HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5043 ., _ + .. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Doc ID : 011503040004 TVDe : REL
Recorded : 08/27/2007 at 11 : 09 : 43 AM
�- Fee Amt : $30 . 00 Paoe 1 of 4
Nashlnoton Countv . AR
Bette Stamps Circuit Clerk
File2007-00032797
ORDINANCE NO, 5043
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 07-2578, BAILEY
MEADOWS, LOCATED WEST OF SCHOOL AVENUE AND
NORTH OF BAILEY DRIVE; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY
3 .86 ACRES; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE
ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby
changed as follows: 1.
From R-A, Residential-Agricultural to R-PZD 07-2578
(Bailey Meadows) as shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in
Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master
development plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval
as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council; further, that the conditions
of approval shall be filed and available for viewing in the office of the City Clerk/Treasurer of the
City of Fayetteville
Section 3 : That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of
the requirements of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby
amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
� � rR�s ,,
PASSED and APPROVED this 7m day of4u)gust, 2007.
APPROVED: ATTEST: ; FAYETTEVILLE ;
9y KANSP�'j�'�`
By: By: . rJ1A �r �J'e4iVG7oN G N`%�
DAN COODY, Mayo SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
�[ A k,i.r ) `� e f r-Y;': t i y A-kti' - r r-+ .,NC t � S si.. y _`�"�_3. i �'l �4�,m—•'T�
Ilk
7 g4yF xf �
'
ry � _
-u
-
��
R f 'S ,ry �' o
lt 11,
lit
r ] 4 Ei q r .r y y '
- ,+ > >• 1 R 3 '" i '4 r. * s
Y t d fY pr ry Fu `t i i 1 1 A s ^ Ci
1 rs ♦ 5 r'. Lr z` h + ¢ Cs e7 ti.5 YrF1 - a.: y , tr . ti
/r 1�1"'`
f a 7 NY V itV , r b '3 • TT c f4 f
In
11,44 1r
r
K ',1 `4ia• 4 - - v l f r At . t
Ins
41144, n.
kw
Lk
on
F .1 pt LL
l
nn
d v s 1 d Ir tr _ i 'i
310
f ,
ssn-
In I
{ In. ,I
klll t 'r 1 5r2
(i e.k .., v r j + i tom'
Clk
atd-?
In, -1Is
,r � v r . 3� 4P.
. . '
jprrR 3 .#„ 5 5 Yi
f l• d y d { N . .ri" ,te �t s r r & e t s
h"k'L. � (r s � w..�+.:.zr ,ray �u f
All1 a
.✓ .zFsa k'�gr � n i - + l .� f z - ��
n14 -Ill IIn,
{ r s taI x j1tx yl' ts A, st s ✓'}� � s v L""` S. i3 F
t
lkk 9.
�LOW
nv j
' z , ° rr :'� ��h ,As h°1
F�� pF:P 'L K'c. itt 1 tt.. y r,•s
Id
V .t . r "Z w . d
rs a t k s IM,-
( YY 1yi )jam � ry 1 ,{� ^Sti t rti t Yil k`yif 4 , r L' L AL
Z J�.$ � 1 ?4@
v. h `' a �h < 3 ✓ti s- x ^+mfi nke 4 'Ild. .l x
�+' e + F t 4 .Ys � rffrt .` n Tl ' . -
EXHIBIT "B"
R-PZD 07-2578
SURVEY DESCRIPTION - ENTIRE TRACT
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SEl/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SEI/4)
OF SECTION THIRTY-TWO (32), TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN ( 16) NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30)
WEST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING
ALUMINUM ARKANSAS STATE LAND SURVEY MONUMENT; THENCE N0004713311
W
858.21 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT; THENCE S89°08'21 "W
43 .30 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON REBAR FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID
POINT BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE; THENCE
LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, N00047'33"W 456.64 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON
ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT; THENCE S89°02' 19"W 372.54 FEET
(DEED=361 .50 FEET) ALONG THE NORTH ILINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT TO AN
EXISTING FENCE AS REFERENCED IN LAND DOCUMENT 96-60514, SAID FENCE ALSO
BEING N89002'19"E 900.83 . FEET (RECORD 920.85 FEET) FROM THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40
ACRE TRACT, SOI 049'40"E ALONG SAID FENCE 241 .60 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST;
THENCE S0201 1 '49"E ALONG SAID FENCE 99.80 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST;
THENCE S01 °O1 ' 19"E 114.66 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON REBAR AT THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE; THENCE N89°08'21 "E 365.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING 3.86 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, FAYETTEVILLE, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, ARKANSAS. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 3.86 ACRE TRACT BEING SUBJECT TO
ANY EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD.
i
I
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
R-PZD 07-2578
Page 1 !of 1
Staff recommends the following conditions of approval associated with R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey
Meadows).
1 . Parks fees are due in the amount of $960.00 for each additional single family residential unit,
due prior to building permit approval for each ch unit.
2. Residences shall be constructed to be consistent with the concepts depicted in the booklet as
specified. Building permits will be based 'upon the submitted materials.
3. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property.
Conditions of approval as noted herein and,other requirements placed upon the project with
review of the Master Development Plan — lanned Zoning District by the City Council shall
also be binding.
4. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western
Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
5 . Provide a CD containing the finalized lot split in AutoCAD or similar format.
6. Each single family home shall be required to submit and obtain a grading permit at the time
of development of that lot.
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
I
1
i
Washington County, AR
I certify this instrument was filed on
08/27/2007 11 :09:43 AM
and recorded in Real Estate
File Number 2007-000327
Bette Stamps - Circuit I
by
City of Fayetteville 7 / 67
Staff Review Form fO ,r
City Council Agenda Items _ J 7L
or P`rr� G7
Contracts v
7-Aug-07lJAJ
�Q City Council Meeting Date
Jeremy Pate a` Planning Operations
Submitted By Division Department
Action Required:
R-PZD 07-2578: Bailey Meadows, 2578 : Submitted by Rodney R. and Nancy K. Payne for property located west of School
Avenue and north of Bailey Drive containing approximately 3 .86 acres. The request i
q s for a Residential Planned
Zoning
District for re-zoning, land use, and lot split approval to create a total of 4 single family lots of 2.94, 0.24. 0.39, and 0.28 acres
and associated rural residential uses.
$0.00 n/a
n/a
Cost of this request Category/Project Budget Program Category / Project Name
n/a n/a �:J
n/a
Account Number Funds Used to Date Program / Project Category Name
n/a n/a
n/a
Project Number Remaining Balance Fund Name
Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached C�
Previous Ordinance or Resolution # n/a
- 2Z u7
Department D rec r Date Original Contract Date: n/a
Original Contract Number: n/a
City Attorney
Received in Qly ClerEDs ffice
Finance an Internal Service Director Date
Received in Mayor's Office
ENTERED
Mayor p-
2 o
Comments:
City Council Meeting of August 07, 2007
Agenda Item Number
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
Thru : Gary Dumas, Director of Operations
From: Jeremy C. Pate, Director of Current Planning
Date: July 12, 2007
Subject: Residential Planned Zoning District for Bailey Meadows (R-PZD 07-2578)
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of an ordinance creating a Residential Planned
Zoning District (R-PZD) for Bailey Meadows, based on the development standards, plans
and statement of commitments submitted. This action will establish a unique zoning
district for a residential project on approximately 3.86 acres located at 1200 Bailey Drive
in south Fayetteville. The proposal is for rezoning, land use, and lot split approval to
create a total of four single family lots and associated rural residential uses.
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests rezoning land use, and lot split approval to create a total of 4 .
single family lots of 2.94, 0.24, 0.39, and 0.28 acres and associated rural residential uses.
The existing house would be on the 0.39-acre tract, the applicant desires to construct two
new residences on the 0.24 and 0.28-acre tracts, and the remaining 2.94 acres would
likely be used for a horse/hay pasture, with the potential for one additional single family
residence. The intent on the 2.94 acres is to allow for low impact agricultural uses
adjacent to single family residences. A total of four residences on the 3 .86-acre property
would result in a maximum density of 1 .04 units per acre.
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission voted 8-0-0 in favor of this request on July 12, 2007.
Recommended conditions were approved by the Planning Commission . and are reflected
in the attached staff report.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 07-2578, BAILEY
MEADOWS, LOCATED WEST OF SCHOOL AVENUE AND
NORTH OF BAILEY DRIVE; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY
3.86 ACRES; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE
ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS :
Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby
changed as follows: '
From R-A, Residential-Agricultural to R-PZD 07-2578 as
shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit `B" attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master
development plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval
as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council; further, that the conditions
of approval shall be filed and available for viewing in the office of the City Clerk/Treasurer of the
City of Fayetteville
Section 3 : That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of
the requirements of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby
amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2007.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
By: By:
DAN COODY, Mayor SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
{
® � ► iii
�ty �ti {+� a .cq�✓'xS �� t �af'F'�rn �+w^�asau�- -- �"� L^czt.. °' �. z � a�'� +:, r �c'S'n �'"bs r 'r �. '-"
�u a }r . >L X t V2 3,tlt^> 4> 5...1 �1 +e �.a. rocF -"�5'Gs tcrgg �` Y r1�t s ';y z y s - �'� t .f's. -• ti
ee
13 t j`
'i-
'�n
.Icc �>� e s q�' t L. *; r � z.'1"'s.� r n� $"* �a7,:�-`�s,��,`• � 3 Y33 �S.cr� r �, u� e u, r �..c� i
rr ?� v ,p, v S,Y-.e#v'.' z vx;"co;•p, a ` x ..t{ r �,"
v�y- ,
r b Y f ty t
k + Z r 4 FvIt
(� . p L� r a: } *' ✓ � h ,�... � v ::as f�s, Fes_ a h-7 a 't } &-�x ': t 2 ., L � S -.. 1
4 Y
Lt t '� a F ti,. J v.✓S'. , S��c'+� �si`r1 . �s .ry R1='�� R.'t; r -.c��nl"'� � asv4..rF- -L'-:`` F :.:,,z� Y
%'
WIN,
Iz Ir
ll �
s'3 �
t F'ai
7
Lam,;"aR rr
s
�Y t C f 1 -t Y a - n t {_ a4w ..e.�u svt?
w x snb '� the
�. x 3• �c'kT ->:.� ,Yf` . .d`.xf u�i, a ,S ti�.� 2.4r 3+' .� 5 Y..4c s
ddddd
ol
:.m
md
wa.`"Vr�i
3 d
EXHIBIT "B"
R-PZD 07-2578
SURVEY DESCRIPTION - ENTIRE TRACT
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1 /4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1 /4)
OF SECTION THIRTY-TWO (32), TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30)
WEST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING
ALUMINUM ARKANSAS STATE LAND SURVEY MONUMENT; THENCE N00047'33"W 858.21
FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT; THENCE S89008'21 "W 43.30
FEET TO A SET 1 /2" IRON REBAR FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING , SAID POINT
BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE; THENCE LEAVING SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, N000471331W 456.64 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON ON THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT; THENCE S89002'19"W 372.54 FEET (DEED=361 . 50 FEET)
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT TO AN EXISTING FENCE AS
REFERENCED IN LAND DOCUMENT 96-60514, SAID FENCE ALSO BEING N890021911E
900.83 FEET (RECORD 920.85 FEET) FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 40
ACRE TRACT; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT,
S01 049'40"E ALONG SAID FENCE 241 .60 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST, THENCE
S0201 1 '49"E ALONG SAID FENCE 99.80 FEETTO A.FENCE CORNER POST; THENCE
S01 °01 '19"E 114.66 FEET TO A SET 1 /2" IRON. REBAR AT THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE; THENCE N89°08'21 "E 365.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING 3.86 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, FAYETTEVILLE, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, ARKANSAS. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 3.86 ACRE TRACT BEING SUBJECT TO
ANY EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL :
R-PZD 07-2578
Page 1 of 1
Staff recommends the following conditions of approval associated with R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey
Meadows).
1 . Parks fees are due in the amount of$960.00 for each additional single family residential unit,
due prior to building permit approval for each unit.
2. Residences shall be constructed to be consistent with the concepts depicted in the booklet as
specified. Building permits will be based upon the submitted materials.
3 . The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property.
Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the.project with
review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the City Council shall
also be binding.
4. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western
Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
5. Provide a CD containing the finalized lot split in AutoCAD or similar format.
6. Each single family home shall be required to submit and obtain a grading permit at the time
of development of that lot.
I
Taye Ole Planning CommissionMeeting
July9, 2007
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE , ARKANSAS.
125 W. Mountain St. -
Fayetteville, AR 72701
PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479) 575-8267
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM : Andrew Garner, Senior Planner
Matt Casey, Assistant City Engineer
THRU : Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning
DATE: ' ' � Updated July 12 2007
R-PZD 07-2578: Planned Zoning District (BAILEY MEADOWS, 755): Submitted by
RODNEY R. & NANCY K. PAYNE for property located WEST OF SCHOOL AVENUE AND
NORTH OF BAILEY DRIVE. The property is zoned R-A, RESIDENTIAL-AGRICULTURAL
and contains approximately 3 . 86 acres. The request is for a Residential Planned Zoning District
for re-zoning, land use, and lot split approval to create a total of 4 single family lots of 2.94,
0.24, 0.39, and 0.28 acres and associated rural residential uses.
Property Owner: Ron Payne
Planner: Andrew Garner
Findings:
Property Description: The subject property consists of approximately 3.86 acres located at 1200
Bailey Drive in south Fayetteville, approximately 0.25 mile west of Drake Field Airport. The
property is zoned R-A, and is currently developed for one single family residence with pasture.
Surrounding zoning and land uses are depicted in Table 1 .
Table 1
Surrounding Land Use/Zoning:
Direction Land Use Zoning
from Site
North Undeveloped/agricultural R-A
South Single Family Rural Residential R-A
East Single Family Rural Residential R-A
West Single Family Rural Residential R-A
Background: The applicant applied to have the property re-zoned to RSF-4 on June 13, 2005
RZN 05- 1449 (Payne) and was denied by the Fayetteville Planning Commission. The applicant
has recently discussed with Planning staff a desire to build two additional single family
residences on the property, and to leave the remainder of the property open for agriculture/horse
pasture. Based on the existing zoning and amount of frontage, staff recommended that these
uses and lot configuration would not fit into any existing zoning district, and that a customized
K:IReporfs120071PC Reports107-09-071R-PW 07-2578 (Bailey Meadm.'s).doc -
Planned Zoning District would be the best fit.
Proposal: The applicant requests rezoning land use, and lot split approval to create a total of 4
single family lots of 2.94, 0.24, 0.39, and 0.28 acres and associated rural residential uses. The
existing house would be on the 0.39 -acre tract, the applicant desires to construct two new
residences on the 0.24 and 0.28 -acre tracts, and the remaining 2.94 acres would likely be used for
a horse/hay pasture, with the potential for one additional single family residence. The intent on
the 2.94 acres is to allow for low impact agricultural uses adjacent to single family residences. A
total of four residences on the 3.86 -acre property would result in a maximum density of 1.04
units per acre.
Access: Access to the site is provided directly to Bailey Drive, with each lot having a minimum
of 70' of frontage. Bailey Drive has access directly to State Highway 71, next to Fayetteville
Municipal Airport, though a portion of the street is within the City of Greenland. No new streets
are proposed. The applicant discussed at the June 28, 2007 Subdivision Committee meeting that
the low railroad crossing on Bailey Drive and associated drainage issues in the City of Greenland
have been improved since the previous rezoning request, and that the electric transmission
service poles are scheduled to be either removed or relocated further away from the railroad
crossing in the near future.
Phasing: The applicant proposes to construct two new houses on the property within two years,
although with this PZD granting lot split approval, as long as the lot split is recorded within one
year there are not time limits for construction of the individual homes.
Water & Sewer: Water and sewer lines are available to the property.
Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Bailey Drive (Local Street)
Parks: A lot split fee of $960.00 for each single family residential unit that is constructed will be
required to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit.
Tree Preservation: This PZD does not propose development besides that of 2-3 single family
homes that would be allowed as part of the lot split. No trees are affected with this PZD request
Public Comment: Staff has received comments from surrounding property owners stating
support for the low density of the project.
Police and Fire Service: The Fayetteville Police and Fire Departments reviewed this rezoning
request and concluded that adverse impacts to provision of service would not occur.
Recommendation: Staff recommends forwarding R-PZD 07-2578 to the full City Council
with a recommendation for approval with the following conditions:
Issues/Conditions to Discuss:
1. Parks fees are due in the amount of $960.00 for each additional single family residential
K:IReporis12007NC Reporls107-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadors).doc
unit, due prior to building permit approval for each unit.
PLANNING COMMISSION MODIFIED THIS CONDITION (JULY 9 2007)
2. Residences shall be constructed to be consistent with the concepts depicted in the booklet
as specified. Building permits will'be based upon the submitted materials.
3. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the
property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the
project with review of the Master Development Plan — P-lanned Zoning District by the
City Council shall also be binding.
Standard Conditions of Approval:
4. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to
the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR
Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
5. Provide a CD containing the finalized lot split in AutoCAD or similar format.
6. Each single family home would be required to submit and obtain a grading permit at the
time of development of that lot.
PLANNING COMMISSION ADDED THIS CONDITION (JULY 9, 2007)
Planning Commission Action: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled X Forwarded to C.C.
Motion: Graves
Second: Winston
Vote: 8-0-0
Meeting Date:
Comments:
July 9, 2007
The "Conditions of Approval" listed in the report above are accepted in total without exception
by the entity requesting approval of this development item.
Signature Date
K: t Reportsl20071 PC Re.ports107-09-0718-PZD 07-2578 Bailey Meadows).doc
Findings associated with MDP R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows)
Sec. 166.06. Planned Zoning Districts (PZD)
(E) Approval or Rejection Criteria for Planned Zoning•Districts
The following criteria shall be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in the
review of a planned zoning district application based on the proposed master development plan:
(1) Whether the application is in compliance with the requirements of the UDC and the
City Plan 2025;
FINDING: Staff finds the application to be in compliance with the Master Development
Plan Planned Zoning District criteria established by the City Council. The Future Land
Use Plan adopted as part of City Plan 2025 designates this vicinity Rural Area. Rezoning
this property to R-PZD.07-2578 with a maximum of four dwelling units and density of 1.04
units per acre is consistent with the land use plan and compatible with surrounding land
uses and density surrounding single family residences and rural residential uses. The form
of development is consistent with the Rural Area policies for an alternative development
pattern to achieve compatibility with surrounding rural areas. The proposed lot splits to -
create three single family lots on Bailey Drive, and retaining the remainder of the site for
open pasture/rural residential use is compatible with the surrounding single family
residences on Bailey Drive, and the open pasture and other rural uses in the surrounding
areas. The existing infrastructure and public services are adequate to support three
additional residences on this property, and this area of Fayetteville is less than 0.25 mile
from Drake Field Airport, and other industrial uses on State Highway 71.
(2) Whether the application is in compliance with all applicable statutory provisions;
FINDING: The application has been reviewed and found to be compliant with applicable
statutory provisions.
(3) Whether the general impact of the rezoning would adversely impact the provision of
public facilities and services;
FINDING: The impact of the rezoning and subsequent development would require the
provision of public facilities, at the cost of the developer. As stated in Finding No. 1, public
services are adequate to serve three new residences on the property as proposed. There arc
existing water and sewer lines on Bailey Drive, and the Police and Fire Department
currently provide service to the residences on this street.
(4) Whether the rezoning is compatible with the surrounding land uses;
FINDING: The rezoning request, combined with the Master Development Plan, would
allow a maximum of four residences on the property in a configuration that would be
K:IReporis110071PC ReporisI07-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadow's).doc
compatible with surrounding land uses. Three single family lots would be created on
Bailey Drive, and the remainder of the property would be left for open pasture and rural
residential uses. Bailey Drive currently has single family residences generally surrounded
by rural residential uses. The proposed PZD would provide compatibility and transition
with those uses.
(5) Whether the subject land is suitable for the intended use and is compatible with
the natural environment;
FINDING: The subject property is developed for one single family residence, and a mobile
home was in existence on the property and has been removed within the past few years. A
large portion of the property is undeveloped grassland, with trees along the fence rows.
The historical rural residential use of the pasture would be retained with project. The
natural environment is suitable for the type of development proposed.
(6) Whether the intended land use would create traffic congestion or burden the
existing road network;
FINDING: The intended land use, rural residential, will create minimal impact the
existing traffic conditions. The existing street infrastructure (Bailey Drive) is an
unimproved two-lane paved road; however, due to the minimal amount of traffic generated
by this PZD traffic congestion or burden to the existing road network would not occur.
(7) Whether the planned development provides for unified development control under a
unified plan;
FINDING: The booklet and master development plans submitted provide for said unified
development control.
(8) Whether any other recognized zoning consideration would be violated in this PZD.
FINDING: No other zoning considerations are proposed to be violated.
(B) Development standards, conditions and review guidelines
(1) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consider a proposed PZD in light of the
purpose and intent as set forth in Chapter 161 Zoning Regulations, and the development
standards and review guidelines set forth herein. Primary emphasis shall be placed upon
achieving compatibility between the proposed development and surrounding areas so as
to preserve and enhance the neighborhood- Proper planning shall involve a consideration
of tree preservation, water conservation, preservation of natural site amenities, and the
protection of watercourses from erosion and siltation. The Planning Commission shall
determine that specific development features, including project density, building
locations, common usable open space, the vehicular circulation system, parking areas,
screening and landscaping, and perimeter treatment shall be combined in such a way as to
further the health, safety, amenity and welfare of the community. To these ends, all
K:1Reporrs12007tPC Reports107-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows) doe
applications filed pursuant to this ordinance shall be reviewed in accordance with the
same general review guidelines as those utilized for zoning and subdivision applications.
FINDING: The proposed Bailey -Meadows PZD provides for two -three additional
residences in an area in the immediate vicinity of the Drake Field Airport and industrial
development in south Fayetteville. Access would be provided for the residences and
pasture with driveways onto Bailey Drive for each of the lots. Adequate frontage and
spacing between the driveways would be provided as each lot would have a minimum of 70'
of frontage. The lot split layout leaves a majority of the property, 2.5 acres, into Planning
Area 2 for rural residential uses. The lot split configuration and zoning criteria proposed
under this PZD promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
(2) Screening and landscaping. In order to enhance the integrity and attractiveness of the
development, and when deemed necessary to protect adjacent properties, the Planning
Commission shall. require landscaping and screening as part of a PZD. The screening and
landscaping shall be provided as set forth in § 166.09 Buffer Strips and Screening. As part
of the development plan, a detailed screening and landscaping plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Commission. Landscape plans shall show the general location, type and
quality (size and age) of plant material. Screening plans shall include .typical details of
fences, berms and plant material to be used.
FINDING: Screening and landscaping will not be required for these rural residential uses.
(3) Traffic circulation. The following traffic circulation guidelines shall apply:
(a) The adequacy of both the internal and external street systems shall be reviewed in
light of the projected future traffic volumes.
(b) The traffic circulation system shall be comprised of a hierarchal scheme of local
collector and arterial streets, each designed to accommodate its proper function and in
appropriate relationship with one another.
(c) Design of the internal street circulation system must be sensitive to such
considerations as safety, convenience, separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic,
general attractiveness, access to dwelling units and the proper relationship of different
land uses.
(d) Internal collector streets shall be coordinated with the existing external street system,
providing for the efficient flow of traffic into and out of the planned zoning
development.
(e) Internal local streets shall be designed to discourage through traffic within the
planned zoning development and to adjacent areas.
(0 Design provisions for ingress and egress for any site along with service drives and
K:Vieports110071PC Beportsl07-09-0718-PZU 07-2578 (Bailer Meadows) .doc
interior circulation shall be that required by Chapter 166 Development of this code.
FINDING: As stated in Finding B.1, access to the residential lots will be provided directly
to Bailey Drive in accordance with Fayetteville. Unified Development Code requirements.
(4) Parking standards. The off-street parking and loading standards found in Chapter 172
Parking and Loading shall apply to the specific gross usable or leasable floor areas of the
respective use areas.
FINDING: Parking will be provided for the new residences in accordance with City
ordinance.
(5) Perimeter treatment. Notwithstanding any other provisions of a planned zoning district,
all uses of land or structures shall meet the open space, buffer or green strip provisions of
• this chapter of this code.
FINDING: This requirement has been met.
(6) Sidewalks. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Sidewalk requirements will be met in accordance with Fayetteville Unified
Development Code Section 171.12 requiring construction or contribution of money inlieu
for the sidewalk, as determined by the Sidewalk Administrator at the time of development.
(7) Street Lights. As required by §166.03.
FINDING: This PZD/lot split is not subject to the street light requirements as it is not
considered a subdivision.
(8) Water. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Public water lines are available along Bailey Drive
(9) Sewer. As required by §166.03.
FINDING: Public sewer lines are available along Bailey Drive.
(10) Streets and Drainage. Streets within a residential PZD may be either public or
private.
(a) Public Streets. Public streets shall be constructed according to the adopted standards
of the City.
(b) Private Streets. Private streets within a residential PZD shall be permitted subject to •
the following conditions:
K:IReporn120071PC Reports107-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows) doe
(i) Private streets shall be permitted for only a loop street, or street ending with a cul-
de-sac. Any street connecting one or more public streets shall be constructed to
existing City standards and shall be dedicated as a, public street.
(ii) Private streets shall be designed and constructed to the same standards as public
streets with the exceptions of width and cul-de-sacs as noted below.
(iii)All grading and drainage within a Planned Zoning District including site drainage
and drainage for private streets shall comply with the City's Grading (Physical.
Alteration of Land) and Drainage (Storm water management) Ordinances. Open
drainage systems may be approved by the City Engineer.
(iv) Maximum density served by a cul-de-sac shall be 40 units. Maximum density
served by a loop street shall be 80 units.
(v) The plat of the planned development shall designate each private street as a
"private street."
(vi) Maintenance of private streets shall be the responsibility of the developer or of a
neighborhood property owners association• (POA) and shall not be the
responsibility of the City. The method for maintenance and a maintenance fund
shall be established by the PZD covenants. The covenants shall expressly provide
that the City is a third party beneficiary to the covenants and shall have the right
to enforce the street maintenance requirements of the covenants irrespective of the
vote of the other parties to the covenants.
(vii) The covenants shall provide that in the event the private streets are not maintained
as required by the covenants, the City shall have the right (but shall not be
required) to maintain said streets and to charge the cost thereof to the property
owners within the PZD on a pro rata basis according to assessed valuation. for ad
valorem tax purposes and shall have a lien on the real property within the PZD for
such cost. The protective covenants shall grant the City the right to use all private
streets for purposes of providing fire and police protection, sanitation service and
any other of the municipal functions. The protective covenants shall provide that
such covenants shall not be amended and shall not terminate without approval of
the City Council.
(viii) The width of private
streets may
vary according to
the density served. The
following standard shall
be used:
K:IReportv120071PC Reporlsl07-09-0718-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows) doc
Paving Width
(No On -Street Pnrkinal
Dwelling
Units
One -Way
Two -Way
1 -20
14'
22'
21+
14'
24'
*Note: If on -street parking is desired, 6 feet must be added to each side where parking is
intended.
(ix) All of the traffic laws prescribed by Title VII shall apply to traffic on private
streets within a PZD.
(x) There shall be no minimum building setback requirement from a private street.
(xi) The developer shall erect at the entrance of each private street a rectangular sign,
not exceeding 24 inches by 12 inches, designating the street a "private street"
which shall be clearly visible to motor vehicular traffic.
FINDING: The applicant does not propose public or private streets.
(11) Construction of nonresidential facilities. Prior to issuance of more than eight
building permits for any residential PZD, all approved nonresidential facilities shall be
constructed. In the event the developer proposed to develop the PZD in phases, and the
nonresidential facilities are not proposed in the initial phase, the developer shall enter into
a contract with the City to guarantee completion of the nonresidential facilities.
FINDING: Not applicable. The applicant is not proposing nonresidential facilities.
(12) Tree preservation. All PZD developments shall comply with the requirements for
tree preservation as set forth in Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection. The
location of trees shall be considered when planning the common open space, location of
buildings, underground services, walks, paved areas, playgrounds, parking areas, and
finished grade levels.
FINDING: A Tree Preservation Plan is not required for the three lot splits proposed.
(13) Commercial design standards. All PZD developments that contain office or
commercial structures shall comply with the commercial design standards as set forth in
§ 166.14 Site Development Standards and Construction and Appearance Design Standards
for Commercial Structures.
K:I Report.d20071PC ReporLY107-09-0718-PZD 07-2578 (Raelev Meadows).doc
FINDING: the single family residences are not subject to commercial design standards.
(14) View protection. The Planning Commission shall have the right to establish
special height and/or positioning restrictions where scenic views are.involved and shall
have the right to insure the perpetuation of those views through protective covenant
restrictions.
FINDING: No scenic views arc identified, and the height of structures proposed is
consistent with that allowed in surrounding RSF-4 and R -A zoning districts.
(E) Revocation.
(1) Causes for revocation as enforcement action. The Planning Commission may
recommend to the City Council that any PZD approval be revoked and all building or
occupancy permits be voided under the following circumstances:
(a) Building permit. If no building permit has been issued within the time allowed.
(b) Phased development schedule. If the applicant does not adhere to the phased
development schedule as stated in the approved development plan.
(c) Open space and recreational facilities. If the construction and provision of all
common open spaces and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the
final plan are proceeding at a substantially slower rate than other project components.
Planning staff shall report the status of each ongoing PZD at the first regular meeting
of each quarter, so that the Planning Commission is able to compare the actual
development accomplished with the approved development schedule. If the Planning
Commission finds that the rate of construction of dwelling units or other commercial
or industrial structures is substantially greater than the rate at which common open
spaces and public recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, then the
Planning Commission may initiate revocation action or cease to approve any
additional final plans if preceding phases have not been finalized. The city may also
issue a stop work order, or discontinue issuance of building or occupancy permits, or
revoke those previously issued.
(2) Procedures. Prior to a recommendation of revocation, notice by certified mail shall be
sent to the landowner or authorized agent giving notice of the alleged default, setting a
time to appear before the Planning Commission to show cause why steps should not be
made to totally or partially revoke the PZD. The Planning Commission recommendation
shall be forwarded to the City Council for disposition as in original approvals. In the
event a PZD is revoked, the City Council shall take the appropriate action in the city
clerk's office and the public zoning record duly noted.
(3) Effect. In the event of revocation, any completed portions of the development or those
K:IRepores110071PC ReponsI07-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows).doc
portions for which building permits have been issued shall be treated to be a whole and
effective development. After causes for revocation or enforcement have been corrected,
the City Council shall expunge such record as .established above and shall authorize
continued issuance of building permits.
(F) Covenants, trusts and homeowner associations.
(1) Legal entities. The developer shall create such legal entities as appropriate to undertake
and be responsible for the ownership, operation, construction, and maintenance of private
roads, parking areas, common usable open space, community facilities, recreation areas,
building, lighting, security measure and similar common elements in a development. The
city encourages the creation of homeowner associations, funded community trusts or
other nonprofit organizations implemented by agreements, private improvement district,
contracts and covenants. All legal instruments setting forth a plan or manner of
permanent care and maintenance of such open space, recreation areas and communally -
owned facilities shall be approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and
by the Planning Commission as to the suitability for the proposed use of the open areas.
The aforementioned legal instruments shall be provided to the Planning Commission
together with the filing of the final plan, except that the Guarantee shall be filed with the
preliminary plan or at least in a preliminary form.
(2) Common areas. If the common open space is deeded to a homeowner association, the
developer shall file with the plat a declaration of covenants and restrictions in the
Guarantee that will govern the association with the application for final plan approval.
The provisions shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
(a) The homeowner's association must be legally established before building permits are
granted.
(b) Membership and fees must be mandatory for each home buyer and successive buyer.
(c) The open space restrictions must be permanent, rather than for a period of years.
(d) The association must be responsible for the maintenance of recreational and other
common facilities covered by the agreement and for all liability insurance, local taxes
and other public assessments.
(e) Homeowners must pay their pro rata share of the initial cost; the maintenance
assessment levied by the association must be stipulated as a potential lien on the
property. The association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changing
needs.
K:IReports 120071PC Reports107-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows) doc
FINDING: The applicant shall comply with these requirements.
Sec. 161.25 Planned Zoning District
(A) Purpose. The intent of the Planned Zoning District is to permit and encourage
comprehensively planned developments whose purpose is redevelopment, economic
development, cultural enrichment or to provide a single -purpose or mixed -use planned
development and to permit the combination of development and zoning review into a
simultaneous process. The rezoning of property to the PZD may be deemed appropriate if the
development. proposed for the district can accomplish one or more of the following goals.
(1) Flexibility. Providing for flexibility in the distribution of land uses, in the density
of development and in other matters typically regulated in zoning districts.
(2) Compatibility. Providing for compatibility with the surrounding land uses.
(3) Harmony. Providing for an orderly and creative arrangement of land uses that are
harmonious and beneficial to the community.
(4) Variety. Providing for a variety of housing types, employment opportunities or
commercial or industrial services, or any combination thereof, to achieve variety
and integration of economic and redevelopment opportunities.
(5) No negative impact. Does not have a negative effect upon the future development
of the area;
(6) Coordination. Permit coordination and planning of the land surrounding the PZD
and cooperation between the city and private developers in the urbanization of
new lands and in the renewal of existing deteriorating areas.
(7) Open space. Provision of more usable and suitably located open space, recreation
areas and other common facilities that would not otherwise be required under
conventional land development regulations.
(8) Natural features. Maximum enhancement and minimal disruption of existing
natural features and amenities.
(9) General Plan. Comprehensive and innovative planning and design of mixed use
yet harmonious developments consistent with the guiding policies of the General
Plan.
(10) Special Features. Better utilization of sites characterized by special features of
geographic location, topography, size or shape.
FINDING: Staff finds this proposal meets the intent of many of the parameters of the City
Plan 2025, as well as the above ten criteria, including compatibility and transition of land
K: IReports(20071PC Reporrs107-09-07R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows).doc
use, and flexibility to mix small, lot residential with historic rural residential use. The
following guiding policies within Rural Areas are applicable to this development, and help
to achieve the primary goals of the City Plan 2025:
Rural Area Guiding Policies:
a Conserve open space and protect areas of significant riparian benefit, tree canopy and
other environmental resources through cluster development provisions, density
controls, protective easements and/or other development tools.
b. Allow and encourage historical agricultural and related uses to continue and to occur
as permanent land uses within planned developments.
c. If developed, encourage alternative development patterns to achieve compatibility with
surrounding rural areas.
(B) Rezoning. Property may be rezoned to the Planned Zoning District by the City Council
in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and Chapter 166, Development. Each
rezoning parcel shall be described as a separate district, with distinct boundaries and specific
design and development standards. Each district shall be assigned a project number or label,
along with the designation "PZD". The rezoning shall include the adoption of a specific master
development plan and development standards.
FINDING: The submitted development plats and Master Development Plan booklets, along
with the conditions of approval found applicable and appropriate, are binding with the
approval of the requested rezoning. Should the Planning Commission forward this item to
the City Council, an ordinance will be drafted for consideration of rezoning this property
in accordance with the submittal herein.
(C) R — PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District.
(1) Purpose and intent. The R-PZD is intended to accommodate mixed -use or clustered
residential developments and to accommodate single -use residential developments that
are determined to be more appropriate for a PZD application than a general residential
rezone. The legislative purposes, intent, and application of this district include, but are
not limited to, the following:
(a) To encourage a variety and flexibility in land development and land use for
predominately residential areas, consistent with the city's City Plan 2025 and the
orderly development of the city.
(b) To provide a framework within which an effective relationship of different land uses
and activities within a single development, or when considered with abutting parcels
of land, can be planned on a total basis.
K:1Repons1200N'C Reporu107-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadmvs/.doc
(c) To provide a harmonious relationship with the surrounding development, minimizing
such influences as land use incompatibilities, heavy traffic and congestion, and
excessive demands on planned and existing public facilities.
(d) To provide a means of developing areas with special physical features to enhance
natural beauty and other attributes.
(e) To encourage the efficient use of those public facilities required in connection with
new residential development.
FINDING: Staff is recommending approval of this application, finding the proposed PZD
meets the intent of the PZD ordinance as noted above.
(2) Permitted Uses. All permitted uses identified within §162 Use Units of the Unified
Development Code shall be allowed as permissible uses, unless otherwise specified,
subject to City Council approval of the Planned Zoning District request.
(3) Conditional Uses. All conditional uses allowed within (Residential, Commercial,.
Industrial) zoning Districts established in the Unified Development Code shall be
allowed with Planning Commission approval, unless otherwise specified, subject to the
code governing Conditional Use requests.
FINDING: Permitted and Conditional uses are outlined in both the Master Development
Plan booklets and plats.
(4) Condition. In no instance shall the residential use area be less than fifty-one percent
(51%) of the gross floor area within the development.
FINDING: The majority of uses are principally residential, with rural -residential and
agricultural uses allowed in Planning Area 2.
(F) Bulk and area regulations
(1) Residential density. Residential densities shall be determined on the basis of the
following considerations:
(a) The densities of surrounding development;
(b) the densities allowed under the current zoning;
(c) the urban development goals and other policies of the city's General Plan;
(d) the topography and character of the natural environment; and
(e) the impact of a given density on the specific site and adjacent properties.
K: IReports120071PC Reportsl07-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows/doe
FINDING: Surrounding development is similar in density to that proposed with the
existing single family residences along Bailey Drive and rural residential uses in the
vicinity. The proposed density and land uses are consistent with the rural residential
development goals in the City Plan 2025 as this area is designated as Rural Area. The
relatively flat topography and open pasture is suitable for the proposed single family
residences adjacent to Bailey Drive, and the remainder of the property left for rural
residential uses. Impacts to surrounding properties will be beneficial in terms of
compatibility. Environmental impacts to the site will be minimal due to the low density
and intensity of the uses proposed. Density and zoning criteria under the current zoning
(R -A) would not allow for the proposed lot split for single family residences. -
(2) Lot area and setback requirements. Taking into consideration the unique aspects of each
project, preliminary development plans for Planned Zoning Districts shall conform as
closely as possible to the existing standards for lot area minimums and setback
requirements under this chapter.
FINDING: Building setbacks proposed are typical of the surrounding RSF-4 and R -A
zoning. Planning Area 1 contains three single family lots adjacent to Bailey Drive and
would have the same building setbacks as RSF-4 with a minimum lot area of 9,000 square
feet, when RSF-4 requires 8,000 square feet. Planning Area 2 contains the large rural
residential lot and would have the same building setbacks as R -A zoning, and would
require a minimum of 2.5 acre lot area when R -A zoning requires 2 acres.
(3) Building height- There shall be no maximum building height except as may be
determined by the Planning Commission during the review of the preliminary
development plan based on the uses within the development and the proximity of the
development to existing or prospective development on adjacent properties. A lesser
height may be established by the Planning Commission when it is deemed necessary to
provide adequate light and air to adjacent property and to protect the visual quality of the
community.
FINDING: Building heights
proposed for this
project are
typical of single family and rural
residential development in the
area. Planning
Area 1 has
a height limit identical to RSF-4
zoning, and Planning Area 2
has a height limit
identical to
R -A zoning.
(4) Building area- The Planning Commission shall review specific proposed lot coverages
which generally correspond to the guidelines for lot coverage in the respective
residential, office, commercial or industrial district which most depicts said development
scheme.
FINDING: The lot
coverage or building area on this project
is typical of lot coverages in a
standard residential
and rural development, where
there is a
40% maximum building area
for Planning Area 1
and no maximum for Planning
Area 2.
K:I Reports110071 PC Reportsl07-09-071 R-PZD 07-25 78 (Railev Meadows,.doc
*Required Findings for Rezoning Request. -
Land Use Plan: The City Plan 2025 Future Land Use Plan designates this site as Rural Area.
Rezoning this property to R-PZD 07-2578, with the associated Master Development Plan,
meets this designation, as the principal use on the property (2.5 acres out of 3.86, or 65%) will
be rural residential in Planning Area 2, and single family residential in Planning Area 1, with
the existing pasture and historic rural residential uses preserved on a majority of the property.
The proposed plan; commitments, design standards and other conditions placed upon the
project result in a compatible development with surrounding land uses in the general vicinity,
meeting many of the goals of the City Plan 2025 for new development.
FINDINGS OF THE STAFF
A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use
planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans.
Finding: Staff finds the proposal is highly consistent with the land use planning
objectives, principles and policies, as evidenced by the number of guiding
policies for Rural Area this proposal meets. Rezoning the property will
accommodate residential uses in this area near industry and flexibility to allow
for a mix of standard residential and agricultural uses in the rural residential
area.
2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the
rezoning is proposed.
Finding: At this time the property is zoned R -A, which would not allow for the lot splits as
proposed. Staff finds that splitting the property into three relatively standard
sized residential lots adjacent to Bailey Drive and retaining a majority of the
property for rural residential use is more appropriate in this location than the
uses allowed under the current R -A zoning. Rezoning of this property as
proposed is advisable.
3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase
traffic danger and congestion.
Finding:
Staff
finds this proposal
will
not create or
appreciably
increase
traffic
danger
and
congestion,
as
discussed
in
Finding
No.
E.6.
4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density
and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and
sewer facilities.
Finding: Staff finds that in evaluating this proposal, the population density. would
K:1Reports120071PC Re1vrts107-09-071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows) .dcc
increase slightly from that which currently exists. Staff finds, however, that the
load created on public services is not an undesirable or detrimental impact.
Engineering: Public water is located adjacent .to the site. There is a 6" waterline along
Bailey Drive. Water service may need to be extended through the property
at the time of development.
Sanitary sewer is located adjacent to the site. There is a 6" sewer main along
Bailey Drive. Improvements to the sewer system may be required dependent
upon the demand placed by the development. The capacity of the existing
main may need to be studied at the time of development.
The site
has access to Bailey Drive.
Bailey Drive
is an unimproved narrow
roadway
in this location.
Standard improvements and requirements for drainage will be required for
the development.
Police: It. is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this rezoning will
not substantially alter population density and will not create an undesirable
increase on police services.
Fire: The subject property is located 4.1 miles from the Engine 6 located at 900
South Hollywood, with an estimated response time of 7 minutes. No adverse
impacts on call volume or response time are anticipated.
5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of
considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed
zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as:
a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses
permitted under its existing zoning classifications;
b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning
even though there are reasons under b (I) through (4) above why
the proposed zoning is not desirable.
Finding: N/A
K:IReporn12007IPC Reporis107-09:071R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadou-s).doc
Date 5/30/07
Jeremy Pate
Zoning and Development Director
City of Fayetteville
113 W. Mountain
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Dear Director Pate,
This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the Planned
Zoning District R-PZD 07-2578: Planned Zoning District (BAILEY MEADOWS,
755): Submitted by RODNEY R & NANCY K. PAYNE for property located WEST OF
SCHOOL AVENUE AND NORTH OF BAILEY DRIVE would substantially alter the
population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services and
create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion - -
)tts the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that•this PZD will not substantially
alter the population density or create an undesirable increase in police 'services. It will
not'create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion i1n the area_
Sincerely, •Captain Wiliam Brown
layetteville`Police Department
Fayetteville .Fire
Department
ME
To: Andrew Garner, Jeremy Pate, and Jesse Fulcher
Thru: Chief Tony Johnson
Assistant Chief Bud Thompson
From: Captain Dale Riggins
Date: May 24, 2007
Re: May 23, Zoning Review — Fire Department Comments
R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows)
These 4.73 acres are covered by Engine 6 located at 900 S. Hollywood
It is 4.1 miles from the stationwith an anticipated response time of 7 minutes.
The Fire Department anticipates l call for service, per year, once the development is
completed and maximum build -out: has occurred.
There is no measured hydrant flow recorded in this area.
There should be no adverse effects on our call volume to this development.
RZN 07-2602 (Armac Engineering)
This .18 acres is covered by Engine t and Ladder 1 located at 303 W Center.
It is .6 miles from the station with an anticipated response time of 2.25 minutes.
The Fire Department anticipates I call for service, per year, once the development is
completed and maximum build -out has occurred
There is no measured hydrant flow recorded in this area.
There should be no adverse effects on our call volume or response time td this
development.
RZN 07-2603 (Kooshesh)
These 1.59 acres are covered by Engine 7 located at 835 N Rupple Road.
It is .7 miles from. the station with an anticipated response time of 2.75 minutes.
The Fire Department anticipates 9(6 EMS & 3 Fire/Other) calls for service, per year,
once the development is completed and maximum build -out has occurred. The service
impact of this type development will typically take eighteen months after the
development is started, and the units begin to be occupied, to occur.
The measured hydrant flow in this area has been recorded at 1520 gallon/minute.
There should be no adverse effects on our call volume or response time to this
development
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
113 West Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
ENGINEERING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE 479-575-8206
To: Andrew Garner, Planner Date: June 27, 2007
From: Glenn E. Newman, Jr., P.E.
Staff Engineer
Re: Plat Review Comments (June 28, 2007 Subdivision Committee Meeting)
Development: Meadows — PZD — 07-2578
Engineer: Alan Reid & Associates
I. Show the location of the existing water mains adjacent to the property. Provide a Utility
Easement 10 ft from the existing utility main, if applicable.
2. Show the location of the existing water and sewer service. Services cannot cross private
property.
Engineering Comments Page I of I
fl
• hs,° t
SC Meeting of July 28, 2007
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 444-3470 ..
PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE
To: Fayetteville Subdivision Commitee
From: Sarah K. Patterson, Urban Forester
Date: June 26, 2007
ITEM #: PZD 07-2578: Planned Zoning District (Bailey Meadows)
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
This PZD does not propose any development besides that of two single family
homes. These lots are not found within the Hillside Hilltop Overlay District
so are therefore exempt from Tree Preservation and Landscape requirements.
No trees will be removed with this PZD request.
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
TO: Andrew Gamer, Associate Planner
FROM: Kay Curry, Park Planner
DATE: June 26, 2007
113 w. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479) 444-3469
SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Subdivision Committee Review Comments
x*x*x*xxxxx*xxxxxxxxx*xxx#x*xxxx*xxx*****xx*xxxxxxxxxxxxx*x**x*xxx**x***xxx*xx
Meeting Date: June 28, 2007
Item: R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows, 755)
Park District:. SW
Zoned: R -A
Billing Name & Address:
Rodney & Nancy Payne
1200 Bailey Drive
Fayetteville,- AR 72701
Current Land Dedication Requirement Money in Lieu
Single Family @ .024 acre per unit = acres @ $960 per unit =
Multi Family @ .017 acre per unit = acres @ $680 per unit = $
Lot Split Fee $960 per single family unit = $2,880
$680 per multi -family unit =
COMMENTS:
A lot split fee of $960 (single family) will be assessed for each single family residential
unit that is constructed on the additional lots. The actual amount of the fee will be based
on the type and number of units $960 (single family) or $680 (multi -family). Fee is due
at time of building permit.
Each additional housing unit that is constructed in Fayetteville places an increased
demand on the Parks and Recreation System. The money collected as part of this lot split
will be used to fund future park acquisitions and improvements for this park quadrant.
R-PZD 07-2578
I
Si �{ �Y.il
♦
,
F���
�:VI
♦�
IVFM1a.4-.
y+ Y a.
f %IY
(
Zv.
J
/
a
a l
S
RPZD07-2578
One Mile View
s il� '-✓
1a
• "a t
BAILEY MEADOWS
N,1 �MV •'� 4 r 1 a 4"aQ Y .4 R I ryyr
ci'9, 3',♦�W•'c-a ^NE_RRY SP -
�(,� 1, :ft CHERRY
R A t$ .I 4 1 2
]( l • ��1V' RSF3 a 4Lf R P _ '
f1, f flA
I f y SKLLTON $1 r I
U0GE CUMM v' j �� N+ccNKp0D $T Pi
SFd 7 G4 r
9� i 1 b-'
x$ - ty'IF , Y��♦ Mil
_ TTT n Rd R5F i R
/CQ J
T V / ♦ •nRs .
• t A4 -'� S0i1Rt5ETIRN,TftN. - rv'-- ••• d q i HM
a/�all / i Fn•.. I "Jt n y i
C 1
l
SUB E ¢
r
.. - . CT PROPERTY n
i,I.. vi '._. 4w`,•vr a. __ f :'
11 ! 1�sl f • w r a IF
N lC�a a Q ••'!Py r' e
k 4 ;F 1yC n iii if 1 '. I }Y Yi.•Z a Eii.JES: • RA -
' • Ir y 'X' '"- BallrY (JN ;4�- \�'•T
� yI
S left �i '. W RBFi 'v-� I- h� ". I ♦ .Q `'
1 (t �
I 4 F:L r < n IL _� m J
�1 ae �W( J y6, J .. ,i. �:a C •w:Gs � n
i s ,
-
a r. 4 SH0FT ST « Ir.=� �..a• T "p
r r • 't'r i, s: ' d N <. 44 .:F , q ' g qi`� F i n .. -it
d Ik, gY . _ w
.T 1 i Ya
f _
—4.:
—:p--
_iI ♦1
•
i I l c' $ G Wei u, '.IF, I >� %
y i. Y.4'
i ijihT
j v i _ 411{.I j j. H djt t rr 4 I
f; 1
Overview Legend Boundary
Subject Property iti Planning Area
RPZD07-2578 '•• '-.
1 Overlay District
1— JI Outside City
Legend
O Hillside -Hilltop O erlay District
0 0.25 0.5 1
M les
VAC07-2638
Close Up View
ESTES
111
--- _- GENTIF OaK5 LN
- G:RLLE OS IN
n o- .. - N ' I
I
1 ryi4� o� I :��'#`.hi
YJ 'ma
SUBJECT PROPERTY
.-
�$eC. x x♦( '
RSR. 1
{{ W�M"
/ ail
-- TALL OAKS DR _ _1.
IhwFp{ n� 5"'•
T '
M1
I� F
t
RSF-4
Overview
•0 • 37.5 75 150 225. 300.c
Feel
II
VAC07-2639 FOUR SEASONS SUNROOM/BOSS
One Mile View
—j 6•
4 �
i1:
t J •
_� s
ifi :wHEEI R DI I lug' IV, '� - N t .tom
\, 41' �i
` i i ! i II n A x Y 'Cy. ( l •sG
i ,. _. _._ rU _ I j `, asF i RSFJ
i °n O ) 9$"I SUNS IN£RD t•. !
J 54 6 i F Iy 1..i L�
R.9FJ
_+.-..{ —I I ` .M • -'. _ .Fray- _ice=a-� _ ASFiWAVESCY Rp I
1 tr a' ESS AND ONWAY'
i�aoUOc��� '!,' II SUBJECT PROPERTY - Y:.' J l. ti
B
y}[f}p� UGLE SY p� i iI? Rf4RSWAYDLYMOV!ry DEK L/l �pA R""°^"fi E%
p I 4FJ 1. i NEIV FJ - 1._.
N_ 00 aRIDGE �.-.:y..__. Y C .aN..S•.T.�Bx'NY LN
-' STEPrfEY fT HAYFLOV.ER CT' t• + � Y_. •� �?
1.
.
w( �iY- t I- r �IixtaiW. _ <� I 4 i wi;`-_ -t T•1 y 1
l NFAYLV_� > t 1 it �2 RSFJ CIi: � i Tl2 �-If RAF.2I•
1 A.i R -A RSFJ R -A w RT 12 �' RSFJ 1'w RSFd v ia5fJ < 1 F'^' �A
1A ' 1 J +- 1 ' •. •: RSFJ A'; a __ RA �' fl -A !1 RSFJ s. (, ` ' s ' . {RAF-Iil 1 .
IY '1^ WEUIN� ONj 1I.� 1 < flA�l} R# f ' L.. 't I RSFJ t i 1, H i 17.TEOMA3T Rd �' F
•IIR$WR IG-2 jj t -A1[rv.._' . J'MA!. 'l -.'pus. It 2
( = 1+1 COfE •t "5F.. �'. w� f 'jt t DING y DR H: WfUI GTUn CR ., '� gJ p�
�: LR.1 .-r YSR-0a . RAS$b fGDI'EpR' .: RSFJ i- i 1 MU Gf {O Y',Eae
_ ' RSFJ LC nsO R, �l i F a`F. ', 1T4..a t1 • . , . R2
L I -. . e: n Wr
me Rp ASFJA : .RSFJNF RSFJ R;F4 I { RA
ARIbRSFJr !? r+ OMETr DPI 91M1n RSFJREVEN(;E(I CR •
• ,r -'&•t -.-RAF 8 H 9FN?-.1- a 61 ._. i tab' - • k j ✓' I I .--`•. •-- _J : k
RA .�' - / F. O, I.-LIkT„-<l." :k ,. a ww_y,__� r<e _F�AYSF�
i}" ASFd w!CkflT `--': ', •r..��.,i .t—••=�� RSFJ U%TIRFLi , �RSFi
},$FJ ?' !AS'd x .. 1 I E!I pRR-A). - , . _'f r _ -RSFJ IR1; �RP]A r RSF:
.?r', i ir�rY yyRSFd `.."6:.fiti� RJ iR.SF'J RSFJ ASF4 Y 71�=..'Rf+ZD
N\ - 1 $FA FJRSFARSFdI b ( < f1. � i v RSFJ
`-i�.tiRSFJ .....r -�... AA I - f •. : Y i k 6
1 G ASFJ _•r J
1 p�' RSF-I z '^.•..4 Y$ GAP ND - -'.'5�.-"- Fi AERSJ
Y C� SFJ c _ftF.ASJMM~` 57 J - RS ..... PERSIMMON ST
O/Y �J t . x
1 c ME50. ST w l . tea. RSFJ y�RSFJ
�Y RSFJ r a -i Y I '
J .� a ♦ •'- Al'{9�_
1 PAGOSA PLC ' 7 i
1 : a.RSFJ {!
RA H � _ •
r.%
FJ VFRTHORNE R +rv+w-1 r i _.Y. -s =' R!.
_ RSf4
L. . DDT T1P10k RD RSF-L .. a, r r-- {.' '.'4 ,-
Overview Legend
Boundary
Subject Property
'`—# Planning Area
� ®.VAC07-2638
- Overlay Dis(nct
-.: % Outside City
Legend
Hillside -Hilltop O erlay District
0 0.25 0.5 1
Mlles
RZNU7-2637
STARKS
One Mile View
Y RA4J0 Yv t �v'iA ylr r ➢ tt , GI }r i� h4 IL ". � '- 1J�p.' �' •-" .� s: '
i e`{ i RMFJO i'JTy�!��ld��l9RP' I ;y:-- r �¢
,1J91 ,* 4"1.i. fALiiy�Ai r ��CI }./S -20 :v a '(QE' —
:C I 111000Y111 (. q' • � _ '� RAff-21 r J. J.e.. r] ,- , rd ..
4 �. R, it e' , 1 IRSF
,'c'-`:i �_ a l.V:�A, _ AGSL6ALu 111NTYajN Sr �} v/ F ... �W+F r
irf� Ri : - fy rL Og $$
1 P.1 �3. l •�- •1 I 9a' :RA6-2a �fe y -N � yv'l +++��� a (r^�1^♦� ` 1•, � �
,� RO rJ ~mlj' FRAF3F, `Aa R'G`'�csy�.7�.
d�RAFJa R i Q¢�@!r
•RMFJ 11 <,r r:' +�F:ir:ST�d .,u RAF.2l v (�f •1. .. 4 �t ..
Pt 1, V PAFJO' Y� i { 1�1 �i 1�+�T ii F1 � MIS - q.tlpfl\P+'111`.1 '2g'4„ w d ".R J i F RSFJ
6ln ,U+� r 2t:uR' '' �_6 ;RAF2Jd6.ii+RAF24 •z v 'tr
z wa ;`�i.z^.Y, 11'1 #•�''. ."�, lti l{ P6'C 6RI.R2/2',cT •C: bTh 5TLi M5� �,'�r'fiTH 51 `3 ` M:\�:::.
--4,11l 1 rr fI" it .fn Jl .1-�•..-\F/4Xro V Ia •,.>r- i...
RIVATE )) , t k "- i i RA4+21 w�p��.,�r YTHSr iy y. _. - - +♦_ f VILLE RD '.�''r
r11��E rr I� f •1`v 4' r r t> eA:. <.W -a♦ j vI ♦L,21 MUN v-
RP20,iR -' CIiRMF34yy'2dF i' w '3 RSFJ > L.IIJn _. •N. r)TU421 Rd :r RSF�
4 -� la R,ARA f,Ce d fo- a 'f yy4V �� a bra r <.)} RAi I< . .. $ RSYJ fi'Q f yR 4R5FJ aP�l.
^. ice `RAYv •/` J IW > M< L FAIi{LANE 5! 2 F < A i 41 v Gl.
VI 2!t I U)<{T v�S�≥ �4 Vru fO .. RAF34�F ri"RARt21 1 r. `_
rKa >-f ! - rw't,r SUBJECT PROPERTY`�a'
a'ME-24 I �+' i v :" iC I� .i }{t'�t y! FAIRIAfIr 5C.ip RSi
w n ; Ip RAF31 i41 'Ur -' i F.MF34 zK'tw - 42
' t 11TH ei�( 4 ♦i is, r! t',Y'a3 ev c r e>2F eiJ� %
RMF 21 �R2.f Y{RAF 24;.rlf P �yt !l Po.K26� .^iH PI 'Q' OR' Vu: tM_-.
Gll u�: 12tf1 Sr ]iiH ST to c r .„.,-„i� < -ot n'w '• -9~ 12THS ''eN: YA ��'3i ylU ; "'�- .to
Po)F2 iL ..S•` L .m' C �r rj6t F • G _-13TN STRAFN a }35H P1- RSFJ - 4ul 'wl ��i C-2
�B\RAR-2� li".Ir R Im 13TH RlTM I3TH'$1 'T ' 24 .2 4 _ 441 v4YE 1ll5Da =i< 'J ..iaf"
G2' j L'2Fy :.`? RMF 21c J{! 'l+e lW E�IA S`• .:i.
rca r a , v 01159 OR'
Iw RAF.2/w F� , .: U RAF -24 O11W 24 `, 2 � Of t Po,F-24 JpG t- Gl '•
.3 '7 n N 1ST H.' T i\ U 1
IF
xI,r f .�i •c - .r a'.n:s a n t :.,; _ J �' P'.
yy ♦ y SFd
vet flMF31 > L. c�M ) { � RAF$ tir R i 1 ' :f• i .r ,.
.. v. wr'i G 'N� Y �. Y h R2A<-21 • y8!
W. � r a rp i♦ r n !`' 1tyF 4'r _'r r' a RMF3'iF : yr alt watt ' ! 'vim
`+ a.L I r'e_C i�rc" F�{'�♦. 1" �. F it . :.' , r}S ` RA g '-0
x 3n : z 1. ff • 4" i . 'vik L}{ yR 113.4 v [i iA 'l q r v v. r i;4` F♦xlY.. • '24 r.
?'•11�}I
w 1 .A/W� • : �.2' LLC 2 19TH ST--" s s y� .:i'-1`i,� F Ti t f 6! Tr i7'CTM+�k'+�. �i _ `� : � I
w. RSFJ 4 - rfFSLdRCH 'ESTER: VO .GLt A •�'S .' �. r ` S Ig.. _ 1
.ti. {( S•,11 .. (y f i RAF -21 flT1
V'I 1. irr �t :r2FF9 k. 4 t rs'tfV1Y s i1
4i 14H RSF `tc./ x r 'v' .•4e.uvY:M _ vtir 3'vlr xva is Y f'i ..f I1, i14 :' .k
ew 3a� ♦\ - 1240.0.T-1 CC 1 . mE tlar lTR•
4. '� H '<: '.
Iz Iw -s l i o''FF. RA • #
5 J8_§. A L3 1}�—� V!J Y'1•li FY - .if
•4j 41 f y r N .
SF RSFJ +� -4. ! � r RA
r-? 1� RSFJYI NTI. rv..•e.. u..wv �'{RA rr *
24. F . ,
. 112 b 4-f.34. �sv ! I�r , * u ya a -' .Y..♦ • ..'fin..
.ld c yaty RbF 41 .4 , ♦t `�yRe _ 1.ir 'rn y'e 2 6r
lWwF4sw'R �0 :2 a{v'•.%q.yH}1RSF3p.E 1 - + ni r. M1.
a ifF 1f a iF a I �
' 1eY2 •yyF�r-` ] i RSFd .c •• i{ 1 s m ...
y.RSFrrn,� d F
}
Overview Legend Boundary
Subject Property ' , planning Area
® RZA107-2637 Overlay District
❑ _ j outsiae city
Legend
Hillside -Hilltop O eday District
0 0.25 0.5 1
M les
LSD07-2574 LIBERTY BANK OF ARKANSAS
One Mile View
�' , ` :( • Y Z c a GGG ppp www ETTTTTGEMLE
u IN N A Jt tn-1 a ' j -
,- 1 :S ,y W G2
3 Y aI J ;J1J
• i•. V. _
• •
-
.�- ON PD l6 TTT
¢ f "y1A , Msl ..
C , x.'ilyit F r �i ti
rci IP m M RPlO `,R -O Y r RJ,]•
, p .Ir µA <. .r
,Nim C I nOrsA�a .. `•
t.. u
let f v -U • } o 'ff• t fl2tt
LRSFJ 'kfAY J4' atrfftET
Cyk
• RSA' F mm X cl
/ /-9f4$Qa.r!Ck{IY+SCy3
RL f RSFJ !. Xu to •i !. , ZI
-., ,. ,s• cz 1 3'+.• RPID . -gip SUBJECT PROPERTY R,ee..
• : R -A c / I ..-':71
�RR..fl lla.�/G�i4 O � �>U.4�J a � 2 RSFi •� !r-
ICE Ali L. S r '1 .'•cl RI.ff2d I T4 ,Y ♦ .e. t
0+2I lit Y
f 1 }}}ppp c2 Oa
-iP> C3-. -�«. q m 7 RSFJ RSFJ �'.
-rI r.. ;I fj� 'd +FO v { IRA c0�, R.A
-.�;24 ` ? b f . k t` Gi y . o
_ Sl}^sT aF'- �l le s,u `IN. R -O -'n t�ft-0 h tr R-0yi
uu'�Y k �i FPI „1f�-��`� l¢'=r Cpl.
Li.t w'" / G2 617 n , < �j.T-� Yr_ , y
< { r n t l RO rr
w
c ��H-0:Ni
>� a5r r ' 1
gy'Dul nk RAA,fARGO A'I i a2d
t. Y. z t R 'I R.A COY r.
1I •1, iVjlt `i^'n SO ta' dr P�•... .'Y xry .
Sf. -v 1 o f
f t R6{F-II . N "
'k L9H, / EXY CQ ;.r 1 1 ({L3ukt •.tS .. OR t t y^•
}\s MiILAP Rb4 {' k irs' 1 b /
^� NYF'P��MII�`�'P Rnmafry y 1Y)NfIcIA DR 'R y (i �R0.6.2A Iy 21F1
62 a K ., fi2 q}'pu rt\C DM1 RSFJ
n' �I .T.y�ii,*i; L} d ;'Y eniGriTON DL t: - RSFJ
e ra It Ly{'4 r la T f 1C DS ' 1 •en. E!ERt
^.n L'I w . A AU{T Si . 1! o `T- O RSFJ <44FE*('nldfl bR t ¢
!� ANCHESitR OR - IY a 0.SFJ
b/Giy. a '•+ i GQ > .'L U • I t .x.. _
¢t IIa 1 3' 7 o-'YDgSMN£ PL. . V EINt.E FV[ £ldiN AVE. f,
' nt4{{C 1 ,� 1y1FVl5≥•.%� RSFJ. H ... czRSFJ z' 3 i RSFJ a6fs w. '�
yr 5 i^A. TROPhllltu DR 'j{f u' AS SHARON _ P
GG� iC.Y'Ogy♦ `Yr 6i Ea4 <<I �jr•_ S I.� [ !'RSf
y Y T-12 r - FJ .a 4 1
r L y ti.3 t �, RSFJ RSFJ - INY Q ti4 , J IYAPIt ICY DR
i.i �{ vT;w RSFJ c iA�u RSFJ. RSFy p RSFJ h. (y.r 4D I R �It
„ « s^,�'e HA50LD c hA30�0 F RSf-0_ v O 4" L
PI ! RO }tl�'ir{AL}NdAdP RM •RA 2'Y � SJ (RSFJ RS? -4 thh 0.S�Cps" Aa,.1\t RSFJ NCS } - -
• j gMF2d#AP Aflfi PLRAG� 1 / W BAI4RCur ST oR1ARCUF( ri RSR14 4 RSFJ �g
+ I '»+iaA60N Div t tL c a_ S7 O Ma RSFJ
%+xRCSY RD r {pIrW 44 A u R-0 I>i RSJ :; G C4 Tf RSFJ, P Di
/ R-0TM ^ • C5 x..p _ DL'ORr{AND SI n R -A RSFJ ERSFJ S�Q'
.A� I'NAPN .$.. ` 1 F, RTI.AND 51 0 1 G PRI�/M 311-arR RSFJ < �'4tr' RSF--
S Sr .v 2« /� i Y Ct ' RS ETON ST 3 LTON cl Jill
RSFJ PA f RSF
RfAFld$ JC { RAF -11 ,y� C:D Ia' .}✓,3 3 L - 'e?l- I
q-0 5RAff.2d Rw. Z2 $'{X:Fs P.qg m. 1 F,i
l), J1'RA421'va a .j-, �ai•vy� tt ( FVRMAN c Pf Y..3 01'. RSFJ
d .C'r lir..N�'F, d'r R-0aa IR-0a `c" 2Q �'R'Dr £ wS R$t. RSFJ . rRSFJ j NI
i[, ' ^ ,+gzRDJy1NG tl!LLS llRPD INf I1LlS R -_w.+, - Y '> • • fl
}RE n
.t RA&.24an RUE_ RA621 ':R.ARA62{I fit y`k'_f1FlJ"--- LL w_ ..�•r+sv n n OtP _ _..
hLN 'RSFJs RSFJ n -....rar ¢'v R J..
Overview Legend Boundary
Subject Property
ti.i Planning Area
ILSDO7-2574 /rv',
OYenay District
c'rp:,l:p
Outside City
Legend
Hillside -Hilltop O erlay District
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
JUNE 6, 2007
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
113 WEST MOUNTAIN ST
FAYETTEVILLE AR 72701
R-PZD OF BAILEY MEADOWS
APPLICANTS: RODNEY AND NANCY PAYNE
• 1.574 N. MAIN ST.
• CAVE SPRINGS AR 72718
Dear Planning,
Please review this letter and the attached plan sheets for our submittal of the conceptual
R-PZD for the Bailey. Meadows development.
SUMMARY: The Bailey Meadows addition is a PZD to be located in southern
Fayetteville near Drake field, on the north side of Bailey Road on a parcel containing an
existing house, and 3.86 acres located at 1200 Bailey Road. We are proposing a lot split
consisting of a total of three single family lots, one with an existing house on it and two
others that will have homes built on them. These homes will be approximately 1200
square foot starter homes. These lots total 1.36 acres, and are planning area 1 (single
family residential).. The remaining lot is planning area 2 (rural residential) and totals 2.5
•acres. This lot will allow for rural residential use typically found in R -A zoning and will
allow for one additional residence. The PZD would allow for a total of four single-family
residences on 3.86 acres, an overall density of 1.03 units per acre.
• GENERAL PROJECT CONCEPT FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED
IN FAYETTEVILLE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAILEY ROAD:
A. Current ownership: Rodney R. and Nancy K. Payne.
• Existing house and its lot sale is pending to single family. Two adjoining lots will
then, be created for construction of single-family homes with remaining partof
parent tract proposed to sell for uses consistent with current zoning (RA) (horses).
.B. Proposal is to rezone and split off 3 lots from parent tract (planning area 1.) with
remainder of parent tract to be left with current zoning intact (planning area 2).
Area 1 will consist of 1. Lot A. existing house (sale pending), 2. Lot B (proposed
construction of single family home), and 3. Lot C (proposed construction of single
family home). Planning area 2 consists of the remainder of the parent tract (lot D)
• that will be retained for rural residential uses.
C. 1. No new streets will be built. Lot A with existing home has 108' street
frontage and is 155' deep. Lots B and C are both to have 75' of street frontage'
and are both to be 155' deep. The remaining rural -residential lot (lot D) has 103
feet of street frontage.
2. The submitted lot split plat depicts the proposed planning areas and lots.
3. Homes will have setbacks well above the minimum requirement to provide
for buffer zones.
4. Trees will only be removed as. needed for outline of homes constructed. No
trees will be removed from lot A, or lot D
5. Storm water run-off is minimal.
6. Remaining parent tract will remain undisturbed.
7. Existing utility connections are in place for Lots A and C. Lot B and the
remaining rural -residential lot will have connections at construction when
needed.
8. A maximum of three homes will be built,.one on Lot B, one on Lot C, and
one on the remainder rural -residential lot (lot D) with each home to be
approximately 1200 square feet in size. Homes on lots B and C to be built by
the current owner
9. (Planned Home Pictures)(see attachment A)
D. The project consists of a single phase. The two new homes would be built with in
two years. This zoning approval is intended for perpetuity. The lot split approval
will be valid for one year from city council approval.
E. Planning area 1 is the 3 proposed single-family lots. Planning area 2 is the
remainder of the Parent tract (see attachment B).
F. Zoning criteria (see attachment B)
G. See attachment C comparing the existing and proposed zoning. The
owner/applicant is not aware of any environmental hazardous, sensitive, or
• natural resource areas, or any other hazards.
H. Closest park is located in Greenland, approximately one mile from the property.
I. Reason for zoning change -family wants to buy existing house and property needs
lot split and rezoning. This change gives needed entry-level homes close to an
established industrial area.
J. Homes will relate well to existing and surrounding properties having similar
square footage and be single-family dwellings of like kind and appearance. Little
traffic increase is expected. -
K. The 2025 city plan calls for this area to be low density rural. The proposed
changes will add only one more residence to the area than the property had when
it was purchased in 2004.
L. Traffic study has not been requested by the city.
M. Impact on city services would be minimal (addition of only one more home).
Water line located in center of Bailey Road is 6" in size and sewer is also 6" (per
• engineering Div). ,
N. "STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS"
The statement of commitments shall, in all cases describe the development
commitments including a method for assigning responsibility to heirs, successors,
or assigns, and timing of the fulfillment of these commitments for the following
Ca)
1.
Dedication -no parks, streets, water, or sewer lines would be built that
would require dedication to the city
2.
Provisions for payment of fees -At time of Building Permit application, all
city fees subject to building of single-family homes would be paid. No
•
other fees or on- or off -site constructions are expected.
3.
The property contains no land in floodplain or wetland.
4.
Project placing -Existing home sale would be completed and the 2 single-
family homes would be built on Lots B. and C. within one year.
• 5.
Fire protection -Existing fire protection is adequate for the small number of
additional homes.
6.
There are currently no other commitments imposed by the City.
• 7.
With. the small number of homes proposed, no parks or trails are planned.
8.
Proposed building elevations -see attachment A
O.
Conceptual descriptions of development standards
1.
Landscaping -average landscaping for entry-level single-family homes.
• 2.
Traffic and circulation -due to. small number of homes added, no traffic
•
impact is expected.
3.
Parking standards- Per city code.
• 4..
Perimeter treatment -due to small size of area, no perimeter treatment is
proposed.
• 5.
Sidewalks required per city code.
6.
Streetlights- installed per city code.
7.
Water -A 6" waterline in place on Bailey Road will supply water. Lots A.
and C. have existing water taps and Lot B. would be have a tap
established. Tap for. lot D would be established at possible construction
•
date.
8.
Sewer- a 6' sewer line in place on Bailey Road would supply sewer
service. Lots A. and C. have existing taps and tap for Lot B. would be
established. Tap for lot D would be established at possible construction
date.
9..
Street and drainage -Bailey Road is the only street in this proposal. It is an
existing street. Proposed drainage is to use the existing. drainage already
in place alone Bailey Road.
10.
Construction of non-residential facilities -none are proposed.
11.
Tree preservation -Only trees located in the foundation areas of the single-
•
family homes built on Lots B or C would be removed. No trees on Lot A
•
would be removed. No trees on remaining rural -residential (lot D): would
be removed.
12.
Architectural design standards -Small single-family home plans compatible
with existing neighborhood homes would be used (see sample).
13.
Proposed signage-None is proposed.
14.
View protection -Due to small number of homes, no view protection is
proposed.
• 15.
Revocations. The developers understand causes for revocation and will
take all measures necessary to avoid revocation.
3)
1
16. Covenants -No covenants, trusts, or homeowners' associations are
proposed. I S
RESPONSE AS TO HOW THE PROPOSAL FULFILLS THE INT ENT/PURPOSE OF
THE PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT:
This development fulfills the intent and purpose of the Planned Zoning District
Ordinance by allowing the sale of an existing newly renovated home and also allows the
construction of two entry level homes with large lots, ensuring the preservation of the
existing low density housing found in the present Bailey neighborhood.
• THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF OUR SUBMITTAL. WE LOOK
FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU TOWARDS A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT.
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL RON AT 479-248-9110 IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
Respectfully,
Rodney and Nancy Payne V
Planned Home Pictures
Attachment B
Zoning Criteria
Bailey Meadows R-PZD
PLANNING AREA I ZONING CRITERIA
(A) Purpose. The Planning Area 1 Zoning Criteria is designed to permit and encourage
development of low density detached dwellings in suitable environments, as well as
to protect existing development of these types.
(B )Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
Unit 1 City-wide uses by right
Unit 8 Single-family dwelling
(2) Conditional uses.
Unit 2 City —wide uses by conditional use permit
• Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities
• Unit 24 Home occupations
(C ) Density.
Acreage: 1.36 acres
Number of dwelling units: 3
Density: 2.2 units per acre
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Lot minimum width
.Lot area minimum
Land area per dwelling unit
Land area per dwelling unit
Single-family
dwellings
70 feet
9000 square feet
9000 square feet
9000 square feet.
(E) Setback requirements
FRONT SIDE REAR
25 ft. - 8ft. 20 ft.
(F) Height. Structures in this Planning area 1 District are limited to a building height of
45 feet. The height of a proposed structure may only be increased above 45 feet by
obtaining a variance after hearing by the Planning Commission. Existing structures
that exceed 45 feet in height shall be grandfathered in, and not considered.
nonconforming uses.
((3) Building Area: On any lot the area occupied by all the buildings shall not exceed
40% of the total area of such lot.
PLANNING AREA 2 ZONING CRITERIA
(A) Purposes. The Planning Area 2 Zoning Criteria are designed to protect
agricultural land until an orderly transition to urban development has been•
accomplished; prevent wasteful scattering of development in rural areas; obtain
economy of public funds in the providing of public improvements and services of
orderly growth; conserve the tax base; provide for affordable housing; increase
scenic attractiveness; and conserve open space.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
Unit 1 City-wide uses by right
Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities
Unit 6 Agriculture
Unit 7 Animal husbandry
Unit 8 Single-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit
Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities
Unit 24 Home occupations
( C) Density
Acreage: 2.5 acres
Number of dwelling units: 1
Density: 0.4 unit per acre
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Lot width minimum 100 feet
Lot Area minimum
Residential 2.5 acres
Lot area per dwelling unit 2.5 acres
(E) Setback requirements.
Front Side Rear
35,feet 20 feet 35 feet
(F) Height requirements. There shall be no maximum height limits in the Planning
• Area 2 District, provided, however, that any building which exceeds the height
of 15 feet shall be setback from any boundary line of any residential district a
distance of 1.0 foot for each foot of height in excess of 15 feet. Such setbacks
shall be measured from the required setback lines;
(G) Building Area. None.
r
Attachment C
Zoning Comparison Chart
ZONING COMPARISON CHART
Ballev'Meadows R-PZD 07.2678
Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
R -A Resldentlal-A dcultural PA -1 PA -2
ter....M£ SN F � �W-•�r4�F[.Fi� vM �''S' . ` •^Yv
,.-. '•i'k.:_ _ 1:�+�``Y,. r .r c' -r'£
Permitted Uses
Unit1
City-wide uses by right
Unit I
-Ciy-wide uses by right
Unit 1
City-wide uses by right
Uni3
Public protection and utility facilities
Unit 8
Single4amly dwellings
- -
Unit3
Pubic protection and utiliyfaciflies
Unit6
Agriculture •
Unit6
Agriculture
Unit?
Animal husbandry
Unit 7
Animal husbandry
Unit8
Single-Iamiy dwellhgs
Unk8
Single-famiy dwellings
Unit9
Two-tamilydwellmgs
Unit37
Manufactured homes
Conditional Uses
Unit 2
City-wide uses by conditional use penna
Unit2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
Unit
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
Unit4
Cultural and recreational faculties
Unit3
Public protection and utility facilities
Unit 4
Cultural and mutational facilities
Unit 20
Commercial recreation, large sites
Unit 24
Home occupations.
Unit 24
Home occupations
Un 24
Home occupations-
Una 36
eless communications facilities
Units per ace
... 1a ± ° .-
One-half
YN ssa.cTile
Aaea a
-•: s ss��. `. v
1.36 acres
p `ac
. - - e' sn�
2.5 acres
Dwelling
Units
3 units
H-
1 unit
- -
Density
2.2 units/acre
0.4 unit per acre
:- ��rwanikmid
Rsee^Re8uA9os�i."z`"-�`r��msF°.T'�'v:
-"'.-:t'Iz•i.� .
1001L
Lot width minimum
20011.
70 R
Lot Area Minimum
Residential 2 ayes
9.000 sq. ft
- 2.5 -acres -
NonresIdentlal 2 acres
- 9 000 sq. ft.
2.5 acres
Lm area per - 2 saes
dwelling unit
9,000 sq. R -
2.5 acres - - ,
qs .-... __z...., ^,.
Front 35-
'a'Si`s`.: ._-., rnM"" .�__.,-�.rsYW
- 25
.35
Side 0
8
20
Rear 25
20 -
- 25
Thera shallbe no maximum height limits in the A-1 Dislrid, .
provided, however, Ihal any building which exceeds the height of 15
feet shall be setback from any boundary line of any residential
distdcta distance of 1.0 foot tar each foot of height i n excess of 15
feel- Suds setbacks shelf be measured from the required setback
lines. -
Maximum building height of 45 feeL The height
may be increased over 45 feet by obtaining a
variance after hearing by the Planning
Commission.
Same height regulation as R -A zoning.
{
••�T xm t<4� ^ALm"_.—ult nM1T.iS- 4ffia___V�3¥":4'�j0eirv_
None
..,_•- -dk yn
_
On any lot the area occupied by a8 the buildings
shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot
..• K �.;ry,. yy _fp i.Y,Cia,
None
u
Arkansas Democrat (SAzette
Northwest Arkansas Times
Benton County Daily Record
P. O. BOX 1607
FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72702
PHONE: 479-571-6415
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Kate MacNaughton, do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the
Arkansas Democrat Gazette newspaper. Printed and published in Benton
County Arkansas, (Lowell) and that from my own personal knowledge and
reference to the files of said publication, the advertisement of
City of Fayetteville: Ordinance No. 5043
Was inserted in the Regular Editions on:
August 18, 2007
Publication Charge: $121.33
Subscribed v,and sworn to before me
This2Dtlay of �,/9t6-f� , 2007.
Notary Public
0—"�IanwDeasft
$otaeyPublic, State of Aemnsas
Washington County
My Commission Expires:
My Qom;;nission Expires il/ISA4
f �.D �y
**N0TE** Please do not pay from Affidavit.
Invoice will be sent.
RECEIVED
AUG 222007
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
�,,. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
I I
Saturday, August 18, 2007
• ORDINANCE NO. 8047
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT' TITLED R-PZD 07-
2578. BAILEYSCHOOL AVENUEEAN� WS. LOCATED WEST NORTH OF BAILEY DRIVE; lFayeCONTAININGAPPROXIMATELY 3.86 ACRES; ARKANSAS
AMENDING THE'OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE a
ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYEF EMCEE,
ARKANSAS:
I Secllon 1: That the zone clessificalbn of the following described property is hereby changed as fol-
IONS: S .� �1
•
From R -A, Residential -Agricultural to R-PZD 07-2578 (Bailey Meadows) as shown in Exhibit'P" and
depicted In Exhibit'Battached hereto and made a pad hereof: -
Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master development
plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval as submit-
ted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council; further,. that the conditions of
approval shall be filed and available for viewing In the office of the City ClerIQTreasurer of the City of
Fayetteville
Section 3: That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of the require-
ments of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville. Arkansas, is hereby amended to
reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above. .
PASSED end APPROVED this 7th day of August 2007.
APPROVED: ATTEST.
By: R
DAN COODY, Mayo. SOMDRA E. SMITH, City Gladr/Treasrvey
Exhibit A Is a map and may be viewed in the office of the city clerkAreasurer during normal business
hours -
EXHIBIT 'B"
R-PZD 07-2578
SURVEY DESCRIPTION - ENTIRE TRACT
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SEC-
TION THIRTY-IWO (32), TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30) WEST, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS'. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT. SAID POINTARKANSAS
SURVEY MONUMENT; THENCE NO°4733W 8 821 FEET ALONG THE EAST LNE OF SAID 40
ACRE TRACT; THENCE S89'0821W 43.30 FEET TO A SET 12' IRON REBAR FOR THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY
i DRIVE; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, N00°47.33W 456.64 FEET TO AN EXISTING
IRON ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT THENCE S89°02'19W 372.54 FEET
( (DEED=361.50 FEET) ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT TO AN EXISTING
FENCE AS REFERENCED IN LAND DOCUMENT 96-60514, SAID FENCE ALSO BEING N89°0219E
900.83 FEET (RECORD 920.85 FEET) FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACHE TRACT;
THENCE LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, S01°4940'E ALONG SAID FENCE
241.60 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST; THENCE S02°11'49 -E ALONG SAID FENCE 99.80 FEET j
TO A FENCE CORNER POST; THENCE S01001.19E 114.66 FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON REBAR AT
THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF BAILEY DRIVE: THENCE NB9°08'21'E 365.27 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 3.86 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, FAYETTEVILLE, WASHING-
' TON COUNTY, ARKANSAS. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 3.86 ACRE TRACT BEING SUBJECT TO ANY
EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF RECORD.
RECEIVED
AUG 222007
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
(8.14.07) Clarice Pearman - Ords. 5042 - 5044 and 5048 - 5052 Page ii
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Pate, Jeremy
Date: 8.14.07 4:13 PM -
Subject: Ords. 5042 - 5044 and 5048 - 5052
Attachments: 5052 Abshier Heights 166.20 waiver.pdf; 5043 R-PZD 07-2578 Bailey Meadows.p
df; 5044 Amend Ch 171 & 172.pdf; 5048 RZN 07-2637 Starks.pdf; 5049 R-PZD 07
-2613 Holcomb Heights Il.pdf; 5050 VAC 07-2638 Estes.pdf; 5051 VAC 07-2639
Four Seasons.pdf; 5042 Amend Ch 161 Zoning Regs.pdf
CC: Audit; GIS
Jeremy:
Attached are the ordinances passed by City Council, August 7, 2007 generated by the Planning Division. Please let me know if
there is anything else needed. Have a good day.
Thanks.
Clarice
Clarice Buffalohead-Pearman, C.A.M.C., C.M.C.
City Clerk/Treasurer Division
113 West Mountain
Fayetteville, AR 72701
479-575-8309
coea rm anfahci.favetteville.a r. us
GENERAL PRDVISIa,s
Atm ORM
TH6 4! MASTER DETRCPMEL IF1 6 NRHDWZED Coot
THE
161 AND FDI PN1NINS
ZONWD YaO4"1f
OF THE CM OF TWIN 09UE WIRED DEVfIDPNEM CODE THE FRONSIDNS OF THS PZD P SHA DEBE I.Q NT
PLAN SHAL. RUN WITH TIE LAND. THE UNDONNEP9 TXFBV SUCCESSORS HORS. CHY ASSIGNS SNLLL BE BOUND
BY INS NASTW DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED a APPROED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION
AYEETT�EVILLF Cm WUN0. TV,T 1I $ PI.WNW ZDIPMENI p G DI5MICT FORw�BV µND � N0 D CZI IN OF NE
( OF 6 W CDIEIGL
CONFORMITY66 F � OF FA LLZ U RNI mDOEVUOPYFHFCODER® BY iXE PRO'.1EIONS OF SECTIONS 101 AND
THE PRONSIONS OF THIS PTA NOSIER DEVBDPYEM PLAN SHALL PREVALL AND GOVERN ME DEVELOPMENT OF
(BAtlEY IAFMDMS fl -no), PROVIDED, H0wtva THAT WHERE THE PROMSDNS OF THS YASRT DEVEtDPUENT
DD tEImMWT WOE, AS AMENNDDE9C. C NW OTiEAHE MREVMI PUC, BIZ RRESO�ESIOt OF UDONB R61 CRYOF
OF CRYUNI�DED
FAYETTMUE, SHAU. BE APPUCABLE
DIP ORCHEW?
TD FURTHER THE MUTUAL INTEREST OF 1NE RESEIENS, OCCUPANTS, AND OWNBS OF THE PRO MASTER DEVELOPMENT
RIM AND OF THE PUBLIC IN TEE PERSFRMNION OF THE UNEOROY OF THE PEW, THE PROVISONS OF THE PLAN
RWLINO TO THE USE OF LAND. STATEMENT OF CDEDUINENISI DE\4OPMENT M Xi ARCHREC11JML SMNBWDS. AND
THE LOCATOR OF COINON OPEN SPACE SHW. RUN M FAVOR OF THE CRY OF FAIERE\RTE Wt SHAU BE FRFORCFIBIE
AT LAW QI W EQUITY BY ME CM WITHOUT UMRATCN ON AND VOWS OR REODUDON OTIERWISE GR4RE0 BY UW.
WNFUCI
WHERE THERE S MORE TUN ONE PROYISON WITHIN THE PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT RAN 11W IXNERS THE SUE
SUBJECT WAITER TIRE PRM ION WHICH 6 MOST RESTRICINE OR WPOS NAPIEI STANDARDS OR RFOUIRENFNR
91W. DO\RN UNLESS DETERMWED MORN15E BY THE ZONING AND DN]gPMFM MYINSTIMTOR.
,.�............. .w, wwncnw,L ouwnc» vn Ww>,rzWA rrtL tI II
IW MAY BE LE 95 DUE ID SUBDMSGR SITE IMPRa.IFMEM PUN REWIREMENS GR OTHER REWREMENR OF ME CRY WUNkL
V I
C I N I T Y
M A P
PROJECT TRACKING
AT TE THE OF SUBOMSWN FINAL PUT OR ACNE SOLE DEVELOPMENT THE MMICAM SHALL PROMDE A SUMMARY OF
THE DEVDOPMENT. TO DATE. TD THE PLANNING DMAON, IN CROFTS TO ASSURE L LUUM DE111OPMENT UNITS ARE NOT
IXCEEOED.
\\
6B
F/1. DIYOIT'
N8902'19 "E
1316.67'
N89'02'19'E
900.83'
+
"NW
NW CDR,
CDR.
SW1/4, SEI/4
N
SEl/4,
SE1/4
961¢
E 6666aos3aa
101
SECTION 32
o I
SECTION
32
/cot
T -16-N, R -30-W
n
T -16-N,
R -30-W
I
LAND USE TABLE -SINGLE FAMILY
ACREAGE
3.86 ACRES
I DWELLING UNITS
4
DENSITY
1.04
ROD
PLANNING AREA 2
(RURAL RESIDENTIAL)
LOT A
2,94± ACRES
BUILDING AREA
NONE
HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS
NO MAXIMUM LIMIT
NOTE: ANY BUILDING EXCEEDING THE HEIGHT OF 15 FEET SHALL BE SETBACK FROM
ANY BOUNDARY ACNE OF ANY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT A DISTANCE OF 1 FOOT FOR EACH
FOOT OF HEIGHT IN EXCESS OF 15 FEET.
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
FRONT
35
REAR-
35'
SIDE
20
DENSITY
ACREAGE
2.94 ACRES
DWELLING UNITS
1
DENSITY
0.4 UNITS PER ACRE
PERMITTED USES
UNIT
1
CITY-WIDE USES BY RIGHT
UNIT
3
PUBLIC PROTECTION AND UTILITY FACILITIES
UNIT
6
AGRICULTURE
UNIT
7
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
UNIT
6
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS
CONDITIONAL USES
UNIT 2
CITY-WIDE USES BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
UNIT 4
CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
UNIT 24
HOME OCCUPATIONS
LOT
WIDTH
MINIMUM
100
FEET
LOT
AREA
MINIMUM- RESIDENTIAL
2.5
ACRES
LAND AREA
PER DWELLING UNIT
2.5
ACRES
PLANNING
AREA 1
(SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL)
LOT
B
0.39± ACRES
17,118.3±
SQ. FT.
LOT
C
0,24± ACRES
10,597.5±
SQ. FT.
LOT
D
12,0.28±
00 Ot
SQ. FT.
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
FROM UTILITY ESMNT. 25
REAR 20
SIDE 8
BUILDING AREA
40% OF LOT (MAXIMUM AREA)
HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS
45 FEET
PERMITTED USES
UNIT 1
CITY-WIDE USES BY RIGHT
UNIT 8
SINGLE-FAMILY OWELUNG
DENSITY
ACREAGE
1.36 ACRES
i1 DWEWNG UNITS
3
DENSITY
2.2 UNITS PER ACRE
CONDITIONAL
USES
UNIT
2
CITY-WIDE USES BY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
UNIT
3
PUBLIC PROTECTION
AND UTILITY FACIUTIES
UNIT
24
HOME OCCUPATIONS
LOT WIDTH
MINIMUM
70 FEET
LOT AREA MINIMUM
9000
SQUARE
FEET
LAND AREA
PER DWELLING UNIT
9000
SQUARE
FEET
LAND AREA
PER DWELLING UNIT
9000
SQUARE
FEET
AS PER LAND I
96-6051
765-15475-000
OLEN & WILLETTA REYNOLDS
1268 W. BAILEY DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
ZONING, R -A F n
S02 11 49 E-
59.44'
NO2.11'49"W
40.36'
N0101°19"W
114.66'11,
R///--1
A G
907.89'_
765-15465-000
RONALD & KIM STUTTING
1209 BAILEY DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
ZONING' RSF-4
SW CDR.
SEI/4, SE/14
SECTION 32
T -16-N, R -30-W
SBB'47'00"W
-PZD OF . BAILEY MEAD O WS
FOUND IRON PIPE NE CDR.
N01'5749'W SECTION 32
• 2.26' T -L6 -N, R -30-W
DETAIL
765-15451-000
WALKER PROPERTIES
1657 SUNRISE MOUNT. ROAD
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 727D1
ZONING, R -A
40 ACRE TR
IRON REBAR
BEING ON T
THENCE LEO
)0'47'33NE
FEET TO AN
3944.76'
TRACT, THE,
ALONG THE
FENCE AS R
ALSO BEING
THE NURTHV
765-15529-000
LEAVINGTH
WALKER PROPERTIES
ALONG SAID SD
1657 SUNRISE MOUNTAIN ROAD
THENCE P 02
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
CORNER TOUTS
ZONING, R -A
REBAR AT T
OF
„n,r „1.„Y - Gry 1KG KA :I
'HE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SEI/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST
1/4) or SECTION THIRTY-TWO (32), TOWNSHIP
NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30) WEST, BEING MORE
Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE
ORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SAID POINT BEING
ALUMINUM ARKANSAS STATE LAND SURVEY MONUMENT,
T7'33'W 658,21 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
CT) THENCE S8908'21'W 43.30 FEET TO A SET 1/2'
FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT
E NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE)
'ING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NDO'47'33'W 456.64
EXISTING IRON ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE
CE $69.02'19'W 372.54 FEET (DEED=361.50 FEET)
IORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT TO AN EXISTING
:FERENCED IN LAND DOCUMENT 96-60514, SAID FENCE
N89.0219'E 900.83 FEET (RECORD 920.85 FEET) FROM
:ST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT) THENCE
NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, S01'4940'E
FENCE 241.60 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST,
II'49,E ALONG SAID FENCE 99,80 FEET TO A FENCE
) THENCE SDI°01'19'E 114.66 FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON
IE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE)
)8'21'E 365.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
3,86 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, FAYETTEVILLE,
COUNTY, ARKANSAS, THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 3.86 ACRE
SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY
.I V/ MGi SS. SURVEY DESCRIPTION — TRACT 'A•
W OGGBteEx6D A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SET/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER (SEI/4) DF SECTION THIRTY-TWO (32), TOWNSHIP
uTW SIXTEEN (16: NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30) WEST, BEING MORE
OTAL PROPERTY4NNNDJV PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE
3.BBf ACRES ❑amaa• SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SAID POINT BEING
acl zzoow" AN EXISTING ALUMINUM ARKANSAS STATE LAND SURVEY MONUMENT,
THENCE N0047'33'W 658,21 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
L�1 DSWU
Aiz� 40 ACRE TRACT? THENCE 589°08'21'W 43.30 FEET TD A SET 1/2'
jI Azz N'4 IRON REBAR FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT
I I o~~o I BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE)
a• zco
ml LOT A M' a o z THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 47'33'W 456.64
FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE
a1 I ; r z TRACT) THENCE 569.02'19'W 372.54 FEET (DEED= 361.50 FEET)
PT. SE1/4, SE1/4 Oc ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT TO AN EXISTING
o I z:+ FENCE AS REFERENCED IN LAND DOCUMENT 96-60514, SAID FENCE
SECTION 32 I'. z < ALSO BEING N89.0219'E 900,83 FEET (RECORD 920,85 FEET) FROM
NI
T -16-N, R -30-T/ 1 y THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT) THENCE
2.94± ACRES x; s , LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SDI°49'40'E
uR'I ALONG SAID FENCE 241.60 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST)
rD THENCE S02'11'49'E ALONG SAID FENCE 59,44 FEET TO A SET 1/2'
IRON REBAR) THENCE LEAVING SAID FENCE, N89'08'21'E 255.62
FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON REBAR) THENCE S00'40'5B'E 155,19 FEE1
TO A SET 1/2' IRON REBAR AT THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
W ?( BAILEY DRIVEL THENCE N89'08'21'E 103.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF
775-17966-000 BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2.94 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
f ,J BADR BARSDUM FAYETTEVILLE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, THE ABOVE
METAL Z 2304 HUNTINGTON DRIVE N252 DESCRIBED 2,94 ACRE TRACT BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS
HED I ` SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA 91108 AND/OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF RECORD.
I ZONING, R --A
- — 20 B 6`-B. + I
469'08`21 "E
1.12.88 62.74 Z 80,00
20' B. B. , �yy 20_ B.S.
B. I I M
WOOD DECK I Q II Ye Y�
F/L DITCH
LOT D
BBB-_ 6s
GAS-.GPO--.GPO�IJ --OAS- E. GAS GA
- E. - E .--Q6'- E
BAILEY DRIVE
(ASPHALT)
765-15467-000
EUGENE & CAROLYN SUE DICKARD
1135 W. BAILEY DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
ZONING, R -A
SURVEYOR CRflFfC4TE
I HEREBY CERTIFY, THAT THIS PLAT IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY
PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR
PROPERTY BOUNDARY SURVEYS AND PLATS IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS.
ALAN REID
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
ARKANSAS REGISTRATION 1005
NOTE:ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
P.
-R/W DEDICATION
0,87± ACRES
37,682.6± SQ. FT.
765-15472-ODO
EUGENE & CAROLYN SUE DICKARD
1135 W. BAILEY DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
ZONING, R -A
PLAT NOTES:
EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY STATED OR SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, THIS SURVEY DOES
DQI PURPORT TO REFLECT ANY OF THE FOLLOMND WHICH MAY SE APPliCABLE
TO THE SUBJECT REAL ESTATE:
EASEMENTS, OTHER THAN POSSIBLE EASEMENTS WHICH WERE VISIBLE AT THE
TIME OF MAKING OF THIS SURVEY; RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS; SUBDMSION
RESTRICTONS OR OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS; AND ANY OTHER FACTS
WHICH AN ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE,
THIS SURVEY IS VAUD ONLY IF THE DRAWING INCLUDED THE $EAL AND
SIGNATURE OF THE SURVEYOR,
THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE CURRENT 'ARKANSAS MINIMUM
STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY BOUNDARY SURVEYS AND PLATS'.
DECIARADON IS MADE TO THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE SURVEY. IT IS
S TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS.
SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTK CONDITIONS WERE NOT EXAMINED OR
CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY.
765-15455-000 775-17967-000
RAYMOND & KRIS HATCHER RAYMOND & KRIS HATCHER
256 W. BAILEY DRIVE 256 W. BAILEY DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701 FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
ZONING, R -A ZONING, R -A
EEA
" 568'02'19"W
.Sf ..
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SET/4) OF THE
QUARTER (SEI/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-TWO (32), TOW.
SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30) WEST, BEIN(
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SAID PI
AN EXISTING ALUMINUM ARKANSAS STATE LAND SURVE
THENCE NDO'47'33'W 858.21 FEET ALONG THE EAST L
40 ACRE TRACT, THENCE 589'DB'21'W 146.57 FEET TO
IRON REBAR FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAL
BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-DF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY
THENCE S89'0B'21'W 80.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT -01
TO A SET 1/2' IRON REBARj THENCE LEAVING SAID R
LINE, N0340'58'W 155.19 FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON F
THENCE N89°08'21'E 80,00 FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON
THENCE 50340'58'E 155.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BI
CONTAINING 0.285 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, FAYETTEVIL
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS. THE ABOVE DESCRIBI
ACRE TRACT BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS AND,
RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF RECORD,
SURV Y NSCRIPTIJ - TRACT 'C'
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SEI/4) OF THE
QUARTER (SEI/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-TWO (32), TOWI
SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30) WEST, BEING
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SAID PE
AN EXISTING ALUMINUM ARKANSAS STATE LAND SURVE
THENCE NOD•47'33'W 858.21 FEET ALONG THE EAST L:
40 ACRE TRACT) THENCE S89°08'21'W 226,57 FEET TO
IRON REBAR FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAI1
BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY
THENCE S89'08'21'W 74.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT -01
TO A SET 1/2' IRON REBARj THENCE LEAVING SAID R
LINE, NOO.28'33'E 155,04 FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON F
THENCE N89.08'21'E 62.74 FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON
THENCE S0340'58'E 155.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BI
CONTAINING 0.243 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, FAYETTEVIL
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS. THE ABOVE DESCRIBI
ACRE TRACT BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS AND,
RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF RECORD.
N
wa
, `
8
MONUMENT)
JE OF SAID
A SET 1/2'
POINT
0.265
1/2'
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SEI/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER (SEl/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-TWO (32), TOWNSHIP
SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30) WEST, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, SAID POINT BEING
AN EXISTING ALUMINUM ARKANSAS STATE LAND SURVEY MONUMENT,
THENCE NDD'47'33'W 858,21 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
40 ACRE TRACT) THENCE S8908'21'W 300.57 FEET TO A SET 1/2'
IRON REBAR FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT
BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BAILEY DRIVE)
THENCE 58908'21'W 108.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
TO A SET 1/2' IRON REBAR, THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, ND1'01'19'W 114.66 FEET ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE TO A
FENCE CORNER POST) THENCE NO2'11'49'W 40.36 FEET ALONG SAID
FENCE TO A SET 1/2' IRON REBAR, THENCE LEAVING SAID FENCE,
N99'08'21'E 11288 FEET TO A SET 1/2' IRON RCBARI THENCE
500°2833'W 155.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
0.392 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, FAYETTEVILLE, WASHINGTON COUNTY,
ARKANSAS, THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 0.392 ACRE TRACT BEING
SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF RECORD.
-C/L RAILROAD
554.36' 1
955.36'
P.T.SECTION /4 1
33 R/B' OED. :
T -I3 -N, ft -30-N
0.371 ACRES y�HL 1
775-17964-000
KEVIN L. GILLOW + COMPUTED POINT
265 W. BAILEY DRIVE 0 EXISTING 1/2" IRON REBAR
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
SE CAR.
SEI/4, SEI/4
SECTION 32
T -16-N, R-30-W
.................................................................
1315.59' NB6.47'09i
CITY OFCITY OF F
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP k bEOtA1flM,
DATE OWNER
DATE OWNER
0 FENCE CORNER
0 SET IRON REBAR
P: 0 EXISTING IRON PIPE
■ STONE MONUMENT
`^u........................................................................s47.oz1....,+ PROPERTY LINE
-----
RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE
— — CENTERLINE ROAD
— — BUILDING SETBACK LINE
x - FENCE LINE
REAL
A OWNER/DEVELOPER:
AND RODNEY & NANCY PAYNE
1200 BAILEY DRIVE 0' 50' 100' 150'
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701
4E
0 LOT SPLIT & RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT
HIS
Alan Reid & Associates DATE:04/19/05 RE VISED:04/10/07 PROJECT NO.
SCALE: 7'=50' DRAWN BY.• JCC 07705
118 South College Avenue
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 RON PAYNE
(479) 444-8784 t�fP.h