HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4387 ORDINANCE NO, 4387
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 171 .12 OF THE
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, PROPERTY
OWNER TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK OR CONTRIBUTE
COST OF SIDEWALK AND ADOPTING A REPLACEMENT
SECTION 171 .12 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT
ORDINANCE
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1 . That §171 .12 of the Unified Development Ordinance,
Property Owner to Construct Sidewalk or Contribute Cost of Sidewalk;
Subsection A. Requirement; Subsection B. Application of Provisions shall be
deleted and the following inserted in its stead:
" §171.12 Property Owner to Construction Sidewalk or Contribute
Money In Lieu of Construction"
A. Requirement
The owner of any property abutting a public street or
highway for which a sidewalk is required by City's Master
Street Plan shall construct a sidewalk along said street or
highway upon receipt of notice issued at the time a building
or parking lot permit is issued.
1 . The property owner shall construct the sidewalk in accordance
with section 171 .13 Sidewalk and Driveway Specifications.
2. A property owner may request a waiver to subsection
171 .12 A.1 . requiring sidewalk construction. The Sidewalk
Administrator shall review the following factors to determine
whether or not to grant the waiver:
A. pedestrian traffic generators such as parks and schools
in the area;
• • Ord , 4387
B. the existence of a sidewalk network in the area;
C. the density of current and future development in the
area;
D. the amount of pedestrian traffic likely to be generated by
the proposed development;
E. whether the terrain is such that a sidewalk is physically
practical and feasible, and the extent to which trees,
ground cover and natural areas would be adversely
impacted by the construction of the sidewalk; and
F. the overall need for a sidewalk to be constructed on the
lot.
3. If the Sidewalk Administrator grants the waiver to construct a
sidewalk, the owner shall have an option to construct the
sidewalk or to contribute money in lieu of construction as set
forth below:
A. The amount of money in lieu of construction to be
dedicated shall be determined based upon the rough
proportionality of the impact of the development upon
the sidewalk infrastructure needs near the development
including consideration of the persons served by the
development and approximate pedestrian trip generation
rates of the development.
B. To facilitate administration of this ordinance for certain
recurrent types of development, the City Council has
determined that the City will accept, as the roughly
proportionate impact, the amount shown below:
1 . Single family house $630.00
2. Duplex $720.00
C. Unless the developer presents evidence that the number
of persons served by the development and the pedestrian
trip generation rates of the development justify a reduced
• a Ord . 4387
contribution in lieu of the construction of sidewalks, all
industrial, commercial, and multi-family developments
shall make a cash contribution in lieu of the construction
of the sidewalk at a rate of Three Dollars $3.00 per square
foot of the sidewalk that normally would have been
required. The amount per square foot and amounts for a
single family house and a duplex shall be reviewed
by the City Council at least every five years.
D. Contribution in lieu of construction of sidewalks shall be
paid or construction of the sidewalks shall be completed
before receiving final plat approval, or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
E. Contributions must be expended within one (1) year to
build a sidewalk close enough to serve the project being
constructed.
F. If the owner voluntarily consents in writing, the
contributions may be used to construct sidewalk projects
where most needed as determined by the Sidewalk
Administrator.
4. An owner/ builder may appeal the Sidewalk Administrator's
refusal to grant a waiver or the Administrator's determination of
the amount of contribution in lieu of construction to the
Planning Commission pursuant to §155.06 D.
B. APPLICATION OF PROVISIONS
The provisions of this section shall only apply to the following
property:
1 . New Structure. On which a new structure is build built.
2. Existing Residential Structure. On which an existing residential
structure is being modified so as to increase the number of
• . Ord . 4387
dwelling units located therein or to change the use to a
nonresidential use.
3. Parking Lot/Garage. On which a parking lot or parking garage,
having a minimum capacity of five automobiles, is constructed
or enlarged.
4. Additions. Additions of 2,500 square feet or larger.
5. Conditional Use. Any development which requires conditional
use approval.
PASSED and APPROVED this the 16th day of April, 2002.
APPROVED:
By:
X/O�
DAN COODY, May
l
U �•
! ^� ather Woodruff, City CZ rk
NAME OF FILE: Ordinance No. 4387
CROSS REFERENCE:
04/16/02 Ordinance No. 4387
04/05/02 Memo to Mayor Coody from Kit Williams, City Attorney, regarding
Sidewalk Ordinance
02/15/02 Planning Division Correspondence
02/11 /02 Planning Division Minutes (Pages 61 -72)
03/05/02 Staff Review Form
04/19/02 Memo to Tim Conklin, Planning Division, from Heather Woodruff, City
Clerk
05 /01 /02 Statement of Legal Advertising from Arkansas Democrat Gazett
NOTES :
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 171 .12 OF THE
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, PROPERTY
OWNER TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK OR CONTRIBUTE
COST OF SIDEWALK AND ADOPTING A REPLACEMENT
SECTION171 .12 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT
ORDINANCE
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1 . That §171 .12 of the Unified Development Ordinance,
Property Owner to Construct Sidewalk or Contribute Cost of Sidewalk;
Subsection A. Requirement; Subsection B. Application of Provisions shall be
deleted and the following inserted in its stead:
" §171.12 Property Owner to Construction Sidewalk or Contribute
Money In Lieu of Construction"
A. Requirement
The owner of any property abutting a public street or
highway for which a sidewalk is required by City's Master
Street Plan shall construct a sidewalk along said street or
highway upon receipt of notice issued at the time a building
or parking lot permit is issued.
1 . The property owner shall construct the sidewalk in accordance
with section 171 .13 Sidewalk and Driveway Specifications.
2. A property owner may request a waiver to subsection 171 .12 A.
1 . requiring sidewalk construction. The Sidewalk Administrator
shall review the following factors to determine whether or not to
grant the waiver:
A. pedestrian traffic generators such as parks and schools
in the area;
B. the existence of a sidewalk network in the area;
C. the density of current and future development in the
area;
D. the amount of pedestrian traffic likely to be generated by
the proposed development;
E. whether the terrain is such that a sidewalk is physically
practical and feasible, and the extent to which trees,
ground cover and natural areas would be adversely
impacted by the contribution of the sidewalk; and
F. the overall need for a sidewalk to be constructed on the
lot.
3. If the Sidewalk Administrator grants the waiver to construct a
sidewalk, the owner shall have an option to construct the
sidewalk or to contribute money in lieu of construction as set
forth below:
A. The amount of money in lieu of construction to be
dedicated shall be determined based upon the rough
proportionality of the impact of the development upon
the sidewalk infrastructure needs near the development
including consideration of the persons served by the
development and approximate pedestrian trip generation
rates of the development.
B. To facilitate administration of this ordinance for certain
recurrent types of development, the City Council has
determined that the City will accept, as the roughly
proportionate impact, the amount shown below:
1 . Single family house $630.00
2. Duplex $720.00
C. Unless the developer presents evidence that the number
of persons served by the development and the pedestrian
trip generation rates of the development justify a reduced
contribution in lieu of the construction of sidewalks, all
industrial, commercial, and multi-family developments
shall make a cash contribution in lieu of the construction
of the sidewalk at a rate of Three Dollars $3.00 per square
foot of the sidewalk that normally would have been
required. The amount per square foot shall be reviewed
by the City Council within five years.
D. Contribution in lieu of construction of sidewalks shall be
paid or construction of the sidewalks shall be completed
before receiving final plat approval, or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
E. Contributions must be expended within one (1) year to
build a sidewalk close enough to serve the project being
constructed.
F. If the owner voluntarily consents in writing, the
contributions may be used to construct sidewalk projects
where most needed as determined by the Sidewalk
Administrator.
4. An owner/builder may appeal the Sidewalk Administrator's
refusal to grant a waiver or the Administrator's determination of
the amount of contribution in lieu of construction to the
Planning Commission pursuant to §155.06 D.
B. APPLICATION OF PROVISIONS
The provisions of this section shall only apply to the following
property:
1 . New Structure. On which a new structure is build built.
2. Existing Residential Structure. On which an existing residential
structure is being modified so as to increase the number of
dwelling units located therein or to change the use to a
nonresidential use.
3. Parking Lot/Garage, On which a parking lot or parking garage,
having a minimum capacity of five automobiles, is constructed
or enlarged.
4. Additions. Additions of 2,500 square feet or larger.
5. Conditional Use. Any development which requires conditional
use approval.
PASSED and APPROVED this the day of April, 2002.
APPROVED:
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Heather Woodruff, City Clerk
FAYETTEVILE ` L
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVIELE, ARKANSAS /
KIT WILLIAMS, CITY ATTORNEY 4
DAVID WHITAKER, ASST. CITY ATTORNEY _ - -
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO: Dan Coody, Mayor
FROM: Kit Williams, City Attorney
DATE: April 5, 2002
RE: Sidewalk Ordinance
The Sidewalk Ordinance Amendment needs to be returned to the
Agenda (as Old Business) . The City Council Ordinance Review
Committee met Thursday, April 4thand discussed proposed changes
for over an hour with input from several Planning Commission
members, the City Planner, and City Attorney.
Attached is the agreed upon new ordinance that incorporates
many improvements recommended by the Planning Commission,
some fine tuning by the City Attorney and amendments by the City
Council Ordinance Review Committee.
u �
1 1
I 1 111
1 I 1 1 Jt
: 1 • 'liltf IMP 111 1 a
1 ' • � 1 1 iv
� I
1 lu 1l ul wll I 1 \ 1 \ 1111 1 ti '1 • n n _ 1
` : 1n 1 n li n Ili :11 \ I u n , l . 1 Nlw n In I • n . 11
rUI 1 1 : 1 \ '1 1 \f 1 l 1 • - Y. 111 \ ' 11 11 N 1 • 11 1 \ I : 1 • L -� 1 . 11 • L -' Il
1 \ 1 : M 1 1 11 . \ 1 11 1 1 : 1 \ H • i wl . 1 1 '1 \ .+ 1 • 11 11 -
VI1 'll 111 1 'l l � ..
r 1 1 11 11 '•LI 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 ni r 1 1 1 1 1 1 u 1 1 .
1 1 1 1 • 1 1 \ 1 11 r 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 : 11 V
1 / \ 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 r I • : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 ' \
1 1 11 1 r 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 '
\ Iwl 1 q 1 n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 YI 1 1 \ 114 1 1 >1
. 11111 11 . 11 M l 1 nll 1 : 11 w IIL : 11 Y \ 1 '• 1 - 1 1 1 11 -11 1 ' \ I L1 I
1 .1 •. - 1 \ II u .
I bit
1 11 \ u : n 1 1 1 1 • ul ni 1 1 ul r 1 \ r II
'1 1
n 100rl III V u 11 N 1 • 1 . -1 wl � w•t: \ n . \ 1 . . - 1 1 .-1111 -' 11 . . n1111 11
11 11 . n1 wll '. - 1 . 1 •ll u 1 11 1 1 1 r1w n 1 • \ •ll u \ \ u 1 u1 11 -
1 Iw II 1 : 11 \ 1 11 : 1 11 : 1 - 1 V: 11 \ 1 1 N1: 1 \ 1 11 1111 1 1 1 . : 11 11 11 . \ 1111 � � 11 : 1111 M11
" V
1 • \• n 1 -1 : 11 Il , 1n 11 n wl 1. 1 u 1 1 I : ui . '1 1 - \• 1 \ n
•�: 1 II 1 ' 11 . 1 ^ 1 1 Y11 '• 1 M111 1 :11 : I .: I � : 111111 ' 111111 \11 ' 1 N � YI � 1
r Ynn 11 n 11 . 'v 1 . . \ n n u. n1w nl -: 1 1 11 : 111
1 1 1 -In
r \ 1 1 1 \ u 1 '1 . .: li • Y \ lun n _ _ run n al l 1 • an - 1 , 1111 : w1n. n n . •• In -' 11
n : 1I's 1 ,- 1 1 1 n1 : .
SIDEWALK CONST
D. 6. Page 3
CURRENT STATUS
The Planning Commission voted 840-0 to recommend the City Council approved the proposed
amendments to Section 171.12 subject to a change in wording of A.3 to wrbe Sidewalk"
Administrator MM(instead of shall) grant the waiver based on a review of the following
factors:'%
RECObOdENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amend to Section
171.12 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
c4n9fitsmssetr oxaooc
SIDEWALK CONST
.D. 6. Page 4
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 171.12 PROPERTY OWNER
TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK UPON RECEIPT OF NOTICE
REGARDING WAIVERS AND CONTRIBUTION OF
FEE IN LIEU OF CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, the current sidewalk ordinance occasionally required the construction of a sidewalk in an
isolated and impractical location, and
WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to use the resources that would be wasted building such an
impractical, isolated sidewalk to build a needed, useful sidewalk nearby,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETPEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That 171.12 Property Owner to Construct Sidewalk or Contribute to Cost of
Sidewalk be hereby amended as follows:
Material to be deleted in stiikeent; material to be added underlined.
171.12 PROPERTY OWNER TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK OR CONTRIBUTE
COST OF SIDEWALK
1-1 I- 1 1 propertyI u11•_ 1 1 Ii 1 highway1 1 I 11('1'
-IkJlfF-
. 1 1 11 1 •1 • 1 •1 i 1
1 1 11 1 1 1 1 LI 11 1 1 - 1 1 ! :__ 1.:
1- 111- 1 1
:11 1 1
The property owner shall construct the sidewalk in accordance with
section 171.13 Sidewalk and Driveway Specifications.
I .1 Y,l. Iii 1 1 1- Administrator
111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1unfeasible,
impracticable,1 1 1jLI 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :11 1 1then
the1 1 1 1 11111 1 11 1 1 1- ••. 1
contribute money 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
C:\WINNf40\sidewalk fee ordinance wpd
of
SIDE W ALt+.,....... -
D.6.Page5
- 11111 -. 1 • 11 1 , b.X.. -♦ :11
1 111 ♦ 111 1 1 11'1 1111: ,'
1 • 11 1 1 , , 1, .11 ILIf•�4•rll y
11 11 1• 1' l%1 �, ,' , 1 ♦ 1 11 1 11 111 'lli:a
1 1 1 •' �, 1, 1 1'use 1 1 1 1' 1 III U'JILI
,.1
C. The cash contribution amount per square foot shall be reviewed
every three years and may be amended by the City Council.
construction be , 11 1 �. , - ,
Certificate1 ,.' 1
E. Contributions must be expended within three (3) years within
the quadrant of the City in which the unbuilt sidewalks are
located.
.111 111'1: 1' -1 , ,11 ♦• ., K
-
Mlii ' 1 y.'L_ t : 1 11 1 If: _ u Sit 1 y- ♦._II
' 4, 1 1 1 • 1 1 1
= 1_ .. 1 . ♦_ ; Imo./i
1 11 1 1 1_ 1 Y 1' 1 1 , 11 1 1._ •' I y [� e' IJ 4
!_\I !ill'UI , 1 1 11
CAWINNT40\sidawalk fee otdinaloc.Wpd
SIDEWALK CONST
D. 6. Page 6
N
B. Application of Provisions.
The provisions of this section shall only apply to the following property:
1. New Structure. On which a new structure is being built;
2. Existing Residential Structure. On which an existing residential
structure is being modified so as to increase the number of dwelling
units located therein or to change the use to a nonresidential use.
kA IITL
having n u n
4. Lot Splits. Division of land into two or more pieces of property,
regardless of size.
5. Additions. Additions of 2,500 square feet or larger.
6. Conditional Use. Any development which requires conditional use
approval.
day of _,2002
APPROVED:
BY:
ATTEST:
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
C:\WINNT4owdewalk fee ordinenae.wpd
tl
:III, I
:I 11
11, .4.t.11 1 4: 1 . i - ' 1 :I 11,
11 ul I I rl n 11 1 11 1I' n 1 .I h Constitution.
:•. . Iresponsive1 I :I I I I 1 questions Y 11 .
stated Ili- :I • . :I are` I. . II X11 I ' :111 • I :I L: L.n II 4':,%''•
II I •f II II :I I Y ' I I I
n d • M I .. 9 1. 154'
aJ..I - l 1. n a
I.
Wi
1 I • . • ', • n a
Estes: We have forwarded that to the City Council and with their good judgment
they will do whatever they please with that recommendation but that is out
of here and that is on the way to the City Council.
Varvil:. Ok
Estes: The second item, which is the one now before us, is to amend the
calculation method for determining the fee in lieu of construction of
sidewalks for a single family lot, duplex lot or lot split to correct the issue
that you have so well articulated and just addressed. If the City Council is
sympathetic to our recommendation under the appeal ordinance, you are
taken care of
Varvil:. That means that I will have to come again and say this to somebody? To
you guys?
Estes No. You cam say to whatever you want to whomever you please.
Varvil: I have to appeal it.
_ 1 1 II .1 specific 1 1 '111 1 11. 1 1 1 :IIJ 11 :1 C, d rl �• J. 1 11. 1 II.M II I: . Y:I 1 1
:I 1 1 1 1 11 r 't' •J !j 11 , IIkl 1 :I ''ii
Estes: Pardon me?
1 1 n a . 1. 1:lL4 tsj.))11 . 1 1 n 14 • _ . 1 n 11 1:4a
• :m 1 s 1 n r\m 1 :1 1 :n.I that 1 II 1 11 :In. C1
1 :rgin , 11 n 1 :n . 1 1 . ., ' :1u1 , I n n LC, . I I.
"s s lower :III I ,n
SIDEWALK CONST Immissio a
D. 6. Page 10 2002
Varvil:
Estes:
• 1, 1 1 I, :1 r: , I 1 :I 1,
I :n . I a n
1 n n 1111 . 1 nadministrative-In -s :ii
1 w :nlHeather 1 1\ 1 I I 1 n
•ra :I1 1 1.: • . n husband 111 . 1 V n -'Jill •P'1. • -. . r l
_vr �: 1 1 1 1 ' \ . I n 1 1 . \ .•: . .\I11 I,r 1 :1
1 irl . 1• n r r. ll 11 1 1 1 1+ `
1 it
theamount 1 I 1. 1 n \:. 1 1 1 1 1:. •. 1 1
1 into. 1 1 .• 1 1 -\ 1 1 1 rbudget 1•-11 n. go 1. .0 1 1
1. 11 1 1 n n. n I n 1 q I: n. 11 r 1somebody going n
1 :I 1 1 • \ . . II \ V: . 1 l \ . :11 r: .: 1 1.-. 1': . . 11
Ilti - 11 . ! 1 II houses 1 : it-,
l 111 \ many, 11 :11 ra
•\ 1• 1 : 1 1 1 -11 . .- 1• :. 1 1 1 I I 1
11 11 •1''
\1 1 1 ' I 111 :. 1 1 .•: . r \ 1
1 I 1 .at
• \-rtII \1
1••1 the.11 1 1: 1 • 1 1• 1 1: si,.
1 :111. wIl-. It! :I
1:1would "w1 111 -G V11 Ilr 1 , 1 1 •I.1 • 1 wl 1 V.
1 1 . 1 11 • permit 11 1 • 1 1 • 1 1 , 1 111: 11 1 111.11- .1 11 -
11.. {.
•1 :I 1'.1. 1 :ILY- 1 Illr 1 K 1 . 11 1 1 YI 11 11 11.
1 L 11 :\ 11 11 1- 1: 1 Y 1 ': -1 1 1 111 11 1
: t411.r,rr II 11 11'
. 1 11 'Ui property /1 n-. I1 •. 1 n ''i times ¼!CII , 1:1 . I1
` Williams: rI kLi'li 1 1111 1 nl ' :n1 I 1' 1n11 1.1 1 nI Y\I Y.r :1II1
MI1- r 1 :I In 1a 1 r Illr 1 Ies 1 11111 11 :1 1 1 -rl 1: 1 ' : I 1
.111 'I11
fanning SIDEW
P Cpmmtssto� � ALK CONS]'
February 1112002 D. 6. Page 11
Page 65
1:1. 1 1 •.
: 1 1 1' 11 11 • 1 1.
1 :1 1 1
YII YIq 1' 1 11 II 1 1 11 :11,rUll
1 .1 1 IIiN
L Y: :111 •, 1' „r , 1 l i
II I Y1 II II 11�' :Ili• 11� in
I 11.:1 II :1
!P! 1 1 I.: 11 11 I 111c1.
NI N 1 :I YI 1'1 \ N 1' : 11 \ 111 1\ • Ir don't 1 : 1\ Y\ 11'. :I•'.•
1.1 liiiw 1 1 :.\fl 1-%111111 \I &t'L'111\\-.;
11�- .• s
1 111 1 ul :11 \1 1 \ \ 1� • C.II I • V.\ M ;11 • :1111 -' l I
1\ ,, I1.111.4tII 11 •I1
'M•'(i'11 11 11 : 11 • 1 1 money : • • 1 ' • 1 11 - • 1 1
1 1 1someone1 situation 11 1
1 1�-�1 you1 •1 1 11 :1 : 11 1 III 1 1 a 1 1 111: ' 1 fir: 11•
s -•f':;
1Ii
1 L�1 11 \ :1 1.-' ♦. 111 •I':1
,a V 11 L, ' :II 1 r: • ,II 1'.1 ' 1 rl�Nl 11 •L- \1 11 1:1.11
11 1': 11 :1 :111 1' 111 1 11 1 1 11 11 1 ' •1 :1 I. -1 - 1 - 4:1
-1 •1 :1 ' 1 1 be1 �Y r:C :I .1 111 1
Y11I -V
to Ida1 11- •J(.<?_ ,I 1 1:11Y 11 :I ••11 -r
Ie r : 1 :Itf
1•: '1 r: • 1 :I : 1te I 1.4:1 :1waiting 1\ O•:1 1'11
1.1 1 111 1 1 ` 11r 1 '1 1' 11 r:.l \ •L1 14:11:'- III ♦e
11:1 1 1 1 1' 1.1A3 _ ass :1•.1 •:1 11 111 1.1'.:
41 a L1 • 1 1- 1 '1 11 1 1 :Ili1 11 1 11 :1 L� l 11
:111.1' III
1 hr :11 other member L I II
11 I 1• 1 1 r• 11 11 ;' , , 11 : 1.11 1 '•1 :11 Irll � rll ` 1.1 I
1• 1 • 1a 11 Ili 111 11 s s1 1 • 1 1 M "\ I 1 11 \t1 \ 1.: :111 rUui 11.^111.
11 :1 L • 1 1 ' 1 11 \ • :1 1 : lil •I IL '1''
rl 1 it fir 1 -.sent, 1 1s'k r r 11 I 1 I 11 :1 li I: 1 ��II \ 1
\ 11 :r �1 1 1 1 :nce I \ 1 1':. '.:1 1: :1 1': • :111 •1
SIDEWALK CONST ,mmissio1S
D. 6. Page 12 •2002
0
ragc w
1 fl
:I 1 1 1 �: -I :111 I \ ':1 1 : 1 :II 1
' 1 ' 1' 1 1 :I1. LI 1 1
I 1 1• +C 1 11 \1 1'%' 1 ordinance1 111'Y1 1 11i 1Y11111 1_
1 :1 1 1 1 1 :1 1 1• I I pose tonight • I otherY I I -s 11 6 -� : I
1\ 11 1 correspondence1 1 11 1 ,1
1\ 11. :IIJ some11 1• I:'-1
1 iii. :ILYL 11., 1 1 1 :I 1 :1 - c 11 11 til 11• 1\" 1 1 1 :ILY_:'
:1 11
1 11 1 1 1:TTT
could 1\ I I 11 I amend 1 -current ordinance 1
we1.: •_ 11 1 1 ' Iremoving IL 1 ' 1 y 11 11 1. %II I
procedure..11 11 _VI 11 1:1 '111 1 Ili II,YM 1'
petitioners1 1 I I: I' I 1 II 11 and II : :II '':J' Y: I :1 ' I
originally,1 :1 •should exempt 1 1 11 K I 1 1 '1 1' F111 1
:I ic. I II N K \ I 1: 1 ' -' 11W 1 11 - • :1111111 '
1 11 11 s1 ri 1 1 1 V 1 11 11 I -i desires on 11 could 111
:11 1 r: 1 1 Yom\
1 1111 :11 1 I 1 1- %1 Awanted 1
1subcommittee1 .1 1 1 1 1 r: 1 1 1
• 1 1 1• • I.1 1 1 I
• I ��� • I 1- 1. 1 • S. 1 11
11 1 1' 1 1- I 1 1 1• 1 • 1 1 1 1' proposed.
IL-{' 1 1 I 1 4 I n •V:I11 11 I \ :11 1 :II '- 11 11
id hl ordinance,1:1 1�subcommitteeII' II II -,II 1:I :111 1 1I]fL•'.'
LI IIti 1 I,w I 1 I- 111
'I.
maximum Isomething•:n :11 _ 1'tea I 111 1-
I I I nl L- .� 1% t.)i:u.,.__;I I hes y l-• I I,
'9 �: 1 :II II Commissioner I iin :II Ii L1 I :111 1 YInII 11 lu
I II -s N111:II I I
I 1 -� I I K I I I N 1 I •': I I 1 I ?5
I: I 1
•--11 VI -1 -I 11 '111 1 Ili \ II I.LILY •1 :1 I V1111 II 11
proposing.changesa :1 ILI,_
recommending :1111 11 1111 •1 111 - I 1 I LII.-nl N YII
1 'I 1' 1:111 1 I 11 N 't'
I I 6 I I I 1 11
I I 1 1 1 1 -1 ' 1 I II. 9 I ' II :I I.II II .
1 1 I-YI _I -1 II I YI I 1 I_1 the 1. 11 1II\'-1
iii Li
1 :1 1 '1 1' f% 11 1 A I 11 d 14 IJ 1 I 1,' 11. cash •\1111 I' 11 IiI
I -� I Y I I\ 1 1 1 • •_h), I I a I I a I I 1 1 per ' 1 a l l 1I-
II
square III 1 I I_ 1_1 . n I I 1• IL '1 I� nll I II
minimumstreet 1 1 1 1: • j.1 I. I 11 I n. II 1' II ui
L I Y111 11 n_ 1 II 1 I ICI 1 • •)'1.:'4 I r. I r:.Vnl lu II
' :1111 1 • 1 11 11 'C• I 1 11
'
1 ':1 _ 1 1 1 1
r.1 I
1• 111 1 I :1 1 I ' 1'til 1 YIIris)
• I 1 1 1 1\ 1 1 • �1 1 1 :•: 1 1 1 1 a I n 1:1 11 time.
1 1 1 I Commissioners, 1 1 I , , •1
Rushing 1- 1 1! i: :< 111' -111 Thank \ 1 : I n 1
question,on 1 In 1 d n- 1. 1 un 1- 1 1 1 _v au n.
• �' that good 1 Y: 1 1 1 :II 11 :I 1 �•: \ 1 :I 111
AdministratorII : •I :III 11r gJN
Williams:1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 :1 1' • 11 I\ 1
11 - 1 \ •1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 :nc 1' 1 q
Commission desires on 11 :1 1 1 1 •1 11 I1� 1 :L11:4:.1.(.).
1 1 11 :I
1�< 1 : \ 11 1 • \ii1 lyll 1 1 1 YI . I1T\ 111•• C1 \ • .1 \ '1 \ 1
u n �!II \ u '1' 1'
Chair,\\would I thank1-subcommittee
1 for1 • 11 11 1
.11 • 'INI 1 I 11 • 11
important1 • 1 IlL"1 1 r 11• 11 1' 1
1 I K•1 11 �: 1y I 1 1 1 1 1 11 1<•
1. 1 1 1' Hwhen 1 11 1
II
Y 1 Y. �1 II •'1 1 I 11,_I, 11 1'.1 •
\ , I ' 11 \ ' I I•.N r r
I• certainly 11 x 1 1 \ 1 : I ' :1• \ • 1 :II Y 11 •':
1 • 11 1 •r..1 •': 1.1 11 1 11 :11 he 11 •': 1 IH II 1 budgeting 1'
homeII 1 1111 \ •:111 11 :1 • d_,understand 1• :1 I1 � ••✓
Ie II 1' 1:1 :IIJ 1:1 1e need 1 1 ' II 1•.
11 :1 • made. 1 1 :'11.41,4
1 '1 1 ' 1 \ 11 : • • • I• 11.\ • :Ir •I
. , 1 • 11 \ 1 • 1 • • 111 1 nc •I : 'I_• • • r1
•I: ''r: 1 :11 • IIi- :q11 I I I
'•1e I. 1 motion • 1 11 1• '\1 1 pr Nj3 i:11 ., ,J:11 11 1 ' 1 • 11.^
Y•11
\ 1111 :11 FYI li•
Bunch;11 1 11 ' 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 11 a
did1 I 11 :IIJ 11 V:111 �1 , information 11 :1 .• n 1.• 1 w I1, J.YI 11 1 11 4.t,
1' 1': N : 1 I �1 411 1 11 ..< :111 continued \ ":1• . • 11
1 :11 1 needsandwould 1 11 :11 . \ w 11 1
SIDEWALK CONST ommissie
D. 6. Page 14 1, 2002
0
rash Oa
u 1 1 1 ii. CommissionerIii..
nand .r1 11 ¶r.
nlll 'CI 1 •.-.
1 iln : 1 1 :n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :• 1 11 1 .j, .c . 1 u 1 :n.• n 11.
1 1 1 1: 1 11 1 :11 1 1 11 11 nl 1 1 _I 1 ! I 1 1
:11 1 have1 1 more, actually probably
1 :1 :1 1111 1 1 111 d Sidewalk' : 1 L _1 11 :1
1 11 11 ' I l d ' 1 %11 • • 1 1 11 1_ 1 1 1 1 11, 1111:.
1 1 1 11 1 1, -1 111 1- he 1 :I 1 appropriate, certainly 1 •.
1 1 1 'I: 1 11 e 1 1 1 1- 1 i1 1 -1 11 1: 1 1 1' \ 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :1 1- 1 .1 1\ 1 1 1 I 111 1 1 +1
1 :nl 1 11 eI 11 1 .11 1 ' 1 1 li • 1.1 1 : 111. lir
1 1 11 :1 1 11 the II I11.L1. -11 • these ( L1
requests?
1 :11 - &1 :T(, L
Rutherford: Our current Master Sidewalk Plan is our Master Street Plan. They go
hand in hand. On our Master Street Plan anywhere you see in the city in
the bottom left hand corner gives you the right-of-way width, the c oss
section of the street width, the greenspace that is required, the sidewalk
width for each and every street in the city of Fayetteville.
11 1 , 1 1 1- 1
.i'I A 1 :11 11 :I 11 _m,1
111 ,•
1 •
' 1 :I 1 r 11 1 : t 1 1 11 : • 1 1 ,. Plan 11 -
LJfrg
I I Y II I I: I wI lIw Street:II 'k 1 - \ ' I I 'I II -
i I. :111_NI'I:Y 111 :!11 II:I 1:! NU :!II -I
I 1
, 11:1 In ' :1111 1' , '111 _,
II _I '1 y w •' 11 11 :1 time,11 :11 , 11• :II - y 1 • 11 :1 1_r
1 • ' :11 _1 11 _1 11. .11 e 4 , 1 1 , • 11 :1 1 1 11 :'• _ 1111
1 LI 1 \ 1 1 1 11 1 , , I 1 -11 Ir I _r ' 11 \ 111 .•I•
1 1111 together: 1 ' 1 1 '1 1 I 11 ' ' :11 and -. 11
' 1se • Council 11
r•,'
\
UI _ 1• 1 11 _V:1 1 11 11. 1_1 1 ' :11 111 ' :11111 1 1 11 11 V1 11! \1 •
I I S N 1 1 :11 1 1'Commission 1 •
Y:1 1 1, 1,. 1 1 1 11 1 V .111
1 1 11 :1 1 1 1'! :111 In 1 :11 :I11 1 Ii
-1 11'.I
I ' 111 �! 1 1 111+ 1 1 ' II : 1 1 11 :1 1 11. 1 1 11
1 1 1 11 l 1 1 11 : 1 11 :I 1 N ,11 s 11 :I II
' 1 111 1 1": 11 ' I11.1� 1 1 1 1 -�: 1 1 • 1 1 11 1':I I
1 In l -I n D e r:l n l - 11 1, n 1 -1 ' 1 ' 1 1 a something
:1111 I 1 11 11, 1 1
SIDE W, Lx CONST
D. 6\ Page 17
1 illl :11 1 1
1 i.s 1 1 1 Williams1 1 1- 11 . 11 111 1
.:' 1 11 ' 1 1 u 1 1 1• • 1 1 1 Iw 1.: 1 •I --1
1 u 1• Y. 1 1 1 \ 1 1additional1 e • 1 1 11 1
• 1 1 11 M 1' 1 11e \: 4 1 1 11 11er _: ':1 111" 1 IL I
•ri
' 1 1 - •_ 1 11 1111 : 1 • 1 :1 11 Il r 11 1 :11 Y11 1 11 I :1•
1 1 11 e 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 Y 1 1' 1 I A •: 1 N
• 1 11 ... 1 1 1 1 1 I I w 1 1 Y 1 .: :11 1 1 111 r :1 r: \ 11 :1
1 1: 1 1 1- 1 1- 1 1 1 11 eC l el I] 1 1 ' 11 1 :1
something 1 1%1 •1 %'1 111 11 ' w. 11 1- 11 el
1 11 Ab\ 1 1: A 1 • \ 1 1 11 \ : Y\ 1 1:11 A 111Y:11 `\ :I n 11.
e 1 1 r" 11• \ \ 1 : 1 .L)11 11 Ili \
:1151.1 1: 11 1 1 \ 1.es, • e In 1...
:11 \K' 1 11 :1 1': 1 :1 1 • I lli-11 1 1 111 1 1 1 Y\ • 11
LI:n a nl ell 11• 1 \ • 1 \ n I. :1 ' In rll 1 1 \ 1 1
h11 :1 : 1 1 1 " \ 1 -' 1 1 11. 1 Ill• :� 1,\ 1 1 1
• 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Let 11 1
M ` el 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 e: r:l ', • ti\ 1 • 1 1
1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 •1- 11 1 11 ' 1 1 1 11 1'% 1 $Li". 1. • • 1 1 1 • \ ••\ iii1 1 1. '2.'
\: 1 1 1 1 1 1
r 1 11 .rC 11 1 1 :1 1 e 1\ 11•
Council :'lit!
I11 •J1iI 1 : 1 11 1 ' 1 1 . ns, issues :11 1
• • 11 \ 1 : 1 1 1 11 1. 1 :n - 1 :I !,r_ :111 1• 1.1with
.
all 1 1111 :I• ,T: ii •'
'�Irf Iher : 1 111 1 1 1 .1a.' 1111 •)I 1 Commissioner :I
:n • 1,• • \ n n -CI 1 1 r 1 inl I I :n •I 1 1 1 . 11.-•
:11 • Il.w 1 '\1 111 -Ili- 1 • \ M: 11. 1 • r: "
• I I[WI I • • 1 h YI 111• • 1 • 1 1 M: the motion 1• :1• • 1 1 1
approved 1 1 I 1 1 1
In 11tJ motionunanimous1 • 'III II /r 1 there
:11
0111 r business?
I 1 lid Lr 1.1 \ 11. -Ill L,
"• I kl
W. 1 1 • 1 1 '' Y I 1 1 1 w • 1 1 •V 1 1 r:
1 • 1 1 I :11 I1f 11 111' r •
1 :1 YI 1 111 11'1 • 1 e :1 :1.1 I. 11 -1 1 :111
. 1 1
I 1 11
I • u•1' •- •1i14111
' \ 1 0 1-\ u nl 1 n I 1;1 :I
\ I 1 11 1 I. ra n n
v l.� • • rn I 1.:1 1: i N II iaA
:u 1 '•I aI Iwn n
V 1 1 'l l ti
II 1 :11
1:11 1( 1 III11 :11 1 1 1 1 \`1
111F
1 : I • 1 • 11 1 1\ .1 1: 1
Il,w :11 &'2' , 11 hisi'
\ 1 1 41I
11 IM 111 :11111 IIiV-111 w11K ' 11 '1:1 1 1 11. 1111':
LU
1 1 • 11 I 1 11.V:11 a'1 VI:1.-: II -_
✓11 r•1 _L 11 :I,NI • - 111. 1 111 1 \• 1' I : 1 1 1 1 :1 .L1 1 1 •1 :I I 11. 1
1 I\1 1 • 11 1 1n1t''
1. 1 ' :1 :Ilw :11.1, 1 1 1 1 1 8\ :1' 1111 IA11 1 11 11 - 1 I• 1 1. 1 :I •';N 1 1 :11.1
• • 1 \1 . • 11 • I•• 1 1% 1 % I 1 1 • • 1 1 I 1 11 - t
1111 11• 1 I 1:1 , I.lt
111 ' 1\ 1' 1 1 11 11 1- 11,--1 1_
I,1 uI I.
ti"1•nl 1' \ Inl.-!1 ' r:I Illicll • .
1 - • II I 11. II Y1 11 1 11 1 1111 I 11.111111
.I MI 1 I 1,1!?
II 1\ • 1 1 - 115c.,11!.1, 1 :I IY :II
I1 11, I .w 1.-+ :1 1 - -
• 1 11 ' II 1 ' \ 1\ 1 111 11 11 tI,j,,T4uiit
11 1 YI11 1 1 L 1 -w ' 1 1 11 " _` IJ • :1111 :11.1\ 11I1:111 I V:111 L.-1 -YI 'I II< I IIC' :,•[•4i'1:
I I I III I L1'I
II-.1<'ILY ' II11I II \ III :II Ii -
III
I •-111 1 1, 1.1
1 I
v1� •1:,1t' 1 11 -1 :II 1 111-1 L 1111 II,V�1111-,111.
:.1 1 1111-1 11 1 I 1 11-1• :1
MSTAFF REVIEW FORM a
X AGENDA REQUEST
CONTRACT REVIEW
GRANT REVIEW
For the Fayetteville City Council meeting of March 5, 2002.
FROM:
Tim Conklin Planning Urban Development
Name Division Department
ACTION REQUIRED: To approve an ordinance to revise the calculation method for
determining the fee in lieu of construction of sidewalks for a single-family lot,
duplex lot or lot split. The amendment also adds a list of factors for the Sidewalk
Administrator to review when considerinq waivers for the construction of sidewalks.
COST TO CITY:
Cost of this Request
Category/Project Budget
Category/Project Name
Account Number
Funds Used To Date
Program
Name
Project Number
Remaining Balance
Fund
BUDGET REVIEW:
Budgeted Item Budget
Adjustment
Attached
Budget Manager
Administrative Services
Director
CONTRACT/GRANT/LEASE
REVIEW: GRANTING AGENCY:
Accounting Manager
Date Internal Auditor
Date
City Attorney
Date ADA Coordinator
Date
Purchasing Officer
Date
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended approval and on February 11, 2002
Fayetteville Planning Commission voted 9-0-0 for approval.
// • /_. e -/ S-02
Division Head Date Cross Reference
New Item: Yes
Department Director
Administrative Services Director
Mayor
Date
Date
Date
Prev Ord/Res #:
Orig Contract Date:
Orig Contract Number:
4
SAfl.REQUEST.
• CONTRACT REVIEW
GRANT REVIEW
SIDEWALK CONST
snip REVIEW YOIOt. D. 6. Page 1
For the Fayetteville City Council meeting of March 5, 2002. U
FROM:
Tim Conklin Planning t
Name Division Department
ACTION REQUIRED: To approve an ordinance to revise the calculation method for
determining the fee in lieu of construction of sidewalks for single-family lot,
duplex lot or lot split. The amendment also adds a list of factors for the Sidewalk
Administrator to review when considering waivers for the construction of sidewalks
COST TO CITY:
Cost. of this Request
Account Number
Category/Project Budget
Funds Used To Date
Category/Project Name
Program Ness
Project Number Remaining Balance Fund
BUDGET•REVIEW: Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached
Budget Manager Administrative Services Director
...CONTRACT/GRANC/LEASE REVIEW: GRANTING. AGENCY:
Ac ing manager Date
Internal Auditor Date
City Atto y Date ADA Coordinator Date
Purchasing Officer Date
STAf RECOet-avIDATION: Staff recommended approval and on February 11,
Fayetteville
Planning Commission voted 9-0-0 for approval.
Division Used Data Cross Reference
New Item: Ta ..
Department Director Date
Prev Ord/Res I:
ASer
vices Svices Director Data .
Oriq Contract Date:
Mayor Date
Orig Contract Numbers
FAYETTEVItLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDE
To: Tim Conklin, Planning Division
From: Heather Woodruff, City Clerk
Date: April 19, 2002
Please find attached a copy of Ordinance No. 4387 repealing Section 171.12 of the Unified
Development Ordinance, Property Owner to Construct Sidewalk or Contribute Cost of Sidewalk
and adopting a replacement Section 171.12 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The original
will be microfilmed and filed with the City Clerk.
cc: Nancy Smith, Internal Audit
Chuck Rutherford, Sidewalk Administrator
Clarice Pearman, Codifier
010 03 City of Fayetteville 5/01/2002
update •Index Maintenance • 16:53:46
Document IteW Action
Reference Date Ref. Taken Brief Description
ORD 4162002 4387 REPEALING SECTION 171.12 UDO
Enter Keywords........: ORD. 4387
REPEALING
SECTION 171.12
UDO
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
PROPERTY OWNER
CONSTRUCT
SIDEWALK
CONTRIBUTE COST
REPLACEMENT
File Reference #......: MICROFILM
Security Class........:
Expiration Date.......:
Date for cont/Referred:
Name Referred to......:
Retention Type:
**** Active ****
Cmdl-Return
Cmd8-Retention
Cmd4-Delete Cmd3-End
Press
'ENTER' to Continue
Cmd5-Abstract
Yes No
(c) 1986-1992
Munimetrix
Systems Corp.
It
STATEMENT OF LEGAL ADVERTISING
RECEIVED REMIT TO:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT -GAZETTE, INC.
113 W MOUNTAIN/PERSONNEL MAY 06 2002 P.O. BOX 2221
FAYETTEVILLE AR 72701 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203
AGCTG. DEPT.
ATTN: HEATHER
DATE : 05/01/02 INVOICE #: 2614 BILLING QUESTIONS CALL 378-3812
ACCT #: L5004205 P.O. #:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, '
COUNTY OF PULASKI, ss. AD COPY
I, Elizabeth Myers do solemnly swear that I am the
Legal Billing Clerk of the Arkansas Democrat -
Gazette, a daily newspaper printed and published
in said County, State of Arkansas; that I was so
related to this publication at and during the
publication of the annexed legal advertisement in
the matter of:
4387
pending in the Court, in said County, and
at the dates of the several publications of said
advertisement stated below, and that during said
periods and at said dates, said newspaper was
printed and had a bona fide circulation in said
County; that said newspaper had been regularly
printed and published in said County, and had a
bona fide circulation therein for the period of
one month before the date of the first publication
of said advertisement; and that said advertisement
was published in the regular daily issues of said
newspaper as stated below.
DATE DAY LINAGE RATE DATE DAY LINAGE RATE
05/01 Wed 214 1.00
TOTAL COST ----- ---- 214.00
Billing Ad #: 7034245
i1111®,111,,x„''
r
• I°/NOTARY
'•.
RECEIVED
PUBLIC
Subscribed a I to me this _/ 9� • °•?. os _204.1 Q;' MAY 0 9 2002
day o/�COVN .���� 3ITY OF FAYETTEVILLE( J y . '"In111 itt" I CITY CLERKS OFFICE
0
I
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEVILLE, APoGWSAS:
Section 1. That §171.12 of the
Unified Development Ordinance,
Property Owner to Construct Side.
or
The owner of any pi
ting a public street or
which a sidewalk is rams
I. I ne prupeny owner snag cmF
struct the sidewalk in accordance
whether or not to grant the waiver.
A. pedestrian traffic generators
r such as parks and schools in the
I sea:
B. the existence are sidewalk
f network b the are;
C. the density of current and fu -
y ture development in kthe area;
k D. the amount of1 t pedestrian bal-
peto begenerated by the po-
osddd
E whether thetenainissuch that
a sidewalk is physicaAy practical and
feasible, and the extent to which
trees, gground cover and natural areas
would be adversely impacted by the
conseucdon of the sidewa0c; and
F. the overall need for a sidewalk
to be castrated on the bt
3. It the Sidewalk Administrator
grants the waiver to construct a side-
walk, the owner shall have an option
to construct the sidewalk or to con-
tribute money In lieu of construction
asset tall below
upon
persons
B. To facrltate administration of
this ordinance for certain recurrent
types of development, the City
C W ncil has determined that the City
will accept, as the roughly
proportionate Impact, the amount
shown below^
1. Single family house
$630.00
2. Duplex, $720.00
C. Urdess the developer presents
evidence that the number of persons
served by the development and the
pedestrian trip generation rates of
the development justify a reduced
contOution In her of the construction
of sidewalks, all industrial,
commercial, and multi -family devel-
opments shall make a cash
contribution In lieu of the construc-
tion of the sidewalk at a rate of Three
Dollars $3.00 per square foot of the
sidewalk that normally would have
been required. The amount per
squarefootSMamountsfora sigle
family house and a duplex shall be
reviewed by the City Cowcil at least
every five years.
D. Contribution in lieu of
voluntarily
may be used to construct sidewalk
projects where most needed as
determined by the Sidewalk
to a nonresidential use.
3. Parking Lot/Garage. On which
a parking lot or perkinp garage
having a minimum capacity of five
automobiles, Is constructed or I
'emerged.
4. Additions. Additions of 2,500
squarefeet a laryer.
5. Conditional Use. Any
development which requires
wi l use epprwa,
PASSED
PASSED avid APPROVED th the I
16th tlav of Peg, 20D2.
APPROVED:
Bv: DAN COODY, Mayo '
A ST:
By: Hwthw Woodruff, Gry Ckrk
1, 2002
7034244WS