Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinance 4818
Doc ID : 006040004 Recorded : 02915/2006 atT 11:43:04 AM Fee Amt : $17 . 00 Pace 1 of 4 vashlnoton Countv . AR Bette Stamoe Circuit Clerk ORDINANCE N0. 4818 F11e2006-00006413 AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 05- 1657 FOR THE PROPERTY SHOWN IN EXHIBIT A. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HUNTSVILLE RD., EAST OF WILLOW AVE,, SOUTH OF ROCK ST., AND WEST OF LYTON AVE. RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY 24 UNITS/ACRE TO RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 8 UNITS/ACRE OR RSF4 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS/ACRE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From RMF-24, Residential Multi-family 24 units per acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 units per acre, as shown on Exhibit "A- 1 " attached hereto and made a part hereof; and from RMF-24 Residential Multi-Family, 24 units per acre to RSF-4, Residential Single Family; 4 units per acre as shown on Exhibit "A-2" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above. PASSED and APPROVED this 171h day of January, 2006. APPROVED: �%O;;FK/T&4. ,v •G\SY Qc.G�� By: c ; FAYETTEVILLE @ _ DAN COODY, Mayor ATTEST: lees'9RkANSPga Jam';' GT By: �Ck. cQc.e� Mum SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk i r 0 IN, 1 p�K ROCK ST do 1� �1 r • � aqq P /\ e Ivo D � Ro a 4Ll � o �0 O 43 6TH ST rj If � C, FRD 0�2 I L Ll Li LI: IJ 0 F3TP Exhibit A N RSF-4 0 105 210 420 630 840 WE RSF-8 Feet January 23, 2006 3 r r "1 C7 µ\VATE SIJ r r6 0 ROCK ST i 4 Lj s t O • SSP Q . � `/(C�. U J Q " 4] isLl ❑ 3 � � ' AA STHST r o a � c s O <ERO Ll UTf Fri Exhibit Al N RSF-8 0 105 210 420 630 84Feet W+ E January 23, 2006 S n . 1 1 N ROCK ST dM P s d � o° faL STH ST fog age ��� �� �• _ h ion to 2 , F 1 ryu m - Exhibit A2 NN Q RSF-4 0 105 210 420 630 84Feet W '�/ E January 23, 2006 3 Washington County, AR I certify this instrument was filed on 02/15/2008 11 :43:04 AM and recorded in Real Estate File Number 2008-0000841 Bette Stamps - Circuit ler by L140 4/ 4/ 8'i , IeZN os- 163 City of Fayetteville 0y, Staff Review Form City Council Agenda Items or Contracts 12/06//2005 City Council Meeting Date Leif Olson Planning Operations Submitted By Division Department Action Required: ADM 05- 1657: Administrative Item (Mt. Sequoyah South Rezoning): Approval of an ordinance to rezone the properly as shown on Exhibit A from RMF-24 to RSF-8, as petitioned by the property owners shown on Exhibit A. The applicant requests to rezone the property from RMF-24, Residential Multi Family 24 units per acre, to RSP-8, Residential Single Family 8 units per acre. $0.00 n/a n/a Cost of this request Category/Project Budget Program Category / Project Name n/a n/a n/a Account Number Funds Used to Date Program / Project CategoryName n/a n/a n/a $ Project Number Remaining Balance Fund Name Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached Previous Ordinance or Resolution # n/a Department ()irector Date Original Contract Date: n/a Original Contract Number: n/a 11- � Svr City Att y Received in City Clerk's Offices Fi an and Internal Service Director Date Received in Mayors Office t Mayor Date Comments: _ Y" � QII ri7.Q �CCOI7 LZ' I'�QC�/N�' ✓ OS �// CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor and City Council Thru : Gary Dumas, Director of Operations Tim Conklin, Planning and Development Management Director From : Leif Olson, Associate Planner Date: November 15, 2005 Subject: Approval of an ordinance to rezone the property shown as Exhibit A on the attached map from RMF-24, Residential Multi-Family 24 units per acre, to RSF-8, Residential Single Family 8 units per acre. RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends approval of an ordinance rezoning the property shown as Exhibit A on the attached map from RMF-24, Residential Multi-Family 24 units per acre, to RSF-8, Residential Single Family 8 units per acre. BACKGROUND In April of 2005, Planning Staff met with the applicant to discuss the existing land use zoning of a neighborhood located on the south side of Mt Seqouyah. This area is roughly bounded by Huntsville Rd. to the south, Willow St. to the west, Rock St. to the north, and Lyton Ave. on the east. This neighborhood is comprised of primarily single family homes located on small lots platted prior to current zoning ordinances, many of which contain slopes greater than 15%. In 1970, this area of Fayetteville was zoned R-2, also known as RMF-24, multi-family residential. The applicant was concerned with the possibility of high density residential being developed in the existing neighborhood. Planning Staff recommended that a new zoning designation be developed in order to reflect the existing conditions such as lot bulk and area, building height, and building setbacks. The RSF-8 zoning district was designed for the purpose of rezoning this neighborhood and bringing these lots into conformity. The applicant, working with City Planning Staff, developed a map and petition for property owners interested in rezoning their property to RSF-8. The applicant spent a considerable amount of time canvassing the neighborhood and collecting signatures for the rezoning petition. The Planning Commission approved both the RSF-8 zoning ordinance amendment and the Mt. Seqouyah South rezoning on July 25, 2005 and forwarded these items to the City Council . The Ordinance Review Committee reviewed the RSF-8 zoning district on September 15, 2005 and voted unanimously to forward it to the City Council with an amendment to the maximum buildable area of the lot. City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4783 on October 18, 2005 amending the Unified Development Code to create the RSF-8 zoning district. DISCUSSION The Planning Commission considered this rezoning petition request on July 25, 2005, on which they voted 9-0-0 in favor of the recommended rezoning. Planning Staff has waited the required 30 days for the RSF-8 zoning district to become law before bringing this rezoning item forward for City Council consideration. BUDGET IMPACT None. IFAYE77IEVE LLIE THE CITY OF FAVETTEVIILE, ARKANSAS Krr WILLIAMS, CITY ATTORNEY DAVID WIRTAKER, ASST. CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO: Dan Coody, Mayor City Council CC : Lief Olson, Planning Department ^ FROM: Kit Williams, City Attorney DATE: November 18, 2005 I RE: ADM05-1657, Consent Withdrawn The Planning Department and Planning Commission were informed that numerous property owners had revoked their initial consent to being down-zoned when a new zoning district, RSF-8 was created that was incompatible with existing large acreage lots. Specifically, all owners of land north of the unbuilt Lucien Street object to such rezoning. These would include all addresses on Rock Street. The City Council can rezone property without the consent of the owners if it has legitimate reasons for such rezoning. However, the City Council should know that these property owners have withdrawn their approval and object to this rezoning. I believe all these property owners would consent to an even lesser density rezoning to RSF-4. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZOING PETITION RZN 05- 1657 AND SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A", GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HUNTSVILLE RD., EAST OF WILLOW AVE., SOUTH OF ROCK ST., AND WEST OF LYTON AVE., FROM RMF-24 RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY 24 UNITS PER ACRE TO RSF-8 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 8 UNITS PER ACRE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From RMF-24, Residential Multi Family, 24 units per acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 units per acre, as shown on Exhibit "A" Attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2 : That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above. PASSED and APPROVED this day of 12005. APPROVED: By: DAN COODY, Mayor ATTEST: By: SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk tp • rc ' �a `'. .r y� fk a � - . a ��' r '" y 4 ai+a�. �G~t zinl 14 +..;rtes<"'y � • •iii. M1 -�'+F�f�. ' } F�L��� � . � .p'x�% $ ^� ,F t j •� • t �+y l r ., f l t y s' ' too, ,I �(n� • 'u rl d51i f ''k { l 'i '�"4 F Y .!„ S ��F y �. �S✓�f ���i S �� 2 � y; YI h �ILL • o. it I F a ORDINANCE NO. 4783 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XV: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, OF THE CODE OF FAYETTEVILLE, TO PROVIDE A NEW RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. WHEREAS, many of the historical residential neighborhoods in Fayetteville were platted prior to current zoning ordinances; and, WHEREAS, these residential neighborhoods are therefore considered non-conforming in regards to bulk, area, and setback requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville desires to preserve these neighborhoods in their present residential conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville recognizes that future residential developments are likely to be built in a historical or New Urbanist pattern, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That Chapter 161: Zoning Regulations, Unified Development Ordinance, Code of Fayetteville is hereby amended by inserting Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. PASSED and APPROVED this 18th day of October, 2005. • aYJTRE9 Y SG 'o APPROV F•. P�� .U • ; FAYETTEVILLE : By. :> ' IIAN COODY, Ma o 9s'9:�'KANSP�J?' y ATTEST: G rrrr4111101TON By: SO DRA SMITH, City Clerk Exhibit "A" 161.26 District RSF-8, Residential Single -Family - 8 units/acre (A)Purpose. The RSF-8 Residential District is designed to bring historic platted development into conformity and to allow for the development of new single family residential areas with similar lot size, density, and land use as the historical neighborhoods in the downtown area. (B) Uses. (1) Permitted uses. Unit I City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities (C) Densihj. By Conditional Right Use Single-family dwelling units per 8 or less -- acre Two-family -- dwelling units per 8 acre (D)Bulk and area regulations. (1) Lot width minimum. Single-family 50 ft. Two-family 50 ft. Townhouse, no more than two attached 25 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. Single-family 5,000 sq. ft. Two-family 5,000 sq. ft. Townhouse, no more than two attached 2,500 sq. ft. (3) Land area per dwelling unit. Single-family 5,000 sq. ft. Two-family 5,000 sq. ft. Townhouse, no more than two attached 2,500 sq. ft. (E) Setback requirements. Front Side Rear 15 ft. 5ft. 5ft. (F) Height regulations. Building height 45 ft. maximum (G) Building area. The area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 50% of the total lot area, except when a detached garage exists or is proposed; then the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total lot area. TayeV KANSAS THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain Si. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 575-8267 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Leif Olson, Long Range Planner THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning Tim Conklin, Planning and Development Management Director DATE: Aug 1, 2005 PC Meeting of August 8, 2005 RZN 05-1576: (MT. SEQUOYAH SOUTH, 524): Submitted by FRAN FREE for property owners in the designated area for various properties located BETWEEN HUNTSVILLE RD, E TO LYTTON AVE., N TO ROCK ST AND W TO WILLOW ST. The property is zoned RMF- 24, MULTI FAMILY - 24 UNITS/ACRE. The request is to rezone the property to RSFH-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY HISTORIC -8 UNITS / ACRE. Submitted on behalf of: FRAN FREE Planner: LEIF OLSON RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning based on the findings included as part of this report. PLaANNINC:COMMISSION ACTION:;' Required b;`YES .; 0 Approved O Denied Date: "August 8,2005 CITY COUNCILcACTION `;-• Required ' YES ,-.ni v at _. , i� a... ✓ w .'. = . 0 Approved,. O Denied Date: September 6, •2005 Comments: BACKGROUND: Property description: The subject properties are located north of Huntsville Road, south of Rock St. and east of Willow Ave. This neighborhood was platted prior to the adoption of zoning codes for the City of Fayetteville. Typically, the lots are small, approximately 50' x 110', and arc K:\Reports\2005\PC Reports\08-08-05\RZN 05 - 1576 Mt. Seqouyah South.doc developed with single family homes. This area of Mt. Seqouyah is very steep with slopes ranging from 10 to 25 percent. Additionally, the undeveloped and under -developed parcels are primarily covered in tree canopy. The applicant coordinated efforts to contact all property owners north of Huntsville Rd., south of Rock St., and east of Willow Ave. A large number of property owners agreed to the rezoning and signed the petition, however, some property owners objected or were unable to be contacted, so the proposed parcels to be rezoned are not all contiguous. Staff has not recommended rezoning any of the parcels that objected to this request. Proposal: The neighborhood proposes this rezoning in order to support the existing single family homes in the area, and to ensure that any future development will occur in a similar pattern and land use. The applicants request a rezoning of the subject property from RMF-24, Residential Multi Family Residential 24 Units / Acre, to RSFH-8, Residential Single -Family Historic — 8 units per acre. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request based on findings stated herein. Any potential future development of these properties will be compatible with the residential developments surrounding the property. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING Direction Land Use Zoning North Open Space / Cemetery / Single R -A, Residential Agricultural Family Residential South Commercial uses along Huntsville C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial Rd. East Open Space / Single Family R -A, Residential Agricultural Residential RSF-4, Res. Single-family, 4 units/ acre West Single Family Residential RMF-24, Res. Multi -family, 24 units/acre INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: Currently the properties are accessed by a number of City Streets including; Huntsville Rd., Lyton Ave., Blair Ave., Mashburn Ave., Barton Ave., Walker Rd., Willow Ave., and Rock St.. No street improvements are required for this rezoning request. Water: Public water is available to the properties located in this rezoning application. Sewer: Sanitary sewer is available to these properties. Any future development would require that sewer infrastructure be installed to service such development. Fire: These properties lie in both Fire Station I and 3 first due area. The response time for this area is 2 minutes with a distance from the nearest fire station at one mile. Due to the unknown number of acres we are unable to calculate the projected fire and ems calls/year for this rezoning. K:\Reports\2005\PC Reports\08-08-05\RZN 05 - 1576 Mt. Seqouyah South.doc Police: It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this rezoning will not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on police services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion in the area. LAND USE PLAN: The Future Land Use Plan designates this area residential. Rezoning this property to RSFH-8 is consistent with the land use plan such that it will allow residential uses compatible with the surrounding properties. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF I. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: The proposed rezoning is consistent with land use planning objectives and policies and is compatible with zoning and use of adjacent properties. Surrounding properties are residential in nature. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The proposed zoning is justified in order to promote orderly and consistent development patterns making use of existing infrastructure. It will provide the potential for the development of comparable uses in close proximity to the existing single family residences. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: Access to these properties is provided by numerous City streets and any future development will not appreciably increase the traffic danger and congestion on these streets. Police — It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police department that an appreciable increase and traffic danger and congestion will not be created by this rezoning request. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: The proposed zoning would decrease the potential for significant population density increases allowed in the RMF-24 zoning district. K:\Reports\2005\PC Reports\08-08-05\RZN 05 - 1576 Mt. Seqouyah South.doc If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (I) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A K:\Reports\2005\PC Reports\08-08-05\RZN 05 - 1576 Mt. Seqouyah South.doc TITLE XV UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 11 Manufactured home park Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 25 Professional offices Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities (C) Density. Ii Units per acre I 4 to 18 (O) Bulk and area regulations. (1) Lot width minimum. Manufactured home park 100 ft. Lot within a manufactured home park 50 ft. Single-family 60 ft. Two-family 60 ft. Three and more 90 ft. Professional offices 100 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. Manufactured home park 3 acres Lot within a manufactured home park 4,200 sq. ft. Townhouse: •Development •Individual lot 10,000 sq. 2 500 sq. ft. ft. Single-family 6,000 sq. ft. Two-family 7,000 sq. ft. Three or more 9,000 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 2 acres Professional offices 1 acre (3) Land area per dwelling unit. Manufactured Home 3,000 sq. ft. Apartments: No bedrooms One bedroom Two or more bedrooms 1,700 sq. 1,700 sq. 2,000 sq. ft. ft. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 1,000 sq. ft. per resident (E) Setback requirements. Front Side Rear 25 ft. aft. 25 ft. Cross reference(s)—Variances, Ch. 156. (F) Height regulations. Any building which exceeds the height of 20 feet shall be set back from any side boundary line an additional distance of one foot for each foot of height in excess of 20 feet. (G) Building area. None. (Ord. No. 4325, 7-3-01) 161.13 District Rmf-24, Residential Multi - Family — Twenty -Four Units Per Acre (A) Purpose. The RMF-24 Multi -family Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the developing of a variety of dwelling types in suitable environments in a variety of densities. (B) Uses. (1) Permitted uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 10 Three-family dwellings Unit 26 Multi -family dwellings (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 11 Manufactured home park Unit 25 Professional offices Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities (C) Density. Units peracre I 4 to 24 (D) Bulk and area regulations. (1) Lot width minimum. Manufactured home park 100 ft. Lot within a Manufactured home ark 50 ft. Single-family 60 ft. Two-family 60 ft. Three or more 90 ft. Professional offices 100 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. Manufactured home park 3 acres Lot within a mobile home park 4,200 sq. ft. Townhouses: •Development •Individual lot 10,000 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. Single-family 6,000 sq. ft. Two-family 7,000 sq. ft. Three or more 9,000 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 2 acres Professional offices 1 acres CD161:9 (3) Land area per dwelling unit. Manufactured home 3,000 sq. ft. Apartments: 'No bedroom 1,700 sq. ft. •One bedroom 1,700 sq. ft. 'Two bedroom 2,000 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 1,000 sq. ft. per resident (E) Setback requirements . Front Side Rear 25 ft. aft. 25 ft. Cross reference(s)--Variance, Ch. 156. (F) Height regulations. Any building which exceeds the height of 20 feet shall be set back from any side boundary line an additional distance of one foot for each foot of height in excess of 20 feet. (G) Building area. None. (Code 1965, App. A., Art. 5(111); Ord. No. 2320, 4-6-77; Ord. No. 2700, 2-2-81; Code 1991, §160.033; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99) 161.14 District Rmf-40, Residential Multi - Family — Forty Units Per Acre (A) Purpose. The RMF-40 Multi -family Residential District is designated to protect existing high density multi -family development and to encourage additional development of this type where it is desirable. (B) Uses. (1) Permitted uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 10 Three-family dwellings Unit 26 Multi -family dwellings (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 11 Manufactured home park Unit 24 Home occupation Unit 25 Professional offices Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities (C) Density. Units per acre I 16 to 40 (D) Bulk and area regulations. (1) Lot width minimum. Manufactured home park 100 ft. Lot within a manufactured home park 50 ft. Single-family 60 ft. Two-family 60 ft. Three or more 90 ft. Professional offices 100 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. Manufactured home park 3 acres Lot within a manufactured home park 4,200 sq. ft. Townhouses: Development Individual lot 10,000 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. Single-family 6,000 sq. ft. Two-family 6,500 sq. ft. Three or more 8,000 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority I acre (3) Land area per dwelling unit. Manufactured home 3,000 sq. ft. Townhouses & apartments No bedroom 1,000 sq. ft One bedroom 1,000 sq. ft. Two or more bedrooms 1,200 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 500 sq. ft. per resident (E) Setback requirements. Front Side Rear 25 ft. aft. 20 ft. Cross reference(s)--Variance, Ch. 156. (F) Height regulations. Any building which exceeds the height of 20 feet shall be set back from any side boundary line an additional distance of one foot for each foot of height in excess of 20 feet. (G) Building area. None. (Code 1965, App. A., Art. 5(IV); Ord. No. 2320, 4-5-77; Ord. No. 2700, 2-2-81; Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Code 1991, §160.034; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99) 161.15 District R -O, Residential Office (A) Purpose. The Residential -Office District is designed primarily to provide area for offices without limitation to the nature or size of the office, together with community facilities, restaurants and compatible residential uses. (B) Uses. CD161:10 (B) Uses. (1) Residential density. Residential densities shall be determined on the basis of the following considerations: (a) The densities of surrounding development; (b) the densities allowed under the current zoning; (c) the urban development goals and other policies of the city's General Plan; (d) the topography and character of the natural environment; and (e) the impact of a given density on the specific site and adjacent properties. (2) Lot area and yard requirements. Taking into consideration the unique aspects of each project, preliminary development plans for Planned Zoning Districts shall conform as closely as possible to the existing standards for lot area minimums and setback requirements under this chapter. (3) Building height. There shall be no maximum building height except as may be determined by the Planning Commission during the review of the preliminary development plan based on the uses within the development and the proximity of the development to existing or prospective development on adjacent properties. A lesser height may be established by the Planning Commission when it is deemed necessary to provide adequate light and air to adjacent property and to protect the visual quality of the community. (4) Building area. The Planning Commission shall review specific proposed lot coverages which generally correspond to the guidelines for lot coverage in the respective residential, office, commercial or industrial district which most depicts said development scheme. (Ord. No. 4434, §1 (Ex. A), 11-19-02; Ord. 4717, 7-5-05; Ord. 4764, 09-20-05) 161.26 District RSF-8, Residential Single - Family —8 Units Per Acre (A) Purpose. The RSF-8 Residential District is designed to bring historic platted development into conformity and to allow for the development of new single family residential areas with similar lot size, density, and land use as the historical neighborhoods in the downtown area. (1) Permitted uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities (C) Density. By Right Conditional Use Single-family dwelling units per acre 8 or less - Two-family dwelling -- units per acre 8 (D) Bulk and area regulations. (1) Lot width minimum. Single-family 50 ft. Two-family 50 ft. Townhouse, no more than two attached 25 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. Single-family 5,000 sq. ft. Two-family 5,000 sq. It. Townhouse, no more than two attached 2,500 sq. ft. (3) Land area per dwelling unit. Single-family 5,000 sq. ft. Two-family 5,000 sq. ft. Townhouse, no more than two attached 2,500 sq. ft. (E) Setback requirements. Front Side Rear 15 ft. 5ft. 5ft. (F) Height regulations. CD161:20 TITLE XV UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE II Building height maximum I 45 ft. II (G) Building area. The area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 50% of the total lot area, except when a detached garage exists or is proposed; then the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total lot area. (Ord. 4783, 10-18-05) 161.27-161.99 Reserved CD161:21 City of Fayetteville, June 2, 2005 Planning Department Attention: Leif elson West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 Subject: Rezoning Dear Leif, I want to thank you again for facilitating this rezoning process. You've been at the helm to answer any questions and make it smooth sailing up to this point. Enclosed, you'll find the petition signed by property owners within the rezoning area. The highlighted signatures indicate the originals; blank copies had to be mailed to those property owners residing out of town or state. The petition was based on information from Washington County property records as of March, 2005. I've included copies of those records, organized in the order of the petition and a City plat map with shaded parcels of those that have been signed. There were three of us that collected these signatures: Andy Lewis, Jonna Hussey, and myself. We divided the rezoning area into three groups (A, B, and C) according to parcel number and recurring owners, followed by our own familiarity of each property owner. I am the main contact, but please feel free to call any of us with specific questions. I must say that we have thoroughly enjoyed meeting our neighbors through this process. My visits were anywhere from 30 minutes to 2% hours per neighbor! This hillside has plenty of history and sizable tales. We feel rezoning will help ensure the sustainability of our current neighborhood and the perpetuity of local natural resources. Please keep me informed of each step of the process and let me know when our rezoning request will be up for public comment. Several neighbors expressed interest in attending. 484 S. Mashburn Ave. Fayetteville, AR 72701 479/443-6732 home 870/818-1987 cell franbfreeAusa.net r r e ^ E b. muemEarcnQQrroo o d m SN H x m Z Z m u a $ m m E m m o Q O q m mo_a�a E c°zz0000 r m au,�m�m n a m C C o m E 5 m 4 m z O m arr00 W m z 3 ym C 0 N m N N m m w C c m m m m m 0)o a E w= l Y J J Y J Y J J m m a CE EEEE'E2 E C Q m d C E N N N N N C a x r of co c6 cd Q of C ((o N O m m` C N N m N N W N J q m 000 0)0)0)0) m m d E F J d J J J J J J t oa EEEEEO MM m > nQ n mCD at tONN a —yC y N N C, V W m N m V1 m N m N m N m in m m �_ C it O E•E E E E EE 0 N NEy my vcoMMc000 v (V vai'i6 C C m C c m uu9V tflr lft rfl C U U' O W o N N N N C CC E _ 50 • m -� O 0- @) x m (OO) 9 w x w w m } } N A m 0 C « W # a m m U' L L C W o m m m m m m >mQQQQ>> mm (J Lo Ln tn In v v u a c c m m m m m c m N J J J J t w o m O m 0 0000000 a m . o O O 0 a O O 4' a- O K x: 2 2 2 2 L L L FAYE'i4TEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS July 18,2005 Jeremy Pate Director of Current Planning City of Fayetteville 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72702 Dear Mr Pate: POLICE DEPARTMENT This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the proposed RZN 05-1576 (Mt. Sequoyah South, 524) submitted by Fran Free for property owners in the designated area for various properties located between Huntsville Road, east to Lytton Avenue, north to Rock Street and west to Willow Street would substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on police services or create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and traffic congestion. It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department the proposed rezoning will not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on police services or create an appreciable increase in traffic danger in the area. Sincerel fr,Q, Lieutenant Rob Turberville Fayetteville Police Department FAYETTEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 1988 FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72702-1988 (DELIVERIES) POLICE: 100-A WEST ROCK STREET 72701 JAIL: 140-A WEST ROCK STREET 72701 PHONE: 479-587-3555 FAX: 479-587-3522 RZN05-1576 Close Up View MT. SEQUOYAH SOUTH t 1L!v o ® ,7 I SUBJECT PROPERTY 7/ S ams Eil Z ❑ d o�O • 1SSSA 0 ,.,I /p o� © HUN 0li — _ .Fq Legend �0000, Oay� o-oo:a Principal Artuul fi00DWAV—SODVEAR MmwseeetPlan MnorMe'ial ,OOYEAR --- UMT OF STUDY Mmw Seat Plan — — CWarAar — — - BaseLMa PmfJa 'FraewyEatswy.e..Fttcoccooectot O Fayetteville O .decay . .�. � RaJnssre .x' 0 75 ,so 300 450 600 < r •.. Feet RZN051576 MT. SEQUOYAH SOUTH • JJiWIANS!AI t1 rur-i RSFd iJ • fr..... d RSfd RSFd 0.5E-4 RSFd R G2 RSFd RSFd M1SP• RSF4 RSF-4 RSFd • RAFd s2 a-0 • d c2 RSFd I f •• ...•.$9P31Y49P.T$L. R -0 s . ECG bT S F� d RSF-4 RS4 • RSF-4 o _ R`�d RSFd L-2 • • RAF dp __ RSF4 RSFd RSF4 !•M RIFdc RSF Ii "- I RSRd I �tSFd L6ISFd RSFd I ST yy•AAFF •'•••. .•.. M•NN•tAN 11 NSFd RSF-• RSFd �RAFd 1 yid RSFJ I NR MNI•N»N...N•i 1 P•1 G2 G2 1 d1 RSFd I RSF4 I RSFd i 41 W4% NVAT P-1 $DO** N. •..Qa•IF�•.iN NN...•NN. •H • RAF -24 24 •.. i �RAPdO C R-0 ft1-___j R -0—•R-0 RSF- RPZD d :R.4I RSF4 RSF.4 1 DJ CJ (nj W R-0 G2 C-2 RSFd''�RF�x e-q{I •. •+ H RSFd RSFd I RSF-4 _� J RAFJO W AI ; LItCT... ...,.Ro .NN•. •.iI1 •00d J0� .R.�d 4 W W• W Ga W . 2R-OI G2 I`MF2a RW. RSF • ~ YLLNED� • RAFde/ 1t W �R-0 W —= RMF-2 R •N SFI • P-1 P.1 • W DJI W I. fUF S ••• _ s� 0 • ` I 41 R-0! R-0: R-0 o G W e.� ..IR —In.� n. 'bl 1 . 4I w•tR�Zjj • P-10 R2R-0 U2 RAF- �' j 1 ' RAF -Z4 RLF-24 -246 RAF -24 F24 MP -21 s2 P 1 µ-24 wt 0.1 RAF -24 G2 W RAF -24 RSF- SUBJECT PROPERTY RSF- ••` <� RURr5ViLLE RD RAF -24 RSFd j RAF -24 ' 0.5Fd RSF-4 RSFd SF -4 RSR R RA -l2 R d RAR24 I Gl Gl F-24 ;.24J IRRF-24\ RAF -24 R-0 RSF! w -q UI R-0 ' 41 ice® 0.-A �41 41 RSF'41St 41 42 .2J' u GI + - '70 RAP -24 r RT-12 fF N a 411W Overview Legend Boundary Master Street Plan ------ - Subject Property i1 Master Street Plan Planning Area ® (Ex resswa •Freewa RZN05-1576 p000% Y P Y '00000$ Overlay District 0 Principal Arterial ❑ Outside City r_ MnorARerial Collector •••• Historic Collector 00.125.25 0.5 0.75 1 iles RSFd U2 RSFd 42 R#I Why Downzone This Neighborhood? 1. We are currently zoned 24 Multi -Family Units per acre. That means that apartment complexes or high -density developments could be built here among our Single Family Units. We do not believe this is feasible because of the steep hillside. a. We all see how the trees and utility poles lean downhill b. We all have or know neighbors with sliding foundation problems Imagine trying to build a large-scale development on this hillside. Although we are not proponents of urban sprawl, there are certain areas that should not be developed to this magnitude. This is one of those areas. 2. The city is currently working on a Hillside Development Ordinance to restrict building on steep hillsides, such as ours. If this ordinance passed, our hillside would be included in this. This ordinance has been in the works for over 3 years and this latest attempt to pass it through the City Council is the 3id try! We hope that it does pass, but feel we cannot take the chance to wait and see. a. The reason it has not passed yet is because there is too much opposition from developers who want to build large-scale Multi -Family Units on marginal lands, such as steep hillsides b. The ordinance would restrict these developments on slopes steeper than 15%. Our hillside has been found to contain slopes of steeper than 25%. c. This ordinance would be mandatory. Although we have gotten assistance from City Planning staff, our petition is voluntary and is an effort of only our neighbors. The City Planning staff is dutifully working with us. They have looked at our lot sizes and established a new zoning district that specifically conforms to our existing lots and structures in this neighborhood. This is not a common service that the City provides. Besides this, they are not charging us anything to go through the rezoning process. This normally costs $1500.00 per lot What is the Process? Once these signatures are collected, they will be turned in to the City Planning staff. They will then present our proposal to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will then vote on it and pass it to the City Council. The City Council approves it. And we celebrate. We may need to attend a Planning Commission and City Council to present our side. Please provide your phone number if you wish to be contacted. •G m m O �' m: y `O • Vl 0 0 �_ O O vy O "' a m Z$OOCO blil D_ �ms CGG.is & m T� u m m T3j o E C O C 0 V o SoO �i • jj 0 ' TJ � 69 •m � O r � E C jt. . WYy.,..� 4 Ob _ V 14:1' �5p o Ayo0 0�oia_y N r0 O'� � '� E � r'O 40 � KG,,OCC O _ .� LLm t � � m iym'' � � — (V C8:-Ehz m3' hii:flihhi: m : p; m th 7y P' C O C 73m�� �093 N � � O m � � T tm . � O Y � ttl mu55o�Qem45yu �a5Eyz..�im5f 0• J. � Q. �s gmg°ooh w5'`om� a�ge u acs 0 y$ �. E O m m m 4 O m 7 7.� 5 0 a.' . OGf O r: Ofl f t • Iv zmmEs:_8Qs IDsm,5{l9y Vim. 41. ��"�35pc��pp°��3mEa i� °'N�iem9-Fr-Icmao� _ fQ' `arms;; a4mm`a LL. m Wo y1y v�m o°q e. ... - .. M N o jM `` ,m ai W . -. ats!EEE mm to � Q'tl boa $ ro d • . . 0. 4 V P O IA 0 E C • O CO m E m e 41 I - J m r .p0 L O -s gym? m y R O O C m$ 0 9 o a 5 9 CU m w O J C '1� i'I � i , ' 1 .• Continued from Al said Free, noting that the second hillside preservation task force is in its second year. "We want to go ahead and protect this area for single-family homes "One difference between this and the Hillside ordi- nance is this is voluntary. Anybody that does not want to sign onto this doesn't have to. We're hoping it's not going to be a checker- board. So far it's looking. good." Homes in the area already have drainage prob- lems, Free explained, and any more impervious sur- faces would only add to the existing problems. The current zoning, which allows for apartment complexes or high density development, was approved in the 1970s, . apparently without a topological. map, Free said. . The petition drive has been under way about three weeks for the approximately 100 parcels of land in the designatedarea. Many of the landowners being approached to sign did not realize the area was zoned for multi -family building, Free said: About 75 percent of the landowners have signed and , none of those approached so far has opposed the idea, according to Free. "When I've been talking ' . BROOKE MdEEIY Northwest Arkansas Times Local resident Fran Free points Thursday to an area on a steep hill on Blair Road that Is zoned to hold a large apartment complex Free Is working with her neighbors in the Norwood and Fairland additions to rezone or 'downzone" their neighborhood from multi -family zoning to single-family zoning because they don't believe their hillsides can handle 24 units an acre. to them about. the possibili- ty. of apartments going in sometime in the future, their first concerns are traf- fic`.; and parking,. water Issues, drainage issues, which is , understandable. These are narrow . streets, dead-end streets;" Free said. • Streets In .. the area include Mashburn Avenue, Blair Avenue, Litton Avenue, Walker Road and Knerr Drive. ... - Once petitions are com- plete, they will be presented to city planners, who will use them as part of a staff report to the Fayetteville Planning Commission. From there the Issue goes to the City Council. .1The city has RSF-1 and RSF-4 classifications now, which are residential single family, one and four units per acre respectively. For this project, a new classification would have to be created. d - "Our lots would not con- form to that (RSF-1 and RSF-4) for certain setbacks, so the city Is making a whole new zoning district for us," Free said. "It's going to be somewhere around RSF-6." The lot size of about 50 feet wide or 5,000 square feet conforms to the homes and lot sizes already in the neighborhood. . . Free concluded, "I'm not a proponent of urban sprawl, for sure; there are just some areas that should not have high density devel- opment. This is one of them" wesr ARKANsAs TIES Opinion Adm bm®Ipw,rbtdb MHOSWrelB,hpnalW A,rtMM•bbwbr a � �.' e"endbow tbdt IMA fSIMwdf3 P ..: , V. �z wA » , , :; 2, And that's what were seeing take shape in n wood and Fairland additions. Residents tit !Tiro@S ipush. Petition a Vs •t�bo1 a,. Tai.. ..-M { ... I. .. _ of democracy in action s we -speak, the. Fayetteville community is receiving a fittirh lesson regarding democia cy-in:haction ,Just'consider, for instance a recent "statement put forth by Fayetteville resident Fran Free x•::_ "I'm nor a proponent of urban sprawl, for sure; there are just some,areas that should not have high density development This is one of them." Of course, we might amend that statement a bit. enough anyway to•point out that.we don't have a problem with the idea of development In fact, we're. patriotic to the extentthatwe're extremelyproud ofa local economy that makes the nation's capitalist. structure proud on a daily basis. Growth is.great, after ally:..: Only sometimes it isn't. Free, and other residents of Fayettevi le's Norwood and Fairland additions, aren't thrilled with a type of expansion they feel is endangering the dignity, even the safety, of their neighborhood. In essence, residents are worried the wrong type of structures on the hillsides dose to their homes will create a drainage problem through- out the area that might make life there unnecessari lydifficult :w ;_ The idea of hillside preservation isn't new There's been talk over the years of creating an official hillside ordinance to direct constmction on simtlar sites to limit drainage complications, among other things In fact, one Fayetteville task force hopes to have an ordi- nance regarding hillside preservation/construction ready for consideratiopeby the town's planning com- mission and City Cotmcil sometime this summer. This popular movement even received a shout - out of support last Thursday from Robert Redford during a speaking engagement at the University of Arkansas. Although his remarks were relatively brief: one important point the famous actor and noted conservationist wished to express to the Fayetteville community is the ongoing importance of communi- ty activism, of the power of neighbors to join togeth- er in the hopes of affecting real change to an ongoing problem thr en worried on behalf of their community— but, ins, of talking about it, or waiting for the city to act, a. actively discussing "downzoning' the neighborhood. In this case, it means changing the immediate area from multi -family zoning (24 units per acre) to sin- gle-family zoning (six units per acre). current This action against expansive growth goes beyond the simple hope that one day things change. In this case, a petition drive circi ating for much of the past month appears to be building steam. Regarding the roughly 100 parcels of land the peti- tion seeks to protect, Free recently told the limes that 75 percent of neighbors have already signed it an impressive representation of the support for "downzoning." A petition that receives such strong support is an important victory in any democracy — and one hopefully the rest of the community will remember whenever important issues arise regarding their own lives and neighborhoods. After all, if opinion remains dose to unanimous, it will be difficult to believe the City Council could credibly ignore the area's will for too long. As Redford reminded the crowd last week, popular supporthas a funny way of snowballing into policy in a representative democracy. At the same time, it's important to understand the balance that must be met anytime a restriction on. construction is being discussed. For instance, most people are fans of the environment, and no one is a fan of urban sprawl, but few of us wish to put the breaks on a local economy that's evolved into one the most promising anywhere in the United States. And, despite all the talk that Northwest Arkansas is disappearing, drive 10 minutes off the beatenpathin any direction, and guess what? You're right back in the middle of wilderness. This conversation is taking us in the direction of moderation. Let's not mislead ourselves into believ- ing the construction rate in NorthwestArkansas is on the verge of destroying the scenic life we all enjoy L.. because it isn't But let's also hope Fayetteville gov-: emment is responsive to the wishes of any local neighborhood when an overwhelming majority of - residents so clearly prefer to restrict growth or boost it — especially if the conversation involves the environment and their own homes. Either way, balance is key. . The editorial board determines the viewpoints expressed in our editorials. Its members are Publisher Jeff Jeffus, Executive . Editor Greg Harton, Managing Editor Christie Swanson and Editorial Page Editor ScottShackelford. % t f z. o FNVATE 51> � u L�.J�oc ROCK ST JL± ar�v rLfs. \ C. O 6TH ST il I. Up I I L. a '^ /t, S�q(�FR 1. y 1. N RSF-4 f� 0 105 210 420 630 840 O RSF-8 �--1 Feet W E R o M ocf S7 January 17, 2006 S 11ayevI1e""'r r ARKANSAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor and City Council Thru: Tim Conklin, Planning and Development Management Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning From: Leif Olson, Associate Long Range Planner Date: January 10, 2006 Subject: Rezoning for the Mt. Sequoyah South (RZN 05-1576) PROPERTY OWNER CONTACTS Planning staff has had contact with residents who have signed the pettition for rezoning. Primarily, property owners had questions regarding the building setbacks, height, and lot area requirements. Andrew Feinstein — Orginally signed the pettition to rezone to RSF-8 but is now requesting an RSF-4 zoning designation. 2. Marcia Donley — Called staff requesting clarification of the RSF-8 zoning district adopted by the City Council. Ms. Donley had questions regarding the buiding setbacks, height, and lot area requirements. 3. Jeremy Tenhaken — Has requested the RSF-4 zoning designation. 4. Jim Jemigen — Called staff with questions regarding the building setback requirement. Mr. Jernigen is requesting the RSF-8 zoning designation. 5. Kit Williams — Mr. Williams is requesting that his properties are rezoned RSF-4. 6. Linda Doede — Ms. Doede contacted staff with questions regarding the RSF-8 zoning designation's lot area requirements. Ms. Doede also has concerns with the property owners not requesting a Residential Single Family designation and the potential for multi -family development uphill from her property. 7. Nancy Varvil — Ms. Varvil is requesting that her property is rezoned RSF-4. NEW "EXHIBIT A" —JANUARY 10, 2006 Please find attached the new "Exhibit A" dated January 10, 2006. This exhibit replaces the existing "Exhibit A" in the ordinance. T 1 •1 •. ♦ T 1 4 RSF-4 0 105 210 420 830 840 RSF 8 Feet January 8, 20?P MansfieldHouse, LLC 217 N. East Ave. Fayetteville, AR 72701 December 30, 2005 City of Fayetteville Alderman 113 W. Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 re: Wedington Circle Dear Fayetteville Alderman, j3,1/, 1'J-ci t K tl4ow R- MansfieldHouse, LLC is proposing a large mixed use project just west of Harp's grocery on Garland. This project is the result of years of discussion with Tim Conklin, Jeremy Pate and Dawn Warwick regarding our shared vision to bring great projects to the City of Fayetteville. Our project has been fashioned to achieve the following goals: 1. create a workable, livable, walkable urban environment 2. connectivity to commercial, retail and transportation nodes 3. reduce urban sprawl 4. use high quality building products and finishes a. no T1-11 b. no vinyl siding 5. eliminate major obstacles to quality design such as a. large surface parking area b. exterior corridors c. architectural mediocrity. We designed a much denser project for the following reasons: 1. the need for critical mass of population to make economic sense for the commercial and retail components to work 2. to trade surface parking for structured parking under buildings 3. the walkable distance to the University grocery store, restaurants, etc. which will reduce the typical number of automotive trips per resident 4. the adequate street capacity —bordered by major streets on both sides, four lane Wedington and soon to be four lane Garland. In order to facilitate the process, we have had: 1. early planning meetings with the members of the two adjoining neighborhood associations 479.521.9155 479.587.7000 2. three separate ward meetings 3. numerous meetings with many different city planners, engineers and three separate city arborists 4. consultations with the State Department of Transportation. As a result, we have made significant changes from the original design and scope based on the input and feedback of each of the above groups. We retained Hall Planning and Engineering (the same team the City used in conjunction with its Downtown Master Plan Study) to perform a traffic study for this project and their results determined that due to the nature of the current infrastructure, no significant impact to current conditions will be created by this project. We believe that the market is now demanding a higher quality environment than the usual multifamily projects that are all over town. Current RMF24 zoning forces the development of more bedrooms for an economically viable project. This PZD permits smaller units with a higher quality design. Our conceptual design includes the following: 1. 296 living units with less bedrooms than are allowed under the current RMF24 zoning (our 428 bedrooms vs. up to 532 bedrooms if each unit were 4 bedrooms) 2. little surface parking yet more parking spaces than required by current code (ours 392 vs. 353 required) 3. attractive architectural design and urban feel 4. use of high quality building materials 5. on -site office and retail components 6. adjacent to two separate University transit stops 7. climate controlled corridors 8. on -site fitness center 9. retention of significant urban forest within tree canopy. We appreciate your time and consideration of our project and hope you can support this PZD development in our urban center. Respectfully Submitted, Gregory House for MansfieldHouse, LLC Clarice Pearman -Ords. 4818, 4820, 4821, 4822 & 4823• •Page 1 From: Clarice Pearman To: Pate, Jeremy Date: 1/23/06 3:49PM Subject: Ords. 4818, 4820, 4821, 4822 & 4823 Jeremy, Attached are the above ordinance passed by City Council, January 17, 2006. CC: Bell, Peggy; Deaton, Vicki; GIS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Erin Emis, do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Northwest Arkansas Times newspaper, printed and published in Lowell, Arkansas,- and that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files Doff said publication, that advertisement of: °�cf�d was inserted in the regular editions on O# ** Publication Charge: $ 47/ 9d' Subscribed and sworn to re me this lQ -- day ° 2006. Notary Public Sharlene D. Williams Notary Public My Commission &oioe&kansas My Commission PEx i October 18, 2014 ** Please do not pay from Affidavit. An invoice will be sent. RECEIVED JAN302W CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ORDINANC E NO. 4810 AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTYSye evi le DESCRIBED EER IN REZPROPERTY S O N IN ONEXB RZN A,05 -1657 N - FOR THEPROPERTYSHOWNINIXBHI8ITA, RD.. ERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HUNTSVILLE RD., EAST OF WILLOW AVE.. SOUTH OF ROCK ST. AND ARKANSAS WEST OF LYTON AVE. RMF-24. RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY 24 UNITSIACRE TO RSF-8. RESI- DENRAL SINGLE FAMILY 8 UNITSIACRE. BE R ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the zone classification of the tdbvirg described property is hereby changed as id - Fm RMF-24. Residential Multi-farrvry 24 units per acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 un per acre, es shown on Edtib4'AAttached hereto end made apart hereof. Section 2: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is hereby amended rellett the zoning Change prSded in Section 1 above. PASSED and APPROVED this 17th day of January, 2908, APPROVED: By: DAN COODY, Ill ATTEST: By SONDRA SMITH, City Clark Exhibit Army be viewed in its office of City clerk during normal business hours. 212 NORTH EAST AVENUE • P.O. BOX 1607 • FAYETTEVII I F, ARKANSAS 72702 • (501) 442-1700 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Erin Emis, do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Northwest Arkansas Times newspaper, printed and published in Lowell, Arkansas, and that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files of said publication, that advertisement of: Cwt , w/? II , `/f/ A was inserted in the regular editions on Qi PO# ** Publication Charge: $ QQ. & < Subscribed and sworn to before me this October 18, 2014 ** Please do not pay from Affidavit. An invoice will be sent. meev S le ARKANSAS SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS/ACRE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. Section 1: That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as fd- lows: 1MF-24. Residential MultNanYly 24 units per acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 units re. as shown on 6dubit'A-1' attached hereto end made a part hereof; and from RhF-24 intial Multi -Family. 24 units per acre to RSF-4, Residential Single FarNty; 4 units per acre as on Exhiblt'A-7 atlachad hereto and made a part hereof. 1 2: That the of iblal zoning map of the City of Fayettoville, Arkansas is hereby amended to the Toning Change provided in Section 1 above. ED urd APPROVED this 17th day of January, 2006. ATTEST: By: SORDRA EI CfCRT CIM• 'Exhibit As are raps and may be viewed in the Office of the City Clerk.' 212 NORTH EAST AVENUE • P.O. BOX 1607 • FAYETTEV]l I E, ARKANSAS 72702 • (501) 442-1700