HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-06-09 - Agendas - Final
1
Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste Committee
9 June 2026
5:30 P.M. City Hall Room 101
(Or immediately following City Council Agenda Session)
Committee: Council Member Teresa Turk, Council Member Mike Wiederkehr, Council
Member Scott Berna, Council D’Andre Jones
Copy to: Mayor Molly Rawn, Keith Macedo, Steve Dotson, Jennifer Walker, Kara Paxton,
Kit Williams, Chris Brown, Alan Pugh, Jonathan Curth, Terry Gulley, Peter
Nierengarten, Brian Pugh, Corey Granderson, Drake Vinyard, Aaron Watkins,
Cody Ashworth, Scott Murphy, Brian Rowland
From: Tim Nyander, Utilities Director
______________________________________________________________________
CALL TO ORDER
UPDATES
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Overview of May’s Water & Sewer Operations
Tim Nyander – Utilities Director
2. Overview of May’s WRRF Monthly Operations
Scott Murphy – WRRF Project Manager, Inframark
NEW BUSINESS:
3. Easement Condemnations for South School Waterline Project
The South School Waterline Bottleneck project will upgrade a section of existing 8-inch diameter
waterline to 12-inch diameter. The waterline is along South School Avenue from approximately
West Hops Drive to Sunrise Mountain Road, in the general vicinity of the Fulbright Expressway
Interchange.
The majority of the necessary easements have been negotiated and acquired, however there
are a few remaining that may need orders of possession for the project to proceed with bidding
this summer. Up-to-date status and details will be presented to the committee.
STAFF REQUESTS THIS BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A
RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL
2
PRESENTATIONS
ATTACHMENTS
May’s Water & Sewer Operations Report
May’s WRRF Report
ADJOURN
Next Water, Sewer, Solid Waste Committee meets on
Tuesday, July 14th, 2026, at 5:30 p.m.
WATER/SEWER/METER
OPERATIONS REPORT
MAY 2026
MONTHLY STATISTICS
•68 –WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WORK ORDERS COMPLETED
•96 –POLYETHENE WATER SERVICE LINES REPLACED
•32 –FIRE HYDRANTS REPAIRED
•20 –NEW SERVICE TAPS
•56,372 FEET –SEWER MAINS WASHED/JETTED
•4,206 FEET –SEWER MAINS INSPECTED VIA CCTV
•1 –POINT REPAIR ON A SEWER MAIN
•69 –TOTAL AFTER-HOURS CALLS
YEAR-TO -DATE STATISTICS
•296 –WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WORK ORDERS COMPLETED
•410 –POLYETHYLENE WATER SERVICE LINES REPLACED
•135 –FIRE HYDRANTS REPAIRED
•98 –NEW SERVICE TAPS
•44,045 FEET –SEWER MAINS INSPECTED VIA CCTV
•244,144 FEET –SEWER MAINS WASHED/JETTED
•35 –POINT REPAIRS ON SEWER MAINS
•34,526 –TOTAL CELLULAR METERS ACTIVE IN SYSTEM
AN UPDATE ON PROJECTS
•WE CONTINUE TO REPLACE POLYETHYLENE WATER SERVICE LINES IN THE CLIFFS APARTMENTS
NEAR NORTH CROSSOVER ROAD. THIS PROJECT WILL TAKE SEVERAL MONTHS, BUT SEVERAL
BUILDINGS HAVE ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED.
•ADDITIONALLY, CREWS ARE ACTIVELY WORKING ON THE EAST ROCKWOOD TRAIL WATER
MAIN REPLACEMENT. 220 FEET OF NEW MAIN HAS ALREADY BEEN INSTALLED, WITH 3 SERVICE
TAPS COMPLETED (THESE WILL NOT BE TIED INTO THE CUSTOMERS EXISTING PLUMBING AND
TURNED ON UNTIL FURTHER INTO THE PROJECT. CUSTOMERS ARE STILL TIED TO THE EXISTING
MAIN). TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE.
REPLACING
SERVICE LINES
AT THE CLIFFS
APARTMENTS
ROCKWOOD
TRAIL WATER
MAIN
REPLACEMENT
NO BAD DAYS!!!!
Inframark Monthly Report
May 2026
2 | Page
2
Table of Contents
Contents
Inframark Monthly Report .............................................................................................. 1
May 2026 ...................................................................................................................... 1
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 3
Compliance .................................................................................................................. 4
Financial ...................................................................................................................... 5
Operations ................................................................................................................... 6
Maintenance ................................................................................................................ 8
Pretreatment .............................................................................................................. 11
Biosolids Management ................................................................................................ 12
Woolsey Wet Prairie .................................................................................................... 13
Appendix .................................................................................................................... 14
3 | Page
3
Executive Summary
1. Operations:
Basins levels are down despite significant rainfall
ADEQ Inspection at Westside
Dr. Sumia Parveen Ph.D. added to the Inframark team in Fayetteville
2. Maintenance:
Multiple pump failures at LS22 resulting in several sanitary sewer overflows
Large number of SCADA improvements
RAS pumps at Noland continue to fail due to excessive debris
Modifications to the second jet aerator have been completed
3. Woolsey Wet Prairie:
Expanded spot spraying for the month of May
A second employee for the summer months has started and is currently
helping to manage vegetation
4. BMS:
Grass growth rate is very high due to frequent rainfall
Wet weather limited the application of water treatment residuals
Limited hay production for May due to weather
5. Training:
AED/first aid
Arc Flash
6. Industrial Pretreatment:
Approximately $102,000 in surcharges
Completed compliance sampling at Con Agra
On-going sampling for headwork loading assessment
7. Financial:
Project is approximately $160,000 under budget for the year
4 | Page
4
Compliance
Paul R Noland:
The Paul R Noland facility achieved perfect permit compliance for May 2026
Westside:
The Westside facility achieved perfect permit compliance for May 2026
Biosolids Management Site (BMS):
No effluent from Noland has been used to irrigate at BMS due to sufficient rainfall
Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs):
Two (3) Sanitary Sewer Overflows occurred in May 2026
1- 9450 gallons May 6, 2026 at Owl Creek Lift-station (LS22) due to pump
failure during a severe storm
2- 26550 gallons May 11, 2026 at Owl Creek Lift-station (LS22) due to
debris damaging the one remaining electric pump
3- 21000 gallons May 11, 2026 Owl Creek Lift-station (LS22) due to
failure of the rental pump
5 | Page
5
Financial
The Project continues to be well under budget for the Maintenance account and slightly
over budget on the Chemical account. Overall, the project is approximately $160,000
under budget so far for the year.
Notable Expenses:
1- $29,060.79 Oxygen
2- $11,834.16 polymer for sludge dewatering
3- $9590.83 repair pump for LS22
4- $4199.51 replace hydraulic control value on BMS tractor
5- $3286.06 repair generator at LS58
Cap Type Project Site Monthly Budget Monthly Expenses Annual Budget YTD Expenses YTD Balance
Contract
Months
Passed
% of
Contract
Year
YTD Spend
%
Maintenance FAYETV 28,998.83$ 17,350.31$ 347,986.01$ 110,462.66$ 34,531.49$ 5 42% 32%
Maintenance FYTNLD 61,923.31$ 23,902.76$ 743,079.72$ 186,283.86$ 123,332.69$ 5 42% 25%
Maintenance FYTWSD 17,413.59$ 10,165.54$ 208,963.11$ 36,514.14$ 50,553.81$ 5 42% 17%
Maintenance FYTLAB 8,169.04$ -$ 98,028.42$ 531.00$ 40,314.20$ 5 42% 1%
Maintenance FYTLSM 12,661.89$ 14,947.73$ 151,942.74$ 100,176.25$ (36,866.80)$ 5 42% 66%
Total M&R 129,166.66$ 66,366.34$ 1,550,000.00$ 433,967.91$ 211,865.39$ 5 42% 28%
Chemical FAYETV 8,419.02$ -$ 101,028.20$ -$ 42,095.10$ 5 42% 0%
Chemical FYTNLD 17,977.74$ 14,556.44$ 215,732.82$ 190,402.73$ (100,514.03)$ 5 42% 88%
Chemical FYTWSD 5,055.56$ 8,928.41$ 60,666.71$ 40,608.79$ (15,330.99)$ 5 42% 67%
Chemical FYTLAB 2,371.66$ -$ 28,459.86$ -$ 11,858.30$ 5 42% 0%
Chemical FYTLSM 3,676.03$ -$ 44,112.41$ 18,380.15$ 5 42% 0%
Total Chemical 37,500.01$ 23,484.85$ 450,000.00$ 231,011.52$ (43,511.47)$ 5 42% 51%
Cap Summary as of May 2026
6 | Page
6
Operations
Despite significant rainfall in
May, staff managed influent and
effluent basin levels at Noland
by adjusting process flow
through the plant. The team
treated 221 million gallons of
wastewater during the month
and were able to draw down
basin levels by over 3ft.
The West Side facility underwent its ADEQ evaluation
on May 21. William Cody (ADEQ Inspector) found no
operational or maintenance non-compliance. He
commented that Inframark has done “Exceptional
work to maintain compliance with the NPDES
individual permit. The facility is clean, well-
maintained, and run by adequately licensed
operators.”
7 | Page
7
Noland RAS pumps
A constant problem at Noland is the
frequency of RAS pump failure or loss of
performance due to rags and debris. Staff
constantly monitor and correct the RAS
rates to compensate for the reduced
performance of the pumps. Periodically
the pumps must removed and serviced to
maintain function. In late May, both RAS
pumps on Aeration Basin 2 failed, resulting
in “emergency action” to pull the pumps
and clear the blockages.
A crane was called to Noland, and both pumps
were removed from the basin to facilitate repair.
Each pump was disassembled on top of the
basin and debris was removed from the volutes
and impellors while the crane waited to ensure
the pumps could be returned to service as
quickly as possible.
8 | Page
8
Maintenance
May Activity Totals: 938 Total Work Orders
60 Safety Work Orders
22 Call outs
SCADA
Our SCADA team has been busy upgrading many of the lift
stations to increase reliability. Four lift-stations had the old
“bubbler” systems for monitoring wet level. All of these
have been removed, and new pressure transducers have
been installed. Four more lift-stations have been moved
over to wireless modems replacing the old, unreliable RTUs
(Radio Telemetry Units). The radios have been removed
from Gully Road and Canterbury water towers and replaced
with more reliable cellular modems. The calculated tank
level issue at W31 has also been corrected.
Lastly, the team has been working through hundreds of lift-
station nuisance alarms. This time last year, we were
responding to approximately 40 call outs per month. With
our recent hardware improvements, we have reduced the
number of call-outs in May to only 4.
9 | Page
9
Ozone Update
After the ozone destruct units were replaced in early February, there have been no
employee complaints or exposures to ozone gas. Ambient ozone levels average well below
1.0 PPM (Part Per Million) and only increase marginally during filter cell backwash cycles.
All protective barriers around the
perimeter of the ozone disinfection skid
have been removed as well as the
warning signage at the plant entrance.
Employees are no longer required to
wear personal ozone monitors except as
a precautionary measure if they are
working on top of the ozone skid. The
windsock was also replaced in May to
better visualize prevailing winds in the
area. Lastly our average response time
for an ozone malfunction is now less
than 15 minutes compared to last year when the ambient ozone levels were so high that
staff had to wait 24hrs to service equipment without needing to wear a full SCBA.
LS-22 Update
We are pleased to report that
Pump 1 has been successfully
reinstalled and is functioning
effectively. The backup pump
remains on-site until Pump 2 is
returned and reinstalled. We
expect Pump 2 to be back from
the shop sometime next week.
10 | Page
10
Noland Aeration Motor Control Center
The breaker supplying power to one of the
critical aeration sections at Noland failed
resulting in critically low levels of dissolved
oxygen in Aeration Basin 1. Maintenace
staff and Safety personnel immediately
responded and replaced the breaker while
the cabinet was energized. Once the
breaker was changed, power was restored
and the dissovled oxygen levels returned to
normal levels.
Since the breaker is obsolete and no
longer available, an older breaker recovered
from an out-of-service MCC was used as a
direct replacement.
11 | Page
11
Pretreatment
For the month of May, surcharges for Tyson have increased from the previous month.
Industrial Surcharges
Industry Flow (MG) TSS (MG/L) BOD (MG/L) Surcharge
Tyson Foods Inc. 3.47 2094.13 1794.13 $69,824.26
Hiland Dairy 2.86 1845 1545 $31,880.34
Total: $101,704.60
Septic Charges
Hauler Loads Charges
AR Portables 28 $1,400
Best Jet 11 $550
Advanced
Septic 24 $1,200
ABC Quick
Pump 8 $400
Consider It
Clean 24 $1,200
Total $4,750
Influent Organic
BOD
Loading Loading
Elkins BOD Lbs. % of Design
Jan-26 16,475 55.5
Feb-26 13,168 44.4
Mar-26 17,001 57.3
April-26 13,728 46.3
May-26 21,512 72.5
12 | Page
12
Biosolids Management
Weather reduced the available WTR spreading days for May. Hay and fertilizer sales
continued to lag. Grass growth has been excellent, however, frequent rainfall has made
cutting, drying, and baling difficult.
Water Treatment Residuals, Hay, and Fertilizer Sales:
May-26 Tons Revenue
Fertilizer 0 0
Hay 48.82 $1,952.80
WTR 50.02 $1,625.66
Totals 98.84 $3,578.46
13 | Page
13
Woolsey Wet Prairie
We are pleased to announce the
successful onboarding of two
exceptional interns, Erin
Funkhouser and Olivia Shuff, who
have made significant
contributions to our team.
Throughout the month of May
they have dedicated their efforts
to the application of herbicides
aimed at managing invasive
species that have historically
posed challenges within Woolsey.
In addition to their work on
invasive plant management, Erin
and Olivia have maintained the
trails allowing easier access for
both the public and our Woolsey
tour guests.
Maintenance:
37 gallons Pasture Guard applied to paths and the border adjacent to South Broyles
5 gallons Pasture Guard applied to individual plants in cells: W1, W2, GL, E4, E5
4 gallons Pasture Guard applied to individual plants in cells: E1, E2, and E3
20 gallons of Pasture Guard applied to Southwest border by solar panels
Hand pulled Queen Ann’s Lace from cell W2
14 | Page
14
Appendix
Inframark Process and Compliance Monthly Report Meeting Date: May 2026 Project: Fayetteville, AR Report Date: 06/04/26 Facility: Noland WRRF
Permit Compliance
Parameter Monthly
Actual Monthly
Limit Percent
Available Weekly Actual Comments
White River Flow, MGD 7.13 7.30
Effluent D.O., mg/L 16.98 7.70 120 16.33
Effluent pH max, S.U. 7.6 9.0 15 7.40
Effluent pH min, S.U. 7.1 6.0 19 7.34
Effluent Fecal Coliform, MPN 9 200 95 20.22
Effluent Ammonia, mg/L 0.06 2.1 97 0.06
Effluent Ammonia, lbs./ day 3.5 221 98 3.78
Effluent T-Phos, mg/L 0.24 1.0 76 0.11
Effluent T-Phos, lbs./ day 13.87 105 87 6.64
Effluent CBOD, mg/L 3.1 7.5 59 3.37
Effluent CBOD, lbs./ day 189 788 76 209.62
Effluent TSS, mg/L 1.4 5.0 72 1.53
Effluent TSS, lbs./ day 81 525 85 95.63
Effluent TDS, mg/L 317 500 37
Effluent TDS, lbs./ day 19,796 52,542 62
Effluent Sulfate, mg/L 51 119 57
Effluent Sulfate, lbs./ day 3,360 12,505 73
Effluent Nitrates, mg/L 3.6 Report
Effluent Nitrates, lbs./ day 237 Report
Influent Parameters Value Comments
Influent Flow, MGD 5.97
Influent BOD, lbs./ day 21,512
Influent TSS, lbs./ day 15,383
Influent Ammonia, lbs./ day 892
Influent T-Phos, lbs./ day 231
15 | Page
15
Inframark Process and Compliance Monthly Report
Meeting Date: May 2026 Project: Fayetteville, AR Report Date: 06/04/26 Facility: West
Side WWRF
Attending:
Permit Compliance
Parameter Monthly
Actual
Monthly
Limit
Percent
Available
Weekly
Actual Comments
GC Discharge, MGD 55.12 184.62
Effluent D.O., mg/L 9.20 7.70 19.48 9.50
Effluent pH, min. S.U. 7.23 6.00 20.50 7.11
Effluent pH, max. S.U. 7.36 9.00 18.22 7.11
Effluent Fecal Coliform, MPN 16.60 200.00 91.70 96.50
Effluent CBOD, mg/L 2.47 10.00 75.33 2.00
Effluent CBOD, lbs./ day 326.40 834.00 60.86 231.90
Effluent TSS, mg/L 1.00 10.00 90.00 1.00
Effluent TSS, lbs./ day 134.13 834.00 83.92 115.90
Effluent Ammonia, mg/L 0.09 1.60 94.69 0.38
Effluent Ammonia, lbs./ day 11.83 133.40 91.14 44.10
Effluent T-Phos, mg/L 0.13 1.00 87.00 0.08
Effluent T-Phos, lbs./ day 17.83 83.40 78.62 9.83
Effluent Nitrate, mg/L 2.73 Possible Permit Limit Pending
Influent Parameters Value Comments
Influent Flow, MGD 8.6
Influent BOD lbs./ day 10,054.3
Influent TSS lbs./ day 10,092.1
Influent Ammonia lbs./ day 1,362.1
Influent T-Phos, lbs./ day 250.4
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
WTR - Compliance Evaluation (Individual NPDES)
Site Information
5/21/20261. Evaluation Start Date
7:36 AM2. Evaluation Start Time
72-010333. AFIN
AR00502884. Permit #
1/01/20265. Permit Effective Date
12/31/20306. Permit Expiration Date
Washington7. County
36.0633620, -94.2328358. GPS Coordinates
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
9. Facility Name
15 S BROYLES AVE, FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72704
10. Physical Address
FAYETTEVILLE11. Facility City
Goose Creek12. Name of Receiving Stream
No13. Is this a Joint Evaluation with EPA? Yes
No14. Did the Responsible Official Participate in the Evaluation? Yes
No15. Were there any Additional Participants Present During the
Evaluation?
Yes
Responsible Official
Responsible Official Contact Information
Mayor Molly Rawn1. Name
Mayor2. Title
No3. Is this the Current Responsible Official? Yes
City of Fayetteville4. Legal Name
113 W. Mountain Street5. Mailing Address
(479) 575-83306. Phone
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 1Question/Section triggered based on another answer
SEEK Watermark
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Responsible Official
Mayor@fayetteville-ar.gov
7. Email
No8. Was the Responsible Official Contacted During the Evaluation? Yes
Evaluation Participants (1)
Scott Murphy1. Name
Inframark2. Company Name
Project Manager3. Title
(912) 281-41864. Phone
scott.murphy@inframark.com
5. E-Mail
Evaluation Participants (2)
Thomas Meunier1. Name
Inframark2. Company Name
Operations Supervisor3. Title
4. Phone
5. E-Mail
Evaluation Participants (3)
Jon Vickery1. Name
DEQ2. Company Name
Inspector II3. Title
(501) 837-20944. Phone
Jon.Vickery@arkansas.gov5. E-Mail
Outfall Information (1)
11. Outfall Number
36.061417, -94.2368332. Outfall Coordinates
No3. Is this Outfall Permitted? Yes
8.274. What is the Flow (MGD) at Outfall?
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 2Question/Section triggered based on another answer
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Outfall Information (1)
5/21/20265. Date of Flow Reading
9:05 AM6. Time of Flow Reading
No NA7. Are there Any Outfall Non-Compliance Items Identified? Yes
Record Keeping and Reporting Evaluation
No NA1. Are Records and Reports being Maintained at the Time of the
Evaluation?
Yes
No NA2. Are there Any Record Keeping or Reporting Non-Compliance
Items Identified?
Comments:
The facility retains digital and physical records for the previous three years. Records reviewed during the
evaluation included daily effluent flow records and monthly effluent benchmark data, dating back to
September 2023. The facility uses the WIMS online system for record retention - no items of non-
compliance were identified.
Yes
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 3Question/Section triggered based on another answer
SEEK Watermark
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Operation and Maintenance
No NA1. Is the Treatment Facility Being Properly Operated and
Maintained?
Comments:
Inframark ensures the facility is well-maintained and in adequate operating conditions. One bar screen is
down for maintenance but is not hindering headworks operations. A new grit auger was installed roughly
four (4) months ago after the original deteriorated to inoperable conditions. All submersible mixers in the
anoxic zone were repaired or replaced roughly three (3) months ago. The facility additionally operates
secondary treatment with a modified oxidation ditch. Two of four oxidation ditches are in service - two are
maintained on standby and are switched online once per year to keep all oxidation ditches in operational
rotation. Secondary clarifiers appear in adequate condition - there is evidence of algae build-up on and
around the v-notch weirs. The algae is scrubbed and/or pressure washed every two weeks in attempt to
keep the algae down. There are plans in the next fiscal year to have the clarifier liners replaced. Various
minor cracking is observed on concrete structures throughout the facility - there is evidence showing that
some areas of cracking have been repaired. Mr. Scott Murphy is well-knowledgeable in understanding
when to remediate cracking based on its severity, and the sustainable, long-term methods to remediate
cracks. No leaks or seepages were observed in any concrete structure. There are no items of non-
compliance throughout the remainder of the treatment process.
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:14:00 AM
36.064147
-94.233763
Photo 1: Headworks building with one
bar screen out for maintenance.
377.750000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:15:00 AM
36.064133
-94.233872
Photo 2: Location where the grit auger
has been recently replaced.
374.960000 meters
Photo Comment:
Yes
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 4Question/Section triggered based on another answer
SEEK Watermark
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Operation and Maintenance
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:30:00 AM
36.062397
-94.230422
Photo 3: Anoxic zone.Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:33:00 AM
36.062908
-94.233200
Photo 4: Oxidation ditch.
380.510000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:43:00 AM
36.062844
-94.233788
Photo 5: Splitter box for the clarifiers
where alum can be introduced if needed.
376.330000 meters
Photo Comment:
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 5Question/Section triggered based on another answer
SEEK Watermark
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Operation and Maintenance
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:45:00 AM
36.063041
-94.234147
Photo 6: Example of cracks on the
exterior of the secondary clarifier wall.
389.740000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:45:00 AM
36.063027
-94.234191
Photo 7: Secondary clarifier with algae
build-up and a deteriorating liner.
377.500000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:53:00 AM
36.062580
-94.234955
Photo 8: Sand filters.
367.840000 meters
Photo Comment:
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 6Question/Section triggered based on another answer
SEEK Watermark
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Operation and Maintenance
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 08:58:00 AM
36.062891
-94.235138
Photo 9: UV disinfection building - two
channels in operation.
379.040000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 09:05:00 AM
36.062149
-94.235052
Photo 10: Effluent Parshall flume, 48".
372.840000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 09:11:00 AM
36.061408
-94.236808
Photo 11: Outfall 001 at Goose Creek.
371.680000 meters
Photo Comment:
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 7Question/Section triggered based on another answer
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Operation and Maintenance
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 09:23:00 AM
36.063494
-94.235533
Photo 12: Sludge pump #4 for biosolids
was recently replaced.
375.410000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 09:26:00 AM
36.063494
-94.235533
Photo 13: Example of one of two sludge
belt presses - the belt has thicker mesh
size and different belt press material to
get the highest quality product as able.
379.040000 meters
Photo Comment:
GPS Latitude:
GPS Longitude:
GPS Altitude:
Photo Taken: 05/21/2026 09:35:00 AM
36.063694
-94.235183
Photo 14: Two aerated sludge holding
tanks - there are no digesters at this
facility.
375.090000 meters
Photo Comment:
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 8Question/Section triggered based on another answer
SEEK Watermark
FAYETTEVILLE/ WEST SIDE WWTP
Inspector: William Cody
H93M-W797-EE1
Start Date: 05/20/2026 Completed Date: 05/22/2026
Operation and Maintenance
No NA2. Are there Any Operation and/or Maintenance Non-Compliance
Items Identified?
Yes
Sampling
No NA1. Are there Any Sampling Non-Compliance Items Identified? Yes
Sludge Disposal
No NA1. Are Sludge Records Maintained as Required by 40 CFR 503?
Comments:
Biosolids are either taken to the Tontitown landfill or are taken to the Fayetteville composting facility.
Yes
Exit
1. General Comments
Inframark has done exceptional work to maintain compliance with the NPDES Individual Permit. The facility
is clean, well-maintained, and run by adequately licensed operators.
5/21/20262. Evaluation End Date
10:17 AM3. Evaluation End Time
5/22/2026 11:32 AM 9Question/Section triggered based on another answer
SEEK Watermark