The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinance 2981 MICROF i ORDINANCE NO , 2981 , PASSED AND APPROVED 2/ 7 / 84 REPLACED BY RESOLUTION NO , 33-84 2-7-84 I 315 . 1 Director Orton commented that it is not good practice to bypass the Planning Commission or di'spen'se with ' a public hearing o'n' an issue that is ' a ' planning subject. Director Sharp .pointed out that 'there were hours of input from P1'anning' ' C6mmissioners as well as from the City Attorney , developers , citizens , and Parks and Recreation represen- tatives but that the court has simply asked for changes to be made to make things more specific . Upon roll call , the ordinan6e passed , 6-0e , _ _. . . . . ORDINANCE N0 . 2980 APPEARS ON, PAGE'__ OF ORDINANCE- '& RESOLUTION BOOK x I/ L f „ Ordinance to Amend Parks Plan 315 . 2 City Attorney McCord introduced , and* read- first-fime; < an ordinance amending the Parks Plan in accordance with the. amendment prepared by the Planning Consultant -and reviewed and• 'appcovea by the ' Parks and Recreation Director , the' former Chairman'of the P1'anning-• Commmiission and the City Attorney' s Office . Director Johnson , seconded - by 'Bumpass , made a motion to " suspend ;the rules and place th'e' ordinance on second reading . Upon roll call , the motion passed , 6-0 . ' The, City' Attorney read the ordinance for the second time . Director Johnson , seconded by ' Bumpass; made ' a motion to f ' rther ' suspend' the i7ules ' and" place' the ordinance on third and final reading . Upon roll call , the motion passed , 6-0 . The City Attorney read the ordinance for the final time . Upon roll call , the ordinance passed , 6-0. ORDINANCE N0 . 2981 APPEARS ON PAGE 0X3 OF ORDINANCE RESOLUTION BOOK VI Ordinance to Amend Parks Ordinance 315 . 3 City Attorney McCord introduced ) and read for the first ' time . : an '. ordinance that would amend the Parks ordinance itself ' to comply with certain requirements indicated in the IBI decision and outlined in his memorandum to the Board' dated Februar} 3 . Director Johnson ; seconded' by Bumpass ; made a motion to • suspend the' rules and place the: ordinance on second reading . Upon roll call , the motion passed ;' 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the second time . Director Johnson , seconded 'by Bumpa's's , made a motion to ' further suspend, the rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading . • Upon ro-11-Ea11 ; + the motion passed , 6 -0 . The City Attorney read the ordinance for the final time . Upon 'roll call , the ordinance ' passea , 6-' 0'. ' ORDINANCE N0 , 2982 APPEARS ON PAGE r OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK �1 2-7-84 315 . 1 Director Orton commented that it is not good practice to bypass the E Planning Commission or dispense with ' a public hearing on an issue that is ' a ' planning subject-. Director Sharp pointed out that 'there were hours of input from Planning' ' Cammissioners as well as from the City Attorney , developers , citizens , and Parks and Recreation represen- tatives but that the court has simply asked for changes to be made to make things more specific . Upbn roll call , the ordinance passed , 6=0 . ' ORDINANCE N0 . ' 2 ,980 APPEARS ON' PAGE'- �� OF ORDINANCE"6 RESOLUTION BOOK �� ` a�$ Ordinance to Amend Parks Plan 315 . 2 City Attorney McCord introduced , and' read. -for-the first -time3 < 'an ordinance amending the Parks Plan in accordance with theamendmentprepared by the Planning Consultant -and reviewed and• approvea by the ' Parks and 'Recreation Director , the' former Chairman'of th'e Planning • Commission and the City Attorney' s - Office . Director Johnson; seconded - by Bumpass , made a motion to' suspend ;the rules' and place th'e' ordinance on second reading . Upon roll call , the motion passed , 6-0 . ' The. City' Attorney read the ordinance for the second time . Director Johnson , seconded by ' B'umpass, 'mad ' ' a motion to fdtther ' susperid' the Eales ' Arid place the ordinance on third and final reading . Upon roll call , the- motion passed , 6-0 . The City Attorney read the ordinance for the final time . Upon roll call , the ordinance passed , 6-0. ORDINANCE NO . 2981 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE f RESOLUTION BOOK UI Ordinance to Amend Parks Ordinance 315 . 3 City Attorney McCord introduced ; and read for the first ' time , : an ' ordinance that would amend the Parks ordinance itself to comply with certain requirements indicated in the IBI decision and outlined in his memorandum to the Board' dated Februar} 3 . Director Johnson ; seconded* by Bumpasa , made a motion' to suspend the i-ules and ' place the: ordinance on second reading . Upon roll call , the motion passed * ' 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the second time . Director Johnson , seconded by Bumpass , made a motion to ' further suspend. the rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading . • •Upon - r o-ll: . •call ; -the motion passed , 6-0 . The City Attorney read the ordinance for the final time . Upon 'roll call , the ordinance passed , 6-' 0''. ' ORDINANCE NO . 2982 APPEARS ON PAGE 6 ,fr OF ORDINANCE S RESOLUTION BOOK �L 33-84 RESOLUTION NO .._,--� A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION PLAN OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE , ARKANSAS .. WHEREAS , the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in City of Fa e't'teville 'v. 'IBI', ' Inc . , 280 Ark . 484 ( 1983) that Me ayettev a ar s an ecreation Plan is not sufficiently definite ; and, WHEREAS , a copy of a proposed amendment to said Parks Plan is attached hereto , marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof ; and WHEREAS , said amendment would make the City ' s Parks Plan more definite . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE , ARKANSAS : Section 1 . That pages 17 , 18 , 19 and 20 of the Fayette - ville ar s an adopted by Resolution No , 10- 81 are hereby amended by substituting' therefor the text , table and figure set out in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof . PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of February 1984 . APPROVED : ayor C y er Page 17 needs , and total capacity acreage needs is made in Table N3 . Deficiencies are derived by subtracting existing acreage from needs . There are six interior sectors , neighborhoods 1 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 10 , 11 and six exterior sectors , neighborhoods 2 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 12 . The park acreage needs for the six exterior sectors was calculated by applying the park service area and minimum acres standard since the holding capacity method could not be applied in the absence of density guidelines " It is expected that as Fayetteville continues to grow into these sectors they will be broken into smaller sectors , land use patterns will be established and residential holidng capacities can be calculated and acreage requirements related to population deri.ved . The 1990 needs are determined for all sectors . Neighborhoods 1 , 21 41 7 , 10 and 11 are the sectors in greatest need of new recreational land . The recreational land needs in these six sectors is . expressed in two forms . The Fayetteville Parks Plan map shows the needs related to the service area standard while the text of this report combines the service area standard with the needs related to population expressed as holding capacity needs . An example of this can be seen in sector 11 . The map identifies one new neighborhood park while the text suggests a holding capacity deficit of 51 acres . This situation illustrated that , while the existing park locations satisfy the service area standard the acreage needs related to the number of people who could ootentially live in sector 11 is below the standard established . This suggests that in addition to acquiring new parks the City needs to add park acreage to existing parks . EXHIBIT A ,• . Page 18 TABLE #3 FAYETTEVILLE PARKS NEEDS ASSESSMENT •• no rn Soo o Nu z . _ •Y ' .• o N o .. cu. " , oo mN o ".iF :' n 'rn - .W.. wNi.n _ T. ' J r'"d•' •`mom � z .'ten in p v. .n ivy N nwinn' .. O .-- LO O � a PN)N NN W (G pN � N i � u � .q PWv P • PW P • - pA � OQ , 00 du . .�. PN N • NN `� � C N m p •.. •O �O 'O p • 2 N N .W.. r ... P v O O tl O O P m O OO � r 1 O O ^ fl •u 0 w � x a P i z .. mm Fi OO• • r N P $ ate. SO /n a• l O P N '•� . O N R P V > q r v m N P C ^ •J o a a $ An rl v + = 4 � 0 N i o o i m o o a 'o oK Page 19 PROGRAM OF ACTION Establishing policies whereby land for recreational facilities is acquired prior to or at the time it is needed is essential to a successful parks and recreation system . The Fayetteville Parks Plan on page 19A illustrates the generalized location of future parks and should be used in conjunction with the standards and needs assessment portion of . the text to establish the total future acreage and location needs . An acquisition schedule for public recreational facilities should be accomplished based on priorities established by the needs assessment . Recreational land acquisition should be made a part of a long range capital improvement program . By this method recreational land needs are assessed on a year to year basis , prioritites are set , and budgeting and purchasing procedured proceed in a systematic manner . The capital improvements program should be projected at five to ten year increments . Development plan should tie reassessed as each year ' s program is accomplished . Priorities should be evaluated and new priorities set for the next year . The information provided in this report establishes acreage needs by neighborhood . It is now possible to set priorities for specific land acquisition . Action must be taken in order to assure that these acquisition policies , procedures and method of acquiring; the needed land are implemented . Typical funding sources include : 1 . General Fund Transfers 2 . User Fees 3 . Donations 4 . Grants 5 . Special Tax 6 . 'Bonds 7 . Money in lieu of land from subdivisions v t LM a all t kkkk ° tom::- .till—all I DISTRICTM Q1 ITPARK ��' 4�iY. Y��•NO; SIEO PARK dd DISTRICT �tlL79 8t 9-j 10) , r®r PAN tI - r r ��