HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4870 j ! Doc ID : 009992750004 Tvoe : REL
Recorded : 05/23/2006 at 11 : 24 : 37 AM
Fee Amt : $17 . 00 Pace 1 of 4
Mashinoton County . AR
Bette Stamps(�Circuit Clerk Q i
File2006801-00020
ORDINANCE NO, 4870
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 06- 1922, SCOTTS WOOD PLACE,
LOCATED NORTHEAST OF OLD FARMINGTON ROAD AND ONE
MILE ROAD, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 5.06 ACRES, MORE
OR LESS; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as
follows:
From R-A, Residential Agricultural, to R-PZD 06-1922 as shown in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master development
plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval as submitted,
determined appropriate and approved by the City Council indicated in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a
part hereof.
Section 3 : That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of the
requirements of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to
reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
` p�
` 11n mph ..
PASSED and APPROVED this 2nd day of May, 2006. ��� ' �S Y p SGS
`- ; FAYETTEVILLE ;
APPROVED- ATTEST:
ON.�oJ��.
BY: -Ael*
BY: )'C.'&' �_�
AN COOD , Mayor SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A".
R-PZD 06-1922
A PART OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1 /4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 30
WEST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: BEGINNING
AT A POINT WHICH IS S02024'54"W 129.94 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, RUNNING THENCE S8705710011E 64.25 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE
OF AN EXISTING ROADWAY, THENCE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROADWAY,
THE FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES: S42°55'00"E 57.40 FEET, S71054'00"E
255 .09 FEET, S6402910811E 229.45 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF OLD FARMINGTON
ROAD, THENCE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROAD FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND
DISTANCES: S46°42'54"W 491 .05 FEET, S45'27'1 6"W 310.58 FEET, THENCE LEAVING SAID
CENTERLINE AND RUNNING NO1054'55"E 777.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
AND CONTAINING 5 .06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
SUBJECT TO UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD.
EXHIBIT `B"
R-PZD 06-1922
Conditions of Approval
1 . Planning Commission determination of street improvements, to include the following:
a. Installation of an 18' wide street from centerline of Old Farmington Rd., including 18'
pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains, and a 6' sidewalk.
b. All improvements shall continue west, through the intersection of One Mile Rd. and Old
Farmington Rd. to provide a safe transition, to be approved by City Engineering prior to
construction.
c. Right-of-way to meet Master Street Plan requirements shall be dedicated prior to filing
the Final Plat (35 feet from centerline along Old Farmington).
d. Street lights are required every 300' along Old Farmington Rd.
e. Interior streets shall be constructed to a 24-foot width within a 40'foot right-of-way with
4-foot sidewalks located on both sides.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED STREET
IMPROVEMENTS.
2. All setbacks, protective easements, density, designated uses and other zoning criteria
submitted on the plat and booklet are binding with the approval of the R-PZD. Submitted
covenants are likewise binding to the project.
3 . At least one ( 1 ) large species tree shall be planted between the right-of-way and the front
building setback line on lots 1 -5 & 13- 18. If possible, locate these trees outside of any utility
easements.
4. Structures shall be constructed as presented in the PZD, meeting the architectural design
standards and building materials established herein.
5. Parks fees in the amount of $9,435 for 17 single-family units shall be paid prior to issuance
of building permits, or as constructed to meet the parkland dedication fee-in-lieu
requirements.
6. The applicant shall coordinate with the Solid Waste Division to determine the most
appropriate waste removal method for this development with a mixed-type of residential
dwellings.
7. The applicant shall be granted one (1 ) year from the date of Planning Commission approval
to receive all permits necessary for development with a one (1 ) year extension available.
8. All development shall meet applicable building codes and other ordinances of the City of
Fayetteville.
9. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, roof overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into building
setbacks.
10. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the
property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the
project with review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the City
Council shall also be binding.
11 . Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified
Development Code, and shall be subject to signage requirements for residential single-
family development. This shall be reflected in the booklets and on the plats.
12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western
Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
13 . Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for
grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,
parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process
was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional
review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City' s current requirements.
14. All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed
utilities shall be located underground.
f
Washington County, AR
05/23 2008 instrument
tnas
11 24 37AMfiled on
and recorded in Real Estate "
p
File Number 2006-0002080 .
Bette Stamps - Circuit Cl r
r' by
DLJ
City of Fayetteville 5//6 Aad
Staff Review Form
City Council Agenda Items
or
Contracts
2-May-06
City Council Meeting Date
Jeremy Pate Planning Operations
Submitted By Division Department
Action Required:
R-PZD 06- 1922: (Scottswood Place, 558): Submitted by H2 Engineering for property located northeast of Old Farmington
Road and One Mile Road. The property is zoned R-A, Residential Agricultural and contains approximately 5 .06 acres. The
request is for a Residential Planned Zoning District with 11 single-family detached units and 6 single-family attached units.
$0.00 n/a n/a
Cost of this request Category/Project Budget . Program Category / Project Name
n/a n/a n/a
Account Number Funds Used to Date Program / Project Category Name
n/a n/a n/a
Project Number Remaining Balance Fund Name
Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached
00� Previous Ordinance or Resolution # n/a
Department Di ector Date Original Contract Date: n/a
C�AOriginal Contract Number: n/a
City Attorn
Received in City Clerk �[['
Fi ance and Internal Service Director Date
Received in Mayor's Office EIIiERm
Mayor Dale
Comments:
City Council Meeting of May 2, 2006
Agenda Item Number
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
Thru: Gary Dumas, Director of Operations
From: Jeremy C. Pate, Director of Current Planning
Date: April 137 2006
Subject: Residential Planned Zoning District for Scottswood Place (R-PZD 06- 1922)
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of an ordinance creating a Residential Planned
Zoning District (R-PZD) for Scottswood Place, based on the Master Development Plan,
development standards and statement of commitments submitted. This action will
establish a unique zoning district for i I single-family detached dwelling units and 6
single-family attached units on approximately 5.06 acres located northeast of Old
Farmington Road and One Mile Road.
BACKGROUND
This site, is located northeast of the intersection of Old Farmington Rd. and One Mile Rd.
The property has been the subject of numerous code violations in the past for
commercial/industrial activities on the agricultural property. The subject request will
hopefully eliminate the potential for future violations of this nature, and result in a single
family residential neighborhood compatible with those around it.
The applicant is attempting to create a single-family development with a density that is
consistent with the RSF-4 zoning district. Through the utilization of smaller lots and
setbacks the applicant has preserved a large portion of the existing tree canopy. The
Planned Zoning District contains one ( 1 ) Planning Area. The Planning Area has its own
specific density (maximum number of dwellings units allowed), and established bulk and
area criteria, setbacks, height, etc. The information is provided both in a booklet form,
which describes the intent of the Planning Area along with a drawing of the overall
Planning Area boundaries and by way of the larger plat, which gives more engineered
information. The applicant requests approval of both the zoning, given the proposed
Master Development Plan, statement of commitments, and development standards and
approval of the preliminary plat which would allow a subsequent review of construction
plans. -
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission voted 8-0-0 in favor of this request on April 10, 2006.
Recommended conditions were approved by the Planning Commission and are reflected
in the attached staff report.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 06-1922, SCOTfSWOOD
PLACE, LOCATED NORTHEAST OF OLD FARMINGTON
ROAD AND ONE MILE ROAD, CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 5.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THEA CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THEO`ASSOCIATED
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. � ` `
4nx' sg}rj y^
y'"•'3 _�y91
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCI"U OFTHE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS :
Section 1 : That the zone classification ofthe following described property is hereby
changed as follows: -I ftmf
From R-A, Residential Agricultural, toil PZD, 06-1922 as shown,- in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof. `
Section 2. That .the*change in zonuig class►fion is based upon the approved
master development plan, development standards, st"atement of commitments and the
conditions of approv404s submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City
Council indicated in Exh'ib►t-_ B attached heretosand made a part hereof.
Section 3?,-4��.. I at this`ordmance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all
of the requirements of€lie'ivaster'development plan have been met.
Section 4. That th6:official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is
hereby amended to. reflect the:zoning change provided in Section I above.
4;3 „}
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 12006.
APPROVED:
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
By:
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A".
R-PZD 06-1922
A PART OF THE NW Y OF THE NE '/< OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE
30 WEST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT:
BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH 1S S02024'54"W 129.94 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID 40 ACRE TRACT, RUNNING THENCE S870w5T00"E 64.25 FEET TO
THE CENTERLINE OF AN EXISTING ROADWAY, THENCE WITH THE CENTERLINE
-
OF SAID ROADWAY, THE FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES: S42055'00"E
57.40 FEET, S71054'0011E 255.09 FEET, S64029108"E 229.45 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF
OLD FARMINGTON ROAD, THENCE WITH THE,CENTERLINE OiASA'1D ROAD
FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES : S46 0
42'54"W 491 .05 FEET:'S45027' 16"W
310.58 FEET, THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE AND, RUNNING N0.1°541551TE
777.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ANITCONTAINING 5 .06 ACRES; MORE OR
LESS, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
SUBJECT TO UTILITY EASEMENTS Afi1D RIGHTS OF WAVY OF RECORD.
mm
4 f
mm
N*l
{
EXHIBIT "B"
R-PZD 06-1922
Conditions of Approval
1 . Planning Commission determination of street improvements, to include the following:
a. Installation of an 18' wide street from centerline of Old Farmington Rd., including 18'
pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains, and a 6 sidewalk:;
4
F+
b. All improvements shall continue west, through the intedt�qrsefction of One Mile Rd. and Old
Farmington Rd. to provide a safe transition, to be a ,A,
pproved,by City Engineering prior to
construction.
c. Right-of-way to meet Master Street Plan requi eine is shall be dedicated prior to filing
the Final Plat (35 feet from centerline along Old Farmington)
d. Street lights are required every 300' along-Old Farmington Rd '
C. Interior streets shall be constructed to a 24 foot., tIMithin a 40'foot right-of-way with
;W
4-foot sidewalk_ s located on both sides.
Wil,
i
THE PLANNING COMMISSION FO ND4N FAVOR OF:=.THE PROPOSED STREET
IMPROVEMENTS. ' "
2. All setbacks, protective,,easements, density; desi'gQed uses and other zoning criteria
submitted on the plat'and,booklet are binding with the approval of the R-PZD. Submitted
covenants are li vyise binding to the project.
3 . At least one ( 1 ) large specres tree,shall be,planted between the right-of-way and the front
buildg ltb cktlmeonlot�s 5 & 13 18'? 'if possible, locate these trees outside ofany utility
easements.
4. Structures shall be constructed as presented in the PZD, meeting the architectural design
'
standards".and building materials established herein.
5. Parks fees in the�amour5t of $9,435 for 17 single-family units shall be paid prior to issuance
of building pe , -uts or as constructed to meet the parkland dedication fee-in-lieu
requirements.
6. The applicant shall coordinate with the Solid Waste Division to determine the most
appropriate waste removal method for this development with a mixed-type of residential
dwellings.
7. The applicant shall be granted one ( 1 ) year from the date of Planning Commission approval
to receive all permits necessary for development with a one ( 1 ) year extension available.
8. All development shall meet applicable building codes and other ordinances of the City of
Fayetteville.
9. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, roof overhangs, ete.)i hall encroach into building
setbacks.
10. The Master Development Plan, Statement of CommJi.imentsand Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered .binding a&.' Fe to the zoning of the
property. Conditions of approval as noted herein'and other requirements placed upon the
project with review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zonin ' Diistrict by the City
Council shall also be binding.
11 . Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified
Development Code, and shall Bbsubject to signage requirements for residential single-
family
family development. This shall be,.reflected in the boO- cts and on the plats.
12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (toAi_"ik c written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western
Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWV-EPCO, Cox Communications).
13 . Staff approval of4fiiial detailed plans, spec fications and calculations (where applicable) for
ski• . fib.,;. �
grading, drainage, Water,�ewer;?;fire, rotection streets ublic andprivate), sidewalks,
par (s)ngdztree p% ervatio"Tfe information submitted for the plat review process
was reviewed forgeneral concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional
review and approvasrAll imp ovements shall comply with City' s current requirements.
3z:
14. All overhead electrichnes;. 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed
V.A 6-
utilities shall be located underground.
§ .
r
t
.1 7aye Y 1� PC Meeting of April 10, 2006
ARKANSAS
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE , ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain Sl.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479) 575-8267
TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission
FROM: Jesse Fulcher, Current Planner
Matt Casey, Staff Engineer
THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning
DATE: Ma-eh 3l�6-REVISED APRIL 13, 2006
R-PZD 06-1922 : Planned Zoning District (Scottswood Place, 558): Submitted by H2
ENGINEERING for property located at NE OF OLD FARMINGTON RD. AND ONE MILE
RD. The property is zoned R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE and contains approximately
5.06 acres. The request is for a Residential Planned Zoning District with 17 single-family lots.
Property Owner: S & M, LLC Planner: JESSE FULCHER
Findings:
Property Description: This site is located northeast of the intersection of Old Farmington Rd.
and One Mile Rd. The property has been the subject of numerous code violations in the past for
commercial/industrial activities on the agricultural property. The subject request will hopefully
eliminate the potential for future violations of this nature, and result in a single family residential
neighborhood compatible with those around it.
Surrounding Land Use/Zoning:
Direction Land Use Zoning
North Single Family Homes RSF-4
South Single Family Homes RSF-4/R-A
East Single Family Homes RSF4
West Single Family Homes R-A
Proposal: The applicant requests a rezoning, Master Development Plan and Preliminary Plat
approval for a single-family development on the property. The proposal includes a maximum of
17 dwelling units within the proposed subdivision. The development will consist of 11 single
family detached dwelling units and 6 single family attached dwelling units.
The applicant is attempting to create a single-family development with a density that is
consistent with the RSF-4 zoning district. Through the utilization of smaller lots and setbacks
the applicant has preserved a large portion of the existing tree canopy. The Planned Zoning
District contains one ( 1 ) Planning Area. The Planning Area has its own specific density
(maximum number of dwellings units allowed), and established bulk and area criteria, setbacks,
K:IReporul2006WC Reportsl04-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scottswood Place)REVISED.DOC
r
height, etc. The information is provided both in a booklet form, which describes the intent of the
Planting Area along with a drawing of the overall Planning Area boundaries and by way of the
larger plat, which gives more engineered information. The applicant requests approval of both
the zoning, given the proposed Master Development Plan, statement of commitments, and
development standards and approval of the preliminary plat which would allow a subsequent
review of construction plans.
Process. The purpose of the subject request is for a rezoning and development approval.
Approval of the Residential Planned Zoning District would effectively rezone the property based
on the engineered plans and information provided.
The following bulk and area regulations are proposed by the applicant:
(A)Proposed Uses.
Permitted uses
Use Unit I City-wide uses by right
Use Unit 8 Single-family dwellin s
Use Unit 10 Three-family dwellings
Conditional Uses
11�Unit 2 Cit -wide uses by conditional use ermit
Unit 4 Cultural and Recreational Facilities
Unit 24 Home Occupations
(B) Density.
Units per acre 3.36
(C) Bulk and area regulations.
Lot minimum width 40 ft.
Lot area minimum 3,300 sq. ft.
IL Land area Er dwelling unit 3,300 N. ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front Building Setback from Proposed Street: 10 Ft. : Lots 5 & 13
10 Ft. : Lots 6-8 & 10- 12
Front Building Setback from Old Farmington: 40 Ft. : Lots 1 -5 & 13- 18
Side Building Setback between Structures: 6 Ft. : Lots 1 -5 & 13- 18
0 Ft. : Lots 6-8 & 10- 12
Setback from alley: 20 Ft. : Lots 1 -5 & 13- 18
8 Ft: Lots 6 & 12
Rear Building Setback 20 Ft. : Lots 6-8 & 10- 12
K:IReports120061PC Relwrts104-10-061 R-PZD 06-1922 (Scousivood Place)REVISED.DOC
(F) Height. None
(G) Building area. Maximum 42% of the Lot Area
Water: Public water is adjacent to the site. A study of the water system shall be conducted by
the developer as directed by the Engineering Division. Substantial improvements to the water
system may be required which includes other off -site improvements. Water service will need to
be extended within the property at the time of development connecting within the proposed
development.
Sewer: Sanitary sewer is currently available to the site. A study of the downstream system shall
be conducted by the developer. Substantial improvements to the sewer system may be required
which includes other off -site improvements. Sewer service will need to be extended within the
property at the time of development connecting within the proposed development.
Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets:
West: One Mile Rd. (Local Street)
South: Old Farmington Rd. (Collector Street)
Traffic: Access to the site is provided by way of a short cul-de-sac extending north from Old
Farmington Road. An alley will extend east and west from the cul-de-sac, paralleling Old
Farmington Road. The alley will provide rear access to the units which front Old Farmington
Road. Street connectivity is not recommended up the slope through the proposed Tree
Preservation area.
Street Improvements: Staff recommends the following improvements:
Improve Old Farmington Rd. to include a 18' wide street section from centerline with
curb, gutter, storm drains and a 6 -foot sidewalk at the Master Street Plan right-of-way
and street lights every 300'.
*Staff recommends that these improvements continue off -site through the intersection of Old
Farmington Rd. and One Mile Rd., so that a dangerous traffic situation is not created by
widening only one side of the intersection. The north side improvement would taper west of the
intersection of One Mile Rd.
Tree Preservation: Lot 9 will serve as a permanent tree preservation area, containing
approximately 32,956 sq. ft. This will result in 29.28% of the existing 43.92% tree canopy being
preserved.
Parks: On January 19, 2006 the Parks Recreation Advisory Board recommended accepting
money in lieu in the amount of $9,435 for 17 single-family homes.
Public Comment: Staff has received comments from an adjacent property owner. The neighbor
has concerns regarding density, inadequate infrastructure, condition of Old Farmington Rd.,
maintenance of the bordering gravel road, sidewalks, lighting and traffic. There has also been a
discussion between the developers and the neighbors regarding the existing access easement,
which borders the east property line. This access easement is being maintained, and
K: IReports110061PC Reports104-10-061R-1'ZD 06-1922 (Smrtswaod Place)REVISED. DOC
improvements provided along Old Farmington Road.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Residential Planned Zoning District (R-
PZD 06-1922) with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
Planning Commission determination of street improvements, to include the following:
a. Installation of an 18' wide street from centerline of Old Farmington Rd., including
18' pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains, and a 6' sidewalk.
b. All improvements shall continue west, through the intersection of One Mile Rd. and
Old Farmington Rd. to provide a safe transition, to be approved by City Engineering
prior to construction.
c. Right-of-way to meet Master Street Plan requirements shall be dedicated prior to
filing the Final Plat (35 feet from centerline along Old Farmington).
d. Street lights are required every 300' along Old Farmington Rd.
e. Interior streets shall be constructed to a 24 -foot width within a 40'foot right-of-way
with 4 -foot sidewalks located on both sides.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED STREET
IMPROVEMENTS.
2. All setbacks, protective easements, density, designated uses and other zoning criteria
submitted on the plat and booklet are binding with the approval of the R-PZD. Submitted
covenants are likewise binding to the project.
3. At least one (1) large species tree shall be planted between the right-of-way and the front
building setback line on lots 1-5 & 13-18. If possible, locate these trees outside of any
utility easements.
4. Structures shall be constructed as presented in the PZD, meeting the architectural design
standards and building materials established herein.
5. Parks fees in the amount of $9,435 for 17 single-family units shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits, or as constructed to meet the parkland dedication fee -in -lieu
requirements.
6. The applicant shall coordinate with the Solid Waste Division to determine the most
appropriate waste removal method for this development with a mixed -type of residential
dwellings.
The applicant shall be granted one (1) year from the date of Planning Commission
approval to receive all permits necessary for development with a one (1) year extension
available.
8. . All development shall meet applicable building codes and other ordinances of the City of
K:IReportsl2006(PC Reports104-)0-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scottswood Place)RIfVISED.DOC
Fayetteville.
9. No portion of any structure (i.e., porches, roof overhangs, etc.) shall encroach into
building setbacks.
Standard Conditions of Approval:
10. The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the
property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon
the project with review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by
the City Council shall also be binding.
11. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 174 of the Fayetteville Unified
Development Code, and shall be subject to signage requirements for residential single-
family development. This shall be reflected in the booklets and on the plats.
12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to
the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR
Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
13. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable)
for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private),
sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat
review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are
subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's
current requirements.
14. All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All
proposed utilities shall be located underground.
Planning Commission Action:
Meeting Date: April 10, 2006
Comments:
Required YES
4 Forward O Denied O Tabled
Motion: Lack
Second: Clark
Vote:8-0-0
K:IReports120061PC Report 104-I0-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Seottswood Place)REVISED.DOC
Findings associated with MDP R-PZD 06-1922
Sec. 166.06. Planned Zoning Districts (PZD).
(E) Approval or Rejection Criteria for Planned Zoning Districts
The following criteria shall be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in the
review of a planned zoning district application based on the proposed master development plan:
(1) Whether the application is in compliance with the requirements of the UDC and the
General Plan 2020;
FINDING: Staff finds the application to be in compliance with the Master Development
Plan Planned Zoning District criteria established by the City Council. In review of the
General Plan 2020, the application provides for a single -purpose development while
minimizing disruption of the existing natural features, including tree canopy and
topography. The General Plan 2020 designates this area as Residential, which should
include traditional neighborhoods containing a mix of different densities, housing types,
and lot sizes.
(2) Whether the application is in compliance with all applicable statutory provisions;
FINDING: The application has been reviewed and found to be compliant with applicable
statutory provisions.
(3) Whether the general impact of the rezoning would adversely impact the provision of
public facilities and services;
FINDING: The impact of the rezoning and subsequent development would require the
provision of public facilities, at the cost of the developer. As indicated in the submittal and
the staff report, certain measures are to be taken to ensure adequate infrastructure
improvements are made by the developer to ensure the level of service does not decline due
to the proposed development. If required, improvements shall be made to the water and
sewer system, as well as improvements to Old Farmington Rd. Fire and police have
responded accordingly.
(4) Whether the rezoning is compatible with the surrounding land uses;
FINDING: The rezoning request, combined with the Master Development Plan, creates a
single purpose residential use. Staff finds the proposed use to be appropriate in this
residential area. Additionally, the proposed development utilizes the natural features of
the site, including topography and tree canopy, to minimize the visual changes to
surrounding properties. As noted in the General Plan 2020, residential areas should
contain a mix of different densities, housing types and lot sizes.
(5) Whether the subject land is suitable for the intended use and is compatible with the
natural environment;
K:IReportsl2006lPCReports 104 -10 -061R -P%1) 06-1922 (Scoussood Place)REVISED.DOC
FINDING: The subject property is at the base of a hill with substantial tree canopy
located on the northern half of the property. The design takes tree preservation priorities
into account, by preserving a large section of canopy within a preservation area. The
applicant proposes preservation of no less than.25% tree canopy. A Tree Preservation
Plan is presented for this proposal. Specific conditions from the Urban Forester have been
included within the staff report.
(6) Whether the intended land use would create traffic congestion or burden the existing
road network;
FINDING: It is expected that the addition of 17 residential dwelling units will increase the
amount of traffic on Old Farmington Rd. However, Old Farmington Rd. is a Collector
Street, which is intended to collect traffic from local streets and channel it into the arterial
system. Vehicles traveling west will be able to access 611i Street (a principal arterial), or east
to Shiloh Dr. (a collector street). The developer will •be expected to make significant
improvements to Old Farmington Rd. in order to provide adequate traffic safety. These
improvements include a 18' wide street section from centerline with curb, gutter, storm
drains and sidewalk along the projects frontage on Old Farmington Rd. Improvements
need to extend beyond the frontage of the subject property through the intersection of Old
Farmington Rd. and One Mile. Rd., so that a dangerous traffic situation is not created by
widening only one side of the intersection.
(7) Whether the planned development provides for unified development control under a
unified plan;
FINDING: A plan and project booklet has been submitted, recognizing the zoning and
development criteria required of a Master Development Plan submittal. Typical
architectural elevations, materials and design standards are called out, in order to describe
the appearance of the project once constructed.
(8) Whether any other recognized zoning consideration would be violated in this PZD.
FINDING: Staff finds
that in review of
the requested rezoning,
the Master Development
Plan proposed does not
violate recognized
zoning considerations, as found below.
(J) Development standards, conditions and review guidelines
(I) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consider a proposed PZD in light of the
purpose and intent as set forth in Chapter 161 Zoning Regulations, and the development
standards and review guidelines set forth herein. Primary emphasis shall be placed upon
achieving compatibility between the proposed development and surrounding areas so as
to preserve and enhance the neighborhood. Proper planning shall involve a consideration
of tree preservation, water conservation, preservation of natural site amenities, and the
protection of watercourses from erosion and siltation. The Planning Commission shall
determine that specific development features, including project density, building
locations, common usable open space, the vehicular circulation system, parking areas,
K:IReporrs110061PC Reports 104-/0-061R-P7D 06-1922 (Scorlsw•ood Place)REVISED.DOC
screening and landscaping, and perimeter treatment shall be combined in such a way as to
further the health, safety, amenity and welfare of the community. To these ends, all
applications filed pursuant to this ordinance shall be reviewed in accordance with the
same general review guidelines as those utilized for zoning and subdivision applications.
FINDING: The proposed Planned Zoning District has been reviewed in light of all
applicable development and zoning ordinances. At this time, the Master Development Plan
sets out the basic guidelines, development and zoning criteria, commitments offered by the
applicant and those recommended by staff, and design standards to ensure the proposal
will achieve a high level of compatibility with adjacent properties. Natural site amenities
are being retained within a Tree Preservation area. The proposed density, while slightly
higher than the existing rural density to the northwest and northeast, is compatible with
the RSF-4 density requirements. The proposed subdivision tree preservation and overall
public amenities required of the developer, along with the variety of lot sizes furthers the
health, safety, amenity and welfare of the community as a whole. The proposed
development will work with the natural features and topography of the property and place
an emphasis on tree preservation, allowing for a project that enhances the neighborhood.
(2) Screening and landscaping. In order to enhance the integrity and attractiveness of the
development, and when deemed necessary to protect adjacent properties, the Planning
Commission shall require landscaping and screening as part of a PZD. The screening and
landscaping shall be provided as set forth in §166.09 Buffer Strips and Screening. As part
of the development plan, a detailed screening and landscaping plan shall• be submitted to
the Planning Commission. Landscape plans shall show the general location, type and
quality (size and age) of plant material. Screening plans shall include typical details of
fences, berms and plant material to be used.
FINDING: Screening is not required as part of this development.
(3) Traffic circulation. The following traffic circulation guidelines shall apply:
(a) The adequacy of both the internal and external street systems shall be reviewed in
light of the projected future traffic volumes.
(b) The traffic circulation system shall be comprised of a hierarchal scheme of local
collector and arterial streets, each designed to accommodate its proper function and in
appropriate relationship with one another.
(c) Design of the internal street circulation system must be sensitive to such
considerations as safety, convenience, separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic,
general attractiveness, access to dwelling units and the proper relationship of different
land uses.
(d) Internal collector streets shall be coordinated with the existing external street system,
providing for the efficient flow of traffic into and out of the planned zoning
development.
K: tReportsO0061PC ReportsI04-10-06IR-PZD 06-/922 (Seausvood Place)RP.V/SED.DOC
(e) Internal
local
streets shall
be designed to
discourage through traffic within the
planned
zoning
development
and to adjacent
areas.
(f) Design provisions for ingress and egress for any site along with service drives and
interior circulation shall be that required by Chapter 166 Development of this code.
FINDING: A traffic study was not required with this proposed development. Ingress and
egress to the project will be provided from a short cul-de-sac extending from Old
Farmington Rd. with a rear alley providing access to Lots 1-5 and 13-18. The interior
street will be a 40 right-of-way with a 4' sidewalk located on both sides. Old Farmington
Rd. serves as a collector for local street traffic, channeling the traffic to the arterial system
of 6'h Street and Shiloh Dr.
(4) Parking
standards. The off-street
parking and
loading standards found in Chapter 172
Parking
and Loading shall apply to
the specific
gross usable or leasable floor areas of the
respective use areas.
FINDING: Standard parking ratios for single family units (2 spaces per unit/dwelling) is
enforced. Although some of the dwellings within this development may be attached, they
are utilized for a single family on a distinct lot and are required to comply with the single
family dwelling parking lot requirements.
(5) Perimeter treatment. Notwithstanding any other provisions of a planned zoning district,
all uses of land or structures shall meet the open space, buffer or green strip provisions of
this chapter of this code.
FINDING: The development will retain approximately 67% of the existing tree canopy on
the property, for a total of 29% of the site area. The development does not provide onsite
public parkland and is contributing money in lieu of land for 17 single family units. At
least one large species tree shall be planted on Lots 1-5 and 13-18.
(6) Sidewalks. As required by §166.03.
FINDING: Four -foot sidewalks are to be constructed on both sides of the interior street; a
six-foot sidewalk is required on the side of the Collector Street adjacent to the subject
property.
(7) Street Lights. As required by §166.03.
FINDING: Street lights will be required at the time of development.
(8) Water. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Public water will be provided to the project site, pursuant to city code. A study
K: IReportsl2006ll'C Reports 104-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scouswood Place)REVISED.DOC
of the water system shall be conducted by the developer as directed by the Engineering
Division. Substantial improvements to the water system may be required which includes
other off -site improvements.
(9) Sewer. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Public sewer will be provided to the project site, pursuant to city code. A study
of the downstream system shall be conducted by the developer. Substantial improvements
to the sewer system may be required which includes other, off -site improvements.
(10) Streets and Drainage. Streets within a residential PZD may be either public or
private.
(a) Public Streets. Public streets shall be constructed according to the adopted standards
of the City.
(b) Private Streets. Private streets within a residential PZD shall be permitted subject to
the following conditions:
(i) Private streets shall be permitted for only a loop street, or street ending with a cul-
de-sac. Any street connecting one or more public streets shall be constructed to
existing City standards and shall be dedicated as a public street.
(ii) Private streets shall be designed and constructed to the same standards as public
streets with the exceptions of width and cul-de-sacs as noted below.
(iii)A11 grading and drainage within a Planned Zoning District including site drainage
and drainage for private streets shall comply with the City's Grading (Physical
Alteration of Land) and Drainage (Storm water management) Ordinances. Open
drainage systems may be approved by the City Engineer.
(iv) Maximum density served by a cul-de-sac shall be 40 units. Maximum density
served by a loop street shall be 80 units.
(v) The plat of the planned development shall designate each private street as a
"private street."
(vi) Maintenance of private streets shall be the responsibility of the developer or of a
neighborhood property owners association (POA) and shall not be the
responsibility of the City. The method for maintenance and a maintenance fund
shall be established by the PZD covenants. The covenants shall expressly provide
that the City is a third party beneficiary to the covenants and shall have the right
to enforce -the street maintenance requirements of the covenants irrespective of the
vote of the other parties to the covenants.
(vii) The covenants shall provide that in the event the private streets are not maintained
K:IReports120061PC Reports104-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scotiswood Place) REVISED. DOC
as required by the covenants, the City shall have the right (but shall not be
required) to maintain said streets and to charge the cost thereof to the property
owners within the PZD on a pro rata basis according to assessed valuation for ad
valorem tax purposes and shall have a lien on the real property within the PZD for
such cost. The protective covenants shall grant the City the right to use all private
streets for purposes of providing fire and police protection, sanitation service and
any other of the municipal functions. The protective covenants shall provide that
such covenants shall not be amended and shall not terminate without approval of
the City Council.
(viii) The width of private streets may vary according to the density served. The
following standard shall be used:
Paving Width
(No On -Street Parkinol
Dwelling
Units
One -Way
Two -Way
1-20
14'
22'
21+
14'
24'
*Note: If on -street parking is desired, 6 feet must be added to each side where parking is
intended.
(ix) All of the traffic laws prescribed by Title VII shall apply to traffic on private
streets within a PZD.
(x) There shall be no minimum building setback requirement from a private street.
(xi) The developer shall erect at the entrance of each private street a rectangular sign,
not exceeding 24 inches by 12 inches, designating the street a "private street"
which shall be clearly visible to motor vehicular traffic.
FINDING: All public and private streets/drives shall conform to city standards, which
have been indicated in the submitted statement of commitments. Public and Private streets
shall not be gated, unless permitted by express approval from the City Council.
(11) Construction of nonresidential facilities. Prior to issuance of more than eight
building permits for any residential PZD, all approved nonresidential facilities shall be
constructed. In the event the developer proposed to develop the PZD in phases, and the
nonresidential facilities are not proposed in the initial phase, the developer shall enter into
a contract with the City to guarantee completion of the nonresidential facilities.
K:IReports12006WC Reports104-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scoalswood Place)REVISED.DOC
FINDING: N/A
(12) Tree preservation. All PZD developments shall comply with the requirements for
tree preservation as set forth in Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection. The
location of trees shall be considered when planning the common open space, location of
buildings, underground services, walks, paved areas, playgrounds, parking areas, and
finished grade levels.
FINDING: Staff recommends approval of the Tree Preservation Plan.
(13) Commercial design standards. All PZD developments that contain office or
commercial structures shall comply with the commercial design standards as set forth in
§ 166.14 Site Development Standards and Construction and Appearance Design Standards
for Commercial Structures.
FINDING: The applicant has proposed design standards for residential structures.
(14) View protection. The Planning Commission shall have the right to establish
special height and/or positioning restrictions where scenic views are involved and shall
have the right to insure the perpetuation of those views through protective covenant
restrictions.
FINDING: Staff finds no specific scenic views to be protected on the subject property.
(E) Revocation.
(1) Causes for revocation as enforcement action. The Planning Commission may
recommend to the City Council that any PZD approval be revoked and all building or
occupancy permits be voided under the following circumstances:
(a) Building permit. If no building permit has been issued within the time allowed.
(b) Phased development
schedule.
If the applicant does not
adhere to the phased
development schedule
as stated
in the approved development
plan.
(c) Open space and recreational facilities. If the construction and provision of all
common open spaces and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the
final plan are proceeding at a substantially slower rate than other project components.
Planning staff shall report the status of each ongoing PZD at the first regular meeting
of each quarter, so that_the Planning Commission is able to compare the actual
development accomplished with the approved development schedule. If the Planning
Commission finds that the rate of construction of dwelling units or other commercial
or industrial structures is substantially greater than the rate at which common open
spaces and public recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, then the
K:IReports120061PC Reports104-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scottswood Place)REVISED.DOC
Planning Commission may initiate revocation action or cease to approve any
additional final plans if preceding phases have not been finalized. The city may also
issue a stop work order, or discontinue issuance of building or occupancy permits, or
revoke those previously issued.
(2) Procedures. Prior to a recommendation of revocation, notice by certified mail shall be
sent to the landowner or authorized agent giving notice of the alleged default, setting a
time to appear before the Planning Commission to show cause why steps should not be
made to totally or partially revoke the PZD. The Planning Commission recommendation
shall be forwarded to the City Council for disposition as in original approvals. In the
event a PZD is revoked, the City Council shall take the appropriate action in the city
clerk's office and the public zoning record duly noted.
(3) Effect. In the event of revocation, any completed portions of the development or those
portions for which building permits have been issued shall be treated to be a whole and
effective development. After causes for revocation or enforcement have been corrected,
the City Council shall expunge such record as established above and shall authorize
continued issuance of building permits.
(F) Covenants, trusts and homeowner associations.
(1) Legal entities. The developer shall create such legal entities as appropriate to undertake
and be responsible for the ownership, operation, construction, and maintenance of private
roads, parking areas, common usable open space, community facilities, recreation areas,
building, lighting, security measure and similar common elements in a development. The
city encourages the creation of homeowner associations, funded community trusts or
other nonprofit organizations implemented by agreements, private improvement district,
contracts and covenants. All legal instruments setting forth a plan or manner of
permanent care and maintenance of such open space, recreation areas and communally -
owned facilities shall be approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and
• by the Planning Commission as to the suitability for the proposed use of the open areas.
The aforementioned legal instruments shall be provided to the Planning Commission
together with the filing of the final plan, except that the Guarantee shall be filed with the
preliminary plan or at least in a preliminary form.
(2) Common areas. If the common open space is deeded to a homeowner association, the
developer shall file with the plat a declaration of covenants and restrictions in the
Guarantee that will govern the association with the application for final plan approval.
The provisions shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
(a) The homeowner's association must be legally established before building permits are
granted.
(b) Membership and fees must be mandatory for each home buyer and successive buyer. -
K:IReportsl20061PC Reports 104-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scattswood Plaee)REV/SED.DOC
(C) The open space restrictions must be permanent, rather than for a period of years.
(d) The association must be responsible for the maintenance of recreational and other
common facilities covered by the agreement and for all liability insurance, local taxes
and other public assessments.
(e) Homeowners must pay their pro rata share of the initial cost; the maintenance
assessment levied by the association must be stipulated as a potential lien on the
property.
FINDING: The applicant shall comply with the above requirements, as part of the
Planned Zoning District ordinance.
Sec. 161.25 Planned Zoning District
(A) Purpose. The intent of the Planned Zoning District is to permit and encourage
comprehensively planned developments whose purpose is redevelopment, economic
development, cultural enrichment or to provide a single -purpose or mixed -use planned
development and to permit the combination of development and zoning review into a
simultaneous process. The rezoning of property to the PZD may be deemed appropriate if the
development proposed for the district can accomplish one or more of the following goals.
(1) Flexibility. Providing for flexibility in the distribution of land uses, in the density
of development and in other matters typically regulated in zoning districts.
(2) Compatibility. Providing for compatibility with the surrounding land uses.
(3) Harmony. Providing for an orderly and creative arrangement of land uses that are
harmonious and beneficial to the community.
(4) Variety. Providing for a variety of housing types, employment opportunities or
commercial or industrial services, or any combination thereof, to achieve variety
and integration of economic and redevelopment opportunities.
(5) No negative impact. Does not have a negative effect upon the future development
of the area;
(6) Coordination. Permit coordination and planning of the land surrounding the PZD
and cooperation between the city and private developers in the urbanization of
new lands and in the renewal of existing deteriorating areas.
(7) Open space. Provision of more usable and suitably located open space, recreation
areas and other common facilities that would not otherwise be required under
- conventional land development regulations.
K:lReporal2006iPC ReportsI04-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scotlswood Place)REVISED.DOC
(8) Natural features. Maximum enhancement and hiinimal disruption of existing
natural features and amenities.
(9) General Plan. Comprehensive and innovative planning and design of mixed use
yet harmonious developments consistent with the guiding policies of the General
Plan.
(10) Special Features. Better utilization of sites characterized by special features of
geographic location, topography, size or shape.
FINDING: The proposed Master Development Plan incorporates many of the above
criteria, as indicated by the minimal disruption of existing natural features and amenities;
utilization of the site special features, such as topography, size and shape; creating a
community atmosphere near retail, and commercial goods and services, while providing
necessary infrastructure improvements to alleviate any potential impact.
The proposal best fits the flexibility and variety goals of the intent of the Planned Zoning
District, while also providing a development that is compatible with surrounding
residential and undeveloped area. The development will offer attached and detached single
family housing types, with alley access to most lots. These development standards will
result in the creation of a unique neighborhood in this area. Staff finds that the proposal is
consistent with many of the guiding policies of the General Plan 2020 including:
Residential Areas:
9.8.a Utilize principles of traditional residential urban design to create compatible, livable, and
accessible neighborhoods.
9.8.f Site new residential. areas accessible to roadways, alternative transportation modes,
community amenities, infrastructure, and retail and commercial goods and services.
(B) Rezoning. Property may be rezoned to the Planned Zoning District by the City Council
in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and Chapter 166, Development. Each
rezoning parcel shall be described as a separate district, with distinct boundaries and specific
design and development standards. Each district shall be assigned a project number or label,
along with the designation "PZD". The rezoning shall include the adoption of a specific master
development plan and development standards.
FINDING: The subject described real property is proposed to be rezoned to R-PZD 06-
1922, with one (1) unique Planning Area. The development standards, statement of
commitments and Master Development Plan approved shall be adopted with the rezoning.
(C) R — PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District.
(1) Purpose and intent. The R-PZD is intended to accommodate mixed -use or clustered
residential developments and to accommodate single -use residential developments that
are determined to be more appropriate for a PZD application than a general residential
K:IReporfs120061PC Repons104-10-061R-PZD 06-1922 (Scouswood Place)REY/SED.DOC
rezone. The legislative purposes, intent, and application of this district include, but are
not limited to, the following:
(a) To encourage a variety and flexibility in land development and land use for
predominately residential areas, consistent with the city's General Plan and the
orderly development of the city.
(b) To provide a framework within which an effective relationship of different land uses
and activities within a single development, or when considered with abutting parcels
of land, can be planned on a total basis.
(c) To provide a harmonious relationship with the surrounding development, minimizing
such influences as land use incompatibilities, heavy traffic and congestion, and
excessive demands on planned and existing public facilities.
(d) To provide a means of developing areas with special physical features to enhance
natural beauty and other attributes.
(e) To encourage the efficient use of those public facilities required in connection with
new residential development.
FINDING: The proposed Residential Planned Zoning District allows residential
development in the form of single-family detached and single-family attached while
preserving many of the significant trees on the site. A general rezoning would not allow the
type of development the applicant is pursuing, based on the bulk and area requirements of
typical zoning districts, therefore a Planned Zoning District is more appropriate for the
proposed development. Improvements to infrastructure will be required in order to
provide adequate traffic safety. By clustering more densely, the natural features of the site
and existing tree canopy can be preserved.
(2) Permitted Uses. All permitted uses identified within §162 Use Units of the Unified
Development Code shall be allowed as permissible uses, unless otherwise specified,
subject to City Council approval of the Planned Zoning District request.
(3) Conditional Uses. All conditional uses allowed within (Residential, Commercial,
Industrial) zoning Districts established in the Unified Development Code shall be
allowed with Planning Commission approval, unless otherwise specified, subject to the
code governing Conditional Use requests.
FINDING: See Zoning Criteria Chart within the project booklet provided by the
applicant for the uses permitted by right and by conditional use in each Planning Area as
proposed by the applicant. This project booklet, if approved, will remain on file in the
Planning Division for comparison to future development on the property. Uses proposed
have been evaluated and found to be reasonably compatible in adjacency to other uses.
(4) Condition. In no instance shall the residential use area be less than fifty-one percent
K: tRepons12006tPC Repor[s104-10-061 R-PZD 06-1922 (Scotukaod Place)REVISED.DOC
(51%) of the gross floor area within the development.
FINDING: The proposed PZD proposed is entirely residential in use.
*Required Findings for Rezoning Request.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request from R -A,
Residential Agriculture, to MDP R-PZD 06-1992, with the adoption of the associated
Master Development Plan.
LAND USE PLAN: The General Plan 2020 Future Land Use Plan designates this site as a
Residential Area. Rezoning this property to R-PZD 05-1636, with the associated Master
Development Plan, varies this future land use to a mixed use; though the principal use on the
property will remain residential. The proposed plan, commitments, design standards and other
conditions placed upon the project result in a compatible development with surrounding land
uses in the general vicinity, meeting many of the goals of the General Plan 2020 for new
development.
FINDINGS OF THE STAFF
A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use
planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans.
Finding: The proposed rezoning of the existing R -A property to the proposed R-PZD
development with single family attached and detached residential usees at a
density of 3.36 units per acre is consistent with the General Plan 2020 that
identifies this area for residential use. The proposed land use is unique to the
area with regard to lot width and lot size, meeting many of the objectives and
principles of the land use plan that promotes unique forms of development.
2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the
rezoning is proposed.
Finding: The proposed zoning is needed in order to develop a subdivision in the
manner proposed with the R-PZD site plan.
3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase
traffic danger and congestion.
Finding: The proposed zoning will certainly result in an increase in vehicle trips, due
to the change in use from one (1) single-family dwelling unit to 17 dwelling
units. It is necessary that street improvements occur as a result, to be
installed with development of the project. With the improvements other
users of Old Farmington Road will likely benefit as well, due to the fact that
at this time there is no curb, gutter, storm drains, or sidewalks. It is the
K:IRepor is12006 PC Reports V)4-JO-06R-PZD 06-1922 (Seoltswood Place)REVISED.DOC
opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this Planned Zoning
District will not substantially alter the population density and thereby
undesirably increase the load on police services or create an appreciable
increase in traffic danger and congestion in the area.
4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population
density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including
schools, water, and sewer facilities.
Finding: Based on findings from public service providers, as outlined below, an
undesirable increase in load on public services would not be created.
Engineering: Public water is adjacent to the site. A study of the water system shall
be conducted by the developer as directed by the Engineering
Division. Substantial improvements to the water system may be
• required which includes other off -site improvements. Water service
will need to be extended within the property at the time of
development connecting within the proposed development.
Sanitary sewer is currently available to the site. A study of the
downstream system shall be conducted by the developer. Substantial
improvements to the sewer system may be required which includes
other off -site improvements. Sewer service will need to be extended
within the property at the time of development connecting within the
proposed development.
Police: It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this
rezoning will not substantially alter the population density and
thereby undesirably increase the load on police services or create an
appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion in the area.
Fire: The subject
property is located
approximately
1.2 miles from the Fire
Station No.
6. Response time to
the property is
3.5 minutes.
5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of
considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the
proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such
as:
a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses
permitted under its existing zoning classifications;
b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the
rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through
(4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable.
Finding: N/A
K. IReporls12006V'C Reports 104-10-061R-P%J) 06-1922 (Scoaswood l'lace)REVISED-DOC
PC Meeting of April io, 2006
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS .
TREE PRESERVATION and PROTECTION REPORT
To: Fayetteville Planning Commission
From: Sarah K. Patterson, Urban Forester
Date: April 4, 2OO6
113 W. Mountain Si.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479) 444-3470
ITEM #: R-PZD o6-1922: Planned Zoning District (Scottswood Place)
Requirements Submitted:
Initial Review with the Landscape Administrator
✓
Site Analysis Map Submitted
Site Analysis Written Report Submitted
T
Complete Tree Preservation Plan Submitted
Canopy Measurements:
rTotal Site Area.-�'�
acres
5.06
square feet
220,414
'istin"Tree G_ ano `'` -
,_
acres
2.22
square feet
96,796
percent of site area
43.92%
'Facis"hn' Tree Caio � tP.leseive7
acres
1.48
square feet
64,545
percent of total site area
29.8%
kP--,ercent+Minimum GanQp °Red aired
25%
FINDINGS:
The desirability of preserving a tree or group of trees by reason of age, location, size or
species.
This site is about half covered with tree canopy. The northwest
section of the property beings to slope at a 15% rate. The species
identified were oak and hickory.
Whether the design incorporates the required tree preservation priorities
• This design takes into consideration the tree preservation priorities.
A large section of canopy will be preserved in a Tree Preservation
Easement.
The extent to which the area would be subject to environmental degradation due to
removal of the tree or group of trees.
• Slight environmental degradation will occur on the site with this
development.
The impact of the reduction in tree cover on adjacent properties, the surrounding
neighborhood and the property on which the tree or group of trees is located.
• Adjacent properties along the southeast and southwest will be
affected by the removal of canopy. All canopy found in the northern
section will be preserved.
Whether alternative construction methods have been proposed to reduce the impact of
development on existing trees.
• N/A
Whether the size or shape of the lot reduces the flexibility of the design.
• The size, shape, and topography of this lot reduces flexibility of
design.
The general health and condition of the tree or group of trees, or the presence of any
disease, injury or hazard.
The general health of the trees was found to be fair to good.
The placement of the tree or group of trees in relation to utilities, structures, and use of
the property.
• No preservation is proposed for the area where structures and
utilities will be. The preservation area on lot 9 will be protected from
all utilities and will have no structures on the site.
The need to remove the tree or group of trees for the purpose of installing, repairing,
replacing, or maintaining essential public utilities.
• A utility easement exists on this site along the boundary of the tree
preservation. No disturbance should occur outside of this easement.
Whether roads and utilities are designed in relation to the existing topography, and
routed, where possible, to avoid damage to existing canopy.
• This development will removal canopy in and around the structures
and roads.
Construction requirements for On -Site and Off -Site Alternatives.
• N/A
The effects of proposed On -Site Mitigation or Off -Site Alternatives.
Mitigation will not be required for this project.
The effect other chapters of the UDC, and departmental regulations have on the
development design.
• NA
The extent to which development of the site and the enforcement of this chapter are
impacted by state and federal regulations:
• N/A
The impact a substantial modification or rejection of the application would have on the
Applicant:
• Staff is recommending approval of the submitted Tree Preservation
Plan with the following conditions.
Conditions:
i. Please make sure your canopy calculations factor in the canopy
removed for grading on Lot 9 Tree Preservation Area and that the
fencing follows these grading lines.
2. Mitigation will not be required unless the canopy value falls below
the required 25%.
PRAB Motion: Langsner moved to accept Staff recommendation of Money -in -
lieu. Davis seconded the motion and approval was unanimous with Bailey,
Langsner, Harrison, Davidson, Davis, Bitler, Burke, and Colwell voting yes.
7. Park Land Dedication: Matt Mihalevich, Park Planner
Development Name: Old Farmington Road
Engineer: H2 Engineering, Inc.
Owner: S & M LLC
Location: North of Old Farmington Road, West of
I-540
Park District: SW
Units: 17 Single-family Units
Total Acres: 5.06 acres
Land Dedication Requirement: .41 acres
Money in Lieu Requirement: $9,435
Existing Parks: Finger Park
Developer's Request: Money -in -lieu
Staff Recommendation: Money -in -lieu
Developer's Comments: None
Justification: The requirement for this project does
not provide adequate acreage for a
neighborhood park. Staff is working
with the developer of Mountain Ranch
to the north of this project to locate
potential park land in that development
which would serve the residents of Old
Farmington development.
PRAB Motion: Langsner moved to accept Staff recommendation of Money -in -
lieu. Davis seconded the motion and approval was unanimous with Bailey,
Langsner, Harrison, Davidson,. Davis, Bitter, Burke, and Colwell voting yes.
8. Community Park Update: Edmonston reported the plans are in the planning
phase. A consultant is being selected. She stated that many projects are
waiting on the planning process to be completed. She will make a monthly
progress report at PRAB meeting.
9. Other Business:
Informational Item: A public meeting to gather input on the development of
Lafayette Lofts subdivision park (formerly site of St. Joseph School) consisting of
.18 acres will be held on Thursday, January 12 at 5:30 p.m. at Washington
School Elementary School Cafeteria. Edmonston stated that the plan chosen will
be present to PRAB at the February meeting for their approval. Harrison asked
what suggested uses were presented at the first public meeting. Some of those
were: Amphitheater, terrace seating, private area on the west side where there
January 19, 2006/ 5
are several trees, picnic/grill area, play element such as a climbing boulder.
There is a budget of $15,000.00 for this project.
Colwell reported the Lake Sequoyah trail being constructed by the Boy Scouts is
nearly complete. They are requesting to name the trail "King Fisher Trail" and
are looking at doing a dedication ceremony. The subject of naming the trail was
tabled to the February meeting.
10. Adjournment: There was no further business so Bailey moved to
adjourn and Langsner seconded the motion at 6:30 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Cheryl Whillock and Tracie Martin
January.19, 2006/ 6
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
113W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: 479-444-3469
TO: Jesse Fulcher, Planner
FROM: Alison Jumper, Park Planner
DATE: January 30, 2006
SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Tech. Plat Review Comments
Meeting Date: February 1, 2006
Item: R-PZD 06-1922 Scottswood Place
Park District: SW
Zoned: RPZD
Billing Name & Address: S & M LLC
Current Land Dedication Requirement
Single Family @ .024 acre per unit = acres
Multi Family @ .017 acre per unit = acres
Mobile Home @ .024 acre per unit = acres
Lot Split
COMMENTS:
Money in Lieu
17 @ $555 per unit = $ 9,435
____@$393 per unit = $
_____@$555 per unit = $
@ $555 per unit = $
• Parks and Recreation Advisory Board made a recommendation of accepting money in
lieu to satisfy the park land dedication requirements for the development. This
recommendation was based on the project's proximity to potential park land within its
service area within another development.
Fees will be due before final plat.
PZD 06-1922
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
POLICE DEPARTMENT
February17, 2006
• Jeremy Pate
Zoning and Development Director
City of Fayetteville
113 W. Mountain.
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Dear Director Pate,
This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the proposed
Planned Zoning District R-PZD 06-1922 (Scottswood Place, 558) submitted by H2
Engineering, Inc. for property located at NE of Old Farmington Road and One Mile Road
would substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load
on•public services or create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and traffic
congestion.
It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this Planned Zoning District
will not substantially alter the population`density and thereby undesirably increase the
load on. police services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion
in the area.
FAYETTEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT .
100-A WEST ROCK STREET . _
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701'
(DELIVERIES) POLICE: 100-A WEST ROCK STREET 72701
PHONE: 479.587.3555 FAX: 479.587.3522
Fayetteville Fire
Department
To: Suzanne Morgan, Andrew Garner, Jeremy Pate, and Jesse Fulcher
Thru: Chief Tony Johnson
From: Captain Dale Riggins
Date: February 17, 2006
Re: February 16, 2006 Zoning Review - Fire Department Comments
C-PZD 06-1921 azenby/Phase , 560)
This 1.30 acres is co Bred by E me 6 at 900 Hollywood.
It is I mile from the sta n th an expected response time of 2.75 minutes.
Measured hydrant flow ' its area is 1760 gallons per minute.
We do not anticipat calls fo ervice on commercial buildings but typically this will not
affect our call v me or response times.
R-PZD 06-1922 (Scottswood Place, 558)
These approximately 5.06 acres are covered by Engine 6 located at 900 S Hollywood.
It is 1.2 miles from the station with an expected response time of 3.5 minutes.
The Fire Department anticipates 4 (2 EMS — 2 Fire/Other) calls for service per year
once the development is completed and maximum build -out has occurred.
Measured Hydrant Flow in this area is 1300 gallons per minute.
The service impact of this development will typically take eighteen months after the
development is started, and the units begin to be occupied, to occur.
There should be no adverse effects on our call volume or response time to this
development.
ANX 06-1933 (Nock -Broyles Land D elopment, 645)
These 6.55 acres are co red by Engi 5 located at 833 N Crossover Road.
It is 3.3 miles from the st lion with expected response time of 6.25 minutes. When the
new Station 3 is in service t Happ Hollow and E Huntsville the distance will be
reduced to 2.4 miles with a ml to response time.
Only concern we have is Alf hydrants in the area but that may be resolved when
the zoning of the propertssed.
We can not anticipate calvice on annexations.
CPZD 06-1921 Lazenby Phase 2 5.06 Acres
1 mile 2.75 minute Response
NI -'LL) Ub-1922 Scottswood Place 5.06 Acres
1.2 miles 3.5 minute Response
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION
OF UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARING
Today's Date: February 6, 2006 Project Name: Scottswood Place
APPLICANT / REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFO:
H2
Subdivision Committee Meeting*:
Planning Commission Meeting*:
Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:30am
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113W. Mountain Street, Room 219
Monday, February 27, 2006 5:30pm
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113 W. Mountain Street, Room 219
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A proposed Residential PZD located on Old Farmington Road
approximately 0.25'miles west of Shiloh Drive in West Fayetteville
Adjoining Property Address and Parcel Number(s): 765-14696-000
• Please call the City of Fayetteville Planning Office at 575-8263 to verify this meeting's date and time.
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS
(Return Comments to City of Fayetteville Planning Division in Stamped Enclosed Envelope)
Project Name: Scottswood Place
_! I have been notified of the above meetings for the described project.
I�do not object to the project described above.
/! I do object to the oroject described above because:
Name of Property Owner (printed)
Signa of PropertyOwner
CIot)t;? oc), OF EX/ST/N*a - r 6E7
Coll F,foea1,A4V £b j
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION
OF UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARING
Today's Date: February 6, 2006 Project Name:
APPLICANT / REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFO:
H2 Engineering, Inc.
479-582-4234
Subdivision Committee Meeting*:
Planning Commission Meeting*: .
Scottswood Place
Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:30am
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113 W. Mountain Street, Room 21.9
Monday, February 27, 2006 5:30pm
Fayetteville City Administration Building
113 W. Mountain Street, Room 219
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A proposed Residential PZD located on Old Farmington Road
approximately 0.25 miles west of Shiloh Drive in West Fayetteville
Adjoining Property Address and Parcel Number(s): 765-14696-000
* Please call the City of Fayetteville Planning Office at 575-8263 to verify this meeting's date and time.
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS
(Return Comments to City of Fayetteville Planning Division in Stamped Enclosed Envelope)
Project Name: Scottswood Place
I have been notified of the above meetings for the described project
I do not object to the project described above.
I do object to the project described above because:� t%J& &9C'�t ''t" LjcftLJ 4aUflh
t'
Donna Sfew ark'
Name of Property Owner (printed)
7vn/riok _ tAlru
Signature of Property Owner
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS
(Return Comments to City of Fayetteville Planning Division in Stamped Enclosed Envelope)
Project Name: Scottswood Place
I have been notified of the above meetings for the described project.
I do not object to the project described above.
Edo object to the proje41cr4 above because: et «ctcz. `n4
.
� ' (l`V Fill ::.!Y.CC
R�O N(CL$
Name of Property Owner J (printed) , o
� �a'�"�.^'o-.^-tee., �'1
615 �T
Signature of Property wne D e h o2� c ra Qfiai
FEB 15 2006 o6;e
CITY OF FAYETIEVILLE NO(S'i 1
.. "". •.-. r.nnclt kl
February 16, 2006
To: Fayetteville Planning Commission (Subdivision Committee)
From: Jeff Hawkins
2824 W. Old Farmington Road
Fayetteville, AR 72704
Reference is made to the proposed 5 -acre, 17 -lot single-family PZD generally
located at 2950 W. Old Farmington Road. My home is immediately east of this
proposed development, on the other side of the gravel road that separates our
respective properties. Over the past 3% years, the subject property has been
used illegally, in violation of the City's zoning regulations, for no less than a half a
dozen different business and industrial purposes. There have been dozens of
zoning, code enforcement, and nuisance complaints associated with the past
uses of this property, and unfortunately the city has done a less than adequate
job of administering its land use regulations. These past uses have been a
continuing threat to the single-family character and integrity of the area, as well
as adversely affecting residential property values.
The proposal before you appears to be consistent with good land use and
development principles, and would be in keeping with the single-family character
of the area. The density, while probably not inconsistent with other zoning in the
area, is a bit higher than what we had hoped. Also, I believe the plan and
narrative (which I saw a couple of weeks ago), mentioned a smaller average
square footage per home that the sample home models that were included in the
application. I could have miss read that portion, but if I didn't, perhaps an
explanation would be in order.
While the lot layout is understandable, given the terrain, I would hope that as
much tree canopy as possible be preserved. Although no access is planned
from the gravel road along the eastern border of the property, we would of course
prefer that it be hard surfaced. At a minimum (assuming it doesn't already exist),
a 25 -foot street right-of-way (west of the center of the road) should be dedicated.
If the developer is not required to make improvements to the gravel road, we
would urge the city to consider subsequent hard -surfacing of it. Although all
adjoining surveys may not show this road as "public" (mine does), it is without
question, public -through -prescription. And as I understand it, the city did, several
years ago, pave virtually all such similar roads. However, for some reason,
possibly through an oversight, this one was not done. In any event, we would
appreciate any consideration that may be given in this regard.
In conclusion, this is, in my view, a good proposal. It should eliminate and
prevent past problems associated with the use of this property. I appreciate the
opportunity to express my views, and I also appreciate your consideration of
them. Thank you .................Jeff Hawkins
t V
1 '
i \
l -
„I
!F ,
•
..
o-� �k • I
a F ?y J
•T l i //'
5
5.
A
RPZD06-1922 SCOTTSWOOD PLACE
Future Land Use
OW 1
r -F PM1N'ZNOT NR� URSF4 Q "wl 1 +'" (:.:
RSf 6 \j u a y •� 't'* 4 e"
PVC
_ snnol+A sr - - -. o \ , r,- }\��`� ••�,, � yComm�n�ry�commerc�al �. � "�
,. + Reglun�al Common cial .•
RA _ c• .y1 2
I+ y [�Y�> �M+Yut $a. tlF{ •Y'i` oY 4�. . "?�� li. �:G
..�p4^�JE,4a #6 Yt. e ?Y 'M •f.Q SY i• 1� Y �y,'1 tJl• y� �\a� f,,F
-'Mixed Use. x A '. Ix { t �p ..... 4. SF w• �'' x. ,. �,+''i
Overview Legend
Subject Property
Boundary
RPZD06-1922
'—'.• Planning Area
Streets o ...8 Overlay District
•`1i Existing Outside City
,_i Planned
Legend
•_ J 0 100 200 400 600 800
Feet
SCOTTSWOOD PLACE
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
April 13, 2006
cH'
Owner / Applicant:
Springdale, AR
Representative:
H2 Engineering
2758 Millennium Dr.
Fayetteville, AR 727(
SUMMARY
Scottswood Place is a proposed Residential PZD located along Old Farmington Road just
west of Fulbright Expressway/I-540 and Shiloh Drive. This submittal reflects a proposed
residential subdivision with 17 residential lots, one lot to serve as detention, and one lot
as a tree preservation area. The property is currently zoned R -A. Adjoining properties to
the west, northwest, and the cemetery to the south are zoned R -A. Properties to the east,
northeast, and south are zoned RSF-4.
Old Farmington Road has historically served as a local street with low density residential
land uses. The boom in commercial development in this locale has resulted in a
modification of traditional traffic patterns and land uses, which has resulted in a
considerable increase in traffic on Old Farmington Road. The City has recognized the
value of Old Farmington Road as a thoroughfare and has identified Old Farmington Road
as a collector on the Master Street Plan. The complexion of this area is starting to
change. This proposal may not resemble existing residential development along Old
Farmington Road, but it is certainly a relatively low density and low impact development.
Although the development of a traditional RSF-4 is not feasible on this property, we have
designed a concept to create a residential development with a density of less than 4
residential units per acre. This is not to say that we would meet all RSF-4 minimum
development standards for lot widths and setbacks, but it does reflect a willingness by
this developer to be sensitive to existing and surrounding land uses. In addition, 22% of
the site is proposed as a tree preservation area. Through utilization of smaller lot widths
and setbacks we are able to better preserve the existing tree canopy into a common area
which will better benefit all homeowners. This area will be maintained by the Property
Owners Association and will provide an opportunity for additional outdoor activities.
General Project Concept
• Street and Lot Layout — The street configuration consists of a short cul-de-sac
extending north from Old Farmington Road providing the one and only point of
access from Old Farmington Road. An alley extends east and west from the cul-
de-sac, which effectively parallels Old Farmington Road. The residential units
with Old Farmington Road frontage will face Old Farmington Road with rear
access to the units provided by the alley. The Cul-de-sac will provide access to
the remaining units, which are proposed as attached single family dwellings. The
• street and lot configuration was derived by an initiative to minimize the impact of
the existing hillside and tree canopy. The subdivision residential lot density is
approximately 3.36 residential units per acre, which is comparable to the adjacent
RSF-4 density limitations.
• Site Plan — See Master Development Plan Sheet
The development of this subdivision will require the construction of a new cu -de -
sac and alleys. Standard improvements to Old Farmington Road include the
dedication of right-of-way and widening of Old Farmington Road.
• Buffer Areas — Lot 9 located on the north side of our proposed project is a
dedicated tree preservation area, which serves as a buffer to our north and east.
2
Due to the existence of a 36 -inch water distribution main along the front of our
property, the contiguous lots will have a 40 -foot minimum building setback from
the Old Farmington Road right-of-way. This will create a large amount of green
space.
• Tree Preservation Areas — Lot 9 (49,581 sf) is dedicated as a tree preservation
area.
• Storm Water Detention Areas and Drainage — Drainage generally flows across the
site from the north. This water will be diverted into a storm water collection
system and directed to the west side of the site into a proposed detention pond.
• Undisturbed Natural Areas — The lots within this development will have a
maximum buildable area of 42% of each lot area. The Tree Preservation area
shall be protected to the extent possible.
• Existing and Proposed Utility Connections and Extensions — An existing 6 -inch
water line is located on -site along the west property line. An existing 36 -inch
water line is located on -site along the south property line, but is not available to
provide service. An existing 8 -inch water line is located along and under Old
Farmington Road. It is our intention to extend an 8 -inch main throughout the
development to provide water service. An existing 8" sanitary sewer line is
located along the south side of Old Farmington Road. It is our intention to derive
service from this existing infrastructure.
• Development and Architectural Design Standards —
o It is the intent of the developer to construct all residential units.
o It is the intent of the developer to sale each unit with no rental property
contemplated.
o The minimum house size for the development is 1500 sf.
o Architectural renderings are provided with this submittal.
o The following represents the expected house plan for the proposed lots:
■ Lots 1 & 18 — Ansley, Hollister, or Joliet (All would be modified to
accommodate a rear entry garage.)
■ Lots 2-5, 13-17 — Mt. Royal, Vestavia, Greenwich, or Pacifica
■ Lots 6-8, 10-12 - Ansley, Hollister, or Joliet
• Building Elevations — Architectural renderings are provided with this submittal.
The developer will require 85% brick or stone for each of the homes, with
approved vinyl or wood siding to be used on gables, eaves, and under covered
porches.
Proposed Development Phasing and Time Frame
This project consists of! phase of development. This zoning approval is intended to
allow construction anytime within 3 years of approval.
Proposed Planning Areas with Proposed Zoning and Development
Standards
3
SCOTTSWOOD PLACE - RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT
(A)Purpose. The SCO11SWOOD Residential PZD is designed to permit and encourage
the development of low density attached and detached single family dwelling units in
a manner to help preserve existing tree canopy and to minimize grading with respect
to hillside development issues.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
Unit 1
City-wide uses by right
Unit 8
Single-family dwelling
Unit 10
Three-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
Unit 2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
Unit 4
Cultural and Recreational Facilities
Unit 24
Home Occupation
(C) Density.
Single-family
dwellings
Units per acre
3.36
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Single-family
dwellings
Lot minimum width
40 ft.
Lot area minimum
3,300 sq. ft.
Land area per
dwelling unit
3,300 sq. ft.
min
(E) Setback requirements.
Lot Number
Front (New
Proposed Street)
Front (Old
Fannin ton Road)
Side
Rear
1-5,13-18
NA
40 ft.
6 ft
20 L
6-8.10-12
loft
NA
Oft.
20 f .
*Side Setback is measured Overhang to Overhang
(F) Height. None.
(G)Building area. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 42% of
the total area of such lot.
4
Comparison of the Proposed Master Development Plan to the Current
Zoning District Requirements
Current Zonings (R -A)
Proposed Zoning (R-PZD)
Description
Requirements
Requirements
Use Unit 1- City-wide Uses by right
Use Unit 1 - City-wide Uses by right
Use Unit 3- Public protection and utility facilities
Use Unit 8- Single-family dwellings
Permitted Use
Use Unit 6- Agriculture
Use Unit 10 - Three-family dwellings
Units Allowed
Use Unit 7 - Animal husbandry
Use Unit 8- Single -Family Dwellings
Use Unit 9 -Two -Family Dwellings
Use Unit 37 - Manufactured homes
Use Unit 2 - City-wide uses by cond. Use permit
Use Unit 2- City-wide uses by cond. use permit
Conditional
Use Unit 4 -Cultural and recreational facilities
Use Unit 4 - Cultural and recreational facilities
Uses
Use Unit 20 - Commercial recreation, large sites
Use Unit 24 - Home occupation
Use Unit 24 - Home occupation
Use Unit 36 - Wireless comm. facilities
Side Setbacks
20 Ft.
BUILDING TO BUILDING
Rear Setbacks
35 Ft.
20 Ft.
Maximum Height
None"
None
Density - Units per Acre
0.5
3.36
Lot Area Minimum (Single Family)
2 acres
3,300 SF
Lot Width Minimum (Single Family)
200 ft
40 Ft.
Land Area per Dwelling Unit
2 acres
n
3,300 SF(Mm)
"R -A: Height regulations. There shall be no maximum height limits in the R -A District,
provided, however, that any building which exceeds the height of 15 feet shall be
setback from any boundary line of any residential district a distance of 1.0 foot for
each foot of height in excess of 15 feet. Such setbacks shall be measured from the
required setback lines.
Note: The existing zoning of this property is R -A.
Analysis of the Site Characteristics
No environmentally hazardous, sensitive, or natural resource areas have been found on
this site.
Recreational Facilities
Charles J. Finger Park (19 Acres) — Baseball, Hiking Trails, Picnic Shelter,
& Restrooms
Holtz Park (.5 Acre) — Picnic Area, Playground
The Crown Apartments Park ( 6.5 Acres) — Trails
Reason for Zoning Change Request
The current zoning of the property is R -A, which effectively restricts any serious
development potential of the property. The use of a PZD to rezone the property allows
for the design of lots and streets to create a minimal impact to the property. We are
creating a low density development while preserving existing tree canopy and steeper
slopes.
Relationship to the Existing and Adjacent Land Uses
Adjoining properties to the west, northwest and the cemetery to the south are zoned R -A.
Properties to the east, northeast, and south are zoned RSF-4. We are preserving 22% of
the site as a tree preservation area. The overall residential density is 3.36 units per acre,
which is• comparable to RSF-4 density allowances.
This architectural emphasis for the residential homes will blend nicely with other
residential houses along Old Farmington Road. The orientation of the homes with the
frontage to Old Farmington Road further demonstrates our efforts to integrate these
homes with the existing residential development. The added traffic with this
development is extremely minimal in comparison with current traffic generation. No
signage is contemplated for this development.
Compliance with Fayetteville General Plan 2020
This development does comply with the Fayetteville General Plan 2020.
Traffic Study
No traffic study has been initiated and would not expect the minimal impact of this
project would warrant a traffic study.
Impacts on City Services .
There are no significant impacts to city services associated with this project.
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS
Dedication of Public Facilities
This project will consist of one public street and one public alley which will be
dedicated to the City of Fayetteville. The tree preservation area will be deeded to
the Property Owners Association (POA) for ownership and maintenance. A POA
assessment will be established for maintenance of these facilities.
Utility infrastructure will be dedicated to the City of Fayetteville and utility
easements will be dedicated by the Final Plat.
On or Off -site Improvements
The development of on or off -site infrastructure necessary to serve this project
shall be completed prior to Final Plat Approval.
Natural Resources and Environmental Sensitive Areas
There are no known natural resources or environmentally sensitive areas on this
site.
Project Phasing Restrictions
This project shall be granted one (1) year from the date of City Council approval
to receive all permits necessary for development with a one (1) year extension
available.
Fire Protection
Scottswood Place will be served by the Fayetteville Fire Department. Station 6 is
located approximately 0.75 miles away from the project on Hollywood Avenue.
Other Commitments Imposed by the City
There are currently no other commitments imposed by the City.
Parks, Trails and Open Space Commitments
Tree preservation and protection will be implemented in accordance with the City
of Fayetteville code of Ordinances Title XV'Unified Development Code: Chapter
167 Tree Preservation & Protection.
Proposed Preliminary Building Elevations
Conceptual architectural elevations and floor plans are provided at the end of this
booklet.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, & REVIEW GUIDELINES
Screening and Landscaping
Not applicable.
Traffic and Circulation
Old Farmington Road is the only point of access into the property. The entire
development will be served by one access, which is less than the 30 lot maximum
enforced by the State Fire Code. The subdivision streets consist of one cul-de-sac
and two alleys.
Old Farmington Road is designated as a collector. Site specific traffic patterns
can utilize Shiloh Drive to the east, One Mile Road (Finger Road) to the south,
and Old Farmington Road to Hwy 62 to the west.
Parking Standards
Not applicable.
Perimeter Treatment
No perimeter treatment is planned.
Sidewalks
Sidewalks will be designed and constructed on both sides of the new proposed
street. The home builders will be responsible for areas contiguous to residential
lots, and the developer will be responsible for common areas.
Street Lights
Street lights will be designed and constructed in accordance with the Unified
Development Code.
Water
Water lines will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of
Fayetteville Water and Sewer Specifications. An 8 -inch water line is located
under Old Farmington Road. We are proposing to loop a new 8 -inch line from
the existing 8 -inch line back through the development to the existing 6 -inch line
along the western boundary.
Sewer
Sewer lines will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of
Fayetteville Water and Sewer Specifications. An 8 -inch sanitary sewer line is
located on the south side of Old Farmington Road. Sewer laterals will be
extended along the alleys and cul-de-sac.
Streets and Drainage
Streets and drainage will be designed and constructed in accordance with the
Unified Development Code. A detention pond will be located along the western
boundary.
Construction of Nonresidential Facilities
There will be no nonresidential facilities constructed on -site.
Tree Preservation
Tree preservation and protection will be implemented in accordance with Section
167 of the Unified Development Code.
Architectural Design Standards
Conceptual architectural renderings and floor plans are provided at the end of this
booklet. The developer will require 85% brick or stone for each of the homes,
with approved vinyl or wood siding to be used on gables, eaves, and under
covered porches.
Signage
No signage is anticipated with this project.
141
View Protection
The tree preservation area along the north side of the property is located on the
higher elevations. The lots around the cul-de-sac are starting to rise in elevation,
but the remaining homes will be constructed on the lowest part of the property. It
is not anticipated that any improvements to this property will impact any view of
surrounding properties.
Revocations
The developer understands causes for revocation and will take all measures
necessary to avoid revocation.
Covenants, Trusts, and Homeowner Associations
The developer will create a Property Owners Association for the purpose of
owning and maintaining the Tree Preservation Area and other landscape areas.
The developer will prepare Protective Covenants to establish homebuilding
standards to sustain a quality environment. The by-laws of the POA will obligate
them to the maintenance of the Tree Preservation Area.
Intent I Purpose of PZD Ordinance
The PZD Ordinance provides this project the ability to create a responsible design
which has minimal impact to existing tree canopy, and minimal grading on a
hillside. Modifications to traditional setbacks, lot widths, and lot area minimums
combined to offer a density of 3.36 residential units per acre while maintaining
significant tree canopy.
9
3621-9AB Greenwich price code 15
Din. Mbr.
136x100 130x130
W COL • -.
_.. ._ yll
Li
Kit. n
P 133x133 Br.2
113 x100
Fam.' 1
Rm. E
133 x 150
ID
Br.3
100x110 Il
1 Gar.
COVERED 1Yx x214
PORCH
rr-----------------1
O
3W-0.
Total Sq. Ft. 1542
9' Main Level Walls
www,designbasics.com/9AB
8623 -1118 Mt Royal price code 20
I � '
Din.L -----------------
133 x 10; Gar.
:- 1YX x214
r: fir:
Br.2
10; x 101
BFam. jti 11,x;03
Rm.
133x16 O 2
ccvq Mbr.'
o
130 X130
• maces
34x-0'
Br.4
Main ......1545 ;X11;
Second .....503
Total ...... 2048
9' Main Level Walls 1 Br,5
e I M.1 13;.tc0
43
r
Ii., sit iniiudrs all ul the clrtdttono- and iIurnplans
own on Ihrsa tnn Isit s. ()r o: h (h Ht n shun if in this
rub c an he puff d ,is an individual plan n ill that
ori(ic plan's odcv,uiun and dour plan only.
in
qai mj
IWIIL:I!!I
\=6$
A ^• JIIr. •■i+
,�� Ifi t
1 !+''-II-��7\. _ \_ n[■/II. a r.:
Ena 1 1 ii. I ■■ .■ . r'. ie {'illu
ll ndlll ii n n
_ � (rf IIIIIII II'1_ Iliit11 lllll
y
.ran` —____
a..9` �= •�
r
:t7814 -
Y IImo_
s. -
.I
111i< '(t in( lucks .III ul the cllatiun. and Iluorpla[IN
shoo. n on Ih(-,(' MO p (.Ios. Or I at h dasi);n shoran in this
hunk c.In ho punha:vd .is an indirifItIal plan %%ith that
n� � iii 1pl.in'v clr•.,dinn and flnnr plan onIV.
8555-9AB Ansley pricecodel5
9x x120
Gar.
Kit. ,9a 2�^
114 X133
I
UP
Fam. Rm
,T0 x142 l�
i
COVERED
PORCH
■ f■
Unfinished Storage
Br.2 adds 327 Sq. Ft.
113 x100
D
Br.3
10 x10 COI
Mbr. Main .......757
12°xi80 Second .....781
Total ...... 1568
9' Main Level Walls
800-947-7526
I
c�
W
W
7
O
0.35
S �
S
Ct
O
Clarice Pearman Ords. 4867, 486&4��9 & 4871 Page 1
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Pate, Jeremy
Date: 5.8.06 11:42AM
Subject: Ords. 4867, 4868, 4869, 4870 & 4871
Jeremy,
Attached are copies of the above ordinances passed by City Council, May 2, 2006.
Thanks.
Clarice
CC: Audit; GIS
--P Pf
�.1
t U
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDITION
Benton County Daily Record
P. O. BOX 1607
FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72702
PHONE: 479-571-6415
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Maria Attaway, do solemnly swear that I am Legal Clerk of the Arkansas
Democrat Gazette newspaper. Printed and published in Benton County
Arkansas, (Lowell) and that from my own personal knowledge and
reference to the files of said publication, the advertisement of:
Ordinance 4870
Was inserted in the Regular Editions:
May 25, 2006
Publication Charge: $298.93
Subscribed and sworn to before me
Thiacday of / 2006.
Notary Public �L�LJ
Sharlene D. Williams
Notary Public
State of Arkansas
My Commission Expires:
My Commission Expires
October 18, 2014
**NOTE** Please do not pay from Affidavit.
Invoice will be sent.
4
Js
• ' OBDINANCQ ND. 9870
I AN' ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL
I PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT TTLED A-p2D 08-
•
I 1822, O OL
D
PIOCE. A ANDD NOMILE Ye evi le
EAST OF OLD FARMING PLACE
ATED ONE MILE
AOAD, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 5.06
ACRES MORE OR LESS AMENDING THE
CIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY ARKANSAS
:TEVILLE. AND ADOPTING THE OF FA.
ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CM
ARKANSAS,
OF FAYFTkv...
� lowaction 1: That the zone classifirgtl n of the lolbwing described property is hereby l
s:
changed es fd-
Rom R -A, Tt hereof
Agrk3ulturel, to R-PTD 06.1822 es ehpwn In Exhlbit'A' attached hereto and
made a part si din:
Section 2: That the change In zoning classification is based upon the approved matter developmem
plan, developrnant standards, statement d commitments and the conditions of
tetl. Oetamtlned appropriate and approved by the City Coandl Indicated inEnhlbl
hereto and made a part heretl�t �Beettaohetl
Section 3: That this ordinance shall take effect and be In full force 61 such time as all of the require-
ments of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of he City Of FayotteNae grksnsas is hereby
reflect he zoning change provided in SMlbn_7•sbove,' - -.:: Y ementletl-tO i
PASSED and APPROVED this 2nd day of May, 2006.
1PPROVED:
ATTEST;
IAN COODYr M� Ay r� a By:
SONDRA BMITNI DRIV CNrk
EXHIBIT -A-
A-PZI) 0s-1922
PAM nt m.- ______
C. Ri(
Plat (;
d. Sin
• 0. Inn;
walks
THEP
2. All
on the
wise b.
3: At la
ing sari
4: SIN[
.derds s
5. Park;
building
6. TheI
w'9Ste a
J. Then
._.. .-ni_ic, vwiF1-'
0 UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD,
EXHIBIT -B-
R-PZD 06.1922
Conditions of Approval it
ommission determination of street Improvements to Include he following
1 of r IB' lade street from Oemedine of Old Femtlngton Rd., including 18' pay
storm drains, and a 6'sIdewalk.
vements shat. Continua west, hrouh the - amen,
id. to Provide a sale transition, to bee t by l0oggcCity tEo0 of
Ono Mile nglneeHng prior to
FProved to and Old
construe-
ry to most Master Oet PlanFarrregdrhis shall be dedicated prior to riling
rom centerline along ld
nj
3 are requlretl ovary W' e,...._ �- - 9lhe Final
19 10 he project
One (1) large speck
k line on lots 1-5 & 1
rs Shall be construe
building materials e
es in the annum of
rmits, or as ca n tr.,
IN FA ^�= "``•,m -roar o-roq'title-
VOR OP THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS ..
the approval of hesesfl-and other zoning criteria submitted PZD. Submuetl covenants are like -
II be planted between he rightbf-weY and the front build-
tssible, locate Chose bees outside of any utTity easements,
rented in the PZp,
herein, meeting he eroMtectural design step
N177e ktgle-fatuity units shall be paid prior to issuance of
_. perRland dedication fAa i, I:_....
,r" t evetoprnem with a mixed -type of residential the
t aPProprlatt
:ant shall be grams one (1) year from the date of Planning Conunlsskn approval
smite necesse for da oprnent with a one (1) year extension available.
portent Shall meet applicable buildin Citytc
0 Codes and other ordinances d the City of
of any Structure (I.e., porches, root Overhangs, etc.) shall encroach Into building Set -
Devi Shall a Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards submit.
a0canshall be con&der bIn rig and tied to the zoning of the properly. Conditions
and Other 3 noted herein and other
PaOed proem Plan - Planned Zoning District by heClty C 'ha^Profect with review d the
be permitted M _
to slgna e r ..... `cptul,
_ 9 equlrements for
representatives
r. Nt Puotp -'-"` .'= pal ravtew process was reviewed
..
_ roverrtents are subject 10 additional review and avowed for
omeleot k lines is2urr current mqalremems. aPPrwal. All it
gad ender and under shall be relocated under 9% grountl. All prop