Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4577ORDINANCE NO.4 5 7 7 AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 04-08.00 AS SUBMITTED BY RAY SMITH ON BEHALF OF NOONCASTER VINEYARDS, INC. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF CROSSOVER AND NORTH OF HEARTHSTONE DRIVE CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 20.01 ACRES FROM R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL TO RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From R-A, Residential Agricultural to RSF-4, Residential Single -Family, 4 Units Per Acre as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above. PASSED and APPROVED this 18`h day of May, 2004. APPROVED: FAYETTEVILLE' = By: ATTEST: Ilplllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Recorded: 08/25/200402 tT11:16:37 AM Fee Amt: $11.00 Paae 1 of 2 WashiatonBetten3tamaeoClrcult untv RClerk F11e2004-00025132 EXHIBIT "A" RZN 04-08.00 A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE %4) AND A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE'/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) ALL IN SECTION EIGHTEEN (18). TOWNSHIP SEVENTEEN (17) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-NINE (29) WEST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARER (SE '/4), SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING NAIL IN A FENCE CORNER POST; THNCE N87010'45"W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE 1320.09 FEET TO A SET IRON ON THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF STONEWOOD ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS; THENCE NO2°31'40"E 644.76 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ADDITION; THENCE S87031'29"E 9.46 FEET TO A SET IRON ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE'/4); THENCE N02024'04"E 6.59 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF (S %2) OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE ''/4), THENCE N02024'0499E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4 ) 8.80 FEET TO A SET IRON IN LINE WITH AN EXISTING FENCE; THENCE ALONG SAID FENCE, THE FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES: S87009931"E 354.14 FEET TO A SET IRON; S87021558"E 289.92 FEET; S8700311"E 407.46 FEET; S87013'24"E 259.66 FEET TO A SET IRON ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE '/4); THENCE S02034'21"W 1.01 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF (S 1 /2) OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE'/4); THENCE S02034'2I"W 660.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 20.01 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS. Washington County, AR Ii,Cekify this Instrument was filed on 08/25/2004 11:16:37 AM and recorded in Real Estate File Number 2004 0 25132 Bette Stamps - c t Clerk by 6 L NAME OF FILE: Ordinance No.4577 w/Ex. A CROSS REFERENCE: Item # Date Document 1 04/29/04 memo to mayor & city council 2 draft ordinance 3 04/21/04 memo to Planning Commission 4 copy of § 161.07 5 copy of Close Up View 6 copy of One Mile View 7 copy of Future Land Use 8 04/26/04 minutes of Planning Commission 9 05/03/04 Staff Review Form 10 05/24/04 memo to Dawn Warrick .it 05/25/04 Affidavit of Publication 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTES: City Councipeeting of May 18, 2004 /1916 Agenda Item Number [L AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor and City Council IVM-1I646ter V1neY ands Thru: Tim Conklin, Community Planning and Engineering Services Director From: Dawn T. Warrick, AICP, Zoning and Development Administrator Date: April 29, 2004 Subject: Rezoning for Nooncaster (RZN 04-08.00) RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends approval of an ordinance rezoning approximately 20.01 acres of property from R-A, Residential Agricultural to RSF-4, Residential single family 4 units/acre. BACKGROUND The subject property is 20.01 acres and located in north Fayetteville. The property is surrounded on three sides by developed or approved Fayetteville subdivisions zoned RSF-4, Residential Single Family, 4 units per acre: Stonewood Gardens to the west, Copper Creek Phase I to the south and Copper Creek Phase II to the east. To the north is one intervening County property south of the Springdale city limits. The subject property has been anticipated for growth by surrounding development; infrastructure has been stubbed out on all three sides to provide street connectivity and looped utility service for development on the 20-acre tract. Proposal: The applicant proposes to rezone the 20.01 acre tract in anticipation of the development of a single family residential subdivision. The requested zoning will provide for additional residential development at a maximum density of 4 units per acre. On April 26, 2004, the Planning Commission voted 6-0-0 to forward this item to the City Council with a recommendation for approval with an accompanying rezoning request. BUDGETIMPACT AT' By: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 04-08.00 AS SUBMITTED BY RAY SMITH ON BEHALF OF NOONCASTER VINEYARDS, INC. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF CROSSOVER AND NORTH OF HEARTHSTONE DRIVE CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 20.01 ACRES FROM R-A, R TIAL AGRICULTURAL TO RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SII F LY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE. & BE IT ORDAINED BY THE FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the property is hereby changed as From R-A, Residential ricultural to Units Per Acre as shown i it "A" ; PASSED Sondra Smith, Section 2. That 1 Arkansas, is hereby THE CITY OF of the Residential Single -Family, 4 breto and made a part hereof. "of the City of Fayetteville, zoning change provided in this da. , of , 2004, By: DAN COODY, Mayor EXHIBIT "A" RZN 04-08.00 A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) AND A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) ALL IN SECTION EIGHTEEN (18), TOWNSHIP SEVENTEEN (17) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY—NINE (29) WEST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST I I R (SE '/4), SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING NAIL IN A FENCE a ER POST; THNCE N87010'45"W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE 1320.09 F - SET IRON ON THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF STONEWOOD ADDIT �N, A DITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS; THENC 2 1940"E 6 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE NORTHEAST CO SAID ADD � N; THENCE S87031929".E 9.46 FEET TO A SET IRON ON WEST INE OF SAID - 4 HWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST ER (S ' 4); THENCE 410411E 6.59 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE NO RNER OF • SOUTH HALF (S ''/2) OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTE %4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE '/4); THENCE N °24'04"E ALON HE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) a ' E SOUTHEAST a UARTER (SE 1/4 ) 8.80 FEET TO A SET IRON IN LINE WIT S ING FENC NCE ALONG SAID FENCE, THE FOLLOWING BEARIN AN APICES- S8700993I"E 4.14 FEE k- A SET IN; S87°21'58" = 8- .92 FEET; S87003' = 07.46 FEET; S87013'24"E 2 - : 6 FEET TO SET IRON ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SO ST sFER t: 4) + THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE '/4); THEN( 02� 4" "W 1. EET TO EXISTING IRON AT THE NORTHEAST CO R OF THE , ®a TH H S 1/2) OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW '/4) OF OUTHEAST TER 4); THENCE S02034'21"W 660.33 FEET TO THE PO F BEG , C(7NTAINING 20.01 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, WAS HIN SON COUNTY; ARKANSAS. FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PC Meeting of April 26, 2004 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 575-8267 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Jeremy Pate, Associate Planner THRU: Dawn Warrick, AICP, Zoning & Development Administrator DATE: Avril 21, 2004 RZN 04-08.00: Rezoning (Nooncaster, pp 61) was submitted by Raymond Smith, Attorney, on behalf of Nooncaster Vineyards, Inc. for property located east of Crossover Road and north of Hearthstone Drive (Stonewood S/D.) The property is currently zoned R-A, Residential Agricultural, and contains approximately 20.01 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property to RSF-4, Residential Single-family, 4 units per acre. Planner: Jeremy Pate RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning based on the findings herein. Date: April 26, 2004 COUNCIL ACTION: 1ON: Required YES 4Approved O Denied 600-0 Required YES O Approved O Denied May 18, 2004 BACKGROUND: Please reference the associated ANX 04-03.00 staff report for additional background information. Property Description: The subject property is 20.01 acres of vacant property located in north Fayetteville. The property is surrounded on the west, south and east by platted subdivisions, currently in various phases of development. To the west is Stonewood Subdivision and to the south and east is Copper Creek Subdivision, Phases I and II, respectively. Right-of-way is stubbed from each of the three developments for future access and street connections. Single family residences are located north of the subject property along Albright Road. Proposal: The applicant intends to develop a single family residential subdivision. Request: The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned from R-A, Residential Agricultural, to RSF-4, Residential Single Family, 4 Dwelling Units per Acre, should the preceding Annexation E request be approved. Related Issues: When property is annexed into the City, it is annexed as R-A Residential Agricultural. If the annexation is recommended for approval to City Council, the applicant would like to rezone the 20.01 acres to RSF-4, Residential Single Family, 4 Units per Acre. The annexation request, ANX 04-03.00, is an accompanying item to this rezoning request. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Future changes or additional development on this site will be regulated by the city allowing for a more uniform and consistent development pattern. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Direction Land Use Zoning North Single family residential In county, no zoning. South Copper Creek S/D, Phase I RSF-4, Res. Single Family, 4 DU/Acre East Copper Creek S/D, Phase II RSF-4, Res. Single Family, 4 DU/Acre West Stonewood Subdivision RSF-4, Res. Single Family, 4 DU/Acre INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: Currently three streets are constructed or are being constructed to allow future access to development on the subject property. Stonewood Subdivision to west, Copper Creek I to the south and Copper Creek II to the east were all required to stub out street connections through the development review process to allow for future access to this property. With development of the subject property, the developer will be required to tie in to these street connections, allowing for connectivity through the subdivision. Additionally, connectivity to the north will be reviewed at that time. Water: The property will have access to an 8" looped water main system that was installed with the Copper Creek Phase I Subdivision and Stonewood Subdivision. An extension of the water main will be required to provide water supply and fire protection within any development on this property. Sewer: The site will have access to an 8" sewer main that was installed with the Copper Creek Phase Subdivision and Stonewood Subdivision. Sewer will need to be extended within the development. The developer's engineer will need to provide calculations to show that there is adequate capacity in the Stonewood lift station. Upgrades to this station and/or force mains may be required. Fire: The subject property is located 3.9 miles from Fire Station #4 on Plainview. Normal driving time is 6 min. 03 seconds. Water supply will be necessary for this property to develop. LAND USE PLAN: General Plan 2020 designates this site Residential. Rezoning this property to RSF-4 is consistent with the land use plan and compatible with surrounding land uses in the area. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: The proposed zoning for a Single Family residential subdivision is compatible with adjacent and nearby single family residential land use. The General Plan designates this area for residential uses, which is compatible with the proposed RSF-4 zoning. Access and provision of adequate services is currently being extended with the development of adjacent properties. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The proposed zoning is justified in order to promote orderly and consistent development patterns making use of existing infrastructure. The rezoning is needed for the development of a single family subdivision as proposed by the applicant. A subdivision with this density in the R-A district could not be developed as it is currently zoned. A higher density than the R-A zoning district allows is appropriate in this area, and would provide compatibility with adjoining developments that are zoned RSF4 and currently being developed with residential subdivisions. In order to provide the connectivity and network of public infrastructure with adjacent residential subdivisions in a manner that is consistent with the future land use plan and guiding policies of annexation, a residential zoning district is needed. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: The proposed zoning will provide additional traffic on Local and Residential streets in the area. Most streets in this area are newly constructed or are being constructed to city specifications. The Fayetteville Police Department finds that rezoning this property will not result in an appreciable increase in the level of traffic danger and congestion in the area. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: The proposed zoning would increase population density. The 20.01 acre tract under an R-A, Residential Agricultural designation would allow for a maximum of 10 dwelling units (1 per 2 acres). With the proposed RSF-4 designation, 80 dwelling units would be permitted. This increases the possible number of residential units, but is consistent with land use and zoning in the immediate vicinity. Engineering - The property will have access to an 8" looped water main system that was installed with the Copper Creek Phase I Subdivision and Stonewood Subdivision. An extension of the water main will be required to provide water supply and fire protection within any development on this property. The site will have access to an 8" sewer main that was installed with the Copper Creek Phase Subdivision and Stonewood Subdivision. Sewer will need to be extended within the development. The developer's engineer will need to provide calculations to show that there is adequate capacity in the Stonewood lift station. Upgrades to this station and/or force mains may be required. Currently three streets are constructed or are being constructed to allow future access to development on the subject property. Stonewood Subdivision to west, Copper Creek'I to the south and Copper Creek II to the east were all required to stub out street connections through the development review process to allow for future access to this property. With development of the subject property, the developer will be required to tie in to these street connections, allowing for connectivity through the subdivision. Additionally, connectivity to the north will be reviewed at that time. Fire - The subject property is located 3.9 miles from Fire Station #4 on Plainview. Normal driving time is 6 min. 03 seconds. Water supply into the property will be necessary. Police - Projects existing in this area already receive police services. The same level of service will be provided to this site as is currently applied to the existing city subdivisions in the vicinity. It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this rezoning will not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on police services. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A 161.07 District RSF4, Residential Single - Family — Four Units Per Acre (A) Purpose. The RSF4 Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development of these types. (B) Uses. (1) Permitted uses. Unit 1 Ci -wide uses by right 11 Unit 8 Single-family dwelling (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellin s Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities (C) Density. Single-family dwellin s Two-family dwellings 11 Units er acre 4 or less 7 or less (D) Bulk and area regulations. Single-family dwellings I Two-family I dwellin s Lot minimum width 70 ft. 1 80 ft. Lot area minimum 8,000 sq. ft. 12,000 sq. R. Land area per dwelling unit 81000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. (E) Setback requirements. I Side Rear jiFront l 25 ft. 1 8 ft. 20 ft. (F) Height. None. (G) Building area. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot. (Code 1991, § 160.031; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99) RZN04-08.00 NOON CASTE R Close Up Yew 1. r - • i r 1'- os -� RSF� 1 C e lk, Id If °f RSF-4 R-0 8030 SflJEC PROPERLY R-A - ."'^,^".'tip-----�;:..... RSF-4 i I I I it pR-A CDf o) s. ,... .n o� I r Overview Legend 0000 Move la oistnd ®P 0008 r mdpal Arlenal—ROODWAY Master Street Fan ®Minor Aneaial — t00YEAR Master Street Fan caneda — 500 YEAR Fee AEVresswar 0040 Rb Cdlecbr M_=l LIMB OF STUDY _I City Links — _ _ Base e F e O OYL C"y ME RZN04-08.00 RSF-4 Iff j 0 175 350 700 1,050 1.400 Feet 0 4 08.00 View One View Mile N O O N C A_ S T E R One 5 - -a t J ♦ lb k, , N" t IN tt It R�N O ; ImIm F.. o - aA t6 Ir I 11 9. I GON LA , r I ALA:: •:r I RS 4 Tr t RA tJ Imt- AKE RAYETTEVILL -- — SUBJEGTPROPERTY art `Ri. '13Ri �Qg' {{`Fff � ---'—f— — I' - LPL _�—I ° 7 i 31 R-O G1 L'.ry �. 7.R -�`T "L_..'A-- l •✓_. I` rs�Al � I GI G r� 5 I i 50sra 1 i —� �<�IF i Iw i j� � .'•i �'" . I r;�. asF. R-A , L„ _ I WA 04 Rr. c L ¢ ."G_ 'Ir IN Overview Legend Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan _EM RZN04-08.00 Planning Area up000 Streets .0— .0 Overlay District 4,i ' Minor Anea, M vina rel E isung L — I City Limits I`. caueaa �P1anne° Outside City 0*0, INat Coueclor 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.g Miles Overview Legend Boundary Subject Property ___, PlanningArea Master Street Plan RZN04-08.00 Ao r000 o Overlay District Freeway/Ezpressway 0000 Streets � Principal Arterial � _ � City Limits .I-J `\� Existing Outside CM 4124k�* Minor Arterial Planned Collectorv�llP 0*%* Historic Collector 0 175 350 700 1,050 1,400 Feet Planning Commission April26, 2004 ANX 04-03.00: Annexation (Nooncaster, pp 61) was submitted by Raymond Smith, Attorney, on behalf of Nooncaster Vineyards, Inc. for property located east of Crossover Road and north of Hearthstone Drive (Stonewood S/D.) The property is in the Planning Area and contains approximately 20.01 acres. The request is to annex the subject property into the City of Fayetteville. RZN 04-08.00: Rezoning (Nooncaster, pp 61) was submitted by Raymond Smith, Attorney, on behalf of Nooncaster Vineyards, Inc. for property located east of Crossover Road and north of Hearthstone Drive (Stonewood S/D.) The property is currently zoned R-A, Residential Agricultural, and contains approximately 20.01 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property to RSF-4, Residential Single-family, 4 units per acre. Ostner: The next item on our agenda is ANX 04-03.00 for Nooncaster. Can we have the staff report please? Pate: I am going to review items nine and ten simultaneously. They are both on the same property. The first item is for the Annexation of the subject property and the second is to rezone that potential annexation to RSF-4. Ostner: Jeremy, let me interrupt you. If someone can get our sixth Commissioner it would help. Thank you. Pate: This property is 20.01 acres of vacant property located in north Fayetteville. The property is surrounded on the west, south and east by platted subdivisions currently in various phases of development from fully built out to just beginning construction. To the west is the Stonewood Subdivision. To the south and east is Copper Creek Phases I and II respectively. Right of way and city services including water and sewer are stubbed out from each of these three developments for future access and street connections to the subject property. Single family residents are located north of the subject property also along Albright Road. Portions of that property are in the county and portions are in the City of Springdale. The applicant is requesting with the first request to be annexed into the city limits. When a property is annexed into the city limits it is automatically zoned R-A, Residential Agricultural. If this annexation is recommended for approval the applicant is requesting that the property be designated RSF-4, Residential Single -Family, four units per acre. The property that is subdivided in the planning area outside of the city limits does not allow for enforcement of many of the regulations required within the city. Thereby allowing for uniform and consistent standard of development. When property that is consistent with the General Plan 2020 and the city's guiding policy of annexation is incorporated into the city undeveloped it allows for many things that we do not actually see such as grading and drainage review, detention, tree preservation review, parks land, code enforcement. There is always confusion of protection for public safety with regard to police and fire and Planning Commission April26, 2004 who responds to that. The ability to require the same level of infrastructure improvements for new development as required within the city limits. That is important because in this specific property this area has been anticipated for future development as is on page 8.13 obvious with the stub outs of streets from the west, south and the east and the stub out of utilities to service this particular property. With regard to findings, obviously improvements will have to occur on this subject property to develop a single family subdivision. The timing of the requested annexation is sufficient. It is following essentially the development of the property surrounding it. It is under pressure to develop. Surrounding subdivisions did anticipate the development of this tract and subsequently have been required to provide access for public infrastructure should the property be annexed and developed. The Fire Department and Police Department say they do already adequately respond with the same level of service as in the city to these areas. There are issues with a lift station in this area which could potentially need to be upgraded with future development of the property. Those are things that I believe the applicant is aware of already and we have been in contact with the Engineering staff and the applicant on these issues with subsequent development proposals. Staff is recommending in favor of the annexation request based on those findings and also in favor of the rezoning request based on the findings found in item number nine of your staff report. 1 will leave that for any questions you may have. Ostner: Thank you. Is the applicant present? Smith: I'm Ray Smith representing Nooncaster Vineyards, Inc. and with me here this evening is John Nooncaster of Nooncaster Vineyards, Inc. I think Jeremy covered the main points there as far as both the annexation and the rezoning is concerned. This property is south of Albright Road and the property just to the north of this property is in the Springdale Planning area. This property is in the Fayetteville Planning area. The 20 acres will probably at this stage be developed somewhere between 40 and 50 lots all together. They will be single family dwellings compatible with the housing that is located both to the west and to the south of this. If there are any other questions I can answer on their behalf or if Mr. Nooncaster can answer we would be glad to answer them. Ostner: Thank you Mr. Smith. Is there anyone from the public who would like to comment on this topic, the annexation and rezoning. We are discussing two at the same time for Nooncaster. I'm going to close it to the public and bring it back to the Commission. A question for staff. Is this property kitty comer to another property that we saw two weeks ago? Pate: Yes it is. If you remember the HarperBrandon annexation rezoning request that was at the last Planning Commission meeting. That was PJ Planning Commission April26, 2004 northeast of the subject property. If you go to the east that is a part of Copper Creek Phase 11 and directly north of that property the Planning Commission did recommend approval of that and I believe it is at the Council level at this time. Ostner: Thank you. MOTION: Trumbo: I would like to make a motion to approve ANX 04-03.00. Vaught: I will second. Ostner: In the discussion of this I see this as a little bit different from the last issue we just saw. This is practically an infill annexation. On three sides it is developed and on the west side it is platted and streets are being cut. This seems like a good density fit for the neighborhood and I am going to support the annexation and the rezoning. Do we have any other discussion? Allen: 1 would agree with the chair that those are the reasons that this is significantly different than the last rezoning. Anthes: 1 would say that it is different than what we are going to hear later this evening for several reasons. One is that it is surrounded on three sides. There are stub outs for utilities and streets to this property from three different directions. Approving this annexation would be consistent with our recommendations from the property nearby and would be consistent with the development pattern that surrounds the property on three sides. Thank you. Ostner: We have a motion on the annexation and a second. Is there further discussion? Renee? Roll Call: Upon the completion of roll call the motion to recommend approval of ANX 04-03.00 by the City Council was approved by a vote of 6-0-0. Thomas: The motion carries six to zero. Ostner: Do we have a motion for the accompanying item, RZN 04-08.00? MOTION: Anthes: 1 will move to forward RZN 04-08.00 with a recommendation for approval to City Council. E Planning Commission April26, 2004 Trumbo: Second. Ostner: Is there any further discussion? Renee? Roll Call: Upon the completion of roll call the motion to recommend approval of RZN 04-08.00 by the City Council was approved by a vote of 6-0-0. Thomas: The motion carries six to zero. STAFF FIVIEW FORM - NON -FINANCIAL ORIGATION x AGENDA REQUEST For the Fayetteville City Council Meeting of: May 18, 2004 FROM: Dawn Warrick Name Planning Division ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance approval. SUMMARY EXPLANATION: CP&E Department RZN 04-08.00: (Nooncaster, pp 61) was submitted by Raymond Smith, Attorney, on behalf of Nooncaster Vineyards, Inc. for property located east of Crossover Road and north of Hearthstone Drive (Stonewood Subdivision) containing approximately 20.01 acres. The newly annexed property will be zoned R-A, Residential Agricultural. The request is to rezone the subject property to RSF-4, Residential Single-family, 4 units per acre. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. A . U Di-4sion Head A; Department Director Finance & Internal Services Dir. WIALd(:�Received in Mayor's Office D to l30 0 Date Cross Reference: Date Previous Ord/Res#: Date Orig. Contract Date: yD� Date Orig. Contract Number: New Item: 30•G4 Date Yes No FAYETT&ILLE 0 THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS City Clerk Division 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 575-8323 DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE To: Dawn Warrick Planning Division From: Clarice Buffalohead-Pearman City Clerk Division Date: May 24, 2004 Re: Ordinance No. 4577 Attached is a copy of the above ordinance passed by the City Council, May 18, 2004, approving the rezoning petition, RZN 04-08.00, for property located east of Crossover and north of Hearthstone Drive. This ordinance will be recorded in the city clerk's office and microfilmed. If anything else is needed please let the clerk's office know. Attachment(s) cc: John Goddard, IT Scott Caldwell, IT Clyde Randall, IT Ed Connell, Engineering Aikansas Democ= IV 05aziette AFFI PUBLICATION I, f� do solemnly swear that I am Legal(Clerk of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Northwest Arkansas Times newspaper, printed and published in Lowell, Arkansas, and that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files of said publication, that advertisement of: was inserted in the regular editions on pp PO# -0�0 Publication Charge: $ ILZA(a Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2004. My Commission Expires: O ,,b13 ** Please do not pay from Affidavit. An invoice will be sent. SEAN%Official Seal RECF-' i i ' , ICHAEL ARGO Notary Public -Arkansas MAY 2 2004 WASHINGTON COUNTY My Commission Expires 07-25.2013 C17YOFFAYETTEVILLE CITY CLERMS OFFICE 212 NORTH EAST AVENUE 9 P.O. BOX 1607 • FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72702 • (501) 442-1700 OKDINANCIS NO. {IS77 REZONINGTHAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN RON RZN 04-OB.00 AS SUBMITTED BY RAV ALF OF NOONCASTER NNEVAADS. INC. FOR ATED EAST OF CROSSOVER AND NORRI OF ram, Of RN DE CONTAININGAr gPPPRO OLVRSF4, r a�i..�......-.._. Or r�yIS7 MVILLE* •NKAKbrra' ONDNNISD By THIS CITY COUNCIL Or THIS Cm 11: That the Zate dessificeliat of the,ofi, ng deschbed ProlpdY Is herebY changed se follows: S.q, Reddential AghwlNral to RSF-4, fla5lderNal Single-FarnIN• 4 Units Per Acre as shwm In ; -A- etta hod hereto ISM made a Pert hereof. n 2: That the olfldal Z rlg Meo of Ne City of FeyeogAlle. Afkairtes, Is hereby amended to reBacl Wing chenge Prohded In Section 1 at W13 NID .0 APrNOYISD the 1 Bth day of MeY, 2004. AN AN Q. 354.14 FEET TO A SET 280.92 FEET, 401.46 FEET: 9 nh M FEET TO A SET OF OF iE 1/4)1 FENCE. Ordinance No.4577 1 04/29/04 memo to mayor & city council 2 draft ordinance 3 04/21/04 memo to Planning Commission 4 copy of § 161.07 5 copy of Close Up View 6 copy of One Mile View 7 copy of Future Land Use 8 04/26/04 minutes of Planning Commission 9 05/03/04 Staff Review Form 10 05/24/04 memo to Dawn Warrick 11 05/25/04 Affidavit of Publication 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25