HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4709 Doc 10 : 008701210002 7voe : REL
Recorded : 07/ 14/2006 at 02 : 36 : 41 PM
Fee Amt : $11 . 00 Pace 1 of 2
Washlnoton Countv . AR
Bette Stamps Circuit Clerk
ORDINANCE N0. 4709 F11e2005_00030657
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN
ANNEXATION PETITION ANX 05- 1451 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
AT THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE ROAD, NORTH OF HWY. 16
EAST AND WEST OF DEERFIELD WAY CONTAINING 24. 19
ACRES
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the City Council hereby confirms the annexation to the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, of that property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the official map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby
amended to reflect the change provided in Section 1 above.
Section 3 : That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is
hereby amended to assign the zoning designation of R-A, Residential Agricultural to the
subject property.
Section 4: That the above-described property is hereby assigned to Ward No.
One.
PASSED and APPROVED this 7`h day of June, 2005 .
fq APPROV
'G\1Y O,c'. G '0
FAYETIEVILLE0 ' By:
�;• • � 3' D N COODY, ayor
:9 �� ro
ATTEST: ��''� N�TON CEJ?;
liduuwutt % n U
By: BJ�t.L� ch r
C) r� m
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk w a s r
Z cn o
m
n70
N
--i
a m c'
."D
EXHIBIT "A"
ANX 05-1451
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NWl /4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20),
TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN ( 16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
(W 1/4) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND CONTINUING THENCE S8702T3115E
930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4), AND CONTINUING THENCE NO204050611E
350.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE
INTERSECTION OF THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY
AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
TRACTS B & C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF RECORD IN BOOK 1284,
PAGES 240 AND 241 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF WASHINGTON
COUTNY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE NO2040306"E 1441 .44 FEET;
THENCE N62008956"E 246. 16 FEET;
THENCE N53032'58"E 213 . 11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE
NW 1 /4 OF THE NWI/4 OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE S02032'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID NW 1/4 OF THE NW I /4;
THENCE S87016' 57"E 448 .50 FEET;
THENCE S02041 '097'W 1031 .51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY
LIMITS BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N87038 '06"W 827.08
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 24. 191 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
Washington County, AR
I certify this instrument was filed on
07/14/2005 02:36:41 PM
and recorded in Real Estate
File 'Number 2005-00030657
Bette Stamps - Circuit Clark
by
FROM ( FRI ) JUL 15 2005 15 : 52 /ST . 15 : 51 /No. 6816796785 P 4
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY-�
n o �
m
IN THE MATTER OF: ic
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN I..ANDS TO THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; ARKANSAS c ym N m
cLi rn b 3 0
NO. CC2005-2 0 74
nM CC7
ORDER OF ANNEXATION
Now on this 1 Vh day of March, 2005, this cause comes on to be heard, the Petitioners, Forrest E.
Lane and Modyne L. Lane, who are represented by the Engineerof Record, Melvin Milholland, Clint
McDonald, and James E Atwood, Attorney at Law, P.A., after announcing the hearing of the cause
and there being no protests or objections, whereupon, the matter is submitted to the Court upon the
Petition filed herein, and the oral and documentary evidence having been adduced, the Court being
well and sufficiently advised finds:
1 . The Petition in this cause was filed on the 3rd day of February, 2005 at which time
this Court fixed the I I 1 day of March, 2005, at 10:00a.m., as the date and time of
hearing for said cause, and that a full notice of this hearing was given as required by
law and the proof of publication of said notice is now on file with the County Clerk
of this Court and the Court has jurisdiction of this cause.
2. The Court is satisfied that the allegations of the Petition are sustained by the proof,
that the limits of the tenitory to be :utnexed have been properly filed; that the
property owners have freehold interests in the property hereinafter described in the .
Petition and constitute the real owners of the area affected.
3 . The land proposed to be annexed to the City of Fayetteville, Washington County,
Page I of 2
OX
Vq • IIPOI
FROM ( FRI ) JUL 15 2005 15 : 52 /ST . 15 : 51 /No . 6816796785 P 5
Arkansas, in this cause is described on "Exhibit A" attached hereto.
4. The area is not unusually large and it is contiguous and adjacent to and adjoins the
present corporate limits of the City of Fayetteville, and it is adapted for urban
purposes and this territory should be annexed to and made a part of the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
IT IS THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the aforesaid
real estate situated in Washington County, Arkansas, is hereby annexed to and made a part of the
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance with Acct. No. 1 of the Acts of the Legislature of 1875
of the State of Arkansas, and all Acts amendatory thereto, particularly including Act 142 of the Acts
u f Arkansas for the year 1953, as codified in Ark. Code Ann.§ 14-40-601 , et seq., and this Order shall
be duly recorded by the County Clerk of Washington County.
IT IS SO ORDERED thisj /
day of � ��� , 2005 .
he onor le JerryHunton
WvAington County Judge
Page 2 of 2
ft
FROM ( FRI ) JUL 15 2005 15 : 52 /ST . 15 : 51 /No . 6816796785 P 6
Codr�rErTMUA an lours
N� 9 ROAD NO. I9T
o ,r�NOr GO
1 0
1 � C
T x
C plll CI
� kyy i4
OUNTRT RIDGEVI
j kl oIl N C
�� ILj Id CAST lWu
NI/Ni5Y1LLC pD__
STATE N1Gwo
EI(�
� /AK1R�W{L. Ota WRQ
HiQ - - oiir
� I � gll
J�
R `II IlI r�mn wuc ON W I ; u
AI ``\ d o
x
il
g o
ANNEXATION VICINITY MAP E - 745
ANNEXATION D SCRIPTION :-
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER (NW}) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) . TOWNSHIP
SIXTEEN ( 16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY - NINE (29) WEST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER (W}) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND
CONTINUING THENCE 587' 27' 31 "E 930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN
BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW}) , AND CONTINUING THENCE NO2'40*06"E
350. 01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF
THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACTS B & C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF
RECORD IN BOOK 1284, PAGES 240 AND '241 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE N02040'06"E 1441 .44 FEET;
THENCE N62008'56 "E 246 . 16 FEET:
THENCE N53' 32 ' 5801E 213 . 11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE NW} OF
THE NW} OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE S02032'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON. THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID NWj OF THE NW};
THENCE 587' 16'576'E 448 . 50 FEET;
THENCE 502' 41009"W 1031 . 51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS
BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N87' 38'06"W 827 .08 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 24. 191 . ACRES , . MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
FROM ( FRI ) JUL 15 2005 15 : 51 /ST . 15 : 51 /No . 6816796785 P 2
� 1091111111011
Dot 10: 006701210002 TVD* : REL
Recordod: 07/14/2006 at 02 :96 :41 PM
Faa Alit : 311 .00 Paoa t. of 2
vashlnoton County . AR
Batts Btawo Circuit Clark
ORDINANCE NO. 4709 F11a200540030657
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN
ANNEXATION PETITION ANX 05- 1451 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
AT THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE ROAD, NORTH OF HWY. 16
EAST AND WEST OF DEERFIELD WAY CONTAINING 24. 19
ACRES
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1 : That the City Council hereby confirms the annexation to the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, of that property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the official map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby
amended to reflect the change provided in Section 1 above.
Section 3 : That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is
hereby amended to assign the zoning designation of R-A, Residential Agricultural to the
subject property.
Section 4: That the above-described property is hereby assigned to Ward No.
One.
PASSED and APPROVED this 7h day of June, 2005.
�o`G�. , . . . . •Fgs, ., APPRO
tis •. GAS Y 0 Fas.
� � • �
; FAYETTEVILLE ; By. D COODY,
8T ;i c
ATTEST: •'PKgNs 2' COO
n
TON C�J� s r
''h•qax
� 1�r lla/�� rn 3
sBy: end4,.�� M
ty r" �
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk v m n N
x c
CIl
.i
FROM ( FRI ) JUL 15 2005 15 : 51 /ST . 15 : 51 /No . 6816796785 P 3
•
EXHIBIT "A"
ANX 05-1451
APART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20),
TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
(W 1 /4) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND CONTINUING THENCE S8702731 "E
930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER (NWI/4), AND CONTINUING THENCE NO204010611E
350.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE
INTERSECTION OF THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY
AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
TRACTS B & C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF RECORD M BOOK 1284,
PAGES 240 AND 241 IN TIME CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF WASHINGTON
COUTNY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE N020401069F, 1441 .44 FEET;
THENCE N62"08956"E 246. 16 FEET;
THENCE N53032158"E 213. 11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE NW ) 14 OF SAID SECTION 20;
TI IENCE S02032'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID N W I/4 OF THE N W 1/4;
THENCE S87016'57"E 448.50 FEET;
THENCE S0204 1 '09"W 1031 .51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY
LIMITS BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N87038'06"W 827.08
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 24. 191 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
FROM ( FRI ) JUL 15 2005 15 : 52 /ST . 15 : 51 /No . 6816796785 P 4
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNFIfv
0
m
IN THE MATTER OF:
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LANDS TO THE , c o
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSASc H m
L -t v
NO. CC2005-2 0
a rn
? fin
ORDER OF ANNEXATION
Now on this l Ph day of March, 2005, this cause comes on to be heard, the Petitioners, Forrest E.
Lane and Modyne L. Lane, who are represented by the Engineer of Record, Melvin Mi (holland, Clint
McDonald, and James E Atwood, Attorney at Law, P.A.. after announcing the hearing of the cause
and there being no protests or objections, whereupon, the matter is submitted to the Court upon the
Petition filed herein, and the oral and documentary evidence having been adduced, the Court being
well and sufficiently advised finds:
1 . The Petition in this cause wag filed on the 3rd day of February, 2005 at which time
this Court fixed the 11 '" day of March, 2005, at 10:00a.m., as the date and time of
hearing for said cause, mid that a full notice of this hearing was given as required by
law and the proof of publication of said notice is now on rile with the County Clerk
of this Court and the Court has jurisdiction of this cause.
2. The Court is satisfied that the allegations of the Petition are sustained by the proof,
that the limits of the territory to be annexed have been properly filed; that the
property owners have freehold interests in the property hereinafter described in the
Petition and constitute the real owners of the area affected.
3. The land proposed to be annexed to the City of Fayetteville, Washington County,
Pagc I of 2
FROM ( FRI ) JUL 15 2005 15 : 52 /ST . 15 : 51 /No . 6816796785 P 5
Y
Arkansas, in this cause is described on "Exhibit A' attached hereto.
4. The area is not unusually large and it is contiguous and adjacent to and adjoins the
present corporate limits of the City of Fayetteville, and it is adapted for urban
purposes and this territory should be annexed to and made a part of the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
1T 1S THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND AD.TUDCED that the aforesaid
real cstute situated in Washington County. Arkansas, is hereby annexed to and made a part of the
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance with Acct. No. 1 of the Acts of the Legislature of 1875
of the State of Arkansas, and all Acts amendatory thereto, particularly including Act 142 of the Acts
of Arkansas for the year 1953, as codified in Ark Code Ann.§ 14-40-601 , et seq., and this Order shall
be duly recorded by the County Clerk of Washington County.
IT IS SO ORDERED this J/ r day of 42005.
he onora le Jerry Hunton
ington County Judge
Page 2 of 2
xa - I tai
FROM ( FRO JUL 15 2005 15 : 52 /ST . 15 : 51 /No. 6816796785 P 6
XHIBIT „ A ; , v -� -
COU r.r[IR1aE OrY MIS
Nn' ROAD N0. 19)
40 ��Or
iJ
X11
0
I z
3
OVNTRY Ri00C j �, L lot 7
AL 8 �
rrKrnw�On�q
mll �wT� g �
# LJL
NUNtiYqL[ RDS NWAY NO. 16 GSI 1 V
J STAT[ HIG J JL-
_ r
Mm
r.nrr[wr cn w?j
F oil
JVI V
a r,wnrn+t On - w I x x .11.
a1 �� _ a a I1
a Ig o
G z
ANNEXATION VICINITY MAP E - 745
ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION:
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER (NW}) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) , TOWNSHIP
SIXTEEN ( 16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY- NINE (29) WEST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER - (WI) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND
CONTINUING THENCE S87' 27' 31 "E 930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN
BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW}) , AND CONTINUING THENCE NO2' 40006"E
350. D1 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF
THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACTS B do C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF
RECORD IN BOOK 1284 , PAGES 240 AND 241 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE NO2' 40006"E 1441 .44 - FEET:
THENCE N62'08'56"E 246. 16 FEET:
THENCE N53' 32 '58"E 213 . 11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE NW} OF
THE NW} OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE 502032 ' 24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID NW} OF THE NW};
THENCE S87' 16' 57 "E 448.50 FEET;
THENCE S02441 "09 "W 1031 .51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS
BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N87' 38'06"W 827 .08 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 24. 191 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
xa ,n�
FROM ( FRO JUL 15 2005 15 : 53 /ST . 15 : 51 /No . 6816796765 P 9
,z
T p
1N THE COUNTY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARK"A $VJ rr„
rn
c� m b 3
J
IN THE MATTER OF: w
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LANDS TO THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Case No. CC 2005.5
DECREE OF ANNEXATION
S t"
Now on this ,2 'day of March, 2005, this cause comes on to be heard, the Petitioners,
Petitioners, Kevin Phillips and Laura Phillips, husband and wife, and Carolyn Baggett, a single
person, through their attorney, Michele A. Harrington of Hartington; Miller, Neihouse &
Kieklak, P.A., of Springdale, Arkansas, announcing ready for a hearing of the cause and there being
no protests or objections filed, whereupon, the matter is submitted to the Court upon the verified
petition tiled herein, and any oral and documentary evidence adduced, the Court being well and
sufficiently advised of the facts and the law, doth hereby find; judge and decree as follows: .
I . The Petition in this cause was filed on February 14, 2005, at which time this Court
fixed Monday, March 21 , 2005, at 10:00 a.m., as the date and time of hearing for said cause, and that
a full thirty (30) days has passed since the filing of the Petition, and this Court has jurisdiction of the
persons and subject matter of this cause of action, and venue is proper herein.
2. The Petition filed herein named Harrington, Miller, Neihouse & Kieklak, P.A. to act
on behalf of Petitioners in filing and presenting the Petition to the Court and handling all matters
connected with the Petition, as well the required notices, and this and any other hearings or
annexation proceedings connected therewith.
3. Harrington, Miller, Neihouse & Kieklak, P.A. has given Notice of hearing on the
Petition as required by law, and the proof of publication of said notice is now on file with the Clerk
of this Court.
4. The Court is satisfied that the allegations of the Petition filed herein are sustained by
the proof, and that a majority of the total number of real estate owners in the area affected by this
Petition have signed said Petition, and that such majority owns more than one-half ( 1 /2) of the
acreage affected.
Page 1 of 3 Pages
xa . $0O
FROM
0
(FRO JUL 15 2005 15:53/ST.15:51/No
0
6816796785 P 10
5. The land and territory sought to be annexed to the City of Fayetteville,
Washington County, Arkansas, in this cause is described as follows:
Tract 1: Owned by Daggett- Part of the W1/2, NWl/4 of Section 20, T16N, R29W in
Washington County, Arkansas, and being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the SW Corner of said NW 114 thence NOO° 15'34"E 335.00 feet to the
P.O.B., thence NOO°15'34"E 1370.44 feet, thence S84°14'26"E 412.50 feet, thence
N63°15'34"E 250.79 feet, thence S87°44'26"E 1.41 feet, thence S00°15'34"W 1440.54
feet, thence S89°52'59"W 635.48 feet to the P.O.B.; Containing 19.87 acres, more or
less, subject to Easements and Right of Way Record.
Tract 2: Owned by Phillips - Pan of the WI/2, NW 114 of Section 20, T16N, R29W in
Washington County, Arkansas and being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the SW Corner of said NW tl4 thence NOO°15'34"E 335.00 feet, thence
N89°52'59"E 635.48 feet to the P.O.B., thence NOO°15'34"E 1440.54 feet, thence
S87°44'26"E 262.73 feet, thence N62* 1514"E 36.61 feet, thence SOO°15'34"W 1446.62
feet, thence S89"52'59"W 294.91 feet to the P.O.B.; Containing 9.72 acres more or less
subject to Easements and Right of Way Record.
and, the same is accurately described in the Petition filed herein.
6. Attached to and made a part of said Petition is an accurate Vicinity Map of the
above -described property that is sought to be annexed to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
7. The above -described property owned by the Petitioners, Kevin Phillips and Laura
Phillips, husband and wife, and Carolyn Baggctt, is adjacent and contiguous to the present city
boundary line for the City of Fayetteville; Washington County, Arkansas, and this territory should be
annexed to and made a part of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
8. The prayer of the Petition filed herein is right and proper and should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the aforesaid real
estate situated in Washington County, Arkansas, is hereby amtexed to and made a pan of the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance with Act No. 1 of the acts of the Legislature of 1875 of the
State of Arkansas and all acts amendatory thereto, particularly including Act 142 of the Acts of
Arkansas for the year 1%3, as codified in Ark. Code Ann. §14-40.601, ct scq.
IT 1S FURTHER CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the original papers
in this cause be delivered to the Clerk of Washington County, Arkansas, with the same to be
properly recorded upon the records of Washington County, Arkansas, and the Clerk, after properly
recording and filing the original papers, is directed to prepare certified transcripts of the same; that
one of the certified transcripts shall be delivered to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, one copy to
Page 2 of 3 Pages
X9.301
FROM
0
(FRI)JUL 15 2005 15:53/ST.15:51/No•6816796785 P
10,
the Secretary of State, and one copy to the Director of the Tax Division of the Arkansas Public
Service Commission.
�� I L�A�
R Y HL14TON, County Judge
Page 3 of 3 Pages
Xa _70Z
FROM :rWRRPC
(FRO JUL 15 2005 15:53/ST.
66AX N6. :4797517156 "^a4
15:51/No.6816796785 P 12
2065 11:31AM P4
FROM (FRI)JUL 15 2005 11p5::pp511mm/SL15:�55NN1��/ggN��o��.pp68167967gg88�yy5��P 2
. • �HWdItlUIpINNtI�VNIgII����tldNU
Doc 10: 008701710007 TVDO: REL
Recorded: 07/14/7005 at 02:55:43 PM
Pee Mt: •11.00 P808 1 of 2
Vuhlnaton Countv, M
Bette stems circuit clerk
ORDINANCE NO, 4709 F11i200540030657
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED M
ANNEXATION PETITION ANX 05-1451 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
AT THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE ROAD, NORTH OF HWY. 16
EAST AND WEST OF DEERFIELD WAY CONTAINING 24.19
ACRES
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council hereby confirms the annexation to the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, of that property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
Section 2: That the official map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby
amended to reflect the change provided in Section I above.
Section 3: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is
hereby amended to assign the zoning designation of R -A, Residential Agricultural to the
subject property.
Section 4: That the above -described property. is hcrcby assigned to Ward No.
One.
PASSED and APPROVED this 7'" day of June, 2005.
• , `aawmnn•y,�
0100 0R�s..,� APPRO
Dow=V' •70S o
0 040
;JJJ
FAY EITEVILLE;
By:
• _ D COODY, ajoP c
r
SP5.2•..0 — n
s
ATTEST: .,,y 948900 _ cv .� -
•gpto
wuua.�• CJrn
By: �e>uttau de��{$Z A rn 3
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk m ro
Aix c
� ^ T_ rr
�J
FROM (FRI)JUL 15 2005 15:51/ST.J 5: 51/No•6816796785 P 3
40 w
EXHIBIT "A"
ANN 05-1451
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20),
TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER
(WI/4) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND CONTINUING THENCE $87°27'31"E
930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER (N W I/4); AND CONTINUING THENCE NO2°40'06"E
350.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE
INTERSECTION OF THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY
AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
TRACTS B & C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF RECORD iN BOOK 1284,
PAGES 240 AND 241 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF WASHINGTON
COUTNY,ARKANSAS.
THENCE NO2°40'06"E 1441.44 FEET;
THENCE N62°08'56"E 246.16 FEET;
THENCE N53°32'58"E 213.11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE S02°32'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID N W 1/4 OF THE N W 1/4;
THENCE S87°16'57"E 448.50 FEET;
THENCE S02°41'09"W 1031.51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY
LIMITS BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N87°38'06"W 827.08
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 24.191 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
RECEIVED 0
State of Arkansas
JUL 2 2 2005 Secretary of State
Charlie Daniels
Secretary of State
July 21, 2005
The Honorable Karen Combs Pritchard
Washington County Clerk
280 North College Avenue, Suite 300
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Dear Ms. Pritchard:
Business & Commercial 5ervices
682-3409
Elections
682-5070
Building & Grounds
682-3407
Communications & Education
683-0057
State Capitol Police
682-5173
Business Office
682-8032
Information Technology
682-3411
The Following Information has been recorded and filed in the Office of the Secretary of State:
Date: 7/21/2005
Annexation:
Incorporation:
Census Information
1st Class City
2nd Class City
Incorporated Town
County: Washington City: Fayetteville
Ordinance No. -4709
Co. Order No.- CC 2005-2
Resolution No. —
Plat
Election
Island
Ordinance No.
Co. Order No.
Plat
Election
X
((ANNEX —ELECTION»
((ISLAND))
((DATE_FILED))
((INCCOORDNO»
((INCPLAT»
I have forwarded this information to the Arkansas Municipal League. If you have any further
questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 1-800-482-1127 or 682-3451.
Sinc rely,
YAV�
Alesha L. Harris
Election Services Representative
Room 256 State Capitol • Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1094
501-682-1010 • Fax 501-682.3510
e-mail: arsos®sosmail.state.ar.us • www.sos.arkansas.gov
City Council Nipeting of June 07, 2005
Agenda Item Number y7&4)y
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO �,�/
To: Mayor and City Council /7�V x 0_;ZZr
Thru: Gary Dumas, Director of Operations
From: Jeremy C. Pate, Director of Current Planning)'
Date: May 20, 2005
Subject: Annexation for Lane (ANX 05-1451)
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation for Lane, a 24.191 -acre
tract located north of Huntsville Road. This action will incorporate the 24.191 -acre tract
of land contiguous with the city limits into the City of Fayetteville.
BACKGROUND
The subject property contains 24.191 -acres owned by the Lanes. It is located north of
Huntsville Road (Hwy 16 East) and west of Deerfield Way Subdivision in southeast
Fayetteville. At this time, the property is currently used for pasture with one single
family home located on the property. It is within the Planning Area and adjacent to the
City limits along the southern property line and one-third of the western property line
where it abuts Deerfield Place. The West Fork of the White River is the northern
boundary of the subject property, and a tributary of this river traverses the property to the
west.
Annexation of the property will not create an island of unincorporated property, and
extends the city limits north to the West Fork of the White River, a natural barrier. Water
and sewer service shall be extended to the property at the time of development.
Improvements to the existing infrastructure adjacent to this site and construction of
streets in compliance with the Master Street Plan will be required at the time of
development. City fire and police currently service the adjoining neighborhoods.
The applicant requested annexation of the property into the City of Fayetteville. A
rezoning request has also been submitted, for RSF-4 zoning. The applicant intends to
develop the property for residential use within the City of Fayetteville.
Staff recommended approval of the proposed annexation. No public comment was
received for this item.
This item was heard at the regular Planning Commission on May 09, 2005. The Planning
Commission voted 8-0-0 to forward this item to the City Council with a recommend of
approval.
BUDGETIMPACT
None.
0 •
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THAT PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN ANNEXATION PETITION ANX 05-1451 FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE
ROAD, NORTH OF HWY 16 EAST AND WEST OF
DEERFIELD WAY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 24.19
ACRES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY/'COUNCIL 'OF`;THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council <hereby�confirms the annexation-!to,,the- City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, of that property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
ell
Section 2. The official map of the.City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended
to reflect the change provided in Section I' above':_
Section 3. That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is
hereby amended to assign the zoning designation of R -A, Residential Agricultural to the subject
property.
Section 4. That the above -described property, is hereby assigned to Ward No. One.
/PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2005.
11Ile,
, APPROVED:
Dan Coody, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sondra Smith, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
ANX 05-1451
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW'/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20),
TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER (W1/4)
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND CONTINUING THENCE S87°27'31"E 930.97 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER
(NW1/4), AND CONTINUING THENCE N02°40'06"E 350.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE EXISTING
FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACTS B & C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF
RECORD IN BOOK 1284, PAGES 240 AND 241 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF
WASHINGTON COUTNY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE N02°40'06"E 1441.44 FEET;
THENCE N62°08'56"E 246.16 FEET;
THENCE N53°32'58"E 213.11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE S02°32'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY
OF SAID NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4;
THENCE S87°16'57"E 448.50 FEET;
THENCE S02°41'09"W 1031.51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY
LIMITS BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N87°38'06"W 827.08 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 24.191 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
i
•
C
y/fy Ll
! ARKANSAS
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE
TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission
FROM: Suzanne Morgan, Associate Planner
THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning
DATE: May 4, 2005
PC Meeting of May 09, 2005
125 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479)575.8267
ANX 05-1451: (LANE, 571): Submitted by MEL MILHOLLAND for property located at at
THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE ROAD, N OF HWY 16E, W OF DEERFIELD WAY. The
property is in the Planning Area and contains approximately 24.191 acres. The request is to
annex the subject property into the City of Fayetteville.
Property Owner: FORREST & MODYNE LANE Planner: SUZANNE MORGAN
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation based on the findings included as
part of this report:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES
(A Approved O Denied
Date: May 09, 2005 Clash- A6t 8 -O -c)
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required YES
O Approved O Denied
Date: June 07, 2005 (lst reading if recommended)
BACKGROUND:,
Property description: The subject property contains 24.191 -acres owned by the Lanes. It is
located north of Huntsville Road (Hwy 16 East) and west of Deerfield Way Subdivision in
southeast Fayetteville. At this time, the property is currently used for pasture with one single
family home located on the property. It is within the Planning Area and adjacent to the City
limits along the southern property line and one-third of the western property line where it abuts
Deerfield Place. The West Fork of the White River is the northern boundary of the subject
property, and a tributary of this river traverses the property to the west.
Proposal: The applicant proposes annexation of 24.191 acres into the City of Fayetteville.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation based on the finding
herein.
K. 1ReportsO005PC Reports105-09-05WNX05-1451 (Lane).doc
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
West Fork of the White River; pasture
Planning Area
South
Vacant/Pasture
C-1, Neighborhood Commercial
East
Residential Single Family
Vacant/Pasture
RSF-4, Res. Single Family -4 units/acre
Planning Area
West
One Single Family Home; pasture
Planning Area
INFRASTRUCTURE:
Streets: Currently the site has access to East Huntsville Road. Road improvements per
AHTD and dedication per the master street plan are required.
Surrounding Master Street Plan Streets:
South: Huntsville Rd (Principal Arterial)
East: Mally Wagnon (Collector), Country Ridge and Deerfield Way (Local)
Water: Public water is adjacent to the site. There is an 8" main along East Huntsville
Road. Water service will need to be extended within the property at the time of
development. Additional connections may be required to complete a looped
system.
Sewer: The site is near sanitary sewer mains. A short off -site sewer main extension may
be required to serve this development. A capacity analysis of the sewer lines
and/or lift stations downstream of the site shall be conducted prior to
development.
Fire: The subject property is located approximately 4.3 miles from the Fire Station #5.
Response time to the property at maximum build -out is projected at
approximately 9.5 minutes with 28 annual calls for service. This does not take
into account the decreased response time for the future Fire Station at the Tyson
complex on Huntsville Road.
Police: It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this annexation will
not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the
load on police services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and
congestion in the area.
LAND USE PLAN: General Plan 2020 identifies the portion of this property within the
Planning Area as Residential.
K9Reporu1d00APC Reporu105-09-0514NX 05-1451 aane).dw
0
FINDINGS:
11.6 ANNEXATION GUIDING POLICIES
BOUNDARIES
11.6.a Annex existing islands and peninsulas and do not annex areas that would create an
island or peninsula.
Finding: Annexation of the property will not create an island of unincorporated property
and does not exacerbate problems created by the extension of peninsulas. In the
1960's, the City of Fayetteville annexed a peninsula of property to incorporate
Lake Sequoyah, a primary water source, within the city limits. Since this time,
the City has annexed several properties north and south of the 600' Huntsville
corridor. The proposed annexation does not extend further north than the
surrounding city boundaries. In order to decrease problems associated with
emergency response and public services in the area, there are areas that have
been identified as more desirable for annexation. Staff has worked with the
applicant to coordinate with an adjacent property owner to bring in property
that creates a more desirable city limit boundary. Therefore, staff finds that the
proposed annexation will not further exacerbate any problems associated with
the current situation.
11.6.b Proposed annexation area must be adjacent, or contiguous, to city limits.
Finding: The proposed annexation area is adjacent to the City Limits to the south and
east along a portion of the property's eastern -most border.
11.6.c Areas should either include or exclude entire subdivisions or neighborhoods, not
divide.
Finding: This area is currently vacant at this time and located adjacent to Deerfield Place
Subdivision. There are several other subdivisions north and south of Huntsville
Road further west of the subject property. Structures on the subject property
consist of one single family dwelling. The property does not consist of defined
subdivisions or neighborhoods; however, future development plans include
residential development of the property. Annexation of the property would
allow for Planning Commission review of development in accordance with City
standards, and would require the same standards of development as the
adjacent properties already within the city limits.
11.6.d Boundaries for annexed areas should follow natural corridors.
Finding: Proposed boundaries follow property lines of the existing parcels. The northern
boundary of the annexation follows a natural corridor created by the White
River. There are no anticipated of planned crossings of the river in this area,
which creates a natural boundary for development.
K:IReporu11005NC Reporul05-09-05WNX05-1951 (Lane).doc
0
11.6.e Timing of services within annexation areas should be considered.
Finding: Current conditions result in a response time of 9 minutes for fire protection
from Fire Station #5. Response times are anticipated to be reduced with the
construction of a new fire station on Huntsville Road at the Tyson Plant.
Additionally, the City's Fire Department currently responds to calls much
further west and north of this property, with much higher response times.
Extension of water and sewer lines will occur at the time of development to
aid in the improvement of services.
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS
11.6. f Annex environmentally sensitive areas that could be impacted by development and
utilize appropriate development regulations to protect those areas.
Finding: The property is mainly cleared pasture land. Tree canopy is concentrated along
the west and north property lines within the riparian corridor of the West Fork
of the White River. This river acts as a natural barrier from this property to
the north. Development regulations within the City will ensure appropriate
development and preservation of the existing natural features on the property.
Development outside the city does not allow for the requirement of parks, open
space or tree preservation.
EMERGENCY AND PUBLIC SERVICES
11.6.g Public services must be able to be provided efficiently in newly annexed areas.
Finding: It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this annexation will
not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase
the load on police services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger
and congestion in the area.
11.6:h Annexed areas should receive the same level of service of areas already in the city
limits.
Finding: Fire and police currently serve subdivisions further east of the subject property.
Service shall be provided to this area with the same level of response and service
as other developments in this area.
11.6.i The ability to provide public services should be evaluated in terms of equipment,
training of personnel, number of units and response time.
Finding: These factors were taken into consideration in the responses and
recommendations included in this report.
K:IReports17005WC Reports105-09-05WNX05-1451 (Lane).doc
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
11.6.j Areas currently served by utilities and other public services should be annexed.
Finding: Water, fire and police protection are currently provided in the surrounding
areas. The subject property is not being served by city utilities at this time.
11.61 Proposed annexation areas should not require the upgrading of utilities to meet the
demands of development unless there is a threat to public safety.
Finding: Improvements to sewer and street systems and installation of fire hydrants
would be made necessary by the annexation should additional development
occur on the subject property. At this time, the property is agricultural in
nature.
11.6.1 Phased annexation should be initiated by the City within active annexation areas
based on planned service extensions or availability of services.
Finding: The proposed annexation is not part of a phased annexation initiated by the
City, though it has been discussed as desirable for annexation in past task
force meetings. It is located adjacent to an extension of City property along
Huntsville Road. To expand this area north to the river will create a more
appropriate City boundary and allow for development to occur under city
guidelines. Additional property to the west is currently under consideration
for annexation as well.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
11.6.m Promote long-range planning with adjacent jurisdictions.
Finding: N/A
11.6.n Establish agreements to address regional concerns, such as water, stormwater and
sewer.
Finding: N/A
ADMINISTRATION OF ANNEXATIONS
11.6.o Designate zoning districts for the property during the annexation process.
Finding: Annexations are automatically zoned R -A, Residential Agricultural. The
property owner requests annexation and requests to rezone this property RSF-
4, Residential single family - 4 units/acre. Additionally, the applicant requests
to rezone 6.68 acres located south of the subject property to RSF-4. This
property is currently within the City and zoned C-1.
KAReportrLMO PC RepornI05-09-0514MY05-1451 (Lane).do
11.6.p An annexation study should be completed on all annexation proposals.
Finding: Planning staff has asked the Engineering Division, Fire Department and Police
Department to study this annexation request to determine if facilities and
services are available to serve this property.
11.6.q Development proposals require a separate review from the annexation proposals.
Finding: Development of this property has not been proposed. At the time the applicant
desires to develop the property, the applicant will be required to submit project
plans for review and approval by the Planning Commission.
11.6.r Residents should be fully informed of annexation activities.
Finding: Adjoining neighbors have been notified of the annexation request. A legal ad
and display have both been submitted with a local newspaper prior to the
Planning Commission meeting for which this item is scheduled.
11.6.w Encourage larger annexations to create acceptable boundaries.
Finding: This annexation consists of 24.191 acres owned by the Lanes. Two adjacent
property owners to the west have also received an Order of Annexation from the
County and have submitted a request for annexation of approximately 30 acres.
The annexation of all properties will incorporate a larger area into the City and
create a more acceptable boundary, with the West Fork of the White River a
natural boundary to the north. As additional petitions of annexation are
submitted, the annexation of additional property to create a city boundary
which follows the existing natural barriers (i.e. the riparian corridors) and the
existing streets will create an even more desirable city boundary.
11.6.t Conduct a fiscal impact assessments on large annexations.
Finding: No fiscal impact assessment was conducted for this annexation of 24.191 acres.
K. WeportvldMPC ReporuI05-09-05WNX05-1451 aane).doc
From Fayetteville Genera/ Plan 2020 — 2002 Revision
11.6 Annexation Guiding Policies
Boundaries
11.6.a Annex existing islands and peninsulas and do not annex areas that would create an island
or peninsula.
11.6.6 Proposed annexation area must be adjacent, or contiguous, to city limits.
11.6.c Areas should either include or exclude entire subdivisions or neighborhoods, not divide.
11.6.d Boundaries for annexed areas should follow natural corridors.
11.6.e Timing of services within annexation areas should be considered.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
11.6. f Annex environmentally sensitive areas that could be impacted by development and utilize
appropriate development regulations to protect those areas.
Emergency and Public Services
11.6.g Public services must be able to be provided efficiently in newly annexed areas.
11.6.h Annexed areas should receive the same level of service of areas already in the city limits.
11.6.i The ability to provide public services should be evaluated in terms of equipment, training
of personnel, number of units and response time.
Infrastructure and Utilities
1 1.6.j Areas currently served by utilities and other public services should be annexed.
1 1.6.k Proposed annexation areas should not require the upgrading of utilities to meet the
demands of development unless there is a threat to public safety.
1 1.6.1 Phased annexation should be initiated by the City within active annexation areas based on
planned service extensions or availability of services.
Intergovernmental Relations
11.6.m
Promote
long-range planning with adjacent jurisdictions.
11.6.n
Establish
agreements to address regional concerns, such as water, stormwater and.sewer.
Administration of Annexations
11.6.o Designate zoning districts for the property during the annexation process.
11.6.p An annexation study should be completed on all annexation proposals.
1 1.6.q Development proposals require a separate review from the annexation proposals.
1 1.6.r Residents should be fully informed of annexation activities.
11.6.w Encourage larger annexations to create acceptable boundaries.
i 1.6.t Conduct a fiscal impact assessments on large annexations.
KAReports12005PC Reporul(15-09-05WNR05-1451 (Lane)_approwLdoc
0
9 u
0
^
O
N
O
E 5 •
0 m o O m
m U m E
'^N N N- •
w fm o
v m
O
O
M
O
O
d` •
E y �
Ytrr w a =O
y V E T
V N D
a iiUy�m n
o m E 5
o
" • m ' O m
m O E
o
g v "o
N
O
aD
N
O
O
a U N f m a
M
d
O Y
E
E
9
m
d
d
d
d
.m+ F- Q �„
]
z
y g j O
C≤
C
C
C
C
E
E
E
E
0. a x
��
LO
r
CO
O` M
O)
O)
a
d
o
cm
c_
`
E E
N
w
t/1
N
N
N
w
N
•C
Y_
4
mod.
Nm
m
c
c
-----
c
c
c
c
o-
o a
E
E
E
E
E
E
or
m
In
r
n
M
C
CL
E
0 Idd,0 c
a)0)
N
N
N
N
d
C li O==
N
N
N
N
H E
E
E
'E
:E
:E
E
N
QO
R
N
w
V
V
N
M
M
r
d
d
N C
t
d m 0_
n
d
O IL
N
U N
.r
W
h
r
M
m
r
a0
r
(O
N
C
Q
ry
M
O
N
A
d
O
o
`
A
W
x
W
LL
�
}
d
C
Q
d
c
d
O
O
00
LO
ad
D
LL
N
n
`
:>
u7
a
V
do
a
N
N
c
c
W
N
c
c
CU
J
J
(n
d
fn
CO
i[1
aD
m
O
O
C
7
V
u7
OJ
e
did —v
v
v
v
ELO•-
•-
•-
.m.
o
O
N
4)
LO
u')
—
X
O
O
O
O
Q
N
Z
Z
Z
Z
N
r
April 18, 2005
Jeremy Pate
Zoning and Development Director
City of Fayetteville
113 W. Mountain
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Dear Director Pate,
This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the proposed
Annexation ANX 05-1451 (LANE, 571): submitted by MEL HOLLAND for property
located at THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE ROAD, N OF HWY 16E, W OF
DEERFIELD WAY. This property is in the Planning Area and contains approximately
24.19. The request is to annex the subject property into the City of Fayetteville.
It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this annexation will not
substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on
police services or create and appreciable increase in traffic.danger and congestion in the
area.
In reference to RZN 0 1451 (LANE, 571): submitted by W HOLLAND for property
located at THE END OF U5UNTRY RIDGE ROAD, N HWY 16E, W OF
DEERFIELD WAY. This prbperty is in the Plannin rea and contains approximately
30.87 acres. The request is to rezo the subject operty to RSF-4, Residential Single
Family, 4 units per acres.
It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Po 'ce Depa ent that this rezoning will substantially
alter the population density and w' ossibl create undesirable increase on police
services. This rezoning will i ease our response time o calls for service because this
property is on the very ou fringes of our current service area. The potential of creating
120 new homes will i rease the traffic on an already congested arterial street, (Huntsville
Road).
0
Individually, each of these annexations and rezoning do not necessarily substantially alter
the population density, nor do they create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and
congestion. The sum total presented over the years, however, has had a substantial impact
on the demand for police services and has caused an appreciable increase in traffic
congestion. Without the addition of police patrol personnel, these areas may see a lack of
traffic enforcement or may experience situations where officers are delayed in answering
many calls for service because of call volume exceeds the number of officers available to
respond in a timely manner.
Sincerely,
Captain William Brown
Fayetteville Police Department
*EXHIBIT "A"
fA YETh1KyE OIY WIS
NO. 16 EAST JL
FAYEIILN{IL OR WIS
ANNEXATION VICINITY MAP
ANNEXATION ESC RIPTioN:
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW}) OF SECTION TWENTY (20), TOWNSHIP
SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER (W}) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND
CONTINUING THENCE S8727'31"E 930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN
BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW}), AND CONTINUING THENCE NOT40'O6"E
350.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF
THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 8 & C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF
RECORD IN BOOK 1284, PAGES 240 AND 241 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE NO2'40'O6"E 1441.44 FEET;
THENCE N62'08'56"E 246.16 FEET;
THENCE N53'32'58"E 213.11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE NWO OF
THE NW} OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE S02'32'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID NW} OF THE NW};
THENCE S8716'57"E 448.50 FEET;
_ THENCE SOZ'41'09'W 1031.51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS
BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N8738'O6"W 827.08 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 24.191 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, ARKANSAS. 0�
OWNER,
OVNE/
r. l_FORREYT. E. LANE (HUSBAND)
W4
L. NODYNE LANE (WIFE)
DATE, 3 I!_g�
DATES a s�
E-745
Pl&
11d`KN 'sbo 1 %0
Y
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS
NO.
PETITION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, WASHINGTON COUNTY ARKANSAS
The Petitioners, Forrest E. Lane and Modyne L. Lane, hereby submit their Petition to annex
certain real property into the City of Fayetteville, Washington, County, Arkansas, pursuant to A.C.A.
Section 14-40-601, et. Seq. as follows:
That Petitioners own the real property described on the Plat Map, Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Real Property"), and said Real Property
is situated in Washington County, Arkansas, and is contiguous with the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, and is within the City of Fayetteville, School District.
2. The Petitioners name Melvin Milholland, Clint McDonald, and James Atwood,
Attorney at Law, P.A. as the persons authorized to act on their behalf with respect to
this Petition.
3. The Petitioners desire that the Real Property become part of the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, and petitions the County Judge for annexation of the Real Property into the
City of Fayetteville.
4. A true and correct presentation of the Real Property and how it is contiguous to the
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is shown on the Plat Map, Exhibit "A", attached hereto.
5. The Petitioners herein desire that the Real
Property become part of the
City
of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas,
and Petitioners state that they
will
do
Page 1 of 2
A
any and all legal acts necessary to accomplish the objective set forth herein.
THEREFORE, Petitioners respectfully pray that this Court set a hearing, and after
notice of such hearing, that the County Judge sign an Order annexing the above described
Real Property into the City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, and to order such
other relief as is appropriate under applicable law.
Respectfully executed this 3 day of ,2005.
est E. Lane
y SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, a Notary Public, on this the Nday of
A x 4 /-? 44A 2005.
M Commission Expires: OFFICIAL SEAL
Y p 3//S-/� O Dr YUN S. BREWER Notary Public Arkansas
dt shingtonCounty
Expires o3itFnnn�
Modyne L. Lane
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, a Notary Public, on this the 3rd"day of
Fe."t.a!>-✓j2005.
_,
U OFFICIAL SEAL
My Commission Expires: YUN S. BREWER
4,¢,,,,, I�tary Public Arkansas
it ington County
Expires nvtrnrna
Page 2 of 2
L
ti
- U
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
IN THE MATTER OF:
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LANDS TO THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
NO. CC2005-2
ORDER OF ANNEXATION
Now on this 11`h day of March, 2005, this cause comes on to be heard, the Petitioners, Forrest E.
Lane and Modyne L. Lane, who are represented by the Engineer of Record, Melvin Milholland, Clint
McDonald, and James E Atwood, Attorney at Law, P.A., after announcing the hearing of the cause
and there being no protests or objections, whereupon, the matter is submitted to the Court upon the
Petition filed herein, and the oral and documentary evidence having been adduced, the Court being
well and sufficiently advised finds:
The Petition in this cause was filed on the 3rd day of February, 2005 at which time
this Court fixed the 11`s day of March, 2005, at 10:00a.m. as the date and time of
hearing for said cause, and that a full notice of this hearing was given as required by
law and the proof of publication of said notice is now on file with the County Clerk
of this Court and the Court has jurisdiction of this cause.
2. The Court is satisfied that the allegations of the Petition are sustained by the proof,
that the limits of the territory to be annexed have been properly filed; that the
property owners have freehold interests in the property hereinafter described in the
Petition and constitute the real owners of the area affected.
3. The land proposed to be annexed to the City of Fayetteville, Washington County,
Page 1 oft
,w '0
Arkansas, in this cause is described on "Exhibit A" attached hereto.
4. The area is not unusually large and it is contiguous and adjacent to and adjoins the
present corporate limits of the City of Fayetteville, and it is adapted for urban
purposes and this territory should be annexed to and made a part of the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
IT IS THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the aforesaid
real estate situated in Washington County, Arkansas, is hereby annexed to and made a part of the
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance with Acct. No. 1 of the Acts of the Legislature of 1875
of the State of Arkansas, and all Acts amendatory thereto, particularly including Act 142 of the Acts
of Arkansas for the year 1953, as codified in Ark. Code Ann.§ 14-40-601, et seq., and this Order shall
be duly recorded by the County Clerk of Washington County.
" ti
IT IS SO ORDERED this %/ day of %Y% YGlti 2005.
heonorab Jerry Hunton
ngton ounty Judge
Page 2 of 2
'IPXHIBIT "A"
rA}[I][TW OTY L..S
FA r�NU[ OFY Ur/�/S
HUNTSVILLE RD.
¢ FAILIIINUF O
II Il0
> I 1 Z
ut I(I`—'jl I I m
N
K
�l
I
U
FAYE)7[N{([ O!Y [LnI$I
`
F\\
C
'b
5
is
c
III
� o
oIQII QIIII
WI
Y l o l l
mil
NO. 16
_TE HIGH'NAY � —
ANNEXATION VICINITY MAP
b
W b
2 �
CITA�OZ
0
STREEfT
: e
EAST
LW u
FA1E/1ENLL( ON UWM
E-745
ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION:
-
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW;) OF SECTION TWENTY (20), TOWNSHIP
SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER (W}) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND
CONTINUING THENCE S87'27'31"E 930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN
BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW}), AND CONTINUING THENCE NO2'40'06"E
350.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF
THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A
PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACTS B & C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF
RECORD IN BOOK 1284, PAGES 240 AND 241 IN THE CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE NO2'40'06"E 1441.44 FEET;
THENCE N62'08'56"E 246.16 FEET;
THENCE N53'32'58"E 213.11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE NW} OF
THE NW41 OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE S02'32'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF
SAID NWJ OF THE NW};
THENCE S87'16'57"E 448.50 FEET;
THENCE S02'41'09"W 1031.51 FEET TO THE EXISTING FAYETTEVILLE CITY LIMITS
BOUNDARY;
THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY N87'38"06"W 827.08 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 24.191 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON
COUNTY. ARKANSAS.
A
/ A Q
��
Planning Commission
r�
May 9, 2005
Page 53
ANX 05-1451: (LANE, 571): Submitted by MEL MILHOLLAND for property located
at THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE ROAD, N OF HWY 16E, W OF DEERFIELD
WAY. The property is in the Planning Area and contains approximately,,24.191 acres.
The request is to annex the subject property into the City of Fayetteville.
RZN 05-1452: (LANE, 571): Submitted by MEL MILHOLLAND for property located
at THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE, N OF 16E AND W OF DEERFIELD WAY. The
property is zoned R -A, Residential Agricultural, and C -1, Neighborhood Commercial and
contains approximately 30.872 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property to
RSF-4, Residential Single Family, 4 units per acre.
Ostner: The next item on our agenda is ANX 05-1451 and RZN 05-1452 for Lane
submitted by Mel Milholland for property located at the end of Country
Ridge Road north of Hwy. 16 East and west of Deerfield Way. If we
could have the staff report please.
Morgan: This property contains 24.191 acres. It is owned by the Lanes located
north of Huntsville Road north of the existing city property line which is
300' from the street. The property is also adjacent to the city limits to the
east where it adjoins Deerfield Way Subdivision. At this time the property
is currently used for pasture with one single family home located on the
property and it is within the Planning Area at this time adjacent to the city
limits. At this time the applicant is requesting annexation and expects
future development of this property for single family use. The General
Plan 2020 identifies the portion of the property within the Planning Area
as residential and all city departments have reviewed this application for
annexation as well as the accompanying request for rezoning this property.
Fire reports that this property is located approximately 9 % minutes from
Fire Station #5. This does not however, take into account the decreased
response time for the future fire station at the Tyson complex on
Huntsville Road, which should be much closer. It is the opinion of the
Fayetteville Police Department that this annexation will not substantially
alter population density and thereby increase the load on these public
services. Annexation of this property will not create an island of
unincorporated area and does not exasperate problems created by a
peninsula. In the 1960's the City of Fayetteville annexed a large peninsula
of property to incorporate Lake Sequoyah, which is east of this property. It
is a primary water source within the City of Fayetteville. Thus, the motive
to annex this property. Since this time, the city has annexed several
properties north and south of this 600' Huntsville corridor. This property
is one of those adjacent to Deerfield Path Subdivision. Staff finds that the
boundary that would be created by annexation of this property will
become more desirable city limits. It is adjacent to the West Fork of the
White River to the north and it is adjacent to two properties which are
further on the agenda and will thereby create a much larger area of
annexation. By annexation of this property the city will ensure that
Planning Commission �l •)
May 9, 2005
Page 54
appropriate development and preservation of existing natural features such
as tree preservation along the riparian corridor will be taken into account
with development. Staff finds that annexation of this property will be
beneficial to the city and create an appropriate boundary. The rezoning
request is for 30.872 acres. The reason that this is different than the area
that is requested for annexation is because the Lanes do own property that
is within the city within that 300' city boundary adjacent to Huntsville.
Therefore, the rezoning request includes additional acreage. At this time
they are requesting to rezone the property to RSF-4 from R -A, if the
annexation requested is approved, and C-1. The current property within
the city limits is zoned C-1. The General Plan 2020 reflects that zoning
for neighborhood commercial. Police have reported that the rezoning will
substantially alter the population density and will possibly create an
undesirable increase on police services. At this time staff is
recommending the annexation but is not requesting in favor of the
rezoning request. This is due to the fact that the applicant is wanting to
rezone that C-1 property to RSF-4. Staff supports RSF-4 zoning in this
area, it is compatible with the other single family residential properties
surrounding this. We feel that a policy decision was made to create
commercial property in this area to serve the surrounding homes. The
nearest commercial node is the intersection of Crossover and Huntsville
and we believe that preservation of this C-1 area is going to be beneficial
for the neighborhood. Therefore, we are recommending for Annexation
yet for denial of the requested Rezoning.
Ostner: Is the applicant present? If you could please introduce yourself and give
us your presentation.
Milholland: I'm Melvin Milholland with Milholland Engineering representing the
Lanes in these two requests. I assume that we are looking at the
annexation or should I speak to both parts?
Ostner: We are going to discuss both items and are going to vote independently.
Milholland: First, if I could, the third line of the background says that this property is
currently used as pasture and it is not. It has been a commercial blueberry
farm for 20 some odd years. I think this may have got misplaced by staff
somewhere else but it is not pasture, it is actually a commercial blueberry
farm. Just for correction purposes, on the fifth line it says the western
property line of this property abuts Deerfield, it is actually the eastern
boundary of this property that abuts Deerfield. In the handout, the last two
maps shows the annexation in a grid and also the rezoning. If you look
directly below this grid you will see that the C-2 for this commercial
blueberry farm just to the north side of Hwy. 16 but if you look across the
south side of the road where Ed Edwards Road, the county road, comes in
Planning Commission
�1
May 9, 2005
Page 55
there,
there
is RSF-4 across the road.
In your
table on page two it shows
on the
south
side of this being C-1. It
is RSF-4
not C-1.
Ostner: That table is correct because it is the land south of the annexation proposal
which is C-1, also your property I believe.
Milholland: Ok, it has C-2 on the rezoning table.
Morgan: The rezoning table is incorrect. That should be RSF-4. To the southeast
there is C-1 property but to the south it is RSF-4.
Milholland: I guess my point is that across the road from this project it is not C-1
zoning. Actually, 867' from the southeast corner of this property over to
Mally Wagnon Road there is a four way intersection there in which they
had a store named Hot Wheels and a Car Wash, which that business has
been shut down for quite some time unless it has recently opened back up.
I guess my point is C-2 on the south side that exists, I have always
understood this but there had been a commercial blueberry business there
and when that was annexed from Elkins somewhere along the line it was
changed over to C-1. I am assuming that could have been for the
blueberry farm because it was a commercial business. We feel that that is
not a desirable location to have C-1 on one side of the road when there is
only 800 some feet from a major intersection where commercial can be
accessed from all directions. Our feeling is a good access should be at a
four way intersection that is already there and probably have a red light
there one of these days. Presently and in the past there has not been
sufficient traffic to support Hot Wheels nor the Car Wash. Back the other
direction, there are other businesses between there and the Crossover Road
intersection that have struggled to maintain business. Even the building
on the south side of Intersection of Hwy. 265 and Hwy. 16, half of that
building is vacant and has not been able to maintain a commercial
business. We would like to propose that the Annexation take place and
that the Rezoning be as requested for all RSF-4. We feel like that is the
best use of this land at this point. Maybe 10 or 15 years down the road
and there is a major intersection 800' down the road to the east will be
appropriate for some type of business that will survive. Right now it will
not survive, has not survived and we don't feel like it will. Thank you
very much.
Ostner: At this point we will take public comment on both the Annexation request,
ANX 05-1451 and RZN 05-1452 if anyone from the public would like to
speak to these issues please step forward. Seeing none, I will close it to
the public comment session and bring it back to the Commission.
Trumbo: The C-1 portion, how deep is that? The applicant indicated it is 800' of
frontage.
Planning Commission
May 9, 2005
Page 56
Pate: I'm not aware. I believe it is about six acres of C-1 property
Williams: It is probably just 300' from the other side where we did the annexation all
the way out.
Milholland: There are some other things relative to that. The Master Street Plan on
that 300' into that would be a four lane highway in the future so it would
take a strip of land out of that 300'.
Ostner: Staff, on the rezoning request on page 12.2 I am reading that the
Fayetteville Police Department says this rezoning will substantially alter
the population and will create an undesirable increase on police services.
Can you elaborate?
Pate: With their calculations, as well as what we do, they take the maximum
density and based on their findings of fact, I'm not sure what all service
numbers that they utilize to make this call, their finding, which we agree
with, will substantially alter population density. Honestly, it might not
because there is no zoning in the county. It could be similarly developed
with multi family development. Potentially if it were in the city and not
zoned agriculturally it would substantially increase the responsibility of
the Fayetteville Police Department to respond to that area if it were in the
city. We are citing the potential creation of 120 homes, 2.6 persons per
home would be a potential maximum increase of about 312 persons on
that particular piece of property. That is just a rough calculation.
However, most of these developments do not develop at four units per
acre but that is what they are requesting and therefore, that is why we
calculate those numbers as such. I'm not able to elaborate much more than
what you have been given in your packet.
Ostner: From my logic it is just too many people, too close together too far out it
would seem. Police calls would have to go too far to handle it adequately
it would seem.
Pate: I would mention that there are hundreds of acres of property that the
Police Department does have to serve all around this. All around Lake
Sequoyah, those are service areas that the Police Department does respond
to currently quite a ways east of this property. Those properties could be
developed currently without Rezoning or a potential Annexation request.
They have not in the last 30 or 40 years but areas of them have, Deerfield
Way, the property directly to the east off of Lake Sequoyah Drive, there
are other developments in this area as well.
Ostner: I appreciate the Police Department being frank and forthright with us and
giving us information that we need.
Planning Commission
May 9, 1005
Page 57
Clark: Jeremy, if you could put on your fortune teller hat, when is the fire station
on Huntsville Road projected to be finished? I read this and fire response
time is nine minutes. That is clean up detail at that point and that troubles
me.
Pate: I'm sorry, I don't have any way to project that.
Williams: I think that they have already selected the architect but they still have to
finance it, the City Council has to appropriate the money. They are
committed to doing this though so I would suspect that it would be the end
of 2006 or 2007 before that will be on line. Part of it depends on are they
going to remodel the current buildings or are they going to knock them
down and start from scratch and I don't know if that decision has been
made yet.
Clark: I have absolutely no problem with the Annexation to be perfectly honest
with you because if we annex it we can control how it is zoned. The
rezoning with the Fire and Police both saying it is going to be a strain,
especially the Police Department. Never in a year have I read the Police
Department saying this in all of the Annexations that we have done so I
am going to pay attention to it.
Vaught: Emergency response vehicles already service a number of these areas due
to shared service agreements do they not? I know my family grew up on
Ed Edwards Road and we had fire and ambulance service through shared
service agreements is that correct?
Pate: That is correct. The city does have certain shared agreements. I am not
sure what jurisdictional boundaries those are. I don't know where those
lines are drawn but there are agreements that the City Council does enter
into for all types of public services surrounding the city.
Graves: We did have a convening of a task force last summer on annexation issues
and we got a number of reports from emergency services. This area out
this way, although it wouldn't be served by the Police Department when it
is in the county, this is an area that the Fayetteville Fire Department is
already servicing so whether it is zoned RSF-4 or not, this is an area that
our Fire Department would have to go to. Those response times are there
and you are looking at the number of calls would they have if you zone it
at this density because there would be an increased number of calls
depending on what density you zone it at.
Vaught: If it were in the county though we could have another Cherry Hills
situation where they can build 10,000 sq.ft. lots, we have no control over
those things, and the Fire Department still has to go there.
Planning Commission
May 9, 2005
Page 58
Ostner: On the issue of the projected fire station that we have been reading about,
our current station is on Hwy. 265 maybe half way between Hwy. 16 and
Hwy. 245 and that is not but ''A mile or maybe % mile further than the new
station, which is important but I don't think it is like the proposed fire
station is being built next door.
Milholland: On a previous project the same discussion came up on the fire station and
the Fire Chief was here at that time, and it was determined about what Mr.
Williams said, a year and a half or two years. On a subdivision like this
the build out of houses would be somewhere in the neighborhood of 2
to 3 years before all of them were built. Even if we got the ok tonight and
had to come back with a Preliminary Plat, we are looking at another
several months. We are looking at bidding it at the very earliest in the Fall
and a year of construction so you are looking at a year and a half before
the first lot is ready to be built on and then it takes time to build those
houses. The time frame to build out this subdivision will be after the
revamping of the fire station.
Williams: The Tyson plant is also being considered as a new location for a police
station. Nothing has been confirmed. The difference with police as
opposed to fire is that police are on patrol throughout the city and so even
though they are going to be moving closer to the site it doesn't effect
much because police cars are on patrol through the city.
MOTION:
Clark: I will move that we approve ANX 05-1451.
Allen: Second.
Ostner: Is there further discussion? Could you call the roll?
Roll Call: Upon
the completion of
roll call
the
motion to recommend approval of
ANX
05-1451 to the City
Council
was
approved by a vote of 8-0-0.
Thomas: The motion carries.
Ostner: The tandem item is RZN 05-1452. We have already heard the staff report.
We have already heard the applicant. Would anyone from the public like
to speak to RZN 05-1452? Seeing none, I will close it to public comment
and bring it back to the Commission.
Vaught: Staff, with the Master Street Plan in this area, how much right of way
dedication is required?
0
40)
City of Fayetteville
Staff Review Form
City Council Agenda Items
or
Contracts
7 -Jun -05
City Council Meeting Date
Jeremy Pate Planning Operations
Submitted By Division Department
Action Required:
ANX 05-145L (LANE, 571): Submitted by MEL MILHOLLAND for property located at THE END OF COUNTRY RIDGE
ROAD, N OF HWY 16E, W OF DEERFIELD WAY. The property is in the Planning Area and contains approximately 24.191
acres. The request is to annex the subject property into the City of Fayetteville.
Cost of this reauest
n/a
Account Number
n/a
Project Number
n/a
Cateaorv/Proiect Budoet
n/a
Funds Used to Dale
Fs n/a �9
Remaining Balance
Proaram Cateaory / Proiect Name
n/a
Program / Project Category Name
n/a
arliirelii!lT1T
Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached O
Previous Ordinance or Resolution # n/a
S 2o25S
Department birector Date Original Contract Date: n/a
Original Contract Number: n/a 05 City Attorney
Received in City Clerk's Office
Fina ce and Internal Service Director Date
Received in Mayor's Office �
Mayor / D' ate/
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Pate, Jeremy
Date: 6/13/05 1:25PM
Subject: Ord. 4708, 4709, 4711, 4712 & 4713
Jeremy,
Attached are copies of the above ordinance passed by City Council June 7, 2005.
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Goddard, John; Jorgensen, Todd; Randall, Clyde
Subject: Fwd: Ord. 4708, 4709, 4711, 4712 & 4713
>>> Clarice Pearman 06/13/05 01:25PM >>>
Jeremy,
Attached are copies of the above ordinance passed by City Council June 7, 2005.
AI kans Di o( I , 4 �. n Wazette
"NorduvestArkaosa.6'most Wider Rea meurspaper"
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Erin Emis. do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the Arkansas
Democrat-Gazette/Northwest Arkansas Times newspaper, printed and
published in Lowell, Arkansas, and that from my own personal knowledge
and reference to the files of said publication, that advertisement of:
inserted in the regular editions on
"Publication Charge: $ J.Qe�
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day
Notary Public'
Sharlene D. Williams
Notary Public
My Commission F9Wr(R$%rkansas _
My Commission Expires
October 18, 2014
Please do not pay from Affidavit.
An invoice will be sent.
RECEIVED
JUN 2 2 2995
CITYOFFAY ILLE
CT LERK�ICE
OROINUICH NO. 4709,
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THAT PROPERTYTayeV1451 FRED IN ANNEXATION PETITION AIMOS1d51 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THEENDCOUNTRY RIDGE ROAD, NORTH OF HWY. 16 EASTAND WEST O DEERFIELD WAY CONTAINING 24.19 ACRES
Be R ONOAd® HY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF FAYHTTHYILLH, Utl(UIIII
Section 1: That Ina City C*xa hgeby cOnt4,re the ann&URMn to the City of FayenoNle. Arkansas, of
that Property desxibed in Ed" 'A' ansta ed hereto and made a Pan hereol.
Section 2: That the official map 01 Yte City of FeyenoMLe, ANaaaa, is hereby anends to Reed the
singe Prwpeo In Section 1 above.
Section 3: Tlat the official 7a"1g naP IN the City of FayedeHe. Arkansas is hereby amenceo to
de za"destination
of R -A. Reddennel A9rWaigil to i e W pop".. assign
Section 4: That the abav `osaancac Property Is hereby assigned to Wad No. Ore.
PAU= ana a MMM an 7th day at. ns. 2005.
EXHIBIT'A'
AM OS -1451
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW t/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20), TOWNSHIP SOGEEN
(16) NORM, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENC-
ING AT THE WEST QUARTER (W1/4) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND CONTINUING THENCE
S87027'31'E 930.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY O SAID NORTHWEST
BEGWGINN�I
BEGINNING: SAID POINT DCONTINUING THENCE BEI 4POINT
G THE INTERSECTION OF THE EXISTING FAYE TEMLLE CITY LIMITS
BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACTS a 8
C IN A WARRANTY DEED FILED OF RECORD IN BOOK 1284, PAGES 240 AND 241 IN THE CIRCUIT
CLERY.'S OFFICE OF WASHINGTON COUTNY, ARKANSAS.
THENCE NO2°40'0WE 1441.44 FEET; THENCE N82Y78'56'E 246.16 FEET, THENCE N53'32'58'E
213.11 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF THE NW1/d OF THE WW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20;
THENCE S02"32'24"W 664.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID NW 1/4 OF THE
NW1/4; THENCE S87°16'57'E 448.50 FEET.' THENCE 502%1'09'W 1031.51 FEET TO THE EXISTING
FAYETIEVILLE CITY OMITS BOUNDARY; THENCE ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY
N87038'069 827.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 24.191 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS,
P.O. BOX 1607 • 212 N. EASI AVENUE • FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701 479-571-6470 _ - --