HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4600r]
ORDINANCE NO.4600
AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED
IN REZONING PETITION RZN 04-1104 AS SUBMITTED BY
TOM HENNELLY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF
GOFF FARM ROAD NORTH OF THE STONEBRIDGE
MEADOWS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 17.50 ACRES FROM R-A, RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL TO RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY,
FOUR UNITS PER ACRE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby
changed as follows:
From
R-A, Residential Agricultural to
RSF-4, Residential
Single -Family, Four
Units
Per Acre as shown in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
Section 2. That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby
amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above.
PASSED and APPROVED this 3rd day of August, 2004.
so
APP" ". "I�
:FAYETTEVILLE:
ek By:
ATTEST: "'�nIuwn"
By:
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk
IIIIIII (IIIII III IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII
Doc ID: 007653860002 Tvoe: REL
Recorded: 09/09/2004 at 02:28:08 PH
Fee Amt: $11.00 Pace 1 of 2
Vsshinoton Countv. AR
Bette Stews Circuit Clerk
File2004-00037310
EXHIBIT "A"
RZN 04-1104
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND A
PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: BEGINNING AT A PINT
WHICH IS 1849.07" NORTH AND 1204.81 FEET WEST FROM THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SECTION 24 AND RUNNING THENCE S35019'50"W 342.18 FEET TO
THE CENTERLINE OF GOFF FARM ROAD, THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE
S89058'403'W 98.72 FEET, THENCEN87°32'25"W 57.17 FEET, THENCE N7705113TV
85.47 FEET, THENCE N64014'48"W 76.85 FEET, THENCE N44038'24"W 75.47 FEET,
THENCE N38033'03"W 101.03 FEET, THENCE N37009101"W 85.69 FEET THENCE
N34029' 11 "W 59.18 FEET, THENCE N29022103"W 63.36 FEET, THENCE N230171549'W
75.96 FEET, THENCE N2302635215W 77.95 FEET THENCE N45016'3911W 41.38 FEET,
THENCE N68055957"W 40.91 FEET, THENCE N85037946"W 17.78 FEET, THENCE
DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE N41 ° 18'26"E 1211.86 FEET, THENCE S61 ° 13'S5"E
175.00 FEET, THENCE S2404014"W 163.32 FEET, THENCE S04031141W 519.57
FEET, THENCE S05029'35"E 427.78 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 17.50 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND SUBJECT TO THAT PORTION IN
COUNTY ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
Washington County, AR
I certify this instrument was filed on
0910912004 02 M08 PM
and recorded m Real Estate
File Number 2004.00037310
Bette Stamps'
Circuit ler
by
,a
0
NAME OF FILE: Ordinance No. 4600
CROSS REFERENCE:
Item # Date Document
1
08/03/04
Ord. 4600 w/Ex. A
2
07/02/04
memo to mayor & city council
3
draft ordinance
4
memo to Planning Commission
5
letter from Lt. William Brown
6
Fayetteville Fire Dept. Service Delivery Impact
7
letter from Thomas A. Hennelly, P.E.
8
letter from Thomas A. Hennelly, P.E.
9
copy of Future Land Use
10
copy of Close Up View
11
copy of One Mile View
12
Staff Review Form
13
memo to Dawn Warrick
14
Affidavit of Publication
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTES:
City Council Mee, ping of July 20, 2004
Agenda Item Number
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
Thru: Tim Conklin, Community Planning and Engineering Services Director
From: Dawn T. Warrick, AICP, Zoning and Development Administrator
Date: July 2, 2004
Subject: Rezoning request for Goff (RZN 04-1104)
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of an ordinance rezoning approximately 17.50 acres
of property from R-A, Residential Agricultural to RSF-4, Residential Single Family — 4
units per acre.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located north of Goff Farm Road. The property is currently large
fields with one single family dwelling and surrounded to the south and west by the
Stonebridge Meadows Golf Course, zoned R-A, and a creek to the east. The property
immediately to the east is a large agricultural field with two single family dwellings.
Further east is property developed as Stonebridge Meadows Phase I. Property to the
south of this subdivision was rezoned to RSF-4 in May of 2003 and is currently under
construction as Stonebridge Meadows Subdivision Phase II. The Future Land Use Plan
identifies this property as Private Open Space.
The applicant requests that the subject property be rezoned from R-A, Residential
Agricultural, to RSF-4, Residential Single-family - 4 units per acre, to allow for the
development of a 48 lot residential subdivision.
On June 28, 2004, the Planning Commission forwarded this rezoning request to the City
Council with a vote of 8-1-0 with a recommendation of approval. Commissioner Ostner
voted no.
BUDGETIMPACT
None.
Oki)
g13 /a
41
RZIl/ev M
rcl
0
AT'
By:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED
IN REZONING PETITION RZN 04-1104 AS SUBMITTED BY
TOM HENNELLY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF
GOFF FARM ROAD NORTH OF THE STONEBRIDGE
MEADOWS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 17.50 ACRES FROM R=A, RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL TO RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY,
FOUR UNITS PER ACRE. 1�
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
THE CITY OF
Section 1: That the done classification of the following7described
property is hereby changed as follo s:,\ fj J k
From R-A, Residential A
Units Per Acre as shown
Section 2. That
Arkansas, is hereby
PASSED AND APPRO
Sondra Smith, City Clerk
ItoI
"A"
Single -Family, Four
d made a part hereof.
"of the City of Fayetteville,
zoning change provided in
of 12004,
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
EXHIBIT "A"
RZN 04-1104
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND A
PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 30 WEST AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: BEGINNING AT A PINT
WHICH IS 1849.07" NORTH AND 1204.81 FEET WEST FROM THE SOUTHEAST_ CORNER OF SECTION 24 AND RUNNING THENCE S35°19;50"W. 342.18 FEET TO
THE CENTERLINE OF GOFF FARM ROAD, THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE
S89058'40"W 98.72 FEET, THENCEN87°32'25"W 57.17 FEE IT IENCEN77°51'39"W
85.47 FEET, THENCE N64014'48"W 76.85 FEET, THENCE N8:24"W 75.47 FEET,
THENCE N38033'03"W 101.03 FEET, THENCE N3700\09ZQ1"W 85;69NFEET THENCE
N34029' 11"W 59.18 FEET, THENCE N29022103"W 63 3 -FEET, T46iCEN23017'54"W
75.96 FEET, THENCE N23026152"W 77.95 FEET THENCE N45°I6'39'VQ1�38nFEET,
THENCE N68055'57"W 40.91 FEET, THENN N85°37'16�`W 17.78 FEET ; THENCE
DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE N41 ° 18'26"E`121�t.86,FEE`!;, THENCE SM ° I Y55"E
175.00 FEET, THENCE S24040' 14"W 163.32 FEENT ,THENCE S04031' 14"W 519.57
FEET, THENCE S05029'35"E 42\738 FEET, TO TIk-POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 17.50 ACRES MORE\OR`LESS, AND SUBJEGT TO THAT PORTION IN
COUNTY ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY AO\D\LITY ASEM S OF RECORD.
O
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
PC Meeting of June 28, 2004
125 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479) 575-8267
PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE
TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission
FROM: Suzanne Morgan, Associate Planner
THRU: Dawn Warrick, AICP, Zoning & Development Administrator
DATE: June 23, 2004
RZN 04-1104: Rezoning (GOFF, 607): Submitted by TOM HENNELLY for property
located at GOFF FARM ROAD, ACROSS FROM STONEBRIDGE MEADOWS GOLF
COURSE CLUB HOUSE. The property is currently zoned R-A, Residential Agricultural, and
contains approximately 17.50 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property to RSF-4,
Residential Single-family, 4 units per acre. Property Owner: DASH GOFF
Submitted on behalf of: MIKE LAMBERTH Planner: SUZANNE MORGAN
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning based on the findings included as
part of this report.
(PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES
O Approved O Denied
Date: June 28, 2004
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required YES
O Approved O Denied
Date: July 20, 2004 (V reading if recommended)
Comments:
BACKGROUND:
Property description: The subject property is located north of Goff Farm Road. The property is
currently vacant pasture and surrounded to the south and west by the Stonebridge Meadows Golf
Course, zoned R-A, and a creek to the east. The property immediately to the east is a large
agricultural field with two single family dwellings. Further east is property developed as
K:IRepora120041PC ReporaI06-28-OARZN 04-/ 104 (Gqj).dw
Stonebridge Meadows Phase I. Stonebridge Meadows Phase H is under construction just south
of Phase I and was rezoned to RSF-4 in May of 2003. The applicant requests that the subject
property be rezoned from R-A, Residential Agricultural, to RSF-4, Residential Single-family - 4
units per acre, to develop a 48 lot residential subdivision as an extension of the approved
surrounding subdivisions.
Proposal. The applicant proposes a rezoning of the subject property from R-A, Residential
Agricultural to RSF-4, Residential Single-family — 4 units per acre, to allow the development of a
residential subdivision.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
Direction
Land Use
zoning
North
Riparian Area
R-A,
Residential Agricultural
South
Stonebridge Meadows Golf Course
Stonebridge Meadows Phase II
PPL under construction)
R-A, Residential Agricultural
RSF-4, Residential Single-family, 4
units per acre
East
Agricultural
residential
and Single family
R-A,
Residential Agricultural
West
Stonebridge
Meadows Golf Course
R-A,
Residential Agricultural
INFRASTRUCTURE:
Streets: At the time of development, street improvements will be recommended for the
property frontage to widen Goff Farm Road to 14' from centerline including storm
drains, curb and gutter, pavement and sidewalks.
Water: The property has access to a 6" looped water main along Goff Farm Road. An
extension of the water main will be required within the property to provide water
supply and fire protection within any development on this property.
Sewer: The site currently does not have access to sanitary sewer. An off -site sewer main
extension will be required to serve this development. The main may be extended
from the existing sanitary sewer main located on River Bluff Cove to the northeast
of this site.
Fire: The subject property is located 3.11 miles from Fire Station #5. Fire response time
is approximately 8-9 minutes with a projected response time of 8-9.5 minutes at
maximum build out.
The subject property is located 2.33 miles from the proposed Fire Station #3. Fire
response time is approximately 5-6 minutes with a projected response time of 5-
6.5 minutes at maximum build out.
K. Vteports120041PC Reportsft-28-04M 04-1104 (Go).doc
Police: It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this annexation will
not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the
load on police services.
LAND USE PLAN: The Future Land Use Plan designates this site for Private Open Space.
Rezoning this property to RSF-4 is consistent with the land use plan such that it will allow
residential uses to be located in close proximity to open space (the golf course) and is compatible
with surrounding properties.
FINDINGS OF THE STAFF
A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use
planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans.
Finding: The proposed rezoning is consistent with land use planning objectives and
policies and is compatible with zoning and use of adjacent properties.
Surrounding properties are residential or agricultural in nature. The subject
property provides for an extension of existing single family subdivisions.
The Future Land Use Plan identifies the subject property for Private Open
Space. Property to the south (Stonebridge Meadows Phase II) was also
identified as Private Open Space on the Future Land Use Plan. It was
rezoned to RSF-4 in May of 2003. Rezoning the subject property to RSF-4
will be consistent with previous rezoning actions in the surrounding area.
2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the
rezoning is proposed.
Finding: The proposed zoning is justified in order to promote orderly and consistent
development patterns making use of existing infrastructure. It will provide
the potential of development comparable to the approved subdivisions in this
area and be served by the golf course.
3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase
traffic danger and congestion.
Finding: Access to this site is provided by Goff Farm Road, a collector road on the
Master Street Plan. Development of this 17.50 acre tract will not appreciably
increase the traffic danger and congestion on this street.
Police — It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police department that an appreciable
increase and traffic danger and congestion will not be created by this
rezoning request.
K:V2eports12004NC Reports106-28-04V?ZN 04-1104 (Gqfi.do
El
4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density
and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and
sewer facilities.
Finding: The proposed zoning would increase population density. The approximately
17.50 acre tract under an R-A, Residential Agricultural designation would
allow for a maximum of 8 dwelling units (1 per 2 acres). With the proposed
RSF-4 designation, 70 dwelling units would be permitted. This increases the
possible number of residential units, yet is consistent with land use and
zoning within the City of Fayetteville and developing areas to the east and
south. The proposed zoning would not substantially alter the population
density in the area. Public service providers have responded accordingly:
Police — This rezoning will not substantially alter the population density thereby
undesirably increasing the load on police services.
Fire — Response time to the subject property from both Fire Station #5 is
approximately 8-9.5 minutes at the maximum development of this area
(approx. 0.311 miles). The proposed Fire Station #3 will be located 2.33 miles
from the property having a projected response time of 5-6.5 minutes at
maximum build out
Engineering - The property currently has access to a 6" looped water main along Goff
Farm Road, which will be extended property at the time of development in
order to supply water and fire protection. Sanitary sewer is not available to
this site. An off -site sewer main extension will be required to serve this
property at the time of development. The main may be extended from the
existing sanitary sewer main located on River Bluff Cove to the northeast of
this site.
5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of
considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed
zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as:
a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted
under its existing zoning classifications;
b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the fezoning
even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why
the proposed zoning is not desirable.
Finding: N/A
K. IReporbs120041PC Reportv106-28-041RZN 04-1104 (Gofi.doc
0
161.03 District R-A, Residential -Agricultural
(A) Purposes. The regulations of the agricultural
district are designed to protect agricultural land
until an orderly transition to urban development
has been accomplished; prevent wasteful scattering
of development in rural areas; obtain economy of
public funds in the providing of public
improvements and services of orderly growth;
conserve the tax base; provide opportunity for
affordable housing, increase scenic attractiveness;
and conserve open space.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
Unit 1
City-wide uses by right
Unit 3
Public protection and utility facilities
Unit 6
Agriculture
Unit 7
Animal husbandry
Unit 8
Single-family dwellings
Unit 9
Two-family dwellings
Unit 37
Manufactured homes
(2) Conditional uses.
Unit 2
City-wide uses b conditional useqe�,IUnit
4
Cultural and recreational facilitiesUnit20Commercial
recreation, la a site
Unit 24
Home occupations
Unit 36
Wireless communications facilities
C Density,
11 Units per acre I One-half
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Lot width minimum
200 ft.
Lot Area Minimum:
Residential:
2 acres
Nonresidential:
2 acres
Lot area per dwelling unit
2acres
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
1 Rear
35 ft.
1 20 ft.
1 35 ft.
(F) Height requirements. There shall be no
maximum height limits in the A-1 District,
provided, however, that any building which
exceeds the height of 15 feet shall be setback from
any boundary line of any residential district a
distance of 1.0 foot for each foot of height in
excess of 15 feet. Such setbacks shall be measured
from the required setback lines.
(G) Building area. None.
K. IReportA2004PC ReporuI06-18-041RT.N 04-1104 (Gop.doc
161,07 District Rsf4, Residential Single -
Family — Four Units Per Acre
(A) Purpose. The RSF-4 Residential District is
designed to permit and encourage the development
of low density detached dwellings in suitable
environments, as well as to protect existing
development of these types.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
Unit t
City-wide
uses by right
Unit
1 Single-family
dwelling
(2) Conditional uses.
Unit 2
City-wide uses by conditional use permit
Unit 3
Public protection and utility facilities
Unit 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
Unit 9
Two-family dwellings
Unit 24
Home occupations
Unit 36
Wireless communications facilities
(C) Density.
era;cre
Single-family
dwellings
11
Two-family
dwellin s
Units
4 or less
1 7 or less
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Single-family
dwellin s
Two-family
dwellin s
Lot minimum width
70 ft.
80 ft.
Lot area minimum
8,000 sq. ft.
12, 000 . ft.
Land area per
dwelling unit
8,000 sq. ft.
6,000 sq. ft
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
I Side
I Rear
11 25 ft.
1 8 ft.
20 ft.
(F) Height. None.
(G) Building area. On any lot the area occupied
by all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total
area of such lot.
1]
Pi
June 18, 2004
Dawn Warrick
Zoning and Development Director
City of Fayetteville
113 W. Mountain
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Dear Director Warrick,
This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the proposed
RZN 04-1104: Rezoning (Goff, pp 607) submitted by Tom Hennelly for property
located at Goff Farm Road across from Stonebridge Meadows Gold Course Club House
would substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load
on public services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and traffic
congestion.
It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this rezoning will not
substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on
police services or create and appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion in the
area.
Sincerely,
Lieutenant William Brown
Fayetteville Police Department
9 •
Faveltaville Fire DeearlmeM Service Delivery Imeae[ 2nnine Rovlaw Jura 21 MU
Proiaa.e
Prolacbd
Protected
Fr p=
6MSGIIs
Proj,cba Ibaponsa
"is for
Calls for
for Service
nm. to Pmpos,I
Service at
Service M
at
Closest RIVI
Uistancalrom
Response Tiima
Ana at Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
tram
Suedivislon
Anrmxauon
Acres
SUllon
nreStadon
to Propoa,lam
Build Out
Build Out
SWId Out
Build OW
nlvn U4-1ua3
mannom
RZN 04-1084
Mann tni
AN%04-1090
Hays
RZN 04-1091
Hays
RZN 04-1099
Brisiel
AN%04-1100
Harper/Brandon
RZN 04-1101
Harper/Brandon
RZN 04-1102
BradbenyNVooly.
RZN 04-1103
Collins
RZN 04.1104
Gott
RZN 04-1111
The Mill District
Insuffident Data for Calculations
[U."
1-ulure FJ /
U.483 miles
1 minute
1-3.0 minutes
'
72/year
29/year
43/yaar
37.3
Future FS 7
1.97 miles
4-5 minutes
4-6.5 minutes
34/year
13tyear
21/year
Future FS 7
2.13 miles
5-6 minutes
5-6 minutes
2/year
.e0tyear
1.2/year
9.99
FS 4
4.73 miles
13-14 minutes
13-14.5 minutes
Future FS 5
3.36 miles
8-9 minutes
8-9.5 minutes
9tyear
3/year
6/year
FS 1
0.337 miles
1 minute
1 minute
'
FS 2
0.633 miles
3-4 minutes
3.4 minutes
5/year
2/year
3/year
FS 6
3.11 miles
8-9 minutes
8-9.5 minutes
16/year
6tyear
10tyear
Future FS 3
2.33 miles
6-6 minutes
5-6.5 minutes
161year
6tyear
101year
FS 1
0.476 miles
1-2 minutes
1-2 minutes
Tomlinson Asphalt
Civil Engineering
Co., Inc.
Division
City of Fayetteville
113 West Mountain Dr.
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Attn: Planning Commission
RE: Lamberth/Carlton Rezoning
Dear Commissioners:
PHONE
1411 W..VA VAN ASCHE ASCHE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72704
May 19, 2004
On behalf of my clients, Mr. Mike Lamberth and Mr. Clay Carlton, the following
information is submitted to supplement the attached application to rezone 17.5 acres from
R-A to RSF-4. The property is currently owned by Mr..Dash Goff. The sale of the
property is subject to the approval of both rezoning and preliminary plat. Mr. Lamberth
and Mr. Carlton are proposing a 48 lot residential subdivision, north of Goff Farm Road
and slightly north east of the Stonebridge Meadows Golf Course Club House.
The request for RSF-4 zoning is consistent with the land use planning objectives for this
area, and is consistent with recent land use and zoning in surrounding developments. The
rezoning is necessary to facilitate the sale of the property. The requested zoning will
neither create, or appreciably increase, traffic danger or congestion. The developers will
more than likely be required to improve and widen Goff Farm Road as a part of this
project. The requested zoning will not dramatically alter the population density of the
area. It would not be financially feasible to develop this property at a density of %2 units
per acre as is permitted under the R-A zoning regulations.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Tomlinson Asphalt
Civil Engineering
0
Co., Inc.
Division
City of Fayetteville
It 3 West Mountain Dr.
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Attn: Planning Department
RE: Lamberth/Carlton Rezoning
To Whom It May Concern:
PHONE 79
1411 W.. VA VAN ASCHASCHE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72704
May 19, 2004
On behalf of my clients, Mr. Mike Lamberth and Mr. Clay Carlton, the following
information is submitted to supplement the attached application to rezone 17.5 acres from
R-A to RSF-4. The property is currently owned by Mr. Dash Goff. The sale of the
property is subject to the approval of both rezoning and preliminary plat. Mr. Lamberth
and Mr. Carlton are proposing a 48 lot residential subdivision, north of Goff Farm Road
and slightly north east of the Stonebridge Meadows Golf Course Club House. The
requested zoning and to be proposed development are in keeping with nature of the
surrounding subdivisions. This property has City of Fayetteville water available via an
existing 6" line along its southern boundary (Goff Farm Road). Sewer is not
immediately available. Plans for a lift station will have to be incorporated into this
project. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions
regarding this project please call me at 521-3179 (ofc), or 263-0556 (cell).
Sincerely,
I
RZN04-1104
Future Land Use
Overview
GOFF
Residential .�
...................:.��.
Legend
Subject Property
EN RZN04-1104
Boundary
Master Street Plan
42;k:o� Freeway/Expressway
Planning Area
o 000g
Principal Arterial
Streets
Overlay District
oo
w�
Minor Arterial
�\ � Existing
Outside City
M
14�
% Collector
Planned
0*Historic Collector
%o
0 200 400 800
1,200 1,600
F[
.. Y !�✓•'4T� � Lf 4i� � f� a _�:ti ^c�-1.. f s,-tn.._- 1�
Cw
S N iF
RZN04-1104 O O F F
One Mile View
_— RO
4 1 11
aMF-x.
it
_ RSJ
. � J " Rp
I'I L—Its
as I -24 } {
I
I, W4 RSF-4 t I I
RNF3�TRd�
�4 �I RS ty —
l_ Lr _i , I . Q
_ I t Fe.2, --
! 1 T --4 a,
I �
• $ r
� vim• _{
r---- --- I I RA
RA I RA .SUBJECT PROPERTY- a II Rd
�����p RA
R#
Z 4
R
__._.L_.----.---1---- —_R " i i.
IRA
I I I IRSF-�
I I I _ iro
j RA
ddd
RA
RA
Overview Legend
Subject Property Master Street Plan
RZN04-1104 Boundary 4:k9 Fre YffixPressvgy
Streets 0%� Planning Area � Penrroal Metal
- 0000% ^/MvarMalal
❑0o...8 Overlay District i, . Cllde
- Outside City ft® CQNWW
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.Miles
Planning Commission • •
June 28, 2004
Page 86
RZN 04-1104: Rezoning (GOFF, 607): Submitted by TOM HENNELLY for
property located at GOFF FARM ROAD, ACROSS FROM STONEBRIDGE
MEADOWS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE. The property is currently zoned R-A,
Residential Agricultural, and contains approximately 17.50 acres. The request is to
rezone the subject property to RSF-4, Residential Single-family, 4 units per acre.
Ostner: Our next item is RZN 04-1 104 for property located at Goff Farm Road.
Morgan: The subject property is located north of Goff Farm Road. The property is
currently vacant with one single family home and surrounded to the south
and west by Stonebridge Meadows Golf Course, zoned R-A and a creek to
the east. The property immediately to the east is a large field with two
single family dwellings. Further to the east is property developed as
Stonebridge Meadows Phase I. Stonebridge Meadows Phase II is under
construction just to the south of Phase I and was rezoned to RSF-4 in May,
2003. The applicant requests that the subject property be rezoned from R-
A, Residential Agricultural to RSF-4 to develop a 48 lot residential
subdivision as an extension of the approved surrounding subdivisions.
Again, property to the north, south, east and west is R-A with two
residential subdivisions to the east. The future land use plan designates
this site for private open space. Staff finds that rezoning the property to
RSF-4 is consistent with the land use plan in such that it will allow
residential uses to be located in close proximity to the open space, the golf
course, and is compatible with surrounding properties. Rezoning the
subject property will be consistent with the previous rezoning actions in
the surrounding area and it will promote orderly and consistent
development patterns making use of existing infrastructure. Police have
found that rezoning this property will not substantially alter the population
density, thereby undesirably increasing the load on police services.
Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the rezoning request based
on these findings.
Ostner: Is the applicant present?
Hennelly: I'm Tom Hennelly with Tomlinson Asphalt Company. I'm the project
engineer representing Mike Lambert and Clay Carlton. This rezoning that
we are requesting, like Suzanne said is Dash Goff s parent's place. It is 17
acres. The property is 17.5 acres total but about 2 of those acres is the
lake that is on the east side of it so you are really only looking at about 15
acres available for development.
Ostner: Thank you. At this time I will open it up to the public. Would anyone
like to speak to this rezoning request? Seeing none, I will close it to the
public and bring it back to the Commission.
Planning Commission • •
June 28, 2004
Page 87
MOTION:
Shackelford: Based on the lengthy conversation that we have had regarding rezoning
tonight 1 think this falls in line with a lot of those same comments. This
rezoning request is in line with development that has occurred in this area
and I think it is compatible with what we want to see in this area. I am
going to make a motion that we recommend approval of RZN 04-1104 to
City Council.
Trumbo: Second.
Ostner: I would like to talk about traffic again. We probably don't have any more
answers now than we did on the last issue. Hwy. 16 is terrible. It is
backed up for miles. Do you know any information when the state might
be widening?
Warrick: Other than that is a state highway and I don't know of any projects that are
slated at this point in time on the highway capital lists for Hwy. 16.
Ostner: My second question was on the fire report. They gave a response time of
8 to 9 %: minutes. That concerns me. The Fire Department has stated that
their goal is for 90% of their calls to be 7 minutes or under. The reason
that is their goal is our rating as a city falls when more than 90% of the
calls take longer than 7 minutes. On page 17.4 the finding under fire does
say that the proposed fire station #3 will be located 2.3 miles from the
property having a projected response time of 5 to 6 %z minutes at
maximum build out. I don't believe that's really relevant. We have tried
for years and we are finally breaking ground on fire station #7. I'm
concerned that this is too far out to be developed.
Allen: I have the same concerns.
Graves: This is certainly an area if you look at the one mile view on page 17.12 of
our packet that the fire department is already servicing and will have to
service both on the northern edge of Hwy. 16 and on the southern edge of
Hwy. 16. This is not going to appreciably increase the response times that
the fire department is already facing in areas that have already been
annexed in and developed. There are also on the northern side two islands
that are currently under consideration by ordinance for annexation in by
the City Council. You are going to continue to see the fire department
have to go this distance to service this area and they already traverse Hwy.
16 as it is because if you look at our city map we go all the way out that
far as it is along Hwy. 16 and they are going to continue to have to service
this area. The fire department certainly has a lot of plans on the board for
trying to be proactive rather than reactive as they have had to be in the
past. As you well know, without development out there, without the need
Planning Commission • •
June 28, 2004
Page 88
to go out there and service those areas the chances of getting the fire
department constructed in those areas aren't going to occur to service one
or two developments. They are going out that far already and their
response times aren't going to be different for this one parcel than they are
for areas that have already been developed.
Ostner: I appreciate that. The counter point is two wrongs don't make a right.
Poor service to an extreme edge of our town does not mean to increase
poor service. Yes, the fire department needs more stations. However, once
again this is an issue of not if to rezone but how much, where and when.
There is a great deal of vacant property that they drive by on their way to
getting to service calls. If a more orderly development pattern were
adhered to filling in those areas another fire station would come on line
with less of a stretch. I just felt like I needed to respond to that.
Vaught: In my opinion in a way this is filling in because it is not annexed. It is a
little bit closer to town. It has better access. I know there are roads on the
Master Street Plan. There is one on here for Starr Drive but once again,
when are we going to see that built. I don't see this as increasing the area
just because it is already in the city limits and they are going to build a
minimal number of houses on it. It would be great to see this stuff further
west with development west of Dead Horse Mountain Road. To me this is
more of a filling in. I learned at the one annexation meeting I attended
was the fire department's meeting and they already service a good deal of
even the planning area through mutual aid agreements. That was one of
their points that they made as we were looking at annexations and
rezonings saying we are already servicing those areas. They were very
proactive in that meeting and spoke about the new fire stations they were
wanting to get and changing their philosophy in the future. For that
reason, I will be voting for this.
Hennelly: If I could also make a point. It was less than a year ago that Stonebridge
Phase II was approved, 153 residential lots which are further away from
the fire station than this parcel is and this being a maximum of I don't
believe we would be able to get anymore than 48 lots on it. We will
actually have a quicker response time than it will for the David Lyle
subdivision or the 153 lots which the city approved less than a year ago.
Shackelford: I concur with what Commissioner Vaught and what Commissioner Graves
said. I totally agree with that. As has been mentioned, we did take a look
at the fire stations and the fire coverage as far as our annexation
subcommittee. One of the interesting comments that I took out of that was
that these proposed developments and increase in density and increase in
development a lot of times that brings about improved infrastructure and
they actually anticipate response times could decline as infrastructure is
improved in some of these outlying areas.
Planning Commission • •
June 28, 2004
Page 89
Ostner: I understand that but when? It could be ten years of excessive response
times, which is not good for anyone. 1 understand that the fire department
does a great job.
Clark: I think this is a classic example of where I'm going to trust all of the city
services who are repeatedly asked can you handle this? Can you handle
this? Can you handle this? Without a doubt and without exception since
I've been on this Commission a short amount of time they have said sure,
we can do it. I would just encourage the City Council members when they
hear budget this year and everybody starts asking for more personnel
because they are understaffed because of all of this growth to kind of
make some people accountable. I am going to vote for this just because I
think Christian may have a point that this is some degree of infill. It is not
an annexed area, it is already part of the city. We've got departments like
fire and police saying we can handle it. If our ratings go down because
they don't have fire stations online, they said they could do it.
Graves: I was maybe not as clear as I would've like to have been. This particular
parcel is in the city. It is already being served by our fire department.
Unless all of the houses that are going to be developed on that property all
went up at the same time I would expect the response time for the parcel
as developed is not going to be any different than the parcel not
developed.
Allen: When we get these reports about response times I guess I hadn't really
thought about, until tonight, that they are talking about what is existing
and not what is to be built. That troubles me to know when it becomes
significant. That seems quite a long time in terms of safety for someone
who has called the fire department.
Warrick: Our fire department just recently updated the way that they do their
reports. This is one of their new ones. You can see on page 17.7 that for a
variety of projects that you are hearing tonight they are looking at various
parameters as opposed to just a drive time, which is what we had been
getting. They are looking at projected calls within time frames. For this
project they are stating that the closest fire station is #5, the distance is
3.11 miles and a response time to the proposed area, that would be today,
between 8 and 9 minutes. They also are looking at projected calls to that
area. They've got software that works on these projections that they plug
the numbers into. They are stating at maximum build out they would be
looking at approximately 16 calls for service per year. Projected fire or
other calls at maximum build out would be six per year. EMS calls at 10.
Those two numbers combined equals their estimated 16 calls per year. It
does reduce the response time by a few minutes if the future fire station #3
proposed would be installed in the area that they have targeted. They are
Planning Commission • •
June 28, 2004
Page 90
talking about build out and projections as opposed to our previous
reporting which was just it takes this long for us to get there.
Allen: That is much more understandable, thank you. I guess sometimes I have
concerns about how much we stretch one way and how much we stretch
the other way and when we are going to pop.
Ostner: We have a motion and a second, is there further discussion?
Roll Call: Upon the completion of roll call the motion to recommend approval of
RZN 04-1 104 was approved by a vote of 8-1-0 with Commissioner Ostner
voting no.
Thomas: The motion tames by a vote of eight to one.
STAFF REVIR FORM - NON -FINANCIAL OBLIGRION
AGENDA REQUEST
For the Fayetteville City Council Meeting of: July 20, 2004
FROM:
Dawn Warrick
Name
Planning CP&E
Division Department
ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance approval.
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
RZN 04-1104 (Goff, pp 607) was submitted by Tom Hennelly for property located on Goff Farm Road north
of the Stonebridge Meadows Golf Course Club House containing approximately 17.50 acres. The request is to
rezone the subject property from R-A, Residential Agricultural to RSF-4, Residential Single Family, four units
per acre.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Department Director
Finance & Internal Services Dir.
Approval.
Received in Mayor's Office 'I -
ate Date
Date
Cross Reference:
Date
Previous Ord/Res#:
Date Orig. Contract Date:
7� Orig. Contract Number:
Date
A� New Item: Yes No
Date
FAYETTEXALLE �
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
City Clerk Division
113 West Mountain
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479) 575-8323
DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
To: Dawn Warrick
Planning Division
From: Clarice Buffalohead-Pearman4
City Clerk Division
Date: August 9, 2004
Re: Ordinance No. 4600
Attached is a copy of the above ordinance passed by the City Council, August 3, 2004, approving RZN 04-
1104, which rezones property located at the north or Goff Farm Road north of the Stonebridge Meadows
Golf Course Club House, containing approximately 17.50 acres.
This ordinance will be recorded in the city clerk's office and microfilmed. If anything else is needed please
let the clerk's office know.
Attachment(s)
cc: John Goddard, IT
Scott Caldwell, IT
Clyde Randall, IT
Ed Connell, Engineering
RECEIVED
AUG 16 2094
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, do solemnly swear that I am
Leg I Clerk of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Northwest Arkansas
Times newspaper, printed and published in Lowell, Arkansas, and that
from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files of said
publication, that advertisement of:
ad, rrt 1 P) ObDo was inserted in the regular editions on
PO# DI Jg( o
`" Publication Charge: $
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day of Aug 2004.
-Ilg cl��
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: 0 /dS do 3
" Please do
not
pay
from Affidavit.
An
invoice
will
be
sent.
ENotary
ficial Seal
ICHAEL ARGO
ublic-Arkansas
GTON COUNTY
n Expires 07-25.2013
uRW cs NO. KOO
AN ORDINANCE RQONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED INSye
evl le
REZONING PETITION RZN 04PROPERTY-110a A$ SS BIG
BY TOM
FARMHENNE OAD NORTH OF THEONE6RIDGE MEADOWS
GOI-FCWRSE CLUB BECONTAINING APPROXIMATELY ARKANSAS
17.50 ACRES FROM R-A, RESIDENIIAL AGRICULTURAL TO RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY,
FOUR,UNITS PER ACRE
BE ET ORDAENBO BY THE CRY COUNCIL OF TNB CRY OF FAYBTTBYELLB, ARKIINSA&
Sectk)r� 1. That the zone d=fication of the I(110 W deswtoRl proporty 4 hereby doVW as kilo :
From R-A, ResWential Agrkdlurel to RSFd, Resloamlal Single -Far*. Row UNIS Per Area as shorn In ErtMblt'A' ettaMeo haeto W merle 0 perl hriap}.
Section 2. That ft
e kid dlzu*V mep Of the City W FayettoWle. Nkarrsay, Is
the zonug charge proNtlea In Sedlan I above. haebY ementlao to re0ed
PAWED ^md APPROYBD this 3N c6y of August, 2004.
ATTEST;
By:
BONORA BURN, CHr CW*
EXHIBIT'A'
RZN 04-1104
A PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOL:
NORTHEAST GUARTEH OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEF
RANGE 30 WEST AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DE
WING AT A PINT WHICH IS 1849.07' NORTH AND 120i
DOWER OF SECTION 24 AND RUNNING THENCE S35.1
DF GOFF FARM ROAD, THENCE ALONG SAID CENTFI
N87'32'25W 67.17 FEET, THENCE N77051'.9 at 47
ET THENCE N34.29.111
4'W 75.96 FEET, THENCE
N68.55'571 40,91 FEET,
212 NORTH EASTAVENUE • P.O. BOX 1607 • FAYFIpaN
.I6 FEEL THENCE N:
'P61521N 77.95 FEET 1
4CE NBV37'46'W 17,71
THENCE S61.13'S5'E 1
9.57 FEET, THENCE S
50 ACRES MORE OR U
AND UTIUTY EASEMFI
OOARTER AND A PART OF
TION 24. TOWNSHIP 16 NOI
I AS FOLLOWS, To WT.. BE
WEST FROM THE SOUTHE
42.18 FEET TO THE CENiFR.
TO