HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4809 mmom�o =
ORDINANCE N0. 4809
� 340 �
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL O 00
PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 05- 1797, O � mgg
BUNGALOWS AT CATO .
AcSPRINGS, LOCATED
NORTHWEST OF CATO SPRINGS ROAD AND CLINE Og 0"%
AVENUE, WEST OF 71 BUSINESS/SOUTH SCHOOL 0 ^ > Mmom .
AVENUE, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 5 .52 Om o � � =_
ACRES, MORE OR LESS; AMENDING THE OFFICIALO ' � 0< —
x �o
N NN0
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND OD mp
ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED MASTER O no
DEVELOPMENT PLAN O M
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the zone classification of the following described property is
hereby changed as follows:
From RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 units per
acre, to R-PZD 05- 1797 as shown in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved
master development plan, development standards, and conditions of approval as submitted,
determined appropriate and approved by the City Council.
Section 3 : That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as
all of the requirements of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is
hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
PASSED and APP
"RAPYED this 20th day of December, 2005 .
���•�� 1ClTR�''ri
W&I
•• G\W YSG.
APPRO
FAYETTEVILLE •
5 •L By.
?NSP.J? DAN COOD , Mayor
N
By: CGut�
SO DRA SMITH, City Clerk
Washington County, AR
I certify this instrument was filed on
01/20/2006 03:58: 18 PM
EXHIBIT "A" and recorded in Real Estate
MDP R-PZD 05-1797 File Number 2006-00002860
Bette Stamps - Circuit Clerk
SURVEY DESCRIPTION TRACT A:
P.N. 765- 15055-000 by
A PART OF THE SWI/4 OF THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 21 , TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH,
RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21 ; THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 S87013'26"E 584.55 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE N09016'40"E 40.27 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF CATO SPRINGS ROAD (R/W VARIES) AS SHOWN ON A PLAT
RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 96073612; THENCE N09° 16'40"E 227.73 FEET; THENCE
N09014'37"E 53 .37 FEET; THENCE N09°39'50"E 23 .81 FEET; THENCE S85°02' 10"E
389.40 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE MCCLINTON'S 2ND ADDITION; THENCE
ALONG SAID WEST LINE S03016'39"W 288.08 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF SAID CATO SPRINGS ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE
N87013'26"W 421 .25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2.75
ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR FACT.
SURVEY DESCRIPTION TRACT B:
P.N. 765- 15055-002
A PART OF THE SWI /4 OF THE SWI /4 OF SECTION 21 , TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH,
RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21 ; THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 S87013'26"E 584.55 FEET; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE N09° 16'40"E 40.27 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF CATO SPRINGS ROAD (R/W VARIES) AS SHOWN ON A PLAT
RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 96073612; THENCE N09' 1 6'40"E 227.73 FEET; THENCE
N09014'37"E 53 .37 FEET; THENCE N09°39'50"E 23 .81 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE N09039'50"E 116.34 FEET; THENCE N06° 11 '27"E 69.72 FEET;
THENCE N16008'04"E 136. 10 FEET; THENCE S87° 10'04"E 342.47 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE MCCLINTON'S 2ND ADDITION; THENCE ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF SAID MCCLINTON'S 2ND ADDITION S03016'39"W 332.05 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE N85002' 10"W 389.40 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2.77 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ANY
EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR FACT.
iz/ z�/vs
City of Fayetteville ��Qy
Staff Review Form
City Council Agenda Items /2PZ665- 797
or ljae5 C, 16, Uus/
Contracts
C�-ry �r5rr�s
20-Dec-05
City Council Meeting Date
Jeremy Pat e Planning Operations
Submitted By Division Department
Action Required:
MDP R-PZD 05- 1797: (Bungalows at Cato Springs, 600): Submitted by McClelland Consulting Engineers, for property
located northwest of Cato Springs Road and Cline Avenue, west of 71 Business/south School Avenue. The property is zoned
RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 units per acre, and contains approximately 5 .52 acres. The request is to approve a Master
Development Plan - Residential Planned Zoning District with four planning areas that could yield 30 single-family lots.
$0.00 n/a n/a
Cost of this request Category/Project Budget Program Category / Project Name
n/a n/a n/a
Account Number Funds Used to Date Program / Project CategoryName
n/a ri/a n/a
$
Project Number Remaining Balance Fund Name
Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached
Previous Ordinance or Resolution # n/a
Department birector Date Original Contract Date: n/a
Original Contract Number: n/a
� 2 - L - oJ
City Attorney
Received in City Clerk's Office r„tERt.
FiAai-nce a nternal Service Director Date
Received in Mayor's Office
Mayor Date
Comments:
City Council Meeting of December 20, 2005
Agenda Item Number
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
Thru: Gary Dumas, Director of Operations
From: Jeremy C. Pate, Director of Current Planning
Date: December 1 , 2005
Subiect: Rezoning for Bungalows at Cato Springs (R-PZD 05- 1797)
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of an ordinance creating a Residential Planned Zoning
District (R-PZD) for the Bungalows at Cato Springs, submitted by McCllelland Consulting
Engineers, Inc. This action will establish a unique zoning district for a residential subdivision on
a 5 .52-acre site located north of Cato Springs Road and west of Cline Avenue.
BACKGROUND
At the August 22, 2005 Planning Commission meeting the applicant proposed this site to be
rezoned from RSF-4 to RMF-6. The. Planning Commission voted 5- 1 -0 to deny the rezoning
request. The site contains two tracts totaling 5 .52 acres that are being used for large lot rural
residential uses with two single-family dwellings. A tandem lot for an additional single family
home on the property was approved by the Planning Commission in 1996. The Cato Springs
Branch Creek and wooded area traverses north-south near the western edge of the property and an
old railroad spur is to the north. It is currently zoned RSF4, Residential Single-Family Four
Units Per Acre. The applicant requests rezoning approval for a unique R-PZD zoning district.
The proposed use of the site is for a single family development with a maximum of 30 lots.
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission voted 9-0-0 in favor of this request on November 28, 2005. A Planned
Zoning District (PZD) requires City Council approval as it includes zoning approval.
Recommended conditions were approved by the Planning Commission and are reflected in the
attached staff report.
The project consists of four planning areas with three different types of single family lots and one
planning area for a preservation and trail uses. The planning areas are designed to provide more
traditional type single family uses adjacent to the established neighborhood to the east, with
higher density, and more affordable units along the west adjacent to undeveloped riparian area
associated with the Cato Springs Branch Creek. The development concept fronts single family
residential uses onto a main street with alley access to the rear of lots. Finding the proposal
compliant with the intent and spirit of the ordinance and compatible with developing land in the
vicinity, staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of this R-PZD.
BUDGETIMPACT
None.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 05- 1797,
BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS, LOCATED
NORTHWEST OF CATO SPRINGS ROAD AND CLINE
AVENUE, WEST OF 71 BUSINESS/SOUTH SCHOOL
AVENUE, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 5.52 .
ACRES, MORE OR LESS; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE;,AND
ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED -"`1v1ASTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITYCOUNCIL OF\TsHE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS : '
Section 1 : That the zone classification of-thefollowingdescribed property is
hereby changed as follows:
From RSF4, Residential Single-Farmly, 4 units per acre;t�ROZD 05-1797 as shown
vrm
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a parGhereof.
Section 2. Thi t41fic change in Toning classification is based upon the
approved master development plan, development standards, and conditions of
approval as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council.
Section 3. Thatsthis ordinance�stia11 take effect and be in full force at such
time as all of the requiremcnts?of the master development plan have been met.
Section 4. Thatthe official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
is hereby -amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 12005.
APPROVED :
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
By:
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
MDP R-PZD 05-1797
SURVEY DESCRIPTION TRACT A:
P.N. 765- 15055-000
A PART OF THE SWIM OF THE SWIM OF SECTION 21 , TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH,
RANGE 30 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21 ; THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 S8791.32'6','-E 584.55 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE N09016'40"E 40.27FEET TO THE
NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CATO SPRING , AD (R/W}UARIES) AS
SHOWN ON A PLAT RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 96073612; THENCE
N09016'40"E 227.73 FEET; THENCE N09° 14'37"E 53.37jFEET; THENCE<
„: ._>
N09039'50" E 23 .81 FEET; THENCE S85°02'10"E 3 9.40 FEET TO THE WEST LINE
OF THE MCCLINTON'S 2ND ADDITION; THENCE►ALONG SAID WEST LINE
S03016'39"W 288.08 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT�OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CATO
SPRINGS ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE.W87° 1326"W 421 .25 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2.75 ACRyS?MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD
OR FACT.
SURVEY DESCRIP.,TION TRACT B:
P.N. 765- 15055-002 ,,
A PART ORZHE?SW I /4 OF..ATHE SWIM OF SECTION 21 , TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH,
RANGE 30 WEST %UVASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :
COMMENCING AT THEiSOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21 ; THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 S87013126"E 584.55 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE N09° 16'40"E 40.27 FEET TO THE
NORTH RIGHT-OFWAY LINE OF CATO SPRINGS ROAD (R/W VARIES) AS
SHOWN ON A PLAT" RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 96073612; THENCE
N09016'40" E 227.73 FEET; THENCE N09° 14'37"E 53 .37 FEET; THENCE
N09039'50" E 23 .81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N09°39'50"E
116.34 FEET; THENCE N06° 11 '27"E 69.72 FEET; THENCE N16°08'04"E 136. 10
FEET; THENCE S87° 10'04"E 342.47 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
THE McCLINTON'S 2ND ADDITION ; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
MCCLINTON'S 2ND ADDITION S03016'39"W 332.05 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING
SAID WEST LINE N85002' 10"W 389.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 2. 77 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS,
COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR FACT.
Taye evl e PC Meeting of November 28 , 2005
ARKANSAS
THE CITY OF FAYETTEvILLE , ARKANSAS
125 W- Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479) 575-8267
TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission
FROM: Andrew Garner, Senior Planner
THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning
DATE: No%rember 17, 2005 December I, 2005
R-PZD 05- 1797: Planned Zoning District (Bungalows at Cato Springs, 600): Submitted by
MCCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS for property located NORTHWEST OF CATO
SPRINGS ROAD AND CLINE AVENUE, WEST OF 71 BUSINESS/SOUTH SCHOOL
AVENUE. The property is zoned RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY FOUR UNITS PER
ACRE (RSF4) and contains approximately 5.52 acres. The request is to approve a Master
Development Plan for a Residential Planned Zoning District (R-PZD) with three planning areas
that could yield 30 single-family lots.
Property Owner: JIM KNIGHT
Planner: ANDREW GARNER
Findings:
Background: At the August 22, 2005 Planning Commission meeting the applicant proposed this
site to be rezoned from RSF-4 to Residential Multi-Family Six Units Per Acre (RMF-6). The
Planning Commission voted 5- 1 -0 to deny the rezoning request.
Property Description and Setting: The subject property contains part of two tracts totaling 5.52-
acres owned by the Hausers and Mitchells. It is located north of Cato Springs Road and west of
Cline Avenue. The property is being used for large lot rural residential uses with two single-
family dwellings and a number of accessory structures. A tandem lot for an additional single
family home on the property was approved by the Planning Commission in 1996. The Cato
Springs Branch Creek and wooded area traverses north-south near the western edge of the
property and an old railroad spur is to the north. The site is zoned RSF-4 and as shown in Table
I is immediately surrounded by single-family residential and undeveloped land, with a variety of
zoning.
K:IReports120051PC Reporut 1l-28-051X-PLD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
Table 1
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Direction From Site Land Use Zoning
North Undeveloped; Single-Family Residential RSF-4; RMF-24
South Single-Family Residential RSF-4
East Single-Family Residential RSF-4
West Undeveloped (Cato Springs Branch and associated RSF-4; 1-1
floodplain)
RSF4, Residential Single-Family Four Units Per Acre
RMF-24, Residential Multi-Family 24 Units Per Acre
1-1 , Heavy commercial and Light Industrial
Proposal: The applicant requests a rezoning approval for a residential subdivision within a
unique R-PZD zoning district. The proposed use of the site is for a single-family development
with a maximum of 30 lots ranging from 1 ,500 square feet to 3,800 square feet, three planning
areas, and a 1 .5-acre preservation and trail area associated with the Cato Springs Branch Creek.
Each of the planning areas has identified single-family uses, with a variety of bulk and area
regulations. The planning areas are designed to provide more traditional type single family uses
adjacent to the existing neighborhood to the east, with higher density, and more affordable units
along the west adjacent to undeveloped riparian associated with the Cato Springs Branch and
industrial zoning to the west.
Process: The purpose of the subject request is for a rezoning approval in order to secure
entitlement for the property with a concept of a variety of single family residential uses fronting
onto a main street with alley access to the rear of lots. As recently approved by the City Council,
an applicant has the option of presenting a Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District
without development-level plans. This action would effectively rezone the property based on the
conceptual plans and information provided. However, it does not give development approval.
The applicant is required to return through the preliminary plat process in order for the Planning
Commission to confirm that the development plans presented are compliant with the zoning and
Master Development Plans approved by the City Council.
Bulk and area criteria, while usually provided within the staff report, have been provided in
duplicate by the applicant. The project booklet provided gives the zoning criteria in detail, as do
the Master Development Plans. Please reference this provided material for more information.
These documents are binding to the zoning of the property.
Water & Sewer: Water and sewer lines are currently available in the area, and would be
designed and constructed in accordance with city specifications to serve the development.
Access: The applicant proposes construction of a single neighborhood street running through the
middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac connecting with two alleys. Lots are located
along either side of this main street, with alleys along the eastern and western side of the lots to
allow for rear access to the residences and trash service.
Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Cato Springs Road (minor arterial).
K:IReportA20051PC Reporo lll-28-051R-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
Parks: The western portion of the site is adjacent to the Cato Springs Branch. The western 1 .5
acres is planned to be dedicated as open space/greenspace to the City of Fayetteville, and has the
potential to be used to connect the overall Multi-Use trails system within the City of Fayetteville
and/or provide pedestrian access to Great House Springs Park to the north.
Tree Preservation: Tree preservation and protection will be implemented in accordance with
Section 167 of the Unified Development Code at the time of development. The applicant desires
to preserve the existing 60" trunk diameter catalpa tree in front of the existing residential
structure. The majority of tree preservation has been identified as occurring within the proposed
green space/trail area; however, if this is dedicated as a park to the City, the tree canopy numbers
in this area will not count as preserved.
Public Comment: Staff has not received any objectionable public comment.
Recommendation: Staff recommends forwarding R-PZD 05-1797 to the City Council with a
recommendation of approval and with the following condition:
Conditions of Approval:
1 . Zoning criteria for Planning Areas 1 -3 shall be revised as follows:
a. Architectural Design Standards: reference a commitment to the concept of
the architectural elevations presented in the booklet (see Condition No. 2
below).
b. Parking: specify parking per city requirements (unless proposed otherwise).
c. Signage: speei . ...... .... ...._ refne • C . !hat
r - _� ^-�--a- r __ ..j ray:: w, vr�F'cz'rrJ-`.xmw��¢bcTa
allewed—Signage shall be permitted in accordance with the regulation set
forth in Chapter 174 of the Unified Development Code for Residential
Single Family Zoning Districts.
PLANNING COMMISSION ADDED 11 /28/05.
2. Front building facades as they face the street shall be varied in material and color so
that no two same facades are adjacent to one another.
3 . The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards
submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the
property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon
the project with review of the Master Development Plan – Planned Zoning District by
the City Council shall also be binding.
4. Pursuant to city ordinance, development of the property shall be approved by the
Planning Commission through the preliminary plat review process. Should a
subdivision of land be desired, all applicable ordinances and processes shall be
followed in order to meet city ordinances.
5. Street connectivity. Staff recommends further evaluation at the time of development.
K:IRepora120051PC Reparalll-28-051R-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
Property to the west will not be connected. Property to the east will likely not be
connected, with the exception that the alley along the eastern property line could
potentially provide connection with the alley right-of-way running adjacent to the
eastern property line. To the south is proposed access. Property to the north is
undeveloped and a street stubbed out to this property may be beneficial to disperse
traffic should that property develop.
6. Detention shall be provided to meet City of Fayetteville requirements, unless at the
time of development the City Engineer approves otherwise, in accordance with City
ordinance and policy.
7. Parkland dedication requirements shall be met at the time of development. This may
include dedication of land, fees-in-lieu, or a combination thereof.
8. Public water and sewer lines shall be extended as required by city ordinance at the time
of development.
9. All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All
proposed utilities shall be located underground.
10. Development on the subject property shall comply with City Fayetteville ordinances at
the time of submittal of development plans.
11 . The western 1 .5 acres proposed to be dedicated to the City as park/trail, should be
designated as a separate planning area (PA-4), with appropriate zoning criteria for the
anticipated park and recreational uses (Use Units 1 , 3, and 4).
12. Building separation shall meet all applicable building codes, and may result in a greater
separation requirement than the proposed minimum five feet.
13. Screening or natural vegetation shall be provided along the west and east property lines
to reduce the impact of the alley and parking areas on adjacent properties. Specific
screening will be recommended at the time of development.
14. Rear setbacks along public alleys shall be measured from the centerline of the alley;
based on the plans provided, and a 25 ' rear setback from centerline of the public alley
appears to be adequate. Please address the platsibooklet accordingly.
15. Tree preservation plans shall be submitted at the time of development meeting city of
Fayetteville criteria. The minimum percent canopy for PZDs is 25%. Staff calls
attention to the fact that while conceptually the Master Plan presented meets the goals
and intent of the Master Development Plan PZD, much of the interior canopy is being
removed if submitted as currently proposed, and would not meet with staff's approval.
Further, the applicant noted in the booklet that the majority of tree preservation areas
would be located in the 1 .5-acre preservation/trail area proposed to be dedicated to the
City as parkland. Parkland cannot count as preserved tree canopy per City ordinance.
K:IReponv120051PC Report 111-78-051R-P7D 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Caio Springs).doc
The applicants should be aware that further detailed information and potentially
modifications to the plans to incorporate a higher percentage of tree canopy interior to
the developed areas is expected at the time of development.
16. All existing easements that conflict with the future development shall be vacated.
17. Prior to City Council, the booklet shall be revised as follows:
a. Include page numbers in the booklet.
b. Remove references to Sandestin, Florida on the building elevations.
c. Label `kitchens' to replace `greatroom' within the architectural renderings.
PLANNING COMMISSION ADDED THIS CONDITION ( 11 /28/05).
Planning Commission Action: Required: YES
❑ Approved ❑ Denied ■ Forward to City Council ❑ Tabled
PC forwarded to City Council with recommendation for approval by a vote of 9-0-0, with
Commissioner Allen making the motion and Commissioner Clark seconding.
Meeting Date: November 28, 2005
Comments:
The "Conditions of Approval" listed in the report above are accepted in total without exception
by the entity requesting approval of this development item.
Signature Date
K:IReporis11005WC Reportslll-18-051R-PZD 05-1797(Bungalows Q Cato Springs).doc
Findings associated with R-PZD 05-1797
Sec. 166.06. Planned Zoning Districts (PZD).
(E) Approval or Rejection Criteria for Planned Zoning Districts
The following criteria shall be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in the
review of a planned zoning district application based on the proposed master development plan:
( 1 ) Whether the application is in compliance with the requirements of the UDC and the
General Plan 2020;
FINDING: Staff finds the application to be in compliance with the Master Development
Plan Planned Zoning District criteria established by the City Council. The General Plan
2020 designates this site Mixed Use. Rezoning this property to R-PZD 05- 1797 with a
variety of single family dwelling units and density is consistent with the land use plan and
compatible with surrounding land uses and density within surrounding developed
property.
(2) Whether the application is in compliance with all applicable statutory provisions;
FINDING: The application has been reviewed and found to be compliant with applicable
statutory provisions.
(3) Whether the general impact of the rezoning would adversely impact the provision of
public facilities and services;
FINDING: The impact of the rezoning and subsequent development would require the
provision of public facilities, at the cost of the developer. Without improvements to existing
infrastructure, the proposal would certainly adversely affect public facilities and services.
However, as indicated in the submittal and the staff report, certain measures are to be
taken to ensure adequate infrastructure improvements are made by the developer to
ensure the level of service does not decline due to the proposed development.
(4) Whether the rezoning is compatible with the surrounding land uses;
FINDING : The rezoning request, combined with the Master Development Plan, would
allow a variety of single-family residential uses and density. The proposed zoning criteria
in the eastern portion of the site would provide for the larger lots and setbacks that would
provide a compatible transition from the adjacent RSF-4 single family neighborhood on
Cline Avenue, to higher density in the eastern portion of the site.
(5) Whether the subject land is suitable for the intended use and is compatible with the
natural environment;
FINDING: The subject property is being used for large lot rural residential uses, with the
K:1Reparu110051PC Reporail1-18-051R-PZ0 05-1791 (Bungalows Q Caro Springs).doc
Cato Springs Branch and associated floodplain located in the western one-third of the site.
The site is relatively flat, and the proposed use for residential development concentrated
out of the floodplain and riparian area is compatible with the natural environment.
(6) Whether the intended land use would create traffic congestion or burden the existing
road network;
FINDING: The proposed PZD would potentially result in 30 new single-family lots that
could generate 300 average daily vehicle trips. Depending on the scale and timing of
proposed development of this site, a traffic study may be required to evaluate the level of
service of the road network that would be used to access this site. At a minimum, the
developer would be expected to improve Cato Springs Road along the project frontage to
Master Street Plan standards to ensure safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian access.
Additional improvements may be required and would be evaluated at the time of
development.
(7) Whether the planned development provides for unified development control under a
unified plan;
FINDING: A plan and project booklet has been submitted, recognizing the zoning and
development criteria required of a Master Development Plan submittal. Typical
architectural elevations are provided in order to describe the appearance of the community
once constructed.
(8) Whether any other recognized zoning consideration would be violated in this PZD.
FINDING: Staff finds
that in review of
the requested rezoning,
the Master Development
Plan proposed does not
violate recognized
zoning considerations, as found below.
(B) Development standards, conditions and review guidelines
(1) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consider a proposed PZD in light of the
purpose and intent as set forth in Chapter 161 Zoning Regulations, and the development
standards and review guidelines set forth herein. Primary emphasis shall be placed upon
achieving compatibility between the proposed development and surrounding areas so as
to preserve and enhance the neighborhood. Proper planning shall involve a consideration
of tree preservation; water conservation, preservation of natural site amenities, and the
protection of watercourses from erosion and siltation. The Planning Commission shall
determine that specific development features, including project density, building
locations, common usable open space, the vehicular circulation system, parking areas,
screening and landscaping, and perimeter treatment shall be combined in such a way as to
further the health, safety, amenity and welfare of the community. To these ends, all
applications filed pursuant to this ordinance shall be reviewed in accordance with the
same general review guidelines as those utilized for zoning and subdivision applications.
FINDING: The proposed Planned Zoning District has been reviewed in light of all
K-'IReports170051PC Reports) I1-28-05IR-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
applicable development and zoning ordinances. At this time, the Master Development Plan
sets out the basic guidelines, development and zoning criteria, commitments offered by the
applicant and those recommended by staff, and design standards to ensure the proposal
will achieve a high level of compatibility with adjacent properties. Staff finds that the
proposal herein does incorporate an acceptable level of compatibility. Density, maximum
dwelling units and building area have been addressed for each lot, and tree preservation is
proposed to meet City of Fayetteville standards, allowing for a project that enhances the
neighborhood.
(2) Screening and landscaping. In order to enhance the integrity and attractiveness of the
development, and when deemed necessary to protect adjacent properties, the Planning
Commission shall require landscaping and screening as part of a PZD. The screening and
landscaping shall be provided as set forth in § 166.09 Buffer Strips and Screening. As part
of the development plan, a detailed screening and landscaping plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Commission. Landscape plans shall show the general location, type and
quality (size and age) of plant material. Screening plans shall include typical details of
fences, berms and plant material to be used.
FINDING: Screening shall be placed along the eastern boundary of the subject property
to screen the site from the established residential neighborhood to the east. In addition,
each dwelling unit shall plant a minimum of one 2" caliper tree along the site's street
frontage.
(3) Traffic circulation. The following traffic circulation guidelines shall apply:
(a) The adequacy of both the internal and external street systems shall be reviewed in
light of the projected future traffic volumes.
(b) The traffic circulation system shall be comprised of a hierarchal scheme of local
collector and arterial streets, each designed to accommodate its proper function and in
appropriate relationship with one another.
(c) Design of the internal street circulation system must be sensitive to such
considerations as safety, convenience, separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic,
general attractiveness, access to dwelling units and the proper relationship of different
land uses.
(d) Internal collector streets shall be coordinated with the existing external street system,
providing for the efficient flow of traffic into and out of the planned zoning
development.
(e) Internal local streets shall be designed to discourage through traffic within the
planned zoning development and to adjacent areas.
(0 Design provisions for ingress and egress for any site along with service drives and
K:I Reports120051PC Repartsl / /-28-051R-PZD 05-/797 (Bungalows® Cato Springs).doc
interior circulation shall be that required by Chapter 166 Development of this code.
FINDING: Ingress and egress interior to the project shall be evaluated and required to be
constructed with the development of the property. The internal street system consisting of
one main cul-de-sac street and two alleys linking to the cul-de-sac provide adequate
circulation. The site is fairly constrained due to natural and man-made features and does
not have much, if any opportunity for exterior street connectivity outside of the entrance
onto Cato Springs Road. However, issues of connectivity and street design criteria will be
further evaluated at the time of development. It is anticipated that the project's frontage
on Cato Springs Road will need to be improved as part of development of the project.
(4) Parking standards. The off-street parking and loading standards found in Chapter 172
Parking and Loading shall apply to the specific gross usable or leasable floor areas of the
respective use areas.
FINDING: Standard parking ratios for the proposed single-family residential uses shall
apply.
(5) Perimeter treatment. Notwithstanding any other provisions of a planned zoning district,
all uses of land or structures shall meet the open space, buffer or green strip provisions of
this chapter of this code.
FINDING: The Master Development Plan proposes screening along the eastern property
line to screen the site from the established residential neighborhood to the east. Screening
is not proposed between the northern property line and the General Industrial (1-2) zone to
the north. Along the western property line 1.5 acres is proposed to be dedicated
greenspace for use as a trail/preservation area.
(6) Sidewalks. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Sidewalks and other pedestrian connections will be evaluated at the time of
development to ensure compliance.
(7) Street Lights. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Street lights will be required at the time of development.
(8) Water. As required by § 166.03
FINDING: Public water will be provided to the project site, pursuant to city code.
(9) Sewer. As required by § 166.03.
FINDING: Public sewer will be provided to the project site, pursuant to city code.
K:I Reportsl20051PC Reportsll I-28-051 R-PZD 05-/797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
(10) Streets and Drainage. Streets within a residential PZD may be either public or
private.
(a) Public Streets. Public streets shall be constructed according to the adopted standards
of the City.
(b) Private Streets. Private streets within a residential PZD shall be permitted subject to
the following conditions:
(i) Private streets shall be permitted for only a loop street, or street ending with a cul-
de-sac. Any street connecting one or more public streets shall be constructed to
existing City standards and shall be dedicated as a public street.
(ii) Private streets shall be designed and constructed to the same standards as public
streets with the exceptions of width and cul-de-sacs as noted below.
(iii)All grading and drainage within a Planned Zoning District including site drainage
and drainage for private streets shall comply with the City's Grading (Physical
Alteration of Land) and Drainage (Storm water management) Ordinances. Open
drainage systems may be approved by the City Engineer.
(iv) Maximum density served by a cul-de-sac shall be 40 units. Maximum density
served by a loop street shall be 80 units.
(v) The plat of the planned development shall designate each private street as a
"private street."
(vi) Maintenance of private streets shall be the responsibility of the developer or of a
neighborhood property owners association (POA) and shall not be the
responsibility of the City. The method for maintenance and a maintenance fund
shall be established by the PZD covenants. The covenants shall expressly provide
that the City is a third party beneficiary to the covenants and shall have the right
to enforce the street maintenance requirements of the covenants irrespective of the
vote of the other parties to the covenants.
(vii) The covenants shall provide that in the event the private streets are not maintained
as required by the covenants, the City shall have the right (but shall not be
required) to maintain said streets and to charge the cost thereof to the property
owners within the PZD on a pro rata basis according to assessed valuation for ad
valorem tax purposes and shall have a lien on the real property within the PZD for
such cost. The protective covenants shall grant the City the right to use all private
streets for purposes of providing fire and police protection, sanitation service and
any other of the municipal functions. The protective covenants shall provide that
such covenants shall not be amended and shall not terminate without approval of
the City Council.
K:IReporisI2005I PC Reporesl ll-28-05IR-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
(viii) The width of private streets may vary according to the density served. The
following standard shall be used:
Paving Width
(No On -Street Parking)
Dwelling
Units
One -Way
Two -Way
1-20
14'
22'
21+
14'
24'
*Note: If on -street parking is desired, 6 feet must be added to each side where parking is
intended.
(ix) All of
the traffic laws
prescribed
by
Title VII shall apply to traffic on private
streets
within a PZD.
(x) There shall be no minimum building setback requirement from a private street.
(xi) The developer shall erect at the entrance of each private street a rectangular sign,
not exceeding 24 inches by 12 inches, designating the street a "private street"
which shall be clearly visible to motor vehicular traffic.
FINDING: All public streets shall conform to city standards as indicated in the submitted
statement of commitments. Streets shall not be gated, unless permitted by express
approval from the City Council.
(11) Construction of nonresidential facilities. Prior to issuance of more than eight
building permits for any residential PZD, all approved nonresidential facilities shall be
constructed. In the event the developer proposed to develop the PZD in phases, and the
nonresidential facilities are not proposed in the initial phase, the developer shall enter into
a contract with the City to guarantee completion of the nonresidential facilities.
FINDING: The project would not result in the construction of nonresidential facilities,
other than the infrastructure required to support the single-family lots. The anticipated
dedication of parkland in the western portion of the site if recommended by the Park and
Recreation Advisory Board would occur at the time of final plat.
(12) Tree preservation. All PZD developments shall comply with the requirements for
tree preservation as set forth in Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection. The
location of trees shall be considered when planning the common open space, location of
K:1Reporu1200511'C Reports ll1-28-05IR-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
buildings, underground services, walks, paved areas, playgrounds, parking areas, and
finished grade levels.
FINDING: A tree preservation plan shall be submitted at the time of development, which
will require the site to maintain a minimum of 25% tree canopy under the tree ordinance.
Specifically, the applicant would like to preserve a 60" trunk diameter catalpa tree in front
of the existing residence. Other tree canopy may be required interior to the project, which
may result in a reduction of dwelling units or reconfiguration of the development. The
Urban Forester has commented that staff will not support the Tree Preservation Plan as
currently presented and the applicant should be aware that further detailed work and
modifications to the plans to incorporate a higher percentage of tree canopy interior to the
developed area will occur at the time of development.
(13) Commercial design standards. All PZD developments that contain office or
commercial structures shall comply with the commercial design standards as set forth in
§166.14 Site Development Standards and Construction and Appearance Design Standards
for Commercial Structures.
FINDING: Not applicable. This PZD does not propose any commercial structures.
(14) View protection. The Planning Commission shall have the right to establish
special height and/or positioning restrictions where scenic views are involved and shall
have the right to insure the perpetuation of those views through protective covenant
restrictions.
FINDING: Staff finds no specific scenic views to be protected on the subject property.
(E) Revocation.
(1) Causes for revocation as enforcement action. The Planning Commission may
recommend to the City Council that any PZD approval be revoked and all building or
occupancy permits be voided under the following circumstances:
(a) Building permit. If no building permit has been issued within the time allowed.
(b) Phased development
schedule.
If the applicant does not
adhere to the phased
development schedule
as stated
in the approved development
plan.
(c) Open space and recreational facilities. If the construction and provision of all
common open spaces and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the
final plan are proceeding at a substantially slower rate than other project components.
Planning staff shall report the status of each ongoing PZD at the first regular meeting
of each quarter, so that_the Planning Commission is able to compare the actual
development accomplished with the approved development schedule. If the Planning
K: IReporu120051PC Reportsl i l-28-05IR-PZI) 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doc
Commission finds that the rate of construction of dwelling units or other commercial
or industrial structures is substantially greater than the rate at which common open
spaces and public recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, then the
Planning Commission may initiate revocation action or cease to approve any
additional final plans if preceding phases have not been finalized. The city may also
issue a stop work order, or discontinue issuance of building or occupancy permits, or
revoke those previously issued.
(2) Procedures. Prior to a recommendation of revocation, notice by certified mail shall be
sent to the landowner or authorized agent giving notice of the alleged default, setting a
time to appear before the Planning Commission to show cause why steps should not be
made to totally or partially revoke the PZD. The Planning Commission recommendation
shall be forwarded to the City Council for disposition as in original approvals. In the
event a PZD is revoked, the City Council shall take the appropriate action in the city
clerk's office and the public zoning record duly noted.
(3) Effect. In the event of revocation, any completed portions of the development or those
portions for which building permits have been issued shall be treated to be a whole and
effective development. After causes for revocation or enforcement have been corrected,
the City Council shall expunge such record as established above and shall authorize
continued issuance of building permits.
(F) Covenants, trusts and homeowner associations.
(1) Legal entities. The developer shall create such legal entities as appropriate to undertake
and be responsible for the ownership, operation, construction, and maintenance of private
roads, parking areas, common usable open space, community facilities, recreation areas,
building, lighting, security measure and similar common elements in a development. The
city encourages the creation of homeowner associations, funded community trusts or
other nonprofit organizations implemented by agreements, private improvement district,
contracts and covenants. All legal instruments setting forth a plan or manner of
permanent care and maintenance of such open space, recreation areas and communally -
owned facilities shall be approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and
by the Planning Commission as to the suitability for the proposed use of the open areas.
The aforementioned legal instruments shall be provided to the Planning Commission
together with the filing of the final plan, except that the Guarantee shall be filed with the
preliminary plan or at least in a preliminary form.
(2) Common areas. If the common open space is deeded to a homeowner association, the
developer shall file with the plat a declaration of covenants and restrictions in the
Guarantee that will govern the association with the application for final plan approval.
The provisions shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
(a) The homeowner's association must be legally established before building permits are
granted.
K:IReports12OO51PC Reponslll-28-051R-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows® Cato Springs).doc
(b) Membership and fees must be mandatory for each home buyer and successive buyer.
(c) The open space restrictions must be permanent, rather than for a period of years.
(d) The association must be responsible for the maintenance of recreational and other
common facilities covered by the agreement and for all liability insurance, local taxes
and other public assessments.
(e) Homeowners must pay their pro rata share of the initial cost; the maintenance
assessment levied by the association must be stipulated as a potential lien on the
property.
FINDING: The applicant shall comply with the above requirements, as part of the
Planned Zoning District ordinance.
Sec. 161.25 Planned Zoning District
(A) Purpose. The intent of the Planned Zoning District is to permit and encourage
comprehensively planned developments whose purpose is redevelopment, economic
development, cultural enrichment or to provide a single -purpose or mixed -use planned
development and to permit the combination of development and zoning review into a
simultaneous process. The rezoning of property to the PZD may be deemed appropriate if the
development proposed for the district can accomplish one or more of the following goals.
(1) Flexibility. Providing for flexibility in the distribution of land uses, in the density
of development and in other matters typically regulated in zoning districts.
(2) Compatibility. Providing for compatibility with the surrounding land uses.
(3)
Harmony. Providing for an orderly and creative
arrangement of land uses that are
harmonious and beneficial
to the community.
(4) Variety. Providing for a variety of housing types, employment opportunities or
commercial or industrial services, or any combination thereof, to achieve variety
and integration of economic and redevelopment opportunities.
(5) No negative impact. Does not have a negative effect upon the future development
of the area;
(6) Coordination. Permit coordination and planning of the land surrounding the PZD
and cooperation between the city and private developers in the urbanization of
new lands and in the renewal of existing deteriorating areas.
(7) Open space. Provision of more usable and suitably located open space, recreation
areas and other common facilities that would not otherwise be required under
K:IReports120051PC Reports)/ /-28-051R-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cato Springs).doe
conventional land development regulations.
(8) Natural features. Maximum enhancement and minimal disruption of existing
natural features and amenities.
(9) General Plan. Comprehensive and innovative planning and design of mixed use
yet harmonious developments consistent with the guiding policies of the General
Plan.
(10) Special Features. Better utilization of sites characterized by special features of
geographic location, topography, size or shape.
FINDING: The proposed Master Development Plan incorporates several of the above goals
of a PZD. The Master Development Plan has changes in density over the site, which
encourages a variety of sizes of single-family dwellings. The proposed zoning would be
compatible with surrounding single-family neighborhoods to the east and south, by
allowing only single-family detached units. The increased density on the site allows for
more intense uses as anticipated for this area on the General Plan 2020. The major natural
features on the site include the Cato Springs Branch, one very large catalpa tree, and
several other significant trees. This Master Development Plan has identified the Cato
Springs Branch area and the large catalpa tree as anticipated to be preserved, and with
25% tree preservation required under the PZD ordinance would likely be able to preserve
many other significant trees.
(B) Rezoning. Property may be rezoned to the Planned Zoning District by the City Council
in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and Chapter 166, Development. Each
rezoning parcel shall be described as a separate district, with distinct boundaries and specific
design and development standards. Each district shall be assigned a project number or label,
along with the designation "PZD". The rezoning shall include the adoption of a specific master
development plan and development standards.
FINDING: The
subject described real
property is proposed
to be rezoned to R-PZD 05-
1797, with three
(3) Planning Areas.
Staff also recommends including the 1.5 acre
preservation area
as a Planning Area
for a total of four
(4) Planning Areas. The
development standards, statement of
commitments and
Master Development Plan
approved shall be
adopted with the rezoning.
(C) R — PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District.
(I) Purpose and intent. The R-PZD is intended to accommodate mixed -use or clustered
residential developments and to accommodate single -use residential developments that
are determined to be more appropriate for a PZD application than a general residential
rezone. The legislative purposes, intent, and application of this district include, but are
not limited to, the following:
K:IReports110051PC Reporis)11-18-051R-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows® Caro Springs).doc
(a) To encourage a variety and flexibility in land development and land use for
predominately residential areas, consistent with the city's General Plan and the
orderly development of the city.
(b) To provide a framework within which an effective relationship of different land uses
and activities within a single development, or when considered with abutting parcels
of land, can be planned on a total basis.
(c) To provide a harmonious relationship with the surrounding development, minimizing
such influences as land use incompatibilities, heavy traffic and congestion, and
excessive demands on planned and existing public facilities.
(d) To provide a means of developing areas with special physical features to enhance
natural beauty and other attributes.
(e) To encourage the efficient use of those public facilities required in connection with
new residential development.
FINDING: This Master Development Plan meets the purpose and intent of the R-PZD
requirements as this 5.52 site is more appropriate to develop as a PZD rather than the
existing zoning, or a blanket rezoning of the entire site to a different residential zoning.
This Master Development Plan encourages a variety of single-family residential housing
types in this transition area between established neighborhoods, university, and industrial
uses. This site is identified as Mixed Use in the General Plan 2020. Consistent with the
Guiding Policies for Mixed Use areas, the density of the proposed Master Development
Plan, and its proximity to the University of Arkansas may encourage students to live in the
area, and help support public transit. The proposed single family uses on the site would be
compatible with surrounding development, and the preservation area in the western
portion of the site could be a public park/trail for the use and enjoyment of this community
and Fayetteville at large.
(2) Permitted uses. All permitted uses identified within §162 Use Units of the Unified
Development Code shall be allowed as permissible uses, unless otherwise specified,
subject to City Council approval of the Planned Zoning District request.
(3)Condition. In no instance shall the residential use area be less than fifty-one percent
(51%) of the gross floor area within the development.
(4) Conditional Uses. All conditional uses allowed within (Residential, Commercial,
Industrial) zoning Districts established in the Unified Development Code shall be
allowed with Planning Commission approval, unless otherwise specified, subject to the
code governing Conditional Use requests.
FINDING:
See
Zoning Criteria
Chart within the project
booklet
provided
by the
applicant for
the
uses permitted by
right and by conditional use
in each
Planning
Area as
K:IReportsl20051PC Reporull1-28-051R-PZD 05-f 797 (Bungalows Q Cato Springs).doc
proposed
by the
applicant. This
project booklet, if approved, will remain on file in the
Planning
Division
for comparison
to future development on the property.
*Required Findings for Rezoning Request.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request from RSF-4,
Residential Single Family, 4 units per acre, to R-PZD 05-1797, with the adoption of the
associated Master Development Plan.
LAND USE PLAN: The General Plan 2020 Future Land Use Plan designates this site as a
Mixed Use Area. Rezoning this property to R-PZD 05-1797, with the associated Master
Development Plan, would allow for a variety of single-family residential development. The
proposed plan, commitments, design standards and other conditions placed upon the project
result in a compatible development with surrounding land uses in the general vicinity, meeting
many of the goals of the General Plan 2020 for new development.
FINDINGS OF TH.E STAFF
A determination of the degree
to which the
proposed zoning
is consistent with land use
planning objectives, principles,
and policies
and with land use
and zoning plans.
Finding: The proposed zoning is to a great degree consistent with many of the
principles and policies in place. The policies encouraged by the General Plan
2020 call for a mixture of housing sizes and types, pedestrian -friendly
neighborhoods, and expanding public trails and parks system. This project
meets all of these goals, and provides an internal transition of residential
density that attempt to address adjacent land uses.
2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the
rezoning is proposed.
Finding: This 5.52 site, is more appropriate to develop as a PZD rather than the
existing zoning, or a blanket rezoning of the entire site to a different
residential zoning. This Master Development Plan encourages a variety of
single-family residential housing types in this transition area between
established neighborhoods, university, and industrial uses. This site is
identified as Mixed Use in the General Plan 2020, and the proposed Master
Development Plan would help this vicinity start to achieve some of the
identified goals of its Mixed Use designation.
3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase
traffic danger and congestion.
Finding: The proposed zoning will result in an increase in vehicle trips over the
existing zoning. Under the current RSF-4 zoning, the 5.52 -acre site could
K:IRcports120051PC Reportslll-28-051R-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows® Cow Springs).doc
potentially yield 22 single-family units, resulting in approximately 220 vehicle
trips per day. Under the proposed R-PZD 05-1797 zoning, the site would
yield a maximum of 30 single-family units, resulting in approximately 300
vehicles trips per day. This is an increase of 80 vehicle'trips per day over
that anticipated under the current zoning, and would result in an even
greater increase in vehicle trips compared to the existing two residences on
the site. Street improvements will be required to be installed with
development of the site. Due to the relatively small scale of this site, its
development will likely only trigger localized, although essential, street
improvements to Cato Springs Road. The Police and Fire Departments
review of this proposed rezoning did not indicate substantial adverse impacts
to their service as a result of this rezoning.
4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density
and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and
sewer facilities.
Finding: Population density and use intensity are planned to increase in this area as
identified in the General Plan 2020. Water and sewer services will be
required to be evaluated and submitted at the time of development; those
improvements necessary to retain an acceptable level of service for all
infrastructure as dictated by the City of Fayetteville will be required of the
developer, including the extension of water service, and sewer lines, and
other infrastructure needs deemed appropriate and meeting the rough
proportionality of the impact of this development on the existing
infrastructure.
5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of
considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed
zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as:
a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses
permitted under its existing zoning classifications;
b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning
even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why
the proposed zoning is not desirable.
Finding: N/A
KAReports120051PC Reports111-28-0518-PZD 05-1797 (Bungalows @ Cam Springs).doc
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: 479-444-3469
TO: Andrew Garner. Planner
FROM: Alison Jumper, Park Planner
DATE: October 3I, 2005
SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Tech. Plat Review Comments
Meeting Date: November 2, 2005
Item: PZD 05-1797 The Bungalows at Cato Springs
Park District: SW
Zoned: RPZD
Billing Name & Address: Jim Knight
Current Land Dedication Requirement
Money in Lieu
Single Family
@ .024 acre per unit = acres
_@
$555
per unit =
$
Multi Family
@ .017 acre per unit = acres
@
$393
per unit =
$
Mobile Home
@ .024 acre per unit = acres
@
$555
per unit =
$
Lot Split
@
$555
per unit =
$
COMMENTS:
This project will need to be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for a
recommendation regarding park land dedication requirements.
Please contact Park Staff to coordinate submittal and meeting dates.
R-PZD0--2
a e evi le
Y ARKANSAS
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479)444-3471
To: McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc.
From: Sarah K. Patterson, Urban Forester
Date: October 31, 2005
Subject: Concept Review Comments
ITEM #: R-PZD 05-1797: Planned Zoning District (Bungalows @ Cato)
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
1. Asa Planned Zoning District, by Chapter 167 of the Unified Development
Code, the developer is required the most restrictive preservation percent;
25%.
2. A full Tree Preservation Plan will be required with the submittal of plans
for this development. This should include but not be limited to canopy
calculations, significant tree inventory, and a site analysis.
3. Keep in mind trees of 'significant' size, found on slopes, and/or found
along waterways are high priority for preservation.
4. Without the trees shown on the development plan it is difficult to
determine whether any would be proposed for preservation. Staff will not
support this PZD as it currently appears to preserve little to no canopy.
5. Without having visited the site, staff suggests a preservation area located
between the existing house and Cato Springs Road that would encompass
the area with the densest canopy and on average larger trees.
November 7, 2005
Jeremy Pate
Zoning and Development Director
City of Fayetteville
113 W. Mountain
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Dear Director Pate,
This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the proposed
R-PZD 05-1797: Planned Zoning District (The Bungalows at Cato Springs, 600)
submitted by McClelland Consulting Engineers for property located NW of Cato Springs
and Cline Ave would substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably
increase the load on police services or create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and
traffic congestion.
It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this Planned Zoning District
will not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the
load on police services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion
in the area.
Sincerely,
Lieutenant William Brown
Fayetteville Police Department
FAYETTEVILLE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE of the FIRE MARSHAL
TO: Planning
FROM: Battalion Chief Kyle S. Cu XC
DATE: November 07, 2005 /
RE: MDP for PZD Bungalos at Cato Springs
Single Family Residential:
• All roads shall have a minimum width of 20 feet
• Rear alleys (concerned about accessing these areas for vehicle fires — have not
received a ruling on whether they need to be 20 feet in width)
• Hydrant spacing shall not exceed 500 feet (from last existing hydrant)
• Addresses will need to be readily visible from the street
• Driving grades over 10% present special consideration
• Driveways to structures will need to be able to support fire apparatus and give
adequate width (if located off of frontage more than 75 feet)
Fayetteville Fire Department
303 W. Center St. Fayetteville AR. 72701
R-PZD05-1798 (DEPALMA ADDITION, 487)
These 10.04 acres are covered by Engine I and Ladder I on Center Street.
The property is 2.4 miles from the station with a projected response time of 9 minutes to
this development. The 9 minute response time is above our response time goal of having
the first unit on the scene within 6 minutes, 90% of the time. Also, our goal of
assembling all responding units to the scene of a moderate risk assignment within 10
minutes, 90% of the time, will not be met_ The longer than average response time is due
to the steepness of Rockwood Trail and the narrow winding road leading down to this
development.
The Fire Department anticipates I call for service (I EMS & 0 Fire/Other) once the
development is completed and maximum build -out has occurred.
If you have any questions please feel free to call or email me
Dale Riggins
Fayetteville Fire Department
Andrew Garner - Meeting of the Technic-' Olat Review Committee for Nov. 2, 2005 Page 1
From: Travis Dotson
To: Fulcher, Jesse; Garner, Andrew; Morgan, Suzanne
Date: 10/31/05 3:09PM
Subject: Meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee for Nov. 2, 2005
Jesse,
LSD 05-1799: Village Apartments - Site plans show no place for a dumpster pad. According to the
number of units - it should have at least two six yard dumpsters going twice a week.
LSD 05-1801: The Stadium Centre - The site plans show three locations for dumpster pads. The two
sites at the southern part of the complex will be easily accessible, however will need to be built 30' wide x
10' deep to house two dumpsters each. The third site on the north end of this complex is not in location
accessible for our trucks to pick up. The pad needs to be placed in an area that would be a straight shot
for our trucks or angled for our trucks to access.
R-PZD 05-1797: The bungalows at Cato Springs - The width of the alleyways is a concern of ouur
division. We will need no less than 15' wide alleys with "NO PARKING" designation on trash day. If
parking is allowed in alleyways, we will need a considerably wider alleyway larger than 15'. Also if we are
required to go down alley ways in this.area, each residence will need to have a numbered address on the
nl of the property as well as the back.
LSD 05-1800: Drake Hill - Container pad area needs to be at least 15'wide x 10' deep.
LSD 05-1809: The
Lofts
@ Underwood Plaza
- The container pad
at this site needs to be larger, and in
a more accessable
area.
15'wide x 10'deep
Suzanne,
LSD 05-1805: Cornerstone Home Services - This plat shows no designated area for a trash container
of any size.
THANKS!
Travis Dotson
Andrew Gamer - The Bungalows at Catn Brings-PZD Page 1
From: Brent O'neal
To: mmorgan@mcclelland-engrs.com
Date: 11/10/05 4:40PM
Subject: The Bungalows at Cato Springs -PLO
Due to the limited information provided, the comments listed below are of a general nature and do not
include requirements from other divisions that may arise later in the development process. The following
are Engineering Division comments for the above Planned Zoning District Master Development Plan:
1. Improvements to the water system will be required which may require off -site improvements. An
evaluation will need to be made at the time of submittal on how the water system is to be connected with
the existing system.
2. Sanitary sewer is adjacent to the site. A study of the downstream system shall be conducted by the
developer.
3. The site has access to Cato Springs Road. Improvements to Cato Springs Road will be required along
the property frontage. Off -site improvements to Cato Springs Road may be required. Further evaluation
will be conducted by staff at the time of preliminary plat submittal. Right-of-way for Cato Springs Road will
also be required at the time of preliminary plat.
4. Runoff from most of the site flows overland to the north and west to a creek. Standard improvements
and requirements for drainage will be required for the development. This may or may not include
provisions for detention of storm water.
CC: Casey, Matt; Fulcher, Jesse; Garner, Andrew; Morgan, Suzanne; Pate, Jeremy
RPZD05-1797 THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
One Mile View
I , Ii #�Y1 Ij�'�'�RAi T7 itrET .�
PI (1MF-QR k
i RIF2� rv.1� il! 4 {♦?'Li Chi �3 n.�i. irl _ /
PR15A
42
1E 6 F
It
C3
RAF -24 T i—
'-
Overview
•
42
ST
SUBJECT PROPERTY
41
Legend Boundary
Subject Property .� P!anni g Azea
RPZD05-1797 yo0P�
0eday DiSOCt
P>OJOJ
Outside City
Legend
0 0.120.25 0.5 0.75 1
files
:au
eathfiryi; Syii� ` ::
,R GiSit
.ii� •i itl•. !•
i'if1..:li J♦
.f
1 ♦�r• il
x � ✓ IL
gN .y
1 _ 1p 1 u•l
• [ h ft ; % 31 M
x A
t
1 •
1
r
c e. - e y/vri
♦ .y - i ).-s,ix. f �..1
` 1w -t 1 ry
SSYY
..
J. 1 �( i >
sirt •1 •!. n
=' 4 4♦ (_t I Y 1 5 it P
♦ >• (.cjc, rod.+• nr 1•�
Yi
t�ttli]i�tV[ � •ai
k•� N Ike_ A•
t N'
f NO
A '
ias r'.
l
r t
r F
P.r t
4f{
� i f
i.fl.
Rc t�
1 5
r.� IWHt—I) • M
+ L
•
J( Y / C T, Y
A.
I
C" •F
LG EEn !i !l)„'�]3 iYe i LA YTT�Y /
nTa
N� ? ��
— I . - - — -r - . --I •.J
• �.-f�
3 YFry♦ :� �' f .�
• q"�n • . re
• ,r.,J r, y,.zr:•
4�. fYwr�YC`J
J a{ .•
'm 2
l.. I \ _ µIC •}J-\ /D� i\ Y- i 1 • \ {\
♦
t• � s � �
j. is71
_.
'C
tk
V! ,
tl1Sr .
a
s
The Bungalows at Cato Springs
Fayetteville, Arkansas
A. Current ownership information:
This 5.52 acre parcel of land consists of two (2) tracts of land — Tract 'A' and Tract `B'.
Tract 'A' occupies the southern half of the site and consists of approximately; 2.75 acres
of land. Tract 'B' occupies the northern half of the site and consists of approximately
2.77 acres of land.
Tract `B'
Current Owner:
Real Sources, Inc.
1310 West Main Street
Russellville, AR 72801
v)(479) 968.2001
f) (479) 964.2008
Tract `A'
Current Owner:
Bruce M. Hauser
11168 Pearce Road
West Fork, AR 72764
Note: Tract 'A' is under contract to be sold to the Current Owner of Tract 'B'1 (Real
Sources, Inc.).
B. Summary description of the scope, nature and intent of the proposal:
The Bungalows at Cato Springs PZD allows for single family, affordable housing while
preserving natural barriers, trees, and buffers. Higher density allows for quality
infrastructure (majority of homes to be served by rear alley — eliminating parking on the
street) while maintaining affordability.
C. General Project Concept: (exhibit Ia) ;
(1) Street and Lot Layout: The proposed site is bisected by a single neighborhood
street (50' ROW) running through the middle of the property and ending in cul-de-sac.
Lots are located along either side of this main street. Additionally, alleys are planned
along the eastern and western side of the lots to allow for both residential access and trash
service. Street and Lot Layout are further illustrated on the Master Development Plan.
(2) Site Plan Showing Proposed Improvements illustrated on the Master
Development Plan.
(3) Buffer area is concentrated along the western property line and runs the length
of the property. The Buffer area is illustrated on the Master Development Plan..
(4) Tree Preservation Areas shall include the large trees located immediately in
front (south side) of the existing residential structure (existing structure is proposed to
remain after development). All trees within the Buffer area along the western property
line shall be protected during development.
(5) Storm Water Detention Areas and Drainage.
a) Currently no storm water detention area is anticipated due to the subject
property being located directly adjacent to Cato Springs Branch. Coordination will occur
with City Engineering Staff to ensure that post -developed waters enter the waterway prior
to peak time of concentration for the tributary and no negative effects shall be felt
downstream of the subject site.
b) Drainage shall be conveyed directly into Cato Springs Branch via sheet
flow.
(6) A large expanse of Undisturbed Natural Area shall remain intact along the
western property line as illustrated in the Master Development Plan.
(7) All existing and proposed utility connections and (water/sewer) main
extensions are currently planned to originate along Cato Springs Road.
(8) Conceptual development and conceptual architectural design standards are
illustrated upon both the Master Development Plan and the architectural renderings (see
appendix 'A')
(9) All conceptual building elevations are illustrated on the enclosed renderings
(see appendix 'A').
D. Proposed Development Phasing and Time Frame:
The Bungalows at Cato Springs is planned to be developed in one phase lasting between.
twelve (12) and eighteen (18) months after receiving engineering approval.
E. Proposed Planning Areas:
Proposed are four (4) separate planning areas (PA -1, PA -2, PA -3, PA -4). Limits of
planning areas are illustrated per the plan sheet labeled `Zoning and Development
Standards by Planning Area' (Sheet 2 of 3). Each specific planning area noted upon this
sheet is broken into its own sheet to specify proposed zoning regulations.
F. Proposed Zoning and Development Standards:
Each proposed zone is individually listed within the project booklet (exhibit 2a, 3a, 4a).
G. Comparison Chart
A graphic comparison chart is provided within the project booklet (exhibit 6a).
H. A
description
of the recreational
facilities, including existing and proposed park
sites,
open space
and accessibility to
parks and open space areas.
The western 1.5 acres of the site is proposed to be dedicated as open space / green space
(PA -4). This area can be used to connect to the overall Multi -Use trail system within the
City of Fayetteville and/or provide pedestrian access to Great House Springs Park to the
north.
I. Reason for requesting the zoning change.
To build the highest quality, affordable housing in the area without violating applicable
building and zoning codes. The zoning change would allow the flexibility necessary to
provide multiple housing types upon this small parcel of land.
J. Statement of how the development will relate to existing and surrounding
properties in terms of land use, traffic, appearance, and signage.
Currently, the proposed site is surrounded by University Property, Rsf-4, Rmf-24, and I-1
zones. The Bungalows at Cato Springs is currently unable to extend its roadway to
neighboring properties — therefore contains a single road ending in a cul-de-sac. This
single road will run between a row of houses on either side (similar to the existing
development to the east.). Land use and traffic will be very similar to existing residential
development to the east and west. The architecture of the Bungalows at Cato Springs
will be attractive and stylized (see enclosed building elevations). To allow for the
•
possibility of a future connection to the existing subdivision to the east, the proposed
ROW has been extended to the subject property's eastern property line.
K. Statement of the project's compliance with the Fayetteville General Plan 2020.
Per the 2020 plan, additional housing units will be needed over the next 15 years.
Recently it has been noted that the overall pricing of housing has left a large portion of
the citizens unable to afford quality homes. The Bungalows at Cato Springs seeks to
build affordable housing with attractive elevations within a quiet setting. To meet the
goal of the 2020 plan of providing an alternative to the "detrimental social, economic and
physical effects of concentrating affordable housing" we offer this PZD that would allow
for the required density of housing necessary to keep pricing low. Further, in lieu of
accessing impact fees for this subdivision toward park land dedication, water impact fees
and sanitary sewer impact fees, the developer would be willing to pass 100% of those
cost savings on to the potential consumer.
"Fayetteville seeks to continue the provision of affordable housing within the City and its
Planning Area. Provisions are sought that encourage more affordable housing utilizing
conventional construction methods and locations within conventional settings."
L. A traffic study when required by the Planning/Engineering Divisions.
Currently a traffic study has not been requested by City Staff.
M. Impacts on City services, including the availability of water and sewer. This
information is available from the City Engineering Division.
Water service is planned to connect to the existing 6" water main located along the north
side of Cato Springs Road.
Sanitary Sewer service is planned to connect to the existing 8" sanitary sewer main
located along the south side of Cato Springs Road.
No concerns have been raised to date regarding the potential availability of utility service
to the proposed units.
N. "STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS"
1) Dedication = After the approval of the City of Fayetteville and at the time of recording
of the final plat with the Washington County Circuit Clerk, all proposed land to be
dedicated to the City of Fayetteville (currently proposed are 1.5 acres of green/trail space,
sanitary sewer easement(s), water service easement(s)) shall be legally conveyed.
2) Any required on or' off site improvement(s) shall be completed during constructed or
bonded in lieu of actual construction.
3) All existing environmentally sensitive areas currently within the floodway and
floodplain shall be dedicated as perpetual green space / trail space.
Existing trees upon the site shall be preserved wherever practicable. An existing, large
tree located directly in front of the existing home shall be preserved by this proposed
development.
4) Project is planned to be constructed in one single phase.
5) Fire protection
shall
include all
necessary hydrant installations as required per the
International Fire
Code
and/or the
City of Fayetteville Fire Chief.
• 6) All conditions required by the City of Fayetteville and agreed upon by theowner shall
be completed (or bonded) prior to the approval of final plat.
7) Lands dedicated to Parks/Trails/Open Space shall be agreed upon during the design
review process and conveyed to the City of Fayetteville when the final plat is recorded
with the Washington County Circuit Clerk. Currently, approximately 1.5 acre's of land
ld
located upon the subject property has been proposed to be dedicated to the City of
Fayetteville.
8) All land is to be utilized for residential use. Proposed conceptual residential elevations
are submitted as part of this project booklet.
O. Conceptual Description of Development Standards, Conditions and Review
Guidelines
1) Screening shall be placed along the eastern boundary of the subject property to screen
the proposed development from the established residential neighborhood to the east.
Each unit shall plant upon completion of the.unit a minimum of one (1) 2" caliper tree.
2) Traffic and Circulation shall meet the requirementsof the City of Fayetteville. -
3) Parking standards shall be in conformance with the requirements of residential parking
requirements for the City of Fayetteville.
4) Screening shall be placed along the eastern boundary of the subject property to screen
the proposed development from the established residential neighborhood to the east. No
screening is currently proposed between the northern edge of the subject property and the
I-1 zone to the north. Approx 1.5 acres of open space (containing Cato Springs Branch
Tributary) will be dedicated to the City of Fayetteville to the west. Cato Springs Road
adjoins the subject property to the south.
5) Sidewalks shall be installed along all proposed rights -of -way within the subdivision.
6) Streetlights shall be provided within the subdivision per the requirements of the City of
Fayetteville.
7) All units within the subdivision shall have water service via a water main extension
originating off of Cato Springs Road.
8) All units within the subdivision shall have access to sanitary sewer via a sewer main
extension originating off of Cato Springs Road.
9) Streets shall meet the design requirements of the City of Fayetteville. Drainage will
either sheet flow into the existing creek, or be conveyed via storm pipes into the existing
creek.
10) Currently, no Non -Residential Facilities are being proposed.
11) Currently the majority of tree preservation is occurring within the proposed green
space / trail area. This development desires to preserve the existing, very large tree
located in front of the existing residential structure.
12) Conceptual architectural elevations and floor plans are located within this project.
booklet.
13) Any and all signage shall be design in accordance with the design guidelines of the
City of Fayetteville.
14) Due to the low nature of this property, view protection from within or outside of this
development is not currently an issue. Conceptual architectural elevations are submitted
as part of this project booklet.
15) Any and all revocations shall follow the due process as per the rules and regulations
of the City of Fayetteville and/or the planned property owners association. I
16) A property owners association with associated covenants shall be formed for this
subdivision.
P. Compliance with the Intent/Purpose of the Planned Zoning District
Having exhausted the option of a general residential rezone, this development is pursuing
the right to develop via R-PZD. This development shall consist of residential, single
family units. The flexibility afforded by the R-PZD allows the development to be further
concentrated away from environmentally sensitive areas located along the western
property line (Cato Spring Branch Creek). The higher yield of single-family units allows
the developer to incorporate higher quality architectural designs into the development.
6
• _____ .+re w ow vavnaia vrwu/w tonov•— '-inn
*Aa wain a_Is_i
• bU1kIdS OlA`J lY &NOM7N'IB 3i!
Oa exNoaut @J '�
.psy6u3
a OYJ/rouoD
m— — ... V
Puollo/��W ravtwy.'vuaa°an'v�woatva_ i • a�
•
•s — — T jymc `Q
�JS
¢ GPG545 3i u I I ..,.._.._.._ Uca0
• _ '1613 flu I j �cJW c
.° ii ll o...... .°r I
i I I m
. ---- --------------L_ - ° s
4Yy
ti
`I • a ato.-._•
I • I .OIJ.anr la t'-iaw
I s I I•
j I
I I _ I. I
Z
Al
• r i aoa tr t - ao tswP
• I, I '°I IAI°! If
a • f I
�• ___ A ways IIIYt₹�J
• O O W
• Q WN I \ si sl .I `�
U 0Z — i H f F ' I
C - z I
• ':\
I \ \
• Oa \ \ �^ \I
• �1 O j .fl
•
I '
LU m
Z U i u°d
� "---7:J
o 1 N N. `
Nm �"J•
� °�QW,I
�N OQ
• `aVWW
• 20�
�00`
'i i i'iil'I 'I ("'ti' tt fi 'iii
1►i.: ;1
t. II I t ;. I
! tt ; ff
• '` J i t�l ( 31t ! li 1: aii ipt J if' ti { i 3'
1±_ ( i III {JJI �ll � f� It�•i1 11J'' I ;it BJ ft i 1: il tl !!
I. i Ii t•
:;Ifj I'fI J3 YO j 11 } ijfi i i0I fl
SO ') S l i,iil'g 1 11
1 J J fit it J 1 ! °' 't i It , 1 1 ` 1 li
• I :' I of i`etl tl 1 i • '1 I °f 1. t t i,' � t e (J i.
'! ! 1' f i ( t 111 �1�3il l '� ! I' I I ( 6i l t' I fl1i,B ft 1 j i i'' i! ( l l l t`' i'Ii''t'
4l��:` ;`.11 It �i�it?IJI(��otila •••
;;`11lf:tlt a it,111ik�3�t�:` taetI II :!F 4il�i111 •H •
•
•
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
PA- >
(A) Purpose. The PA -1 area (68ac) is designed to permit and
encourage the development of detached dwellings in suitable
environments.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UNIT 1 City-wide uses by right
UNITS Single-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT 2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
UNITS
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNIT 24
Home occupations
(C) Density
Units per acre Maximum Eight (8) units per acreIL
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Lot width minimum
20 ft.
Lot area minimum
3,800 sq.ft.
Land area per dwelling unit
3,800 sq. ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
Rear
10 R.
0 ft. *
25 ft. - ALONG ANY vueuc.uAE)s (MEASURED FROM CENIERUNEOFAUE'Y).
20 ft. -BEnwsJ OMSIDowes NC alsnwa SLCLEFAULYRE50£NW
5 ft. - answvPROPOSED owas wo _____niEaiarovenrvu
* all buildings shall be detached (recommended 5'separation).
(F) Height regulations.
II Building height maximum 35 ft.
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 50% of the total area of such lot.
Four (4) units proposed (approx 25% of total planning area).
(H) Landscaping: Each lot shall plant one large street tree per lot
along the frontage (if applicable).
(I) Parking. • Per city requirments (2 spaces per residential unit).
(J) Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architecectural design
standards have been submitted with the R-PZD project booklet.
Front building facades as they face the street shall be varied in
material and color so that no two same facades are adjacent to one
another or face one another.
(K) Signage Requirments: Signage shall be in accordance with the
regulations set forth in UDC Chapter 1 74:Signs-RSF Zoning District.
PLANNED AREA. -01 19
•
•
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
PA -2
(A) Purpose. The PA -2 area (1.24ac) is designed to permit and
encourage the development of detached dwellings in suitable
environments.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UN/Ti City-wide uses by right
UNIT 8 Single-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
UNIT 3
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNIT 24
Home occupations
(C) Density
Units per acre 10 to 15 units per acre
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Lot width minimum
20 ft.
Lot area minimum
1,500 sq.ft.
Land area per dwelling unit
1,500 sq. ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
Rear
loft.
0 ft. *
25 ft. **
* all buildings shall be detached (recommended 5' separation).
** as measured from the centerline of the alley nearest the unit.
(F) Height regulations
Building height maximum 1 35 ft. II
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 50% of the total area of such lot.
Thirteen (13) units proposed (approx 30% of total planning area).
(H) Landscaping: Each lot shall plant one large street tree per lot.
along the frontage (if applicable).
(l) Parking: Per city requirments (2 spaces per residential unit).
(J) Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architecectural design
standards have been submitted with the R-PZD project booklet
Front building facades as they face the street shall be varied in
material and color so that no two same facades are adjacent to one
another or face one another.
(1Q Signage Requirments: Signage shall be in accordance with the
regulations set forth in UDC Chapter 174:Signs-RSF Zoning District.
PLANNED AREA - 02 1O
•
S
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
PA -3
(A) Purpose. The PA -3 area (2.17ac) is designed to permit and
encourage the development of detached dwellings in suitable
environments.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UN/TI City-wide uses by right
UNIT 8 Single-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
UNIT 3
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNIT 24Home
occupations
(C) Density
Units per acre Maximum Eight (8) units per acre
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Lot width minimum
30 ft.
Lot area minimum
3,500 sq.f.
Land area per dwelling unit
3,500 sq.ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
Rear
loft.
Oft.
25 ft.
" as measured from the centerline of the alley nearest the unit.
(F) Height regulations
II Building height maximum 1 35 ft. II
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 50% of the total area of such lot.
Thirteen (13) units proposed (approx. 26% of total planning area).
(H) Landscaping: Each lot shall plant one large street tree per lot
along the frontage (if applicable).
(l) Parking: Per city requirments (2 spaces per residential unit).
(J) Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architecectural design
standards have been submitted with the R-PZD project booklet.
Front building facades as they face the street shall be varied in
material and color so that no two same facades are adjacent to one
another or face one another.
(1Q Signage Requirments: Signage shall be in accordance with the
regulations set forth in UDC Chapter 174:Signs-RSFZoning District.
PLANNED AREA. -03 I ��
(exhibit 4a)
•
•
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
-4 & Rsf-4, Residential Single Family
Four Units Per Acre
(A) Purpose. The RSF-4 Residential District is designed to permit
and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings
in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development
of these types.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UNIT 1
City-wide uses by right
UNIT 8
Single-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT 2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit•
UNIT 3
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNIT9
Two-family dwellings
UNIT24
Home occupations
UNIT 36
Wireless communications facilities
(C) Density
Single-family Two-family
dwellings dwellings
Units per acre 4 or less 7 or less
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Single-family
dwellings
Two-family
dwellings
Lot width minimum
70 ft.
80 ft.
Lot area minimum
8,000 sq.2
12000 sq. ft.
Land area per
dwelling unit
8, 000 sq. ft.
6,000 sq. ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front Side Rear
25 ft. 8 ft. 20 ft.
(F) Height regulations.
II Building height maximum NONE
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot.
EXISTING ZONING (Rsf-4) X12
I
•
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
PA -4 & Rsf-4, Residential Single Family
Four Units Per Acre
(A) Purpose. The RSF-4 Residential District is designed to permit
and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings
in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development
of these types.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UNIT I
City-wide uses by right
UNIT 8
Single-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT 2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
UNITS
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNITS
Two-family dwellings
UNIT 24 -
Home occupations
UNIT 36
Wireless communications facilities
(C) Density
Single-family .Two-family
dwellings dwellings
Units per acre 4 or less 7 or less
'(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Single-family
dwellings
Two-family
dwellings
Lot width minimum
70 ft.
Soft.
Lot area minimum
8,000 sq.ft.
12,000 sq.ft.
Land area per
dwelling unit
8,01)0 sq. ft.
6,000 sq. ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
Rear
125!?.
aft.
20 ft.
(F) Height regulations.
Building height maximum NONE
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot.
PA -1
(A) Purpose. The PA -I area (68ac) is designed to permit and
encourage the development of detached dwellings in suitable
environments.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UNIT 1 City-wide uses by right
UNITS Ingle -family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
UNITS
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNIT24
Homeoccupations
(C) Density
Units per acre IMaximum Eight (8) units per acre
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Lot width minimum
20 ft.
Lot area minimum
3,800 sq. R.
Land area per dwelling unit
3,800 sq. ft.
(E) Setback requirements. -•
Front
Side
Rear
10ft
Oft. •
25 ft. /I�ASLpEO FROM LEMENIIBCFAII£YJ.
20 ft -BERYF£N PROPOSED &JXSMO LOS TWIG S4 CLEFAWLVRESWJTh4[
5 ft. - eeIwmvoaoacsm&Sn.o 'ape p?TY LatE
all buildings shall be detached (recommended 5'separation).
(F) Height regulations.
Building height maximum 35 ft.
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 50% of the total area of such lot.
Four (4) units proposed (approx 25% of total planning area).
(H) Landscaping: Each lot shall plant one large street tree per lot
along the frontage (d applicable).
(l) Parking: Per city requirments (2 spaces per residential unit).
(J) Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architecectural desk
standards have been submitted with the R-PZD project booklet.
Front building facades as they face the street shall be varied in
material and color so that no two same facades are adjacent to one
another or face one another.
(K) Signage Requrrments: Signage shall be in accordance with the
regulations set forth in UDC Chapter 174:Signs-RSFZoning District.
EXISTING ZONING (Rsf-4)
/ PLANNED AREA - 01
COMPARATIVE ZONING CHART
PA -2
(A) Purpose. The PA -2 area (1.24ac) is designed to permit and
encourage the development of detached dwellings in suitable
environments.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UNIT > City-wide uses by fight
UNITS ingle-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
UNIT 3
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNIT24
Home occupations
(C) Density
Units per acre 10 to 15 units per acre
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Lot width minimum
20 ft.
Lot area minimum
1,500 sq.ft.
Land area per dwelling unit
1,500 sq.ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
Rear
loft.
oft.*
25 ft. **
"all buildings shall be detached (recommended 5'separation).
** as measured from the centerline of the alley nearest the unit.
(F) Height regulations.
Building height maximum 35 ft.
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 50% of the total area of such lot.
Thirteen (13) units proposed (approx 30% of total planning area).
(H) Landscaping: Each lot shall plant one large street tree per lot
along the frontage (if applicable).
(I) Parking: Per city requirments (2 spaces per residential unit).
(J) Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architecectural desigi
standards have been submitted with the R-PZD project booklet.
Front building facades as they face the street shall be varied in
material and color so that no two same facades are adjacent to one
another or face one another.
(lq Signage Requirments: Signage shall be in accordance with the
regulations set forth in UDC Chapter 174:Signs-RSF Zoning District.
PA -3
(A) Purpose. The PA -3 area (2.17ac) is designed to permit and
encourage the development of detached dwellings in suitable
environments.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
UNIT I City-wide uses by right
UNIT 8Single-family dwellings
(2) Conditional uses.
UNIT 2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
UNIT 3
Public protection and utility facilities
UNIT 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
UNIT24
Home occupations
(C) Density
Units per acre frtiaximum Eight (8) units per acre
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Lot width minimum
30 ft.
Lot area minimum
3,500 sq.ft.
Land area per dwelling unit
3,5oo sq.ft.
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
Rear
loft.
Oft.
25 ft. *
* as measured from the centerline of the alley nearest the unit.
(F) Height regulations.
Building height maximum 35 tt.
(G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all building
shall not exceed 50% of the total area of such lot
Thirteen (13) units proposed (approx. 26% of total planning area).
(H) Landscaping: Each lot shall plant one large street tree per lot
along the frontage (if applicable).
(I) Packing. Per city requirments (2 spaces per residential unit).
(J) Architectural Design Standards: Conceptual architecectural design
standards have been submitted with the R-PZD project booklet.
Front building facades as they face the street shall be varied in
material and color so that no two same facades are adjacent to one
another or face one another.
(/q Signage Requirments: Signage shall be in accordance with the
regulations set forth in UDC Chapter 1 74:Signs-RSF Zoning District.
• PLANNED AREA - 02 / PLANNED AREA - 03 13
(exhibit 6a)
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
CONCEPTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS
AND FLOOR PLANS
M
X31 1., r a
I y
i .� 1 r l
I '•'i -I 'nom
15
S.
•
• H.
•
•
•
•• I �� t LLL
(nv,cncn w
• �. co o co o co
• co 1' 0) rn ao
rn CO IL) r
• ®❑
• Z o o O
• L g. ooJZUo
oo!
• No o a
• _0 ZZ
N U
• ®❑
i
m
i .
4-
o
1 I
V
nm I
I
c ^ i o
Y I
o r
o r - O
I Z
I
I
�o
i
.
T
9 ® ® Z
®
d'
p
8I I1 li al
'
I
I
I
I
{
{'
' -
I
! I I.
1R
4
/'I
+ r'
_ Ili
r-� I�
�1
11 p .
I ,I e:1
J 7i II.it���Z�l� / jw, 1
r
'i
i YIi.
I 1
4 5
Y. Y
d:
•
•
•
21
3
a
I
N
n
t
N
N
O
N
M
N
M1
r
cr
O
0
.W
O
O
W
=
<
Q
ojzoF
IW0
~
rzo
o
a
N
04
Z
O
U
z
5
a
0
Or
L
z
0
U
W
N
22
i� •.• II I
I. II
1 • •
.���IIIIIIIIIIIII�III I •
NEON a _
M���•�!•lI1111l11III III
.■-- - ---a
- �-Iununununi
.________ IIIIIIIIIIOII��II u
--. '-'-•-' �1111111111111
c
•
I - -=- -- . .
1 _
-t
• nb S
I II
ate- ►�-• •
II
►►
•
• =- �t�
•a•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• e
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sri r2 �_ '.— / +
' Y "
•
•
•
•1.
•
•
•
I.
24
Clarice Pearman - Ords. 4804, 4807 4808 4809 & 4810 Page 1
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Pate, Jeremy
Date: 12/28/05 1:35PM
Subject: Ords. 4804, 4807, 4808, 4809 & 4810
Jeremy,
Attached are the ordinances passed by City Council, December 20, 2005.
CC: Bell, Peggy; Deaton, Vicki; GIS
a.
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDITION
• • , .
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Erin Emis. do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the Arkansas
Democrat-Gazette/Northwest Arkansas Times newspaper, printed and
.published in Lowell, Arkansas, and that from .my .own personal knowledge
and reference to the files of said publication, that advertisement of:
was inserted in the regular editions on
D/'D.//rt/4. C/ C2(Y?S
PO#
** Publication Charge: $ /99.4 9
Subscribed and sworn to bet ;e;e this
day of A) 2005.
-Notary Public Sharlene D. Williams
Notary Public
state of Arkansas
My Commission Expires:
My Commission Expires
October is, P014
" Please do not pay from Affidavit.
An invoice will be sent.
RECEIVED
JAN O32005
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
P.O. BOX 1607 • 212 N. EAST AVENUE • FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701 • 479-571-6470
.4-
I -
ORDINANCE NO. 4809
Mr ORDINANCE BatabCPZD a -1797. NML lows W eINAle
zato PIngs tlIoC R-PZD OSTHWE T OFNwsOLeto Springs, IoCATED NORTHWEST OF CATOSPRINGS ROAD AND CLINE AVENUE, WEST OFBUSINESS/SOU H SCHOOL AVENUE, CONTAINING ARKA
APPROXIMATELY 5.52 ACRES, MORE OR LESS;
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEV LLE; AND ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT ORONNED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSA&
Section 1: That the zone dea4ficptbn Of the f010w4g described propery Is hereby changed a9 fdbxs:
From RSF-4, Resldentlel SIrgo-Femlly 4 units per eve, to R-PZD 05-1797 as shown In Etdbit'A'
attached hereto and made a pert hereof.
Section 2: That the change ki wring daseiflratbn Is based upon the epprwed muster developrneri
plan. deesoprnent stnldwds, entl conditlons of approval as submitted, detanfsied appropriate Nld
waved by the City Cana.
Section 3: That this aNlnence shaft take effect and ben MI force at such time as SI of the requbements
at the master development plan have been met.
Section 4: That the ofda zvdg map of the City of Fayettmilo. A/kensas. b hereby amended to reflect
the zoning change prwkbd in Section 1 abo t.
PASSED a1M APPROVED Uis 20th day of December, 2005.
APPROVED: .
By:
DAN COODY Mayor
By.
SONURA SMITH, City CMrt
EXHIBIT'A•
MDP R-PZD 08-1797
SURVEY DESCRIPTION TRACT A:
P.N. 765-15055-ODO
A PART OF THE SW1/4 OF THE SWl/4 OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST.
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH
UNE OF SAID SECTION 21 SBP13'26'E 584.55 FEED, THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE
N09'16'40'E 40.27 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF CATO SPRINGS ROAD (RAN
VARIES) AS SHOWN ON A PLAT RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 96073612; THENCE NOT16'40'E
227.73 FEET; THENCE N09'14'37E 53.37 FEET, THENCE N09'39'50E 23.81 FEET. THENCE
585'0210E 389.40 FEET TO THE WEST UNE OF THE MCCUNTON'S 2ND ADDI ION; THENCE
ALONG SAID WEST UNE S03*1639'W 288.08 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF SAID
CATO SPRINGS ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH UNE N8P13'26 W 421.25 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2.75 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TOANY EASEMENTS,
COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD OR FACT.
SURVEY DESCRIPTION TRACT B:
P.N. 765-15055-002
A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST„
WASHINGTON.CWHE SOUT W ASEST C MORE PARTICULARLY
SECTION N 21IB H AS FALONG T
COhcMENCINGID AT TION 21 S87 13'26 ERE 58455 SAID HENC 2D THENCEASAID SJTH UNE
UNE 6' SAID .27 587.12E 5RIGH FEET, THENCE CATO SPRINGS NSOUTH UNE
VARIES AS 40.27 FEET TO THE NORTH EIGHT -OF -CU UNE OF 3ATO THNCEROAD (RAN!
VARIES) AS SHOWN NN A PLAT RECORDED E AS ENCE NOD' 960738171 FENCT THE PT
227.]9 BEGINNING:
THENCE CE NM39 E E 116E4T; THENCE NCE 30601E 23.81 9.72 FTOE THT POINT
N1OF 0B'D4 IN 3 THENCE NHENCE0'E 112'04 E 342'47 FEET NOf11THE NOR2TE HWE TECT,' THENCER;
THE187'1
THENCE TSOr1 'S 2ND W ADDf5 FEEflTHENCE
ALONG THEWESTI LINE OF SAID MCO2 10 W 3 2ND
ADDITION E POINT
OF 3EGIN FEET, THENCE DE2ARTING SAID WEST LE S, SUBJE T O A.NY!
FEEE[[ TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, RESTRICTIONSOR OF RECORD OR FACT.
I
• 1
pp oy nr�m ' D'j`I nynm >m m $ q> Y
4m m 2
Mpg ����y �D`Ilz$i EA
F', iic Uzi^py Qpm y 1�m1rr11QC rn yOm rmyl ylyliOm yA y �A y�rp0�B �j�y GmCN
C' RI
yGm �" Z +l �1A ��m;r1 2.191N CSC2 �CZpo CSm yN OIZ^j SS2
p$N yA mA 1r71 � Dm O 0•111y29��1y1 CJ� rA l T��S aaMOO�J
I•IK rU iZN S NpD no
m nlzm $ZI�ZIZtIZ> bbm2SN IOII T VI SN ONmr N
mX ge$ Q mg �ypinZ $ 848r4
y 100 f�p 9� IIIL2N -1 Nam K S N d<0>` yzG> m l>_
S 0♦ >yN O f>> _ np 9r-oj�jjj
z c2ir v Q zs z j �''�5 2=1 $a• o �. 20 OA m n R Z 0 fl zr0
- $m> o00
ONO 0y$ 9moTA mNar C Nofyj
Z zyp Z 01ppVp+m oZ0 r mZ Oll�m yi $ H E02 NQ0B
v N �Zr2 2 aZ�C 2gym pD g Z1�j�jN{ N�yr OAV91 ('A �0 yy�8ym 11 �1}f m4;= g'g 2m[5[>=p7yC9 m7og mS OWA
O V 4 N Fm,m Z�D S�11DT2 Acw 28g
O> D ZO
>a8 Z d -i W
v7 g�z $ in RM o>NM Se $v4'
OXm ABC D; m1m11r m� 111 �z0 O>m mN°'
z° 1N0mo �5i < -NivN Q (S/11c�s `b z 0
01m ��A •• M.p� p2 fAQom T0�z pZ1/IZN 0PZ C
8 FT1gn≥ >y�� FZp9p9p9p9' > 4$
/�N O ~A +INZK yZO ~D31/1 �y`2 p9 OZa �s~O C) Z
1V0Ito fO m 59 AI nn5MZ P $ ZN
1
Qmm
o% gNq$ g g Z2 Dm $m 22V
°K mld4 o 2
Dm mm Ny m$m NmT(1:1>
-<z0.
o N4rn T H
m ' 1 ~ Cq O Sp LJ
BEECHWOOD- AVE
z I N ' ^� ly"
zfl O --I /PTnfl
�RD if r> CD
9I r
` A R ORBACK
mry rn3 m
J• > qsr A>>
2 Z
R N v' zoo m AVE. yN T L
O VER DR I 0
S. LAVERNE AVE. CLINE qVE, _ L >0
oon
1�I N b ilp^�c >n $mi1�1 $INi ;{m9 9c m9i y��1�.11$Yol >a' p� coVm
..$6N x +IZ0�aV K yD Z� 8m$ydny j =<
A W N m T N NO AO j 1z sv g 0a4 �O CA =�Zt10; M - U11K1
J 11ym� ^�D O�^�rNj 1�0r N (p0�yo V 01r19ymnZ O -IN sz m�yy �mmR QQI cc
W111r~r�1Z Jy ;m ('f �npnp<�SZ4fV11 Am v
KI(Nf T ZJ��2�Nm gp ~22mZy�0� yN Oy O
N i N n >C 5 iVl 'J �iO� n\ N2 LmzM Ob m Yp $ T
!�1 Z m S >i JE iyl$\p yC 2q 0 Z$A
A 47 N m m7 czi [s�YN"4u£rfrNl m m 1�nn1"F 4^11�/�1 PA t
Cf D = I'N ybnoi<1�y < 1.�i<(ly T
!1 Z Al 1rO� sO$ ���[[[111 111N Apmm{� �1•IQ �Or1 >Om111N •
F,, H v O NO NC �i]{yT 011iV 9Z y♦�9
" T > y1 1V2J yg o NAOJ+�v>p RZI mo
N N z o x a F $:cm oy tog Agy oo ,j ..(f)
O�" QI Quo yo'.1°im'Zvo"p
N. N.N• S i m i '9i""Z?oA Fcv "n m�2Q$ M FDN
c- -o ' Z H O
Ii
cy" �Ovl N _I k 0 nou X85 CZN ..I Cw lllsO�C2z ..
o 2 r _ F ��ki oog�rAiz -1g555III[Dr�zN
vN. z N mo x S izmn$A " Nm$$4
ti CS) O �Z�m1�1000 M .1111 O.n p
C1CT !2
m nOOnDmyyR �Zu22m§ a
mp m ~Nyyy mfzll f Dm1p 10N))1 (J,1mm F
$ CZ�0TTN o(o yi' pz2£99g�1DNP=� >
n > 9MP yRQlrV�'M >n 2 A+1�.m� N Z
__ __ __ ___ C')
A0 Tm22.pO -i Ip11N4eQy Oo
n NJ21
IF11 yomoo"2i14 g t5d 9
p$imS$ E go=$
o
2tfl
mC �- X C
$ vi z 4 m z
D m 2
4
yy 1
No
,
�
p gL a₹fl
`g' t y
as a..g59
_a t
$
E
§$j •�t'
]�5`
F �
33y S
�Pg�§a�@
g`.�
g8
$ � g9� �
Yu�
_
$
yP�Pd�sggpl
g09 a�+�8
3 ₹F o
r
H IIe ! zp
�
6 ₹
g{ 8 `qq
yqg g:,
6 i
�®
R5
a7 $�"_Si
4
y� 1
Y���i '��
��'
a(c
pp B
e
Pd
r��$
sy°
i o°m�
j r1i
c
I
j
'13
I..,
$L_
--1P �
i
IO r
\
I
� �� m
;
��
o v v .A�.A•
2
Npb°JJ7r[
I
•
�
t
taro
PhINGS
.;
�
•.
\
\
� N
m
Z
O
BRANCy
PRESE/
z
ArjoNAR
m
1
�
til
' . ,
PAR RAI
a
T
<
r
y
VJ
a•
4
\
, .•
r
rn
v
1
aim
T
a
I
,I1____
I I a
1
0
m
I a r
•
..
O•
I
O
fti 1
I I
1
Ill
co
•
rid it r r
1! I
;i�i�
� r� r
'l V
0
I r
Ion !
al �.
a rN 1 ai
1 i
r r I r
j iii�et r
;Yr l j , .
f
r
r
i/ o.
Imi
T
•
' r r
� •
I
1 I II
p
Iryl ( I�: �1
' t I
obi
i t
,NI
1 Or r
\ 1
V
r
QOI'ER OR.
2p" —p B[Op 5E1HAp(J
rTi
1
ti
11
�
rw
'I
~
v
I
I
( ' p p
I Y
R r
I
r
v I
r
r
r
I
I
r r N r
ry
Mcf L.t/TO
NHS 2N '
r l O N
'
O
(
\ Y
��
CUNEAVE.
�p
—
--
�•
2
10
rmaiw)
2
a.
.
2
D
J
—_—
Psi
II
O
O
I
,
jI
•
I
1 O4etne* l Oe cmi
s
y
<
r
r
I
I
_
J
"I�
1TT
I
r
r
r
9OF_N��^t N92�y��Gtt. T F e�rrrr `
pv�Q Tm3 9 , NZ
.T D P 1 9 O
Sn
Fy
I
I
r
D
CC
F
O \•
�V1lJ
1
F
m
T
gip
Q
fDrt�
v sr
a
L
1 ;
g
11
o
a
�=
L
ro
: �}
a f
zav�n�uvaE�safrl�rranennuosern.awau
McClelland
*seCOn"near3g
4
PROP108f� PM
•st ne To Ssr
En
tq
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
Fayetteville
1810 N. Cd/M.
lncorporatad
Little Rock
900 W. Mmknan
8
R
e
.i
�T}
_
4f
CA70
8"FM
+
a.o a CR FAYE77F&
L A/KAM448
•
o��To
�o
a3
aC'
<'
-cni
uci
m
A
Z
�
yy
&-
1
�
m
m
yi
77y NO9°1640E Did A
'\
\ J 35 mOJ .
.-t-'•.• \
1_ Li: C4 Tp SPRINGS T :-
BRANCH R A
RESERVATION
&
PARK/TRAIL
I m I
I
N
aI yIL1
n °2
L Vl
1
i
I �
1
P.
q
u
•m'
f i
� I
¢OVETi
R f- - _'�_--.----
50r-0• R.O.W.
24'-0' R.O.W. a -
O
N
O
N
N
I
t
ti
flT1I"
fl%'.
� 1
o g N
P
20'-0 BLDG 3'IBAO(
fl
'psc,
V.
'ii II
Dom+*6Qe®xaIII Ii
0O
Fp �n
mz
m �1yn, F
G a!1 i�r�r
ry
Q
McClelland
..+ne ro ser EngineersConsultin9
Incorporated
Fayetteville Little Rock
PROPOSED Pm
THE BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS
Q
3
R
C3
QAm _._-fl t cover. ar PAYETTEWLE APoCANBAB
1810 N. College 900 W Markham
1
N
Lm
e
i.
0
z
a
o-
z
m
2
m
ov
C
/�
/
O �.
coD
mn
mZ
:1co
m�
rD 0)
my
>zD
°n
mm D
<
m CD
Z
C)
I
19
I I I: a:>v..a a°R x. 4
/ gg>
pV. rA V
•i a V i 41 _/ \
o3ia WI 1+1 '
OU1/' ' L•l� V \
m n A
p \
• vLt.V.• 1I))3 "— '• IiN °171E
j� s�y3r \
? �€. ., 1 l. 1J •N09°3950£: ,$L, z `♦\
. t BI i—••�I�r-�_i 1 nz u
cr�al.a_ _� lais': /��zb 1\-.♦ 1" 11639. •.�_. '.6912 !' ..`f)i�. N_ _\�`\ ♦\ �tlsg` •�_ ��. `C4 TO SARIN S NCH
" '. p r I� • 1 Ip
m .. /213 B� I +I/! I I ` •� '-.
1 ; "iz '....�� :.t .,,_/1� '1nwijr •p �a'.Ist �I 1. 1 _, kJ213v a
+ \-« �. r 20 - Yy� E• fY CY 0fryx $ !fa a�t'I \ "`z". i r v r
V� Y-••�^ �,T+�.-�� a �`1N+�;.��WiYY,�,-fM'SS re+m�s.0 1 !_ t3 �•.�',
b �4 /' ,. ��@- 1 -C_ _ 1"^^w \ I.tI5 +z♦r �: � •♦.� �-r_ _ r � \� ` ` -_
'^I �' _ ♦. Vn` — ` `` \v. PLOW ZM2' �. - ii r _. �. .Y
t 1I P\ ;\ '_•� n..�� �L� OSp a -_ IZaJ /'- WAY
W l 1 ''AJ i \ ` , IpVF x ^.-- v r ♦ a-"�0._+.4- --YIIS --"u' .. �..
T• �L � ..-..`\ +3]`_•.�!\al `�,"^W+.i:.->.-e+_ ... i'.! a R� try
bi.
�.^_ ` 0 �� ice' ... .1i ' Ti/iu--.i."k a :• SP10 \ _
. ,... " ry ._ .____ "� \! ._ .T.... •rte,. .. ;frSC211. tr ��'. • �`� S� �L Tf 1. io v�r al{ .8-n ^ -�'e _e_ 'S �. v _ : �+$ •....w..._ .r--..
1
• rl I IW � n . ^ r "'l\\. '\ 1tly� a @ \ h ..v \ . •OJ
4 l 'I< \ 1 '_.. ~ // \ 41 $�n i� �. m % ne e J. 5
try rin a d UCLI ) xW4 +i bJ t ♦ +10 Im
.. •tl 1 n \.�+ �//'\n � yn �+ m - ♦N. +3� n. fi/ 1 .-'t ✓ "4 J.e
I 1 r Ea �-^ ti / •M1 Oyu]' •L 'i' " a Ji ` ` J+ _ +d 4 • n
B �iTLC,� I,'r �'I _. s/"e v _� ♦J" nee 9r_-eS.- ''4 }+vI I, e J % , .+....• ,N
11� ra / 1 v.i /+i` /�� -bps i� �.. +4��\ �L +�\.. •��� "�1. Ib J'Il�t +dfi., d'tla�xlr .c n 'b ♦Q�. ♦l
y Y/ + Yg+Jl •'� ` '! u +P'� 1 �/� "" ` S'+'✓1♦.\j•?h `n.� J,•�J \ li a u •v �+i r:`iFM �,>I,ii♦.0 ^♦i_ v. N iI:i.
°�I > I �%"'�u4 �\I _3�"' .F•B i' y, � to � �,"_�Ibf +`Gs / I
9i'v. Y al �\ g,p.3� \ �'a n� +al � N ..� 1• .- r°+ sv.° �'Te
b Jejl Nd \` +\ \\ �8 nil u i !♦ y`♦'ttl ~`~� ��.r. 1 d• ul IN =t♦ a\�+d�4�:A 'Mb!r v\\ -N u•la♦r `
�'111�r� �. Rir+ N v> a !be 4E+@ ♦ \.` 11 ♦. • S / _ _\I
I /. �./G lr ' / �. aool Y+.@. t4 a.Ji \\} b ♦ r "ir+ 1 'b_ ' y \1
�♦p 1 � � r \ ♦1J 1 ` 17
r 1. IN • k 1k \r J/ r.\/ls Ir 3x °«R A+ \ 4. 1,
•
tt r. + /,y� '(. �1 '♦ 1
l 1 k "• 1 IR 't YuL G „/�,� 1 i a lY L ,` r 1Fr /� •T'��• it '\ .
4 e�' •+QI Y t Ji�4aaee{`lt'AI w�
Iu/I t as 1 I h t,jh `IL r�l` 4 is a'.�♦ I41+`@h'rae d >PJy]♦� liar u•.et ��'•'♦ to +J'•
4' % 0 J3+�r `4 t 1 k r r 1 \ ,.Z`\ rzu.__ m` • ` Il � �- \
• ••gam / r __ .288.08' a _ L.. � ♦. r 331.05' t
J 503 18'39"W • - _• -
CLOVER DR. - -- - - - --- -----
h r I '. N --- — —_-- _ 'JQyL : n l _88�.i4'. 1 _ —
rp i N0 I"'�, u� it �1— i � i mr' Ij O 1 ♦I
I♦ pqY p1 � 1� PI_ IQ PY ♦ .� A
N�
♦ O � V I 1r
1 `i:4' 1 ,h• nl S tNn l" NN Nv 1 [i , I Nb Om I• Q
0 0
gE� 1 M[ L l N T O N' 5 2 IV O ADDITION
4Y
' ^k I I 1 I I I I \ 1
i
s>9D
n
a
-o
➢
mz>
A O
�
990
FF-1
ENy O
a7
U)
'"
a_y
22P��
•$0A0T
r
B
z
pn
MMMJu/
3
I
1121
La
fJ
C z N
mm�zm�
O
C
070
��
Ul
vj
2
zo
a
A2
N
(/1 N
CLINE A VE.
(50R/w)
o Fi�z otl<.{pG Fs A my ��n u..nz Gn Fs yin 9'tb pup nmmlvn s`aeon $m r"imC)
S amPQAQA�1u rr��II z'[m� i$ xm ym ^$�Wm$m�'(( zM :7'b9'r^,rAY >2ngo 41n k, I'Tl
N mO n' �PSS rii 24 N.L .1 00N 9 LI~N i 7n ..
r Pil$ IQi rAm aN€� zRIT
(0 MM /(�] m O5 Lm�+`I °� ST <
TO 02P 2ON mi Om � Zm Aril :SS O N1°y nN InA 1,12 r'iy "'Jn! N SypNafl a > ym m Y
<aui �mZ4.1n uy� M 'vl mF r�1 bbS r��n 1,1 n nn TJl nn A 1
Nm ��••..mm ^z T]� ? u0 O,l Xgz -1i gF tl� a c _ mg> DAIn`c iy Az $
n8 amrz5 qz z'J YmC .>y' pzQ yypz{zrazm 'y F'a n 4AA„ np u�i' gom vl2 n 9
Zo O�4a y0y�5`J AS A41 •6. �wOs0 �5y 1&J On qn a'x♦'AOsrl> ;Rnm'Vi Q 2 O
u3m You yS� miYr lr m a ai1"i-Im.: 1�1 Zm a 'alb F 'r cg'S<'aia'a sW iXTo a '
OAEgg �No zagn Gen` z�e9mmm(�
S °^ FG Mo �y�µTv S_4m �I+W 02�'pq O Q�J >2�WO TA^ S�Ia54YrTm1 y�s9$Dn y9yRrJ$ ('^�(�i$(m�rmr��l1 yoy�/n.NiD yay'^ oz
: �➢n of pjQgxm g
4n O�mm~Vr�NT i.J it "'.ii r�'f]4Ny T� A S n 1�'1> mF2 { omg
mz$ re, i1Lz51 3y13 .�.. In � £ Fyy m nnc'#g! 9>>soR z a
P D2.rr2M �$I�i ~ OxO IO MMK p O '> RMcN• oouilo O 2
$Ogg 1$11 T s >1
N.r1Taam
,T5�°,�rrCZpZp OZi{"rlO - IC D"'Ia Ym~ 4Nf$A Y 2I
IHbPifl
CyrQr �.C44ZJ'^yI^rlZ�s_ o4n4�A on�p€;6N ennd 2
8yN ��G14 O,myY3a rZ {Oyu n N rn Y ',F'1>'�Arn �^yn3Yl QD $ x �r2h0 m SZ N o YO zp n3� Y A
i ,Gxq ',"yy"yr� O JuF� a �♦"2C . DIZO 0,AA c_t n A
nz
F m F R� im aam - $egg o s
i�tLml'=0 d 0o IRRq I0'°
r9 r�Q0r11I FN_ynN.J mStGmrp�p>rr$mF FnFe CI,,AA
r$r9(9(��
rl�lrTA}i CV i{�' 2°J�S GGS ..Cy]]' SD �OQ� oo
Z3 z>
yir1 y03 O' 5yCOi`8_L"^ RI-, OOO
TK22
AA SO$AAIIrA InA C D ZI°y•y3�,1
A {n iim xm
m A�� A
n m
m
ni
2
O
C
H
zfl
�HI
-4z
-
OWNER_
THE BARBER GROUP
2921 S OLD MISSOURI RD
SUITE 5
SPRINGDALE, AR 72764
ENGINEER / REPRESENTATIVE:
H2 ENGINEERING, INC.
2758 MILLENNIUM DR.
SUITE #1
FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72703
OWNER:
JOHN OATES
P.O. BOX 473
WOODY CREEK, CO 81656
LAND USE TABLE
SYMBOL LAND USE NStTY UNITS ACRES fT7
a
RES RESIDENTIAL 0.5 5 10.04 100/
PERMITTED USES
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT 1
CITY-WIDE USES BY RIGHT
UNIT 8
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
CONDITIONAL USES
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT 24
HOME OCCUPATIONS
LAND AREA PER DWELLING UNIT
LOT #
AREA -
1
2
2,04
2.00
3
2.00
4
2.00
5
2.00
LANQ_USE DEN5ITY.J-INTENSITY
TOTAL SITE AREA: 10.04 ACRES
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS: 5 (MAXIMUM)
RESIDENTIAL: 1%2 UNIT / I ACRE (MAXIMUM)
DENSITY: 0.5 UNITS PER ACRE
AREA REGULATIONS:_
LOT WIDTH MINIMUM: 264.00 FT
LOT AREA MINIMUM: 2.00 ACRES
FRONTAGE: PRIVATE STREET AS INDICATED
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
FRONT (ADJACENT TO PRIVATE STREET): 50 FT
SIDE: 50 FT
REAR: 50 FT
HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS;
NONE
BUILDING AREA
,3'500 S.F. (MINIMUM)
10% OF LOT (MAXIMUM AREA)
8700 S.F. (MAXIMUM AREA)
LANDSCAPING
NONE
PARKING=
NONE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS:
EXTERIOR: BRICK, STONE, HARDY -BOARD
NGLFS
November l , 2005
T
r,. a ✓.�.+. ,. ..... .. ........... /.Me.�Y'n`.du _ _... _..
. r ,L 11..11 �Y' a.y........ .. ........... ....__
.. ........✓..� 9
FR
264 00, a Date: A9ocro5
\ j .SO 9. S. B. W�
R0P FORCE M I LI E 264.aa RCviSianS:
—
b--.
_ W. „ s 11N0V05
tk?L........ _.— _ — ---- W.:..,. e m.... �✓ .. :::: __._ _ f3[;VISIor
zt«
_...,,� �. W.... _... _.,_. �,. W.�: ACCESS `'25' UE. a PLANNING
fl zei�gvn
�..., 25 U.E. _— -. ^ "'
noN I[ l(eJ e � 54 B. B. '. __._.. .—.-........ —_ '. > �
N, Nu 9 u es 50'. B, S, B ^q a
'rr 50' B - - „w�lu
emu, > S. B, & 2 /
/ �v
\• �s L r Cif Project Number.
N N,. I• ;:' C / Y. 4_P 1.7 Q_ _ e A(Ql - I CQ � �,�.,> .-n % '�.cY .6-... G'� q •. a 1.,I ise Ui "... t\O e'^. -V ..... N (/i.. P".` a C4 C6 I m 0cryryryo p�+�m o A 2.00 Ac. m , ppct�� 2.00 Ac. �l �} • c
2.04 Ac. I q 1
z I 43
L ._ 50 B. S. B,
_aN. .- .q P.0. — J O B.S.B.
NW ` CORNER .. . .�— —.. . . . . - . . ..- .. ... . . .. ... ... . 50 B. S. L?.
.. . .. . . .. ....
. . .. 14N 3 .N6N.. . .I 50 B.S:B.
.. .........................•
ib-16--30 L-
2/��.a�s s
— 26:aa
-- - , _ ,d.637..22,9Q
MC(LROY INVFSI'MENT$ 1 ilL. _ _ 2 6 4 e'a a j
N ANS MANOR OR E: 679906, 01
°qa Fnrrr lrvaLC AR >vo3 E____—` '.. .-
p�/y13 '23264 ao
'..... n ", � "iV i . ,' ..?ONFC RINV i6S 14352 r)OD 2• AA /
4{ � `� � AVID P, ft IMDR DAM NI'f[ INTQ'J, 132 a
t rii ... .. SG' N. WH : I IAMS OR 714i&5000 .. _.—...-.__..
"". I 1 _.... 4&'.96 • BSGA(4K I- a' SUSAN a OWCHT1 rns-14+na oon l
Ne 6388
F4YC1TV/ t AR 7770/
a 1 2 �- o _. Tn rfTr/A AR ]z>ar. 7 4t 3ca-000 2ONLO I. tl 8lI5gN l3 DOf1LNi r
aS4 srcn wE DR.. _.__ ... . .Ee 679957.46 _. zpNrn Rv' =. GARY L. R RFRORAII M $WICKER a64 SO n rNr W
3717 WILLIAMS 1M FAYE,'I Yrl r F AR rare HLVRLE AR 727G1 j' >65-V,3B9 00U . . .. .............. ..E;67 17.4e67
- ' - - - -- - -. ---- .,/ -- -- - - - - - - - - - j
,- I'AYFTTEVILLC AN )G`V . " SONLD RST F ! IJII Y OF i AYGTT.VILL1
'-' 10N[C: RSF 4 A MUMCFAI. tORPUHAfrONN S... .. . . .. ..... ..
. ... ...
FLOO)�OERTIFICA TION; THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT IS IN A
NON —FLOODED AREA AND NOT WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD
PLAIN. PER FIRM MAP NO, 05143C00920, DATED 7-21-1999.
ROOFING: METAL, WOOD, ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SEA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION:
SIGNAGE A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
NONE QUARTER OF SECTION 14,' TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 30
WEST OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
NOTE: ONE GAS STREETLIGHT WILL BE PLACED AT THE BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST
INTERSECTION OF DRIVEWAY AND PRIVATE DRIVE. QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION
INSTALLATION OF GAS STREETLIGHT WILL COINCIDE WITH THE 14-16-30 SAID POINT BEING A FOUND 3/a" REBAR AND
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DWELLING. RUNNING THENCE 58643"37"E 330.06 FEET; THENCE
S0213'23"W 1322.09 FEET; THENCE N87'31'OO"W 330.00
FEET; THENCE NO2'13'23"E 1327.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING CONTAINING 10.04 ACRES MORE OR LESS, SUBJECT
TO UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY RECORD, CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
-GENERAL... PROVISIONS:
AUTHORITY '.
THIS PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS AUTHORIZED BY SECTIONS 161 AND 166 - PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL RUN WITH THE LAND, THE LANDOWNERS,
THEIR SUCCESSORS, HEIRS, OR ASSIGNS SHALL BE BOUND BY THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL.
ADOPTION
THE ADOPTION OF THIS PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL EVIDENCE THE FINDINGS AND DECISION OF THE FAYETTEVILLE CITY COUNCIL
THAT THIS PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT FOR DEPALMA ADDITION IS IN GENERAL CONFORMITY WITH THE FAYETTEVILLE GENERAL PLAN 2020; IS
AUTHORIZED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 161 AND 166 OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE.
THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL PREVAIL AND GOVERN THE DEVELOPMENT OF DEPALMA ADDITION, PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, THAT WHERE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN DO NOT ADDRESS A PARTICULAR SUBJECT, THE RELEVANT
PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, AS AMENDED, OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE RESOLUTIONS OR
REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, SHALL BE APPLICABLE.
ENFORCEMENT
TO FURTHER THE MUTUAL INTEREST OF THE RESIDENTS, OCCUPANTS, AND OWNERS OF THE PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OF THE
PUBLIC IN THE PRESERVATION OF THE INTEGRITY OF THE PLAN, THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PLAN RELATING TO THE USE OF LAND, STATEMENT OF
COMMITMENTS, DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS, AND THE LOCATION OF COMMON OPEN SPACE SHALL RUN IN FAVOR OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEVILLE AND SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE AT LAW OR IN EQUITY BY THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITATION ON ANY POWER OR REGULATION
OTHERWISE GRANTED BY LAW. If
CONFLICT
WHERE THERE IS MORE THAN ONE PROVISION WITHIN THE PZD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT COVERS THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER, THE
PROVISION WHICH IS MOST RESTRICTIVE OR IMPOSES HIGHER STANDARDS OR REQUIREMENTS SHALL GOVERN UNLESS DETERMINED OTHERWISE BY
THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR. . -
MAXIMUM LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT
THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLINGS OR THE TOTAL COMMERCIAL, BUSINESS, OR INDUSTRIAL INTENSITY APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE
PLANNING AREAS IS THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED FOR PLATTING OR CONSTRUCTION, THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DWELLINGS OR LEVEL
OF DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL, BUSINESS, OR INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES MAY BE LESS DUE TO SUBDIVISION OR SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
REQUIREMENTS OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
$ PROJECT TRACKING
AT THE TIME OF SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT OR LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT, TO
DATE, TO THE PLANNING DIVISION, IN ORDER TO ASSURE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT LIMITS ARE NOT EXCEEDED.
M1A
OVERALL. LOT CONFIGURATION
SCALE: I" = 200'
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 60 ft.
a
240
°� ROCKWOOD
_ TRAIL
HISTORIC COLLE OR RE9ECCA C� �
Y i
M PLE 0
_ /7 / 0/ /7 7< /// H
yJ(/
J
= A8
0
rr Q
GOOD LN REX c7
ck
CRESCENT D DR II IiMISSOURI � � ≥
PROJECT CLIFF S
LOCATION _&LVD
w 1'-
COLLECTOR' "'�
OC;
LIGHTON TR
SOUTHERN
RODGERS _ �j]}�� HEIGHT CC
PL o o
FtEAT4� Dit .
ICINITY _MAP
N.7'.S.
COMMENTS
ON
R-P7D05-1798
of
r I
jj
. , vi, '` J:,:
in
275£3 MILL.E.NNIUM DRIVE
Suite 1
FAYC Tl FVII..I_.F, ARKANSAS T?703
PHONE_ (479) .`5£31 4134
1"/\>K: (479) `.S2 Jar -r4