Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-06-02 - Minutes - City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 1 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov City of Fayetteville Arkansas City Council Meeting June 2, 2026 A meeting of the Fayetteville City Council was held on June 2, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in Room 219 of the City Administration Building located at 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Mayor Rawn called the meeting to order. Present: Council Members Robert B. Stafford, D’Andre Jones DHA, Sarah Moore, Mike Wiederkehr, Scott Berna, Sarah Bunch, Teresa Turk, Minister Monique Jones, Mayor Molly Rawn, City Attorney Kit Williams, City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton, Chief of Staff Keith Macedo, Chief Financial Officer Steven Dotson, Staff, Press and Audience. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor’s Announcements, Proclamations and Recognitions: None City Council Meeting Presentations, Reports, and Discussion Items: Sales Tax & Monthly Financial Report - Chief Financial Officer Chief Financial Officer Steven Dotson provided the March Sales Tax Report, adding that the taxes were received April of 2026. The sales came in at about $298.8 million which matched March of 2025, stating the month was flat. He reminded the City Council that in March of 2025 there were tariffs implemented which increased sales due to pre-tariff purchasing. Retail trade was up 1%, approximately $1.4 million. Accommodations and food services were up 5%, approximately $2.1 million. Wholesale trade went up 9%, approximately $1.6 million. Tax collections were also flat. The city’s one penny portion was down two hundredths of a percent, or about $400 and the county’s portion was down five hundredths of a percent, approximately Council Member Scott Berna Ward 3 Position 1 Council Member Sarah Bunch Ward 3 Position 2 Council Member Teresa Turk Ward 4 Position 1 Council Member Min. Monique Jones Ward 4 Position 2 Mayor Molly Rawn City Attorney Kit Williams City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton Council Member Robert B. Stafford Ward 1 Position 1 Council Member Dr. D’Andre Jones Ward 1 Position 2 Council Member Sarah Moore Ward 2 Position 1 Council Member Mike Wiederkehr Ward 2 Position 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 2 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov $1,200, resulting in a total combined sales tax collection decrease of three hundredths of a percent. When compared to what was budgeted, the city’s one penny was down approximately 2.9%. The county portion was down around 2.96% compared to budget. Cumulatively, it would put the city on a year to date basis down approximately four tenths of a percent, or $84,000 compared to budget. Council Member Min. Jones and Steven discussed how flat sales were compared to 2025. Steven explained the city was taking in the same amount of money as last year. Council Member Wiederkehr thanked Steven for his visual references. Chief Financial Officer Steven Dotson presented the April Monthly Financial Report. Property Tax came in about 2% above budget, roughly $51,000. Sales Tax was down 1%, but franchise fees were up 8%, around $209,000. Alcoholic Beverage Fees were up 2%, and he noted that after some dips earlier in the year, those revenues seemed to have bounced back. Building permits came in at 68% above what had been budgeted, about $879,000. The General Fund was up 3.6%, roughly $900,000. The Street Fund was flat, up only $7,500 for the year. In the Parking Fund, revenues were down 2%, or $18,000, which he attributed to budgeting for the new bakery building lot. It was still being monitored and expected better projections in 2027. In the Parks Development Fund, revenues were up 3.6%, about $65,000. Water and Sewer was up 6.2%, or $1 million for the year. He stated he was only reporting revenues and that expenses had risen due to purchased water costs. The Stormwater Management Fund was up 6%, around $60,000, and the fund was tracking right where it needed to be. Recycling and Trash was up 2.2%, or $130,000. The Airport Fund was up 4.6%, around $77,000, and they had seen about 911 more flight operations for the year compared to 2025. Council Member Turk asked why the number of flights increased. Steven explained that throughout the first several months of 2026 had better weather compared to 2025, which seemed to be one of the indicators as why there was an increase in flight operations. Agenda Additions: Mayor Rawn stated there were two proposed agenda additions. The first was a resolution recognizing black owned and LGBTQ owned businesses in Fayetteville during Juneteenth and Pride Month. Mayor Rawn read the proposed resolution. Council Member Stafford moved to add 2026-1992 to the agenda. Council Member Dr. Jones seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. A Resolution to Recognize Black-Owned and LGBTQ+-Owned Businesses: A resolution recognizing black-owned and LGBTQ+-owned businesses in Fayetteville during Juneteenth and Pride month. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 3 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Council Member Dr. Jones thanked Mayor Rawn, the City Council and his co-sponsor Council Member Moore. The resolution was recognizing black owned and LGBTQ owned businesses in Fayetteville during Juneteenth and Pride month. Both groups played a large part in Fayetteville’s economic vitality. He felt it was appropriate to recognize the two groups during the month of June. Council Member Moore thanked Council Member Dr. Jones and wished everyone a happy Pride month. She highlighted the importance of freedom for African Americans in the United States. She was excited about all the activities and events planned, inviting the community to participate. On June 19th 2026, there would be an event hosted by Let’s Talk Northwest Arkansas at the Spring Shop area by the old Jefferson School from 4 – 8 pm. On June 20th 2026, the Yvonne Richardson Center’s “Uptown Ramble” there would be another Juneteenth celebration from 10am – 3pm. She went on to say that Fayetteville Pride would be happening on June 27th 2026, with activities throughout the month. On June 26th 2026, there would a community Trans March and gathering. She looked forward to celebrating together. The City Council received 1 public comment regarding this resolution. Council Member Berna moved to approve the resolution. Council Member Bunch seconded the motion. Upon roll call the resolution passed unanimously. Resolution 133-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Mayor Rawn read the second proposed resolution. Request to Submit FY 2026 Federal Railroad Administration Grant Application: A resolution to authorize an application for a Federal Railroad Administration Grant to make safety improvements to railroad crossings in Fayetteville. Public Works Director Chris Brown explained the item was a grant application. The city had a current grant in place for planning and design efforts for a few railroad crossings, one at Frisco Avenue and the other at the University of Arkansas. There was another round of grant funding available to implement the crossing locations. The grant application deadline was the following week, June 8th, so the item needed City Council approval in order to apply. Fayetteville was partnering with the City of Springdale on the grant, responsible for $19 million of the total $48 million amount. Council Member Min. Jones and Chris discussed the funds for the project. Chris explained the funds would come from the bond program, either the current bond or the bonds that will be issued later in the year. It would be a total match if the city received the full grant amount, approximately $3.9 million. Council Member Berna moved to add 2026-1809 to the agenda. Council Member Bunch seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 4 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Council Member Min. Jones and Chris discussed Fayetteville’s commitment and grant matching. Council Member Moore and Chris then discussed the proposed changes to the crossing while using a slideshow presentation. Council Member Turk felt the changes would improve safety in the proposed areas. Council Member Berna moved to approve the resolution. Council Member Dr. Jones seconded the motion. Upon roll call the resolution passed unanimously. Resolution 134-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Consent: Approval of the May 19, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes Approved Lake Sequoyah Bridge Rehabilitation - Amendment to Agreement with Garver, LLC: A resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Contract with Garver, LLC for additional services related to the Lake Sequoyah Bridge Rehabilitation Project. Resolution 135-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Goins Enterprises, Inc. (Change Order No. 2): A resolution to approve Change Order No. 2 to the contract with Goins Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $5,672.00 for the reconstruction of 24-inch waterlines in south Fayetteville. Resolution 136-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Gregg St. SS4A –Amendment #1 with Crafton Tull: A resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement with Crafton Tull and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $189,380.00 for preliminary design services on the Gregg Street Safe Streets and Roads for All Project. Resolution 137-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Safe Routes to School Plan Adoption: A resolution to adopt the Fayetteville Safe Routes to School Plan. Resolution 138-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Vision Zero Safety Action Plan: A resolution to adopt the Fayetteville Vision Zero Safety Action Plan. Resolution 139-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 5 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Council Member Berna moved to accept the Consent Agenda as read. Council Member Bunch seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Unfinished Business: 516 North Fallin Avenue Sewer Damage Claim: A resolution pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code to authorize a payment of $100,000.00 to Chris Skrocki for a sewer damage claim arising at 516 North Fallin Avenue. For item history from February 17, 2026 through May 5, 2026, please contact the Office of the City Clerk Treasurer. At the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the June 2, 2026 City Council meeting. Utilities Director Tim Nyander explained he had received the lodging receipts in time to figure them into the adjusters formula. He went on to review the cost breakdown; lodging was $4,806, a plumbing bill for $89, mitigation cost for cleanup of material and removing damaged portions of the structure was $36,241, the cleaning of personal property was $32,745, replacement of lost personal property was $16,416, construction repair was $60,719. The adjuster’s deductions included the removal and reinstallation of a water heater, something the owner stated wasn’t needed, and a $10,000 insurance payment by the owners insurance company. Altogether, the amount to be paid to the citizen was $140,111.21, which staff recommended the citizen be paid the full amount. It was decided to amend the resolution to the new amount provided by the utilities department and then hear from the citizen. Council Member Stafford moved to amend language to match resolution provided to the City Council on June 2, 2026. Council Member Moore seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Citizen Chris Skrocki presented to the City Council. He appreciate what the City Council had done and recognized the progress they had made on the ordinance. His intent was to share remaining concerns so his perspective could be understood. He described the scope and severity of the damage done to his home, pointing to an image that had dark material covering the floor, adding it wasn’t the floor color it was sewage that had back flowed throughout the entire first floor. There were additional photos showing the volume of hazardous waste in the bathtub. In another image, he explained the flooring in the photo was tile, but the city hired adjuster estimate continued to list it as bamboo flooring, which was one of the several errors in the city’s documentation. He went on to describe the path the overflow took throughout the home, from the half bath near the entry foyer, into the dining area, kitchen island, bedroom and primary bathroom. He provided a brief history of the claim process. The initial offer had been $4,000 and three nights in a hotel, which had put him on edge. He asked for three bids and only received two. He then submitted a FOIA request to see what had been submitted initially, in terms of an itemized breakout that wasn’t sent to him voluntarily. The home repairs were the major discrepancy in the claim. They were aligned on mitigation costs and person items. His first estimate was about $96,447, the second was $99,507, mentioning the $99,507 was what he had paid out of pocket. He mentioned he had to borrow from his retirement savings because he Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 6 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov couldn’t get a home equity line of credit as the house no longer had equity due to the damage. He said his own documentation had been consistent throughout, while the city’s numbers had continuously shifted. He described identifying more than 25 errors and omissions in the city’s estimates, pointing out some errors were in his favor, such as the water heater reset, and he asked for those to be removed. The only change made was to the water heater, with no corrections to the other errors. He reiterated the process had been long and difficult for everyone. If there was an opportunity to correct the remaining errors with a second estimate, he would welcome it. He again expressed appreciation for the City Council and the progress made so far. Council Member Moore requested City Attorney Kit William’s opinion when it came to the amount the City Council could approve, as it seemed there had been discrepancies. City Attorney Kit Williams explained the issue had been studied and it had been decided to try to create a way to authorize additional compensation for Chris Skrocki. Under the change in city code, if the city’s professional insurance adjuster determined that reasonable compensation for a valid claim exceeded $100,000, then the City Council could, by unanimous vote, authorize payment above the cap and up to the full amount determined by the adjuster. The adjuster’s analysis came to $150,000 but due to Chris’ insurance company having already paid $10,000, the maximum the city could offer would be $140,111.21. Approving the recommended payout required 8 affirmative votes. If one member voted no, the City Council could not exceed the $100,000 cap. Council Member Moore acknowledged how unfortunate the incident was and that she was grateful it wasn’t something most residents experienced. She noted that the process had been long and frustrating and she felt the City Council could continue to speak on improvements but that could cause more of a delay for Chris’ payout. She wondered if having the delay would be worth it to him and invited his feedback. Chris felt that given how uncharted the situation was, he understood the ordinance had been modified and rules shift, but he kept returning to the fact he knew what he had paid out of pocket based on real numbers. It was frustrating to him to have clear facts about what was in his house and still see the facts misrepresented in the estimate. He felt it would be productive to sit down with the estimator and walk through why the estimate didn’t match the actual conditions of the home. He compared the process to private insurance, mentioning an initial check would be issued for repairs and after repairs there would be a reconciliation. He would be very interested in a process that would address the errors in the estimate but if there wasn’t a process he wasn’t sure what else could be done. Council Member Stafford asked if the adjuster considered the discrepancies. Tim stated the adjuster stood behind their estimate. City Attorney Kit Williams shared his experience of being a personal injury lawyer and reminded the City Council they could not pay more than what the city adjuster recommended, adding that he felt the adjuster analysis was fair and reasonable. He didn’t think second guessing the adjuster in public made much sense. The City Council received 3 public comments regarding this resolution. Council Member Stafford stated it had been an imperfect process, as it started with an inadequate system and ordinance. He understood the homeowners frustrations with the monetary discrepancies as a $38,000 difference was substantial. He questioned who hired/picked the adjuster, as he confirmed with Mayor Rawn that the adjuster was not a city employee. He had Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 7 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov not spoken to the adjuster, who was not present at the meeting, but felt the City Council had to decide. He wasn’t sure what the options were going forward and was hopeful to hear from his fellow City Council members. Council Member Berna requested clarification on when the adjuster reviewed the discrepancies. Tim explained the result of the meeting determined the floor was more expensive than what the adjuster originally thought, as the floor was missing when the adjuster came to look. The amount was then adjusted by several thousands of dollars. The adjuster felt he did not miss anything on the adjustment. He added there could always be improvements done but felt strides were made in this instance. Council Member Berna clarified the adjuster reviewed the claim multiple times and he was of the opinion that his estimate was accurate. Council Member Berna reviewed the history of the item, adding there had been much back and forth. In his opinion, the City Council had to rely on the experts, which was why the Ordinance Review Committee included the third party adjuster. He thought the adjuster had done a good job and was viewing the situation as what he felt was fair. Council Member Min. Jones confirmed the adjusted amount was $140,111.21 and that to approve it, the City Council had to have unanimous consent. Council Member Wiederkehr commended Chris Sckrocki for his patience. While the process was imperfect, he would rather give Chris $140,111.21 than $100,000. Council Member Moore acknowledged the processes had been imperfect. She explained her hesitation to move forward stemmed from her feeling they wouldn’t ever reach a perfect process, and believed more work was needed. She felt the concerns raised were valid and worth considering, acknowledging that back and forth with an adjuster was an unfortunate inevitable part of the process. She doubted that waiting another month or two would result in significantly more compensation and worried that the emotional toll of waiting would outweigh any small financial gain. She stated she would continue working with staff to address the concerns raised, as she believed improvements were necessary. She did not want to table to table the item further, she believed ongoing conversations were needed to make progress. She felt the amount reached could hopefully help Chris return to his home and restore his accounts, she felt that delaying the decision for a small additional amount improve the situation. Council Member Dr. Jones agreed with what Council Member Moore had expressed. He then asked if it would be possible to have a second adjuster to provide another opinion. City Attorney Kit Williams stated the city code stated an experienced insurance adjuster would review the claim, which had been fulfilled so having another opinion would not in accordance with the city code. Council Member Berna moved to approve the resolution. Council Member Turk seconded the motion. Upon roll call the resolution passed unanimously. Resolution 140-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 8 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Mayor Rawn apologized to the Sckrocki family. She did not like the way the situation unfolded. There were many lessons staff had learned due to what happened. She was grateful to the City Council for their work on the item and again apologized for Chris’ experience. Raze and Removal of a Dilapidated and Unsafe Structure at 20 N. School Ave.: A resolution to order the razing and removal of a dilapidated and unsafe structure on property owned by Stephen and Gretta Smith located at 20 North School Ave. in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. At the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the June 2, 2026 City Council meeting. Code Compliance Supervisor Billy Bryant presented on the item. He reviewed the location of the property and stated staff had first been notified about the property through an anonymous complaint in 2022 regarding an unsecured violation, which the owner corrected. Then on March 25, 2025 a raze and removal case was opened, and the owner was notified by certified mail. Due to the increased complaints, staff inspected the property again in November 2025 and found an unsecured, abandoned cinder block structure with graffiti on several walls and significant interior and exterior deterioration. Utility audits showed the building had no electricity and water since 2013, meaning it had been exposed to the elements without climate control. Staff had repeatedly communicated the need to begin demolition. A demolition permit was submitted only after the raze and removal order was placed on the April 7, 2026 City Council agenda. Due to the building’s age, an asbestos report was required and submitted on May 14, 2026. The demolition permit was issued on May 22, 2026. Staff then requested a timeline, which was provided on May 26, showing demolition in September following architectural design work for a future building. Staff felt it did not adequately account for the nearly 13 months since the initial violation and informed him they would recommend the City Council issue a raze and remove order. He then submitted a revised demolition timeline of around two months. Although staff was hesitant due to the lack of activity on the property, they were recommending tabling the item until the August 4, 2026 City Council meeting to allow the property to be addressed. Council Member Bunch questioned whether, because of the building’s history as a dry cleaners, there was a chemical element that needed to be considered with the raze and remove. Billy stated not that he was aware of and confirmed there had been an asbestos test on the building. Council Member Bunch moved to table the resolution to the August 4, 2026 City Council meeting. Council Member Berna seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. This resolution was tabled to the August 2, 2026 City Council meeting. Raze and Removal of a Dilapidated and Unsafe Structure at 848 N. Jackson Dr.: A resolution to order the razing and removal of a dilapidated and unsafe structure on property owned by Born In a Barn, Inc. located at 848 North Jackson Drive in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. At the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the June 2, 2026 City Council meeting. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 9 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Code Compliance Supervisor Billy Bryant stated staff did not have a presentation on the item as the owner had been communicating recently with staff. Staff noticed completed work on the structure and was optimistic more would be completed soon. Staff had outlined items that needed to be addressed on the property and the owners agreed to have them completed by the July 7, 2026 City Council meeting. Staff recommending tabling the item and informed the owner that if work was not completed, staff was prepared to move forward with the raze and removal recommendation on the July 7, 2026 meeting. Council Member Bunch moved to table the resolution to the July 7, 2026 City Council meeting. Council Member Turk seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. This resolution was tabled to the July 7, 2026 City Council meeting. Council Member Moore requested clarification from City Attorney Kit Williams on the proper procedure for a member of the City Council to present newly discovered material evidence that was substantial and unavailable at the time of the Swarm Aero appeal hearing that could change the council’s vote, as the information was not publicly available at the time of the vote. City Attorney Kit Williams explained before anything could be discussed, there had to be an item for it on the agenda. It was possible that a Council Member that voted in the majority could ask for a reconsideration, which would place the item back onto the agenda. But without that, there was no other way to discuss it. RZN-2026-0011: Rezoning (1002 N Hall Ave/ Central United Methodist Church INC, 443): An ordinance to rezone the property described in rezoning petition RZN 2026-11 for approximately 0.40 acres located at 1002 North Hall Avenue in Ward 4 from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, four units per acre to UN, Urban Neighborhood. At the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was tabled to the June 2, 2026 City Council meeting before going through any readings. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth reviewed the location of the property. The request was for the property to be rezoned from Residential Single Family – 4 to Urban Neighborhood. Staff supported the request, finding the proposed zoning compatible with surrounding land uses. Staff also found the request consistent with the city’s future land use map, which had designated the area as a city neighborhood intended to support a mix of uses. Several infill characters made the site suitable for additional housing or small scale nonresidential development. The tree preservation requirement would decrease from 25% to 15%. Staff had received public comments related to ongoing historic preservation work in the area. A historic context study had been completed but found the structure on the property to not be of historic age or architectural significance and would not contribute to potential historic district. Public comments were mixed; some residents had concerns about the neighborhood character, traffic Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 10 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov and parking. Others supported the request, adding that the Urban Neighborhood zoning was preferable compared to other zoning districts that allowed large scale student housing. Staff recommended approval and the Planning Commission forwarded the request with a 7-1 vote in favor. He was available for questions. Council Member Min. Jones and Jonathan discussed the process of consideration when it came to historic districts. Representative Will Clark presented on the item. He felt the request was logical and a compatible step toward implementing Fayetteville’s 2040 plan. The rezone aligned with the property’s future land use designation and would replace outdated zoning with a transitional mixed use district. He highlighted the property’s high infill suitability, referencing staff’s evaluation showing strong scores on the City Plan 2040 infill grading. The site had walkability and immediate access to infrastructure. The rezoning would promote homeownership through missing middle housing rather than large scale student rentals. He went on to address public concerns, in regard to traffic, he explained due to the lots small size and development constraints, it limited any potential increase. The rezoning did not constitute spot zoning as it aligned with the future land use maps and represented planned transition. The redevelopment would increase surrounding property values, adding the existing infrastructure had adequate capacity. He asked that the City Council vote to approve the rezone request. Council Member Turk and Jonathan discussed the slope of the property and Hillside Hilltop Overlay District requirements. She then added that the item be tabled to the next meeting to allow for more information. It was discussed how many units could be built under Urban Neighborhood. Jonathan stated he did not have an estimate as it was dependent on the size of units. Council Member Stafford asked if the future land use map marked the area for a higher density zoning than what it was currently at. Jonathan stated the future land use map was not that explicit based on context. It contemplated the potential for different land uses. He did think that Residential Single Family-4 zoning did not align with the city neighborhoods. Council Member Berna then questioned the slope of the property as when he drove by the property it appeared very flat. Jonathan explained the property had a downward slope from Hall in the southwest corner of the property to northeast corner. The most significant amount of slope was just beyond the northern property line in Wedington itself. The City Council received 4 public comments regarding this ordinance. Council Member Stafford agreed the project fit with the City Plan 2040 and he felt delaying the project would only add to cost, making housing less affordable. He was in full support of the project and rezoning. Council Member Moore agreed with Council Member Stafford that the proposal was a good fit for a city neighborhood definition. She supported the project and quoted, “if everyone does a little, no one has to do a lot.” She felt that every neighborhood would need to welcome more Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 11 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov neighbors tin order to pursue equity across the community. She looked forward to supporting the project. Council Member Turk stated the project was spot zoning. The road at the corner of the project was very steep, she had not pulled any accident data but hazard a guess that there were some on the road due to its conditions. She argued that the city did not know the plans for the area but that it would likely not be workforce or affordable housing. She would not be in support of the item. Council Member Wiederkehr found the project reasonable to support and felt it was a logical location to increase density. Council Member Bunch felt due to the location; it was not spot zoning. She felt it was the appropriate zoning due to what was around the property. She explained the possibility of the project freeing up more housing. She would be in support of the item. Council Member Berna asked Jonathan under the current zoning how many homes could be built. Jonathan did not have the exact number but felt it possible that the current home could be demolished and have two houses built in its place. Council Member Berna felt the proposed zoning change was appropriate for the area and gave the flexibility to build a project that would fit within the 2040 plan. He then made a motion to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Dr. Jones reviewed the Planning Commission’s decision and asked if any of the Ward 4 Council Members had heard from their residents regarding the project. Council Member Turk stated she had received letters and fielded phone calls. Council Member Stafford moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Berna seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed 7-1. Council Member Bunch, Min. Jones, Stafford, Dr. Jones, Moore, Wiederkehr and Berna voted yes. Council Member Turk voted no. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the motion passed 7-1. Council Member Bunch, Min. Jones, Stafford, Dr. Jones, Moore, Wiederkehr and Berna voted yes. Council Member Turk voted no. Ordinance 6999 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk RZN-2026-0010 North Hall Avenue: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026-10 for approximately 0.31 acres located at 800 North Hall Avenue in Ward 4 from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre, and P-1, Institutional to UN, Urban Neighborhood. At the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was tabled to the June 2, 2026 City Council meeting before going through any readings. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 12 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. He reviewed the location of the item and stated staff supported the request. The request was similar to the previous, noting the area was highly walkable. He felt Urban Neighborhood zoning district and the uses allowed within it were complementary to redeveloping the property. Due to the size of the property, staff felt it would reduce the developability of the property overall to a level more appropriate with a site located mid-block, compared to the previous item. The request was also designated as a city neighborhood area on the future land use map. He explained the number of the infill attributes of the property, noting access to the public transit system within Fayetteville. The tree preservation requirements, historic contract statements, descriptions and feedback were similar to the previous item, but not identical. The house on the property was of historic age but had significant modifications over the years making it no longer eligible for listing on the national register or any similar designation. He then addressed the stormwater features of the property. Since the Agenda Session, staff had not been able to find the drain onsite. It was unclear whether it was a part of the property’s private stormwater system. Staff was recommending approval of the item and the Planning Commission was supportive with a vote of 7-1. Representative Will Clark reviewed the property, stating it was a smaller lot so some of the traffic and density issues raised by neighbors were further alleviated by the size of the lot. The city had indicated that a city neighborhood was designated for the property in the 2040 plan, stating it was more compatible with the rezone to Urban Neighborhood than Residential Single Family-4. Council Member Turk and Jonathan discussed what the frontage distance was for the project. Jonathan stated he did not have a measurement but it looked to be about 98 – 100 feet. There was no parking allowed on this part of Hall St, meaning the development would have to have a driveway under the site and accommodate parking on their property. The City Council received 2 public comments regarding this ordinance. Council Member Moore shared her vision for the property and added that she felt the rezoning was appropriate and compatible with future eland use and made a motion to suspend the rules and move to the third and final reading. Council Member Moore moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed 7-1. Council Member Bunch, Min. Jones, Stafford, Dr. Jones, Moore, Wiederkehr and Berna voted yes. Council Member Turk voted no. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 13 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Ordinance 7000 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk New Business: Cost of Living Adjustment for the Local Fire Benefit Plan: An ordinance to implement an annual 3% compound cost of living adjustment for all eligible participants of the City of Fayetteville Fire Pension Fund. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn stated staff was excited and proud of the ordinance. Chief Financial Officer Steven Dotson would not be providing a presentation but was in attendance to answer any questions. Council Member Moore asked if other City Council member had received feedback or questions. The City Council received 1 public comment regarding this ordinance. Council Member Stafford moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Berna seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 7001 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk City Attorney Kit Williams reminded the City Council they will need a separate vote for the emergency clause. Council Member Berna moved to approve the emergency clause. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Conservation Ordinance for properties included in the Climate Pollution Reduction Grant: An ordinance to provide for the conservation and protection of certain City-owned real property, to establish permitted and prohibited uses; and for other purposes. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Director of Parks, Natural Resources and Culture Affairs explained that in 2024 the City of Fayetteville partnered with the Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission, MetroPlan in Central Arkansas, and the City of Fort Smith to form the Arkansas Tri-Region Coalition and Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 14 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov apply for an EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grant. The coalition worked with more than 50 communities, agencies, and organizations to develop projects aligned with the grant’s goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and harmful air pollution. In late 2024 the EPA awarded the coalition just under $100 million to support community driven climate and clean energy initiatives. It was a major accomplishment made possible by collaboration among city staff and partner organizations statewide. Northwest Arkansas received about $36.25 million for 18 regional projects, including five in Fayetteville. The Town Branch Corridor Project received roughly $5.2 million for habitat and stream improvements, with the Watershed Conservation Resource Center designated as the lead agency. She requested approval of the ordinance conserving city owned lands along Town Branch until 2050 to meet the carbon sequestration requirements of the grant. She explained that nine city parcels, totaling about 72 acres, would be affected. Privately owned parcels shown in yellow on the project map would be addressed separately through agreements with landowners. The ordinance was modeled off the Streamside Protection Ordinance, with similar permitted and prohibited uses. She then confirmed that utility installations could be allowed if the city engineer decided no feasible alternative existed and went on to explain that if a prohibited use ever became necessary, the impacted area would need to be offset with additional land placed under the ordinance to maintain required metrics. The ordinance was proposed in accordance with the grant requirements to maximize and realize greenhouse gas reduction benefits included in the grant application and grant award metrics. She was available for questions. Council Member Min. Jones and Alison discussed who was managing the five projects within in Fayetteville. Alison explained the project lead was Watershed Conservation Resource Center, the Northwest Regional Planning Commission and the Northwest Arkansas Land Trust. Council Member Stafford asked if there would be any issue if the item was held on the first reading as he would like to speak with the city engineer about land that needed their approval. Alison stated it would not be a detriment to the project if more time was needed to work through the particular instance. The City Council received 2 public comments regarding this ordinance. Council Member Turk highlighted the work that went into drafting the ordinance. She then asked Alison if the funds would be able to fill a gap to where the city could remove a dam at the Pump House Station Road. Alison was unsure and didn’t believe the funds could be comingled with that particular project, but she would verify. Council Member Turk felt it would be helping as the dam had been an ongoing issue for at least 8 years and felt it would restore the local ecology. Council Member Stafford stated he was in full support of the item and hoped it would pass. He requested that it be left on the first reading as there was a sliver of land that was already a utility easement that a citizen was working to obtain water access. He wanted to ensure the ordinance wouldn’t interfere with the citizens project as they were on vacation. This ordinance was left on the First Reading. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 15 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Council Member Moore had a point of information and asked the members of the prevailing vote from the Swarm Aero appeal to consider a reconsideration due to new voter information. Council Member Stafford then had a point of order and asked if it was proper for the reconsideration to be lobbied as it was up to a City Council member that voted in favor to bring forward a reconsideration. City Attorney Kit Williams stated the point of order was well taken. It had already been discussed once without being added to the agenda and shouldn’t be discussed again unless someone with the power to make the motion decides to. Mayor Rawn stated that since it was the second point of information, everyone was clear on what it would take for the vote to be reconsidered. Although it was good politics to be reminded, the City Council didn’t need a continuous reminder as it wasn’t helpful for the meeting. RZN 2026-0014 North Colette Ave: An ordinance to rezone the property described in rezoning petition RZN 2026-14 for approximately 0.21 acres located at 2710 North Colette Avenue in Ward 3 from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, four units per acre, to NC, Neighborhood Conservation. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. The request was to rezone the property from Residential Single Family - 4 to Neighborhood Conservation. Staff found the request compatible as both districts permitted single family homes, but Neighborhood Conservation allowed a higher density of up to 10 units per acre. The increased density was appropriate given the property’s access to Gulley Park, fire services, water and sewer, and the Niokaska Creek Trail just south of the site. The surrounding area already included a wide mix of lot and housing sizes, from recently built homes in the Gulley Grove subdivision to much larger and much smaller lots in neighborhoods to the east, south, and north. From a long range planning perspective, the request supported the city’s goals for appropriate infill development and aligned with the future land-use map designation of a residential neighborhood area. The tree preservation requirements would decrease from 25% to 20% and engineering staff noted a wet weather sewer capacity issue. After reviewing the small scale of development, the utility department determined the impact on the system would not be significant. Staff was recommending approval and the Planning Commission forwarded the request with a unanimous 8-0 vote and no public comments were received. He was available for questions. Council Member Berna had not heard any public comment regarding the rezoning. Council Member Bunch hadn’t heard any either. She then verified with Jonathan that the Gully Grove subdivision was a Planned Zoning District. Council Member Berna moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 16 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 7002 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk RZN 2026-0012 (2245) West Deane Street: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026-12 for approximately 0.70 acres located at 2245 West Deane Street in Ward 2 from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre, to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. The request was to rezone the property from Residential Single Family – 4 to Residential Intermediate Urban. Staff considered the request very straightforward. The property was almost entirely surrounded by attach residential dwelling of various sizes. The Residential Intermediate Urban zoning would bring the property into compliance as the site already contained a duplex. The rezoning aligned with long range planning goals, including future land use map designation and the criteria for infill development. The tree preservation requirements would decrease to 15%. Staff recommended approval and the Planning Commission unanimously supported the request with an 8-0 vote. No public comment was received. Council Member Turk and Jonathan discussed access to the property and how much frontage was on Deanne St with the property. Jonathan stated the driveways on the property were nonconforming and if/when the property was redeveloped, it would likely go from a two driveway to a one. The frontage was approximately a 90 foot width along Deanne. Council Member Wiederkehr moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Berna seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 7003 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk RZN 2026-0013 (1429 & 1431) West Deane Street: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026-13 for approximately 0.40 acres located at 1429 and 1431 West Deane Street in Ward 2 from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre, to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 17 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. The request was to rezone the property from Residential Single Family - 4 to Residential Intermediate Urban. Staff found the land use compatible. The rezoning aligned with adopted land use plans. The property’s proximity to transit and other infrastructure made it appropriate for infill development. The tree perseveration requirements would decrease from 25% to 15%. Staff had received public comment with concern that the infill development could harm the character of the area that was almost entirely single family. Staff found the project compatible with city’s long range planning goals and recommended approval. The Planning Commission forwarded the request with a unanimous 8-0 vote. Representative Larry McCready presented on the item on behalf of the applicant. He explained the Residential Intermediate Urban zoning fit within the area and allowed various types of dwellings, with protections on building height and coverage ratio. He emphasized the new zoning was consistent with the 2040 plan and the institutional uses. He expressed appreciation for the City Council and thanked them for their consideration. Council Member Turk and Jonathan discussed an unbuilt right of way and the possibility of it being vacated in the future. Council Member Berna moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 7004 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk Amend § 164.04 Urban Agriculture: An ordinance to allow sheep within the corporate limits of the city by amending § 164.04 Urban Agriculture. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Council Member Moore explained she had a resident approach her regarding the addition of sheep. She explained the difference in sheep that would be allowed. She felt the ordinance added diversity in community animals, had environmental benefits and added joy. She added that she would be requesting an emergency clause as well. Council Member Moore moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816 City Council Meeting Minutes June 2, 2026 Page 18 of 18 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 7005 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk Council Member Moore moved to add an emergency clause. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Council Member Moore moved to approve the emergency clause. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Announcements: None City Council Agenda Session Presentations: None City Council Tour: None Adjournment: 8:40 p.m. _____________________________ __________________________________ Molly Rawn, Mayor Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasurer Docusign Envelope ID: 37324E2B-84DA-8EF6-838D-EC29D8403816