No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4113 ORDINANCE NO.4 1 1 i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XV: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, OF THE CODE OF FAYETTEVILLE, TO PROVIDE AMENDMENTS TO AND CLARIFICATION OF VARIOUS PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE PHYSICAL ALTERATION OF LAND. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS : Section 1 . That Sections 153.07 A.; 159.01 B.4.; 169.01 B.; 169.02 B.; 169.03 B. 4. through B.9.; 169.04 B.; 169.06 A., B., C., D., E.3 ., and F.4; 169.07 A.3 ., AA., and A. 14; 169.07 B. ; 169.09; 169. 10; 169. 12 and 169. 14 of the Code of Fayetteville, are hereby repealed and the following shall be inserted in their stead: §153.07A. Remedial Work. 1 . A stop work order may be issued if remedial work is not being undertaken. 2. When the City has performed remedial work, a stop work order shall be issued and shall remain in effect until payment has been received for the work performed. §159.01 B.4. Physical Alteration of Land. Permit Fee. Less than %2 Acre $ 75.00 %2 to 1 Acre 100.00 Over 1 Acre 200.00 Appeals 100.00 §169.01 B. The purpose of this chapter is to control grading, clearing, filling, and cutting (or similar activities) which alone or in combination cause landslide, flooding, degradation of water quality, erosion and sedimentation in storm sewer systems and water storage basins. It is also the intent of this chapter that, through the implementation of the guidelines and regulations contained herein, the existing scenic character and quality of the neighborhood and city as a whole not be diminished. Page 2 Ordinance No. 4113 August 18, 1998 §169.02 B. Site Conditions. Development shall generally conform to the natural contours of the land, natural drainage ways, and other existing site conditions. §169.03 B. Exception. Exceptions to this rule are as follows: 4. Single Family/Duplex. Construction of one single family residence or duplex except where the average slope across the lot is 15 percent or greater or where any portion of the planned grading activities is contained within the 100 year floodplain. 5. Building Additions. Building additions of less than 1 ,000 square feet where associated land alteration activities are not beyond the scope of what is necessary to construct said addition. 6. Grading Plan Approval. No grading permit shall be issued until the grading plan, endorsed by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer, is approved by the City Engineer. A separate permit shall be required for each site; it may cover both excavations and fills. Any application for a grading permit required under this chapter shall be combined with a drainage permit application under Chapter 170 , Stormwater Management, Drainage and Erosion Control, if such drainage permit is required. Coordination with Chapter 167, Tree Protection and Preservation, is required. §169.03 C. Permit Posted. A copy of the grading permit cover page shall be posted at or near the street right of way line and shall be clearly visible from the street. §169.04 B. Stabilization. All graded and otherwise disturbed areas shall be stabilized within 15 days. Stabilization methods such as baled straw, filter fabric, ditch checks, diversion ditches, brush barriers, sediment basins, matting, mulches, grasses and ground cover shall be used. §169.06 LAND ALTERATION REQUIREMENTS. A. Grading Plan Evaluation. Grading plans shall be evaluated by the City Engineer for conformance with the minimal erosion control requirements of § 169.04 and the following requirements. Page 3 Ordinance No. 4113 August 18, 1998 B. Requirements Varied. Requirements may be varied by the City Engineer with the approval of the Planning Commission. The extent to which variations may be made will depend on the soil types encounter, planned slopes, planned vegetation, and investigative engineering reports. In no case shall the City Engineer waive or modify any of the minimum erosion control requirements as given in § 169.04. C. Cut or Fill Slopes. 1 . Finish Grade. Cut or fill slopes shall have a finish grade no steeper than 33% (3 .00 horizontal to 1 vertical), unless approved by the City Engineer. 2. Maximum Length. The maximum length of any cut or fill slope without a terrace (as described in D. below ) shall be one hundred (100) feet as measured along the ground. The terrace shall be at least 6 feet wide. 3. Existing Topography. Cut or fill slopes shall be constructed to eliminate sharp angles of intersection with the existing terrain and shall be rounded and contoured to blend with the existing topography. 4. Setback Requirements. The following setback requirements shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for purposes of assessing safety, stability, and drainage problems: (See illustrations) a. Setback from Top or Toe of Cut or Fill. Buildings shall be set back from the top or toe of a cut or fill in accordance with Zoning, Chapters 160- 165, Building Regulations, Chapter 173, or the approved grading plan, whichever is greatest. b. Setbacks from Property Lines. The required setback of retaining walls, cut slopes, and fill slopes from property lines shall be as given in the illustrations. Property lines may be filled over or cut if a grading plan for the cut or fill is submitted jointly by the owner of both properties and if no utility easements are involved. If utility easements are involved, approval is required as given in "c." below in addition to the joint submittal requirement. c. Setbacks From the Edge of an Easement. The required setback of retaining wall, cut slopes, and fill slopes from the edge of easements shall be as given in the illustrations. Where no utilities are present in an casement, or where utilities are planned to be relocated, and where such action is approved by all utilities, then easements may fall within a cut or fill section. Page 4 Ordinance No. 4113 d. Setbacks from Structures. The required setback of retaining walls, cut slopes, and fill slopes from structures shall be as given in the illustrations. If a structure forms an integral part of the retaining wall, then the setbacks do not apply to that structure. e. Public Rights-of-Way. Cuts adjacent to public rights-of- way shall be set back a minimum of 25 feet, excluding driveways or access roads. f. Calculating Setbacks. For the purpose of calculating setbacks, any cut or fill section which is on a slope of 1 to 1 or greater shall be considered a retaining wall. g. Administrative Variance. Setbacks from easement lines and structures may be varied administratively by the City Engineer if geotechnical and/or structural information is provided that, in the opinion of the City Engineer, justifies the variance. It. Additional Information Required, The City Engineer may require further geotechnical and/or structural information to show that setbacks greater than those given are not needed to protect property, utilities, or the integrity of property lines. I r y I I �fCONST-n _MITS OF RELAINING INING ""-LL m 5' MIN. P or L —+ I 5' Jr rL S/B - I ' = PROPERTY LINE = EASEMENT LME - S/B = SET BACK C - CONSTRUCTION DISTANCE H = HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALL NOTE: SETBACKS MAY BE INCREASED WHEN ADJACENT T� EASEMENTS WITH DEEP SANITARY SEWER OR OTHER LEEP TINES. Page 5 Ordinance No. 4113 _ FL S SLOPE 5: 1 or LESS 2' 5: 1 to 3: 1 5' 3: 1 to 1 :1 8'' > 1 : 1 TREAT AS RETAINING WALL i R or i S/B SB - C + 5' S/B - 5' CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PROPERTY & EASEMENT LINES r. L S/B = 2 S S/B < 3: 1 5' 3:1 to 1 :1 10' > 1 : 1 TREAT AS RETAINING WALL �--- S/B t0' S/B = 54 -r NOTE: SETBACKS MAY BE INCREASED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE FOR SURCHARGES AND/OR TO PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURES. STRUCTURES rcc Page 6 Ordinance No. 4113SB - - S/B -►I _ 10+{ -- I1 1 1 _ 1 1 /-CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -.{{II S/B SC + 10' + IS/ C H S/B 4H/3 H a HEIGHT OF RETAINING 'HALL STRUCTURES D. Cuts. " 1. Vertical Height. Cuts shall be limited to 10 feet in vertical height, unless information demonstrating slope stability, erosion control and drainage control is provided together with a revegetation plan. For non-solid rock cuts, terraces shall be required for cut and fill slopes greater than 10 feet in height. It is recommended that terracing be at a maximum ratio of one foot of horizontal terrace for every foot of vertical surface. 2. Maximum Vertical Cut. In solid rock, as determined by geotechnical and engineering data approved by the City Engineer, the maximum vertical cut shall be 30 feet. 3. Fill Material. In no case shall a cut be allowed primarily for the purpose of obtaining fill material to a different site, unless the exporting site is located within an extraction district. E. Fills 3. Grade. Fill shall not be placed on existing slope with a grade steeper than 15% (6.67 horizontal to 1 vertical) unless keyed into steps in the existing grade and thoroughly stabilized by mechanical compaction. SB = r, = 10') 5/B Page 6 Ordinance No. 4113 ° C, August 18, 1998 H r , 1 1 i�CONSTRUCTION LIMITS S/B = C + 10' �S/I C cf1 a .____[_.. S/B = 4H/3 H = HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALL STRUCTURES r D. Cuts. 1. Vertical Height. Cuts shall be limited to 10 feet in vertical height, unless information demonstrating slope stability, erosion control and drainage control is provided together with a revegetation plan. For non-solid rock cuts, terraces shall be required for cut and fill slopes greater than 10 feet in height. It is recommended that terracing be at a maximum ratio of one foot of horizontal terrace for every foot of vertical surface. 2. Maximum Vertical Cut. In solid rock, as determined by geotechnical and engineering data approved by the City Engineer, the maximum vertical cut shall be 30 feet. 3. Fill Material. In no case shall a cut be allowed primarily for the purpose of obtaining fill material to a different site, unless the exporting site is located within an extraction district. E. Fills 3. Grade. Fill shall not be placed on existing slope with a grade steeper than 15% (6.67 horizontal to I vertical) unless keyed into steps in the existing grade and thoroughly stabilized by mechanical compaction. Page 7 Ordinance No. 4113 August 18, 1998 F. Erosion and Sedimentation Control 4. Revegetation. Revegetation shall be required to meet the following performance standards: a. 0 to 10% grade: Revegetation shall be a minimum of seeding and mulching. Said seeding shall provide complete and uniform coverage that minimizes erosion and run-off in no more than two growing seasons. b. l0% to 15% grade: Revegetation shall be a minimum of hydroseeding with mulch and fertilizer, staked sod and/or ground cover. Said planting shall provide complete and uniform coverage in no more than two growing seasons. c. 15% to 20% grade: The slope shall be covered with landscape fabric and planted with ground cover as set forth in b. above. d. More than 20% grade: Any finish grade over 20% shall be stabilized with retaining walls, cribbing, terraces, landscape fabric, vegetation, or riprap. If riprap is used the slope's stability and erodibility must be equivalent to or better than its predevelopment state. G. Undisturbed Land Requirements. In the development of residential subdivisions, allowable grading of slopes shall be in accordance with this table. AVERAGE GRADE MINIMUM UNDISTURBED AREA 10 TO 15 PERCENT 40 PERCENT 15 TO 20 PERCENT 50 PERCENT > 20 PERCENT 60 PERCENT H. Required Retaining Wall and Rock Cut Design. 1 . Design/Inspection. Any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height shall be designed by a registered professional engineer and shall be field inspected by the design engineer. The City Engineer may require retaining walls less than 4 feet in height to be designed by a professional engineer. Page 8 Ordinance No. 4113 August 18, 1998 2. Investigation/Report. All proposed rock cuts and any cut 10 feet or greater will require a geotechnical investigation and a formal report submitted by a registered professional engineer qualified to make such investigations. 3. Safety Railings. Safety railings may be required on any retaining wall 2.5 feet or higher. The decision as to whether to require safety railing shall be based on potential pedestrian and public access to the retaining wall and applicable building codes. This requirement for safety rails shall also apply to vertical or near vertical rock cuts and to steep cut or fill slopes. §169.07 A. The applicant shall prepare a grading plan as follows: 3. Designation of Grade. Areas with 0 to 10%, 10-15%, 15-20% and >20% grade shall each be identified in a distinguishing manner. 4. Identify Land to be Disturbed. Land areas to be disturbed shall be clearly identified. 14. Underground Utilities. Profiles and cross sections of streets; drainage systems; and underground utilities, if they are necessary to clarify the grading plan in terms of potential erosion or runoff, or if the grading on site has the potential of disturbing the utility line. §169.07 B. Preliminary Grade Plan. The preliminary grading plan shall include all the above items except 5 ., 7., 11 ., 13., and 14., above. In addition to the above items, the City may require a cross section through the property showing existing and proposed grades as part of the preliminary submission. §169.09 MINOR MODIFICATIONS. Finish grades shall be allowed no more than a 0.50 foot tolerance from the grading plan. However, the City Engineer may authorize in writing minor modifications so long as they do not alter the direction of run-off and otherwise comply with the intent of this chapter. When applicable, major modifications must be brought before the subdivision committee for their approval. §169.10 APPROVAL. Approval of a grading plan is contingent on meeting all the requirements of this ordinance plus any set of varied requirements approved by the Planning Commission. Page 9 Ordinance No. 4113 August 18, 1998 §169.12 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. All revegetation and grading plan improvements shall be in place before a certificate of occupancy shall be issued. When a property owner has finished building construction but has yet to install plant material, said owner may apply for a temporary certificate of occupancy. In evaluating whether or not to grant a temporary certificate of occupancy, the Building Inspection Superintendent shall consider weather conditions and temporary stabilization measures. $ection2. That Chapter 151 : Definitions, of the Code of Fayetteville, is hereby amended to delete the definition of Retaining Wall and to add the following: Retaining Wall. A structure erected between lands of different elevation to protect structures and/or prevent erosion from the upper slope. Retaining Wall Height. The height of a retaining wall, for setback purposes, shall be defined as the vertical distance from the top of the wall to the ground surface of the low side. PASSED AND APPROVED this 196 day of August s 1998. APPROVED: , . 's 4 Fred Hanna Mayor ATTES-,T: , , , .. By: Heather Woodruff, City Cle ORDINANCE NO. 4M greater or where any portion of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING the planned grading activities is TITLE XV: UNIFIED DEVEL. contained within the 100 year OPMENT ORDINANCE, OF floodplain. THE CODE OF FAYETTE- S. Building Additions. Building VILLE, TO PROVIDE AMEND. additions of less than 1 ,000 STATE OF ARKANSAS , MENTS TO AND CLARIFICA. square feet where associated Jy TION OF VARIOUS PROVI- land alteration activities are not SS- SIONS CONCERNING THE band alt the scope of what is PHYSICAL ALTERATION OF necessary a constrscope o said ad- County of Washington LAND. dition. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE 6. Grading Plan Approval. No I, RANDALL COPE, herebycertify that I am the publisher of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY grading permit shall be' issued y FAVETTEVILLE, ARKAN- timid the grading plan, endorsed SA NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES, a daily newspaper having a second SAS: by a registered architect, land- scape architect, or engineer, is class mailing privilege, and being not less than four pages of five section 1 That . Sections approved by the City Engineer. Columns each, published at a fixed place of business and at fixed (daily) B.; 16 A.; 159.01 B 4.; 1B. 4. A separate permit shall be re- thr 169..2;.; , 69.63 69 4. quired for each site; it may cov- intervals continuously in the City of Fayetteville, County of Washington, through B.9.; 169.04an 169.06 er beth excavations and fills. Arkansas for more than a period of twelve months, circulated and 169.07 A.3,E.3., and F.4; Any application for a grading 169.07 A.3.,A.4., and A. 14; permit required under this distributed from an established place of business to subscribers and 169.078. ; 169.09; 169. 10; chapter shall be combined with 169.12 and 169.14 of the Code readers generally of all classes in the City and County for a definite price of Fayetteville, are hereby re- a drainage permit application pealed and the following shall under Chapter 170, Stortnwater for each copy, or a fixed price per annum, which price was fixed at what be inserted in their stead: Management, Drainage and Erosion Control, if such drain- is considered the value of the publication, based upon the news value age permit is required. Coordi- and service value It contains, that at least fifty percent of the Subscribers §153.07A. Remedial Work. nation with Chapter 167, Tree Protection and Preservation, is thereto have paid for their subscriptions to the newspaper or its agents 1 . A stop work order may be is. required. Or through recognized news dealers Over a period Of at least six months Sued if remedial work is not be- ing undertaken. §169.03 C. Permit Posted. A and that the said newspaper publishes an average of more than forty copy of the grading permit cov- 2. When the City has performed er page shall be posted at or percent news matter. remedial work, a stop work or. near the street right of way line der shall be issued and shall re- and shall be clearly visible from main in effect until payment has the street. been received for the work per- Tfurther certifythat the legal notice attached in the matter of be nee. §169.04 B. Stabilization. All 9 graded and other wise tli §159.01 B.A. Physical Altera- bed areas shall be stabilized l/ ) C/(/ tyi(/ YAV/ •(7/ tion of Land. Permit Fee, within 15 days. Stabilization �w N methods such as baled straw, / Less than 12 Acrafilter fabric, ditch checks, diver- 12 to 1 Acre $$pp sion ditches, brush barriers, Was published In the regular daily issue Of Said newspaper for Over 1 Acre $200 sediment basins, matting, Appeals $100 mulches, grasses and ground consecutive insertions as fol cover shall be used. §169.01 B. The purpose of this 1 The first insertion on the da of 19 chapter is control grading, § 69.06 LAND ALTERATION y clearing; tiling, and cutting (or REQUIREMENTS. similar activities) which alone or A, Grading Plan Evaluation. the second Insertion On the day Of 19flood _ in combination cause for water Grading plans shall be evaluav quality, e degradation or water ad by the City Engineer for con- qualiry, erosion and sedimenta- fornance with the minimal ero- tion in storm sewer systems Sion control requirements of the third insertion on the day Of 19 _ - and water storage basins. It is §169.04 and the following re. also the intent of this chapter quiremems. that, through the implements. and the fourth insertion on the day of 19 _ tion of the guidelines and regu- ' B. Requirements Varied. re- lations contained herein, the quirements may be varied by existing scenic character and the City Engineer with the ap- quality of the neighborhood and provai of the Planning Commis. City as a whole not be diminish- Sion. The extent to which vasa- l tions may it made will tinter, blishe General Manager epend §769.028. Site Conditions. De- planned the soil types encounter, velopment shall generally con- planned slopes, planned e g i. form to the natural contours of teflon, and investigative engi- the land, natural drainage nearing reports. In no case 9 ways, and other existing site shall the CityEngineer waive or Swum to and subscrib7b9fore this day of conditions. modify any of the minimum eco- sion control requirements as Se ) _�� /} Q! given in 169.04. YYI"O– 19 (�i7lAL— §169.03 B. Exception. Excep- tions to this rule are as follows: C. Cut or Fill Slopes. 4. Single Family/Duplex. Con. 1 , Finish Grade. Cut or fill ion e1 one single family slopes shall have a finish grade residstrucence residence or duplex except rq steeper than 33% (3.00 hod- !««/..< « where the average slope zontal to 1 vertical), unless ap- �i Catherineball across the lot is 15 percent or proved D the r Notary Public y City Engineer. My Commission Expire s?t NotaryPublic, StareofArkansas , >i My Commission FXpires 0212 )105 '( acccccccccucccccccccccccccccccc 1( Fees for Printing . .. .............. ... .... ..... ............ ... ...$ Costof Proof... .... .. ... .. ...... . .. ............ ..... ... ..... .....$ 1 Total.... .............. .. ... ......... .. ... .... .. ... ... .. ... .... ... .....$ J 2. Maximum Length. The maxi- , mum length of any cut or fill slope without a terrace (as de- h. Additional Information Re- scribed in D. below) shall be quired. The City Engineer may one hundred ( 100) feet as require further geotechnical measured along the ground. and/or structural information to The terrace shall be at least 6 show that setbacks greater . feet wide. than those given are not need- STATE OF ARKANSAS 3. Topography. Cut or ed to protect property, utilities, Existing or the integrity or property lines. SS. fill slopes shall be const clad to eliminate sharp angles of in- D. Cuts. County of Washington tersection with the existing ter- , rain and shall be rounded and 1, Vertical Height. Cuts shall be contoured to blend with the ex- limited to 10 feet in vertical isting topography. height, unless information dem- I, RANDALL COPE, hereby certify that I am the publisher of THE onstrating slope stability, ere- NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES, a daily newspaper having a second 'fo Setback Requirements. The sion control and drainage con- following setback requirements trol is provided together with a class mailing privilege, and being not less than four pages of five shall be reviewed by the City revegetalion plant. For non-sol- Engineer for purposes of as- id rock cuts, terraces shall be columns each, published at a fixed place of business and at fixed (daily) sessing safety, stability, and required for cut and fill slopes intervals continuously in the City of Fayetteville, County of Washington, drainage problems: (See illus- greater than 10 feel in height. It traaons) is recommended that terracing Arkansas for more than a period of twelve months, circulated and be ata maximum ratio of one a. Setback from Top or Toe of toot of horizontal terrace for ev- distributed from an established place of business to subscribers and Cut or Fill. Buildings shall be ' ery foot of vertical surface. readers generally of all classes In the City and County for a definite price set back from the lop or toe of a cut or fill in accordance with 2. Maximum Vertical Cut. In for each copy, or a fixed price per annum, which price was fixed at what Zoning, Chapters 160-165, solid rock, as determined by Building Regulations, Chapter geotechnical and engineering is considered the value of the publication, based upon the news value 173, or the approved grading data approved by the City Engi- and service value It Contains, that at least fifty percent of the Subscribers plan, whichever is greatest. neer, the maximum vertical cut thereto have aid for their subscriptions to the newspaper or Its agents shall be mfeetaxi. p P WSpapB b. Setbacks from Property or through recognized news dealers over a period of at least six months lines. The required setback of 3. Fill Material. In no case shall retaining walls, cut slopes, and a cut be allowed primarily for and that the said newspaper publishes an average of more than forty fill slopes from property line the purpose of obtaining fill ma- percent news matter. shall as given in the illustra- terial to a different site, unless tions. Property lines may be fir the exporting site is located led over or cul it a grading plari within an extraction district. for the cut or fill Is submitted jointly by the owner of both E. Fills I further certif that the legal notice attached in the matter of properties and if no utility ease- ments are involved. If utility 3. Grade, Fill shall not be easements are involved, appro- placed on existing slope with a val is required as given in "c." grade steeper than 15% (6.67 below in addition to the joint horizontal to 1 vertical) unless / submittal requirement. keyed into steps in the existing grade and thoroughly stabilized was published in the regular daily issue of said newspaper for c. Setbacks From the Edge of by mechanical compaction. Consecutive insertions astoll wi an Easement. The required set- m back of retaining wall, cut D. Cuts. slopes, and fill slopes from the The first insertion on the day of 19 edge of easements shall be as 1 . Vertical Height. Cuts shall be given in the illustrations. Where limited to 10 feet in vertical no utilities are present in an as. height, unless information dem- the second Insertion on the sessment, or where utilities are onstrating slope stability, ero- day 0} 19 — planned to be relocated, and sion control and drainage con- where such action is approved trol is provided together with a by all utilities, then easements revegelation plan. For non-solid the third insertion on the day of 19 — may fall within a cut or fill sec- rock cuts, terraces shall be re- tion. quired to cut and fill slopes greater than 10 feet in height. It and the fourth insertion on the day of 19 tl. Setbacks from Structures: is recommended that terracing The required setback of retain- be at a maximum ration of one ing walls, cut slopes, and fill foot of horizontal terrace for ev- slopes from structures shall be ery foot of vertical surface. as given in the illustrations. If a I A 4 le_� structure forms an integral part . 2. Maximum Vertical Cut. In of the retaining wall, then the solid rock, as determined by Publi r / General Manager setbacks do not apply to that geotechnical and engineering set b setbacks e. data approved by the City Engi- neer, the maximum vertical cut e. Public Rights-oi-Way. Cuts shall be 30 feel. Swum to and subscribed before me on this day of adjacent to public rights-of-way 3. Fill Material. In no case shall shall be sat back a minimum of t cut be allowedobtaining primarily for 25 feet, excluding driveways or the purpose offobtaining till ma- �1LlAA , 'IC J�—L,NJ� 19 L� access mads terial to a different site, unless It I. Calculating Setbacks. For the the exporting site is located Purpose of calculating set- within an extraction district. i backs, any cur or fill Section ( which is on a slope of 1 to 1 or 3. Fills (!!!t!!!! greater shall be considered a )1 Catherine Sallr retaining wall. �< r , Notary Public 3. Grade. Fill shall not be otaryPublic, StateofArkansac , g. Administrative Variance. Set- placed on existing slope with a My Commission Expire backs from easement lines and , grade steeper that 15% (6.67 ) iTib[tn-C�f'7l structures may be varied ad- horizontal to t vertical) unless My Commission Expires 0?l27/OS t ministratively by the City Engi- neer it geotechnical and/or CC(f{(Ct<c(C(C((((((((((((C[(C<(< structural information is provid - - - - - Fees for Printing $ 4 ed that, in the opinion of the - City Engineer, justifies the var- iance. _ Cost of Proof.... .. ..... . ... .. ... .... ... .. .... . ... ... . ... .. ... .. . .$ �j Total. .. ... . ........... ... .. ... ...... ... ......... ..... ..... ... ... . .... .$ �/ -