and Thomas Cooper Lee and Barbara C.Lee,husband and wife.(collectively the"Petitioners")hereby submit their Petition to annex certain real property into the City of Fayetteville,Washington,County,Arkansas,pursuant to A.C.A. Section 14-40-601, et. Seq. as follows: 1. That Petitioners collectively own the zeal property described on the Plat Map,Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a,part hereof(the "Real Property"); and said Real Property is situated in Washington County,Arkansas,and is contiguous with the City of Fayetteville;Arkansas, and is within the City of Fayetteville, School District.. 2. The Petitioners name James Atwood,Attorney at Lain,P.A.as the person authorized to act on their behalf with respect to this Petition. 3. The Petitioners desire that the Rea :Property become part of the City of Fayetteville; Arkansas,and petitions the County Judge for annexation of the Real Property into the City of Fayetteville. 4. A true and correct presentation of the Real Property and how it is contiguous to the City of Fayetteville,Arkansas is shown on the Plat Map,Exhibit"A",attached hereto. 5. The Petitioners herein desire that the Real Property become part;ofthe City of Pagel of 4 j Fayetteville,Washington County,Arkansas,and Petitioners state that theywill do any and all legal acts necessary to accomplish the objective set forth herein. f THEREFORE,Petitioners respectfully pray that this Court set a.hearing,and after notice of such hearing,that the County Judge sign.an Order anomi ng the above described Real Property into the City of Fayetteville,Washington County,Arkansas,and to order such other relief as is appropriate under applicable law. Respectfcily executed WmaAday of 2.000. pas.ofpfe MI M14r of Old Wire Investors, LLC S SCRIBED AND SWORN TO.before me,a Notary Public,on-this th 4dayof 200f. Notary Public Sharon Bishop My Commission Expo of ftansm,Washington County Y Commission.Expires August i8,2014 Page 2 of* S } Respectfully executed this day of .20dW Thomas Cooper.Lee SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me,a Notary Public,on this the j�day of DCD SA ,.2 • Mary�t3d1iC My Commission Expires: Sharon Bishop Shave of Aftrrw,Washout Cotmty MY Cession Expires_ QM 19,DJ4— Page 3 o Respectfully executed th�day o4�SILJ� n0j Barbara C.Lee S SCRIBED AND.5 W©RN TO before me,a Notary Public,on this t day of 4,-A-,I7.20Cq, Notary PublIa My conttnission E Sharon Bishop afe of Arkansas;Washington County My Commission Expires August 19,2014 Page 4 of+ Description (Parcel Nos. 001-15604-000r 001-15605-000, 001-15606-000, 0.01-25606-000, 001-15608-001, DOI-2560-000, and 001-15610-000) All of the land described in the deeds recorded as File Numbers 93- 3908, 20.05-18120, 2005-18121, 2005-18122, 2005-18123, 2006-22924, and 2009-9274 in- the Circuit Clerk's Office of Washington County, Arkansas residing in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 17 North, Range 29 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian being also described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of .the above said Southwest 1/4; thence N021126'06"E, along the West line of the above said Southwest 1/4, a distance of 1315.03 feet to the Northwest corner of the above said Southwest 1/4; thence S8. 7016113"E, along the North line of the above said Southwest 1/4, a distance of 1319.96 feet to the Northeast corner of the above said Southwest 1/4.; thence S02'29'32nW, along the East line of the above said Southwest 1/4, a distance of 1016.73 feet; thence S18"21147"W, leaving the above said East line, a distance of 116.92 feet; thence S34'39'26"W, a distance of 96-67 feet, thence S52'01142"W, a distance of 94-13 feet; thence S6.90021130W, a distance of 95.91 feet, thence S86*30'36".W, a distance of 46.95 feet to a point on the South line of the above said Southwest 1/4; thence N87011'42"W, along the above said South line, a distance of 1028.91 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 1,713,107 square feet or 39.33 acres, more or less. LA 758-1324 0 001>i*560.3-o00 ciai-41PU r� Prop. �,. t701-18$06-flClOj� .� $ 00115504-WO 1-1550.7-0.03 LO OL F e Ville , a � 001-is6o�0D� 001-1560 .000 to 001-15607-0D4 • O 1 y.. o c C3 4 L 10 CS r _ ppr N .Q Q: ti le 0 tfj r C3 7 O p r 0 1-1 Cs 1-15632-00 1-1582 a C tXl1>15634-040 001-15545-000 7 i) Feet County Disclaimer. 0 2$7,5 575 1,150 This map was created by Washloglon County using data created or acquired by its Assessor's office,Dept,of Emergency Management,and Road Department and in aceardanoe wb Arkansas Code 1SS-21-502(2)(a),which statea'The digital.cadastre manages and provides aCss to cadastral InfnrmatioM Digital cedasfre does not represent legal property boundary descriptions, nor is it sultable forboundary determination of the individual parcels included In the eadestre.":and Arkansas Code 15-21-502(S) which Eradicates that"Digital cadastre'means the storage and manipulation of computerized representattvna(if parcel maps and finked databases." This map has been developed from the best available sources. No guarantee sof accuracy f5.grsnted,not is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. in.no event shalt said W4-4hfngtcrn County be liable for direc€,indirft incidental,consequential or special damages of any kind,including,but not limited to,loss of antidpated profits or benefits arising out of use of or reliance on the map. The pRrcet lines shown are considered a graphical representation of the actual boundaries.,Washington County.is in rho sway responsible for or liable W any rMisrepmontatipn or re-use of this Wrap, Distribution of this map is intended for Inforrrrational purposes and should n t be considered authoritative for engineering,legal and othsr site4pedlfio os.