Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5161 Doc ID : 012453040006 TVDe : REL Recorded : 08/25/2008 at 04 : 03 : 56 PM Fee Amt : $40 . 00 Pace t of 6 Mashinoton Countv . AR Bette StaMoS Circuit Clerk File200840028232 ORDINANCE NO. 5161 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 08-3022, STONEWOOD GARDENS, LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CROSSOVER AND ALBRIGHT ROAD; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 3 .36 ACRES; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From R-PZD 04-04.00, Residential Planned Zoning District to R-PZD 08-3022 Stonewood Gardens as shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master development plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council; further, that the conditions of approval shall be filed and available for viewing in the office of the City Clerk/Treasurer of the City of Fayetteville. Section 3 : That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of the requirements of the master development plan have been met. Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above. T46 y eve 00 R PASSED and APPROVED this 5th day of August, 2008. rU ; p OFAYETTEVILLE ; APPROVE ATTEST- rz: ` .9S,KANSP� �'� By: 4By: �•'`y„v 0 DA COODY, Mayor SON51WSMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer ZIP ¢ tvx, '.?rgn^i4�tlri�r`G'�'�`YY�, t �, a'IAS Mir+°" "13t`x'v"`4Yk`" .Isi> r§ v-44 -�- =t ' ��'�W �.��e °^ k�• � mai '�a\ � � �: �� ws�'�y-H a � eeee OR - 'a", .is \ 4.Y ac` T' yMy ` 5f ^xs iF WPM $ 3 e5k P e Y a +5" Ks MI i+is ` NO Milli .fes F �^^ �`��� � aYy �y �`%\ ,Um""�&✓ 'si�u��sr �� {rA t Fn � ma+.? � � � �u. '\-lb?, ° '` {Ex' > r 'Anr� .e EXHIBIT "B" R-PZD 08-3022 PART OF THE SE 1 /4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 18, T17N, R29W IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NW CORNER OF SAID SE 1 /4 , SW 1/4 THENCE S00026502"E 110.00 FEET TO THE P.O.B., THENCE N89033 '5811E 122.33 FEET, THENCE S32050929"E 378. 17 FEET, THENCE S00026102"E 231 .35 FEET, THENCE S89040340"W 325 .00 FEET, THENCE N00026'02"W. 549.99 FEET TO THE P.O.B.; CONTAINING 3 .36 ACRES MORE OR LESS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY OF RECORD. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: R-PZD 08-3022 Page 1 of 3 Conditions of Approval for R-PZD 08-3022 (Stonewood Gardens): 1 . At minimum, staff will recommend that Stonewood Court be constructed to include a stub out for a future east connection, including pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains, and a 5 ' sidewalk on both sides. A turn lane may be needed at the entry to Crossover Road. Staff will likely recommend money in lieu of sidewalk construction and other street improvements along Crossover Road. 2. Staff recommends in favor of the proposed connectivity finding that the proposed future connection will be beneficial to the neighborhood. In addition, the applicant is proposing pedestrian access to the south, to provide connectivity to those undeveloped lots. 3 . Curb-cuts shall be limited to a maximum width of 16' at the right-of-way and shall be at least 5 ' from the property line. Shared driveways may be located on the property line. All driveways shall otherwise meet the standards established in Chapter 172 Parking and Loading. 4. This project is required to go through preliminary plat and final plat review and approval. 5 . The applicant shall dedicate right-of-way for Crossover Road and Stonewood Court pursuant to the Master Street Plan at the time of final plat approval. 6. Project phasing. The applicant shall have one year from City Council approval of the PZD to receive preliminary plat approval, one year from the date of preliminary plat approval to obtain all development permits, and three years to obtain final plat approval with a one year extension available for each time limit pursuant to Chapter 166.20 of the Unified Development Code. 7. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building setbacks or utility easements. 8 . Buildings shall be constructed to be consistent with the elevations and concepts depicted in the building elevations in the booklet as specified. Building elevations will be reviewed at the time of preliminary plat, final plat and building permit to ensure compliance. All homes shall be designed with a "front fagade" fronting onto Stonewood Court and to have varied facades to provide variety within the overall development. Articulation shall be required for the west facades of the houses adjacent to Crossover Road (Lots I — 5). 9. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code for single family residential subdivisions. 10. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments, and Architectural Standards submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the project with CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: R-PZD 08-3022 Page 2 of 3 review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the City Council shall also be binding. 11 . This development shall be required to comply with the Tree Preservation requirements (25% minimum canopy) as set forth in the Unified Development Code at the time of development, subject to approval by the Urban Forester. 12. Prior to preliminary plat submittal, the applicant shall submit the development plans to the Parks Recreation and Advisory Board for review and recommendations regarding parkland dedication. 13 . Landscape requirements as outlined in Chapter 177 shall be required with development plat approval. 14. An ornamental fence shall be constructed along Crossover Road at the time of development as proposed in the Master Development Plan; along with a vegetative buffer of trees and shrubs. The fence shall not impede pedestrian access at the south boundary of the subject property. 15. The location of fire department connections shall be approved and shown on the final plat. 16. All new street names and addresses shall be approved by the GIS Division. 17. The following revisions shall be made: a. Page 4. Include in the paragraph about phasing and timeframe a statement regarding the timeframe for final plat approval, as the development will be required to receive Planning Commission approval of both preliminary and final plat requests prior to the issuance of a building permit. b. Page 5 . Add a column for a 0-foot side setback requirement for accessory structures to allow for the proposed shared garage on Lots 10 and 11 . c. Page 7. Add "Accessory Structures" to the far left column under Setback Requirements. d. Page 2 of the site plan. Add "Lot Width Minimum" under Bulk and Area Regulations. e. Page 2 of the site plan. Add the setback requirement for accessory structures. f. Extend the 8' pedestrian access easement between Lots 7 and 8 to the southern boundary of the subject property. Standard Conditions of Approval: 18. Impact fees for fire, police, water, and sewer shall be paid in accordance with City ordinance. 19. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: R-PZD 08-3022 Page 3 of 3 applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications). 20. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 21 . All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed utilities shall be located underground. 22. Street lights shall be installed adjacent to all public and private streets (not alleys), with a separation of no greater than 300 feet. 23 . All exterior lighting is required to comply with the City's lighting ordinance. A lighting plan and cut-sheets of the proposed exterior light fixtures shall be required to be approved by Planning Staff prior to building permit. 24. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required: a. Grading and drainage permits b. An on-site inspection by the Landscape Administrator of all tree protection measures prior to any land disturbance. C. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation area. d. Project Disk with all final revisions e. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by Section 158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 1 . City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form /5 163 City Council Agenda Items 51 �; i and :�Pzb D8 Contracts, Leases or Agreements ! , , • 1016 August 5, 2008 �a 4vz�aalS City Council Meeting Date Agenda Items Only Jeremy Pate Planning Operations Submitted By Division Department Action Required: R-PZD 08-3022: Planned Zoning District (Stonewood Gardens, 60): Submitted by Jorgensen & Associates for property located near the southeast corner of Crossover and Albright Road containing approximately 3.36 acres. The request is for zoning and land use approval of a Residential Planned Zoning District with 15 single family dwelling units. Cost of this request Category I Project Budget Program Category / Project Name Account Number Funds Used to Date Program I Project Category Name Project Number Remaining Balance Fund Name Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached 77 - MD6 Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Department 'recto Date Original Contract Date: 0 Original Contract Number: City Attor Date Received in City REQ Clerk's Office Finance and Internal Service Director Date // Received in ��p• Mayor's Office Mayor Da e Comments: Revised April 16, 2007 City Council Meeting of August 15, 2008 Agenda Item Number CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor and City Council Thru: Gary Dumas, Director of Operations \p From: Jeremy C. Pate, Director of Current Planning a' Date: July 15, 2008 Subject: Residential Planned Zoning District for Stonewood Gardens (R-PZD 08-3022) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of an ordinance creating a Residential Planned Zoning District (R-PZD) for Stonewood Gardens, based on the development standards, plans and statement of commitments submitted. This action will establish a unique zoning district for a single-use project on approximately 3 .36 acres. The proposal consists of 15 detached single-family homes with shared drives and zoning criteria indicative of the RSF-8 zoning district. BACKGROUND In May of 2004, the City Council approved a Residential Planned Zoning District (R- PZD) on the subject property for 12 single family dwellings on a gated, private street that ended in a cul-de-sac in the R-PZD zoning district. Prior to that approval, the property was zoned R-0, Residential Office. Because the original developer could not finish the project, the applicant submitted a revised proposal in 2007 that included the subject property and two additional properties to the south for a total of 4.64 acres within two planning areas, containing 21 attached dwelling units and 7 detached dwelling units and a street connecting to the cul-de-sac south of the subject property. On November 26, 2007, the Planning Commission voted to forward the revised request to the City Council with a recommendation of approval and the condition that the applicant construct an additional street and stub-out to the east. Unable to move forward to the City Council with the second proposal, the applicant submitted a revised zoning and land use proposal for the original 3 .36 acres, containing one planning area with designated green space and 15 detached single family homes with shared drives. The density proposed for the project (15 dwelling units on 3 .36 acres) is 4.46 dwelling units/acre. The proposal includes one interior public street, to which all lots will front, with a stub out to the east for future connectivity and a public pedestrian access easement and 4' sidewalk for future connection to the properties zoned R-0 located to the south of the subject property. Similar to the previous proposal, the single- family lots are indicative of the RSF-8 zoning district criteria with a typical lot width of 50 feet and reduced front setbacks. City Council Meeting of August 15, 2008 Agenda Item Number DISCUSSION The Planning Commission voted 7-0-0 in favor of this request on July 14, 2008. Recommended conditions were approved by the Planning Commission and are reflected in the attached staff report. BUDGETIMPACT None. ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 08-3022, STONEWOOD GARDENS, LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CROSSOVER AND ALBRIGHT ROAD; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 3 .36 ACRES; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From R-PZD 04-04.00, Residential Planned Zoning District to R-PZD 08-3022 as shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master development plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council; further, that the conditions of approval shall be filed and available for viewing in the office of the City Clerk/Treasurer of the City of Fayetteville. Section 3 : That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of the requirements of the master development plan have been met. Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section I above. PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2008. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: By: DAN COODY, Mayor SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer 4 r 8 Y '• F x ; -1 5��.eYe�roy ' S'v r �� ��� ,r 5 � A k Y - - N '2 ,4�+�� �✓} ' . Y� tet" '> .'- �"i <cy� ,� •� � .�`s^"F.�.a�� r"T-.'`�irK r<� � y `�� � � 3.t• }'Yf4 . � '- `S��y'^jl} v tY3 ` r 4 c I e A , EXHIBIT "B" R-PZD 08-3022 PART OF THE SE % OF THE SW '/a OF SECTION 18, T17N, R29W IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NW CORNER OF SAID SE 1/4 , SW '/< THENCE S00026102"E 110.00 FEET TO THE P.O.B., THENCE N89033758"E 122.33 FEET, THENCE S32050129"E 378. 17 FEET, THENCE S00026502"E 231 .35 FEET, THENCE S89040740"W 325.00 FEET, THENCE N00026'02"W 549.99 FEET TO THE P.O.B.; CONTAINING 3 .36 ACRES MORE OR LESS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY OF RECORD. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: R-PZD 08-3022 Conditions of Approval for R-PZD 08-3022 (Stonewood Gardens): 1. At minimum, staff will recommend that Stonewood Court be constructed to include a stub out for a future east connection, including pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains, and a 5' sidewalk on both sides. A turn lane may be needed at the entry to Crossover Road. Staff will likely recommend money in lieu of sidewalk construction and other street improvements along Crossover Road. 2. Staff recommends in favor of the proposed connectivity finding that the proposed future connection will be beneficial to the neighborhood. In addition, the applicant is proposing pedestrian access to the south, to provide connectivity to those undeveloped lots. 3. Curb -cuts shall be limited to a maximum width of 16' at the right-of-way and shall be at least 5' from the property line. Shared driveways may be located on the property line. All driveways shall otherwise meet the standards established in Chapter 172 Parking and Loading. 4. This project is required to go through preliminary plat and final plat review and approval. 5. The applicant shall dedicate right-of-way for Crossover Road and Stonewood Court pursuant to the Master Street Plan at the time of final plat approval. 6. Project phasing. The applicant shall have one year from City Council approval of the PZD to receive preliminary plat approval, one year from the date of preliminary plat approval to obtain all development permits, and three years to obtain final plat approval with a one year extension available for each time limit pursuant to Chapter 166.20 of the Unified Development Code. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building setbacks or utility easements. 8. Buildings shall be constructed to be consistent with the elevations and concepts depicted in the building elevations in the booklet as specified. Building elevations will be reviewed at the time of preliminary plat, final plat and building permit to ensure compliance. All homes shall be designed with a "front fa�ade" fronting onto Stonewood Court and to have varied facades to provide variety within the overall development. Articulation shall be required for the west facades of the houses adjacent to Crossover Road (Lots I — 5). 9. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code for single family residential subdivisions. 10. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments, and Architectural Standards submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the project with review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the City Council shall also be binding. 11. This development shall be required to comply with the Tree Preservation requirements (25% minimum canopy) as set forth in the Unified Development Code at the time of development, subject to approval by the Urban Forester. 12. Prior to preliminary plat submittal, the applicant shall submit the development plans to the Parks Recreation and Advisory Board for review and recommendations regarding parkland dedication. 13. Landscape requirements as outlined in Chapter 177 shall be required with development plat approval. 14. An ornamental fence shall be constructed along Crossover Road at the time of development as proposed in the Master Development Plan; along with a vegetative buffer of trees and shrubs. The fence shall not impede pedestrian access at the south boundary of the subject property. 15. The location of fire department connections shall be approved and shown on the final plat. 16. All new street names and addresses shall be approved by the GIS Division. 17. The following revisions shall be made: a. Page 4. Include in the paragraph about phasing and timeframe a statement regarding the timeframe for final plat approval, as the development will be required to receive Planning Commission approval of both preliminary and final plat requests prior to the issuance of a building .permit. b. Page 5. Add a column for a 0 -foot side setback requirement for accessory structures to allow for the proposed shared garage on Lots 10 and 11. c. Page 7. Add "Accessory Structures" to the far left column under Setback Requirements. d. Page 2 of the site plan. Add "Lot Width Minimum" under Bulk and Area Regulations. e. Page 2 of the site plan. Add the setback requirement for accessory structures. f. Extend the 8' pedestrian access easement between Lots 7 and 8 to the southern boundary of the subject property. Standard Conditions of Approval: 18. Impact fees for fire, police, water, and sewer shall be paid in accordance with City ordinance. 19. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications). 20. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 21. All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed utilities shall be located underground. 22. Street lights shall be installed adjacent to all public and private streets (not alleys), with a separation of no greater than 300 feet. 23. All exterior lighting is required to comply with the City's lighting ordinance. A lighting plan and cut -sheets of the proposed exterior light fixtures shall be required to be approved by Planning Staff prior to building permit. 24. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required: a. Grading and drainage permits b. An on -site inspection by the Landscape Administrator of all tree protection measures prior to any land disturbance. c. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation area. d. Project Disk with all final revisions e. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by Section 158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ARKANSAS eeville PC Meeting July 14, 2008 THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479) 575-8267 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Dara Sanders, Current Planner Matt Casey, Assistant City Engineer THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning DATE: July ,8 2008 Updated July 15, 2008 R-PZD 08-3022: (STONEWOOD GARDENS, 060): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES for property located at THE SE CORNER OF CROSSOVER AND ALBRIGHT. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT and contains approximately 3.36 acres. The request is for Zoning and Land Use approval of a Residential Planned Zoning District with 15 single family dwelling units. 0 Planner: Dara Sanders Findings: Property Background: The subject property is located adjacent to Crossover Road and was initially approved by the City Council in May of 2004 for 12 single family dwellings on a gated, private street that ended in a cul-de-sac in the R-PZD zoning district. Prior to that approval, the property was zoned R -O, Residential Office. Most of the waterlines and sewer lines have been installed, a portion of the drainage has been installed, and the street has been "cut -in". Because the original developer could not finish the project, the applicant submitted a revised proposal in 2007 that included the subject property and two additional properties to the south for a total of 4.64 acres within two planning areas. The proposal contained 21 attached dwelling units and 7 detached dwelling units, an overall density of 6.03 dwelling units/acre, designated green space, and a street connecting to the cul-de-sac south of the subject property. On November 26, 2007, the Planning Commission forwarded the revised request to the City Council with a recommendation of approval and the condition that the applicant construct an additional street and stub -out to the east. Unable to move forward to the City Council with the second proposal, the applicant has submitted a revised zoning and land use proposal for the original 3.36 acres. Proposal: The applicant proposes one planning area with designated green space and 15 detached single family homes with shared drives. The density proposed for the project (15 dwelling units on 3.36 acres) is 4.46 dwelling units/acre. The proposal includes one interior public street, to which all lots will front, with a stub out to the east for future connectivity and a K IReports120081PC Reportsll3-July 1418-PZD 08-3022 (Stanwood Gardens).doc public pedestrian access easement and 4' sidewalk for future connection to the properties zoned R -O located to the south of the subject property. Similar to the previous proposal, the single- family lots are indicative of the RSF-8 zoning district criteria with a typical lot width of 50 feet and reduced front setbacks. The applicant proposes hidden garages and shared drives to reduce pavement and promote traditional residential development. Surrounding land use and zoning are listed in Table 1. Table I: Surrounding Land Use/Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning North Single family RSF-4, Single Family Res. 4 DU/Acre South Single family R -O, Residential Office East Single family RSF-4, Single Family Res. 4 DU/Acre West Lake Fayetteville, Botanical Gardens R -A, Residential Agricultural Request: The request is for zoning and land use approval only for a Master Development Plan of a Residential Planned Zoning District with 15 single-family detached lots and I detention pond. If the PZD is approved as proposed the project would be required to go through preliminary and final plat approval prior to development. Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Crossover Road (Principal Arterial Parkway) Right-of-way to be dedicated: Right-of-way in the amount of 53.5' from centerline for Crossover Road and 25' from centerline for Stonewood Court shall be dedicated with approval of the final plat. Staff recommends money in lieu of sidewalk construction along Crossover Road for the preliminary plat of the development. Connectivity: Currently, Castlewood Lane ends in a cul-de-sac. The applicant proposes to remove the cul-de-sac and curve Stonewood Court to the east property line for a future connection to the neighboring residential developments. Phasing: The applicant is proposing to develop the property in one phase. The applicant shall have one year from City Council approval of the PZD to receive preliminary plat approval, one year to obtain all development permits, and three years to obtain final plat approval with a one year extension available for each time limit pursuant to Chapter 166.20 of the Unified Development Code. Infrastructure: Streets: The site has access to Crossover Road. Crossover Road is an unimproved paved 3 lane highway and designated as highway 265. Street improvements will be evaluated with the proposed development. Water: Public water is available to the property. The previously approved development for this property installed an 8" main and fire hydrants that connect to the existing 8" watermain in Stonewood Subdivision. Water may need to be relocated within KAlReports120081PC Reportsll3Juiy 141R-PZD 08-3022 (Stonewood Gardens).doc the property based on the revised street layout at the time of development to provide domestic service and fire protection. Sewer: Sanitary sewer is available to the site. The previously approved development for this property installed 8" sanitary sewer mains and a sanitary sewer lift station that will discharge into the Stonewood Subdivision sanitary sewer gravity system. Sewer may need to be relocated within the property based on the revised street layout at the time of development to provide sanitary sewer service. The sanitary sewer lift station will also be required to meet current requirements at the time of development. Fire: This development will be protected by Engine 5 located at 2979 N. Crossover. It is 2.7 miles from the station with an anticipated response time of 4 minutes to the beginning of the development. The Fire Department anticipates 3(2 EMS — I Fire/Other) calls for service each year after the development is completed and maximum build -out has occurred. Typically, this type of development usually takes 12 — 18 months, after the development is started, before maximum build -out occurs. The Fayetteville Fire Department does not feel this development will affect our calls for service or our response times. Police: It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this R-PZD will not • substantially alter the population density, and create an appreciable or undesirable increase in the load on police services. This R-PZD will not create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion. Tree Preservation: This development will be required to comply with the Tree Preservation requirements as set forth in the Unified Development Code at the time of development with a 25% preservation requirement. The applicant's proposal is arranged in a manner that will save some of the significant trees on site. Public Comment: Staff has received public comment from the property owner to the east, citing concerns with the existing detention pond regarding weeds and mosquitoes. Recommendation: Finding that the proposed rezoning and development approval meets many of the primary goals of the Planned Zoning District ordinance and policies adopted within the City Plan 2025 as noted herein, staff recommends forwarding R-PZD 08-3022 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. Planning Commission determination of street improvements. The Planning Commission will make final determinations of street improvements at the time of development. At minimum, staff will recommend that Stonewood Court be constructed to include a stub out for a future east connection, including pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains, and a 5' sidewalk on both sides. A turn lane may be needed at the entry to Crossover Road. Staff will likely recommend money in lieu of sidewalk construction and other street K: IReports120081PC Reportsll3,hdy141R-P7D 08-3022 (Stanwood Gardens).doc improvements along Crossover Road. 7/14/08: THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IN FAVOR OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS. 2. Planning Commission determination of adequate connectivity. A future connection from Stonewood Court to the east is proposed. Staff recommends in favor of the proposed connectivity finding that the proposed future connection will be beneficial to the neighborhood. In addition, the applicant is proposing pedestrian access to the south, to provide connectivity to those undeveloped lots. 7/14/08: THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IN FAVOR OF CONNECTIVITY. 3. Curb -cuts shall be limited to a maximum width of 16' at the right-of-way and shall be at least 5' from the property line. Shared driveways may be located on the property line. All driveways shall otherwise meet the standards established in Chapter 172 Parking and Loading. 4. This project is required to go through preliminary plat and final plat review and approval. 5. The applicant shall dedicate right-of-way for Crossover Road and Stonewood Court pursuant to the Master Street Plan at the time of final plat approval. 6. Project phasing. The applicant shall have one year from City Council approval of the PZD to receive preliminary plat approval, one year from the date of preliminary plat approval to obtain all development permits, and three years to obtain final plat approval with a one year extension available for each time limit pursuant to Chapter 166.20 of the Unified Development Code. 7. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building setbacks or utility easements. 8. Buildings shall be constructed to be consistent with the elevations and concepts depicted in the building elevations in the booklet as specified. Building elevations will be reviewed at the time of preliminary plat, final plat and building permit to ensure compliance. All homes shall be designed with a "front facade" fronting onto Stonewood Court and to have varied facades to provide variety within the overall development. Articulation shall be required for the west facades of the houses adjacent to Crossover Road (Lots 1-5). 9. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code for single family residential subdivisions. 10. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments, and Architectural Standards submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the project with review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the K: IReportst20081PC Reporisll3July l4I R-PZD 08-3022 (Stonewood Gardens).doe City Council shall also be binding. H. This development shall be required to comply with the Tree Preservation requirements (25% minimum canopy) as set forth in the Unified Development Code at the time of development, subject to approval by the Urban Forester. 12. Prior to preliminary plat submittal, the applicant shall submit the development plans to the Parks Recreation and Advisory Board for review and recommendations regarding parkland dedication. 13. Landscape requirements as outlined in Chapter 177 shall be required with development plat approval. 14. An ornamental fence shall be constructed along Crossover Road at the time of development as proposed in the Master Development Plan; along with a vegetative buffer of trees and shrubs. The fence shall not impede pedestrian access at the south boundary of the subject property. 15. The location of fire department connections shall be approved and shown on the final plat. 16. All new street names and addresses shall be approved by the GIS Division. 17. The following revisions shall be made: a. Page 4. Include in the paragraph about phasing and timeframe a statement regarding the timeframe for final plat approval, as the development will be required to receive Planning Commission approval of both preliminary and final plat requests prior to the issuance of a building permit. b. Page 5. Add a column for a 0 -foot side setback requirement for accessory structures to allow for the proposed shared garage on Lots 10 and 11. c. Page 7. Add "Accessory Structures" to the far left column under Setback Requirements. d. Page 2 of the site plan. Add "Lot Width Minimum" under Bulk and Area Regulations. e. Page 2 of the site plan. Add the setback requirement for accessory structures. f. Extend the 8' pedestrian access easement between Lots 7 and 8 to the southern boundary of the subject property. Standard Conditions of Approval: 18. Impact fees for fire, police, water, and sewer shall be paid in accordance with City ordinance. 19. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR K: IReports120081PC ReportsU3-July 1418-PZD 08-3022 (Stone wood GardensJ.doc Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications). 20. Staff approval of final detailed, plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets @ublic and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 21. All overhead electric lines l2kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed utilities shall be located underground. 22. Street lights shall be installed adjacent to all public and private streets (not alleys), with a separation of no greater than 300 feet. 23. All exterior lighting is required to comply with the City's lighting ordinance. A lighting plan and cut -sheets of the proposed exterior light fixtures shall be required to be approved by Planning Staff prior to building permit. 24. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required: a. Grading and drainage permits b. An on -site inspection by the Landscape Administrator of all tree protection measures prior to any land disturbance. c. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation area. d. Project Disk with all final revisions e. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by Section 158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Planning Commission Action: Tabled Motion: Graves Second: Myres Vote: 7-0-0 Meeting Date: July 14, 2008 x Forwarded to C.C. Denied K: IReports120081PC ReportsI J3 -Jury 141R-PZD 08-3022 (Stanwood Garden4.doc Sec. 166.06. Planned Zoning Districts (PZD). (E) Approval or Rejection Criteria for Planned Zoning Districts The following criteria shall be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in the review of a planned zoning district application based on the proposed master development plan: (I) Whether the application is in compliance with the requirements of the UDC and the City Plan 2025; FINDING: Staff finds the application to be in compliance with the Master Development Plan - Planned Zoning District criteria established by the City Council. City Plan 2025 designates this site as a Residential Neighborhood Area. The proposed zoning and development criteria encourage a layout that promotes walkability and traditional residential urban design. Rezoning this property to R-PZD 08-3022 with single-family dwelling units at an average density of 4.46 units per acre is consistent with the land use plan and the surrounding land use. Goal 2: We will discourage suburban sprawl. Staff finds that the proposed development is an infill project that promotes walkability in close proximity to two large city/community parks and neighborhood services and will utilize existing infrastructure and city services that are nearby while protecting the integrity of the predominantly single-family residential neighborhood to the north, cast, and south. Goal 3: We will make traditional town form the standard. Staff finds that the proposed development supports the City's goal to promote traditional town form, contributing a variety of housing types and lot sizes in close proximity to a commercial node (Crossover and Zion intersection) in a growing neighborhood with an overall mixture of uses that include eating places, professional offices, retail stores, recreational establishments, and a variety of residential types and densities. Goal 4: We will grow a livable transportation network. Staff finds that the proposed development supports the City's goal to create a multi -modal transportation network. The applicant proposes to construct a public street (Stonewood Court) to City standards and a stub out to the cast for a future connection to several dead-end streets within the residential development less than one half mile to the east of the subject property. The applicant also proposes a pedestrian access casement and sidewalk to connect with the property to the south, which under the current zoning could potentially contain professional offices, neighborhood retail shopping, restaurants, a video store, etc — all of which could serve this development and the surrounding neighborhoods. (2) Whether the application is in compliance with all applicable statutory provisions; FINDING: The application has been reviewed and found to be compliant with applicable statutory provisions. (3) Whether the general impact of the rezoning, would adversely impact the provision of public facilities and services; K:IReportsl20081PC Repxutsl13-Juiv 141R-PZD 03-3022 (Stonewood Gardens).doc FINDING: The impact of the rezoning and subsequent development would require the provision of public facilities, at the cost of the developer. As indicated in the submittal and the staff report, certain measures have been taken by the developer to ensure adequate infrastructure improvements are made to ensure the level of service will not decline due to the proposed development. Additional improvements will be determined at the time of development by the Planning Commission. (4) Whether the rezoning is compatible with the surrounding land uses; FINDING: The proposed development will yield a slightly higher density than the developed neighborhood to the southeast. However, an overall density of 4.46 units/acre is compatible with surrounding developments, given that the proposal incorporates this higher density, single-family development adjacent to Crossover Road, designated a Principal Arterial Parkway by the Master Street Plan. (5) Whether the subject land is suitable for the intended use and is compatible with the natural environment; FINDING: The intended use is suitable for the subject property and the surrounding development. The majority of the site will be developed, though the houses will be arranged and built in a manner that will preserve the significant canopy. Furthermore, Lot 16 has been designated as an unbuildable lot detention and recreational space. The applicant proposes to coordinate with the utility companies the placement of all utility easements in an attempt to increase canopy preservation. (6) Whether the intended land use would create traffic congestion or burden the existing road. network; FINDING: Any additional development in the area will increase the amount of traffic on Crossover Road; however, the overall density should not create an appreciable amount of traffic above that which can be managed with the streets in the area. Improvements to Crossover Road are anticipated to be recommended with preliminary plat approval. (7) Whether the planned development provides for unified development control under a . unified plan; FINDING: The booklet and master development plans submitted provide for said unified development control. (8) Whether any other recognized zoning consideration would be violated in this PZD. FINDING: No other zoning considerations are proposed to be violated. (B) Development standards, conditions and review guidelines K: IReports120081PC ReponsU3-Ju(y 1418-PZD 08-3022 (Stonewood Gardens).doc (1) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consider a proposed PZD in light of the purpose and intent as set forth in Chapter 161 Zoning Regulations, and the development standards and review guidelines set forth herein- Primary emphasis shall be placed upon achieving compatibility between the proposed development and surrounding areas so as to preserve and enhance the neighborhood. Proper planning shall involve a. consideration of tree preservation, water conservation, preservation of natural site amenities, and the protection of watercourses from erosion and siltation. The Planning Commission shall determine that specific development features, including project density, building locations, common usable open space, the vehicular circulation system, parking areas, screening and landscaping, and perimeter treatment shall be combined in such a way as to further the health, safety, amenity and welfare of the community. To these ends, all applications filed pursuant to this ordinance shall be reviewed in accordance with the same general review guidelines as those utilized for zoning and subdivision applications. - FINDING: The subject infill development should be compatible with surrounding developments, as single-family detached residences of a slightly higher density will be the primary use permitted. Since the proposal is not for development rights a tree preservation plan has not been reviewed. However, the applicant has designed the site in a manner that will provide sufficient green space and preserve canopy. (2) Screening and landscaping. In order to enhance the integrity and attractiveness of the .development, and when deemed necessary to protect adjacent properties, the Planning Commission shall require landscaping and screening as part of a PZD. The screening and landscaping shall be provided as set forth in §166.09 Buffer Strips and Screening. As part of the development plan, a detailed screening and landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission. Landscape plans shall show the general location, type and quality (size and age) of plant material. Screening plans shall include typical details of fences, berms and plant material to be used. FINDING: The applicant proposes screening along Crossover Road for the residential uses proposed. (3) Traffic circulation. The following traffic circulation guidelines shall apply: (a) The adequacy of both the internal and external street systems shall be reviewed in light of the projected future traffic volumes. (b) The traffic circulation system shall be comprised of a hierarchal scheme of local collector and arterial streets, each designed to accommodate its proper function and in appropriate relationship with one another. (c) Design of the internal street circulation system must be sensitive to such considerations as safety, convenience, separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, general attractiveness, access to dwelling units and the proper relationship of different land uses. (d) Internal collector streets shall be coordinated with the existing external street system, providing for the efficient flow of traffic into and out of the planned zoning development. K:1 Repons1200SIPC Reports 1 /3 -July /41 R-P7_D 08-3022 (Stonemood GardensJ.doc (e) Internal local streets shall be designed to discourage through traffic within the planned zoning development and to adjacent areas. (1) Design provisions for ingress and egress for any site along with service drives and interior circulation shall be that required by Chapter 166 Development of this code. FINDING: All properties will front onto Stonewood Court and will be served by shared access driveways as indicated on the site plan. Curb -cuts shall be limited to a maximum width of 16' at the right-of-way and shall be at least 5' from the property line. Shared driveways may be located on the property line. All driveways shall otherwise meet the standards established in Chapter 172 Parking and Loading. (4) Parking standards. The off-street parking and loading standards found in Chapter 172 Parking and Loading shall apply to the specific gross usable or leasable floor areas of the respective use areas. FINDING: Parking is to be provided on -site for each residential lot. On -street parking will be permitted in accordance with city codes for the street constructed. (5) Perimeter treatment. Notwithstanding any other provisions of a planned zoning district, all uses of land or structures shall meet the open space, buffer or green strip provisions of this chapter of this code. FINDING: The applicant's proposal has met the open space requirements for single-family developments and further designates Lot 15 as common, open space. (6). Sidewalks. As required by § I66.03. FINDING: A 5' sidewalk is to be constructed on both sides of Stonewood Court and money in lieu of a sidewalk along Crossover Road will likely be recommended at the time of development submittal. (7) Street Lights. As required by § 166.03. FINDING: Street lights are to be provided at all intersections and with a maximum separation of 300 feet along all streets. (8) Water. As required by § 166.03. FINDING: Public water will he provided to the project site, pursuant to city code. Improvements to water services may be required and shall be reviewed at the time of preliminary plat submittal. (9) Sewer. As required by §166.03. FINDING: Public sewer will be provided to the project site, pursuant to city code. Improvements to sewer services may be required and shall be reviewed at the time of K:I Reporrs1200611'C Reports l3 -July 141R-t'%D 08-3022 (Sronenvod Gardens).doc preliminary plat submittal. (10) Streets and Drainage. Streets within a residential PZD may be either public or private. (a) Public Streets. Public streets shall be constructed according to the adopted standards of the City. (b) Private Streets. Private streets within a residential PZD shall be permitted subject to the following conditions: (i) Private streets shall be permitted for only a loop street, or street ending with a cul-de- sac. Any street connecting one or more public streets shall be constructed to existing City standards and shall be dedicated as a public street. (ii) Private streets shall be designed and constructed to the same standards as public streets with the exceptions of width and cul-de-sacs as noted below. (iii)All grading and drainage within a Planned Zoning District including site drainage and drainage for private streets shall comply with the City's Grading (Physical Alteration of Land) and Drainage (Storm water management) Ordinances. Open drainage systems may be approved by the City Engineer. (iv) Maximum density served by a cul-de-sac shall be 40 units. Maximum density served by a loop street shall be 80 units. (v) The plat of the planned development shall designate each private street as a "private street." (vi) Maintenance of private streets shall be the responsibility of the developer or of a neighborhood property owners association (POA) and shall not be the responsibility of the City. The method for maintenance and a maintenance fund shall be established by the PZD covenants. The covenants shall expressly provide that the City is a third party beneficiary to the covenants and shall have the right to enforce the street maintenance requirements of the covenants irrespective of the vote of the other parties to the covenants. (vii) The covenants shall provide that in the event the private streets are not maintained as required by the covenants, the City shall have the right (but shall not be required) to maintain said streets and to charge the cost thereof to the property owners within the PZD on a pro rata basis according to assessed valuation for ad valorem tax purposes and shall have a lien on the real property within the PZD for such cost. The protective covenants shall grant the City the right to use all private streets for purposes of providing fire and police protection, sanitation service and any other of the municipal functions. The protective covenants shall provide that such covenants shall not be amended and shall not terminate without approval of the City Council. (viii) The width of private streets may vary according to the density served. The following K:IReports12008V'C Repo'lsV3-July 1418-PZD 08-3022 (Stonewood Got dens).doc standard shall be used: Paving Width (No On -Street Parking) Dwelling Units One -Way Two -Way 1 -20 14' 22' 21+ 14' 24' *Note: If on -street parking is desired, 6 feet must be added to each side where parking is intended. (ix) All of the traffic laws prescribed by Title VII shall apply to traffic on private streets within a PZD. (x) ]'here shall be no minimum building setback requirement from a private street. (xi) The developer shall erect at the entrance of each private street a rectangular sign, not exceeding 24 inches by 12 inches, designating the street a "private street" which shall be clearly visible to motor vehicular traffic. FINDING: All public and private streets/drives shall conform to city standards, which have been indicated in the submitted statement of commitments. Public and Private streets shall not be gated, unless permitted by express approval from the City Council. (II) Construction of nonresidential facilities. Prior to issuance of more than eight building permits for any residential PZD, all approved nonresidential facilities shall be constructed. In the event the developer proposed to develop the PZD in phases, and the nonresidential facilities are not proposed in the initial phase, the developer shall enter into a contract with the City to guarantee completion of the nonresidential facilities. FINDING: All development on the site shall be phased according to the phasing plan and conditions herein. There are no nonresidential facilities proposed. (12) Tree preservation. All PZD developments shall comply with the requirements for tree preservation as set forth in Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection. The location of trees shall be considered when planning the common open space, location of buildings, underground services, walks, paved areas, playgrounds, parking areas, and finished grade levels. FINDING: A tree preservation plan shall be submitted at the time of development. Canopy calculations shall be based upon a minimum 25% canopy preservation required. (13) Commercial design standards. All PZD developments that contain office or commercial structures shall comply with the commercial design standards as set forth in § 166.14 Site Development Standards and Construction and Appearance Design Standards for K:IRepons120081PC Reports/3-July141R-PZD 08-3022 (Seoneuood Gardens).doc Commercial Structures. FINDING: The applicant has proposed design standards for residential structures; no commercial uses are proposed. (14) View protection. The Planning Commission shall have the right to establish special height and/or positioning restrictions where scenic views are involved and shall have the right to insure the perpetuation of those views through protective covenant restrictions. FINDING: Staff finds no specific scenic views to be protected on the subject property. (E) Revocation. (1) Causes for revocation as enforcement action. The Planning Commission may recommend to the City Council that any PZD approval be revoked and all building or occupancy permits be voided under the following circumstances: (a) Building permit. If no building permit has been issued within the time allowed. (b) Phased development schedule. If the applicant does not adhere to the phased development schedule as stated in the approved development plan. (c) Open space and recreational facilities. If the construction and provision of all common open spaces and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the final plan are proceeding at a substantially slower rate than other project components. Planning staff shall report the status of each ongoing PZD at the first regular meeting of each quarter, so that_the Planning Commission is able to compare the actual development accomplished with the approved development schedule. If the Planning Commission finds that the rate of construction of dwelling units or other commercial or industrial structures is substantially greater than the rate at which common open spaces and public recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, then the Planning Commission may initiate revocation action or cease to approve any additional final plans if preceding phases have not been finalized. The city may also issue a stop work order, or discontinue issuance of building or occupancy permits, or revoke those previously issued. (2) Procedures. Prior to a recommendation of revocation, notice by certified mail shall be sent to the landowner or authorized agent giving notice of the alleged default, setting a time to appear before the Planning Commission to show cause why steps should not be made to totally or partially revoke the PZD, The PlanningCommission recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Council for disposition as in original approvals. In the event a PZD is revoked, the City Council shall take the appropriate action in the city clerk's office and the public zoning record duly noted. (3) Effect. In the event of revocation, any completed portions of the development or those portions for which building permits have been issued shall be treated to be a whole and effective development. After causes for revocation or enforcement have been corrected, the City Council shall expunge such record as established above and shall authorize continued K:IReports120081PC Retorts(13-Juts 141R-PZD 08-3022 'Stone�rood Gardens).doc issuance of building permits. (F) Covenants, trusts and homeowner associations. (1) Legal entities- The developer shall create such legal entities as appropriate to undertake and be responsible for the ownership, operation, construction, and maintenance of private roads, parking areas, common usable open space, community facilities, recreation areas, building, lighting, security measure and similar common elements in a development. The city encourages the creation of homeowner associations, funded community trusts or other nonprofit organizations implemented by agreements, private improvement district, contracts and covenants. All legal instruments setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of such open space, recreation areas and communally -owned facilities shall be approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and by the Planning Commission as to the suitability for the proposed use of the open areas. The .aforementioned legal instruments shall be provided to the Planning Commission together with the filing of the final plan, except that the Guarantee shall be filed with the preliminary plan or at least in a preliminary form. (2) Common areas. If the common open space is deeded to a homeowner association, the developer shall file with the plat a declaration of covenants and restrictions in the Guarantee that will govern the association with the application for final plan approval. The provisions shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: (a) The homeowner's association must be legally established before building permits are granted. (b) Membership and fees must be mandatory for each home buyer and successive buyer. (c) The open space restrictions must be pernanent, rather than for a period of years. (d) The association must be responsible for the maintenance of recreational and other common facilities covered by the agreement and for all liability insurance, local taxes and other public assessments. (e) Homeowners must pay their pro rata share of the initial cost; the maintenance assessment levied by the association must be stipulated as a potential lien on the property. The association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changing needs. FINDING: The applicant shall comply with these requirements. Sec. 161.25 Planned Zoning District (A) Purpose. Tire intent of the Planned Zoning District is to permit and encourage comprehensively planned developments whose purpose is redevelopment, economic development, cultural enrichment or to provide a single -purpose or mixed -use planned development and to permit the combination of development and zoning review into a simultaneous process. The rezoning of property to the PZD may be deemed appropriate if the development proposed for the district can accomplish one or more of the following goals. (1) Flexibility. Providing for flexibility in the distribution of land uses, in the density of development and in other matters typically regulated in zoning districts. K:IReportsO008U'C Reports 113 -Jul y I4tR-PZD 08-3022 tStonewood Gardens).doc (2) Compatibility. Providing for compatibility with the surrounding land uses. (3) ' Harmony. Providing for an orderly and creative arrangement of land uses that are harmonious and beneficial to the community. (4) Variety- Providing for a variety of housing types, employment opportunities or commercial or industrial services, or any combination thereof, to achieve variety and integration of economic and redevelopment opportunities. (5) No negative impact. Does not have a negative effect upon the future development of the area; (6) Coordination. Permit coordination and planning of the land surrounding the PZD and cooperation between the city and private developers in the urbanization of new lands and in the renewal of existing deteriorating areas. (7) Open space. Provision of more usable and suitably located open space, recreation areas and other common facilities that would not otherwise be required under conventional land development regulations. (8) Natural features. Maximum enhancement and minimal disruption of existing natural features and amenities. (9) General Plan. Comprehensive and innovative planning and design of mixed use yet harmonious developments consistent with the guiding policies of the General Plan. (10) Special Features. Better utilization of sites characterized by special features of geographic location, topography, size or shape. FINDING: Staff finds that the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding and adjacent land uses, will be beneficial to the community, and is a result of consideration of the existing natural features specific to the subject property. Page 2 of the site plan indicates the existing trees that are proposed to be preserved. The applicant proposes a pedestrian access easement and sidewalk for future pedestrian access to the property to the south in order to better utilize special features of both sites. This access was coordinated with the lot arrangements and setbacks proposed for Stonewood Gardens and the easements and lot arrangements of the adjacent property. Staff finds this proposal meets the intent of many of the parameters of the City Plan 2025, as well as the above criteria, including flexibility in density, compatibility with surrounding land uses and integration of a varied housing type and lot size in an infill situation. The proposal best fits the flexibility and variety goals of the intent of the Planned Zoning District, offering attached and detached single-family housing types, recreational green space, a variety of lot arrangements, and lot dimensions. The following guiding policies within Residential Neighborhood Areas are applicable to this K:IReporns120081PC Reporlsl/3-Jule I41R-P7D 08-3022 (Smnewood Gardens).doc development, and help to achieve the nine primary goals of the City Plan 2025: Residential Neighborhood Areas: a. Where possible, encourage a block -and -street layout that promotes walkable, cyclist friendly road designs with slow design speeds. b. Utilize principles of traditional residential urban design to create compatible, livable, and accessible neighborhoods. c. Discourage design elements that prohibit complete, compact, connected neighborhoods such as cul-de-sacs, gated communities, etc. d. Minimize through traffic on minor residential streets, while providing connections between neighborhoods to encourage openness and neighborliness. e. Site new residential areas accessible to roadways, alternative transportation modes, community amenities, infrastructure, and retail and commercial goods and services. (B) Rezoning. Property may be rezoned to the Planned Zoning District by the City Council in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and Chapter 166, Development. Each rezoning parcel shall be described as a separate district, with distinct boundaries and specific design and development standards. Each district shall be assigned a project number or label, along with the designation "PZD". The rezoning shall include the adoption of a specific master development plan and development standards. FINDING: The submitted development plats and Master Development Plan booklets, along with the conditions of approval found applicable and appropriate, are binding with the approval of the requested rezoning. Should the Planning Commission forward this item to the City Council an ordinance will be drafted for consideration of rezoning this property in accordance with the submittal herein. (C) R PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District. (1) Purpose and intent. The R-PZD is intended to accommodate mixed -use or clustered residential developments and to accommodate single -use residential developments that are determined to be more appropriate for a PZD application than a general residential rezone. The legislative purposes, intent, and application of this district include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) To encourage a variety and flexibility in land development and land use for predominately residential areas, consistent with the city's City Plan 2025 and the orderly development of the city. (b) To provide a framework within which an effective relationship of different land uses and activities within a single development, or when considered with abutting parcels of land, can be planned on a total basis. (c) To provide a harmonious relationship with the surrounding development, minimizing such influences as land use incompatibilities, heavy traffic and congestion, and excessive demands on planned and existing public facilities. K::I Reportsl2008IPC Reporfsl]3-Jul v 14(R-PZD 08-3022 (Sionex ood Gardens). doe (d) To provide a means of developing areas with special physical features to enhance natural beauty and other attributes. (e) To encourage the efficient use of those public facilities required in connection with new residential development. FINDING: Staff is recommending approval of this application, finding the proposed R-PZD meets the intent of the PZD ordinance as noted above. The requested R-PZD provides variety and flexibility in land development while also providing a compatible relationship with surrounding land uses. (2) Permitted Uses. All permitted uses identified within §,162 Use Units of the Unified Development Code shall be allowed as permissible uses, unless otherwise specified, subject to City Council approval of the Planned Zoning District request. (3) Conditional Uses. All conditional uses allowed within (Residential, Commercial, and Industrial) zoning Districts established in the Unified Development Code shall be allowed with Planning Commission approval, unless otherwise specified, subject to the code governing Conditional Use requests. FINDING: Permitted and Conditional uses are outlined in both the Master Development Plan booklets and plats. (4) Condition. In no instance shall the residential use area be less than fifty-one percent (51%) of the gross floor area within the development. FINDING: The residential uses on this property will be 100 percent of the gross floor area within the development. (F) Bulk and area regulations (1) Residential density. Residential densities shall be determined on the basis of the following considerations: (a) The densities of surrounding development; (b) the densities allowed under the current zoning; (c) the urban development goals and other policies of the city's General Plan; (d) the topography and character of the natural environment; and (e) the impact of a given density on the specific site and adjacent properties. FINDING: The surrounding development is consistent in density with large lot residential properties and platted subdivisions typical of the RSF-4 zoning district. A density of 4.46 units/acre is appropriate given that the project is an infill development that is adjacent to a State highway and located near retail and commercial establishments, as well as recreational K:IReports12008lPC Reports113-July 141R-PZD 08-3022 (Sioneitood Gardens).doc facilities, meets the urban development goal of the City's City Plan 2025, and will not have a detrimental impact on the site and adjoining properties. (2) Lot area and setback requirements. Taking into consideration the unique aspects of each project, preliminary development plans for Planned Zoning Districts shall conform as closely as possible to the existing standards for lot area minimums and setback requirements under this chapter. FINDING: Lot area minimums are varied on this project with structures oriented to the street. Due to the unique nature of this development, it is not possible to conform to existing standards for lot area minimums and setback requirements in a typical single-family district without increasing the total pavement area. (3) Building height. There shall be no maximum building height except as may be determined by the Planning Commission during the review of the preliminary development plan based on the uses within the development and the proximity of the development to existing or prospective development on adjacent properties. A lesser height may be established by the Planning Commission when it is deemed necessary to provide adequate light and air to adjacent property and to protect the, visual quality of the community. FINDING: Building heights proposed for this project are typical of the single-family developments in the surrounding area, and shall not exceed 40'. (4) Building area. The Planning Commission shall review specific proposed lot coverages which generally correspond to the guidelines for lot coverage in the respective residential, office, commercial or industrial district which most depicts said development scheme. FINDING: The lot coverage or building area on this project is lower than the RSF-4 zoning district, with a maximum of 35% buildable area permitted. *Required Findings for Rezoning Request. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the land use planning objectives, principles and policies, as evidenced by the number of guiding policies for Residential Neighborhood Areas this proposal meets, as discussed on Page 6 of this report. The revised proposal for this R-PZD zoning district will accommodate both the future land use plan for residential uses in this area, create a pedestrian friendly environment, and also allow for a variety of housing types, sizes and development pattern, thus providing more choice for more citizens. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the K:I Repot ls12OO81 PC Reports 141 R-PZD O.S-3022 (Stonewood Gardens).doe rezoning is proposed Finding: The proposal is appropriate for the current R-PZD zoning and will allow for an infill development that is somewhat unique in comparison to the residential development pattern in the surrounding neighborhood, while also maintaining a level of compatibility and sensitivity to surrounding properties. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: Staff finds this proposal will not create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: Staff does not find that an undesirable increase in load on public services would be created. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: Not applicable. Staff is recommending approval of the request. K:IRelrorts120081PC Reports/3-./uty 1418-PZD 08-3022 (Sionewood Garden.$).doc JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 124 WEST SUNBRIDGE, SUITE 5 June 5, 2008 City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 Attn: Planning Department Re: Stonewood Gardens, PZD FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72703 ' (479) 442-9127' FAX (479) 5821807 DAVID L. JORGENSEN, P.E., P.L.S. Enclosed herewith please find 10 copies of the Zoning & Development plans and 5 copies of the booklet for the project mentioned above. This property is currently zoned R-PZD and was recently. brought through the city but tabled by the developer in order to make some changes. The main request from the Planning Commission was street connectivity so the street was continued to the east property as shown on the plan. The developer has also reduced the amount of lots and this project will all be single family detached homes. It contains 3.36 acres and has 15 units with lot 16 being green space and a detention pond. Please call concerning any questions you may have. Thank you. Sincerely; J tin L. Jorgensen, E.I. STRUCTURAL DESIGN ' LAND DEVELOPMENT ' WATER SYSTEMS ' WASTEWATER SYSTEMS' LAND SURVEYING yCLLC'Anile ARKANSAS THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PC Meeting of July 14, 2008 PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE To: . Fayetteville Planning Commission From: Carole Jones, Interim Urban Forester Date: July 8, 2008 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 444-3472 ITEM #: R-PZD o8-3022-: Planned Zoning District (Stonewood Gardens) TREE PRESERVATION PLAN >. A full Tree Preservation Plan will be required when the development comes through the planning process. This should include but will not be limited to: • A full tree inventory of all significant trees; • Canopy calculations including existing canopy, preserved canopy and removed canopy; • A site analysis report; and • A survey of the location of significant trees and those directly affected by the development. 2. The site has little existing canopy. The development should be designed to work around as many existing trees as possible, particularly trees that are not located in existing or proposed utility easements. Mitigation will not likely be supported by staff without detailed supportive information such as an arborist report. 3. Significant trees are a high priority for preservation. Groupings of quality trees are also a high priority for preservation. LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS i. Landscape Regulations as defined in Chapter i77 will be required with development plan approval. This shall include but not be limited to street trees, detention facility plantings, adequate greenspace, etc. Date 6/27/08 Jeremy Pate Zoning and Development Director City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Dear Director Pate, This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the proposed R-PZD 08-3022: (Stonewood Gardens,060): Submitted by Jorgensen & Associates for property located at the SE corner of Crossover and Albright would substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services and create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion. The property contains approximately 2.97 acres. It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this R-PZD will not substantially alter the population density, and create an appreciable or undesirable increase in the load on police services. This R-PZD will not create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion. Sincerely, Captain William Brown Fayetteville Police Department Engineering Division R-PZD 08-3022: (STONEWOOD GARDENS, 060): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES for property located at THE SE CORNER OF CROSSOVER AND ALBRIGHT. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT and contains approximately 2.97 acres. The request is for Zoning and Land Use approval of a Residential Planned Zoning District with 15 single family dwelling units. Planner: Dara Sanders Public water is available to the property. The previously approved development for this property installed an 8" main and fire hydrants that connect to the existing 8" watermain in Stonewood Subdivision. Water may need to be relocated within the property based on the revised street layout at the time of development to provide domestic service and fire protection. Sanitary sewer is available to the site. The previously approved development for this property installed 8" sanitary sewer mains and a sanitary sewer lift station that will discharge into the Stonewood Subdivision sanitary sewer gravity system. Sewer may need to be relocated within the property based on the revised street layout at the time of development to provide sanitary sewer service. The sanitary sewer lift station will also be required to meet current requirements at the time of development. The site has access to Crossover Road. Crossover Road is an unimproved paved 3 lane highway with a TWLTL and designated as highway 265. Street improvements will be evaluated with the proposed development. Standard improvements and requirements for drainage will be required for the development. This property is not affected by the 100 -year floodplain. RPZD08-3022 STONEWOOD GARDENS Close Up View IAKE F 1 i ' , 1 RS i +' i SUBJECT PROPERTY r', j ,.J •R .. I Y.. i . y ♦� \ JR d ri. .. F 1 RA f RA �� r .z(` xy i � 4 'i3 1IIIj ♦ � : j r A .1 .� .. %. iN I y r - ' -1-. ( Yi 0 Overview o:: o: __ a.... 0 75 150 300 450 600 Feet RPZD08-3022 One Mile View STONEWOOD GARDENS IVEY1R J SUBJECT PROPER Y TY 'a.cuEek Rn f R# a•. .__ LAKE FA YETTEVILLE 1 �'� ' W ` p Rsw A �- TN � ,,, _!!--��qi-��T({34 aT �} Y .� .�Y_si R R 1 t F^ 1 ye• m -c t -� y�) � s - i Overview „ .. • , ,, f �r I- R# Legend Boundary Subject Property iti o Planning Area RPZD08-3022 d)ncn?, Overlay District 0)0 Outside City Legend S Hillside -Hilltop O erlay District 0.25 0.5 1 Mies JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 124 WEST SUNBRIDGE, SUITE 5 • FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72703 • (479) 442-9127 • FAX (479) 582-4807 STONEWOOD GARDENS ZONING & LAND USE PLAN FAYETTEVILLE, AR June 5, 2008 Revised June 24, 2008 Revised July 7, 2008 Owner Stonewood Gardens, LLC Fayetteville, AR 72703 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. REPRESENTATIVEICURRENT OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY ........................................... 1 B. SUMMARY (SCOPE, NATURE, AND INTENT) .................................................. C. GENERAL PROJECT CONCEPT....................................................................... 1. Street and Lot Layout............................................................................. 2. Site Plan.................................................................................................. 3. Buffer Areas............................................................................................ 4. Tree Preservation................................................................................... 5. Storm Water Detention Areas and Drainage .......................................... 6. Undisturbed Natural Areas..................................................................... 7. Existing and Proposed Utility Connections and Extensions ................... 8. Development and Architectural Design Standards ................................. 9. Building Elevations................................................................................. D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PHASING AND TIME FRAME ........ E. PROPOSED PLANNING AREAS ..... 1 ........................ 4 .......... 4 F. PROPOSED ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.........................................................4 1. Planning Area #1: Single -Family Residential................................................................. 4-5 G. MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS COMPARED TO CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................................................ 6 1. Planning Area #1: Single -Family Residential.................................................................... 7 2. Analysis of the Site Characteristics.................................................................................... 8 H. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES......................................................................................................... 8 I. REASON FOR REZONING REQUEST........................................................................................... 8 J. RELATIONSHIP TO THE EXISTING AND ADJACENT LAND USES ............................................ 8 K. COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLAN 2025 ....................................................9-10 L. TRAFFIC STUDY........................................................................................................................... 10 M. IMPACTS ON CITY SERVICES.................................................................................................... 10 N. STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS............................................................................................... 10 1. Dedication of Public Facilities........................................................................................... 10 2. On or Off -Site Improvements............................................................................................ 11 3. Natural Resources and Environmental Sensitive Areas ................................................... 11 4. Project Phasing Restrictions............................................................................................. 11 5. Fire Protection................................................................................................................... 11 6. Other Commitments Imposed by the City......................................................................... 11 7. Parks, Trails, and Open Space Commitments................................................................. 11 8. Proposed Preliminary Building Elevations........................................................................ I1 O. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, AND REVIEW GUIDELINES .......................12 13 1. Screening and Landscaping............................................................................................. 12 2. Traffic and Circulation....................................................................................................... 12 3. Parking Standards............................................................................................................ 12 4. Perimeter Treatment..................................................................... 5. Sidewalks...................................................................................... 6. Street tights.................................................................................. 7. Water............................................................................................ 8. Sewer............................................................................................ 9. Streets and Drainage.................................................................... 10. Construction of Non -Residential Facilities .................................... 11. Tree Preservation......................................................................... 12. Architectural Design Standards .................................................... 13. Signage......................................................................................... 14. View Protection............................................................................. 15. Revocations.................................................................................. 16. Covenants, Trusts, and Homeowner Associations ...................... 17. Intent/Purpose of PZD Ordinance ................................................. APPENDIX 4................... ................... 14 0 LL * o Isj ta M It m � y LQ r >. d.0 � v 0 2 Q J ahLD W> J J N J H y Q tL ~ p W W O W N= o y W~ N N y W C Q l- 0 o p zNN,o "73 W m W O N o z o o fn p0]NNO =? h CD Q' W 01 y 3 m i' ti ~� pcn2 W N10 L W Zti m u W ly o p Z G W 3 2 R -1 U W 0 W I. - cc Nj W ti J N W o F- U W a h W 0 a 00 W W O z 44 o a N VI W m J Q V z W y? a y '55 c32 z N WQ y NV -7d 3S(1 QNV7 P DNINOZ V3QaVJ QOOMSNO1 svrj ria I IPo�Nrw :. SNOA]AWIIS • SN39NION9 1IAID flLVIDOSSV a' NISNUIDTIOf - Ii! r9 I'' // // XrtE SMITH 2462 ORCHARD ST J SPRINGDALE, AR 7 76 (RSF-6) / // MK BOX TER 087 \ FOSTER P 0. BOX 9087 // I/ FAYETTEVRI 0 E. AR 72703 FAYETTE-O) VILLE AR 72703 / S89° '40` 325.0' I .0'59 nL L .IL 'II IT &1n iv, _JTh. /71 r^ PI I + - w 7 / m� 4\. mx 1U7II, 0 q U� u AG .C77Z .9809 Y 1 —_—1 SS' I b .00 9 P '� n I a 6 V x x y v Q n V i Q , t 1 S. n •b9 QI Z T} WF O �C.. n b a r 1< t V N 7 s: - D: �Y -mac \ �+•'.'.LR��t� e' \'t:\v_j5?L!- •Z y r n N P C a ` \tL . z c -a Liss6 ny u 04 l ao 5v zY ~ -4 =_I4. W ® v 'C e z� a taz .68 s "- (17VHSSV) OVOL 1H91a81V JINdS do AllD 0-q f'& IN'319M... ASS u S S3 tC V AM9i89 ''cot .99'901 ah %Gl bA 3WOM NO WQT WQTV 59aW iVIIV v N0MI9OC weal A. CURRENT OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY AND REPRESENTATIVE The owner of this property is B.R. Peoples. The developers are Stonewood Gardens, LLC. The representative for this project is Jorgensen and Associates. B. SUMMARY (SCOPE. NATURE, AND INTENT) Stonewood Gardens PZD was originally approved by the City May 4th, 2004. Most of the waterlines and sewer lines have been installed. A portion of the drainage has been installed and the street has been "cut -in." For numerous reasons, the original developer could not finish the project. The cost of the project exceeded expectations and the demand for lots is too low. A revised PZD was reviewed by the Planning Commission on 11/26/07 and forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation of approval subject to adding a connection to the east. The owner decided to table the project in order to analyze some changes and then move forward or change the layout. As a result, we are submitting this new revised conceptual PZD for consideration by the City. The intent of this submittal is to create an infill project that will help meet the demands of the affordable housing market while focusing on the goals of the City Plan 2025. This can be achieved by striving to create a unique atmosphere that promotes traditional town form and a friendly community environment. The revised layout has one planning area with Single Family Detached dwelling units. The overall density of this project is 4.46 dwelling units per acre, which is based on 15 units on 3.36 acres, and falls between the RSF-8 zoning and the RSF-4 zoning. The street will be in the same location as previously planned but instead of having a cul-de- sac at the end; the road will curve to the east and connect the adjacent property. The water and sewer will have to be extended. This revised plan proposes a minimum lot width of 21.3 feet, an average lot width of approximately 50 feet, a minimum lot area of 4,635 square feet, and setback requirements similar to the RSF-8 zoning district. Stonewood Gardens Page 1 The revised plan has 15 lots with shared drives on the property line that will provide access to the garages. Most of the houses that are along the street will have a front porch that faces the street with a garage hidden from the street on the side of the house. This will create the feel of the traditional town form and promote walkability within this project. Sidewalks will be built on both sides of Stonewood Court with an additional pedestrian access easement and sidewalk between lots 7 and 8. jbis is an importa nt connection that will help promote Traditional Town Form by giving residence pedestriRnaicess to future amenities to the south. The lots to the south are currently zoned residential office and could contain professional offices, neighborhood retail shops, restaurants, a video store, etc. This would not only be beneficial to the r�sidenceofStonewood Gardens, hurt also to the surreundiRg neighborhoodsio prnvida. aeGess_to these amenities. Lot 16 is designated open/common area for neighborhood amenities and the location of the detention pond. This lot will be maintained by the POA and cannot be built on. C. GENERAL PROJECT CONCEPT 1) Street and Lot Layout: The current PZD shows a cul-de-sac street which will be removed and a, 21 -foot wide, street will curve to the east to the adjacent property for a future east/west connection. In addition, a pedestrian access easement and sidewalk has been added between lots 7 and 8 for future connection to the residential office zoning to the south. We feel this connection will promote Traditional Neighborhood Development through the use of pedestrian connectivity to possible future amenities such as professional offices, neighborhood retail shopping, restaurants, a video store, etc.. 2) Site Plan: Please refer to the Master Development Plan. Stonewood Gardens Page 2 3) Buffer Areas: There will be decorative fencing along with detailed landscaping added along Hwy. 265 to provide a buffer between this project and the highway. There is already a fence along the east side of the property, but additional trees and landscaping will help provide needed buffers. The entrance, to the development from Hwy 265 will also be addressed with raised landscaped beds and trees to add a buffer and aesthetics from the highway. 4) Tree Preservation: As per the present City ordinance, tree preservation will be required. Lot 16 open/common space is reserved for green space as well as to preserve a number of existing trees in the southeast corner of the lot. The houses will be arranged and built in a manner to preserve all trees if available. We will work with all utility companies to evaluate any opportunities to move easements in order to save trees. 5) Storm Water Detention Areas: As required by the current drainage manual, our post development flow will not exceed the pre -development. A detention pond will be installed on the north side of the project and will be subject to the City's Landscaping requirements for Stormwater Facilities. 6) Undisturbed Natural Areas: The majority of this site will be developed. Additional plantings will be made on the perimeter of this project. 7) Existing and Proposed Utility Connections and Extensions: This project will connect to an existing 8" waterline to the south and west. In addition, a wastewater pump station has been installed to collect and pump wastewater to an existing 8" sewer in Stonewood Subdivision. All utilities will try to be located in the rear of the lots to preserve and maintain curb appeal. Stonewood Gardens Page 3 8) Development and Architectural Design Standards: All buildings in Stonewood Gardens shall conform conceptually to the "Craftsman" and or "Bungalow" Architectural style (See Appendix A). Most of the houses will have rear or side loaded garages and shall have street facing porches incorporated in their design. Restrictive covenants will be provided that will determine details such as material use, roof pitch, etc. to ensure high quality and consistency on the design of the houses. Because lots 1-5 are adjacent to Hwy 265 the west facade of these houses will be required to be articulated for visual aesthetics from the road. 9) Building Elevations: Architectural renderings and building elevations have been included with this project booklet (see appendix A). These illustrations show general layout, style, and floor plan. D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PHASING AND TIMEFRAME One year from City Council approval to receive preliminary plat approval, one year to obtain all development permits, and then start building houses and depending on the market demand, achieve final build out over next 4 years. E. PROPOSED PLANNING AREAS This project has one planning area. F. PROPOSED ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Planning Area #1: Single Family Residential: Purpose: The purpose of this PZD, is to permit and encourage the development of single family detached dwelling units which will have a density of 4.46 lots/acre, which is based on the proposed 15 units on 3.36 acres. Stonewood Gardens Page 4 A. Uses: 1) Permitted Uses. (Planning Area #1). Unit I City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings B. Conditional Uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 24 Home occupations C. -Density: Single Family Dwellings Units Per Acre 5.0 D. Bulk and Area Regulations: Single Famil Dwellin s Lot minimum width 21.3 feet Lot area minimum 4,635 square feet Land area per dwelling unit 4,635 square feet E. Setback Requirements: Front Side Rear 15' 5' 20' F. Maximum building height: 40 feet. G. Building Area: The square footage of improvements shall not exceed 35% of the total lot footage. Stonewood Gardens Page 5 Site Planning: H. Screening and Landscaping: The screening and landscaping will be provided as set forth in the Unified Development Code. The developer will install decorative fencing with landscaping along the West side, adjacent to Hwy. 265, and along the South side. They are also going to landscape the front entrance and plant trees to provide screening from Hwy 265 into the subdivision. I. Parking: All parking shall comply with chapter 172 of the Unified Development Code. J. Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architectural renderings have been provided in Appendix A. K. Signage: Signs shall be permitted and approved and shall be installed in accordance with the Single -Family Unified Development Code. G. MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS COMPARED TO CURRENT ZONING REQUIREMENTS As noted before, this property is currently zoned R-PZD. The property due North and East are zoned RSF-4. There are subdivisions located to the South of this property. The property due North is currently a field with a few trees. The property to the West across Hwy 265 is the Lake Fayetteville property. Included with this property are: jogging trails, bike riding trails, baseball felids, and numerous other recreational facilities. This property also consists of the new site of the Botanical Gardens of the Ozarks. The land to the South of the subject property is zoned R -O to create a transition zone between the R -A to the East, Hwy. 265 and the RSF-4 to the East. Stonewood Gardens Page 6 1. PA -1 (Single Family) Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning PZD (Single Family) PZD: PA -1 Sin le Family) Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 8 Single-family dwellings % `_ ��Cpnditioi7 t�ses ➢a " a - � Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 4 Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 24 Home occupations R3L+X�V' 4tln. ..r '.:.t ., td'PP./% �i\_ uD4nsr. Y F.�J✓_}✓" .1_ TM1F ] 3 2 Y. Acreage 3.36 Acreage 3.36 acres Dwelling Units 12 units Dwelling Units 15 units Density 3.57 units/acre - Densi 5.0 unitstacre �•`M-F3�T:: I .y u a. .=u:a,�x= „� 8u lr nd rea:e ulations '.z�aT Tla's'4..n.0.i ♦ .y I.3 s - .at t � Lot width minimum I 19.88 ft. 21.3 ft Lot Area Minimum Residential 4568 sq. ft. 4635 sq. ft. Land area per dwelling unit 4568 sq. ft 4635 sq. ft. Front Oft 15 ft Side 5ft 5 ft Rear Oft 20 ft 0 'Rer`3e�n _> n=_�ix. �,<.u, Maximum building height of 35 feet. Maximum building height of 40 feet. tlddm ;`At5'a { }� $: On any lot, the area occupied by all the buildings shall not exceed 78% of the total area of such lot. On any lot, the area occupied by all the buildings shall not exceed 35% of the total area of such lot. 2. Analysis of the Site Characteristics: No environmentally hazardous, sensitive, or natural resource areas have been found on this site. Stonewood Gardens Page 7 H. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES: Recreational Facilities are not proposed for this site; however, this property is east of the Lake Fayetteville recreation area which has an extensive walking trail, bike trail, softball field, etc. A parks fee will be assessed at the appropriate time for these lots. I. REASON FOR REZONING REQUEST: The reason for this PZD request is to provide a planned development that does not fit the present standard zonings thatthe City has. We feel there is a need for smaller single family quality homes built in a traditional neighborhood form at a slightly higher allowable density than the RSF-4 Zoning District requirements. J. RELATIONSHIP TO THE EXISTING AND ADJACENT LAND USES: The properties due North and to the West are zoned RSF-4. There are subdivisions located to the East and South of this property. The property due North is currently a field with a few trees. The property to the West across Hwy 265 is the Lake Fayetteville property. Included with this property are: jogging trails, bike riding trails, baseball felids, and numerous other recreational facilities. This property also consists of the new site of the Botanical Gardens of the Ozarks. The land to the South of the subject property is zoned R -O. We feel this zoning and density will be a good transition from the R -O to the South, Hwy 265 to the west, and the RSF-4 and R -A zoning to the North and East. The homes in this PZD are going to be high quality brick homes that should blend nicely with the surrounding style of houses. Because of the existing high volume of traffic on Hwy 265, the current housing demands, and the R -O zoning due south it is hard to market larger homes on larger lots directly adjacent to a principal arterial parkway such as Hwy 265. We feel the requested density is a needed transition for this property location without compromising the quality of these and the surrounding homes. Stonewood Gardens Page 8 K. COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLAN 2025: It is true that this project is not mixed use that would provide neighborhood services. However, in our opinion we feel that daily commercial goods and service needs are within a couple of miles — gas and convenience store, Fayetteville Athletic Club, numerous restaurants and other businesses at the corner of Hwy. 265 and Zion Road. The adjacent land to the south is zoned residential office and could potentially have many of these amenities. In addition, the Botanical Gardens and Lake Fayetteville facilities are directly west. Goal 2 of the Fayetteville City Plan 2025 is to discourage suburban sprawl. We do not feel that this project represents urban sprawl and in fact we believe that this represents "infill" within this area. Property to the south is R -O, to the east and north is residential. We feel this R-PZD compliments and is a good transition for the surrounding areas. Goal 3 of the Fayetteville City Plan 2025 is make traditional town form the standard. We find this project represents traditional town form with sidewalks providing walkability and connectivity and smaller front setbacks. All the lots besides lot 1 will have a shared common drive along the property line to reduce curb cuts and the number of driveways from the road. The pedestrian access easement and sidewalk between lots 7 and 8 will help create this traditional town form by promoting walkability to the close amenities directly to the south in the future. In addition, we are providing future connectivity to the east. Goal 4 of the Fayetteville City Plan 2025 is to grow a livable transportation network. The entrance to this PZD is off of Hwy 265 and we have made a stub out for future connection to the property to the east. We have also added numerous sidewalks to promote pedestrian movement with the most important being the access easement and sidewalk between lots 7 and 8. This is important because it will give residence of not only Stonewood Gardens but future residence to the north and ease pedestrian access to future amenities to the Stonewood Gardens -• Page 9 south. The property to the south is currently zoned residential office and could contain professional offices, neighborhood retail shopping, restaurants, a video store, etc. We have also provided pedestrian connectivity to a future sidewalk along Hwy 265. This can easily transport people from this PZD and surrounding properties to close amenities such as the Fayetteville Athletic Club, Lake Fayetteville Park, restaurants, gas stations, etc. Although the houses that we are proposing are not "attainable" to all income levels, we feel that we are offering an alternative product that will hopefully meet the demand of the market for smaller lots, less yard to mow, reduced setbacks and curb appeal with quality built homes that compliment the surrounding properties. . L. TRAFFIC STUDY: We feel that the added traffic to the surrounding area with this development is minimal. No traffic study has been initiated since the impact of this project would not be expected to warrant such a study. M. IMPACTS ON CITY SERVICES: There are no significant impacts to city services associated with this project. Water and sewer have been addressed in other areas of the booklet. Waste will be managed by each single family dwelling being assigned a plastic trash container in accordance with the City of Fayetteville waste management practices. N. STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS: 1) Dedication of Public Facilities: This project will consist of one public street, which will be dedicated to the City of Fayetteville. Utility infrastructure will be dedicated to the City of Fayetteville and utility easements will be dedicated by the Final Plat. Stonewood Gardens Page 10 2) On or Off -Site Improvements: The development of on or off -site infrastructure necessary to serve this project shall be completed prior to Final Plat approval. 3) Natural Resources and Environmentally Sensitive Areas: There are no known natural resources or environmentally sensitive areas on this site. 4) Project Phasing Restrictions: The applicant shall have one year from City Council approval of the PZD to receive preliminary plat approval, one year to obtain all development permits, and three years to obtain final plat approval with a one year extension available for each time limit pursuant to Chapter 166.20 of the Unified Development Code. 5) Fire Protection: This project will be served by the Fayetteville Fire Department. The closest station is at Hwy 265 and Old Wire Road. 6) Other Commitments Imposed by the City: There are currently no other commitments imposed by the City. 7) Parks, Trails, and Open Space Commitments: Tree preservation and protection will be implemented in accordance with the City of Fayetteville Code of Ordinances Title XV Unified Development Code: Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection. 8) Proposed Preliminary Building Elevations: Conceptual architectural elevations and floor plans are provided in Appendix A of this booklet. Stonewood Gardens Page 11 • O. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CONDITIONS. AND REVIEW • GUIDELINES: 1) Screening and Landscaping: This development shall comply with the landscaping requirements as i outlined in Chapter 177 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code. An ornamental fence shall be constructed along Crossover Road and on the i south side of the property at the time of development, as well as vegetative buffer of trees and shrubs. The fence along the south side shall not prohibit pedestrian movement in along the pedestrian easement and sidewalk to the south. The fence will be of the same materials along • • all the lots and will be constructed prior to Final plat. 2) Traffic and Circulation: i Access to this property is by way of a public street to the west onto Hwy •i 265 3) Parking Standards: Residential parking will be provided and all driveways shall meet the ;; standards as required by Chapter 172 of the Fayetteville Unified • Development Code for single-family residences. Curb cuts shall be limited -i to a maximum width of 16 feet at the right-of-way and shall be at least 5 • feet from the property line. Shared driveways may be located on the • property line and shall be placed in a private shared access easement. 4) Perimeter Treatment: • Perimeter fencing and landscaping will be provided to the west and south. There is an existing privacy fence along the east and northeast side of the • project. • 5) Sidewalks: ,i Sidewalks will be designed and constructed on both sides of the proposed • street along with a pedestrian access easement and sidewalk between lots 5 and 6 for connectivity to the south. • • Stonewood Gardens -i Page 12 :i 6) Street Lights: Street lights will be designed and constructed in accordance with the Unified Development Code. 7) Water: Water lines will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Fayetteville Water and Sewer Specifications. 8) Sewer: Sewer lines will be constructed in accordance with the City of Fayetteville Water and Sewer Specifications. 9) Streets and Drainage: Streets and drainage will be designed and constructed in accordance with the Unified Development Code. 10) Construction of Non -Residential Facilities: There are no non residential areas proposed on the subject property. 11) Tree Preservation: This development shall comply with the Tree Preservation requirements as set forth in the Fayetteville Unified Development Code at the time of development, subject to approval by the Urban Forester. 12) Architectural Design Standards: It is the interest of this Owner to obtain approval of this PZD for construction of single family houses with a front porch and rear access with shared driveways. 13) Signage: Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code for single family residential subdivisions. 14) View Protection: We are not anticipating that any improvements to this property will impact any view of surrounding properties. Stonewood Gardens Page 13 15) R evocations: The developer understands causes for revocation and will take all measures necessary to avoid revocation. 16) Covenants, Trusts, and Homeowner Associations: The developer will create a property owners association for the purpose of owning and maintaining the detention pond and greenspace. The developer will prepare protective covenants to establish home building standards. 17) Intent/Purpose of PZD Ordinance: The PZD Ordinance provides this project the ability to create a unique infill development. Utilizing a PZD allows for slight modifications to traditional setbacks, lot widths, and lot area minimums while keeping the focus on the City Plan 2025. Stonewood Gardens Page 14 APPENDIX A Stonewood Gardens Page 15 • • r11s tI .ai� " F k( r jw.fir" r 3 .ii 1! ti •p' - Y yy TT: F' a::j -�- yp n S S 1.3 . [!� IF 3r t .w+ '1 • Ir' 1- • w•yyiryy'M 006 4 po N0181 SVW&1V 3"IM Ifl Y - Q LUYSl48!• Mi Ewa •0N1 gy�nlyPA1J omaIolu S•vr•wwA•j •�.. ro 9N1 S2133NIJN3 OOOHNOBHOGN SaddOSHOHOd S d 9 ' a r •a�nosn ,•�• IV a•u 31q a•3 3 NOISK UlNnwwoJ 00 NO-LOMHSVM SO A1MVW/1H HOJ L9WH yn JNI17nSN0W atl.. 0NN77373�W Oil 133HS SNOWONOO 1VH3v3D / M3400 a R € y-2 I VQ5 SYW -mmZSWWLantf zfll- Q W M1 N M1nT �W- [I� O �, <i�o�Aiup�pM1W-i UY > pz00VWriWIri28yry y x(I F}Z1� I2 xi tl NW eeW O ;TOE 3 ROsy ♦♦ y[ y� LaLao p]s=OyF*O zz F�YJTNyry<Fo Up3 NN Lar[ (W y1 FLa OS $WW Q[O�J yFy ps�j mWFWWT[ JpNN N FOy 3aI Yj R•W rr OK Km0 < W nNWQ�Y O O M1i lLa ♦gtl -'0o <Vp WN %[o M1�hoazu o u zo cm 8'j a n_zJ]o Sip �2 �Wp p tSr<O`NM1M1pNQ S y�y1t2M1�jpJ p {w0 O 2p YWW �uWyyO}�WpyWINW� 0W M13 WW2< Sl♦W�G0 Y 1 ,M, 'Z `Lan °i€5ouliw`g�w3¢ z W 3J 3 _W9'j,'WaCu42Q C, rj 4OEW 00 u Li i _ WjjpaW3�nN} V 0tL4 Fsaz<<< O[UnW Spp`x Li=pu raj VNo�N zp $Np J O{I.iQ % O WUZ` UItl<VC {La=VF tl La0 <W 2 0 < n x mu M1O�On2N�U�202�22 N N % y�<LaM1W pY0 Sl (V7Zy YIW tl�o 0W_2 W LJ Li0 lUYtl y M1� ^ WO WpIt f� q rr VWMIS O. I WWj&JI KFNN�J6.1 2 `LLL���llllll 18 I- OU F532 WpV u Z<Z y1 pOY1W OQOTNN 0FZIM1 U7yWNM1zJm Om5 xt3\G W IM1Op OO WUO WWO V- W V Wzi xo° IX 030 O'"W~�1St[0 Wz amm) ) 33 pp <-04 Z <Y;°3zai YN y^_r �iniw3w 2-QW W Q U) LU z Q ELI__ I QW c 00 OC _ Q o U W Q , a N rn 0-r�= N T V ) V N T A IL T O 1 Z_ 1 O U _J I• / M wW LJJ O0< UOu O n W6 O Q M1W N W W Q Q O_2 -O-,0 �. i 6iM1 oWljo Wi W W <W NW Q N1-0O�y O 1. � U a �z `W i6Za Jiw I F 3p u>J tN_ Z WWNO <nLa Y p M1WWO zU u_ i0 NJ O VLLRRQ NWZ Y6 FI JV U2 tN N J< 2 4 puWO WZaW F pWu02 yL Q ONOZ 0Fl>OZ OO1lM1 ZNa] J>NeLaNe� tDl YO NV Cy O1C0 NT�2> }W Oz OJOCU QQ O R OZ S WGp}N0 xiz �W mOmJ (W Z4~0 1W-sx lrIOWO<J l O g10N0 xp0 N g b ¢ = -o� oo₹MoNW; Mfg C' o� z 31n SW pNN� F4W?3 6 z--lOV WI IC Z OO< L NO QZ0033 rWi00bj QW Oylr ON OV3 aoO JjSNQ <O< 30 WN FNU'W JF O Gw 2W u�2�Q�ej VoFO5: Lapin Yz u�k wjLa N QT M1z N'2(2<Q ]W6W Vj V<7Q Wp0 W3 i NLi 10 � z� JNN� QiM1 )«) NKKN OW F}WO 2 > u i0 pONj �peo WpOzgN SNZ ODU NJ 0p QLaW� Z}SW0O WZWW pQ OVw 221 ZQ. FWV wow OOrm W3N0 Q3pyq(Wq NW•WjLg2 �Sw YSy�EK~ M1JLSLa g6�j]w yyM1W0( X,- OO20 z30 O _J$p O (JIQ JNY )ZFM1 m W �W O_j 1a. V NW2� M1W oW p.W G( M1urot M1 IrP SiNW ^23ipO "O �WYn FJJK Q pW_M10NC p�Qz�W } WWM1 } m OSCW NpJWN ZWp p<O rz•W z1O ,�SpW o� y2La �j S� hi ypp30g5 2Lac 0 WF10 ITWC FpQOJ r(QFLIG O3S OI�Np m>( S OVW M1VFV W <FW xiz�i N NDln 0C MM Z Om 0J_2 NkNg( FpM1O00 r 02z m00i WZ1 N Jl M1 2 WJ1. M1 p[V's Wy6 Li 6U0 OM13 30QZ 0 ZQ N Q O W_WNC_00 wwa` LaO YW 2OW N p IL}N2N2I( 2y 2 NM1 N_J 8 1'G 0> 60 yaa z fWJ By$0V31 M1y2 QVW V 8:L Q V_LatU �ON6�ti WaW� LaV z'W W3NjV NNM1N Li O W VW WWOOW� WWp WQC3 M1 Fr. ' YF XWOo7I eoac.' e n Out dab G Lu W � o01 6 Z 1 po X W = W < �Wa- =o�m_ o A} v > x Z Z o U K U = Li H00 'Ctaj O N 3 N f- W O O xi p MI V xn Wagia M006 499103 NOTBT S )n 3T1131LaAvd ° _ i iCOPIOf)1.a��IM'aMMta3 'ON! 'SH!f33N3NlON3 � m _ tea OOOH&OSHSl3N S3dVOSHOdOd a y I � NLN33 NOK3C ALNnWWOO ._.._,.. ,° ..,....,_. vn ONInnSNOI CC) A'019 AJSVM dO AltJVW/Y/ &Od AVl9VH ... >� UNV77373�W p $ a salvo vvls ingndola.iaa ow .n. VAW40Z p -- '_ I U \` KS ° ₹ ii e 88� _ lilt w /I I .._t o \\ _ , r _ , \ k q3p . 1 'yf�yf y c5 a�°£x yp4�3i94 I / �_�✓ C133b18 Y i�kY i 4 II r IISSCC CCC A IINN ff R -` 1Y Im{y r I 7 - - - p e g aG g e I � i Tito �� Nyiiy r I r0 6 �0 y ri.G d 0 r — — — — — —� — — — L4". [EY{,3i G'QNp ���t E( 1 I bl ANN N°° x d � '7____ Ii L w 1, 118IL II33CC SS6 rni V J lY 3 � a ? 8 $ I I ___ I I. z aN Bg / 1 f --__ — n I I - �.. I --`- yk� S8p Gc, Gc,tt G `yj�E.yyp31E '-NI. d €2 €�' '.03 �R C 9 / I ' ' I oo, IiY3`3Y�yy O j _ � / ' Y {55 CC 5555 4'e' y963g:: ���iSS CCCCC E ��ii �I'Si 4 Vi 3g 8_ _ � ��l�I ytl _ , It i y4 I / _ \ / C Ilyyy w 'a y c pt11 t t c y :_3;3IXqy W / 2 C QU. ___ � ..R_ on..,, n g 3Y11g.61 jf I 111 w Q 1 I � � 3 4 , I 1 a. 1I { Q p}� 4`�6 I I I n. , 553 4:3 IJ2-- ff--'_ 3 Iltltl d § e B SZ 6 ii a 8 I I I -- I 1tlaWp. 44 006 eH%NO "N Oiar SCSNVJHV 3TN3LLaA V - ° L[[KL98L1 P1 coos al OIIWYaf9J I flSW •I•wv wl ro� I OOOHHOBHOSN S3dVOSHObOd a 3 '3Nl SH33NIJN3 ' y'a'p ��a 1131)133 NOIS30 AJINNWWOJ v(� OO NOIOMHSVM j0 A1NVW7M HPl1V1191M a.. 1 >m .a ..•II.,.V Ia..1•...I.e 'Nfl `JNl1N1SN03 L a 0Nt 77373OW Prmv NVId 1N73120 H3(ShY IT rz1 II.. � L 1 %'+�, �S1 it . ..ii VIII i1�,11S1i.A ayls i i H;•1 's�sR'•- .�a des • Id • ti t; t �! t;t �It �ne II si _ In.,.. •1^�Y� : • La� 1 a• '�YR IIII Q s M1• tIIt'IiIt Q. ' • Y�C� -111I. �' y �%,�� i\i ire' J O • I ' -un � u Inl o�ee�A . VIII O uUJ111a�1 '�tla ___ glue H. i • O q , 4 D �' II RU!!- him= z 0 U 0 00 cz Ie 0 ieTtr O0O I^ I qi €1 z An y � RI S,25° Cil dtfl e oil UN-- -- •- �-- a r ' 'i n a.1..J 1l 1 II Ii i 1.%y 1 _JL—a/_J LJ 11 II l ii ,Air - 11 I II l a•tl l r-- 1 r---1 C I •1 4L'4 L04 4j �{ 11 R 1 1 ! q i J`xmitl • jl S 1 1 i i ._L__f L__3 11 1 1 1 11 ; aII I --- s t yld� i%.. WSWOW MDoc affo3 NDrat SSW' 3TVi3L13A Vd - =L<9fLY9lt •J WO emit e11N.UaAej 3Nl S2133N19N3 OOOHNOHHOISN SadVOSHOHOd g " MaNaoN .Y A31...11Mn a31N3] a1140 AII..1woj b,n 9NU nSNoo OO NOlONMSVM dO A1M/VW/N-I F6J /1Y1/HtM .ee—. "' ' 0n737w 1 dwxWJ3s $ s p � ----- - � zIx KLt.sI.ryN 1 o a Dal ® 'fi r r tP 9p Il t II 1® Ij ®: II ® II o li ® it ® I I, ,� I; ti� SiI4I J4 U._ I if y1 I1____ L S 1�t{ _ I sY3 , I—' r � I 1 S I I 1I FFFF ® I b Is � b■ _ !S — L _ Iea ® 1 1 I Ob tt17LNiJI__ FFFIII I UI I _` I y II I .® , ® 1 I I III II I I �_- J_maA p II III ® III ® II O (� 1 (111F. -F 1 ^Y I ^s LL I III - =W'KL gLT,MQ,11 I 14 i l o � I I I I I I ' a , I I qy oJB5 4Er , I I f 1 to p. 4' I r I %\ O!itj 11 1 _i N ■ U p W R w❑ ��zaa p ¢�y €F•. o .. NN QHMw 44N Pililli USyimowa�1aio wcQia4Q O y�>`�p¢C �`^� a W >Y%Q >FV0y0 4. ORW¢ 4' ,,,<o -y NOHm4F IGH flb 054 y4 a F ai10$ ¢i0 ya gOUFR Lc i2�y yFsy y y¢ayd °°my dP ys a CoS y2<<ozWP J3ooQ��z ���� z a s ° ygqu°'XR bt'ippqT ❑ SO � OoS yow° R-`iy3t 2¢4>pw�> wo a wowao o� wx di O V NR2¢W a �4p¢000 Q�� Sa y�xr0 q U rn yy zWz,, ra� ez¢�gy`�F2 �apm�t(i1oo ��acljW c4i o`""os aN 3Z yoacwi w° ooxW �N o o � Jr, wO q b W E W w h4F $m° 4g y� J��Jfl aVYiW HryfFG'W�a 4aja¢ WW3 '.1 r ONYJjU y p° Y+ ~ W uj o ZO �a�UaR$77ao m Qb4�≤°008 v�Sc≤a8Q w 2 w 4kj UI UNF - N M Cl) Z �cn W(11 No o oc o W ° L 0 D Q . n W Y n C J W o0W ° w a N W ssY m ZW cu O a y 0 m< A. Wz a 3 a 9f�@1lii _y O w 7 Z m N d 6 W W Nil rte' F W ::: O �T 0 Z ₹ L P O s J W �' 2 o w i W 4 F W Q W M 2 M W F 2 p F N w o{ 3>vW�wy & O a T n F Q N V u J 1 F- W W O Z °3w W T O T m p L y N y W T U z WO F V N N 0 a u Vi T w 2 b00 - M 1 Q T 0 2 0 a w 0 4 I--- W Jw NK T d Q ¢ CILIMBS S'C z G TY a 0 N K F W LL K ti W } 41 e 2 0� a�W oo 4jw 2W C F J ep6 a ti ;=ioaviz� by Z e! N d W o ZOOM 2 0 >Q 4. F W F�moMVV3 oe s W I- 'S 4w bi- ho .o Ko o3'°w a� W} 'S W Q W Q< 0 0 2 4 0 b S Q -J II. J R�WI/J Fvliff i-x ay §E 2�3 22ag;9�mz— — - i /� zSNJOdvs 000«gNOIs ewea,.eew,a e«a ]§:g _ SUgJO S 79 N S Nm � §III! ^ �i �,!® #.■..��ak T ;j�A\\ q \ \ §j�I � | !\ / §§§ \}} ``Kw» � m ,®a}te § \§§§� \ } £ N71d 1N3Wd07343(1 N31SVW La 'G .aI . "ii IWlw w £ SN349aV9 QOOM.3NOIS saoAanans •saaaHtoz� �)n�o z z y u w ( � wl m i t ?' Zl w z z IY"'� a ozdi ezlzoortaalst �r r'm eD3rmre .va S''HIVIDOSSV ''1 NHSN13DUOf W U2 Q ti W j 1m- U L C rt �I W y ly ~¢ /'if/6M'B :AR NMtlLa :ARD3J3HJ 03GIA3H 31Da .OT-I3NOS F W ti ti u W W W y rc .I 2I l y < N u I w 13 w 16 1 W >•wioilo I II 3NIN � pp Q J W J y> l m l m m l m III O I OWWOW �QN (oil I IN.N S`I m y u w 2 y w b 3 i Y u g �c •oae®�o ogpm® II m ww _ N)tE SMITH I 2462 ORCHARD Si. / SPRINGDALE. AR 77 \ (RSP-4) ' .' o BUDDY PEOPLESJ. 297 BUDDY PEOPLES 5 SHADOW CREST LANE ( 2915 SHAOOW CREST LANF �j // SPRINGDALE. AR 72162 \ ' I I SPRINGDALE, AR 72162 _ (Rq) ry Q m b n STON 000 SOBDIVIStOM 58 °4O'40"YY 325.00' • S p C N u .0059 II?' IL'4ll •W' Z J x J b W 2 N W y y_ 3 M w aWJ - w2W N1�FWN WQk W 2 y� z 22W uviW o^>m az ao O 0�'4 W 00 �'�� m iL e c N * h M Q � /IL ti_ y i } F= W N ? e 0 2 2 O Q J gw 9� id y� i y W i o N Z Q S. Q C ( •s - lu N <W J z z C N 3a a in a, N ¢ u F trio �Q3 i=.WW W0r-. W o> o Q W ry 91 0 V 2 0 W O ry' 4• W W F ul Q w ooiW�l'a tiu� �o�" wo'•T L3 yQw bQu 2Q O V=1 J 2 O O' � U• V m Z N ,o 'o a Wiz �ywn won o >oo y W; W Q i W W 1� p M Q yKj O h O z J O�t2 -OhW W M1Qi! O Lu 01 AN I - cola. w o-sl -,V O = wa['er'am Hs / W'. N 1l 6YIMro6n o9(1 ( Z , Sham 1Qe O f lv flU 3 i. X O y W U V \ 4 i1 P L >. Q ° N Q O 3 t U' � Z V: r --- e /r 9 STONEWOOD GARDENS ZONING & LAND USE PLAN FAYETTEVILLE, AR June 5, 2008 Revised June 24, 2008 Revised July 7, 2008 Owner Stonewood Gardens, LLC Fayetteville, AR 72703 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. REPRESENTATIVE/CURRENT OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY.. B. SUMMARY (SCOPE, NATURE, AND INTENT)..... I ............................6.............6..... 1 C. GENERAL PROJECT CONCEPT................................................................................................... 2 1. Street and Lot Layout......................................................................................................... 2 2. Site Plan.............................................................................................................................. 2 3. Buffer Areas........................................................................................................................ 2 4. Tree Preservation............................................................................................................... 3 5. Storm Water Detention Areas and Drainage...................................................................... 3 6. Undisturbed Natural Areas................................................................................................. 3 7. Existing and Proposed Utility Connections and Extensions ............................................... 3 8. Development and Architectural Design Standards............................................................. 3 9. Building Elevations............................................................................................................. 3 D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PHASING AND TIME FRAME ....................................................... 4 E. PROPOSED PLANNING AREAS.................................................................................................... 4 F. PROPOSED ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS......................................................... 4 1. Planning Area #1: Single -Family Residential.................................................................4-5 G. MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS COMPARED TO CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT REQU I REM ENTS............................................................................................................................ 6 1. Planning Area #1: Single -Family Residential.................................................................... 7 2. Analysis of the Site Characteristics.................................................................................... 8 H. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES................................................................ I. REASON FOR REZONING REQUEST.................................................. J. RELATIONSHIP TO THE EXISTING AND ADJACENT LAND USES ........ K. COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLAN 2025 ..................... L. TRAFFIC STUDY, M. IMPACTS ON CITY SERVICES ....................................... N. STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS........................................................ 1. Dedication of Public Facilities.................................................... 2. On or Off -Site Improvements..................................................... 3. Natural Resources and Environmental Sensitive Areas ............ 4. Project Phasing Restrictions...................................................... 5. Fire Protection............................................................................ 6. Other Commitments Imposed by the City .................................. 7. Parks, Trails, and Open Space Commitments .......................... 8. Proposed Preliminary Building Elevations ................................. IL' O. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, AND REVIEW GUIDELINES .......................12-13 1. Screening and Landscaping............................................................................................. 12 2. Traffic and Circulation....................................................................................................... 12 3. Parking Standards............................................................................................................ 12 4. Perimeter Treatment......................................................................................................... 12 5. Sidewalks.......................................................................................................................... 12 6. Street Lights...................................................................................................................... 13 7. Water................................................................................................................................ 13 8. Sewer................................................................................................................................ 13 9. Streets and Drainage..................................................................................................I..... 13 10. Construction of Non -Residential Facilities........................................................................ 13 11. Tree Preservation............................................................................................................. 13 12. Architectural Design Standards........................................................................................ 13 13. Signage............................................................................................................................. 13 14. View Protection................................................................................................................. 13 15. Revocations......................................................................................................................14 16. Covenants, Trusts, and Homeowner Associations........................................................... 14 17. Intent/Purpose of PZD Ordinance..................................................................................... 14 APPENDIXA.............................................................................................................................................. 14 SN 3--MU4 tutij o aQ J u J 0 O J N �ZUi � U Fi 0 W O cN a Os 0 y U a fn I, h LQ I-. W Z '0 ti v Q W> zQ J J ti W a F v� i NV7d 3Sr 0NV7 9 DNINOZ inflflltflVd I SNSO2JVJ QOOM3NOI SNOA3AdnS o ST793NION3 1JAI0 6eeeizooaoaisvr - no jeoamr7 Sf.LVIDOSSV 79 NdSN3D≥IOf i I ti KYLE SMITH // /2662 / SPRIHGOALERAR 7476 j IRSF-A) FOSTER F.O. BFOS ER // / // P.O.PBox FAYEI 9087LE AR 72703 FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72705 // (R -O) L-- __ __rR, PLL 4.- 'YO.r_Crn..0 :UH:f } :Ora Sd '4 5. 320' rvi i591• r - - RZL..._. _ -'mr a JC9fl- b � . - - I ,_ - W Ir�`6l 1Y �1 Q a tL tu o O W W ® h Z p U W 3 O a h 2 w o W h N S U ti olio X02'°3 ® 2 w H] h W m W O N a 2 t� WO fn z . 'u x I' 0 a 3 = � ti In W yI 2 Nam p m ti I- Q(n Z W N o W W M O Z tU n? W H IInn 2 0 O F.Ij O ti ti W U W 1=- c6 2 W O p• p W W Q ? r O N y W m J Q I� Q 1 2 ti 2 y 3 R N W U y J a R U VMj N In J =L e d x x W 0 NOW e49eTiJ.7 ee/.oeTe&68 w Llty LIm7s_ _ Q _ U-TVHdsy) 0V081H9MBlV ` y iii -w] 4WdSd0AIIJ (r9) wu"aery 1111 awaptmn t380mv a.W0SJV0 �i 16 0 S Im er r Y N. a Co\%\d._3 �' •• N a rr.iw J Z C 'I- t (6V) will " V f7P50 W6 S5'JM iINVIN' Y'N OWVMLW •696[ lie 96 Y _iY G V Y O 1 I I A. CURRENT OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY AND REPRESENTATIVE The owner of this property is B.R. Peoples. The developers are Stonewood Gardens, LLC. The representative for this project is Jorgensen and Associates. B. SUMMARY (SCOPE. NATURE, AND INTENT) Stonewood Gardens PZD was originally approved by the City May 4th, 2004. Most of the waterlines and sewer lines have been installed. A portion of the drainage has been installed and the street has been "cut -in." For numerous reasons, the original developer could not finish the project. The cost of the project exceeded expectations and the demand for lots is too low. A revised PZD was reviewed by the Planning Commission on 11/26/07 and forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation of approval subject to adding a connection to the east. The owner decided to table the project in order to analyze some changes and then move forward or change the layout. As a result, we are submitting this new revised conceptual PZD for consideration by the City. The intent of this submittal is to create an infill project that will help meet the demands of the affordable housing market while focusing on the goals of the City Plan 2025. This can be achieved by striving to create a unique atmosphere that promotes traditional town form and a friendly community environment. The revised layout has one planning area with Single Family Detached dwelling units. The overall density of this project is 4.46 dwelling units per acre, which is based on 15 units on 3.36 acres, and falls between the RSF-8 zoning and the RSF-4 zoning. The street will be in the same location as previously planned but instead of having a cul-de- sac at the end; the road will curve to the east and connect the adjacent property. The water and sewer will have to be extended. This revised plan proposes a minimum lot width of 21.3 feet, an average lot width of approximately 50 feet, a minimum lot area of 4,635 square feet, and setback requirements similar to the RSF-8 zoning district. Stonewood Gardens Page 1 The revised plan has 15 lots with shared drives on the property line that will provide access to the garages. Most of the houses that are along the street will have a front porch that faces the street with a garage hidden from the street on the side of the house. This will create the feel of the traditional town form and promote walkability within this project. Sidewalks will be built on both sides of Stonewood Court with an additional pedestrian access easement and sidewalk between lots 7 and 8. Ibis is an important connection that will help promote Traditional Town Form by giving residence pedestrian access to future amenities to the south. The lots to the south are currently zoned residential office and could contain professional offices, neighborhood retail shops, restaurants, a video store, etc. This would not only be beneficial to the residence of Stonewooardenc hut also te the surreundingneighborhoods to nrnvidc assess_to these amenities. Lot 16 is designated open/common area for neighborhood amenities and the location of the detention pond. This lot will be maintained by the POA and cannot be built on. C. GENERAL PROJECT CONCEPT 1) Street and Lot Layout: The current PZD shows a cul-de-sac street which will be removed and a, 21 -foot wide, street will curve to the east to the adjacent property for a future east/west connection. In addition, a pedestrian access easement and sidewalk has been added between lots 7 and 8 for future connection to the residential office zoning to the south. We feel this connection will promote Traditional Neighborhood Development through the use of pedestrian connectivity to possible future amenities such as professional offices, neighborhood retail shopping, restaurants, a video store, etc.. 2) Site Plan: Please refer to the Master Development Plan. Stonewood Gardens Page 2 3) Buffer Areas: There will be decorative fencing along with detailed landscaping added along Hwy. 265 to provide a buffer between this project and the highway. There is already a fence along the east side of the property, but additional trees and landscaping will help provide needed buffers. The entrance, to the development from Hwy 265 will also be addressed with raised landscaped beds and trees to add a buffer and aesthetics from the highway. 4) Tree Preservation: As per the present City ordinance, tree preservation will be required. Lot 16 open/common space is reserved for green space as well as to preserve a number of existing trees in the southeast corner of the lot. The houses will be arranged and built in a manner to preserve all trees if available. We will work with all utility companies to evaluate any opportunities to move easements in order to save trees. 5) Storm Water Detention Areas: As required by the current drainage manual, our post development flow will not exceed the pre -development. A detention pond will be installed on the north side of the project and will be subject to the City's Landscaping requirements for Stormwater Facilities. 6) Undisturbed Natural Areas: The majority of this site will be developed. Additional plantings will be made on the perimeter of this project. 7) Existing and Proposed Utility Connection and Extensions: This project will connect to an existing 8" waterline to the south and west. In addition, a wastewater pump station has been installed to collect and pump wastewater to an existing 8" sewer in Stonewood Subdivision. All utilities will try to be located in the rear of the lots to preserve and maintain curb appeal. Stonewood Gardens Page 3 8) Development and Architectural Design Standards: All buildings in Stonewood Gardens shall conform conceptually to the "Craftsman" and or "Bungalow" Architectural style (See Appendix A). Most of the houses will have rear or side loaded garages and shall have street facing porches incorporated in their design. Restrictive covenants will be provided that will determine details such as material use, roof pitch, etc. to ensure high quality and consistency on the design of the houses. Because lots 1-5 are adjacent to Hwy 265 the west facade of these houses will be required to be articulated for visual aesthetics from the road. 9) Building Elevations: Architectural renderings and building elevations have been included with this project booklet (see appendix A). These illustrations show general layout, style, and floor plan. D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PHASING AND TIMEFRAME One year from City Council approval to receive preliminary plat approval, one year to obtain all development permits, and then start building houses and depending on the market demand, achieve final build out over next 4 years. E. PROPOSED PLANNING AREAS This project has one planning area. F. PROPOSED ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Planning Area #1: Single Family Residential: Purpose: The purpose of this PZD, is to permit and encourage the development of single family detached dwelling units which will have a density of 4.46 lots/acre, which is based on the proposed 15 units on 3.36 acres. Stonewood Gardens Page 4 A. Uses: 1) Permitted Uses. (Planning Area #1). Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-familySingle4amily dwellings B. Conditional Uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 24 Home occupations C. Density: Single Family Dwellings Units Per Acre 5.0 D. Bulk and Area Regulations: Single Famil Dwellin s Lot minimum width 21.3 feet Lot area minimum 4 635 square feet Land area per dwelling unit 4,635 square feet E. Setback Requirements: Front Side Rear 15 5' 20' F. Maximum building height: 40 feet. G. Building Area: The square footage of improvements shall not exceed 35% of the total lot footage. Stonewood Gardens Page 5 Site Planning: H. Screening and Landscaping: The screening and landscaping will be provided as set forth in the Unified Development Code. The developer will install decorative fencing with landscaping along the West side, adjacent to Hwy. 265, and along the South side. They are also going to landscape the front entrance and plant trees to provide screening from Hwy 265 into the subdivision. I. Parking: All parking shall comply with chapter 172 of the Unified Development Code. J. Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architectural renderings have been provided in Appendix A. K. Signage: Signs shall be permitted and approved and shall be installed in accordance with the Single -Family Unified Development Code. G. MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS COMPARED TO CURRENT ZONING REQUIREMENTS •As noted before, this property is currently zoned R-PZD. The property due North and East are zoned RSF-4. There are subdivisions located to the South of this property. The property due North is currently a field with a few trees. The property to the West across Hwy 265 is the Lake Fayetteville property. Included with this property are: jogging trails, bike riding trails, baseball felids, and numerous other recreational facilities. This property also consists of the new site of the Botanical Gardens of the Ozarks. The land to the South of the subject property is zoned R -O to create a transition zone between the R -A to the East, Hwy. 265 and the RSF-4 to the East. Stonewood Gardens Page 6 1. PA -1 (Single Family) Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning PZD Sin le Family) PZD: PA -1 (Single Family) 9T� ^ M�..l: /T I i '�. Xs✓••:,1�T i�' A •p" •_V4� {�5 f w��� Y �:} ti'5 i.: ..V m{. �I�'�'6".' a'N':': . Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 8 Single-family dwellings '•F:: .,$ ." z-:n<,-,.��" w. � '.� �-`ndrtioda Us.s�._::°. � �;.y:� -:,��,�.:.' �<.� ,._. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permitCity-wide Unit 2 uses by conditional use permit Unit 4 Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 24 Home occupations a# 5Y,Id- Acreage 3.36 Acreage 3.36 acres Dwelling Units 12 units Dwelling Units 15 units Density 3.57 units/acre Density 5.0 units/acre Lot width minimum 19.88 ft. 21.3 ft Lot Area Minimum Residential 4568sq.ft. 4635 5 . ft. Land area per dwelling unit 4568 sq. ft 4635 sq. ft. Front Oft 15 ft Side 5ft 5 ft Rear 0 ft 20 ft 0' Maximum building height of 35 feet. Maximum building height of 40 feet. .. On any lot, the area occupied by all the buildings shall not exceed 78% of the total area of such lot. On any lot, the area occupied by all the buildings shall not exceed 35% of the total area of such lot. 2. Analysis of the Site Characteristics: No environmentally hazardous, sensitive, or natural resource areas have been found on this site. Stonewood Gardens Page 7 H. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES: Recreational Facilities are not proposed for this site; however, this property is east of the Lake Fayetteville recreation area which has an extensive walking trail, bike trail, softball field, etc. A parks fee will be assessed at the appropriate time for these lots. I. REASON FOR REZONING REQUEST: The reason for this PZD request is to provide a planned development that does not fit the present standard zonings that the City has. We feel there is a need for smaller single family quality homes built in a traditional neighborhood form at a slightly higher allowable density than the RSF-4 Zoning District requirements. J. RELATIONSHIP TO THE EXISTING AND ADJACENT LAND USES: The properties due North and to the West are zoned RSF-4. There are subdivisions located to the East and South of this property. The property due North is currently a field with a few trees. The property to the West across Hwy 265 is the Lake Fayetteville property. Included with this property are: jogging trails, bike riding trails, baseball felids, and numerous other recreational facilities. This property also consists of the new site of the Botanical Gardens of the Ozarks. The land to the South of the subject property is zoned R -O. We feel this zoning and density will be a good transition from the R -O to the South, Hwy 265 to the west, and the RSF-4 and R -A zoning to the North and East. The homes in this PZD are going to be high quality brick homes that should blend nicely with the surrounding style of houses. Because of the existing high volume of traffic on Hwy 265, the current housing demands, and the R -O zoning due south it is hard to market larger homes on larger lots directly adjacent to a principal arterial parkway such as Hwy 265. We feel the requested density is a needed transition for this property location without compromising the quality of these and the surrounding homes. Stonewood Gardens Page 8 . . . • K. COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLAN 2025: • It is true that this project is not mixed use that would provide neighborhood services. However, in our opinion we feel that daily commercial goods and service needs are within a couple of miles — gas and convenience store, Fayetteville Athletic Club, numerous restaurants and other businesses at the • corner of Hwy. 265 and Zion Road. The adjacent land to the south is zoned residential office and could potentially have many of these amenities. In addition, the Botanical Gardens and Lake Fayetteville facilities are directly west. Goal 2 of the Fayetteville City Plan 2025 is to discourage suburban sprawl. We do not feel that this project represents urban sprawl and in fact we believe that this represents "infill" within this area. Property to the south is R -O, to the east and north is residential. We feel this R-PZD compliments and is a good transition r. for the surrounding areas. • Goal 3 of the Fayetteville City Plan 2025 is make traditional town form the • standard. We find this project represents traditional town form with sidewalks providing walkability and connectivity and smaller front setbacks. All the lots besides lot 1 will have a shared common drive along the property line to reduce curb cuts and the number of driveways from the road. The pedestrian access • easement and sidewalk between lots 7 and 8 will help create this traditional town form by promoting walkability to the close amenities directly to the south in the • future. In addition, we are providing future connectivity to the east. Goal 4 of the Fayetteville City Plan 2025 is to grow a livable transportation network. The entrance to this PZD is off of Hwy 265 and we have made a stub out for future connection to the property to the east. We have also added • numerous sidewalks to promote pedestrian movement with the most important being the access easement and sidewalk between lots 7 and 8. This is important • because it will give residence of not only Stonewood Gardens but future • residence to the north and ease pedestrian access to future amenities to the Stonewood Gardens -• Page 9 south. The property to the south is currently zoned residential office and could contain professional offices, neighborhood retail shopping, restaurants, a video store, etc. We have also provided pedestrian connectivity to a future sidewalk along Hwy 265. This can easily transport people from this PZD and surrounding properties to close amenities such as the Fayetteville Athletic Club, Lake Fayetteville Park, restaurants, gas stations, etc. Although the houses that we are proposing are not "attainable" to all income levels, we feel that we are offering an alternative product that will hopefully meet the demand of the market for smaller lots, less yard to mow, reduced setbacks and curb appeal with quality built homes that compliment the surrounding properties. L. TRAFFIC STUDY: We feel that the added traffic to the surrounding area with this development is minimal. No traffic study has been initiated since the impact of this project would not be expected to warrant such a study. M. IMPACTS ON CITY SERVICES: There are no significant impacts to city services associated with this project. Water and sewer have been addressed in other areas of the booklet. Waste will be managed by each single family dwelling being assigned a plastic trash container in accordance with the City of Fayetteville waste management practices. N. STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS: 1) Dedication of Public Facilities: This project will consist of one public street, which will be dedicated to the City of Fayetteville. Utility infrastructure will be dedicated to the City of Fayetteville and utility easements will be dedicated by the Final Plat. Stonewood Gardens Page 10 2) On or Off -Site Improvements: The development of on or off -site infrastructure necessary to serve this project shall be completed prior to Final Plat approval. 3) Natural Resources and Environmentally Sensitive Areas: There are no known natural resources or environmentally sensitive areas on this site. 4) Project Phasing Restrictions: The applicant shall have one year from City Council approval of the PZD to receive preliminary plat approval, one year to obtain all development permits, and three years to obtain final plat approval with a one year extension available for each time limit pursuant to Chapter 166.20 of the Unified Development Code. 5) Fire Protection: This project will be served by the Fayetteville Fire Department. The closest station is at Hwy 265 and Old Wire Road. 6) Other Commitments Imposed by the City: There are currently no other commitments imposed by the City. 7) Parks, Trails, and Open Space Commitments: Tree preservation and protection will be implemented in accordance with the City of Fayetteville Code of Ordinances Title XV Unified Development Code: Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection. 8) Proposed Preliminary Building Elevations: Conceptual architectural elevations and floor plans are provided in Appendix A of this booklet. Stonewood Gardens Page 11 O. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CONDITIONS. AND REVIEW GUIDELINES: 1) Screening and Landscaping: This development shall comply with the landscaping requirements as outlined in Chapter 177 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code. An ornamental fence shall be constructed along Crossover Road and on the south side of the property at the time of development, as well as vegetative buffer of trees and shrubs. The fence along the south side shall not prohibit pedestrian movement in along the pedestrian easement and sidewalk to the south. The fence will be of the same materials along all the lots and will be constructed prior to Final plat. 2) Traffic and Circulation: Access to this property is by way of a public street to the west onto Hwy 265 3) Parking Standards: Residential parking will be provided and all driveways shall meet the standards as required by Chapter 172 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code for single-family residences. Curb cuts shall be limited to a maximum width of 16 feet at the right-of-way and shall be at least 5 feet from the property line. Shared driveways may be located on the property line and shall be placed in a private shared access easement. 4) Perimeter Treatment: Perimeter fencing and landscaping will be provided to the west and south. There is an existing privacy fence along the east and northeast side of the project. 5) Sidewalks: Sidewalks will be designed and constructed on both sides of the proposed street along with a pedestrian access easement and sidewalk between lots 5 and 6 for connectivity to the south. Stonewood Gardens Page 12 6) Street Lights: Street lights will be designed and constructed in accordance with the Unified Development Code. 7) Water: Water lines will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Fayetteville Water and Sewer Specifications. 8) Sewer: Sewer lines will be constructed in accordance with the City of Fayetteville Water and Sewer Specifications. 9) Streets and Drainage: Streets and drainage will be designed and constructed in accordance with the Unified Development Code. 10) Construction of Non -Residential Facilities: There are no non residential areas proposed on the subject property. 11) Tree Preservation: This development shall comply with the Tree Preservation requirements as set forth in the Fayetteville Unified Development Code at the time of development, subject to approval by the Urban Forester. 12) Architectural Design Standards: It is the interest of this Owner to obtain approval of this PZD for construction of single family houses with a front porch and rear access with shared driveways. 13) Signage: Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code for single family residential subdivisions. 14) View Protection: We are not anticipating that any improvements to this property will impact any view of surrounding properties. Stonewood Gardens Page 13 15) R evocations: The developer understands causes for revocation and will take all measures necessary to avoid revocation. 16) Covenants, Trusts, and Homeowner Associations: The developer will create a property owners association for the purpose of owning and maintaining the detention pond and greenspace. The developer will prepare protective covenants to establish home building standards. 17) Intent/Purpose of PZD Ordinance: The PZD Ordinance provides this project the ability to create a unique infill development. Utilizing a PZD allows for slight modifications to traditional setbacks, lot widths, and lot area minimums while keeping the focus on the City Plan 2025. Stonewood Gardens Page 14 APPENDIX A Stonewood Gardens Page 15 a r — — — ri. f e fr /Ai4 9 4 .1 • �'I 4 pm ze¢ Wxx y d i 4���aO z`J3y,zywx.a°a.IflIb °UU$✓�Ol-y�`m°_.�zf�omFr o � W ^c i i >u"°° w `mma ga atNtioow'aa 5F`zy° a� ' y° ° Pndh PHfl vi zzap ° or<i�p� °o-ZzQ z4�u Q(�!flflflh >o�'u ��eoq °oro o9a jd, z 4oM22 o� g�" ° ° S ° °m ezJ o<. �,< � w o �yw y y c E& U�' W� 2� m° °� nra � �ao .,� �.c ygaoy a m° o m 2Wo Q{-. za Z m(� F. ���+++ o S $G aqua Q u W Zoo W>J YI Oyu [- im w sowao� KLLI /w Lu >.y�m °E ,4, y>pG W°fawy>. a WF^, 4WF KK l Why Q t>.Y?�`7'W �I Sai'Oy^�JJz �/W O 2_ v < y 6yy Q ¢ Fya°U° i-.yym OU FOc44 00004 U I K�< 2 M1U6G4°Ow6U 4 Q�n'n 4° y W �N� Z N M Z W ¢c) I 0 c. W N Cl)Co nW Y Imo- a C J o m �a W 'va a UI Zia a 3 ti w Cl)C7 Zz w 6 bO 0z 5 r CI O -a . T III Z O H C ' w'W o '�wa m W M = u 2M wI'� ? o ti N LL m F ti P 2 b LL W P (0;, jyMN p. 1�- OQ o 2 Yve"'W o. F. oN N¢ W o M O to, ; Q ti o L y Woo va N P1 m u�oF`o w ya 2 ao a cc-) LL 20 F a 1-M u§ Z M ' �` .T ¢U W W zu t V m WO r 3 y 2~ LL h m ik U CITY LIM115 W a W 1� Q yct Q @@y (0 N Ya O wo ma Z N J ! Ca N V N a W o Z o M? m Q V W H xoma`Noo3 a� ?4 y� p Q�- oy:t c�LL oQ LLV H' p„O CO in i' l7 ayJo WaOu NN � LL �3 iN -ya a IZ-= y Ta £ NP Id 1NdfdU fdAjU t! JNINUL -- --- -- ---- - -- ------ - II NI I wl W Z SN3O2JV`J OOOM3NOIS saonanans •saaailona nlnro c w llwl'° ZI i, N 1 1 pzdlez,wozlaB�sl:r f-rpsoaNmz eD3nnrc �3ivp saivjJOSSH a'S'N3SNa[ JOf ' Q W •' U E C O ~ 3 Q ¢ fV/81'B :AB HAlVHQ A8 CYJJ,HJ O3SIA3H3IVO ,DT-.( E w ¢ till W¢ wI wI w 3Iw o 13 +CZWWo_ti x ~ W W ¢ W m ¢ <. 31•.m1rc *�o I� 3 £III �I a 2I2' a�w�E w y NUC2 I- W 2 2 ai W U 2 z N.b Iti II sl oae®#c® II ml I Wlw i KYLE SHITH .- ' / // Q 2602 GDALE. ST.1 � ' / •' SPR!NGDALE, AR J J6 ( -L') I j // BIADY PEOPLES \ I I i T95 SHADOW ECREST LANE // // " SNADOW CREST LANE NN. $PRINGDALF, AR J216T SPR(NGOALE. AR J2162— L p) R-0) NO ON OD SUBDIVISION '3 I0 ETON 4 325. wZtig y to A .WJ Y.1i Q W 0 W n V y: ye. i-:f'.�♦:.�'.:.: .S �_..: c y> NI=I-IW.� ., '. 9 DJ. b 22ND W a { J 0 4 ur I fl Cf rWAy� Q Q 0 ~ 2 1\ ri•�: V COQ w iiw / "y rti a �J 2 O N U ?� — W F = yQ� y u i"tiF 4 O W W N F W W P&-m—Ww </1 2jNeINP OF U) '^/, nC o.NvU P R' 1r ~ ~wvl2`DN� ON O ouo 4n QW U FuWr'WN� WQ o y m W Dl W O u y W 10 to ;oai��z� Qg q atPjW KIi �n u •i V 3 F y W V h Q N Z T C F W= On u W1p U 0 Q M W O7 w h u N O P >: ¢ w W O IJJ W O C > N � 13' io P4 tiC x io U y w Oj 02;Nwv U' hajoWPOu Nry Ih-Q ya. vim, ti4�i cc �i GO 12 � Ha It ti Q Iz j W 2 Jy 2 O 2 L J LU O ti°c @ ♦ LL � s@ E- N aa S� g`a'G 5 a +< • Q m ' r na Fi ag 7: n\f �t\ • I =X —X —A X —a— ntu w 3nP�Vl6' SO zn awnv V m' anew me°c of w O � J ti W NI iQ 0 U ~ 'u NV7d 1N3Wd073A30 d31SW • r, '°° " " " "�"" "° " FF II w I ?li 1 4 w SNSQ2JVO QOOM3NOIS sxoxanxns • SflaNinN3 IIAID w n Wo wlf w' w wl�' � a ozeia------ulr 3ROo, a vo .S'91vtoOSSt� w NHSNO Of e W W I m 2_J uJ u A. • ¢ W w > `> I C ti U F 2 y 1'I W �/+ Q 4 rV AB NMvb'0 :AB J 0N31fJ 035iA3H 31VC .T.I -3-M% fl u3 oJ≥wEErn y"sl �Il il� w13�31v WI0o � z J d= J a0' m Q F J � W w` p I I J V1 > I WE W=� W W 02 W i 1p i �_ 3I3 2I2 �z 51_2 i3 WW tii-om'r+ 2 9Wwi2 h�1-u3 0 I Iw ml I I ww, o Ole P0r'{}x O g rrp OO QME /*40440r2'VWfB3:2S�.00' K2S' SLODY PEOPLES HLDDYYFOPLEC2975 SHADOW CREST2975 SHADOW CRESTSPRINGDALE. AR J2T62 SPRINGDALE, AR 72762 _ (R-01 I_ _S. (RRSSIONO° I- - S /� J 0 i 2 p Q .00'54 n W .11ZL in W.IL'9ll M Oh __ WJ OJ O G> W2Wj n'�I rrb Y l 0 0.W W 7u`;'W8 m iI(LL_ii c W n. 9 N N n h_ T Y I. ' N 1 ? t' • Q I 1-: Y! 9 f9Z 0 \ - I I '• -�,c N /~CIW Wqq Q 2 r� D_ V ^1 Z O 1 O O M o ¢ n U y W w J y W w N Z v 2 Q Z o Q W> N W LL .':F N m ,; v , y, IryI S99Z .00' P W m I v Y �yy qI ': i. paSE -! .l r P N W N -�. a i in O n m r.."�.-'-' O W . , ..� uCi y c pa 3 k �' J' N 4 QI N QQ A n i 6 m 6 u, rvit L 'i� '� •'y w •,/.%•\ r_.LZ'S6 Op ♦ ♦ 3� ylY�p:. LtF�' M ✓y iliy�r " �f Jpy' O . k J e C • � 0 ua m. u o ffZ21 ggg O .ff'RL 3^9.£6.60N 1_E a Jill, i •CyZ'. 04 7. Q•iN N �y•• i2w 'O wcs U S /, C. �ipW r'r'NOx m III\ ^ yWy W W H W W °O rtf ~ tOil p !L ? e o G w v o r; a o (f 1JVN1 3781 .98111 ) .8.�.d I �w f wo".�°'wo3 m¢^b j 0 W V E IL r=n ¢ ypj II i.' (N ( LLB' LLO N Q3NPn W 3 y i 2ND Z -. 80d -_ �- V¢uZOm 2N¢p y¢W yii \3 W OZb W O.p O; 20 W .. — a�.r 4 Wes= 2 F �o N2 Z 2 4Jo 2 mrzr Ltt7Wm°s J O 2 u) W W W¢ 4 4 'avlMrumaar 59AW il,wrov N rsvxav W er=ww3�nni o a tiHiL w °°°�` �V� J C1� m61h CNN ICU W U NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDITION Benton County Daily Record P. O. BOX 1607 FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72702 PHONE: 479-571-6421 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Cathy Wiles, do solemnly swear that I am Legal Clerk of the Arkansas Democrat Gazette newspaper. Printed and published in Benton County Arkansas, (Lowell) and that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files of said publication, the advertisement of: City of Fayetteville Ordinance 5161 August 13, 2008 Publication Charge : $89.68 Subscribed and sworn to before me This/3 day of , 2008. Notary Public n(Y__ My Commission Expires: 7yJ C O/9 Do not pay from Affidavit, an invoice will be sent ,�� A. JqR� 0F•'pMM• At OjXRY' •. a IVED 'AUG 1 h 2008 CITY OF FAVETTEVILLE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE •-9. ORDINANCE NO. 5161 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISMNG A RESIDENTIAL 4'. 302 STONEW00 DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 0&, 117avye E OUTHEAST GARDENS. OFLOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CROSSOVER AND: ALBRIGHT ROAD: CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 3.36 ACRES: AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ARKANSAS MAP OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPT- ING THE ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: ' Section 1: That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as Id- kAvsr- i • From R-PZD 04-04.00, own in Exhibit Planned Zoning District to R PZD 0&3022 1 Stmewood Gardens as shown in Exhibit'K and depicted In Exhibit'B' attached here- to and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master development plan, development standards, statement of canrnitments and the conditions of approval as submit- ted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council: further, Mal the conditions of approval shall be filed and available for viewing in the office of the City Clerk/Treasurer of the City of I Fayetteville. Section 3: That INS ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such tore as all of the require- ments of the master development plan have been met. Section 4: Thai the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above. 10 PASSED and APPROVED this 51h day of August. 2008. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: By DAN COODY, Mayor SONDRA SMITH, City ClarktMaalnsa Exhibit A Is a map and may be Weaved in Me office of the City Clerk/Treasurer during normal busi- ness hours. EXHIBIT R-PZD 0.43022 PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 18, T17N. R29W IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NW CORNER OF SAID SE 114 , SW 114 THENCE S00°2602 -E 110.00 FEET TO THE PO.B.. THENCE N69°3358'E 122.33 FEET, THENCE 532°5029'E 378.17 FEET. THENCE S00°2602E 231.35 FEET, THENCE 589°40'40W 325.00 FEET, THENCE N00°26'02W 549.99 FEET TO THE P.O.B.; CON- TAINING 3.36 ACRES MORE OR LESS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY OF RECORD. RECEIVED AUG I t]U8 CITY S CIUYCLERKSOFFICE