HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4969 f I36
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII VIII VIII VIIVIII VIII VIII VIIIIIIIII s
Doc ID : 010799510005 TVDe : REL
I Recorded : 01/31/2007 at 11 : 03 : 05 AM
! Fee Amt : $20 . 00 Paae 1 of 5
r Nashinoton Countv . AR
I Bette Stamos Circuit Clerk
FL4007-00003740„
I
ORDINANCE NO. 4969
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 06-2349, WESTBROOK
VILLAGE II, LOCATED AT SALEM ROAD AND CLABBER
CREEK DRIVE; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1 .38 ACRES;
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby
changed as follows:
From RSF-4, Residential Single Family, 4 units per acre to
R-PZD 06-2349 as shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in
Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master
development plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval
as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council indicated in Exhibit "C"
attached hereto and made a part hereof. said Exhibit "C" shall be filed and available for view in the
office of the City Clerk of the City of Fayetteville.
Section 3 : That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of
the requirements of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby
amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
-. 0^GTY �okesel
PASSED and APPROVED this 2"d day of January, 2007.
; FAYETTEVILLE ;
APPROVED: ATTEST: - -
.s�9RKANSP�J=�:
' "A
vGT(1t3 C�..�.
By: By.
DAN COODY, Mn
SON DRA SMITH, City Cler urer
EXHIBIT "A" -- R-PZD 06-2349
TRACT ONE:
ALL OF TRACT ONE AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF SALEM VILLAGE P.U.D.,
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 15 AT PAGE 70, BEING PART OF THE NW 1 /4 OF THE SWI /4 OF
SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS,
ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A FOUND IRON PIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT ONE;
THENCE S87028'49"E 198. 16 FEET; THENCE S02°34'27"W 117.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A
CURVE TO THE RIGHT 14AVING A RADIUS OF 25 .00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS
S47034127"W, 35 .36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE
N87025'33 "W 46.20 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 48.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S66003125"W, 42.86 FEET,
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 44.43 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 15 .00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S6600114711W,
13 .38 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 13.87 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCEN87°28'49"W
51 .48 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N42028149"W, 35 .36 FEET, AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE NO2°3 I ' 1 I "E 142.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.70 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, BEING SUBJECT TO ANY
EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR FACT.
TRACT TWO:
ALL OF TRACT TWO AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF SALEM VILLAGE P.U.D.,
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 15 AT PAGE 70, BEING PART OF THE N W 1/4 OF THE SWI /40F
SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS,
ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2; THENCE N87028'49"W 152.99
FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 15 .00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N4202711 I "W, 21 .22 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE
OF 23.58 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE NO2034'27"E 6.23 FEET TO A FOUND IRON
PIN ; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 51 .00 FEET, A LONG
CHORD THAT BEARS N08056'20"W, 20.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 20.50 FEET TO A
FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE N20°27'08"W 109.75 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 .00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT
BEARS N36002'02"E, 41 .69 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 49.29 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN;
THENCE S87028'49"E 70.64 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE
RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 15 .00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S61 °04'04"E, 13 .34
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 13 .83 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING
A RADIUS OF 48.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S61 °02'26"E, .42.66 FEET, AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 44.21 FEET; THENCE S87°25'33"E 46. 19 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 .00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT
BEARS S42025'33 "E, 35 .36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27; THENCE S02°34'27"W 127.00
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.72 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, BEING
SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR FACT.
p �I
� I
ez3 n
I
v
} )
a , 7
i
rY
u�
) C
1
Y
v Legend
49000
O
M G
175 150 300 450 Bw
EXHIBIT "C"
R-PZD 06-2349
Page 1 of 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1 . A shared driveway shall be provided for Lots 10 and 11 .
2. Individual lot access shall be provided from the alleys and shall be prohibited from Salem
Rd.
3 . An additional 5 ' of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Salem Road along the property
frontage.
4. All infrastructure improvements shall be installed, inspected and accepted prior to final plat
approval.
5 . No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building
setbacks or utility easements.
6. Parks fees are due in the amount of $6, 105.00 for 11 single-family dwelling units, prior to
building permit approval.
7. Street trees are required for every individual lot in a subdivision. There are existing trees for
all lots except 7-9. Three (3) trees shall be planted for Lots 7-9 and the timing for installation
shall be indicated on the site plans.
8. A three (3) year maintenance bond for the required street trees is required in the amount of
$750.00 prior to signing the final plat.
9. Buildings shall be constructed to be consistent with the photos and concepts depicted in the
booklet as specified. Building permits will be based upon the submitted photos.
10. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified
Development Code, and shall be subject to signage requirements for residential single-family
development.
11 . The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property.
Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the project with
review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the City Council shall
also be binding.
Standard Conditions of Approval:
12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western
Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
EXHIBIT "C"
R-PZD 06-2349
Page 2 of 2
13 . Trash enclosures shall be screened on three sides with materials compatible with the
surrounding structures, with access not visible from the street. Architectural elevations for
these structures shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit.
14. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for
grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,
parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process
was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional
review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements.
15 . All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed
utilities shall be located underground.
16. All exterior lighting is required to comply with the City's lighting ordinance. A lighting plan
and cut-sheets of the proposed exterior light fixtures shall be required to be approved by
Planning Staff prior to building permit.
17. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required:
a. Grading and drainage permits
b. An on-site inspection by the Landscape Administrator of all tree protection
measures prior to any land disturbance.
b. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation
area.
C. Project Disk with all final revisions
d. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with
the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by Section 158.01
"Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all incomplete
improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and
protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
City of Fayetteville
Staff Review Form
City Council Agenda Items ' nIL XITla
or
Contracts
'Y -
2-Jan-07
City Council Meeting Date
Jeremy Pate Planning Operations
Submitted By Division Department
Action Required:
R-PZD 06-2349: Planned Zoning District (Westbrook Village II, 284): Submitted by Project Design Consultants for property
located at Salem Road and Clabber Creek Drive and contains approximately 1 .38 acres. The request is for approval of a
Residential Planned Zoning District with 1 l single-family lots.
$0.00 n/a n/a
Cost of this request Category/Project Budget Program Category / Project Name
n/a n/a n/a
Account Number Funds Used to Date Program / Project Category Name
n/a n/a n/a
$
Project Number Remaining Balance Fund Name
Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached Q
Previous Ordinance or Resolution # n/a
Department D' ector Date Original Contract Date: n/a
Original Contract Number: n/a
City A ey
Received in City Clerk's
� Ci � Q I7. - tg -oG ' ZC
Finance and Internal Service Director Date
Received in Mayor's Office %ED
Mayor D
Comments:
City Council Meeting of January 2, 2006
Agenda Item Number
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
Thru: Gary Dumas, Director of Operations y�
From: Jeremy C. Pate, Director of Current Planning`
Date: December 14, 2006
Subject: Residential Planned Zoning District for Westbrook Village II (R-PZD 06-2349)
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of an ordinance creating a Residential Planned
Zoning District (R-PZD) for Westbrook Village II, based on the development standards,
plans and statement of commitments submitted. This action will establish a unique
zoning district for a single-use project on approximately 1 .38 acres located at Lots 1 & 2
of the Salem Village P.U.D. The proposal consists of a residential development
consisting of l 1 single-family residential dwelling units.
BACKGROUND
Lots I and 2 were created as part of the original Salem Village P.U.D. for future
development. Most of the Salem Village development has been constructed, however the
two larger tracts located at the entrance into Salem Village are currently vacant and have
retained the original RSF-4 zoning. Since the P.U.D. process is no longer an option for
developing the remaining lots, the developer has requested a Residential Planned Zoning
District to allow for similar lot sizes and configurations as those already developed in
Salem Village.
A Residential Planned Zoning District was approved on the subject properties by the City
Council on February 21 , 2006 for development of 7 single-family homes. However, the
approved development never received final plat approval and consequently was not
constructed.
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission voted 8-0-0 in favor of this request on December 11 , 2006.
Recommended conditions were approved by the Planning Commission and are reflected
in the attached staff report.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 06-2349, WESTBROOK
VILLAGE 1I, LOCATED AT SALEM ROAD AND CLABBER
CREEK DRIVE; CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1 .38 ACRES;
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS :
Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby „
changed as follows:
From RSF4, Residential Single Family, 4 units per acre to R-PZD 06-2349 as shown in Exhibit
"A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved
master development plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the
conditions of approval as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City
Council indicated in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said Exhibit "C"
shall be filed and available for view in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Fayetteville.
Section 3. That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all
of the requirements of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4. That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is
hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 12007.
APPROVED :
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
By:
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
R-PZD 06-2349
TRACT ONE:
ALL OF TRACT ONE AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF SALEM VILLAGE P.U.D., RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 15 AT PAGE 70, BEING PART OF THE NW1 /4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 32,
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ALSO BEING
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A FOUND IRON PIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT ONE;
THENCE S87028'49"E 198.16 FEET; THENCE S02034'27"W 117.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE
TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S47034127"W,
35.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE N87025'33"W
4620 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 48.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S66003125"W, 42.86 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
44.43 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 15.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S66001147"W, 13.38 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
13.87 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE N87028'49"W 51 .48 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD
THAT BEARS N42028149"W, 35.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN;
THENCE NO2031 '11 "E 142.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.70 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD OR FACT.
TRACT TWO:
ALL OF TRACT TWO AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF SALEM VILLAGE P.U.D., RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 15 AT PAGE 70, BEING PART OF THE NW1 /4 OF THE SW1 /4 OF SECTION 32,
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ALSO BEING
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2; THENCE N87°28'49"W 152.99 FEET
TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00
FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N42027'11 "W, 21 .22 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 23.58 FEET
TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE NO2°34'27"E 6.23 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG
A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 51 .00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS
N08056'20"W, 20.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 20.50 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE
N20027'08"W 109.75 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N36002'02"E, 41 .69 FEET, AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 49.29 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE S87°28'49"E 70.64 FEET TO A
FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET, A
LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S61 °04'04"E, 13.34 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 13.83 FEET; THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 48.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS
S61 °02'26"E, 42.66 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 44.21 FEET; THENCE S87°25'33"E 46.19 FEET TO
A FOUND IRON PIN, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET,
A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S42025133"E, 35.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27; THENCE
S02034'27"W 127.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.72 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS, BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR
FACT.
. :tole] rkikyj I MA 10
1 I,
il' I;I
. s .
ft
IV
cr
1 �
1
ari
�w i I t
Y �
Legend
� IM YEAR — UNIT OF STUDY
r
1
9 " n '
t
Lam:!
® ou%w city
c
0 75 150 3DO 450 600
EXHIBIT "C"
R-PZD 66-2349
Page 1 of 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1 . A shared driveway shall be provided for Lots 10 and 11 .
2. Individual lot access shall be provided from the alleys and shall be prohibited from Salem
Rd.
3. An additional 5 ' of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Salem Road along the property
frontage.
4. All infrastructure improvements shall be installed, inspected and accepted prior to final plat
approval.
5. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building
setbacks or utility easements.
6. Parks fees are due in the amount of $6, 105.00 for I 1 single-family dwelling units, prior to
building permit approval.
7. Street trees are required for every individual lot in a subdivision. There are existing trees for
all lots except 7-9. Three (3) trees shall be planted for Lots 7-9 and the timing for installation
shall be indicated on the site plans.
8. A three (3) year maintenance bond for the required street trees is required in the amount of
$750.00 prior to signing the final plat.
9. Buildings shall be constructed to be consistent with the photos and concepts depicted in the
booklet as specified. Building permits will be based upon the submitted photos.
10. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified
Development Code, and shall be subject to signage requirements for residential single-family
development.
11 . The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property.
Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the project with
review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the City Council shall
also be binding.
Standard Conditions of Approval:
12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western
Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
EXHIBIT "C"
R-PZD 06-2349
Page 2 of
13. Trash enclosures shall be screened on three sides with materials compatible with the
surrounding structures, with access not visible from the street. Architectural elevations for
these structures shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit.
14. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for
grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,
parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process
was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional
review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements.
15. All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed
utilities shall be located underground.
16. All exterior lighting is required to comply with the City's lighting ordinance. A lighting plan
and cut-sheets of the proposed exterior light fixtures shall be required to be approved by
Planning Staff prior to building permit.
17. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required:
a. Grading and drainage permits
b. An on-site inspection by the Landscape Administrator of all tree protection
measures prior to any land disturbance.
b. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation
area.
C. Project Disk with all final revisions
d. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with
the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by Section 158.01
"Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all incomplete
improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and
protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Planning Commission Meeting
November 30, 2006
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
125 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479) 575-8267
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Jesse Fulcher, Current Planner
Matt Casey, Assistant City Engineer
THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning
DATE: December 5 2006 Updated December 12, 2006
R-PZD 06-2349: Planned Zoning District (WESTBROOK VILLAGE, 284): Submitted by
PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC for property located at SALEM ROAD, CLABBER
CREEKS DRIVE. The property is zoned RSF-4, SINGLE FAMILY — 4 UNITS/ACRE and
contains approximately 1.38 acres. The request is a.Residential Planned Zoning District
containing ii single-family lots.
Planner: Jesse Fulcher
Findings:
Property Description: The subject property consists of Lots I and 2 of the original Salem
Village P.U.D., which were reserved for future development. Most of the Salem Village
development has been constructed, however the two larger tracts located at the entrance into
Salem Village are currently vacant and have retained the original RSF-4 zoning. A Residential
Planned Zoning District was approved on the subject properties by the City Council on February
21, 2006 for development of 7 single-family units. However, the approved development was
never constructed and therefore the applicants have submitted a new request for 1( single-family
lots.
Surrounding Land Use/Zoning:
Direction
from Site
Land Use
Zoning
North
Undeveloped
RSF-4, Res.
Single
Family —4
units/acre
South
Salem Village PUD
RSF-4, Res.
Single
Family -4
units/acre
East
Gary Hampton Softball Complex
RSF-4, Res.
Single
Family —4
units/acre
West
Salem Village PUD
RSF-4, Res.
Single
Family — 4
units/acre
Proposal: The applicant requests rezoning and preliminary plat approval for a residential
development in an R-PZD zoning district. The proposed use of the site is for II single-family
units for a maximum density of 7.97 units per acre. All of the residential units will be located in
Planning Areas I and 2 and Planning Area 3 will be utilized for community green space. This
proposal does subdivide the property and will require final plat approval.
K.:IRepores12OO61PC Reports) /2-1 /-06(R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
Background: Salem Village P.U.D. was approved in 1997 for a maximum of 156 single-family
units, although only 111 lots were platted. The 111 platted lots did not include Tract 1, Tract 2,
or Tract 3, which were reserved for future development of either residential, office, retail,
community services, church grounds, recreational green or •residential uses. Tract 3 was
subsequently combined with previously dedicated park land for Salem Village and deeded to the
City of Fayetteville in 1999. Tract I and Tract 2 have remained undeveloped with the original
zoning designation of RSF-4 (R-1). The addition of II single-family homes would still be well
under that which was originally permitted with the Salem Village P.U.D. Density calculations
are indicated in the table below.
Salem Village/Westbrook Village Density
Units
Acreage
Density
Acreage Less Park
Land/Green S ace
Density
111 -Platted
39.22
2.83
. 26.44
4.19
156 -Permitted
39.22
3.97
26.44
5.90
11 -Westbrook
1.38
7.97
1.28
8.59
122 (111 + 11) -Total
39.22
3.11
26.44
4.61
Access: All public rights -of -way were constructed with Salem Village. As with the original
development, each lot will access from an alley located at the rear of the lots.
Street Improvements Proposed: No street improvements are required, since all improvements,
including sidewalks, were installed with the original development. However, an alley is required
to be constructed for Planning Area 1 to provide rear access to the units. With the adoption of
the Master Street Plan and the designation of Salem Road as a Collector Street, an additional 5'
of right-of-way is to be dedicated by this plat.
Water & Sewer: Water and sewer lines will be extended to serve the development.
Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Salem Road (Collector Street)
Tree Preservation: Existing Canopy: 0%
Preserved Canopy: 0%
Required Canopy: 0%
Mitigation: None -A Tree Preservation Plan Waiver Form was
submitted and approved by the Urban Forester.
Parks: Salem Village P.U.D. dedicated land. to meet the Park Land Dedication requirement at
the time of approval. This dedication did not account for the development of an additional
eleven (11) single family lots on tracts one and two. Fees in lieu will be assessed for eleven
single family lots. Parks fees are due in the amount of $6,105.00 before signing the final plat.
K:IReports120061PC Reportcll2-1 t-061R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PCJ.doc
Recommendation: Staff recommends forwarding R-PZD 06-2349 to the City Council with a
recommendation for approval with the following conditions to approval:
Conditions of approval:
1. A shared driveway shall be provided for Lots 10 and 11.
2. Individual lot access shall be provided from the alleys and shall be prohibited from Salem
Rd.
3. An additional 5' of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Salem Road along the property
frontage.
4. All infrastructure improvements shall be installed, inspected and accepted prior to final
plat approval.
5. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building
setbacks or utility easements.
6. Parks fees are due in the amount of $6,105.00 for 11 single-family dwelling units, prior to
building permit approval.
7. Street trees are required for every individual lot in a subdivision. There are existing trees
for all lots except 7-9. Three (3) trees shall be planted for Lots 7-9 and the timing for
installation shall be indicated on the site plans.
8. A three (3) year maintenance bond for the required street trees is required in the amount
of $750.00 prior to signing the final plat.
9. Buildings shall be constructed to be consistent with the photos and concepts depicted in
the booklet as specified. Building permits will be based upon the submitted photos.
10.. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified
Development Code, and shall be subject to signage requirements for residential single-
family development.
11. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the
property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the
project with review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the
City Council shall also be binding.
Standard Conditions of Approval:
12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to
the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR.
K: IReports t20061 PC Reports(/1-/ /-061R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
13. Trash enclosures shall be. screened on three sides with materials compatible with the
surrounding structures, with access not visible from the street. Architectural elevations
for these structures shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit.
14. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable)
for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets. @ublic and private),
sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat
review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are
subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's
current requirements. ,
15. All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed
utilities shall be located underground.
16. All exterior lighting is required to comply with the City's lighting ordinance. A lighting
plan and cut -sheets of the proposed exterior light fixtures shall be required to be approved.
by Planning Staff prior to building permit.
17. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required:
a. Grading and drainage permits
b. An on -site inspection by the Landscape Administrator of all tree
protection measures prior to any land disturbance.
b. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree
preservation area.
c. Project Disk with all final revisions
d. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety
with the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by Section 158.01
"Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all
incomplete improvements. Further, all'improvements necessary to serve
the site and protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed,
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Planning Commission Action: El Denied
Motion: Lack
Second: Ostner
Vote: 8-0-0
Meeting Date: December 11, 2006
Comments:
❑ Tabled J Forwarded to C.C.
The "Conditions of Approval" listed in the report above are accepted in total without exception
by the entity requesting approval of this development item.
Signature Date
K:IRepora120061PC Reporall2-ll-061R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc 0
Findings associated with MDP R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village)
Sec. 166.06. Planned Zoning Districts (PZD).
(E) Approval or Rejection Criteria for Planned Zoning Districts
The following criteria shall be considered by. the Planning Commission and City Council in the
review of a planned zoning district application based on the proposed master development plan:
(1) Whether the application is in compliance with the requirements of the UDC and the
City Plan 2025; ,
FINDING: Staff finds the application to be in compliance with the Master Development
Plan Planned Zoning District criteria established by the City Council. The Interim Future
Land Use Plan Map adopted as part of City Plan 2025 designates this site Residential. The
Sector Map also adopted as part of City Plan 2025 does not designate this specific area as a
growth area. Rezoning this property to R-PZD 06-2349 with single-family dwelling units is
consistent with the land use plan and the surrounding land use. Although some of the
proposed lot sizes are smaller than the existing Salem Village development, staff finds the
development to be compatible with the existing neighborhood and to support the goal of
providing density nearby to public services; i.e. schools, sports complexes, etc.
(2) Whether the application is in compliance with all applicable statutory provisions;
FINDING: The application has been reviewed and found to be compliant with applicable
statutory provisions, or the applicant has submitted requests for waivers thereof.
(3) Whether the general impact of the rezoning would adversely impact the provision of
public facilities and services;
FINDING: All existing infrastructure, including streets, have been installed with the
development of Salem Village. The proposed PZD will allow the two existing vacant lots
within the subdivision to be developed in a similar and appropriate fashion as the
previously developed lots.
(4) Whether the rezoning is compatible with the surrounding land uses;
FINDING: The proposed subdivision allows for a density and land use that is compatible
with adjacent properties, yet also allows for a flexible site plan and layout. A harmonious
relationship with surrounding developments is achieved, while allowing for a unique style
and type of development. Staff fords that the proposed use to be appropriate, finding that
while the lot sizes are smaller than the existing developed subdivision, the overall land use
and density, are compatible.
(5) Whether the, subject land is suitable for the intended use and is compatible with the
natural environment;
K_ IReports120061PC Reportsll2-11-061R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
FINDING: The two properties
were proposed
for future development with
the original
Salem Village PUD. The sites are flat with trees
located on the perimeter of the
properties.
(6) Whether the intended land use would create traffic congestion or burden the existing
road network;
FINDING: The proposed zoning will not create or appreciably increase traffic danger or
congestion surrounding streets. Approximately 110 average two-way vehicle trips per day
from this development would be created; a Collector Street, the primary means of access to
the site currently, can accommodate 6,000 vehicles per day at full build -out.
(7) Whether the planned development provides for unified development control under a
unified plan;
FINDING: A plan and project booklet has been submitted, recognizing the zoning and
development criteria required of a Master Development Plan submittal. Typical
architectural elevations, materials and design standards are called out, in order to describe
the appearance of the project once constructed.
(8) Whether any other recognized zoning consideration would be violated in this PZD.
FINDING: No other zoning considerations are proposed to be violated.
(B) Development standards, conditions and review guidelines
(1) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consider a proposed PZD in light of the
purpose and intent as set forth in Chapter 161 Zoning Regulations, and the development
standards and review guidelines set forth herein. Primary emphasis shall be placed upon
achieving compatibility between the proposed development and surrounding areas so as
to preserve and enhance the neighborhood. Proper planning shall involve a consideration
of tree preservation, water conservation, preservation of natural site amenities, and the
protection of watercourses from erosion and siltation. The Planning Commission shall
determine that specific development features, including project density, building
locations, common usable open space, the vehicular circulation system, parking areas,
screening and landscaping, and perimeter treatment shall be combined in such a way as to
further the health, safety, amenity and welfare of the community. To these ends, all
applications filed pursuant to this ordinance shall be reviewed in accordance with the
same general review guidelines as those utilized for zoning and subdivision applications.
FINDING: The proposed rezoning of the existing RSF-4 property to the proposed R-PZD
development with single family residential use at a density of 7.97 units per acre is
consistent with the City Plan 2025 that identifies this area for residential use. The
proposed land use is unique to the area with regard to site layout and organization,
meeting many of the objectives and principles of the land use plan that promotes unique
forms of development.
K.:IReportsl2006V'C Rcportcll1-11-0618-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PCJ-doc
(2) Screening and landscaping. In order to enhance the integrity and. attractiveness of the
development, and when deemed necessary to protect adjacent properties, the Planning
Commission shall require landscaping and screening as part of a PZD. The screening and
landscaping shall be provided as set forth in §166.09 Buffer Strips and Screening. As part
of the development plan, a detailed screening and landscaping plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Commission. Landscape plans shall show the general location, type and
quality (size and age) of plant material. Screening plans shall include typical details of
fences, berms and plant material to be used.
FINDING: Screening is not required for the residential use;- however three (3) street trees
shall be planted for Lots 7-9.
(3) Traffic circulation. The following traffic circulation guidelines shall apply:
(a) The adequacy of both the internal and external street systems shall be reviewed in
light of the projected future traffic volumes.
(b) The traffic circulation system shall be comprised of a hierarchal scheme of local
collector and arterial streets, each designed to accommodate its proper function and in
appropriate relationship with one another.
(c) Design of the internal street circulation system must be sensitive to such
considerations as safety, convenience, separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic,
general attractiveness, access to dwelling units and the proper relationship of different
land uses.
(d) Internal collector streets shall be coordinated with the existing external street system,
providing for the efficient flow of traffic into and out of the planned zoning
development.
(e) Internal local streets shall be designed to discourage through traffic within the
planned zoning development and to adjacent areas.
(f) Design provisions for ingress and egress for any site along with service drives and
interior circulation shall be that required by Chapter 166 Development of this code.
FINDING: All lots will be rear loaded from alley ways interior to the site. No curb -cuts
are allowed onto Salem Road.
(4) Parking standards. The off-street parking and loading standards found in Chapter 172
Parking and Loading shall apply to the specific gross usable or leasable floor areas of the
respective use areas.
FINDING: Parking is to be provided on -site for each residential lot.
K:Il?eporlsl20061PC Reports112-11-06tR-/'7.D 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
(5) Perimeter treatment. Notwithstanding any other provisions of a planned zoning district,
all uses of land or structures shall meet the open space, buffer or green strip provisions of
this chapter of this code.
FINDING: This requirement has been met.
(6) Sidewalks. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: All sidewalks were installed with the development of Salem Village PUD.
(7) Street Lights. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING If street lights are not located within 300' of this development, they shall be
constructed by the developer.
(8) Water. 'As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Public water lines are available to each lot and shall be extended in accordance
with city codes.
(9) Sewer. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Public sewer lines are available to each lot and shall be extended in accordance
with city codes.
(10) Streets and Drainage. Streets within a residential PZD may be either public or
private.
(a) Public Streets. Public streets shall be constructed according to the adopted standards
of the City.
(b) Private Streets. Private streets within a residential PZD shall be permitted subject to
the following conditions: ,
(i) Private streets shall be permitted
for only a loop street, or street
ending with a cul-
de-sac. Any
street connecting one
or more public streets shall
be constructed to
existing City
standards and shall
be dedicated as a public street.
(ii) Private streets shall be designed and constructed to the same standards as public
streets with the exceptions of width and cul-de-sacs as noted below.
(iii)All grading and drainage within a Planned Zoning District including site drainage
and drainage for private streets shall comply with the City's Grading (Physical
Alteration of Land) and Drainage (Storm water management) Ordinances. Open
drainage systems may be approved by the City Engineer.
K: I Reports120061PC ReportsII2-II-061 R-PZU 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PQ.doc
(iv) Maximum density served by a cul-de-sac shall be 40 units. Maximum density
served by a loop street shall be 80 units.
(v) The plat of the planned development shall designate each, private street as a
"private street."
(vi) Maintenance of private streets shall be the responsibility of the developer or of a
,neighborhood property owners association (POA) and shall not be the
responsibility of the City. The method for maintenance and a maintenance fund
shall be established by the PZD covenants. The covenants shall expressly provide
that the City is a third party beneficiary to the covenants and shall have the right
to enforce the street maintenance requirements of the covenants irrespective of the
vote of the other parties to the covenants.
(vii) The covenants shall provide that in the event the private streets are not maintained
as required by the covenants, the City shall have the right (but shall not be
required) to maintain said streets and to charge the cost thereof to the property
owners within the PZD on a pro rata basis according to assessed valuation for ad
valorem tax purposes and shall have a lien on the real property within the PZD for
such cost. The protective covenants shall grant the City the right to use all private
streets for purposes of providing fire and police protection, sanitation service and
any other of the municipal functions. The protective covenants shall provide that
such covenants shall not be amended and shall not terminate without approval of
the City Council.
(viii) The width of private streets may vary according to the density served. The
following standard shall be used:
Paving Width
(No On -Street Parking)
Dwelling
Units
One -Way
Two -Way
1-20
14'
22'
21+
14'
24'
*Note: If on -street parking is desired, 6 feet must be added to each side where parking is
intended.
(ix) All of the traffic laws prescribed by Title VII shall apply to traffic on private
streets within a PZD.
K:I Reports12006IPC Reports) l2-ll -06IR-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
(x) There shall be no minimum building setback requirement from a private street.
(xi) The developer shall erect at.the entrance of each private street a rectangular sign,
not exceeding 24 inches by 12 inches, designating the street a "private street"
which shall be clearly visible to motor vehicular traffic.
FINDING: A combination of public and private streets and alleys were constructed with
the Salem Village P.U.D. The rear loaded alley providing access to Tract 1 will be accessed
from Westminster Drive,. which is a public street. The rear loaded alley providing access to
Tract 2 will also be accessed from Westminster Drive, however Westminster is a private
street on the south side of Clabber Creek Boulevard.
(11) Construction of nonresidential facilities. Prior to issuance of more than eight
building permits for any residential PZD, all approved nonresidential facilities shall be
constructed. In the event the developer proposed to develop the PZD in phases, and the
nonresidential facilities are not proposed in the initial phase, the developer shall enter into
a contract with the City to guarantee completion of the nonresidential facilities.
FINDING: All development on the site shall be phased according to the phasing plan and
conditions herein.
(12) Tree preservation. All PZD developments shall comply with the requirements for
tree preservation as set forth in Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection. The
location of trees shall be considered when planning the common open space, location of
buildings, underground services, walks, paved areas, playgrounds, parking areas, and
finished grade levels.
FINDING: A Tree Preservation Plan Waiver Form was submitted and approved by the
Urban Forester.
(13) Commercial design standards. All PZD developments that contain office or
commercial structures shall comply with the commercial design standards as set forth in
§166.14 Site Development Standards and Construction and Appearance Design Standards
for Commercial Structures.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed design standards for residential structures; no
commercial uses are proposed.
(14) View protection. The Planning Commission shall have the right to establish
special height and/or positioning restrictions where scenic views are involved and shall
have the right to insure the perpetuation of those views through protective covenant
restrictions.
FINDING:
No scenic views
are identified,
and the height of structures
proposed, are not
uncommon
for the area.
-
K: tReports120061PC Reports i2-11-0618-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
(E) Revocation.
(1) Causes for revocation as enforcement action. The Planning Commission may
recommend to the City Council that any PZD approval be revoked and all building or
occupancy permits be voided under the following circumstances:
(a) Building permit. If no building permit has been issued within the time allowed.
(b) Phased development schedule. If the applicant does not adhere to the phased
development schedule as stated in the approved development plan.
(C) Open space and recreational facilities. If the construction and provision of all
common open spaces and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the
final plan are proceeding at a substantially slower rate than other project components.
Planning staff shall report the status of each ongoing PZD at the first regular meeting
of each quarter, so that_the Planning Commission is able to compare the actual
development accomplished with the approved development schedule. If the Planning
Commission finds that the rate of construction of dwelling units or other commercial
or industrial structures is substantially greater than the rate at which common open
spaces and public recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, then the
Planning Commission may initiate revocation action or cease to approve any
additional final plans if preceding phases have not been finalized. The city may also
issue a stop work order, or discontinue issuance of building or occupancy permits, or
revoke those previously issued.
(2) Procedures. Prior to a recommendation of revocation, notice by certified mail shall be
sent to the landowner or authorized agent giving notice of the alleged default, setting a
time to appear before the Planning Commission to show cause why steps should not be
made to totally or partially revoke the PZD. The Planning Commission recommendation
shall be forwarded to the City Council for disposition as in original approvals. In the
event a PZD is revoked, the City Council shall take the appropriate action in the city
clerk's office and the public zoning record duly noted.
(3) Effect. In the event of revocation, any completed portions of the development or those
portions for which building permits have been issued shall be treated to be a whole and
effective development. After causes for revocation .or enforcement have been corrected,
the City Council shall expunge such record as established above and shall authorize
continued issuance of building permits.
(F) Covenants, trusts and homeowner associations.
(1) Legal entities. The developer shall create such legal entities as appropriate to undertake
and be responsible for the ownership, operation, construction, and maintenance of private
roads, parking areas, common usable open space, community facilities, recreation areas,
building, lighting, security measure and similar common elements in a development. The
K:1 Reports120061PC Reports112-11-061R-PZ.D 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
city encourages the creation of homeowner associations, funded community trusts or
other nonprofit organizations implemented by agreements, private improvement district,
.contracts and covenants. All legal instruments setting forth a plan or manner of
permanent care and maintenance of such open space, recreation areas and communally -
owned facilities shall be approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and
by the Planning Commission as to the suitability for the proposed use of the open areas.
The aforementioned legal instruments shall be provided to the Planning Commission
together with the filing of the final plan, except that the Guarantee shall be filed with the
preliminary plan or at least in a preliminary form.
(2) Common areas. If the common open space is deeded to a homeowner association, the
developer shall file with the plat a declaration of covenants and restrictions in the
Guarantee that will govern the association with the application for final plan approval.
The provisions shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
(a) The homeowner's association must be legally established before building permits are
granted.
(b) Membership and fees must be mandatory for each home buyer and successive buyer.
(C) The open space restrictions must be permanent, rather than for a period of years.
(d) The association must be responsible for the maintenance of recreational and other
common facilities covered by the agreement and for all liability insurance, local taxes
and other public assessments.
(e) Homeowners must pay their pro rata share of the initial cost; the maintenance
assessment levied by the association must be stipulated as a potential lien on the
property. The association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changing
needs.
FINDING: The applicant shall comply with these requirements. A condition to this effect
is included in the staff report.
Sec. 161.25 Planned Zoning District
(A) Purpose. The intent of the Planned Zoning District is to permit and encourage
comprehensively planned developments whose purpose is redevelopment, economic
development, cultural enrichment or to provide a single -purpose or mixed -use planned
development and to permit the combination of development and zoning review into a
simultaneous process. The rezoning of property to the PZD may be deemed appropriate if the
development proposed for the district can accomplish one or more of the following goals_
(1) Flexibility. Providing for flexibility in the distribution of land uses, in the density
of development and in other matters typically regulated in zoning districts.
K:1Reporfs120061PC Reports\/2-/ 1-06\R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
)
(2) Compatibility. Providing for compatibility with the surrounding land uses.
(3) Harmony. Providing for an orderly and creative arrangement of land uses that are
harmonious and beneficial to the community.
(4) Variety. Providing for a variety of housing types, employment opportunities or
commercial or industrial services, or any combination thereof, to achieve variety
and integration of economic and redevelopment opportunities.
(5) No negative impact. Does not have a negative effect upon the future development
of the area;
(6) Coordination. Permit coordination and planning of the land surrounding the PZD
and cooperation between the city and private developers in the urbanization of
new lands and in the renewal of existing deteriorating areas.
(7) Open space. Provision of more usable and suitably located open space, recreation
areas and other common facilities that would not otherwise be required under
conventional land development regulations.
(8) Natural features. Maximum enhancement and minimal disruption of existing
natural features and amenities.
(9) General Plan. Comprehensive and innovative planning and design of mixed use
yet harmonious developments consistent with the guiding policies of the General
Plan. '
(10) Special Features. Better utilization of sites characterized by special features of
geographic location, topography, size or shape.
FINDING: Staff finds this proposal meets the intent of many of the parameters of the City
Plan 2025, as well as the above criteria, including flexibility in density, providing for a
variety of housing types, common open spaces, and enhancement of existing natural
features. The proposal best fits the flexibility and variety goals of the intent of the Planned
Zoning District, offering detached single-family housing types, lot arrangements, lot
dimensions and building setbacks which are comparable to the original Salem Village PUD.
The
following guiding policies within
Residential
Areas arc applicable to this development,
and
help to achieve the nine primary
goals of the
City Plan
2025:
Residential Areas:
12.1.4.a Utilize principles of traditional residential urban design to create compatible, livable,
and accessible neighborhoods. (Goal 3)
K:IReports110061PC Retorts 12-II-061R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Rerisedfor P).doc
12.1.4.e Minimize through. traffic on minor residential streets, while providing connections
between neighborhoods to encourage openness and neighborliness. (Goal 4)
12.1.4.f Site new residential areas accessible to roadways, alternative transportation modes,
community amenities, infrastructure, and retail and commercial goods and services. (Goals
Ig and 3)
12.1.4.g Encourage residential dwellings in appropriate specified Mixed Use Areas. (Goals 1
and 3)
12.1.4./i Encourage a development scale to maintain compatibility and proportionality
between nonresidential development and adjacent residential areas. (Goal 3a)
12.1.4 j Discourage design elements that prohibit complete, compact, connected
neighborhoods such as cul-de-sacs, gated communities, etc. (Goal 3a)
(B) Rezoning. Property may be rezoned to the Planned Zoning District by the City Council
in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and Chapter 166, Development. Each
rezoning parcel shall be described as a separate district, with distinct boundaries and specific
design and development standards. Each district shall be assigned a project number or label,
along with the designation "PZD". The rezoning shall include the adoption of a specific master
development plan and development standards.
FINDING: The submitted development plats and Master Development Plan booklets, along
with the conditions of approval found applicable and appropriate, are binding with the
approval of the requested rezoning. Should the Planning Commission forward this item to
the City Council, an ordinance will be drafted for consideration of rezoning this property
in accordance with the submittal herein.
(C) R — PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District.
(1) Purpose and intent. The R-PZD is intended to accommodate mixed -use or clustered
residential developments and to accommodate single -use residential developments that
are determined to be more appropriate for a PZD application than a general residential
rezone. The legislative purposes, intent, and application of this district include, but are
not limited to, the following:
(a) To encourage a variety and flexibility in land development and land use for
predominately residential areas, consistent with the city's City Plan 2025 and the
orderly development of the city.
(b) To provide a framework within which an effective relationship of different land uses
and activities within a single development, or when considered with abutting parcels
of land, can be planned on a total basis.
K:IReports120061PC Reportstl2-//-061R-PZD 06-2349 (IVestbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
(c) To provide a harmonious relationship with the surrounding development, minimizing
such influences as land use incompatibilities, heavy traffic and congestion, and
excessive demands on planned and existing public facilities.
(d) To provide a means of developing areas with special physical features to enhance
natural beauty and other attributes.
(e) To encourage the efficient use of those public facilities required in connection with
new residential development.
FINDING: Staff is recommending approval of this application, finding that compatibility
and transition have been achieved in relation to the surrounding small lot, single-family
homes. The requested R-PZD provides an effective relationship between similar land uses
and activities on abutting parcels.
(2) Permitted Uses. All permitted uses identified within §162 Use Units of the Unified
Development Code shall be allowed as permissible uses, unless otherwise specified,
subject to City Council approval of the Planned Zoning District request.
(3) Conditional Uses. All conditional uses allowed within (Residential, Commercial,
Industrial) zoning Districts established in the Unified Development Code shall be
allowed with Planning Commission approval, unless otherwise specified, subject to the
code governing Conditional Use requests.
FINDING: Permitted and Conditional uses are outlined in both the Master Development
Plan booklets and plats.
(4)
Condition.
In no
instance shall the residential use
area be less than fifty-one percent
(51 %) of the
gross
floor area within the development.
FINDING: All uses are proposed as residential.
(F) Bulk and area regulations
(1) Residential density. Residential densities shall be determined on the basis of the
following considerations:
(a) The densities of surrounding development;
(b) the densities allowed under the current zoning;
(c) the urban development goals and other policies of the city's General Plan;
(d) the topography and character of the natural environment; and
(e) the impact of a given density on the specific site and adjacent properties.
K::IReportsl2006iPC Reportsl ]2-11-061 R-PZ!) 06-2-149 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
FINDING: Surrounding development is predominantly small lot residential to the west
with average sized RSF-4 lots to the north and south. Density under the current zoning
(RSF-4) is not appropriate for this area, as the city's future land use goals and
infrastructure for this area supports a higher density. Additionally, a greater level of
compatibility is achieved by utilizing a smaller lot size, consistent with the existing Salem
Village subdivision.
(2) Lot area and setback requirements. Taking into consideration the unique aspects of each
project, preliminary development plans for Planned Zoning Districts shall conform as
closely as possible to the existing standards for lot area minimums and setback
requirements under this chapter.
FINDING: Lot area minimums and setbacks are varied on this project, as it provides for a
small footprint type of unit. The property is being subdivided into individual lots. Smaller
lot and decreased setback development has been approved• to the west of the subject
property in the original Salem Village PUD.
(3) Building height. There shall be no maximum building height except as may be
determined by the Planning Commission during the review of the preliminary
development plan based on the uses within the development and the proximity of the
development to existing or prospective development on adjacent properties. A lesser
height may be established by the Planning Commission when it is deemed necessary to
provide adequate light and air to adjacent property and to protect the visual quality of the
community.
FINDING: Building heights proposed for this project are typical of single-family
development in the surrounding area.
(4) Building area. The Planning Commission shall review specific proposed lot coverages
which generally correspond to the guidelines for lot coverage in the respective
residential, office, commercial or industrial district which most depicts said development
scheme.
FINDING: Though the density is higher than currently permitted under the RSF-4 zoning
district, the lot sizes proposed are consistent with the existing lots in the Salem Village
neighborhood.
*Required Findings for Rezoning Request.
Land Use Plan: The City Plan 2025 Interim Future Land Use Plan designates this site as a
Residential Area. Rezoning this property to R-PZD 06-2212, with the associated Master
Development Plan, allows the principal use on the property to remain residential. The proposed
plan, commitments, design standards and other conditions placed upon the project result in a
compatible development with surrounding land uses in the general vicinity, meeting many of the
goals of the City Plan 2025 for new development.
K:IReporia12006 PC Reponsll2-ll-061R-PZD 06-2349 (IVesibrook Village Revised for PCJ.doe
FINDINGS OF THE STAFF
A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use
planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans.
Finding: Staff finds the proposal is highly consistent with the land use planning
objectives, principles and policies, as evidenced by the number of guiding
policies for Residential Areas this proposal meets. Rezoning the property will
accommodate both the future land use plan for residential uses in this area and
also allow for a variety of housing types, sizes and development pattern, thus
providing more choice for more citizens.
2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the
rezoning is proposed.
Finding: The rezoning is needed to allow for the creation of a development that is
consistent with the originally approved Salem Village PUD.
3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase
traffic danger and congestion.
Finding: The proposed zoning will not create or appreciably increase traffic danger or
congestion surrounding streets. Approximately 110 average two-way vehicle
trips per day from this development would be created; a Collector Street, the
primary means of access to the site currently, can accommodate 6,000 vehicles
per day at full build -out.
4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density
and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and
sewer facilities.
Finding: Based on findings from public service providers, as outlined below, an
undesirable increase in load on public services would not be created.
Engineering: The proposed subdivision has been reviewed for access to public utilities,
including water and sewer. Improvements to the water system and sewer
system are required to serve all of the proposed lots.
Police: Projects existing in this area already receive police services. The same level
of service will be provided to this site as is currently applied to the existing
surrounding development. It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police
Department that this Planned Zoning District will not substantially alter the
population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on police
services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion
in the area.
K:IReporis120061PC Reporis112-11-061R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PC).doc
R PZD 06-2349
Page 18
Fire: Fire station #7, approximately 2.2 miles away, serves this site. Fire response
time to the site is approximately 6 minutes, with an anticipated 2 calls for
service at maximum build -out, based on the Service Delivery Impact
included as a part of the staff report.
5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of
considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed
zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as:
a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses
permitted under its existing zoning classifications;
b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning
even though there are reasons under b (l) through (4) above why
the proposed zoning is not desirable.
Finding: N/A
K:IReportst20061PC Reporuii2-11-06tR-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village Revised for PCjdoc
PC Meeting of December 11, 2006
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
LANDSCAPE REVIEW FORM
To: Fayetteville Planning Commission
From: Sarah K. Patterson, Urban Forester
Date: December 6, 2006
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479) 444-3470
ITEM #: R-PZD o6-2349: Planned Zoning District (Westbrook Village)
Applicable Requirements:
NA
t; ite' eve opment 8t ar ang I of
.
NA
...,- .
'I 54oDestgrrOverlay
Y
Stree�Treel?lanting Standards
NA
'Stormwater Facilities
Plan Checklist:
Y= submitted by applicant
N=requested by City of Fayetteville
NA= not applicable
?Preliminary
[[Final
stiffiI
ISnbffiu
AIU Irtdsca 'e Elaris;
.
y
Irrigation notes either automatic or hose bib .
y
Species of plant material identified
y
Size of plant material at time of installation indicated
Soil amendments notes include that soil is amended and sod
y
removed
Mulch notes indicate organic mulching around trees and within
Y
landscape beds
Plans stamped by a licensed Landscape Architect
y
y
Planting details according to Fayetteville's Landscape Manual
rn='¢q
>itetDeve opment 'Par ngI of .ar '`
)Stan
NA
Wheel stops/ curbs
Interior landscaping
Narrow tree lawn (8'min width, i7/min length/i tree per 12 spaces)
NA
Tree island (8' min. width i tree per 12 spaces)
Prellmmary
Fu al f
Sub nittal
Subnutta}=
•
Perimeter landscaping
Side and rear property lines (5'landscaped)
Shade trees as described in street tree planting standards,
Parking lot adjacent to R.O.W.- continuous planting of shrubs -at least
8per tree- and ground cover -5o% evergreen)
NA
er ay 1strlet Requirements
Greenspace adjacent to street R.O.W. (25' wide)
NA
NA
Large street trees planted every 30' L.F. along R.O.W.
25% of total site area left in greenspace (8o% landscape)
NA
NA
____________________________________________________
Parking lots and outdoor storage screened with landscaping
,Street=TreePlan n Standards tlmeo FP orpermit
Residential Subdivisions- 1 large species shade tree/ lot tree
Y
planted within R.0.W. fpossible
Nonresidential Subdivision- 1 large species shade tree/3o L.F.
NA
tree planted within 15-25'greenspace
' reens ace
NA
Urban Tree Wells -urban streetscape only-lofoot sidewalk
Structural Soil -if urban wells are used, a note or detail of structural
NA
soil must be indicated on the landscape plan
N
Timing of planting indicated on plans (subdivisions only)
N
Written description of themethod for tracking plantings
•
n H' T1. • • W y•L: -.�jyl₹ 4 YT '[
±StormwaterFacihties (tin^aeLofFP;,o YTermit)
.rY i.i "^?kTh .'� -Sr.� 1° Y-8 ^k Al Sf.._.. _ r
NA
1 deciduous or evergreen tree/ 3000 square feet
NA
4 large shrubs (3 gal) or small trees / 3000 square feet
NA
6 shrubs or grasses (1 gal) / 3000 square feet
NA
Ground cover unless seed or sod is specified
NA
50% of facility planted with grass or grass like plants
Conditions of Approval:
1. With the new requirements of Chapter 177 street trees are required
for every individual lot in a subdivision. Existing trees meet this
requirement for all lots except lots 7-9. The applicant has
proposed to add an additional 3 trees to the site.
2. Please revise the timing note in the Landscape Notes section to
read that the 3 trees will be planted prior to signature of final plat.
Due to the rear loading of these lots, staff would recommend
planting all 3 trees before Final Plat.
3. With the new ordinance requirements, the trees must be bonded
for a 3 year term to ensure health. The amount will equal $'750 and
shall be deposited with the City before signature of Final Plat.
1•ve.tevflie PC Meeting of December 11, 2006
ARKANSAS
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
Telephone: (479) 444-3470
TREE PRESERVATION and PROTECTION REPORT
To: Fayetteville Planning Commission
From: Sarah K. Patterson, Urban Forester
Date: December 6, 2OO6
ITEM #: R-PZD o5-1619: Planned Zoning District (Westbrook Village)
Background:
➢ The Tree Preservation Plan was approved with the original plat for
Salem Village. Lots 1A -7A have no existing trees on -site outside of
utility easements and/or rights of ways.
Findings:
➢ The 54 trees planted along the rights of ways and utility easements
range in size from 2"-8" diameter breast height. None of the trees
should be damaged or removed during this process. A Tree
Preservation Waiver has been submitted and approved by the Urban
Forester.
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479) 444-3469
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
TO: Jesse Fulcher, Associate Planner
FROM: Alison Jumper, Park Planner
DATE: . November 28, 2006
SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Subdivision Committee Review Comments
Meeting Date:
November 30, 2006
Item:
R-PZD 06-2349 Westbrook Village, 284
Park
District:
NW
-
Zoned:
RSF-4
Billing Name
& Address: Nock -Broyles Land
Development, LLC
4921
Clear
Creek
Blvd.
Fayetteville, AR 72704
Land Dedication Requirement
Money
in Lieu
Single Family
@ .024 acre per unit =
acres _I 1
_@
$555
per unit =
$6,105
Multi Family
@ .017 acre per unit =
acres
@
$393
per unit =
$
Mobile Home
@ .024 acre per unit =
acres
@
$555
per unit =
$
Lot Split
@
$555
per unit =
$
COMMENTS:
• Salem Village P.U.D. dedicated land to meet the Park Land Dedication requirements at
the time of approval. This dedication did not account for development of 11 single family
lots on tracts one and two.
Fees in lieu will be assessed for 11 single family lots.
Parks fees are due in the amount of $6,105 before building permits are issued.
R-PZD0-1
December 1, 2006
Jeremy Pate
Zoning and Development Director
City of Fayetteville
113 W. Mountain
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Dear Director Pate,
This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the planned
zoning district. R-PZD 06-2349: (WESTBROOK VILLAGE, 284): Submitted by
Project Design Consultants, Inc for property located at Salem Road, Clabber Creek
Drive, would substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase
the load on public services and create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and
congestion.
It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this rezoning will not
substantially alter the population density or create an undesirable increase in the load on
police services. The rezoning will not create an appreciable increase in traffic danger
and congestion.
tp reference to plann zoning distri9fr -PZD 0499: (RU/$'t N HE)cnS, 370):
bmit y Co um By De n, Lt C ff prop I ty bated a . i st of HS 65 /
Cr over oa , and Sou ission B levard.
It is the opinion of the Fayet ille Police De artment that t ' rezoning wi of
ubstanti y er the pop atio density a ere e an uesira e incre a in e load on
lice ervices. itho traffic i rove It,
the. z in will ere e traffic ger
an congestion on a ready crowded sion Boulevard (AR. ST. . 45).
Fayetteville Fire
Department
To: Suzanne Morgan, Andrew Garner, Jeremy Pate, and Jesse Fulcher
Thru: Chief Tony Johnson
Asst Chief Bud Thompson
From: Captain Dale Riggins
Date:
December
5,
2006
Re:
December
5,
2006 Zoning Review - Fire Department Comments
R-PZD 06-2349 (Westbrook Village)
These 1.38 acres is covered by Engine 7 at 835 Rupple Road.
It is 2:3 miles from the station with an expected response time of 6 minutes.
The Fire Department anticipates 2 (2 EMS —0 Fire/Other) calls for service per year once the development
is completed and maximum build -out has occurred.
Measured Hydrant Flow in this area is 1500 gallons/minute.
The service impact of this development will typically take eighteen months after the development is started,
and the units begin to be occupied, to occur.
There should be no adverse effects on our call volume or response time to this development.
hese/ 1.9, acres is c�vere¢ by Engyge 5 located at 833 N Crossover.
is 1 mils from t stab n wit an xpected response time of 4 minutes. When the new Station 5 is
at C{Id Wireknd Cr*sovt the spouse time i ay approximately ame.
e D4ppartm_/iit anticiHJatesf 3 (8',-i1'vlS — 5 Fl Other) alts for servi per ye once the development
t c mplete and aximum u d -out ha Mcjsured dra t Flow in hi area is 1 0 ga ons/minute.
The service m et of this elopment w 1 ically take eigh a onths after the de elopment is started,
and the units gin to be oc pied, to occur.
There should be no adverse effects on our call volume or response time to this development.
iese 29\ acres is covered by Engine 7 at 835 Rupple Road.
is 2. mil from the sta on ith an expected response time of 5.25 minutes.
to F re Dep rtment an cipates (I EMS 1i - /Other) calls foreft7ib�per year once the development
he a is no M sure ydrant Flo rec ded in this ea.
h service im ct this developm will typically t e e' hteen months aft the development is started,
a d the units beg o be occupied, to occur.
There should be no adverse effects on our call volume or response time to this development.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning any of these comments.
Dale Riggins
Captain
Fayetteville Fire Department
Si
41
y/y -
_yW i ,n•
r
fie
.} ��'+ •y •c
e -4j1
l
—i. i1t Y �.rY'r:�i i'f�L
�1✓�. (. ' h"-].
t:u
:�.1 \f i$i IG I JTT]] `(. y.%J4 4�jii�'1•.I_! I.. YM kV Y{.�;eTtY f rl�J{
-
^..'. ��aT {iS .t i S "r- rf 'r h*"� � �.., '4 w•. Y?'� .. X` E[ 1f:.
@2/12/2002 00:3e
4795213259
PAGE 02/02
Salem Village/Clabber Creek I iflage
Property Owner's Associat ion
P.O. Box 4753
Fayetteville, AR 72702
479-442-3965
www wire1essxt.com
Board 14mbers Jonathan Martfn, I earurer
Rob Scott, President Cathay M nney
Laura Ca $, Vice President Cole McKinney
Chastity 91ark Kurt Meredith, Secs Maly
Septem r 25, 2006
Mr. Lio eld Jordan
Aldern34n, Ward 4, Position 2
City of ifayetteville
1600 Adrowhead Street
Fayette ' le, AR 72701
RE: St
Dear A
In recc
impro'
Rupplt
suppoi
eleven
Blvd a
The Se
to add
suppo:
IfltL�Z''
cc:
Nock -Broyles Variance Request in Salem Village
erman Jordan:
lition of Nock -Broyles Land Development's continual I .evelopment and
tnent of Salem Village and in appreciation of the futuxe Vonstruction of the
load neighborhood fence, Clabber Creek Village POA, ,L(:; / Salem Village POA
o Nock -Broyles Land Development, LLC request for a v .riance from seven (7) to.
.1) homes on the two Residential Office Tracts on the a inners Clabber Creek
L Salem Road of Salem Village.
em Village POA Executive Board have discussed all pen e'b-ed issues pertaining
onal homes constructed at the front entrance and hay€ unanimously voted to
Mr. Hank Broyles proposal increase.
i. Board, also, wishes to thank Aldermen Jordan and Li .ca:; for their continual
of the neighborhood of Salem Village.
YV 2- Gur^1'e l
Y, cm 6� o� v�
e via 0
colse'i0yl kYfc
\,cc o �f
rtt Ce . 't %Qcth
cwc'q V'Mve \ corts•deraCiovL,
ik Broyles, Managing Member „v E 7 e s� "' ' ° r° c
crwoman Shirley Lucas �� �Y ti n cs` ye- & v' ° ,a
ll r vne.- -
'ye
ADJO__ANG PROPERTY OWNERS NOTi. ACATION
OF UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARING
Today's Date: 11/22/06
Nn.,.
APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFO:
Project Design Consultants, Inc.
4285 N. Shiloh Dr. Suite 104
Fayetteville, AR 72703
Subdivision Committee Meeting:
Planning Commission Meeting:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
R-PZD (Residential Planned Zoning District)
Bus: 479-521-5405
Fax: 479-521-0919 G�V
Thursday, 11/30/06, 9:00am
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113 W. Mountain Street, Room 219
Monday, 12/11/06. 5:30pm
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113 W. Mountain Street, Room 219
Property is located at the corners of Salem Rd., Clabber Creek Blvd. and Westminister Dr. The property has a
total of 1.4 acres, containing 11 single family residential lots.
Please see attached vicinity map.
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS
(Return Comments to City of Fayetteville Planning Division in Stamped Enclosed Envelope)
I have been notified of the above meetings for the described project.
I do not object to the project described above.
kt I do object to the project described above because:
tb
Name of Property Owner (Printed) Jo ;jvk WAnf
Si ature of Property Owner
•pc rcc ineSe l �Y 1Ho'nz. d..v .
February 2004
ADJO:_ ANG PROPERTY OWNERS NOTI..CATION
OF UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARING
Today's Date: 11/22/06
APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFO:
Project Design Consultants, Inc.
4285 N. Shiloh Dr. Suite 104
Fayetteville, AR 72703
Subdivision Committee Meeting:
Planning Commission Meeting:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
R-PZD (Residential Planned Zoning District)
Bus: 479-521-5405
Fax: 479-521-0919
Thursday, 11/30/06, 9:00am
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113 W. Mountain Street, Room 219
Monday, 12/11/06. 5:30pm
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113 W. Mountain Street, Room 219
NOV 2=9•:.2006
Property is
located at the corners of Salem Rd., Clabber
Creek Blvd. a4d
W�n1rSLm,
pdoperjy has a
total
of 1.4
acres, containing
11 single family residential
lots. I
PLANNING
DIVISION
Please see attached vicinity map.
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS
(Return Comments to City of Fayetteville Planning Division in Stamped Enclosed Envelope)
I have been notified of the above meetings for the described project.
I do not object to the project described above.
I do object to the project described above because: %v iJ7yG1J G>tI NHS ,4 DP2 ih
OGf/ area
d fl/P'
Name of Property Owner (Printed)
Si natu of operty Owner
February 2004
•I•
i
to Rir itR I N
pa
f
. � I l _ .J
:RC. J t i
PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS, ING.
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED. ZONING
DISTRICT
For
WESTBROOK VILLAGE R-PZD
Salem Road
Fayetteville, AR
December 4, 2006.
For Developer:
Nock -Broyles Land Development
• 4921 Clear Creek Boulevard
Fayetteville, AR 72704
• Tax ID # 13-4295430
Prepared By:
N. Arthur Scott, P.E.
Project Design Consultants, Inc.
Project No: 2006036
d .
4285 N. SHILOH DR.• FAYETTEVILLE, AR • 72703
PHONE: 479-5.21-5405 • FAX: 479-521-0919
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
A.
Name and Address of Landowner/Applicant and Re resentative
1
B.
Summary of Proposal
1
C.
General Project Concept
1
D.
Proposed Development Phasing and Time Frame
2
E.
Proposed Planning Areas Descriptions
2
F.
Proposed Zoning and Development Standards
2
- Plannin Area 1 (PA -1)
3
- Planning Area 2 (PA -2)
4
- Plannin Area 3 (PA -3)
5
G.
Comparison Charts
6
H.
Description of Recreational Facilities
6
I.
Reason for PZD Request
6
J.
Land Use, Traffic, Appearance and Signage e
6
K.
Compliance with the Fayetteville General Plan 2020
6
Traffic Stud
7
•L..
M.
Impacts on City Services
7
N.
Statement of Commitments
8
O..
Conceptual Descri tion of the Dev. Standards, Conditions and Guidelines
9
• P.
Fulfills the IntentIPurpose of the PZD Ordinance
9
.
Waiver Request
10
APPENDICES
Cover sheet from Plan Set with General Provisions
A
•
Zoning and Development Standards by Planning Area
B
Master Development Plan
C
Overall Plannin Areas and Tree Cano with Architectural St les
D
Site and Utility Plan
E
Tree Preservation and Grading Plan F
Westbrook Village,.PZD
Project 2006036
A. Name and Address.of Applicant
The applicant and owner is:
Nock -Broyles Land Development, LLC
4921 Clear Creek Boulevard
Fayetteville, AR 72704
Tax ID # 13-4295430
Art Scott, P.E.
December 4, 2006
The Engineer representative for the applicant is Art Scott, P.E. of Project Design Consultants,
Inc. of Fayetteville, AR.
PDC, Inc.
4285 N. Shiloh Drive
Suite 104
Fayetteville, AR 72703
B. Summary of Proposal
• Westbrook Village is designed to provide a variety of affordable. housing in a modem
development integrated into the undeveloped area remaining in the subdivision located at
Salem Road and Clabber Creek Boulevard.
• Westbrook Village offers residential housing with the feel of neighborhood with front
porches and closeness to the adjoining neighbors in an "in -fill" situation avoiding urban
sprawl.
C. General Project Concept
1. Street and Lot Layout.
• The development already has public streets Clabber Creek Boulevard,. Salem Road
and Westminster Drive.
• Alleys will be constructed to access the parking garages at the rear of the lots.
2. Site Plan Attached on next page
3. Buffer Areas — No buffer areas are required due to the residential nature of this
development and the surrounding properties..
4. Tree Preservation Areas — No permanent tree preservation area is proposed for this site
due to the fact that there are no existing trees onsite other than street trees.
5. Storm Water Detention and Drainage — Since this site is adjacent to Clabber Creek and
was originally approved as R -O usage, detention is not recommended for this development.
There are existing storm drainage improvements in the Salem Village subdivision adequate
for the proposed development:
PDC, Inc.
Westbrook Village, PZD
Project 2006036
Art Scott, P.E.
December 4, 2006
6. Existing and Proposed Utility Connections and Extensions = There is a sanitary sewer
and water services available at the site. The development will connect to these existing main
lines. There will be one short extension of a sanitary sewer main and water service
performed onsite.
7. Development and Architectural Design Standards — Refer. to Sections E and F below.
and Appendix D.
8. Building Elevations — Refer to Appendix D.
D. Proposed Development Phasing & Time Frame.
• The
development is proposed to
be completed in one phase and to follow the standard
one
year for permitting and start
of construction
witha 1 year extension.
E. Proposed Planning Areas.
• This development is proposed to offer three Planning areas.. PA -1 and PA -2 will be
single family detached homes and PA -3 will be a green space for common use.
PDC, Inc. 2
Westbrook Village,.PZD
Project 2006036
Art Scott, P.E.
December 4, 2006
F. Proposed Zoning and Development Standards For:
PLANNED AREA 1 (PA -1)
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING
(A) PURPOSE: AREA 1 IS DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AT A
MODERATE DENSITY. REFER TO APPENDIX D FOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS.
(B) USES:
Permitted Uses
UNIT 1 CITY WIDE USES BY RIGHT
UNIT 8 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING
Conditional Uses
UNIT 2 CITY WIDE USES BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
UNIT 24 HOME OCCUPATIONS
(C)DENSITY: 6 units / 0.68 ac
UNITS/ACRE I 8.82
(D) BULKAND AREA REGULATIONS:
LOT AREA MINIMUM 2771s ft
MIN. LOT WIDTH AT R/W 24 ft
LAND AREA PER DWELLING 2771s ft
(E) SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
FRONT
SIDE
REAR
*25 ft
**0 ft
10 ft
NOTE: Rear setback is measured from the alley right-of-way. Lots 1 and Lot 6 have no rear
setback.
*10' for Lot 1 along Westminster Drive, **10 along the alley
*40' for Lot 6 along Salem Road, *90 along the alley
(F) HEIGHT REGULATIONS: 35 feet measured from the lowest point of the structure at the
historic grade.
(G) BUILDING AREA: THE AREA OCCUPIED BY ALL BUILDINGS SHALL NOT
EXCEED 80% OF THE TOTAL LOT AREA
(H) SITE PLANNING
(1) Landscaping — In accordance with City of Fayetteville Landscape Manual.
(2) Parking — In accordance with Section 172 of the UDC.
(3) Architectural Design Standards — See building elevations included on Appendix D of
the project booklet. Materials shall be, Hardy Panel, Hardy Board and Asphalt shingle roofs.
PDC, Inc.
Westbrook Village, PZD r Art Scott, P.E.
Project 2006036 December 4, 2006
(4) Signage — In accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville UDC.
G. Proposed Zoning and Development Standards For:
PLANNED AREA 2 (PA -2)
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING
(A) PURPOSE: AREA 2 IS DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AT A
MODERATE DENSITY. REFER TO APPENDIX D FOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS. ,
(B) USES:
Permitted Uses
UNIT I CITY WIDE USES BY RIGHT
UNIT 8 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING
Conditional Uses
UNIT 2 CITY WIDE USES BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
UNIT 24 HOME OCCUPATIONS
(C)DENSITY: 5 units / 0.60 ac
UNITS/ACRE 1 8.33
B ULK AND AREA REG ULA TIONS:
LOT AREA MINIMUM 3079 sq ft
MIN. LOT WIDTH AT RIW •24 ft
LAND AREA PER DWELLING* 3079 sq ft
*Over all land area/dwelling.
(E) SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
FRONT SIDE REAR
*15 ft **0 ft 26 ft
NOTE: Rear setback is measured from the alley right-of-way. Lots 7 and Lot 11. have no rear
setback.
*45' for Lot 7 along Salem Road
**26' for Lot 7 and Lot 11 side setback along the alley
(F) HEIGHT REGULATIONS: 35 feet measured from the lowest point of the structure at the
historic grade.
(G) BUILDING AREA: THE AREA OCCUPIED BY ALL BUILDINGS SHALL NOT
EXCEED 80% OF THE TOTAL LOT AREA
(H) SITE PLANNING
(1) Landscaping — In accordance with City of Fayetteville Landscape Manual.
(2) Parking— In accordance with Section 172 of the UDC.
PDC, Inc.
V,
Westbrook Village,.PZD
Project 2006036
Art Scott, P.E.
December 4, 2006
(3) Architectural Design Standards — See building elevations included on Appendix D of
the.project booklet. Materials shall be. Hardy Panel, Hardy Board and Asphalt shingle roofs.
(4) Signage — In accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville UDC.
Proposed Zoning and Development Standards For:
PLANNED AREA 3 (PA -3)
GREENSPACE
(A) PURPOSE: AREA 3 IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE GREENSPACE FOR THE USE AND
ENJOYMENT OF THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT
(B) USES:
Permitted Uses
UNIT 1 CITY WIDE USES BY RIGHT I.
Conditional Uses
UNIT 2 CITY WIDE USES BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(C)DENSITY:
UNITS/ACRE I N/A-.
(D) BULK AND AREA REGULATIONS:
LOT AREA MINIMUM
4415 s ft
MIN. LOT WIDTH AT R/W
48 ft
LAND AREA
PER DWELLING
4415 sq ft
(E) SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
FRONT SIDE REAR
15ft Oft *N/A
* Lot 12 has no rear setback.
(F) HEIGHT REGULATIONS: NO STRUCTURES ARE PROPOSED FOR AREA 3
(G) BUILDING AREA: N/A
(H) SITE PLANNING
(1) Landscaping — In accordance with City of Fayetteville Landscape Manual.
(2) Parking - In accordance with Section 172 of the UDC.
(3) Architectural Design Standards — N/A
(4) Signage — No signage proposed.
PDC, Inc. 5
Westbrook Village, PZD
Project 2006036
F. Proposed Zoning and Development Standards.
Art Scott, P.E.
December 4, 2006
• Zoning and Development Standards are listed below and in Section E.
• Refer to Appendix D for the different Building Elevations.
G. Comparison Charts.
Description
Current Zoning R-PZD Requirements
Proposed Zoning R-PZD
Requirements
Permitted Use
UNIT I CITY WIDE USES BY RIGHT
UNIT I CITY WIDE USES BY RIGHT
Units Allowed
UNIT 8 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
UNIT 8 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
Conditional
UNIT 2 CITY WIDE USES BY CUP-
UNIT 2 CITY WIDE USES BY CUP
Uses
UNIT 24 HOME OCCUPATIONS
UNIT 24 HOME OCCUPATIONS
Current Zoning I Proposed Zoning R-PZD
Standards
R-PZD
PA -1
PA -2
PA -3
OVERALL
Density
5.03
8.82
8.33
NA
7.97
Min Lot Width
40
24
24
NA
Min. Lot Area
4500
2771
3079
4415
Land Area/Dwelling
8779
4926
5203
NA
5453
Max. Building Height
35
35
35
NA
Front Setback*
15
25
15
NA
Rear Setback
10
10
26
NA
Side Setbacks
0
0
0
NA
Max. Lot Coverage•
NA
80%
80%
NA
*Setbacks along Salem Road are 40 feet for PA-i and 45' for PA -2
Setback along Westminster Drive is 10' for PA -1
H. Description of the Recreational Facilities.
• A lot of approximately 4,415 square feet is proposed for green space to be used by the
residents in the development
I. Reason For PZD Request.
• To provide a non -typical design of affordable housing in a modem development,
integrated into existing residential use of the area within the existing Salem Village
subdivision.
• The development offers a use of residential housing in an "in -fill" situation avoiding
urban sprawl.
PDC, Inc. 6
Westbrook Village, PZD Art Scott, P.E.
Project 2006036 December 4, 2006
• r
J. Land Use, Traffic, Appearance, and Signage.
• The proposed development Land Use relationship is addressed in Section K. below.
• Traffic shall be increased by approximately 110 trips per day on Salem Road.
• The appearance of the development is designed to maintain continuity of the existing
style of residential development with narrow lots with the use narrower roads and alleys.
•The front of the homes will face the streets while access to the garages will be from,
alleys at the rear of the lots. No permanent tree preservation area is proposed for this site
due to the fact that there are no existing trees other than street trees located on the
• property.
• The development will follow all signage requirements for an RSF-4 zoning district.
K. Compliance with the Fayetteville City Plan 2025.
• The proposed development is in compliance with the City Plan 2025. -
• Utilized principles of traditional residential urban design to create compatible, livable,
and accessible neighborhoods. Section 12.1.4.a City Plan 2025.
• Utilize more intense development patterns within the infill sector and encourage mixed
uses in new developments to promote better community design, maintain human scale,
and enhance pedestrian activity. Section 12.1.4.e City Plan 2025.
• It encourages residential units in appropriate specified Mixed Use Areas since it is
• positioned between RSF-4 and undeveloped areas. Section 12.1.4.g City Plan 2025.
• Encourage the development scale to maintain compatibility and proportionality between
nonresidential development and adjacent residential areas. Section 12.1.4 h City Plan
2025.
L. Traffic Study.
• Preliminary trip generation estimates are 10 trips per day per home, totaling 110
additional trips distributed to the north and south along Salem Road.
• The capacity for the two-lane Salem Road is approximately 9000 trips per day; therefore
the impact of this development is very negligible and will not require a traffic study.
PDC, Inc. 7
Westbrook Village, PZD Art Scott, P.E.
Project 2006036 December 4, 2006
M. Impacts on City Services.
• The existing water and sewer capacity is more than adequate for the proposed subdivision
and impact to the infrastructure and capacity will be negligible.
• There is a large sanitary sewer force lift station at the northeast property line of this
•
project that has capacity for the use proposed. The project will require one additional
sanitary sewer manhole and a short extension of main line at the rear of lots 7-11.
'H Water Service and main lines are already installed in the subdivision..
• The single family homes will use standard trash pick up procedures typical in the city.
N. "Statement Of Commitments".
1. Dedication..
• . The property has will dedicate 5 additional feet Right of Way along Salem Road.
2. On and Off Site Improvements.
• The proposed subdivision has existing public streets already constructed.
• There will be alleys constructed for rear access to the parking garages.
3. Natural Resources and Environmental Sensitive Areas.
• No permanent tree preservation area is proposed for this site due to the fact that there are
no trees present inside the property.
• There are no known natural or manmade hazards on the site.
• Clabber Creek, a tributary to the Illinois River is located south of the site and will not be
adversely impacted from the development. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
shall be submitted to ADEQ at the appropriate time.
4. Project Phasing Restrictions.
• The development is planned to be constructed in only one phase.
S. Fire Protection.
There are existing Fire hydrants within the Salem Village subdivision with one hydrant
adjacent to lot 11 that is within the required distance from all proposed lots.
The nearest fire station is less than 5 miles from the site.
PDC, Inc.
Westbrook Village,PZD Art Scott, P.E.
Project 2006036 December 4, 2006
6. Other commitments imposed by the City.
• No additional commitments have been imposed by the City to date.
7. Parks/Trails/Open Space Commitments.
Approximately 4415 square feet of common green space will be provided.
There is also an existing park along Clabber Creek known as Salem Village park that was
provided with the original subdivision and development.
8. Proposed Preliminary Building Elevation.
• Included in the Planning Area Development Standards are examples of the proposed
single family homes and building elevations. Refer to Appendix D.
O. Conceptual Description of the Development Standards,
Conditions and Review Guidelines.
a) Screening and Landscaping — There is no screening required due to the residential nature
of the development and surrounding area. Landscaping will be per the city requirements
•for RSF-4.
b) Traffic and Circulation — The existing street network provides two access points to Salem
Road. There will be alleys constructed to access the rear parking garages.
c) Parking Standards - Not applicable except for off street parking requirements for single
family homes. No parking is recommended in the proposed street and alley.
d) Perimeter Fencing — There is existing fencing along Salem Road that will remain.
e) Street Lights are existing in the Salem Village subdivision and no new lights are
proposed.
f) Water services will connect to existing lines at the properties and in Salem Village
subdivision.
g) Sanitary Sewer is existing in Salem Village with a short main extension proposed.
h) Streets and Drainage — The streets were described in Section C.1 and the drainage in
Section C-5.
i) Construction of Non Residential Facilities — The only non residential facilities proposed
are the parking garages located at the rear of the lots.
j) Tree Preservation — No permanent tree preservation area is proposed for this. site due to
the lack of existing trees. All existing trees are street trees and not located within. the lots.
k) Commercial Design Standards — No commercial uses are proposed for this PZD.
1) Proposed Signage — The development will follow all signage requirements for an RSF-4
zoning district.
m) View Protection — There does not appear to be a view protection issue for this PZD.
n) Revocations — There are no known revocations for this development.
o) Covenants, Trusts, and Homeowner Associations — Covenants and Restrictions for the
PZD will be provided at final plat.
PDC, Inc.
Westbrook Village, PZD
Project 2006036
Art Scott, P.E.
December 4, 2006
P. Fulfills The Intent/Purpose of the PZD Ordinance.
• The purpose and intent of the PZD Ordinance is fulfilled through:
• Design of a community with a use of affordable housing to include single family
dwellings with an overall density of 7.97.
• Avoiding urban sprawl through development of a new residential area within existing
• neighborhoods and accessible to roadways, community amenities, schools and
infrastructure.
• The development is designed to maintain continuity of the existing neighborhood of
Salem Village by use of narrow lots and rear vehicle access.
• Encourages increased use of park lands by infill near several local parks within walking
• distance.
• • Single Family uses are allowed in Section 162 of the Unified Land Development Code.
• Proposed conditional use of Home Occupation is allowed in the same section with
Planning Commission approval.
O• Waiver Requests.
•• There is a Tree Preservation Waiver Request as a part of this development.
PDC, Inc. 10
p,tOTS, I
N. 2
S
t
3
y
q
z
VI
i 0
a
v
a
sLi>
> Q
Q
s a
Z
O r
VF11£�JJyy�•<NF .L&O�..ypyp''"d.�G2Fx.r/1 zz2 sG `= LLO 1,p�1�QQ ru Mr1��,1��'1. `rrYfyyoy1£Nayy�3yj#tif-P �yp' - ��1
W
Q Q J
ZZ>
4ui C
O oC
(ON
W(l)
Z3
5.
a
I
•
w� N
VP
ffcH1Z
LL
OT•. -Y>^. _ - -.• - _ -,.
L
- • I 1 - • II 1 I l • J •
• • II
II • • / • I • • - • Ir II - • iY
• • • • • • L • II J • _ • • • Il it • _ n n •. II
J •••1 • _ • 4 i••n • •-• L it _ J '.. •n •
II • r - • 1 it • rl ( 11 • • ; _ L / I II .
• it • • • • _ _ � -
n••• • n •L:.A n• U. • II (•1111 - _ ••• • •
�• • - II _ ♦n II• •• - X11 •' •• •J ••• _ JII _ • J i J• • • rl a •• f • • • • �.
11• • 11.11 J_ • • 11•• 11 • •• 11
Jir • rl• ••• • 11 1•/1 •I • n ••� ; J - x,II 11 i1 .rte • •
11 • % ;..
. II •• • • ? 1 - I 1 • 11
• 11/ • • • • • J 11 'a - • 11 II •_II _ • .
II. /11 Jam• �/
J • • 11 • 11 / 11 • II • • • • • / O � _
• • _ J • • 11 • 1 J i 1I • r 11 • II • 11 _ II 11 • • • • / _ • /
• • • • II. • • • ` • / • • • • II II 11
• •;n r; rn •;• rl '' •f n6• • .n1I• • ••
1 it Y• _ i1! ••. nd_• _ • • 1 .
• ' n I • • • 1 • - n J • - i1
w
/
^•
$
j.
5 �t
Q
a f
OS
vmi
Q C
�'
O N .
C7 O gyp/
z
77 �..N.
u
zwa
rn
e o
acc
<5'._ D
€
g
a
N o a
h
P
N
� m
r �;' afar��pV qiv!';t
� r6..iY� ��
�ervZ &
V- ≥ 7i; .1 § I � `,xMit®aJ.3s sr 3 • Y k ul GJ SGAJr +.mnYixRL'rJ .
Q� �$ _ } v uLn.GtJ
.—.. P
bb .r .fU'LS 'v
ftl �•°�• -f_I-� :�'�' N L�'�x1* ti. n. R AOnII .4tl'55 • •_•T
Q ..4• • �GM �g s .e t,,t o(n � 1
Z! a I� •P Iii •'• y6 �✓N.K - Z—t� cr , ~ S.
W Tu r rn ..• e « •: -_ a ..N ps r� 6M -S .�rv�T'4I ' 1 • �•. a�14 y-rR' -i
-r •O. �vt---�n-a r -• w .a! ^ r tl c ��_r�•r- 4 •�� � �.�'�. .. �'V -..4 -.'� e. y�y Fppi-.-r [.� M� 1 , v --.- �.�
Qx y i .j .� I1�3 .80 IfI I_Sfo N-- / $ CPP n• __�-}_' I,' vri: �x�
3 feON - .i5
C Th /
W •a 00 G6 � Cq � � �j R7 n5'j5•
wP o!'"�Nio°2'oe"V'DRN.-,I---G.r•7.. .�,.�:: -,,:6,
wn RfL - a
I?lO b31SNIW1S3M :ra MIN5T , ! ! i
a -- D \NEST . , Yi>; \ },� : •;
w �� , IR. L{b i "r} ^ I
� i.}P�� U��N �!� e.4`�A• nay� iL-: � }SF. • z, ,a. ..•iy I• . x' v � v�
• ._ � SMA a F\ . I � ♦i .Y �'J l�� • ] • ) • •
.. tE.I F , 6r � , , .
�' fl � I'A. tnh •f D • • � � ,
I I' I j
j
•
n
-. -H I-
�000�®0000
_���Si0
•f$�
S
'S.- N
_ 0
Sid '�?
ia
�jZ
�m�m�
1
ONJ'
Rg Y
d
�zzp `
C t$
4
O
a
O
f s
V
• I
O
3Kii
SAO
,IL
LLs
r0 ILaja
�z
o
Os
1�3���a
€
_
a"
T_
r��AS
.8
i
a
a
a
A
��99aE
f
9
E
R
E
_
n
n
k/N
a
. pl
°
° gyp#p
z u.R
JJ '
`'ll .aeP nl�n nq• I R
'1• 1
•
,,,°...
!Ppi S
a �� . Iy
n. • tva Ne l \ ~Oi • ♦11�J eiQ t•� f i::
p!::__ Sn
�8 13
Y sva c n B ,Vj „z ,M
w 6 R d.'.
,_1
♦o a �•e
4 n id
3AAW(7 •w pR
--- -"- b31�7P1IW1S3M ` � �/�-�
w - ,-
L! 5113(
:♦4� � TMI
a.. -. l V�
7. atF A FT
r,l £
Yi w eY "Y IA r
i 3.
• 1 "r �� •_.x1 v
INc0 N z
V
o
U a
wZ P o o g
w m W
b LLa 2
-b a a a
V
.lL \M1
1
S }tTVGlT Yf[. -Y.
S
�
IT
."
9T
, air
C
XIAgY4Y'j'(}If
h
#Y1IPiljtj
i:OJc)
{
�
N
rY11f
I—
V
ce W
4 -—I-
0 -I
Lu
Z
• LLJ U)
zIaJ
W
M
Rb
I
o
E
v \ ZF 2
p� 1r P NF p� ..pp � l•C..�- _ _;
2 gWY z Ckt OQ N �QQQ?tpt 6pP �� U
W y zozrcy?o4 u�l°.^ �zYlz�_�x y4 5�
3 g4�-GP� P Q
1I UWiP G�PLL S£mQ�LLLL 0•
% V LL W LL (1 V
_ W
oy9
SI1.
U_
L
et
r E « .:.�rl � II 1 �
�'4a f as I ''
1
� 1
. e?5Ly iC[
7.
1...
(.
ga J
1
ry' J
l
g`2
Thy �y
y
p b
�♦ y
nk
l
I
s
k"
1
ry
r
�p
b O
V Y
r
T
Lu
Ct
7
a.
a.
L
J��PNTS,1Nc
w
,�21{��� pypy Vy�y1 • Ili GG 3J m.
rro
a
O
�rN
A
A
•�+ ��/ �'y
■■
'
9
V
J
z
2� "m "°Pr
�i'g
c
o '
O a
0.
.•.....,+
A+
.nzg
Z
as
Oa'
oiS a
I
•`�
es J4 i'
<5'
5
ryla °K.
S
Q
`^
W
�a
1�3to
W µ
a
I4'
Y Y� $s;a[ 55 6 i�WR Yg ihR WYY�₹ _ 4!
I=d G ® €�i
uY °t 9 S �R 9 8 x I W Y R g
UiUu!f
�j R5fl
9 a 8.a R RJt
L A is�We Ky$yy{y${�
ypy 5W �3 goy nnn� �d
6 _ � Wa U. � §46 �3 32tQ2 134 N 11++ � � pF{ S
j z
°. " - N A { M d w d w u ;J Nn { M tl K d ri
��� I II
� �����,►i� •
• =�'I• • Q ®®�
�I�� oh
I II
k Es;"6 �W3�9ig&j��itl ff�G g5 �p@6� 4 �Y
3a Y �i gg 5@� @ r @
�����Wf� a3�k�IEa°u3 W Z S Ys
i •
II I
- lII II • $ �MyyyA� {/� ggE gp$�'gge qy y�tpy3p+
yy 0O�I � I ■" 'i A '8 W" I II
j a E6HI
n i� or LL A3 .. .. ... . .
N •4 {
!. g
e
8
Hoego
a
n
o
..
A
G
u
o
ri
a
>t,,
i
i
s
_.,
NT S, I W z
p
_ o zQ
r^°dv •'d J J Q a
V3� Oa 1 r J w�¢aQ
Q z�nn Sggt o c w o N
oscu--° Jt r4i urC -hill ' LL
�fs�, �a
I
III iii III 111 'I
I II II III
III' II
gR
I I�� 1 FIN •s::,.• • 6 y
G • Jam
I II II IIIW W
c LL `' i■ CW �' w m gtlo 8
O.
3 c (J.III
Y VV •II j4 t LU tltl
II �a l
W 4 g
" ilil a wR�°sGa
6ffl
�b
t1 p
lip S.
.tea
hfl�g 1
a
�Whl
W F
00
ii
J c d 1 i J w tl w .. - -
psi
pe
F
L
,I
ll,r
a
X11
!
!
Y
1�.�: !
,
rI
Yt.
' 0�
114:,
'71H]
If!
,P1
�1,°' k
ear --vv � � vlµvn.'nvJ ivRn arl' 9.
- sf a{ e e
y a r a �lKP T+v1 Nie.$.ly+
.33 S a �eipt' "♦ ,t � :� n cwt •n
lv.b a i : I
R Od
u• 14; C) ICS A •o
.. Na •,\ AC Tt4 S
w'. g svP aR ' t z 0' j♦
PYC n
1 i( �, ,i y�
,F ttF [[-M Y v4
fri
b
CIW1S� 4 31� ° '�.i V 5TM
ry
2
I
A I B C I D E
GENERAL PROVISIONS RESI~
AUTHORITY:
PLANNED Z
This PID MASTER DEVNT ELOPMEPLIN I5
AUTHORIZED BY SECTIONS 161 AND 166 -
FAYETTEVILLE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE -
PROVISIONS OF THIS PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT
FLAN SHALL RUN WITH IRS BONA, SHE ASSIGNS SHAU.MER5,
• BOOR BYTIUS RS, MASMERITS,ORPMTPLAN, BE
BOENDD ANDS PROVED BY THE
POUN,Is
AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 4,
ADOPTION:
THE ADOPTION OF This PA)MASTER --.—.__--
DEVELOPMENT PLAN SMALL EVIDENCE THE FINDINGS —_—_—_
D DECISION OF THE FAYEREVILLE CITY COUNCIL __,_
AN
THAT THIS PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT FOR WESI&tOOK VILLAGE _-_
IS IN GENERAL CONFORMITY WITH THE FAYETTEVILLE �T CITY PLAN 2025; 15 AUTHORIZED BY THE PROVISIONS. T _ — - I --- I
Of SECTIONS 16' AND 166 OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE i I -
UNIFITD DEVELOPMENT CODE. I P1
I E PROVISIONS OF THTSPMA $D STER I Q.
TH
DEVELOPMENT PLAN SMALL PREVAIL AND GOVERN I t P PAS
THE DEVELOPMENT OF WESTBROOK VILLAGE PROVIDED. I ?0 I 29b �I59'
HO`NEVER, THAT WHERE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS I
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN DO NOT ADDRESS A I h co: •s
• PARTICULAR •SUBJECT, THE RELEVANT P ROVISIOFSOf I I' : ersi -
THE CTTY OF FAYEf1EVIlLE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT APPLOT 52 LOT $7 �ijq°"y.,"a �yJ-''e°'e
CODE, AS AMENDI p
ED. OR ANY OTHER IICA&E fiU6-21Ci'-QD I ` •.•1071 v,1LQT2 F 33
RESOLUTIONSOR REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF < ED RSx mgop Am w'0 FAYErrEVILLE, SHALL BE APPQCABIE,
ENFORCEMENTit : � �
RESIDENTS,
TC NS, ND OWNERS
OS THE j
RESRIFMEVELO MENTS. MID R5 OF THE IN ---/J
MASTER pE PRESERVATION
OF TIN1 MID OF THE PUBLIC ____�__ �
THE PROVISIONSON OF THE IN OM E TIf
THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PLAN RELATING TO THE USE
OF LAND, STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS,
DEVELOPMENT AND ECRAL STANDARDS, -
• AND THE LOCATION OF OF COMMON RIMMON OPEN SPACE
SNAIL RUN IN FAVOR CF THE CRY OF FAYETTEVILLE
MID 9(AILBE OUTEA&E AT LAW OR IN EQUITY______________________
BY TH
B E CITY WITHITHOIR LIMITATION ON ANY PWIFR OR
REGULATION OTHERWISE GRANTED BY LAW.
CONFLICT:
MEIkE THERE IS MORE THAN ME MMSION PPP LA °aolm, "W tIE
20 F
WITHIN THE PLD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AP LOi i$ c°„rriwt�,e to) 31AA®y
THAT COVERS THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER,THE a0 ZONED R-4 roo,°c .fgpJl \ LOT 12 `•,.
Ewe. me -raw -ac 4415 R ,415 4,415 -tWHICHPROVISION WHICH IS MOST RESTRICTIVE OR 7em,w RS -4
Sq' wos a
IMPOSES HIGHER STANDARDS OR REQUIREMENTS !_ —__\ 0.10 dO6
SMALL GOVERN UNLESS DETERMINED OTHERWISE BY (,�% AL -{\
^• 118: ZONING MID DEVELOPMENT PDMINISIAATOR QP? LOT 16 M'z� b. c7s \
MAXIMUM LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT: Rm,ur4 PC -lf'DJ',,N-m
oro
THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLINGS OR THE TOTAL
qMaQ.APPROVED
U5INE55, OR INDUSIRIPL INTENSITY __—_. P` __._—__c��?wm\ •.mph AgAgJt
APPROVED R6* IS HE MEM WITHM THE P LOT 17 \ LOT w
PLANNING ENTTHE MAXIMUM Q ;N r ono AR1 JD, D31 B-
P rbp Me h, Iq JtJ03 \
e DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED FOR OF OR A0l ZONED A.S�-a ar scro, qc 3903J
• OR UCION. THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DWELLINGS c P WJes-sroal_pp
OR LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL, rmw F4 ,
BUSINESS, OR INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES MAY BE \
LESS WE TO SUBDIVISION OR SITE IMPROVEMENT
PLAN REQUIREMENTS OR OTHER REQUNQAENTS OF xee v.,eu o
THE CRY [OIINCII \ QPV L07 18 c b nrw*„ Sah - 438
P ZONED RSF-4 to,E Mffs S,R" 204
F fine M Jb03
PROJECT TRACKING: / \ 0t n AXt w ac M00337
° AT THE TIME OF SUBDIVISION FINAL FLAT OR LARGE /
SAME DEVELOPMENT THE APPLICANT SMALL rD' es2.
PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT, TO \ ® E� xen 110 Es. uc
DATE, TO THE PLANNING DIVISION, IN ORDER TO . IV LOT 19 cep gp Na>v 4N
ASSURE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT LIMITS ARE NOT
P [wl tfEw S` ks N•
EXCEEDED. U 04 ZONED AST -4 r a%n3 .__
eeY JStzrow_gq
'' FLOOD CERTIFICATION:
THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ANY PRESENTlY
10 ESTABLISHED ]00 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN, AS DETERMINED BY THE
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE zr.
-MMA FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARXANSAS AND INCORPORATED _ F___t
LOT 20-
MAP NUMBER: 05143C0085C I r n r w r--
I
REVISED DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1991
rr
CITY PLAT PAGE : 28
•I B I [ I D E E A X
ENTIAL
NINE ,DISTRI`CT
OK Vi LLA'G' .
ill- V
R I '
d 5EAL^
::SURVE'Y DESCRIPTION:
:TALL OF
'0F:SA% TRACr: GE'p u 0., R N'D IN PLAT
pEAT
I:saoic:15 TI PAGE 0,LI D, c:p tED IN PLAT
6F K I:SATVAGE ]U, BEIN 32. COW THE:NW.1'/4
'NF'THE:AYNa 30:.WE57. ASHINGTIDN J
7
NOT$ RANGE O BEING
G bESME GITSFeLcOWS
:ARKANSAS,' AT A.BUNG IRON PIN AT TIEl10WB:
IBE[NNTNG'ATA:FOUND IRON PIN AT THE
ID IRON VIN; THENCE
ET i0'A:F.O11No IRON ?IN;
:YE TO THE RIGHT NAVENGA
A:LONG:QIORD THAT BEARS
IT Arl'AIic:DISf,AN(£:DF
ID IRON PIN; THENCE
:Er TO IliE POINT Of
ING:O:N'AGRF5, MORE OR
%TOaNY FSEMFis,
I I T
I: This dravrihglls'9PRELiF11NARY -
NO? iF,0.R�QNSTR0CTf0N",until
above;sealiliolder'acknowledges
the:Cancelladon:Qf.thls Cisdaimel
I' I: below.
N. Arthur Sebtt, .P,IE
DATE
./ Sys �n ITHACf Two: .t Tr ll. y
54AI" 3pN sc.rt ;/ �� 'EAIL;DF TINCTYYIO'AS:SIgWNDN TAE FINAL PLAT Al
ma Aarmc aq:.c .fa35'ec -lOF'SAIFM.VRl'AGE.P.U.DRECORDEDINPI'AT y.c.'t$1.
'18.001( 15AT'PAGE.O, BEING PART0FTHE NWl'/9 /i�(i� [,
(OF NHE,'W1'/4 OF SECSTON 32, TOWNSH:P'1] .' /f i .�
1 _ _ - .INORTNIiiIANGE dD.WEST, :WASHINGTON:000NIY, -Q' �.,. I I
'ARKANSS; ALSOBEING UEAIUBED AS OF SAID • II_. t ]
— — — - _ ,BEGINNINGIATTHESOUTHEASTCOPJI6 OF BAID s I _ 1`
- - - ly TWTGr:[RON FIN,. E°28'49".W¢52:99FEET .T.0'A . " � 13 J +-1 �iu
FUND IRON PINS THENCE FLONG'A CURVE TO THE l i
: IGF? HPVTNG 0.:RADIus of 16:OO.FEU,'ALONG Ui i' ID r�\1J])
((.n
••s-` - _ _ `�:.• ''•''• iCHORD THAT BEAR5.N92FEEf M1W.:FOUNFEkT.11i .^'." Il r
I: •
ARC DISTANCE"OF 23:56 FEET TOA FOUND (RON —' fhT
:1 V 'IRON
R NTPIN; T NOCE AE NGA:3 FEET TPA E LEFT j
I0.0N:P[N; THENCE'AL0NG A',CURVE TO THE LEFT d I -//
I/VINGR NW56F:5100 FEETMETA :QgRD
IDIS T Nq %q.NOB°S6Z0'.FN� 28:36: UW!if bN P .
IODTANCE002O.SO.F.'EET T.O'A: FOUND:•IRON.PIN; ' 42b5'
.. :THENCE N20°2Z'D8:]5
"W 109FEETTDAIFOUND l :i . • l
.T 'IRON PIN:' THENCE'AL0NGKCURVEIT0 THE RIGM CSV11TjE f104
— _ `y ' 4MAVBCG'AIR0.OR15':OF 26:00 FEET„A�LONG'CHORD IF.AYETT:EGILfL•E,TAit 47_27U3 I'
- ITHATIBEARS.N36°OIT12-E, 4l%9:FEEf,LAN'ARZ IPh- 4 S !145705
.a '1ITNEI0P.49:29.FEET TO A.FWND:'IFRRON.PM, r
dNXfi—
ENCE5BP.28'49E 70:64 FEEL IT0 A'F..
` •.... '(PIm; •THENLE'ALONG A'.CLRVE TO •THERICNr .�
.- �. J •tHP NG'A4RADIUS:OF.15:OD.FEETI:A_LONG',CHOFD I PRO]EOTI• �
FR' IDRAWNIBY
` W-TIBEAs $6.1%oM, ND EI:13.MeRd ET:'AN ARC +•F
/�
CO ISTFNGE.OF,13:83.FEET, THENGEIALONG'A.CtJ E -�2DaA36 NMkw
PA - Z i TONE LEn HAVING'ATRADIUS OOFAB:DpyFEEf A O1EO ED BV 12 ISUBMFT,TAIIDATE:
II •HONG:Q1ORD,THAT;6E1Q5l76,
2E42FEE
f, — - - i1/30/05
26,016, sN.R
(0:60.avg III.ANRT:ULSTAA •.OFi4d:231FEET;,THFNCE DRAWING NPME.. _ _ a80671P.ZD.dn9
} ¢58]°IS'33,E'46: 19 FEETyTO,AFOUNO:lFa GIN; •ITHTN .A.LONGfAICURVE'6TOTHIGHr HA[NG'A
tRADIUS;OF15 OO!-a I,,[A 1'ANyCHORD?HATBEAR5
1O7,4 1m a - (T547025333 36:36SFEE'r,LAN1ARC(OIST CE OF
3'coCol v:rt .�y ' 'I�iF(i FBEGINNINGgICOMN2NirrNG�O lTACRE5. f . El9 pp
z
-_"-- �..
KT
..Ii DSIIRVEYOR:
CGEonATIc.CONSULTANTS,:fC
1BRIAN(D IsCUU,CRP't_i
y1:34N.fMATN5IREE-r
(GAVE.SPRING5,!AR$72]1b
I(PHH: 1379)-)4&1`46fi
IN
IN
(GPAP%q GiSCA,IF
YI IIJI
I I�a�G�,�'I
gijIN :RE -r)
1IB1' OFEET
,PZ9 * (004239'.9
9
A 9I c I o I e I F Ie
5
7
PLANNING AREA 1 (PA - 1)
SINGLE. -FAMILY DWELLING
a) PURPOSE: AREA I JSD8SIGh'£D 70&IWUR/GESPfiL&FAM/LYHOM
AT A MOD£RI TE DENSITY R£FM TO A PP£TDG'D FOR UJLDAT•
!.'LEDATIOM
(RI USES:
Permms um
NIT) cnrwzoEuwarsjoffr I.
gT B !LT µ
MnaW Can
(Th'lTJ I On'µIDE VSLS BYCOWDmONAL WE.PERMIT
UXITM HOME OLY'UPARONS
iV DDQmT6•vA69 ee
NIryAGL 7.g?
IF= AND ARFN REGULAnOW--
D
a.
UNDARJ:J PER DWLIJAG j7!)
(A5?RACX ftxorflp;wivzc
FRONT
SIDE
REAR
•n
n
10
NOT& Rprxdact LimmfuMfiun IIc h7 rlgMa/vey'a l a.1u thawe
3 90FOR WI/ALO.VG WFSI]IPVSTER DRJVE••/VALOMi THEAIL.LT
eV FOR WI 6ALOW S4LEMRDAD, ••)VAW,O TThALLF.T
(L) HxwurRmuunoV 35 FEET nenwd— m, lnl put ot[x
IECOve N6e Frock tr. .
() SW/DLVU AREA: THE AREA OCCUPIED BV ALL BUIDQO.S SHALL
NOT EXCEED SO X OF TH£ TOTAL LOT ARM
(H)SfTL'PLAA'MAV
(D LwbmGg. Ln ¢t Jnme.46 Cln cffbwnnffk L4�gethaw.
n) Pry W g- Ln nDMmte MP SMlon /72 t& (J)4. kltatemJ/lag. SbnLry 3- bee Mdlding e/ewtlmah
w AULLf on 4ndfrD
oftMp,v)el/mold? M4Wa4 shall b. NONv P,mel,/Lr Roe aMAsphab My)e
A anti,
(4) 3)5,47.-/n aaoNome M41(Xpea /74 (Me F,ffa&k OVC
PLANNING AREA 2 (PA -3)
SINGLEFAMILY DWELLING
W PURPOSE: AR£11 rsDLWNED70ENCOUGcs SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES
A TA MODeM r£ fla9TX REFER SO (PPEVDIX O FOR Bull ,
ELESA"Oh5
B) UffS
S
Pmnlrcd Um
UN/TI CITY HTDL ISmBYRIGM
/IITd 'OLE-FAMPYDI
4111)12 I C?Y IY1D£ 1136511 CO. VhTIOh'AL USE PFRHn'
UN/I2 ROME OCCUPATIONS
D77 S VAGA[BF
NItiA ti)
J079rt
JA
GADAR£1 P& DW£U1p• )ON ft
•nmmvlaMmmAheldrg
(IIJ SETBACK RLQL'IREMETS
FROM RID£ REAR
•
15fl 0 J6
MOTE ecra v IM oIk egklaf^% loo TmW Lath ha'.
w rem ntae!
N'fROSTSLTBIC6 FOR LOTIALONG SALEM RO.ID
•J6SIDE flICEFORLOTYAADLOT II ALQVO WEALL£Y
k
I
t
(NElOI?PLYfR.InOHS' 3S F➢T me®.4 fimn the a.egpuloTthe
(G) StTHE AREA OCIJnED a' ALL BULL11 OOiOS SNA
(AREA
M(M1) NOT IXCFID &3 % INETOTAL WT AREA
(N1 S?£PLA Br
(I)Lcthc,dg- In ndmxe NMa ofFe)mnlLLm eMmuL
(J)➢ctig AemNmn MM SnTfon 172 grthe (fDC
• (3)ArtMn,tlDercgn SlsWNi- Set ENWbq e/nusMs 3i 4th on A{eMp0
ofJMpolsi booklet Mabfalr shall b llnrt Po M. Hare Bmt mldAav*a113111y1e
roofs.
6
(4)Slgnage-1, a(or s ce with GopM IJI f*Fo)m(I4 UDC.
PLANNING AREA 3 (PA - 3)
GREENSPACE
(A) PZIPFOS£:AR£A J S DESIGNED W PRO f DL GRlLVS .Aa FIR T HE U W
-MD &WOFMEVF OF flit EV7775OEVELOPMENT
fB) USES:
Fool— Us
l I air WWB(/S6'BYMGM
9
(e*MMnal UM
JUN/12 I CIIT W7DF. usisaY Ct.vD/rta,CL fl PERMIT
UNDyACRL N/A
BU(XANDARFA REGOLAUONS
WrARtA MINIMUM 4( n.t
a7.
LA ND AREA PER DM1ZUJ]VG a.a1S
19
(9 SLIBACRR£QULP' FEE
FROM SIDE REAR
V/A
Loa1 no rw,roct
(fl IIEIOM A£.GVIARO.YS NO
STRULT)RESARL PROPOSED FOR ARM 2.
(O) BUILDING AREA: ,VA
(x) s/2 PuhNNG
(1) Irn&cc A,g-Is mavlwwe Wh PryolFa)tMllefv.NenleMmtaa(
(2) Pmdng - In mmMmee MM SeoIm 172 efb UDC No Pmdig elfa.ed
(3)AmAIWVWM)5w m.dards-N.Anhtg UrM AIInei
LI
(a)S/ginge-Nos/gti .pgmrd -
OVERALL DENSITY 1.38AC 11 UNITS
7.97 UNITS PER ACRE
RE;
PLANNED;
WESTB
(JO' lG/C)MN61 ACc r Ali )
I
1 QpA O P
I I •p r °gyp
l`I
I I
N I (Ot a9
l NII t:,e]y Ame M Dus rr �'� O I ]3
52 j LOT 51I O �,•w5nw ;1₹ • rn
wvs
L
(SSA/W
CLABBER
FJ8AZ - nv
5.48•
QgQt fl Ii,/ui AC L, - —_�
C/O B2,*n Bmte, &w rn r
L Cant Md a g�
pt gZGWEOORSP-A r rta fa AR 12703 V . (rA¢FR)
rarn — -2: svJ /7 _ LOT l!
z�'vrr-. -s.
A.nb4R
N Q.I O.IOpa
lo•on[S NWam & ems ~L
?q LOT 16 •.z Ba71dn C2 v Z w\,,\°
R'mn4t4k AR 72&22
S e' u IY AA/ LG .]64; p' A' I\ 4
�\p a. n5 -Mar -$p � 4[
21,ea RS', rn y \\
QqP� LOT 17 • colNn swc Q q7.
all
[sae Nwy Sulb 204 y\ \
ZONE R5F- FO),Nnme AR 73!05 wF
AAp 4 Pm./4 M} r,4 N"�� O N
HD O
QPa tor 1B cEnt M am &a 438
2CN'r0 FSF-A Eat MAap Sul. 204 'I
IagHelFa AR 7270)
ap otX 2004 ,x xan__
1ORSL fin r.
QpQ1 LOT 79 c v Fes. m0 LW
p fall Ira, �a 0
•Ap. ZLVJE RS_a F '2 ' 8037
7
1.07 20
12II Illil-- I
,J. •.n — i.
ENTII'AL
NINE .DISTRICT
)OK VILLAGE
R, r
[i.n
o
.Tr.?Y1.59•
, F II
i6 _ri..Ji
ii
2849'I
Y _
ii
Imn rt6a 's _ e.'
,
.dOl Wa � =4.n0' f.159W^ ,E
•,- rns r' �I
It ll
p+l
p
l .r^ I
:II yy
,A•.., Q'I
� N. Sig )'...-. n i . SBJ°25'aoir YI 'I]
_z 'ffI�
6:0:65y.ig; x: R
II
U:60'aocAfl lQ
�f ] I 6865°
'9 •rLmrII
3.ndt}V2 r0im^ ;yY, IR%W
E.�bn G`f02r 'i • 'L
I( ?'Nn rlol 1.
11 G G 1 -' .$ A✓Row.
io 3
FPAi:9J' •;I I . ' : j 'I
•j
, IOIp
__ors ,:I rl
l"� � •1 V 1
__dS
�� PA'ip l51 0A!F I I'I'
•"./ May.A(Y-ASS '1L'JY,-'---
Ni
I
F �C�1
EOMATIG)CON O1iT'RPtS
'ft 34N,o. seam; EET
'AVTE?+IN. MRIN!6'!REET
{UIN. i INGS,r 11466 8
'f:II9I9}298'862
$1 RVEY:DESCRIPTION:
ITAACT.bNE -
£ALL OF TRACT ONE' AS.SHOWN:ON THE:RNA PEAT
::OF SALEM .VICEAGE P:U.D . RECORDED INP.UT
':
[BWN 15 AT:P,AGE.M BEING?ART OF THE NW1',4
:OF THE'swPA ;Of'SEC:ON 32,'TOWNSNIPi
!NORTH, HANGS 30.WF5T,:WASHINGTON COUNTY,
S EOILOWs:
'ARI(ANSAS,'AUO.BEIND IRON
y
PIN Al
tNoRT NINGjAT'AFWND [RON.PIN'AT THE
tNOR2
19816
'49"E EET]SgIOTRACT.ONE;THENCE
J°28'49'E ]98]6 FEET, THENCE 503341JW
I
F
A1 J:B0 FEET; THENCE: AOIRVE TO THE
F
RIGHT HAVINGA RADIUS:O25:OO.EET,'ALONG
C 38:36:FEET•NN
C DISThATBEAR539J°342JW,
IRON
•ARC DIETANCE:OF39:21 FEET20 FEET
TO
IPIN; THFNGE NBJ°2T3311W'46.20 FEET TO'A FOUND
IRON PIN; THENCE ALWGA:FEET. TO'THE16T
IONG.QIORD
NAVING'A RADIUS. Of98.O42
B6.,A
33:25'.W,'42 B6:FEET, IAN ARC
tiDIS T NCE
o"S66?
DISTANCE of WIG ti TO A EORJ IRON PIN;
•THENGF AIONG'A;WRVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS Cff' 1313 ALONG :THAT BEARS
'.
566°01'9TH13.38'FEET•R N'A DISD
IN THEANLE'OF
;13:BYFEEYTO'AFOUND IRON PIN'THIRON
NBJ°28'49bO51'9B FEET TOA:FOUND IRON PIN;
.THENCEOF.25 :A'.t]1RVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING:A
CHORD'THAT BEARS
RADIUS.OFN, 35:
6 FEEA'.LWG
35:36 FEET,'AN:ARC DISTANCEOF
N422.FEE
t
39.2J.F.EET T.O'A FMgIND IRW :PIN; BHENU.
1'42.00 FEET TO THE ROINT:OF
BEGINNINGS
BEGRNING, CONTAINING D0:ACRES, MORE OR
LESS :BEING'SUBIECT TOANYFASEMENR,
'
OVENANTS:OR RESTNCIION5:OF:RE)DOFI
FACT.
'ITRACT'RWO:
v
ALL:UF TRACT T.WO'ASSHOWNON THE FINAL PLAT
BF5ALEM.NILLAGE P.U.O.; G PAT
BOOK _IS AT PAGE 70, BEING PART OF THE NW114
OF THE OF:SECTION32, TOWNSHIP 17
.RNtG
NORTH,:R ,:AiSb SING :WAS BEAAS ;COUNTY,
ARRAN INGMT BEING DFSQttBED'AS FOFSAW
BEGINNING' AT THE;SO28'49'T.CORNEA. OF SAID
:TRACT 2; ;THENCE N87628149V 152:99 FEET TO'A
FOUND IRW.PIN::THEIIMALfiNG A:(.LRW%TrtTNF
•,
T. .r
SFAL. $�A�Sc I.
,:ARKA SAS
REGISTERED
PROFESSIOT'AL
:ENGINEETt
M. 41Mun Yml .
Re. ecea /
?iTT3��ymrvnTw's"s�e'4 E'
DATE:
This:Arawing.is "PRELIMINARY -
NOT.F.OR:cONSIRUCfION" unibi
:above:seal hOlder:admowledges
:the:Gancellation 6f tliis.Aisdaimer
below:
N. Arthur:Sc6tt; P. E.
DATE
D.; ; D1 u,
'SUFfE'104
FAYETTEVILLE, BAR ,2703
Ph: ''4 9:521.5405
PROJECT N2
DRAWN BY:
2006036
. Nelkw .
AlBMrRAL DATE.
____DBY __
mv�
%]1'!30/06.
DRAWING
NAME 506J.RZD.
N9
:REVISIONS: .
:DATE'
.1
REVISION C&.1E01 PUT PfV1W
•
BY .
1
REVISION PER TEOI F1 REMEW
BY RX ..
61
-BY
BY'
.P.R03ECT:
WESTBROOK'VILLAGE
RPZD#
FAYETTE IL�LE• AR
SHEET TRLE;
,ZONING •AND
VDEVELOPMENT
_€STANDARES ___ iA.
SHEET INP:
d2dJ
B I
C
I
O I
I FB
a
\ ' gA — ZON£D RSF-4
Of FpAllsnrye. .y/ytpv
W J C=.: 210 1W W 4mIM
WI/EJ at &. •t" rc'^fIAP]JO/
@ 1ftn nC es 90.'
4 lVo_llt: CPIYOI 4j /v/\ LMT'
_-
f !x' uE/cpluM AC ss 4[E 2
C
I I I ti �JL 1
IAP -=E94-M1
P
r Q r ALIT KT ,1B
A ;_ 1 . t\eM..r
of I 1
sp, R.
W / I 29bsssS� el ! h I l0] 49 n n
L 4ra Mro Ernl fsw.• 4i a1 6
„.
LO ]' $1. v �aHneN.!e ,203
K5 cC BC LOfI 6 ,q Wi3 t.
i [cnM rya I e1N ,qt 3.3333 AR. ].33 f& I.EN ry.R I2n1i4M1
Z1WFC RS6 \ \ K &OlO m6 I14 0.mFy'p Op]Ac ODS ma
IJ
J
rmesa vcp Lv
PLZ
WN ] IIBSpI /
-O t[nrn.m'
- )t [0/3 R)IT(JI' / 4
3 (w'RMI / qp mvu
II01 n CA
n
— CLA BE2CREE BLVD. ;a .,
-�—� Pif.. ]!J-SIrh4 Rtl
FEE, Rg.
Qq0 cp tgmmp Lt/fl
C _ —�p�, rz uczc'
LOT - East Ws,p APW0 72 Vey . fM1 J \ \
rl ZONED PCF—i Rm OxLi µ ]DW V e {J���fUIT U
Pall nJ-!Jac—.co ` 4.1 5 sq.ILt4,4254x
eomnm kMim Y. k M'b 1 \ PA I
2 LOT /6 .wai o AR nnnz , 'r r 26,016I. R•\ / W :JW PC 444] N I/
Ay0 ZqIsd _4
Pe ]s.•wr_Fv s\\ O.60,aog
e �� LOT 17 ros �:rl.a uc a wr ro
qR Z rax4 Soft.fi� lm JAA wn. iwr w.rt ],Po4a I]
rav:nnp. na `27 3 I\ ��1 cclt au.ve ommv I o.wevo o.La I ro'J33s / 1 1
DS ZIb.EU RSF-a Ilr xw Pc .ap&n t� \ .Se
Pan; '-27O42-roo
Z&, RYY \ \\4 ..I \
LJ p6l
Qr` LOT ra �` I I r 111
B 4F IONCb RS -4 Nsl 4.r.y, BYra xs 4, @ I II )
ra Non 0.P a _L N %
�U °�/��≥. �!• � ire vvc
1 S
IJ UE
r9..a A
/ u M
eq2 O' 13 cN olee �� � eJem
f TV ff r I ' . S q ZQVEC RS°_f ra rhrW�..e�≥i� /NNVW .(�5 4/rr
-2JJ]
�__—_ Parpel :4r-Twe�yq--�
Imen Ay _e
vB-'--__-_ - _µ — IT ex✓ �l eq6
�s MYamt fr .t
Erb e XyyfMuln pAa
LOT 20 rA j /'a�.rc..rya. ,w raw
'e rc zrr.
. /� l7YllbLA4-J__
LOT 21
ll I (ry 3{srrAscj,
�� w(Ej5ff7am COT 2
PLANNE
WEST
n/ II vcrc
ra
/ MIl/4 flV.l
1
�M1o,
eo _t.
tCATED
'
V
�
a
R'
9
ZONING DISTRICT
VILLAGE
laax____
Jc.eq
I wm usE
lM6 ._ J
Nata _
—
1'_j—
IPA i
LSINaFiMlnv
.loExsrf�'Lme .
J i&a3
_
(oee
_
�'_—
1
cn':e
L9xQFNEMIry
fa9a
s
IB
meg(4347
_.
_
d
III J
...._ f7m
-..
i L'AND'SUR Erdk:
[GEOtIM1.TICIWNSUL'TMT JNC.
19RIANID.4SC0IT,IRP,L5
;1J9N:�M0.11i SiREFT
kC VEISeRINGS. LAPL72 ZI6
tRH;: 4 Y248J 465
iF:11929};249;1%1
L� M{WfL AfIAVIµII
_ � 6
_' fe i I E
.w .. VI •i f �T ��
.
UIGPNI�TY iMA'P
INTS
N
'LRPHICISC L'E
d 5
6bNaI,=3oFEB-
A-,R,ZD'# (Pd 1349
SL6
.
AS'.
IRED 1
0NAL
IER 1 fCCi1
L LAEq'• Ji•f
C.h..
, dg
'c""" ocvw
I, Ii LIB .cdma'n+is.'=g
'Py"+,......:✓.tom',
(DATE: 'll!S . �ec`^''•
1TFiisLdrawing Its IiP.RELIMINARY'-
[NOT EFOR ' CONSTRUCTION"[until I
[above Iseal[holder 'acknowledges
N Ithe' ,Cancellation Ldf(thisldisdaimer
'below:
N.,AithurEScdtt, Pt.
[DATE
. iCrON,
Li I SGl
U I
WP D '1
n'
1O1 \ ti
. SUITE 104
FAYETTEVILLE,LAR'72703
EP,hP47g 521!5405
IPROJECfiNo: ID AWN BY
12W6036 -1NSkw
CHECKEDIBY: ISUBM[TCAI DATE:
�— (]111/30/06
LDRAWING'NAME: .ISD67IPZD:dwgI
N"[ .LREWSIONS:
BY
ID. I
_ I
- i
16t:
IBC I
hRC]ECT,_
W ESTBROOK IVILILAGE
a
IRPZD,#
FAYETT LLE,1A'R
(SHEET TITLE:
MASTER DE,U',EL'OPM ENT[
,
SHEET [N^: 1
3�0
EXI577NG SINGLE FAME V HOMES
g
e
FRONT ELEVA77ON
SIDE ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
LOT d9
±2
I
I
PLANNEI
" S c
LI
ZONING t 'lSTRIC
IROOK VILLAG E PROPOSED•SINGGEPAMILYHOMES
I'm
th.II
II
,2r,
t17''
e
9
II
,PROPOSED SINGLE;FAMIL OMES
LSAI4LL iq4I LWJT777XTh rsNG
BUILDINGrDESIGNS&3T —UCThRES
1
IAND'SRVEYUR:
iGEOMATIC:WNSULTANT5; [INC.
IBRIAN (DaGWTT,(RPLr
113TNIM1Nf5fREET
'.CAVE ISRRINGS(AR72fl
IPN'I(479) 2 8-liE6
IFAM' I79}18-194'
IX
IR=P,ZD„? •(002.349
tl IN
Iii I
141
o � 1 cV-i1jA'\
D
Ly
iti
SUCfE:104 N'
FAYETnEV1LCE,!AR '72703
PHONE (479} 521-5405
FFAX (479) 571=O919
RROJER.N?: i
.DRAWN BY:
_-20063fi
MEW(OV
?ROVEDBV:
DATE:
_ _
_,:%34,2006
(DRAWINGNAME: c20050036-0ID
IllREV,sue !1 DATE: 11
WESTBROOK VILLAGE
RRZD
FAYETTEVILLE, (AR
(W%ARCHITIECWRAL 1s9 ES
NEST Lt!
n
ZaVED RSr-4
21 n°
lP I i 25 IKHt. 1
r° X10.70 ACR /L
o I LOT 4,9 f LOT
1 or
ti IIN PQ a,. > Ig LOT lA I L m L (( U
i O p 6,768 Sq. FL r ..,� 4,749 $g. R
Yaww 4 ¢ 51528 5Q. R 0.11 Lor 51�" Liam Rc >m - o Ig` 0.16 sag W
�aN/ ns2l Wn /. " �L
O L 0.17 aces r �u
4 e -
i Z0.vED R o
C,
ry L° w e
I I wl -. ml n I z l� o I 2 d a c
cad w meY4PQT'
PPS y Wc4r
SP wnn
rMB Nnfvq l.C
Pe LOT 15 CM r uo® Muss
r0� r ZGWco RS[ -4 2w M J \ •,tl
Hres/ ns-zroa.oZen. Ar-i
J
\ vRq(o4o�e�
2q..N. M['4T, K. s aNry 2 \ \ LOT SA
QP LOT 75 AR72802 --- \ N � 12,841 Sq. R 't
r°t P / + E 24 PC7°-M7 \ 0.29 aces TRACT;
--_--_ --_ ��\ _ SEN3d#9Y 15492
0.72 ACRES
7 F4- G07 17 croN e.. uc — - a
Q [au Bm[r, 4 8 LOT A
rq1 Zp ED RV -4 rac{rar op °a 722W a.r un+ ra - rr a 6,257 Sq. >
sro a -um.
w i°2° ' 2 2!1x1 rs• ass 0.19 �L
.
nW a a- axis' `r� S_AZBY9•6' f°
141(313 or--
4 a , a• RG° III o IS.0D 1AbfO3D
PQ COT 78 C/O°4a it ' LOT7A
P ZONED RSF-4 Ent ue.® &m. 2w 1 7 665 Sq. FL
e °ti ro Nam., wR 727W 34VIE
ista>38017
r' 7 0.18 saes /
QZ3
_.a R5r-4 ry
1 NeB Va.rr.vLW a II. ®` I
QPp for 19 cro mm y, ernes ue a' /PHZ°:8'49w
M Y I DJ
°1 PZ0. ED RSF-4 r&2a1 4 PC 7nu[mu___ u
fw S -2,o4
e DIN n a- v%r,S
L1 181.74 y _ .m+
AV IN]]Pa Rb ' ,i sP,
a r Er) sE' Rw I -'' . ' B Nam¢ NN,m v r° °t
.10 2728 N Mya(ml..2s py,a
LOT 20 M1 . re fawn wR dill
t
2aas M ten.
_ amy ns-2ro2s-am
h±
H Item_
LOT 27 f F
'a I I \ / Ir Wlgn-rvaarr 'LOT 2
6 fN(N]
M1 W( SJ
M1 a-2lm
n M/N r
n w2sJ it
•
IX!16_OM
Ft ar1M7r.v
Ft W(NJ )E'd
Ft WT (5) IC.
I ?�
n w(1 Res I li aWT(sJrrom
n WI Y IIC it Ft -7184,Y
MPMt muwo5C
en® nrt:sR[r¢a it in!
CITY PLAT PAGE:
R 0 C II E Ir
TREE TABLE
-. !1
-.
a
H≥1S
sl�
[
I
®?5iJ•IQaI�
6x.:._3.1
!—•*
'[aIHA
�1nl;n�
^E,11 IrIl1
Ar
n--I.nrn
•:? -
:Sr•�IfiEll
irLp[rL0>�•llt!
[u:p[�-'1163'B�
ucan_.�esa�
4_a>•LuilU.__
L r
'Jug....—Qj�
�[A7_a�n'1�Ie�
• IIp�1t '.�
�.
INMVR4pPTOY.1u' TI
HI, aTM:Tp[�ICWM1 ry1'111�y'!I WiaDl Y411CFolib:
I,R[6Acow Fu1NXiST'A1.ly: ylly4Wi .Thr nYy4alw
Sm/Ia'RCTY]LEL11V/M91It7,.,a R0.UR-W inEl;_
w,slrn6V 11ry•Mluxy\'ALtl Em1E 4W I@i A51plEyy
I4�TI��o111nAr*A0
rI:.IP�1uL1.TC'M 90MN'T 11N I1WL RAi SYS LIG!
11 E1yIRnO�f!UTM111S r. Pie. 'OA IW'OM IWIM
P1M SW1,M'P.RTa 9•M'.tp01)r rp%wa W1,
LW A9111eo'a10nD [ MS.1.4s, mm Eflo 115'1N.'N5,
IN 1GRAPHIC:SCA:LE
b I lM
1 1 1
NIlM!aT]
1-:io
;GENERAL NOTES:
ZFIH,IS V/!°M1I Y � PWf'XA1 p1G1'&.¢u•49 S *'pP
N.2M �a
T654R'T Rlf ORVer 1 VIOMY ns SIP NfRI1
RYItlFI gA rr P'•SIA5TPM4MN4
, L.a-.Bn9P 1.Y O ctTW5,.91 M, WJCWP
@>Wtn AS.IMfa 11m9FM
IFXaL'D•YER9R , iti1i 9Kw11114flO}x'1
ArffiVRS Aram
1K.iRfIfAlNJulIl1f169V.n MVE 811[b10IN4 HELD
9SI+. n1.WNP%n 4W F$1rG PAWPi `,1Nf 4NYR MMES ro
OLhzi1 ,ryMMM9FPR vItmrsWm A@ IX11E
L cr Loc4 . MJIG1Ai1NOIOI M 9R/ne D]5aRM
W T •'e ML ILCATO A5'KyRAIELY AS gE5 - I RCM IMG W'XM
ALUP®EIm LxnYm na NOT nP hLY LCCTWM
[uPPFsalea unun¢
[C rti$aICYLYSTTFDap'W a11P PAT T10 ajre
`rt0lgl_ARMI1'J PE11EC1'/MI,a,1M Ia10.NwW HMAY R
• UZA!t[ In11119nCT K4 STAn I SA4Ayco Ion —'Is.
t.o,,50E EA41C]ISMWI M9M V6161 r ITE Tnf 01MVl[ a
L_- I:p6D4' WWW° I"FScTT wT:
SAc Mfl,0T 11.MS Yief1 N AmMn NP a nPY YNaI
'm Moen W onmin.vumI
1M$6,V, R.1lC aI1 s NYFT*WLU tlWC4.: bYAS DAn
LwN[ m1E1mNW,A IJn3c Jo,
uP[
YIFAVdI$'-ALLn'—W6'.IYJ.tlIASGpn111Ps'01Xe set
Ills ILL! kA HFIIiI"Ef NT WT.' SraI1,TE
r Pm®iu rE®n ail 111rui a Te wan TM1,1
A®BTHTW NVHRPnW1PR1N°WW! Lr&
:1ra9 PCT 1w w110 WI M:wv"
gftva 1111
i
WRH.
,IMo1AJ
___________I
XACiUSI IFNCM
IOla] I
CIJ
Jfl9D
1]140 d4P
H47 342fl.
CJ,1'
QlACl
'
[48.00 Mq
:.zeal
C 'I
I' ♦i
.p5o3•_jf
KM014rr Ll&3 I
.__J
JEflW7
li]OR r9 27
s4r,4c7 3&J I
I.
C6 .I
1 -
t48OJ a'19A
1A.Oi DPW
Y.A
0) 1
IraTtOtEOJ
I]91?
44 A
CJ
.St03
1K i2 Y
54fl7flL I1fl
01 .1
.LX :2t50
ITh0C
_
62C flM
',10. J1
'4919
M9H
CI'J
15945
vs OT In,
481W ;J _
C'9:1
r .
41M .+44]1£6
n> -1
1
!L' OO _23 6.
r 2' 2
&I. nRUTIgpT:
�?ETAT[fss 1
IS11(
4U &VO
°&i11ia0s
1
L1 al
li.!�
"It 4!'T ]IF 1E
e. ''o
Y•L
r
I._I1
.
KW Mmmm.
IL
1 tom,
N.
act
PP, t
so ty m 19.5°,yg
(MD RI1,MrsA:m
:I
th
VICINITY MAP
LATITUDES '36°.06''1'0":N
LONGITUDE:'94° 12'.29'W
LEGEND.
]fNf.OF WAY AWE
R.
a'IF]IUNE
EASEMFMIJXE
_ ISiCQX
DRAYX
r — GASIWVE
DE DAD E£LTUG
SEWER
-w— WITER LINEE
LINE
rGNINJNX RH3
tt
.O [mbwpIHrOIDc
O IIROlPl '1
..1 tUTI1PYPol!
'e wY.wIr
IC ffiicmrm, n
,O IGAS,XF'ER
lO 4A3.VNVf
'e 'WIITMV OEWI1
,® 'SN?Y SEER,IW 431
!® 'WR'ESMETER
,V FlREHYCR.M
• DWN VALVE
W
O ➢RAINAGE )AMRUC&STUU
9 6FJTN]IN.F'
•D pf10F [(WX
Q
e NINLetlx
TREE Duv ues
rA�PENART5
'. [6LIDv14 Im
fY n?W6CW
1ZA*14:Mfi
(as (ORMIATFD aAcTI
M INSMG MC
ANLLY
\•. Ei119I FDf
I Dolan Y
• alit p T
:,
rEF6'nGP1flEV'
4 A[L\0®0LAl1:M
'v .TY,P0.A•
•K •TWSQfl
Atc IrAITG WiaMEN
SATEOF+ARKANSAS
COUNTY EOF [WASHINGTON
(CIT}Y i0F rFAYETTEVILLiE
TOR0GRAPHIC // [BOUNDARY
SURVEY [FOR H ;&'L'BRDYLES
[DEVELOP.MENT, LLC
DATE,CF.L'AST REfl:U-3o-o - YfLAvens ,j
' GI^ eomaG
I 7�'
,GEONLATIC CONSULTANTSi]NG:
T
1341N [MNN'AA
7
;UNEBIU PNG5'AR J2JI8
[ 1ONE1(179)$,6I466
'IFF% (79) 2�&1d62
FDRAWN:o [NNN
[SCAL {P:n'l]0 .�
I➢:EFW' L['LS?I
{MW: S1151 TOWbM.
ROCs"7,£C IN.�
(0TLll..+'31 .•
I
A
�_- Ctig 35.0 ml
I
Q C
ii W ZIA
W �9 j.41
L ✓•
O i,it ' Zr
3 O
• •,5 Lori IBFx
3� " 4 14 WR l-T3fb,R • IO Vc OWWa OS Od
F OMYOK•9WLIXL.Pw
INY7 P
9Ln1npr BY mfl 7re P0* la4P
(f) 1w¢
W
/ r [vAI
nu
_;_p/_Be.6
w (WI 11.11M39 N8r°I8'49'W
(s n -n n.er' 5m ,5n11M 51.98'
pO NI n., 72. I 03
(A')
h
CLABBER CREE Bls}%UE 7D.;
—_—_ `1 t4UC 72 uc
win
N15T.M1
ola ma
— �•'Lfl
fie
732• \\ 10511
J1 A
I2�
P___ IO'@$L
ML�Yly, N
VTLLLU IF. PCPtALtD
AT M Mm0MR
——=M1a6,A 914L
LW[t [L x1NRG
n LaLL(N
E
n-um6''
L0TP 1O15 LOTS
S4nM1 x.771Wm 7.xflZ
6.N cc nm aa. 0.16w
96.19'
587°2533'E
41.19'
)IR
17J H
rt
ON
_____
L3$SL _____
____
_____
_
JIG Mjfld
ii
II
837 5.
DE0ICP
R/W
LAND USE TABLE
FWINIW MM
SYMB0.
INN 115E
OEMTY/I Nit N5xxY
mm
A0,6
R'
1•
PAIL
SIM3EiMILY
68i
6
069
49.2
2
PA •9
SOI&E FAMLLY
833
5
0.W
43.1
3
P4.3
GPFBI SPAII
O
0
0.10
7.26
i0f'LL
• 7.97
11
138
xm
1 SI D. P
N
INj
I#• + IGRAPHIC;SULE
it \ ,� •w.--- is �
1. 1�4. .S IIIIDI-m raT
OC3rP1
LEGEND
i _w'u mes.e.—,we
`wm6G qtp�
e IRONPINIPINE f i1PONPIMT ¢T
IeENOIMARx
� IAINDMYIWYE. L __
IFAS@ffMdlflF:
E — CB111NIRG;C19a]f UME ----r'
AsMVLT.PAVIM'. fr'��--
%OJ1lSEn.PxnNG III
•SflfW%
aN'uro4w•TMI:urE '�_
e EDGE OE,V.WEM@JrEEOPJ
SIGN
SI.
- - OiW,RF OEI[YIIINf —.:c:-1°.—
.
—n— MnF.MICE.0
�= FAPD.TxF IINF _____ ____
.TOPN 5EWERUNE
• _—
OwMnmE SIPLCRMES �}E p ID I �R
IMRED END5EenCx:()
iip lWeTEP.MN1 1 YY x'
EIDf NvgtAMl 454MSLV
(GVTE,V4W. ,
IGIONOR',vuvt
B
IDDI$E VIVI.THNME19l l�9{ _
J2gQ MAN %%rM
'SSWIPA 0.NQ iINE —
i(.9 _SEWE0.MNIplF-y
—ei_TT—THEPIpMC (OWRA+E0)
3yE-� �Eucrvc[cDvSnfl]
'i' -- fi(CTRIE STR
(GAS METER
IQDOaosswc
IlmufV,l_.
4 SIREtTLUTsl
WOTE5: _
YVAEODM1PWAYsNµL'M,MhIxc: HIP (s114@
'YIMINIgHI'1<P'1�S5SMJ fl E NtOIIDW FR .(nlr:.41E1sIND
Kswi:eE NSMIe INNS EM O.
CENERALSITE NOTES;
n.I
a
I
IIRIur,MT,ES:
Ii 1
it
el
-
''ARkN AS .
L...
REGISTERED
�PRGFESSroNAL
IE ENGINEER
♦x Arlxur srort
.w. eeiu
b,..i..,r.
e n It{Vq[Lr S�i
I,emxza.uOSZ j
DATE:.
'THlsldrawing is "PRELIMINARY= -
!NOT F0R:C0NSTRULTI0Nn;until
6bove�seal'holder:a. knowledges
:the Cancellation f:this tlisclaime7
wow:
jN.r`Arthur Scutt, !PIE.
DATE
Z
ID
C
w of
, CM
`130 N: MAIN:ST.
CAVE SPRINGS,' AR 72718
.479 248adfi1
Fx:.479. 248.1462
PROIECTINP: I
IDRAW N'BY: I
12006036.
ER. NEDKOVJI
(OIEOED BY:
ISUBMDTAVDATEL
{11/3006
IDRAIV!NG NAME: 15067;
- n: I
:Ns ISJBMRTALS: i !DATE:
_wt_
I
Im
PROJECT:
WESTBROOK VILLAGE
R=.PZD
FAYETTEVIL'LE IR
ISHEETIIIRE:
SITE r& tflIfl
~PLAN
•S1EEJ NP:
5:0
x I\ \ 20.'EO ASF-t a THEE OHDW
'
2P Qnl1 II
.Lex"' 'Y ar (aAlleWp .hnyee .IIJLI ILL' j$p
rr (IL,67. OV R�Il1).b' I II
TgEEWNTiY
Partl )6s-3rr.o-n w f I I ]flFE
a�p�p R-. /
CiMvov LRSLV / x fl1F 77•1 Nn
$ i ar a- nw — , I Iuu Gv4Dvr wD
R 'tl
I (10' U(./(pMW AL n RILL J •n:.. g-. ' I R iNFE GVIOV!
1,. _ F ;. I 1 TOTAL
h9 ,I
I nD!
I QP , ;k'slsa M I I) �'I WfsiED wa
uRn III rnr :AI jj 0tP ^ � � � I Id$I1
m) s NI NI _ 3
^ I al I e� I 0.
Its a .111II1\
IN (yryJ. Mtn rwl 31f I.. ]1' I I V I j
^wA ) )OJ - 'x i x t$' I CEDIUIEOI
IwadR A RG �. IO)1 t013 1Of3 , IOI, I
S\
WT6I
W As
r h
o.to w tm qh ),ssv R 1
Wea O.OB mo 0.m W
1 fD R 1 O.N mp OOv 1 I
gtyp FY" +oes ato n
I 5/ � rw auonicsxxLL A
� I I\ It
II // III �1 ' //(' I�R®eYTIE1S9nCE llNi �1 — I I S t
HS I O
_
�` ; iR 3 W ll Y L x I II I. KgI•'I 1e1e4.W4 IMn
Sa- / '�jIrf.Wl AP MATT
_.. r e I I I rf97 h'.M3r
III I : r AAA.ItY/ 0.5-lesu-OJ
w .
� F.
J u
a) f MII]2D' 1 WTO RY-.
CllAxG LRE(R
0-1 hnl � c .o
$ (%R/Iq � / Pe aa6arm ecny Rrtp I I l
AAM unhk
1.Fal I
CLA BLVD. B2CREE \ : �fl fi x xrcw I I
-'-- \ ,.c,$/ JE4�I!.e-CYST
3QHD RY-.
} \•
• coe,&, Ue / Sdt ` J 5 ' 4Z I I
a M`tav�.�•"t`n3ioiu1II
J 1) IIi
It 4
3i'e Rsr. -7 ` "'Nslutcarge
J6 RvyxHy Mrs-jeo) L{i �y \ '
8✓ 3aV Po .)R.) I
3mb RY-. �„ \ 686 S II
)' ).'
I'w DI DII:PTED• F. I
17 CAT Rn vL LLA �\ 40!11 LOTTO rcN Beta .14 1•>!)4R 3AALR IA ID)9 yLpOTS
(wf M)+9+ S.I.Y]W T 0.1)ov iQNa6 6Wm¢iJ41g NA b0.N)5� HIED RSF—S lepneM4..W )3>af _ 11
8R It II 'I�xl
/T� 1 / II ¢
Paex zr wxj,q Yi t\\ e. _ I Z4 D.i.mtaI
In �\F` OP /' t[x:m9a I 0�I 6
viii///[
IM9 VMI ^ f , I 1 \ I W II
Q14 mR ryoaa,,a ewe i; 1 t 11y¢` II en II II
P ZONEp Rsr-. To - u:...Sn. 3M ms' ' II II
ia4h �-
x Y. 1
To-ftL I I I ISI V£ IU940 RMm I .
- 1;0 LOT J9 c �+I w'�aa`eLL. cvH I - I Cc,I I n
Z0.vfD PSI -4 !k $oo Jaoj 03 R II rm v£.imolnf AOL „IM II
.. �, M ti 1 T BALL AT
--ID_ii
---
.I L(J µ aawurxswax
. N \ I5 9S(/ , Wr P MOt GtNm (({S
- Hle� I I f
MNaaMV te9, TI
N Wna 1 IVMbv
T>SB N NN(mY.rn P'M IKII Nt R[
LOT Z0 lo,.l:[,0rm Arr nror
_____ PznY >4s-3roa-tttl 1
to LOT 21 ' T f
(/ 8R
�% aT(sl n.rrJear
LMDS(Ai£ gNRIIIG IEGEND
MIST a? WY OOTANVA IGyCOMNOl t41c 6MEN15
'{�tWnc
TREE PL
] )8{OSFPFRTA exltde
YOAMSS mm. S4LRq
1➢�UM@M
A -
TFfEFLNLarJ.T1pM6 NR ,
'A(AES
Y%
'5r3EARGa _59 •I
..iI.JB I
II -I
(IFEBISPAQ _ Is'.
aMi_ i
M.62 -
11WIDARE'. __.20fl15
SRNGIOmALIMIM5G•EAW'm 1
__000
OAO
:ow I
lPE2.GNCVr. BIREO
1536325
.0352- _
_ 35
_TREE w+OF PRLSERWt•:
ON
COO
_ Iw
TRE£'(AJPY UMwm
_ 0,
4.00
o m
1H)wuw%r.F4NEM-
:n:.eR
;cuM___
_ MSN
,1Gi®1W Ro.w aRu-
111&41
LC I
___
i'AMI FASEMEMIII5 NM 'p &LREMOVED
'R RQFD `fl% 'uon(AREAoc:E10
:fl
Ib
N`„ laesa=
YREEIPROTERIONIVENCING
-. Is
N
Ig
T.
(GRAPHIC -SCALE
U L! la
WIN MEFTI)
111wD1 •NPST
(TIRES •T.ABLE
�v
Gi4 ,t.Si®
sr._-
t.•z�m
�
E1�
s
e�®
______
�1i�Od:T.>D•
eIRM F,, ,lp !AM
':IRCNPIF:T
'"'
:BFNDIMAR2
0.Ip110�-WAY.IM
— —
— ,eulinrlvc sEiBAd ua= :—
— —
'* HAII;PAWW
ItO RSEiPAN
T
SICEW4%
fs—.
IEIXi 0FPAVENFN1 ftcP) .
[MAI.B x
sII
t WNEKK
0
—.a —:e-.
WI UK
RE FEFEN& LINE
..y—
__
s=aRv 9wm uNF
'
. CaANIAfF 5T¢LL'IUFFS
t',IO E %
F VPEOENO 5ERION(FFS)
I,r
TA
1Y
r61N
I_SSM1TING DETAIL' ,`ESA.
♦ t%4
1'rp[
BI
,6 rrny'
'+� g
.li NtlR[T}
I ll mal r+rr,s.i:4.:
g:]
`Sr N..n• F
DATE:
This drawing Is "PRELIMINARY--
NOT FORICONSTRUCTION'.until
labbve (seal I hdlderackhSIedges
Ithe(Cani:ellatibn (df lthisldlsdalmer
below.
Amy C. Scott, ASLA
GATE
�;SG'5N �:CiO>ySG
if
F- Z
w II,'I TC\lill,lf
'
O --- ti
130 N. MAI N ST.
IC'AVE SPRINGSr AR d2J18
IPh; '4Zg)2481%161
IFx::47,9:448.1'482
PRDJECTkW..
DRAWN BY:
00506]
_ _ R. NEDNW
_
p1EIXED BY . -.
9JBMr TAL DATE:
MI -I
1]--2006
DRAWING NAME: 6036 LSPAwg
Nc
19JBMRTAI.5:
(DATE'.'
l
do:
RY: I
I
1
PROJECT:
WESTB.ROOK VILLAGE
R,PZD
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FAY ; 'EVILLE;AR
SHEET TJRE:
TREE PRESERVATION;
GRADIING SAND
II`,'NDDSCA'�PIEPLLAN
ISMEET I2N,rl IJ
rw
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Pate, Jeremy
Date: 1.8.07 4:01 PM
Subject: Ords. 4968-4971
Attachments: 4971 R-PZD 04-1307 extension.pdf; 4969 R-PZD 06-2349.pdf; 4970 VAC 06-2362.
pdf; 4968 RZN 06-2366.pdf
CC: Audit; GIS
Jeremy,
Attached are the ordinances passed by City Council, January 2, 2007 regarding various zoning and vacations. Please let me
know if anything else is needed.
Thanks.
Clarice
Clarice Buffalohead-Pearman, CMC
City Clerk/Treasurer Division
113 West Mountain
Fayetteville, AR 72701
479-575-8309
cpearman@cifayettevifle.ar.us
_z.
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDITION
•
Benton County°Daily Record
P. O. BOX 1607
FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72702
PHONE: 479,-571-6415
1
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Karen Caler, do solemnly swear that I am Legal Clerk of the Arkansas
Democrat Gazette newspaper. Printed and published in Benton County
Arkansas, (Lowell) and that from my own personal knowledge and
reference to the files of said publication, the advertisement of:
Ordinance 4969
Was inserted in the Regular Editions:
January 12, 2007 ��ED
Publication Charge: $258.48 SELF
JAN 1 6 2007
CITY ERE
Subscribed a sworn to before me CLERKKIC
CITY CLERKS OFFICE
This is day o f 2007.
Notary Public fi1QahfL.L cq
My Commission Expires:
Sharlene D. Williams
Notary Public
State of Arkansas
My Commission Expires
October 16, 2014
DIo.IANw �. -
PL ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL%
evi le
NPLANNED ZONING E TABLISHI TITLED SPER
2349. WESTBROOK VILLAGE II, LOCATED AT
SALEM ROAD AND CLABBER CREEK DRIVE;
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1,38 ACRES:
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE: AND ADOPTING THE
ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT ORDAINED IV THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
Section 1: That Me zone classification of the folbeAng described oroperty is hereby changed as ftl-
kwa:
From RSF-4, Residential Sb, N Fal?Eµ 4 wills per acre to R'PZD 06-2349 as shown in Exhibit'A'
and depicted in E#dpt Y aEaly4d hereto and made a pan hereof.
Section 2 mM p.UtOF M Ming classification is based upon the approved neater development
pen, s, statement of cpnmaments and the conditipm of ppgwl as subntt-
led, appropriate and approved by 81e City Council indicated in E101DE V a11aeFNd
Mato and made a pan hereof said ExTbit -C- shall be Ned and aveilede for view M the dke d�
the CRY Clerk of Me City of Fayetteville.
Section 3: Thai this ordinance shall lake effect and be in full force at such time as all of the require-
ments of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That Me official zoning map of Me City of Fayetteville. Arkansas, is hereby amended to
reflect the zoning change provided in Seclicn 1 above.
ATTEST
By
SOtCRA SMITH, ONy Cletejw-
EXHIBIT'A' -. R-PZD 06-2349
TRACT ONE
ALL OF TRACT ONE AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF SALEM VILLAGE PU D., RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 15 AT PAGE 70, BEING PART OF THE NW114 OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 32, TOWN-
SHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ALSO BEING
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING AT A FOUND IRON PIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT ONE',
THENCE S87°28'49 -E 198.16 FEET, THENCE S02°34'27W 117.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE
TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S47°34'27W,
35.36 FEET. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN, THENCE N87°25'33W
46.20 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 48.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS 5660325W, 42.86 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
44.43 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 15.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS $66°01'47W, 13.38 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
13.87 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE N87°2849W 51.48 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN,
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD
THAT BEARS N42°2B'49W, 35.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN
THENCE NO2°31'11'E 142.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.70 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD OR FACT.
TRACT TWO.
ALL OF TRACT TWO AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF SALEM VILLAGE PUD RECORDED IN
RAT BOOK 15 AT PAGE 70, BEING PART OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 32, TOWN-
SHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY. ARKANSAS, ALSO BEING
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2; THENCE N87°28'49W 152.99 FEET
TO A FOUND IRON PIN: THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500
FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N42°27'11 W, 21.22 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 23.56 FEET
TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE N02'34'2TE 6.23 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN. THENCE ALONG
A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS
tWW'20W. 20.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 20.50 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN. THENCE
N2MZTYJBW IC 75 FEET TO A FOUND PION PIN: THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE TWO4T
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N36`02'02'E, 41.69 FEET AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 49.29 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN, THENCE S87128'49'E 70.64 FEET TO A
FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET.
A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS $61°04'04'E. 13.34 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 13.83 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 48.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD
THAT BEARS 561°02'26E. 42.66 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 44.21 FEET; THENCE S87°2533E
46.19 FEET TO A FOUND IRON PIN; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 25.00 FEET, A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S42°25'33 -E, 35.36 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
39.27; THENCE S02°34'2TW 12700 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.72
ACRES. MORE OR LESS, BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS. COVENANTS OR RESTRIC-
TIONS OF RECORD OR FACT
EXHIBIT'Sis a map and may be viewed in the office of the City Clen/lreasure• during no'na lus:ess hours.
EXHIBIT'C
R-PZD 06-2349
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I. A shared driveway shall be provided for Lots 10 and -1
2. Individual lot access shall be provided from the alleys and shall be prohibited from Salted Rd.
3. An additional 5°f right-of-way snail be dedicated for Salem Road along the property irontpe.
4. All infrastructure improvements shall be installed, inspected and accepted prior to final plat
approval.
5. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building setbacks
or utility easements.
6. Parks fees are due in the amount of $6,105.00 for 11 single-family dwelling units, pear to building
permit approval
7 Street trees are required for every individual at in a subdivision. There are existing frees for all
lUs except 7-9. Thee (3) trees shall be planted far Lots 7-9 and the timing for installation shall be
indicated on the she plans.
8 A three (3) year maintenance bond for the required street trees is required In Me amount of
$750.00 pip to signing Me final plat.
9 Buildings shall be constructed to be consistent with me photos and concepts depicted in the
booklet as specified. Building permits will be based upon the submitted photos.
10. Signs shah be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville United Development
Code, and shall be subject to signage requirements for residential single-family development.
11. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards submit-
ted by Me applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property. Conditions
of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon me protect with review of the
Master Development Ran - Planned Zoning District by the City Council shall also be binding.
Standard Conditions of App -oval
12. Rat Review and Subdivision comments (to include whiten stag comments provided to the appli-
cant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SW13T
Ozarks. SWEPCO, Cox Cp*municatlons)
13. Trash enclosures shall be screened en three sides with materials compatible with the surround-
ing structures, with access not visible from the street Architectural elevations for these structures
shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit.
14 Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grad-
ing, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lol(s) and
tree preservation. The information submitted far the plat review process was reviewed for general
concept only All public improvements are subject I0 additional review and approval All ,morove.
ments shall comply with City's current requirements.
15. All overhead electric tins 12kv and under shall be relocated trite':,' -
shell be located underground
16 All exterior lighting is required to comply with the City's lighting ore narco A - rvl ilar•. aria
cut -sheets of the proposed exterior light fixtures shall he required to be approveu by Plann.ng Staff
prior to building permit.
17. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required.
Grading and drainage permits
site inspection by hie Landscape Administrator of all tree protection measures prior to any
.:urbance.
u ate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation area
-, Disk with all that revisions
oletion of all required improvements or to placement of a surary with the Oty (latter of trod-
'. escrow) as required by Section 158.01 'Guarantees in Lou of Installed Improvements' to
.,r m:✓e ni "Complete improverrierits. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and
afety must be completed. not lust guaranteed. prior to the issuance o1 a Certificate