HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5281 '!�I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
�III1���III1311111111111DOC 0111311170212ll000l16 Type : REL
Kind : ORDINANCE
Recorded : 11/ 17/2009 at 03 : 28 : 04 PM
Fee Amt : $40 . 00 Pace 1 of 6
Meahinaton County . AR
Bette 6tC�u1t Clerk
Flle OO 997 00036591
ORDINANCE NO. 5281
AN ORDINANCE TO PREVENT INJURY OR ANNOYANCE WITHIN THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF FAYETTEVILLE BY REGULATING RED DIRT
MINING FACILITIES SO THAT THESE FACILITIES WILL NOT BE
NUISANCES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas recognizes the need
for red dirt mining facilities to supply necessary red dirt for building construction, parking lot
and road construction within and near the corporate limits of Fayetteville; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has listened to experts and citizens and
determined that any blasting that could be used in red dirt mining could cause nuisance effects
upon nearby structures (especially homes) and their inhabitants; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has also learned and determined that without
the reasonable regulations required by this ordinance an operating red dirt mining facility can
cause vibrations, dust, ground upheaval, loud noises, fumes and other deleterious effects within a
mile from the red dirt mining facility to such an extent that the red dirt mining facility would be a
nuisance to Fayetteville citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has also heard from citizens living near an
existing and operating red dirt mining facility and determined that unregulated blasting, dirt
excavating, dump truck loading, dump truck tailgate banging and other red dirt mining facility
activities would be a nuisance to Fayetteville citizens and potentially damaging to their property
and city streets; and
WHEREAS, unless the frequency of blasting, its distance from houses, the elimination
of dump truck tailgate banging, the hours and days of red dirt mining facility operation near
residences to prevent noise, dust and fumes in excess of ADEQ limits from escaping the red dirt
farm are properly regulated and controlled, such a red dirt mining facility would constitute a
nuisance to Fayetteville residents and citizens and should be abated.
Page 2
Ordinance No. 5281
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby enacts
Chapter 113 Rock Quarries and Red Dirt Mining Facilities of the Code of Fayetteville,
Article II Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
,,,1larlrry,rs ,,
PASSED and APPROVED this the 20'" day of October, 2009. r�� .•'G�SY o,W. G.p'o
; FAYETTEVILLE ;
APPROVED: ATTEST:
'�9s'9RkANSP.• �$
Vol' T
III Bit
By: 4-400
By: /
LIO LD JOIJJJAA, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
EXHIBIT "A"
ARTICLE II.
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating quarry operator, the Director of
License Development Services may designate
another weekday during the next five
§113.11. Finding of Nuisance and Need weekdays as a permitted blast day.
for Abatement
(4) Upon timely request by the red dirt
The City Council of the City of Fayetteville, mining facility operator, the Director of
Arkansas determines and finds that the Development Services or designee is
operation of a red dirt mining facility would empowered to grant a variance of the
be a nuisance to the citizens and City of time limitations for rock blasting if
Fayetteville, Arkansas if operated or used inclement weather or other condition
other than as prescribed in § 113 . 12 and, beyond the reasonable control of the
therefore, should be abated by the operator has caused a safety issue that
reasonable regulations required by this requires blasting outside the 10:00 a.m.
ordinance. until 3 :00 p.m. permitted period. Re-
notification is not required unless
§113. 12. Regulations to Abate Nuisance blasting is moved to another day.
(A) Rock Blasting/Use of Explosives. (5) The red dirt mining facility operator
shall notify by telephone the Director of
( 1 ) No blasting shall be allowed within Development Services and any
60 yards of any house within the city Fayetteville neighbor within a mile of
limits of Fayetteville. his quarry who has requested such
notification at least two hours prior to
(2) No blasting explosive charge or rock blasting.
location shall exceed the most restrictive
limitations within federal, state and (B) Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility.
Washington County regulations or laws.
( 1 ) All red dirt mining facilities within
(3) All blasting within the permitted red the city limits of Fayetteville or within
dirt mining facility shall only be allowed one mile beyond the city limits of
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and Fayetteville shall only be allowed to
3 :00 p.m. on the first and third operate during the period of 7:00 a.m.
Wednesday of each month unless such until 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday,
Wednesday is a federal or city holiday. and during 7 :00 a.m. until noon on
If such Wednesday is a holiday, the Saturday. No major noise producing
permitted blasting day will be moved to activities shall occur before 8 :30 a.m. or
the next day (Thursday). If the after 4:30 p.m. on a weekday or anytime
permitted blasting day would be unsafe on Saturday or Sunday. No red dirt
or not feasible or practical because of mining facility shall be allowed to
inclement weather or other condition operate on a federally recognized
beyond the reasonable control of the holiday or Sunday.
3
(2) All red dirt mining facilities within to ensure that any and all vehicles
the city limits of Fayetteville or within leaving the red dirt mining facility shall
one mile beyond the city limits of have all mud and dirt removed from the
Fayetteville shall be prohibited from any tires and exterior parts of the body of all
operations until the owner/operator of vehicles prior to exiting the site onto
such facility has obtained a valid, annual public roads.
Red Dirt Mining Operating License.
This license to operate shall be issued by (3) Red dirt. The red dirt mining
the Fayetteville Planning Department on operator is responsible to ensure that all
a fiscal year (July 1 through June 30) dump trucks leaving the red dirt mining
schedule with no fee assessed. site that may utilize any city street and
are carrying more than half a truck load
(C) Dust, Mud and Rock Control Measures. of red dirt have their load fully and
properly covered.
All red dirt mining facilities within the city
limits of Fayetteville or within one mile (4) Dump truck identifying number. In
beyond the city limits of Fayetteville shall order for citizens to easily and correctly
only be allowed to operate with the identify dump trucks and their
following safeguards and measures to ensure owner/operators who are servicing the
that dust, dirt, mud, loose rock, and all other red dirt mining facility, the red dirt
possible irritants or nuisance substances do mining operator shall require any dump
not adversely affect Fayetteville residents. truck accessing or servicing his facility
It is the express continuing duty of the to have an easy to read four digit number
licensed red dirt mining facility operator to at least six inches high and twelve inches
ensure all of these safeguards, requirements wide on the tail gate of the dump truck.
and measures are constantly enforced. The red dirt mining operator shall
maintain an up-to-date and accurate log
( 1 ) Dust control measures. Water or of the owner and operator of each
other substances or measures must be numbered dump truck and shall
fully effective during the operation of immediately supply the owner and
the red dirt mining to ensure the red dirt operator' s name, address and contract
mining facility is in full and continual information to any Fayetteville
compliance with the requirements of the employee, official or citizen who
Arkansas Water and Air Pollution requests such information.
Control Act as administered by the
Arkansas Department of Environmental (5) Only dump trucks with proper
Quality. A violation of the permit identifying number may be loaded The
conditions required by the Arkansas red dirt mining operator shall not load or
Department of Environmental Quality permit to be loaded or permit to exit the
can be grounds for a suspension or red dirt mining facility any dump truck
revocation of the City's Red Dirt Mining unless the identifying number specified
Facility Operating License. (See in subsection (4) is clearly legible, easy
§ 133 . 15) to read and not obscured by dirt, mud or
otherwise.
(2) Dirt and mud control measures.
The red dirt mining operator is required
4
(D) Control of Dump Truck Tailgate dwelling, a residence, an apartment, a
Banging condominium, a dormitory, a hotel or motel.
It is the express duty of the red dirt mining (C) "Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility"
facility operator to prevent a dump truck means any blasting, operation of any
delivering anything to the red dirt mining mechanical equipment on the premises of
facility or receiving red dirt from the the red dirt mining facility or any operation
facility to engage in Dump Truck Tailgate of dump trucks or other large vehicles on the
Banging as defined in § 113 .04 (E) at any premises of the red dirt mining site.
time upon its property. Starting, running the engine or moving any
equipment or dump truck on the premises
The red dirt mining facility operator shall shall constitute operation of the red dirt
keep a record of the owner/operator and mining facility.
number of the offending dump truck to
include the date and time of the occurrence. (D) "Major Noise Producing Activities"
No dump truck which has banged its tailgate means blasting, rock breaking, dump truck
shall be loaded or otherwise serviced for a tailgate banging, and the use by the red dirt
full operational day of the red dirt mining mining facility operator of non-static backup
facility after the incident to include all day warning devices on its loader or other major
Monday if the tailgate banging occurs after equipment. Rock crushing within a half-
4:30 p.m. Friday or anytime on Saturday or mile of a house within the city limits of
Sunday. Loading or servicing such dump Fayetteville is also a major noise producing
truck during this suspension shall constitute activity.
a violation of this ordinance and the Red
Dirt Mining Facility Operating License. (E) "Dump Truck Tailgate Banging" means
the avoidable and loud banging of a dump
§113.13: Jurisdiction of This Ordinance. truck tailgate used to vibrate the bed to
loosen material in the bed sought to be
Pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-54- 103( 1 ), this dumped. The relatively quiet bang that
ordinance to abate a nuisance shall be might be unavoidable when a dump truck
applicable to any and all red dirt mining load is dumped and the truck moves away
facilities located within the corporate limits form the pile without applying the truck' s
of Fayetteville and for one ( 1 ) mile beyond brakes is not regulated by this ordinance.
the city limits as prescribed in A.C.A. § 14-
262- 102. 113. 15: Issuance, Suspension or
Revocation of License.
§113.14 : Definitions.
(A) Issuance. The Director of Development
(A) "Red dirt mining" means any open Services or designee shall prepare and issue
excavation used for obtaining red dirt or an annual Red Dirt Mining Facility
other type of soil used for paving or building Operating License upon proper application
purposes. of an owner/operator of a red dirt mining
facility within the jurisdiction of this
(B) "House" means any habitable structure ordinance after ensuring the owner/operator
including a mobile or manufactured home, a will be in full compliance with all
requirements of this ordinance and has all
5
other current and valid federal, state and the limits of this ordinance and shall be
county permits required for red dirt mining guilty of a criminal violation for any
operation. violation of the requirements of this
ordinance.
(B) Suspension. The Director of
Development Services may suspend a Red (B) The Red Dirt Mining Facility
Dirt Mining Facility Operating License for Operating License may be revoked or
up to thirty (30) days for violations of the suspended by the Director of Development
terms of the license after a due process Services after a due process hearing for an
hearing. owner' s, manager' s, operator' s, employee's,
or lessee' s violation of any terms or limits
(C) Revocation. The Director of within this ordinance or for operating the red
Development Services may revoke a Red dirt mining facility not in conformity with
Dirt Mining Facility Operating license for its Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating
repetitive, continuing, intentional, or License.
substantial violations of the requirements of
this ordinance. The Director of (C) Any owner, operator, manager, lessee
Development Services may require adequate or employee of a Red Dirt Mining Facility
assurances that any operator whose license shall be guilty of a criminal violation if such
has been revoked will fully comply with the person operates the red dirt mining facility
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License in violation of any of the terms of this
before reissuing another license. ordinance, without a current and valid Red
Dirt Mining Facility Operating License, or
(D) Appeal. Any person whose license has in violation of any of the terms of his Red
been suspended or revoked pursuant to this Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
section, may appeal such suspension or
revocation to the City Council by providing (D) Each violation of the operational hour
the City Clerk' s Office with a written limitations or the number of blasting events
request for City Council review within ten allowed by this Ordinance or the applicable
business days of the issuance of suspension Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License
or revocation. The City Council may then shall constitute a separate violation of this
determine whether the red dirt mining ordinance and shall be punishable by a fine
facility owner/operator violated the of up to $500.00.
requirements of the ordinance and, if so,
whether suspension (up to 30 days) or § 113.17: No reduction in property
revocation is appropriate for such violation. owner's right to sue for nuisance.
§113. 16: Penalty. Nothing in this ordinance removes or
reduces a property owner' s right to sue or
(A) Any owner, lessor or lessee of real seek an injunction against any owner or
property upon which is located a red dirt operator of a red dirt mining facility if a
mining facility and any operator, manager, court of competent jurisdiction finds that
or employee of such red dirt mining facility such facility constitutes a private or public
shall ensure such facility is operated within nuisance to that property.
6
AGENDA REQUEST
FOR: COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2009
FROM:
Shirley Lucas, Council Member
Sarah Lewis, Council Member
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION TITLE AND SUBJECT:
An Ordinance To Prevent Injury Or Annoyance Within The Corporate Limits Of Fayetteville By
Regulating Red Dirt Mining Facilities So That These Facilities Will Not Be Nuisances
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
a � D
Shirley Lucas Date
:ouncilMeber
Sarah Lewis Date
Council Member
qC
Kit WilliatuA Date
City Attorney (as to form)
cm 3cct:j wigol to/G/09 CCK-� .
�4 � &Ud Ret k;9 9-15- -Og /dl2 l
U11 Dr) ( rY �PctCCc dty� q- I- t3q crt /cje
177 1 , r
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
KIT WILLIAMS, CITY ATTORNEY
DAVID WHITAKER, ASST. CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE LEGAL DEPARTMENT
TO: Lioneld Jordan, Mayor
City Council
CC : Don Marr, Chief of Staff
Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director
�
FROM: Kit Williams, City Attorney
DATE: August 19, 2009
RE: Proposed Chapter 113 Rock Quarries and Red Dirt Mining Facilities of
the Code of Fayetteville
Several months ago, City Council members Sarah Lewis and Shirley Lucas asked me to
attend a meeting of Ward 4 residents who were concerned and unhappy about problems caused
to their neighborhood by a Rock Quarry and Red Dirt Mining Facility near their homes. These
city residents described regular disturbing activities that operation of the quarry and red dirt mine
were inflicting upon them in their homes and on their property. These nuisance type activities
included:
(1 ) the dust, noise and vibration from frequent blasting of the rock for quarrying;
(2) the noise, dust and fumes from the machines operating at the quarry and red dirt mine;
(3) the large number of dump trucks which serviced the quarry and red dirt farm which
often immediately entered city streets and caused traffic problems and safety issues during
morning and afternoon school rush hours;
(4) the amount of red dirt and rocks that fell from these dump trucks onto city streets and
right-of-way. These trucks were often uncovered with very little freeboard.
The City Council Ordinance Review Committee held several meetings to fine tune the
initial ordinances I drafted pursuant to the requests of City Council Members Lucas and Lewis.
Neighbors attended these public meetings and also provided input information and suggestions.
The owners or managers of the rock quarry and red dirt mining operation did not attend to
provide any input. I recommend that the ordinances be left on the first reading so that the rock
quarry and red dirt mining owners and operators can review these ordinances for fairness and
utility.
These ordinances would mandate that each operator of a rock quarry or red dirt mining
facility within the city and within one mile of the city limits must obtain a license from the City
to operate their facility. The ordinances prescribe measures that an operator must take to prevent
his facility from being a nuisance to Fayetteville residents. These measures restrict:
( 1 ) the frequency of allowed explosions;
(2) require dust control measures;
(3) restrict the days of operation to regular workdays (Monday-Friday);
(4) restrict the hours of operation with longer hours allowed in the summer when school
is out;
(5) require dump trucks servicing the facility to have their loads covered more frequently
than now allowed; and
(6) require other measures to abate the potential of the facility to be a nuisance to our
citizens.
ORDINANCE AS AMENDED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2009
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE TO PREVENT INJURY OR ANNOYANCE
WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF FAYETTEVILLE BY
REGULATING RED DIRT MINING FACILITIES SO THAT
THESE FACILITIES WILL NOT BE NUISANCES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas recognizes the need
for red dirt mining facilities to supply necessary red dirt for building construction, parking lot
and road construction within and near the corporate limits of Fayetteville; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has listened to experts and citizens and
determined that any blasting that could be used in red dirt mining could cause unavoidable
damaging or nuisance effects upon nearby structures (especially homes); and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has also learned and determined that an
operating red dirt mining facility can cause vibrations, dust, ground upheaval, loud noises, fumes
and other deleterious effects within a mile from the red dirt mining facility; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has also heard from citizens living near an
existing and operating red dirt mining facility and determined that unregulated blasting, dirt
excavating, dump truck loading and other red dirt mining facility activities are offensive and
potentially unhealthy and dangerous to Fayetteville citizens and damaging to their property and
city streets;
WHEREAS, unless the frequency of blasting, its distance from houses, the hours and
days of red dirt mining facility operation near residences to prevent noise, dust and fumes in
excess of ADEQ limits from escaping the red dirt farm are properly regulated and controlled,
such a red dirt mining facility would constitute a nuisance to Fayetteville residents and citizens
and should be abated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby enacts
Chapter 113 Rock Quarries and Red Dirt Mining Facilities of the Code of Fayetteville,
Article II Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
PASSED and APPROVED this the 6`h day of October, 2009.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
By: By:
LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
2
EXHIBIT "A"
ARTICLE II. the operation of the red dirt mining to ensure the red dirt
mining facility is in full and continual compliance with the
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License requirements of the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution
Control Act as administered by the Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality. A violation of the permit conditions
§113.11 . Finding of Nuisance and Need for required by the Arkansas Department of Environmental
Abatement Quality can be grounds for a suspension or revocation of the
City's Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License. (See
The City Council of the City of Fayetteville, §133. 15)
Arkansas determines and finds that the operation of a red
dirt mining facility is a nuisance to the citizens and City of (2) Dirt and mud control measures. The red
Fayetteville, Arkansas if operated or used other than as dirt mining operator is required to ensure that any and all
prescribed in §113. 12 and, therefore, should be abated by vehicles leaving the red dirt mining facility shall have all mud
the reasonable regulations required by this ordinance. and dirt removed from the tires and exterior parts of the body
of all vehicles prior to exiting the site onto public roads.
§113.12. Abatement of Nuisance (3) Red dirt. The red dirt mining operator is
responsible to ensure that all dump trucks leaving the red
(A) Rock Blasting/Use of Explosives. dirt mining site that may utilize any city street and are
carrying more than half a truck load of red dirt have their
(1 ) No blasting shall be allowed within 60 yards load fully and properly covered.
of any house within the city limits of Fayetteville.
(4) Dump truck identifying number. In order for
(2) No blasting explosive charge or location citizens to easily and correctly identify dump trucks and their
shall exceed the most restrictive limitations within federal, owner/operators who are servicing the red dirt mining facility,
state and Washington County regulations or laws. the red dirt mining operator shall require any dump truck
accessing or servicing his facility to have an easy to read
(3) All blasting within the permitted red dirt four digit number at least six inches high and twelve inches
mining facility shall only be allowed one day per month wide on the tail gate of the dump truck. The red dirt mining
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m, during a operator shall maintain an up-to-date and accurate log of the
single weekday (non-holiday) pursuant to the Red Dirt owner and operator of each numbered dump truck and shall
Mining Operating License. immediately supply the owner and operator's name, address
and contract information to any Fayetteville employee,
(B) Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility. official or citizen who requests such information.
(1 ) All red dirt mining facilities within the city (5) Only dump trucks with proper identifying
limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits number may be loaded. The red dirt mining operator shall
of Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate during the not load or permit to be loaded or permit to exit the red dirt
period of 8:30 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday mining facility any dump truck unless the identifying number
from August 20 through June 5 and during the period of specified in subsection (4) is clearly legible, easy to read and
8:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday from June not obscured by dirt, mud or otherwise.
60 through August 19 . No red dirt mining facility shall be
allowed to operate on a federally recognized holiday. §113.13: Jurisdiction of This Ordinance.
(2) All red dirt mining facilities within the city
limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits Pursuant to A.C.A. §14-54-103(1 ), this ordinance
of Fayetteville shall be prohibited from any operations until to abate a nuisance shall be applicable to any and all red dirt
the owner/operator of such facility has obtained a valid, mining facilities located within the corporate limits of
annual Red Dirt Mining Operating License. This license to Fayetteville and for one (1 ) mile beyond the city limits as
operate shall be issued by the Fayetteville Planning prescribed in A.C.A. §14-262-102.
Department on a fiscal year (July 1 through June 30)
schedule with no fee assessed. §113.14: Definitions.
(C) Dust, Mud and Rock Control Measures. (A) "Red dirt mining" means any open
excavation used ,for obtaining red dirt or other type of soil
All red dirt mining facilities within the city limits used for paving or building purposes.
of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits of
Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate with the (B) "House" means any habitable structure
following safeguards and measures to ensure that dust, dirt, including a mobile or manufactured home, a dwelling, a
mud, loose rock, and all other possible irritants or nuisance residence, an apartment, a condominium, a dormitory, a
substances do not adversely affect Fayetteville residents. It hotel or motel.
is the express continuing duty of the licensed red dirt mining
operator to ensure all of these safeguards, requirements and (C) "Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility'
measures are constantly enforced. means any blasting, operation of any mechanical equipment
on the premises of the red dirt mining facility or any
(1 ) Dust control measures. Water or operation of dump trucks or other large vehicles on the
other substances or measures must be fully effective during premises of the red dirt mining site. Starting, running the
3
engine or moving any equipment or dump truck on the
premises shall constitute operation of the red dirt mining
facility. However, as long as the dust control measures
remain in operation and effective, dump trucks may be
driven onto the red dirt mining facility to park (but may not be
loaded) on the premises up until 5:30 p.m. during the August
20'" to June 5'" period.
113.15: Issuance, Suspension or Revocation
of License.
(A) Issuance. The Director of Development
Services or designee shall prepare and issue an annual Red
Dirt Mining Facility Operating License upon proper
application of an owner/operator of a red dirt mining facility
within the jurisdiction of this ordinance after ensuring the
owner/operator will be in full compliance with all
requirements of this ordinance and has all other current and
valid federal, state and county permits required for red dirt
mining operation.
(B) Suspension. The Director of Development
Services may suspend a Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating
License for up to thirty (30) days for violations of the terms of
the license after a due process hearing.
(C) Revocation. The Director of Development
Services may revoke a Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating
license for repetitive, continuing, intentional, or substantial
violations of the requirements of this ordinance. The
Director of Development Services may require adequate
assurances that any operator whose license has been
revoked will fully comply with the Red Dirt Mining Facility
Operating License before reissuing another license.
(D) Appeal. Any person whose license has
been suspended or revoked pursuant to this section, may
appeal such suspension or revocation to the City Council by
providing the City Clerk's Office with a written request for
City Council review within ten business days of the issuance
of suspension or revocation. The City Council may then
determine whether the red dirt mining facility owner/operator
violated the requirements of the ordinance and, if so,
4
whether suspension (up to 30 days) or revocation is
appropriate for such violation.
§113.16: Penalty.
(A) Any owner, lessor or lessee of real property
upon which is located a red dirt mining facility and any
operator, manager, or employee of such red dirt mining
facility shall ensure such facility is operated within the limits
of this ordinance and shall be guilty of a criminal violation for
any violation of the requirements of this ordinance.
(B) The Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating
License may be revoked or suspended by the Director of
Development Services after a due process hearing for an
owner's, manager's, operator's, employee's, or lessee's
violation of any terms or limits within this ordinance or for
operating the red dirt mining facility not in conformity with its
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
(C) Any owner, operator, manager, lessee or
employee of a Red Dirt Mining Facility shall be guilty of a
criminal violation if such person operates the red dirt mining
facility in violation of any of the terms of this ordinance,
without a current and valid Red Dirt Mining Facility
Operating License, or in violation of any of the terms of his
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
(O) Each violation of the operational hour
limitations or the number of explosions or the explosive force
of any blasting of this Ordinance or the applicable Red Dirt
Mining Facility Operating License shall constitute a separate
violation of this ordinance and shall be punishable by a fine
of up to $500.00.
§113.17: No reduction in property owner's
right to sue for nuisance.
Nothing in this ordinance removes or reduces a
property owner's right to sue or seek an injunction against
any owner or operator of a red dirt mining facility if such
facility constitutes a private or public nuisance to that
property owner.
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
KIT WILLIAMS, CITY ATTORNEY
DAVID WHITAKER, ASST. CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE LEGAL DEPARTMENT
TO: Lioneld Jordan, Mayor
City Council
Don Marr, Chief of Staff
Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director
FROM: Kit Williams, City Attorney
DATE: September 10, 2009
RE: Amendments to Rock Quarry and Red Dirt Mining Facility Ordinances
recommended by City Attorney
I have some proposed amendments to what I handed out to you. In the Definitions
section, I mistakenly left in (A) "Explosive force" which would have been necessary if we
regulated how much explosive force would be allowed for explosions in the quarries and red dirt
farms. However, I recommended and the Ordinance Review Committee agreed to remove any
such attempted regulation because the state and federal laws and regulations had probably
preempted this consideration. Thus, there is no need for the "Explosive force" definition which
should be deleted from both ordinances and the other definitions renumbered.
I also recommend some modifications relating to dust and dust control measures. The
Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality is given the exclusive power to regulate, control
and abate "air pollution and contamination." A.C.A. §8-4-306. Although most citizens probably
would not consider "dust" as air pollution, the definition of "Air Pollution" in the Water and Air
Pollution Control Act (A.C.A. §8-4-301 et seq.) is so broad that it probably covers dust.
"Air pollution' means the presence in the outdoor atmosphere
of one (1) or more air contaminants in quantities ... which are
materially injurious ..., or which unreasonably interfere with
enjoyment of life or use of property ...."
"Air contamination' means any solid, liquid, gas or vapor or
any combination thereof" A.C.A. §8-4-303
Thus; the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality has the sole right and power to
regulate "dust" (a "solid" air contaminant) through the Water and Air Pollution Control Act. I,
therefore, recommend the amendments to § 113.02 (C)(1) Dust Control Measures which now
refer to ADEQ permits, limitations and controls. Please see the attached proposed modified
ordinances with this change in place.
As this ordinance may likely be challenged in Court, I considered adding a
severability section, but I believe the Unified Development Code's general severability
section (§150.13 Severability) is sufficient without adding a specific severability section for
these ordinances.
I do recommend some minor changes in the "Whereas" clauses portion. I have
removed "Reviewed scientific evidence" as I am unsure if such a review will actually occur
and is not necessary for the passage of these ordinances. I have proposed a few, other
changes ("homes" replaced by "property") (adding "and citizens" after "experts" in the
second "Whereas" clause) (inserting "properly" before "regulated and controlled" in the last
"Whereas" clause) (adding "in excess of ADEQ permitted limits" in the last "Whereas"
clause). I believe that these changes should strengthen these ordinances and so recommend
your approval of these amendments.
Finally in §113.12 (A)(3) and §113.02 (A)(3), I replaced "one time" with "one day."
Blasting in rock quarries does not happen in one large explosion, but many smaller
explosions often only milliseconds apart. It has always been the intent to limit such
explosions so that they occur on a single day per month not in a single explosion so that this
change clarifies what was intended.
DRAFT
q -€79 oq
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANC TO/TJ IURY OR ANNOYANCE
WITHIN THE C RPOLIMJJ OF FAYETTEVILLE BY
REGULATING CERTAINIES SOTHATTHESE
FACILITIES WILL NANCES
WHEREAS,the City Council ayetteville, Arkansas recognizes the need
for certain facilities to supply necesservices near the corporate limits of
Fayetteville; and
WHEREAS,
the Fayetteville/City
Council
has determined that blasting, noise, and heavy
truck traffic have the
potential to c se
damaging or nuisance effects upon nearby property; and
WHEREAS, the Fayett ille City Council\has also determined that an operating certain
facilities has the potential to fause vibrations, dust, ground upheaval, loud noises, fumes and
other deleterious effects to n�tghboring landowners o?\the facilities; and
WHEREAS, the
dump truck loading and
and damaging to their p1
NOW,
CITY OF FA'
tteville City Council has
activities have the ooten
BE IT ORDAINED BY
ARKANSAS:
determined that unregulated blasting,
D be offensive to Fayetteville citizens
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville\Arkansas hereby enacts
Chapter 113 Heavy Use Facilities of the Code of Fayetteville, Article II Heavy Use Facility
Operating License as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
Sic pinu�s Vcd �v Fawn
PASSED and APPROVED this the 13'h day of October, 2009. DRAFT
By:
APPROVED:
LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor
By:
ATTEST:
E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
`a
?kpttA Od N rk IF r
DRAFT
EXHIBIT "A"
ARTICLE II.
Heavy Use Facility Operating License
§113.11. Finding of Nylsance and Need for
Abatement
The City Cou�lcil of the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas finds that the operation of certain activities could
potentially become a nuisance to the citizens and City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas if performed other than as prescribed
in §113.12 and, therefore, should be subject to the
reasonable regulations requiredby this ordinance.
§113.12. Abatement of Nu\igance
(A) Rock Blasting Jse
(1) No blasting explo 've charge or location
shall exceed the most restrictive lim ations within federal,
state and Washington County regulationQ or laws.
(2) All blasting within the pe'tvlitted heavy use
facility shall only be allowed one day per w��k between the
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. during a gle weekday
(non -holiday) pursuant to the Heavy Use Operafl�g License!
(B) Operation of Heavy Use Facility.
(1) All heavy use facilities within the city limits
of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city/fimits\of
Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate during the,
period of 6:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday.
(2) All heavy use facilities withinrthe city limits
of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond )he city limits of
Fayetteville shall be prohibited from any operations until the
owner/operator of such facility has obtaVed a valid, annual
Heavy Use Operating License. This license to operate shall
be issued by the Fayetteville Planning Department on a
fiscal year (July 1 through June 30) schedule with no fee
assessed. Jr
(3) All heavy use facif es shall be allowed to work
from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. f a cumulative 120 hours on
Sundays throughout the year r emergency weather related
purposes. In the event a Hey Use Facility Operator works
on a Sunday, the imm lately following Monday, said
operator shall contact the irector of Development Services
and report the Sunday a ivities.
(4) All hq�vy use facilities shall restrict and
prevent all dump tryeks operating upon said facility from
utilizing the tail ga of the truck from dislodging material
from the dump tru bed prior to 9:00 a.m.
(C) Dust, Mud and Rock Control Measures.
All heavy use facilities within the city limits of
Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits of
Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate with the
following safeguards and measures to ensure that dust, dirt,
mud, loose rock, and all other possible irritants do not
adversely affect Fayetteville residents. It is the express
continuing duty of the licensed heavy use facility operator to
ensure all of these safeguards, requirements and measures
are constantly enforced.
(1) Dirt'and mud control measures. The heavy
use facility operator is required to comply with all state and
federal regulations regarding prevention of material from
leaving the heavy use facility.
r(2) Dump truck identifying number. In order for
citizens to 9asily and correctly identify dump trucks and their
owner/oppfators who are servicing the heavy use facility, the
heavy u e operator shall require any dump truck owned by
or work ng for the heavy use facility to have an easy to read
four 4(git number at least six inches high and twelve inches
wid on the tail gate of the dump truck. The heavy use
fagility operator shall maintain an up-to-date and accurate
lad of the owner and operator of each numbered dump truck
and shall immediately supply the owner and operator's
name, address and contract information to any Fayetteville
employee, official or citizen who requests such information.
(3) Only dump trucks with proper identifying
number may be loaded. The heavy use facility operator
shall not load or permit to be loaded or permit to exit the
heavy use facility any dump truck unless the identifying
number specified in subsection (4) is clearly legible, easy to
read and not obscured by dirt, mud or otherwise.
§113.13: Jurisdiction of This Ordinance.
Pursuant to A.C.A. §14-54-103(1), this ordinance
to abate a nuisance shall be applicable to any and all heavy
use facilities located within the corporate limits of Fayetteville
and for one (1) mile beyond the city limits as prescribed in
A.C.A. §14-262-102.
§113.14: Definitions.
(A) "Heavy Use Facility means any location
where dump trucks or other heavy trucks are operated, any
location where rock blasting may occur, or any location
where machinery may be operated.
(B) 'House' means any habitable structure
including'a mobile or manufactured home, a dwelling, a
residence,\an apartment, a condominium, a dormitory, a
hotel or motel.
(C 'Operation of Heavy Use Facility' means
any blasting, or any operation of dump trucks or other large
vehicles used for the purpose of loading the dump trucks on
the premises of the\heavy use site. Starting, running the
engine or moving any equipment or dump truck on the
premises shall constitute operation of the heavy use facility.
113.15: Issuance, Suspension or Revocation
of License.
(A) Issuance. The Director of Development
Services or designee shall prepare and issue an annual
Heavy Use Facility Operating License upon proper
application of an owner/operator of a heavy use facility within
3
44nsI12d b,(i' r'l
AFT
the jurisdiction of this ordinance after ensuring the
owner/operator will be in full compliance with all
requirements of this ordinance and has all other current and
valid federal, state and county permits required for heavy
use operation. Any Heavy Use Facility currently in operation
upon the enactment of this ordinance shall automatically be
issued a permit.
(1) Subsequent to the initial license issued to the
Heavy Use Facility, said license shall be renewed
automatically each year upon the owner/operators
presentation to the Director of Development Services valid
federal, state, and county permits required for the heavy use
operation. No fee shall bt required for the renewal of the
license.
(2) In the event a'complaint is received by the
Director of Development Services regarding the operation of
a heavy use facility, upon notice, at facility shall have thirty
(30) business days to correct any ctivity which may violate
the terms of this ordinance before hearing to determine a
suspension or revocation of the avy Use Operator's
License may be issued.
(B) Suspension. The Fayette ille City Council,
after a public hearing where the heavy se operator is
allowed to present evidence, may suspend Heavy Use
Facility Operating License for up to thirty 0) days for
violations of the terms of the license after a �te process
hearing.
(C) Revocation. The Fayetteville City Council,
after a public hearing where the heavy use opera or is
allowed to present evidence, may revoke a Heavy
Facility Operating license for repetitive, continu g,
intentional, or substantial violations of the requireme0th f
this ordinance. The Fayetteville City Council may �quir�
adequate assurances that any operator whose licese has
been revoked will fully comply with the Heavy U Facility
Operating License before reissuing another licens .
(D) Appeal. Any person whosA license has
been suspended or revoked pursuant to t ' section, may
appeal such suspension or revocation to the Washington
County Circuit Court to determine whethe suspension (up to
30 days) or revocation is appropriate for uch violation. The
Heavy Use operation may continue operations pending
appeal of any suspension or revocation.
§113.16: Penalty.
(A) Any owner, lessor or lessee of real property
upon which is located a heavy use facility and any operator
or manager of such heavy use facility shall ensure such
facility is operated within the limits of this ordinance and shall
be guilty of a criminal vv)olation for any violation of the
requirements of this ordinance.
(B) The Heavy Use Facility Operating License
may be revoked or suspended by the Fayetteville City
Council after a due process hearing for an owner's,
manager's, operators, employee's, or lessee's violation of
any terms or limits within this ordinance or for operating the
heavy use facility not in conformity with its Heavy Use
Facility Operating License.
C) Any owner, operator, manager or lessee
e of a Heavy Use Facility shall be guilty of a criminal
n if such person operates the heavy use facility in
i of any of the terms of this ordinance, without a
and valid Heavy Use Facility Operating License, or in
i of any of the terms of his Heavy use facility
ng License.
(D) Each violation of the operational hour
limitations or the number of explosions or the explosive force
of any blasting of this Ordinance or the applicable Heavy use
facility Operating License shall constitute a separate
violation of this ordinance and shall be punishable by a fine
of up to $500.00.
§113.17: No reduction in property owner's
right to sue for nuisance.
Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed or
used ina Court of law as evidence or a standard of conduct
to determine if any heavy use facility constitutes a private or
public nuisance, and this ordinance shall not act as a bar to
a suit by a private citizen concerning the heavy use facility.
DRAFT It)
ORDINANjTfNJURY
AN ORDIN CE TO PREVOR ANNOYANCE
WITHIN TH CORPORATEOF FAYETTEVILLE BY
REGULATING D DIRT FACILITIES SO THAT
THESE FACILI ES WILLE NUISANCES
WHEREAS, the City Counci\the
he
for red dirt mining facilities to supple,
and road construction within and nearor
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City C,
to experts and determined that any blasting
unavoidable damaging effects upon nearby sl
of Fayetteville, Arkansas recognizes the need
red dirt for building construction, parking lot
e limits of Fayetteville; and
I has reviewed scientific evidence and listened
could be used in red dirt mining could cause
ces (especially homes); and
WHEREAS, the
Fayetteville City
rouncil s
also learned and determined that an
operating red dirt mining
facility causes vibrations,
du'kt,
ground
upheaval, loud noises, fumes
and other
deleterious effects within a mile f
m the red di
mining
facility; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City ouncil has also eard from citizens living near an
existing and operating red dirt mining fa ility and determin¼l that unregulated blasting, dirt
excavating, dump truck loading and otheij red dirt mining face 'ty activities are offensive and
potentially unhealthy and dangerous to Fzyetteville citizens and amaging to their homes and
city streets;
WHEREAS, unless the frequencylof blasting, its distance f m houses, the hours and
days of red dirt mining facility operation near residences and the red 'rt mining's dust causing
activities are regulated and controlled, suca red dirt mining facility wo d constitute a nuisance
to Fayetteville residents and citizens and should be abated.
DRAFT 0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1:
Chapter 113 Rock
Article II Red Dirt
By:
PASSED and
the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby enacts
irries and Red Dirt Mining Fa'ities of the Code of Fayetteville,
�tg Facility Operating License as/shown on the attached Exhibit A.
LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor
this the 151 day of
By:
74
S
E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
EXHIBIT "A"
ARTICLE II.
Red Dirt Mining Fadjlity Operating License
§113.11. Finding of Nuisance and Need for
Abatement
The City Council o the City of Fayettevil
Arkansas determines and finds th t the operation of a r
dirt mining facility is a nuisance to a citizens and City
Fayetteville, Arkansas if operated o used other than
prescribed in §113.12 and, therefore, s ould be abated
the reasonable regulations required by thi ordinance.
§113.12. Abatement of Nuisance
(A) Rock Blasting/Use of Explosives.
(1) No blasting shall be allowed within
of any house within the city limits of Fayetteville.
(2) No blasting explosive charge or
shall exceed the most restrictive limitations within
state and Washington County regulations or laws.
(3) All blasting within the permitted red dirt
mining facility shall only be allowed one time per month
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. during a
single weekday (non -holiday) pursuant to the Red Dirt
Mining Operating License.
(B) Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility.
(1) All red dirt mining facilities within the city
limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits
of Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate during the
period of 8:30 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
from August 20'" through June 5'" and during the period of
8:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday from June
6'" through August 19'". No red dirt mining facility shall be
allowed to operate on a federally recognized holiday.
(2) All red dirt mining facilities within the city
limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits
of Fayetteville shall be prohibited from any operations until
the owner/operator of such facility has obtained a valid,
annual Red Dirt Mining Operating License. This license to
operate shall be issued by the Fayetteville Planning
Department on a fiscal year (July 1 through June 30)
schedule with no fee assessed.
(C) Dust, Mud and Rock Control Measures.
All red dirt mining facilities within the city limits
of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits of
Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate with the
following safeguards and measures to ensure that dust, dirt,
mud, loose rock, and all other possible irritants or nuisance
substances do not adversely affect Fayetteville residents. It
is the express continuing duty of the licensed red dirt mining
operator to ensure all of these safeguards, requirements and
measures are constantly enforced.
(1) Dust control measures. Water or
other substances or measures must be fully effective during
the operation of the red dirt mining to prevent the escape of
dust from the red dirt mining facility. During any period of a
week or longer when the red dirt mining facility is not
operating, the operator shall take all measures necessary to
ensure dust does not escape from the red dirt mining facility.
(2) Dirt and mud control measures. The red
dirt mining operator is required to ensure that any and all
vehicles leaving the red dirt mining facility shall have all mud
and dirt removed from the tires and exterior parts of the body
of all vehicles prior to exiting the site onto public roads.
(3) Red dirt. The red dirt mining operator is
responsible to ensure that all dump trucks leaving the red
dirt mining site that may utilize any city street and are
carrying more than half a truck load of red dirt have their
load fully and properly covered.
(4) Dump truck identifying number. In order for
citizens to easily and correctly identify dump trucks and their
owner/operators who are servicing the red dirt mining facility,
the red dirt mining operator shall require any dump truck
accessing or servicing his facility to have an easy to read
four digit number at least six inches high and twelve inches
wide on the tail gate of the dump truck. The red dirt mining
operator shall maintain an up-to-date and accurate log of the
owner and operator of each numbered dump truck and shall
immediately supply the owner and operator's name, address
and contract information to any Fayetteville employee,
official or citizen who requests such information.
(5) Only dump trucks with proper identifying
nurftker may be loaded. The red dirt mining operator shall
not loW or permit to be loaded or permit to exit the red dirt
mining cility any dump truck unless the identifying number
specified'� subsection (4) is clearly legible, easy to read and
not obscureq by dirt, mud or otherwise.
§113.13: Julysdiction of This Ordinance.
Pursuan to A.C.A. §14-54-103(1), this ordinance
to abate a nuisance all be applicable to any and all red dirt
mining facilities loc d within the corporate limits of
Fayetteville and for on (1) mile beyond the city limits as
prescribed in A.C.A. §14-2Q2-102.
§113.14: Definitions
(A) "Explosive forde means the amount of
explosive power generated by vaPIqus types of explosive
substances such as dynamite, blasting'powder, etc.
(B) "Red dirt mining" means any open
excavation used for obtaining red dirt or other type of soil
used for paving or building purposes.
(C) "House" means any habitable structure
including a mobile or manufactured home, a dwelling, a
residence, an apartment, a condominium, a dormitory, a
hotel or motel.
(D) "Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility'
means any blasting, operation of any mechanical equipment
on the premises of the red dirt mining facility or any
operation of dump trucks or other large vehicles on the
premises of the red dirt mining site. Starting, running the
engine or moving any equipment or dump truck on the
premises shall constitute operation of the red dirt mining
facility. However, as ong as the dust control measures
remain in operation and effective, dump trucks may be
driven onto the red dirt mimgg facility to park (but may not be'
loaded) on the premises up gtil 5:30 p.m. during the August
20rn to June 5'" period. 1
113.15: Issuance, Suspensioft or
of License.
(A) Issuance. The Director d Deve
Services or designee shall prepare and issue a ann
Dirt Mining Facility Operating License upn
application of an owner/operator of a red dirt min.i
within the jurisdiction of this ordinance after ensu
owner/operator will be in full compliance v
requirements of this ordinance and has all other curi
valid federal, state and county permits required for
mining operation.
(B) Suspension. The Director of Developme
Services may suspend a Red Dirt Mining Facility Operati
License for up to thirty (30) days for violations of the terms
the license after a due process hearing.
(C) Revocation. The Director of Develo
Services may revoke a Red Dirt Mining Facility Opt
license for repetitive, continuing, intentional, or subs
violations of the requirements of this ordinance.
Director of Development Services may require ad(
assurances that any operator whose license has
revoked will fully comply with the Red Dirt Mining F
Operating License before reissuing another license.
(D) Appeal. Any person whose license
been suspended or revoked pursuant to this section,
appeal such suspension or revocation to the City Coun
providing the City Clerk's Office with a written reques
City Council review within ten business days of the issu
of suspension or revocation. The City Council may
determine whether the red dirt mining facility owner/ope
violated the requirements of the ordinance and, if
AFT 0
whether suspension (up to 30 days) or revocation is
appropriate for such violation.
§113.16: Penalty.
(A) Any owner, lessor or lessee of real property
upon which is located a red dirt mining facility and any
operator, manager, or employee of such red dirt mining
facility shall ensure such facility is operated within the limits
of this ordinance and shall be guilty of a criminal violation for
any violation of the requirements of this ordinance.
(B) The Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating
License may be revoked or suspended by the Director of
Development Services after a due process hearing for an
owner's, manager's, operator's, employee's, or lessee's
violation of any terms or limits within this ordinance or for
operating the red dirt mining facility not in conformity with its
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
(C) Any owner, operator, manager, lessee or
employee of a Red Dirt Mining Facility shall be guilty of a
criminal violation if such person operates the red dirt mining
facility in violation of any of the terms of this ordinance,
without a current and valid Red Dirt Mining Facility
Operating License, or in violation of any of the terms of his
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
(D) Each violation of the operational hour
ms or the number of explosions or the explosive force
blasting of this Ordinance or the applicable Red Dirt
Facility Operating License shall constitute a separate
p of this ordinance and shall be punishable by a fine
of up
§113.17: Nc reduction in property owner's
rikht to sue for nuisance.
Nothin in this ordinance removes or reduces a
property owner's rtght to sue or seek an injunction against
any owner or oper�tpr of a red dirt mining facility if such
facility constitutes a rivate or public nuisance to that
property owner.
f+ i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO PREVENT
WITHIN THE CO RATE LIMI'
REGULATING RED IRT MINI?
THESE FACILITIES WILL NOT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the CibK of
for red dirt mining facilities to supply necessary c
and road construction within and near the corporate 1
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council
determined that any blasting that could be used in
damaging or nuisance effects upon nearby structures
URY OR ANNOYANCE
OF FAYETTEVILLE BY
FACILITIES SO THAT
NUISANCES
:tteville, Arkansas recognizes the need
for building construction, parking lot
of Fayetteville; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has h
operating red dirt mining facility can cause vibrations, dust
and other deleterious effects within a mile from the red dirt
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has alsc
existing and operating red dirt mining facility and detern
excavating, dump truck loading and other red dirt mining
potentially unhealthy and dangerous to Fayetteville citizens
city streets;
ned to experts and citizens and
mining could cause unavoidable
homes); and
le ed and determined that an
round�ipheaval, loud noises, fumes
ning fa\are
heard ns living near an
ned thated blasting, dirt
cility offensive and
id datheir property and
WHEREAS, unless the frequency of blasting, its dista'ce from houses, a hours and
days of red dirt mining facility operation near residences and thk red dirt mining's ust causing
activities are properly regulated and controlled, such a red dirt mining facility would c' nstitute a
nuisance to Fayetteville residents and citizens and should be abated.
DRAFT
NOW, THE'EFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That th� City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby enacts
Chapter 113 Rock Quarr'I�s and Red Dirt Mining Facilities of the Code of Fayetteville,
/
Article II Red Dirt Mining rQcihty Operating License as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
PASSED and
APPROVED:
By:
LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor
this the 15th day of September, 2009.
By:
2
TTEST:
E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
1 ,♦
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License
§113.11. Finding of Nuisance a d Need for
Abatement
The City Council of the C\y of Fayettevil
Arkansas determines and finds that the peration of a r
dirt mining facility is a nuisance to the cit ens and City
Fayetteville, Arkansas if operated or use other than
prescribed in §113.12 and, therefore, shout be abated
the reasonable regulations required by this ordjnance.
§113.12. Abatement of Nuisance
(A) Rock BlastinglUse of Explosives.
(1) No blasting shall be allowed within
of any house within the city limits of Fayetteville.
(2) No blasting explosive charge or
shall exceed the most restrictive limitations within
state and Washington County regulations or laws.
(3) All blasting within the permitted
mining facility shall only be allowed one day per
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. d
single weekday (non -holiday) pursuant to the R
Mining Operating License.
(B) Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility.
(1) All red dirt mining facilities within I
limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the cit
of Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate dur
period of 8:30 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. Monday through
from August 20'" through June 5and during the pc
8:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday fror
6k" through August 19'". No red dirt mining facility s
allowed to operate on a federally recognized holiday.
(2) All red dirt mining facilities within
limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the (
of Fayetteville shall be prohibited from any operati
the owner/operator of such facility has obtained
annual Red Dirt Mining Operating License. This Ii
operate shall be issued by the Fayetteville
Department on a fiscal year (July 1 through J
schedule with no fee assessed.
(C) Dust, Mud and Rock Control
a city
limits
3 the
od of
June
ill be
the operation of the red dirt mining to ensure the red dirt
mining facility is in full and continual compliance with the
requirements of the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution
Control Act as administered by the Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality. A violation of the permit conditions
required by the Arkansas Department of Environmental
Quality can be grounds for a suspension or revocation of the
City's Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
(2) Dirt and mud control measures. The red
dirt mining operator is required to ensure that any and all
vehicles leaving the red dirt mining facility shall have all mud
and dirt removed from the tires and exterior parts of the body
of all vehicles prior to exiting the site onto public roads.
(3) Red dirt. The red dirt mining operator is
responsible to ensure that all dump trucks leaving the red
dirt mining site that may utilize any city street and are
carrying more than half a truck load of red dirt have their
load fully and property covered.
(4) Dump truck identifying number. In order for
citizens to easily and correctly identify dump trucks and their
owner/operators who are servicing the red dirt mining facility,
the red dirt mining operator shall require any dump truck
accessing or servicing his facility to have an easy to read
four digit number at least six inches high and twelve inches
wide on the tail gate of the dump truck. The red dirt mining
operator shall maintain an up-to-date and accurate log of the
owner and operator of each numbered dump truck and shall
immediately supply the owner and operator's name, address
and contract information to any Fayetteville employee,
official or citizen who requests such information.
(5) Only dump trucks with proper identifying
umber may be loaded. The red dirt mining operator shall
t load or permit to be loaded or permit to exit the red dirt
mi ing facility any dump truck unless the identifying number
spa ified in subsection (4) is clearly legible, easy to read and
not o scured by dirt, mud or otherwise.
§113.13 Jurisdiction of This Ordinance.
e city Pvrsuant to A.C.A. §14-54-103(1), this ordinance
limits to abate a n 'sance shall be applicable to any and all red dirt
until mining facilit s located within the corporate limits of
valid, Fayetteville ank for one (1) mile beyond the city limits as
ise to prescribed in A. .A. §14-262.102.
nning
a 30) §113.14: Definitions.
(A) "E losive force" means the amount of
explosive power gend�ated by various types of explosive
substances such as dyrimite, blasting powder, etc.
All red dirt mining facilities within the city limits
of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the city limits of
Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate with the
following safeguards and measures to ensure that dust, dirt,
mud, loose rock, and all other possible irritants or nuisance
substances do not adversely affect Fayetteville residents. It
is the express continuing duty of the licensed red dirt mining
operator to ensure all of these safeguards, requirements and
measures are constantly enforced.
(1) Dust control measures. Water or
other substances or measures must be fully effective during
(B) "Red in mining" means any open
excavation used for obtainI�g red dirt or other type of soil
used for paving or building purposes.
(C) "House" means any habitable structure
including a mobile or manufactured home, a dwelling, a
residence, an apartment, a condominium, a dormitory, a
hotel or motel.
(D) "Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility'
means any blasting, operation of any mechanical equipment
3
on the premises of the red dirt mining facility or any
operation of dump trucks or\other large vehicles on the
premises of the red dirt mining"aite. Starting, running the
engine or moving any equipmera\or dump truck on the
premises shall constitute operation of the red dirt mining
facility. However, as long as the dOss control measures
remain in operation and effective, duthq trucks may be
driven onto the red dirt mining facility to pa but may not be
loaded) on the premises up until 5:30 p.m. du ' g the August
20'" to June 5 period.
113.15: Issuance, Suspension or
of License.
(A) Issuance. The Director of Developme'h
Services or designee shall prepare and issue an annual Red
Dirt Mining Facility Operating License upon proper
application of an owner/operator of a red dirt mining facility
within the jurisdiction of this ordinance after ensuring the
owner/operator will be in full compliance with all
requirements of this ordinance and has all other current and
valid federal, state and county permits required for red dirt
mining operation.
(B) Suspension. The Director of Developmk
Services may suspend a Red Dirt Mining Facility Operati
License for up to thirty (30) days for violations of the terms
the license after a due process hearing.
(C) Revocation. The Director of Develc
Services may revoke a Red Dirt Mining Facility Opr
license for repetitive, continuing, intentional, or subs
violations of the requirements of this ordinance.
Director of Development Services may require adi
assurances that any operator whose license has
revoked will fully comply with the Red Dirt Mining F
Operating License before reissuing another license.
(D) Appeal. Any person whose licen a has
been suspended or revoked pursuant to this sectiqi, may
appeal such suspension or revocation to the City Co ncil by
providing the City Clerk's Office with a written recijiest for
City Council review within ten business days of the ' suance
of suspension or revocation. The City Council ray then
determine whether the red dirt mining facility owne operator
4
violated the requirements of the ordinance and, if so,
whether suspension (up to 30 days) or revocation is
appropriate for such violation.
§113.16: Penalty.
(A) Any owner, lessor or lessee of real property
upon which is located a red dirt mining facility and any
operator, manager, or employee of such red dirt mining
facility shall ensure such facility is operated within the limits
of this ordinance and shall be guilty of a criminal violation for
any violation of the requirements of this ordinance.
(B) The Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating
License may be revoked or suspended by the Director of
Development Services after a due process hearing for an
owner's, manager's, operators, employee's, or lessee's
violation of any terms or limits within this ordinance or for
operating the red dirt mining facility not in conformity with its
,Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
(C) Any owner, operator, manager, lessee or
emp ee of a Red Dirt Mining Facility shall be guilty of a
crimina violation if such person operates the red dirt mining
facility in violation of any of the terms of this ordinance,
without a urrent and valid Red Dirt Mining Facility
Operating Li nse, or in violation of any of the terms of his
Red Dirt Minin acility Operating License.
(D) E�h violation of the operational hour
limitations or the nu er of explosions or the explosive force
of any blasting of this rdinance or the applicable Red Dirt
Mining Facility Operatin License shall constitute a separate
violation of this ordinan and shall be punishable by a fine
of up to $500.00.
§113.17: No reduction in ��operty owner's
right to sue for nthgance.
Nothing in this ordinanceemoves or reduces a
property owner's right to sue or seek\n injunction against
any owner or operator of a red dirt m ing facility if such
facility constitutes a private or public uisance to that
property owner.
HUGH JARRATT*
ATTORNEY AT L A W
1 2 0 0 EAST JOYCE BLVD., 6TH FLOOR
F A Y E T T E V I L L E, ARKANSAS 7 2 7 0 3
TELEPHONE 479.521.6686/FACSIMILE 479.527.8833
• Licensed in Arkansas, Oklahoma
& Missouri
October 13, 2009
Mr. Kit Williams
Fayetteville City Attorney
113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
RE: Red Dirt Mining Ordinance
Dear Mr. Williams:
When the Red Dirt Mining Ordinance was first drafted in an effort to abate an alleged
nuisance, the ordinance addressed the strength of blasting used in Red Dirt Mining
Facilities, dust from the mining operations, fumes from mining operations, and noise
created by the mining operations. However, it appears that the City is pre-empted by
State regulations on those issues with the exception of noise and the time blasting is
allowed.
It has become apparent from the public meetings held by the City Council and Ordinance
Review Committee that there are two separate issues regarding Red Dirt Mining Facilities
which can be addressed by the City of Fayetteville: (1) The timing of blasting that may
be done by the Red Dirt Mining Facilities, and (2) the noise created by the Red Dirt
Mining Facilities.
From listening at the public meetings, it appears that limiting the timing of blasting to the
hours between 10:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. has met with general agreement from the various
parties involved in this discussion.
The remaining issue is the noise created by the Red Dirt Mining Facilities which, it is
claimed, annoys Fayetteville citizens. If the red dirt mining facilities can operate in a
manner which does not create undue annoyance to the citizens of Fayetteville, the
annoyance would be dealt with, and the City would require no further steps in the
regulation of these businesses.
The proposed ordinance sets out certain times which the Red Dirt Mining Facilities may
operate, and another more restrictive time frame during which the Red Dirt Mining
Facilities may operate but must not perform certain alleged noisy operations. The
limitation of the hours of operation of the Red Dirt Mining Facilities seems to be an
arbitrary regulation which would not necessarily deal with alleged problems that have
been claimed by certain individuals, some of whom are Fayetteville residents many of
whom are not Fayetteville residents.
Mr. Kit Williams — 2— October 13, 2009
Pursuant to Arkansas Code Section 14-54-103(1), the City has authority to "prevent
injury or annoyance within the limits of the municipal corporation from anything
dangerous, offensive, or unhealthy and cause any nuisance to be abated..." I request that
comments related to this ordinance be limited to the residents of the City of Fayetteville.
Any comments from individuals outside the corporate limits of the City of Fayetteville
should be excluded so that the City Council is not unduly influenced by individuals who
have no standing pursuant to Arkansas law.
Under Arkansas law, the City of Fayetteville has certain regulatory power to "abate a
nuisance" that is within the jurisdiction of its Board of Health. That jurisdiction is up to
one (I) mile from the city limits or one half the distance to the nearest neighboring city
limits, whichever is farther. The alleged nuisance in this case is the timing of the blasts
used in red dirt mining operations and the alleged noise created by operating Red Dirt
Mining Facilities, if Red Dirt Mining Facilities operate in a manner in which blasting and
noise do not rise to the level of a "nuisance" the need to restrict the hours of operation of
the Red Dirt Mining Facilities goes away.
I propose that the City of Fayetteville give the Red Dirt Mining Facilities sixty (60) days
during which time those facilities can address any potential noise issues which may annoy
Fayetteville citizens. At the end of that sixty (60) day period, the City Council can
reassess the actual impact the Red Dirt Mining Facilities have on Fayetteville citizens.
The limitation on hours of operation does nothing but hurt the Red Dirt Mining Facility,
and if those facilities can operate in the manner described above, the Red Dirt Mining
Facilities should not be subject to arbitrary restrictions on their hours of operation.
In this letter I have not addressed the dump truck numbering portions of the ordinance. I
would like to separate the dump truck numbering requirements from the actual operations
of the Red Dirt Mining Facility, and address those two issues individually. Stephens Red
Dirt Farm has no objections to requiring its trucks and trucks contracted with Stephens
Red Dirt Farm to have the numbers required by the ordinance so long as all vehicles
requiring a Commercial Drivers License which operate within the jurisdiction of the City
of Fayetteville are required to have the same numbering system.
Attached to this letter, please find a coversheet with detailed weather information, along
with a coversheet with detailed real estate records. If you have any questions of if I can
help in any way, please let me know.
Thank you.
Sin e ,
ug att
Att ey at Law
Memo
To: The City of Fayetteville
From: Hugh Jarratt, Attorney at Law
Date: 10/13/2009
Re: Red Dirt Mining Ordinance
Attached please find detailed weather information for the Fayetteville area. These
measurements were taken at Drake Field. As shown by this data, as of October 11
there have been 63 days with rainfall greater than one -tenth (1/10"') of an inch, 31
days with rainfall greater than one-half (1/2) an inch and ten days with rainfall greater
than one (1) inch. After discussing this information with the managers of the Red Dirt
Mining Facility, every day with one (1) inch of an inch of rain or greater the Red Dirt
Operator loses two (2) days of work. For every day with half (1/2) an inch of rain the
Red Dirt Operator loses on average 1.5 days of work. Therefore, as of October 11,
the Red Dirt Operator has lost 51.5 days of work.
If you have any questions, please call.
Jarratt
79) 521-6686
Current Month -
Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6formphp?siteName=Drake_Field_Fa...
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
JANUARY
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 O N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 M
TEMPERATURE IN
F:
:PCPN: SNOW: WIND
:SUNSHINE:
SKY :PI(
WND
.........L.v........................a..uvvv.........".v.....
0............
1 2 3 4
5
6A
6B 7 8 9 10 11
12
13 31
15 16
1l
18
121 AVG HK 2MIN
DY MAX MIN AVG
DEP
HDD
CDD WTR SNW DPTH SPD SPO
DIR
MIN PSBL
S -S WX
SPD
DR
.......................................................v.......................
1 50 22 36
2
29
0 0.00 0.0 M 6.8 20
180
M M
M
24
170
2 59 23 11
7
24
0 0.00 0-0 M 4.3 I6
l70
M M
M 1
21
170
3 74 45 60
26
5
0 T M M 13.6 26
190
H M
M
33
180
4 45 26 36
2
29
00-00 0.0 M 9.6 18
340
M M
H I0
23
340
5 35 26 31
-3
34
0 0.01 M M 4.6 13
50
M H
MU
16
50
6 44 29 37
320
0 0.00 0.0 M 6.4 14
300
M M.
M 1
17
300
7 51 29 40
6
25
0 T H M 0.3 17
250
M M
H
23
230
B 57 26 12
8
23
0 0.00 0.0 H 2.9 17
270
M M
M.
22
270
9 59 31 45
11
20
0 0.05 H M 10.0 22
180
M M
M 1
29200
10 56 18 37
3
28
0 T M M 10.0 24
300
M M
M IB
28
300
11 50 16 33
-1
32
0 0.00 0.0 M 4.3 13
300
M M
M 10
15
290
12 56 26 12
8
23
0 0.00 0.0 H 11.5 29
210
H M
H
35
210
13 34 15 25
-9
40
0 0.00 0.0 H B.9 25
330
M H
H8
29
340
14 49 20 35
1
30
0 0.00 0.0 M 11.9 23
220
M M
M
29
230
15 20 12 16
-18
49
0 0.00 0.0 M 6.7 13
340
H M
M
15
340
16 31 11 21
-13
44
0 0.00 0.0 M 0.9 18
210
M M
H
22
220
17 54 25 40
6
25
0 0.00 0.0 M 10.8 24
210
M M
?1
30
220
18 51 22 37
320
0 0.00 0.0 H 6.8 18
300
M M
M
25
290
19 49 28 39
5
26
0 0.00 0.0 M 10.6 21
330
M H
M
25
340
20 35 18 27
-7
36
0 0.00 0.0 M 9.4 24
340
H M
M
30
340
21 51 15 33
-1
32
0 0.00 0.0 H 6.5 21
210
H M
M
25
250
22 69 18 14
10
21
0 0.00 0.0 N 4.2 16
200
H H
M
21
190
•
23 59 33 46
12
19
0 0.00 0.0 M 6.3 16
10
M N
H
22
10
24 35 22 29
-5
36
0 0.00 0.0 M 7.5 15
10
H M
M
21
10
25 31 25 30
-5
35
0 0.00 0.0 H 4.0 9
50
M M
H
12
60
26 31 26 29
-6
36
0 0.55 M M 5.1 13
50
M M
1118
16
60
27 M H M
M
M
M M M H M M
M
H M
M
NH
28 M M M
M
M
M M M H M H
M
M H
M
M
H
29 M M M
M
M
M M M M M M
M
M H
M
M
M
30 M M M
M
M
M H M M M M
M
M M
M
M
M
31 M M M
M
H
M H M M H M
M
M M
M
M
M
.......v.....a.................................................
va............
SH 1240 607
759
0 0.61 0.0 202.5
H
M
.............................................................0............i....
AV 17.7 23.3
7.8 FASTST
H M
0 MAX(MPH)
MISC ----> 4 29
210
0 35
210
NOTES:
N LAST OF SEVERAL
OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK
WIND
IN
M.P.N.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA (MS FORM: F-6(
,
PAGE 2
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH;
JANUARY
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
(TEMPERATURE DATA(
[PRECIPITATION DATA)
SYMBOLS USED
IN COLUMN
16
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
35.5
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 0.61
1 -
FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL:
1.2
DPTR FM NORMAL: -1.53
2 -
FOG REDUCING VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 74
ON
3
GRIST 24HR 1.01 ON 26-27
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 11
ON
16
3 •
THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH; 0.0 INCH
5 -
(JAIL
GRIST 24HR 0.0
6 a
FREEZING
RAIN OR DRIZZLE
GRIST DEPTH: M ON M
7 -
DUSTSTORM OR SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2
MILE OR LESS
0 •
SMOKE OR
HAZE
[NO. OF DAYS WITH(
(WEATHER - DAYS WITH)
9 -
BLOWING
SNOW
X -
TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW:
3
0.01 INCH OR MORE: 3
MAX 90 0R ABOVE:
0
0.10 INCH OR MORE: 1
MIN 32 OR BELOW:
24
0.50 INCH OR MORE: 1
MIN 0 OR BELOW:
0
1.00 INCH OR MORE: 0
[HOD (BASE 65)
1
TOTAL THIS NO.
159
CLEAR (SCALE 0-31 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-194
PTCLDY (SCALE 4-71 0
TOTAL FM JUL 1
2470
CLOUDY (SCALE 8-10) 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-122
(CDD (BASE 65)
1
TOTAL THIS MO,
0
DPTR M NORMAL
0
(PRESSURE DATA)
TOTAL M JAN 1
0
HIGHEST SLP M ON H
DPTR M NORMAL
0
LOWEST SLP 29.52 ON 6
10/12/2009 8:16
AM
I of 1
Current Month -
Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/%formphp?siteName=Drake_Field_Fa...
STATION;
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
FEBRUARY
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
TEMPERATURE
IN F:
:PCPN: SNOW: WIND
:SUNSHINE:
SKY
:PK 1'IND
.........eses......c..---t*-s....................=............=
...........a...
1 2 3 4
5 6A
6B 7 8 9 10 11
12
13 14
15
16 11
10
12Z AVG MX ZNIN
DY MAX MIN AVG
DEP
HOD
CUD WTR SNW OPIN SPD SPD
DIR
MIN PSBL
S-5
WX SPD
DR
................................................................................
1 M H M
M
H
M M M M M M
M
M M
M
NM
2 M M M
M
H
M M M M M M
M
M M
M
NH
3 35 20 28
-9
31
0000 M M M 27
330
M M
M
20
340
4 41 12 27
-10
38
0 0.00 0.0 M 1.3 9
110
M H
H
12
190
$ 59 20 40
3
25
0 0.00 0.0 M 12.6 24
200
M M
M
31
210
6 64 49 57
20
0
00.00 0.0 M 16.8 30
190
M H
M
41
200
7 66 58 62
24
3
0000 0.0 M 13.7 24
190
H H
H
30
200
8 69 52 61
23
4
0 0.00 0.0 H 8.7 20
160
M M
M
26
170
9 62 50 56
18
9
0025 0.0 H 16.1 30
160
M M
M
1 39
170
10 67 49 58
20
7
0 0.83 M M 9,7 28
310
M M
M136
35
310
11 51 31 41
2
24
0 0.48 M H 9.0 28
240
M 14
M
13 33
230
12 63 28 46
7
19
0 0.00 0.0 M 4.3 12
200
M M
M
1 14
160
13 61 34 48
9
17
0 0.00 0.0 M 7.4 23
160
M M
M
31
160
14 49 33 41
1
24
0003 M H 8.2 17
330
M M
M
23
330
15 40 23 32
-8
33
0 0.06 M H J.9 12
60
H M
M
128 14
10
16 51 22 37
-3
28
0 0.00 0.0 H 5.7 18
180
H H
MI?
24
170
17 57 40 49
9
16
0 0.07 H M 14.9 26
190
M M
MIS
33
190
18 59 30 45
4
20
0 0.00 0.0 M 11.7 21
2210
M H
M
28
310
19 41 23 32
-9
33
0000 0.0 M 8.4 11
330
M M
M
22
300
2D 61 23 42
1
23
0 0.00 0.0 M 12.4 22
190
H M
M
26
210
21 51 25 38
-3
27
0 0.00 0.0 M 11.4 26
320
M M
M
30
320
22 47 18 33
-9
32
0 0.00 0.0 H 2.2 12
330
M M
M
14
330
23 53 21 31
-5
28
0 0.00 0.0 H 5.0 16
190
H H
M
20
180
24 53 42 48
6
11
0 0.00 0.0 M 9.8 20
160
M M
M
26
160
25 69 36 53
10
12
00,00 0.0 M 4.6 15
180
H M
M
1 17
190
26 73 49 61
18
4
0 0.17 H M 15.8 30
270
H M
M
130 41
260
27 53 33 43
0
22
0 0.04 M H 8.917
50
M M
M
18 24
40
28 36 18 27
-17
30
0 0.08 M M 12.9 23
330
M H
M
18 28
320
SM 1431 839
548
0 2.01 0.0 236.2
H
M
.............................:...................e...1..
---
1iv 55.0 32.3
9.4 FASTST
M H
0
MAX(MPH)
MISC ----> 4 30
190
0 41 200
..............=-=--.........a......................1.......v....................
NOTES:
4 LAST OF SEVERAL
OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK
WIND
IN
M.P.H.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL
DATA (WS FORM: F-6)
,
PAGE 2
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
FEBRUARY
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE;
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
[TEMPERATURE DATA]
[PRECIPITATION DATA[
SYMBOLS USED
IN
COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
43.7
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 2.01
1 =
FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL:
4.0
DPTR FM NORMAL: -0.40
2 -
FOG REDUCING
VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 73
ON 26
GRIST 24HR 1.31 ON 10-11
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 12
ON 4
3 -
THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0 INCH
5 -
HAIL
GRIST 24HR 0.0
6 -
FREEZING
PAIN
OR DRIZZLE
GRIST DEPTH: M ON M
7 .
DUSTSTORM OR
SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2
MILE
OR LESS
8 -
SMOKE OR
HAZE
(NO. OF DAYS WITH)
(WEATHER - DAYS WITH)
9 -
BLOWING
SNOW
X -
TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.01 INCH OR MORE: 9
MAX 90 OR ABOVE:
0
0.10 INCH OR MORE: 4
MIN 32 OR BELOW:
14
0.50 INCH OR MORE: 1
MIN 0 OR BELOW:
0
1.00 INCH OR MORE: 0
[HDD (BASE 65)
I
TOTAL THIS MO.
540
CLEAR (SCALE 0-31 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-162
PTCLDY (SCALE 4-7) 0
TOTAL FM JUL 1
3018
CLOUDY (SCALE 8-101 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-284
(CDD (BASE 65)
I
TOTAL THIS MO.
0
DPTR FM NORMAL
0
(PRESSURE DATA)
TOTAL FM JAN 1
0
HIGHEST 5LP 30.64 ON 4
DPTR PM NORMAL
0
LOWEST SLP 29.50 ON 11
1 of l
10/12/2009 8:17
AM
Current
Month - Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6form.php?siteName=Drake_Field_Fa...
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH:
MARCH
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
TEMPERATURE IN F:
:PCPN: SNOW: WIND
:SUNSHINE:
SKY :PK WND
.................v.e....:..s.x....n.n....=............:..................n.... ..
1 2 3 4
5 6A
6B 7 B 9 10 11
12
13 14
15
16 17
18
12Z AVG MX
2MIN
DY MAX MIN AVG
DEP HDD
CDD WTR SNW OPTN SPD SPD
DIR
MIN PSBL
S -S
WX SPD
DR
............................................................................. u.
1 37 13 25
-19
40
0 0.00 0.0 M 7.6 11
340
M M
M
22
330
2 49 10 34
-10
31
0 0.00 0.0 M 3.6 9
120
M H
H
10
120
3 48 29 39
-5
26
0 0.00 0.0 H 8.5 17
180
M M
M
21
140
4 63 37 50
5
15
0 0.00 0.0 M 10.2 20
180
M M
MB
23
190
5 73 55 64
19
1
0 0.00 0.0 H 19.9 30
190
M H
M
38
190
6 00 62 71
26
0
6 0.00 0.0 H 14.0 23
210
M M
M
30
170
7 71 62 67
21
0
2 0.00 0.0 M 17.1 32
200
M M
M
40
200
9 68 36 52
6
13
0 0.01 M M 12.1 31
270
M M
M
41
290
9 75 33 54
8
11
0 0.00 0.0 M 10.2 23
180
M M
MO
28
170
10 76 37 57
11
8
0 0.14 M M 15.5 28
330
H M
Ml
32
330
11 43 32 38
-9
27
0 T M M 9.1 17
60
M H
M
22
60
12 39 31 35
-12
30
00.09 H M 8.1 16
80
M M
H
20
10
13 47 34 41
-6
24
00.00 0.0 H 6.9 14
40
M H
M
17
40
14 48 39 44
-4
21
00.10 H M 3.9 9
60
H K
M
18 13
40
15 59 38 49
1
16
0 0.00 0.0 H 4.0 13
200
H M
M
1B 15
190
16 12 35 54
6
11
0 0.00 0.0 M 1.9 8200
M M
M
12 10
240
17 18 35 57
8
8
0 0.00 0.0 M 6.6 16
200
H M
M
1 23
190
18 79 45 62
13
3
0 0.00 0.0 M 6.7 21
200
M H
H
25
210
19 60 49 55
6
10
0 0.02 M M 8.3 18
70
M M
H3
24
70
20 64 38 51
2
14
0 0.40 H H 7.0 17
180
H 4
M
13 20
180
21 51 45 51
1
14
00.94 M M 5.6 16
180
M M
M
13 18
110
22 73 44 59
9
6
0 0.00 0.0 M 11.5 22
180
M H
M
26
150
23 71 61 66
16
0
1 T 0.0 M 20.3 32
160
M M
M
3 47
140
24 67 42 55
4
10
0 0.99 M M 13.2 35
240
M M
M
123 49
260
25 58 33 46
-5
19
0 1 M M 3.8 16
260
H H
M
18260
26 68 35 52
1
13
0 0.13 M M 4.3 22
120
M H
M
12 2B
110
27 62 47 55
3
10
0 0.59 M M 9.6 22
70
M M
M
13 26
70
28 53 32 43
-9
22
0 0.28 M M 13.3 21
300
M M
M
1 28
290
29 59 30 45
-7
20
0 0.00 0.0 M 6.0 16
300
M M
M
22
140
30 66 52 59
6
6
0 0.23 0.0 H 16.6 31
170
M H
M
13 39
110
31 53 33 43
-10
22
0 0.09 H M 11.1 25
270
M M
1413
32
280
................................................................................
SM 1916 1212
451
9 4.01 0.0 296.7
M
H
AV 61.8 39.1
9.6 FASTST
M M
0
HAX(MPH)
MISC ----> Y 35
240
0 49 260
................................................................................
NOTES:
0 LAST OF SEVERAL OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK
WIND
IN
M.P.H.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL
DATA IWS FORM: F-6)
,
PAGE 2
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
MARCH
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
(TEMPERATURE DATA]
(PRECIPITATION DATA]
SYMBOLS
USED
IN
COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
50.5
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 4.01
1 -
FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL:
2.2
DPTR FM NORMAL: -0.16
2 -
FOG REDUCING
VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 80
ON 6
GRIST 24HR 0.99 ON 24-24
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 13
ON 1
3 -
THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0 INCH
5 -
HAIL
GRIST 24HR 0.0
6 -
FREEZING
RAIN
OR DRIZZLE
GRTST DEPTH: M ON M
7 -
DUSTSTORM
OR
SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2
MILE OR LESS
8 -
SMOKE OR
HAZE
(NO. OF DAYS WITH)
[WEATHER - DAYS WITH]
9 =
BLOWING
SNOW
X -
TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.01 INCH OP MORE: 13
MAX 90 OR ABOVE:
0
0.10 INCH OR MORE: 9
MIN 32 OR BELOW:
7
0.50 INCH OR MORE: 3
MIN 0 OR BELOW:
0
1.00 INCH OR MORE: O
[HDD (BASE 65)
1
TOTAL THIS 140.
451
CLEAR (SCALE 0-31 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-69
PTCLDY (SCALE 4-7) 0
TOTAL FM JUL 1
3469
CLOUDY (SCALE 8-10) 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-353
[CDD (BASE 651
1
TOTAL THIS MO.
9
DPTR FM NORMAL
9
[PRESSURE DATA]
TOTAL FM JAN 1
9
HIGHEST SLP 30.58 ON 1
DPTR FN NORMAL
9
LOWEST SLP 29.38 ON 26
Loll
10/12/2009 8:15
AM
Current Month - Daily Weather Data (F6) http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6form.php?siteName=Drake_Field_Fa...
STATION: FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH: APRIL
YEAR: 2009
LATITUDE: 36 0 N
LONGITUDE: 94 10 W
TEMPERATURE IN F: :PCPN; SNOW: MIND :SUNSHINE: SKY :PK WND
1 2 J 4 5 6A 68 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
121 AVG MX 2MIN
DY MAX MIN AVG DER NDD CDD WTR SNW DPTH SPD SPD DIR MIN PSBL S -S WX SPD DR
......................................„....-...................................
1 67 30 19 -4 16 0 0.00 0.0 M 11.2 29 180 M M M 37 150
2 61 39 52 -2 13 0 0.20 M M 9.6 24 310 M M M 1 30 310
3 66 26 47 -7 18 0 0.00 0.0 H 4.7 15 180 M H M 12 17 170
4 74 52 63 9 2 0 0.00 0.0 H 14.6 30 170 M M M 37 160
5 64 37 51 -3 14 0 0.11 K M 16.7 29 300 M M M 13 36 310
6 45 30 38 -17 2l 0 0.00 0.0 M 16.5 29 330 M M M 35 330
7 56 26 41 -14 24 0 0.00 0.0 M 7.8 17 230 M M M 22 260
6 73 35 54 -1 11 0 0.00 0.0 M 4.7 13 220 M H M 16 220
9 68 46 57 1 0 0 0.50 H M 11.0 31 160 M M M 1 40 240
10 58 34 46 -10 19 0 0.15 M M 12.5 25 260 M M ML 32 280
11 67 29 40 -8 11 0 0.00 0.0 H 4.7 13 60 M M M 12 1650
12 55 44 50 -6 15 0 1.54 M M 8.3 30 9O M H M 13 39 80
13 48 41 45 -12 20 0 0.02 M M 6.9 17 300 H H M 1 22 280
14 63 34 49 -8 16 0 0.00 0.0 M 5.1 11 340 H M M 1 .22 310
15 73 34 54 -3 11 0 0.00 0.0 M 2.9 12 120 M M Ml 15 110
16 71 46 59 1 6 0 0.00 0.0 H 7.2 15 70 H M M 20 90
17 7l 46 59 1 6 0 T M M 0.0 22 190 M M M 18 26 190
18 67 52 60 2 5 0 0.21 0.0 M 8.8 31 300 M M M 13 39 30D
19 61 50 56 -2 9 0 0.32 0.0 M 9.2 25 320 M M M 1 32 320
20 72 37 55 -4 10 0 0.00 0.0 M 8.1 22 340 M M H 29 230
21 66 42 55 -4 10 00.00 0.0 M 6.0 18 340 M M M 23 330
22 86 47 67 8 0 2 0.00 0.0 M 5.4 13 230 M M M 16 230
23 85 60 13 13 0 B 0.00 0.0 H 16.1 29 200 M M M 36 190
24 80 63 72 12 0 7 T 0.0 M 11.4 29 180 M M M 30 170
25 79 65 12 12 0 70.00 0.0 M 15.9 30 180 M M M 35 190
26 80 67 74 14 0 9 0.00 M M 16.2 26 160 M M M 37 150
27 71 57 64 3 1 0 0.06 0.0 M 11.5 20 170 H H N 123 38 160
28 76 57 67 6 0 2 0.00 0.0 M 3.4 9 70 M M M 1 14 340
29 74 57 66 5 0 1 0.30 0.0 M 8.1 25 130 M H M 33 37 130
30 69 57 63 2 2 0014 0.0 M 5.3 20 220 M M M 1 25 220
SM 2051 1342 280 36 3.61 0.0 267.2 M M
................................................................................
AV 68.4 44,7 9.6 FASTS? M M 0 MAX(MPH)
RISC ----> M 31 160 440 240
.....................................................................:..........
NOTES:
* LAST or SEVERAL OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK WIND IN H.P.N.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA IWS FORM: F-6) , PAGE 2
STATION: FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH: APRIL
YEAR: 2009
LATITUDE: 36 0 N
LONGITUDE: 94 10 W
[TEMPERATURE DATA] (PRECIPITATION DATA[ SYMBOLS USED IN COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY: 56.6 TOTAL FOR MONTH: 3.61 1 - FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL: -0.8 DPTR FM NORMAL: -0.72 2 • FOG REDUCING VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 86 ON 22 GRIST 24HR 1.54 ON 12-12 TO 1/4 MILE OR LESS
LOWEST: 26 ON 7 3 - THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL 4 - ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0 INCH 5 - HAIL
GRTST 24HR 0.0 6 - FREEZING RAIN OR DRIZZLE
GRIST DEPTH; H ON M 7 - DUSTSTORH OR SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2 MILE OR LESS
8 - SMOKE OR HAZE
(NO. OF DAYS WITH] [WEATHER - DAYS WITH) 9 . BLOWING SNOW
• X - TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW: 0 0.01 INCH OR MORE: 11
MAX 90 OR ABOVE: 0 0.10 INCH OR MORE: 9
MIN 32 OR BELOW: 5 0.50 INCH OR MORE: 2
MIN 0 OR BELOW: 0 1.00 INCH OR MORE: I
[HDD {BABE 651 1
TOTAL THIS MO. 280 CLEAR (SCALE 0-3) 0
DPTR FM NORMAL 34 PTCLDY (SCALE 4-7) 0
TOTAL FM JUL 1 3719 CLOUDY (SCALE 0-10) 0
DPTR FM NORMAL -319
(CDD (BASE 65) I
TOTAL THIS MO. 36
DPTR FM NORMAL 19 (PRESSURE DATA)
TOTAL FM JAN 1 45 HIGHEST SLP 30.27 ON I1
DPTR FM NORMAL 28 LOWEST SLP 29.31 ON 2
lofI
10/12/2009 8:18 AM
Current Month -
Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6form.php?siteName=Drake_FieId_Fa...
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
MAY
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 H
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
TEMPERATURE
IN F:
:PCPN: SNOW: WIND
:SUNSHINE:
SKY :PK
WND
a.aaa..cc-.aa caccacca....ay.....
e a...a-a..va.cuc.-..a.a.vaa....
..a.a-v
c
I 2 3 1
5 6A
6B 7 8 9 10 11
Z;
l2
13 14
15
16 II
10
12Z AVG MX
2MWN
DY MAX MIN AVG
DEP HOD
COD WTR SNW DPTH SPD SPD
DIP
MIN PSOL
$-S
WX SPD
DR
. as.....aa......a:......:a
e..a.........................aa..alo .............
1 71 54 63
1
2
0 0.73 0.0 M 6.3 22
310
M M
M
13 26
330
2 57 51 54
-8
11
0 D.40 0.0 H 6.5 23
90
M M
M
13 28
90
3 57 52 55
-7
10
0 0.71 0.0 M 5.4 14
280
M M
K13
17
70
1 60 50 55
-7
10
0 0.04 0.0 H 3.1 9
80
M H
Ml
13W
5 64 51 58
-5
1
O1.) 0.0 H 2.7 17
140
M M
M
123 22
150
6 76 58 67
4
0
2 0.65 0.0 H 3.8 13
270
M M
1413
20
240
1 83 53 68
5
0
30.00 0.0 M 4.9 18
200
4 M
MU
23
190
6 74 62 69
5
0
30.94 0.0 M 4.2 2D
190
M M
H13
29
180
9 69 59 64
0
1
00.05 0.0 M 3.3 10
340
H M
MU
16
60
10 64 52 58
-6
1
0 0.11 0.0 M 5.815
70
H M
M
1 24
40
11 68 49 59
-5
6
0 0.00 0.0 M 5.9 14
180
M M
M
1670
12 71 51 63
-1
2
00.83 0.0 M 7.8 25
340
M M
M
13 36
330
13 B3 63 73
B
0
8 0.39 0.0 M 16.2 31
190
M M
M
13 39
180
14 76 61 69
4
0
4 0.08 0.0 M 2.8 15
210
M M
M
13 19
210
15 83 59 71
6
0
60.23 0.0 M 8.5 36
330
M H
M
13 40
340
16 66 50 58
-7
7
00.o8 0.0 M 6.3 20
350
N M
M3
25
350
17 61 44 56
-10
9
0 0.00 0.0 H 3.4 16
80
M H
M
22
70
18 75 40 58-8
7
0 0.00 0.0 M 1.1 10
180
N M
M
13
ISO
19 81 45 63
-3
2
0 0.00 0.0 M 2.5180
12
H H
M
170
15
20 78 45 62
-5
3
0 0.00 0.0 M 3.3 15
190
M H
M
20
180
21 82 50 66
-1
0
1 0.00 0.0 M 2.2 14
140
H H
M
IB
150
22 B4 53 69
2
0
4 0.00 0.0 M 2.9 14
70
M H
Ml
10
100
23 01 57 69
2
0
40.66 0.0 M 3.1 28
100
M M
M
13 36110
24 72 61 67
-1
0
2 0.20 0.0 H 3.9 12
50
M M
M
12 1750
25 75 64 70
2
0
5 0.43 0.0 M 6.3 11
320
M H
NIB
21
230
26 79 62 71
3
0
6 0.01 0.0 M 5.9 15
230
M H
M
1 21
220
27 69 50 64
-4
1
0 0.02 0.0 M 6.7 16
290
M M
HIS
22
280
20 65 52 59
-10
6
0 0.00 0.0 H 4.6 12
330
H M
M
12 15
320
29 01 50 66
-3
0
1 0.01 0.0 M 3.3 12
330
H H
M
12 15
350
30 85 53 69
0
0
4 0.00 0.0 M 5.4 14
240
M M
H
18
260
31 86 51 10
0
0
5 0.00 0.0 M 4.4 15
180
M M
M
18
170
...........aa..........................+...........-.-...-........--....._......
SM 1262 1666
91
56 ].95 0.0 152.5
H
M
...........a....aa„......:
..........................................a........
AV 73.6 53.7
4.9 FASTST
M M
0
MAX(MPHI
MISC ----> 9180
12
1170 15
............a...aa...a......a
... ...........a.........................a.........
NOTES:
4 LAST OF SEVERAL OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK
WIND
IN
M.P.N.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL
DATA INS FORM: F-6)
.
PAGE 2
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH:
MAY
YEAR;
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
(TEMPERATURE DATAI
(PRECIPITATION DATA]
SYMBOLS USED
IN
COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
63.7
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 7.95
1 •
FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL:
-1.8
DPTR PM NORMAL: 2.89
2 •
FOG REDUCING
VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 86
ON 31
GRIST 24HR 2.03 ON 5- 6
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 40
ON 18
3 a
THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0 INCH
5 •
HAIL
GRIST 24HR 0.0
6 •
FREEZING
RAIN
OR DRIZZLE
GRTST DEPTH: M ON 4
7 -
DUSTSTORM OR
SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2
MILE OR LESS
8 -
SMOKE OR
HAZE
(NO. OF DAYS WITH)
(WEATHER - DAYS WITH)
9 -
BLOWING SNOW
K •
TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.01 INCH OR MORE: 20
MAX 90 OR ABOVE:
0
0.10 INCH OR MORE: 13
MIN 32 CR BELOW:
0
0.50 INCH OR MORE: 7
MIN 0 OR BELOW:
0
1.00 INCH OR MORE: I
(HOD (BASE 65)
I
TOTAL THIS M0.
91
CLEAR [SCALE 0-3) 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
1
PTCLOY (SCALE 4-71 0
TOTAL FM JUL I
3040
CLOUDY (SCALE 0-10) 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-318
(COD (BASE 651
1
TOTAL THIS MO.
58
DPTR FM NORMAL
-45
(PRESSURE DATA]
TOTAL FM JAN 1
103
HIGHEST SLP 30.36 ON 11
DPTR FM NORMAL
-17
LOWEST SLP 29.59 ON B
I of I
10/12/2009 8:18
AM
Current
Month - Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6form.php?siteNaiiic=Drake_Field_Fa...
:i IAT:ON:
FFYETTE'C
LE APKADSAS
HONTN:
DONE
":EAR:
2995
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
SANG i'FUDE:
94 I0 W
:'EMPERAP:R!
IN F:
: PC PN: SNOW:
WIND
:SUNSHINE :
SKY :PK W!i9
.____ ...........................-.........................:...................-..
I 1- 3 4
5 6A
6B % 9 9
L•3 it
i.
13 14
15
:6 11
is
12Z
AVG M%
2MI5
UY MAX 1419 AVG
DEP H00
CDD WTR 5MW DPTK
SPD SPD
LIP
MFN PSEL
S -S
i4X SPO
DR
............................................................-
...................-..
R5 59 72
2
0
% O.OG 0.0 M
6.9 20
`_a0
M H
H
26
190
2 %2 59 71
0
€0.00 0.0 K
4.3 :'
i.'.O
H M
H
1 21
130
3 ;1 60 66
-5
3
I C.23 9.0 H
6.9 16
340
H H
H133
20
50
4 75 53 64
-.
1
0 9.00 0.0 H
5.? 17
50
4 H
M
25
50
5 79 49 E4
-7
1
A 0.00 0.0 M2.
9
-GO
H H
Ml
13
80
6 50 54 61
-4
0
23.00 !•.0 M
7.: I9
L70
H :4
H
26
1170
7 84 50 16
4
0
1: 0. 09 0.0 H
II.5 22
1190
:4 M
M
29
173
64 66 75
3
0
£0 T 0.0 H
7.4 2I
189
M 4
H
26
190
9 66 65 76
4
C
1: 0.33 0.0 Y..026339
26
339
R t4
H
I3 43330
iO 65 64 75
3
0
10 G.29 0.0 M
7. ?i
21D
H 4
MU
?6
270
:1 8160 71-2
0
6C.00 0.0 M
4.9 15
230
M H
M
1 23
250
12 80 60 10
-3
0
S0.'4 0.0 H
!.7 ]2
320
M M
4:23
4)1O
13 97 63 "5
2
G
!C 0.GO n.0 H
2.3 4
100
M H
4
123 iJ
60
!4 77 67 12
-i
0
7 0.81 0.0 M
3.5 30
230
H H
H
13 41
230
L5 50 619 7P
4
0
13 0.00 0.0 H
8.0 21
160
H H
MI
26
170
IF. E7 66 77
3
0
12 0.04 0.0 H
9.3 30
320
H M
M
.3 41310
11 8970 83
6
0
15 0.00 0.0 M
6.9 21
15'
H H
M1
25200
18 85 69 79
5
0
14 0.00 0.0 4
a.e 21
190
H H
H
25
200
19 SP 73 9!
6
0
!6 8.09 0.0 H
10.5 23
210
M H
14
31
213
20 99 10 50
5
0
15 0.00 0.0 H
7.0 20
210
H H
H
24
190
21 90 69 60
5
0
15 0.00 0.0 K
6.9 20
190
M M
MIS
241%
22 93 69 61
6
0
160.00 0.0 H
4.4 15.
213
H H
1418
18230
23 94 70 52
6
0
3' 0.00 0.0 M
i.9 10
10
M H
H
13
10
24 56 69 E3
7
0
18 0.00 0.0 M
1.4 13
230
M H
M
15
230
25 94 70 d2
6
0
1C.06 0.0 M
2.9 24
220
H H
H
33
2'20
26 95 70 93
7
0
180.00 0.0 :4
3.2 930
M H
Ml
12
270
27 95 7183
7
0
19 0.00 0.0 M
3.5 13
260
H H
Ml
15
250
28 81 64 76
-1
0
!0.'JO 3.0 H
3.S13
50
14 M
Ml
20
50
29 51 59 75
-2
0
130,0O 0.0 M
2.9 9
310
M M
H
13
300
20 92 65 79
2
0
110.00 0.0 M
6.1 20
220
M M
H
26
270
SM 2552 1535
2
]25 2.53 0.0 :F,6.5
M
M
.....n.........s........vu....a
...........e.......c..a,...a.........n.
A! 86.4 69.6
5.5 FASTST
H M
9
MA%1HPH3
MISC ---->
4 32
320
4 43 330
..........V...p........................=_==
.
i 2
..........
NOTES:
4 LAST OF SEVERAL OCCURRENCES
COLUI4N 17 PEAK
WIND
III
M.P.H.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLI.4FTOLCGICAL
DATA IWS
FORM: F -6i
,
PAGE 2
STAT:ON:
FAYETTEVILLE
.ARKAIISAS
MONTH;
JUNE
'YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 9 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W 9
(TEMPERATURE DATA)
(PRECIPITATION DATA(
SYHR01.S USED
IN
COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
75.5
TOTAL FOR MON:'H:
2.53
1
EOC OR N!ST
DRFR FM NORMAL:
1.0
CPTR F4 NORMAL:
-2.13
"2 -
FOG REDUCING
V:SIB:LITY
41CIIEST: 96
ON 24
GRIST 241IR O.E4 O9 14-14
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 49
ON 5
3
THUNDER
SIIOW, ICE PELLETS,
NAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL 14011TIl: 0.0
INCH
5 +
HAIL
519757 241119 ^..9
6 =
FREEZING
RAIN
OR :.RiZZLE
GRIST DEPTH: M ON H
7
IDJSTSTOFN OR
SANCSTORM:
VSBY 1/2
MILE OR LESS
SMOKE OR
HAZE
;NO. OF DAYS WI
iii
IWEATHER - PAYS WITHI
9 =
FLOM:NS SNOW
X -
TCPNACO
MAX 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.C1 :NCH OR MOPE:
7
MAX 40 OR ABO'V!:
9
0.13 INCH OR MORE:
-
MIN 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.59 INCH OR POPE:
0 OR BELOW:
^-
2 1411
1.90 :NCH 04 14DRE:
3
:40➢ !BASE AS;
i
FOCAL THIS 40.
2
CLEAR !SCALE 9-3i
0
CPTR FM 3CRMA1.
-6
?TGDV (SCALE 4-71
i3
70.AL iN JUL 1
3E42
CLOUDY CALE •i-10:
0
DPTR EM NORMAL
-324
co BASE 65:
I
TOTAL THis MO.
325
CPR EM IIORMAL
56
;PRESSURE DATA]
TOTAL fN .;AN 1
429
X!^X.EST SLP 3G. 0]
ON !4
PITH el'I ❑CRMAL
39
LOWEST SLP 29.68
On 3
I of 1
10/ 12/2009 8:14 AM
Current Month -
Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6form.php?siteNanle=Drake_Field_Fa...
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH:
JULY
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
TEMPERATURE
IN F:
:PCPN: SNOW:
WIND
:SUNSHINE:
SKY
:PK
WILD
1 2 3 4
5
6A
60 7 B 9
10 Ii
12
13 ]4
15 16
!7
]8
12Z
AVG MX
2MIN
DY MAX MIN AVG
DER
HOD
COD MIA SNN DPTH
SPD SPD
DIR
MIN PSBL
S -S WX
SPD
DR
......................._....._.---c.a...
...a..-............................
1 86 61 74
-3
0
9 0.00 0.0 M
2.3 13
340
H H
M 1
15
320
2 87 58 73
-4
0
8 0.00 0.0 M
1.4 12
330
M H
H
H30
3 89 64 11
0
0
12 0.16 0.0 .H
4.4 13
330
M M
M 3
17
340
4 84 7I7
0
0
13 0.95 0.0 H
8.4 26
300
M M
1413
33
300
5 B2 66 74
-4
0
9 T 0.0 M
5.2 15
340
M M
H3
10
330
6 01 63 72
-6
0
7 0.00 0.0 M
2.0 10
70
H H
M 18
14
50
7 83 59 71
-7
0
6 0.00 0.0 H
2.0 10
180
M M
112
14
190
8 85 61 73
-5
0
00.00 0.0 M
2.8 12
200
H M
M 1
17
220
9 90 66 78
0
0
13 0.00 0.0 M
5.5 14
140
M H
M 1
21
130
10 93 77 05
6
0
20 0.00 0.0 M
10.7 22
200
M M
M
30
200
11 95 74 85
6
0
20 0.00 0.0 H
6.8 20
200
M M
H
24
200
12 96 72 84
5
0
19 0.00 0.0 M
6.1 18
210
M M
H
24
220
13 96 72 84
5
0
19 0.02 0.0 H
3.6 20
110
H M
0 3
26
10D
14 92 75 84
5
0
19 0.00 0.0 0
9.4 20
180
M M
13
25
180
15 9B 76 87
8
0
22 0.00 0.0 0
6.0 15
260
M M
2
22
220
16 89 70 BO
1
0
15 P0.0 0
3.1 17
290
M M
1
21
330
17 82 57 70
-9
0
5 0.00 0.0 0
5.3 20
320
M H
1
24
320
18 83 52 68
-11
0
3 O.DO 0.0 0
3.9 15
290
M M
1
21
310
19 86 58 72
-7
0
70.00 0.0 0
1.6 9
340
M M
3
13
360
20 88 60 74
-5
0
9 0.01 0.0 0
5.2 17
70
M H
13
22
60
21 78 65 72
-7
0
7 1.35 0.0 0
0.0 26
240
M M
8 13
35
250
22 82 60 71
-8
0
6 0.00 0.0 0
4.5 14
350
H M
41
11
340
23 85 56 71
-9
0
6 0.00 0.0 0
2.6 10
280
M H
1
13
280
24 89 61 75
-5
0
10 0.00 0.0 0
7.4 18
220
H M
0
25
210
25 86 69 78
-2
0
13 0.00 0.0 0
4.5 13
200
M H
0
15
190
26 88 67 78
-2
0
13 0.00 0.0 0
2.1 10
30
M M
3
15
10
27 06 62 74
-6
0
9 0.14 0.0 0
2.4 23
200
M H
3 13
29
200
29 06 68 77
-3
0
12 0.00 0.0 0
2.9 13
220
M M
618
15
210
29 03 66 75
-5
0
10 0.02 0.0 0
1.6 9
190
M M
3 1
10
190
30 76 62 69
-11
0
4 1.39 0.0 0
2.5 12
330
M M
5
16
320
31 82 58 70
-10
0
5 0.00 0.0 0
1.7 7
160
M M
21
12
340
.......................................................:.............-......:.-.
SM 2686 2006
0
338 4.04 0.0 136.5
M
45
AV 86.6 64.7
4.4 FASTST
H H
2 MAX(MPH)
MISC ---->
M 26
300
N 35
250
NOTES:
N LAST OF SEVERAL OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK
WIND
IN
M.P.N.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL
DATA (WS
FORM: F-6)
,
PAGE 2
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
JULY
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
(TEMPERATURE DATA)
]PRECIPITATION DATA)
SYMBOLS USED
IN COLUMN
L6
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
75.7
TOTAL FOR MONTH:
4.04
1 -
FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL:
-3.2
DPTR FM NORMAL:
0.90
2 -
FOG REDUCING VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 98
ON 15
GRIST 24HR 1.39 ON 30-30
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 52
ON 18
3 -
THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS,
HAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0
INCH
5 -
HAIL
GRIST 24HR 0.0
6 -
FREEZING
RAIN OR DRIZZLE
GRIST DEPTH: 0
7 -
DUSTSTORM
OR SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2
MILE OR LESS
-
B -
SMOKE OR
HAZE
(NO. OF DAYS WITH)
[WEATHER - DAYS WITH]
9 -
BLOWING SNOW
X -
TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.01 INCH OR MORE:
8
MAX 90 OR ABOVE:
7
0.10 INCH OR MORE;
5
MIN 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.50 INCH OR MORE:
3
MIN 0 OR BELOW:
0
1.00 INCH OR MORE:
2
(HOD (BASE 65)
I
TOTAL THIS HO.
0
CLEAR (SCALE 0-3)
I4
DPTR FM NORMAL
0
PTCLDY (SCALE 4-7)
5
TOTAL FM JUL 1
0
CLOUDY (SCALE 8-101
D
DPTR EM NORMAL
0
[CDD (BASE 65)
I
TOTAL THIS MO.
338
DPTR FM NORMAL
-92
[PRESSURE DATA]
TOTAL FM JAN 1
166
HIGHEST SLP M ON M
DPTR FM NORMAL
-53
LOWEST SLP 29.13 ON 21
ofl
10/12/2009
8:18 AM
Current
Month - Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/fb/f6tomi.php?siteName=Drake_Field_Fa...
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
AUGUST
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 20 W
TEMPERATURE IN
F:
:PCPN: SNOW: WIND
:SUNSHINE:
SKY
:PK W14D
..................u-.v........e................................................
1 2 3 4
S 6A
6B 7 8 9 10 11
12
13 14
15
16 17
IB
122 AVG MX 2MUN
DY MAX MIN AVG
DER HDD
CDD WTR SNW UPTH SPD SPD
DIR
MIN PSBL
5-S
WX SPD
DR
........................
.........................
I..........................
-a.
1 82 62 12
-B
0
7 0.22 0.0 0 2.9 20
300
H M
4
25
300
2 86 64 75
-5
0
10 0.00 0.0 0 2.2 8
270
H H
32
10
270
3 91 65 78
-2
0
13 0.00 0.0 0 8.4 20
180
M M
1
23
190
4 94 74 84
4
0
19 0.00 0.0 0 9.8 20
200
M M
0
25
200
5 92 64 79
-1
0
13 3.46 0.0 0 5.8 35
230
M M
4
13 40
240
6 88 63 76
-3
0
11 0.00 0.0 0 1.8 13
150
H M
41
16
150
766 61 78
-1
0
13 0.00 0.0 0 0.1 22
180
M H
0
26
160
B 09 74 82
3
01'0.00O.0
0 10.5 21
200
M M
0
28
190
989 74 82
3
0
11 0.00 0.0 0 0.8 17
200
M M
0
22
210
10 92 69 81
2
0
16 0.41 0.0 0 8.5 22
180
H M
4
13 28
180
11 B4 65 75
-4
0
10 T 0.0 0 3.9 24
330
M M
2
29
340
12 B6 60 73
-6
0
00.01 0.0 0 2.5 12
BO
H M
11
15
80
13 06 58 72
-7
0
7 0.00 0.0 0 1.5 12
180
M M
I
17
110
14 B6 58 72
-7
0
7 0.00 0.0 0 2.1 9
170
M H
01
15
200
'SOB 62 75
-3
0
10 0.00 0.0 0 8.7 20
180
M M
2
25
170
16 89 76 83
5
0
180.00 0.0 0 10.0 21
180
M H
1
26
200
17 90 69 80
2
0
15 T 0.0 0 4.6 26
330
M H
1
38 33
320
18 85 67 76
-2
0
11 T 0.0 0 3.1 20
280
M M
33
24
270
19 85 70 78
0
0
13 0.00 0.0 0 8.1 11
190
M M
23
22
160
20 77 63 70
-8
0
5 0.70 0.0 0 S.5i]90
190
H H
5
13 22
190
21 81 57 69
-8
0
4 0.00 0.0 0 5.8 20
330
H M
31
24
310
22 79 53 66
-11
0
1 0.00 0.0 0 2.3 14
340
M K
1
18330
23 82 51 67
-10
0
2 0.00 0.0 0 1.2 9
i90
M M
1
30 10
190
24 83 56 10
-1
0
5 0.00 0.0 0 3.5 13
180
M H
1
15
170
25 88 60 74
-2
0
9 0.00 0.0 0 3.5 12
1170
M M
1
14
170
26 06 50 72
-4
0
70.00 0.0 0 3.3 13
170
M H
0
17
160
27 85 61 73
-3
0
01.10 0.0 0 3.1 12
140
M M
6
138 14
130
2B 79 62 71
-5
0
6 0.23 0.0 0 4.3 16
330
H H
6
13 20
320
29 79 60 70
-5
0
5 0.00 0.0 0 2.0 13
330
M H
6
15
330
30 76 55 66
-9
0
1 0.00 0.0 0 3.1 13
70
M M
4
20
60
31 75 51 63
-12
2
0 0.00 0.0 0 1.5 9
340
H H
3
13
360
.....................................f.......................
w=.................
SM 2640 1940
2
288 6.13 0.0 150.4
H
70
............................................................................
AV 85.2 62.0
4.9 FASTST
M M
2
MAX(MPH)
MISC ----> N 35
230
N 48 240
................................................................................
NOTES:
N LAST OF SEVERAL
OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK
WIND
IN
M.P.H.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL
DATA (WS FORM: F-6)
,
PAGE 2
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MONTH:
AUGUST
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
[TEMPERATURE DATA!
(PRECIPITATION DATA]
SYMBOLS USED
IN
COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
74.0
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 6.13
1 -
FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL:
-3.9
DPTR FM NORMAL: 3.13
2 -
FOG REDUCING
VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 94
ON 4
GRTST 24HA 3.47 ON 5- 6
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 51
ON 31,23
3 -
THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS. HAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0 INCH
5 -
HAIL
GRTST 24HR 0.0
6 -
FREEZING
RAIN
OR DRIZZLE
GRTST DEPTH: 0
7 •
DUSTSTORM OR
SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2
MILE OR LESS
8 -
SMOKE OR
HAZE
(NO. OF DAYS WITH!
[WEATHER - DAYS WITH[
9 -
BLOWING
SNOW
X -
TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.01 INCH OR MORE: 7
MAX 90 OR ABOVE:
5
0.10 INCH OR NORE: 6
MIN 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.50 INCH OR MOPE: 3
MIN 0 OR BELOW:
0
1.00 INCH OR MORE: 2
(HOD (BASE 65)
TOTAL THIS MO.
2
CLEAR (SCALE 0-31 21
DPTR FM NORMAL
-2
PTCLDY (SCALE 4-7) 10
TOTAL FM JUL 1
2
CLOUDY (SCALE 8-101 0
DPTR FM NORMAL
-2
(COD (BASE 65)
!
TOTAL THIS MO.
280
DPTR FM NORMAL
-114
(PRESSURE DATA)
TOTAL FM JAN 1
1054
HIGHEST SLP 30.25 ON 31
DPTR FM NORMAL
-167
LOWEST SLP 29.74 ON 20
10/ 12/2009 8:19
AM
I of 1
Current Month -
Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6form.php?siteName=Drake_FieId_Fa...
STAT104:
FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH:
SEPTEMBER
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
TEMPERATURE IN F:
:PCPN: SNOW: WIND
:SUNSHINE:
SKY :PK WND
iii...a.a-..........-i..................aYi....-..-..---..---•-_-------i....
I 2 3 4
5 6A
60 1 8 9 10 11
12
13 31 15
16 11
16
121 AVG MX
2MIN
DY MAX MIN AVG
DEP
HD0
COD WTR SNW OPTH SPD SPC
DIR
MIN PSBL S -S
'fIX.. SPD
DR
i i i i• i ii iiaiiiiiiiiiviiiii i ii
i
iii iv•ivii v vi i
1 78 49 64
-11
1
0 0.00 0.0 0 0.0 7
120
M H 1
9
110
2 72 55 64
-10
1
0 0.72 0.0 0 2.4 17
350
M M 3
13 23
360
3 79 56 68
-6
0
3 0.03 0.0 0 1.9 13
16D
H M 6
13 15
160
4 82 58 70
-1 .
0
5 T 0.0 0 1.3 8
130
H M 4
1 10120
5 82 64 13
0
0
9115 0.0 0 2.9 13
22D
M H 6
13 15
220
6 82 62 12
-1
0
7 0.01 0.0 0 2.3 12
310
M H 5
13 15
320
7 85 61 13
0
0
8 0.00 0.0 0 0.9 10
330
M M 5
12 13
330
0 06 60 73
1
0
8 0.00 0.0 0 2.5 10
180
M M 2
12 13
40
9 75 69 72
0
0
7 0.59 0.0 0 2.9 9
70
H H 01
15
100
10 80 67 74
2
0
9 0.02 0.0 D 2.4 12
70
M H 81
15
60
11 92 63 13
1
0
00.00 0.0 0 2.0 9
80
4 H 1
18 14
90
12 79 63 11
0
0
6 0.00 0.0 0 2.3 l3
70
M M 3
128 1690
13 71 63 61
-4
0
2 0.07 0.0 0 4.7 15
B0
H M 7
1B 20
6O
14 71 64 68
-3
0
3 T 0.0 0 3.9 13
80
H M 10
1 11
10
15 76 61 72
2
0
7 0.31 0.0 0 4.1 10
10
M 4 10
1 16
20
16 69 66 68
-2
0
30.63 0.0 0 6.B 14
50
M H 1018
23
50
17 73 65 69
-1
0
4 0.37 0.0 C 4.2 14
60
H H 918
20
50
18 77 63 10
1
0
5 0.00 0.0 0 2.8 14
80
M 1110
1790
19 13 64 69
0
0
4 T 0.0 0 2.9 9
20
M M 10
18 17
100
20 11 61 69
0
0
4 0.00 0.0 0 2.6 9
310
H H 6
12 13
310
21 84 59 72
1
0
7 2.32 0.0 0 7.7 33
330
M M 4
1238 44
330
22 65 50 62
-6
3
0 0.04 0.0 0 5.4 15
290
H H 816
11
290
23 10 58 64
-4
1
0 0.04 0.0 0 2.2 8
350
M M 71
16
50
24 71 54 63
-4
2
0 T 0.0 0 1.5 8
310
M N 5
128 12
20
25 77 50 64
-3
1
0 0.00 0.0 0 0.7 7
180
M M 3
12 980
26 74 52 63
-3
2
0 0.00 0.0 0 5.3 18
290
H M 11
23
290
27 85 49 67
1
0
2 0.00 0.0 0 7.2 22
190
H M 0
26
200
28 12 15 59
-7
6
0 0.00 0.0 0 7.5 18
320
M M 0
24
32C
29 71 40 56
-9
9
0 O.OD 0.0 0 1.6 10
290
M H 01
14
290
30 75 42 59
-6
6
00.00 0.0 0 5.7 17
160
H M 01
23
180
--------ii-i--i-iiii---------------
___ --- .a...a
...----------------
SM 2293 1717
1
J2
110 6.30 0.0 101.1
H 158
AV 76.1 58.2
3.4 FASTST
M M 5
MAX(MPH)
MISC ---> 133
330
M 44 330
• ___•__ n.
s.
Liiiiii ii sea iii ii ..... n• .ia. .......V... i.
NOTES:
1 LAST OF SEVERAL
OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 17 PEAK
WIND
1N
M.P.H.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL
CLIMATOLOGICAL
DATA (WS FORM: F-6) ,
PAGE 2
STATION:
FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH:
SEPTEMBER
YEAR:
2009
LATITUDE:
36 0 N
LONGITUDE:
94 10 W
[TEMPERATURE DATA[
[PRECIPITATION DATA)
SYMBOLS USED IN
COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY:
67.3
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 6.30
1 -
FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL:
-2.7
DPTR FM NORMAL: 1.47
2 -
FOG REDUCING
VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 86
ON B
GRTST 24HR 2.42 ON 21-21
TO 1/4 MILE
OR LESS
LOWEST: 40
ON 29
3 -
THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL
4 -
ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0 INCH
5 -
MAIL
GRTST 24HR 0.0
6 -
FREEZING RAIN
OR DRIZZLE
GRTST DEPTH: 0
7 i
DUSTSTORM OR
SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2 MILE
OR LESS
8 -
SMOKE OR HAZE
[NO. OF DAYS WITH[
[WEATHER - DAYS WITH)
9 -
BLOWING 5NOW
% -
TORNADO
MAY 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.01 INCH OR MORE: 1]
MAX 90 OR ABOVE:
0
0.10 INCH OR MORE: 1
MIN 32 OR BELOW:
0
0.50 INCH OR MORE: 5
MIN 0 OR BELOW:
0
1.00 INCH OR MORE: 2
[HOD (BASE 651
1
TOTAL THIS MO.
32
CLEAR (SCALE 0-31 9
DPTR FM NORMAL
-10
PTCLDY (SCALE 1-1) 1.3
TOTAL FM JUL 1
34
CLOUDY (SCALE 8-10j 8
DPTR FM NORMAL
-12
(CDD (BASE 651
1
TOTAL THIS MO.
110
DPTR FM NORMAL
-90
[PRESSURE DATA)
TOTAL FM JAN 1
1164
HIGHEST SLP 30.25 ON 2
DPTR FM NORMAL
-247
LOWEST SLP 29.65 011 27
I of I
10/12/2009 8:19
AM
Current
Month - Daily Weather Data (F6)
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/f6/f6form.php?siteName=Drake_FieId_Fa...
-
STATION: FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH: OCTOBER
YEAR: 2009
LATITUDE: 36 0 N
LONGITUDE: 94 10 W
TEMPERATURE IN F:
:PCPN: SNOW: WIND :SUNSHINE: SKY :PK WND
1 2 3 4 5 6A
68 ] b 9 JD 11 12 Il 14 15 16 1] 18
122 AVG MX 2MIN
DY MAX MIN AVG OCR HDD
CDD WTR SNW DPT( SPD SPO DIR MIN PSBL S -S WX SPD DR
-....I... --- ..a ---.......s .............................................. ve.....
1 78 47 63 -2 2
0 0.07 M 0 12.4 24 190 M N 5 1 3:1230
2 68 40 54 -10 11
00-00 0.0 0 8.5 22 300 M H 0 31 240
3 68 38 53 -11 12
0 0.00 0.0 0 2.3 12 230 M M 4 15 250
4 57 52 55 -9 10
0 0.02 0.0 0 4.9 15 80 H H 81 20 70
5 62 51 51 -6 B
0007 0.0 0 5.1 15 150 M M 10 1 20 150
6 65 46 56 -7 9
0 0.55 M 0 6.6 2J 190 M M 6 13 28 190
7 70 38 54 -8 11
0 0.76 M 0 3.3 14 190 M M 4 123 16 190
8 60 51 69 7 0
4 4.21 0.0 0 11.1 31 350 H M 10 135 38 340
9 N M M M M
M 1.52 M 0 8.9 14 340 M M 913 18 340
10 M H H H H
10.00 0.0 M 2.6 7 BO M M 61 M M
11 54 45 50 -11 15
00.01 H M 3.6 12 140 M M 102 15 13D
.....C...............e..........--<.<.-...i-.....
6...C -_v.....................
SM 602 414 78
4 7.21 0.0 69.3 M 72
.------------
..................._____ ............v..............
AV 66.9 46.0
6.3 FASTS? M M 7 MAX(MPH)
MISC ----5 ! 31 350 M 38 340
................................................................................
NOTES:
1 LAST OF SEVERAL OCCURRENCES
COLUMN 1J PEAK WIND IN
M.P.N.
PRELIMINARY LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA (WS FORM: F-6) , PAGE 2
STATION: FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS
MONTH: OCTOBER
YEAR: 2009
LATITUDE: 36 0 N
LONGITUDE: 94 10 W
[TEMPERATURE DATA[
(PRECIPITATION DATA) SYMBOLS USED IN COLUMN 16
AVERAGE MONTHLY: 56.4
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 7.21 1 - FOG OR MIST
DPTR FM NORMAL: -6.4
DPTR FN NORMAL: 5.81 2 - FOG REDUCING VISIBILITY
HIGHEST: 80 ON 8
GRTST 24HR 5.65 ON 8- 9 TO 1/4 MILE OR LESS
LOWEST: 39 ON 7, 3
3 • THUNDER
SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL 4 - ICE PELLETS
TOTAL MONTH: 0.0 INCH 5 - HAIL
GRIST 24HR 0.0 6 - FREEZING RAIN OR DRIZZLE
GRTST DEPTH: 0 . 7 - DUSTSTORM OR SANDSTORM:
VSBY 1/2 MILE OR LESS
B - SMOKE OR HAZE
[NO. OF DAYS WITH[
(WEATHER - DAYS WITH[ 9 - BLOWING SNOW
X - TORNADO
MAX 32 OR BELOW: 0
0.01 INCH OR MORE: 8
MAX 90 OR ABOVE: 0
0.10 INCH OR MORE: 4
MTN 32 OR BELOW: 0
0.50 INCH OR MORE: 4
MIN 0 OR BELOW: 0
1.00 INCH OR MORE: 2
I HDD (BASE 65) 1
TOTAL THIS MO. 70
CLEAR (SCALE 0-31 1
DPTR FM NORMAL 32
PTCLDY (SCALE 4-1) 5
TOTAL FM JUL 1 112
CLOUDY (SCALE 8-10) 5
DPTR FM NORMAL 20
(COD (BASE 65) I
TOTAL THIS MO. 4
DPTR FN NORMAL -17
[PRESSURE DATA)
TOTAL FM JAN I 1168
HIGHEST SLP M ON M
DPTR FM NORMAL -264
LOWEST SLP 29.62 ON 1
I of 1
10/12/2009
8:20 AM
Memo
To: The City of Fayetteville
From: Hugh Jarratt, Attorney at Law
Date: 10/13/2009
Re: Red Dirt Mining Ordinance
Attached please find real estate records that relate to property close to Hamestring
Road which lie inside the city limits of Fayetteville. Although there have been
comments made that the Red Dirt Mining Operations hurt property values, I
researched all transactions that I could find for this area dated 1994 or later (1994 is
the date red dirt mining began in the Hamestring Road area). In my research, there
has not been a single sale for a loss in the area since 1994. Therefore, the argument
that the red dirt mining operations have hurt property values is not correct.
If you have any questions, please call.
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record 1 of 1  Last Updated 10101109
Parcel Number: 765-16151-600 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11607-000 Type: Al
Location: 1075 N HAMSTRING RD
Owner Name: BOLEN, DAVE C
Mailing Address: 1075 N Hamstring Rd Fayetteville AR 72704-7801
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 09-16-31
Addition: 09-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NE SE 10.99AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status: O
Last Appraised: 2009 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 26,350 4,180
Improvement 183,650 35,090
Total 210,000 39,270
Tax History
Taxable
Ad Imp.
Timber Voluntary
A79
A79
Net Total Total Tax
Payment
Year
Value
Valorem Dist.
Tax
Tax
Credit
Status
Tax Paid
Status
Tax Tax
2008
37,582
$1,924.20 $0.00
$1.05
$0.00
$350.00
O
$1,575.25 $1,575.25
PAID
2007
35,894
$1,841.36 $0.00
$1.05
$0.00
$350.00
O
$1,492.41 $1,492.41
PAID
2006
34,014
$1,785.74$0.00
$1.05
$0.00
$300.00
O
$1,486.79$1,486.79
PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Ad
Receipt Payment
Year # Valorem
Date
Tax
2008 1990 03/31/2009 $1,574.20
2007 14445 04/28/2008 $1,491.36
2006 32855 4/25/2007 $1,485.74
Imp. Timber Voluntary Penalty y
Dist. Tax Tax Tax Pa ment
Tax
$0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $1,575.25
$0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $1,492.41
$0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $1,486.79
Deed History
Deed
Sale
Revenue
Date Deed Ref. Granteel
Grantee2
Type
Amount
Amount
6/4/1999 99-52081 BOLEN, DAVE C.
WD
157,000
518.10
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR
2006 &
FOLLOWING YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO.
4888 FCS
99: 99-52081 WD $518.10 REV
(157M)
12/23/1992 92-68546 WATT, WILLIAM G.
WD
140,000
308.00
& GRACE L.
1/20/1988 1256-132 WARREN, GENE G. WD 87,000 191.40
& ARLENE H.
10/2/2009 1:47 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http: //w w w.co. w ashi ngton. ar. us/PropertySearc WRParce l lnfo. as p?ST...
EDMONSTON,
1/1/1985 1256-131 CRAIG A. & CONNIE
R.
WD 73,000 80.30
Structure Occupancy
Construction
First Floor
Total Living
Year Basement
Number Type
Type
Living Area
Area
Constructed Area
1 SF
MV
2003
2003
1966
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace Year Effective
Remodeled Age
3 G MAS/VEN 1SG 41
r-25--1
1 SEP 1
Sketch: Z MFA 23 MN
6 (616) 61 (2003)
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty
Description
Size Quality
I
Driveway, concrete
18x60
I
Driveway, concrete
11x77
I
Driveway, concrete
16x108
I
Garage - frame unfinished, det
26x30
1
Garage - frame unfinished, det
20x23
1
Garage - masonry unfinished, d
12x22
1
Pole Sheds
30x40
I
Fence, wood 3'
540
Next Item I Previous Item I Prey. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Map I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
of 2
10/2/2009 1:47 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record 1 of 1  Last Updated 10101/09
Parcel Number: 765-16151.950 Prev. Parcel Number: 344-01533-000 Type: RI
Location: 741 N ED MOORE LN
Owner Name: SILVA PROPERTIES, LLC
Mailing Address: 12198 LITTLE ELM RD FARMINGTON AR 72730
Lot: 006 Block: S -T -R: 09-16-31
Addition: ED MOORE SID
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 0.55 A.
Current Year A79 Credit Status: V
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 25,000 4,205
Improvement 6,600 1,320
Total 31,600 5,525
Tax History
Taxable Ad Imp. Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Net Total Payment
Year Valorem Dist. Total Tax
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 5,100 $261.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $261.12 $0.00
.2007 4,675 $239.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $239.83 $239.83 PAID
2006 4,250 $223.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $223.12 $223.12 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Receipt Payment Ad
Year # Date Valorem
Tax
2007 74525 10/17/2008 $239.83
2006 111915 10/8/2007 $223.12
Imp' Timber Voluntary Penalty
Dist. Tax Tax Tax Payment
Tax
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $239.83
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $223.12
Deed History
Deed
Date Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2 Sale Revenue
Type Amount Amount
SILVA
1/20/2006 2006-2891 PROPERTIES, WD 48,000 158.40
LLC
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING
YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 NLB 2006-2891 WD
(48M)
7/5/2002 2002-96709 GOODWIN, JOHN WD 29,000 95.70
KST 2002-96709 WD $95.70(29M)
8/20/1993 93-48926 MARTIN, KENT & WD 24,000 79.20
OLETA
93-51868 REFILED TO CORR ORDER. MH TRANSFERRED FROM
765-15093-092
l of2
10/2/2009 1:53 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcelinfo.asp?ST...
1/111985 1101-802 MOUNCE,
SCOTT
WD 0 0.00
Structure Occupancy
Total Living Year Basement
Construction
First Floor
Number Type
Type
Living Area
Area Constructed Area
1 MH
FS
784
784 1986
Year Effective
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace
Remodeled Age
5 A STANDARD 21
56� -,
1 MH 1
4 (784) 4
Sketch: I5
t2
00P(120) 0
L12—/
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty
Description
Size Quality
I
Driveway, concrete
26x25
I
Fence, chain link 4'
330
1
Outbuilding,metal
7x9
I
Pole Sheds .
30x24
Next Item I Previous Item I Prev. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Map I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
2 of2
10/2/2009 1:53 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washingtonar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record I of I  Last Updated 10/01/09
Parcel Number: 765-16151-920 Prev. Parcel Number: 344-01530-000 Type: RM
Location: 797 N ED MOORE LN
Owner Name: JOHNSON, DONALD H JR & DEBBIE
Mailing Address: 797 N ED MOORE LN FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704
Lot: 003 Block: S -T -R: 09-16-31
Addition: ED MOORE SID
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 0.55 A.
Current Year A79 Credit Status: V
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 25,000 4,931
Improvement 17,150 3,430
Total 42,150 8,361
Tax History
Ad Imp. Net Year
Taxable Valorem Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Total Payment
Dist. Tax Total
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 7,974 $408.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $408.27 $408.27 PAID
2007 7,587 $389.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $389.21 $389.21 PAID
2006 3,870 $203.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $203.18 $203.18 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Ad
Receipt Payment
Year # Valorem
Date
Tax
2008 42045 09/16/2009 $408.27
2007 55685 10/07/2008 $389.21
2006 1021183 1010712008 $203.18
Imp.
Dist. Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
Tax Tax Tax Tax
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $408.27
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $389.21
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44.47 $247.65
Deed History
Deed Sale Revenue
Date Deed Ref. Grantee/ Grantee2
Type Amount Amount
5/20/2005 2005-22274 JOHNSON, DONALD WD 20,000 66.00
H. JR & DEBBIE
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING
YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 GFJ 2005-22274 WD
$66.00 REV(20M)
8/10/2001 2001-97244 GABBARD, LEONARD RD 0 0.00
& MARY
WCS 2001-97244 REDEMPTION DEED #159509
11/4/1993 2002-72455 WILLIAMS, MARION WD 16,000 52.80
E.
KST 2002-72455 WD $52.80(16M)
of 2
10/2/2009 1:53 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washi ngtonar.us/PropertySearch/RParceI Info.asp?ST...
11/4/1993 2002-72455 WILLIAMS, MARION
WD 16,000 52.80
KST 2002-72455 WD $52.80(16M)
12/111986 1205-612
GABBARD, LEONARD
CT 5,000 5.50
& MARY
GABBARD,GREG
1/1/1985 103-848
ALLEN & BRENDA
WD 0 0.00
LEE
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Oty
Description
Size Quality
1
Pole Sheds
20x20
1
Outbullding,metal b u l ld i n g, meta l
10x12
1
Utility Bldg, Avg, Exc Class
30x60
Next Item I Previous Item I Prev. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Map I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
2of2
10/2/2009 1:53 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record I of I  Lasl Updated 10/01/09
Parcel Number: 765-16151-900 Prev. Parcel Number: 344-01528-000 Type: RI
Location: 860 N ED MOORE LN
Owner Name: LANCE, JOY M
Mailing Address: 860 N Ed Moore Ln Fayetteville AR 72704-7802
Lot: 001 Block: S -T -R: 09-16-31
Addition: ED MOORE SID
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 0.63 A.
Current Year A79 Credit Status: O
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 25,000 3,450
Improvement 5,150 360
Total 30,150 3,810
Tax History
Taxable
Ad
Imp.
Timber Voluntary
Year
Value
Va
Dist.
Tax
Tax
Tax
Tax
2008
3,644
$186.57
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2007
3,478
$178.42
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2006
3,312
$173.88
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
A79
A79
Net
Total
Payment
Total
Tax
Credit
Status
Tax
Paid
Status
$186.57
O
$0.00
$0.00
PAID
$178.42
O
$0.00
$0.00
PAID
$173.88
O
$0.00
$0.00
PAID
Deed History
Deed
Sale
Revenue
Date
Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2
Type
Amount
Amount
7/21/1997
97-48431 LANCE, JOY M
WD
28,000
92.40
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
FOR
2006 &
FOLLOWING
YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE
NO. 4888
LPW 97-48431 WD
REV $92.40 (28M)
3/11/1994
94-15313 SILVA, MARK &
WD
22,000
72.60
DEBBIE
MH ADDED FOR 1986,
1/1/1985
HUTCHINS, MARK
1117-773
WD
0
0.00
& KATHY
Structure Occupancy
Construction
First Floor
Total Living
Year Basement
Number Type
Type
Living Area
Area
Constructed Area
1 MH
FS
840
840
1985
Year Effective
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace od
Remodeled Age
5 A STANDARD 22
I oft
10/2/2009 1:54 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washi ngton.ar. us/PropertySearcWRParceI Info.asp?ST...
�18�
1 WD 1
2121
6 6 i
Sketch: 1 MH 1
4 (640) 4
60
B B
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty Description Size Quality
Carport, Dirt Floor 20x20
Outbuilding, metal 10x12
Next Item I Previous Item I Prev. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Mao I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
2of2
10/2/2009 1:54 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/ProperrySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record 1 of.1  Last Updated 10/01/09
Parcel Number: 765-16152-600 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11714-004 Type: R1
Location: 7299 W WEDINGTON DR
Owner Name: GARCIA, JOSE & RAQUEL; GARCIA, LUZ & JOSE G JR
Mailing Address: 7299 W WEDINGTON DR FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NW SW 1.50A
Current Year A79 Credit Status: F
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 34,400 4,530
Improvement 173,000 27,200
Total 207,400 31,730
Tax History
Taxable
Ad Imp.
Timber Voluntary
Year
Value
Valorem Dist.
Tax
Tax
Tax Tax
2008
31,730
$1,624.58 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2007
31,730
$1,627.75 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2006
31,730
$1,665.83 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
A79
A79
Net Total
Total Tax
Payment
Credit
Status
Tax
Paid
Status
$350.00
F
$1,274.58 $1,274.58
PAID
$350.00
F
$1,277.75$1,277.75
PAID
$300.00
O
$1,365.82 $1,365.82
PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Year
Receipt
Payment
Valorem
Dist.
Timber
Voluntary
Penalty
Payment
#
Date
Tax
Tax
Tax
Tax
Tax
2008
12743
04/27/2009
$1,274.58
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,274.58
2007
14445
04/2812008
$1,277.75
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,277.75
2006
32858
4/25/2007
$1,365.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,365.82
Deed History
Date Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2 Deed Sale Revenue
Type Amount Amount
GARCIA, GARCIA, LUZ
10/13/2005 2005-46805 JOSE & & JOSE G JR WD 175,000 577.50
RAQUEL; TNTS IN COM
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 &
FOLLOWING YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 NLB
2005-46805 WD $577.50 REV (175M)
KRUGER,
10/15/2003 2003-54573 OLIVER & CR 0 495.00
REBA
SJJ 2003-54573 CR $495.00 (150M) RECORDED TO CORRECT DEED
2003-34314 * FILE DATE USED AS DEED DATE
I oft
10/2/2009 1:57 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearclVRParcel info.asp?ST...
KRUGER,
6111/2003
2003-34314 OLIVER & CR 0 495.00
REBA
SJJ FOR 2003: 1.50A FROM #003 BRYAN & LIZ LAW W/
IMPROVEMENTS NOTE: DEED INCLUDES AN INCORRECT CALL
S00.10'52W 474.52 FT) - THE CORRECT CALL SHOULD BE
S00.1052"W 257.68 FT - WALT & CHERYL FROM WACO TITLE
COMPANY SAID THAT THEY WOULD FILE A CORRECTION DEED
OR A CORRECTION ADDIVADIT OF SCRIVENER'S ERROR - PER BH
GO AHEAD & SPLIT B/C THE DEED SAYS..." ... TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. SJJ 2003-34314 CR $495.00 (150M) REV
KRUGER,
6/11/2003
2003-32213 OLIVER & WD 150,000 495.00
REBA
SJJ 2003-32213 WD $495.00 (150M) REV - BAD LEGAL
Structure Occupancy Construction First Floor Total Living Year Basement
Number
Type Type Living Area Area Constructed Area
I
DP MV 2246 2246 2002
Year Effective
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace
Remodeled Age
4 A MASONVEN 5
Sketch:
9
OP
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty Description Size Quality
I Driveway, concrete 23x47
1 Driveway, concrete 14x15
1 Driveway, concrete 14x15
Next Item I Previous Item I Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Map I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
! of2 10/2/2009 1:57 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
M1
Record 1 of 1  Lasl Updated 10101/09
Parcel Number: 765-16152-525 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11714-001 Type: RI
Location: 7313 7315 W WEDINGTON DR
Owner Name: GLOVER, CLARA SUE
Mailing Address: PO BOX 306 UNIONTOWN AR 72955
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NW SW 1.02 A
Current Year A79 Credit Status: VF
Last Appraised: 2009 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 22,500 4,500
Improvement 144,850 28,970
Total 167,350 33,470
Tax History
Taxable
Timber Voluntary
A79
A79
Net Total Total Tax
Payment
Year
Value
Va oAdem Dist.
Tax
Tax
Credit
Status
Tax Paid
Status
Tax Tax
2008
41,290
$2,114.05 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N
$2,114.05 $2,114.05
PAID
2007
43,720
$2,242.84 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N
$2,242.84 $2,242.84
PAID
2006
52,680
$2,765.70 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N
$2,765.70 $2,765.70
PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Ad
Receipt Payment
Valorem
Year # Date
Tax
2008 49534 10/01/2009 $2,114.05
2007 27711 06/25/2008 $2,242.84
2006 98625 10/2/2007 $2,765.70
Imp. Timber Voluntary Penalty
Dist. Tax Tax Tax Payment
Tax
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,114.05
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,242.84
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,765.70
Deed History
Deed Sale Revenue
Date Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2
Type Amount Amount
GLOVER, WD 164,000 541.20 6/1712008 2008-21049
CLARA SUE
JRW 2008-21049 WD $541.2 REV(164M)
ROBBINS INVESTMENTS,
6/6/2008 2008-18895 INVESTMENT, INC QC 0
INC; ADCOCK
LAJ 2008-18895 QC NO REV /// TENANTS IN COMMON
ROBBINS INVESTMENTS,
6/6/2008 2008-18894 INVESTMENT, INC QC 0
INC; ADCOCK
I of3
10/2/2009 1:59 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
ti
SLB FOR 2008: 0.004 A TRANSFERRED FROM #575 & 0.654 A
TRANSFERRED TO #575 ROBBINS INVESTMENTS, INC; ADCOCK
INVESTMENTS (SEE SURVEY 2008-7388) SLB 2008-18894 QC NO
REV.
ADCOCK,
ROBBINS
WARREN P.;
316/2008
2008-7388 INVESTMENT, SV 0
TENANTS
INC;
UNCOMMON
WJC 2008-7388 SV FOR ROBBINS INVESTMENT //INCLUDES
765-16125-575// RMC SURVEY ON RECORD
ADCOCK,
ROBBINS
WARREN P.
819/2006
2006-37567 INVESTMENT, QC 0
TENENTS
INC;
UNCOMMON
SLB FOR 2007: 1.06 A TO #530 R STEVEN & SARAH SMITH WITH
CARD #2 (SEE SURVEY 2002-15469) LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS PER ANNEXATION
ORDINANCE NO. 4888 SN 2006-37567 QC NO REV INCLUDES
PARCELS: 001-11714-001, 001-11714-003
ROBBINS ADCOCK,
1/25/2002
2002-15468
INVESTMENTS, WARREN P. & WD 0 0.00
INC.; MARILYN JO
BH FOR 2002: 2.18 A. TO #003 BRYAN C. & ELIZABETH J. LAW BH
FOR 2002: 1.07 A. TO #002 JAMES LEON & HELEN Y. GREGORY BH
2002-15468 WD NO REV 1/2 INTEREST FROM ROBBINS
INVESTMENTS, INC.
ROBBINS
12/5120012001-158720
INVESTMENTS, WD 150,000 495.00
INC.
BH FOR 2002: 5.98 A. FR #000 BARBARA W. WYNN WITH
IMPROVEMENTS 2001-158720 WD $495.00 REV (150M)
Structure Occupancy
Construction
First Floor
Total Living
Year
Basement
Number Type
Type
Living Area
Area
Constructed
Area
I DP
MV
2282
2282
2002
Year
Effective
Grade
Condition
Exterior Wall
Fireplace
Remodeled
Age
4
A
MASONVEN
5
2 of3
10/2/2009 1:59 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
5
MN
(22821
4
4
9
9
Sketch:
Z
1
1
MFA
1 (5881
1 1
0P1
OP
1
1
2
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty
Description
Size Quality
I
Driveway, concrete
23x47
I
Driveway, concrete
14x15
I
Driveway, concrete
14x15
Next Item Previous Item Ledger Card I Prey. Ledger Card
I GIS Parcel Map Return
to Search Results Modify
Search I New
Search
I of)
10/2/2009 1:59 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearcWRParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record 1 of I  Last Updated 10/01/09
Parcel Number: 765-16151-300 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11615-000 Type: RI
Location: 882 N RAINCROW RD
Owner Name: LEWIS, MATTHEW MILES
Mailing Address: 882 N RAINCROW RD FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 09-16-31
Addition: 09-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NW SE 1.50AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status: O
Last Appraised: 2008 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 31,250 4,774
Improvement 138,150 26,079
Total 169,400 30,853
Tax History
Taxable Ad. Imp. Timber Voluntary A79 . A79 Net Total Total Tax Payment
Year Value Valorem Dist. Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
Tax Tax
2008 29,652 $1,518.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350.00 O $1,168.18 $1,168.18 PAID
2007 25,221 $1,293.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350.00 O $943.84 $943.84 PAID
2006 24,020 $1,261.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 O $961.05 $961.05 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Ad
Receipt Payment
Year # Date Valorem
Tax
2008 13255 04/28/2009 $1,168.18
2007 15223 04/29/2008 $943.84
2006 1863 3/23/2007 $961.05
Imp.
Dist.
Tax
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
Tax Tax Tax
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,168.18
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $943.84
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $961.05
Deed History
Date Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2 Deed Sale Revenue
Type Amount Amount
7/25/2005 2005-32678 LEWIS, MATTHEW MILES WD 162,500 537.90
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING
YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO, 4888 SN 2005-32678 WD
$537.90 REV(163M)
MELCHER,
3/2/1999 99-20457 THEODORE & WD 111,000 366.30
LINDA K.
DKS 99-20457 WD $366.30 REV (111M) INCLUDES #11614
GRAVES,
5/20/1994 94-31130 LAWRENCE L. & WD 8,000 26.40
of 2
10/2/2009 2:01 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
hrtp://www.cowashington.ar.us/PropertySearclt/RParcel info.asp?ST...
3/4/1993
4/19/1991
IDA J.
ALSO 001-11614-000
BAILEY, CASEY
94-30639 DON; BAILEY,
ANDY
NO REV ALSO #11614
BOWERS,
1413-020 EDWARD D. &
GENEVA
1/1/1985 1141-967 SECKINGER,
WILLIAM C. SR
Structure Occupancy
Number Type
I SF
Grade
C
Sketch:
Qty
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DEWAYNE WD
CHRISTINE FD
Construction First Floor Total Living
Type Living Area Area
FS 1744 1744
Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace
A FRAME
0 0.00
3,000 6.60
0 0.00
Year Basement
Constructed Area
1995
Year Effective
Remodeled Age
12
1 WD 1
0 (4401 44 0
58
3 MN 3
0 (1744)
32 1
21 2 B5 14
WD 2
2 FFA 2
2 (462) 2
L21
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Description Size Quality
Utility Bldg, Low, Dirt Floor 24x18
Hot tub/Jacuzzi
Driveway, concrete 6x19
Driveway, concrete 22x42
Wood deck 13x30
Wood deck 20x51
Hot tub/Jacuzzi
Next Item I Previous Item I Prev. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Mao I Return to Search Results I Modify Search I New
Search
2of2
10/2/2009 2:01 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo,asp?ST...
Record I of 1  Last updated toro109
Parcel Number: 765-16151-250 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11614-000 Type: RV
Location:
Owner Name: LEWIS, MATTHEW MILES
Mailing Address: 882 N RAINCROW RD FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 09-16-31
Addition: 09-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NW SE (67 X 324.06) 0.50AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status: V
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 9,400 1,469
Improvement 0 0
Total 9,400 1,469
Tax History
Taxable Ad Imp. Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Net Total Payment
Year Valorem Dist,
Total Tax
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 1,356 $69.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $69.43 $69.43 PAID
2007 1,243 $63.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $63.77 $63.77 PAID
2006 593 $31.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $31.13 $31.13 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Ad Imp.
Year Receipt Payment Valorem Dist. Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
# Date Tax Tax Tax Tax Tax
2008 17460 05/06/2009 $69.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $69.43
2007 19616 05/08/2008 $63.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $63.77
2006 1860 3/23/2007 $31.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31.13
Deed History
Date Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2 Deed Sale Revenue
Type Amount Amount
7/25/2005 2005-32678 LEWIS, WD 163,000 537.90
MATTHEW MILES
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING
YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 SN 2005-32678 WD
$537.90 REV(163M)
MELCHER,
3/2/1999 99-20457 THEODORE & WD 111,000 366.30
LINDA K.
DKS 99-20457 WD $366.30 REV (111M) INCLUDES #11615
GRAVES,
5/20/1994 94-31130 LAWRENCE L. & WD 8,000 26.40
of 2
10/2/2009 2:02 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParce I Info.asp?ST...
IDA J.
ALSO 001-11615-000
BAILEY, CASEY
3/4/1993
94-30639 DON; BAILEY DEWAYNE
WD
0
0.00
ANDY
NO REV ALSO #11615
BOWERS,
4119/1991
1413-020 EDWARD D. & CHRISTINE
FD
3,000
6.60
GENEVA
12/511985
1162-200 SECKINGER,
WD
0
0.00
WILLIAM C. SR
ADKINS, JOHNNY
111/1985
1037-668 P. & SUSAN
WD
0
0.00
CARSON
Next Item I Previous Item I Prey. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Map I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
2 oft
10/2/2009 2:02 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record I of 1  Last Updated 10/01/09
Parcel Number: 765-16152-425 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11711-000 Type: RI
Location: 7105 W WEDINGTON DR
Owner Name: BOWERS-CASSELL, ANNALEA K &JEFFREY
Mailing Address: 7105 W WEDINGTON DR FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704-9140
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NW SW 0.80AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status: V
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 22,500 3,978
Improvement 92,850 17,966
Total 115,350 21,944
Tax History
Taxable Ad
Year Value Valorem
Tax
2008 20,256 $1,037.11
2007 18,568 $952.54
2006 16,880 $886.20
Dist. Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Net Total Total Tax Payment
Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $1,037.11 $1,037.11 PAID
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $952.54 $952.54 PAID
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V $886.20 $886.20 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Year Receipt Payment Ad Imp.
Valorem Dist. Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
# Date Tax Tax Tax Tax Tax
2008 12743 04/27/2009 $1,037.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,037.11
2007 14445 04/28/2008 $952.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $952.54
2006 32856 4/25/2007 $886.20 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $886.20
Deed History
Deed Sale Revenue
Date Deed Ref. Grantee/ Grantee2
Type Amount Amount
BOWERS-
JEFFREY
12/28/2005 200557885 CASSELL,
L12159 W.
WD
155,000 511.50
ANNALEAK& &
HWY 16
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
FOR
2006 &
FOLLOWING YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 SN
2005-57885 WD $511.50 REV(155M)
5123/2005 2005-22339 WILSON, RUTH
WD
104,000 343.20
MANON
BJF WD 2005 22339 $343.20
REV ()104M
GRAVES,
1/1/1985 774-381 MACK
WD
0 0.00
1o12
10/2/2009 2:07 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washi ngton.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcel lnfo.asp?ST...
c
MILLARD &
JEANNIE
Structure Occupancy
Construction
First Floor
Total Living
Year Basement
Number Type
Type
Living Area
Area
Constructed Area
I SF
FS
1384
1384
1963
Year Effective
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace
Remodeled Age
4 G STEELE ISG 44
F
1 FEP 1
?(2138)6
1
10P(195)
4
Sketch: 18 t 28 2MN
8 (1ae41
1
109 t4
8 `14) 8 8 23
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty
Description
Size Quality
I
Driveway, concrete
10x100
I
Fence, chain link 4
80
I
Outbuilding, block
12x12
1
Patio cover, steel
21x16
1
Pole Sheds
29x20
I
Outbuilding,metal b u i ld i n g, m eta l
12x10
10
Next Item I Previous Item I Prev. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Map I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
2of2
c
10/2/2009 2:07 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/ProperiySearcIVRParcellnfo.asp?Sr...
Record I of 1  Last Updated 10/01)09
Parcel Number: 765-16152-675 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11717-000 Type: RM
Location: 7094 W WEDINGTON DR
Owner Name: NWACHUKWU, PRINCE N & RHONDA G
Mailing Address: 7123 W WEDINGTON DR FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704
Lot: Block:
S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY
Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 &
FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NW SW 0.50
AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status:
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value
Taxable Value
Land 11,250
2,250
Improvement 15,250
3,050
Total 26,500
5,300
Tax History
Ad Imp. Net Total
Year
Taxable Valorem Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Total Tax Payment
Dist.
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 5,300 $271.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $271.36 $271.36 PAID
2007 5,071 $260.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $260.14 $260.14 PAID
2006 4,610 $242.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $242.02 $242.02 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Year Receipt Payment Va Ad
Dist. Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
Date Tax Tax Tax Tax Tax
2008 2519 04/07/2009 $271.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $271.36
2007 10189 04/21/2008 $260.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $260.14
2006 14653 4/6/2007 $242.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $242.02
Deed History
Date Deed Ref. Grantee/ Grantee2 Deed Sale Revenue
Type Amount Amount
NWACHUKWU,
11/3/1999 99-99818 PRINCE N. & WD 22,000 72.60
RHONDA G.
LMB ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 &
FOLLOWING YEARS PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 LMV
FOR 2006: ACREAGE CORRECTION FROM 0.75 AC TO 0.50 AC PER
MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION LRR 99-99818 WD 72.60 (22M)
MCCARTY, ALVIN
11/17/1998 98-101002 WD 21,000 69.30
& SHIRLEY M.
MS 98-101002 WD $69.30 (21M)
1/5/1989 1303-373 ADKINS, TILLMAN WD 17,000 37.40
R. & BETTY S.
I oft
10/2/2009 2:09 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http: //www.co.was hi ngton. ar.us/ PropertySearch/R Parce I Info. as p?ST...
FLETCHER,
1/29/1988 1258-838 MILDRED & REEL, TRUSTEES WD 0 0.00
LEROY,
1/1/1985 843-379 REEL, V J & WD 0 0.00
BESSIE
Structure Occupancy
Construction
First Floor
Total Living
Year Basement
Number Type
Type
Living Area
Area
Constructed Area
1 SF
MV
798
1008
1944
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace Year Effective
Remodeled Age
6 P CONC/BLK 63
�2
1
0
3J 2
2
Sketch: MN
(798)
2 10
2 2 2
11 GARC 1
(210)
Li.i 1
Next Item I Previous Item I Prey. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Map I Return to Search Results I Modify Search j New
Search
2 of 2 10/2/2009 2:09 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record I of I  Last Updated 10/01409
Parcel Number: 765-16152-625 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11715-000 Type: RI
Location: 7170 W WEDINGTON DR
Owner Name: GOAD, JUDY L
Mailing Address: 7170 W WEDINGTON DR FAYETTEVILLE AR 72701
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31 FAYETTEVILLE OUTLOTS
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, FAY Tax District: 062
City: FAYETTEVILLE
Legal: ANNEXED TO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE FOR 2006 & FOLLOWING YEARS
PER ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 4888 PT NW SW 1.25AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status: V
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 29,700 5,191
Improvement 47,950 9,590
Total 77,650 14,781
Tax History
Ad Imp. Net Total
Total Tax
Taxable Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Payment
Year Valorem Dist.
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 13,644 $698.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $698.57 $698.57 PAID
2007 12,507 $641.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $641.61 $641.61 PAID
2006 11,370 $596.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $596.92 $596.92 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Year Receipt Payment Va odrem Dist. Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
# Date Tax Tax Tax Tax Tax
2008 38189 09/0212009 $698.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $698.57
2007 49731 10/02/2008 $641.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $641.61
2006 104403 10/4/2007 $596.92 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $596.92
Deed History
Date Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2 Deed Sale Revenue
Type Amount Amount
911/20092009-28569 GOAD, JUDY L WD 80,000 264.00
AJM 2009-28569 WD $264.00 (80M)
1/1/1985 774-386 GREGORY, JAMES WD 0 0.00
LEON & HELEN Y.
Structure Occupancy Construction First Floor Total Living Year Basement
Number Type Type Living Area Area Constructed Area
1 SF FS 936 936 1973
10/2/20092: 10PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washingtonar.us/PropertySearclt/RParcel lnfo.asp?ST...
Year
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace
Remodeled
5 A FRAME
421
8
12 I
2 MN I I
Sketch: 8 (936)
2 CP 2
0 ) 0
40 30 12
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty Description Size Quality
I Driveway, concrete 12x16
I Welihouse
Effective
Age
34
Next Item I Previous Item I Prev. Ledger Card I GIS Parcel Mao I Return to Search Results I Modify Search New
Search
2of2
10/2/2009 2:10 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearciVRParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record 1 of I anbspLast updated 10/01/09
Parcel Number: 001-11671-000 Prev.
Parcel Number: 114309-000-00
Type: Al
Location: 12360 MARTIN RD
Owner Name: LEWIS, SCOTT A
Mailing Address: 12360 MARTIN RD
FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704
Lot: Block:
S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31
School District: FARMINGTON SCH,
RURAL
Tax District: 060
City: RURAL
Legal: PT S/2 NW NW 7.04AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status: O
Last Appraised: 2007
Appraised Value
Taxable Value
Land
35,700
4,050
Improvement
130,100
22,906
Total
165,800
26,956
Tax History
Taxable Ad Imp. Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Net TotalPayment
Year Valorem Dist. Total Tax
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 25,794 $1,266.49 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $350.00 O $917.09 $917.09 PAID
2007 24,632 $1,211.89 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $350.00 O $862.49 $862.49 PAID
2006 23,470 $1,182.89 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $300.00 O $883.49 $883.49 PAID
2005 22,664 $1,067.47 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $300.00 O $768.07 $768.01. PAID
2004 21,627 $1,028.58 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $300.00 O $729.18 $729.18 PAID
2003 20,590 $998.82 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $300.00 $699.42 $699.42 PAID
2002 20,590 $895.87 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $896.47 $896.47 PAID
2001 20,031 $871.55 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $872.15 $872.15 PAID
2000 18,210 $692.89 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $693.49 $693.49 PAID
1999 18,210 $702.00 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $702.60 $702.60 PAID
1998 18,210 $703.82 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $704.42 $704.42 PAID
1997 18,210 $613.68 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $614.28 $614.28 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Year Receipt Payment
# Date
2008 13255 04/28/2009
2007 15223 04/29/2008
2006 39968 4/27/2007
2005 22105 4/19/2006
2004 7763 4/25/2005
2003 124650 10/23/2004
2002 35720 5/8/2003
2001 19635 4/18/2002
2000 11660 5/15/2001
Ad
Valorem
Tax
$916.49
$861.89
$882.89
$767.47
$728.58
$698.82
$895.87
$871.55
$692.89
Imp.
Dist.
Tax
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Timber Voluntary
Tax Tax
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
$0.60 $0.00
Penalty
Tax
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Payment
$917.09
$862.49
$883.49
$768.07
$729.18
$699.42
$896.47
$872.15
$693.49
I of2
10/2/2009 2:11 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcelinto.asp?sI...
1999 13149 51112000 $702.00 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $702.60
1998 7071 4/2111999 $703.82 $0.00 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 $704.42
Deed History
Deed
Sale Revenue
Date
Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2
Type
Amount Amount
6/4/2003
2003-32230 LEWIS, SCOTT A
FD
125,000 412.50
PYM 2003-32230 FD $412.50 REV (125M)
(JEFFERY A. BYNUM
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PERRY NATHAN BYNUM
119/1995
97-73498 BYNUM, PERRY
QC
0 0.00
JLF 4/3198 97-73498 QCD NO REV. FROM
MARY
ANN BYNUM
4/6/1992
92-18124 BYNUM, PERRY
WD
75,000 165.00
N. & MARY ANN
1/1/1985 800-134 ATTO, BILLYJ& S WD 0 0.00
SYLVIA E
Structure Occupancy Construction First Floor Total Living Year Basement
Number Type Type Living Area Area Constructed Area
SF FS 2756 2756 1964
Year Effective
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace o
Remodedeled Age
4 A STANDARD ISG 43
16,
42CS2
8 10.I
8 MN
Sketch:
3 )2756) 121
3
6
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty Description Size Quality
I General Purpose Barn 28x18
I Garage - frame unfinished, det 26x24
Next Item I Previous Item I Ledger Card I
Prev Ledger
Card
I GIS Parcel Map
I Return to Search Results I Modify
Search I
New
Search
2 of 2 10/2/20092:11 PM
Real Estate -Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record 1 of 1  Last Updated 10/01/09
Parcel Number: 001-11672-000 Prev.
Parcel Number: 114307-000-00 Type: Al
Location: 12341 MARTIN RD
Owner Name: GALLAGHER, JAMES
F & DIANA L
Mailing Address: 12279 MARTIN RD.
FAYETTEVILLE AR 72704
Lot: Block:
S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31
School District: FARMINGTON SCH,
RURAL
Tax District: 060
City: RURAL
Legal: PT NW NW 6.62AC
Current Year A79 Credit Status: V
Last Appraised: 2007
Appraised Value
Taxable Value
Land
35,600
4,512
Improvement
102,650
20,530
Total
138,250
25,042
Tax History
Year Taxable Valoem Dist. Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Net Total Total Tax Payment
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 23,116 $1,135.00 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 V $1,135.75 $1,135.75 PAID
2007 21,190 $1,042.55 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 V $1,043.30 $1,043.30 PAID
2006 19,264 $970.91 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 V $971.66 $971.66 PAID
2005 19,252 $906.77 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $300.00 O $607.52 $607.52 PAID
2004 18,371 $873.72 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $300.00 O $574.47 $574.47 PAID
2003 17,490 $848.44 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $300.00 O $549.19 $549.19 PAID
2002 17,314 $753.33 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $300.00 O $454.08 $454.08 PAID
2001 16,527 $719.09 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $300.00 O $419.84 $419.84 PAID
2000 15,740 $598.91 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $300.00 O $299.66 $299.66 PAID
1999 15,740 $606.78 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $607.53 $607.53 PAID
1998 15,740 $608.35 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $609.10 $609.10 PAID
1997 15,740 $530.44 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $531.19 $531.19 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Year Receipt Payment Valorem Dist. Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
# Date Tax Tax Tax Tax Tax
2008 12743 04/27/2009 $1,135.00 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $1,135.75
2007 14445 04/28/2008 $1,042.55 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $1,043.30
2006 29832 4/25/2007 $970.91 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $971.66
2005 35483 4/25/2006 $606.77 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $607.52
2004 51642 6/28/2005 $573.72 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $574.47
2003 22327 4/27/2004 $548.44 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $549.19
2002 35721 5/8/2003 $453.33 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $454.08
2001 14122 4/16/2002 $419.09 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $419.84
2000 4861 4/24/2001 $298.91 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $299.66
10/2/2009 2:13 PM
Real Estate.Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnto.asp!S'I'...
1999 1961 3/29/2000 $606.78 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $607.53
1998 12207 5/3/1999 $608.35 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 $609.10
Deed History
Deed
Sale
Revenue
Date Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2
Type
Amount
Amount
6/24120052005-27779 GALLAGHER,
& DIANA L.
WD
145,000
478.50
JAMES F.
SN 2005-27779 WD $478.50 REV(145M)
FLEMING,
6/25/1990 1373-512 MARSHALL C., JR. &
WD
64,000
140.80
NONA
YOUNG, WILSON & WD 43,000 47.30
1/1/1985 1373-518
NAOMI
Structure Occupancy
Construction
First Floor
Total Living
Year
Basement
Number Type
Type
Living Area
Area
Constructed
Area
I SF
MV
1816
1816
1968
Year
Effective
Grade
Condition
Exterior Wall
Fireplace
led
Remodeled
Age
g e
4
A
MASONVEN
1SG
39
r-12�
1 OP 1
2 12 2,
70 9
�21�
Sketch: 3 MN
1 (1816) 2 MFA 2
2 (462) 2 I
23--'6 6 01
10
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty Description Size Quality
1 Driveway, concrete 18x22
1 Outbuilding,metal b u i ld i n g, meta l 10x12
Next Item I Previous Item I Ledger Card I
Prev. Ledger
Card
I GIS Parcel Map
I Return to Search Results I Modify
Search I
New
Search
2 of 2 10/2/2009 2:13 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParcellnfo.asp?ST...
Record I of I  Last Updated 10/01109
Parcel Number: 001-11670-002 Prev. Parcel Number: 001-11670-000 Type: Al
Location: 12375 W DOUBLE SPRINGS RD
Owner Name: GOLDEN, GARY & KATHY
Mailing Address: 12375 W Double Springs Rd Fayetteville AR 72704-9538
Lot: Block: S -T -R: 10-16-31
Addition: 10-16-31
School District: FARMINGTON SCH, RURAL Tax District: 060
City: RURAL
Legal: PT N/2 NW NW 8.66 A
Current Year A79 Credit Status: V
Last Appraised: 2007 Appraised Value Taxable Value
Land 70,750 9,620
Improvement 30,250 6,050
Total 101,000 15,670
Tax History
Taxable Ad Imp' Timber Voluntary A79 A79 Net Total Payment
Year Valorem Dist. Total Tax
Value Tax Tax Tax Tax Credit Status Tax Paid Status
2008 14,760 $724.72 $0.00 $0.90 $0.00 $0.00 V $725.62 $0.00
2007 13,850 $681.42 $0.00 $0.90 $0.00 $0.00 V $682.32 $682.32 PAID
2006 9,100 $458.64 $0.00 $0.90 $0.00 $0.00 V $459.54 $459.54 PAID
2005 8,532 $401.86 $0.00 $0.90 $0.00 $0.00 V $402.76 $402.76 PAID
2004 7,821 $371.97 $0.00 $0.90 $0.00 $0.00 V $372.87 $372.87 PAID
2003 7,110 $344.91 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 V $345.96 $345.96 PAID
2002 7,110 $309.36 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 V $310.41 $310.41 PAID
2001 7,110 $309.36 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $263.67 O $51.42 $51.42 PAID
2000 7,060 $268.63 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $268.63 O $1.05 $1.05 PAID
1999 7,060 $272.16 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $273.21 $273.21 PAID
1998 7,060 $272.87 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $273.92 $273.92 PAID
1997 7,060 $237.92 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $238.97 $238.97 PAID
Available Tax Payment Receipt(s)
Year Receipt Payment Ad Imp. Valorem Dist. Timber Voluntary Penalty Payment
Tax Tax
# Date Tax Tax Tax
2007 1043618 07/15/2009 $681.42 $0.00 $0.99 $0.00 $124.13 $806.54
2006 1014979 04/14/2008 $458.64 $0.00 $0.99 $0.00 $73.45 $533.08
2005 58481 6/7/2006 $401.86 $0.00 $0.90 $0.00 $0.00 $402.76
2004 42320 5/17/2005 $371.97 $0.00 $0.90 $0.00 $0.00 $372.87
2003 47285 6/9/2004 $344.91 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $345.96
2002 48039 5/30/2003 $309.36 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $310.41
2001 117015 11/7/2002 $45.69 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $4.68 $51.42
2000 2625 4/5/2001 $0.00 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $1.05
1999 1908 9119/2000 $272.16 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $273.21
l of3
10/2/2009 2:14 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washington.ar.us/PropertySearch/RParce I lnfo.asp?ST...
1998 3550 9/29/1999 $272.87 $0.00 $1.05 $0.00 $0.00 $273.92
Deed History
Deed
Sale Revenue
Date
Deed Ref. Granteel Grantee2
Type
Amount Amount
31912001
2001-65667 GOLDEN, GARY
WD
0 207.90
& KATHY
SLC FOR 2005: 0.17 A TRANSFERED TO
#11669-000 HARVEY &
MILDRED LUTTRELL (SEE SURVEY 2004-2962)
BH 2001-65667 WD
$207.90 (63M) RE-RECORDED TO SHOW CORRECT LEGAL
3/9/2001
2001-24959 GOLDEN, GARY
WD
63,000 207.90
& KATHY
WCS 2001-24959 WO $207.90 REV (63M)
11114/1991
1441-689 SMITH, PAUL D.
WD
44,000 96.80
& BARBARA J.
Structure Occupancy Construction First Floor Total Living Year Basement
Number Type Type Living Area Area Constructed Area
1 MH FS 840 840 1974
Year Effective
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace Age
Remodeled Age
5 A STANDARD 33
-60 I
7 CS (420) 780 1
MH
Sketch. 1 (840) 46 CS 6
60 0J
7BS 7 1BWD7 16p17 17 710—'
L..p X10—�-16— —17
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty Description Size Quality
1 Wellhouse
Structure Occupancy Construction First Floor Total Living Year Basement
Number Type Type Living Area Area Constructed Area
2 MH FS 910 910 1979
Year Effective
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace
Remodeled Age
5 A STANDARD 28
10/2/2009 2:14 PM
Real Estate Parcel Information
http://www.co.washington.ar. us/PropertySearch/RParceI Infoasp?Sf...
1 MH 1
Sketch: 4 (910) 4
r
6' B B
Out Buildings and Yard Improvements
Qty Description Size Quality
I Outbuilding,frame 10x12
Structure Occupancy Construction First Floor Total Living Year Basement
Number Type Type Living Area Area Constructed Area
3 MH FS 1792 1792 1996
Y
Grade Condition Exterior Wall Fireplace g
Remodeled
Effective
dee led Age
e
5 A STANDARD 9
�64-
2 MH 2
Sketch:
8 (1792) 8
�64�
Next Item I Previous Item I Ledger Card I
Prev. Ledger
Card
I GIS Parcel Map
I Return to Search Results I Modify
Search I
New
Search
301'3
10/2/2009 2:14 PM
APPENDIX A
Understanding Ground Vibration/Airblast Levels
and Damage
)UIVD VIBRATIDWAIRBLAST LEVELS
AND DAMAGE
by
R. Frank Chiappeaa, BSc., MSc.
Exploivas Applications Engineer
o Copyngh41992. BlmtivgAmlyvs Ivt®etiona rvc.
Al Rights l awed
1. Ground Vibration Levels Required to Cause Damage to Residential
Structures
Them are two issues which need to be addressed regarding residential ownem located in the
vicinity of blasting operations. The first is physical property damage which may result from the
blast disturbances in the form of ground vibrations that propagate through the ground, and
airblast (Le. overpressure) which navels through the air. In order for these two disturbances to
cause real damage, they would have to contain certain specific traits in terms of then amplitudes,
ductions and frequency relative to the structure of concern. The second issue is related to
homeowner complaints in terms of then perception of blasting activities, regardless of whether
any real damage resulted or not. The Inter issue is always mom problematic in trying to define
or control through a simple aet of guidelines and/or Locat/ShtoA+edeml regulations governing all
blasting activities.
The United Stites Bureau of Mines, (USBM), published the results of an extensive series of tests
regarding ground vibration levels which could cause damage to residential Ito 2 story homes in
a Report of Investigation, 818507 (1981). lu this study, direct ground vibration and aiiblast
measurements were made in 76 homes for 219 production blast. A typical home, using
common construction materials, such as concrete, blocks, brick, drywall, plaster anda wood
frame, was also built near a blast site and n nitomd as the blot got pmgressively closer. The
ten home was monitored with extensive sensors and insrun nation systems to measure ground
vibrations, airbtw, structural response, displacements, acoelemtions andthe breaking strains of
individual component membem of the home in drywall, plaster, ceilings, walls, structure comers,
doors and windows. Results were submitted for peer review by other industry experts, including
the Office ofsurface Mining, asdfinaly published in 1981. This study was no doubt one of the
best, most cientific and comprehensive amdies performedby an independent government
organization, which correlated blast induced ground vibmtons to a damage potential for
residential dwellings.
Although the USBM study is still one of the best in existence, it does not cover all pmsible Ito 2
story residential structures, such as historical, log cabin, all masonry and mobile home st ictums.
These structures may require a different set of damage thresholds.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
A safe ground vibmtim damage criteria was recommended by the USBM in the form of agmph
which is ilustmted in Figure 1.1. This is a plot of ground vibmtion amplitude versus frequency.
The ground vibmrton amplitude (particle velccity) is measured in inchesheconds or how fast a
pout on the ground or a stlucMue moves around its original rest petition. The frequency is
measured in Hertz (Hz) or how many mui ]ations the pout makes around its original rest m Star[
poon over one econ Both the combined particle velccity and its associated frequency are
important in determining if this combination has a high or low probability of damage to a
residential dwelling.
Safe Vibration Limit ( USBM RI 8507 )
I
IC
zoo ......
1.0
oarvmu
N=n eLASTFa
SAFE
GROUNn VIBRATION
0.1
LEVELS
0.01
10 100
Frequency ( Hertz
Figure 1-1
THRESHOLD
LINE OF
COSMETIC
DAMAGE
BLASTING ANALYSIS IME¢NAIIO.WyLYG 2
Basically, the USBM graph says that if ameasumd ground vibration point and its associated
measured frequency fats below the safe vibration lint line, (shown in the solid and partly
dashed lives), the probability of physical damage is extremely low or non existent The safe
wbration lint line represents the threshold or beginning of cosmetic damage, such as very small,
barely viable hairline cracks in plaster and/or drywall. If a vibration point fats above the safe
vibration lint line, (Le. above the threshold line ofcosmedc damage), the probability of real
damage will increase. Itdoes not, however, necessarily mean that physical damage is guaranteed
to occur. But, the higher the vibration point is above the safe limit line, the higher the
probability ofdamage.
Another way to look at this is in terms of a structure's elasticity, brittleness and breaking strain.
lithe ground vibration amplitude and frequency causes any structural component member ofa
home to exceed the breaking strain jut once, permanent damage will aceur. All parts of a home
are designed to flex with some degree without damage, similar to the springs on a car. As long
as the flex, twisting and bending is within the object's single limit, no damage will occur
regardless of the number of times it is distorted. But pull the spring beyond its elastic,
brittleness or breaking strain just once, and permanent deformation damage will aceur.
Also, all homes go through natural setting in periods throughout its life due to a host of factors
related to the construction, thermal strains and aging, on. Other than major structural or
construction problems, minor defects, hairline cracks, separations, comer/waWceiling
detachments and differential settling are often expected, regardless of whether the home is
located near blasting operations or not.
BLASTING ANALYSIS IM'e¢NnnONAL, INC.
2. Ground Vibration Perception and Annoyance
The psychological response to blasting is an entirely different matter. Human perception to
groundvibmdons andnoise usually occurs well below the damage thresholdine recommended
by the USBM. (Refer toFigure2.1.) In addition, noiseisoften interpreted by the lay personas
also being ground vibrations. Blast induced ground vibrations and aifilast (or noise) are two
entirely different disturbances caused by blasting.
Safe Vibration Limit ( USBM RI 8507 ) and
Human Perception ( Goldman
10
g m7I uuroAAA "-� intcierable
PLA TEP '
0.50- --��-
r
o lJnpleasan
m k
0.1
Perceptible
0.01
1 10 1
Frequency (Hertz)
Figure 2-1
BLASTING ANALYSIS ILrrERNA'TIONAL, INC. 4
Although real strucfual damage will genemfly not ,cur in residences until ground vibrations
are wellove 0.5 to 2.0 in/sec, (Figure 1.1) and then only underspecific frequency levels and
conditions, humans will respond to ground vibrations and airblast at considetably lower levels,
(Figure 2.1). The human perception is very complex because it depends on each person's
tolerance level, the ambient noise level, displacement, velocity, acceleration, frequency,
condition of the structure and rattling effects from lose construction, etc. Extensive studies by
Chu in 1978, Nitro Nobel, United Stites Bureau of Mines (USBM), Blasting Analyse
International, Inc., White Industdal Seismology, Inc., andothem deter®ned thathuman
response to gmund vibrations and airblastam actually many orders of magnitude less than the
levels that would even come close to producing actual damage. For example, the following
effects were documented on humans from bluting activities:
Ground Vibration Level
Effects on Humane
inch/second
mmk
Inpemeptible
0.001-0.003
0.025-0.076
Barely Femepfible
0.®3-0.01
0.O76-0.254
Detincdy Perceptible
0.01- 0.03
0.254 - 0.762
Strongly Femepfible
0.03 -0.1
0.062 - 2.540
Disturbing
0.1-0.3
2.540 -7.620
Very Disturbing
0.3-1.0
7.620-25.400
Itis evident from this data that ground vibration levels received ata structure in the order of
0.03- 0.10 inch/sec is quite perceptible, but the probability of damage is usually nonexistent.
Likewise, levels in the range of 0.10 -0.3 inch/sec can be disturbing and levels over 0.5 inchkec
can be very unpleasant, although permanent damage nuely occur.
3. Ambient Normality
Another factor that can affect one perception of an event is "ambient normality". For example,
blasting is a normal activity to a quarry operator in his operation, and thus, the gmund
vibration/aifilast sensed by employees within the quany propeNes is a normal and expected
activity. Likewise, the continuous noise generated from drilling, processing and vehicle traffic is
often oblivious to employees because these am normal and expected in a quarry. However, if
low flying jet plane suddenly and unexpectedly flew over the quarry, this could startle the quarry
operators into fling a complaint, even though the noise level may be weft below the damage
threshold. Similarly, ablest event a usually pemavedby msidentialhomcownem as abnormal,
especially if the disturbance occur during periods of the day when ambient levels am low,
and/or when the blast event is unexpected.
In any case, the human perception is so acute that even very low ground vibrations can be felt
within the community, but no souctuml damage generally occurs. This is always avert' difficult
concept for homeowners to grasp, uvdemtavd and/or accept.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INrERNnnONAL, INC.
0. Surface Blast Vibration Levels to Damage Steel and PVC Transmission
Pipeline
A number of studies were conducted by various researches and organizations on the effects of
Muting near steel and/or PVC pressurizes pipelines. The explosive weight per delay varied
from as low as 3lbe (1.] Kg) ro as high as 9 tons (9000 Kg) at dstances of 6 ft (1.9 m) towe0
over 1000 ft (305 m). Materials condsted of ands, rocks and coal mine overburdens. Pipeline
diametem varied from 6 inches (152 mm) to 30 inches (762 mm).
In all cars, the levels required to cause permanentdamage, deformation, depressodzation and/or
breaks were atleast an order of magnitude greater than the ground vibration levels generated
from typical commercial Muting operations, (i.e. quarries, constluction, coalmines and open
pits.)
In the USBM studies (Siskind et all 1992), it was concluded that buried pipelines are relatively
resistant to bleatvibrations. In fact, it was reported that no failures or damage of any kind
occurred from bleating as close as 50 ft (15 m), which produced ground vibration levels of over
24 incec (600 mm).
5. Typical Ground Vibration and Alrblast Levels Produced by Non -Blasting
Activities and Events
Tables 5.1 and 5.2 Mournte typical vibration levels produced from normal household activities
and other events. Note that normal household activities, such as running, exercising,
doorwivdow slams can generate vibration levels between 0.10 to 1.30 in/sec. Even the simple
act of just hammering nails into a wall to hang pictures up can produce vibration levels between
0.50 to 3.90 incee.
Daily envvovment l strains on a dwelling resulting from changes in humidity, temperature, wind
andprecpitation, etc. can produce vibration levels ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 incee. lithe dwelling
is constructed during pedods of rain or high humidity and not allowed to properly dry ordain
during each ph ne of the construction, ahigher frequency of irregularities wouldbe expected
during the initialaettlivg-in period.
lightning and thunder during an electrical storm is also a direct vibration source, which is often
overlooked because this is anatuel phenomenon. In some cases, electrical storm activity hea
produced ground vibration levels up to 0.40 in/sec and aifileat levels exceeding 140 dB. These
often exceed the levels produced by blasting.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INrERNnnONny INC.
TABLE 5.1
Typical Ground Vibration and Airblast Levels Produced by Non Blasting
Activities and Events
Homan Household Activities
1 Walking
2 Running
3 HeelDmp
4 Low to highjump on floor
5 Entrance door slam
6 Sliding glass door slam
7 Hammering nails to hang pictures
Induced Strain on Structure
Daily environmental strains on stmctum
resulting from changes in humidity,
temperature, wind and precipitation.
Lightning and Thmder
Country Wide
Expected Vibration Level (tn/secl
0.03-0.16
0.10-0.50
0.16-0.65
0.12-1.20
0.15-1.90
0.50-1.00
0.50-3.90
Expected Vibration Level (iu/secl
1.0-3.2
Expected Vibration & Airblast Levels
Up to 0.4 in/sec
Up tol40+dB
BLASTING ANALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
TABLE 5.2
OTHER NON BLASTING SEISMIC SOURCES
Inch/Sec.
From USBM fatigue study test -house in Indiana (RI 8896, Stagg, et al, 1981)
Jumping on the floor& waking
0.10-0.50
Humidity change inside (10 pct)
1.0-2.4
Temperature change inside (AWl?)
1.0-3.2
Wind
0.6-2.6
From five homes in Penna (Fang,1976)
Temp. and humidity over? days
1.75-3.1
Auto traffic
0.04-0.20
Pushing on the wail
0.025- 0.36
From UK studies at Leeds University (White et aL,1993)
Outside tempenWre changes (A1S F)
>0.34
Pushing on wattneardoorway
0.6-1.2
Pushing on watt next to window
2.4
Heel drop andjumping
0.15-0.9
From ISEE paper by Shams, et aL, 1994
Closing door
0.3 - 0.45
From Sutherland, et aL, 1968
Wind (50 mph)
1.1- 6.7
From ISEE paper by Sbkind, et aL,1996
Temperature outside (AI0"f0
0.5-1.7
From Dowding, 1996
Temperature and humidity
0.75- 2.6
BLASTING ANALYSIS INrERNnnONAL, INC.
Q Repeated Blasting
A legitimate concern which often comes up with homeowvem is that of repeated blasting. Even
when ground vibration levels are kept low, could repeated blasting over the years cause fatigue
and ultimately damage? The USBM also investigated this and published a report with their main
conclusions as follows:
"Cosmetic arlairline cracks O.01 to 0.10mm wide occurred during construction of the
house and aka dung periods when no blartr were detonated The formation of cosmetic
cracks increa,edfrom 0.3 to 1.0 cords perweek when ground motions exceeded 1.0 ink.
Human activity and changes in temperature and humidity caused strains t., waits that
were equivalent to those produced by ground motions Sc to 1.2 ink. When the entire
structure was mechanically shaken, the fimtcmc: appeared q(kr54OW cycles, the
equivalent of 28 yin ofshakNg byblast-generated groundmotions of U.S ink twice a
day."
Foresample, if we take the avenge vibntion levelof0.2 in/sec genentedftom blasting
activities in the Northeast USA, structure fatigue from blasting alone would not set in for at least
a few hundred years. For mat residential dwellings, this period of time is well within the
structures natural aging and degradation fatigue.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
7. Alrblast Levels Required to Cause Damage
Airblast or impulse noise is generally the number one cause of complaints because this i5 what a
homeowner hears and senses, even at very low non damaging levels. Table 7.1 lists typical
airblast levels versus human responses. Cracked windows are usually one of the first signs of
airblast damage, but require minimtm levels of 145 -150 dB. However, levels between 125 -
140 dB can be extremely loud and in many cases quite intolerable. Lome window panes, doom
and/or poor construction will usually enhance the star0ing effect, making the disturbance sound
much more devastating than it really is in trams of permanent damage, pardcuWly when the
blot is unexpected
TABLE 7.1
TYPICAL OVERPRESSURE, AIRBLAST AND NOISE LEVELS
Sound Pressure(dE)
Source. Activity. Response and Damage
90
OSHA maximum for 8 hours
90-100
Normal to loud conversation
110
Perceptble,complaints begin
112
Complaints vary depending on ambient levels
115
Perception increases, complaints increase
120
Threshold of pain for continuous sound
125-130
Sounds very loud, rattling effect, no damage
140
OSHA maximum for impulse sound, intolerable
150
Some windows begin to break
170
Most windows break
180
Strucmmldamage
BLASTING ANALYSIS INrERNATIO.WymG 10
& Natural Construction Causes of Cracks in Wage and Celtlugs
The architect's Small House Service Bureau of the United Stites published a list of 40 reasons
why walls andceilings muck:
1. Building a house on a fdl
2. Failure to make the footings wide enough
3. Failure to carry the footings below the front line
4. Width of footings not made proportional to the loads they can
5. The posts in the basement not provided with separate footings
6. Failure to provide abase raised above the basement floor line for the settling of wooden
posts
7. Not enough cement used in the concrete
B. Dirty sander gravel usedin theconcrete
9. Mmmr, plaster, or concrete work allowed to freeze before setting
10. Wood Beams sparred too long between posts
11. Wooden beams used to support masonry over openings
12. Failure to protect beams and sills from mixing through dampness
13. Braces omitted in wooden walls
14. Sheathing omitted in wooden walls (except in "back -plastered construction)
15. Wooden walls not framed so as to equalize shrinkage
16. Selling floor joists one end on masonry and the other on wood
17. Floorjoists too light
18. Floorjoists placed too fir apart
19. Failure to use double joists under unsupported partitions
20. Floorjoints not bridged.
21. Subfloodng omitted
22. Supporting poets too small
23. Cross beams too light
26. Failure to erect tni es over wide wooden openings
25. Rafters too light and too far apart
26. Laths plated too close together
27. Laths run behind amds at comets
28. Metal reinforement omitted in pmamr at covets
29. Metal reinforcement omitted where wooden walls join masonry
30. Metal lath omitted on wide expanses of ceiling
31. Poor materials used in planer
32. Plumr applied too thin
33. Plumr applied directly on masonry at chimney stock
34. First coat of pmamr not pmpedy keyed to backing
35. Plumr applied on laths that am too dry
36. Too much cement in the amao
37. Stucco not kept wet until set
38. Toofew nails used
39. Subsoil drainage not carded away from walls
40. Drainage water from mof not carded away from foundations
BLASTING ANALYSIS INrERNATIONay INC. 11
9. Common Defects which Occur In Homes and are Completely Unrelated to
Blasting
A number of common and normal defects in newly constructed homes and throughout the
trucdre's life cycle are listed below. Every home will experience some of these defects
regardless of whether it is located near blasting activities or not.
9.1 Masonry and Concrete
1. Concrete foundation will mattes. Shrinkage oraetdemev[cracks within lB inch
(3.2 mm) are common and should be expected within certain tolemnces.
2. Cracks in blocks or veneer walls (blocks bricks and molter joints). Settlement cracks up
to 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) are common and should be expected within certain tolerances.
3. Cracks in concrete hasenuat floom. Shrinkage (i.e. hairline cracks are common and
should be expected within certain tolerances. Any cracks greater than 14 inch (6.4 mm)
in width or 1/8 inch (3.2 mm) in vertical displacement are abnormal and should be
investigated further.
4. Verticalorhothont1movenntofconcfl floorfloortb atjoints. Concmte floorslabs
are engineered to move at expansion and contraction joints. Thus, some differential
displacement can be expected.
5. Cracks in atlached estate or vatio slab. Shrinkage crocks within 14 inch (6.4 mm) in
width or 1/d inch (6.4 mm) are common and should be expected within certain
tolerances.
6. Concrete floors in moms designed forG' having r
These can our for slopes specifically created for drainage.
7. Concrete tb cmcks which cause finished . These are
generally rare, but could occur fora number of reasons.
8. .. . These canbe
caused by poor materials or emsion due to salt, chemicals or unusual weather.
9. hpdni1 nanflai of gb away fran the hoo Minor separadovu
normal as is ®nor puddling of min water. Separation of mom than' inch (25 mm) or
excessive waterpuddlivg is not normal andshould be investigatedfur ter.
BLASTING ANALYSIS lmaananonsyINC. 12
9.2 Lot Grading and Drdvage
1. Ground etdementfoundation, utility trencheL or other filled aloas. Ground
settlement should not disrupt water drainage away from the house. Settlement around
the foundation, at utility trenches and other filled areas of up to 6 inches (152 mm)
should be expected in new homes less than 3 years old.
2. I®mcer grades and wale. These can cause standing water and could affect drainage
in the immediate area surrounding the home which in turn could affect the foundation.
After a normal rainfall, water should not st nd in the yard for mom than 26 hours nor 68
hours in swales.
3. Prjg�. Water not properly collected and channeled away from the foundation walls,
stairs, walkways and driveways, etc. can cause differential settling and some damage can
be expected This is usually the number one cause of most minor and major damage
claims.
9.3 Chimney and Fireplaces
1. Chimney seoaated from home. Minor sepuations of up to 12 inch (12.7 mm) over a
10 ft (3m) measurement are normal and should be expected within certain tolerances.
2. Cracking offnchdck. It is expected that heat and thermalstmim will eventually cause
cracking.
3. Fireplace brick veneer tacking. Some cracking up to 14 inch (6.4 mm) is expected.
9A InteriorWans and THm
1. Sevanfon at ioutu. Some sepamdon atjoiats in moldings avdbetweev moldings and
adjacent surfaces is normal and should be expected up to 1/d inch (6.4 mm).
2. Watt or ceiling cracks. Hairline cracks, seams or tape cracks and light imperfections up
to 1.8 inch (3.2 mm) are normal and should be expected within certain tolerances.
3. Nail These are quite tummy in homes and are due to contaction and expansion
oflumberpmducts.
4. Cracking of ceramic tile. Cracking ofgmutjoit is common and shouldbe expected.
5. Cracks at cernets. Window and door curvets are stress points in any structure and minor
horizontal, vertical and diagonal cracking can be expected.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 13
9.5 ExlerIor walls
1. Qacks in to o wall finish. (Sacks in sWao wall fviahes up to I/B Inch (3.2 ®) are
common and should be expected.
2. Bricks separating orcncked. Mmorseparadonandisolated cracking of individual
bricks are normal and should be expected.
3. Seuaradon ofcanikinp. All caulking wileventually shdnk and some separation from
watt, window, door, chimney, etc. is expected.
4. Bulcedsidine. Some® nor bulging is expected due W warping of underlying materials.
9.6 Cabinets and Counter Tops
Sons separation up W 1/d inch (6.4 mm) is common and should be expected within
certain tolerances.
BLASTING ANALYSIS IBrrananoNAL, INC. 14
10.0 References
Borg, D.G., Chiappetla, R.P., Marhard, R.C. & Steiner, V.A.,1987. Explosives and Rock
Blasting. Chapter 11, pp 321410, Adas Powder Company, 662 pp.
Dowding, C.H., 1996. Construction Vibrations. Prentice Hall, 610 pp.
Pang, H.Y.,1976. Field Studies of Structural Response to Blasting Vibrations and
Environmental Effectr. Lehigh University.
Simms, D.R., 1994. A Good Neighbors Policy", the Evolution of 0 & G IndusMes, Inc.S Public
Relation Policy Working with Local Towns. Pmc. 12th Annual Conf. On explosives and
Blasting Techniques, Society of Explosives Engineers, Austin, TX, pp 46'1-4'18.
Siskind, D.E., Stagg, M.S., Kopp, I.W. & Dowding, C.H., 1980. Structure Response and
Damage Produced by Ground Vibration from Surface Mine Blasting. U.S. Bureau of
Mines RI 8507,'14 W.
Siskind, D.E., Stachun, V.I., Stagg, M.S. & Kopp, I.W., 1980. Structure Response and Damage
Produced by Airblastfrom Surface Mining. U.S. Bureau of Mines 818495,111 W.
Siskind, D.E. & Stagg, M.S., 1994. Surface Mine Blasting Near Transmission Pipelines. Mining
Engineering Journal, December Issue, Volume 46, No.12, pp 1357-1360.
Siskind, D.E., Stagg, M.S., Pierre, WE. & Crum, S.V.,1996. Low -Frequency Blast Vibrations
ata High Water Table Site. Pmc.12th Annual Symp on expletives and Blasting
Re earch, Society of Explosives Engineers, Odando, FL., pp 21-31.
Stagg, M.S., Siskind, D.E., Stevens, MG., & Dowding, C.H., 1984. Effects of Repeated Blasting
an a Wood Frame House. U.S. Bureau of Mines 818896, 82 pp.
Sutherland, L.C.,1968. Sonic and Vibration Environments for Ground Facilities ...A Design
Manual. Report for NASA, Contract NASB-11217, 633 W.
TLaenen, IR. & Windes, S.L.,1942. Seismic Effects of Quarry Blasting. U.S. Bureau of Mines
Bulletin, 442, 83 pp.
White, T., Parnfield, R., & Kelly, M. 1993a The Effect of Low Level Blast Vibrations and the
Environmenton a Domestic Building. Pmc. 9th Annual Symp. On Explosives and
Blasting Research, Society ofExplmives Engineers, San Diego, CA, pp 71-81.
While, R., Parnfield, R, & Kelly, M., 1993b. The Effects of Surface Mine Blasting on Buildings.
Proc., 4th International Symp. On Rock Fragmentation by Blasting (Pragblast4), Vienna,
Austria, pp 105-111.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 15
APPENDIX B
Selected Particle Velocity Damage Criteria
SELECTED PARTICLE VELOCITY DAMAGE CRITERIA
Selected particle velocity damage criteria are listed as follows:
1. Langefom, Kihls[mm, andWesterberg(1951):
Particle Vebcity
Damage
2.8 in.hec
No noticeable damage
4.3 in.hec
Fine cracks and fall of plaster
6.3 in.hec
Cracking of plaster and masonry walls
9.1 in.hec
Serious cracking
2. Edwards and Northwood based their criteria in correction with the St. Lawrence Project in
Canada (1959):
Particle Vebcity
Damage
≤2 in./cec
Safe; no damage
2-4in.hec
Caution
>d in./cec
Damage
3. USBM (1901):
Particle Vebcity
Damage
<2 in./cec
No damage
2.0 - 4.0 in./cec
Plaster cracking
4.0 -7.0 in./eec
Minor damage
>7.0 in.hec
Major damage to structure
4. Canmet,Bauer, and Calder (1977) established damage for equipment and structures:
Pattice Velocity at
Type of$hutere
Type of II
which Da®geSb%dx
ItigiAty mourned nemury ewi¢W
'hip out
0.5 ia/eec
Houses
Plaster cracking
2 m./seu
Cmcmte blocks m anew home
(racks in book
8 in./eec
CaWdill hdw
Horizontalofaa
15 inhec
Mechmicel a uipnent, pumI canpreasae
Shts misaligrod
40 inha
Pmfeleimtd mad building on co rate pads
Cracked pods. building
60 ids¢
twisted and dismmd
APPENDIX C
Farmington, AR Quarry
- USBM Data Plot (03/09/09 to 09/08/09)
- Seismic/Airblast Measurements Obtained in the
Surrounding Community
a
iiiiin�iiiiii•
iiuu
i�
111•ih
■IISIII•■IIIII.■
III.I.
■IIIIIIInIihII■
IIIIII
IIIII9UIIIIII�
IIIII
1iiiui•illllle
IliuM
1111111
uii•uri
iiIIif•■III...
m•uvi�liin■��m����
111■Ihi€II
111111�
II
1111114
II
!lIIII�
IIIur
ii
!uu
.,
IIIII■I
iii'
null
111111 I�
(MBN(wA l 1101WAIA
mm
VIBRA-TECH EVENT SUMMARY
ROGERS GROUP
FARMINGTON QUARRY
ZIMS DATA
04/2109
0t58 PAl
0504
NE OF Pr
7a) Ft.
485
128
0.0044
O.5
81
0.270
88
0.8
88
0.20
05/19109
O5 FM
87
NE OF Pr
7 Ft.
481
l4
0.004
0.048
03
0.423
50
0.395
28
0.020
05/19109
05 PM
85
#1 - NEAR THE WARD RES.
84 Ft.
481
l0
0.0O31
0425
7
0.018
10
0.018
0
0.8
05/19109
05 PM
87
#2- NEARTHEMAIN RFS.
2)5 Ft.
481
110
0.0025
0.040
17
0.038
14
0.053
l
0.8
05/19109
05 PM
0500
fl- NE MARK RCH RE4TAL
4875 Ft.
481
00
0.02
0.025
0.018
50
0.025
0.008
05/19109
PM
0550
#4 - NE THE AUSTIN RES.
1452 Ft.
481
110
0.0027
0.133
40
0.08
80
0.123
36
0.020
05/19109
05 FM
0455
#5 - NEARTHEGALLAGE RES.
l2 Ft.
481
118
0.23
0.048
50
0.048
40
0.070
40
0i0
05/19109
05 FM
0017
#0 - NEAR THE CRLJULFV RFS.
2501 Ft.
481
117
0.0O
0.055
10
0.050
O
0.055
I
0.010
G7/2l4
1141 MI
97
NEOF Pr
9 Ft.
440
127
0064
0.(8
0.
18
0.160
10
020
08/04109
l:l4 PM
07
NE OF Pr
000 Ft
404
110
0.09
0.105
4
0.100
0
0.105
10
0.00
08/18109
I :l 8 FM
87
NE OF Pr
010 Ft
40
15
0OJ49
0.108
14
0.185
10
0.170
II
0420
ll;ll MI
g7
NEOFPr
677Ft
415
118
0(8
0.660
89
0.668
25
0.525
46
0.(0
09/08109
II;I2MA
g7
NEoFPr
804Ft
40
112
0.0013
0i5
0
0425
I
0420
18
020
CONTINUOUS SEISMIC RECORDER
APPENDIX D
Farmington, AR Quarry
- Linear Regression Analysis (03/09/09 - 09/08/09)
Rogers Group - Farmington Quarry
Linear Regression Analysis
03/09/09 to 09/0&09
RUsting.Analysis IntenuM1ond. Inc.
GROUND VIBRATION/AIRBLAST
DAMAGE INSPECTION
Ward Residence
1048 North Hamstring Road
Fayetteville, AR 72704
(Claim No. P413 129 779)
Preparedby
R. Frank Chiappeaa BSc., MSc.
Explosives Applications Engii er
BLASTING ANALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Explosives, Seismic & Mining Specialists
371 Daniel Street, Allentown, PA 18104
(610) 530-7415 • fax (610) 395-5552
btutnganaly is@mn.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND OPINIONS .........................1
1.0
INTRODUCIION..............................................................................................................
6
1.1
Ward Residence ..............................................................................................................
7
1.2
Concerns Voiced by the Owners .....................................................................................7
2.0
RESULTS OF INSPECLION— EXTERIOR OF HOME..................................................9
2.1
Norm Side.......................................................................................................................
9
2.2
West Side......................................................................................................................
13
2.3
South Side.....................................................................................................................
17
2.4
East Side........................................................................................................................
21
2.5
Cmwl Space..................................................................................................................
23
2.6
WaterWell ....................................................................................................................
25
3.0
RESULTS OF INSPECLION—INTERIOR OF HOME.................................................28
3.1
Living Room.................................................................................................................
29
3.2
Kitchen -Dining Area.....................................................................................................
31
3.3
Hall to Bedrooms..........................................................................................................
36
3.4
Bathroom.......................................................................................................................
35
3.5
Bedroom No. I ..............................................................................................................
31
3.6
Bedroom No. 2..............................................................................................................
31
3.7
Bedroom No. 3 (Master Bedroom)...............................................................................
38
4.0
BLAST DESIGN REVIEW AND SEISMIC/AIRBLAST ANALYSIS ..........................
40
4.1
Seismuc/Aifilast Results ...............................................................................................
60
4.2
Vib,ation Levels Plotted on USBM Damage Cdtaia..................................................40
4.3
linear Regression.........................................................................................................
62
4.4
AGblut Results.............................................................................................................
65
4.5
Vib,ation/Aifilast Regulations .....................................................................................
65
APPENDIX A Understanding Ground Vibration/AGblut Levels and Damage
APPENDIX B
Selected Velccity Damage Cdtaia
APPENDIX C
USBM Data Plot
Seismic/Airblast Measurements Obtained in the Community
APPENDIX D
Linear Regression Analy is
GROUND VIBRATIONIAIRBLAST DAMAGE INSPECTION
Bradley Ward Restdence
1018 North llamtring Baal
Fayetteville, AR 72701
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENOATIONS AND OPINIONS
Blasting Analysis International, Inc. (BAI) completed a full blot damage inspection of the Ward
residence and waterwell on Augns[27, 2009 with an emphasis on the majoramas of concern
void by the owner. Analyse consisted of a complete external and internal on -site inspection
of the home and water well, a mview of the blztdesign parameter usedat the quarry,
eismicIairblast measurements taken in the community between 034)9/09 and P9/08d)9,
comparison of the data against the USBM damage criteria anda linear mgmnsion analysis. The
Wardhome was located approximately 3,1® feet (0.6 miles) from the blast zones. Primary
conclusions, opinions and recommendations am summarized as follows:
1. Blasting did notcontributeto any ofthe claimed structural damages pertainingto
the Ward residence or water well, even asa minor aggravating factor.
2. No local, State or Federal laws were violated pertaining to the maximum
allowable ground vibration orairblast levels.
3. According to the owner, the claimed structural damages to their home occurred
within the first two months after they moved into their now home during the
January -February, 2009 time frame. Blasting from the Rogers Group
Farmington quarry in 2109 did net start until 03/09N9.
4. A total of 20 verifiable seismic/aeblzt measurements and their accompanying relevant
blast design parameters were reviewed and analyzed for the period between 03/094)9
and 09/08/09. All of the seismic measurements wem obtained at distances varying
from approximately 680 to 4,375 feet from the blast zones. The maximum explosive
weight per delay used on the blasts varied between 34 and 526 pounds. This data were
analyzed in two ways. First, the seismic dam was plotted against the USBM damage
critedagmph for 1-2 story residential stmctures, to determine the blast damage
potential Second, a linear Ingmrion analysis was performed on the data to determine
BLASTING ANwla® INTERNATIONAL, INC.
the wont pmsible vibration levels to reach the Ward readevice, even if no direct
measurements were obtained at the Ward residence.
5. Direct ground vibration measurements at the Ward residence ranged from No Trigger
to 0.025 inhec.
6. Aceording to the United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) damage criteria established
fort to 2 story residential stluct res, minimum vibration levels ofatleast 0.50 in/sec
would be required to cause cosmetic surface haidine cracks in plaster; 0.75 to
2.00 in/sec to cause drywall cracks depending on the wave frequency; 3 to 4 in/sec to
came cracks in mortar fdl, mortar finish or bricks; 2.0 to 2.4 to cause cracks in freshly
poured concrete (0- d hours); d to 8 inhec ro cause cracks in fully cured concrete (7-
10 days); and 10 to 40 inhec to cause structural distortions, such as wallsrceilings to
separate, frames to distort, floors to sag or lift up and doorways to go out of
alignment, etc. The correct combination of the vibration wave frequency matching the
resonant frequency of the structure, and very long shot durations must also be present
to nucleate the onset of any new cracks.
7. Aplotofallthe seismic data against the USBM damage thresholdgraph clearly
showed thatnone of the vibration levels ex eded the damage threshold for drywalt
This applies to any residential or commercial stmcture in the surrounding community,
including the Ward residence.
8. The weakest structural component member in the Ward home was the drywall, which
required minimum vibration levels of 0.75 to 2.0 in/sec., depending on the predominant
frequencies, to cause cracks. Now of the vibration levels in the surrounding
community exceeded the damage threshold for drywall at the Ward home. In addition,
no blutinduceddrywalcncks were found anywhere in the Wardhose. Since
blasting did not contribute to any drywall cracks, it negates all of the claimed damages
pertaining to the Ward home, because all of the other material and stuctual damages
required contadenbly higher levels than the vibration levels required to cause drywall
cracks.
9. A linear regression analysis was also performed on the data to estimate or predict what
the avenge and worst case vibration levels could be expected at the Ward home.
Linear regression is a reliable statistical mathematical means of predicting the expected
BLASTING AnALVSss Irtl'F.m'Unonpywc.
vibration levels at distances which were closer, in between, or farther away from where
the actual eisrmcaiblast measurements were taken, within reasonable tolerance
limits. Both the avenge and upper 95% confidence intervals were used in the analysis.
However, only the more conservative and restlictive upper 95%confidence interval
was used in forming the final conclusions.
10. if we take the largest weightofesplmives used per delay on the blots as 524 pounds,
anda distance of 3,100 feet the home would have received on average, a vibration
amplitude of 0.04 in/sec. This seismic disturbance would be equivalent to the vibration
levels measures on a kitchen floor from an adult walking normally anon the floor.
11. If we now aame the wont possible case condition by using the more restrictive 95%
upper confidence limit line of the regression analysis, the maximum weight of
explosives used on a blast as 542 pounds, anda distance of 3,100 feet from the blast
zones; the maximum possible vibration level which the Ward home could have
received would have been no roam than 0.07 in/sec. This is a very conservative
estimate because the calculations aame that Igll of the shots between 03MA9 and
09A8/09 were fired with 524 the per delay, even though the majority of the blots were
fired with much lea explosives. The linear regression analysis also clearly showed
that the highest possible ground vibration levels to reach the Ward residence could not
have caused any damage to the home or water well.
12. The vertical mortar tracks along all of the block foundation walls were most likely
caused by a combination ofweathedng, mortarfill shrinkage, and inadequate drainage
around the foundation walls of the home. Vibndov levels between grid uhee
would be requiredto cause mortar fill tracks. Ifwe aame that blasting caused the
mortar tracks along the foundation wall blocks, extensive drywall cracks would be
expected in every mom in the home, but this was not the case.
13. The home was situated on flat ground, and them were no gutter or downspouts installed
anywhere on the home to drain run-off roof water away from the foundation walls of
the home. Although the trawl space was dry at the time of the blest damage
inspection, it was obvious that water had accumulated in the trawl space in the past,
particularly along the back South foundation watt. Them was no drainageayatem in
the trawl apace to channel water away from underneath the home.
BLASTING An ALla® INTERNATIONAL, INC.
14. Water getting under the foundation base of any stnrcmm will eventually lead to some
northing through wet/dry, freeze/thaw and thermal cycling over prolonged periods.
Minor settling was beginning to show by the stepped hairline mmhr fill crack in the
foundation wall blocks along the back South wall near the SW cover. Stepped mrtar
crocks are indicative of some settling. Unless the inadequate water drainage problem
is permanently corrected, the ownem can expect accelerated settling along the
foundation walls, new mmhr fill cracks to develop, and existing cracks to widen and
elongate overtime. Moderate to severe foundation watt settling will cause (loom to go
off level, comer walljuncrtoos to separate, and doom/windows to become offset from
their frames. Vibration levels of between 2 and20 in/ ec would be mquiredto affect
the integrity of the soil around the concrete poured footers for the foundation walls and
the center block support in the center of the crawl space, depending on the soil
characteristics and footer depths below the frost line.
15. What appeared to the owners as cover wall separations in the NB comer of the dining
room andin the SE corner of the master bedroom were nothing more than paint
shrinkage. Vibration levels of between 10 and 60 in/sec would be mquired to cause
comer watt junctions to separate.
16. The straight-line drywall crack found on the South watt open entrance to the hallway
was along a tape seam. Blasting does not cause perfectlyetmight-line cracks in
drywall. Typical blast induced drywall cracks are always diagonal in nature, because
all walls are plavars[mcturos. Vibaton levels of between 0.75 and 2.0 in/sec would
be inquired to cause drywall cocks, depending on the associated frequency with the
peak vibration level
17. Blasting had nothing to do with the water well filter having to be replaced on a weekly
basis. The well was 70-80 yearn old, and the floor of the water shed was completely
water saturated, implying that them could be aleakin theeyetem. This problem was
stringy related to the age and maintenance schedule of the water well. Blasting did not
cause the water table to drop, damaging the well or causing the dirty water. Minimum
vibration levels of at least 5 inhec would be required to affect the well casing, fittings
or water containment mnorvoir.
BLASTING AX4LVSss IM'F.BNNTYONNy INC.
18. In terms of a1blu4 levels of at least 150 dB would be required to cause strucnual
damage, usually stlrting with cracked windows. The highest airblast level recorded in
the residential community was 12'1 dB on 0721,V9, at ad st nm 932 feet Bom the
blur zones. The Ward residence was 3,100 feet from the blast zones. This level was
not high enough to have caused any of the claimed structural damages. However
airblast levels of 125 dB or greater could have been "felt, heard or cened" by
cccupuB in the home. Sensing, hearing or feeling the effects of airblast does not
mean that permanentstluctural damage was ustained. This i5 perhaps one of the most
difficult concepts for mmthomeownem to uceptor understand. Refer to Appendix
for a more detailed aceount of the psychological response to airblast
19. The homeowners can rest assured that blasting from the Rogers Group Farmington
query is not causing any stmcNml damage to their home or causing the dirty water in
their water well.
BLASTING AnALVSss Irtl'F.m'U honpywc.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Blasting Analysis International, Inc. (BAI) was commusioued by the Rogers Group insurance
company to conduct an independent bleat damage inspection of the Ward dwelling, which was
located at 1048 North Hamstring Road, Fayetteville, AR 72704. The dwelling was located
approximately 3,100 feet (0.6 miles) from the bleat zones. The investigation also included a
review of the detailed bleat design parameters and ceumic/airblzt measurements obtained in the
surrounding community during 2009.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the alleged damages resulted from the
quarry blasting and%or if the damages were caused by other sources and/or activities. This report
u based and qualified on the following:
1. An on -site inspection of the Ward dwelling on August 21, 2009.
2. A review of the blast design parameters used at the quarry.
3. A review of all ceurmc/aubleat measurements obtained in the surrounding
community in 2009.
4. Meetings and/or discussions with representatives from the Rogers Group, Austin
Powder Company, Vibra-Tech Engineem, and one of the homeowner.
5. Digital photographs and field notes pertaining to the Ward home.
BAT is an international engineering consulting group specializing in bleat damage amessments
for madddential and commercial structures, blasting audits, custom bleat designs, bleat monitoring
instrumentation and Vining. To date, BAT has evaluated, mnitomd, designed and/or supervised
over 6,7W fulacale blasts spanning 25 counvies, including hundreds of bleat related property
damage claims. Such projects included the entire fist major Expansion and Deepening of the
Panama Canal between 1995 and 2002.
BAl certifies that itis completely independent and is not amaiated with the financial busivea
activities of the Rogers Group, the homownem, the Austin Powder Company or Vibra-Tech
Engineers,normthe saleofexplosives and/orrcckpmducta. Ourservices wensm iuedstdctly
as an independent engineering funs to eases the alleged damages from an engineedng and
scientifcslandpoint.
BLASTING ANwla®INTERNATIOnpy INC.
1.1 Ward Residence
The Ward residence is acne story structure built over acrawl apace on concrete block
foundation wags. The center supports were grouted concrete blocks, which were placed on
concrete poured footers. The siding along the exterior wags of the structure consisted of a
decorative concrete based material which looked like wood aiding. The home was completed in
eady20D9, making it appmximrtely8-9 mntha old The current owners moved into the
dwelling in the January -February, 2009 time from. A ]0 -80 year old water weft was also on
the Ward property.
Common materials used in the construction of the hors were concrete blocks, mortar fill,
concrete based aiding, asphalt shingles, word board flooring, drywall, wood frama, and
wood/aluminum framed doom and windows.
Utilities consisted of central electric heat, central A/C, well water and aseptic tankaystent
1.2 Concerns Voiced by the Owners
A number of concerns were voiced by the owners regarding blasting from the quarry:
Exterior of Home
Cracks on all sides of the home, along the mortar fill in the block foundation watt blacks.
Some mater fail deterioration along the foundation watt blacks.
Interim ofHom
Corner walljunction separations in the diving area and master bedroom.
Drywall crack at the hallway entrance.
Filter needed to be replaced every week due to dirty water.
BLASTING ANwxa®Irt emSATIGNAL, INC.
According to Mr. Ward, his initial main concerns were with mortar cmcks/separations along the
foundation wall blocks of the home, and the necessityof having to replace the water wait filter
every week Accordingto the owners all of these problems accurred within l-2 months after
they moved into their new home in January -February, 2009. It should be noted that the first bleat
at the Farmington quarry in 2009 did not tske place until 03/09A9.
Mr. Ward stated that the water well was at least 70-80 yearn old, which went back to his
grandmothefs day. Mr. Ward does not mean ever having to replace the water well filter as
frequently as every week He believes that blasting affected the water able, damaged his well,
and was the cause of the dirty water.
Mr. Ward stated that he was very pleased with the blast levels form the quarry within the last 2 to
3 months, compared to bleating within the firs[ quarter of 2009. If the blast levels could remain
as they are currently, W. Ward stated he would have no bleating concerns.
W. Ward stated that his greater concern with bleating was from the nearby dirt farm. Mr. Ward
observed the dirt farm bleats to throw material very high up into the air, causing excessive
airblast anddispemeddutatlover the neighbmhoed W. Wardwouldtike the dirtfarm to
conduct cont,lled bleating similar to that done at the Rogers Gmup quarry within the last 2 to
3 months.
BLASTING AnALIR® IM'F.BNATION INC.
2.0 RESULTS OF INSPECTION - EXTERIOR OF HOME
A complete interval and external inspection of the Ward dwelling was completed, with an
emphasis on the major areas of concern voiced by the owners. The investigation was partially
accompanied by one of the ownem, who was very accommodating, cooperative and patent
throughout the entire inspection pmcem. Documentation was achieved with digital photographs,
a video and field notes.
For reference purposes, the front of the home Asing North Hamstring road has bean designated
as North, although it may not necessarily represent true North. All digital photographs have
been labeled as'P?', where xis the photograph number. Some sections in Appendices A and B
may be referred to throughout this report to put some things into perspective, and to also help the
reader in understanding the seismicIairblast levels which can and cannot cause damage. Detailed
eismiclairblast results taken in the community and comparison of the data to the USBM damage
criteriaare presented in Appendix C. A linear regression analysis of the data is presented in
Appendix D.
2.1 North Side
P1
P1 Norm side-Overallviewof the home, frontwalkway,andthe terrain. The terrainwas
completely flat on all sides around the home. Although the extedor siding appears to be wood, it
was actually a concrete basedalding. No majorstuotural pmblems were found anywhere along
this side of the home.
BLASTING ANAI.ISIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
P2
P2 North side —Close up of the concrete based siding and oofoverhang. No structural or
commode defects were noted in any of the roof overhangs or along the siding.
P3
P3 North side —NE cornerofthe fontporch roofunderside. Noproblems werenotedalong the
corner junctions in the porch oof or in any of the vertical oof supports.
BLASTING AnALYSIS In TER ATIONNy INC. 10
Pd
P4 Normside —Top left-hand corner of window Wl. The window frames consisted of wood and
aluminum No blast induced problems were found in either of the two windows on this side of
the home.
From dDor
P5
P5 Normside —Top left-hand corner of the front door. Nostroctural, offset or alignment
problems were found around the front door. ALL of the exterior and interior doom opened and
closed freely with no problems.
BLASTING AnALYSIS IrlfemrpnonpymC. II
P6
16 North side —Top right-hand comer of window W2. No problems were noted around the
window frame or along the surrounding siding. According to the ownem, the broken window
pane was caused by a lawn mower kicking debrisIr ks up into the air.
P7
P/ North side —Footsteps anddeck area in frontofthe foot doorentmncc. The step, deck
boards, mils and vertical roof supports were all tmatedwoad No obvious stmctmal or cosmetic
problems were found along any of the wood works.
BLASTING AnALYSIS IrlfemvpnonpymC. 12
2.2 West Side
Pe
P8 West side —Overall view of the dwelling, terrain and gravelddveway. The terrain was flat
on this side of the home. Note that there were no gutters installed on the home. The main
concern here was relatedto four mortar cracks along the block foundation walls. The owner
claimed that these cracks developed within the fast Ito 2 months after they moved into the new
home
P9
P9 West side —NW comer of the front porch area No gutterm were installed on this side or the
oppoate East side of the home.
BLASTING AnALYSIS INt Anonnywc. 13
P 10
Pl0 Wes[side — Top right-hand corner of window W2. NostrooWvlpmblems were found in
any of the windows. All of the windows on the home opened and closed freely. The comer
condition shown hem was typical of the other windows on this side of the home.
P 1
Pll Westside— Bottom section of window W2. Damage to the inside blind was not related to
bluting.
BLASTING AnALYSIS INremvnnonny INC. 14
Front I
NN
Come! oyoing
Ut
1lolaIii
Or k
Fw neomr ral:eboa
P 12
P12 Westaide— Foundation wall area in the NW corner. A vertical crackseparation was noted
along the corner block These types of cracks were a major concern to the ownem.
sums
Fnunantlw: wnll a ran HaidIneverftaI
Lelavv wlrox W2 rmabr fill crack
P 13
P13 West side —Foundation wall area below window W2. A hairline vertical mortar crack was
noted in the top Mockler.
BLASTING AX4LVSIS IN1'rmvnnonny INC. 15
AP npnae!PmA@n®swucnd'
Vent Va
Foundation nail Vellwl hairline
Mora, mortar fill crack
z a v
now -``...iii, _!
P 14
P16 Westside—Foundation wall area below vent No. d. A vertical haidine crack was notedin
the block works.
P15
P15 Westside— Foundation wall area in the SW comer. Here some oldie mortar fill had
deteriorated and fallen out amend the top comer block. Note thA the horizontal mortar fill was
at"l completely intact
BLae'1'Car. Arvna.xa®INa'rmvpnopywc. 16
23 South Side
WI wz -t:l
y...'P
Founnuailm wall cracks�
Back a'ouh Sloe
P 16
P16 South side — Overall view of the house and tensln. The tensln on this side of the home was
flat The main concern in this area were three mortar cracks along the foundation watt blacks.
No structural problems were noted around the windows or along the siding.
P 17
P17 South side — Top section of the roof ovefiang. No obvious poblems were noted along the
siding or roof ovmhangs.
BLASTING AX4LIR® InTERNATIONNy INC. 17
P18
P18 South side — Bottom left-hand comer of window W1. All of the windows on this side of the
home were stmcturally intact. The comer condition shown here was typical of the other
windows on this side of the home.
SW
Comer -
SIEIn3
Morhrfill
creck �J
__ __.. . VenIV1
Foundation wall
'.'�,.. blinks
P 19
P19 South side — Foundation watt area in the S W corner around vent No. 1. A hairline mortar
crack was noted to the immediate left of the vent Again, these types of cracks were a major
concern to the ownem.
Bweftnc Ary xa® INremvn'Tionpy INC. 18
Sirlind
Mortar
L cracks
Foundation vjall
bbda
P20
P20 South side — Foundation will blacks to the right oldie crawl apace entrance door. A
stepped mmhr crack was noted in the block works. Stepped mortar cracks are indicative of
some settlement.
Wall area between windo Wl and W2
P21
P21 South side — Close up oldie aiding between windows WI and W2. No problems were
found with any of the siding of the home.
BLASTING AnALISO INI'F.m4AnonAL, INC. 19
P 22
P22 South side — Foundation will area in the SE comer. A vertical separation was noted along
the mortar fill in the top comer black. Note that the horizontal mortar fill was completely intact,
and that the comer top blackis still in place. This implies that the mortar fi0separation was due
strictly to the quality of the mortar fill and shrinkage.
P 23
P23 South side — Close up of the mortar fill shrinkage shown in P22.
Bwenric Ary "m IrlfemvAnonpymc. 20
2A East Side
P 24
P24 East side —Overall view of the dwelling and retrain. The retrain on this side of the home
was also perfeefyflat, as was the retrain on all sides of the home. Note that no gutiem were
installed on thisside of the home. The main concern here was asingle hairline mmhrcnck
along the foundadon wall blocks.
No gutters
P 25
P25 Eastside —SE comer of the roof overhang. Note the lack ofagutrer and downspoutsystem
to channel roof water away from the foundation walls of the home.
BLASTING AiALIR® INrEIe4ATIon INC. 21
P 26
P26 East side —Bottom right-hand comer of window WI. All of the window flames on this &de
of the home were in excellent s[mctuml condition. The comer condition shown hem was typical
of the other windows on this side of the home.
vela va
Vertical hairline Fourdatbn Hall
mortar crack hluckr
.e
P 27
P27 Butaida —Foundation watt area below vent No. 2. A barely visible vertical mortar fill
crack was noted below the vent.
BLASTING Arvwxa®INa'rmvpnonpyINC. 22
Side door
P 28
P28 Past side—Topsecdon of the aide door. No problems were found around the door frame or
along the surrounding siding.
2.5 Crawl Space
P 29
P29 Crawl apace — Overall view looking at the North wall. No obvious structural problems were
found along any of the exterior foundation walls or along any of the center block supports.
BLASTING Arvwxa® INTERNATIONAL, INC. 23
P 30
P30 Crawl space — Close up ofasection of the West watt foundation blocks. No obvious
structural problems were found along any of the foundation walls in the crawl apace. Also, none
of the exterior mortar cracks along the outside of the foundation watt blacks had penetrated
through the watt into the crawl space.
P31
P31 Crawl apace— Example of one ofthe center block mpports. Attofthecenter blocksuppmts
were grouted and placed over concrete poured footem. No obvious stnrctural, settlement or
leaning problems were found in any of the center supports.
BLASTING AnALYSIS Irleem4AnonpymC. 24
P32 Crawl space — Close up of the floor section along the South watt. This was a low spot in the
crawl space for the collection of water, but the crawl space had no drainage system to channel
water out of the crawl space. At the time of this inspection the floor was dry, but it was obvious
in this low spot that water had gotten into the crawl apace in the past Water getting underneath
the foundation walls of any st ucture can lead to settling over pmlonged periods ofweVdry and
finevehbaw cycling.
2.6 Water Well
P 33
P33 Water well —Overall view of the shed housing the water well. According to the owners, this
well was at least 70-80 years old. The main concern here was that the owners had to mplace
the water filter weekly. The owners believed that bluting caused the water table to change,
causing damage to their well and thus creating the dirty water.
BLASTING AnALYSIS Irltem4Nnonny INC. 25
P 34
P34 Water well— Will section to the left of the door. A number of paint filled mortar cracks
were noted in the block works. But, the ownem had no concerns with damage to the block works
from blasting.
P 35
P35 Water well- Wall section to the right of the door. A number of paint filled mortar cracks
were also noted in the block worm. Again, the ownem had no concerns with damage to the
block works fromblu[ing.
Bwenric Ary wsms Irtfemvnnonpy Pvc. 26
P 36
P36 Water well —Overall view of the inside of the shed housing the water well The floor was
completely water saturated. Because Were were a number of storage hems on the floor, it was
not clear lithe water on the floor readied fmm recent rain falls or from leakages in the water
well/pumping system. It was obvious that the shed and well system were very old.
P 37
P37 Water well —Close up of the water filter, which was very discolored, blackened and dirty.
According to the owners, the water filter has to be changed every week The owner believes that
blasting caused the water tablet change, resulting in damage to their well system, and the cause
of the dirty water.
BLASTING AnALYSIS Irteemvpnonpywc. 27
3.0 RESULTS OF INSPECTION - INFERIOR OF HOME
Figure 3.01 Jlustratea agenerabzed plan view of the mom layout in the Ward home. Note that
the drawing is not to scale, and that some of the door entrances and/or windows may have been
purpo ely left out for clarity. The drawing ia only intended to show where the moms are relative
to each other for mfemnee purpmes.
North Fgel Door
Dining
Area
Uvir
Roam
tl
en
WE
er
r
om
om3ter
South WAN Pesd.a FiTSIb, AR
FiguteJ.01- Generalized plan vim tithe home layout. Notto scat¢.
BLASTING AN "ts INrESNAnoNAlywc. 28
3.1 Living Boom
P 38
P38 Living mom —Overall view looking at the entrances into the hallway and kitchen/dining
room. The floor was word boards, and the walls ding were drywall. Everything in the living
room was in excellent structural condition.
R1 mp
Dwaloraijon is
from painthig.
Thesearonot NW
P 39
P39 Living mom —Close up of the NW Sling/wall comerjunction. No cncks,sepmations or
other problems were found in any of the corner junctions in the mom. The comer condition
shown here was typical throughout the mom
BLASTING ANALYSIS INrERNATIoNAL, INC. 29
T
Discoloration is
fmm painting
South wall
P 40
P40 Living more —Sloped ceiling section over the South wall. ALL of the comerjunctions were
intact. The discoloration along the cornerjunctions was due to incomplete painting, not from
water leaks. Paint d scolorations were found in many rooms of the home.
P41
P41 Living mom —Level placedon the floor in a West —Past direction in front of the front door
exit. ALL of the zooms with woodfloom were found to be level in all directions.
BLASTING Arvwxa s Iwremvpnonpywc. 30
3.2 IGtehen-Dining Area
P 42
P42 iLitohen,Dining area —Overall view looking at the Past watt diving area The floor was
continuation of the wood boards from the living room, and the walls and ceiling were all drywall.
The main concern in this area pertained in a perceived partial separation in the bottom half of the
NE corner wall junction.
P 43
P43 Kitchen/Dining area —Overall view of the kitchen area looking at the South watt entrance
door into the washer/dryer room Everything in the kitchen was in excellent structural condition.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INr'Em4ATlonhy INC. 31
Ceiling
TOP of
NE Amer
P 44
P44 Kitchen/Diving area —NE comer ceiling/wal unction. The top section of this corner wall
junction was completely intact, but according to the ownem the bottom section near the floor had
separated
Comer
separation
Bottom of
NE corner
P 45
P45 Kitchen/Dining area —NE comer waljunction near the floor. what appearedto the owners
as a waljunction separation was due only to paint shrinkage. The gap between the floor
molding ends had nothing to do with blasting.
BLASTING Arvnt.ia s INeemvnnonnywc. 32
West wall
cupboards
P 46
P46 Kitchen/Dinivg area—Clo a up of the Westwall cupboards against the will. Allot the
cupboards and counter tops were intact against the walls.
P 47
P47 Kitchen/Dining area —South wall entrance door into the washer/dryer room. No problems
were noted with any of the mitered door comer in the home. Everything in the washer/dryer
room was in excellent structural condition.
BLASTING ANwxa® INTERNATIONAL, INC. 33
3.3 Hall to Bedrooms
P 48
P48 Hallway to bedrooms —Overall view of the hallway leading into the bedroom area The
floor was wood boards, and all the walls and ceiling were drywall. The fist door on the right of
the hallway was aclmet, the second mom on the right was bedroom No. 1, and the lit door on
the tight was bedroom No.2. The fist door on the left of the hallway was the batmom, and the
second door on the left was bedroom No. 3 (Master bedroom). The main contour at the hallway
entrance was relatedto a drywall crack.
P 49
P49 Hallway to bedrooms —South wait open entrance into the hallway. A small barely viable
stress crock was noted at the corner, which connected to a tmight-line tape seam separation.
BLASTING AnALYSIS INrEIe4ATIonAL, INC. 34
CoiIin /1
South wall clasc4 door
P 50
P50 Hallway to bedrooms —Ceiling and cornerjunctions at the end oldie ha0way. ALL of the
comer junctions, clown moldings and mitered door flame comers were iniact.
3A Bathroom
PSI
P51 Badrreom —Overall view looking at the SE corner. Here the floor was carpeted, and the
wallstceiling were drywall. No major stmctural problems were found in this mom.
BLASTING An\LL5® INrEIe4ATIonAL,wc. 35
oeilrng
We
lies
SE
Corner
P 52
P52 Bathmom—SE comer o ling/walljunction. No cracks, separations or other emblems were
foundin any of the comerjunctions. Thecorner condition shown hem was typicalofthe other
junctions in the room. Buckling out of the wallpaper trim had nothing to do with blasting. This
was due primarily to condensation.
ceiling
NW corner ever
the bathtub/ahovrer
P 53
P53 Hallway —NW comer ceiling/walljunction over the bathWWshower area. All of the comer
junctions in the mom were compleWly intact.
BLASTING Arvwxa®INeemvpnopywc. 36
35 Bedroom No.I
At the time of the inspection for this room, the owner's two young daughters were taking their
afternoon nap. The owner did not want their daughters disturbed while they were sleeping, and
thus no digital images were taken in bedroom No.1 at the request of the owner. However, a
walk through this bedroom earlier in the coming with the owner did not reveal any stocmml
problems.
3b Bedroom No.2
sw
Corner
P 54
P54 Bedoom No. 2 — Ovemfl view looking at the SW corner. The floor was tiled, and the
wallsociling were all drywall. No significant strocWml problems were found anywhere in the
room.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INI'P.BNATIonAL, INC. 37
P 55
P55 Bedoom No.2— Se cmnercelinghvadjonction. ALL of the commjovctiovs in the mom
were intact with no problems. The comer condition shown here was typical W ooghoot the
room.
3.7 Bedroom No. 3 (Master Bedroom)
P 56
P56 Bedoom No.3— Overall view looking at the SE comer. The floor was carpeted, and the
walslceding were drywall. The main concern here wasmlatedto a separation in the Se corner
wall junction.
BLASTING Ary rsrs INremvpnonpywc. 38
SE[IXO&
Nrallju bm
Slight
separation
P 57
P57 Bedroom No.3— Close up of the SE comer wattjunctim. What appeared[o me ownem as
comer separation was due only to paint shonkage.
North wall door
P 58
P58 Bedroom No. 3 — Top section of the North watt door. No structural ofbet or alignment
problems wen found around the door. All of the doom and windows in the home opened,
closed, and lacked freely with no problems.
BLASTING Ary "m INTERNATIONAL, INC. 39
4.0 BLAST DESIGN REVIEW AN]) SEISMIC/AmBLAST ANALYSIS
The seismic data was analyzed in two ways. Pi* the data were plotted against the USBM
(United States Bureau of Mines) damage criteria to deter®ve the pmbablity of any strucmnl
damage. Second, a linear regrn ion analyse was performed on the data to determine what the
highestpossible vibration level the Ward residence could have received, even if no monitoring
was done directly at the Ward residence
4.1 Seismic/Airbbtl Results
A total of 20 ceumic/airblast measurements and then accompanying blast design parsmetem
were renewed and analyzed for the period between 03oD9/09 and 09/08099. No blasting
occurred at the quarry in 2009 prior to 03A9/09. The owners moved into their home in January -
February, 2009. The maximum verifiable weight of explosives per delay used on the shots
ranged from 34 to 524 lbs. The measured seismic amplitudes in terms of the peak particle
velocity ranged from 0.015 to 0.66 in/sec, at frequencies ranging from 6 to 63Hz. Airblast
levels ranged from % to 127 dB. All measurements were t ken over distances ranging form
approximately 680 to 6,375 feet from the blast zones. The Ward residence was located
approximately 3,100 feet (0.6 miles) from the actual blast zones. Detailed eeismic'airblast
results, anda plot of the data results against the USBM damage criteria, are presented in
Appendix C.
4.2 Vibration Levels Platted an USBM Damage Criteria
According to the Indent United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) damage criteria established for
one to two story residential dwellings, and from other reseamhem, ground vibration levels of
over 0.50 In/sec would be required to cause cracks in plaster, 0.75 to 2.0 in/sec to cause drywall
cracks depending on the frequency, at least 3 inhe to cause mortar cracks, 2.0 to 2.4 inhe to
cause races in freshly poured concrete (0- d hours old), d ro 8 inch/sec to cause cracks in fully
curedconcrete (7-10 days old), andwed over 10 in/sec to cause strocmmlderortions. In
addition, the correct combination of vibration amplitude, resonant frequency energy and very
long shot durations would be requiredto cause permanent damage. Refer to Appendices Al
andB for more technical details.
BLASTING ANALvs® INr'Emgnnonpywc. 40
Figure 4.21 illustrates a plot of all the vibration meumemenB on the USBM graph, which were
collected in 2009 since 03/09/09. The USBM graph is a plot of ground vibration amplitude
vemu frequency. As long as a vibration measuement is not above the solid or dashed redlines
within a specific frequency range, no structural damage is possible. The USBM damage criteria
is very stringen4 but also a very wncervative threshold of damage. It does not mean that
damage is guaranteed to occmjust by going over the damage threshold limit. Bsimply means
that the probability of damage goes up. The higher the threshold limit value is exceeded, for a
particular building material, the higher is the probability of damage. If the vibration
measurement falls below the solid or dashed red lines for specific frequency ranges, no suucNnl
damage is poveible.
Note that none of the seismicampltudes acceded the damage threshold linesfor either
plasterordrywall at their respective frequencies.
Rnv iton dnr NMlbn Mas.*M
0UB6b®UB®
__
__
_
_!.
ii
a�
r�i��
aaiMw��r�pp
�■■III■
111a--I■
s>ff_
__
__
�iiirrirrt���
-I.
r :.Iau11■u11■
!
lf1Y
_.
__.
■ul1■_VIII■
Figure 421—USBMgraph plat for seismic measurements obtained between
03N9/09 and 09/0S/09 in the surrounding community. None of the blasts resulted in
vibration amplitudes which exceeded the damage threshold lines foreitherpbdcr
or drywall.
BLASTING AnALYSIS Iwtemvnnowny INC. 41
The weakest structural component member in the Ward home was the drywall, which required
mivirwm vibration levels between 0.75 and 2.0 ivhec to cause permanent damage. None of the
vibration levels form the quarry blasting exceeded the damage threshold for drywall at any time,
and no blot induced drywall cracks wem found anywhere in the home. Since blasting did not
exceed the drywall damage thmsholdin the home, itnegates all oldie otherstmcWral damage
claims, because those material damages, structural distortions and displacement tolerances
required much higher vibration levels than the levels required to cause drywallcracks. Direct
vibration measurements at the Ward residence were between No Trigger to 0.025 in/sec.
Thus, the vibration levels were not high enough to have caused any of the mortarcracks along
the block foundation walls, or any comer waljunctiom to separate in the interior oldie home.
4.3 LinarRegression
Linear regression analysis allows one to predict what the expected vibration levels would be at
distances or at homes in which no direct vibration/airblast measurements were available. For
example, the seismic measurements taken form the quarry blasts were collected at distances
between 680 and 4,375 feet away. linear regression allows one to confidently predict the
vibration levels for homes which might be located closer than 680 ft, father away than 4,375 ft,
or any distance in between. The Wardhome was lorated3,100 feet (0.60 miles) from the blast
zones. This type of analyse also allows one to predict the worst possible levels of vibrations
which could have reached the home.
Linear regression develops a plot of the peak particle velocity versos scaled distance. Scaled
distance relates the measured or predicted gmund vibration level to the distance from the shot
poin4 and to the maximum weight of explosives per detonation usedon each blast.
BLASTING ANALYSIS INI'F.m4AnonAL, INC. 42
Remits are presented in Figure 4.31, with the general rega mion equation as:
PPV = 145.19 (D/Wm)—L®
Where:PPV - Feakpartirle velocity(in/mc)
D - Distance from shot(ft)
W - Maximum weight of explosives per detonation (lb)
The values 145.19 and -1.68 are the calculated geologic site constants forthe area. The basis of
this equation was used to predict both the avenge and worst case seismic levels expected at the
Ward home.
If we tke the largest verifiable weight of explosives per delay melon the bluB as 542 lbs, and
the distance from the shots as 3,100 feet, the estimated avenge vibration level to mach the Ward
residence would have been 0.04 in/sec. This would be equivalent to the vibration levels
measured on akitchen floorfmm an adult walking normally across the floor.
If we now man= the wont possible case condition, by using the mme maximum weight of
explosives of 542 lbs, but with the 95% upper limit line equation shown in Figure 4.31, the
vibration levels at the Ward home would NOT exceed 0.0] in/sec. This is avery conservative
estimate because it mmme thatIgll of the shots were f red with a maximum weight of explosives
of 542 lbs, even though the majority of the shots were fired with leas explosives. Using the
upper limit line 95%confidence interval also aaommdatea for low correlation coefficients in
the data analysis. However, it is import rat to note that the conclusions contained within this
report relied on only the more restrictive and conservative 95% upper confidence interval, and
were not based on the avenge.
(Based an the linear regressions analyds, the ground vibration levels could not have caused
any damage to the home or waterwell, even in the word case renariaa
BLASTING Arvns.va® INrEANATtoNN., INC. 43
RopersCroup - Fennmgmn Que rry
Linor R®oim And.
S3/O9/09 to LL9/Ig/O9
Blasii Aovly,i 1nIerwiooalr be.
Figure 431 -Linear regrerdon analyis
BLASTING AiX LIS®INTERNATIONAL, INC. 44
4A Atrblast Revels
In terms of akblu4 minimum levels of at least 150 dB would be required to cause physical
damage, usually stlrting with cracked windows. No blast induced broken window panes were
found anywhere on the Ward residence. The broken window pave at the front of the home was
caused by a lawn mower kicking up jocks and debris. The highest airblast level recorded in the
community was 12] dB on 0]/28A9 ata distance of 932 feet from the blot zones. The Ward
residence was located 3,100 feet away from the blast zones. Direct aifilast measurements at the
Wardresideoce were between No Trigger to 120 dB. Thus, the airblast levels were also not high
enough to have caused any tnsctmal damage to the home or water well
However, airblast levels of 125 dB or over could have been "felt, heard and/or sensed" by the
homeowners, but they would not high enough to have caused any of the claimed structural
damages.
45 Ybrtion ktrblast Regulations
No local, SMW or Federal regulations pertaining to the maximum allowable vibration and aifilast
amplitudes were violated by the Rogers Group Farmington Quarry.
NAY-WWRF�NIVMDI3]�B
BLAS'T'ING AiALISIS INr'F.BPU'TIon INC. 45
• • • • ' I jl i ; I ' I
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDITION
Benton County Daily Record
P.O. BOX 1607
FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72702
PHONE: 479-571-6421
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
RECEIVED
N0V 1 1 2009
BY:
I, Cathy Wiles, do solemnly swear that I am Legal Clerk of the Arkansas
Democrat Gazette newspaper. Printed and published in Benton County
Arkansas, (Lowell) and that from my own personal knowledge and
reference to the files of said publication, the advertisement of: City of
Fayetteville —Ordinance 5281
October 30, 2009
Publication Charge : $ 414.26
Signed:
==J ------
Subscribed and sworn to before me
This 4 day of 70t f, jc.) , 2009.
Notary Public Q, a./N2, 1.
V
My Commission Expires: lkla.y- 4, 020/02
Do not pay from Affidavit, an Invoice will be sent
ORDINANCE NO. 5281
AN ORDINANCE TO PREVENT INJURY OR ANNOY-
ANCE WITHIN
THE
CORPORATE
ITIES WILL NOT aye evl e
TEVILLE BY REGULATING RED DIRT MINING
FACILITIES SOTHAT THESE FACILITIES
BE NUISANCES ARKANSAS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas recognizes the need for
red din mining facilities to supply necessary red dirt for building construction, parking lot
and road construction within and near the corporate limits of Fayetteville, and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has listened to experts and citizens and deter-
mined that any blasting that could be used in red din mining could cause nuisance effects
upon nearby structures (especially homes) and their inhabitants; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has also learned and determined that without the
reasonable regulations required by this ordinance an operating red dirt mining facility can
cause vibrations, dust, ground upheaval. loud noises, fumes and other deleterious effects
within a mile from the red din mining facility to such an extent that the red dirt mining facil-
ity would be a nuisance to Fayetteville citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council has also heard from citizens living near an exist-
ing and operating red dirt mining facility and determined that unregulated blasting, dirt
excavating, dump truck loading, dump truck tailgate banging and other red dirt mining
facility activities would be a nuisance to Fayetteville citizens and potentially damaging to
their property and city streets; and
WHEREAS, unless the frequency of blasting, its distance from houses, the elimination of
dump truck tailgate banging, the hours end days of red din mining facility operation near
residences to prevent noise, dust and fumes in excess of ADEO limits from escaping the
red dirt farm are properly regulated and controlled, such a red dirtmining facility would con-
stitute a nuisance to Fayetteville residents and citizens and should be abated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS!
Section I That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville. Arkansas hereby enacts Chapter
113 Rock Quarries and Red Dirt Mining Facilities of the Code of Fayetteville. Article 11 Red
Din Mining Facility Operating License as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
and APPROVED this the 20th day of October, 2009.
APPROVED.
ATTEST:
By:
BY:
LIONELD JJORDAN, Mayor
SONDRA E. SMITH, City CIarWMasurer
EXHIBIT -A
ARTICLE II.
Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License
§113.11. Finding of Nuisance and Need for Abatement
The City Council of the City of Fayetteville. Arkansas determines and finds that the opera -
ion of a red dirt mining facility would be a nuisance to the citizens and City of Fayetteville.
Arkansas if operated or used other than as prescribed In §113.12 and, therefore, should be
abated by the reasonable regulations required by this ordinance.
§113.12. Regulations to Abate Nuisance
(A) Rock Blasting/Use of Explosives.
(1) No blasting shall be allowed within 60 yards of any house within the city limits of
Fayetteville.
(2) No blasting explosive charge or location shall exceed the most restrictive limitations
within federal, state and Washington County regulations or laws.
(3) All blasting within the permitted rod dirt mining facility shall only be allowed between
the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. on the first and third Wednesday of each month
unless such Wednesday is a federal or city holiday. II such Wednesday is a holiday, the
permitted blasting day will be moved to the next day (Thursday). If the permitted blasting
day would be unsafe or not feasible or practical because of inclement weather or other con-
dition beyond the reasonable control of the quarry operator, the C irector of Development
Services may designate another weekday during me next live weekdays as a permitted
blast day
(4) Upon timely request by the red dirt mining facility operator, the Director of Development
Services or designee is empowered to grant a variance of the time limitations for rock blast-
ing if inclement weather or other condition beyond the reasonable control of the operator
has caused a safety issue that requires blasting outside the 1000 n until 3:00 p.m. per-
mitted period. Re -notification is not required unless blasting is moved to another day.
(5) The red dirt mining facility operator shall notify by telephone the Director of
Development Services and any Fayetteville neighbor within a mile of his quarry who has
requested such notification at least two hours prior to rock blasting.
(B) Operation of Red Dirt Mining Facility.
(1) All rod dirt mining facilities within the city limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond
me city limits of Fayetteville shall only be eflowetl to operate during the period of 7:00 a.m.
until 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and during 7:00 em, until noon on Saturday. No
major noise producing activities shell occur before 8.30 am. or her
4:30 p.m. one week-
day or anytime on Saturday or Sunday. No red dirt mining facility shall be allowed to oper-
ate an a federally recognized holiday or Sunday.
(2) All red dirt mining facilities within the city limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond
the city limits of Fayetteville shall be prohibited from any operations until the owner/opera-
tor of such facility has obtained a vatid, annual Red Dirt Mining Operating License. This
license to operate shall be issued by the Fayetteville Planning Department on a fiscal year
(July 1 through June 30) schedule with no fee assessed.
(C) Dust, Mud and Rock Control Measures.
All red dirt mining facilities within the city limits of Fayetteville or within one mile beyond the
city limits of Fayetteville shall only be allowed to operate with the following safeguards and
measures to ensure that dust, din, mud, loose rock, and all other possible irritants or nui-
sance substances do not adversely affect Fayetteville residents. It is the express continu-
ing duty of the licensed red din mining facility operator to ensure all of these safeguards.
requirements and measures are constantly enforced.
(1) Dust control measures. Water or other substances or measures most be fully effective
during the operation of the red dirt mining to ensure the red dirt mining facility is in lull and
continual compliance with the requirements of the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Contra
Act as administered by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality. A violation of
the permit conditions required by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality can
be grounds for a suspension or revocation of the City's Red Din Mining Facility Operating
License. (See§133.15)
(2) Dirt and mud control measures. The red dirt mining operator is required to ensure that
any and all vehicles leaving the red dirt mining facility shall have all mud and dirt removed
from the tires and exterior parts of the body of all vehicles prior to exiting the site onto pub-
lic roads.
(3) Red dirt. The red dirt mining operator is responsible to ensure that all dump trucks leav-
ing the red dirt mining site that may utilize any city street and are carrying more than halt a
truck load of red dirt have)heir load fully and properly covered. _
T] 1wH
gate
rate
mp truck identifying number. inormer Tor citizens to easnyand correctly identify
licks and their owner/operators who are servicing the red din mining facility, the red
ing operator shall require any dump truck accessing or servicing his facility to have
to read four digit number at least six inches high and twelve inches wide on the tail
the dump truck. The red dirt mining operator shall maintain an up-to-date and accu-
of the owner and operator of each numbered dump truck and shall immediately
he owner and operators name, address and contract information to any Fayetteville
rte, official or citizen who requests such information.
dump trucks with proper identifying number may be loaded. The red din mining
r shall not load or permit to be loaded or permit to exit the red din mining facility any
uck unless the identifying number specified in subsection (4) is clearly legible, easy
and not obscured by din, mud or otherwise.
(D) Control of Dump Truck Tailgate Banging
It is the express duty of the red dirt mining facility operator to prevent a dump truck deliv
eying anything to the red dirt mining facility or receiving red din from the facility to engage
in Dump Truck Tailgate Banging as defined in §113.04 (E) at any time upon its property.
The red dirt mining facility operator shall keep a record of the owner/operator and number
of the offending dump truck to include the date and time of the occurrence. No dump truck
which has banged its tailgate shall be loaded or otherwise serviced for a full operations
day of the red dirt mining facility after the incident to include all day Monday if the tailgate
banging occurs after 4:30 p.m. Friday or anytime on Saturday or Sunday. Leading or serv-
icing such dump truck during this suspension shall constitute a violation of this ordinance
and the Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License.
13: Jurisdiction of This Ordinance.
Pursuant to A.C.A. §1454-103(1), this ordinance to abate a nuisance shall be applicable to
any and all red din mining facilities located within the corporate limits of Fayetteville and for
one (1) mile beyond the city limits as prescribed in A.C.A. §14-262-102.
§113.14: Definitions,
(A) 'Red dirt mining' means any open excavation used for obtaining red dirt or other type
of soil used for paving or building purposes.
(B) 'House" means any habitable structure including a mobile or manufactured home, a
dwelling, a residence, an apartment, a condominium a dormitory, a hotel or motel.
(C) -operation of Red Din Mining Facility' means any blasting, operation of any mechani-
cal equipment on the premises of the red din mining fecitity or any operation of dump trucks
or other large vehicles on the premises of the red din mining site. Starling, running the
engine or moving any equipment or dump truck on the premises shall constitute operation
of the red din mining facility.
(D) 'Major Noise Producing Activities' means blasting, rock breaking, dump truck tailgate
banging, and the use by the red din mining facility operator of non -static backup warning
devices on its loader or other major equipment. Rock crushing within a half -mile of a house
within the city limits of Fayetteville is also a major noise producing activity.
(El "Dump truck Tailgate Banging' means the avoidable and loud banging of a dump truck
tailgate used to vibrate the bed to loosen material in the bed sought to be dumped. The
relatively quiet bang that might be unavoidable wren a dump truck load is dumped and the
truck moves away form the pile without applying the truck's brakes is not regulated by this
ordinance.
113.15: Issuance, Suspension or Revocation of License.
(A) Issuance. The Director of Development Services or designee shall prepare and issue
an annual Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License upon proper application of an
owner/operator of a red dirt mining facility within the jurisdiction of this ordinance after
ensuring the owner/operator will be in full compliance with all requirements of this ordinance
and has all other current and valid federal, state and county permits required for red dirt
of Development Services may suspend a Red Din Mining
up to thirty (30) days for violations of the terms of the license
14 Hevocatmn. The Director of Development Services may revoke a Red Din Mining
Facility Operating license for repetitive, continuing, intentional, or substantial violations of
the requirements of this ordinance. The Director of Development Services may require ade-
quate assurances that any operator whose license has been revoked will fully comply with
the Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License before reissuing another license,
(0) Appeal. Any person whose license has been suspended or revoked pursuant to this
section, may appeal such suspension or revocation to the City Council by providing the City
Clerks Office with a written request for City Council review within ten business days of the
issuance of suspension or revocation. The City Council may then determine whether the
red dirt mining facility owner/operator violated the requirements of the ordinance and, if so,
whether suspension (up to 30 days) or revocation is appropriate for such violation.
§113.16: Penalty.
(A) Any owner, lessor or lessee of real property upon which is located a red dirt mining
facility and any operator, manager, or employee of such red dirt mining facility shall ensure
such facility is operated within the limits of this ordinance and shall be guilty of a criminal
violation for any violation of the requirements of this ordinance.
(B) The Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License may be revoked or suspended by the
Director of Development Services after a due process hearing for an owners, managers,
operator's, employees, or lessee's violation of any terms or limits within this ordinance or for
operating the red din mining facility not in conformity with its Red Din Mining Facility
Operating License.
(C) Any owner, operator, manager, lessee or employee of a Red Dirt Mining Facility shall
be guilty of a criminal violation if such person operates the red din mining facility in viola-
tion of any of the terms of this ordinance, without a current and valid Red Dirt Mining Facility
Operating License, or in violation of any of the terms of his Red Dirt Mining Facility
Operating License.
ID) Each violation of the operational hour limitations or the number of blasting events
allowed by this Ordinance or the applicable Red Dirt Mining Facility Operating License shall
constitute a separate violation of this ordinance and shall be punishable by a fine of up to
pc. M
§ 113.17: No reduction in property owners right to sue for nuisance.
Nothing in this ordinance removes or reduces a property owners right to sue or seek an
injunction against any owner or operator of a red dirt mining facility if a court of competent
jurisdiction finds that such facility constitutes a private or public nuisance to that property.
r
4i. NuED
IN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
ROGERS GROUP, INC. PLAINTIFF
vs. Case No. 09-5926
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS DEFENDANT
AFFIDAVIT
Comes now Sondra Smith, Fayetteville City Clerk and Treasurer and after being lawfully
placed upon her oath, swears or affirms as follows:
I am Sondra Smith, the elected Fayetteville City Clerk and Treasurer. I am the lawful
custodian of documents presented to the City Council for their consideration when the aldermen
are deciding whether or not to amend and pass ordinances and resolutions for the City. I have
certified the Minutes of the City Council meetings in which the Rock Quarry Operating License
Ordinance was discussed, amended and finally passed. I have also certified the Agenda Packets
that were provided to the City Council for each of those meetings (September 1, September 15,
October 6 and October 20, 2009).
During the City Council meeting of October 20, 2009, Mr. Darin Matson, Division Vice
President and General Manager of Rogers Group, Inc. handed out to the City Council, Mayor,
City Attorney and me a document titled "Farmington Quarry 2009 YTD Blast Summary," which
he represented to be a list of all the blasts the Rogers Group had done since April of 2009 and
which is attached as Exhibit A to the City's Answer and also to this Affidavit.
Included in the Agenda Packet supplied to the City Council during its meetings of
October 6'h and 20th is a letter from the Rogers Group, Inc.'s attorney with proposed amendments
and a proposed amended ordinance which are also attached to the City's Answer as Exhibit.
... FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NOT ...
Signed this date: fl - -Q
SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
NOTARY OATH
State of Arkansas )
) .ss
County of Washington )
On this the .ZO -day of November, 2009 before me, Judith Housley, a Notary Public,
personally appeared, Sondra E. Smith and known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same for the
purposes therein contained.
In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
Notary