Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026-05-05 - Agendas - Archive
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 City Council Final Agenda Results Tuesday, May 5, 2026 5:30 PM City Hall Room 219 City Council Members Council Member Robert B. Stafford Ward 1 Council Member Dr. D'Andre Jones Ward 1 Council Member Sarah Moore Ward 2 Council Member Mike Wiederkehr Ward 2 Council Member Scott Berna Ward 3 Council Member Sarah Bunch Ward 3 Council Member Teresa Turk Ward 4 Council Member Min. Monique Jones Ward 4 Mayor Molly Rawn City Attorney Kit Williams City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 2 Meeting Information: 1. Webinar ID: 822 5167 5315 Public Registration Link: https://fayetteville-ar.zoom.us/webinar/ register/WN_z0NBFAepTgSWnE8cs0ikFg Public Comment: 1. You may submit a public comment regarding an upcoming City Council agenda item using the below options: 1) You can email your comment to AgendaItemComment@fayetteville-ar.gov 2) You can attend the meeting in person and speak during the public comment period on the item. 3) You can attend the meeting via Zoom and raise your virtual hand during the public comment period on the item. Call to Order Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Mayor' s Announcements, Proclamations and Recognitions City Council Meeting Presentations, Reports and Discussion Items 1. Sales Tax & Monthly Financial Report - Chief Financial Officer Proposed Agenda Additions A. Consent A.1. Change Order with Southern Brothers Construction: A resolution to approve Change Order No. 1 with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $37,950.00 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad. (2026-1257) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 107-26. A.2. Flowers CC&D, LLC (Cost Share Agreement): A resolution to repeal Resolution 278-24 and to approve a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50 for the City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 3 installation of a water line, and to approve a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. (2026-1369) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 108-26. A.3. On-Call Materials Testing Services: A resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #1 and authorize the purchase of on- call materials testing services from McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson Associates, Inc., and GTS, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. (2026-1343) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 109-26. A.4. On-Call Surveying Services: A resolution to award RFQ #26-01, Selection #2 and authorize the purchase of on-call surveying services from Crafton Tull, Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc., and Garver, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. (2026-1350) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 110-26. A.5. Plainview Avenue/Rolling Hills Connection – Contract Amendment with Garver: A resolution to amend the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Garver, LLC for additional design services in the amount of $88,050.00 to continue engineering design on the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. (2026-1383) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 111-26. A.6. S. School Ave. SS4A –Amendment #1 with ISG: A resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with I & S Group, Inc. in the amount of $443,000.00 for additional services on the South School Avenue Safe Streets and Roads for All Project. (2026-1384) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 112-26. A.7. Contract for 7hills Day Center and Walker Family Residential Community: A resolution to waive competitive bidding and authorize a contract with Seven Hills Homeless Center for operations and capital improvements in the total amount of $275,370.00. (2026-1366) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 113-26. City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 4 A.8. Installation of Security Bollards at the Upper Ramble: A resolution to award Bid 26-32 and authorize a contract with Hutton Corporation in the amount of $166,647.00 for the installation of security bollards in the Upper Ramble, to approve a project contingency in the amount of $20,000.00, and to approve a budget amendment. (2026-1390) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 114-26. B. Public Hearing B.1. Ordinance to Adopt 2026 Water & Sewer Rate & Impact Fee Study: An ordinance to amend § 51.136 Monthly Water Rates, §51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates, and §159.02 Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to change water and sewer rates as recommended by the cost of service study conducted by Carollo Engineers. (2026-1386) Passed and shall be recorded as Ordinance 6994. C. Unfinished Business C.1. 516 North Fallin Avenue Sewer Damage Claim: A resolution pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code to authorize a payment of $100,000.00 to Chris Skrocki for a sewer damage claim arising at 516 North Fallin Avenue. (2026-222) At the February 17, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting. At the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting. At the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting. D. New Business D.1. 2825 North Hughmount Road (Sewer Connection): A resolution to allow the extension of the city’s sewerage system beyond the city limits to 2825 North Hughmount Road, under the same conditions as a citizen of Fayetteville could receive such sewer services for new construction. (2026-1392) City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 5 Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 115-26. D.2. Purchase 2400 W. Valley Drive: A resolution to approve the purchase of property located at 2400 West Valley Drive in the amount of $225,000.00, to approve a contingency in the amount of $7,500.00, and to authorize the Mayor to sign all closing documents. (2026- 1311) Passed and shall be recorded as Resolution 116-26. D.3. VAC-2026-0002 West Meadow Street: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-02 for property located at 600 West Meadow Street in Ward 2 to vacate 0.06 acres of general utility easement. (2026-1342) Passed and shall be recorded as Ordinance 6995. D.4. VAC-2026-0001 West Kaywood Lane: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-01 for property located at 1834 West Kaywood Lane in Ward 1 to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of-way. (2026-1341) Passed and shall be recorded as Ordinance 6996. D.5. RZN-2026-0009 West Palmer Place: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 09 for approximately 0.38 acres located at 1660 West Palmer Place in Ward 1 from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 Units Per Acre. (2026-1356) At the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance failed. D.6. RZN-2026-0008 North Garland Avenue (Appeal of Planning Commission Denial): An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 08 for approximately 2.10 acres located at 1705 North Garland Avenue in Ward 2 from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. (2026-1335) Passed and shall be recorded as Ordinance 6997. D.7. Resolution to Express Gratitude for Academic Project: A resolution to express gratitude for academic project to explore and provide considerations for crisis response systems. (2026-1520) At the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled indefinitely. City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 6 E. City Council Tour E.1. Agenda Item D.5: RZN-2026-0009 West Palmer Place: Date & Time: May 4th, 2026 at 3:00 PM. Address: 1660 W. Palmer Pl. Parking: Park on-street along Hartman Ave. to the west. E.2. Agenda Item D.6: RZN-2026-0008 North Garland Avenue (Appeal of Planning Commission Denial): Date & Time: May 4th, 2026 at 4:00 PM. Address: 1705 N. Garland Ave. Parking: Park on-site west of the intersection of Sycamore/Garland. F. Announcements G. Adjournment 9:31 PM (o A90V'da 3ts!510y] MtL�-I-Vlj 1\)CA-es City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 City Council Tentative Agenda Tuesday, April 28, 2026 4:30 PM City Hall Room 219 City Council Members Council Member Robert B. Stafford Ward 1 Council Member Dr. D'Andre Jones Ward 1 Council Member Sarah Moore Ward 2 Council Member Mike Wiederkehr Ward 2 Council Member Scott Berna Ward 3 Council Member Sarah Bunch Ward 3 Council Member Teresa Turk Ward 4 Council Member Min. Monique Jones Ward 4 Mayor Molly Rawn City Attorney Kit Williams City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton Citv Council Meeting Tentative Agenda April 28, 2026 Meeting Information: 1. Webinar ID: 862 2568 1135 Public Registration Link: https://favetteviIle-ar.zoom.us/webinar/ 1, register/WN Jrm-XZ9UR069bS*ZsmGtJw Public Comment: You may submit a public comment regarding an upcoming City Council agenda item using the below options: 1) You can email your comment to Agenda Item Comment(q-�fayetteville-ar.gov 2) You can attend the meeting in person and speak during the public comment period on the item. 3) You can attend the meeting via Zoom and raise your virtual hand during the public comment period on the item. /Call to Order Roll Call V/'V-�Pledge of Allegiance V-1mayor' s Announcements, Proclamations and Recognitions ity Council Meeting Presentations, Reports and Discussion Items 1. Sales Tax & Monthly Financial Report - Chief Financial Officer A�Consent ,A.1. Change Order with Southern Brothers Construction: A resolution to approve Change Order No. 1 with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $37,950.00 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad. (2026-1257) y Flowers CC&D, LLC (Cost Share Agreement): A resolution to repeal Resolution 278-24 and to approve a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50 for the installation of a water line, and to approve a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. (2026-1369) City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 2 Council Meeting Tentative Agenda April 25. 2026 n` }p V 7� 4o� 2825 North Hughmount Road (Sewer Connection): A resolution to allow the extension of the city's sewerage system beyond the city limits to 2825 North Hughmount Road, under the same conditions as a citizen of Fayetteville could receive such sewer services for new construction. (2026-1392) 17 A.J� On -Call Materials Testing Services: A resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #1 and authorize the purchase of on - call materials testing services from McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson Associates, Inc., and GTS, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. (2026-1343) A,6. On -Call Surveying Services: A resolution to award RFQ #26-01, Selection #2 and authorize the purchase of on -call surveying services from Crafton Tull, Hawkins -Weir Engineers, Inc., and Garver, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. (2026-1350) 5 A,6' Plainview Avenue/Rolling Hills Connection — Contract Amendment with Carver: resolution to amend the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Garver, LLC for additional design services in the amount of $88,050.00 to continue engineering design on the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. (2026-1383) i..Q A,X S. School Ave. SS4A —Amendment #1 with ISG: A resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services IN,/Agreement with I & S Group, Inc. in the amount of $443,000.00 for additional services on the South School Avenue Safe Streets and Roads for All Project. (2026-1384) 1 A.8' Contract for 7hills Day Center and Walker Family Residential Community: //A resolution to waive competitive bidding and authorize a contract with Seven Hills Homeless Center for operations and capital improvements in the total amount of $275,370.00. (2026-1366) A,,9: Installation of Security Bollards at the Upper Ramble: A resolution to award Bid 26-32 and authorize a contract with Hutton Corporation in the amount of $166,647.00 for the installation of security bollards in the Upper Ramble, to approve a project contingency in the amount of $20,000.00, and to approve a budget amendment. (2026-1390) nn � �Av. Purchase 2400 W. Valley Drive: 1. A resolution to approve the purchase of property located at 2400 West Valley a Drive in the amount of $225,000.00, to approve a contingency in the amount of ti $7,500.00, and to authorize the Mayor to sign all closing documents. (2026- ��1311) '%,4t3 Cin, of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 3 Citv Council Meeting Tentative Agenda April 28.2026 B. Public Hearing B.I. Ordinance to Adopt 2026 Water & Sewer Rate & Impact Fee Study: An ordinance to amend § 51.136 Monthly Water Rates, §51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates, and §159.02 Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to change water and sewer rates as recommended by the cost of service study conducted by Carollo Engineers. (2026-1386) C. Unfinished Business C.1. 516 North Fallin Avenue Sewer Damage Claim: S A resolution pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code to authorize a payment of $100,000.00 to Chris Skrocki for a sewer damage claim arising at 516 North Fallin Avenue. (2026-222) � O At the February 17, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the �O March 5, 2026 City Council meeting. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting. Jy At the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting. D..New Business Dk VAC-2026-0002 West Meadow Street: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-02 for property located at 600 West Meadow Street in Ward 2 to vacate 0.06 acres of general utility easement. (2026-1342) D� VAC-2026-0001 West Kaywood Lane: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-01 for property located at 1834 West Kaywood X Lane in Ward 1 to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of-way. (2026-1341) D RZN-2026-0009 West Palmer Place: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 09 for approximately 0.38 acres located at 1660 West Palmer Place in Ward 1 from RSF-4, Residential, Single -Family, Four Units Per Acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 Units Per Acre. (2026-1356) D.`. RZN-2026-0008 North Garland Avenue (Appeal of Planning Commission enial): An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 08 for approximately 2.10 acres located at 1705 North Garland Avenue in Ward 2 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 4 Cite ( uuncil Meetin,! 1 entAiN e A'_'e11d;1 April28, 2026 from RSFA Residential, Single -Family, Four Units Per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate -Urban. (2026-1335) D,S'.' Resolution to Express Gratitude for Academic Project: ZA resolution to express gratitude for academic project to explore and provide V considerations for crisis response systems. (2026-1520) E. Proposed Agenda Additions F. City Council Agenda Session Presentations F.1. Opportunities in Crisis Response Presentation by UofA PHD Public Policy V Program Team - Dola Flake, Erica Eneks, Larissa Rocha, and Travis Wagher 0 '.2. Department of Economic Development Quarterly Report -Director of 0 Economic Development Oh r� G. City Council Tour �d� � ui- D5. QZ� -2�ZCP _ �Od'd �20 Zip 035(��1 Vt-I. Announcements C(,Q . _�/'f. Adjournment City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 5 41 DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY TO: Mayor Rawn THRU: Kara Paxton, City Clerk -Treasurer FROM: Blake Pennington, Senior Assistant City Attorney DATE: May 6, 2026 Kit Williams City Attorney Blake Pennington Senior Assistant City Attorney Hannah Hungate Assistant City Attorney Stacy Barnes Paralegal RE: Ordinances and Resolutions prepared by the City Attorney's Office and passed at the City Council meeting of May 5, 2026 A resolution to approve Change Order No. 1 with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $37,950.00 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad. 2. A resolution to repeal Resolution 278-24 and to approve a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50 for the installation of a water line, and to approve a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. A resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #I and authorize the purchase of on -call materials testing services from McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson Associates, Inc., and GTS, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. 4. A resolution to award RFQ #26-01, Selection #2 and authorize the purchase of on -call surveying services from Crafton Tull, Hawkins -Weir Engineers, Inc., and Garver, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. 5. A resolution to amend the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Garver, LLC for additional design services in the amount of $88,050.00 to continue engineering design on the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. 6. A resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with I & S Group, Inc. in the amount of $443,000.00 for additional services on the South School Avenue Safe Streets and Roads for All Project. 7. A resolution to waive competitive bidding and authorize a contract with Seven Hills Homeless Center for operations and capital improvements in the total amount of $275,370.00. 8. A resolution to award Bid 26-32 and authorize a contract with Hutton Corporation in the amount of $166,647.00 for the installation of security bollards in the Upper Ramble, to approve a project contingency in the amount of $20,000.00, and to approve a budget amendment. 9. An ordinance to amend § 51.136 Monthly Water Rates, §51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates, and § 159.02 Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to change water and sewer rates as recommended by the cost of service study conducted by Carollo Engineers. 10. A resolution to allow the extension of the city's sewerage system beyond the city limits to 2825 North Hughmount Road, under the same conditions as a citizen of Fayetteville could receive such sewer services for new construction. 11. A resolution to approve the purchase of property located at 2400 West Valley Drive in the amount of $225,000.00, to approve a contingency in the amount of $7,500.00, and to authorize the Mayor to sign all closing documents. 12. An ordinance to approve VAC-26-02 for property located at 600 West Meadow Street in Ward 2 to vacate 0.06 acres of general utility easement. 13. An ordinance to approve VAC-26-01 for property located at 1834 West Kaywood Lane in Ward 1 to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of-way. 14. An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026-08 for approximately 2.10 acres located at 1705 North Garland Avenue in Ward 2 from RSF-4, Residential, Single -Family, Four Units Per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate -Urban, subject to a Bill of Assurance. 2 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 City Council Tentative Agenda Tuesday, April 28, 2026 4:30 PM City Hall Room 219 City Council Members Council Member Robert B. Stafford Ward 1 Council Member Dr. D'Andre Jones Ward 1 Council Member Sarah Moore Ward 2 Council Member Mike Wiederkehr Ward 2 Council Member Scott Berna Ward 3 Council Member Sarah Bunch Ward 3 Council Member Teresa Turk Ward 4 Council Member Min. Monique Jones Ward 4 Mayor Molly Rawn City Attorney Kit Williams City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton City Council Meeting Tentative Agenda April 28, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 2 Meeting Information: 1. Webinar ID: 862 2568 1135 Public Registration Link: https://fayetteville-ar.zoom.us/webinar/ register/WN_Jrm-XZ9UR069bSjZsmGtJw Public Comment: 1. You may submit a public comment regarding an upcoming City Council agenda item using the below options: 1) You can email your comment to AgendaItemComment@fayetteville-ar.gov 2) You can attend the meeting in person and speak during the public comment period on the item. 3) You can attend the meeting via Zoom and raise your virtual hand during the public comment period on the item. Call to Order Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Mayor' s Announcements, Proclamations and Recognitions City Council Meeting Presentations, Reports and Discussion Items 1. Sales Tax & Monthly Financial Report - Chief Financial Officer A. Consent A.1. Change Order with Southern Brothers Construction: A resolution to approve Change Order No. 1 with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $37,950.00 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad. (2026-1257) A.2. Flowers CC&D, LLC (Cost Share Agreement): A resolution to repeal Resolution 278-24 and to approve a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50 for the installation of a water line, and to approve a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. (2026-1369) City Council Meeting Tentative Agenda April 28, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 3 A.3. 2825 North Hughmount Road (Sewer Connection): A resolution to allow the extension of the city’s sewerage system beyond the city limits to 2825 North Hughmount Road, under the same conditions as a citizen of Fayetteville could receive such sewer services for new construction. (2026-1392) A.4. On-Call Materials Testing Services: A resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #1 and authorize the purchase of on- call materials testing services from McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson Associates, Inc., and GTS, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. (2026-1343) A.5. On-Call Surveying Services: A resolution to award RFQ #26-01, Selection #2 and authorize the purchase of on-call surveying services from Crafton Tull, Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc., and Garver, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. (2026-1350) A.6. Plainview Avenue/Rolling Hills Connection – Contract Amendment with Garver: A resolution to amend the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Garver, LLC for additional design services in the amount of $88,050.00 to continue engineering design on the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. (2026-1383) A.7. S. School Ave. SS4A –Amendment #1 with ISG: A resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with I & S Group, Inc. in the amount of $443,000.00 for additional services on the South School Avenue Safe Streets and Roads for All Project. (2026-1384) A.8. Contract for 7hills Day Center and Walker Family Residential Community: A resolution to waive competitive bidding and authorize a contract with Seven Hills Homeless Center for operations and capital improvements in the total amount of $275,370.00. (2026-1366) A.9. Installation of Security Bollards at the Upper Ramble: A resolution to award Bid 26-32 and authorize a contract with Hutton Corporation in the amount of $166,647.00 for the installation of security bollards in the Upper Ramble, to approve a project contingency in the amount of $20,000.00, and to approve a budget amendment. (2026-1390) A.10. Purchase 2400 W. Valley Drive: A resolution to approve the purchase of property located at 2400 West Valley Drive in the amount of $225,000.00, to approve a contingency in the amount of $7,500.00, and to authorize the Mayor to sign all closing documents. (2026- 1311) City Council Meeting Tentative Agenda April 28, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 4 B. Public Hearing B.1. Ordinance to Adopt 2026 Water & Sewer Rate & Impact Fee Study: An ordinance to amend § 51.136 Monthly Water Rates, §51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates, and §159.02 Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to change water and sewer rates as recommended by the cost of service study conducted by Carollo Engineers. (2026-1386) C. Unfinished Business C.1. 516 North Fallin Avenue Sewer Damage Claim: A resolution pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code to authorize a payment of $100,000.00 to Chris Skrocki for a sewer damage claim arising at 516 North Fallin Avenue. (2026-222) At the February 17, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting. At the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting. D. New Business D.1. VAC-2026-0002 West Meadow Street: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-02 for property located at 600 West Meadow Street in Ward 2 to vacate 0.06 acres of general utility easement. (2026-1342) D.2. VAC-2026-0001 West Kaywood Lane: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-01 for property located at 1834 West Kaywood Lane in Ward 1 to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of-way. (2026-1341) D.3. RZN-2026-0009 West Palmer Place: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 09 for approximately 0.38 acres located at 1660 West Palmer Place in Ward 1 from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 Units Per Acre. (2026-1356) D.4. RZN-2026-0008 North Garland Avenue (Appeal of Planning Commission Denial): An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 08 for approximately 2.10 acres located at 1705 North Garland Avenue in Ward 2 City Council Meeting Tentative Agenda April 28, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 5 from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. (2026-1335) D.5. Resolution to Express Gratitude for Academic Project: A resolution to express gratitude for academic project to explore and provide considerations for crisis response systems. (2026-1520) E. Proposed Agenda Additions F. City Council Agenda Session Presentations F.1. Opportunities in Crisis Response Presentation by UofA PHD Public Policy Program Team - Dola Flake, Erica Eneks, Larissa Rocha, and Travis Wagher F.2. Department of Economic Development Quarterly Report - Director of Economic Development G. City Council Tour H. Announcements I. Adjournment City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 City Council Final Agenda Tuesday, May 5, 2026 5:30 PM City Hall Room 219 City Council Members Council Member Robert B. Stafford Ward 1 Council Member Dr. D'Andre Jones Ward 1 Council Member Sarah Moore Ward 2 Council Member Mike Wiederkehr Ward 2 Council Member Scott Berna Ward 3 Council Member Sarah Bunch Ward 3 Council Member Teresa Turk Ward 4 Council Member Min. Monique Jones Ward 4 Mayor Molly Rawn City Attorney Kit Williams City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 2 Meeting Information: 1. Webinar ID: 822 5167 5315 Public Registration Link: https://fayetteville-ar.zoom.us/webinar/ register/WN_z0NBFAepTgSWnE8cs0ikFg Public Comment: 1. You may submit a public comment regarding an upcoming City Council agenda item using the below options: 1) You can email your comment to AgendaItemComment@fayetteville-ar.gov 2) You can attend the meeting in person and speak during the public comment period on the item. 3) You can attend the meeting via Zoom and raise your virtual hand during the public comment period on the item. Call to Order Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Mayor' s Announcements, Proclamations and Recognitions City Council Meeting Presentations, Reports and Discussion Items 1. Sales Tax & Monthly Financial Report - Chief Financial Officer Proposed Agenda Additions A. Consent A.1. Change Order with Southern Brothers Construction: A resolution to approve Change Order No. 1 with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $37,950.00 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad. (2026-1257) A.2. Flowers CC&D, LLC (Cost Share Agreement): A resolution to repeal Resolution 278-24 and to approve a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50 for the installation of a water line, and to approve a project contingency in the amount of 4,658.00. (2026-1369) City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 3 A.3. On-Call Materials Testing Services: A resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #1 and authorize the purchase of on- call materials testing services from McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson Associates, Inc., and GTS, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. (2026-1343) A.4. On-Call Surveying Services: A resolution to award RFQ #26-01, Selection #2 and authorize the purchase of on-call surveying services from Crafton Tull, Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc., and Garver, Inc. as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. 2026-1350) A.5. Plainview Avenue/Rolling Hills Connection – Contract Amendment with Garver: A resolution to amend the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Garver, LLC for additional design services in the amount of $88,050.00 to continue engineering design on the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. 2026-1383) A.6. S. School Ave. SS4A –Amendment #1 with ISG: A resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with I & S Group, Inc. in the amount of $443,000.00 for additional services on the South School Avenue Safe Streets and Roads for All Project. 2026-1384) A.7. Contract for 7hills Day Center and Walker Family Residential Community: A resolution to waive competitive bidding and authorize a contract with Seven Hills Homeless Center for operations and capital improvements in the total amount of $275,370.00. (2026-1366) A.8. Installation of Security Bollards at the Upper Ramble: A resolution to award Bid 26-32 and authorize a contract with Hutton Corporation in the amount of $166,647.00 for the installation of security bollards in the Upper Ramble, to approve a project contingency in the amount of $20,000.00, and to approve a budget amendment. (2026-1390) B. Public Hearing B.1. Ordinance to Adopt 2026 Water & Sewer Rate & Impact Fee Study: An ordinance to amend § 51.136 Monthly Water Rates, §51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates, and §159.02 Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to change water and sewer rates as recommended by the cost of service study conducted by Carollo Engineers. (2026-1386) City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 4 C. Unfinished Business C.1. 516 North Fallin Avenue Sewer Damage Claim: A resolution pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code to authorize a payment of $100,000.00 to Chris Skrocki for a sewer damage claim arising at 516 North Fallin Avenue. (2026-222) At the February 17, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting. At the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting, this resolution was tabled to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting. D. New Business D.1. 2825 North Hughmount Road (Sewer Connection): A resolution to allow the extension of the city’s sewerage system beyond the city limits to 2825 North Hughmount Road, under the same conditions as a citizen of Fayetteville could receive such sewer services for new construction. (2026- 1392) D.2. Purchase 2400 W. Valley Drive: A resolution to approve the purchase of property located at 2400 West Valley Drive in the amount of $225,000.00, to approve a contingency in the amount of 7,500.00, and to authorize the Mayor to sign all closing documents. (2026- 1311) D.3. VAC-2026-0002 West Meadow Street: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-02 for property located at 600 West Meadow Street in Ward 2 to vacate 0.06 acres of general utility easement. (2026-1342) D.4. VAC-2026-0001 West Kaywood Lane: An ordinance to approve VAC-26-01 for property located at 1834 West Kaywood Lane in Ward 1 to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of-way. (2026-1341) D.5. RZN-2026-0009 West Palmer Place: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 09 for approximately 0.38 acres located at 1660 West Palmer Place in Ward 1 from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre to RSF-8, Residential Single Family, 8 Units Per Acre. (2026-1356) City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 5 D.6. RZN-2026-0008 North Garland Avenue (Appeal of Planning Commission Denial): An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026- 08 for approximately 2.10 acres located at 1705 North Garland Avenue in Ward 2 from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. (2026-1335) D.7. Resolution to Express Gratitude for Academic Project: A resolution to express gratitude for academic project to explore and provide considerations for crisis response systems. (2026-1520) E. City Council Tour E.1. Agenda Item D.5: RZN-2026-0009 West Palmer Place: Date & Time: May 4th, 2026 at 3:00 PM. Address: 1660 W. Palmer Pl. Parking: Park on-street along Hartman Ave. to the west. E.2. Agenda Item D.6: RZN-2026-0008 North Garland Avenue (Appeal of Planning Commission Denial): Date & Time: May 4th, 2026 at 4:00 PM. Address: 1705 N. Garland Ave. Parking: Park on-site west of the intersection of Sycamore/Garland. F. Announcements G. Adjournment NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE All interested persons may appear and address the City Council on Unfinished Business, New Business, and Public Hearings at City Council meetings. If you wish to address the City Council on an agenda item, please wait for the Mayor or Chair to request public comment. When the Mayor or Chair recognizes you, please start your public comment by giving your name and address. Comments are to be addressed to the Mayor or Chair. The Mayor or Chair will direct your comments to the appropriate elected officials, staff, or others for response. Keep your comments respectful, brief, to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered. Each speaker from the public will be allowed one turn to speak for discussion of an agenda item. Below is a portion of the Rules of Order and Procedure of the Fayetteville City Council pertaining to City Council meetings: City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 6 Agenda Additions: A new item which is requested to be added to the agenda at a City Council meeting should only be considered if it requires immediate City Council consideration and if the normal agenda setting process is not practical. The City Council may only place such new item on the City Council meeting's agenda by suspending the rules by two-thirds vote. Such agenda addition shall be heard prior to the Consent Agenda. Consent Agenda: Consent Agenda items shall be read by the Mayor and voted upon as a group without discussion by the City Council. If a Council Member wishes to comment upon or discuss a Consent Agenda item that item shall be removed and considered immediately after the Consent Agenda has been voted upon. Unfinished Business and New Business: Overview Period: Agenda items at a City Council meeting shall be introduced by the Mayor and, if an ordinance, read by the City Attorney. City staff shall then present a report. An agenda applicant city contractor, rezoning or development applicant, appellant from a final decision of the Planning Commission or City Staff, etc.) may present its proposal only during this presentation period but may be recalled by a Council Member later to answer questions. City staff, Council Members and applicants may use electronic visual aids in the City Council meeting as part of the presentation of the agenda item. City staff’s presentation and an Applicant’s presentation whether presented by one or more than one presenter shall each be limited to a maximum of ten (10) minutes unless the City Council by unanimous consent or majority vote allows additional time. Public Comments: Public comment at a City Council meeting shall be allowed on all items of unfinished and new business and subjects of public hearings. Amendments may receive public comments only if approved by the City Council by unanimous consent or majority vote. Speakers present in the City Council Chambers shall be recognized before speakers participating by electronic means. Speakers shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes to discuss the agenda item or amendment being considered by the City Council. The City Council may allow a speaker additional time by unanimous consent or majority vote. As part of a person’s public comments allowed above, the speaker may use electronic visual aids during their three (3) minutes presentation period concerning the agenda item being considered by the City Council. Courtesy and Respect: All members of the public, all city staff and elected officials shall accord the utmost courtesy and respect to each other at all times. All shall refrain from comments that are harassing or amount to a personal attack against any identifiable individual including abusive comments and derogatory remarks about integrity or offer any other comments that are also not limited to the discussion of the specific agenda item being considered by the City Council. Any member of the public who violates these standards shall be ruled out of order by the Mayor, must immediately cease speaking and shall leave the podium. Cell Phones and Pagers: Cell phones must be turned off or put in silent mode and not used within the City Council Chambers during City Council meetings. Pagers must be turned off or put in silent mode within the City Council Chambers during City Council meetings. These restrictions also apply during Agenda Sessions. Smoking Prohibited: There will be no smoking allowed in the City Council Chambers during City Council meetings. Interpreters or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD), for hearing impaired are available for all City Council meetings, a 72-hour advance notice is required. For further information or to City Council Meeting Final Agenda May 5, 2026 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas page 7 request an interpreter, please call 479-575-8330. A copy of the complete City Council agenda is available on our website at www.fayetteville-ar.gov or in the Office of the City Clerk, 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas (479) 575-8323. Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1257 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Peter Nierengarten, Environmental Director SUBJECT: Approval of a reconciliation change order with Southern Brothers Construction RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of a reconciliation change order with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $37,950 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad BACKGROUND: On January 6, 2026, the Fayetteville City Council approved a contract (Resolution 19-26) with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $233,068.18, for concrete repairs to the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad and recycling processing facility baler pit. DISCUSSION: During demolition of the compost pad, it was discovered that the existing concrete was thicker than anticipated the plans showed 6” of existing concrete but the actual field conditions were 8” - 10” of concrete. Discovery of this additional concrete depth and other unknown field conditions resulted in unanticipated work for the contractor: Provide & place additional 2" of concrete paving Additional concrete paving area Added cost to cut out existing concrete footing discovered under the middle of the pad Added cost for concrete repairs along the edge of the paving due to flaking and minor blemishes The attached reconciliation change order accounts for the cost of these additional quantities and changes the total contract price to $271,018.18. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: The cost of the change order will be paid for using the remaining contingency in this project and previously budgeted project funds. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Transfer Station PCCO#1_For Signature Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1257 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WITH SOUTHERN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,950.00 FOR ADDITIONAL CONCRETE WORK ON THE RECYCLING AND TRASH COLLECTIONS COMPOST PAD WHEREAS, on January 6, 2026, City Council approved Resolution 19-26 authorizing a contract with Southern Brothers Construction for concrete repairs to the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad and recycling processing facility baler pit; and WHEREAS, during demolition of the compost pad, it was discovered that the existing concrete was thicker than anticipated, and other field conditions resulted in unanticipated work for the contractor; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 will provide for additional concrete paving and concrete repairs. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes Mayor Rawn to sign Change Order No. 1 to the contract with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of 37,950.00 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad. Comments: 2026-00000266PurchaseOrderNumber: Change Order Number:1 Previous Ordinance or Resolution #19-26 Approval Date:1/6/2026 Original Contract Number: 20006.1 Project Number Budget Impact: RTC - Compost Site Improvements Fund Recycling and TrashCollections5500.750.5080-5816.00 Account Number Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1257 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only Approve a reconciliation change order with Southern Brothers Construction in the amount of $37.950 for additional concrete work on the Recycling and Trash Collections compost pad repairs N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Peter Nierengarten RECYCLING/TRASH COLLECTION (750) Division / Department 4/2/2026 Submitted Date Yes 445,421.13$ 37,950.00$ Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Amendment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Amendment Remaining Budget 675,873.00$ 230,451.87$ Yes No 407,471.13$ Southern Brothers Construction,LLC 2156 E Emma Ave,Suite C Springdale,Arkansas 72764 Phone:479)313-7120 Project:26.002.000 Fayetteville Transfer Station Prime Contract Change Order 001:CE 002 Additional 2"of Concrete Paving TO:City of Fayetteville 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville,Arkansas 72701 FROM:Southern Brothers Construction,LLC 2156 E Emma St,Suite C Springdale,Arkansas 72764 DATE CREATED:4/02/2026 CREATED BY:Mike Manthei Southern Brothers Construction,LLC) CONTRACT STATUS:Pending Revised REVISION:0 DESIGNATED REVIEWER:REVIEWED BY: DUE DATE:REVIEW DATE: INVOICED DATE:PAID DATE: SCHEDULE IMPACT:EXECUTED:No REVISED SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE: SIGNED CHANGE ORDER RECEIVED DATE: CONTRACT FOR:1:Fayetteville Transfer Station Improvements TOTAL AMOUNT:$37,950.00 DESCRIPTION: CE 002 Additional 2"of Concrete Paving Cost associated with additional concrete scope due to unforeseen items,further scope requested by the city,etc. Provide place additional 2"of concrete paving at the Compost Facility due to existing conditions.Documents show 6"concrete.Actual field condition is 8-10". Additional concrete paving at section panels that city added at time of site walk. Cost to cut out existing concrete discovered in middle of the pad. Cost for concrete repairs along the edge of the paving due to flaking and minor blemishes ATTACHMENTS: Transfer Station Subgrade Demo.pdf,Transfer Station Additonal R&R.pdf,Transfer Station Additional 2''Concrete Rev.pdf,Transfer Station Demoliton Rev.pdf POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDERS IN THIS CHANGE ORDER: PCO Title Schedule Impact Amount 001 CE 002 Additional 2"of Concrete Paving $37,950.00 Total:37,950.00 CHANGE ORDER LINE ITEMS: PCO 001:CE 002 Additional 2"of Concrete Paving Budget Code Description Amount 1 32-321313.S Site Paving Concrete ADD 2"Concrete Paving $7,700.00 2 02-024119.S Sawcut Remove Existing Compost Pad Additional Demo $1,300.00 3 02-024119.S Sawcut Remove Existing Compost Pad Additional Concrete Section $3,500.00 4 02-024119.S Sawcut Remove Existing Compost Pad Additional Concrete Discovered $22,000.00 5 01-007233.O Contractor/GC Fee.Other OH&P $3,450.00 Grand Total:$37,950.00 Southern Brothers Construction,LLC Page 1 of 2 Printed On:4/2/2026 01:28 PM PCCO 001 The original Contract Sum)$233,068.18 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $0.00 The contract sum prior to this Change Order was $233,068.18 The contract sum would be changed by this Change Order in the amount of 37,950.00 The new contract sum including this Change Order will be $271,018.18 The contract time will not be changed by this Change Order. Matt Loos Olsson)City of Fayetteville Southern Brothers Construction,LLC 3537 North Steele Blvd.Suite 310 113 West Mountain Street 2156 E Emma St,Suite C Fayetteville,Arkansas 72703 Fayetteville,Arkansas 72701 Springdale,Arkansas 72764 ProcoreArchitectSignHere ProcoreArchitectSignedDate ProcoreOwnerSignHere ProcoreOwnerSignedDate ProcoreGeneralContractorSignHere ProcoreGeneralContractorSignedDate SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE Southern Brothers Construction,LLC Page 2 of 2 Printed On:4/2/2026 01:28 PM PCCO 001 4/2/202604/02/2026 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1369 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Tim Nyander, Utilities Director SUBJECT: Flowers CC&D, LLC - Water Line Cost Share near the corner of East Rock Street and South Willow Avenue RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends repealing Resolution 278-24 and approving a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50, for a water line cost share near the corner of East Rock Street and South Willow Avenue, and approval of a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. BACKGROUND: Tommie Flowers Davis with Flowers CC&D, LLC owns property near East Rock Street and South Willow Avenue. Resolution 278-24 approved a cost share on November 1, 2024 for constructing a waterline that will serve these properties and other additional neighboring properties. DISCUSSION: This cost share has not been utilized yet, but the applicant wished to proceed. Due to the length of time that has passed, new bids were requested. Sweetser Construction submitted the lowest construction bid in the amount of $40,254.00. Additionally, there are engineering costs in the amount of $6,325.00. Staff recommends approval of a cost share agreement in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50 with Flowers CC&D, LLC for 50% of the cost of engineering and construction costs, and approval of a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funds are available in the Water & Sewer Cost Sharing account within the Water & Sewer fund. The current open purchase order for the 2024 cost share will be closed, and a new purchase order will be issued. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Cost Share Request Letter, 5. Cost Share Agreement Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1369 A RESOLUTION TO REPEAL RESOLUTION 278-24 AND TO APPROVE A COST SHARE AGREEMENT WITH FLOWERS CC&D, LLC IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $23,289.50 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER LINE, AND TO APPROVE A PROJECT CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,658.00 WHEREAS, on November 1, 2024, City Council approved Resolution 278-24 approving a cost share agreement for constructing a waterline that will serve properties near East Rock Street and South Willow Avenue; and WHEREAS, this cost share has not been utilized, but the applicant wishes to proceed; and WHEREAS, new bids were requested due to the length of time that has passed and Sweetser Construction submitted the lowest construction bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby repeals Resolution 278-24 in its entirety. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50 for the installation of a water line, and further approves a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1369 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item Tim Nyander 4/15/2026 WATER SEWER (720) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Staff recommends repealing Resolution 278-24 and approving a cost share agreement with Flowers CC&D, LLC in an amount not to exceed $23,289.50, for a waterline cost share near the corner of East Rock Street and South Willow Avenue, and approval of a project contingency in the amount of $4,658.00. Budget Impact: 5400.720.5600-5808.00 Water and Sewer Account Number Fund 04039.1 Water & Sewer Cost Sharing Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item?Yes Total Amended Budget $2,275,739.00 Expenses (Actual+Encum)$1,210,643.30 Available Budget $1,065,095.70 Does item have a direct cost?Yes Item Cost $27,947.50 Is a Budget Amendment attached?No Budget Amendment $- Remaining Budget $1,037,148.20 Purchase Order Number:Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Change Order Number:Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Comments: March 4, 2026 To: Corey Granderson CC: Water and Sewer Committee; City Council Hi Corey, I am writing to formally request a modification to the existing Flowers Rock Street Project cost-share agreement for the water line, APPROVED November 2024. The proposed line facilitates immediate infill development, expands service opportunities for this and multiple adjacent parcels left without service after the City abandoned a previously active water line, and supports the City’s 2040 goals. This line addition will provide water to six new 1-bedroom units on +/- 0.16 acres of irregularly-shaped buildable area within a +/- 0.46 acre property re-zoned Urban Neighborhood in 2025. That makes 1 unit per 0.078 gross acres, including green space, parking, and walkways – or more than 12 units per acre. Yet these six units only occupy 2,252 SF (+/- 0.05 acres), leaving almost the entire remaining 0.41 acres as natural open space. These attainable housing units are naturally more affordable. This update is being requested due to a number of reasons, including an attempt to coordinate utilities with other developers who have a project on the east side of the alley from my project, Wes Bates and Konrad Siemek. An attempt to coordinate utilities for both projects resulted in complicating matters, resulting in the need to redirect my time and resources back to the original scope of my waterline cost-share request. My attempt to collaborate with these developers was based on a need to create and foster positive relationships with adjoining property owners through collaboration. Unfortunately, the challenges related to coordinating utilities resulted in further complications and a decision to circle back to my original plan. The passage of time has resulted in increasing costs. Three bids were secured from the previous three companies that initially bid on my project attached). The initial scope of my project is connecting to the line on S. Willow Ave, running east and west down an alley; the alley will intersect with an alley that runs north and south, at which time it will take a 90 degree (two 45 degree bends) turn north in the alley toward Rock Street. My townhomes at 249 and 261(5units) will tie into the waterline. This design is less complicated than the design created by Wes, which results in a 20 foot easement that crosses their property. The revised proposals have resulted in Sweetser Construction submitting the lowest bid of 38,254. Additional costs related to the waterline include Odyssey/Flintlock engineering charges $6,325.(pd, invoices attached). Staking the waterline will be completed by Bates and Associates: proposed cost $2,000. The proposed development adds an efficient density of units within the downtown Tier 1 Center in Fayetteville’s 2040 plan growth concept map. It’s directly adjacent to two public parks and walkable to downtown and public transit. It supports and directly enables the City’s following 2040 Plan goals: 1. We will make appropriate infill and revitalization our highest priority 2. We will discourage suburban sprawl o 3.2.2. Direct capital improvements into infrastructure that encourages and supports infill and revitalization. 3. We will make compact, complete, and connected development the standard 6. We will create opportunities for attainable housing o 3.6.1 Increase housing choices by encouraging a mixture of housing types and sizes dispersed throughout the city and in proximity to transit and active transportation networks The original cost share reflected: City of Fayetteville – 50% Tommie Flowers Davis (Parcels: 765-06329-000 & 765-06328-000) This cost share effort is directly enabling the extension of utilities to currently underserved properties and making it financially feasible to add density through infill development. It supports improved service coverage and long-term community growth. In conversing with the Mayor’s office, I have been assured that my financial responsibility will not exceed the original amount determined in the initial cost-share agreement. I respectfully request that the City proceed with modifying the original approved water line cost-share agreement (2024 Flowers Rock Street Project) to reflect the updated project cost, as outlined above. Thank you for your continued attention to this project and your assistance in advancing this infrastructure improvement. Best regards, Tommie Flowers Davis Tommie Flowers Davis Page 1 of 2 WATER MAIN INSTALLATION COST SHARE AGREEMENT This Agreement, made and entered into on this _____ day of May, 2026, by and between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas (“City”) and Flowers CC&D, LLC (“Flowers”), witnesseth: WHEREAS, Tommie Flowers Davis with Flowers CC&D, LLC has requested that the City share in the cost of constructing a 2-inch water main near the corner of East Rock Street and South Willow Avenue, a distance of approximately 282 linear feet, so that Flowers may develop a property located on East Rock Street; and WHEREAS, constructing this segment of 2-inch water main will provide for ample future capacity which the City recognizes will be necessary for the area that is served by this water main. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas and Flowers CC&D, LLC agree as follows: 1. The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas agrees to: A. Reimburse Flowers CC&D, LLC for 50.0% of the cost to install approximately 284 linear feet of 2-inch water main in the area identified in Exhibit “A” up to a maximum-not-to-exceed amount of 23,289.50, as was estimated by the builder’s representatives and shown on Exhibit “B”, attached. B. Payments due to Flowers CC&D, LLC shall be remitted within sixty 60) days after receipt of valid invoices. 2. Flowers CC&D, LLC agrees to: A. Provide the necessary and normal project management, inspection, and testing as necessary for a complete and acceptable water main installation, including submittal of plans and specifications to the City’s Engineering Department, per their standard procedures. B. Provide a copy of the invoices from the Contractor upon City approval of the water main upgrade. C. Pay for the water main installation (with reimbursement of 50.0% of the cost by the City of Fayetteville in a not -to -exceed amount of $23,289.50). IN AGREEMENT WITH ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ABOVE, WE SIGN BELOW: FLOWERS CC&D, LLC CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS r By. TOMMIE FL tVER5 ITAiVIS, Owner ATTEST: MOLLY RAWN, Mayor ATTEST: By: By: KARA PAXTON, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 Exhibit A 0 0.01 0.010 mi 3URSRVHG inFK :DtHUOiQH ExtHQtiRQ Approximately 284 linear feet EXHIBIT B 1 Granderson, Corey From:Tommie Flowers Davis <tflowersd@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, March 6, 2026 11:21 AM To:Granderson, Corey Cc:Alli Thurmond Quinlan Subject:Re: Flowers Rock St waterline CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Fayetteville. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning, Charlie contacted me back and said to add $2000 to the staking, although it may be a little high. Another company does their staking for Sweetser. Everything else should be ok. Thank you On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 7:26 AM Granderson, Corey <cgranderson@fayetteville-ar.gov> wrote: Tommie, Alli, I’ve tried to summarize the original cost share and the proposed, updated cost share below. I still lack the engineering construction services (staking, inspections, etc.) number from you. Otherwise does this all look correct? We publish the agenda for Tuesday night today by noon, I’ve got a few meetings this morning but will keep an eye on email to help get this completed on time. 124 Grant Place, Suite E Lowell, AR 72745 Office: 479-717-7474 Item # QTY Unit Unit Price Total 1 a.1 LS $3,200.00 $3,200.00 b.1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Demo Total $5,700.00 Item # QTY Unit Unit Price Total 1 a.300 LF $20.00 $6,000.00 b.1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 c.1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 d.1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 e. 2 EA $900.00 $1,800.00 f. 50 TNS $24.00 $1,200.00 g.300 LF $1.50 $450.00 Water Total $17,950.00 QTY Unit Unit Price Total 1 a.1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500.00 b. 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500.00 c.1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 d.1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Misc. Total $21,000.00 Total Total $44,650.00 2" Waterline (PVC ASTM D-2241 SDR 13.5) Testing Tapping Sleeve and Valve 6x2 2" Blow Off Assembly Demo Clearing and grubbing Demo Haul-off Description Flowers Waterline Extension Per Revised Plans Dated: 07/29/2024 Preliminary Cost Estimate Sitework Utilities Description Water Backfill Gravel 2" 90° Bend and Thrust Block Waterline Fittings Material testing Miscellaneous- included in total Signage Plumbing Description Misc. General Conditions Equipment Mobilization Data Prep, Staking & Layout Exclusions Electrical Landscaping/ Tree Planting Bonding General Scope Limitations A-CO CONSTRUCTION CIVIL CONSTRUCTION EXCLUSIONS, CLARIFICATIONS & INFORMATIVE NOTICE** The following Exclusions, Clarifications, and Informative Notices are provided as an integral part of A-CO Construction’s proposal. These statements are intended to outline the limits of our scope, define responsibility for undisclosed conditions, and ensure project expectations are clearly understood prior to mobilization. Unless otherwise noted in writing, all items listed below shall apply in full. Schedule & Production Delays All work performed by A-CO Construction is limited solely to the items, quantities, and details explicitly listed in the proposal. Any item not specifically listed or quantified shall be considered excluded—even if commonly associated with this type of work. No verbal agreements or assumptions shall modify scope unless documented and approved through written change procedures. Undisclosed / Unforeseen Conditions A-CO Construction is not responsible for concealed or unknown conditions including, but not limited to: unmarked utilities, buried obstructions, unsuitable soil, unknown infrastructure, environmental hazards, or items not shown on plans. Work will pause in affected areas until evaluation is completed. Additional work caused by these conditions shall be treated as Extra Work and addressed through a formal Change Order. Change Orders & Plan Revisions Any deviation from the original issued drawings, specifications, or bid documents requires a written Change Order. A-CO Construction will halt production until revised drawings or instructions are formally received and reviewed. No extra or revised work will be performed without written authorization. Time or cost impacts caused by late revisions are not the responsibility of A-CO Construction. Client/Owner Responsibilities The Client/Owner must provide complete, accurate, and coordinated plan sets. Missing dimensions, incomplete details, conflicting elevations, or unspecified information must be clarified prior to execution. Delays or cost impacts due to missing or revised information will be handled through Change Orders. Site Access & Coordination A-CO Construction is not liable for delays resulting from restricted access, unprepared work areas, or coordination failures by others. Site must be accessible and clear of unrelated trades unless otherwise agreed. Any relocation, cleanup, or additional preparation outside A-CO’s scope will be treated as Extra Work. Materials & Equipment Only materials explicitly listed in the proposal are included. Upgrades or specification changes require a Change Order. Temporary utilities (water, power, lighting) shall be provided by others unless stated otherwise. Material delays or price escalations outside contractor control may result in schedule or cost adjustments. This informational section protects both parties by clarifying scope limits and eliminating assumptions. Any work not expressly included, or any condition not disclosed prior to bidding, shall be handled as additional work through a formal Change Order. Acceptance of the proposal includes acceptance of these terms. Proposed schedule assumes uninterrupted workflow and access. Delays caused by other trades, design issues, owner decisions, permitting, or late plan revisions may lead to extensions or added costs. If delays prevent continuous work, A-CO Construction may demobilize and remobilization costs may apply. Inspections & Testing Inspections, testing, compaction reports, engineering verification, and third-party services are excluded unless explicitly included. A-CO Construction is not responsible for delays due to failed tests, engineering hold-ups, or design changes resulting from testing. Warranty Limitations Warranty applies only to workmanship within A-CO’s contracted scope. Warranty does not cover failures resulting from design defects, improper maintenance, damage by other trades, subsurface conditions, or modifications made after turnover without authorization. Final Clarification NO.QUANTITIY UNIT 1 1 EA 2 300 LF 3 1 EA 4 EA 5 1 LS 6 EA 7 1 LS 8 1 LS SUBTOTAL 63,290.00$ ALT $450.00 NO.QUANTITIY UNIT 0.00 ALT $450.00 WATER DESCRIPTION CONNECTION TO EXISTING MAIN LINE 2' WATER LINE INSTALLATION BLOWOFF ASSEMBLEY INSTALLATION DOUBLE 5/8" SERVICE SETTING INSTALLATION SY-CON EXCAVATION AND UTILITIES, LLC 261 N HWY 62 ROGERS, AR 72756 PH. (479) 278-4043 FLOWERS WATERLINE EXTENSION BID DATE:2/26/26 PLANS DATED :7/29/24 All bonding, tap impact fees, and Site Layout NOT included in pricing** Trench Rock Removal 3 PRESSURE TESTING /INSPECTIONS AS NEEDED MOBILIZATION 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES STREET PATCHING PER FAYETTEVILLE SPEC CY SEWER DESCRIPTION This bid is all inclusive any deductions or alterations will affect pricing. Excludes all bonding and tap fees. Site Layout not included in pricing** WATER AND SEWER SUBTOTAL BID $ 63,290.00 All bonding, tap impact fees, and Site Layout NOT included in pricing*SUBTOTAL Trench Rock Removal CY ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 2" CLASS 315 WATER LINE LF 300 125.00$ 37,500.00$ CONNECTION TO EXISTING MAIN LS 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ FITTINGS & THRUST BLOCKING LS 1 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$ BLOW OFF HYDRANT EA 1 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 5/8" SERVICE SETTINGS EA 3 2,500.00$ 7,500.00$ MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,790.00$ 2,790.00$ TOTAL 63,290.00$ FLOWER ST WATER LINE UNIT PRICING Scope Boundaries – Standard Exclusions The following exclusions are standard for Sy-Con Excavation & Utilities and are included to clearly define responsibilities, avoid scope overlap, and ensure fair allocation of cost and risk. These exclusions are not intended to delay work, but to maintain clarity and prevent misunderstandings. Utility layout, surveying & as-builts – Typically provided by the GC or a licensed surveyor under a separate contract. Taking on this responsibility would add time, liability, and costs not included in our bid. City impact fees, including meter fees and large tap impact fees – Paid directly to the municipality by the Owner or GC; not a construction cost. Density testing for compaction – Performed by an independent testing agency for impartial results; outside our scope and pricing. Hauling of materials not generated by Sy-Con's work – Prevents scope creep by limiting hauling to materials from our contracted work. Hydrant extensions due to grade discrepancies – Considered a change in site conditions and addressed via change order. Loss of progress due to design or plan errors – Protects against unrecoverable labor/equipment costs caused by factors beyond our control. Concrete washout – Requires specialized containment and disposal procedures not included in our bid. Relocation or removal of existing utilities (unless noted in proposal) – Often unpredictable and requires separate scope, coordination, and pricing. Plumbing connections beyond meter settings – Falls under licensed plumbing scope; meters excluded unless stated otherwise. Concrete, sidewalk, or asphalt replacement from utility installation (unless noted in proposal) – Avoids absorbing significant paving costs outside the utility scope. Tree or shrub removal/replacement – Landscaping work is a separate trade and not included in utility installation. Bonding costs – Performance and payment bonds excluded unless specifically included in pricing. Permit fees – Typically handled and paid for by GC to align with prime contract requirements. Private plumbing scope – Outside of public utility installation work and not included in our bid. City Fire Hydrant flow testing costs - SY CON does not have this cost in any bids Item Type Description Amount Construction Plan Set & Documentation Prepare Design Drawings per AHJ & State Requirements. Plan set to include at a minimum: Water Main Plan, Profile, and Details. Record Drawings and As-Builts not included in scope. This line item will be billed as an hourly not-to-exceed of $1,500. 950 Billed previously on 10/31/24 550.00 Additional Services Additional Civil Engineering Services including revisions to plans per City comments and coordination of waterline through City approval. This line item will be billed as an Hourly Not-To-Exceed $2,000 500.00 Amount Due $1,050.00 Notes Thank you for choosing Odyssey Engineering. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to ctilley@odysseynwa.com or call us at 479-480-3330. If paying by credit card a 3% processing fee will be added to your invoice(s). From Odyssey Engineering LLC 124 Grant Place, Suite E Lowell, AR 72745 WE HAVE MOVED** Invoice For Tommie Flowers-DavisInvoiceIDINV-0272 Issue Date 12/20/2024 Due Date 01/19/2025 (Net 30) Subject [ODY0052] Flowers Waterline Extension Page 1 of 1 Item Type Description Amount Additional Services Additional Civil Engineering Services including revisions to plans per City comments and coordination of waterline through City approval. This line item will be billed as an Hourly Not-To-Exceed $2,000. 500 Billed previously on 12/20/24 1,500.00 Amount Due $1,500.00 Notes Thank you for choosing Odyssey Engineering. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to ctilley@odysseynwa.com or call us at 479-480-3330. If paying by credit card a 3% processing fee will be added to your invoice(s). From Odyssey Engineering LLC 124 Grant Place, Suite E Lowell, AR 72745 Invoice For Tommie Flowers-DavisInvoiceIDINV-0319 Issue Date 04/30/2025 Due Date 05/30/2025 (Net 30) Subject [ODY0052] Flowers Waterline Extension Page 1 of 1 WODYSSEYNGINEERING Invoice ID INV-0114 Issue Date 10/31/2023 Due Date 11 /30/2023 (Net 30) Subject ODY0052] Flowers Waterline Extension Item Type Construction Plan Set & Documentation Description From Odyssey Engineering LLC 117 Parkwood St., Suite 101 Lowell, AR 72745 Invoice For Tommie Flowers Prepare Design Drawings per AHJ & State Requirements. Plan set to include at a minimum: Water Main Plan, Profile, and Details. Amount Due Amount 950.00 950.00 Notes Thank you for choosing Odyssey Engineering. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to ctilley@odysseynwa.com or call us at 479-480-3330. If paying by credit card a 3% processing fee will be added to your invoice(s). pp,ID paid in full on 2/j/24 Page 1 of 1 fl] 4,- nt1oc ARCHITECTURE 'LANDSCAPE Billed To Tommie Flowers Davis Date of Issue 10/31 /2024 Due Date 11 /30/2024 Invoice Number 356989 Flintlock Ltd 479.305.4807 512 N Mission Blvd Fayetteville, AR 72701 Amount Due (USD) 2,825-00 Description Rate Qty Line Total Rock St Water Line Location Design + Coordination with City $250.00 7.5 $1,875.00 of Fayetteville + Site Plans Odyssey Engineering Pass Through Cost $950.00 1 $950.00 Water Line Design for Rock St Extension Subtotal 2,825.00 Tax 0.00 Total 2,825.00 Amount Paid 0.00 Amount Due (USD) $2,825.00 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1343 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Chris Brown, Public Works Director FROM: Justin Bland, City Engineer SUBJECT: On-Call materials services as needed RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #1 to McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson, Inc. and GTS, Inc. as primary providers based on rates provided and availability for on-call materials services as needed through April 30, 2027. BACKGROUND: As part of each of the City’s street, drainage, water and sewer projects, a materials testing lab is contracted to perform materials testing for the design and construction. The testing includes asphalt, gravel base, concrete and various other materials used during the construction of these projects. The testing is done to ensure that the materials and the installation meet the City requirements and the project’s specifications. DISCUSSION: An engineering selection committee selected McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson, Inc. and GTS, Inc. to be used for on-call materials testing services for street, drainage and utilities projects through April 30, 2027. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funds for the material testing have been budgeted in various capital projects with the Sales Tax Capital Improvements Fund, the Transportation Bond Fund, Drainage Bond Fund and the Water and Sewer Fund. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Olsson Hourly Fee Sheet, 5. GTS Hourly Fee Sheet, 6. MCE Hourly Fee Sheet Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1343 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD RFQ 26-01, SELECTION #1 AND AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF ON-CALL MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FROM MCCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., OLSSON ASSOCIATES, INC., AND GTS, INC. AS NEEDED THROUGH APRIL 30, 2027, WITHIN THE APPROVED BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby awards RFQ 26-01, Selection #1 and authorizes the purchase of on-call materials services from McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson Associates, Inc., and GTS, Inc. for the rates attached to this Resolution and based on availability as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Project Number Budget Impact: FundAccountNumber Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1343 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only Approval of a resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #1 to McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc., Olsson, Inc. and GTS, Inc. as primary providers based on rates provided and availability for on-call materials services as needed through April 30, 2027. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Sara Combs ENGINEERING (621) Division / Department 4/10/2026 Submitted Date No V20221130 Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Adjustment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget No No -$ 2026 Field Operations Services Unit Rate Schedule Special Inspections and Construction Materials Testing Services Testing Services (3-Hour Minimum) Field Technician ................................................................................................Hour $75.00 Senior Technician ..............................................................................................Hour $90.00 Steel Technician ................................................................................................Hour $110.00 Field Manager ....................................................................................................Hour $115.00 Project Manager / Project Engineer ...................................................................Hour $175.00 Technical Leader/Engineer ...............................................................................Hour $250.00 Senior Project Manager / Senior Engineer .........................................................Hour $230.00 Administrative Coordinator.................................................................................Hour $75.00 Mileage ..............................................................................................................Mile $0.85 Laboratory Testing Services Aggregate Testing Abrasion - LA Machine ......................................................................................Each $500.00 Atterberg Limit (Plasticity Index) .......................................................................Each $125.00 Bulk Density (Unit Weight) and Voids ...............................................................Each $115.00 Deleterious - Clay Lumps and Friable Particles ................................................Each $200.00 Deleterious - Flat & Elongated Particles ............................................................Each $375.00 Deleterious - Lightweight Particles ....................................................................Each $230.00 Deleterious - Organic Impurities ........................................................................Each $150.00 Material Finer than No. 200 Sieve .....................................................................Each $85.00 Minimum & Maximum Index Density (Vibratory Table) ......................................Each $260.00 Moisture Content ..............................................................................................Each $25.00 Oversize Particle Correction .............................................................................Each $125.00 Particle Size (Gradation) - Sieve Analysis <3/4" ...............................................Each $140.00 Particle Size (Gradation) - Sieve Analysis >3/4" ...............................................Each $220.00 Percent Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate .............................................Each $280.00 Proctor - Modified .............................................................................................Each $270.00 Proctor - Standard ............................................................................................Each $230.00 Sand Equivalent of Fine Aggregate ..................................................................Each $245.00 Soundness Aggregates (Sodium or Magnesium) ...............................................Each $305.00 Specific Gravity of Aggregate Coarse or Fine Aggregate ...................................Each $200.00 Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate ..................................................Each $80.00 Asphalt Testing Asphalt Binder Content by Ignition .....................................................................Each $150.00 Gradation of Extracted Aggregates (Includes Binder by Ignition) .......................Each $200.00 Bulk Specific Gravity/ Pavement Cores (1pt) .....................................................Each $75.00 Marshall Density (3pt) ........................................................................................Each $250.00 Marshall Stability and Flow (3pt) ........................................................................Each $350.00 Percent Air Voids in Compacted Paving Mix ......................................................Each $50.00 Preparation & Density of Superpave Gyratory Compaction Specimens (2pt) .....Each $330.00 Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Rice) (Gmm) .........................................Each $160.00 Cement, Concrete, & Masonry Testing Chloride Ion .......................................................................................................Each $200.00 Compressive Strength – Block or Block Prism ...................................................Each $230.00 Compressive Strength - Concrete Cores ...........................................................Each $100.00 Compressive Strength - Cube (Grout & Mortar) .................................................Each $50.00 Compressive Strength - Cylinders .....................................................................Each $25.00 Density, Absorption & Voids of Hardened Concrete ...........................................Each $630.00 Flexural Strength of Concrete ............................................................................Each $75.00 Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete ...............Each $400.00 Measuring Thickness of Concrete Elements (Drilled Cores) ..............................Each $70.00 Potential Alkali Silica Reactivity (ASR) ...............................................................Each $830.00 Equipment Core Machine/Sampling ...................................................................................Day $300.00 Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) .................................................................Day $250.00 Electrical Resistivity - Field (AEMC Gauge) ......................................................Day $100.00 Floor Flatness Equipment .................................................................................Day $300.00 Relative Humidity Probe/Sensor .......................................................................Each $100.00 Settlement Monitoring Plate ..............................................................................Each $300.00 Standard Field Equipment ................................................................................Day $25.00 Vapor Emission Test Kit ...................................................................................Each $75.00 Sand Cone Equipment .......................................................................................Day $25.00 Ten Foot Rolling Straight Edge ..........................................................................Day $350.00 Soil Testing Atterberg Limits (Plasticity Index) ......................................................................Each $125.00 CBR Laboratory Compacted (3pt) .....................................................................Each $630.00 CBR Laboratory Compacted (1pt) .....................................................................Each $230.00 Density (Wet/Dry) .............................................................................................Each $30.00 Direct Shear Test of Soils (Consolidated Drained) (3pt) ....................................Each $1,600.00 Dispersion - Crumb ...........................................................................................Each $95.00 Dispersion - Pinhole ..........................................................................................Each $190.00 Material Finer than No. 200 Sieve .....................................................................Each $85.00 Moisture Content ..............................................................................................Each $25.00 Moisture Content - Microwave ..........................................................................Each $50.00 One-Dimensional Consolidation Test ................................................................Each $440.00 Organic Content - Soils .....................................................................................Each $105.00 Oversize Particle Correction .............................................................................Each $125.00 Particle Size (Gradation) - Hydrometer .............................................................Each $250.00 Particle Size (Gradation) - Sieve Analysis ..........................................................Each $140.00 Permeability - Flexible Wall Permeameter (Intact) ............................................Each $550.00 Permeability - Flexible Wall Permeameter (Remold) ..........................................Each $650.00 Proctor - Modified .............................................................................................Each $270.00 Proctor - Modified w/Additive ............................................................................Each $350.00 Proctor - Standard ............................................................................................Each $230.00 Proctor - Standard w/Chem Additive .................................................................Each $300.00 Swell or Collapse (One Dimensional) ................................................................Each $315.00 Triaxial Compression – Consolidated Drained (Intact) ......................................Each $1,730.00 Triaxial Compression – Consolidated Drained (Remold) ....................................Each $1,930.00 Triaxial Compression – Consolidated Undrained (Intact) ..................................Each $1,575.00 Triaxial Compression – Consolidated Undrained (Remold) ................................Each $1,775.00 Triaxial Compression – Unconsolidated Undrained ...........................................Each $180.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength - Intact Rock ...............................................Each $125.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength - Soils .........................................................Each $95.00 Sprayed Fire Resistive Materials (SFRM) Adhesion of SFRM to Structural Members (Field) ..............................................Each $50.00 Thickness and Density of SFRM to Structural Members ....................................Each $100.00 General Terms and Conditions 1. These Unit Fees are in effect until January 1, 2027. Services and fees not listed above will be quoted upon request. 2. All services charged are portal-to-portal. 3. Services provided on Saturday, Sunday, Holidays, or in excess of 8-hours/day will be charged at 1.5 times the unit fee. 4. Services provided before 6:00 a.m. and after 6:00 p.m. will be charged at 1.5 times the unit fee. 5. Mileage Rate subject to change based on Federal and IRS rate changes. 6. Subcontracted services and expenses will be invoiced at our cost plus 20% 7. Project Manager time will be included for project coordination and report review. 8. Per Diem will be billed at actual cost + 15% unless otherwise specified. office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Description Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Hourly Rate Equipment Fee if applicable) Soil Density Testing Materials Testing Technician performing in- place soil densities AASHTO T310, ASTM D6938 $ 65.00 $ 15 Gauge Fee Per Trip Soil/Aggregate Sample Pick up On site sampling of soils and aggregates for laboratory testing AASHTO T2, ASTM D 75 $ 65.00 NA Proofroll and Undercut Observation Engineering observation of on site soils prior to placement of fill material or after undercut has been completed NA $125.00 NA Field Concrete Testing Slump, air content, temperature, and casting of cylinders for compressive strength testing AASHTO T23, T119, T141, T152, T309, ASTM C31, C143, C172, C231, C1064 65.00 NA Concrete Cylinder Pick up (per set charge) Retrieving concrete test specimens made by GTS or by the client NA $35.00 NA Concrete Rebound Hammer (Schmidt Hammer) Assess the in-place uniformity of concrete and to estimate in-place strength ASTM C805 $125.00 $15.00 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Field Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 Concrete Earthwork and Soils Page 1 of 7 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Description Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Hourly Rate Equipment Fee if applicable) 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Field Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 Concrete Coring and Sampling Coring and sampling of hardened concrete including backfilling with grout AASHTO T24 ASTM C42 $ 65.00 $250.00 Concrete maturity and temperature testing Placement and downloading of maturity and temperature information and equipment ASTM C1074 $125.00 $ 50.00 per site visit Concrete maturity and temperature sensors (per sensor fee) Field Sensors ASTM C1074 $125.00 $50.00 Per Test Floor Flatness Determination Evaluating and providing statistical (and graphical) information concerning floor surface profiles ASTM E1155 $125.00 . 02 per square foot Concrete Floor Vapor Emission Testing Obtaining a quantitative value indicating the rate or moisture vapor emission from a concrete floor ASTM F1869 $125.00 $35 per kit Concrete Ph testing Evaluating the Ph of concrete floors ASTM F710 $125.00 $10 per kit Concrete mortar time of setting testing Time of setting concrete by means of penetration resistance method ASTM C403 $125.00 $150.00 Concrete Concrete Floor Relative Humidity Insitu Testing Quantitative determination of percent relative humidity in concrete slabs ASTM F2170 $125.00 50.00 per site visit and $50.00 per Sensor Test Concrete Page 2 of 7 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Description Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Hourly Rate Equipment Fee if applicable) 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Field Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 Field Grout Testing On site sampling, testing and making grout test specimens of freshly mixed grout AASHTO T23, T119, T309, ASTM C1019, C143, C1064 65.00 NA Field Observation of CMU Block Wall Construction Visual observation of CMU reinforcing, joint placement, bond beams etc. NA $125.00 NA Field Mortar Testing This test assigns an empirical value to the relative amount, fineness, and character of claylike material present in the specimen. ASTM C1714 $65.00 NA Asphalt Rolling Pattern Evaluation of density with passes of compaction equipment of fresh hot mix asphalt ASTM D2950 $75.00 $15 Gauge Fee Asphalt coring and sampling Coring and sampling of in place asphalt including backfilling with grout ASTM D979, AASHTO T168 65.00 $ 100.00 Per Site Visit Construction Observation and additional Special Inspections Observation of straight shaft drilled piers Observation of soil type, depth, reinforcing bars, bearing capacity, etc. NA $125.00 NA Masonry, Grout and Mortar Asphalt Page 3 of 7 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Description Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Hourly Rate Equipment Fee if applicable) 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Field Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 Observation of Geopier foundations Observation of soil type, depth, compactive effort, bearing capacity, etc. NA $125.00 NA Observation of retaining wall installation Observation of retaining wall construction NA $125.00 NA Observation of soil bearing capacity for foundation elements Observation of soil types and bearing capacity NA $125.00 NA Observation of reinforcing bars for foundation and structural elements Observation of size, number and placement of reinforcing bars NA $125.00 NA Observation of driven pile foundations Observation of driven piles, number of blows, pile size, etc. NA $125.00 NA Observation of soil nail reinforcement Observation of soil nails, bar size, bar length, grout type and strength, etc. NA $125.00 NA Observation of micropile foundations observation of micropiles, bar size, bar length, grout type and strength, etc. NA $125.00 NA Construction Observation and additional Special Inspections Observation of Post Tension concrete systems observation of installation and tensioning of post tension cables NA $125.00 NA Construction Observation and additional Special Inspections Page 4 of 7 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Description Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Hourly Rate Equipment Fee if applicable) 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Field Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 Construction Observation and additional Special Inspections Fireproofing Observation observation of fireproofing for thickness, density and cohesion ASTM E605 $125.00 Paint Thickness Gauge per day 100.00 / Adhesions $40.00 per Test / Density 60.00 per Test Principal Professional Engineer Professional Engineer services in the field or report writing NA $175.00 NA Staff Professional Engineer Professional Engineer services in the field or report writing NA $150.00 NA Intern-Engineer Intern engineer services in the field or report writing NA $125.00 NA Structural Steel Certified Welding Inspector (CWI) Code compliance, visual and ultrasonic weld inspection, bolt inspection, impact wrench calibration, etc. Varies $150.00 NA Reinforcing Bar Locating Locating reinforcing bars, conduits, post tension cables, etc. in concrete slabs Varies $150.00 $250 per half day Skidmore Wilhelm Tension Calibrator Varies $150.00 $40.00 Torque Multiplier Used in conjunction with torque wrench for high strength bolt testing NA $150.00 $100.00 Torque Wrench Used for testing torque of high strength bolts Varies $150.00 $20.00 Structural Steel Engineering Page 5 of 7 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Description Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Hourly Rate Equipment Fee if applicable) 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Field Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 Ultra Sonic Testing Phased UT Machine Varies $150.00 $300.00 Mag Particle Testing Mag Particle Yoke Varies $150.00 $100.00 x-ray services x-ray of structural welds Varies Call for Quote upon request Bolt Pulling Test Used to check the suitability and allowable loads of an anchor type and check they have been installed correctly Varies $150.00 Varies by Project Forensic Testing Impact Echo Services Using sound waves to determine flaws and/or thicknesses in concrete structures NA $175.00 $250.00 Ground Penetrating Radar Using radar to locate, reinforcing bars or conduits in concrete, underground utilities, underground structures or tanks, etc. NA $150.00 $250 per half day Forensic Testing Sonic Echo Impulse Response Non-Destructive method of determining length and integrity of concrete foundations NA $175.00 $1,000.00 Structural Steel Page 6 of 7 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Description Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Hourly Rate Equipment Fee if applicable) 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Field Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 FLIR Infrared Camera Imaging Infrared imaging of building components using a Flir E60 camera NA $150.00 $400.00 Administrative and Mileage Mileage Based on published current IRS government mileage rates plus 5% minimum $40 fee) NA Report Preparation and Review (Per Report) Administative costs for distribution. Technician reports and Associated Lab field reports only) NA $20.00 NA Project Management Fee 10% Will be added to all invoice subtotals for Project Management, Dispatch, and Administation NA 10%NA Overtime, Weekend, and Holiday Rates Minimum Time Charge Work requested to be performed on Saturdays or prior to 6:00am and after 6:00pm Monday through Friday will be billed 1.5 times the normal hourly rates listed above. Sunday testing will be Double and Holiday will be Triple the normal hourly rates. Any test scheduled between 6:00pm to 5:00am but not performed by no fault of GTS will be charged a premium charge of $200.00 for the cancellation (in addition to Mileage and Travel Time if onsite). There is a Minimum charge of 1 hour on site time and .5 hour travel time Based on published current IRS government mileage rates plus 5% (minimum $40 fee) Page 7 of 7 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Equipment Fee (if applicable) Moisture - Density Relationship AASHTO T99, ASTM D698 $ 160.00 Moisture - Density Relationship AASHTO T180, ASTM D1557 $ 185.00 Moisture Content ASTM D2216 $10.00 Atterberg Limits AASHTO T-89, AASHTO T-90, ASTM D 4318 75.00 Sieve Analysis ASTM C136 ASTM C117 AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11 75.00 Sieve Analysis ASTM C136 ASTM C117 AASHTO T27 AASHTO T11 150.00 Sieve Analysis Hydrometer) AASHTO T 88 ASTM D 422 ASTM D 7928 130.00 Specific Gravity and Absorption ASTM C127 AASHTO T84 / ASTM C128 60.00 California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 3-point method ASTM D 1883, AASHTO T 193 $ 300.00 Laboratory Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Description Standard Proctor Modified Proctor Moisture Content of soils Slump, air content, temperature, and casting of cylinders for compressive strength testing Washed and dried sieve used for soil classification determination (< 5 lbs) Washed and dried oversized sieve (greater than 5 lbs) Fine Particle Size Distribution Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis Determination of Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine or Coarse Aggregate Evaluating the potential strength of subgrade, subbase, and base course material, for use in road and airfield pavements. Earthwork and Soils and Aggregates Page 1 of 4 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Equipment Fee (if applicable) Laboratory Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Description Unconfined Compressive Strength Testing ASTM D 2166, AASHTO T 208 $ 100.00 Triaxial testing** AASHTO T 296, ASTM D 2850 $ 375.00 Triaxial testing** AASHTO T 297, ASTM D 4767 $ 500.00 Triaxial testing**ASTM WK 3821 $750.00 Soil Consolidation One- Dimensional, Interval Loading) ASTM D 2435, AASHTO T 216 $ 300.00 Permeability Testing (Flexible Wall)** ASTM D5084 $300.00 NA $75.00 Consolidated - Undrained (CU) Consolidated - Drained (CD) Determining the magnitude and rate of consolidation of soil when it is restrained laterally and drained axially while subjected to incrementally applied controlled-stress loading. Laboratory Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity sample prep or remolding Obtain a measure of compressive strength for soils that possess sufficient cohesion to permit testing in the unconfined state Unconsolidated - Undrained (UU) Earthwork and Soils and Aggregates Page 2 of 4 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Equipment Fee (if applicable) Laboratory Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Description Sand Equivalency Test ASTM D 2419, AASHTO T 176 $ 450.00 Soundness of Aggregates ASTM C 88, AASHTO T 104 $ 500.00 LA Abrasion ASTM C 131, AASHTO T 96 $ 650.00 Deleterious Material Determination NA $50.00 Swell Test ** (One- Dimensional) ASTM D 4546, AASHTO T 216 $ 300.00 Soil Stabilization NA call for quote Laboratory Compressive Strength of Cylinders ASTM C 39, ASTM C1231, ASTM C511 $ 25.00 Laboratory Compressive Strength of Cylinders ASTM C 39, ASTM C1231, ASTM C511 $ 15.00Curing, Storing and Testing (Pad Capping) 4" x 8" cylinders This test assigns an empirical value to the relative amount, fineness, and character of claylike material present in the specimen. Standard Test Method for Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate Coring and sampling of in place asphalt including backfilling with grout determination of friable particles, clay lumps, and soft fragments in an aggregate Standard Test Method for One-Dimensional Swell or Settlement Potential of Cohesive Soils using fly ash, cement and lime to stabilize soils Curing, Storing and Testing (Pad Capping) 6" x 12" cylinders For any soils and aggregate lab testing not listed please call for quote*** Earthwork and Soils and Aggregates Concrete and Masonry Page 3 of 4 office 479-521-7645 fax 479-521-6232 Category Name of Test Relevant ASTM and AASHTO Equipment Fee (if applicable) Laboratory Materials Testing Services (please call for unlisted items) Fayetteville, Arkansas Office Effective January 2025 1915 N. Shiloh Drive Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704 Description Laboratory Flexural Strength of Beams per beam) ASTM C 78, ASTM C511, ASTM C1542 $ 45.00 Laboratory Compressive Strength of drilled cores ASTM C 42, ASTM C 39, ASTM C617 $ 50.00 Saw cutting cylinders and drilled cores NA $10.00 Petrographic Analysis ASTM C 457 Call for Quote Laboratory Compressive Strength of Grout Prisms ASTM C 1019 $30.00 Laboratory Compressive Strength of mortar cubes ASTM C 109 $20.00 Laboratory testing of concrete masonry units ASTM C 140 Call for Quote Asphalt Laboratory testing of Asphalt Cores AASHTO T-166 $35.00 Fireproofing Laboratory Density of Fireproofing each density) ASTM E 605 $150.00 Laboratory Testing of asphalt cores for specific gravity (density) Curing, Storing, Measuring and Testing Curing, Storing and Testing (sulfur Capping) Microscopic analysis of hardened concrete Curing, Storing and Testing (Pad Capping) 6" x 3" x 3" prisms Curing, Storing and Testing (Pad Capping) 2" x 2" x 2" cubes Saw cutting ends of contractor formed cylinders to achieve a perpendicular surface (per end) This test methods provides various testing procedures commonly used for evaluating characteristics of concrete masonry units and related concrete units. Laboratory determination of SRFM density Concrete and Masonry Page 4 of 4 1580 East Stearns Street Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703 479-443-2377 www.mce.us.comCTTPLabNo. 914810 Page 1 of 2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LABORATORY FEE SCHEDULE 2026 GENERAL: CMT Technician $ 65.00 per hour Senior CMT Technician 75.00 per hour CMT Supervisor 155.00 per hour Geotechnical/CMT Specialist 150.00 per hour Engineering Technician/EIT 130.00 per hour Laboratory Supervisor 90.00 per hour Geotechnical Project Engineer 170.00 per hour Construction Observation 110.00 per hour Geotechnical Project Manager 160.00 per hour Principal Geotechnical Engineer 230.00 per hour Senior Administrative Assistant 95.00 per hour Mileage 0.75 per mile SOILS: CMT Technician Field Testing* 65.00 per hour Senior CMT Technician Field Testing* 75.00 per hour Density Testing-Nuclear Gauge (ASTM D 2922/ AASHTO T310), Sample Pickup, or Stand-by Time Nuclear Density Gauge Fee: (per Density Test); [Minimum $15.00 per trip, per project] 18.00 each Atterberg Limits Test (3-point) ( ASTM D 4318 / AASHTO T89, T90) 65.00 each Soil Sieve Analysis w/ No. 200 Wash ( ASTM D 422, D 1140 / AASHTO T88) 100.00 each Soils Classification: Atterberg Limits & Sieve Analysis 155.00 each Standard Proctor Test ASTM D 698 or AASHTO T 99(includes Soils Classification) 415.00 each Modified Proctor Test ASTM D 1557 or AASHTO T 180(includes Soils Classification) 465.00 each California Bearing Ratio (CBR) ASTM D 1883/ AASHTO T193 400.00 each Additional Soil Testing Procedures Available On Request*** CONCRETE/AGGREGATE: Concrete Mix Design Price on Request Review Concrete Mix Design Submittal 170.00 per hour CMT Technician Concrete Field Testing* 65.00 per hour Senior CMT Technician Concrete Field Testing* 75.00 per hour 1-hour minimum): [For any of the following 6 items:] Concrete Cylinder, Grout, Mortar or Beam Molding Concrete Cylinder or Beam Pickup Concrete Slump Test ASTM C 143 / AASHTO T119 Concrete Air Content Test ASTM C 231 or C 173 / AASHTO T 152 Cement Mortar or Grout Sampling Stand-by Time Unit Weight and Yield of Freshly Mixed Concrete ASTM C 138 / AASHTO T121 Sample Pickup, Transporting, and Processing/Placement Into Curing Compressive Strength of Concrete Test Cylinders C 39/T22 (pad capped) 25.00 each Compressive Strength of Concrete Test Cylinders C 39/T22 (sulfur capped) 35.00 each Spare Cylinders Specimens Processed, Stored & Cured but not Tested 25.00 each Schmidt Hammer Testing (Engineering Technician) 130.00 per hour ACI Grade I Concrete Field Testing Technician 1580 East Stearns Street Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703 479-443-2377 www.mce.us.comCTTPLabNo. 914810 Page 2 of 2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LABORATORY FEE SCHEDULE 2026 CONCRETE/AGGREGATE (Continued): Flexural Strength of Concrete Beams ASTM C 78 or C 293 50.00 each Spare Beam Specimens Processed, Stored & Cured but not Tested 40.00 each Compressive Strength of Grout Cubes/Prisms 40.00 each Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar Cubes 25.00 each Concrete Coring (4" diameter): Core Machine & CMT Technician 140.00 per hour Compressive Strength of Concrete Cores (4" diameter) 40.00 each Other Core Sizes (sampling and testing) Price on Request Concrete Fine Aggregate Gradation (AASHTO T11 and T27) 125.00 each Concrete Coarse Aggregate Gradation (AASHTO T11 and T27) 125.00 each Aggregate Specific Gravity Testing ASTM C 127,C 128 / AASHTO T84, T85 150.00 each Class 7 Aggregate Gradation (AASHTO T11 and T27) 250.00 each ARDOT Class 7 Sounding 25.00 each Additional Concrete/Aggregate Testing Procedures Available On Request*** ASPHALT: Asphalt Mix Design (Marshall Design Method) Price on Request Review Asphalt Mix Design 170.00 per hour CMT Technician Asphalt Field Testing* 65.00 per hour Senior CMT Technician Asphalt Field Testing* 75.00 per hour In-place Spot Check Density Testing, Sample Pickup, or Stand-by Time Superpave Laboratory Analysis (Gmm, Gmb, AC Content, Air Voids, Gradation) 650.00 each Marshall Laboratory Analysis (Gmm, Gmb, AC Content, Air Voids, Gradation) 750.00 each Laboratory Density of Cored Samples including Thickness Measurement** 35.00 each Asphalt Coring Machine & CMT Technician** 140.00 per hour Testing and Sampling of 4” or 6” diameter cores SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: Spray-Applied Fire-Resistant Material/Intumescent Coating Testing 130.00 per hour Structural Steel/Welding Inspection by CWI 100.00 per hour Non-destructive Testing on Welds (UT, MT, or Radiographic) 110.00 per hour Post-Tension Inspection 150.00 per hour Firestop/Fire Penetration Inspection 150.00 per hour Floor Flatness/Levelness Testing 150.00 per hour Services Not Listed are Available on Request All prices are subject to revision each year Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1350 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Chris Brown, Public Works Director FROM: Justin Bland, City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of a resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #2 to Crafton Tull, Hawkins- Weir Engineers, Inc. and Garver as primary providers based on rates provided and availability for on-call surveying services as needed through April 30, 2027. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #2 to Crafton Tull, Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc. and Garver, Inc. as primary providers based on rates provided and availability for on-call surveying services as needed through April 30, 2027. BACKGROUND: The Engineering Division has a two-person survey crew as part of the design team. The survey crew provides surveying services to multiple City Divisions in addition to the surveys needed for the in-house projects designed by the City engineers. As a result, the current workload for the survey crew is quite large. With the potential for many projects to begin in 2026, additional surveying services may be required. DISCUSSION: An engineering selection committee selected Crafton Tull, Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc. and Garver to be used for on-call surveying services for various city projects until April 30, 2027. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funds for the project surveying have been budgeted in various capital projects with the Sales Tax Capital Improvements Fund, the Transportation Bond Fund, Drainage Bond Fund and the Water and Sewer Fund. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Garver Fee Sheet, 5. Crafton Tull Fee Sheet, 6. HW Fee Sheet Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1350 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD RFQ #26-01, SELECTION #2 AND AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF ON-CALL SURVEYING SERVICES FROM CRAFTON TULL, HAWKINS- WEIR ENGINEERS, INC., AND GARVER, INC. AS NEEDED THROUGH APRIL 30, 2027, WITHIN THE APPROVED BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby awards RFQ #25-01 Selection #2 and authorizes the purchase of on-call surveying services from Crafton Tull, Hawkings- Weir Engineers, Inc., and Garver, Inc. for the rates attached to this Resolution and based on availability as needed through April 30, 2027, within the approved budget. 4/10/2026 Submitted Date No V20221130 Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Adjustment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget No No -$ Project Number Budget Impact: FundAccountNumber Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1350 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only Approval of a resolution to award RFQ 26-01, Selection #2 to Crafton Tull, Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc. and Garver as primary providers based on rates provided and availability for on-call surveying services as needed through April 30, 2027. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Sara Combs ENGINEERING (621) Division / Department Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Rates Rates Engineers / Architects Resource Specialists E-1 146.00$ RS-1 120.00$ E-2 171.00$ RS-2 159.00$ E-3 191.00$ RS-3 214.00$ E-4 223.00$ RS-4 309.00$ E-5 272.00$ RS-5 386.00$ E-6 333.00$ RS-6 475.00$ E-7 475.00$ RS-7 517.00$ Planners Environmental Specialists P-1 181.00$ ES-1 119.00$ P-2 226.00$ ES-2 151.00$ P-3 270.00$ ES-3 194.00$ P-4 316.00$ ES-4 219.00$ P-5 347.00$ ES-5 277.00$ ES-6 367.00$ Designers ES-7 449.00$ D-1 135.00$ ES-8 507.00$ D-2 150.00$ D-3 186.00$ Project Controls D-4 217.00$ PC-1 122.00$ D-5 267.00$ PC-2 163.00$ D-6 282.00$ PC-3 206.00$ PC-4 265.00$ Technicians PC-5 324.00$ T-1 110.00$ PC-6 418.00$ T-2 127.00$ PC-7 511.00$ T-3 161.00$ T-4 202.00$ Management / Administration AM-1 86.00$ Surveyors AM-2 108.00$ S-1 67.00$ AM-3 152.00$ S-2 89.00$ AM-4 188.00$ S-3 120.00$ AM-5 242.00$ S-4 165.00$ AM-6 299.00$ S-5 216.00$ AM-7 393.00$ S-6 246.00$ M-1 574.00$ S-7 299.00$ S-8 368.00$ 2-Man Crew (Survey) 253.00$ 3-Man Crew (Survey) 318.00$ 2-Man Crew (GPS Survey) 320.00$ 3-Man Crew (GPS Survey) 388.00$ Construction Observation C-1 126.00$ C-2 159.00$ C-3 198.00$ C-4 247.00$ C-5 305.00$ Agreement for Professional Services Fayetteville 2026 On-Call Surveying Garver Project No. 2600000 Garver Hourly Rate Schedule: July 2026 - June 2027 Classification Classification Exhibit B City of Fayetteville Fayetteville 2026 On-Call Surveying Effective January 1, 2026 Hourly Hourly Category Rate Category Rate ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PRINCIPAL ……....………..……………………..270$ VICE PRESIDENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE …..........220$ SR. ENGINEERING MANAGER ……………...……………...……240$ SR. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGER …............................................195$ ENGINEERING MANAGER ………………….……………....……..210$ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGER …..............................................................180$ SR. PROJECT ENGINEER …………………….…………...…….180$ SR. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ………………..…………………..170$ PROJECT ENGINEER …………………………..…………..…….160$ PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ………....………………..155$ ENGINEER INTERN III ………………………..………….………..145$ LANDSCAPE DESIGNER III …………………...……….................125$ ENGINEER INTERN II …………………………..………..………..135$ LANDSCAPE DESIGNER II …………………………...................115$ ENGINEER INTERN I …………………………..………….……….125$ LANDSCAPE DESIGNER I …………………………......................100$ SR. ENGINEERING DESIGNER ……………..…………..………..165$ LANDSCAPE DESIGN INTERN …………………………....................80$ ENGINEERING DESIGNER III ………………..…………..……….130$ LANDSCAPE CAD TECHNICIAN II …………………………....................85$ ENGINEERING DESIGNER II ………………..…………..………..110$ LANDSCAPE CAD TECHNICIAN I …………………………....................75$ ENGINEERING DESIGNER I …………………..………..…………100$ SURVEYING ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN III ……..……………………..95$ SURVEYING PRINCIPAL ………………………………….............250$ ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN II ……….………..…………..85$ SR. SURVEYING MANAGER ………………………………..………215$ ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN I ………..……….……………75$ SURVEYING MANAGER …………………………….....................190$ ENVIRONMENTAL SR. PROJECT SURVEYOR ………………………………….........165$ SR. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER …………….……..………….220$ PROJECT SURVEYOR ……………………………………….........145$ ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER …………………..……........…….185$ SURVEYOR INTERN II ………………………………………..…….125$ SR. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST ……………..…...………….155$ SURVEYOR INTERN I …………………………………………..….110$ PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST ……..……........……125$ SURVEY COORDINATOR …………………………………….……120$ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST II ………………..……...……….100$ CREW CHIEF II ………………………………………………..........110$ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I ………………..………....…….80$ CREW CHIEF I ………………………………………………….......95$ ENVIRONMENTAL FIELD TECHNICIAN …..…………………….65$ FIELD SURVEYOR III …………………………………………........85$ INSPECTION FIELD SURVEYOR II …………………………………………...…...75$ INSPECTION MANAGER …........................................................140$ FIELD SURVEYOR I ……………………………………………......65$ SR. INSPECTOR ………………………………...…..……………..120$ SURVEY CAD TECHNICIAN III ………………………………..…..110$ INSPECTOR II ………………………………...….………………….100$ SURVEY CAD TECHNICIAN II ………………………………...…..90$ INSPECTOR I …………………………………....………………….80$ SURVEY CAD TECHNICIAN I ………………………………...…….80$ UAV SERVICES GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS UAV TEAM LEAD ………………………………...……………........125$ SR. GIS MANAGER ………………………………………………..180$ UAV PILOT ………………………………………...………………....85$ GIS MANAGER ………………………………………….....………..145$ ADMINISTRATIVE GIS ANALYST …………………...………………………....………..110$ ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPAL ………………...………………….240$ GIS TECHNICIAN II ……………………………………..……………85$ ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER ………………...…………………..180$ GIS TECHNICIAN I …………………………………….…………….65$ ADMINISTRATIVE IV ………………………....……………………..120$ REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES ADMINISTRATIVE III …………………………...…………………..95$ GPS Equipment………...….....….……............…..….....…....$35/Hour ADMINISTRATIVE II ……………………...……...…………………..70$ Robotic Survey Equipment…….……….........…….............…$20/Hour ADMINISTRATIVE I ……………………………...………………….55$ Bathymetric Survey Equipment …………..….................…...$35/Hour PLANNING LiDAR Scanning Equipment …………..…..................….…..$35/Hour PLANNING PRINCIPAL …...........................................................250$ UAV ……………………………….............……….…..…...…$1000/Unit SR. PLANNING MANAGER …………………………………...…..220$ Job Related Mileage………...........................................…...$0.72/Mile PLANNING MANAGER ……………………………………….........210$ Per Diem for Out of Town Crews…...…................Per GSA Allowable SR. PLANNER …………………………………………………...…..170$ Airfare and other travel related expenses……….................….At Cost PROJECT PLANNER …………………………………………........130$ Black and white 8.5"x11" Copies ….……......................... $0.15/sheet PLANNER III …………………………………………………….…....120$ Color 8.5"x11" Copies …….……....……..................….…. $1.50/sheet PLANNER II ……………………………………………………..….....110$ Photo Paper Color Plan Sheet Copies ……..................... $0.75/sq. ft. PLANNER I ………...…………………………………………...……..100$ Reproducible Plan Copies (Vellum) …...…....................... $1.50/sq. ft Reproducible Plan Copies (Bond) ……........................…. $0.35/sq. ft. All rates are subject to change without notice. Exhibit "B" Standard Hourly Rate Schedule Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc. Hourly Rate Schedule: 2026 Description Billing Rate/Hour Engineer VII $275 Engineer VI $250 Engineer V $225 Engineer IV $200 Engineer III $175 Engineer II $150 Engineer I $125 Environmental Specialist II $130 Environmental Specialist I $110 145 135 120 100 90 150 145 135 125 135 125 Designer III Designer II Designer I Civil Eng. Assistant II Civil Eng. Assistant I Digital Design Manager BIM Modeler III BIM Modeler II BIM Modeler I CAD/GIS Technician III CAD/GIS Technician II CAD/GIS Technician I $115 Construction Manager II $150 Construction Manager I $130 Construction Observer IV $140 Construction Observer III $120 Construction Observer II $110 Construction Observer I $100 Surveyor $175 GPS Survey $200 Survey Technician $50 Business Manager $100 Graphic Designer $100 Administrative $75 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage $0.77/mile Printing @ Cost Travel @ Cost Expert Witness Rate x 2.0 Other Direct Costs @ Cost Notes: 1.Hourly rates may be equitably adjusted 2. Adjustment to rate schedule will not change contract lump sum or NTE amounts 3.If a conflict exists, hourly rates & reimbursable expenses will be invoiced per terms of Agreement. Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1383 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Chris Brown, Public Works Director Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Justin Bland, City Engineer SUBJECT: Plainview Avenue/Rolling Hills Connection – Contract Amendment with Garver RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a design contract Amendment with Garver in the amount of $88,050 for additional design services on the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. BACKGROUND: This is a 2019 bond program project that was originally intended to connect Appleby Drive, Rolling Hills Drive, and Plainview Avenue through the Fiesta Square Shopping Center. The project was stalled due to property acquisition issues and was modified to remove the southern portion of the project. Design of the project has begun moving forward, and construction is planned for later this year. DISCUSSION: The project revisions have resulted in additional design efforts by Garver. They have provided a proposed contract amendment in the amount of $88,050 for these additional design services. Detail of this amendment is attached. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: These fees will be paid from the 2019 bond program funds. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Appendix A - Garver Scope of Services- Amend #1 Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1383 A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH GARVER, LLC FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $88,050.00 TO CONTINUE ENGINEERING DESIGN ON THE PLAINVIEW AND ROLLING HILLS EXTENSION PROJECT WHEREAS, a 2019 bond program project to connect Appleby Drive, Rolling Hills Drive, and Plainview Avenue through the Fiesta Square Shopping Center was stalled due to property acquisition issues; and WHEREAS, the project was modified to remove the southern portion of the project and a contract amendment is intended to provide funds for the additional design services associated with the modification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes Mayor Rawn to sign an Amendment to the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Garver, LLC in the amount of $88,050.00 for additional engineering design services associated with the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution #158-20 Approval Date: Original Contract Number: 46020.7221.1000 Project Number Budget Impact: Appleby/Rolling Hills/Plainview Connection Fund 4602 - Streets Project 2019Bonds4602.860.7221-5860.02 Account Number Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1383 Legistar File ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only Staff recommends approval of a design contract Amendment with Garver in the amount of $88,050 for additional design services on the Plainview and Rolling Hills Extension Project. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Sara Combs ENGINEERING (621) Division / Department 4/15/2026 Submitted Date Yes 207,581.55$ 88,050.00$ Must Attach Completed Budget Adjustment! V20180321 Budgeted Item? Does item have a cost? Budget Adjustment Attached? Current Budget Funds Obligated Current Balance Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget 1,394,635.00$ 1,187,053.45$ Yes No -$ 119,531.55$ Appendix A- Scope of Services Amend. No. 1 1 of 2 Plainview Avenue Extension APPENDIX A – SCOPE OF SERVICES AMENDMENT NO. 1 1. General Generally, the scope of services includes revising final plans and property acquisition documents as required to redesign the roundabout as a mini-roundabout at the intersection of the existing Fiesta Square entrance with the new roadway. The revisions also include changing the alignment of the proposed Plainview Avenue and adding a right turn lane between the proposed mini-roundabout and the College Avenue intersection. These changes will result in updated designs for roadway, landscaping, electrical, traffic signal, water and sewer relocations, and preparation of revised property acquisition documents The following Section 11 – Final Design for Amendment No. 1 shall be added to the previously approved Section 11 – Final Design. 11. Final Design 11.1. Signalization Design The revised signal design and plans will include the following: A dedicated right turn only lane to turn southbound onto College Ave. from new roadway to roundabout Signal pole layout revision for poles B & C (pedestrian pushbuttons) for ADA compliance Verify proper signal head alignment Updates to Detector Chart, Interval Chart, and Phasing Quantity Updates 90% plan submittal for client review and comment then Final Revised Plans 11.2. Mini-Roundabout Final Design (90% & 100%) Garver will revise the Final Design plans to incorporate the changes to the alignment and roundabout. During the final design phase of the project, Garver will conduct final designs to prepare construction plans and specifications, for one construction contract, including final construction details and quantities, special provisions, and opinion of probable construction cost. Garver will also provide final coordination with Owner, make any needed plan changes as a result of the final review comments and/or special easement acquisition considerations, and prepare the construction documents as required to advertise for bids. The following design items shall be revised: Horizontal and Vertical Alignments Roadway Model Drainage Design Lighting Layout The following plan sheets shall be revised: Typical Sections Maintenance of Traffic Plans Pavement Marking and Striping Plans Demolition Plans Appendix A- Scope of Services Amend. No. 1 2 of 2 Plainview Avenue Extension Cross Sections Drainage Plans and Profiles Survey Control Plans Roundabout Layout Plans Roundabout Grading Plans Erosion Control Plans Landscaping Plans 11.3. Utility Potholing (Crossland) Garver will subcontract with Crossland Heavy Construction to perform subsurface potholing for up to eight (8) locations to develop accurate locations and depth information for underground utilities and confirm conflicts and required utility relocations. 11.4. Water and Sewer Plans Garver will revise water and sewer line design per previous City comments and from the findings of the utility potholing. Water/Sewer plan and profile sheets will be revised as required to accommodate changes to design. The following Section 12 – Property Acquisition Documents for Amendment No. 1 shall be added to the previously approved Section 12 - Property Acquisition Documents. 12. Property Acquisition Documents Revised Property Acquisition Documents Garver will develop updated individual tract maps with description of temporary and permanent acquisition for each property affected by the changes to the roadway alignment and roundabout. The Owner will provide a standard easement acquisition document or “go-by” example for use by Garver. The fee for providing property acquisition documentation is based on permanent right of way and temporary construction easements for no more than 3 properties. Garver will stake ROW/easements up to one (1) time as requested by the City. Exhibit B - Amendment No. 1 City of Fayetteville Plainview Avenue Extension FEE SUMMARY Title I Service Original Estimated Fees Amendment No. 1 Estimated Fees Total Estimated Fees Geotechnical Services (Terracon)5,400.00$ 5,400.00$ Record Research 5,400.00$ 5,400.00$ Utility Markings (ARKUPS)400.00$ 400.00$ Environmental Handling/Documentation 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ Traffic Studies 19,700.00$ 19,700.00$ H&H Study 23,650.00$ 23,650.00$ Signalization Design 28,260.00$ $ 9,100.00 37,360.00$ Surveys 49,870.00$ 49,870.00$ Conceptual Design 66,820.00$ 66,820.00$ Preliminary Design 87,850.00$ 87,850.00$ Preliminary Design - Electrical 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ Final Design 77,100.00$ 77,100.00$ Final Design - Electrical 5,120.00$ 5,120.00$ Property Acquisition Documents 16,450.00$ $ 9,000.00 25,450.00$ Bidding Services 4,830.00$ 4,830.00$ Mini- Roundabout Final Design (90%/100%) $ 35,200.00 35,200.00$ Final Design - Water & Sewer Relocations $ 24,750.00 24,750.00$ Utility Potholing (Subconsultant) $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ Subtotal for Title I Service 402,650.00$ 88,050.00$ 490,700.00$ Title II Service Original Estimated Fees Amendment No. 1 Estimated Fees Total Estimated Fees Construction Phase Services -$ -$ -$ Subtotal for Title II Service -$ -$ -$ Total All Services 402,650.00$ 88,050.00$ 490,700.00$ L:\2020\20T21040 - Fayetteville Plainview Avenue Extension\Contracts\Client\Draft\Amendment No. 1\2026-03-06 Exhibit B - Garver Fee Spreadsheet - Amend #1 Exhibit B - Amendment No. 1 City of Fayetteville Plainview Avenue Extension REVISED SIGNALIZATION DESIGN WORK TASK DESCRIPTION E-6 E-5 E-3 E-1 T-1 320.00 $261.00 $183.00 $140.00 $105.00 hr hr hr hr hr 1. Phase Pedestrain Push Button Pole Layout Revision 2 4 Verify signal head alignment 2 2 2 Detector Chart, Interval Chart, and Phasing Updates 2 8 4 Quantity Revisions 1 2 2 90% Revised Plans Submittal Review Comments 2 2 4 Final Revised Plans 2 2 4 2 QA/QC 1 1 Subtotal - Phase 1 12 12 20 6 Hours 1 12 12 20 6 Salary Costs $320.00 $3,132.00 $2,196.00 $2,800.00 $630.00 SUBTOTAL - SALARIES: $9,078.00 DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES Document Printing/Reproduction/Assembly $22.00 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES: $22.00 SUBTOTAL: $9,100.00 SUBCONSULTANTS FEE: $0.00 TOTAL FEE: $9,100.00 Exhibit B - Amendment No. 1 City of Fayetteville Plainview Avenue Extension PROPERTY ACQUISITION DOCUMENTS WORK TASK DESCRIPTION E-1 S-5 S-2 2-Man Crew (Survey) 2-Man Crew (GPS Survey) 140.00 $207.00 $85.00 $243.00 $307.00 hr hr hr hr hr 1. Acquisition Documents Coordination and Administration 1 1 Permanent Right-of-Way Acquisition Documents 4 8 Temporary Construction Easements 4 8 Stake Proposed Easement (Maximum 6-Parcels)8 6 8 Subtotal - Acquisition Documents 1 17 16 6 8 Hours 1 17 16 6 8 Salary Costs $140.00 $3,519.00 $1,360.00 $1,458.00 $2,456.00 SUBTOTAL - SALARIES: $8,933.00 DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES Travel Costs $67.00 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES: $67.00 SUBTOTAL: $9,000.00 SUBCONSULTANTS FEE: $0.00 TOTAL FEE: $9,000.00 Exhibit B - Amendment No. 1 City of Fayetteville Plainview Avenue Extension MINI- ROUNDABOUT FINAL DESIGN (90%/100%) WORK TASK DESCRIPTION E-5 E-2 E-1 T-2 E-4 E-1 P-2 261.00 $164.00 $140.00 $122.00 $214.00 $140.00 $217.00 hr hr hr hr hr hr hr 1. Project Management Administration and Coordination 4 Subtotal - Project Management 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. Civil Engineering Revise Horizontal and Vertical Alignments 1 4 Revise Roadway Model 1 4 Revise Drainage Design 1 4 Revise Typical Sections 1 4 4 Revise Maintenance of Traffic Plans 2 4 4 Revise Pavement Marking and Striping Plans 2 4 2 Revise Demolition Plans 2 2 2 Revise Cross Sections 1 4 4 Revise Drainage Plan and Profiles 1 6 4 Revise Survey Control Plans 1 2 2 Revise Driveway Plans 1 2 2 Revise Roundabout Layout Plans 4 4 4 Revise Roundabout Grading Plans 4 6 4 Revise Erosion Control Plans 2 4 4 Revise Landscaping Plans 2 20 Coordination with Utility Companies 2 4 Coordination and Meetings with Owner 2 2 Coordination with Property Owners 2 2 SWPPP/Coordination with DEQ 1 6 6 Specifications/Contract Documents 6 4 1 1 Quantities 4 8 1 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 4 4 1 Quality Control Review 4 2 Address City Comments on 90%8 8 8 Subtotal - Civil Engineering 8 53 82 50 5 23 6 Hours 12 53 82 50 5 23 6 Salary Costs $3,132.00 $8,692.00 $11,480.00 $6,100.00 $1,070.00 $3,220.00 $1,302.00 SUBTOTAL - SALARIES: $34,996.00 DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES Document Printing/Reproduction/Assembly $204.00 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES: $204.00 SUBTOTAL: $35,200.00 SUBCONSULTANTS FEE: $0.00 TOTAL FEE: $35,200.00 Exhibit B - Amendment No. 1 City of Fayetteville Plainview Avenue Extension FINAL DESIGN - WATER & SEWER RELOCATIONS WORK TASK DESCRIPTION E-5 E-4 E-1 T-2 261.00 $214.00 $140.00 $122.00 hr hr hr hr 2. Civil Engineering Revise Water Line Horizontal Alignments 8 12 Revise Sewer Line Horizontal Alignments 8 12 Plan & Profile Sheets 8 30 16 Detail Sheets 1 2 ADH Permitting 4 8 Coordination with Utility Companies 2 Coordination and Meetings with Owner 6 Submittals to Owner 2 2 Measurement and Payment Specs 8 Quantities 1 6 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 4 Quality Control Review 4 Subtotal - Civil Engineering 4 52 72 16 Hours 4 52 72 16 Salary Costs $1,044.00 $11,128.00 $10,080.00 $1,952.00 SUBTOTAL - SALARIES: $24,204.00 DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES Document Printing/Reproduction/Assembly $31.00 ADH Permitting $515.00 SUBTOTAL - DIRECT NON-LABOR EXPENSES: $546.00 SUBTOTAL: $24,750.00 SUBCONSULTANTS FEE: $0.00 TOTAL FEE: $24,750.00 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1384 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Chris Brown, Public Works Director Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Justin Bland, City Engineer SUBJECT: S. School Ave. SS4A –Amendment #1 with ISG RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of contract Amendment #1 to the master agreement with ISG in the amount of 443,000 for additional design services on the South School Avenue SS4A project. BACKGROUND: The city received a $25,000,000 Safe Streets for All grant for five construction projects including this section of S. School Ave. (between Martin Luther King Blvd. and 15th St). ISG has a contract in place to provide a conceptual design on which they are nearing completion. This conceptual design phase included a public meeting which was held on December 11, 2025. Staff presented the recommended design concept along with public feedback/survey results at the Transportation Committee on January 27, 2026. At this meeting the committee voted to approve the conceptual design concept and proceed with the conceptual design which is near completion. DISCUSSION: The scope of services for this next phase of design includes the Preliminary Design Phase which includes another round of public engagement, preparation of land acquisition documents, agency coordination for environmental review and preliminary plan preparation, among other items. The amendment also includes similar tasks for completion of the final plan preparation and bidding services. One item of note is that there is 95,000 in design fees for the water line improvements. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funding for this project will come from the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant (resolution 301-240), the 2022 Transportation Bond program, and the Water & Sewer fund. The contract amendment cost is split between the SS4A grant and the City at 74.63% and 25.37%, respectively. The water line improvements portion of the amendment is not eligible for SS4A reimbursement; therefore, the City match is calculated on 348,000. The funding breakdown for the contract amount is as follows: Description Account Project Amount SS4A 2235.900.9222-5860.0232401.9222 $259,712.40 Transportation Bond Program 4702.860.7235-5860.0246020.7235.9222 $88,287.60 Water and Sewer Fund 5400.720.5600-5314.0012009.1 $95,000 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Total $443,000.00 ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. S School Ave Contract Amendment 1 Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1384 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH I & S GROUP, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $443,000.00 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES ON THE SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL PROJECT WHEREAS, the School Avenue and College Avenue Corridors serve as the major north-south route through the central part of the city and are major commercial and retail destinations; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2024, City Council approved Resolution 301-24 to accept federal aid funding in the amount of $25,000,000.00 from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration through the Safe Streets and Roads for All Program to fund improvements to these corridors; and WHEREAS, the scope of services for this phase of design includes the Preliminary Design Phase which includes another round of public engagement, preparation of land acquisition documents, agency coordination for environmental review and preliminary plan preparation, among other items. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes Mayor Rawn to sign Amendment No. 1 with I & S Group, Inc. in the amount of $443,000.00 for additional services on the South School Avenue Safe Streets and Roads for All Project. Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution #301-24; 168-25 Approval Date: Original Contract Number: 32401.9222 46020.7235.9222 12009.1 Project Number Budget Impact: Safe Street and Roads Grant - S School Streets Project (Bonds) - SS4A City Portion - S School Water System Rehabilitation/Replacement Fund Safe Streets and Roads Grant Street Projects 2022 Bonds Water & Sewer 2235.900.9222-5860.02 4702.860.7235-5860.02 5400.720.5600-5314.00 Account Number Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1384 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only Staff recommends approval of contract Amendment #1 to the master agreement with ISG in the amount of 443,000 for additional design services on the South School Avenue SS4A project. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Sara Combs ENGINEERING (621) Division / Department 4/15/2026 Submitted Date Yes 3,650,913.54$ 443,000.00$ Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Amendment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Amendment Remaining Budget 5,277,640.00$ 1,626,726.46$ Yes No -$ 3,207,913.54$ Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 1 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, AR ISG PROJECT #25-32858 CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 This Contract Amendment No. 1, effective on the date last written below, shall amend the original contract between the City of Fayetteville (Owner) and I & S Group, Inc. (ISG), dated August 5, 2025 referred to in the following paragraphs as the original contract. This Contract Amendment No. 1 adds professional design services for the : Improvements to South School Avenue from MLK Jr. Boulevard to 15th Street. In general, Amendment No. 1 scope of services include survey, environmental review, street design, traffic signal design, water utility design, storm sewer culvert design, real estate acquisition documents, and bidding support. APPENDIX A – SCOPE OF SERVICES All items contained in the attached Amendment No. 1 Appendix A shall be added to the original project Scope of Services. APPENDIX B – PROJECT FEE SPREADSHEETS The attached hourly rates, summary sheet and fee spreadsheets shall be added to APPENDIX B as included in the original agreement. The Amendment No. 1 shall increase the agreement amount a sum of $443,000.00 from $287,000.00 to 730,000.00. Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 2 This Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and ISG have executed this Amendment effective as of the date last written below. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE I & S Group, Inc. By:_________________________________ By:_________________________________ Name:______________________________ Name:__William Kratt_________________ Title:_______________________________ Title:__Business Unit Leader____________ Date:_______________________________ Date:_March 20, 2026_________________ Attest:______________________________ Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 3 APPENDIX A SCOPE OF SERVICES Project The scope of services generally includes survey, environmental review, street design, traffic signal design, water utility design, storm sewer culvert design, real estate acquisition documents, and bidding support. The project limits are School Avenue from W 15th St to W Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard, including the functional areas of the intersections. The project is being funded through a Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant from the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) and local funding. The reconstruction will include enhancements to pedestrian infrastructure, landscaping, hardscaping, streets, intersections, drainage systems, water systems, sanitary sewer systems, and access control. PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE Once the City approves the conceptual plans, ISG will begin the preliminary design phase and incorporate remaining comments from the conceptual design phase. The preliminary design phase will document design decisions and will be used to complete the NEPA documentation, and continue coordinating with agencies, utilities, and other stakeholders. A preliminary scope of services is provided below that may be included in the Preliminary Design Phase, however, this is subject to modification and revisions based on the findings during the Conceptual Design Phase and the preferred selected alternative. Surveys Right-of-Way and Easement Exhibit Preparation ISG will prepare the right-of-way and easement descriptions along with associated exhibits as necessary, to assist with any anticipated land acquisition adjacent to existing City of Fayetteville right-of-way or easements. These exhibits will be based upon the final negotiated property acquisition agreements between the landowners and the City of Fayetteville and will be utilized for recordation. Utility Coordination Once preliminary plans and right-of-way and easement documents are prepared, ISG will provide these documents to utilities in order for them to confirm any conflicts their facilities have with the reconstruction. Utilities will be asked to provide a work plan for any removals, relocations, or additions to their facilities. The work plan will include drawings and a proposed schedule for any work on their facilities. ISG will coordinate with utilities to encourage the relocation of any conflicts prior to the reconstruction of School Avenue. Any conflicts that must be resolved during reconstruction of School Avenue will be coordinated and information will be provided in the contract documents for the City’s contractor to continue coordination through the reconstruction of School Avenue. Environmental Agency Coordination ISG will provide preliminary and final plans to the following agencies for regulatory approvals, if required: Arkansas Division of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Arkansas Department of Health Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 4 Division of Arkansas Heritage United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Environmental Document ISG will finalize the environmental document, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards. The subject project is assumed to require a Tier 3 Categorical Exclusion (CE). Once complete, ISG will furnish the City and the FHWA original copies for review. ISG will incorporate comments into a revised document. ISG assumes up to two rounds of comments. ISG will submit the final document to FHWA for its approval. Public Engagement ISG will provide the City with written content, graphics, and project documentation for the City’s use on the City’s website, social media, and other communication methods. In addition, the following meetings are anticipated: Up to Two (2) public involvement meetings, one prior to preliminary design, and one during final design and prior to bidding Up to One (1) Transportation Committee meetings Up to One (1) Active Transportation Committee meetings Meetings with residents, businesses, property owners, and other stakeholders, as necessary ISG will coordinate the public meetings, with assistance from the City. ISG will keep a public engagement log of comments and interactions with public stakeholders and will provide the log to the City. Culvert Design ISG will complete a comprehensive Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) study to evaluate the existing culvert at the Tanglewood Branch crossing. This study will include an analysis of current conditions, modeling of proposed improvements, and recommendations for appropriate culvert replacement sizing. ISG will also document the anticipated upstream and downstream impacts associated with the proposed improvements. Incorporating the culvert replacement into the project scope may necessitate additional environmental investigations, including but not limited to an endangered species bat assessment. Permitting through agencies such as the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will also be required. ISG will coordinate directly with each permitting agency to obtain all necessary approvals for the project. It is anticipated that the culvert will be a precast reinforced concrete box. Should the preferred alternative be of a different structure type requiring structural analysis and design, ISG can provide a subsequent proposal with those additional service. Preliminary Plans ISG will prepare a Preliminary Plan set that will take the preferred alternative to approximately 60% of completed construction documents. An updated opinion of probable cost will be provided. ISG will coordinate a preliminary plan review meeting with the City. The preliminary plan set will include: Title Sheet Typical Sections Construction Details Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 5 Removal Plans Utility Plans and Profiles Intersection Details Street Plans and Profiles Pavement Marking and Signing Plans Maintenance of Traffic Conceptual Plans Cross Sections Box Culvert Plan and Profile Landscape Architecture ISG will design streetscape amenities. These amenities could include plantings, planters, benches, bus shelters, refuse receptacles, placemaking features, gateway features, and other amenities. Streetscape amenities will be coordinated with green infrastructure, lighting, and street reconstruction designs. Electrical Design ISG will design street lighting. Lighting spacing will be according to City standards. If none exist, spacing will match typical installations. A photometric analysis will be provided, if requested. FINAL DESIGN Once the City approves the preliminary plans, ISG will begin the final design phase and incorporate remaining comments from the preliminary design phase. The final design phase will provide construction plans, specifications, and estimates for the purpose of bidding and construction. Plans and specifications will be used to continue coordinating with agencies, utilities, and other stakeholders. ISG will coordinate a final plan review meeting with the City. After comments from the final plan review meeting are received and incorporated, a plan-in-hand walkthrough will be conducted with the City, and final changes will be incorporated into the final construction documents prior to bidding. An updated opinion of probable cost will be provided. The final plan set will include: Title Sheet Project notes Typical Sections Construction Details Removal Plans Erosion Control Plans Utility Plans and Profiles Intersection Details Street Plans and Profiles Pavement Marking and Signing Plans Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 6 Maintenance of Traffic Plans Cross Sections Box Culvert Plan and Profile Utility Coordination ISG will provide utilities with final plans and right-of-way and easement exhibits and will continue to coordinate with utilities prior to reconstruction of School Avenue as needed. Environmental Permitting Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) ISG will prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for the scope of this proposed construction work. A stormwater pollution prevention plan will be prepared that incorporates Best Management Practices (BMPs). This plan will include the necessary erosion control measures to meet local and state requirements. Bidding Assistance ISG will assist in the preparation of an advertisement for bids to assist with solicitation of competitive general contractor bids. We are prepared to respond to contractor questions and issue clarifications via addendum if necessary. We will also provide assistance with bid evaluation, issuance of a recommendation of award, and preparation of the Notice to Proceed and Agreement between the City and Contractor. Survey Monumentation Based on the boundary survey and the recorded right-of-way and easement documents, ISG will install iron monuments at the new property corners. It is anticipated that temporary monumentation will be set prior to construction and that after construction is completed final monumentation will be installed. This will include subsurface installation of ½-inch diameter, 20- inch-long solid iron rods, or other permanent monuments where applicable, at each of the new property corners. The locations will also be identified on the surface by wooden lath. EXCLUSIONS The following items are excluded from the scope of services in this proposal: Geotechnical Services Public Hearings Cultural Resources Surveys beyond Phase I Wetland Delineation Hazardous Material Surveys beyond Phase I Section 4(f) Evaluations Visual Impact Memo Noise Screening Analysis Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 7 A NEPA Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, or Environmental Impact Statement LOMR Structural Engineering Construction Phase Services SCHEDULE ISG proposes the following schedule if the contract amendment is approved by May 1, 2015. This schedule is dependent upon the City receiving the approval of the NEPA document by July 1, 2026. The subsequent tasks are expected to be adjusted if that approval is delayed. Phase Date Receive Final Environmental Clearance July 1, 2026 Preliminary Plans (60%) August 14, 2026 Right-of-way and Easement Documents September 18 2026 Final Plans and Specifications for City Review (90%) April 1, 2027 Final Construction Documents June 1, 2027 Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 8 APPENDIX B COMPENSATION ISG proposes to provide the scope of work described within this proposal for compensation in accordance with the following schedule. Anticipated reimbursable expenses such as travel time, mileage expenses, and printing costs are included. Preliminary Design Phase Compensation Surveys $40,000.00 Environmental $24,000.00 Franchise Utility Coordination $10,000.00 Preliminary Plans (including box culvert addition) $139,000.00 Public Engagement $15,000.00 Total $228,000.00 Preliminary Design Phase – Water Utility Compensation Preliminary Plans $50,000.00 Total $50,000.00 Final Design Phase Compensation Survey $15,000.00 Franchise Utility Coordination $5,000.00 Final Plans $90,000.00 Total $110,000.00 Final Design Phase – Water Utility Compensation Final Plans $45,000.00 Total $45,000.00 Contract Amendment No. 1 South School Ave. – MLK Jr. Blvd to 15th St. I & S Group, Inc. | 3100 Market Street + Suite 106 + Rogers, AR 72758 + 479.974.1601 9 Bidding Assistance Compensation Bidding Assistance $10,000.00 Total $10,000.00 Total Compensation for Contract Amendment 1 $443,000.00 Fee Summary City of Fayetteville, AR S. School Ave. (MLK to 15th) ISG Project #32858 FAYETTEVILLE, AR (SS4) S. SCHOOL AVE PROJECT Senior Civil Engineer Civil Engineer IV Civil Engineer II Civil Engineer I Civil Designer IV Civil Designer III Civil Designer II Landscape Architect IV Landscape Architect II Senior Environmental Scientist Environmental Scientist/Engineer III Senior Land Surveyor Geospatial Specialist III Geospatial Specialist II Total 250.00$ 215.00$ 170.00$ 160.00$ 170.00$ 150.00$ 140.00$ 205.00$ 160.00$ 225.00$ 170.00$ 210.00$ 140.00$ 130.00$ SURVEY Prelim Phase Right-of-way and Easement Exhibits 22 132 58 39,990.00$ Final Phase Temporary Monumentation 1 29 24 7,395.00$ Final Monumentation 1 9 9 11 4,795.00$ Expenses 2,815.00$ TASK TOTAL 54,995.00$ ENVIRONMENTAL Prelim Phase Project Management 1 6 1,600.00$ Agency Coordination 1 2 13 2,875.00$ Archaeology and History 1 2 4 1,345.00$ Hazardous Materials 8 1,360.00$ Environmental Document 1 3 14 3,305.00$ Permitting 2 9 1,980.00$ Wetland Delineation 1 5 60 11,575.00$ TASK TOTAL 24,040.00$ FRANCHISE UTILITY COORDINATION Prelim Phase Preliminary Plan Packages 1 5 5 1,900.00$ Review of Utility Work Plans 2 15 15 5,450.00$ Work Plan Revisions 1 8 8 2,890.00$ Final Phase Final Plan Packages 2 8 8 3,140.00$ Continued Coordination 1 4 4 1,570.00$ TASK TOTAL 14,950.00$ Fee Summary PRELIMINARY PLANS Project Management 14 4 4,360.00$ Civil Design 40 128 27,280.00$ Landscape Architecture 24 110 22,520.00$ Plan Production 96 14,400.00$ Cost Opinion 4 12 2,600.00$ Electrical 2 16 24 40 30 18,920.00$ TASK TOTAL 90,080.00$ FINAL PLANS Project Management 14 4 4,360.00$ Civil Design 40 136 28,560.00$ Landscape Architecture 22 109 21,950.00$ Plan Production 92 13,800.00$ Cost Opinion 4 10 2,280.00$ Electrical 2 17 26 40 28 19,175.00$ Bidding -$ TASK TOTAL 90,125.00$ BOX CULVERT Field Survey 8 4 2,240.00$ Process Survey 4 8 1,960.00$ Survey/Design Report 2 16 2 3 12 6,450.00$ Hydrology and Hydraulics 4 16 26 8,600.00$ Structure Design 6 32 12 8 11,660.00$ Permitting 9 40 24 14,690.00$ Drafting Structure Plan 24 3,360.00$ TASK TOTAL 48,960.00$ PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Prelim Phase Project Management 10 10 4,650.00$ Prepare Materials 10 10 4 5,290.00$ Coordinate Public Meetings 10 10 4,650.00$ Public Engagement Log 2 430.00$ Expenses 3,000.00$ TASK TOTAL 15,020.00$ Fee Summary PUBLIC UTILITIES Prelim Phase Preliminary Design 13 24 124 166 51,490.00$ Final Phase Final Desgin 20 24 100 100 40,160.00$ Permitting 8 8 3,720.00$ TASK TOTAL 95,370.00$ Bidding Bidding 10 18 23 10,050.00$ TASK TOTAL 10,050.00$ GRAND TOTAL 443,590.00$ Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1366 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Marlee Stark, Chief Housing Officer SUBJECT: 7hills Annual Contract Renewal RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend approval of a resolution to waive the requirements of formal competitive bidding and approve a contract with Seven Hills Homeless Center (“7hills”) in the amounts of $125,370.00 for operations of the 7hills Day Center and $150,000.00 for capital improvements at the Walker Family Residential Community facility. BACKGROUND: The City Council has approved contracts to provide funding assistance for the 7hills Day Center and maintenance of the Walker Family Residential Community facility through citywide budgeting processes since 2017. The Walker Family Residential Community provides transitional housing and overnight shelter to individuals experiencing homelessness. Dedicated case managers provide tailored support to each resident, identifying opportunities for employment and housing as well as support to address legal or health-related issues. 7hills also operates its Day Center on School Avenue, providing essential services such as meals, clothing, showers, and hygiene items to help meet daily needs. DISCUSSION: 7hills and the Facilities Management Department outlined several items for repair or replacement in the 2026-2030 Capital Improvements Program, including parking lot and driveway repairs in 2026. This funding supports the maintenance of community infrastructure and facilities. On June 17, 2025, the City Council adopted the 2026-2030 Capital Improvements Program, which included $330,000 in funding over five years to repair and maintain the Walker Family Residential Community facility. Planned projects for 2026 include parking lot and driveway repairs. On November 18, 2025, the City Council approved the 2026 annual operating budget, which appropriated 125,370 for the fiscal year to support the operations of the Day Center. This amount is constant from the 2025 budget cycle. As part of citywide review of housing and shelter-related programming, the Mayor’s Office and the Chief Housing Officer worked with 7hills leadership to update and consolidate these two annual funding commitments to support unhoused residents in Fayetteville. Per the contract’s terms, 7hills will provide Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov quarterly financial and written reports to the Chief Housing Officer, and 7hills will deliver a semi-annual update to the City Council. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funding for the operations of the Day Center was included in the 2026 operational budget, and funding for the Walker Family Residential Community facility was included in the 2026-2030 Capital Improvements Program. While the contract references the development of a Memorandum of Understanding related to extreme weather response, funding for these efforts comes from annual federal funding allocations from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). All HUD-related funding allocations are included in the City’s five-year Consolidated Plan and associated Annual Action Plans, which go through annual public comment periods and review and approval by HUD. The 2026-2030 Consolidated Plan is under development and will be made available for public review in early summer 2026. GL Account Project Amount 1010.090.6600-5721.00 40901.4010.1 $125,370.00 4470.140.8900-5400.00 18004.1 $150,000.00 Total $275,370.00 ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. 7hills Contract 2026 - Signed by 7hills Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1366 A RESOLUTION TO WAIVE COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND AUTHORIZE A CONTRACT WITH SEVEN HILLS HOMELESS CENTER FOR OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $275,370.00 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Seven Hills has operated a day time facility to serve numerous homeless and needy Fayetteville residents for over 20 years relying upon the support of several local churches, charities and charitable persons, as well as some governmental support (for veterans, etc.); and WHEREAS, the Fayetteville City Council approved a funding request for the 2026 fiscal year to maintain the operations of the Seven Hills day center and, although funding for the center by donors has improved, a shortfall still exists that jeopardizes its ability to continue to offer vital services to Fayetteville’s homeless residents; and WHEREAS, if Seven Hills could no longer operate its Walker Family Residential Community transitional housing facility, currently housed residents might become homeless again and have to live on the streets or in the woods; and WHEREAS, if Seven Hills could no longer operate its day time facility, the large number of homeless residents who depend upon this facility for showers and washing, hot food, a warm place to stay during the day, as well as access to a telephone and other job assistance services could not find such comparable services elsewhere; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved contracts to provide funding assistance for maintenance of the Walker Family Residential Community facility through citywide budgeting processes since 2017; and WHEREAS, Seven Hills and the Facilities Management Department outlined several items for repair or replacement in the 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, the facilities and services provided by Seven Hills should continue to be supported by the City in order to prevent our homeless and needy residents from suffering undue hardship and deprivation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby determines an exceptional situation exists in which competitive bidding is deemed not feasible or practical and therefore waives the requirements of formal competitive bidding and authorizes Mayor Rawn to sign a contract with Seven Resolution: File Number: 2026-1366 Page 2 Hills Homeless Center for Operations and capital improvements to the Walker Family Residential Community Facility in the total amount of $275,370.00. City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1366 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item Marlee Stark 4/15/2026 COMMUNITY RESOURCES (642) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Staff recommend approval of a resolution to waive the requirements of formal competitive bidding and approve a contract with Seven Hills Homeless Center (“7hills”) in the amounts of $125,370.00 for operations of the 7hills Day Center and $150,000.00 for capital improvements at the Walker Family Residential Community facility. Budget Impact: 1010.090.6600-5721.00 4470.140.8900-5400.00 General Sales Tax Capital Improvements Account Number Fund 40901.4010.1 18004.1 Community Partners Funding - 7Hills 7Hills Walker Family Residential Facility Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item?Yes Total Amended Budget $333,321.00 Expenses (Actual+Encum)$17,951.37 Available Budget $315,369.63 Does item have a direct cost?Yes Item Cost $275,370.00 Is a Budget Amendment attached?No Budget Amendment $- Remaining Budget $39,999.63 Purchase Order Number:Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Change Order Number:Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Comments: 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT This Professional Services Contract (the “Contract”) is made between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas (hereinafter the “City”) and Seven Hills Homeless Center, an Arkansas nonprofit corporation which filed its corporate documents with the Secretary of State in 2001 (hereinafter “7hills”) on this day _________________________, 2026. Whereas, the Board of Directors of 7hills has operated a daytime facility (“Day Center”) to serve numerous unsheltered or housing insecure Fayetteville residents for over 20 years relying on the support of local churches, charities and charitable people as well as some governmental support; Whereas, the Fayetteville City Council has approved the City’s 2026 budget and the City’s 2026-2030 Capital Improvements Program, which both include funding for 7hills; Whereas, each year since 2017, the City Council has authorized contracts to provide funding assistance for repairs at 7hills’ transitional housing facility (“Walker Family Residential Community”); Whereas, 7hills and Facilities Management have identified planned repairs to help support the Walker Family Residential Community facility, including parking lot and driveway repairs; Whereas, if 7hills could no longer operate Walker Family Residential Community, currently housed residents may become unsheltered again and must live on the streets, in the woods, or in other unstable living situations; Whereas, if 7hills could no longer operate its Day Center, the number of homeless residents who depend on the facility for services would not receive comparable services elsewhere; and Whereas, the facilities and services provided by 7hills are required to be continued and should continue to be supported by the City to prevent our homeless residents from suffering undue hardship and deprivation. NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Fayetteville and the Board of Directors of Seven Hills Homeless Center agree as follows: 1. Contract Amount. The City agrees to pay 7hills the sum of TEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED and FORTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS ($10,447.50) on the first Wednesday of each month beginning in January 2026. 2. Term . The term of this contract shall be January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026 unless terminated by the City for failure of 7hills to comply with all provisions and requirements of this contract. 2 3. Ongoing Maintenance and Operations. 7hills shall provide all necessary personnel, supplies, utilities, and maintenance of its facilities to serve the City’s homeless residents who are utilizing and will continue to utilize 7hills. 4. Day Center. 7hills shall continue to offer all programs and services that7hills provided in the previous year at its Day Center. This includes but is not limited to meals, showers, telephone services, and job assistance services. 5. Walker Family Residential Community. 7hills shall provide all necessary personnel, supplies, utilities, and maintenance of the Walker Family Residential Community facility to provide transitional housing that 7hills provided in the previous year at its transitional housing facility. 7hills will work with the Facilities Management Division and the Chief Housing Officer to utilize City funds set aside for facilities maintenance in the amount of $150,000.00 for capital improvements, including driveway and parking lot repairs, at the Walker Family Residential Community. Improvements utilizing these funds shall be pre-authorized and approved in writing by Facilities Management and the Chief Housing Officer before the commencement of work. 7hills shall comply with City’s purchasing policies for all approved expenditures. The City may disperse funds prior to commencement of a repair or maintenance project with a valid contract or purchase order or may reimburse 7hills for completed repair or maintenance work only for projects that were approved in writing prior to the commencement of the work. 6. Extreme Weather Response. 7hills shall continue to operate and/or manage extreme weather sheltering services in coordination with other service providers, the logistical details of which will be outlined in a Memorandum of Understanding agreed upon by both parties. To the extent reimbursement funding is available from the City, 7hills shall obtain approval from the City’s Chief Housing Officer in advance to access those funds. 7. Financials. 7hills shall continue to make diligent efforts to stabilize its long-term funding, and 7hills shall provide quarterly financial reports tothe Chief Housing Officer. These reports shall bedelivered on or before April 15, July 15, October 15, and January 15. 8. Reporting. 7hills shall provide quarterly written reports to the Chief Housing Officer no later than the 15 days after the last month of each quarter that provide qualitative and quantitative analysis of 7hills’ services at its Day Center and Walker Family Residential Community. 7hills shall coordinate with the Chief Housing Officer to determine appropriate reporting metrics. 7hills shall also appear twice yearly, in May and November, before the Fayetteville City Council and provide a detailed report of its activities across all aspects of this contract in coordination with the Chief Housing Officer. 9. Termination. Either party to this Contract shall have the absolute right at anytime to terminate this Contract by providing the other party with ninety (90) days advance written notice. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their signatures to be set by their authorized representatives effective the date signed by the Mayor after approval by the Fayetteville City Council. SEVEN HILLS HOMELESS CENTER Read Hudson, Chairman of the Board tJones, Chief Executive Officer Date:goat', CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE Molly Rawn, Mayor Date: ATTEST: Kara Paxton, City Clerk/Treasurer Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1390 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Chris Brown, Public Works Director SUBJECT: A Resolution Approving a Contract with Hutton Corporation in the amount of 166,647.00 for Installation of Security Bollards at the Upper Ramble and approving a Contingency in the amount of $20,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a Resolution approving a contract in the amount of $166,647.00 with Hutton Corporation for installation of high security bollards at the Upper Ramble, contingency in the amount of 20,000, and approval of a budget amendment. BACKGROUND: The Upper Ramble hosts large gatherings and includes three corner locations where vehicular access is possible, presenting a safety risk that warrants mitigation. A combination of retractable and removable bollards planned to reduce the risk of unauthorized vehicular access to the park. The City Council has previously approved purchase of these bollards from Delta Scientific Corporation. Delta Scientific has provided a shipping date of no later than May 28th. DISCUSSION: Bids for this project were opened on April 14th. Hutton Corporation of Wichita, KS is the lowest responsive bidder on the project at $166,647.00. Two other bids were submitted but were rejected due to missing information in their bids. This contract includes a required completion date of June 19th, contingent on receipt of the bollards by June 1st. Due to this tight timeframe, a relatively large contract contingency is requested so that contract additions for unforeseen conditions can be approved administratively. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funds for this contract are being moved to the Arts Corridor 2022 Bond Funds project with the included budget amendment. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Budget Amendment, 5. Hutton Agreement - Upper Ramble Bollard Installation, 6. Bid 26-32, Bid Tab - Final, 7. Bid 26-32, FILE #02 - Plans Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1390 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD BID 26-32 AND AUTHORIZE A CONTRACT WITH HUTTON CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $166,647.00 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SECURITY BOLLARDS IN THE UPPER RAMBLE, TO APPROVE A PROJECT CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000.00, AND TO APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby awards Bid 26-32 and authorizes a contract with Hutton Corporation in the amount of $166,647.00 for the installation of security bollards in the Upper Ramble, and further approves a project contingency in the amount of 20,000.00. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a budget amendment, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. 4/16/2026 Submitted Date Yes 0.41$ 186,647.00$ Must Attach Completed Budget Adjustment! V20180321 Budgeted Item? Does item have a cost? Budget Adjustment Attached? Current Budget Funds Obligated Current Balance Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget 18,194.00$ 18,193.59$ Yes Yes 186,647.00$ 0.41$ 46080.7800 Project Number Budget Impact: Arts Corridor 2022 Bond Funds Fund Sales TaxCapital4470.090.8900-5315.00 Account Number Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1390 Legistar File ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only Staff recommends approval of a Resolution approving a contract in the amount of $166,647.00 with Hutton Corporation for installation of high security bollards at the Upper Ramble, contingency in the amount of $20,000, and approval of a budget amendment. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Sara Combs ENGINEERING (621) Division / Department Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Approval Date: Original Contract Number: City of Fayetteville, Arkansas - Budget Amendment/Adjustment Agenda) Budget Year Division Org2 ENGINEERING (621) BA Number 2026 Requestor:Sara Combs BUDGET AMENDMENT/ADJUSTMENT DESCRIPTION: Staff recommends approval of a Resolution approving a contract in the amount of $166,647.00 with Hutton Corporation for installation of high security bollards at the Upper Ramble, contingency in the amount of $20,000, and approval of a budget amendment. COUNCIL DATE:5/5/2026 ITEM ID#:2026-1390 Holly Black 4/16/2026 2:12 PM Budget Division Date TYPE: D - (City Council) JOURNAL #: GLDATE: RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE CHKD/POSTED:/ v.202646TOTAL-- Increase / (Decrease)Project.Sub# Account Number Expense Revenue Project Sub.Detl AT AccountNameGLACCOUNTEXPENSEREVENUEPROJECTSUBATDESCRIPTION X 4470.090.8900-5315.00 166,647 -46080 7800 EX Contract Services 4470.090.8900-5911.99 20,000 -46080 7800 EX Contingency - Capital Project 4470.090.8900-5400.00 (186,647)-15008 1 EX Building & Grounds - Maintenance 1 of 1 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR Contract Name/Title: UPPER RAMBLE BOLLARD INSTALLATION Contract No.: BID 26-32, CONSTRUCTION THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of the day of in the year 2026 by and between The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas and u0N Cu rpara'k0.1 (hereinafter called Contractor). ARTICLE 1 - WORK 1.01 Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The work under this Contract includes, but is not limited to: Demolishing the existing sidewalk, performing excavation and installing bollards with footings and new concrete pavement. Any use of a third -party dumpster or roll off container shall be procured from the City of Fayetteville Recycling and Trash Collection Division. Use of a Non -City dumpster or roll off container is not allowed. Open burning is not allowed on City projects. Blasting is not allowed on City projects. Contractor is responsible for obtaining all applicable permits; however, fees for the City issued permits shall be waived. The Contract includes work in City of Fayetteville Right-of-way and in General Utility Easements. Refer to Section 00400-Bid Form for quantities. ARTICLE 2 - ENGINEER 2.01 The Contract Documents have been prepared by the City of Fayetteville Engineering Division. City of Fayetteville Engineering Division assumes all duties and responsibilities, and has the rights and authority assigned to City of Fayetteville Engineering Division in the Contract Documents in connection with completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 3 - CONTRACT TIME 3.01 TIME OF THE ESSENCE: A. All time limits for milestones, if any, Substantial Completion, and completion and readiness for final payment as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence of the Contract. 00500 Agreement 00500- 1 31 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT (continued) 3.02 DATES FOR SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND FINAL PAYMENT: A. The Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the Project on or before June 19, 2026. This completion deadline is expressly contingent upon the City's receipt of the bollards procured for the Project on or before June 1, 2026. In the event the bollards are not received by June 1, 2026, the Contract Time shall be equitably adjusted to account for the delay, and the Contractor shall not be held responsible for failure to meet the June 19, 2026 completion date to the extent such failure is caused by the delayed delivery. B. Final Completion shall be achieved within thirty (30) days after Substantial Completion, at which time the Project shall be eligible for final payment in accordance with the General Conditions of the Contract. 3.03 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: A. Owner and Contractor recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that The City of Fayetteville will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the time specified above, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with the GENERAL CONDITIONS. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving the actual loss suffered by The City of Fayetteville if the Work is not Substantially Completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, The City of Fayetteville and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty) Contractor shall pay The City of Fayetteville Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($750.00) for each calendar day that expires after the time specified above in Paragraph 3.02 for Substantial Completion until the Work is Substantially Complete. After Substantial Completion, if Contractor shall neglect, refuse, or fail to complete the remaining Work within the time specified in Paragraph 3.02 for completion and readiness for final payment or any proper extension thereof granted by The City of Fayetteville, Contractor shall pay The City of Fayetteville Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each calendar day that expires after the time specified for completion and readiness for final payment. ARTICLE 4 - CONTRACT PRICE 4.01 The CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE agrees to pay, and the CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, as full and final compensation for all work done under this agreement, the amount based on the unit prices bid in the Proposal (BID FORM) which is hereto attached, for the actual amount accomplished under each pay item, said payments to be made in lawful money of the United States at the time and in the manner set forth in the Specifications. 4.02 As provided in the General Conditions, estimated quantities are not guaranteed, and determinations of actual quantities and classifications are to be made by ENGINEER as provided in the General Conditions. Unit prices have been computed as provided in the General Conditions. 00500 Agreement 00500-2 32 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT (continued) 4.03 Changes, modifications, or amendments in scope, price or fees to this contract shall not be allowed without a prior formal contract amendment approved by the Mayor and the City Council in advance of the change in scope, cost or fees. There shall be no changes without prior written approval of the Engineer of Record and/or the City's designated Professional Engineer. ARTICLE 5 - PAYMENT PROCEDURES 5.01 SUBMITTAL AND PROCESSING OF PAYMENTS: A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with the GENERAL CONDITIONS. Applications for Payment will be processed by Engineer as provided in the GENERAL CONDITIONS. 5.02 PROGRESS PAYMENTS, RETAINAGE: A. The City of Fayetteville shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor's Applications for Payment as recommended by Engineer, on or about the 15th day of each month during construction. All such payments will be measured by the schedule of values established in the GENERAL CONDITIONS (and in the case of Unit Price Work based on the number of units completed) or, in the event there is no schedule of values, as provided in the General Requirements. Prior to Substantial Completion, progress payments will be made in an amount equal to the percentage indicated below, but, in each case, less the aggregate of payments previously made and less such amounts as Engineer shall determine, or The City of Fayetteville may withhold, in accordance with the GENERAL CONDITIONS. a. 95% of Work Completed (with the balance being retainage). If Work has been 50% completed as determined by Engineer, and if the character and progress of the Work have been satisfactory to The City of Fayetteville and Engineer, The City of Fayetteville on recommendation of Engineer, may determine that as long as the character and progress of the Work subsequently remain satisfactory to them, there will be no additional retainage on account of Work subsequently completed, in which case the remaining progress payments prior to Substantial Completion will be an amount equal to 100% of the Work Completed less the aggregate of payments previously made; and b. 100% of Equipment and Materials not incorporated in the Work but delivered, suitably stored, and accompanied by documentation satisfactory to The City of Fayetteville as provided in the GENERAL CONDITIONS. 00500 Agreement 00500-3 33 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT (continued) 5.03 FINAL PAYMENT: A. Upon final completion and acceptance of the Work in accordance with the GENERAL CONDITIONS, The City of Fayetteville shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by Engineer and as provided in the GENERAL CONDITIONS. ARTICLE 6 - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 6.01 In order to induce The City of Fayetteville to enter into this Agreement, Contractor makes the following representations: A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents including the Addenda and other related data identified in the Bid Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, performance, and furnishing of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, performance, and furnishing of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) Reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site; and (2) Reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site. Contractor acknowledges that The City of Fayetteville and Engineer do not assume responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of information and data shown or indicated in the Contract Documents with respect to Underground Facilities at or contiguous to the Site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility of having done so) all such additional supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site or otherwise which may affect cost, progress, performance, and furnishing of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performing and furnishing of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by The City of Fayetteville and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. 00500 Agreement 00500-4 34 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT (continued) H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents and the written resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to Contractor. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. ARTICLE 7 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 7.01 CONTENTS: A. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire Agreement between The City of Fayetteville and Contractor concerning the Work consist of the following and may only be amended, modified, or supplemented as provided in the GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. This Agreement. 2. Exhibits to this Agreement (enumerated as follows): a. Notice to Proceed. b. Contractor's Bid. c. Documentation submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award. 3. Performance, Payment, and other Bonds. 4. General Conditions. 5. Supplementary Conditions. 6. Specifications consisting of divisions and sections as listed in table of contents of Project Manual. 7. Drawings consisting of a cover sheet and sheets as listed in the table of contents thereof, with each sheet bearing the following general title: UPPER RAMBLE BOLLARD INSTALLATION 8. Addenda numbers 1-3 inclusive. 9. The following which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: All Written Amendments and other documents amending, modifying, or supplementing the Contract Documents pursuant to the GENERAL CONDITIONS. ARTICLE 8 - MISCELLANEOUS 8.01 TERMS: A. Terms used in this Agreement which are defined in the GENERAL CONDITIONS shall have the meanings stated in the GENERAL CONDITIONS. 00500 Agreement 00500-5 35 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT (continued) 8.02 ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT: A. No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract Documents will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and specifically but without limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by Law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. 8.03 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: A. The City of Fayetteville and Contractor each binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 8.04 SEVERABILITY: A. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon The City of Fayetteville and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 8.05 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: A. City contracts and documents prepared while performing city contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the City of Fayetteville, the contractor will do everything possible to provide the documents in a prompt and timely manner as prescribed in the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. §25-19-101 et. seq.). Only legally authorized photocopying costs pursuant to the FOIA may be assessed for this compliance. 8.06 LIENS: A. No liens against this construction project are allowed. Arkansas law (A.C.A. §§ 18- 44-501 through 508) prohibits the filing of any mechanics' of materialmen's liens in relation to this public construction project. Arkansas law requires and the contractor promises to provide and file with the Circuit Clerk of Washington County a bond in a sum equal to the amount of this contract. Any subcontractor or materials supplier may bring an action for non-payment or labor or material on the bond. The contractor promises to notify every subcontractor and materials supplier for this project of this paragraph and obtain their written acknowledgement of such notice prior to commencement of the work of the subcontractor or materials supplier. 00500 Agreement 00500-6 36 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT (continued) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The City of Fayetteville and Contractor have signed this Agreement in quadruplicate. One counterpart each has been delivered to Contractor. Three counterparts each has been retained by The City of Fayetteville. All portions of the Contract Documents have been signed, initialed, or identified by The City of Fayetteville and Contractor. This Agreement will be effective on of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR: By: (Type or legibly print) �ZA 6�:2 (Signature) Title: Pres1&o + 20, which is the Effective Date CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE By: Molly Rawn (Signature) Title: Mayor Contractor shall attach evidence of authority to sign. If Contractor is a corporation, corporate entity or LLC, Contractor shall attach Corporate Resolution authorizing Contractor's signature and execution of Agreement. Further if Contractor is a corporation, corporate entity or LLC, Contractor shall also attach a copy of the Contractor's Articles of Incorporation and a copy form the Arkansas State Secretary of State to document that the corporation, corporate entity or LLC is in current "Good Standing" with the State of Arkansas and such entity is permitted to perform work in the State of Arkansas. (SEAL) Attest 00500 Agreement Attest 00500-7 (SEAL) 37 DOCUMENT 00500 — AGREEMENT (continued) Address for giving notices lit N. Syccmure Zvlr.� 4�, 14S 67203 License No. 01533 2052Z6 Agent for Service of process r � (Type or legibly print) Address for giving notices 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Contractor shall attach evidence of authority of Agent for Service process to sign. If Contractor is a corporation, corporate entity or LLC, Contractor shall attach Corporate Resolution authorizing Agent for Service process authority to sign. (If Contractor is a corporation, corporate entity or LLC, attach evidence of authority to sign.) 00500 Agreement END OF DOCUMENT 00500 00500-8 38 Total Line #Description QTY UOM Unit Extended Unit Extended Unit Extended 1 Mobilization 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $850.00 $850.00 2 Insurance & Bonding 1 LS $6,100.00 $6,100.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,872.00 $2,872.00 3 Trench & Excavation Safety 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 4 Construction Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,700.00 $3,700.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 5 Erosion Control 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $500.00 $500.00 6 Temporary Construction Fencing (6-FT Chain Link)400 LF $12.00 $4,800.00 $6.25 $2,500.00 $4.00 $1,600.00 7 Demolition of Concrete Pavement (Unreinforced)30 SY $90.00 $2,700.00 $110.00 $3,300.00 $55.00 $1,650.00 8 Demolition of Concrete Pavement (Reinforced)85 SY $100.00 $8,500.00 $120.00 $10,200.00 $55.00 $4,675.00 9 Remove and Reinstall 2'x4" Pavers 20 SY $200.00 $4,000.00 $575.00 $11,500.00 $900.00 $18,000.00 10 6" Thick Fiber Reinforced Concrete w/Class 7 Base 30 SY $232.00 $6,960.00 $104.00 $3,120.00 $890.00 $26,700.00 11 6" Thick Steel Reinforced Concrete w/Class 7 Base 85 SY $232.00 $19,720.00 $125.00 $10,625.00 $500.00 $42,500.00 12 Retractable Bollard Footing (Single Bollard)2 EA $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $2,279.00 $4,558.00 $10,600.00 $21,200.00 13 Retractable Bollard Footing (Double Bollard)1 EA $4,270.00 $4,270.00 $8,757.00 $8,757.00 $9,200.00 $9,200.00 14 Retractable Bollard Footing (Triple Bollard)1 EA $7,630.00 $7,630.00 $9,551.00 $9,551.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 15 Fixed Bollard Footing (5-Bollard Array)1 LS $5,600.00 $5,600.00 $13,012.49 $13,012.49 $8,700.00 $8,700.00 16 Traffic Control Maintenance 1 LS 3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 96,423.49 Incomplete Incomplete 91,280.00 Bid 26-32, Construction - Upper Ramble Bollard Installation BID TABULATION NOTICE: Bid award is contingent upon supplier meeting minimum specifications and formal authorization by City Officials. Kenny Fitch, Sr Procurement Agent Trevel Young, Procurement Agent Sandridge Construction Oelke Construction Company Hutton Design Build Certification of Funds: $220,000 ($275,000 maximum allowed) Deadline: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 at 2:00 PM 166,647.00 UPPER RAMBLE BOLLARD INSTALLATION PROJECT VICINITY MAP NTS PHONE: (479) 575-8206 ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE SHEET NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET & INDEX OF SHEETS NOTES & LEGEND SUPPLEMENTAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES BOLLARD LOCATIONS #1- #4 OVERALL PLAN BOLLARD LOCATIONS #1 - #4 PLAN VIEW DELTA SCIENTIFIC DSC 720 COUNTERWEIGHT BOLLARD DELTA SCIENTIFIC DSC720M-SS CW BOLLARD, 25FT. RADIUS FOUNDATION GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DELTA SCIENTIFIC DSC700 SERIES COUNTERWEIGHTED BOLLARD FOUNDATION SPECIFICATION DELTA SCIENTIFIC MODEL DSC720M-SS FULLY WELDED COVER/LID STAINLESS STEEL DELTA SCIENTIFIC DSC700M INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS DELTA SCIENTIFIC DSC 600-1 OPTIONAL FOUNDATION, 25FT. RADIUS DELTA SCIENTIFIC DSC600-SS FULLY WELDED COVER (SLEEVE/LID), STAINLESS STEEL DELTA SCIENTIFIC DSC600 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS & CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS PAVEMENT DETAILS UPPER RAMBLE DETOUR MAP #1 UPPER RAMBLE DETOUR MAP #2 INDEX OF SHEETS M A T THEW B L A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E O F 2 Overhead Electric Edge of Pavement Utility Easement Drainage Easement Fence Centerline Road Underground Electric Cable Temporary Construction Easement Underground Telephone Cable Underground TV Cable Sanitary Sewer (size noted) Waterline (size noted) Contours Right of Way EXISTING LINETYPES PROPOSED Gas Line Flared End Section Fire Hydrant Assembly Ex. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Power Pole Gas Meter Water Meter Water Valve Telephone Box or Riser Transformer Pad Guy Wire Light Pole Tree w/"X" Dia. SYMBOLS LEGEND Sign GAS OHE UGE UGT TV W-12 GAS METER PP DE Storm Structure (Size Noted) WM W-12 LPS-6 EX. UE EX. ROW PROP. UE PROP. ROW TCE Proposed Concrete Proposed Asphalt Demo Ex. Storm Inlet WTL Wattle (Erosion Control) Prop. S/S Manhole Ex. S/S Manhole and Line Wattle GE N E R A L N O T E S CO N T A C T S L E G E N D 13801380 Mill Rip Rap GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS, DIMENSIONS, LEVELS, PLAN ELEVATIONS, INVERTS, ETC. BEFORE ORDERING MATERIALS AND PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK, AND IS TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. REMEDIAL WORK RESULTING FROM LACK OF VERIFICATIONS WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2.ALL ROADWAY CUTS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY REPAIRED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETION OF TRENCH BACKFILL. 3.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DAMAGE OR LOSS OF ANY REFERENCE POINTS AND HUBS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIS/HER WORK, AND SHALL BEAR THE COST OF REPLACING SAME. 4.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT ANY UTILITIES, TREES, ETC. WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AND NOT TO BE DISTURBED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO SUCH PROPERTY. 5.PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL THE PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL NECESSARY TEMPORARY WORKS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE WORK AND THE PUBLIC, INCLUDING BARRICADES, WARNING SIGN, LIGHTS OR OTHER DEVICES SOLELY AT THE DETERMINATION OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE DONE TO THE PREMISES OR ADJACENT PROPERTY PREMISES, OR INJURIES TO THE PUBLIC DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WORK, WHETHER CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTORS, OR THE CARELESSNESS OF ANY OF THEIR EMPLOYEES. 8.ALL PAY ITEMS HAVE BEEN EXPLICITLY SET FORTH AS SUCH IN THE PROPOSAL, ALL OTHER ITEMS OF COST ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE OF THE ITEMS ACTUALLY BID UPON. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUCH BRACING, SHEETING AND SHORING, BLASTING PROTECTION, WARNING LIGHTS, AND BARRICADES, ETC. AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PROPERTY FOR EMPLOYEES AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY STATUTES AND RULES REQUIRING CERTAIN PROTECTIVE PERSONAL APPAREL SUCH AS HARD HATS, EAR PLUGS, EYE SHIELD, PROTECTIVE SHOES, ETC. THE OWNER AND ENGINEER ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR WHICH ENDANGER LIFE AND PROPERTY. 10.ANY FOREIGN ITEM FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION IS THE PROPERTY OF THE LAND OWNER. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, PRECIOUS METALS, COINS, PAPER CURRENCY, ARTIFACTS AND ANTIQUES. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS TO ENSURE THAT THE NEW WORK SHALL FIT INTO THE EXISTING SITE IN THE MANNER INTENDED AND AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. SHOULD ANY CONDITIONS EXIST THAT ARE CONTRARY TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AREA INVOLVING DIFFERENCES. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE IN THE DORM OF A DRAWING OR SKETCH INDICATING FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND NOTES RELATING TO THE AREA. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE SITE IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. DAILY AND MORE OFTEN IF NECESSARY, INSPECT AND PICK UP ALL SCRAP, DEBRIS, AND WASTE MATERIAL. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION TO ALL FINISHED WORK. MAINTAIN SURFACES CLEAN, UNMARRED, AND SUITABLY PROTECTED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. 14.UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN THE PAVED AREAS PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY AND/OR CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT MANAGER. IF POWER WASHING IS USED, NO SEDIMENT LADEN WATER SHALL BE WASHED INTO THE STORM SYSTEM. ALL SEDIMENT LADEN MATERIAL ON PAVEMENT OR WITHIN THE STORM SYSTEM SHALL BE COLLECTED AND REMOVED FROM THE THE SITE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES ENSURE THAT SWPPP MEASURES PROTECTING EXISTING DRAINAGE FACILITIES BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PHASE OF THE SITE CONSTRUCTION NOR LAND ALTERATION. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL QUANTITY TAKEOFFS REQUIRED FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. 17.EXCAVATED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED & SIGNED IN SUCH A WAY TO NOTIFY AND PREVENT THE PUBLIC FROM ENTERING. 18.ACCESS TO DRIVEWAYS AND MAILBOXES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. GRADING: 1.UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPREAD ACROSS NON-STRUCTURAL FILL AREAS, COVERED WITH TOPSOIL, AND VEGETATED PER DRAWINGS. 2.FILL AREAS SHALL BE PROOF-ROLLED WITH RUBBER TIRED EQUIPMENT A MINIMUM WEIGHT OF 15 TONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING FILL OPERATION. AREAS WHICH ARE SOFT OR UNSTABLE SHALL BE UNDERCUT UNTIL STABLE SOILS ARE FOUND. 3.FILL AREAS SHALL BE RAISED IN LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 8". 4.FILL AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH PROPER EQUIPMENT SUITABLE FOR THE SITUATION AND ENVIRONMENT. 5.FILL AREAS SHALL BE FINISH GRADED TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE SUBGRADE TO APPLY SEED AND MULCH. 6.ALL AREAS WILL BE GRADED TO PROVIDE PROPER DRAINAGE AND PREVENT STANDING WATER. 7.ALL FILL AND CUT SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 8.STRIP, STOCKPILE AND REPLACE TOPSOIL IN DISTURBED AREAS, ANY STORED TOPSOIL MUST BE SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE. 9.THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATED AREAS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BY WAY OF WATERING, FERTILIZING, MULCHING, AND MOWING UNTIL APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER. UTILITIES: 1.UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE OWNER. BEFORE YOU DIG CALL 811 TO HAVE EXISTING UTILITIES MARKED. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXITING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK AND AGREES TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO REMAIN. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: 1.DO NOT EXCEED CLEARING AND GRUBBING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LINES INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 2.ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT BE CROSSED BY HEAVY EQUIPMENT OR USED FOR STORING HEAVY EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS. 3.NO EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED UNDER THE DRIP LINE OF ANY TREES TO REMAIN. 4.DO NOT PUSH PILES OR DEBRIS AGAINST TREES TO REMAIN. 5.REMOVE ALL STUMPS, ROCKS, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE DEBRIS, ETC. WITHIN CLEARING LIMITS AND DISPOSE OFF SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, COUNTY , STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS . 6.CONTACT ALL UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CLEARING AND GRUBBING LIMITS. 7.PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED. 8.COORDINATE ALL BURNING ACTIVITIES WITH FAYETTEVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. THE SWPPP MUST REMAIN ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT THE RELEASE OF AIRBORNE DUST AND WATERBORNE SEDIMENT FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE MINIMIZED, DISTURBED SOIL AND CONSTRUCTION SITE ENTRANCES/EXITS SHALL BE MANAGED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING. STREETS AND STORM INLETS MUST BE KEPTCLEANATALL TIMES AND FREE OF LOOSE ROCK, MUD, DEBRIS, AND TRASH. MUD ON THE STREETS MUST BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED AND NOT WASHED OFF. 3. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED SO THAT ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE NOT UNREASONABLY BURDENED WITH SURFACE WATERS AS A RESULT OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT. MORE SPECIFICALLY, NEW DEVELOPMENT MAY NOT UNREASONABLY IMPEDE WATER RUNOFF FROM HIGHER PROPERTIES NOR MAY IN UNREASONABLY CHANNEL WATER TO LOWER PROPERTIES. 4. LAND SHALL BE REVEGETATED AND RESTORED AS CLOSE TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITIONS SO FAR AS TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF AND EROSION ARE CONCERNED. 5. A RECORD OF THE DATES WHEN GRADING ACTIVITIES OCCUR, WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASE ON A PORTION OF THE SITE, AND WHEN STABILIZATION MEASURES ARE INITIATED SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. EXCEPT IN (A) AND (B) BELOW, STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE IN PORTIONS OF THE THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. A). WHERE THE INITIATION OF STABILIZATION MEASURES BY THE 14TH DAY AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES IS PRECLUDED BY SNOW COVER, STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. B). WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL RESUME ON A PORTION OF THE SITE WITHIN 21 DAYS FROM WHEN ACTIVITIES CEASED, (E.G. THE TOTAL TIME PERIOD THAT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS TEMPORARILY CEASED IS LESS THAN 21 DAYS) THEN STABILIZATION MEASURES DO NOT HAVE TO BE INITIATED ON THAT PORTION OF THE SITE BY THE 14TH DAY AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY CEASED. C). STABILIZATION PRACTICES MAY INCLUDE: TEMPORARY SEEDING, PERMANENT SEEDING, MULCHING, GEOTEXTILES, SOD STABILIZATION, PROTECTION OF TREES, AND PRESERVATION OF MATURE VEGETATION AND OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES. 6. EXCAVATION MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE DEPOSITED IN OR SO NEAR STREAMS AND OTHER STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS WHERE IT MAY BE WASHED DOWNSTREAM BY HIGH WATER OR RUNOFF. ALL EXCAVATION MATERIAL SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY WITH EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 7. DEBRIS, MUD, AND SOIL IN PUBLIC STREETS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS BUT IF ANY DEBRIS, MUD, OR SOIL FROM THE SITE REACHES THE PUBLIC STREET IT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED VIA SWEEPING OR OTHER METHODS OF PHYSICAL REMOVAL. DEBRIS, MUD, OR SOIL IN THE STREET MAY NOT BE WASHED OFF THE STREET OR WASHED INTO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 8. ALL STORAGE PILES OF SOIL, DIRT OR OTHER BUILDING MATERIALS SHALL BE LOCATED MORE THAN 25 FEET FROM ROADWAY, DRAINAGE CHANNEL OR STREAM, WETLAND, AND STORMWATER FACILITY. 9. CONCRETE TRUCK WASH AREAS. NO WASHING OF CONCRETE TRUCKS OR CHUTES IS ALLOWED EXCEPT IN PROPERLY LOCATED AND CONSTRUCTED CONCRETE WASH PITS. PROPER RUNOFF AND EROSION CONTROLS MUST BE IN PLACE TO RETAIN ALL CONCRETE WASH WATER. 10. DEWATERING. ALL RAINWATER PUMPED OUT OF SUMPS AND DEPRESSIONS ON CONSTRUCTION SITES SHOULD BE CLEAR AND FREE OF SEDIMENT. 11. PUBLIC STREETS AND SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR TEMPORARY STORAGE OF ANY CONTAINERS OR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, ESPECIALLY LOOSE GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL. 12. TOPSOIL PILES SURFACES MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH APPROPRIATE STABILIZATION. 13. THE MAIN CONTRACTOR ONSITE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DAMAGED OR DISTURBED BY UNDERGROUND PRIVATE OR FRANCHISE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS WATER AND SEWER SERVICE LEADS, TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE, ETC. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS MUST BE IMMEDIATELY RESTORED AFTER EACH UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 14. TOPSOIL: A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE REQUIRED IN AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED. ANY APPLICATION OF TOPSOIL AND SEEDING UNDER THE DRIP LINE OF A TREE SHOULD BE MINIMIZED TO 3 INCHES SO AS NOT TO DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE TREE. 15. 10:1 UP TO 4:1 GRADE: REVEGETATION SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF HYDRO-SEEDING WITH MULCH AND FERTILIZER, OR STAKED SOD, OR GROUNDCOVER. SAID PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE COMPLETE AND UNIFORM COVERAGE THAT MINIMIZES EROSION AND RUNOFF IN NO MORE THAN TWO GROWING SEASONS. 16. 4:1 AND 3:1 GRADE: THE SLOPE SHALL BE COVERED WITH LANDSCAPE FABRIC AND HYDRO -SEEDED WITH MULCH AND FERTILIZER OR STAKED SOD GROUNDCOVER. SAID PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE COMPLETE AND UNIFORM COVERAGE IN NO MORE THAN TWO GROWING SEASONS. 17. SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREVENT POLLUTION BY SPILLS. POLLUTANTS SUCH AS CHEMICALS, FUELS, LUBRICANTS, ASPHALT, RAW SEWAGE, CONCRETE DRUM WASH WATER, AND OTHER HARMFUL WASTES SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED INTO OR ALONG SIDE ANY WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, BUT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. STORAGE OF THESE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND OR WATERBODY. (ATHD 110.06) 18. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATED AREAS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BY WAY OF WATERING, FERTILIZING, MULCHING, AND MOWING UNTIL APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER. LOC Limits of Construction Existing Ground (Cross Section) EP M Electric Pedestal Electric Meter TR MB Mar 17, 2026 CI T Y O F AR K A N S A S FA Y E T T E V I L L E UP P E R R A M B L E B O L L A R D I N S T A L L A T I O N P R O J E C T COX COMMUNICATIONS BILL SMITH CONSTRUCTION PLANNER OFFICE PHONE: 479-957-2079 EMAIL: BILL.SMITH@COX.COM UTILITY CONTACTS AT&T BRYAN WILLIAMS ENGINEER OFFICE PHONE:479-249-5194 EMAIL: AW9156@ATT.COM BLACK HILLS ENERGY SCOTT STOKES UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MGR. OFFICE PHONE: 479-601-8383 EMAIL: SCOTT.STOKES@ BLACKHILLSCORP.COM SWEPCO ELECTRIC HAYDEN MERRITT DISTRIBUTION ENGINEER WORK PHONE: 903-285-3196 EMAIL: HMMERRITT@AEP.COM CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE CONTACTS MATT BLANCHARD STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE PHONE: 479-575-8205 EMAIL: MBLANCHARD@FAYETTEVILLE-AR.GOV FAYETTEVILLE WATER & SEWER AARON WATKINS OPERATIONS MANAGER OFFICE PHONE: 479-575-8392 EMAIL: AWATKINS@FAYETTEVILLE-AR.GOV OZARKS ELECTRIC LONNIE GRANT STAKING TECH. III WORK PHONE: 479-684-4691 CELL: 479-267-8563 EMAIL: LGRANT@OZARKSECC.COM M A T THEW B L A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E O F CHASE WEBB STAFF ENGINEER OFFICE PHONE: 479-444-3424 EMAIL: CWEBB@FAYETTEVILLE-AR.GOV JUSTIN BLAND CITY ENGINEER OFFICE PHONE: 479-718-7623 EMAIL: JBLAND@FAYETTEVILLE-AR.GOV 3 SU P P L E M E N T A L C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T E S MB Mar 17, 2026 CI T Y O F AR K A N S A S FA Y E T T E V I L L E UP P E R R A M B L E B O L L A R D I N S T A L L A T I O N P R O J E C T CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.PROTECTION OF EXISTING SURFACES CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING CONCRETE, PAVERS, AND ADJACENT FINISHES FROM DAMAGE PRIOR TO BEGINNING OPERATIONS. INSTALL PROTECTIVE SHEETING, PLYWOOD, OR EQUIVALENT BARRIER OVER SURROUNDING SURFACES TO PREVENT CRACKING, CHIPPING, OR STAINING. THIS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT, AND NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. 2.GENERAL BOLLARD INSTALLATION INSTALL BOLLARDS AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SET BOLLARDS PLUMB, CENTERED AND TO GRADE. MAINTAIN UNIFORM ALIGNMENT AND SPACING PER PLAN LAYOUT. EXCAVATE TO THE DEPTH SHOWN ON THE DETAIL AND REMOVE ALL LOOSE AND UNSUITABLE MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. INSTALL SHORING. SET BOLLARDS IN CONCRETE FOOTINGS USING CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. PROTECT FINISHED BOLLARDS FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REPLACE ANY DAMAGED OR MISALIGNED UNITS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. BOLLARD AND VAULT SURFACES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. 3.RESTORATION ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING CONCRETE, PAVERS, OR ADJACENT FEATURES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. RESTORE ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND ADJACENT FINISHES TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION AFTER COMPLETION. SIDEWALK/TRAIL CLOSURE NOTES: ALL SIDEWALK/TRAIL CLOSURES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ENGINEERING DIVISION. FOR DETOUR PURPOSES, NO MORE THAN TWO LOCATIONS MAY BE CLOSED SIMULTANEOUSLY; HOWEVER, THIS CONDITION REMAINS SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADVANCE NOTIFICATION TO THE CITY PRIOR TO CLOSING ANY PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK. SIDEWALK CLOSURE SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF THE CLOSURE AND AT THE NEAREST INTERSECTIONS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PEDESTRIAN WARNING. SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MOST RECENT MUTCD. PEDESTRIAN DETOUR ROUTES SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED, ADA COMPLIANT, AND MAINTAINED FREE OF OBSTRUCTIONS AT ALL TIMES. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BARRICADES, FENCING, OR OTHER APPROVED PROTECTIVE DEVICES TO FULLY RESTRICT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO CLOSED AREAS. ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND BUSINESSES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY. SIDEWALK CLOSURES SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE MINIMUM LENGTH AND DURATION NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MUTCD AND CITY STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE SIDEWALK ACCESS IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY. M A T THEW B L A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E OF W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W-2 W-2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W-8 W-8 W-8 W-8 W-8 W-8 W-8 W-8 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 6 W- 6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W-6 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W- 1 2 W-4 W-4 W-4 W-4 W-4 W-4 W-4 W-4 W-4 W-8 W-8 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W-6 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S- 8 S-12S-12S-12 S-8S-8S-8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S-18 S- 1 8 S- 1 8 S-8 S-8 S-18 S-18 S-18 S-18 S-8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S-12 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S- 1 2 S-16 S-16 S-16 S-16 S-16 S-16 S-16 S-16 S-16 S-16 LP UGE UGEUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT U G T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT U G E U G E UGE UGE UGE Scale: 1" = 50' 50 0 50 MB Mar 17, 2026 CI T Y O F AR K A N S A S FA Y E T T E V I L L E 4 UP P E R R A M B L E B O L L A R D I N S T A L L A T I O N P R O J E C T BO L L A R D L O C A T I O N S 1 4 OV E R A L L P L A N M A T THEW B L A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E OF W-61325 1326 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 1 3 3 4 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 S- 8 13 3 2 LP UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGEUGE UGE UGE 1328 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 W- 6 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 S 1 8 U G T U G T U G T U G T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT U G T U G T U G T U G T U G T UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT Scale: 1" = 10' 10 0 10 MB Mar 17, 2026 CI T Y O F AR K A N S A S FA Y E T T E V I L L E 5 B O L L A R D L O C A T I O N S 1 4 PL A N V I E W UP P E R R A M B L E B O L L A R D I N S T A L L A T I O N P R O J E C T EX. PAVERS SHALL BE REMOVED CAREFULLY AND REINSTALLED AROUND PROPOSED BOLLARDS, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 14 FOR PAVER INFORMATION & INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS BOLLARD COORDINATES NORTHING EASTING 1 637815.25 672343.20 2 637820.53 672342.79 3 637825.59 672341.27 4 637830.21 672338.74 5 637834.20 672335.29 6 637837.37 672331.08 7 637839.59 672326.30 8 637840.76 672321.16 SAWCUT & REMOVE 12'-0" X 12'-2" SECTION OF NON-REINFORCED CONCRETE 12'-2" 12'-0" LOCATION #1 RETRACTABLE BOLLARD NORTHWEST CORNER LOCATION #2 RETRACTABLE/FIXED BOLLARDS NORTHEAST CORNER LOCATION #3 RETRACTABLE BOLLARD SOUTHEAST CORNER LOCATION #4 RETRACTABLE BOLLARD SOUTHEAST CORNER 8'-0" SAWCUT & REMOVE 8'-0" X 11'-9" SECTION OF NON-REINFORCED CONCRETE BOLLARD COORDINATES NORTHING EASTING 1 637321.05 672279.65 2 637323.89 672275.22 COF MONUMENT NORTHING: 639234.68 EASTING: 671898.89 ELEV: 1379.64 EX. 6'X6' RCB LOCATION IS APPROXIMATE. TOP OF BOX ELEV: 1327.30 +/- EX. SURFACE ELEV: 1331.50 +/- PROTECT EX. WATER FOUNTAIN & SIGN FINISH CONCRETE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT AND MATCH EXISTING SURFACE TEXTURE AND JOINT PATTERN 6'-1" 6'-1" CAUTION* WATER & SEWER LINE 4'-4" BOLLARDS #1-#3 INSTALL MANUAL RETRACTABLE STAINLESS STEEL BOLLARDS & FOOTING (BOLLARDS PROVIDED BY THE CITY), FOOTING REBAR SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 7 FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS INSTALL MANUAL RETRACTABLE STAINLESS STEEL BOLLARD PROVIDED BY THE CITY), FOOTING REBAR SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 8 FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 4' INSTALL MANUAL RETRACTABLE STAINLESS STEEL BOLLARD & FOOTING BOLLARD PROVIDED BY THE CITY), FOOTING REBAR SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 7 FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 3'-3" 3'-3" 11'-9" SAWCUT & REMOVE 10' X 8' SECTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE 8' 10' CAUTION* AT&T BOLLARDS #4-#8 INSTALL FIXED STAINLESS STEEL BOLLARDS WITH FOOTING MODULE & REBAR ( BOLLARD, FOOTING MODULE REBAR PROVIDED BY THE CITY), SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 11 4' TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS REMOVE CONCRETE TRAIL TO EX. EXPANSION JOINT DOWEL INTO EX. CONCRETE TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 14 INSTALL 6" THICK FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE SEE DETAIL SHEET 14 INSTALL 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE SEE DETAIL SHEET 14 DOWEL INTO EX. CONCRETE TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 14 INSTALL 6" THICK FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE SEE DETAIL SHEET 14 DOWEL INTO EX. CONCRETE TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 14 INSTALL 6" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE SEE DETAIL SHEET 14 BUTT JOINTS ON ALL SIDES WITH1 8"R EDGE INSTALL MANUAL RETRACTABLE STAINLESS STEEL BOLLARD & FOOTING (BOLLARD PROVIDED BY THE CITY), FOOTING REBAR SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 8 FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS DOWEL INTO EX. CONCRETE TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 14 FINISH CONCRETE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT AND MATCH EXISTING SURFACE TEXTURE AND JOINT PATTERN FINISH CONCRETE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT AND MATCH EXISTING SURFACE TEXTURE AND JOINT PATTERN FINISH CONCRETE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT AND MATCH EXISTING SURFACE TEXTURE AND JOINT PATTERN 20'-0" 31'-3" FOOTING DIMENSION 5'-8" X 7'-0" FOOTING CENTER DIMENSION 5'-8" X 13'-10" BOLLARD COORDINATES NORTHING EASTING 1 637849.32 672162.43 BOLLARD COORDINATES NORTHING EASTING 1 637303.96 672325.81 SAWCUT & REMOVE 31'-3" X 20'-0" SECTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE M A T THEW B L A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E OF R25' 6 BOLLARD PROVIDED BY THE CITY 7 BOLLARD PROVIDED BY THE CITY EXCAVATE AN ADDITIONAL 6" BEYOND THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING AND INSTALL 6" OF #57 STONE FOR BOLLARD VAULT DRAINAGE TYP. 1-1/2" PVC DRAIN EXTENSION INTO DRAINAGE LAYER, 3" PENETRATION 8 BOLLARD PROVIDED BY THE CITY EXCAVATE AN ADDITIONAL 6" BEYOND THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING AND INSTALL 6" OF #57 STONE FOR BOLLARD VAULT DRAINAGE TYP. 1-1/2" PVC DRAIN EXTENSION INTO DRAINAGE LAYER, 3" PENETRATION 9 BOLLARD SLEEVE PROVIDED BY THE CITY 10 DELTA DSC700 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: FOUNDATION THE BOLLARD FOUNDATION TUBES ARE TO BE CAST IN PLACE. THE OUTSIDE OF THE BOLLARD FOUNDATION TUBE IS THE FORM; NO ADDITIONAL FLASHING OR FORMING SHOULD BE NECESSARY. SEE THE APPROPRIATE FOUNDATION DRAWING IN THE DRAWING SECTION OF THE MANUAL. THE FOUNDATIONS SHOWN ON DELTA DRAWINGS, UNLESS SPECIALLY NOTED, ARE DESIGNED ON A SOIL LOAD-BEARING FACTOR OF 1.5 TONS/FT². ONLY A VERY BOGGY OR MIGRATING SITE WOULD NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO MOUNT THE BOLLARDS IN AN AREA THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FLOODING. ADDITIONALLY, THE ROADWAY SHOULD BE CROWNED IN THE AREA OF THE BOLLARDS TO PREVENT STANDING WATER FROM DRAINING INTO THE BOLLARD FOUNDATION TUBES. THE BOLLARDS NEED TO BE INSTALLED LEVEL OR PLUMB TO OPERATE PROPERLY. IF THE ROADWAY IS NOT LEVEL, AND CAN NOT BE SLOPED TO MATCH THE BOLLARD, THEN THE BOLLARDS MAY NEED TO HAVE SPECIAL GROUND PLATES MADE TO MATCH THE CONTOUR. THE FACTORY CAN WORK WITH THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PROCUREMENT STAGE TO WORK OUT ANY PROBLEMS IN THIS REGARD. THE BOLLARDS CAN BE SECURED IN THE FOUNDATION BY LEVELING WITH CONCRETE BLOCKS, OR HELD TO TEMPORARY WOODEN FRAMES IN ORDER TO HOLD A GROUP IN ALIGNMENT DURING THE POUR. DRAINAGE DRAINAGE AND PROTECTION AGAINST SUBSURFACE WATER IS IMPORTANT. A BED OF AGGREGATE UNDER THE BOLLARD(S) WILL HANDLE RAINWATER IN MOST CIRCUMSTANCES. ESPECIALLY WET LOCATIONS SHOULD HAVE THE BOLLARD DRAIN LINE PLUMBED TO A SUMP WELL OR SEWER AS APPROPRIATE. THREE 1 1/2" NPT (FEMALE) CONNECTIONS ARE PROVIDED ON THE BOTTOM PLATES FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. PERFORATED TAIL PIPES OF AT LEAST 12 INCHES [30 CM] LENGTH SHOULD EXTEND INTO THE AGGREGATE FOR PROPER DRAINAGE. WHILE THE MACHINE IS DESIGNED FOR HARSH ENVIRONMENTS, PROLONGED SUBMERSION WILL EVENTUALLY CAUSE BOTH APPEARANCE AND OPERATING DETERIORATION. PACKAGING BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO OPERATE THE BOLLARD FOR THE FIRST TIME, REMOVE THE RETAINING BOLTS FOR THE COUNTERWEIGHT SETS. THE COUNTERWEIGHTS SERVE NO PURPOSE IF THESE BOLTS ARE IN PLACE, AND APPROXIMATELY 750 POUNDS WILL BE REQUIRED TO RAISE THE BOLLARD TO THE GUARD POSITION. THE COUNTERWEIGHT RETAINING BOLTS MAY BE LEFT IN PLACE UP UNTIL THE TIME OF FIRST OPERATION AND MAY BE KEPT FOR FUTURE USE. MANUAL BOLLARD OPERATION IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE BOLLARDS WILL REMAIN FULLY RAISED AND LOCKED AT ALL TIMES AND WILL BE UNLOCKED AND LOWERED ON OCCASION TO PERMIT THE PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. AFTER THE VEHICLE(S) ARE CLEAR, THE BOLLARD WILL AGAIN BE RAISED TO THE GUARD POSITION, THE BOLLARD LOCKED AND THE ACCESS COVER REPLACED TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY. TO OPERATE (FROM RAISED AND LOCKED POSITION): LOWERING 1)REMOVE THE ACCESS BOX COVER PLATE CONTAINING THE LATCH AND REMOVE THE PADLOCK FROM THE LOCKING PIN. 2)PULL BACK THE LOCKING PIN. THE BOLLARD MAY NEED TO BE MOVED SLIGHTLY AND HELD IF IT IS RESTING ON OR OTHERWISE PREVENTING MOVEMENT OF THE LOCKING PIN. 3)THE BOLLARD IS COUNTERWEIGHTED AND BY DESIGN IS SLIGHTLY HEAVIER THAN THE ATTACHED WEIGHTS. THEREFORE, THE BOLLARD MAY HAVE A TENDENCY TO BEGIN MOVING WHEN RELEASED. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO KEEP HANDS AND FEET CLEAR OF ANY OF THE MOVING PARTS TO PREVENT INJURY. 4)THE BOLLARD CAN NOW BE PUSHED DOWN UNTIL IT COMES TO REST IN THE BOTTOM OF THE FOUNDATION TUBE. 5)PUSH THE LOCKING PIN FORWARD INTO ITS LOCKING HOLE IN THE BOLLARD AND REINSTALL THE PADLOCK. SECURE THE ACCESS BOX COVER PLATE TO PREVENT ANY UNAUTHORIZED OPERATION OF THE BOLLARD. RAISING 1)REMOVE THE ACCESS BOX COVER PLATE CONTAINING THE LATCH AND REMOVE THE PADLOCK FROM THE LOCKING PIN. 2)PULL BACK THE LOCKING PIN. THE BOLLARD MAY NEED TO BE MOVED SLIGHTLY AND HELD IF IT IS RESTING ON OR OTHERWISE PREVENTING MOVEMENT OF THE LOCKING PIN. 3)THE BOLLARD IS HEAVIER, BY DESIGN, THAN THE COUNTERWEIGHTS AND SHOULD NOT MOVE. HOWEVER, USE CAUTION AND KEEP HANDS AND FEET CLEAR OF ANY OF THE MOVING PARTS TO PREVENT INJURY. 4)USING THE LIFTING HANDLE IN THE BOLLARD CAP, BEGIN TO PULL UP ON THE BOLLARD. PULL UPWARD UNTIL THE BOLLARD IS IN THE FULL UP POSITION. THE BOLLARD WILL TEND TO STAY IN ANY POSITION IN WHICH IT IS PLACED. HOWEVER, BECAUSE THE BOLLARD IS DESIGNED TO BE SLIGHTLY HEAVIER THAN THE WEIGHTS, IT MAY HAVE A TENDENCY TO DRIFT DOWNWARD. IT IS IMPORTANT TO KEEP HANDS, FEET AND BODY PARTS AWAY FROM THE PATH OF THE BOLLARD. IF THE BOLLARD WERE TO MOVE UPWARD OR DOWNWARD WHEN YOU ARE NOT PREPARED, AN INJURY COULD OCCUR. 5)PUSH THE LOCKING PIN FORWARD TO LOCK THE BOLLARD IN THE UP POSITION. REPLACE THE PADLOCK AND THE ACCESS COVER TO AGAIN SECURE THE ENTRANCE. SHOULD THE LOCKING PIN NOT MOVE EASILY INTO POSITION AT EITHER THE FULL UP OR DOWN POSITION, CLEAN THE PIN MECHANISM AND LUBRICATE WITH A GOOD GENERAL PURPOSE GREASE.) 11 BOLLARD PROVIDED BY THE CITY 12 BOLLARD SLEEVE PROVIDED BY THE CITY 13 DELTA DSC600 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: THE BOLLARD FOUNDATION TUBES ARE TO BE CAST IN PLACE. THE OUTSIDE OF THE BOLLARD FOUNDATION TUBE AND FRAME IS THE FORM; NO ADDITIONAL FLASHING OR FORMING SHOULD BE NECESSARY. THE EXCAVATION FOR THE MODULES MAY BE INDIVIDUAL FOR EACH MODULE IN AN ARRAY OR THE FOUNDATION MAY BE COMMON FOR ALL BOLLARDS. WE RECOMMEND THAT EACH MODULE BE SET IN AN INDIVIDUAL FOUNDATION SO THAT CONCRETE DAMAGE FROM A POTENTIAL IMPACT TO ONE ARRAY IS ISOLATED. ALTERNATIVELY, JOINTS MAY BE PROVIDED BETWEEN ADJACENT MODULES TO SIMILARLY REDUCE THE PROPAGATION OF FOUNDATION DAMAGE. SEE THE APPROPRIATE FOUNDATION DRAWING IN THE DRAWING SECTION OF THE MANUAL. THE FOUNDATIONS SHOWN ON DELTA DRAWINGS, UNLESS SPECIALLY NOTED, ARE DESIGNED ON A SOIL LOAD-BEARINGFACTOR OF 1.5 TONS/FT2. ONLY A VERY BOGGY OR MIGRATING SITE WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FOUNDATION. IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR THE BOLLARDS TO BE LEVEL OR PLUMB. IF THE ROADWAY OR INSTALLATION LOCATION IS NOT LEVEL THE BOLLARDS MAY BE PLACED TO MATCH THE CONTOUR; HOWEVER, BE SURE THE APPEARANCE FACTOR IS CONSIDERED. AN INSTALLATION WHERE THE EQUIPMENT IS NOT LEVEL EVEN IF IT FOLLOWS THE TERRAIN CAN BE DISTRACTING. THE MODULES CAN BE SECURED IN THE FOUNDATION BY LEVELING WITH CONCRETE BLOCKS, HELD TO TEMPORARY WOODEN FRAMES, OR IF DESIRED, STEEL STRAPS OR ROLLED SHAPES CAN BE WELDED TO THE FOUNDATION TUBE EXTERIORS TO HOLD A GROUP IN ALIGNMENT DURING THE POUR. CONCRETE SHOULD BE POURED INTO AND AROUND THE MODULE SO THAT AIR IS NOT TRAPPED INSIDE. ALL NECESSARY STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO EVACUATE AIR FROM THE STRUCTURE. AFTER CONCRETE IS POURED INTO THE EXCAVATION, THE BOLLARD TUBES SHOULD ALSO BE FILLED WITH CONCRETE. THE BOLLARD COVER PLATES ARE TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF THE FILLED BOLLARD TUBES WITH THE TWO EXPOSED ANCHOR REBARS EMBEDDED IN THE CONCRETE AS IT CURES. CONCRETE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS (MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS) 1)CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AT THE JOB SITE. 2)FOUNDATION CONCRETE MAY BE PLACED DIRECTLY INTO NEAT EXCAVATIONS, PROVIDED THE SIDES OF THE EXCAVATION ARE STABLE. WHERE CAVING OCCURS, PROVIDE SHORING. TYPE AND METHOD OF SHORING SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION. 3)THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE KEPT DRY AT ALL TIMES. GROUNDWATER, IF ENCOUNTERED, SHALL BE PUMPED FROM THE EXCAVATION. 4)CONCRETE SHALL BE LABORATORY DESIGNED, MACHINE MIXED, PRODUCING 4,000 PSI [27,58 MPA] AT 28 DAYS. 5)CEMENT SHALL BE TESTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C150, TYPE I OR II. 6)AGGREGATES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C33. MAXIMUM SIZE OF AGGREGATE SHALL BE 1.5 INCH [38 MM]. 7)REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DEFORMED BARS CONFORMING TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60 (60,000 PSI [413,7 MPA]). 8)HOOKS AND BENDS SHALL CONFORM TO ACI STANDARD 318, LATEST REVISION. INSIDE DIAMETER OF HOOKS AND BENDS SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 BAR DIAMETERS. 9)PROVIDE SPACER BARS, CHAIRS, SPREADERS, BLOCKS, ETC, AS REQUIRED TO POSITIVELY HOLD THE STEEL IN PLACE. ALL DOWELS SHALL BE FIRMLY WIRED IN PLACE BEFORE CONCRETE IS POURED. 10)CONCRETE SHALL BE CONVEYED FROM THE MIXER TO FINAL DEPOSIT BY METHODS THAT WILL PREVENT SEPARATION OR LOSS OF MATERIALS. TROUGHS, BUCKETS OR THE LIKE MAY BE USED TO CONVEY CONCRETE. IN NO CASE SHALL CONCRETE BE ALLOWED TO FREE DROP MORE THAN 5 FEET [1,5 M]. 11)CONCRETE SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CONSOLIDATED BY SUITABLE MEANS DURING PLACEMENT AND SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WORKED AROUND REINFORCEMENT AND EMBEDDED FIXTURES AND INTO CORNERS OF FORMS. 12)CONCRETE SHALL BE MAINTAINED ABOVE 50ºF [10ºC] AND IN A MOIST CONDITION FOR AT LEAST 7 DAYS AFTER PLACEMENT.ADEQUATE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR HEATING CONCRETE MATERIALS AND PROTECTING CONCRETE DURING FREEZING OR NEAR FREEZING WEATHER.13)WHERE EXTERIOR WALL FACE REQUIRES SHORING AND/OR FORMING, THE FORMS SHALL BE SUBSTANTIAL AND SUFFICIENTLY TIGHT TO PREVENT LEAKAGE. FORMS SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL THE CONCRETE IS 7 DAYS OLD.14)BACKFILLING SHALL BE DONE BY DEPOSITING AND TAMPING INTO PLACE CLEAN SAND OR POURING LEAN CONCRETE. WATER JETTING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED.15)CONDUITS AND PIPES OF ALUMINUM SHALL NOT BE EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE UNLESS EFFECTIVELY COATED OR COVERED TO PREVENT ALUMINUM/ CONCRETE REACTION OR ELECTROLYTIC ACTION BETWEEN ALUMINUM AND STEEL.16)CONSTRUCTION JOINTS NOT INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. WHERE A CONSTRUCTION JOINT IS TO BE MADE, THE SURFACE OF CONCRETE SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED AND ALL LAITANCE AND STANDING WATER REMOVED.17) CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL ADJACENT AREAS AGAINST DAMAGE AND SHALL REPAIR OR PATCH ALL DAMAGED AREAS TO MATCH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS.18)CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE CONSTRUCTION AREA CLEAN AT ALL TIMES AND AT COMPLETION OF WORK REMOVE ALL SURPLUS MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS AND LEAVE THE PREMISES IN A CLEAN CONDITION ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. MB Mar 17, 2026 CI T Y O F AR K A N S A S FA Y E T T E V I L L E 14 PA V E M E N T D E T A I L S UP P E R R A M B L E B O L L A R D I N S T A L L A T I O N P R O J E C T CONCRETE PAVEMENT - REINFORCED NTS CONCRETE WITH LIGHT BROOM FINISH (COF-CLASS 1) 6" 6" 1 8" SAW CUT JOINT, DEPTH OF JOINT TO BE ONE-THIRD THICKNESS OF SLAB 4 REBAR 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS, PLACE REBAR IN BOTTOM THIRD OF CONCRETE CLASS 7 AGGREGATE BASE 98% MPD COMPACTED 95% SPD COMPACTED SELECT FILL CONCRETE PAVERS ON CTA BASE - PEDESTRIAN NTS 4% CEMENT TREATED AGG BASE COMPACTED TO 98% GRADED TO +/- 1 4" 1" POLYMER MODIFIED (SETTING BED MORTAR) "SPEC MIX" 4" CONCRETE PAVER: SUNNY BROOK - 237 8" X 477 8" X 23 4" COLOR: SB-57C - PATTERN RUNNING BOND 1 8" POLYSWEEP POLYMERIC JOINT SAND COLOR: PLATINUM SUREBOND 1300 SEALER FILTER FABRIC MIRAFI 160N CONCRETE PAVEMENT - FIBER REINFORCED (TRAIL) NTS CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CEMENT CONTENT OF 5-1/2 BAGS PER CUBIC YARDS WITH 5-1/2% ± 1-1/2% AIR ENTRAINMENT AND 1.5 CY FIBER REINFORCEMENT WITH A MAXIMUM 4" SLUMP. 6" 4" CLASS 7 AGGREGATE BASE 98% MPD COMPACTED 95% SPD COMPACTED SELECT FILL EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL NTS EXPANSION JOINT1 2" FIBER BOARD WITH REMOVABLE CAP AND FILLED CONCRETE JOINT SEALANT (MASTERSEAL) DRILL 9 16" HOLE AND INSERT #4-18" LONG SMOOTH DOWEL W/CAP 18" O.C. WITH EPOXY INTO EX. CONCRETE DEWALT AC100+GOLD) GENERAL CONCRETE PAVEMENT NOTES: 1.ALL EXPANSION JOINTS AND SAW JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C920, TYPE S. A SELF LEVELING SEALANT SHALL BE USED FOR HORIZONTAL SURFACES. "MASTERSEAL SL-I" OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. CLOSED CELL BACKER ROD SHALL BE USED IN DEEP JOINTS, AS NEEDED, ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 2.CONCRETE CURING COMPOUND SHALL MEET ASTM C-309 AND SHALL BE W.R. MEADOWS 1200 WHITE OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. 3.EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL SHALL BE PREFORMED ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FIBERBOARD CONFORMING TO AASHTO M-213. EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL SHALL BE LEFT 1/2" LOWER THAN GRADE OR TRIMMED 1/2" LOWER. 4.CONSTRUCT 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE ON TRAIL IN SAME DIRECTION AS EXISTING GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. 5.TRAILS SHALL HAVE A ONE-HALF (12) INCH ROLLED EDGE. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL CONCRETE WORK DURING CURING. ANY CONCRETE THAT IS DEFACED SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SAW-CUT M A T THEW BL A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E O F Scale: 1" = 50' 50 0 50 MB Mar 17, 2026 CI T Y O F AR K A N S A S FA Y E T T E V I L L E 15 D E T O U R P L A N 1 UP P E R R A M B L E B O L L A R D I N S T A L L A T I O N P R O J E C T M A T THEW B L A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E O F LP Scale: 1" = 50' 50 0 50 MB Mar 17, 2026 CI T Y O F AR K A N S A S FA Y E T T E V I L L E 16 D E T O U R P L A N 2 UP P E R R A M B L E B O L L A R D I N S T A L L A T I O N P R O J E C T M A T THEW B L A N C H A RDNo. 17159 S T A T E O F Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1386 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff Steven Dotson, Chief Financial Officer FROM: Tim Nyander, Utilities Director SUBJECT: 2026 Water & Sewer Rate & Impact Fee Study RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an ordinance to change the water and sewer rates and Impact Fees based on a Cost of Service Study conducted by Carollo Engineers as presented to the Water and Sewer Committee in open meetings. These recommended rates are reflected in the attached replacement for sections 51.136, 51.137, and 159.02 of the Fayetteville City Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Fayetteville has been conducting a water and sewer rate study and impact fee study since May 2025. Carollo Engineers was selected pursuant to RFP 25-02 by the City Council on May 6, 2025 with the approval of Resolution 119-25. The intent of the rate study is to establish water and sewer rates that fully recover the cost of providing service to customers, adequately provide for maintaining and expanding the City’s infrastructure, and provide adequate reserves for future needs. The study is based on a comprehensive review of the City of Fayetteville’s water and sewer funds and budgets, comprehensive Water Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, planned wastewater facilities upgrades, customer classes, current usage data, future planned growth of the City of Fayetteville, and any other information deemed necessary. The intent of the impact fee study is to analyze how the existing water and sewer capacity is affected by growth, and to calculate those growth-related costs. It ensures that growth pays for itself and prevents existing customers from subsidizing new construction through higher utility rates. The current water and sewer rates were adopted by the City of Fayetteville in 2023 based on a Cost of Service Study conducted by Black & Veatch Engineers. This was sufficient to fund operations and capital needs until now. Since the 2023 study, the City has experienced consistent growth and anticipates continued growth into the future. In addition, the City’s purchased water costs have increased significantly due to recent rate and impending rate increases from Beaver Water District. The most recent impact fee study was completed in 2007 and implemented in 2009. DISCUSSION: In addition to adhering to state requirements, Carollo’s rate-setting methodology is consistent with industry guidelines described in the American Water Works Association’s M1 Manual: Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges, and MOP 27:Financial and Charges for Wastewater Systems. Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov State code dictates a schedule of events for any change in water and sewer rates. These require that the rate change ordinance be read, a public hearing be scheduled and announced, the ordinance be published, and the public hearing take place at least ten days after the initial reading and publication of the ordinance. The rate ordinance can then be approved any time after the public hearing. The public hearing attachment details the public notice process for the proposed rate study, and what the initial changes will be to the water and sewer rates. Additionally, the Monthly Water and Sewer Rates attachment indicates the level of rate increases through 2030. The rate study prepared by Carollo Engineers reflects some of the following guidelines: 1. The City has adopted a cost of service rate schedule based on customer class. 2. The City is using a volumetric block system within customer class to encourage conservation. 3. New rates reflecting the true cost of service by customer class as determined by the rate study will be implemented as soon as this ordinance takes effect. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Adoption of these new rates will provide necessary revenues to address current and future operating costs and capital needs. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. 2026 Fayetteville Water and Sewer Rates and Impact Fee Study Report, 5. Revisions: 51.136_51.137___ 2026-04-15, 6. Revisions 159.02___ 2026-04-23, 7. Exhibit A 51.136_51.137___Revisions 2026-04-15_clean version, 8. Exhibit B 159.02___Revisions 2026-04-23_clean version, 9. Public Notice 2026 Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1386 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND § 51.136 MONTHLY WATER RATES, §51.137 MONTHLY SEWER RATES, AND §159.02 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES TO CHANGE WATER AND SEWER RATES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE COST OF SERVICE STUDY CONDUCTED BY CAROLLO ENGINEERS WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville’s current water and sewer rates were adopted in 2023 based on a Cost of Service Study conducted by Black & Veatch Engineers; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution 119-25 authorizing a contract with Carollo Engineers for an updated Cost of Service Study; and WHEREAS, since the 2023 study, the City has experienced consistent growth in both population and water use and anticipates continued growth into the future; and WHEREAS, the City’s cost to deliver water from the Beaver Water District to our customers has increased and will continue to increase because of the construction and operation of the necessary ninety million dollar large transmission line into Benton County to receive the water and many other transmission and storage costs; and WHEREAS, the City’s cost to purchase water from the Beaver Water District has and will continue to increase because of recent and impending water rate increases imposed by the Beaver Water District; and WHEREAS, the City’s costs to efficiently operate over two wastewater plants, numerous lift stations, and miles of sewer piping continue to rise necessitating an increase of revenue to fund these operations, maintenance, and improvements. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined, after the public hearing required by Ark. Code Ann. § 14-235-223, that the proposed rate changes reflecting the true cost of service should be adopted and that the new rates shall take effect on July 1, 2026. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby repeals § 51.136 Monthly Water Rates and enacts replacement § 51.136 Monthly Water Rates as shown Exhibit A, attached hereto. Ordinance: File Number: 2026-1386 Page 2 Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby repeals § 51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates and enacts replacement § 51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates as shown Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 3: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby repeals § 159.02 Water and Wastewater Impact Fees and enacts replacement § 159.02 Water and Wastewater Impact Fees as shown Exhibit B, attached hereto. City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1386 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item Tim Nyander 4/15/2026 WATER SEWER (720) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of an ordinance to change the water and sewer rates and Impact Fees based on a Cost of Service Study conducted by Carollo Engineers as presented to the Water and Sewer Committee in open meetings. These recommended rates are reflected in the attached replacement for sections 51.136, 51.137, and 159.02 of the Fayetteville City Code. Budget Impact: N/A Water & Sewer Account Number Fund N/A N/A Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item?No Total Amended Budget $- Expenses (Actual+Encum)$- Available Budget $- Does item have a direct cost?No Item Cost $- Is a Budget Amendment attached?No Budget Amendment $- Remaining Budget $- Purchase Order Number:Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Change Order Number:Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Comments: 2026 Water and Sewer Rate and Impact Fee Study 2026 Water and Sewer Rate and Impact Fee Study Report April 2026 / FINAL 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY ii Contents SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Water System 1 1.3 Sewer System 2 1.4 Combined Bill Impacts 3 1.5 Impact Fees 3 SECTION 2 INTRODUCTION 5 2.1 City of Fayetteville Service Area Overview 5 2.1.1 Water Service Area 5 2.1.2 Sewer Service Area 5 2.2 Rate Setting Process 6 2.2.1 Rate Design and Calculation 6 2.3 Forward-Looking Statement 7 2.4 Study Assumptions and Inputs 7 2.4.1 Input Data 7 2.4.2 Cost Escalation and Budget Forecasting 7 SECTION 3 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS 9 3.1 Input Data 9 3.1.1 Current Rates 9 3.1.2 Billing Data 10 3.1.3 Expenses 12 3.1.4 Revenues 14 3.2 Water System Revenue Requirements 14 3.2.1 Revenue Requirement Tests 14 3.2.2 Reserve Target Test 15 3.2.3 Debt Coverage Test 17 3.3 Water COS Analysis 18 3.3.1 Functional Cost Allocation 19 3.3.2 Cost Components 19 3.3.3 Customer Allocation 23 3.4 Water Rate Design 25 3.4.1 Rate Structure 26 3.4.2 Fixed Monthly Service Charges 26 3.4.3 Volumetric Rates 28 SECTION 4 SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS 30 4.1 Input Data 30 4.1.1 Current Rates 30 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY iii 4.1.2 Billing Data 31 4.1.3 Expenses 33 4.1.4 Revenues 34 4.2 Sewer System Revenue Requirements 35 4.2.1 Revenue Requirement Tests 35 4.2.2 Reserve Target Test 35 4.3 Sewer Proposed Rates 36 SECTION 5 COMBINED BILL IMPACT 38 SECTION 6 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS 40 6.1 Existing Impact Fees 40 6.2 Methodology 41 6.2.1 Impact Fee Components 41 6.2.2 Impact Fee Methodologies 42 6.2.3 Assessment Basis 44 6.3 Water System Impact Fee 45 6.3.1 Water System Valuation 45 6.3.2 Proposed Water Impact Fee 46 6.4 Sewer System Impact Fee 47 6.4.1 Sewer System Valuation 47 6.4.2 Proposed Sewer Impact Fee 48 6.5 Combined Impact Fee Comparison 49 SECTION 7 CONCLUSION 51 Tables Table 1 Inside City Existing and Proposed Water Monthly Service Charges for the Study Period 1 Table 2 Inside City Proposed Sewer Rates and Charges for the Study Period 2 Table 3 Combined Inside City Bill Impacts Under Existing and Proposed Rates for the Study Period 3 Table 4 Recommended Water and Sewer Impact Fees 4 Table 5 Escalation Factors 8 Table 6 Existing Water Rates and Charges 9 Table 7 Projected Number of Water Connections 10 Table 8 Current and Projected Water Sales 11 Table 9 Baseline and Projected Water Operating Expenses ($ Thousands) 12 Table 10 Projected Water Capital Improvement Plan and Funding ($ Thousands) 13 Table 11 Existing and Future Modeled Debt Service ($ Thousands) 14 Table 12 Projected Water Revenues under Existing Rates ($ Thousands) 14 Table 13 Projected Water Reserve Balance Under Existing Rate Ordinance ($ thousands) 15 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY iv Table 14 Projected Water Reserve Balance Under Proposed Rate Revenue Adjustments thousands) 16 Table 15 Projected Water Debt Service Coverage Under Existing Rate Ordinance ($ thousands) 17 Table 16 Projected Water Debt Service Coverage Under Proposed Rate Revenue Adjustments ($ thousands) 17 Table 17 Allocation of Water System Assets to Cost Components ($ thousands) 21 Table 18 Functional Allocation of Water O&M Budget (FY 2026) ($ thousands) 21 Table 19 Allocation of Water O&M Budget to Cost Components ($ thousands) 22 Table 20 Allocation of Water Revenue Requirements to Cost Components ($ thousands) 23 Table 21 Water Units of Service by Customer Type (FY 2026) 24 Table 22 Development of Water Unit Costs ($ thousands) 25 Table 23 Water Revenue Requirement by Customer Type (FY 2026) 25 Table 24 Existing and Mid-Year Proposed Inside City Water Monthly Service Charges 27 Table 25 Inside City Existing and Proposed Water Monthly Service Charges for the Study Period 27 Table 26 Existing and FY 2026 Proposed Water Volumetric Rates 28 Table 27 Inside City Existing and Proposed Water Volumetric Rates for the Study Period 29 Table 28 Existing Sewer Rates and Charges 30 Table 29 Projected Number of Sewer Connections 31 Table 30 Current and Projected Sewer Sales 32 Table 31 Baseline and Projected Sewer Operating Expenses ($ Thousands) 33 Table 32 Projected Sewer Capital Improvement Plan and Funding ($ Thousands) 34 Table 33 Projected Sewer Revenues under Existing Rates ($ Thousands) 35 Table 34 Projected Sewer Reserve Balance Under Existing Rate Ordinance ($ thousands) 36 Table 35 Inside City Proposed Sewer Rates and Charges for the Study Period 37 Table 36 Combined Inside City Bill Impacts Under Existing and Proposed Rates for the Study Period 38 Table 37 Existing Impact Fees 40 Table 38 System Valuation Approaches from M1 43 Table 39 Projected Water and Sewer EDUs (2025-2035) 45 Table 40 Existing Water System Valuation Calculation ($ thousands) 45 Table 41 Water Capital Projects Related to Expansion ($ Thousands) 46 Table 42 Future Water System Valuation Calculation ($ Thousands) 46 Table 43 Proposed Water Impact Fee Calculation 46 Table 44 Recommended Water Impact Fees 47 Table 45 Existing Sewer System Valuation Calculation ($ thousands) 47 Table 46 Sewer Capital Projects Related to Expansion ($ Thousands) 48 Table 47 Sewer Future System Valuation Calculation ($ Thousands) 48 Table 48 Proposed Sewer Impact Fee Calculation 48 Table 49 Recommended Sewer Impact Fees 49 Table 50 Existing and Proposed Combined Water and Sewer Impact Fees 49 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY v Figures Figure 1 Conceptual Overview of the Rate-Setting Process 6 Figure 2 COS Analysis Steps 18 Figure 3 Northwest Arkansas Water and Sewer Rate Comparison 39 Figure 4 Northwest Arkansas Water and Sewer Impact Fee Comparison 50 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY vi Abbreviations AWWA American Water Works Association BWD Beaver Water District Carollo Carollo Engineers CIP capital improvements plan City City of Fayetteville COS cost-of-service DSCR debt service coverage ratios EDU equivalent dwelling unit ENR-CCI Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index FY fiscal year gpd gallons per day kgal kilogallon MOP 27 Manual of Practice 27: Financial and Charges for Wastewater Systems O&M operations and maintenance PILOT Payment in lieu of taxes RCNLD Replacement Cost New Less Depreciation RCN Replacement Cost New R&R repair and replace Study Water and Sewer Rate and Impact Fee Study WEF Water Environment Practice WIP work in progress WWTP wastewater treatment plant 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 1 SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction The City of Fayetteville (City) retained Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) to conduct a Water and Sewer Rate and Impact Fee Study (Study) for fiscal years (FY) ending FY 2026 through 2030. The City receives treated water from Beaver Water District (BWD) and owns and maintains a distribution system for potable water service. Its water system serves approximately 100,000 people (50,000 connections) inside and outside the corporate city limits. The City also owns and operates two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and maintains a local sewer collection system. The sewer system provides wholesale and retail sewer service to approximately 40,000 connections inside and outside of the corporate City limits. 1.2 Water System The Study analyzed the revenue requirements to test the fiscal health of the water system, evaluate the adequacy of current rates and charges, and set the basis for the five-year rate plan (FY 2026 through FY 2030). Carollo recommends the City increase water rate revenue according to the following schedule: July 1, 2026 14.0 percent January 1, 2029 3.0 percent January 1, 2027 16.0 percent January 1, 2030 3.0 percent January 1, 2028 16.0 percent The recommended increases are necessary to fund operational and capital needs, as well as meet debt service and reserve requirements. Carollo recommends the following rates to meet the revenue requirements over the next five years. Table 1 Inside City Existing and Proposed Water Monthly Service Charges for the Study Period Rate Component Existing FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Revenue Adjustments 14.0% 16.0% 16.0% 3.0% 3.0% Monthly Water Service Charge 5/8" Meter $7.85 $7.85 $9.11 $10.57 $10.89 $11.22 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $7.85 $7.85 $9.11 $10.57 $10.89 $11.22 1" Meter $11.30 $11.30 $13.11 $15.21 $15.67 $16.15 1.5" Meter $21.55 $21.55 $25.00 $29.00 $29.87 $30.77 2" Meter $29.52 $29.52 $34.25 $39.73 $40.93 $42.16 3" Meter $64.37 $64.37 $74.67 $86.62 $89.22 $91.90 4" Meter $106.59 $106.59 $123.65 $143.44 $147.75 $152.19 6" Meter $213.18 $213.18 $247.29 $286.86 $295.47 $304.34 8” Meter $319.67 $319.67 $370.82 $430.16 $443.07 $456.37 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 2 Rate Component Existing FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Volumetric Rates ($/1,000 gallons) Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) $4.04 $4.04 $4.69 $5.45 $5.62 $5.79 Tier 2 (2,001 – 15,000 gallons) $5.34 $5.80 $6.73 $7.81 $8.05 $8.30 Tier 3 (> 15,000 gallons) $7.57 $8.70 $10.10 $11.72 $12.08 $12.45 Non-Residential (all usage) $4.72 $4.77 $5.54 $6.43 $6.63 $6.83 Major Industrial (all usage) $3.53 $4.10 $4.76 $5.53 $5.70 $5.88 Irrigation (all usage) $5.34 $8.70 $10.10 $11.72 $12.08 $12.45 Wholesale (all usage) $3.71 $4.25 $4.93 $5.72 $5.90 $6.08 Notes: 1) Proposed FY 2026 rates effective July 1, 2026. 2) Beginning FY 2027 rates are effective January 1 of each fiscal year. 3) Proposed outside City rates are 1.5 times inside City rates. 1.3 Sewer System The Study analyzed the revenue requirements to test the fiscal health of the sewer system, evaluate the adequacy of current rates and charges, and set the basis for the five-year rate plan (FY 2026 through FY 2030). Carollo recommends the City increase sewer rate revenue in accordance with its existing rate ordinance of 3.0 percent per year. These increases are sufficient to fund operational and capital needs and reserve requirements. Carollo recommends the following rates to meet the revenue requirements over the next five years. Table 2 Inside City Proposed Sewer Rates and Charges for the Study Period Rate Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Revenue Adjustments 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Monthly Sewer Service Charge 5/8" Meter $13.52 $13.93 $14.35 $14.79 $15.24 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $13.52 $13.93 $14.35 $14.79 $15.24 1" Meter $25.94 $26.72 $27.53 $28.36 $29.22 1.5" Meter $47.53 $48.96 $50.43 $51.95 $53.51 2" Meter $65.37 $67.34 $69.37 $71.46 $73.61 3" Meter $140.67 $144.90 $149.25 $153.73 $158.35 4" Meter $231.80 $238.76 $245.93 $253.31 $260.91 6" Meter $459.37 $473.16 $487.36 $501.99 $517.05 8” Meter $687.03 $707.65 $728.88 $750.75 $773.28 Volumetric Rates ($/1,000 gallons) Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) $5.24 $5.40 $5.57 $5.74 $5.92 Tier 2 (>2,000 gallons) $6.99 $7.20 $7.42 $7.65 $7.88 Non-Residential (all usage) $5.88 $6.06 $6.25 $6.44 $6.64 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 3 Rate Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Major Industrial (all usage) $6.21 $6.40 $6.60 $6.80 $7.01 Wholesale (all usage) $6.09 $6.28 $6.47 $6.67 $6.88 Notes: 1) Rates and charges effective January 1 of each fiscal year. 2) Outside City rate factors vary by meter size and are unchanged from the current rate ordinance. 1.4 Combined Bill Impacts In FY 2026 the total bill increase varies by each customer class due to the proposed water rates being more aligned with the cost to provide service. In FY 2027 and FY 2028 all customer classes will see an average of a 9 percent increase on their total combined bill, and in FY 2029 and FY 2030 all customers will experience an average 3 percent increase on their total combined bill. Table 3 summarizes the combined water and sewer bill impacts for select customer classes and usage for the rate-setting period. Table 3 Combined Inside City Bill Impacts Under Existing and Proposed Rates for the Study Period Customer Class Existing Bill FY 2026 Bill FY 2027 Bill FY 2028 Bill FY 2029 Bill FY 2030 Bill Residential 5/8" meter, 2 kgals $39.93 $39.93 $43.22 $46.96 $48.40 $49.88 5/8" meter, 4 kgals $64.59 $65.51 $71.08 $77.42 $79.80 $82.24 5/8" meter, 10 kgals $138.57 $142.25 $154.66 $168.80 $174.00 $179.32 Non-residential 5/8" meter, 10 kgals $127.37 $127.87 $139.04 $151.72 $156.38 $161.16 1" meter, 50 kgals $567.24 $569.74 $619.83 $676.74 $697.53 $718.87 Industrial 2" meter, 1,000 kgals $9,834.89 $10,404.89 $11,261.59 $12,239.10 $12,612.39 $13,005.77 6" meter, 5,000 kgals $49,372.55 $52,222.55 $56,520.45 $61,424.22 $63,297.46 $65,271.39 Notes: kgal – kilogallon 1) There is a FY 2026 mid-year rate increase for water rates only. 1.5 Impact Fees Impact fees are one-time fees assessed on new system connections for water or sewer service. As the City manages its water and sewer systems, it needs to estimate a certain level of capacity required to serve peak day and peak wet weather flow for existing and future customers. The impact fee valuates the reservation of system capacity to serve that new and/or modified connection. The City’s current impact fees were implemented in 2009. The proposed water and sewer impact fees were calculated using the incremental method, which aligns with industry standards and follows Arkansas state requirements. Carollo recommends the City charge water and sewer residential and multifamily development per dwelling unit and charging non-residential developments per meter based on meter size. The schedule below shows the proposed water and sewer impact fees. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 4 Table 4 Recommended Water and Sewer Impact Fees Customer Class Water Sewer Total Residential Single Family (per dwelling unit) $2,672 $2,998 $5,670 Multi-Family (per dwelling unit) $1,897 $2,129 $4,026 Non-Residential 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $2,672 $2,998 $5,670 1" Meter $6,680 $7,496 $14,176 1.5" Meter $13,361 $14,991 $28,352 2" Meter $21,377 $23,986 $45,363 3" Meter $42,754 $47,972 $90,726 4" Meter $66,803 $74,956 $141,759 6" Meter $133,606 $149,911 $283,517 8” Meter $213,770 $239,858 $453,628 10” Meter $307,294 $344,796 $652,090 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 5 SECTION 2 INTRODUCTION The City retained Carollo to conduct a Study for FY ending 2026 through 2030. The City receives treated water from BWD and owns and maintains a distribution system for potable water service. The City also owns and operates two WWTPs and maintains a local sewer collection system. The City Council approves water and sewer rate adjustments to meet forecasted funding obligations. The most recent rate adjustments covered FY 2023 through 2027 and were based on the recommendations of the Water and Wastewater Comprehensive Rate Study (2023 Study), performed by Black & Veatch. Since the 2023 Study, the City has experienced consistent growth and anticipates continued growth into the future. In addition, the City’s purchased water costs have increased significantly due to recent rate and impending rate increases from BWD. The unexpected increases coupled with anticipated demand growth and other rising operating costs and capital infrastructure needs prompted the City to update their user rates before the routine five-year update. 2.1 City of Fayetteville Service Area Overview 2.1.1 Water Service Area The City owns and operates a water system that serves approximately 50,000 meters and approximately 100,000 customers inside and outside the corporate city limits. Outside city customers include the cities of Farmington, Greenland, and Goshen, and portions of the City of Johnson and unincorporated Washington County. The distribution system includes over 850 miles of water lines, booster pump stations and storage tanks to serve customer needs and fire flow protection. The City provides both retail and wholesale water service. Wholesale customers include the City of Elkins, City of West Fork, and Mount Olive Water Association. The City has implemented several water system capital improvement efforts over the past few years to ensure level of service and accommodate growth. The City is currently in the process of constructing an 11.3-mile transmission main to accommodate increased water demand. With the recent improvements and those planned for the next several years, the City wants to implement a financial plan expected to generate sufficient revenue. 2.1.2 Sewer Service Area The sewer system provides wholesale and retail sewer service to approximately 40,000 connections inside and outside of the corporate City limits. Outside city customers include the cities of Farmington and Greenland, and portions of the City of Johnson and unincorporated Washington County. The City owns and operates a sewer system that includes two WWTPs and a collection system with over 600 miles of sewer lines and lift stations. The City provides both retail and wholesale sewer service. Wholesale customers include the City of Elkins and City of West Fork. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 6 2.2 Rate Setting Process Rate analyses are typically performed every five years so that revenues from rates adequately fund utility operations, maintenance, and capital investments. Additionally, in Arkansas, water and sewer providers must conduct rate studies at least every five years to adhere to the requirements imposed by Arkansas Act 605 of 2021 and amendments thereto. In addition to adhering to state requirements, Carollo’s rate-setting methodology is consistent with industry guidelines described in the American Water Works Association’s AWWA) M1 Manual: Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges and Water Environment Federation’s (WEF) Manual of Practice 27: Financial and Charges for Wastewater Systems MOP 27). The cost-of-service (COS) study presented within this report consists of the following three interconnected processes shown in the figure on the right: Revenue Requirement Analysis, COS Analysis, and the Rate Design Analysis. While the process is described in a linear step- by-step approach, it is better understood as an iterative process where the ultimate objective is to balance revenues with costs in an equitable manner for customers. These three processes will form the basis for the rate analyses presented within this report. 2.2.1 Rate Design and Calculation The rate design involves developing a rate structure that proportionately recovers costs from customers. This structure must be resilient enough to handle changing cost and demand scenarios, and flexible enough to meet other unique criteria. By collecting different cost drivers from different rate components, the utility can ideally balance these goals. The rate calculation is intended to quantify the nexus between the Revenue Requirements and the final rate that customers are charged. This process establishes rates to match the estimated revenue generation with expenditures. Figure 1 Conceptual Overview of the Rate-Setting Process Revenue RequirementAnalysisHowmuchraterevenuedoesthe City need to fully fund O&M and CIP? Cost-of-ServiceAnalysisWhatiseachcustomerclass's equitable share of the revenue requirements? RateDesignWhatratestructureand rates best recovers the revenue requirements? 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 7 2.3 Forward-Looking Statement The calculations and forecasts of this analysis are based upon the information available and reasonable projection of existing service costs, customer demands, system operational needs, existing legal agreements, and other similar data provided by the City, as well as Carollo’s best understanding of the City’s system. These projections are based on the data provided by the City. If significant changes occur to any of those or the other assumptions used in this analysis, the City may need to revisit the analysis. These changes could include unexpected inflation, changes to Arkansas specific legislation governing water and sewer utilities, deviation from the projected water and sewer demands, just to name a few. 2.4 Study Assumptions and Inputs 2.4.1 Input Data City staff provided Carollo with the following data, which was used to build Carollo’s rate model: FY 2024 and 2025 operations and maintenance (O&M) budgets for water and sewer. Multi-year capital improvement plans (CIP). Water and sewer billing data for FY 2022-2024. Debt service schedules for existing debt obligations. Projected system growth based on recent history. Beginning reserve balances for FY 2025. Carollo used this data to forecast expenses and revenues, and total revenue requirements for the next ten years. This forecast extends beyond the five-year timeframe of proposed rate adjustments as it is a best practice to look at possible long-term funding needs. 2.4.2 Cost Escalation and Budget Forecasting Based on discussion, Carollo and City staff determined escalation factors to project revenues and expenses when developing a 10-year financial forecast. These factors were selected based on recent history, anticipated drivers, and other relevant factors. Most expenses were escalated either by a general inflation factor of 3 percent, which was based on a combination of recent inflation trends and anticipated near-term inflation. Salary and labor-related expenses were escalated by 5 percent per City staff guidance. Purchased water costs from BWD were escalated based on BWD’s adopted rate schedule, which is set to increase rates annually by approximately 8.5 percent through FY 2030. While an annual account growth of 2 percent was used to project water sales, an annual account growth of 1.75 percent was used to project sewer sales, as the sewer system is anticipated to grow at a slightly lower rate. Construction materials as part of the budget were escalated by 3.5 percent. Capital costs provided in the CIP were already escalated by the City and were therefore not escalated in the model. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 8 Interest earnings on any cash deposits held by the City were calculated and projected based on the previous year’s cash ending balance using a 0.35 percent annual factor. The various escalation rates for these factors and others are shown in Table 5. Table 5 Escalation Factors Cost / Input Category Annual Rate General Inflation / Operations 3.0% Labor 5.0% Energy 5.0% Water Cost from BWD 8.5% (5-year average) Water Cost + Growth 10.7% (5-year average) Capital 3.5% Water Account Growth 2.0% Sewer Account Growth 1.75% Reserve Interest Rate 0.35% 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 9 SECTION 3 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS 3.1 Input Data 3.1.1 Current Rates The City’s current water rate structure has two components: a fixed monthly charge based on meter size; and a usage charge based on the amount of metered water sold. Residential customers have an inclining 3-tiered variable rate structure and non-residential customers are charged a uniform variable rate. The existing rates that took effect on January 1, 2026 are shown in Table 6. Inside and outside City customers are charged separate rates for service, with outside City customers’ rates being higher than inside City. This difference is to account for the lack of ownership and equity of the City’s system, as well as to support the additional infrastructure required to extend the distribution system outside of the City limits. Table 6 Existing Water Rates and Charges Rate Component Inside City Outside City Wholesale Monthly Water Service Charge 5/8" Meter $7.85 $8.98 $9.90 5/8" x 3/4" Meter 7.85 8.98 9.90 1" Meter 11.30 15.55 15.55 1.5" Meter 21.55 30.78 30.78 2" Meter 29.52 42.64 42.64 3" Meter 64.37 88.89 88.89 4" Meter 106.59 130.07 133.70 6" Meter 213.18 245.14 253.40 8” Meter 319.67 367.63 396.49 Volumetric Charges ($/1,000 gallons) Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) $4.04 $5.10 Tier 2 (2,001 – 15,000 gallons) 5.34 6.75 Tier 3 (> 15,000 gallons) 7.57 9.57 Non-Residential (all usage) $4.72 $5.75 Major Industrial (all usage) $3.53 $3.92 Irrigation (all usage) $5.34 $6.61 Wholesale (all usage) $3.71 Notes: 1) Rates and charges effective January 1, 2026. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 10 3.1.2 Billing Data 3.1.2.1 Baseline Billing Data The City provided billing data covering FY 2022 through 2024 for the water system, including date, customer identifier, meter size, location (inside or outside city), customer type, metered usage within each tier, and billed dollar amount. Carollo analyzed this data and aggregated usage, and bill counts for each meter size and location. 3.1.2.2 Projected Billing Data To project billing data for the next five years, Carollo used an annual growth assumption of 2.0 percent for all retail classes and locations but kept wholesale number of accounts steady. Retail per account usage is projected to remain stable, meaning that any change in total projected water sales is due to account growth. The baseline and forecasted billing summaries are shown in the following tables. In the rate model, total annual bill counts were used to forecast revenues as the number of accounts fluctuates month to month and total accounts directly corresponds with billed revenue. For purposes of transparency, however, this report provides for the total number of connections. The number of connections was calculated by dividing the number of bills by 12 for each month, even though the actual number of accounts at any given time could deviate from this figure. Table 7 illustrates the summary of projected number of connections by meter size during the study period. Table 8 summarizes the projected water sales based on the billing data analysis. Table 7 Projected Number of Water Connections FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Inside City 5/8” 171 175 178 182 185 189 5/8 x 3/4” 38,905 39,683 40,476 41,286 42,112 42,954 1" 1,592 1,624 1,656 1,689 1,723 1,757 1.5" 342 349 356 363 370 378 2" 375 383 391 398 406 414 3" 97 98 100 102 104 107 4" 16 16 16 17 17 17 6" 5 5 5 6 6 6 Total Inside City 41,502 42,332 43,179 44,043 44,924 45,822 Outside City 5/8” 12 12 12 13 13 13 5/8 x 3/4" 7,301 7,447 7,596 7,747 7,902 8,060 1" 228 232 237 242 247 251 1.5" 18 19 19 19 20 20 2" 11 11 11 11 12 12 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 11 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 3" 1 1 1 1 1 1 4" 0 0 0 0 0 0 6" 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Outside City 7,570 7,722 7,876 8,033 8,194 8,358 Wholesale 3" 1 1 1 1 1 1 4" 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total Wholesale 4 4 4 4 4 4 Total Number of Connections 49,077 50,058 51,059 52,080 53,122 54,184 Table 8 Current and Projected Water Sales FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Water Sales (kgal) - Inside City Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) 757,096 772,238 787,683 803,436 819,505 835,895 Tier 2 (2,001 – 15,000 gallons) 857,058 874,199 891,683 909,516 927,707 946,261 Tier 3 (> 15,000 gallons) 459,037 468,218 477,582 487,134 496,877 506,814 Non-Residential (all usage) 924,681 943,175 962,038 981,279 1,000,904 1,020,922 Major Industrial (all usage) 302,406 308,455 314,624 320,916 327,334 333,881 Irrigation (all usage) 342,363 349,210 356,195 363,319 370,585 377,977 Total Inside City Usage kgal) 3,642,641 3,715,494 3,789,804 3,865,600 3,942,912 4,021,770 Water Sales (kgal) - Outside City Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) 151,008 154,028 157,108 160,250 163,455 166,724 Tier 2 (2,001 – 15,000 gallons) 239,719 244,513 249,403 254,391 259,479 264,669 Tier 3 (> 15,000 gallons) 107,107 109,249 111,434 113,662 115,936 118,254 Non-Residential (all usage) 52,020 53,061 54,122 55,204 56,309 57,435 Major Industrial (all usage) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Irrigation (all usage) 35,527 36,237 36,962 37,701 38,455 39,224 Total Outside City Usage kgal) 585,380 597,088 609,029 621,210 633,634 646,307 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 12 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Water Sales - Wholesale (kgal) Elkins 93,225 95,089 96,991 98,931 100,910 102,928 Mount Olive 73,035 74,495 75,985 77,505 79,055 80,636 West Fork 66,632 67,964 69,324 70,710 72,124 73,567 Total Wholesale Usage kgal) 232,891 237,549 242,300 247,146 252,089 257,131 Total (kgal) 4,460,913 4,550,131 4,641,133 4,733,956 4,828,635 4,925,208 3.1.3 Expenses 3.1.3.1 Budget Data The City provided Carollo with its currently adopted FY 2025 budget to use as a base for forecasting. The budget provided is for water and sewer combined. Carollo worked closely with City staff to identify how to split costs between two funds and allocated the costs appropriately to each fund based on these discussions. Additionally, costs were escalated based on the percentages shown in Table 5. The baseline and projected operating budget expenses are summarized in Table 9. Table 9 Baseline and Projected Water Operating Expenses ($ Thousands) FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Utilities Director (1800) $127 $129 $135 $140 $146 $151 Utilities Project Management 4020) $258 $244 $255 $267 $279 $287 Utilities Financial Services 1810) $1,176 $1,355 $1,407 $1,460 $1,516 $1,562 Meter Reading (1820) $1,339 $1,488 $1,546 $1,607 $1,670 $1,720 Meter Maint & Backflow Prev 1830) $767 $772 $804 $838 $873 $899 Meter Operations Capital (1840) $165 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Water Purchased (3800) $16,097 $18,422 $20,442 $22,746 $25,350 $27,501 Operations & Administration 4000) $2,257 $2,019 $2,089 $2,167 $2,247 $2,315 Water Distribution Maintenance 4310) $4,332 $4,883 $5,063 $5,251 $5,445 $5,615 Water Storage & Pump Maintenance (4330) $353 $360 $375 $390 $406 $418 Capital Water Mains (5600) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Water & Sewer Connections 5620) $534 $571 $593 $615 $639 $658 PILOT $1,073 $1,133 $1,225 $1,547 $1,955 $2,054 Trustee & Pay Agent Fees $151 $151 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Operating Expenses $28,629 $31,529 $33,934 $37,029 $40,526 $43,180 Notes: PILOT – payment in lieu of taxes 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 13 3.1.3.2 Capital Improvement Plan Expenses The City provided the FY 2026 through 2030 CIP, which has been approved by City Council, along with planned funding for each project. These expenses were already escalated and provided in future dollars. Most CIP expenses are for routine repair and replacement of water system infrastructure and are planned to be cash-funded through either rate revenues in the year they are collected, or unrestricted reserves, if available after meeting the City’s target reserve level. The City also funds CIP through impact fee revenues. Impact fees are one-time fees paid by new connections to fund infrastructure needed to expand capacity to meet this growth. Impact fees are deposited in a restricted fund and reserved for these growth-related projects. The summarized five-year CIP and funding allocation is shown in Table 10. Table 10 Projected Water Capital Improvement Plan and Funding ($ Thousands) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 CIP Water System Rehabilitation $4,445 $4,259 $3,778 $3,667 $4,326 Water Tank Improvements $1,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 Improvements Defined by Study $0 $0 $300 $300 $0 Relocations for Bond Projects $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 Rate Operations Study $10 $10 $10 $20 $20 Impact Fee Cost Sharing $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 Water Meters $1,700 $2,000 $2,400 $2,900 $2,000 Storage & Pump Station Maintenance $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 Equipment Expansions $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 Technology Equip Replacement $10 $73 $15 $54 $25 Building/Office Improvements $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 Backflow Prevention Assemblies $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 Utilities Financial Services Improvements $8 $3 $2 $8 $8 Total Funding Needed $7,723 $7,395 $7,554 $7,999 $7,428 Funding New Debt $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Impact Fees $3,302 $3,302 $3,302 $3,260 $3,343 Remaining Funding Needed from Rates $4,421 $4,093 $4,252 $4,738 $4,085 Total Funding Allocated $7,723 $7,395 $7,554 $7,999 $7,428 3.1.3.3 Debt Service The City will begin payments to Series 2024 bond in FY 2027, which was used to fund the 48-inch West Transmission Main Project. While there is no future debt issuances projected in the Study period, the City should evaluate its capital funding strategy as the CIP changes. Table 7 summarizes the debt service for the study period. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 14 Table 11 Existing and Future Modeled Debt Service ($ Thousands) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Existing Debt Service Series 2024 $0 $3,052 $4,578 $4,578 $4,578 Total Existing Debt Service $0 $3,052 $4,578 $4,578 $4,578 Future Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Debt Service $0 $3,052 $4,578 $4,578 $4,578 3.1.4 Revenues 3.1.4.1 Projected Rate Revenues under Existing Rates Carollo first forecasted rate revenues for the next five years assuming rate adjustments from the City ordinance, which includes a 6 percent increase in water rates in FY 2027 and annual 3 percent increases thereafter. This forecast took the existing rates (Table 6) and calculated revenues based on the projected water sales and bills from Table 7 and Table 8. By calculating baseline rate revenue under existing rates and doing this exercise, Carollo identified any revenue shortfalls under existing rates. Projected revenues before rate adjustments are shown in Table 12. Table 12 Projected Water Revenues under Existing Rates ($ Thousands) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Water Sales Revenue $28,823 $31,129 $32,741 $34,397 $36,138 Operations & Administration (4000) $339 $297 $278 $269 $274 Water Distribution Maintenance 4310) $1,318 $1,345 $1,372 $1,399 $1,427 Total Revenues $30,480 $32,771 $34,390 $36,066 $37,839 3.2 Water System Revenue Requirements The revenue requirement analysis is a comprehensive test of a utility’s fiscal health, scrutinizing the adequacy of current revenues and setting the basis for short-term and long-term rate planning. It reviews the utility’s revenues, expenses, debts, and reserve policies, assessing the viability of each metric going forward. Where cash flow and balances are insufficient, the revenue requirement analysis determines the additional cash flow needed to meet all funding goals. 3.2.1 Revenue Requirement Tests There are two sufficiency tests used to define the annual revenue requirement during this analysis: 1) reserve target test and (2) debt service coverage test. These sufficiency tests are commonly used to determine the amount of annual revenue that must be generated from a utility’s rates. The cash flow sufficiency test was omitted as the City’s cash flow is tested under the reserve target test. Reserve Target Test: Measures if a utility is generating enough revenue to meet the City’s minimum operating reserve balance to ensure continuation of their operations and any financial obligations. This test is not legally binding but provides assurance for a utility’s financial stability and is often 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 15 based on the reserve policies adopted by the City Council. When the year-end balance falls short of the desired target, a rate increase is recommended. This reserve target ranges by utility, depending on capital needs and service demands. Debt Service Coverage Test: Assesses a utility’s ability to meet their annual debt service obligations. Bond issuances regularly include covenants requiring the agency to maintain sufficient cash flows to meet annual debt service payments plus an additional amount. Typical debt service coverage ratios DSCR) range from 1.20 times to 1.50 times annual debt service, depending on the terms of debt instrument issued. The City’s current DSCR target is 1.20 times (1.20x). The higher multiplier can provide credit rating agencies with additional evidence of a utility’s strong financial health and can potentially reduce long-term costs. If net revenue falls below debt service coverage in any given year, the model would indicate a need for additional revenue. Based on the financial sufficiency tests described above, the revenue requirement analysis determines if the City must increase system revenues to meet its ongoing obligations. If revenues are found to be insufficient to meet debt obligation (debt service coverage test) and/or reserve policies (reserve sufficiency test), revenues must be increased to achieve the higher of the needs. The revenue requirement recommendations presented herein are based on best available information as of the writing of this report. 3.2.2 Reserve Target Test The reserve target test assesses the adequacy of the rates to maintain end-of-year unrestricted reserve balances at or above the City’s policy target. Historically, the City’s annual operating reserve minimum was 10 percent of O&M expenses. Industry best practices are an operating reserve of 90 to 180 days of annual O&M expenses. To be more in line with industry standards and provide financial security, Carollo recommended the City increase its operating reserve minimum to the greater of 10 percent of O&M or 7 million for the water fund. The total water and sewer combined minimum reserve is set at $12 million starting in FY 2026. The reserve balance forecast under the existing rate ordinance is outlined in Table 13 below. Table 13 Projected Water Reserve Balance Under Existing Rate Ordinance ($ thousands) Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Ordinance Rate Adjustments 6.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Beginning Reserve Balance $13,497 $8,027 ($281) ($11,526) ($24,739) Sources of Funds Rate Revenues $28,823 $31,129 $32,741 $34,397 $36,138 Other Revenues $1,657 $1,642 $1,649 $1,668 $1,701 Total Sources of Funds $30,480 $32,771 $34,390 $36,066 $37,839 Uses of Funds Operating Expenses $31,529 $33,934 $36,804 $39,963 $42,588 Debt Service $0 $3,052 $4,578 $4,578 $4,578 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 16 Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Cash Funded CIP $4,421 $4,093 $4,252 $4,738 $4,085 Total Uses of Funds $35,950 $41,079 $45,635 $49,279 $51,252 Cash Flow ($5,470) ($8,308) ($11,245) ($13,213) ($13,412) Ending Reserve Balance $8,027 ($281) ($11,526) ($24,739) ($38,151) Reserve Balance Target $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 Surplus / (Deficit) $1,027 ($7,281) ($18,526) ($31,739) ($45,151) As shown, the existing rates are insufficient to meet the reserve target throughout the rate-setting period. The City falls below this target beginning in FY 2027. Carollo recommends the following rate revenue increases: 14 percent in FY 2026, 16 percent in FY 2027 and FY 2028, and 3 percent annually thereafter. Following the proposed rate revenue adjustments, the City is expected to meet its reserve targets throughout the duration of the rate-setting period. Table 14 Projected Water Reserve Balance Under Proposed Rate Revenue Adjustments ($ thousands) Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Proposed Revenue Adjustments 14.0% 16.0% 16.0% 3.0% 3.0% Beginning Reserve Balance $13,497 $10,045 $7,017 $8,825 $9,007 Sources of Funds Rate Revenues $30,841 $36,406 $46,001 $48,329 $50,774 Other Revenues $1,657 $1,645 $1,666 $1,696 $1,733 Total Sources of Funds $32,498 $38,052 $47,667 $50,025 $52,507 Uses of Funds Operating Expenses1 $31,529 $33,934 $37,029 $40,526 $43,180 Debt Service $0 $3,052 $4,578 $4,578 $4,578 Cash Funded CIP $4,421 $4,093 $4,252 $4,738 $4,085 Total Uses of Funds $35,950 $41,079 $45,859 $49,843 $51,844 Cash Flow ($3,452) ($3,028) $1,808 $182 $663 Ending Reserve Balance $10,045 $7,017 $8,825 $9,007 $9,670 Reserve Balance Target $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 Surplus / (Deficit) $3,045 $17 $1,825 $2,007 $2,670 Notes: 1) Operating expenses slightly increase as revenue adjustments increase due to PILOT expenses. The PILOT expense is calculated based on previous year’s rate revenue. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 17 3.2.3 Debt Coverage Test Debt service coverage refers to the collection of revenues to meet all operating expenses and debt service obligations, plus an additional multiple of that debt service. Debt service coverage is dictated by the borrower’s bond covenants and establishes a threshold above basic debt service that the borrower must maintain. For example, the City’s current bonds require it maintain fees and charges for the sale of water at levels enough to enable it to collect in each year the amount necessary to pay all its water system operating expenses, debt service on the bonds, plus an amount equal to 20 percent of debt service on the bonds. That additional 20 percent is referred to as coverage. Not all revenues are allowed in the debt coverage test. For the City, impact fee revenues are not included in the calculation. Table 15 illustrates that debt service coverage requirements (DSCR) under the rate ordinance increases will not be met. Table 16 shows debt coverage following proposed revenue adjustments outlined in Table 14. The City is projected to exceed its debt coverage ratio requirements with the proposed revenue adjustments. Table 15 Projected Water Debt Service Coverage Under Existing Rate Ordinance ($ thousands) Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Eligible Revenues $30,480 $32,771 $34,390 $36,066 $37,839 Operating Expenditures $31,529 $33,934 $36,804 $39,963 $42,588 Debt Service $0 $3,052 $4,578 $4,578 $4,578 1.20x Debt Coverage $0 $610 $916 $916 $916 Debt Service Coverage Target $31,529 $37,596 $42,298 $45,457 $48,082 Debt Coverage Surplus/(Deficit) N/A ($4,825) ($7,908) ($9,391) ($10,243) DSCR Before Increase no debt -0.38x -0.53x -0.85x -1.04x Table 16 Projected Water Debt Service Coverage Under Proposed Rate Revenue Adjustments ($ thousands) Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Eligible Revenues $32,498 $38,052 $47,667 $50,025 $52,507 Operating Expenditures $31,529 $33,934 $37,029 $40,526 $43,180 Debt Service $0 $3,052 $4,578 $4,578 $4,578 1.20x Debt Coverage $0 $610 $916 $916 $916 Debt Service Coverage Target $31,529 $37,597 $42,522 $46,020 $48,674 Debt Coverage Surplus/(Deficit) $969 $455 $5,144 $4,005 $3,833 DSCR Before Increase no debt 1.35x 2.32x 2.07x 2.04x 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 18 3.3 Water COS Analysis The COS analysis serves as a rational basis for distributing the full costs of the City’s water service to each customer class in proportion to the demands placed on the system. Those steps are outlined in Figure 2. Figure 2 COS Analysis Steps The COS analysis takes the revenue requirements outlined in the prior section and allocates them first to City functions and then to customer classes based on usage of the City’s system. The goal is to provide a fair and equitable method of allocating costs and establishes a clear nexus between the water used by different customers and the fees they are charged by the City to distribute and store that water. Using the industry standard methodology outlined in the AWWA M1 Manual, the two most widely used methods for allocation of functionalized costs to cost components: Base Extra Capacity Method, where costs are allocated among: (1) a base category to provide baseline water service or average day demand; (2) an extra capacity category to provide peak demand service, often split into maximum day and maximum hour components; and (3) a customer category to provide services that do not vary with water usage, such as customer service and billing. Commodity Demand Method, where costs are allocated among: (1) a commodity category for costs that are directly driven by demand; (2) a demand category for building and maintaining peak system capacity; and (3) a customer category to provide services that do not vary with water usage, such as customer service and billing. Cost Functionalization The City's expenses are allocated to functional categories on a line-by-line basis. Rate Component Allocation The functional categories are allocated to cost components based on system usage statistics and engineering standards. Customer Class and Tier Allocation The cost components are reallocated to each class or tier based on demand profiles. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 19 Both methodologies recognize that the COS “depends not only on the total volume of water used, but also on the rate of use, or peak demand requirements.” Costs incurred by the City are not incurred uniformly or simply based on the total quantity or volume of water used. The COS changes based on both when and how much water is used. Both methodologies account for this by including an extra capacity or demand category, in recognition of costs associated with capacity that is not used consistently which impacts operating costs and capital asset related costs to accommodate peak flows. For this Study, the Base Extra Capacity methodology was selected. The following sections discuss how costs are allocated to the system’s functions, cost components, and customer classes using this methodology. 3.3.1 Functional Cost Allocation The functional cost allocation assigns the test year’s revenue requirement identified by major functions. The Study developed a list of functions specific to the City’s water system. Each function is related and allocated to specific cost components, which can then be assigned to rates. The functional components used for the City are: Customer Billing: Costs associated with materials and outside services directly related to customer communication such as billing, outreach, printing, and postage. Meters Services: Costs associated with water meters and service connections. Supply: Costs associated with obtaining treated water to then provide to retail and wholesale customers. Pumping: Costs associated with pumping treated water. Storage: Costs associated with storage of treated water to provide adequate system pressure and meet maximum hour demands. Distribution: Costs associated with delivering water to customers including the operation and maintenance of the water distribution system facilities. As All Others: Costs associated with other expenses that provide an overall benefit to the water system such as staff costs for management personnel who oversee all aspects of the water operation. This category also includes costs that do not fit any of the other categories such as overhead, in lieu of taxes expense, and the Operations & Administration (4000) budgeted cost center. The City’s budget was analyzed line by line and distributed to appropriate components listed above. Details of how the O&M, debt service, and other expenses were distributed among functional categories are shown in the following sections. 3.3.2 Cost Components Once the City’s budget was allocated to functional categories, each function category was allocated to the cost components. The following describes each of the cost components for the City. Base: This category includes a portion of operating and capital costs related to source of supply and distribution costs, up to a level that meets the City’s baseline (average day) demands throughout the year. Base also includes a portion of general and administrative costs associated with the operations and management of those functions. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 20 Extra Capacity – Max Day: This category includes a portion of O&M and capital costs for water distribution related to meeting maximum day demands. Max day also includes a portion of general and administrative costs associated with the operations and management of those functions. These costs are incremental to those required for Base service. For example, they include capital costs related to oversizing the system to meet excess max day demand. System peaking factors are used to determine the appropriate allocations to the Extra Capacity cost components. For the purpose of this Study, the maximum day peaking factor is 1.9 based on the City’s water use records. This means that the maximum day demand is assumed to be 1.9 times the average day demand. Extra Capacity – Max Hour: The Max Hour category is similar to the Max Day category but covers the additional costs related to peak above Max Day. These costs are incremental to those required for Base and Max Day service. The Max Hour peaking factor is 1.1 times the maximum day demand based on the City’s recent water use records. Common to All: Costs associated with the part of the distribution system that retail and wholesale customers use, like large transmission mains. Common to Retail: Costs associated with the distribution system that only retail customers use, like smaller water pipes and storage for max hour demands. Meter Service: Costs associated with customer meters and service lines and the associated capacity. These costs are included in the fixed charge based on the meter’s hydraulic capacity. Customer: Costs related to operational support activities including accounting, administration, billing, and customer service. These expenditures are common to all customers and are reasonably uniform across the different customer classes. Carollo reviewed the existing fixed assets for the water system and allocated each to the appropriate functional category based on direction from City staff. In addition, each of the operating budget line items was reviewed and its corresponding costs allocated based on the service provided. The functionalized assets and O&M are then allocated to the appropriate cost components according to the Base Extra Capacity methodology. This functional allocation process provides a reasonable, appropriate basis for proportionately distributing costs to customer types based on their usage patterns and is grounded in COS principles and standards. 3.3.2.1 Fixed Asset Allocation Carollo reviewed the fixed asset registry provided by City staff, which allocated each asset to a specific functional category. The Study then allocated the functionalized assets to cost components. The overall results of this allocation are used as a proxy to allocate capital-related costs. This minimizes large shifts in the allocation of capital costs, which can vary significantly from year to year. Table 13 summarizes the allocation of the functionalized assets to the components to determine the allocation factors applied to the capital related costs. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 21 Table 17 Allocation of Water System Assets to Cost Components ($ thousands) Description Total Value Customer Service All Base All Max Day All Max Hour Retail Base Retail Max Day Retail Max Hour As All Others Transmission $90,711 $0 $0 $34,396 $56,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Distribution $103,863 $0 $15,580 $0 $0 $0 $28,843 $51,415 $8,026 $0 Storage $888 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $319 $569 $0 $0 Water Meter $3,622 $0 $3,622 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 General Water 1,683 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,683 Subtotal Allocation 200,768 $0 $19,202 $34,396 $56,315 $0 $29,163 $51,984 $8,026 $1,683 Reallocation of General 1,683 $0 $162 $291 $476 $0 $247 $440 $68 Total Allocation ($) 19,364 $34,686 $56,791 $0 $29,409 $52,423 $8,094 $0 Total Allocation (%) 9.6% 17.3% 28.3% 0.0% 14.6% 26.1% 4.0% 0.0% 3.3.2.2 O&M Allocation Similar to fixed assets, Carollo allocated the water system operating expenses to functional categories and then to cost components. The allocation percentages used to functionalize the operating budgets are estimates based on discussions with City staff. Table 18 provides the allocation of the O&M budget to functional categories. Table 19 summarizes the allocation of the functionalized O&M expenses to the cost components. Table 18 Functional Allocation of Water O&M Budget (FY 2026) ($ thousands) Component FY 2026 Budget Customer Meter Service Supply Pumping Storage Distribution As All Others Utilities Director 1800) $129 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $129 Utilities Project Management (4020) $244 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244 Utilities Financial Services (1810) $1,355 $1,355 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Meter Reading (1820) $1,488 $0 $1,488 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Meter Maint & Backflow Prev (1830) $772 $0 $772 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Meter Operations Capital (1840) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 22 Component FY 2026 Budget Customer Meter Service Supply Pumping Storage Distribution As All Others Water Purchased 3800) $18,422 $0 $0 $18,422 $0 $0 $0 $0 Operations & Administration (4000) $2,019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,019 Water Distribution Maintenance (4310) $4,883 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,883 $0 Water Storage & Pump Maintenance 4330) 360 $0 $0 $0 $180 $180 $0 $0 Capital Water Mains 5600) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Water & Sewer Connections (5620) $571 $0 $571 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PILOT $1,133 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,133 Trustee & Pay Agent Fees $151 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151 Total Operating Expenses $31,529 $1,355 $2,831 $18,422 $180 $180 $4,883 $3,677 Reallocation of As All Others $179 $374 $2,432 $24 $24 $645 Total Allocation ($) $1,534 $3,205 $20,854 $204 $204 $5,528 Total Allocation (%) 4.9% 10.2% 66.1% 0.6% 0.6% 17.5% Table 19 Allocation of Water O&M Budget to Cost Components ($ thousands) Description FY 2026 Budget Customer Meter Service All Base All Max Day All Max Hour Retail Base Retail Max Day Retail Max Hour Meter Service $3,205 $0 $3,205 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Customer Billing $1,534 $1,534 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Supply $20,854 $0 $0 $7,908 $12,947 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pumping $204 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67 $119 $19 Storage $204 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67 $119 $19 Distribution $5,528 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,806 $3,219 $503 Total Allocation 31,529 $1,534 $3,205 $7,908 $12,947 $0 $1,939 $3,457 $540 Total Allocation (%) 4.9% 10.2% 25.1% 41.1% 0.0% 6.2% 11.0% 1.7% Notes: 1) Totals may not tie due to rounding. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 23 3.3.2.3 Offsetting Revenue Water connection fees, billed services, interest income, contracted services, and other non-rate revenue are used to offset the revenue requirements and reduce the required increase in rate revenue. Additionally, Outside City retail and wholesale revenue also offset the revenue requirements for Inside City customers. Table 20 summarizes the net revenue requirements. Table 20 Allocation of Water Revenue Requirements to Cost Components ($ thousands) Description FY 2026 Budget Customer Meter Service All Base All Max Day All Max Hour Retail Base Retail Max Day Retail Max Hour Operating Expenses 31,529 $1,534 $3,205 $7,908 $12,947 $0 $1,939 $3,457 $540 Capital Costs: Cash Funded Capital 4,421 $0 $426 $764 $1,251 $0 $648 $1,154 $178 Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Revenue Requirement 35,950 $1,534 $3,631 $8,671 $14,197 $0 $2,587 $4,611 $718 Less Offsetting Revenues: Non-Operating Revenues 1,657) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($541) ($965) ($151) Outside City Retail 6,020) ($237) ($682) ($1,175) ($2,154) $0 ($559) ($1,058) ($156) Outside City Wholesale 1,179) ($0) ($4) ($467) ($707) $0 $0 $0 $0 Change in Cash Reserves 1,434) $0 ($138) ($248) ($406) $0 ($210) ($375) ($58) Net Revenue Requirement 25,660 $1,297 $2,807 $6,782 $10,931 $0 $1,276 $2,213 $354 Allocation 5.1% 10.9% 26.4% 42.6% 0.0% 5.0% 8.6% 1.4% 3.3.3 Customer Allocation The amount of costs allocable to customers is calculated with the unique units associated with each cost function. For example, the customer component is the same for all meter sizes and is calculated by dividing the allocated customer costs by the number of accounts. The resulting value will then be allocated to each customer class in the final COS step. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 24 3.3.3.1 Units of Service Based on functional category, the units of service are water consumed, incremental demand (max day and max hour capacity), meter equivalents, and annual bills. Base Costs: Allocated by total annual treated sales volume or annual water consumption in 1,000 gallons. Extra Capacity Costs: Allocated based on each customer type’s extra capacity demand developed from the incremental amounts between max day demand and average day demand and between max hour demand and max day demand. Extra capacity units are based on the incremental capacity, in 1,000 gallons per day, needed to serve demands in excess of the baseline or average day demand. Meter Equivalents: The meter equivalents are derived based on the meter’s hydraulic capacity. Larger meters are assigned more meter equivalents than smaller meters. Customer: For the fixed charge, customer component unit cost is based on number of bills. 3.3.3.2 Unit Cost Development In order to allocate the COS to various customer types, unit costs of service are developed for each cost component. As shown in Table 16, the total rate revenue requirements are allocated to each cost component for the test year. The total cost for each functional category is then divided by the total number of associated units of service to determine appropriate unit costs for the water system. The units of service for each customer type are shown in Table 21. Table 22 illustrates the calculation of the unit costs for each cost component, which are then applied to the units of service. Table 21 Water Units of Service by Customer Type (FY 2026) Component # of Bills of Bills Equivalents Annual Water Usage (kgal) Max Month Max Day Max Hour Inside City: Residential 449,248 459,898 2,114,655 230,250 10,726 7,441 Non-Residential 38,773 61,805 943,175 91,054 3,357 3,176 Major Industrial 59 806 308,455 34,788 1,098 1,039 Irrigation 19,909 26,590 349,210 73,513 3,346 1,386 Outside City: Residential 85,417 86,476 507,790 73,409 2,656 1,795 Non-Residential 4,866 6,201 53,061 5,676 189 179 Major Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 Irrigation 2,376 3,166 36,237 8,299 347 144 Wholesale: Elkins 12 162 95,089 10,370 394 326 Mount Olive 24 270 74,495 8,631 341 258 West Fork 12 162 67,964 7,917 313 236 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 25 Table 22 Development of Water Unit Costs ($ thousands) Description Customer Meter Service All Base All Max Day All Max Hour Retail Base Retail Max Day Retail Max Hour Allocated Revenue Requirements 1,297 $2,807 $6,782 $10,931 $0 $1,276 $2,213 $354 Total Units 507,990 549,099 3,715,494 18,527 13,042 3,715,494 18,527 13,042 Unit Cost $2.55 $5.11 $1.83 $589.99 $0.00 $0.34 $119.47 $27.13 Units # of Bills # of equiv. bills kgal kgal/day kgal/day kgal kgal/day kgal/day Table 23 shows the COS by customer type for the FY 2026 test year. Table 23 Water Revenue Requirement by Customer Type (FY 2026) Component Test Year FY 2026 Inside City: Residential $15,835 Non-Residential $4,975 Major Industrial $1,482 Irrigation $3,368 Outside City: Residential $5,112 Non-Residential $417 Major Industrial $0 Irrigation $496 Wholesale $1,179 Total $32,863 3.4 Water Rate Design Revenue requirements and COS analysis provide the basis for designing water rates. Revenue requirements show the level of revenue to be recovered from rates to fund utility’s O&M and capital needs and provide adequate resources to meet minimum cash levels. COS allocations provide the units and ultimately the COS for each customer class that can be used to design equitable user rates and charges. During rate design, it is important to develop equitable charges that commensurate with the cost of providing service to customers. As this is challenging for each individual customer, rates are normally designed to meet average conditions for each customers type with similar service requirements. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 26 The COS results are based on cost and engineering estimates that rely in part on professional judgement and experience. Detailed results should not be used as exact answers but as guides to the necessity for rate adjustments. Practical considerations may enter into the final choice of charges, recognizing such factors as previous rate levels, existing rate structures, the degree of adjustments indicated, and policies concerning the application of rates. Carollo worked with City staff to analyze various adjustments with goals of affordability to low volume water users, water conservation, and improving equity and understanding among customers. The FY 2026 proposed water rates are intended to transition each customer type toward its COS. Starting in FY 2027, rates are recommended to be increased across the board for each rate component. 3.4.1 Rate Structure The City’s existing water rates have been in effect since January 1, 2026, with the following rate structure: Monthly service charge varies by meter size and varies by inside City, outside City, and wholesale. Outside City rate factors vary and are not consistent amongst meter sizes. Volume rate ($ per 1,000 gallons) structure consists of three tiers for residential and a uniform volume rate for all non-residential customer classes. Carollo recommends the following minor modifications to the existing water rate structure: Monthly service charge for outside City and wholesale is proposed to be the same. All outside City rates have a factor of 1.5 times the rates of inside City for the monthly service charge and volume rates. This difference is to account for the lack of ownership and equity of the City’s system, as well as to support the additional infrastructure required to extend the distribution system out to the farther reaches. The proposed irrigation rate is the same rate as the residential third tier rate. 3.4.2 Fixed Monthly Service Charges A monthly fixed service charge is a cost recovery mechanism that is generally designed to recover the utility’s fixed expenditures, such as metering, testing, billing and other customer related costs. The proposed fixed charge primarily recovers the customer service and other fixed cost components of the revenue requirements. Table 24 summarizes the existing and FY 2026 mid-year proposed monthly service charges by meter size for July 1, 2026. There is no proposed increase to the Inside City monthly water service charges for the mid-year rate adjustments. However, Outside City proposed monthly service charges have a 1.5 rate factor applied beginning July 1, 2026. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 27 Table 24 Existing and Mid-Year Proposed Inside City Water Monthly Service Charges Rate Component Existing(1) FY 2026 Proposed(2,3) Difference Monthly Water Service Charge 5/8" Meter $7.85 $7.85 $0.00 5/8" x 3/4" Meter 7.85 7.85 0.00 1" Meter 11.30 11.30 0.00 1.5" Meter 21.55 21.55 0.00 2" Meter 29.52 29.52 0.00 3" Meter 64.37 64.37 0.00 4" Meter 106.59 106.59 0.00 6" Meter 213.18 213.18 0.00 8” Meter 319.67 319.67 0.00 Notes: 1) Existing fixed effective January 1, 2026. 2) Proposed service charge effective July 1, 2026. 3) Proposed Outside City and Wholesale monthly service charges are 1.5x proposed inside City rates. Starting in FY 2027 proposed monthly service charges can be calculated by escalating them based on proposed revenue requirement increases shown in Table 25. The proposed five-year rates are shown in the following tables. All rates have been rounded up to the nearest $0.01 to avoid under-collection of revenues. Table 25 Inside City Existing and Proposed Water Monthly Service Charges for the Study Period Rate Component Existing FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Revenue Adjustments 14.0% 16.0% 16.0% 3.0% 3.0% Monthly Water Service Charge 5/8" Meter $7.85 $7.85 $9.11 $10.57 $10.89 $11.22 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $7.85 $7.85 $9.11 $10.57 $10.89 $11.22 1" Meter $11.30 $11.30 $13.11 $15.21 $15.67 $16.15 1.5" Meter $21.55 $21.55 $25.00 $29.00 $29.87 $30.77 2" Meter $29.52 $29.52 $34.25 $39.73 $40.93 $42.16 3" Meter $64.37 $64.37 $74.67 $86.62 $89.22 $91.90 4" Meter $106.59 $106.59 $123.65 $143.44 $147.75 $152.19 6" Meter $213.18 $213.18 $247.29 $286.86 $295.47 $304.34 8” Meter $319.67 $319.67 $370.82 $430.16 $443.07 $456.37 Notes: 1) Existing fixed effective January 1, 2026. 2) Beginning FY 2027 monthly service charges are effective January 1 of each fiscal year. 3) Outside City rates are 1.5 times inside City rates. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 28 3.4.3 Volumetric Rates Variable volumetric rates include a base component, which represents the cost to meet the average day demand, a maximum day component, which represents the incremental cost to meet the maximum day demand; and a maximum hour component, which represents the cost to meet the maximum hour demand. Carollo recommends that the City keep its inclining three-tier residential rate structure, where the volume rate increases for each incremental unit of water at each tier. This rate structure encourages water conservation, which is a goal of the City. When designing rates during this Study, Carollo also took a closer look at the low volume users with water use of 2,000 gallons or less. The proposed volumetric rates for Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) will not increase for the mid-year FY 2026 rate adjustments, which supports the City’s conservation and affordability efforts. The FY 2026 proposed rates for Inside City customer classes are summarized in the table below: Table 26 Existing and FY 2026 Proposed Water Volumetric Rates Rate Component Existing(1) FY 2026 Proposed(2,3) Difference Volumetric Charges ($/1,000 gallons) Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) $4.04 $4.04 $0.00 Tier 2 (2,001 – 15,000 gallons) $5.34 $5.80 $0.46 Tier 3 (> 15,000 gallons) $7.57 $8.70 $1.13 Non-Residential (all usage) $4.72 $4.77 $0.05 Major Industrial (all usage) $3.53 $4.10 $0.57 Irrigation (all usage) $5.34 $8.70 $3.36 Wholesale (all usage) $3.71 $4.25 $0.54 Notes: 1) Rates and charges effective January 1, 2026. 2) Proposed service charge effective July 1, 2026. 3) Proposed Outside City volumetric rates are 1.5x proposed inside City rates. While FY 2026 rates take into account the COS analysis and the City’s goals and objectives, beginning in FY 2027, the volumetric rates can be calculated by escalating the rates and charges by the revenue adjustment percentages. The proposed five-year volume rates are shown in the following table. All rates have been rounded up to the nearest $0.01 to avoid under-collection of revenues. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 29 Table 27 Inside City Existing and Proposed Water Volumetric Rates for the Study Period Rate Component Existing FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Revenue Adjustments 14.0% 16.0% 16.0% 3.0% 3.0% Volumetric Rates ($/1,000 gallons) Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) $4.04 $4.04 $4.69 $5.45 $5.62 $5.79 Tier 2 (2,001 – 15,000 gallons) $5.34 $5.80 $6.73 $7.81 $8.05 $8.30 Tier 3 (> 15,000 gallons) $7.57 $8.70 $10.10 $11.72 $12.08 $12.45 Non-Residential (all usage) $4.72 $4.77 $5.54 $6.43 $6.63 $6.83 Major Industrial (all usage) $3.53 $4.10 $4.76 $5.53 $5.70 $5.88 Irrigation (all usage) $5.34 $8.70 $10.10 $11.72 $12.08 $12.45 Wholesale (all usage) $3.71 $4.25 $4.93 $5.72 $5.90 $6.08 Notes: 1) Rates and charges effective January 1, 2026. 2) Proposed service charge effective July 1, 2026. 3) Proposed Outside City volumetric rates are 1.5x proposed inside City rates. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 30 SECTION 4 SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS 4.1 Input Data 4.1.1 Current Rates The City’s current sewer rate structure has two components: a fixed monthly charge based on meter size; and a volumetric charge based on the amount of metered water sold. Residential customers have an inclining 2-tiered variable rate structure and are charged based on a five-month winter average to account for water use that does not end up in the sewer system. Non-residential customers are charged a uniform variable rate. The existing rates that took effect on January 1, 2026 are shown in Table 28. Similar to water, inside and outside City customers are charged different rates for service, with outside City’s rates being higher than inside City’s. This difference is to account for the lack of ownership and equity of the City’s system, as well as to support the additional infrastructure required to extend the distribution system outside of the City limits. Table 28 Existing Sewer Rates and Charges Rate Component Inside City Outside City Monthly Water Service Charge 5/8" Meter $13.52 $16.66 5/8" x 3/4" Meter 13.52 16.98 1" Meter 25.94 33.23 1.5" Meter 47.53 66.98 2" Meter 65.37 93.23 3" Meter 140.67 195.74 4" Meter 231.8 286.99 6" Meter 459.37 532.02 8” Meter 687.03 592.02 Volumetric Charges ($/1,000 gallons) Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) $5.24 $8.05 Tier 2 (>2,000 gallons) $6.99 $8.05 Non-Residential (all usage) $5.88 $8.05 Major Industrial (all usage) $6.21 $8.05 Wholesale (all usage) $6.09 $6.09 Notes: 1) Outside City sewer rates shown do not include Farmington and Greenland surcharges. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 31 4.1.2 Billing Data 4.1.2.1 Baseline Billing Data The City provided billing data covering FY 2022 through 2024 for the sewer system, including date, customer identifier, meter size, location (inside or outside city), customer type, wastewater flow billed within each tier, and billed dollar amount. Carollo analyzed this data and aggregated usage, and bill counts for each meter size and location. 4.1.2.2 Projected Billing Data To project billing data for the next five years, Carollo used an annual growth assumption of 1.75 percent for all retail classes and locations while keeping wholesale number of accounts steady. Retail per account flow is projected to remain stable, meaning that any change in total projected sewer sales is due to account growth. The baseline and forecasted billing summaries are shown in the following tables. In the rate model, total annual bill counts were used to forecast revenues as the number of accounts fluctuates month to month and total accounts directly corresponds with billed revenue. For purposes of transparency, however, this report provides for the total number of connections. The number of connections was calculated by dividing the number of bills by 12 for each month, even though the actual number of accounts at any given time could deviate from this figure. Table 29 below illustrates the summary of projected number of connections by meter size during the study period. Table 30 summarizes the projected sewer sales based on the billing data analysis. Table 29 Projected Number of Sewer Connections FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Inside City 5/8” 161 164 167 170 173 176 5/8 x ¾” 35,210 35,826 36,453 37,091 37,740 38,401 1" 672 684 696 708 720 733 1.5" 267 272 276 281 286 291 2" 289 294 299 304 309 315 3" 51 52 53 54 55 55 4" 12 12 12 13 13 13 6" 4 4 4 4 4 4 Total Inside City 36,666 37,308 37,960 38,625 39,300 39,988 Outside City 5/8” 9 9 9 9 9 3 5/8 x ¾” 2,867 2,917 2,968 3,020 3,073 3,126 1" 37 38 38 39 40 40 1.5" 5 5 5 5 5 6 2" 2 2 2 2 2 2 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 32 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 3" 0 0 0 0 0 0 4" 0 0 0 0 0 0 6" 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Outside City 2,919 2,971 3,023 3,075 3,129 3,184 Wholesale 4" 1 1 1 1 1 1 8” 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Wholesale 2 2 2 2 2 2 Total Number of Connections 39,587 40,280 40,985 41,702 42,432 43,174 Table 30 Current and Projected Sewer Sales FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Sewer Sales (kgal) - Inside City Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) 735,608 748,481 761,579 774,907 788,468 802,266 Tier 2 (>2,000 gallons) 861,902 876,985 892,333 907,948 923,837 940,005 Non-Residential (all usage) 786,956 800,728 814,740 828,998 843,506 858,267 Major Industrial (all usage) 297,546 302,753 308,052 313,443 318,928 324,509 Total Inside City Usage kgal) 2,682,012 2,728,947 2,776,704 2,825,296 2,874,739 2,925,047 Sewer Sales (kgal) - Outside City Residential (all usage) 99,430 101,170 102,941 104,742 106,575 108,440 Non-Residential (all usage) 14,248 14,497 14,751 15,009 15,272 15,539 Major Industrial (all usage) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Outside City Flow kgal) 113,678 115,668 117,692 119,752 121,847 123,980 Sewer Sales - Wholesale (kgal) Elkins 96,697 98,389 100,111 101,863 103,645 105,459 West Fork 77,327 78,680 80,057 81,458 82,884 84,334 Total Wholesale Flow kgal) 174,024 177,069 180,168 183,321 186,529 189,793 Total (kgal) 2,969,714 3,021,684 3,074,563 3,128,368 3,183,115 3,238,819 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 33 4.1.3 Expenses 4.1.3.1 Budget Data The City provided Carollo with its currently adopted FY 2025 budget to use as a base for forecasting. The budget provided is for water and sewer combined. Carollo worked closely with City staff to identify how to split costs between two funds and allocated the costs appropriately to each fund based on these discussions. Additionally, costs were escalated based on the percentages shown in Table 5. The baseline and projected operating budget expenses are summarized in Table 31. Table 31 Baseline and Projected Sewer Operating Expenses ($ Thousands) FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Utilities Director (1800) $127 $129 $135 $140 $146 $151 Utilities Project Management 4020) $258 $244 $255 $267 $279 $287 Utilities Financial Services 1810) $1,619 $1,865 $1,936 $2,010 $2,087 $2,150 Meter Reading (1820) $149 $165 $172 $179 $186 $191 Operations & Administration 4000) $4,216 $3,897 $4,046 $4,209 $4,378 $4,533 Sewer Mains Maintenance 4410) $2,980 $3,148 $3,266 $3,390 $3,518 $3,624 Water & Sewer Connections 5620) $735 $786 $816 $847 $879 $906 Trustee & Pay Agent Fees $209 $209 $0 $0 $0 $0 WWTP Administration & SCADA (5100) $2,368 $2,368 $1,980 $2,039 $2,101 $2,164 WWTP East Side Operations 5110) $7,759 $7,762 $8,011 $8,269 $8,536 $8,792 WWTP West Side Operations 5120) $2,501 $2,507 $2,598 $2,692 $2,790 $2,874 WWTP Lab/IPP (5130) $534 $534 $550 $567 $584 $601 WWTP Lift Station Maintenance (5140) $1,208 $1,286 $1,332 $1,380 $1,430 $1,473 Total Operating Expenses $24,663 $24,900 $25,098 $25,989 $26,914 $27,744 4.1.3.2 Capital Improvement Plan Expenses The City provided the FY 2026 through 2030 CIP, which has been approved by City Council, along with planned funding for each project. These expenses were already escalated and provided in future dollars. Most CIP expenses are for routine repair and replacement (R&R) of sewer system infrastructure and are planned to be cash-funded through either rate revenues in the year they are collected, or unrestricted reserves, if available after meeting the City’s target reserve level. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 34 The City also funds CIP through impact fee revenues. Impact fees are one-time fees paid by new connections to fund infrastructure needed to expand capacity to meet this growth. Impact fees are deposited in a restricted fund and reserved for these growth-related projects. The summarized five-year CIP and funding allocation are shown below. Table 32 Projected Sewer Capital Improvement Plan and Funding ($ Thousands) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 CIP SS Rehabilitation $2,800 $870 $870 $2,870 $2,870 Improvements Defined by Study $0 $0 $300 $300 $0 Relocations for Bond Projects $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 Rate Operations Study $10 $10 $10 $20 $20 Impact Fee Cost Sharing $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 WWTP Improvements $1,700 $1,700 $1,700 $1,700 $1,700 Equipment Expansions $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 Technology Equipment Replacements $10 $73 $15 $54 $25 Building/Office Improvements $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 Phosphorus Standards Management $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 Utilities Financial Services Improvements $8 $3 $2 $8 $8 Total Funding Needed $4,978 $3,106 $3,346 $5,402 $5,072 Funding New Debt $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Impact Fees $2,300 $853 $1,153 $2,653 $2,353 Remaining Funding Needed from Rates $2,678 $2,253 $2,194 $2,749 $2,720 Total Funding Allocated $4,978 $3,106 $3,346 $5,402 $5,072 4.1.3.3 Debt Service The City does not have existing debt obligations that are paid with sewer rate revenue. Additionally, while there is no future debt issuances projected in the Study period, the City should evaluate its capital funding strategy as the CIP changes. 4.1.4 Revenues 4.1.4.1 Projected Rate Revenues under Existing Rates Carollo first forecasted rate revenues for the next five years assuming rate adjustments from the City ordinance, which includes a 3 percent annual increase for the Study period. This forecast took the existing rates (Table 28) and calculated revenues based on the projected sewer sales and bills from Tables 29 and 30. By calculating the baseline rate revenue under existing rates and doing this exercise, Carollo identified any revenue shortfalls under existing rates. Projected revenues before rate adjustments are shown in Table 33. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 35 Table 33 Projected Sewer Revenues under Existing Rates ($ Thousands) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Sewer Sales Revenue $27,259 $28,568 $29,940 $31,378 $32,885 Operations & Administration (4000) $316 $310 $326 $347 $366 Sewer Distribution Maintenance 4410) $30 $30 $31 $31 $32 WWTP Administration & SCADA 5100) $406 $418 $431 $443 $457 Total Sewer Revenues $28,011 $29,327 $30,727 $32,200 $33,740 4.2 Sewer System Revenue Requirements The revenue requirement analysis is a comprehensive test of a utility’s fiscal health, scrutinizing the adequacy of current revenues and setting the basis for short-term and long-term rate planning. It reviews the utility’s revenues, expenses, debts, and reserve policies, assessing the viability of each metric going forward. Where cash flow and balances are insufficient, the revenue requirement analysis determines the additional cash flow needed to meet all funding goals. 4.2.1 Revenue Requirement Tests Similar to water, Carollo used two sufficiency tests to define the annual sewer revenue requirement: 1) reserve target test and (2) debt service coverage test. Reserve Target Test: Measures if a utility is generating enough revenue to meet the City’s minimum operating reserve balance to ensure continuations of their operations and any financial obligations. This test is not legally binding but provides assurance for a utility’s financial stability and is often based on the reserve policies adopted by the City Council. When the year-end balance falls short of the desired target, a rate increase is recommended. This reserve target ranges by utility, depending on capital needs and service demands. Debt Service Coverage Test: Assesses a utility’s ability to meet their annual debt service obligations. Bond issuances regularly include covenants requiring the agency to maintain sufficient cash flows to meet annual debt service payments plus an additional amount. Typical DSCRs range from 1.20 times to 1.50 times annual debt service, depending on the terms of debt instrument issued. Since there is no existing or anticipated future debt associated with the sewer system during the Study period, the revenue requirement analysis for the City’s sewer system was conducted based on the reserve target test only. 4.2.2 Reserve Target Test The reserve target test assesses the adequacy of the rates to maintain end-of-year unrestricted reserve balances at or above the City’s policy target. Historically, the City’s annual operating reserve minimum was 10 percent of O&M expenses. Industry best practices are an operating reserve of 90 to 180 days of annual O&M expenses. To be more in line with industry standards and provide financial security, Carollo recommended the City increase its sewer operating reserve minimum to the greater of 10 percent of O&M or $5 million for the sewer fund. The total water and sewer combined minimum reserve is set at 12 million starting in FY 2026. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 36 The reserve balance forecast under the existing rate ordinance is outlined in Table 34. Table 34 Projected Sewer Reserve Balance Under Existing Rate Ordinance ($ thousands) Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Ordinance Rate Adjustments 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Beginning Reserve Balance $3,910 $4,344 $6,319 $8,864 $11,400 Sources of Funds Rate Revenues $27,259 $28,568 $29,940 $31,378 $32,885 Other Revenues $752 $758 $787 $822 $855 Total Sources of Funds $28,011 $29,327 $30,727 $32,200 $33,740 Uses of Funds Operating Expenses $24,900 $25,098 $25,989 $26,914 $27,744 Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cash Funded CIP $2,678 $2,253 $2,194 $2,749 $2,720 Total Uses of Funds $27,577 $27,351 $28,183 $29,663 $30,464 Cash Flow $434 $1,975 $2,544 $2,537 $3,276 Ending Reserve Balance $4,344 $6,319 $8,864 $11,400 $14,676 Reserve Balance Target $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Surplus / (Deficit) ($656) $1,319 $3,864 $6,400 $9,676 As shown, the rates under the existing rate ordinance are sufficient to meet the reserve target throughout the rate-setting period, with exception for FY 2026. For the City’s sewer system, Carollo recommends the City adhere to the 3 percent annual rate increase outlined in its existing rate ordinance for FY 2027 through FY 2030. This increase applies to both the monthly service charge and volumetric rates. With the proposed water rate adjustments, the combined water and sewer reserve balance would satisfy the combined minimum reserve target balance of 12 million in FY 2026 and beyond during the Study period. 4.3 Sewer Proposed Rates With the proposed rate adjustments projected to support the $5 million reserve minimum for the City, the proposed rates can be calculated by escalating the rates and charges by the percentages shown in Table 35, which also aligns with the City sewer rate ordinance. The proposed five-year rates are shown in the following tables. All rates have been rounded up to the nearest $0.01 to avoid under-collection of revenues. Rates for all fiscal years are set to take effect at the start of the fiscal year (January 1). 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 37 Table 35 Inside City Proposed Sewer Rates and Charges for the Study Period Rate Component FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Monthly Sewer Service Charge 5/8" Meter $13.52 $13.93 $14.35 $14.79 $15.24 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $13.52 $13.93 $14.35 $14.79 $15.24 1" Meter $25.94 $26.72 $27.53 $28.36 $29.22 1.5" Meter $47.53 $48.96 $50.43 $51.95 $53.51 2" Meter $65.37 $67.34 $69.37 $71.46 $73.61 3" Meter $140.67 $144.90 $149.25 $153.73 $158.35 4" Meter $231.80 $238.76 $245.93 $253.31 $260.91 6" Meter $459.37 $473.16 $487.36 $501.99 $517.05 8” Meter $687.03 $707.65 $728.88 $750.75 $773.28 Volumetric Rates ($/1,000 gallons) Residential Tier 1 (first 2,000 gallons) $5.24 $5.40 $5.57 $5.74 $5.92 Tier 2 (>2,000 gallons) $6.99 $7.20 $7.42 $7.65 $7.88 Non-Residential (all usage) $5.88 $6.06 $6.25 $6.44 $6.64 Major Industrial (all usage) $6.21 $6.40 $6.60 $6.80 $7.01 Wholesale (all usage) $6.09 $6.28 $6.47 $6.67 $6.88 Notes: 1) Rates and charges effective January 1 of each fiscal year. 2) Outside City rate factors vary by meter size and are unchanged from the current rate ordinance. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 38 SECTION 5 COMBINED BILL IMPACT The following table summarizes the combined water and sewer bill impacts for select customer classes and usage over the duration of the rate-setting period. In FY 2026 the bill increase varies by each customer class due to the proposed water rates being more aligned with the cost to provide service. In FY 2027 and FY 2028 all customer classes will see an average of a 9 percent increase on their total combined bill, and in FY 2029 and FY 2030 all customers will experience an average 3 percent increase on their total combined bill. Table 36 Combined Inside City Bill Impacts Under Existing and Proposed Rates for the Study Period Customer Class Existing Bill FY 2026 Bill FY 2027 Bill FY 2028 Bill FY 2029 Bill FY 2030 Bill Residential 5/8" meter, 2 kgals $39.93 $39.93 $43.22 $46.96 $48.40 $49.88 5/8" meter, 4 kgals $64.59 $65.51 $71.08 $77.42 $79.80 $82.24 5/8" meter, 10 kgals $138.57 $142.25 $154.66 $168.80 $174.00 $179.32 Non-residential 5/8" meter, 10 kgals $127.37 $127.87 $139.04 $151.72 $156.38 $161.16 1" meter, 50 kgals $567.24 $569.74 $619.83 $676.74 $697.53 $718.87 Industrial 2" meter, 1,000 kgals $9,834.89 $10,404.89 $11,261.59 $12,239.10 $12,612.39 $13,005.77 6" meter, 5,000 kgals $49,372.55 $52,222.55 $56,520.45 $61,424.22 $63,297.46 $65,271.39 Notes: 1) There is a FY 2026 mid-year rate increase for water rates only. As part of the Study, Carollo completed a survey of water and sewer rates for utilities in Northwest Arkansas, with a focus on the cities that purchase water directly from BWD (Springdale, Rogers, and Bentonville). All three of these cities have recently passed water and sewer rate increases in response to the increased cost of purchased water, escalating O&M costs, and major CIP needs, similar to what the City is currently experiencing. Figure 3 shows that with the recommended rates in place, a typical combined bill for a City resident will be slightly less than a similar bill in Springdale and significantly less than the bills that residents in Rogers and Bentonville will experience over the next 5 years. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 39 Figure 3 Northwest Arkansas Water and Sewer Rate Comparison 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 40 SECTION 6 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS Impact fees, sometimes referred to as capacity or system development charges, are one-time fees assessed on new system connections for water or sewer service. As the City manages its water and sewer systems, it needs to estimate a certain level of capacity required to serve peak day and peak wet weather flow for existing and future customers. The impact fee valuates the reservation of system capacity to serve that new and/or modified connection. Carollo relied on City policies, industry best practice, and Arkansas statutory guidance when developing the analysis in the Study. As with any fee analysis, the City prioritizes COS as a foundation of setting the capacity fee. Several additional key criteria were at the center of this analysis: Do the impact fees represent a reasonable nexus to the costs incurred by the City on behalf of future customers and the benefits received? Is the impact fee methodology consistent with standards established in the AWWA M1 Manual: Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges, and the WEF MOP 27? Do the methodology and the resulting recommendations meet City policies and adhere to applicable legal requirements? Are the fees equitable for current and future ratepayers and do they reflect system investment contributions? By setting these guiding principles, the results of this analysis are developed with legal, policy, and fiscal goals in mind. 6.1 Existing Impact Fees The City’s existing impact fees are based on an impact fee study completed by a different consultant in 2007. In 2009 the City elected to implement approximately one-third of the allowable impact fee recommended by the consultant. Additionally, the consultant recommended the City charge a per dwelling unit fee for single family residential and multi-family residential and a fee per meter based on meter size for non-residential development. In the City ordinance, multi-family development with a master meter can be charged either by meter size or per dwelling unit. The following table summarizes the City’s existing water and sewer impact fees. Table 37 Existing Impact Fees Customer Class Water Sewer Total Impact Fee Residential Single Family (per dwelling unit) $971 $872 $1,843 Multi-Family (per dwelling unit) $691 $620 $1,311 Non-Residential 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $971 $872 $1,843 1" Meter $2,428 $2,180 $4,608 1.5" Meter $4,855 $4,360 $9,215 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 41 Customer Class Water Sewer Total Impact Fee 2" Meter $7,768 $6,976 $14,744 3" Meter $15,536 $13,952 $29,488 4" Meter $24,275 $21,800 $46,075 6" Meter $48,550 $43,600 $92,150 8” Meter $77,680 $69,760 $147,440 10” Meter $111,665 $100,280 $211,945 6.2 Methodology The impact fee is based on a relatively straightforward calculation: divide system value by system capacity, yielding an estimate of the cost to build one unit of capacity. This is demonstrated in Equation 1. Equation 1 Impact Fee Conceptual Formula Despite this simple equation, quantifying system value and capacity inputs can be complex and will vary from utility based on several factors, including but not limited to: Age, size, and density of the system. Planned expansion- related capital projects. Anticipated growth. Ability to discharge treated wastewater. Selecting the most appropriate methodology for any utility depends on the nature of the system, the level of planned investment, and the projected capacity needs. The available methodologies along with the rationale behind their selection are detailed later in this section. 6. 2.1 Impact Fee Components 6.2. 1.1 Assessing System Value The first component of the impact fee is system value. This can be the value of the existing system, future system, or a combination of both, depending on which methodology is chosen. An important consideration – and what often presents the most difficulty – is using a system value that represents the system capacity (not demand) served in the denominator. The two should be in alignment. System value should be excluded if it is not represented by the system capacity, and vice versa. This step is further complicated by the nature of investments and depreciation. It is sometimes challenging to delineate the infrastructure (or a portion thereof), repairs, or replacements serving only future connections or assess its retained 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 42 6.2.1.2 Determining System Capacity The denominator of the impact fee is system capacity. While the calculation is straightforward, the challenge is defining the system capacity in a unit of measure that can be assessed to a new or modified connection, such as equivalent dwelling units (EDU) served or a unit cost per gallons per day. For example, a utility may know that its sewer system treatment capacity is 21 million gallons per day, but it may be difficult to convert that capacity into service units and divided into system value to yield a per service unit fee. 6.2.1.3 Calculating the Impact fee After determining the system value and capacity, the impact fee is calculated by dividing system value by system capacity. The utility can then assess its impact fee for new connections using a selected fee assessment approach, which is discussed in the following subsection. 6.2.2 Impact Fee Methodologies There are three industry-accepted methodologies for calculating impact fees: the buy-in method, incremental cost method, and a hybrid or combined approach. For this Study, Carollo calculated impact fees using the incremental method, consistent with the previous Study and State regulations. To understand this decision better, it is helpful to understand all the options. 6.2.2.1 Buy-In Method The buy-in approach is most appropriate when existing capacity is sufficient to serve both existing and forecasted future connections and planned capital investment projects are minimal. These utilities typically have some “buffer capacity” after constructing excess infrastructure that can meet new connections. The purpose of the buy-in approach is to recover costs that have already been incurred by the City. Existing customers have paid for this system over time through their user rates (through direct capital financing or retired debt). The buy-in approach (or this component, in the hybrid approach discussed below) of an impact fee provides a mechanism to reimburse existing system users for the carrying costs of constructing system capacity that is available for future users. The fee is calculated by dividing the total system value by the total current capacity of the system, including all used and unused capacity, as seen in Equation 2. Equation 2 Buy-In Method Impact Fee Formula Existing System Value Determining existing system value begins with a valuation of all assets currently owned by the utility. This is then adjusted by several factors, resulting in an estimate of system value that represents the total net equity held in the system by the utility’ s existing 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 43 Table 38 System Valuation Approaches from M1 Method Asset Valuation Approach Original Cost Nominal value paid at the time of construction. Net Book Value Original value, less accumulated depreciation. RCN Original cost, adjusted to represent cost of replacement in current dollars; no depreciation is subtracted. RCNLD (as New) Original cost less accumulated depreciation, adjusted to represent cost of replacement in current dollars. Notes: RCNLD - Replacement Cost New Less Depreciation; RCN – Replacement Cost New Neither AWWA nor WEF dictate a specific valuation methodology. Carollo recommends the RCNLD approach for this Study. The first part of this approach is calculating the RCN by escalating the Original Cost to build each asset to present-day dollars using the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index (ENR-CCI). Values can be inflated based on the ENR-CCI of one of twenty cities or a 20-city average; due to location, Carollo chose the latter. Then, accumulated depreciation is similarly escalated and deducted, resulting in the RCNLD. The existing system value also includes any work in progress (WIP) and cash reserves. However, it must adjust for costs that have not yet been incurred by the utility. For this Study, those are contributed assets and debt service principal for the system. Contributed or donated assets are deducted because current system users did not pay for the construction of these assets and thus do not own equity in these assets. Therefore, it would be inappropriate for future users to reimburse current customers for assets which they did not fund. For the same reason, all outstanding principal on existing debt service of the current system is deducted because existing users have not yet paid for that portion of the assets and so should not be reimbursed. After deducting contributed assets and outstanding principal from the RCNLD asset value, the result can be divided by the existing system capacity to calculate impact fees using the buy-in method. 6.2.2.2 Incremental Cost Method In contrast with the buy-in approach, which can be described as “backward-looking” by valuating historical system investment and capacity, the incremental approach is “forward-looking” by capturing planned expansion and growth of the system. The buy-in approach typically serves built-out systems better than systems that are growing and expanding. While the buy-in approach looks at the unit cost of existing capacity in the system, the incremental approach looks at the cost to add marginal capacity to a system where that demand cannot be served by existing capacity. The incremental approach can be neatly summed up by the philosophy of “growth pays for growth.” In contrast to the buy-in approach of valuating the cost of capacity as the existing system assets, the incremental approach is based on the cost of expanded future capacity. To estimate this, the CIP is allocated to either R&R of the existing assets or the installation of new assets for new capacity. The costs are reflected in present day dollars, regardless of project timing. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 44 Not all projects fit entirely in one allocation or the other; some may serve both categories. For instance, a pipeline R&R can have an expansion element to it if the pipeline replacement is upsized from the original pipe diameter and adds capacity or if a portion of the replaced pipeline capacity is unused and available to serve future connections. Once the projects are allocated between R&R and growth, the expansion CIP portion of the equation is ready. When there is available existing capacity within the built system, it is appropriate to also include the value of that capacity in the incremental cost method because it was built for future users. Similar to the buy-in method, the incremental cost method calculation divides system value by the capacity served by those assets. However, because it is critical for the value used in the numerator to represent the capacity in the denominator, the incremental cost method impact fee divides the sum of expansion CIP and available asset value by net future capacity available for new connections (future system capacity less existing demand), as seen in Equation 3. Equation 3 Incremental Cost Method Impact Fee Formula 6.2.2.3 Hybrid Method Some agencies have a sizable existing system plus significant expansion CIP on the horizon. To appropriately capture the capacity built for future customers as well as reimburse existing customers for the built system, a hybrid approach combines elements from each methodology to form one impact fee. The system valuation accounts for both the RCNLD of the existing system and expansion CIP. The corresponding capacity in the denominator is the sum of total capacity served at the end of the CIP forecast, as shown in Equation 4. Equation 4 Hybrid Method Impact Fee Formula 6. 2.3 Assessment Basis The assessment basis is the unit of measure used when determining what the fee will be for an individual connection. Historically, the City used an EDU (per unit) for Residential customers and meter sizes for all other customers. Currently the City gives master metered multifamily developers the option of the EDU or meter size assessment. 6.2.3. 1 Equivalent Dwelling Unit Projections Account data is collected from the City’s billing data and converted into EDUs which is the standard measure of demand expressed as water usage and wastewater discharge for an average household unit. For the City, one water EDU is equivalent to 235 gallons per day (gpd), and one sewer EDU is equivalent to 233 gpd. The projection of EDUs over the next 10 years helps determine what portion of planned capital improvements will 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 45 Table 39 Projected Water and Sewer EDUs (2025-2035) Component Usage (1,000 gallons) EDUs 2025 2035 2025 2035 Change Water 6,988,432 8,050,431 81,308 93,664 12,356 Sewer 2,795,690 3,292,757 62,130 73,176 11,047 6.3 Water System Impact Fee The City currently has system capacity available to accommodate a portion of the additional EDUs projected over the next 10 years. The City also has upcoming CIP projects for the distribution system that will expand capacity for future users. Therefore, this Study maintained the incremental approach for calculating the capacity. 6.3.1 Water System Valuation While the City’s water system is mostly built out, some water system assets are available to serve new customers. The first step in calculating the water impact fee is to determine the eligible existing system assets to be included in the fee. The existing system value is calculated by adding, RCNLD, WIP, and outstanding interest, then subtracting contributed assets and debt service principal. As summarized in Table 36, only 9.7 percent of the existing transmission system and storage and 2.3 percent of the distribution assets are eligible to serve new customers over the next 10 years. Table 40 Existing Water System Valuation Calculation ($ thousands) Component Transmission Distribution Storage Total Fixed Assets (RCNLD) $14,173 $232,897 $2,166 $249,236 WIP $85,000 $12,618 $0 $97,618 Outstanding Interest $6,561 $0 $0 $6,561 Less: Debt Service Principal $85,000 $0 $0 $85,000 Less: Contributed Assets $0 $83,680 $0 $83,680 Total Existing System Value $20,734 $161,834 $2,166 $184,734 Total Eligible Capacity 9.7% 2.3% 9.7% Total Eligible Existing System Value $2,011 $3,672 $210 $5,893 The future system value is based on upcoming capital projects within the next 10 years that are related to serving new customers. Table 41 shows future projects related to customer expansion. As shown, only distribution system projects are related to expansion. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 46 Table 41 Water Capital Projects Related to Expansion ($ Thousands) Capital Project System Expansion Related 10-Year Total Ash St. PS & 12" WL Distribution 100% $4,720 S. School Ave. Bottleneck Distribution 100% $1,110 18" WL to Elkins (1.8 miles) Distribution 100% $7,200 Kessler Booster PS Distribution 100% $4,239 HWY 112 N. Relocations Distribution 100% $500 North College Waterline Replacements Distribution 100% $13,200 Total Future System Value $30,969 Similar to the eligible existing system value, only a portion of the capital projects will serve the anticipated number of EDUs added to the water system over the next 10 years. Below summarizes the eligible future system value. Table 42 Future Water System Valuation Calculation ($ Thousands) Component Transmission Distribution Storage Total Total Future Systems Improvements $0 $30,969 $0 $30,969 Less: Contributed Assets $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Future System Value $0 $30,969 $0 $30,969 Total Eligible Capacity N/A 87.6% N/A Total Eligible Future System Value $0 $27,124 $0 $27,124 6.3.2 Proposed Water Impact Fee Now that the eligible existing and future water system values have been determined, the impact fee calculation as a dollar per EDU is $2,672, as outlined below. Table 43 Proposed Water Impact Fee Calculation Component Transmission Distribution Storage Total Total Eligible System Value ($ Thousands) $2,011 $30,796 $210 Added EDUs 12,356 12,356 12,356 Water Impact Fee ($ per EDU) $163 $2,492 $17 $2,672 Carollo recommends the City charge residential and multifamily customers on a per dwelling unit basis. As multifamily dwelling units typically do not use as much water as a single family home, an EDU factor for multifamily is 0.71 is applied, resulting in a lower fee per unit than that of a single family home. Carollo recommends charging non-residential development per meter based on meter size. The schedule below shows the recommended water impact fee schedule. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 47 Table 44 Recommended Water Impact Fees Customer Class Existing Proposed Difference Residential Single Family (per dwelling unit) $971 $2,672 $1,701 Multi-Family (per dwelling unit) $691 $1,897 $1,206 Non-Residential 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $971 $2,672 $1,701 1" Meter $2,428 $6,680 $4,252 1.5" Meter $4,855 $13,361 $8,506 2" Meter $7,768 $21,377 $13,609 3" Meter $15,536 $42,754 $27,218 4" Meter $24,275 $66,803 $42,528 6" Meter $48,550 $133,606 $85,056 8” Meter $77,680 $213,770 $136,090 10” Meter $111,665 $307,294 $195,629 6.4 Sewer System Impact Fee The City currently has system capacity available in the current to accommodate a portion of the projected additional EDUs over the next 10 years. The City also has upcoming CIP projects for the collection and treatment systems that will expand capacity for future users. Therefore, this Study maintained the incremental approach for calculating the capacity. 6.4.1 Sewer System Valuation Similar to the water system, there is a portion of the existing sewer system available to serve new customers. Table 45 shows the calculation of the sewer eligible existing system assets that can be included in the fee. Table 45 Existing Sewer System Valuation Calculation ($ thousands) Asset Category Collection Treatment Total Fixed Assets (RCNLD) $229,645 $87,357 $317,002 WIP $0 $0 $0 Outstanding Interest $0 $0 $0 Less: Debt Service Principal $0 $0 $0 Less: Contributed Assets $62,721 $0 $62,721 Total Existing System Value $166,924 $87,357 $254,281 Total Eligible Capacity 2.6% 11.7% Total Eligible Existing System Value $4,419 $10,191 $14,610 The future system value is based on upcoming capital projects within the next 10 years that are related to serving new sewer customers. Table 46 shows future projects related to customer expansion. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 48 Table 46 Sewer Capital Projects Related to Expansion ($ Thousands) Capital Project System Expansion Related 10-Year Total LS-22 Owl Creek Upgrades Collection 100% $1,030 Mally Wagnon Outfall 18" SS Collection 100% $4,270 Dead Horse to Mally Wagnon 18" SS Collection 100% $4,190 LS-40, 41, 46 and 27 Elimination Collection 100% $1,530 LS-14 Industrial Park Upgrades Collection 100% $4,310 Goose Creek Interceptor + LS-44 Elimination Collection 100% $2,130 Greenland Sewer Cost Share Collection 100% $1,050 Total Future System Value $18,510 Unlike the eligible existing system value, 100 percent of the capital projects related to growth will serve the anticipated number of EDUs added to the sewer system over the next 10 years. Below summarizes the eligible future system value. Table 47 Sewer Future System Valuation Calculation ($ Thousands) Component Collection Treatment Total Total Future Systems Improvements $18,510 $0 $18,510 Less: Contributed Assets $0 $0 $0 Total Future System Value $18,510 $0 $18,510 Total Eligible Capacity 100.0% 0.0% Total Eligible Future System Value $18,510 $0 $18,510 6.4.2 Proposed Sewer Impact Fee Now that the eligible existing and future sewer system values have been determined, the sewer impact fee calculation as a dollar per EDU is $2,998, as outlined below. Table 48 Proposed Sewer Impact Fee Calculation Component Collection Treatment Total Total Eligible System Value $22,929 $10,191 $33,120 Added EDUs 11,047 11,047 11,047 Sewer Impact Fee ($ per EDU) $2,076 $922 $2,998 Carollo recommends the City charge sewer residential and multifamily development per dwelling unit, keeping with the multifamily EDU factor of 0.71. Carollo recommends charging non-residential developments per meter based on meter size. The schedule below shows the recommended sewer impact fee schedule. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 49 Table 49 Recommended Sewer Impact Fees Customer Class Existing Proposed Difference Residential Single Family (per dwelling unit) $872 $2,998 $2,126 Multi-Family (per dwelling unit) $620 $2,129 $1,509 Non-Residential 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $872 $2,998 $2,126 1" Meter $2,180 $7,496 $5,316 1.5" Meter $4,360 $14,991 $10,631 2" Meter $6,976 $23,986 $17,010 3" Meter $13,952 $47,972 $34,020 4" Meter $21,800 $74,956 $53,156 6" Meter $43,600 $149,911 $106,311 8” Meter $69,760 $239,858 $170,098 10” Meter $100,280 $344,796 $244,516 6.5 Combined Impact Fee Comparison The proposed combined water and sewer impact fee schedule is shown in Table 50. Table 50 Existing and Proposed Combined Water and Sewer Impact Fees Customer Class Existing Proposed Difference Residential Single Family (per dwelling unit) $1,843 $5,670 $3,827 Multi-Family (per dwelling unit) $1,311 $4,026 $2,715 Non-Residential 5/8" x 3/4" Meter $1,843 $5,670 $3,827 1" Meter $4,608 $14,176 $9,568 1.5" Meter $9,215 $28,352 $19,137 2" Meter $14,744 $45,363 $30,619 3" Meter $29,488 $90,726 $61,238 4" Meter $46,075 $141,759 $95,684 6" Meter $92,150 $283,517 $191,367 8” Meter $147,440 $453,628 $306,188 10” Meter $211,945 $652,090 $440,145 As part of the Study, Carollo completed a survey of water and sewer impact fees for utilities in Northwest Arkansas. The figure below illustrates that the City currently has the lowest combined impact fee of the utilities surveyed, while the proposed fees are within the middle range of the group. 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 50 Figure 4 Northwest Arkansas Water and Sewer Impact Fee Comparison 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE 2026 WATER AND SEWER RATE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY 51 SECTION 7 CONCLUSION In order to meet its financial obligations and secure financial stability, Carollo recommends the City implement the rates and charges proposed for FY 2026 through FY 2030 that are detailed in this report. The resulting revenues generated by the rates will allow the City to meet its financial commitments, achieve necessary capital funding objectives, and absorb the large inflationary cost increases that have occurred in recent years. Projected water rate revenue is based on proposed water rates being implemented on July 1, 2026, and then January 1 of each year thereafter. Projected sewer rates rate revenue is based on proposed sewer rates being implemented on January 1 of each year starting in FY 2027. Regulatory requirements, economic conditions, weather events, system emergencies, and other factors can influence the revenue recovered and/or required for sufficiently maintaining the utility. Therefore, these projections should be revisited annually and updated as necessary, within a five year period. Carollo also recommends the City implement the full water and sewer impact fees discussed in Section 5 of this report. The proposed water and sewer rate adjustments for the rate-setting period assume that impact fee revenue will partially fund projects outlined in the CIP. The impact revenue projected in this Study is based on 100 percent fee implementation. Carollo recommends the City update its water and sewer impact fees at least every five years. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 1 of 16 51.136 Monthly Water Rates Effective as of the first billing statements issued after December 31, 2023June 30, 2026, the following monthly rates shall be fixed as rates to be charged for water furnished by the waterworks system of the city, which rates the City Council finds and declares to be reasonable and necessary minimum rates to be charged. All non- emergency water uses shall be billed to the user, to include but not limited to water used for: use within structures; business; manufacturing; irrigation; retail by another water utility; city uses; educational purposes; medical purposes; water system routine non-emergency uses; wastewater system routine non-emergency uses; non-profit uses; fire department non-emergency uses to include training and equipment calibration; construction of new water mains; street cleaning; and wet down of construction sites and materials. Emergency water use that does not pass through a water system meter shall not be billed, including firefighting, water leaks, water leak repair, and emergency water line flushing. The volumes used for these emergency purposes should be estimated and submitted monthly to the Business Office Manager and the Water/Sewer Operations Manager. A) Monthly Water Rates. 1) The water usage of each customer shall be determined each month by meter measurement and the amount per 1,000 gallons to be paid for water usage by each customer shall be computed on the basis of the following schedule of rates. Table A-1 Monthly Water Rates Prior to January 1, 2024 July 1, 2026 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $3.51 $4.04 $4.04 $5.10 Next 13,000 $4.65 $5.34 $5.35 $6.75 Residential Over 15,000 $6.59 $7.57 $7.54 $9.57 Non-Residential First 300,000 All Usage $3.79 $4.72 $4.38 $5.75 Over 300,000 $3.39 $3.90 Major Industrial All Usage $2.96 $3.53 $3.40 $3.92 Irrigation First 300,000 All Usage $5.04 $5.34 $5.80 $6.61 Over 300,000 $4.53 $5.22 Wholesale Reduced Peak Demand All Usage 2.87 $3.71 $2.87 $3.71 Peak Demand $3.20 $3.20 Table A-2 Monthly Water Rates After December 31, 2023June 30, 2026 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $3.59 $4.04 $4.54 $6.06 Next 13,000 $4.75 $5.80 $6.01 $8.70 Residential Over 15,000 $6.74 $8.70 $8.52 13.05 Non-Residential First 300,000 All Usage $4.20 $4.77 $5.11 $7.16 Over 300,000 $4.20 $5.11 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 2 of 16 Major Industrial All Usage $3.14 $4.10 $3.49 $6.15 Irrigation First 300,000 All Usage $4.75 $8.70 $5.89 13.05 Over 300,000 $4.75 $5.89 Wholesale Reduced Peak Demand All Usage 3.30 $4.25 $3.30 $4.25 Peak Demand $3.30 $3.30 Table A-3 Monthly Water Rates After December 31, 2024 2026 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $3.81 $4.69 $4.81 $7.03 Next 13,000 $5.04 $6.73 $6.37 10.10 Residential Over 15,000 $7.14 10.10 9.03 15.14 Non-Residential First 300,000 All Usage $4.45 $5.54 $5.42 $8.31 Over 300,000 $4.45 $5.42 Major Industrial All Usage $3.33 $4.76 $3.70 $7.14 Irrigation First 300,000 All Usage $$5.04 10.10 6.24 15.14 Over 300,000 $5.04 $6.24 Wholesale Reduced Peak Demand All Usage 3.50 $4.93 $3.50 $4.93 Peak Demand $3.50 $3.50 Table A-4 Monthly Water Rates After December 31, 2025 2027 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $4.04 $5.45 $5.10 $8.16 Next 13,000 $5.34 $7.81 $6.75 11.72 Residential Over 15,000 $7.57 11.72 9.57 17.57 Non-Residential First 300,000 All Usage $4.72 $6.43 $5.75 $9.64 Over 300,000 $4.72 $5.75 Major Industrial All Usage $3.53 $5.53 $3.92 $8.29 Irrigation First 300,000 All Usage $5.34 11.72 6.61 17.57 Over 300,000 $5.34 $6.61 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 3 of 16 Wholesale Reduced Peak Demand All Usage 3.71 $5.72 $5.72$3.71 Peak Demand $3.71 , $3.71 Table A-5 Monthly Water Rates After December 31, 2026 2028 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $4.28 $5.62 $5.41 $8.41 Next 13,000 $5.66 $8.05 $7.16 12.08 Residential Over 15,000 $8.02 12.08 10.14 18.10 Non-Residential First 300,000 All Usage $5.00 $6.63 $6.10 $9.93 Over 300,000 $5.00 $6.10 Major Industrial All Usage $3.74 $5.70 $4.16 $8.54 Irrigation First 300,000 All Usage $5.66 12.08 7.01 18.10 Over 300,000 $5.66 $7.01 Wholesale Reduced Peak Demand All Usage 3.93 $5.90 $3.93 $5.90 Peak Demand $3.93 $3.93 2) Beginning January 1, 20282030, all monthly water rates shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) All bills under such schedules shall be computed by adding the applicable meter service charge prescribed by subsection (B) to the amount determined to be due for water usage under this schedule. Applicable sales tax and franchise fees shall be added to the bill so computed. 4) When a common facility/building is served by multiple water meters and the water usage is for the same purpose, customers may petition the Water and Wastewater Director and/or the Finance and Internal Services Director to have the water consumption aggregated and have the tiered rates apply to the aggregated quantity. 5) Water used for flushing and sampling of newly constructed water lines, Fire Department training and equipment calibration, and other similar uses requiring a large volume and/or high velocity of water movement shall employ a fire hydrant meter of the appropriate size for the use. If a fire hydrant meter cannot be used due to high flow or volume requirements, then the volume of water used shall be measured by using a pitot gauge to determine the gallons per minute and by timing the flow of water to be able to calculate total volume. In the cases of fire department training and equipment calibration, sewer line washing, street sweeping, and other uses where the equipment employed has a built-in water meter, these built in water meters may be used. All such meters other than those on fire trucks must be evaluated by the Meter Superintendent. These water uses shall be billed at the same rates as non-residential customers. 6) Monthly wholesale treated water rates outside city limits are based on Cost of Service Methodology. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 4 of 16 B) Monthly Water Service Charge. 1) In addition to the above, each customer shall pay a monthly water service charge in accordance with the following schedule: Table B-1 Monthly Water Service Charge Prior to January 1, 2024July 1, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 6.59 $7.85 $7.54 $8.98 $9.90 $7.54 x ¾ inch $6.59 $7.85 $7.54 $8.98 $9.90 $7.54 1 inch $9.14 $11.30 $10.52 $15.55 $15.55 $10.52 1 ½ inch $15.93 $21.55 $18.31 $30.78 $30.78 $18.31 2 inch $23.20 $29.52 $26.66 $42.64 $42.64 $28.56 3 inch $54.05 $64.37 $62.18 $88.89 $88.89 $64.38 4 inch $89.50 106.59 102.93 130.07 133.70 112.25 6 inch $178.99 213.18 205.82 245.14 253.40 213.02 8 inch $268.41 319.67 308.67 367.63 396.49 319.47 Table B-2 Monthly Water Service Charge After December 31June 30, 20263 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 7.85$6.99 $7.99 $11.78 $8.81 $11.78 x ¾ inch $7.85$6.99 $7.99 $11.78 $8.81$11.78 1 inch $11.30$10.06 $13.84 16.95 13.84$16.95 1 ½ inch $21.55$19.18 $27.40 32.33 27.40$32.33 2 inch $29.52$26.27 $37.95 44.28 37.95$44.28 Commented [NB1]: What did we decide on service charge for wholesale meters? Match outside city? Get rid of all together? Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 5 of 16 3 inch $64.37$57.29 $79.11 96.56 79.11$96.56 4 inch $106.59$94.87 $115.76 159.89 118.99 159.89 6 inch $213.18$189.73 $218.17 319.77 225.53 319.77 8 inch $319.67$284.51 $327.19 479.51 352.88 479.51 Table B-3 Monthly Water Service Charge After December 31, 20264 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 7.41 $9.11 $8.47 $13.67 $9.34$13.67 x ¾ inch $7.41 $9.11 $8.47 $13.67 $9.34$13.67 1 inch $10.66 $13.11 $14.67 $19.67 $14.67$19.67 1 ½ inch $20.33 $25.00 $29.04 $37.51 $29.04$37.51 2 inch $27.85 $34.25 $40.23 $51.37 $40.23$51.37 3 inch $60.73 $74.67 $83.86 112.01 83.86 112.01 4 inch $100.56 123.65 122.71 185.48 126.13 185.48 6 inch $201.11 247.29 231.26 370.94 239.06 370.94 8 inch $301.58 370.82 346.82 556.24 374.05 556.24 Table B-4 Monthly Water Service Charge After December 31, 20275 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 7.85 $10.57 $8.98 $15.86 $9.90$15.86 x ¾ inch $7.85 $10.57 $8.98 $15.86 $9.90$15.86 1 inch $11.30 $15.21 $15.55 $22.82 $15.55$22.82 1 ½ inch $21.55 $29.00 $30.78 $43.52 $30.78$43.52 2 inch $29.52 $39.73 $42.64 $59.59 $42.64$59.59 3 inch $64.37 $86.62 $88.89 129.94 88.89 129.94 4 inch $106.59 143.44 130.07 215.16 133.70 215.16 6 inch $213.18 286.86 245.14 430.30 253.40 430.30 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 6 of 16 8 inch $319.67 430.16 367.63 645.24 396.49 645.24 Table B-5 Monthly Water Service Charge After December 31, 20268 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 8.32 $10.89 $16.34$9.52 $10.49$16.34 x ¾ inch $8.32 $10.89 $9.52$16.34 $10.49$16.34 1 inch $11.98 $15.67 $16.48$23.51 $16.48$23.51 1 ½ inch $29.87$22.84 $32.63$44.83 $32.63$44.83 2 inch $40.93$31.29 $45.20$61.38 $45.20$61.38 3 inch $89.22$68.23 $94.22$133.84 $94.22$133.84 4 inch $147.75$112.9 9 137.87 221.62 141.72 221.62 6 inch $295.47$225.9 7 259.85 443.21 268.60 443.21 8 inch $443.07$338.8 5 389.69 664.60 420.28 664.60 2) Beginning January 1, 20282030, all monthly water service charges shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) The monthly treated water rates and the monthly meter service charge rates prescribed by subsections A) and (B) of this section shall commence as of the first billing statements issued after December 31, 2023June 30, 2026. 4) The State of Arkansas mandated Safe Drinking Water Act fee shall be added to the monthly water utility bill. C) Monthly Standby Fire Protection Service Charge. 1) Charges for unmetered service connections for standby fire protection and fire hydrants shall be based on the incoming line size or the backflow preventer size, whichever is smaller, as set forth in the following table: Monthly Standby Fire Protection Service Charge Line Size or Backflow Preventer Size Inside City Outside City 1 inch $10.34 $12.38 2 inch $10.78 $12.83 2.5 inch $21.55 $24.77 3 inch $32.31 $37.16 4 inch $64.63 $74.32 6 inch $179.50 $209.60 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 7 of 16 8 inch $376.99 $433.54 10 inch $646.26 $743.18 2) The Utilities Department shall review the monthly standby fire protection service charges every two (2) years and shall make recommendations to the City Council following such review. Fire protection lines shall not be connected to the water system downstream from a meter. Code 1965, §21-25; Ord. No. 1165, 4-18-58; Ord. No. 2144, 9-2-75; Ord. No. 2594, 2-5-80; Ord. No. 3197, 7-1-86; Ord. No. 3409, 2-21-89; Ord. No. 3431, 6-6-89; Ord. No. 3491, 7-17-90; Ord. No. 3513, 9-18-90; Ord. No. 3519, 11- 20-90; Ord. No. 4059, §1, 10-7-97; Ord. No. 4223, 2-15-00; Code 1991, §51.136; Ord. No. 4530 12-02-02; Ord. No. 4540, 02-03-04; Ord. No. 5123, 4-1-08; Ord. No. 6169, §1, 4-2-2019; Ord. No. 6633, §1, 1-3-23; Ord. No. 6681, 1(Att.), 9-19-23) 51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates A) Monthly Sewer Rates. 1) All monthly sewer charges shall be calculated from the customer's monthly water usage. The following monthly rates are hereby fixed as rates to be charged for sewer services: Table D-1 Monthly Sewer Rates Per 1,000 Gallons Before January 1, 2024July 1, 2026 Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Cost per 1,000 gallons First 2,000 gallons $4.35 5.24 Residential Greater than 2,000 gallons 5.80 6.99 Non-Residential All Usage $4.40 5.88 Major Industrial All Usage $4.71 6.21 Farmington All Usage $7.52 Outside city All Usage $8.18 8.05 Wholesale 85% of metered water usage All Usage 5.19 6.09 Usage above 85% of metered water usage 2.99 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 8 of 16 Table D-2 Monthly Sewer Rates Per 1,000 Gallons After December 31, 2023June 30, 2026 Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Cost per 1,000 gallons First 2,000 gallons $5.24$4.94Residential Greater than 2,000 gallons 6.99$6.59 Non-Residential All Usage $5.88$5.54 Major Industrial All Usage $6.21$5.85 Farmington All Usage $8.05$7.59 Outside city All Usage $8.05$7.59 Wholesale 85% of metered water usage All Usage 6.09$5.74 Usage above 85% of metered water usage 5.74 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 9 of 16 Table D-3 Monthly Sewer Rates Per 1,000 Gallons After December 31, 2024 Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Cost per 1,000 gallons First 2,000 gallons $5.09Residential Greater than 2,000 gallons 6.79 Non-Residential All Usage $5.71 Major Industrial All Usage $6.03 Farmington All Usage $7.82 Outside city All Usage $7.82 85% of metered water usage 5.91Wholesale Usage above 85% of metered water usage 5.91 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 10 of 16 Table D-4 Monthly Sewer Rates Per 1,000 Gallons After December 31, 2025 Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Cost per 1,000 gallons First 2,000 gallons $5.24Residential Greater than 2,000 gallons 6.99 Non-Residential All Usage $5.88 Major Industrial All Usage $6.21 Farmington All Usage $8.05 Outside city All Usage $8.05 85% of metered water usage 6.09Wholesale Usage above 85% of metered water usage 6.09 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 11 of 16 Table D-5 Monthly Sewer Rates Per 1,000 Gallons After December 31, 2026 Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Cost per 1,000 gallons First 2,000 gallons $5.40Residential Greater than 2,000 gallons 7.20 Non-Residential All Usage $6.06 Major Industrial All Usage $6.40 Farmington All Usage $8.29 Outside city All Usage $8.29 85% of metered water usage 6.27Wholesale Usage above 85% of metered water usage 6.27 2) Beginning January 1, 20287, all monthly sewer quantity charge-usage rates per 1,000 gallons shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) Sewer related fees levied by the Cities of Farmington or Greenland shall be added to the wastewater utility bill at the request of Farmington or Greenland. These fees may be calculated on a per-thousand volumetric usage or a per month basis. B) Monthly Sewer Service Charge. 1) In addition to the above, each customer shall pay a monthly sewer service charge in accordance with the following schedule: Table E-1 Monthly Sewer Service Charge Prior to January 1, 2024July 1, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City† 18.28 $13.52 $18.28 $16.66 x ¾ inch $18.28 $13.52 $18.28 $16.98 1 inch $23.74 $25.94 $33.92 $33.23 1½ inch $38.77 $47.53 $60.37 $66.98 2 inch $55.43 $65.37 $79.73 $93.23 3 inch $128.73 140.67 184.24 195.74 4 inch $212.13 231.80 303.44 286.99 6 inch $420.39 459.37 601.46 532.02 8 inch $628.73 687.03 899.76 592.02 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 12 of 16 Table E-2 Monthly Sewer Service Charge After December 31, 2023June 30, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City† 13.52$12.75 $16.66$15.71 x ¾ inch $13.52$12.75 $16.98$16.01 1 inch $25.94$24.45 $33.23$31.32 1½ inch $47.53$44.81 $66.98$63.14 2 inch $65.37$61.64 $93.23$87.88 3 inch $140.67$132.59 $195.74$184.50 4 inch $231.80$218.49 $286.99$270.52 6 inch $459.37$433.00 $532.02$501.48 8 inch $687.03$647.59 $592.02$558.03 Table E-3 Monthly Sewer Service Charge After December 31, 2024 Meter Size Inside City Outside City† Farmington† 13.13 $16.18 $16.18 x ¾ inch $13.13 $16.49 $16.49 1 inch $25.19 $32.26 $32.26 1½ inch $46.15 $65.03 $65.03 2 inch $63.48 $90.52 $90.52 3 inch $136.57 $190.04 $190.04 4 inch $225.09 $278.64 $278.64 6 inch $445.99 $516.52 $516.52 8 inch $667.02 $574.77 $574.77 Table E-4 Monthly Sewer Service Charge After December 31, 2025 Meter Size Inside City Outside City† Farmington† 13.52 $16.66 $16.66 x ¾ inch $13.52 $16.98 $16.98 1 inch $25.94 $33.23 $33.23 1½ inch $47.53 $66.98 $66.98 2 inch $65.37 $93.23 $93.23 3 inch $140.67 $195.74 $195.74 4 inch $231.80 $286.99 $286.99 6 inch $459.37 $532.02 $532.02 8 inch $687.03 $592.02 $592.02 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 13 of 16 Table E-5 Monthly Sewer Service Charge After December 31, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City† Farmington† 13.93 $17.16 $17.16 x ¾ inch $13.93 $17.49 $17.49 1 inch $26.72 $34.23 $34.23 1½ inch $48.96 $68.99 $68.99 2 inch $67.35 $96.03 $96.03 3 inch $144.89 $201.61 $201.61 4 inch $238.75 $295.60 $295.60 6 inch $473.15 $547.98 $547.98 8 inch $707.64 $609.78 $609.78 Cost of Service Methodology required by contract. 2) Beginning January 1, 20287, all monthly sewer service charges shall be increased by 3% per year. C) Determination of Sewer Quantity Charge for Residential Customers. 1) In the case of residential customers residing in a single family home, duplex, triplex, and/or fourplex, the average monthly water consumption for the preceding months of December, January, and February shall be computed separately for each customer, and a uniform monthly charge for each customer shall be determined by applying the schedule of rates set out in subsection (A) of this section to such average monthly water consumption. In the case of a residential user for whom a uniform monthly charge has been established and who moves to a new location the same uniform monthly charge shall apply at the new location. In the case of new residential customers, sewer averages shall be established based on the number of individuals residing within the dwelling unit, at a rate of 2,100 gallons per customer per month. This methodology of sewer averaging shall not apply to multi-family structures containing five (5) or more units in a contiguous building. 2) In the case of sewer customers who do not have a water meter provided by a public water utility, the sewer usage volume billed shall be the average volume of all users in the sewer system in like dwellings from the most recent system-wide sewer average calculation. D) Determination of Charge for Non-residential and Major Industrial Customers. In the case of non-residential and/or major industrial customers, the monthly sewer charge shall be determined by applying the schedule of rates prescribed in subsection (A) of this section to the monthly water usage of such customers. In the event that a non-residential or major industrial customer discharging waste into the city's sanitary sewer system produces evidence to the Water and Wastewater Director demonstrating that a substantial portion of the total amount of water from all sources used for all purposes does not reach the sanitary sewer which is in excess of the factors used in establishing the rates in subsection (A) of this section, an estimated percentage of total water consumption to be used in computing charges may be established by the Water and Wastewater Director. The factors used in establishing said rates are on file in the office of the Water and Wastewater Director and are incorporated herein by reference thereto. Any rate so adjusted by the Water and Wastewater Director shall be effective for a twelve (12) month period beginning with the billing for the month when rates adjudged hereby go into effect. E) Extra Strength Surcharge. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 14 of 16 1) For all significant industrial users as defined in §51.074, whose wastewater discharge is greater than 300 mg/I of BOD 5 and/or TSS, the city shall levy an Extra Strength Surcharge for each parameter in accordance with the following unit charges: Table F1 Extra Strength Surcharges Prior to January 31July 1, 20264 Prior to 01/01/2024 Extra Strength BOD 5 $0.5743 per pound $0.3148 per pound Extra Strength TSS $0.7086 per pound $0.4483 per pound Table F2 Extra Strength Surcharges After December 31, 2023June 30, 2026 After 12/31/2023 Extra Strength BOD 5 $0.5743 per pound $0.5414 per pound Extra Strength TSS $0.7086 per pound $0.6679 per pound Table F3 Extra Strength Surcharges After December 31, 2024 After 12/31/2024 Extra Strength BOD 5 $0.5576 per pound Extra Strength TSS $0.6880 per pound Table F4 Extra Strength Surcharges After December 31, 2025 After 12/31/2025 Extra Strength BOD 5 $0.5743 per pound Extra Strength TSS $0.7086 per pound Table F5 Extra Strength Surcharges After December 31, 2026 After 12/31/2026 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 15 of 16 Extra Strength BOD 5 $0.5915 per pound Extra Strength TSS $0.7299 per pound 2) Beginning January 1, 2027Starting after December 31, 2026, Extra Strength Surcharges shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) Extra Strength Surcharges shall be billed monthly and shall be computed on the basis of water meter reading (wastewater discharge volume). 4) All sampling and analyses of the wastewater characteristics shall be performed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 136 approved methods. 5) The volume of flow used in computing surcharge shall be based upon metered water consumption as shown in the records of meter readings maintained by the city's business office. In the event that a user discharging waste into the city sanitary sewer system produces evidence to the city demonstrating that a portion of the total amount of water used for all purposes is not discharged into the sanitary sewer, a separate meter or meters or other approved flow measuring device may be installed at the user's expense, upon its request, to measure only that portion of the total flow being discharged into the city sewer system. If a surcharge is assessed by the city, it shall be shown separately on the monthly billing. 6) Any person discharging industrial waste into the sanitary sewers of the city who procures any part or all of the user's water supply from sources other than the city, all or part of which is discharged into the sanitary sewer, shall install and maintain at the user's expense water meters of the type approved by the city for the purpose of determining the proper volume of flow to be used in computing sewer service charges. Such meter will be read monthly and tested for accuracy when deemed necessary by the city. Where it can be shown that a portion of the water measured by the aforesaid meter or meters does not enter the sanitary sewer system of the city, a separate meter or meters or other approved flow measuring device may be installed at the user's expense, upon its request, to measure only that portion of the total flow being discharged into the city sewer system. If a surcharge is assessed by the city, it shall be shown separately on the monthly billing. 7) Computation of extra strength surcharges shall be based on the following formula: a) Extra strength surcharge: S =V × 8.34 × [BOD Unit Charge (BOD - 300) + SS Unit Charge (TSS - 300)] b) Where: S =Surcharge in dollars V =Sewer volume in million gallons 8.34 = Pounds per gallon of water BOD Unit Charge Unit charge for BOD in dollars per pound BOD =BOD strength in parts per million 300 =Allowed BOD strength in parts per million TSS Unit Charge Unit charge for suspended solids in dollars per pound TSS =Suspended solids strength in parts per million 300 =Allowed TSS Strength in parts per million Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 16 of 16 F) Elkins Sewer Charges. 1) Elkins' payment for wastewater treatment shall be based on 85% of the metered water purchased. The volume of wastewater received by Fayetteville at the "Point of Connection" shall be measured by the installed wastewater meter. Volumes of wastewater below or above the agreed upon percentage (85%) of metered water, as measured by the wastewater meter, shall be recorded on a monthly basis, with a reconciliation of the net difference to occur semiannually in June and December. If the reconciliation volume is over the agreed upon percentage, this amount shall be billed to Elkins in June and December at the actual computed cost of wastewater collection to and treatment at the Noland Wastewater Treatment Plant, not including the calculated rate of return and not including depreciation charges, but including any capacity surcharge, based on the most recent rate as determined in paragraph B of this contract. If the reconciliation volume is below the agreed upon percentage, the actual amount billed for the difference shall be refunded to Elkins in June and December 2) Elkins Impact Fee Charges. The City of Elkins shall pay an additional $0.25 per 1,000 gallons of wastewater, for all wastewater volume charges including both the 85% of metered water volume and for wastewater in excess of the 85% of the metered water purchased billed volume. G)(F) Hauled Wastewater Fees. 1) Application Fee. An application to discharge hauled domestic waste must be accompanied by a fee of 100.00. 2) Discharge Fee. A fee of $50.00 must be paid for each hauled domestic waste load discharged. H)(G) Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit Fee. 1) Application Fee. An application for an industrial wastewater discharge permit must be accompanied by a fee of $500.00. Code 1965, §21-26; Ord. No. 1165, 4-18-58; Ord. No. 3197, 7-1-86; Ord. No. 3285, 8-4-87; Ord. No. 3398, 1-3-89; Ord. No. 3491, 7-17-90; Ord. No. 3637, §§1, 2, 8-18-92; Ord. No. 4059, §2, 10-7-97; Code 1991, §51.137; Ord. No. 4530, 12-02-03; Ord. No. 4803, 12-20-05; Ord. No. 4998, 4-3-07; Ord. No. 5129, 4-15-08; Ord. No. 5438, 9-20-11; Ord. No. 5739, 2-17-15; Ord. No. 6633, §1, 1-3-23; Ord. No. 6681, §1(Att.), 9-19-23) Commented [NB2]: Removed as this information is contained in the Sewer Agreement with Elkins. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 1 of 4 159.02 Water And Wastewater Impact Fees A) Applicability. 1) The following provisions shall apply to all of the territory within the city's water and wastewater service areas, including areas outside the corporate city limits and within service areas located within Washington County and other incorporated cities after June 16, 2003. 2) The following types of development shall be required to pay a water and/or wastewater impact fee: a) New and existing development seeking a new connection to the city's water or wastewater system resulting in increased demand from water and/or wastewater facilities. This shall not apply to existing development that is connecting to the wastewater system in order to eliminate an individual sewage disposal system. b) New and existing development as stated in (a) above seeking a new connection to the system of a wholesale customer of the city's water or wastewater system, where collection of the city's impact fee is required by the city's contract with the wholesale customer. c) Nonresidential or residential redevelopment seeking a larger capacity or additional water meter. B) Intent. 1) The intent of wastewater and water impact fees is to ensure that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of improvements to the city's water and wastewater systems; to ensure that the proportionate share does not exceed the cost of providing water and wastewater facilities to the development that paid the fee; and to ensure that funds collected from developments are used to construct water and wastewater facilities that serve such developments. It is further the intent of this ordinance to use the impact fees to implement the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and future plan updates and to implement the city's Five Year Capital Improvements Program. 2) It is not the intent of this ordinance to collect any money from any development in excess of the actual amount necessary to offset demands generated by that development for the water and wastewater facilities for which the fee was paid. 3) It is not the intent of this ordinance that any monies collected for the water impact fee and the wastewater impact fee ever be commingled or ever be used for a type of facility different from that for which the fee was paid. C) Time of Collection. 1) Water and wastewater impact fees shall be paid at the time of installation of the water meter serving the property or of the connection to the wastewater system, whichever comes first. 2) Development projects which have obtained building permits prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall not have to pay impact fees if the building is completed with water and sewer hook-ups installed and Certificate of Occupancy issued no later than six (6) months from the effective date of this ordinance. D) Fee Determination. 1) Schedule of Fees. The Impact Fee Administrator shall determine the amount of the water and wastewater impact fees for residential uses based on the type or size of the water meter and for nonresidential uses based on the size of the water meter using the following schedule: Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 2 of 4 Land Use Unit Water Wastewater Total Single-Family (average) Dwelling $971.00 2,672.00 872.00 2,998.00 1,843.00 5,670.00 Multi-Family per dwelling unit) Dwelling $691.00 1,897.00 620.00 2,129.00 1,311.00 4,026.00 Nonresidential 5/8 x 3/4 inch meter) Meter $971.00 2,672.00 872.00 2,998.00 1,843.00 5,670.00 Nonresidential 1 inch meter) Meter $2,428.00 6,680.00 2,180.00 7,496.00 4,608.00 14,176.00 Nonresidential 1½ inch meter) Meter $4,855.00 13,361.00 4,360.00 14,991.00 9,215.00 28,352.00 Nonresidential 2 inch meter) Meter $7,768.00 21,377.00 6,976.00 23,986.00 14,744.00 45,363.00 Nonresidential 3 inch meter) Meter $15,536.00 42,754.00 13,952.00 47,972.00 29,488.00 90,726.00 Nonresidential 4 inch meter) Meter $24,275.00 66,803.00 21,800.00 74,956.00 46,075.00 141,759.00 Nonresidential 6 inch meter) Meter $48,550.00 133,606.00 43,600.00 149,911.00 92,150.00 283,517.00 Nonresidential 8 inch meter) Meter $77,680.00 213,770.00 69,760.00 239,858.00 147,440.00 453,628.00 Nonresidential 10 inch meter) Meter $111,665.00 307,294.00 100,280.00 344,796.00 211,945.00 652,090.00 2) Redevelopment, Reconstruction, Change of Use. In the event of a redevelopment, reconstruction or change of use from an existing development or use, the fee shall be the difference between what the fee would be for the entire redevelopment or reconstruction project and what the fee would have been for the existing development or use. Existing development must be connected to the water or wastewater system at the time of redevelopment in order to apply this credit. 3) Mixed Use. If the proposed development includes a mix of the residential land uses and/or nonresidential meter sizes that are listed in the impact fee schedule, the fee shall be determined by adding up all the water and wastewater impact fees that would be applicable for each residential land use type and/or nonresidential meter size as if it was a freestanding land use type. For mixed use developments requiring a shared meter to serve both multi-family and nonresidential uses, the impact fee shall be calculated by assigning (a) the applicable multi-family impact fee based on the number of dwelling units, and (b) a nonresidential impact fee based on the meter size that would be required to serve only the nonresidential portion of the development, as determined by projected demands, fixture counts, or other accepted methods. The combined total shall constitute the impact fee for the mixed use development, regardless of the actual meter size installed to serve the full building demand. 4) Fire Suppression/Low Pressure. It is the intent of this ordinance to base water and wastewater impact fees on the typical usage in a new building or other facility. Extinguishing of fires is not a part of typical usage; to allow adequate fire flow to sprinklers and internal hydrants at some large and at-risk properties, it may be necessary for fire protection purposes to install a larger water meter than would be necessary to meet day-to-day needs of that facility. In addition, a larger meter may be required in areas of low water pressure than in areas of normal water pressure for the same type of use. In those cases, it is the policy of the city that the impact fee for water and wastewater should be based on the Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 3 of 4 meter size needed by that facility for its typical usage, without regard to fire-flow or unusual pressure conditions. 5) Irrigation. Any separate water meter installed for irrigation purposes only shall not be included in the calculation of the wastewater impact fee. 6) Affordable Housing and Homeless Shelter Exemption. Construction of single family, non-profit multi- family supportive housing, and homeless shelters funded wholly or primarily by federal Community Development Block Grants, non-profit service organizations such as Habitat for Humanity, Housing and Urban Development housing loans and similar programs designed to provide affordable, owner- occupied, single family residences to low income individuals, non-profit multi-family supportive housing, and homeless shelters, and all accessory dwelling units shall be exempted from payment of impact fees pursuant to this ordinance by the Impact Fee Administrator. 7) Master Meters. In the event that a water master meter is utilized for any development including multi- family or mixed use, the fee shall be based on the Master Meter size. E) Use of Fees. 1) Establishment of Accounts. An Impact Fee Fund that is distinct from the General Fund of the city is hereby created, and the impact fees received will be deposited in the following interest-bearing accounts of the Impact Fee Fund: a) Water Impact Fee Account; and b) Wastewater Impact Fee Account. 2) Water Impact Fee Accounts. The Water Impact Fee Account shall contain only those water impact fees collected pursuant to this ordinance plus any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. 3) Wastewater Impact Fee Account. The Wastewater Impact Fee Account shall contain only those wastewater impact fees collected pursuant to this ordinance plus any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. 4) Order of Use. Monies in each impact fee account shall be considered to be spent in the order collected, on a first-in/first-out basis. 5) Use of Fees. The monies in each impact fee account shall be used only for the following: a) Acquisition. To acquire land for and/or acquire or construct water or wastewater system improvements of the type reflected in the title of the account and as described in the Impact Fee Study as well as extension of service to new development paying an impact fee. b) Debt Service. To pay debt service on any portion of any current or future general obligation bond issue or revenue bond issue used to finance water or wastewater system improvements of the type reflected in the title of the account that created or will create capacity to serve new development. c) As described in subsection F, Refunds. F) Refunds. 1) The City of Fayetteville shall refund the portion of collected development impact fees, including the accrued interest that has not been expended seven (7) years from the date the fees were paid. Interest shall be based on a 4% annual rate. 2) A refund shall be paid to the present owner of the property that was the subject of new development and against which the fee was assessed and collected. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 4 of 4 3) Notice of the right to a refund, including the amount of the refund and the procedure for applying for and receiving the refund, shall be sent or served in writing to the present owners of the property no later than thirty (30) days after the date which the refund becomes due. The sending by regular mail of the notices to all present owners of record shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirement of notice. 4) The refund shall be made on a pro rata basis, and shall be paid in full no later than ninety (90) days after the date certain upon which the refund becomes due. 5) At the time of payment of the water or wastewater impact fee under this ordinance, the Impact Fee Administrator shall provide the applicant paying such fee with written notice of those circumstances under which refunds of such fees will be made. Failure to deliver such written notice shall not invalidate any collection of any impact fee under this ordinance. Ord. No. 4447, §1, 12-17-02; Ord. No. 4492, §159.02 C.1, 6-03-03; Ord. No. 4496 §159.02 "F", 6-17-03; Ord. No. 4919, 9-05-06; Ord. No. 4975, 1-16-07; Ord. No. 5206, 12-16-08; Ord. No. 6255, §2, 11-5-19) Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 1 of 9 51.136 Monthly Water Rates Effective as of the first billing statements issued after June 30, 2026, the following monthly rates shall be fixed as rates to be charged for water furnished by the waterworks system of the city, which rates the City Council finds and declares to be reasonable and necessary minimum rates to be charged. All non-emergency water uses shall be billed to the user, to include but not limited to water used for: use within structures; business; manufacturing; irrigation; retail by another water utility; city uses; educational purposes; medical purposes; water system routine non-emergency uses; wastewater system routine non-emergency uses; non-profit uses; fire department non- emergency uses to include training and equipment calibration; construction of new water mains; street cleaning; and wet down of construction sites and materials. Emergency water use that does not pass through a water system meter shall not be billed, including firefighting, water leaks, water leak repair, and emergency water line flushing. The volumes used for these emergency purposes should be estimated and submitted monthly to the Business Office Manager and the Water/Sewer Operations Manager. A) Monthly Water Rates. 1) The water usage of each customer shall be determined each month by meter measurement and the amount per 1,000 gallons to be paid for water usage by each customer shall be computed on the basis of the following schedule of rates. Table A-1 Monthly Water Rates Prior to July 1, 2026 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $4.04 $5.10 Next 13,000 $5.34 $6.75 Residential Over 15,000 $7.57 $9.57 Non-Residential All Usage $4.72 $5.75 Major Industrial All Usage $3.53 $3.92 Irrigation All Usage $5.34 $6.61 Wholesale All Usage $3.71 $3.71 Table A-2 Monthly Water Rates After June 30, 2026 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $4.04 $6.06 Next 13,000 $5.80 $8.70 Residential Over 15,000 $8.70 $13.05 Non-Residential All Usage $4.77 $7.16 Major Industrial All Usage $4.10 $6.15 Irrigation All Usage $8.70 $13.05 Wholesale All Usage $4.25 $4.25 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 2 of 9 Table A-3 Monthly Water Rates After December 31, 2026 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $4.69 $7.03 Next 13,000 $6.73 $10.10 Residential Over 15,000 $10.10 $15.14 Non-Residential All Usage $5.54 $8.31 Major Industrial All Usage $4.76 $7.14 Irrigation All Usage $10.10 $15.14 Wholesale All Usage $4.93 $4.93 Table A-4 Monthly Water Rates After December 31, 2027 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $5.45 $8.16 Next 13,000 $7.81 $11.72 Residential Over 15,000 $11.72 $17.57 Non-Residential All Usage $6.43 $9.64 Major Industrial All Usage $5.53 $8.29 Irrigation All Usage $11.72 $17.57 Wholesale All Usage $5.72 $5.72 Table A-5 Monthly Water Rates After December 31, 2028 Cost per 1,000 gallons Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Inside City Outside City First 2,000 $5.62 $8.41 Next 13,000 $8.05 $12.08 Residential Over 15,000 $12.08 $18.10 Non-Residential All Usage $6.63 $9.93 Major Industrial All Usage $5.70 $8.54 Irrigation All Usage $12.08 $18.10 Wholesale All Usage $5.90 $5.90 2) Beginning January 1, 2030, all monthly water rates shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) All bills under such schedules shall be computed by adding the applicable meter service charge prescribed by subsection (B) to the amount determined to be due for water usage under this schedule. Applicable sales tax and franchise fees shall be added to the bill so computed. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 3 of 9 4) When a common facility/building is served by multiple water meters and the water usage is for the same purpose, customers may petition the Water and Wastewater Director and/or the Finance and Internal Services Director to have the water consumption aggregated and have the tiered rates apply to the aggregated quantity. 5) Water used for flushing and sampling of newly constructed water lines, Fire Department training and equipment calibration, and other similar uses requiring a large volume and/or high velocity of water movement shall employ a fire hydrant meter of the appropriate size for the use. If a fire hydrant meter cannot be used due to high flow or volume requirements, then the volume of water used shall be measured by using a pitot gauge to determine the gallons per minute and by timing the flow of water to be able to calculate total volume. In the cases of fire department training and equipment calibration, sewer line washing, street sweeping, and other uses where the equipment employed has a built-in water meter, these built in water meters may be used. All such meters other than those on fire trucks must be evaluated by the Meter Superintendent. These water uses shall be billed at the same rates as non-residential customers. 6) Monthly wholesale treated water rates outside city limits are based on Cost of Service Methodology. B) Monthly Water Service Charge. 1) In addition to the above, each customer shall pay a monthly water service charge in accordance with the following schedule: Table B-1 Monthly Water Service Charge Prior to July 1, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 7.85 $8.98 $9.90 x ¾ inch $7.85 $8.98 $9.90 1 inch $11.30 $15.55 $15.55 1 ½ inch $21.55 $30.78 $30.78 2 inch $29.52 $42.64 $42.64 3 inch $64.37 $88.89 $88.89 4 inch $106.59 $130.07 $133.70 6 inch $213.18 $245.14 $253.40 8 inch $319.67 $367.63 $396.49 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 4 of 9 Table B-2 Monthly Water Service Charge After June 30, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 7.85 $11.78 $11.78 x ¾ inch $7.85 $11.78 $11.78 1 inch $11.30 $16.95 $16.95 1 ½ inch $21.55 $32.33 $32.33 2 inch $29.52 $44.28 $44.28 3 inch $64.37 $96.56 $96.56 4 inch $106.59 $159.89 $159.89 6 inch $213.18 $319.77 $319.77 8 inch $319.67 $479.51 $479.51 Table B-3 Monthly Water Service Charge After December 31, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 9.11 $13.67 $13.67 x ¾ inch $9.11 $13.67 $13.67 1 inch $13.11 $19.67 $19.67 1 ½ inch $25.00 $37.51 $37.51 2 inch $34.25 $51.37 $51.37 3 inch $74.67 $112.01 $112.01 4 inch $123.65 $185.48 $185.48 6 inch $247.29 $370.94 $370.94 8 inch $370.82 $556.24 $556.24 Table B-4 Monthly Water Service Charge After December 31, 2027 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 10.57 $15.86 $15.86 x ¾ inch $10.57 $15.86 $15.86 1 inch $15.21 $22.82 $22.82 1 ½ inch $29.00 $43.52 $43.52 2 inch $39.73 $59.59 $59.59 3 inch $86.62 $129.94 $129.94 4 inch $143.44 $215.16 $215.16 6 inch $286.86 $430.30 $430.30 8 inch $430.16 $645.24 $645.24 Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 5 of 9 Table B-5 Monthly Water Service Charge After December 31, 2028 Meter Size Inside City Outside City Wholesale 10.89 $16.34 $16.34 x ¾ inch $10.89 $16.34 $16.34 1 inch $15.67 $23.51 $23.51 1 ½ inch $29.87 $44.83 $44.83 2 inch $40.93 $61.38 $61.38 3 inch $89.22 $133.84 $133.84 4 inch $147.75 $221.62 $221.62 6 inch $295.47 $443.21 $443.21 8 inch $443.07 $664.60 $664.60 2) Beginning January 1, 2030, all monthly water service charges shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) The monthly treated water rates and the monthly meter service charge rates prescribed by subsections A) and (B) of this section shall commence as of the first billing statements issued after June 30, 2026. 4) The State of Arkansas mandated Safe Drinking Water Act fee shall be added to the monthly water utility bill. C) Monthly Standby Fire Protection Service Charge. 1) Charges for unmetered service connections for standby fire protection and fire hydrants shall be based on the incoming line size or the backflow preventer size, whichever is smaller, as set forth in the following table: Monthly Standby Fire Protection Service Charge Line Size or Backflow Preventer Size Inside City Outside City 1 inch $10.34 $12.38 2 inch $10.78 $12.83 2.5 inch $21.55 $24.77 3 inch $32.31 $37.16 4 inch $64.63 $74.32 6 inch $179.50 $209.60 8 inch $376.99 $433.54 10 inch $646.26 $743.18 2) The Utilities Department shall review the monthly standby fire protection service charges every two (2) years and shall make recommendations to the City Council following such review. Fire protection lines shall not be connected to the water system downstream from a meter. Code 1965, §21-25; Ord. No. 1165, 4-18-58; Ord. No. 2144, 9-2-75; Ord. No. 2594, 2-5-80; Ord. No. 3197, 7-1-86; Ord. No. 3409, 2-21-89; Ord. No. 3431, 6-6-89; Ord. No. 3491, 7-17-90; Ord. No. 3513, 9-18-90; Ord. No. 3519, 11- 20-90; Ord. No. 4059, §1, 10-7-97; Ord. No. 4223, 2-15-00; Code 1991, §51.136; Ord. No. 4530 12-02-02; Ord. No. 4540, 02-03-04; Ord. No. 5123, 4-1-08; Ord. No. 6169, §1, 4-2-2019; Ord. No. 6633, §1, 1-3-23; Ord. No. 6681, 1(Att.), 9-19-23) Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 6 of 9 51.137 Monthly Sewer Rates A) Monthly Sewer Rates. 1) All monthly sewer charges shall be calculated from the customer's monthly water usage. The following monthly rates are hereby fixed as rates to be charged for sewer services: Table D-1 Monthly Sewer Rates Per 1,000 Gallons Before July 1, 2026 Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Cost per 1,000 gallons First 2,000 gallons $5.24Residential Greater than 2,000 gallons 6.99 Non-Residential All Usage $5.88 Major Industrial All Usage $6.21 Outside city All Usage $8.05 Wholesale All Usage $6.09 Table D-2 Monthly Sewer Rates Per 1,000 Gallons After June 30, 2026 Class Usage Rate In Gallons) Cost per 1,000 gallons First 2,000 gallons $5.24Residential Greater than 2,000 gallons 6.99 Non-Residential All Usage $5.88 Major Industrial All Usage $6.21 Outside city All Usage $8.05 Wholesale All Usage $6.09 2) Beginning January 1, 2027, all monthly sewer quantity charge-usage rates per 1,000 gallons shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) Sewer related fees levied by the Cities of Farmington or Greenland shall be added to the wastewater utility bill at the request of Farmington or Greenland. These fees may be calculated on a per-thousand volumetric usage or a per month basis. B) Monthly Sewer Service Charge. 1) In addition to the above, each customer shall pay a monthly sewer service charge in accordance with the following schedule: Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 7 of 9 Table E-1 Monthly Sewer Service Charge Prior to July 1, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City 13.52 $16.66 x ¾ inch $13.52 $16.98 1 inch $25.94 $33.23 1½ inch $47.53 $66.98 2 inch $65.37 $93.23 3 inch $140.67 $195.74 4 inch $231.80 $286.99 6 inch $459.37 $532.02 8 inch $687.03 $592.02 Table E-2 Monthly Sewer Service Charge After June 30, 2026 Meter Size Inside City Outside City 13.52 $16.66 x ¾ inch $13.52 $16.98 1 inch $25.94 $33.23 1½ inch $47.53 $66.98 2 inch $65.37 $93.23 3 inch $140.67 $195.74 4 inch $231.80 $286.99 6 inch $459.37 $532.02 8 inch $687.03 $592.02 2) Beginning January 1, 2027, all monthly sewer service charges shall be increased by 3% per year. C) Determination of Sewer Quantity Charge for Residential Customers. 1) In the case of residential customers residing in a single family home, duplex, triplex, and/or fourplex, the average monthly water consumption for the preceding months of December, January, and February shall be computed separately for each customer, and a uniform monthly charge for each customer shall be determined by applying the schedule of rates set out in subsection (A) of this section to such average monthly water consumption. In the case of a residential user for whom a uniform monthly charge has been established and who moves to a new location the same uniform monthly charge shall apply at the new location. In the case of new residential customers, sewer averages shall be established based on the number of individuals residing within the dwelling unit, at a rate of 2,100 gallons per customer per month. This methodology of sewer averaging shall not apply to multi-family structures containing five (5) or more units in a contiguous building. 2) In the case of sewer customers who do not have a water meter provided by a public water utility, the sewer usage volume billed shall be the average volume of all users in the sewer system in like dwellings from the most recent system-wide sewer average calculation. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 8 of 9 D) Determination of Charge for Non-residential and Major Industrial Customers. In the case of non-residential and/or major industrial customers, the monthly sewer charge shall be determined by applying the schedule of rates prescribed in subsection (A) of this section to the monthly water usage of such customers. In the event that a non-residential or major industrial customer discharging waste into the city's sanitary sewer system produces evidence to the Water and Wastewater Director demonstrating that a substantial portion of the total amount of water from all sources used for all purposes does not reach the sanitary sewer which is in excess of the factors used in establishing the rates in subsection (A) of this section, an estimated percentage of total water consumption to be used in computing charges may be established by the Water and Wastewater Director. The factors used in establishing said rates are on file in the office of the Water and Wastewater Director and are incorporated herein by reference thereto. Any rate so adjusted by the Water and Wastewater Director shall be effective for a twelve (12) month period beginning with the billing for the month when rates adjudged hereby go into effect. E) Extra Strength Surcharge. 1) For all significant industrial users as defined in §51.074, whose wastewater discharge is greater than 300 mg/I of BOD 5 and/or TSS, the city shall levy an Extra Strength Surcharge for each parameter in accordance with the following unit charges: Table F1 Extra Strength Surcharges Prior to July 1, 2026 Extra Strength BOD 5 $0.5743 per pound Extra Strength TSS $0.7086 per pound Table F2 Extra Strength Surcharges After June 30, 2026 Extra Strength BOD 5 $0.5743 per pound Extra Strength TSS $0.7086 per pound 2) Beginning January 1, 2027, Extra Strength Surcharges shall be increased by 3% per year. 3) Extra Strength Surcharges shall be billed monthly and shall be computed on the basis of water meter reading (wastewater discharge volume). 4) All sampling and analyses of the wastewater characteristics shall be performed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 136 approved methods. 5) The volume of flow used in computing surcharge shall be based upon metered water consumption as shown in the records of meter readings maintained by the city's business office. In the event that a user discharging waste into the city sanitary sewer system produces evidence to the city demonstrating that a portion of the total amount of water used for all purposes is not discharged into the sanitary sewer, a separate meter or meters or other approved flow measuring device may be installed at the user's expense, upon its request, to measure only that portion of the total flow being discharged into the city sewer system. If a surcharge is assessed by the city, it shall be shown separately on the monthly billing. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:39 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 9 of 9 6) Any person discharging industrial waste into the sanitary sewers of the city who procures any part or all of the user's water supply from sources other than the city, all or part of which is discharged into the sanitary sewer, shall install and maintain at the user's expense water meters of the type approved by the city for the purpose of determining the proper volume of flow to be used in computing sewer service charges. Such meter will be read monthly and tested for accuracy when deemed necessary by the city. Where it can be shown that a portion of the water measured by the aforesaid meter or meters does not enter the sanitary sewer system of the city, a separate meter or meters or other approved flow measuring device may be installed at the user's expense, upon its request, to measure only that portion of the total flow being discharged into the city sewer system. If a surcharge is assessed by the city, it shall be shown separately on the monthly billing. 7) Computation of extra strength surcharges shall be based on the following formula: a) Extra strength surcharge: S =V × 8.34 × [BOD Unit Charge (BOD - 300) + SS Unit Charge (TSS - 300)] b) Where: S =Surcharge in dollars V =Sewer volume in million gallons 8.34 = Pounds per gallon of water BOD Unit Charge Unit charge for BOD in dollars per pound BOD =BOD strength in parts per million 300 =Allowed BOD strength in parts per million TSS Unit Charge Unit charge for suspended solids in dollars per pound TSS =Suspended solids strength in parts per million 300 =Allowed TSS Strength in parts per million F) Hauled Wastewater Fees. 1) Application Fee. An application to discharge hauled domestic waste must be accompanied by a fee of 100.00. 2) Discharge Fee. A fee of $50.00 must be paid for each hauled domestic waste load discharged. G) Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit Fee. 1) Application Fee. An application for an industrial wastewater discharge permit must be accompanied by a fee of $500.00. Code 1965, § 21-26; Ord. No. 1165, 4-18-58; Ord. No. 3197, 7-1-86; Ord. No. 3285, 8-4-87; Ord. No. 3398, 1-3-89; Ord. No. 3491, 7-17-90; Ord. No. 3637, §§1, 2, 8-18-92; Ord. No. 4059, §2, 10-7-97; Code 1991, §51.137; Ord. No. 4530, 12- 02-03; Ord. No. 4803, 12-20-05; Ord. No. 4998, 4-3-07; Ord. No. 5129, 4-15-08; Ord. No. 5438, 9-20-11; Ord. No. 5739, 2-17-15; Ord. No. 6633, §1, 1-3-23; Ord. No. 6681, §1(Att.), 9-19-23) Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 1 of 4 159.02 Water And Wastewater Impact Fees A) Applicability. 1) The following provisions shall apply to all of the territory within the city's water and wastewater service areas, including areas outside the corporate city limits and within service areas located within Washington County and other incorporated cities after June 16, 2003. 2) The following types of development shall be required to pay a water and/or wastewater impact fee: a) New and existing development seeking a new connection to the city's water or wastewater system resulting in increased demand from water and/or wastewater facilities. This shall not apply to existing development that is connecting to the wastewater system in order to eliminate an individual sewage disposal system. b) New and existing development as stated in (a) above seeking a new connection to the system of a wholesale customer of the city's water or wastewater system, where collection of the city's impact fee is required by the city's contract with the wholesale customer. c) Nonresidential or residential redevelopment seeking a larger capacity or additional water meter. B) Intent. 1) The intent of wastewater and water impact fees is to ensure that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of improvements to the city's water and wastewater systems; to ensure that the proportionate share does not exceed the cost of providing water and wastewater facilities to the development that paid the fee; and to ensure that funds collected from developments are used to construct water and wastewater facilities that serve such developments. It is further the intent of this ordinance to use the impact fees to implement the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and future plan updates and to implement the city's Five Year Capital Improvements Program. 2) It is not the intent of this ordinance to collect any money from any development in excess of the actual amount necessary to offset demands generated by that development for the water and wastewater facilities for which the fee was paid. 3) It is not the intent of this ordinance that any monies collected for the water impact fee and the wastewater impact fee ever be commingled or ever be used for a type of facility different from that for which the fee was paid. C) Time of Collection. 1) Water and wastewater impact fees shall be paid at the time of installation of the water meter serving the property or of the connection to the wastewater system, whichever comes first. 2) Development projects which have obtained building permits prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall not have to pay impact fees if the building is completed with water and sewer hook-ups installed and Certificate of Occupancy issued no later than six (6) months from the effective date of this ordinance. D) Fee Determination. 1) Schedule of Fees. The Impact Fee Administrator shall determine the amount of the water and wastewater impact fees for residential uses based on the type or size of the water meter and for nonresidential uses based on the size of the water meter using the following schedule: Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 2 of 4 Land Use Unit Water Wastewater Total Single-Family (average) Dwelling $2,672.00 $2,998.00 $5,670.00 Multi-Family per dwelling unit) Dwelling $1,897.00 $2,129.00 $4,026.00 Nonresidential 5/8 x 3/4 inch meter) Meter $2,672.00 $2,998.00 $5,670.00 Nonresidential 1 inch meter) Meter $6,680.00 $7,496.00 $14,176.00 Nonresidential 1½ inch meter) Meter $13,361.00 $14,991.00 $28,352.00 Nonresidential 2 inch meter) Meter $21,377.00 $23,986.00 $45,363.00 Nonresidential 3 inch meter) Meter $42,754.00 $47,972.00 $90,726.00 Nonresidential 4 inch meter) Meter $66,803.00 $74,956.00 $141,759.00 Nonresidential 6 inch meter) Meter $133,606.00 $149,911.00 $283,517.00 Nonresidential 8 inch meter) Meter $213,770.00 $239,858.00 $453,628.00 Nonresidential 10 inch meter) Meter $307,294.00 $344,796.00 $652,090.00 2) Redevelopment, Reconstruction, Change of Use. In the event of a redevelopment, reconstruction or change of use from an existing development or use, the fee shall be the difference between what the fee would be for the entire redevelopment or reconstruction project and what the fee would have been for the existing development or use. Existing development must be connected to the water or wastewater system at the time of redevelopment in order to apply this credit. 3) Mixed Use. For mixed use developments requiring a shared meter to serve both multi-family and nonresidential uses, the impact fee shall be calculated by assigning (a) the applicable multi-family impact fee based on the number of dwelling units, and (b) a nonresidential impact fee based on the meter size that would be required to serve only the nonresidential portion of the development, as determined by projected demands, fixture counts, or other accepted methods. The combined total shall constitute the impact fee for the mixed use development, regardless of the actual meter size installed to serve the full building demand. 4) Fire Suppression/Low Pressure. It is the intent of this ordinance to base water and wastewater impact fees on the typical usage in a new building or other facility. Extinguishing of fires is not a part of typical usage; to allow adequate fire flow to sprinklers and internal hydrants at some large and at-risk properties, it may be necessary for fire protection purposes to install a larger water meter than would be necessary to meet day-to-day needs of that facility. In addition, a larger meter may be required in areas of low water pressure than in areas of normal water pressure for the same type of use. In those cases, it is the policy of the city that the impact fee for water and wastewater should be based on the meter size needed by that facility for its typical usage, without regard to fire-flow or unusual pressure conditions. 5) Irrigation. Any separate water meter installed for irrigation purposes only shall not be included in the calculation of the wastewater impact fee. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 3 of 4 6) Affordable Housing and Homeless Shelter Exemption. Construction of single family, non-profit multi- family supportive housing, and homeless shelters funded wholly or primarily by federal Community Development Block Grants, non-profit service organizations such as Habitat for Humanity, Housing and Urban Development housing loans and similar programs designed to provide affordable, owner- occupied, single family residences to low income individuals, non-profit multi-family supportive housing, homeless shelters, and all accessory dwelling units shall be exempted from payment of impact fees pursuant to this ordinance by the Impact Fee Administrator. E) Use of Fees. 1) Establishment of Accounts. An Impact Fee Fund that is distinct from the General Fund of the city is hereby created, and the impact fees received will be deposited in the following interest-bearing accounts of the Impact Fee Fund: a) Water Impact Fee Account; and b) Wastewater Impact Fee Account. 2) Water Impact Fee Accounts. The Water Impact Fee Account shall contain only those water impact fees collected pursuant to this ordinance plus any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. 3) Wastewater Impact Fee Account. The Wastewater Impact Fee Account shall contain only those wastewater impact fees collected pursuant to this ordinance plus any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. 4) Order of Use. Monies in each impact fee account shall be considered to be spent in the order collected, on a first-in/first-out basis. 5) Use of Fees. The monies in each impact fee account shall be used only for the following: a) Acquisition. To acquire land for and/or acquire or construct water or wastewater system improvements of the type reflected in the title of the account and as described in the Impact Fee Study as well as extension of service to new development paying an impact fee. b) Debt Service. To pay debt service on any portion of any current or future general obligation bond issue or revenue bond issue used to finance water or wastewater system improvements of the type reflected in the title of the account that created or will create capacity to serve new development. c) As described in subsection F, Refunds. F) Refunds. 1) The City of Fayetteville shall refund the portion of collected development impact fees, including the accrued interest that has not been expended seven (7) years from the date the fees were paid. Interest shall be based on a 4% annual rate. 2) A refund shall be paid to the present owner of the property that was the subject of new development and against which the fee was assessed and collected. 3) Notice of the right to a refund, including the amount of the refund and the procedure for applying for and receiving the refund, shall be sent or served in writing to the present owners of the property no later than thirty (30) days after the date which the refund becomes due. The sending by regular mail of the notices to all present owners of record shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirement of notice. Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Supp. No. 39) Page 4 of 4 4) The refund shall be made on a pro rata basis, and shall be paid in full no later than ninety (90) days after the date certain upon which the refund becomes due. 5) At the time of payment of the water or wastewater impact fee under this ordinance, the Impact Fee Administrator shall provide the applicant paying such fee with written notice of those circumstances under which refunds of such fees will be made. Failure to deliver such written notice shall not invalidate any collection of any impact fee under this ordinance. Ord. No. 4447, §1, 12-17-02; Ord. No. 4492, §159.02 C.1, 6-03-03; Ord. No. 4496 §159.02 "F", 6-17-03; Ord. No. 4919, 9-05-06; Ord. No. 4975, 1-16-07; Ord. No. 5206, 12-16-08; Ord. No. 6255, §2, 11-5-19) CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Water and Sewer Rate Changes City Council Meeting: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 5:30 PM City of Fayetteville Administration Building, City Hall 113 W. Mountain – Room 219 or via Zoom link at www.fayetteville-ar.gov On May 5, 2026 shortly after the beginning of the Council Meeting at 5:30 PM, the Fayetteville City Council will hold a public hearing prior to the consideration and possible adoption of the 2026-2030 water and sewer rates ordinance and impact fee ordinance. The public will be able to comment during this Public Hearing and also during consideration of the rate ordinance prior to its final consideration and vote by the Fayetteville City Council. The public can attend in person or remotely via the link on the City’s website, www.fayetteville-ar.gov. If adopted, the proposed new rates would take effect on July 1, 2026, with. All persons are invited to attend the public hearing and be heard on the matter. A water and sewer cost of service study was conducted by Carollo Engineers pursuant to Fayetteville City Council Resolution 25-02 and State Law to perform a cost analysis to determine if costs allocations are fair and equitable among customer classes and to review the existing rate structure and design proposed rates that provide adequate revenues to operate and maintain the utilities and ensure sufficient funds will be available for necessary capital expansions. The rate study was conducted following the industry standard methodology from the American Water Works Association (M1 Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges). The proposed water and sewer rate changes below are necessary for the City of Fayetteville to continue to provide safe and reliable water and sewer services to its citizens and other customers because extensive new capital needs are required now and will be required in the future, and operating costs have increased and will continue to increase. 2 Additional Information Received Date Received: MM/DD/YYYY 05/05/2026 Time: 00:00 (AM/PM) 5:30 PM From: Name & Title Senior Assistant City Attorney Blake Pennington To: Name & Title City Council Agenda Meeting Date: MM/DD/YYYY 05/05/2026 Civic Clerk Number: Ex. 2025-994 2026-1386 Forwarded to City Attorney’s Office and Department Head Received documentation from the City Attorney’s Office EXHIBIT B — Revised Clean Version 159.02 Water And Wastewater Impact Fees (A) Applicability. (1) The following provisions shall apply to all of the territory within the city's water and wastewater service areas, including areas outside the corporate city limits and within service areas located within Washington County and other incorporated cities after June 16, 2003. (2) The following types of development shall be required to pay a water and/or wastewater impact fee: (a) New and existing development seeking a new connection to the city's water or wastewater system resulting in increased demand from water and/or wastewater facilities. This shall not apply to existing development that is connecting to the wastewater system in order to eliminate an individual sewage disposal system. (b) New and existing development as stated in (a) above seeking a new connection to the system of a wholesale customer of the city's water or wastewater system, where collection of the city's impact fee is required by the city's contract with the wholesale customer. (c) Nonresidential or residential redevelopment seeking a larger capacity or additional water meter. (B) Intent. (1) The intent of wastewater and water impact fees is to ensure that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of improvements to the city's water and wastewater systems; to ensure that the proportionate share does not exceed the cost of providing water and wastewater facilities to the development that paid the fee; and to ensure that funds collected from developments are used to construct water and wastewater facilities that serve such developments. It is further the intent of this ordinance to use the impact fees to implement the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and future plan updates and to implement the city's Five Year Capital Improvements Program. (2) It is not the intent of this ordinance to collect any money from any development in excess of the actual amount necessary to offset demands generated by that development for the water and wastewater facilities for which the fee was paid. (3) It is not the intent of this ordinance that any monies collected for the water impact fee and the wastewater impact fee ever be commingled or ever be used for a type of facility different from that for which the fee was paid. (C) Time of Collection. (1) Water and wastewater impact fees shall be paid at the time of installation of the water meter serving the property or of the connection to the wastewater system, whichever comes first. (2) Development projects which have obtained building permits prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall pay the impact fees in effect at the time of the issuance of the building permit. (D) Fee Determination. (1) Schedule of Fees. The Impact Fee Administrator shall determine the amount of the water and wastewater impact fees for residential uses based on the type or size of the water meter and for nonresidential uses based on the size of the water meter using the following schedule: Land Use Unit Water Wastewater Total Single -Family (average) Dwelling $2,672.00 $2,998.00 $5,670.00 Multi -Family Dwelling $1,897.00 $2,129.00 $4,026.00 (per dwelling unit) Nonresidential Meter $2,672.00 $2,998.00 $5,670.00 (5/8 x 3/4 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $6,680.00 $7,496.00 $14,176.00 (1 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $13,361.00 $14,991.00 $28,352.00 (1%2 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $21,377.00 $23,986.00 $45,363.00 (2 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $42,754.00 $47,972.00 $90,726.00 (3 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $66,803.00 $74,956.00 $141,759.00 (4 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $133,606.00 $149,911.00 $283,517.00 (6 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $213,770.00 $239,858.00 $453,628.00 (8 inch meter) Nonresidential Meter $307,294.00 $344,796.00 $652,090.00 (10 inch meter) (2) Redevelopment, Reconstruction, Change of Use. In the event of a redevelopment, reconstruction or change of use from an existing development or use, the fee shall be the difference between what the fee would be for the entire redevelopment or reconstruction project and what the fee would have been for the existing development or use. Existing development must be connected to the water or wastewater system at the time of redevelopment in order to apply this credit. (3) Mixed Use. For mixed use developments requiring a shared meter to serve both multi -family and nonresidential uses, the impact fee shall be calculated by assigning (a) the applicable multi -family impact fee based on the number of dwelling units, and (b) a nonresidential impact fee based on the meter size that would be required to serve only the nonresidential portion of the development, as determined by projected demands, fixture counts, or other accepted methods. The combined total shall constitute the impact fee for the mixed use development, regardless of the actual meter size installed to serve the full building demand. (4) Fire Suppression/Low Pressure. It is the intent of this ordinance to base water and wastewater impact fees on the typical usage in a new building or other facility. Extinguishing of fires is not a part of typical usage; to allow adequate fire flow to sprinklers and internal hydrants at some large and at -risk properties, it may be necessary for fire protection purposes to install a larger water meter than would be necessary to meet day-to-day needs of that facility. In addition, a larger meter may be required in areas of low water pressure than in areas of normal water pressure for the same type of use. In those cases, it is the policy of the city that the impact fee for water and wastewater should be based on the meter size needed by that facility for its typical usage, without regard to fire -flow or unusual pressure conditions. (5) Irrigation. Any separate water meter installed for irrigation purposes only shall not be included in the calculation of the wastewater impact fee. (Supp. No. 39) Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Page 2 of 4 (6) Affordable Housing and Homeless Shelter Exemption. Construction of single family, non-profit multi- family supportive housing, and homeless shelters funded wholly or primarily by federal Community Development Block Grants, non-profit service organizations such as Habitat for Humanity, Housing and Urban Development housing loans and similar programs designed to provide affordable, owner - occupied, single family residences to low income individuals, non-profit multi -family supportive housing, homeless shelters, and all accessory dwelling units shall be exempted from payment of impact fees pursuant to this ordinance by the Impact Fee Administrator. (E) Use of Fees. (1) Establishment of Accounts. An Impact Fee Fund that is distinct from the General Fund of the city is hereby created, and the impact fees received will be deposited in the following interest -bearing accounts of the Impact Fee Fund: (a) Water Impact Fee Account; and (b) Wastewater Impact Fee Account. (2) Water Impact Fee Accounts. The Water Impact Fee Account shall contain only those water impact fees collected pursuant to this ordinance plus any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. (3) Wastewater Impact Fee Account. The Wastewater Impact Fee Account shall contain only those wastewater impact fees collected pursuant to this ordinance plus any interest which may accrue from time to time on such amounts. (4) Order of Use. Monies in each impact fee account shall be considered to be spent in the order collected, on a first-in/first-out basis. (5) Use of Fees. The monies in each impact fee account shall be used only for the following: (a) Acquisition. To acquire land for and/or acquire or construct water or wastewater system improvements of the type reflected in the title of the account and as described in the Impact Fee Study as well as extension of service to new development paying an impact fee. (b) Debt Service. To pay debt service on any portion of any current or future general obligation bond issue or revenue bond issue used to finance water or wastewater system improvements of the type reflected in the title of the account that created or will create capacity to serve new development. (c) As described in subsection F, Refunds. (F) Refunds. (1) The City of Fayetteville shall refund the portion of collected development impact fees, including the accrued interest that has not been expended seven (7) years from the date the fees were paid. Interest shall be based on a 4% annual rate. (2) A refund shall be paid to the present owner of the property that was the subject of new development and against which the fee was assessed and collected. (3) Notice of the right to a refund, including the amount of the refund and the procedure for applying for and receiving the refund, shall be sent or served in writing to the present owners of the property no later than thirty (30) days after the date which the refund becomes due. The sending by regular mail of the notices to all present owners of record shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirement of notice. (Supp. No. 39) Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Page 3 of 4 (4) The refund shall be made on a pro rata basis, and shall be paid in full no later than ninety (90) days after the date certain upon which the refund becomes due. (5) At the time of payment of the water or wastewater impact fee under this ordinance, the Impact Fee Administrator shall provide the applicant paying such fee with written notice of those circumstances under which refunds of such fees will be made. Failure to deliver such written notice shall not invalidate any collection of any impact fee under this ordinance. Ord. No. 4447, §1, 12-17-02; Ord. No. 4492, §159.02 C.1, 6-03-03; Ord. No. 4496 §159.02 "F", 6-17-03; Ord. No. 4919, 9-05-06; Ord. No. 4975, 1-16-07; Ord. No. 5206, 12-16-08; Ord. No. 6255, §2, 11-5-19) (Supp. No. 39) Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Page 4 of 4 Additional Information Received Date Received: 05/05/2026 M M/D D/YYYY Time: 5:30 PM 00.00 (AM/PM) From: Senior Assistant City Attorney Name &Title Blake Pennington To: City Council Name & Title Agenda Meeting Date: 05/05/2026 M M/D D/YYYY Civic Clerk Number: 2026-1386 Ex. 2025-994 Forwarded to City Received documentation Attorney's Office and Department Head from the City Attorney's Office 159.02 Water And Wastewater Impact Fees (A) Applicability. (1) The following provisions shall apply to all of the territory within the city's water and wastewater service areas, including areas outside the corporate city limits and within service areas located within Washington County and other incorporated cities after June 16, 2003. (2) The following types of development shall be required to pay a water and/or wastewater impact fee: (a) New and existing development seeking a new connection to the city's water or wastewater system resulting in increased demand from water and/or wastewater facilities. This shall not apply to existing development that is connecting to the wastewater system in order to eliminate an individual sewage disposal system. (b) New and existing development as stated in (a) above seeking a new connection to the system of a wholesale customer of the city's water or wastewater system, where collection of the city's impact fee is required by the city's contract with the wholesale customer. (c) Nonresidential or residential redevelopment seeking a larger capacity or additional water meter. (B) Intent. (1) The intent of wastewater and water impact fees is to ensure that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of improvements to the city's water and wastewater systems; to ensure that the proportionate share does not exceed the cost of providing water and wastewater facilities to the development that paid the fee; and to ensure that funds collected from developments are used to construct water and wastewater facilities that serve such developments. It is further the intent of this ordinance to use the impact fees to implement the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and future plan updates and to implement the city's Five Year Capital Improvements Program. (2) It is not the intent of this ordinance to collect any money from any development in excess of the actual amount necessary to offset demands generated by that development for the water and wastewater facilities for which the fee was paid. (3) It is not the intent of this ordinance that any monies collected for the water impact fee and the wastewater impact fee ever be commingled or ever be used for a type of facility different from that for which the fee was paid. (C) Time of Collection. (1) Water and wastewater impact fees shall be paid at the time of installation of the water meter serving the property or of the connection to the wastewater system, whichever comes first. (2) Development projects which have obtained building permits prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall wsNhaveto pay the impact fees in effect at the time of the issuance of the building permit (D) Fee Determination. (1) Schedule of Fees. The Impact Fee Administrator shall determine the amount of the water and wastewater impact fees for residential uses based on the type or size of the water meter and for nonresidential uses based on the size of the water meter using the following schedule: (Supp. No. 39) Created: 2026-02-24 15:05:56 [EST] Page 1 of 4 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-222 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Tim Nyander, Utilities Director SUBJECT: Sewer Damage Claim for 516 North Fallin Avenue (Chris Skrocki) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a resolution to authorize a payment of $100,000.00 to Chris Skrocki for a sewer damage claim arising at 516 North Fallin Avenue, pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code. BACKGROUND: On or about December 8th, 2025, a directional boring company bored through the sewer main that had been incorrectly located by the City of Fayetteville which was located behind 516 N Fallin Ave. This caused a buildup of debris in the sewer main, which resulted in the home located at 516 N Fallin Ave experiencing a sewer backup. The customer called a mitigation company, NWA Restore It. They removed flooring, trim, sheetrock, etc. On December 9th, 2025, City crews were notified of the issue and promptly went to repair the sewer main. DISCUSSION: The claimant, Chris Skrocki, is seeking compensation from the City which includes the cost of the mitigation, cleaning of personal effects, and construction costs to replace materials removed by the mitigation company. Below are the cost estimates: NWA Claims, LLC Repair Estimate $46,496.83 Personal Property Loss (Customer estimate, approved by NWA Claims) 24,505.00 NWA Restore It Personal Property Cleaning Estimate $32,745.19 NWA Restore It Mitigation Estimate $36,241.11 Total $139,988.13 Less: Insurance Payment ($10,000.00) Damage Claim Amount Requested from City $129,988.13 City staff recommends the maximum allowable compensation in the amount of $100,000.00 as specified by Ordinance 6725. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Funds are available in the Self Insurance – Non-Vehicular Damage account within the Water & Sewer fund. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Attachments Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-222 A RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO §39.10(C)(4) OF THE FAYETTEVILLE CITY CODE TO AUTHORIZE A PAYMENT OF $100,000.00 TO CHRIS SKROCKI FOR A SEWER DAMAGE CLAIM ARISING AT 516 NORTH FALLIN AVENUE WHEREAS, pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the City Code, the City Council may, in an extraordinary case by a 2/3 vote, approve the payment of water or sewer damage claims up to $100,000.00; and WHEREAS, the City has received estimates for repairs at 516 North Fallin Avenue exceeding 100,000.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, pursuant to § 39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code, authorizes a payment of $100,000.00 to or on behalf of Chris Skrocki for expenses related to the sewer damage claim at 516 North Fallin Avenue. City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-222 Item ID 2/17/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item Tim Nyander 1/28/2026 WATER SEWER (720) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Staff recommends a resolution to authorize the Mayor to pay the total amount of $100,000.00 to Chris Skrocki for a sewer damage claim arising at 516 North Fallin Avenue, pursuant to §39.10(C)(4) of the Fayetteville City Code. Budget Impact: 5400.720.4410-5311.04 Water and Sewer Account Number Fund N/A N/A Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item?Yes Total Amended Budget $180,000.00 Expenses (Actual+Encum)$- Available Budget $180,000.00 Does item have a direct cost?Yes Item Cost $100,000.00 Is a Budget Adjustment attached?No Budget Adjustment $- Remaining Budget $80,000.00 V20221130 Purchase Order Number:Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Change Order Number:Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Comments: Claim Request Although the City of Fayetteville is immune from any claim for liability or damages caused by alleged negligence of its employees, the City Council has authorized a very limited property damage claims procedure. INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete this form clearly stating the reason for the claim, amount you are requesting, all contact information, and attach appropriate documentation including receipts, estimates, photos, etc. Three (3) itemized written estimates must be provided prior to repairs being made. Substantive documentation MUST be provided to establish all monetary values. Additional sheets may be added. Failure to provide all information and fully substantiate your claim will result in the claim being denied. Please do not discard any items that are being claimed as damaged. Filing a claim does not imply approval; claims will be investigated before a decision is rendered; claims received more than 30 days after the incident will be denied. Claims containing inaccurate or fraudulent information will be denied. Please mail to or hand-deliver documents to: Mayor’s Office – Claims, City of Fayetteville, 113 W. Mountain St., Fayetteville, AR 72701 OR Fax to 479-575-8257 CLAIMANT INFORMATION First Name Last Name Middle Initial Claim Type Email Address Chris Skrocki M What type of claim are you requesting? General Water and Sewer cskrock@gmail.com City Fayetteville State / Province / Region AR Postal / Zip Code 72701 Country USA Street Address 516 N FALLIN AVENUE Address Line 2 1/27/26, 8:16 AM Shea Fankhouser https://lfforms.city.fyv.us/Forms/form/approval/8f40f4bc-1b31-4b30-ade3-0901494d6096?hideHeader=true 1/5 Daytime Phone Alternate Phone Incident Location INCIDENT INFORMATION Date of Incident Time of Incident Amount being Claimed Incident Nature Legal Owner of Property Insurance The City cannot pay a claim in an amount exceeding a Claimant’s insurance deductible, if covered. The undersigned hereby files a claim against the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas for the following reason(s): Attach additional sheets if necessary 479-466-6593 City Fayetteville State / Province / Region Arkansas Postal / Zip Code 72701 Country United States Address/Location of Occurence Street Address 516 N FALLIN AVENUE Address Line 2 12/8/2025 4:00 PM $1000000.00 Nature of Occurrence Automotive Related Home Related Personal other Chris Skrocki As shown in the Washington County land records Do you have any insurance which covers your damage? Yes No 1/27/26, 8:16 AM Shea Fankhouser https://lfforms.city.fyv.us/Forms/form/approval/8f40f4bc-1b31-4b30-ade3-0901494d6096?hideHeader=true 2/5 Incident Description The undersigned hereby files a claim against the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas for the following reason(s): Please consider the amounts required for form submission to be placeholders and not necessarily representative of actual claimed amounts or the relevancy of a private property insurance claim. Based on a preliminary conversation with a claims adjuster it does not appear likely that private insurance will come anywhere close to covering the extent of this incident, therefore I selected 'No' to the insurance question. Here is what I know - on the afternoon of December 8th sewage water seeped through two toilets, my bathtub, and shower and covered the lower level of my house. Franklin Plumbing came out this morning, and, upon opening the manhole cover at the street, advised that the overflow came from the city sewer system. Furniture, clothing, and other personal items have been damaged to a significant extent. My floors require replacement, wool rugs are a total loss, cabinetry will need to be replaced, etc. My mitigation/remediation contractor, NWA Restore It, tentatively estimates the house will be uninhabitable for 6 months. NWA Restore It is actively documenting losses/articles which are candidates for remediation throughout the process. I have concerns about damage to the value of the property with respect to eventual required seller's disclosures given the extent to which raw sewage from the city's line has been distributed throughout my house. I would like to discuss the next steps moving forward as we further learn the scope of the damages. Merry Christmas, Chris Skrocki 1/27/26, 8:16 AM Shea Fankhouser https://lfforms.city.fyv.us/Forms/form/approval/8f40f4bc-1b31-4b30-ade3-0901494d6096?hideHeader=true 3/5 File Upload Agreement Signature Refer To Department Additional Documentation Attach appropriate documentation including receipts, itemized estimates, photos, etc. If vehicle related, please include proof of insurance if applicable. image0.jpeg 804KB image1.jpeg 804KB image2.jpeg 1.53MB image3.jpeg 1.75MB image4.jpeg 1.12MB Upload I Agree. By checking the "I agree" box below, you agree and acknowledge that 1) your application will not be signed in the sense of a traditional paper document, 2) by signing in this alternate manner, you authorize your electronic signature to be valid and binding upon you to the same force and effect as a handwritten signature, and 3) you may still be required to provide a traditional signature at a later date. By signing below, I acknowledge that the above-provided information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Shea Fankhouser WATER & SEWER Upload Skrocki Subrogation Demand.pdf 4.12MB 1/ 27/26, 8:16 AM Shea Fankhouser https:// lfforms.city.fyv.us/Forms/form/approval/8f40f4bc-1b31-4b30-ade3-0901494d6096?hideHeader=true 4/5 2000 characters left Letter to Claimant * Comments Submit Memo Memo Sent claim received email and told claimant they first needed to file a claim with their home owner's insurance. CA 12-10-25 Sent NWA Claims, LLC a request to perform a damage assessment at this property. CA 12-11-25 Insurance company responded with letter stating they will seek subrogation against the City. Sent inquiry on how to proceed to CAO. CA 12-23-25 City Attorney's Office gave response that claimant will have to provide subrogation letter or claim will be closed. I sent this instruction to claimant and asked if he could provide this from his insurance company. CA 1-7-26 Upload 1/27/26, 8:16 AM Shea Fankhouser https://lfforms.city.fyv.us/Forms/form/approval/8f40f4bc-1b31-4b30-ade3-0901494d6096?hideHeader=true 5/5 1 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 Client:Chris Skrocki Property:516 North Fallin Avenue Fayetteville , AR 72702 Operator:MDEATON Estimator:Mark Deaton Business:(479) 871-3700 Type of Estimate:Water Damage Date Entered:12/16/2025 Date Assigned:12/11/2025 Price List:ARFA8X_JAN26 Labor Efficiency:Restoration/Service/Remodel Estimate:SKROCKI_SKETCH File Number:26-001 PROPERTY DAMAGE DISCLAIMER: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY NWA Claims, LLC . is not authorized to: (1) make coverage determinations, (2) secure contractors, (3) authorize OR suggest payments, or (4) authorize work of any kind whatsoever. NWA Claims, LLC . will prepare an estimate based on visible damages and a scope of work needed in accordance to our opinions. Items such as hidden damages or unforeseen future developments cannot be forecasted, so our estimate represents our opinions as to an estimated measure of damages that exist as of the date of preparation. OUR ESTIMATE IS NOT A PROMISE OF PAYMENT OR CONSTITUTES SETTLEMENT OR AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT; IT IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION FOR REPAIRS. Our estimate does not create coverage under a policy where coverage does not or did not exist. Preparation of our estimate does not prevent an insurance company from reserving its rights under a policy, or from exercising its rights as outlined within the policy. This estimate is subject to review by the client/insurance company. NWA Claims, LLC . is not responsible for payment to any third party contractor for any fees for repairs, construction, remediation, etc., to the property upon which this estimate was prepared. 2 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 2 SKROCKI_SKETCH Downstairs Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet LivingRoom Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet LivingRoom Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) 8' 1 1 3' 1 5' 1 0 2' 8" 3' 2" 2' 1' 2 1' 3 3' 2' 6 1' 1' 2 2' 2' 2 Half Bath Height: 9' 191.83 SF Walls 215.61 SF Walls & Ceiling 2.64 SY Flooring 23.17 LF Ceil. Perimeter 23.78 SF Ceiling 23.78 SF Floor 14.50 LF Floor Perimeter Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into ENTRY_FOYER DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 1. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 14.50 LF 11.38 19.31 33.00 217.32 (0.00)217.32 2. Remove Pre-finished solid wood 84.00 SF 2.70 26.53 45.36 298.69 (0.00)298.69 flooring Remove half of the wood flooring not removed during mitigation. 3. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 23.78 SF 9.54 26.54 45.38 298.78 (0.00)298.78 4. Baseboard *14.50 LF 3.82 6.48 11.08 72.95 (0.00)72.95 5. Paint baseboard - one coat 14.50 LF 1.03 1.75 2.98 19.67 (0.00)19.67 6. Paint the walls - two coats 191.83 SF 1.09 24.47 41.82 275.38 (0.00)275.38 Paint Walls For Match 7. Interior door unit 1.00 EA 316.68 37.06 63.34 417.08 (0.00)417.08 To Include Framing 8. Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 2.00 EA 34.48 8.06 13.80 90.82 (0.00)90.82 coats (per side) Totals: Half Bath 150.20 256.76 1,690.69 0.00 1,690.69 Entry/Foyer Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Living Room Vanity (B1) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) Entry/Foyer Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Living Room Vanity (B1) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1)7' 6' 8" 5' 6 4' 5"1' 11"7" 2' 6 1' 1' 2 2' 2' 2 Entry/Foyer Height: 15' 6" 289.31 SF Walls 326.89 SF Walls & Ceiling 4.18 SY Flooring 24.83 LF Ceil. Perimeter 37.58 SF Ceiling 37.58 SF Floor 12.42 LF Floor Perimeter Missing Wall 5' 6" X 15' 6"Opens into LIVING_ROOM Door 4' 5" X 6' 8"Opens into Exterior Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into HALF_BATH DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 9. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 12.42 LF 11.38 16.54 28.26 186.14 (0.00)186.14 10. Paint the walls - two coats 289.31 SF 1.09 36.90 63.08 415.33 (0.00)415.33 Paint Walls For Match 3 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 3 CONTINUED - Entry/Foyer DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE RCV DEPREC.ACVTAXO&P 11. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 37.58 SF 9.54 41.94 71.70 472.15 (0.00)472.15 Totals: Entry/Foyer 95.38 163.04 1,073.62 0.00 1,073.62 Dining Area Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Master Bedroom Living Room Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Tile Shower (B1) Dining Area Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Master Bedroom Living Room Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Tile Shower (B1) 13' 2" 13' 6" 1616 6 8' 8 8' 2 4' 6"8' 6" 1' 1 11 5' 6 Living Room Height: 9' 434.89 SF Walls 643.89 SF Walls & Ceiling 23.22 SY Flooring 52.33 LF Ceil. Perimeter 209.00 SF Ceiling 209.00 SF Floor 46.92 LF Floor Perimeter Missing Wall - Goes to Floor 4' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into KITCHEN Missing Wall 6" X 9'Opens into DINING_AREA Missing Wall - Goes to Floor 11" X 6' 8"Opens into DINING_AREA Missing Wall 5' 6" X 9'Opens into ENTRY_FOYER DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 12. Fireplace hearth - tile 96.00 SF 17.91 201.17 343.88 2,264.41 (0.00)2,264.41 13. Framing & Rough Carpentry (Bid Item)1.00 EA 325.00 38.03 65.00 428.03 (0.00)428.03 14. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 4' tall 46.92 LF 16.41 90.08 154.00 1,014.04 (0.00)1,014.04 15. Paint the walls - two coats 434.89 SF 1.09 55.46 94.80 624.29 (0.00)624.29 16. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 209.00 SF 9.54 233.28 398.78 2,625.92 (0.00)2,625.92 17. Baseboard *46.92 LF 3.82 20.96 35.84 236.03 (0.00)236.03 18. Paint baseboard - one coat 46.92 LF 1.03 5.65 9.66 63.64 (0.00)63.64 Totals: Living Room 644.63 1,101.96 7,256.36 0.00 7,256.36 Closet Under Stairs MasterBathroomLivingRoom Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) Closet Under Stairs MasterBathroomLivingRoom Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) 6' 87' 1' 1 0 4' 9 3' 2" 3' 6" 2' 6" 6" 4"4" Closet Under Stairs Height: 9' 160.33 SF Walls 181.44 SF Walls & Ceiling 2.35 SY Flooring 19.67 LF Ceil. Perimeter 21.11 SF Ceiling 21.11 SF Floor 17.17 LF Floor Perimeter Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into DINING_AREA 4 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 4 DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 19. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 17.17 LF 11.38 22.86 39.08 257.33 (0.00)257.33 20. Remove Pre-finished solid wood 84.00 SF 2.70 26.53 45.36 298.69 (0.00)298.69 flooring Remove half of the wood flooring not removed during mitigation. 21. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 21.11 SF 9.54 23.57 40.28 265.24 (0.00)265.24 22. Baseboard *17.17 LF 3.82 7.68 13.12 86.39 (0.00)86.39 23. Paint baseboard - one coat 17.17 LF 1.03 2.06 3.54 23.29 (0.00)23.29 24. Paint the walls - two coats 160.33 SF 1.09 20.45 34.96 230.17 (0.00)230.17 Paint Walls For Match 25. Interior door unit 1.00 EA 316.68 37.06 63.34 417.08 (0.00)417.08 To Include Framing 26. Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 2.00 EA 34.48 8.06 13.80 90.82 (0.00)90.82 coats (per side) Totals: Closet Under Stairs 148.27 253.48 1,669.01 0.00 1,669.01 LaundryRoomLaundryRoom 3' 3" 5' 6 6' 3' 1" 2' 9" 4' 9" 1' 1 9" Laundry Room Height: 9' 121.83 SF Walls 136.96 SF Walls & Ceiling 1.68 SY Flooring 16.50 LF Ceil. Perimeter 15.13 SF Ceiling 15.13 SF Floor 12.50 LF Floor Perimeter Door 4' X 6' 8"Opens into KITCHEN DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 27. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 12.50 LF 11.38 16.64 28.46 187.35 (0.00)187.35 28. Remove Pre-finished solid wood 84.00 SF 2.70 26.53 45.36 298.69 (0.00)298.69 flooring Remove half of the wood flooring not removed during mitigation. 29. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 15.13 SF 9.54 16.88 28.86 190.08 (0.00)190.08 30. Baseboard *12.50 LF 3.82 5.59 9.56 62.90 (0.00)62.90 31. Paint baseboard - one coat 12.50 LF 1.03 1.51 2.58 16.97 (0.00)16.97 32. Paint the walls - two coats 121.83 SF 1.09 15.54 26.56 174.89 (0.00)174.89 Paint Walls For Match 33. Interior door unit 1.00 EA 316.68 37.06 63.34 417.08 (0.00)417.08 To Include Framing 34. Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 2.00 EA 34.48 8.06 13.80 90.82 (0.00)90.82 coats (per side) Totals: Laundry Room 127.81 218.52 1,438.78 0.00 1,438.78 5 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 5 Kitchen Dining Area Closet Under Stairs Master Bedroom Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3) Kitchen Dining Area Closet Under Stairs Master Bedroom Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3) 3' 4" 3' 2" 7' 8" 7' 6" 2' 6 5" 9' 1 2' 6" 6"1' 1 6" 10 Dining Area Height: 9' 214.06 SF Walls 302.53 SF Walls & Ceiling 9.83 SY Flooring 28.17 LF Ceil. Perimeter 88.47 SF Ceiling 88.47 SF Floor 22.25 LF Floor Perimeter Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into MASTER_BEDRO Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into CLOSET_UNDER Missing Wall - Goes to Floor 11" X 6' 8"Opens into LIVING_ROOM Missing Wall 6" X 9'Opens into LIVING_ROOM Missing Wall 10' X 9'Opens into KITCHEN DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 35. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 22.25 LF 11.38 29.63 50.64 333.48 (0.00)333.48 36. Paint the walls - two coats 214.06 SF 1.09 27.30 46.66 307.29 (0.00)307.29 Paint Walls For Match 37. Remove Pre-finished solid wood 44.23 SF 2.70 13.97 23.88 157.27 (0.00)157.27 flooring Remove portion of wood flooring during mitigation 38. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 88.47 SF 9.54 98.75 168.80 1,111.55 (0.00)1,111.55 Totals: Dining Area 169.65 289.98 1,909.59 0.00 1,909.59 Kitchen Dining Area Closet Under Stairs Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Living Room Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3) Kitchen Dining Area Closet Under Stairs Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Living Room Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3) 12' 12' 6" 14 14 6 1' 1 0 2' 6"3' 5"6' 1" 2' 6 9' 1 Master Bedroom Height: 9' 434.67 SF Walls 602.67 SF Walls & Ceiling 18.67 SY Flooring 52.00 LF Ceil. Perimeter 168.00 SF Ceiling 168.00 SF Floor 47.00 LF Floor Perimeter Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into MASTER_BATHR Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into DINING_AREA DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 39. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 47.00 LF 11.38 62.58 106.98 704.42 (0.00)704.42 40. Remove Pre-finished solid wood 84.00 SF 2.70 26.53 45.36 298.69 (0.00)298.69 flooring Remove half of the wood flooring not removed during mitigation. 41. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 168.00 SF 9.54 187.52 320.54 2,110.78 (0.00)2,110.78 42. Baseboard *47.00 LF 3.82 21.01 35.90 236.45 (0.00)236.45 43. Paint baseboard - one coat 47.00 LF 1.03 5.66 9.68 63.75 (0.00)63.75 44. Paint the walls - two coats 434.67 SF 1.09 55.43 94.76 623.98 (0.00)623.98 6 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 6 CONTINUED - Master Bedroom DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE RCV DEPREC.ACVTAXO&P Paint Walls For Match 45. Interior door unit 1.00 EA 316.68 37.06 63.34 417.08 (0.00)417.08 To Include Framing 46. Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 2.00 EA 34.48 8.06 13.80 90.82 (0.00)90.82 coats (per side) Totals: Master Bedroom 403.85 690.36 4,545.97 0.00 4,545.97 Entry/Foyer Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Vanity (B1) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) Entry/Foyer Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Vanity (B1) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) 5' 1 0 6' 4 9' 9' 6" 6' 3' 10" 3' 8" 2' 6"2' 1"7" 5" Master Bedroom Closet Height: 9' 250.33 SF Walls 302.83 SF Walls & Ceiling 5.83 SY Flooring 29.67 LF Ceil. Perimeter 52.50 SF Ceiling 52.50 SF Floor 27.17 LF Floor Perimeter Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into MASTER_BATHR DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 47. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 27.17 LF 11.38 36.18 61.84 407.21 (0.00)407.21 48. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 52.50 SF 9.54 58.60 100.18 659.63 (0.00)659.63 49. Baseboard *27.17 LF 3.82 12.14 20.76 136.69 (0.00)136.69 50. Paint baseboard - one coat 27.17 LF 1.03 3.28 5.60 36.87 (0.00)36.87 51. Paint the walls - two coats 250.33 SF 1.09 31.92 54.58 359.36 (0.00)359.36 Paint Walls For Match 52. Interior door unit 1.00 EA 316.68 37.06 63.34 417.08 (0.00)417.08 To Include Framing 53. Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 2.00 EA 34.48 8.06 13.80 90.82 (0.00)90.82 coats (per side) Totals: Master Bedroom Closet 187.24 320.10 2,107.66 0.00 2,107.66 7 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 7 Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet LivingRoom Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet LivingRoom Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Tile Shower (B1) 4' 1 1 8' 2 3' 2"3' 1 3' 10" 3' 8" 2' 1 1 3' 4' 9 4' 1 0 2' 6"3' 5"6' 1" 2' 6"2' 1"7" Master Bathroom Height: 9' 304.19 SF Walls 386.74 SF Walls & Ceiling 5.08 SY Flooring 52.17 LF Ceil. Perimeter 82.56 SF Ceiling 45.76 SF Floor 18.67 LF Floor Perimeter Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into MASTER_BEDRO Door 2' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into MASTER_BEDR2 DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 54. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 18.67 LF 11.38 24.85 42.50 279.81 (0.00)279.81 55. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 45.76 SF 9.54 51.07 87.32 574.94 (0.00)574.94 56. Baseboard *18.67 LF 3.82 8.34 14.26 93.92 (0.00)93.92 57. Paint baseboard - one coat 18.67 LF 1.03 2.24 3.84 25.31 (0.00)25.31 58. Paint the walls - two coats 304.19 SF 1.09 38.80 66.32 436.69 (0.00)436.69 Paint Walls For Match 59. Interior door unit 1.00 EA 316.68 37.06 63.34 417.08 (0.00)417.08 To Include Framing 60. Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 2.00 EA 34.48 8.06 13.80 90.82 (0.00)90.82 coats (per side) 61. Jetted tub *1.00 EA 2,260.16 264.44 452.04 2,976.64 (0.00)2,976.64 Replace Jetted Tub-Had to be removed to clean fecal matter which had settled under it. 62. Masonry (Bid Item)1.00 EA 675.00 78.97 135.00 888.97 (0.00)888.97 Re-tile around tub 63. Tile shower - 61 to 100 SF 1.00 EA 2,137.88 250.13 427.58 2,815.59 (0.00)2,815.59 Replace shower stall - Hardware Included 64. Vanity*4.00 LF 154.22 72.18 123.38 812.44 (0.00)812.44 65. Countertop - Reset*4.00 LF 10.88 5.09 8.70 57.31 (0.00)57.31 66. Plumbing (Bid Item)1.00 EA 325.00 31.69 0.00 356.69 (0.00)356.69 Reset plumbing fixtures in bathroom Totals: Master Bathroom 872.92 1,438.08 9,826.21 0.00 9,826.21 8 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 8 Kitchen Laundry Room Dining Area Closet Under Stairs Master Bedroom Vanity1 (B2) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3) Kitchen Laundry Room Dining Area Closet Under Stairs Master Bedroom Vanity1 (B2) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3)13 6 13 1 0 3' 1" 2' 9" 9' 3" 9' 9" 4' 9" 1' 1 5' 6 1' 7 1' 3 2' 3 2' 7 10 4' 6"8' Kitchen Height: 9' 377.17 SF Walls 599.29 SF Walls & Ceiling 21.76 SY Flooring 53.50 LF Ceil. Perimeter 222.13 SF Ceiling 195.84 SF Floor 26.50 LF Floor Perimeter Door 4' X 6' 8"Opens into LAUNDRY_ROOM Door 5' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into Exterior Missing Wall 10' X 9'Opens into DINING_AREA Missing Wall - Goes to Floor 4' 6" X 6' 8"Opens into LIVING_ROOM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 67. Detach & Reset Countertop*54.00 SF 33.07 208.93 357.16 2,351.87 (0.00)2,351.87 Reset Countertop 68. 1/2" - drywall per LF - up to 2' tall 26.50 LF 11.38 35.28 60.32 397.17 (0.00)397.17 69. Remove Pre-finished solid wood 97.92 SF 2.70 30.94 52.88 348.20 (0.00)348.20 flooring Remove half of the wood flooring not removed during mitigation. 70. Pre-finished solid wood flooring 195.84 SF 9.54 218.59 373.66 2,460.56 (0.00)2,460.56 71. Baseboard *26.50 LF 3.82 11.84 20.24 133.31 (0.00)133.31 72. Paint baseboard - one coat 26.50 LF 1.03 3.19 5.46 35.95 (0.00)35.95 73. Paint the walls - two coats 377.17 SF 1.09 48.10 82.22 541.44 (0.00)541.44 Paint Walls For Match 74. Detach & Reset Range - freestanding -1.00 EA 160.88 18.83 32.18 211.89 (0.00)211.89 gas * Reset Stove 75. Detach & Reset Refrigerator*1.00 EA 54.02 6.32 10.80 71.14 (0.00)71.14 Reset Refrigerator 76. Detach & Reset Dishwasher 1.00 EA 234.69 27.46 46.94 309.09 (0.00)309.09 Reset Dishwasher 77. Remove Cabinetry - lower (base) units 6.00 LF 8.65 6.07 10.38 68.35 (0.00)68.35 Remove lower cabinet section not removed during mitigation 78. Cabinetry - lower (base) units *16.00 LF 361.97 677.60 1,158.30 7,627.42 (0.00)7,627.42 Replace lower cabinets-Doors Included-R&Ret Hardware Included 79. Plumbing (Bid Item)1.00 EA 325.00 31.69 0.00 356.69 (0.00)356.69 Reset All Plumbing Items/Plumbing/Garbage Disposal/Etc. Totals: Kitchen 1,324.84 2,210.54 14,913.08 0.00 14,913.08 Total: Downstairs 4,124.79 6,942.82 46,430.97 0.00 46,430.97 Stairs 9 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 9 Miscellaneous DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX O&P RCV DEPREC.ACV 80. Insulation (Bid Item)1.00 EA -575.00 -67.27 -115.00 -757.27 (0.00)-757.27 Replace damaged insulation on exterior walls 81. Electrical (Bid Item)1.00 EA 750.00 73.13 0.00 823.13 (0.00)823.13 Address electrical items Totals: Miscellaneous 5.86 -115.00 65.86 0.00 65.86 Total: Stairs 5.86 -115.00 65.86 0.00 65.86 Line Item Totals: SKROCKI_SKETCH 4,130.65 6,827.82 46,496.83 0.00 46,496.83 Grand Total Areas: 4,438.26 SF Walls 1,398.22 SF Ceiling SF Walls andCeiling5,836.48 1,365.36 SF Floor 151.71 SY Flooring 428.73 LF Floor Perimeter 0.00 SF Long Wall 0.00 SF Short Wall 574.89 LF Ceil. Perimeter 1,365.36 Floor Area 1,549.25 Total Area 4,064.17 Interior Wall Area 2,854.42 Exterior Wall Area 308.00 Exterior Perimeter of Walls 0.00 Surface Area 0.00 Number of Squares 0.00 Total Perimeter Length 0.00 Total Ridge Length 0.00 Total Hip Length 10 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 10 Summary Line Item Total 35,538.36 Overhead 3,413.91 Profit 3,413.91 Total Sales Tax 4,130.65 Replacement Cost Value $46,496.83 Net Claim $46,496.83 Mark Deaton 11 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 11 1 1-IMG_4023 12 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 12 2 2-IMG_4024 13 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 13 3 3-IMG_4025 14 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 14 4 4-IMG_4027 15 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 15 5 5-IMG_4028 16 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 16 6 6-IMG_4029 17 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 17 7 7-IMG_4030 18 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 18 8 8-IMG_4032 19 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 19 9 9-IMG_4033 20 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 20 10 10-IMG_4034 21 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 21 11 11-IMG_4035 22 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 22 12 12-IMG_4036 23 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 23 13 13-IMG_4037 24 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 24 14 14-IMG_4039 25 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 25 15 15-IMG_4040 26 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 26 16 16-IMG_4041 27 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 27 17 17-IMG_4042 28 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 28 18 18-IMG_4043 29 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 29 19 19-IMG_4044 30 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 30 20 20-IMG_4045 31 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 31 21 21-IMG_4046 32 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 32 22 22-IMG_4047 33 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 33 23 23-IMG_4048 34 NWA Claims, LLC. P.O. Box 4872 Fayetteville, AR 72702 479-871-3700 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 34 24 24-IMG_4049 35 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 35 Downstairs Kitchen Laundry Room Dining Area Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Master Bedroom Living Room Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3) Tile Shower (B1) Kitchen Laundry Room Dining Area Entry/Foyer Closet Under Stairs Half Bath Master Bathroom Master Bedroom Closet Master Bedroom Living Room Vanity (B1) Vanity1 (B2) Tile Shower1 (B3) Cabinet (B1) Cabinet1 (B2)Island (B3) Tile Shower (B1) Downstairs 9' 3" 13' 5' 1 0 5' 6 13 6 36 4 3' 1" 2' 9" 12' 6" 7' 8" 20' 9' 4 9' 4 10 8 1' 1 0 20' 20' 4" 7' 6' 8" 5' 6 3' 2" 7' 3' 2" 12 14 29 12' 4' 1 1 3' 2" 8' 1 1 6' 8" 2' 8" 12' 8" 5' 1 0 9' 6' 8 4' 9 2' 1' 2 16 8' 2 3' 1 5'3' 8" 1' 95' 8" 4' 1' 1 13' 8 5' 8" 1' 9 4' 1' 9" 10 6" 36 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 36 Upstairs Landing Small Bedroom Small Bed Closet Large Bedroom Large Bed Closet 1 Large Bed Closet 2 Landing Small Bedroom Small Bed Closet Large Bedroom Large Bed Closet 1 Large Bed Closet 2 Upstairs 8' 2" 4' 1 16 1 7' 6" 4' 5 8' 5 3' 7 3' 9 4' 9" 11 12' 12' 8" 2' 1 1 4' 6" 6' 8 10 9 2' 5" 2' 1"12 2' 5" 6' 6' 2' 2" 2' 2" 12 4 16 6 14' 10" 7'7' 10" 2' 7 5' 8' 5" 9' 1" 7' 8" 3' 6 3' 2 6' 7" 37 SKROCKI_SKETCH 1/4/2026 Page: 37 Stairs Up Up Up Up StairsStairs Stairs 6' 8 9' 4 9' 8 8' 2 8' 6 6' 8" 7' 4" 3' 6" 6' 8 3' 2"3' 2" Personal Property Lost Items ROOM ITEM DESCRIPTION VALUE POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE Comments KITCHEN Food on counters Assorted food exposed $75 0 Sewage air, approx 8 hrs Dog food Dog food on floor $40 0 Plants Plants on floor $110 0 Dog containers Bowls, auto water dispenser $80 0 On floor, Rizzari Automatic Pet Water Bowl part of this Dishwasher Stainless, $600 0 In standing sewage approx 8 hrs Stove Gas 5 burner stove and oven $950 0 Bottom instanding sewage appro 8 hrs. Top to match including exhaust hood 0 Trash Can Stainless trash can pedal $60 0 Plastic storage Containers in island approx 15 pcs $70 0 Close proximity to raw sewage 0 Bottom Cabinet 0 Pots 13 pcs $280 0 Close proximity to raw sewage Cast iron pans 4 pcs $140 0 Close proximity to raw sewage Other pans 4 pcs $120 0 Close proximity to raw sewage Towels / trivets /0 Close proximity to raw sewage pot holders 15 pcs $170 0 Close proximity to raw sewage Cleaning supplies $150 0 Close proximity to raw sewage under sink 0 Close proximity to raw sewage Free Standing Cabinet Cabinet sitting under window that $900 1 900 In standing seage for approx 8 hrs, potentially recoverable with refinish housed liquor and serving items 0 0 Runner carpet 10'x3'$300 0 Under carpet pad 10'x3'$40 0 0 DINING 6 chairs Raised, solid wood $1,500 1 1500 Legs in sewage approx 8 hrs, potentially recoverable with refinish Dining room table Solid wood $1,100 1 1100 Legs in sewage approx 8 hrs, potentially recoverable with refinish Air rifle Rifle w/ scope $250 0 Butt stock in raw sewage 0 WATER HEATER CLOSET Cleaning supplies floor Chemicals $210 0 Rags, towels on floor x 12 $120 0 Free standing selves $150 0 Vacuum cleaner $175 0 Steam cleaner $200 0 0 LIVING ROOM 0 8' Leather Couch Full leather dog proof $2,500 0 Legs in standing sewage for 8 hrs as well as potentially underside of couch. Dog jumped on couch after paws in raw sewage. 4' Fabric Love Seat Custom furniture to the house $750 0 Legs in sewage approx 8 hrs, dog jumped on with contaminated paws 4' Fabric Love Seat Custom furniture to the house $600 0 Legs in sewage approx 8 hrs, dog jumped on with contaminated paws Fabric Bench Seat Custom furniture to the house $800 0 Legs in sewage approx 8 hrs, dog jumped on with contaminated paws Ottoman storage bench $350 0 Legs in sewage approx 8 hrs, dog jumped on with contaminated paws Dog toys several kong toys, chuck it balls $90 0 Router $150 0 Replacement from ATT Google Nest Range Extender $90 0 Accent lamp $75 0 fell on contaminated ground Electric cords 4 pcs $60 0 Bar stools 3 pcs solid wood $450 0 Coffee Table Solid wood (Walnut) $400 0 Legs in sewage approx 8 hrs Area Rug 8 x 10 $1,439 0 Rizzy Mod Mo575a Grey Area Rug Under Rug Pad 8 x 10 $150 0 Bottom shelf Curio 0 Items by Entrance Book $60 0 Plant $40 0 Photos $40 0 0 1/2 BATHROOM 0 Cleaning Supplies $65 0 Towels / Rags x 8 $80 0 Brush, plunger $30 0 Bidet on toilet $90 0 BEDROOM 0 King Bed frame Bernhardt 379-H06 Headboard Fabric, Bernhardt 379-FR06 Footboard/rails $1,095 0 Purchased 7/22/2024 Sam's Furniture order 15178 Box Spring $270 1 270 Potentially recoverable Mattress $1,500 1 1500 Potentially recoverable, had a waterproof coverg Bedding Comforter $150 0 Bedding replacement result of dog jumping on bed with contaminated paws Blankets x 2 $90 0 Bedding replacement result of dog jumping on bed with contaminated paws Dream Fit Enhanced Bamboo King Sheets FFBB004-75-5K5 Sheet Set $190 0 Bedding replacement result of dog jumping on bed with contaminated paws. Purchased Sam's Furniture 7/19/2024 King Size Pillows (x 4), Decorative Pillow set (x3) x1 $125 0 High Dresser Solid wood 5' $800 1 800 Bottom in sewage 8 hrs. Potentially recoverable Low dresser Solid wood 7' $1,300 1 1300 Bottom in sewage 8 hrs. Potentially recoverable End tables Solid wood by bed x 2 $600 1 600 Bottom in sewage 8 hrs. Potentially recoverable Air filter free standing $250 0 Clothes bottom drawers 0 Pants x 7 pr $280 0 T shirts x 14 $200 0 Collar shirts x 12 $360 0 Socks x 15 pr $150 0 End table lamps x 2 $100 0 Cords in sewage approx 8 hrs Dog bed x1 $90 0 MASTER BATHROOM 0 Cleaning supplies bottom $175 0 Bathroom products bottom $120 0 Hairdryer $30 0 Brush, plunger $30 0 Bath mat $25 0 Bath products tub $40 0 Tub overflow and raw sewage spill 0 MASTER CLOSET Soft sided gun cases x 6 $260 0 Absorbed raw sewage. All exposed firearms recoverable after extensive disinfecting/lubricating Hard sided gun case x 1 $80 0 Shoes 0 Sneakers x 5 $750 0 Boots x 3 $420 0 Special boots with Sole insoles x 1 $600 0 Cape Buffalo Courtenay Boots tyre style tread sourced from Africa Sporting Creations Dallas Safari Club with sole insoles Cowboy Boots x 2 $700 0 Caiman and bull hide Dress shoes x3 $510 0 Shotgun shells Pheasant loads x150 $250 0 Disposed of with Fayetteville PD hand receipt Cabela's Compound Bow case x1 $90 0 Soft case, absorbed sewage Laser Rangefinder in Bow case x1 $100 0 Sat in sewage for 8 hrs. Bow release x1 $60 0 absorbed sewage Ultralight aluminum collapsible hunting tripod (rail and swivel attachments)x1 $300 0 elastic line within poles (similar to camping poles) could not be effectively decontaminated EXTERIOR Welcome mat x2 $80 0 Contaminated shoes making repeated contact 8'x10' mat x1 $150 0 Contaminated items seeping sewage placed upon this mat in screened in porch area ADDITIONAL EXPENSES Tarps, gloves, towels for gun cleaning x1 $70.84 0 receipt TrueValue 12/10/25 28,490 total personal property impacted 7,970 potentially recoverable amount 24,505 total personal property loss if half recoverable items are restored, doesn't include costs for restoration 1 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 Client:Skrocki, Christopher Property:516 N Fallin Ave Fayetteville , AR 72701 Operator:GEORGIAC Estimator:Georgia Coppock Business:(479) 795-1300 E-mail:georgiac@nwarestoreit.comCompany:NWA Restore It Inc. Business:13525 W Hwy 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Type of Estimate: Date Entered:12/8/2025 Date Assigned: Price List:ARFA8X_DEC25 Labor Efficiency:Restoration/Service/Remodel Estimate:SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 2 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 2 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C Inventory Import Inventory Import DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 1. On-Site Evaluation and/or 25.00 HR 0.00 65.73 160.22 1,803.47 Supervisor/Admin - per hour 2. On-Site Inventory, Packing, Boxing,76.33 HR 0.00 52.86 393.39 4,428.19 Moving chrg - per hour 3. Cleaning Technician - per hour 138.00 HR 0.00 52.86 711.23 8,005.91 4. Moving Truck 1.00 EA 0.00 933.43 0.00 933.43 5. Job-site moving/storage container -3.00 MO 0.00 249.00 72.83 819.83 per month) This is for 3 months of storage ( any additional months will be charged separately) 6. Job-site moving container - pick 2.00 EA 0.00 99.50 19.40 218.40 up/del. (ea. way) 12'-20' Total: Inventory Import 1,357.07 16,209.23 Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 7. Clean countertop appliance - small -1.00 EA 0.00 7.82 0.77 8.59 Light clean 8. Clean countertop appliance 5.00 EA 0.00 16.55 8.14 90.89 Skrocki-000021] - Clean countertop appliance Skrocki-000021] - Clean countertop appliance Skrocki-000027] - Clean countertop appliance Skrocki-000024] - Clean countertop appliance 9. Clean countertop appliance - Heavy 3.00 EA 0.00 22.32 6.67 73.63 clean Skrocki-000039] - Clean countertop appliance - Heavy clean Skrocki-000039] - Clean countertop appliance - Heavy clean Skrocki-000018] - Clean countertop appliance - Heavy clean 10. Clean household appliance 3.00 EA 0.00 25.00 7.42 82.42 Skrocki-000029] - Clean household appliance Skrocki-000099] - Clean household appliance Skrocki-000099] - Clean household appliance 11. Clean household appliance - small 1.00 EA 0.00 8.46 0.84 9.30 3 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 3 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000028] - Clean household appliance - small 12. Clean household appliance - Light 4.00 EA 0.00 16.13 6.37 70.89 clean Skrocki-000021] - Clean household appliance Skrocki-000099] - Clean household appliance - Clean household appliance Skrocki-000099] - Clean household appliance 13. Clean vacuum cleaner - canister w/1.00 EA 0.00 43.73 4.30 48.03 attachments Skrocki-000042] - Clean vacuum cleaner - canister w/ attachments 14. Clean bag - handbag - small - Full 2.00 EA 0.00 13.68 2.93 30.29 service Skrocki-000028] - Clean bag - handbag - small - Full service Skrocki-000028] - Clean bag - handbag - small - Full service 15. Clean bag - tote bag - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 13.56 1.45 15.01 Skrocki-000018] - Clean bag - tote bag - Full service 16. Clean belt - leather - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 6.67 0.72 7.39 Skrocki-000065] - Clean belt - leather - Full service 17. Clean back pack - outdoor - Full 1.00 EA 0.00 18.82 2.01 20.83 service Skrocki-000068] - Clean back pack - outdoor - Full service 18. Provide box & tape - medium size 42.00 EA 0.00 3.42 29.37 173.01 Skrocki-000075] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000070] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000071] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000074] - Provide box & tape - medium size No tags Skrocki-000033] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000076] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000084] - Provide box & tape - medium size Pillow No tags Skrocki-000071] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000074] - Provide box & tape - medium size No tags 4 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 4 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000039] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000078] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000085] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000098] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000070] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000072] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000032] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000075] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000083] - Provide box & tape - medium size Pillow No tags Skrocki-000042] - Provide box & tape - medium size Blanket Pillow No tags Skrocki-000073] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000081] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000028] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000042] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000032] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000073] - Provide box & tape - medium size Skrocki-000072] - Provide box & tape - medium size Provide box & tape - medium size 19. Provide box & tape - small size 25.00 EA 0.00 2.47 12.63 74.38 Skrocki-000028] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000069] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000047] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000045] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000068] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000100] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000052] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000030] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000029] - Provide box & tape - small size 5 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 5 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000082] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000025] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000027] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000099] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000069] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000031] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000028] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000066] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000061] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000067] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000065] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000060] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000064] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000059] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000063] - Provide box & tape - small size Skrocki-000062] - Provide box & tape - small size 20. Provide box & tape - large size 3.00 EA 0.00 4.63 2.84 16.73 Skrocki-000048] - Provide box & tape - large size Skrocki-000054] - Provide box & tape - large size Skrocki-000026] - Provide box & tape - large size 21. Provide box, packing paper & tape -1.00 EA 0.00 3.91 0.80 4.71 medium size Skrocki-000024] - Provide box, packing paper & tape - medium size 22. Clean curtains - plain - large - Full 4.00 EA 0.00 42.20 18.08 186.88 service Skrocki-000018] - Clean curtains - plain - large - Full service Skrocki-000018] - Clean curtains - plain - large - Full service Skrocki-000018] - Clean curtains - plain - large - Full service Skrocki-000018] - Clean curtains - plain - large - Full service 23. Clean gloves - Full service 2.00 EA 0.00 8.32 1.79 18.43 Skrocki-000081] - Clean gloves - Full service Skrocki-000081] - Clean gloves - Full service 24. Clean hanger - padded - Full 3.00 EA 0.00 3.88 1.24 12.88 service 6 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 6 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000065] - Clean hanger - padded - Full service 25. Clean hat - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 20.19 2.17 22.36 Skrocki-000028] - Clean hat - Full service 26. Clean mittens - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 4.06 0.44 4.50 Skrocki-000018] - Clean mittens - Full service 27. Clean pillow - large - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 21.48 2.30 23.78 Skrocki-000083] - Clean pillow - large - Full service 28. Clean pillow case - Full service 2.00 EA 0.00 4.47 0.96 9.90 Skrocki-000018] - Clean pillow case - Full service Skrocki-000018] - Clean pillow case - Full service 29. Clean toy - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 12.43 1.33 13.76 Skrocki-000096] - Clean toy - Full service 30. Clean toy - small - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 9.46 1.01 10.47 Skrocki-000096] - Clean toy - small - Full service 31. Clean toy - doll clothes - Full 8.00 EA 0.00 6.01 5.15 53.23 service Skrocki-000058] - Clothes Skrocki-000057] - Clothes Skrocki-000051] - Clothes Skrocki-000053] - Clothes Skrocki-000050] - Clothes Skrocki-000049] - Clothes Skrocki-000055] - Clothes Skrocki-000056] - Clothes 32. Clean towel - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 3.23 0.35 3.58 Skrocki-000048] - Clean towel - Full service 33. Clean wall hanging - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 16.29 1.74 18.03 Skrocki-000031] - Clean wall hanging - Full service 34. Clean electronics / accessories -5.00 EA 0.00 9.88 5.00 54.40 exterior wipe down Skrocki-000097] - Clean electronics / accessories - exterior wipe down Skrocki-000039] - Clean electronics / accessories - exterior wipe down Skrocki-000077] - Clean electronics / accessories - exterior wipe down Skrocki-000028] - Clean electronics / accessories - exterior wipe down 7 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 7 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000028] - Clean electronics / accessories - exterior wipe down 35. Clean electronics / accessories -8.00 EA 0.00 1.87 1.48 16.44 small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000052] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000045] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000081] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000045] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000024] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000029] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000028] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down Skrocki-000028] - Clean electronics / accessories - small - ext. wipe down 36. Cleaning - Electronics - per hour 3.00 HR 0.00 52.86 15.46 174.04 Skrocki-000099] - Cleaning - Electronics Skrocki-000099] - Cleaning - Electronics - per hour Skrocki-000028] - Cleaning - Electronics - per hour 37. Clean bar contents 14.00 LF 0.00 13.95 19.61 214.91 Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000030] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents 38. Clean bar contents 1.00 LF 0.00 13.95 1.40 15.35 Skrocki-000052] - Clean bar contents 39. Clean bookcase contents 9.00 LF 0.00 11.19 10.15 110.86 8 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 8 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000052] - Clean bookcase contents Skrocki-000081] - Clean bookcase contents Skrocki-000024] - Clean bookcase contents Skrocki-000024] - Clean bookcase contents Skrocki-000029] - Clean bookcase contents 40. Clean bookcase contents 3.00 LF 0.00 11.19 3.38 36.95 Skrocki-000045] - Clean bookcase contents Skrocki-000045] - Clean bookcase contents Skrocki-000045] - Clean bookcase contents 41. Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box 37.00 EA 0.00 85.61 311.89 3,479.46 Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box 9 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 9 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000026] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000081] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000099] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000077] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000077] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000012 Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box Skrocki-000012 42. Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box -1.00 EA 0.00 45.57 4.48 50.05 low density - Lt Clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - low density - Lt Clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 43. Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt 17.00 EA 0.00 68.35 114.18 1,276.13 clean Skrocki-000097] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000097] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000097] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000097] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000097] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 10 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 10 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000097] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000077] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Lt clean 44. Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box -6.00 EA 0.00 129.70 77.03 855.23 Hvy clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000097] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Hvy clean Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 45. Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box -12.00 EA 0.00 86.24 102.27 1,137.15 Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean 11 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 11 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean Skrocki-000076] - Clean bric-a-brac - per Sml box - Hvy clean 46. Clean dishpack - per box - Heavy 1.00 EA 0.00 104.51 10.38 114.89 clean Skrocki-000039] - Clean dishpack - per box - Heavy clean 47. Clean glasspack - per box - Light 2.00 EA 0.00 27.06 5.46 59.58 clean Skrocki-000030] - Clean glasspack - per box - Light clean Skrocki-000030] - Clean glasspack - per box - Light clean 48. Clean glasspack - per box - Heavy 1.00 EA 0.00 85.24 8.50 93.74 clean Skrocki-000039] - Clean glasspack - per box - Heavy clean 49. Clean misc items - per Lg box -1.00 EA 0.00 102.96 10.23 113.19 Hvy clean Skrocki-000039] - Clean misc items - per Lg box - Hvy clean 50. Clean misc items - per Med box 1.00 EA 0.00 60.94 6.02 66.96 Skrocki-000019] - Clean misc items - per Med box Skrocki-000019] - Poopy job 51. Clean misc items - per Med box -3.00 EA 0.00 82.77 24.64 272.95 Hvy clean Skrocki-000021] - Clean misc items - per Med box - Hvy clean Clean misc items - per Med box - Hvy clean Clean misc items - per Med box - Hvy clean 52. Clean misc items - per Sml box 1.00 EA 0.00 50.80 5.02 55.82 Skrocki-000045] - Clean misc items - per Sml box 53. Clean misc items - per Sml box -1.00 EA 0.00 36.56 3.61 40.17 Lt clean Skrocki-000045] - Clean misc items - per Sml box - Lt clean 54. Clean misc items - per Sml box -1.00 EA 0.00 67.84 6.72 74.56 Hvy clean Skrocki-000045] - Clean misc items - per Sml box - Hvy clean 55. Clean cabinet contents - kitchen 11.00 LF 0.00 19.20 21.90 233.10 Skrocki-000039] - Clean cabinet contents - kitchen Skrocki-000024] - Clean cabinet contents - kitchen Skrocki-000049] - Clean cabinet contents - kitchen 12 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 12 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000026] - Clean cabinet contents - kitchen Skrocki-000032] - Clean cabinet contents - kitchen Skrocki-000020] - Clean cabinet contents - kitchen Skrocki-000032] - Clean cabinet contents - kitchen 56. Clean closet contents (no clothing)14.00 LF 0.00 5.87 8.68 90.86 Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000002 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000061] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000031] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000061] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000064] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000001 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000001 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000079] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000061] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000001 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000061] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000061] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000061] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) Skrocki-000038] - Clean closet contents (no clothing) 57. Clean ladder - small - Heavy clean 1.00 EA 0.00 31.43 3.17 34.60 Skrocki-000016] - Clean ladder - small - Heavy clean 58. Clean night stand contents - Heavy 2.00 EA 0.00 22.24 4.46 48.94 clean Clean night stand contents - Heavy clean Skrocki-000035 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean night stand contents - Heavy clean Skrocki-000036 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 59. Clean sporting goods - binoculars /6.00 EA 0.00 11.48 6.95 75.83 monocular / scope Skrocki-000065] - Clean sporting goods - binoculars / monocular / scope 13 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 13 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000068] - Clean sporting goods - binoculars / monocular / scope Skrocki-000065] - Clean sporting goods - binoculars / monocular / scope Skrocki-000031] - Clean sporting goods - binoculars / monocular / scope Skrocki-000028] - Clean sporting goods - binoculars / monocular / scope Skrocki-000028] - Clean sporting goods - binoculars / monocular / scope 60. Clean power tool - exterior wipe 1.00 EA 0.00 21.01 2.06 23.07 down Clean power tool - exterior wipe down Skrocki-000001 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 61. Clean bar stool 3.00 EA 0.00 16.29 5.23 54.10 Skrocki-000005 - Clean bar stool Skrocki-000006 - Clean bar stool Skrocki-000007 - Night stand 62. Clean bar stool - Heavy clean 4.00 EA 0.00 26.47 11.48 117.36 Clean bar stool - Heavy clean Skrocki-000006 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bar stool - Heavy clean Skrocki-000005 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bar stool - Heavy clean Skrocki-000015 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean bar stool - Heavy clean Skrocki-000014 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 63. Clean chair - wood with 6.00 EA 0.00 47.07 29.48 311.90 plastic/vinyl seat - Heavy clean Clean chair - wood with plastic/vinyl seat - Heavy clean Skrocki-000009 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean chair - wood with plastic/vinyl seat - Heavy clean Clean chair - wood with plastic/vinyl seat - Heavy clean Skrocki-000013 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean chair - wood with plastic/vinyl seat - Heavy clean Skrocki-000012 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean chair - wood with plastic/vinyl seat - Heavy clean Skrocki-000010 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean chair - wood with plastic/vinyl seat - Heavy clean 14 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 14 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000011 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 64. Clean chest 2.00 EA 0.00 29.88 6.09 65.85 Skrocki-000080 - Clean chest Skrocki-000081] - Display 65. Clean dresser - single 1.00 EA 0.00 32.65 3.36 36.01 Skrocki-000037 - Clean dresser - single 66. Clean dresser - single - Heavy 5.00 EA 0.00 39.76 21.30 220.10 clean Clean dresser - single - Heavy clean Skrocki-000037 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Clean dresser - single - Heavy clean Skrocki-000101 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed Skrocki-000034 - Clean dresser - single - Heavy clean Skrocki-000035 - Clean dresser - single - Heavy clean Skrocki-000036 - Clean dresser - single - Heavy clean 67. Clean dresser mirror 1.00 EA 0.00 16.54 1.72 18.26 Clean dresser mirror Skrocki-000022 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 68. Clean shoe tree / rack / organizer 2.00 EA 0.00 18.20 3.87 40.27 Skrocki-000043 - Clean shoe tree / rack / organizer Skrocki-000083] - Clean shoe tree / rack / organizer 69. Clean shoe tree / rack / organizer -1.00 EA 0.00 23.86 2.64 26.50 Heavy clean Clean shoe tree / rack / organizer - Heavy clean Skrocki-000043 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 70. Clean table - coffee - Heavy clean 1.00 EA 0.00 27.15 2.98 30.13 Clean table - coffee - Heavy clean 71. Clean table - dining - large - Heavy 1.00 EA 0.00 75.93 7.79 83.72 clean Clean table - dining - large - Heavy clean 72. Clean table - end table - Heavy 1.00 EA 0.00 20.02 2.20 22.22 clean Clean table - end table - Heavy clean Skrocki-000007 matches a Box ID used in a prior Job and was removed 73. Clean table - kitchen 3.00 EA 0.00 22.88 7.08 75.72 15 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 15 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000008 - Clean table - kitchen Skrocki-000023] - Clean table - kitchen Clean table - kitchen Skrocki-000008 is a duplicate of another Item ID and was removed 74. Clean table - kitchen - Heavy clean 4.00 EA 0.00 39.20 16.58 173.38 Skrocki-000010 - Kitchen chairs Skrocki-000012 - Kitchen chairs Skrocki-000009 - Kitchen chairs Skrocki-000011 - Kitchen chairs 75. Clean lamp shade - cloth - Light 1.00 EA 0.00 20.08 1.99 22.07 clean Skrocki-000085] - Clean lamp shade - cloth - Light clean 76. Clean table lamp - flat finish (no 2.00 EA 0.00 32.99 6.53 72.51 shade) Skrocki-000041 - Clean table lamp - flat finish (no shade) Skrocki-000040 - Clean table lamp - flat finish (no shade) 77. Clean table lamp - flat finish (no 1.00 EA 0.00 24.46 2.42 26.88 shade) - Light clean Skrocki-000085] - Clean table lamp - flat finish (no shade) - Light clean 78. Clean vase - gloss finish - Heavy 1.00 EA 0.00 8.42 0.90 9.32 clean Skrocki-000024] - Clean vase - gloss finish - Heavy clean 79. Clean bidet - Heavy 1.00 EA 0.00 39.35 3.85 43.20 Skrocki-000096] - Clean bidet - Heavy 80. Cleaning (Miscellaneous Item)1.00 EA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Steamer 81. Clean soap/hand sanitizer 1.00 EA 0.00 9.09 0.89 9.98 dispenser Skrocki-000096] - Clean soap/hand sanitizer dispenser 82. Clean toilet paper dispenser -1.00 EA 0.00 12.18 1.19 13.37 Heavy Skrocki-000096] - Clean toilet paper dispenser - Heavy 83. Packaging, Handling, Storage 82.00 EA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miscellaneous Item) Backpack Sponge Holder 16 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 16 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000065] - Scent killer Skrocki-000065] - Rifle stand Skrocki-000065] - Night vision goggles headband and misc hardware Sweater Skrocki-000067] - Large Box Dog Collar Duffel Bag Dog Seatbelt Crock Pot Shower Curtain Skrocki-000039] - Misc papers Sweater Dog Leash Tupperware Lid Portable Charger HDMI Cord Sous Vide Cooker Tote Bag Skrocki-000065] - Misc papers Sweater Skrocki-000039] - Clean pocket knife Dog Jersey Microfiber Towel Dog Pants Dog Chew Toys Dog Toy Dog Puzzle Skrocki-000029] - Ned Buc-Cee Squishmellow Clip On Fan Skrocki-000027] - Kitchen appliance Skrocki-000017 - Side table Skrocki-000016] - Kitchen chair 17 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 17 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Skrocki-000013 - Kitchen chair Skrocki-000015 - Kitchen chair Basket Skrocki-000099] - Household appliance Skrocki-000014 - Kitchen chair Skrocki-000046] - Clothes Skrocki-000044] - Clothes Security Camera Luggage Bag Waterproof Storage Bag Lock Small Bag Dry Bag Chargers Safety Vest Harness Dry Bag Misc Game Camera Dry Bag Scopes Turkey Call Portable Chargers Knives Hunting Hat Pillow Case Fanny Pack Part of Gun Scope Dry Bag Pillow Case Gun Manuals Plug In USB-C Charger Collar 18 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 18 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Plug In Range Finder Hunting Vest Waterproof Storage Bag Head Lamp Winter Gloves Safety Harness iPhone 8 84. Job-site cargo/storage container -1.00 MO 0.00 128.83 12.56 141.39 20' long (per month) Skrocki-000065] - Rifle scope 85. Evaluate, tag, & inventory 1.00 EA 0.00 10.19 0.00 10.19 miscellaneous - per item Skrocki-000101 - Evaluate, tag, & inventory miscellaneous - per item 86. Clean picture - frame, glass & back 1.00 SF 0.00 4.82 0.50 5.32 only - Light clean Skrocki-000081] - Clean picture - frame, glass & back only - Light clean 87. Clean picture - frame, glass & back 1.00 SF 0.00 11.46 1.18 12.64 only - Heavy clean Skrocki-000096] - Clean picture - frame, glass & back only - Heavy clean 88. Clean/Restore taxidermy - BID 1.00 EA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ONLY Skrocki-000083] - Clean/Restore taxidermy - BID ONLY 89. Clean furniture - Heavy clean 1.00 EA 0.00 71.45 7.35 78.80 Skrocki-000001 90. Clean furniture - Heavy clean 1.00 EA 0.00 71.45 7.35 78.80 Skrocki-000003 91. Clean furniture - Heavy clean 1.00 EA 0.00 71.45 7.35 78.80 Skrocki-000002 92. Clean furniture - Heavy clean 1.00 EA 0.00 71.45 7.35 78.80 Skrocki-000022 93. Clean furniture - Heavy clean 1.00 EA 0.00 71.45 7.35 78.80 Skrocki-000004 94. Clean bric-a-brac - per Lg box -1.00 EA 0.00 129.70 12.83 142.53 Hvy clean Skrocki-000077 ] 19 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 19 CONTINUED - Cleaning Items DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX 95. Clean wall hanging - wood 3.00 EA 0.00 22.88 7.08 75.72 sculpture - Light clean Skrocki-000081] - Clean wall hanging - wood sculpture - Light clean Skrocki-000081] - Clean wall hanging - wood sculpture - Light clean Skrocki-000081] - Clean wall hanging - wood sculpture - Light clean Totals: Cleaning Items 1,128.42 12,177.77 Garment & Soft Goods DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 96. Heavy Soil/Body Fluied Charge 1.00 EA 0.00 250.00 2.19 252.19 97. Clean scarf - Full service 1.00 EA 0.00 7.31 0.78 8.09 98. Clean sweater - Full service 9.00 EA 0.00 11.21 10.81 111.70 99. Clean pants - Full service 7.00 EA 0.00 11.98 8.99 92.85 100. Clean tie - silk - Full service 11.00 EA 0.00 6.71 7.90 81.71 101. Clean shirt - Full service 32.00 EA 0.00 8.53 29.25 302.21 102. Clean blazer/sport coat - lined -8.00 EA 0.00 12.11 10.38 107.26 Full service 103. Clean coat - Full service 4.00 EA 0.00 36.93 15.82 163.54 104. Clean jacket - leather suede -3.00 EA 0.00 111.06 35.70 368.88 heavy - Full service 105. Clean rug - Pelt- large - Full 1.00 EA 0.00 208.85 22.37 231.22 service 106. Laundry - wash/dry/fold - per 10.00 LB 0.00 6.53 6.37 71.67 pound - Full service 107. Clean blouse - fancy - Full 53.00 EA 0.00 19.22 109.13 1,127.79 service 108. Clean comforter - king size - Full 1.00 EA 0.00 45.84 4.91 50.75 service 109. Clean blanket -Weighted- full 1.00 EA 0.00 39.64 4.25 43.89 size - Full service 110. Clean blanket - full size - Full 1.00 EA 0.00 29.24 3.14 32.38 service 111. Clean robe - Full service 3.00 EA 0.00 44.65 14.34 148.29 112. Clean shirt - knit - Full service 5.00 EA 0.00 13.17 7.06 72.91 113. Clean pants - denim jeans - Full 24.00 EA 0.00 10.93 28.09 290.41 service 20 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 20 CONTINUED - Garment & Soft Goods DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX 114. Clean belt - Full service 2.00 EA 0.00 6.67 1.43 14.77 115. Clean overalls - ski bibs - Full 1.00 EA 0.00 14.46 1.55 16.01 service 116. Clean jacket - Full service 12.00 EA 0.00 21.34 27.44 283.52 117. Clean uniform - military - Full 6.00 EA 0.00 14.93 9.59 99.17 service 118. Clean bag - Backpack- Full 1.00 EA 0.00 24.90 2.67 27.57 service 119. Clean bag - handbag - Full 3.00 EA 0.00 25.03 8.05 83.14 service 120. Clean vest - Full service 5.00 EA 0.00 7.70 4.13 42.63 121. Clean sweatshirt - Full service 12.00 EA 0.00 8.09 10.40 107.48 122. Clean jacket - heavy weight - Full 2.00 EA 0.00 23.92 5.13 52.97 service 123. Clean hat - fur/leather - Full 1.00 EA 0.00 66.11 7.08 73.19 service Totals: Garment & Soft Goods 398.95 4,358.19 Total: Inventory Import 2,884.44 32,745.19 Line Item Totals: SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 2,884.44 32,745.19 21 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_CONT_0977C 1/12/2026 Page: 21 Summary for Contents Line Item Total 29,860.75 Material Sales Tax 8.56 Cleaning Matl Tax 79.43 Storage Rental Tax 104.79 Subtotal 30,053.53 Service Sales Tax 2,691.66 Replacement Cost Value $32,745.19 Net Claim $32,745.19 Georgia Coppock INVOICE DATE 1/12/2026 INVOICE # 37951 BILL TO: Christopher Skrocki 516 N Fallin Ave Fayetteville, AR 72701 Christopher Skrocki 516 N Fallin Ave Fayetteville, AR 72701 Project 20250977C Claim #Insurance Co. Total Balance Due Sales Tax (9.75%) Payments/Credits Jobs involving multiple phases ((mitigation (initial work to stop further loss, dry, and remove damaged material), mold remediation, general construction (work to restore property to pre-loss condition), and/or contents (moving, cleaning, and storing personal property)) may be invoiced at the completion of each phase. Federal ID Number: 72-1532198 Remit to: 13525 W Hwy 102 - Centerton, AR 72719 Main 479.644.4246 Office 479.795.1300 Fax 479.795.1156 Payment Due Upon Receipt. Invoice Past Due at 30 Days. Lien Notice sent at 45 Days. 5% finance charge may apply to balances not paid within 30 days. A 3.0% surcharge will be added to payments made by credit card. DescriptionAmountItem CONTENTS DIVISION 0.00Division - Co... TAXABLE CLEANING 0.00TCONTXSTMT CLEANING 7,355.30TXM8 - CLN - ... CLEAN APPLIANCES 349.24TXM8 - CAP - ... CLEAN GARMENT & SOFT GOODS 10,268.13TXM8 - CDC - ... CLEAN ELECTRIC ITEMS 222.94TXM8 - CEL - ... CLEAN GENERAL ITEMS 7,931.86TXM8 - CGN -... CLEAN HARD FURNITURE 1,510.97TXM8 - CHF - ... CLEAN LAMPS OR VASES 118.94TXM8 - CLM -... CLEAN CEILING/WALL HANGINGS 84.92TXM8 - CWH -... INVENTORY, PACKING OUT, PACKING IN, HANDLING, STORAGE 0.00CONNTXST... CONTENTS: PACKING/HANDLING/STORAGE 2,018.45XM8 - CPS - ... TAX ADJ - MATERIALS 169.81MTAD -XM8 32,745.19 32,745.19 2,714.63 0.00 1 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 Client:Christopher Skrocki Property:516 N Fallin Ave. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Operator:JEFFT Type of Estimate: Date Entered:12/18/2025 Date Assigned: Price List:ARFA8X_DEC25 Labor Efficiency:Restoration/Service/Remodel Estimate:SKROCKI_0977M 2 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 2 SKROCKI_0977M General DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 1. Emergency service call - after 1.00 EA 0.00 262.92 0.00 262.92 business hours 2. Residential Supervision / Project 3.00 HR 0.00 83.00 0.00 249.00 Management - per hour 3. Asbestos test fee - (per sample)12.00 EA 0.00 89.76 0.00 1,077.12 Per industry standard IICRC S500 (section 8.7) AND OSHA guidelines asbestos samples must be taken on any PACM (presumed asbestos containing materials). 4. Contamination - post test - full 1.00 EA 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 service (Bid Item) Totals: General 0.00 2,689.04 Master Bedroom DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 5. Water extract from hard surf flr -80.00 SF 0.00 1.32 0.00 105.60 Cat 3 wtr - after hours Initial extraction. 6. Content manipulation - master 1.00 EA 0.00 73.78 0.00 73.78 bedroom To manipulate contents for extraction on initial evening. 7. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 150.00 SF 0.00 0.45 7.55 75.05 agent to the surface area - after hrs Anit microbial sprayed on initial evening. 8. Block and pad furniture in room -1.00 EA 0.00 85.22 0.00 85.22 after hours 9. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 300.00 SF 0.00 0.32 11.29 107.29 agent to the surface area To apply anti microbial on day 2 to re-extract. And to spray after necessary removal of affected materials. 10. Water extraction from hard surface 80.00 SF 0.00 0.83 0.00 66.40 floor - Cat 3 water Extraction on day 2. 11. Tear out oversized/multibase - bag 23.00 LF 1.87 0.00 0.00 43.01 for disp. - up to Cat 3 12. Tear out trim and bag for disposal -28.00 LF 1.04 0.00 0.00 29.12 up to Cat 3 13. Clean the surface area 150.00 SF 0.00 0.72 10.69 118.69 3 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 3 CONTINUED - Master Bedroom DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX To clean before necessary removal after double extraction. IICRC Standard S500- 12.4.5 Initial Cleaning, Category 1 Water: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. The drying process can aerosolize soil and particulates present in the environment. As water evaporates from surfaces and materials such as carpet, more particles can aerosolize, creating possible health, safety, comfort, and cleanliness issues. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). Further- IICRC Standard S500- 12.5.3 Controlling Airflow: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, when airflow is directed through interstitial spaces, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). 14. Tear out wet drywall, cleanup, bag,35.00 LF 5.98 0.00 0.00 209.30 per LF - to 2' - Cat 3 15. Tear out and bag wet insulation -48.00 SF 1.19 0.00 0.00 57.12 Category 3 water 16. Tear out non-salv wood floor &78.00 SF 6.11 0.00 0.00 476.58 bag - Category 3 water 17. Add for tear out wd flr glued down 78.00 SF 4.18 0.00 0.00 326.04 over concrete-after hrs 18. Clean with pressure/chemical 150.00 SF 0.00 1.83 26.93 301.43 spray Low pressure wash of affected areas and extraction. 19. HEPA Vacuuming - Detailed -150.00 SF 0.00 0.84 12.29 138.29 PER SF) Totals: Master Bedroom 68.75 2,212.92 Master closet DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 20. Water extract from hard surf flr -52.00 SF 0.00 1.32 0.00 68.64 Cat 3 wtr - after hours Initial extraction. 4 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 4 CONTINUED - Master closet DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX 21. Content manipulation - closet 1.00 EA 0.00 55.39 0.00 55.39 To manipulate contents for extraction on initial evening. 22. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 106.00 SF 0.00 0.45 5.33 53.03 agent to the surface area - after hrs Anit microbial sprayed on initial evening. 23. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 106.00 SF 0.00 0.32 3.99 37.91 agent to the surface area To apply anti microbial on day 2 to re-extract. And to spray after necessary removal of affected materials. 24. Water extraction from hard surface 52.00 SF 0.00 0.83 4.21 47.37 floor - Cat 3 water Extraction on day 2. 25. Tear out oversized/multibase - bag 27.00 LF 1.87 0.00 0.00 50.49 for disp. - up to Cat 3 26. Tear out trim and bag for disposal -14.00 LF 1.04 0.00 0.00 14.56 up to Cat 3 27. Clean the surface area 106.00 SF 0.00 0.72 7.55 83.87 To clean before necessary removal after double extraction. IICRC Standard S500- 12.4.5 Initial Cleaning, Category 1 Water: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. The drying process can aerosolize soil and particulates present in the environment. As water evaporates from surfaces and materials such as carpet, more particles can aerosolize, creating possible health, safety, comfort, and cleanliness issues. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). Further- IICRC Standard S500- 12.5.3 Controlling Airflow: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, when airflow is directed through interstitial spaces, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). 28. Tear out wet drywall, cleanup, bag,27.00 LF 5.98 0.00 0.00 161.46 per LF - to 2' - Cat 3 29. Tear out and bag wet insulation -30.00 SF 1.19 0.00 0.00 35.70 Category 3 water 30. Clean with pressure/chemical 106.00 SF 0.00 1.83 19.02 213.00 spray 5 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 5 CONTINUED - Master closet DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Low pressure wash of affected areas and extraction. 31. HEPA Vacuuming - Detailed -106.00 SF 0.00 0.84 8.68 97.72 PER SF) Totals: Master closet 48.78 919.14 Master Bathroom DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 32. Water extract from hard surf flr -75.00 SF 0.00 1.32 0.00 99.00 Cat 3 wtr - after hours Initial extraction. 33. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 122.00 SF 0.00 0.45 6.13 61.03 agent to the surface area - after hrs Anit microbial sprayed on initial evening. 34. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 122.00 SF 0.00 0.32 4.59 43.63 agent to the surface area To apply anti microbial on day 2 to re-extract. And to spray after necessary removal of affected materials. 35. Water extraction from hard surface 75.00 SF 0.00 0.83 0.00 62.25 floor - Cat 3 water Extraction on day 2. 36. Toilet - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 56.72 0.00 56.72 37. Bathtub - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 128.75 0.00 128.75 38. Remove Shower door 1.00 EA 21.14 0.00 0.00 21.14 39. Tear out oversized/multibase - bag 14.00 LF 1.87 0.00 0.00 26.18 for disp. - up to Cat 3 40. Interior door slab only - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 7.51 0.00 7.51 41. Tear out trim and bag for disposal -12.00 LF 1.04 0.00 0.00 12.48 up to Cat 3 42. Clean the surface area 92.00 SF 0.00 0.72 6.56 72.80 6 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 6 CONTINUED - Master Bathroom DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX To clean before necessary removal after double extraction. IICRC Standard S500- 12.4.5 Initial Cleaning, Category 1 Water: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. The drying process can aerosolize soil and particulates present in the environment. As water evaporates from surfaces and materials such as carpet, more particles can aerosolize, creating possible health, safety, comfort, and cleanliness issues. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). Further- IICRC Standard S500- 12.5.3 Controlling Airflow: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, when airflow is directed through interstitial spaces, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). 43. Countertop - solid surface/granite -5.50 SF 0.00 9.91 0.00 54.51 Detach 44. Sink - single basin - Detach 2.00 EA 0.00 33.73 0.00 67.46 45. Cabinet - vanity unit - remove - cat 5.50 LF 0.00 19.54 0.00 107.47 3 46. Water line copper cap/plug - per 4.00 EA 0.00 24.20 0.00 96.80 cap 47. Tear out wet drywall, cleanup, bag,16.00 LF 8.38 0.00 0.00 134.08 per LF - to 4' - Cat 3 48. Tear out wet drywall, cleanup, bag,17.00 LF 5.98 0.00 0.00 101.66 per LF - to 2' - Cat 3 49. Tear out and bag wet insulation -26.00 SF 1.19 0.00 0.00 30.94 Category 3 water 50. Clean with pressure/chemical 122.00 SF 0.00 1.83 21.90 245.16 spray Low pressure wash of affected areas and extraction. 51. Tear out non-salv. tile & bag -57.00 SF 4.94 0.00 0.00 281.58 Category 3 water 52. HEPA Vacuuming - Detailed -122.00 SF 0.00 0.84 9.99 112.47 PER SF) 53. Tear out non-salv. tile & bag -46.00 SF 4.94 0.00 0.00 227.24 Category 3 water 54. Add for tear out tile thinset down 46.00 SF 2.10 0.00 0.00 96.60 over concrete substrate 7 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 7 CONTINUED - Master Bathroom DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Totals: Master Bathroom 49.17 2,147.46 Toilet Room DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 55. Water extract from hard surf flr -24.00 SF 0.00 1.32 0.00 31.68 Cat 3 wtr - after hours Initial extraction. 56. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 92.00 SF 0.00 0.45 4.63 46.03 agent to the surface area - after hrs Anit microbial sprayed on initial evening. 57. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 92.00 SF 0.00 0.32 3.46 32.90 agent to the surface area To apply anti microbial on day 2 to re-extract. And to spray after necessary removal of affected materials. 58. Water extraction from hard surface 24.00 SF 0.00 0.83 0.00 19.92 floor - Cat 3 water Extraction on day 2. 59. Toilet - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 56.72 0.00 56.72 60. Tear out oversized/multibase - bag 14.00 LF 1.87 0.00 0.00 26.18 for disp. - up to Cat 3 61. Interior door slab only - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 7.51 0.00 7.51 62. Tear out trim and bag for disposal -56.00 LF 1.04 0.00 0.00 58.24 up to Cat 3 63. Clean the surface area 92.00 SF 0.00 0.72 6.56 72.80 8 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 8 CONTINUED - Toilet Room DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX To clean before necessary removal after double extraction. IICRC Standard S500- 12.4.5 Initial Cleaning, Category 1 Water: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. The drying process can aerosolize soil and particulates present in the environment. As water evaporates from surfaces and materials such as carpet, more particles can aerosolize, creating possible health, safety, comfort, and cleanliness issues. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). Further- IICRC Standard S500- 12.5.3 Controlling Airflow: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, when airflow is directed through interstitial spaces, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). 64. Countertop - solid surface/granite -7.00 SF 0.00 9.91 0.00 69.37 Detach 65. Sink - single basin - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 33.73 0.00 33.73 66. Cabinet - vanity unit - remove - cat 2.50 LF 0.00 19.54 0.00 48.85 3 67. Water line copper cap/plug - per 2.00 EA 0.00 24.20 0.00 48.40 cap 68. Tear out wet drywall, cleanup, bag,17.00 LF 8.38 0.00 0.00 142.46 per LF - to 4' - Cat 3 69. Tear out and bag wet insulation -15.00 SF 1.19 0.00 0.00 17.85 Category 3 water 70. Clean with pressure/chemical 92.00 SF 0.00 1.83 16.51 184.87 spray Low pressure wash of affected areas and extraction. 71. HEPA Vacuuming - Detailed -92.00 SF 0.00 0.84 7.53 84.81 PER SF) 72. Tear out non-salv. tile & bag -24.00 SF 4.94 0.00 0.00 118.56 Category 3 water 73. Add for tear out tile thinset down 24.00 SF 2.10 0.00 0.00 50.40 over concrete substrate Totals: Toilet Room 38.69 1,151.28 9 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 9 Living Room/ Kitchen DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 74. Containment 56.00 SF 0.00 1.02 0.00 57.12 Barrier/Airlock/Decon. Chamber 75. Content manipulation - Living 1.00 EA 0.00 221.33 0.00 221.33 room 76. Containment Barrier - tension post 2.00 DA 0.00 3.35 0.00 6.70 per day) 77. Peel & seal zipper - heavy duty 1.00 EA 0.00 16.80 0.00 16.80 78. Water extract from hard surf flr -450.00 SF 0.00 1.32 0.00 594.00 Cat 3 wtr - after hours Initial extraction. 79. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 620.00 SF 0.00 0.45 31.19 310.19 agent to the surface area - after hrs Anit microbial sprayed on initial evening. 80. Block and pad furniture in room -1.00 EA 0.00 85.22 0.00 85.22 after hours 81. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 1,240.00 SF 0.00 0.32 46.64 443.44 agent to the surface area To apply anti microbial on day 2 to re-extract. And to spray after necessary removal of affected materials. 82. Water extraction from hard surface 450.00 SF 0.00 0.83 0.00 373.50 floor - Cat 3 water Extraction on day 2. 83. Tear out oversized/multibase - bag 82.00 LF 1.87 0.00 0.00 153.34 for disp. - up to Cat 3 84. Tear out trim and bag for disposal -56.00 LF 1.04 0.00 0.00 58.24 up to Cat 3 85. Clean the surface area 620.00 SF 0.00 0.72 44.18 490.58 10 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 10 CONTINUED - Living Room/ Kitchen DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX To clean before necessary removal after double extraction. IICRC Standard S500- 12.4.5 Initial Cleaning, Category 1 Water: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. The drying process can aerosolize soil and particulates present in the environment. As water evaporates from surfaces and materials such as carpet, more particles can aerosolize, creating possible health, safety, comfort, and cleanliness issues. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). Further- IICRC Standard S500- 12.5.3 Controlling Airflow: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, when airflow is directed through interstitial spaces, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). 86. Range - freestanding - electric -1.00 EA 0.00 24.37 0.00 24.37 Detach 87. Tear out non-salv. tile & bag -16.00 SF 4.94 0.00 0.00 79.04 Category 3 water For affected tile removed around the fireplace. 88. Dishwasher - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 63.18 0.00 63.18 89. Sink - double basin - Detach 1.00 EA 0.00 36.03 0.00 36.03 90. Remove P-trap assembly - ABS 2.00 EA 10.46 0.00 0.00 20.92 plastic) 91. Remove Garbage disposal /1.00 EA 28.82 0.00 0.00 28.82 disposer 92. Countertop - solid surface/granite -18.00 SF 0.00 9.91 0.00 178.38 Detach 93. Cabinet - lower (base) unit -8.00 LF 0.00 26.85 0.00 214.80 Detach - Cat 3 94. Water line copper cap/plug - per 2.00 EA 0.00 24.20 0.00 48.40 cap 95. Tear out wet drywall, cleanup, bag,85.00 LF 5.98 0.00 0.00 508.30 per LF - to 2' - Cat 3 96. Tear out and bag wet insulation -42.00 SF 1.19 0.00 0.00 49.98 Category 3 water 97. Tear out non-salv wood floor &476.00 SF 6.11 0.00 0.00 2,908.36 bag - Category 3 water 11 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 11 CONTINUED - Living Room/ Kitchen DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX 98. Add for tear out wd flr glued down 476.00 SF 4.18 0.00 0.00 1,989.68 over concrete-after hrs 99. Clean with pressure/chemical 620.00 SF 0.00 1.83 111.28 1,245.88 spray Low pressure wash of affected areas and extraction. 100. HEPA Vacuuming - Detailed -620.00 SF 0.00 0.84 50.78 571.58 PER SF) Totals: Living Room/ Kitchen 284.07 10,778.18 Closet under the stairs DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 101. Water extract from hard surf flr -21.00 SF 0.00 1.32 0.00 27.72 Cat 3 wtr - after hours Initial extraction. 102. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 55.00 SF 0.00 0.45 2.76 27.51 agent to the surface area - after hrs Anit microbial sprayed on initial evening. 103. Apply plant-based anti-microbial 110.00 SF 0.00 0.32 4.13 39.33 agent to the surface area To apply anti microbial on day 2 to re-extract. And to spray after necessary removal of affected materials. 104. Water extraction from hard 21.00 SF 0.00 0.83 0.00 17.43 surface floor - Cat 3 water Extraction on day 2. 105. Tear out oversized/multibase -15.00 LF 1.87 0.00 0.00 28.05 bag for disp. - up to Cat 3 106. Tear out trim and bag for disposal 14.00 LF 1.04 0.00 0.00 14.56 up to Cat 3 107. Clean the surface area 55.00 SF 0.00 0.72 3.92 43.52 12 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 12 CONTINUED - Closet under the stairs DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX To clean before necessary removal after double extraction. IICRC Standard S500- 12.4.5 Initial Cleaning, Category 1 Water: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. The drying process can aerosolize soil and particulates present in the environment. As water evaporates from surfaces and materials such as carpet, more particles can aerosolize, creating possible health, safety, comfort, and cleanliness issues. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). Further- IICRC Standard S500- 12.5.3 Controlling Airflow: Prior to implementing the restorative drying effort (e.g., rapid air movement), restorers should evaluate then clean materials within the work area as needed. Where necessary, restorers should clean visible debris, dust, and soil from materials and surfaces to reduce the amount of soil or particulates that can become aerosolized. Restorers should employ cleaning methods that minimize aerosolizing particulates. Where cleaning cannot sufficiently remove soil or particulates, when airflow is directed through interstitial spaces, or there are high-risk occupants, it is recommended restorers install one or more air filtration devices (AFDs). 108. Tear out wet drywall, cleanup,17.00 LF 5.98 0.00 0.00 101.66 bag, per LF - to 2' - Cat 3 109. Tear out non-salv wood floor &12.00 SF 6.11 0.00 0.00 73.32 bag - Category 3 water 110. Add for tear out wd flr glued 12.00 SF 4.18 0.00 0.00 50.16 down over concrete-after hrs 111. Clean with pressure/chemical 55.00 SF 0.00 1.83 9.87 110.52 spray Low pressure wash of affected areas and extraction. 112. HEPA Vacuuming - Detailed -55.00 SF 0.00 0.77 4.13 46.48 PER SF) Totals: Closet under the stairs 24.81 580.26 Restoration Equipment DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 113. Air filtration device (24 hr period)34.00 DA 0.00 80.00 0.00 2,720.00 No monit. Price does not include filter. 114. Air mover (per 24 hour period) -104.00 EA 0.00 33.00 0.00 3,432.00 No monitoring 13 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 13 CONTINUED - Restoration Equipment DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTALTAX Includes: Equipment cost for a standard drying fan. Based on 24 hours of "run time" on the job-site. Excludes: Set-up, take down, and monitoring. Use WTREQ for set-up, take down, and/or monitoring, if needed. Quality: Standard drying fan, typically greater than 850 actual CFM. Note: Due to ever improving technology and efficiency of equipment, and as the actual type (brand/model/specs) of equipment used varies, CFM may not always be the best indicator. The price for this line item is therefore based on the reported cost for the most predominantly used standard drying fans in this area. No life expectancy data 115. Dehumidifier (per 24 hr period) -22.00 EA 0.00 95.00 0.00 2,090.00 70-109 ppd - No monitor. Includes: Hourly labor to travel to job-site to deliver, setup, inspect, move and adjust, monitor, take moisture readings, etc. and/or take down & remove dryers and dehumidifiers. Excludes: Equipment charges. No life expectancy data Price does not include filter. 116. Dehumidifier (per 24 hr period)-22.00 EA 0.00 123.00 0.00 2,706.00 110-159 ppd - No monitor. Includes: Equipment cost for a dehumidifier unit. Based on 24 hours of "run time" on the job-site. Excludes: Set-up, take down, and monitoring. Use WTREQ for set-up, take down, and/or monitoring, if needed. Quality: Dehumidifier with an AHAM certified rating of 110 to 159 pints per day. Note: Due to ever improving technology and efficiency of equipment, and as the actual type (brand/model/specs) of equipment used varies among service providers and areas of the country, no specific equipment is referenced within this line item. The price for this line item is therefore based on the reported cost for the most predominantly used "high capacity" dehumidifier in this area. No life expectancy data Price does not include filter. 117. Equip. setup, take down &4.00 HR 0.00 94.90 0.00 379.60 monitoring - after hrs 1 hr for set up of stabilization and 1 hr of monitoring on the original evening. 2 hrs over the weekend of monitoring. 118. Equipment setup, take down, and 12.00 HR 0.00 63.20 0.00 758.40 monitoring (hourly charge) 10 hours of monitoring while drying. 2 hours for equipment take down. 119. Equipment decontamination 20.00 EA 0.00 59.46 0.00 1,189.20 charge - HVY, per piece of equip To decontaminate the drying equipment after drying. 120. Water Extraction & Remediation 12.00 HR 0.00 63.20 0.00 758.40 Technician - per hour 2 techs for 4 hours to decontaminate & clean hoses, wands, truck mount, and portables. Totals: Restoration Equipment 0.00 14,033.60 14 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 14 Consumables DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 121. Add for HEPA filter (for negative 2.00 EA 0.00 210.80 41.11 462.71 air exhaust fan) 122. Filter (Pre-filter for air filtration 2.00 EA 0.00 8.74 3.57 21.05 device) New filters for air filtration device(s). 123. Filter (dehumidifier)5.00 EA 0.00 11.86 12.13 71.43 New filters for dehumidifier(s). 124. Add for personal protective 9.00 EA 0.00 21.43 10.66 203.53 equipment - per person per suit up 3 techs, 1 set of PPE the original evening response, 3 techs, 2 sets of PPE (before lunch and after lunch) on day 2. Includes up to protective: suits, masks, filters and gloves. 125. Add for HEPA filter (for 1.00 EA 0.00 92.19 7.56 99.75 canister/backpack vacuums) 126. Ducting - lay-flat 10.00 LF 0.00 0.51 1.05 6.15 Totals: Consumables 76.08 864.62 Debris Removal DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 127. Dumpster trailer load - Approx.1.00 EA 474.80 0.00 46.29 521.09 12 yards, 1-3 tons of debris 1.66 tons of debris dumped. 128. Haul debris - per pickup truck 1.00 EA 163.28 0.00 0.00 163.28 load - including dump fees Totals: Debris Removal 46.29 684.37 Labor Minimums Applied DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 129. Plumbing labor minimum 1.00 EA 0.00 50.75 0.00 50.75 130. Mirror/shower door labor 1.00 EA 0.00 129.49 0.00 129.49 minimum Totals: Labor Minimums Applied 0.00 180.24 Line Item Totals: SKROCKI_0977M 636.64 36,241.11 15 NWA Restore It Inc 13525 W. Highway 102 Centerton, AR 72719 Office: 479-795-1300 Fax: 479-795-1156 Tax-ID-- 72-1532198 SKROCKI_0977M 12/30/2025 Page: 15 Summary Line Item Total 35,604.47 Material Sales Tax 59.33 Cleaning Matl Tax 28.39 Subtotal 35,692.19 Service Sales Tax 548.92 Replacement Cost Value $36,241.11 Net Claim $36,241.11 FOREMOST GROup Drcc•ntt-K•r Is. _u:5 Cl iltl�n)PHER �hRtx KI 516 N PALLIN AVF PA"'ErrVVn.LE AR t+.a nr. ism u?. yto t<+r.rl! wrNtrwdt(4w.wr+rune� ►flow. IM %Mb paw rbww • oe a" mer. ") Q-$ww w cawrr pU HwrJ4*"1 f oar%oww rw% I'M 14 tt40"4 .lserrr It r-r RE: Ituumd: Christopher Skmckl (]aim Number: 50.10242207-1-1 PAICT Number: 5017751 WZ LAM Date: 12AW2025 Lot ocron of Doss: 516 N Fallen Avc. f'ayeetcvdk. AR .SubK" Sttticmcnt Notice Dear CHRIS-TOPHER SKR(X:KI: Thmik rou for betng a vAued customer. VCc•Il asuc )our clam payment(%) through the mcchm you select to rWctvc your fund►. Our lettletrtetet lonmkdow-n i-f n(he-lsrm rclarClf lnformalnrn fan be fuutxl on the sncllscicd Addlt'"t"I lntc,rmateoo pan The amt„u,r vuu: lc»s chat c%tcedcd the luau wits etsnugh to cover the entlte deductible iniount. Qr etxuurage you to volt orvnio t.cl,m to learn mots about our self-service opta>ns A%'.UI lIIlr 911 you tncitdenf; the abtluy to svcw yout clam status, upl,jad d<xuments and photon and find (1x A serti•lt c hni%i dcr-, If you hair art)• 4urstu►tls. pkew contact nx. Thank you. Ashlec (hnclas bpc.t W field (Istns Rcptrscntiuve W405) 782-6221 Fotrttsost Ittsuraruc (;UMp+ny (;uml PAP11.1s, MKIUI;AU tomrd communuatawn are Ixrfcttca) alld sls+'uld he Knt w m�cla4n((X flmmwt.cwn. if hard .ti�Ewes of ccxnmunicatiotu AM roylwt:d, they %lUNid Ix w", al out Noloxwl llwxcunrnt (Rntet at P.U. Bait 2W)94, ()klah.}u1+ City. UK T 3126-899.1. Paya'Mit Rt•fetetKc Nunllwf(s): 1M4..JS74(M Etx bsurc(s): Estimatcilnvui(c - Aths l ional Information pavrOCn SUrpnia..a+ 'The following f kI& of tnfvrmrtton outlines your claim settlement. Line of Coverage I Water Backup less: hv1Ky lh�lucnhlc S2St)o ApphiAblc A,ln�• Li mit SIOMMAX) Am xint Slimi T-55 ntctll{�trtt��rtmati,�O; Act", ash value is based on replacement cost less any applicable deprecation for age. useful Itfe and cnndurR Labot. taxes and other tees and expenses have Also been depreciated if not prohibited by your state. To rec:,-,T &Tgx_,:iatmn. please send us A copy of any invoices or receipts that demonstrate replacement or repairs. Dee believe out estimate reflects the reasonable cost necessary to repair or replace the covered damages New lcr %aww- imtnedtately if you disagree. We'll reimburse you for the full replacement cost re")nAliiy paid to mp, trpbce tiro c(,vctcd damages or any Applicable policy limits. A" dedvcttble amount wdl lac applied according to policy provisions. ls» tNtre rxi cb«'ta• Ttic auaclTrcd acts catWKWdeb All km Payees as your policy reyuires. S�riori rsuit: UC intend to pursue reimbursement of amounts we paid, including your dcductiblc. if Applicable. from rhr respuniihk party who caused or contnbuted to tilts loss. if we receive pAyment, we will reunburstr sour dedwrsMe. if one w•as applied. according to your state's law. U;r ftwrve all rights and defenses under the policy Abel law And to activity on our pAtt six,uld be-00"I'l u a tratvvr Even though Only parts Of the policy may lac mentioned ur yuocctl act this Irtcct. ajjaR al F"rtiuns d ftnirid to be relevant will he applied. Please Wtc tlictc ate tune lunits act forth iri the ConduKons ("LAWsum A$ainsc 1;8-act "Legal :1:cwa A1;Ainst Us' Or "Sui( Anaiast Us`) ties thin of the lxihe y which. depending on your sate, a,Av Atki -t the cinie wittun which you cusy pucbug yr,ur <laun. i?in lac riiii) niay Is.ve liens eaterxkd by uaeuec .r .+se law. 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 Ordinance: 6725 File Number: 2024-1790 ORDINANCE TO AMEND §39.10 WATER AND WASTEWATER DAMAGE CLAIMS (AMENDMENT): AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND §39.10 WATER AND WASTEWATER DAMAGE CLAIMS AND §39.11 DAMAGE CLAIMS OTHER THAN WATER AND WASTEWATER DAMAGE CLAIMS OF THE FAYETTEVILLE CODE TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CAN AWARD WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville is authorized to pay reasonable claims of citizens damaged by water and sewer infrastructure problems and uninsured city vehicles, equipment, infrastructure and personnel even though statutory sovereign immunity protects our taxpayers for such unintentional, actions even if negligent; and WHEREAS, a dozen years have passed since these code sections were enacted by the City Council and recent inflationary pressures necessitate an increase in the City Council's authority to grant reasonable compensation for appropriate claims. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends § 39.10 and § 39.11 of the Fayetteville Code to increase the City Council's authority to grant reasonable compensation to citizens whose property have been damaged by City infrastructure or personnel by repealing the current § 39.10 and § 39.11 and by enacting new § 39.10 and § 39.11 as shown on Exhibit A attached to this ordinance to more properly compensate a person whose property has been damaged. PASSED and APPROVED on March 19, 2024 Approve Attest: JI oneld Jorda yor Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasurer =: FAYET TEVILLi ; aT$ dnThispublicationwaspaidforbytheCityClerk -Treasurer of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. Amount Pai Page 1 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1392 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Tim Nyander, Utilities Director SUBJECT: Extension of Sewer Service at 2825 N. Hughmount Rd. in Washington County RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approval of sewer service for a single-family home located at 2825 N. Hughmount Road in Washington County. BACKGROUND: Sewer service for an existing single-family home in Washington County with a failing septic tank system has been requested at 2825 N. Hughmount Road. A sewer service line across N Hughmount Road would be required to service this property. DISCUSSION: Per City of Fayetteville Code §51.113(C), City Council approval is necessary for any sewer connections outside the corporate city limits of Fayetteville, Farmington, Greenland, or Johnson. Addition of this sewer connection will not negatively impact system capacities in the vicinity. Additionally, this residence is surrounded on three sides by the Fayetteville city limits, and annexation is a condition of this sewer service connection. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: No impacts. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. 2825 N Hughmount Location Map, 5. Hughmount Septic System Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1392 A RESOLUTION TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION OF THE CITY’S SEWERAGE SYSTEM BEYOND THE CITY LIMITS TO 2825 NORTH HUGHMOUNT ROAD, UNDER THE SAME CONDITIONS AS A CITIZEN OF FAYETTEVILLE COULD RECEIVE SUCH SEWER SERVICES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, §51.113 Sewer Service and Extension Policy states that “the city’s sewerage system shall not be extended outside the city’s corporate limits except on the express approval of the City Council,” and; WHEREAS, the rare approvals of such extension of sewer availability into unincorporated County property has always required the property owner to annex into the City of Fayetteville as soon as legally possible (when the property adjoins the City); and WHEREAS, to assist this property owner whose property already adjoins the city limits and whose septic system is failing, the Water and Wastewater Department recommends that the City Council approve this extension for a single home immediately, but on condition that the property owner immediately begins the annexation process and completes the annexation as soon as possible. A failure to fulfill these conditions authorizes the Water and Wastewater Department to remove any tap connection) to our sewage system until annexation is accomplished. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves the extension of sewage service to 2825 North Hughmount Road immediately, but on the condition that the property owner immediately begins the annexation into Fayetteville process and satisfactory completes this annexation as soon as reasonably possible with a failure to comply with these conditions empowers the Water and Wastewater Department to remove this tap (connection) until the annexation is accomplished. City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1392 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item Tim Nyander 4/16/2026 WATER SEWER (720) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council approval of sewer service for a single-family home located at 2825 N. Hughmount Road in Washington County. Budget Impact: N/A N/A Account Number Fund N/A N/A Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item?No Total Amended Budget $- Expenses (Actual+Encum)$- Available Budget $- Does item have a direct cost?No Item Cost $- Is a Budget Amendment attached?No Budget Amendment $- Remaining Budget $- Purchase Order Number:Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Change Order Number:Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Comments: 2825 N Hughmount Location . ig and Heating, Inc. ingandheating.com Carley Road ES ile, AR 72762 PLUMBING s 339 Fax: 4794724 080 HEATING 1 m ing a?gmail.com Michael and Nancy MacDonald 2825 N. Hughmount Rd. Fayetteville, AR 72704 Date: March 2, 2026 To Whom It May Concern: �,a �I�a col 6a83 PI�$x I am writing to document the condition of the existing septic system at the above property and to provide a professional recommendation regarding its future use. Our company has inspected, serviced, and evaluated this system in February 2026, and the findings consistently indicate that the septic system is failing and no longer functioning in a safe or sustainable manner. uring our ini Dtial service call on February 2, 2026, we investigated repeated backups affecting the kitchen, laundry, and half -bath fixtures. While the internal ABS main line was clear, the drainage symptoms were consistent with downstream restriction. On February 16, 2026, we excavated and opened the septic tank and distribution components to assess the cause of the recurring backups. At that time, we found: • The septic tank was completely full. • The outlet baffle was inaccessible until the tank lid was cut open with a hot saw. • The distribution box (D-box) was full and non-functional. • The leach lines were saturated and not accepting effluent. After pumping the tank and D-box to expose the components, it became clear that the leach field has failed. The system is no longer dispersing wastewater into the soil as designed, causing sewage to back up into the home. The customer was referred to a septic specialist, who confirmed the severity of the failure. Based on these findings, the septic system is structurally compromised, hydraulically failed, and would require extensive and costly reconstruction to restore even minimal function. Continued use in its current condition poses ongoing health, safety, and property -damage risks. Given the age of the system, the condition of the tank and leach field, and the repeated failures documented across multiple service visits, the most reliable and cost-effective long-term solution is to abandon and properly dispose of the existing septic system and connect the property to the municipal sewer system. This option eliminates the need for ongoing septic repairs, prevents future backups into the home, and ensures compliance with modern wastewater standards. Please feel free to contact us with any further questions. Sincerely, Mayes Plumbing &Heating LLC Licensed Plumbing Contractor Springdale, Arkansas Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1311 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff Chris Brown, Public Works Director FROM: Alan Pugh, Stormwater Manager SUBJECT: Approving the purchase of the property at 2400 W Valley Drive for the purchase price of $225,000 due to ongoing flooding of Hamestring Creek and to remove the structure from the floodway, approval of a $7,500 contingency to cover all closing costs and authorizing the mayor to sign all closing documents. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend purchasing the property at 2400 W Valley Drive for the purchase price of $225,000 due to ongoing flooding of Hamestring Creek and to remove the structure from the floodway, approval of a $7,500 contingency to cover all closing costs and authorizing the mayor to sign all closing documents. BACKGROUND: Due to continued flooding and in response to the May 2017 flood event, the City Council approved a contract with FTN Associates in May of 2020 to research potential solutions to the flooding in the Hamestring Creek repetitive loss area (RLA). This study looked at several options including upstream detention and channel improvements to determine if the flooding could be alleviated. This study ultimately did not yield any feasible results. Resolution 44-25 authorized staff to enter into an agreement with Olsson to study another option for reduction in flooding along W Valley Dr and draft a grant application to purchase properties should that option not yield acceptable results. Results from study indicated that flooding could be reduced enough to potentially avoid the purchase of a few of the properties, however others still would continue to flood. Staff then submitted a grant application to the Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Division for a Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant to purchase properties within the RLA. One of these properties was located at 2400 W Valley Drive. The home currently experiences water in the crawl space, property damage during flooding and is located within the floodway. DISCUSSION: After the grant submission, the property located at 2400 W Valley Drive was listed for sale. At that time the City placed an offer to purchase the property, contingent on an appraisal and on City Council approval, to remove the structure from the floodway and eliminate future flood losses. The City is also studying the potential to create floodplain storage at this location and return the area to a natural floodplain. While this small area may not show a measurable decrease in the flood elevations, this may be combined with future projects to help alleviate flooding in the area. The property is listed for sale for $225,000 and while the City’s appraisal was slightly below that figure at $217,000, the owner indicated that they had other full price offers which would support the value of $225,000. Staff is recommending purchasing the property for $225,000. Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funding would be from the 2022 Drainage Bonds which allow for the purchase of floodplain properties. ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. 2400 Valley Dr Appraisal, 5. Accepted Offer Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1311 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2400 WEST VALLEY DRIVE IN THE AMOUNT OF $225,000.00, TO APPROVE A CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,500.00, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN ALL CLOSING DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, due to continued flooding and in response to the May 2017 flood event, the City Council approved a contract with FTN Associates to research potential solutions to the flooding in the Hamestring Creek repetitive loss area that did not yield any feasible results; and WHEREAS, on February 4, 2025, City Council passed Resolution 44-25 authorizing an agreement with Olsson to study another option for reduction in flooding along West Valley Drive and draft a grant application to purchase properties should that option not yield acceptable results; and WHEREAS, results from the study indicated that flooding could be reduced enough to potentially avoid the purchase of a few of the properties, though others would continue to flood; and WHEREAS, staff then submitted a grant application to the Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Division for a Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant to purchase properties within the repetitive loss area with the intent to remove the structures; and WHEREAS, after the grant submission, the property located at 2400 West Valley Drive was listed for sale and the City submitted an offer to purchase the property, contingent on an appraisal and on City Council approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves the purchase of the property located at 2400 West Valley Drive in the amount of $225,000.00 for the purpose of removing a repetitive loss structure, approves a contingency in the amount of $7,500.00, and further authorizes Mayor Rawn to sign all closing documents. Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Approval Date: Original Contract Number: 46040.7405 Project Number Budget Impact: Drainage Projects-Floodplain Buyout Fund LandAcquisition4704.860.7405-5805.00 Account Number Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1311 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only Approving the purchase of the property at 2400 W Valley Drive due to ongoing flooding of Hamstring Creek and to remove the structure from the floodway, approval of a $7,500 contingency to cover all closing costs and authorizing the mayor to sign all closing documents. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Chris Brown STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (740) Division / Department 4/9/2026 Submitted Date Yes 232,500.00$ 232,500.00$ Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Amendment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Amendment Remaining Budget 232,500.00$ Yes No -$ APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville, AR 72703 Lot 21, ST Russell Subdivision City of Fayetteville 113 W Mountain St Fayetteville, AR 72701 217,000 03/23/2026 Chris Hamaker Boston Mountain Real Estate PO Box 722 Fayetteville, AR 72702-0722 479) 251-8600 appraisal@cox-internet.com Form GA1V - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE LOCATED AT FOR OPINION OF VALUE AS OF BY 260305 N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville A reasonable exposure time for the subject property at the market value stated is between 0 and 3 months. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. Unless otherwise indicated, I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or the parties involved with this assignment. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were in effect at the time this report was prepared. Unless otherwise indicated, I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. Unless otherwise indicated, no one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this certification (if there are exceptions, the name of each individual providing significant real property appraisal assistance is stated elsewhere in this report). Chris Hamaker 03/24/2026 CR2256 AR 06/30/2026 03/23/2026 Form ID14AP - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE File No. Borrower Property Address City County State Zip Code Lender This report was prepared in accordance with USPAP Standards Rule 2-2(a). This report was prepared in accordance with USPAP Standards Rule 2-2(b). My opinion of a reasonable exposure time for the subject property at the market value stated in this report is: I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: I have NOT performed services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. I HAVE performed services, as an appraiser or in another capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. Those services are described in the comments below. APPRAISER: Signature: Name: Date Signed: State Certification #: or State License #: State: Expiration Date of Certification or License: Effective Date of Appraisal: SUPERVISORY APPRAISER: (only if required) Signature: Name: Date Signed: State Certification #: or State License #: State: Expiration Date of Certification or License: Supervisory Appraiser Inspection of Subject Property: Did Not Exterior-only from Street Interior and Exterior Boston Mountain Real Estate 260305RESIDENTIALAPPRAISALSUMMARYREPORT 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville AR 72703 Washington Lot 21, ST Russell Subdivision 765-11077-000 2025 1,555 .00 N/ A TCSE, LLC W Fayetteville 22220 0106.02 Floodplain Buyout City of Fayetteville City of Fayetteville 113 W Mountain St, Fayetteville, AR 72701 Chris Hamaker PO Box 722, Fayetteville, AR 72702-0722 100 3,000 500 0 175 25 60 10 10 10 Vac/ Public 10 The subject neighborhood is roughly defined by E Joyce Blvd to the north; N Rupple Rd to the west; MLK Blvd to the south; and College Ave to the west.The subject is in a growing to stable residential neighborhood consisting of mostly single family homes, apartment complexes, and 2-4 family buildings. The subject neighborhood is near employment centers, public services, entertainment facilities, schools, hospitals, parks, and recreational facilities. The unemployment rate in northwest Arkansas is around 3.5% which is below national and state averages. OTHER=AGR. Market conditions have been average to good in northwest Arkansas and most areas have declined between 2008 and 2010. There were signs of stabilization in some sub-markets and some areas saw an increase in values during most of 2012. 2013-2025 saw steady sales, which have continued into 2026. The area is still experiencing growth and reasonable interest rates. 97' x 169'16,393 sf RSF-4 Residential Single Family Single Family Residential Single Family Residential The highest and best use is for single family residential. SWEPCO Black Hills Fayetteville Fayetteville Fayetteville Asphalt Concrete Concrete Wood Pole None Generally Level Typical for area Rectangular Appears Adequate Residential AE 05143C0204G 01/25/2024 The subject property is in flood zone AE. A professional survey is recommended (not required) to determine the exact location of the subject within the flood zone. The subject property is also affected by Streamside Protection Ordinance. Please city documents for additional information. 1 1 Ranch/ Avg 59 30 Con Block HB Composition/ Avg None Double Pane/ Avg Yes/ Avg None Yes None None Noted None Noted 0 0 FWA N. Gas X CP;V;HW/ Fair-Avg DW/ Fair-Avg Wood/ Average Vinyl/ Fair-Avg Fiberglass/ Average Hollow Core/ Average 0 None Cov Concrete CvCn None None 2 1 1 Concrete 5 2 1.5 1,093 The subject has typical amenities for the area. Improvements are of average quality and in fair to average condition. No repairs are needed at this time. Form GPRES2 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE File No.: SU B J E C T Property Address:City:State:Zip Code: County:Legal Description: Assessor's Parcel #: Tax Year:R.E. Taxes: $Special Assessments: $Borrower (if applicable): Current Owner of Record:Occupant:Owner Tenant Vacant Manufactured Housing Project Type:PUD Condominium Cooperative Other (describe)HOA: $per year per month Market Area Name:Map Reference:Census Tract: AS S I G N M E N T The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of:Market Value (as defined), or other type of value (describe) This report reflects the following value (if not Current, see comments):Current (the Inspection Date is the Effective Date)Retrospective Prospective Approaches developed for this appraisal:Sales Comparison Approach Cost Approach Income Approach (See Reconciliation Comments and Scope of Work) Property Rights Appraised:Fee Simple Leasehold Leased Fee Other (describe) Intended Use: Intended User(s) (by name or type): Client:Address: Appraiser:Address: MA R K E T A R E A D E S C R I P T I O N Location:Urban Suburban Rural Built up:Over 75%25-75%Under 25% Growth rate:Rapid Stable Slow Property values:Increasing Stable Declining Demand/supply:Shortage In Balance Over Supply Marketing time:Under 3 Mos.3-6 Mos.Over 6 Mos. PredominantOccupancy Owner Tenant Vacant (0-5%) Vacant (>5%) One-Unit Housing PRICE 000) Low High Pred AGE yrs) Present Land Use One-Unit % 2-4 Unit % Multi-Unit % Comm'l % Change in Land Use Not Likely Likely *In Process * To: Market Area Boundaries, Description, and Market Conditions (including support for the above characteristics and trends): SI T E D E S C R I P T I O N Dimensions:Site Area: Zoning Classification:Description: Zoning Compliance:Legal Legal nonconforming (grandfathered)Illegal No zoning Are CC&Rs applicable?Yes No Unknown Have the documents been reviewed?Yes No Ground Rent (if applicable)$/ Highest & Best Use as improved:Present use, or Other use (explain) Actual Use as of Effective Date:Use as appraised in this report: Summary of Highest & Best Use: Utilities Public Other Provider/Description Off-site Improvements Type Public Private Electricity Gas Water Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Street Curb/Gutter Sidewalk Street Lights Alley Topography Size Shape Drainage View Other site elements:Inside Lot Corner Lot Cul de Sac Underground Utilities Other (describe) FEMA Spec'l Flood Hazard Area Yes No FEMA Flood Zone FEMA Map #FEMA Map Date Site Comments: DE S C R I P T I O N O F T H E I M P R O V E M E N T S General Description of Units Acc.Unit of Stories Type Det.Att. Design (Style) Existing Proposed Und.Cons. Actual Age (Yrs.) Effective Age (Yrs.) Exterior Description Foundation Exterior Walls Roof Surface Gutters & Dwnspts. Window Type Storm/Screens Foundation Slab Crawl Space Basement Sump Pump Dampness Settlement Infestation Basement None Area Sq. Ft. Finished Ceiling Walls Floor Outside Entry Heating Type Fuel Cooling Central Other Interior Description Floors Walls Trim/Finish Bath Floor Bath Wainscot Doors Appliances Refrigerator Range/Oven Disposal Dishwasher Fan/Hood Microwave Washer/Dryer Attic None Stairs Drop Stair Scuttle Doorway Floor Heated Finished Amenities Fireplace(s) # Patio Deck Porch Fence Pool Woodstove(s) # Car Storage None Garage # of cars (Tot.) Attach. Detach. Blt.-In Carport Driveway Surface Finished area above grade contains:Rooms Bedrooms Bath(s)Square Feet of Gross Living Area Above Grade Additional features: Describe the condition of the property (including physical, functional and external obsolescence): Copyright© 2007 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified without written permission, however, a la mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited. 3/2007 260305RESIDENTIALAPPRAISALSUMMARYREPORT Co Assessor & MLS N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville, AR 72703 N/ A Property Inspection N/ A N/ A N/ A Fee Simple Suburban/ Avg 16,393 sf Residential/ Avg Ranch/ Avg Average 59 Fair to Average 5 2 1.5 1,093 N/ A N/ A Average CH/ A Average 1 Car Carport Covered Porch Flood Zone Yes 2227 W Hatfield St Fayetteville, AR 72703 0.16 miles E 224,000 198.58 ML#1309096;DOM 58 County Assessor Not Disclosed Not Disclosed 09/09/2025 Fee Simple Suburban/ Avg 17,424 sf 0 Residential/ Avg Ranch/ Avg Average 59 Average -10,000 6 4 1.0 +3,000 1,128 N/ A N/ A Average CH/ A Average Garage Storage 0 Porch/ Patio 0 Yes 7,000 217,000 1119 S Ellis Ave Fayetteville, AR 72701 2.31 miles SE 200,000 203.25 ML#1317108;DOM 3 County Assessor Not Disclosed Not Disclosed 09/18/2025 Fee Simple Suburban/ Avg 12,632 sf 0 Residential/ Avg Ranch/ Avg Average 65 0 Fair to Average 5 3 1.0 +3,000 984 +8,175 N/ A N/ A Average CH/ A Average 1 Car Garage -4,000 Porch/ Patio 0 Yes 7,175 207,175 1224 N Turner Ave Fayetteville, AR 72703 0.34 miles E 255,000 249.76 ML#1321877;DOM 1 County Assessor Not Disclosed Not Disclosed 10/09/2025 Fee Simple Suburban/ Avg 12,632 sf 0 Residential/ Avg Ranch/ Avg Average 63 0 Fair to Average 6 3 1.0 +3,000 1,021 +5,400 N/ A N/ A Average CH/ A Average 1 Car Garage -4,000 Porch/ Patio 0 No -20,000 15,600 239,400 The sales utilized in this report were based upon their location, age, dwelling size, condition, and market appeal. The sales were researched and verified through county assessor records and the Northwest Arkansas multi-list service. Other sales were researched; however, these are considered to be the most instructive as of the date of the appraisal. The subject is compatible with homes located in the defined neighborhood. The sales have been weighted on their similarity and percentage adjustments. The subject is inferior in number of bedrooms but superior in number of bathrooms. The location of the subject in the flood plain is inferior to similar homes not in the floodplain. This adverse site condition can vary from year to year based upon perceived flooding, flood insurance rates, and governmental development restrictions. 217,000 Form GPRES2 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE File No.: TR A N S F E R H I S T O R Y My research did did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the subject property for the three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal. Data Source(s): 1st Prior Subject Sale/Transfer Date: Price: Source(s): 2nd Prior Subject Sale/Transfer Date: Price: Source(s): Analysis of sale/transfer history and/or any current agreement of sale/listing: SA L E S C O M P A R I S O N A P P R O A C H SALES COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE (if developed)The Sales Comparison Approach was not developed for this appraisal. FEATURE SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE # 1 COMPARABLE SALE # 2 COMPARABLE SALE # 3 Address Proximity to Subject Sale Price $$$$ Sale Price/GLA $/sq.ft.$/sq.ft.$/sq.ft.$/sq.ft. Data Source(s) Verification Source(s) VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION +(-) $ Adjust.DESCRIPTION +(-) $ Adjust.DESCRIPTION +(-) $ Adjust. Sales or Financing Concessions Date of Sale/Time Rights Appraised Location Site View Design (Style) Quality of Construction Age Condition Above Grade Total Bdrms Baths Total Bdrms Baths Total Bdrms Baths Total Bdrms Baths Room Count Gross Living Area sq.ft.sq.ft.sq.ft.sq.ft. Basement & Finished Rooms Below Grade Functional Utility Heating/Cooling Energy Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Net Adjustment (Total)+-+-+-$$$ Adjusted Sale Price of Comparables $$$ Summary of Sales Comparison Approach Indicated Value by Sales Comparison Approach $ Copyright© 2007 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified without written permission, however, a la mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited. 3/2007 260305RESIDENTIALAPPRAISALSUMMARYREPORT Land sales in the area were researched through the Northwest Arkansas MLS. Zoning, geography, and land size were all taken into account and an opinion for estimated site value was found. N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A Physical depreciation is calculated using the effective age/ economic life method based on a sixty year scale. N/ A N/ A 217,000 The income approach was not utilized since the subject property is located in an area of mostly owner occupied single family homes. The sales comparison approach has been given all of the weight since the cost approach was not necessary due to good market information. The subject property value could easily range from $215,000 to $225,000 depending on mortgage and insurance rates. 217,000 03/23/2026 23 Scope of Work Limiting Cond./Certifications Narrative Addendum Photograph Addenda Sketch Addendum Map Addenda Additional Sales Cost Addendum Flood Addendum Manuf. House Addendum Hypothetical Conditions Extraordinary Assumptions City of Fayetteville 113 W Mountain St, Fayetteville, AR 72701 Chris Hamaker Boston Mountain Real Estate 479) 251-8600 appraisal@cox-internet.com 03/24/2026 CR2256 AR None 06/30/2026 03/23/2026 Form GPRES2 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE File No.: CO S T A P P R O A C H COST APPROACH TO VALUE (if developed)The Cost Approach was not developed for this appraisal. Provide adequate information for replication of the following cost figures and calculations. Support for the opinion of site value (summary of comparable land sales or other methods for estimating site value): ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION OR REPLACEMENT COST NEW Source of cost data: Quality rating from cost service:Effective date of cost data: OPINION OF SITE VALUE =$ DWELLING Sq.Ft. @ $=$ Sq.Ft. @ $=$ Sq.Ft. @ $=$ Sq.Ft. @ $=$ Sq.Ft. @ $=$ Garage/Carport Sq.Ft. @ $=$ Total Estimate of Cost-New =$ Less Physical Functional External Depreciation =$() Depreciated Cost of Improvements =$ As-is'' Value of Site Improvements =$ INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH =$ Comments on Cost Approach (gross living area calculations, depreciation, etc.): Estimated Remaining Economic Life (if required):Years IN C O M E A P P R O A C H INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE (if developed)The Income Approach was not developed for this appraisal. Estimated Monthly Market Rent $X Gross Rent Multiplier = $Indicated Value by Income Approach Summary of Income Approach (including support for market rent and GRM): PU D PROJECT INFORMATION FOR PUDs (if applicable)The Subject is part of a Planned Unit Development. Legal Name of Project: Describe common elements and recreational facilities: RE C O N C I L I A T I O N Indicated Value by: Sales Comparison Approach $Cost Approach (if developed) $Income Approach (if developed) $ Final Reconciliation This appraisal is made ''as is'',subject to completion per plans and specifications on the basis of a Hypothetical Condition that the improvements have been completed,subject to the following repairs or alterations on the basis of a Hypothetical Condition that the repairs or alterations have been completed,subject to the following required inspection based on the Extraordinary Assumption that the condition or deficiency does not require alteration or repair: This report is also subject to other Hypothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions as specified in the attached addenda. Based on the degree of inspection of the subject property, as indicated below, defined Scope of Work, Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, and Appraiser’s Certifications, my (our) Opinion of the Market Value (or other specified value type), as defined herein, of the real property that is the subject of this report is:$, as of:,which is the effective date of this appraisal. If indicated above, this Opinion of Value is subject to Hypothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions included in this report. See attached addenda. AT T A C H M E N T S A true and complete copy of this report contains pages, including exhibits which are considered an integral part of the report. This appraisal report may not be properly understood without reference to the information contained in the complete report. Attached Exhibits: SI G N A T U R E S Client Contact:Client Name: E-Mail:Address: Appraiser Name: Company: Phone:Fax: E-Mail: Date of Report (Signature): License or Certification #:State: Designation: Expiration Date of License or Certification: Inspection of Subject:Interior & Exterior Exterior Only None Date of Inspection: Supervisory or Co-Appraiser Name: Company: Phone:Fax: E-Mail: Date of Report (Signature): License or Certification #:State: Designation: Expiration Date of License or Certification: Inspection of Subject:Interior & Exterior Exterior Only None Date of Inspection: Copyright© 2007 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified without written permission, however, a la mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited. 3/2007 260305 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what they consider their own best interests; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions* granted by anyone associated with the sale. (Source: FDIC Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, 2010.) Adjustments to the comparables must be made for special or creative financing or sales concessions. No adjustments are necessary for those costs which are normally paid by sellers as a result of tradition or law in a market area; these costs are readily identifiable since the seller pays these costs in virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative financing adjustments can be made to the comparable property by comparisons to financing terms offered by a third party institutional lender that is not already involved in the property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be calculated on a mechanical dollar for dollar cost of the financing or concession but the dollar amount of any adjustment should approximate the market's reaction to the financing or concessions based on the appraiser's judgment. STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS AND CERTIFICATION CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The appraiser's certification that appears in the appraisal report is subject to the following conditions: 1. The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect either the property being appraised or the title to it. The appraiser assumes that the title is good and marketable and, therefore, will not render any opinions about the title. The property is valued on the basis of it being under responsible ownership. 2. Any sketch provided in the appraisal report may show approximate dimensions of the improvements and is included only to assist the reader of the report in visualizing the property. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. 3. The appraiser will not give testimony or appear in court because he or she made an appraisal of the property in question, unless specific arrangements to do so have been made beforehand, or as otherwise required by law. 4. Any distribution of valuation between land and improvements in the report applies only under the existing program of utilization. These separate valuations of the land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if they are so used. 5. The appraiser has no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent conditions of the property or adverse environmental conditions (including the presence of hazardous waste, toxic substances, etc.) that would make the property more or less valuable, and has assumed that there are no such conditions and makes no guarantees or warranties, express or implied, regarding the condition of the property. The appraiser will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. This appraisal report must not be considered an environmental assessment of the subject property. 6. The appraiser obtained the information, estimates, and opinions that were expressed in the appraisal report from sources that he or she considers to be reliable and believes them to be true and correct. The appraiser does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. 7. The appraiser will not disclose the contents of the appraisal report except as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and any applicable federal, state or local laws. 8. The appraiser has based his or her appraisal report and valuation conclusion for an appraisal that is subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations on the assumption that completion of the improvements will be performed in a workmanlike manner. 9. The appraiser must provide his or her prior written consent before the lender/client specified in the appraisal report can distribute the appraisal report (including conclusions about the property value, the appraiser's identity and professional designations, and references to any professional appraisal organizations or the firm with which the appraiser is associated) to anyone other than the borrower; the mortgagee or its successors and assigns; the mortgage insurer; consultants; professional appraisal organizations; any state or federally approved financial institution; or any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or any state or the District of Columbia; except that the lender/client may distribute the property description section of the report only to data collection or reporting service(s) without having to obtain the appraiser's prior written consent. The appraiser's written consent and approval must also be obtained before the appraisal can be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media. 10. The appraiser is not an employee of the company or individual(s) ordering this report and compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction of value or upon an action or event resulting from the analysis, opinions, conclusions, or the use of this report. This assignment is not based on a required minimum, specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. Form ACR2_DEFD - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE File No. Page 1 of 2 260305 CERTIFICATION: The appraiser certifies and agrees that: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3. Unless otherwise indicated, I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4. Unless otherwise indicated, I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. 5. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or the parties involved with this assignment. 6. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 7. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 8. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were in effect at the time this report was prepared. 9. Unless otherwise indicated, I have made a personal inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the property that is the subject of this report, and the exteriors of all properties listed as comparables. 10. Unless otherwise indicated, no one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this certification (if there are exceptions, the name of each individual providing significant real property appraisal assistance is stated elsewhere in this report). 2400 W Valley Dr, Fayetteville, AR 72703 Chris Hamaker Title:Certified Residential CR2256 AR 06/30/2026 03/24/2026 Title: Form ACR2_DEFD - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE File No. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ANALYZED: APPRAISER: Signature: Name: State Certification #: or State License #: State:Expiration Date of Certification or License: Date Signed: SUPERVISORY or CO-APPRAISER (if applicable): Signature: Name: State Certification #: or State License #: State:Expiration Date of Certification or License: Date Signed: Did Did Not Inspect Property Page 2 of 2 260305 FOR FEDERALLY RELATED TRANSACTIONS Borrower Lender/Client N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Floodplain Buyout City of Fayetteville AE 05143C0204G 01/25/2024 Fayetteville TCSE, LLC Form MPA4 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Boston Mountain Real Estate MULTI-PURPOSE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM Property Address City County State Zip Code This Multi-Purpose Supplemental Addendum for Federally Related Transactions was designed to provide the appraiser with a convenient way to comply with the current appraisal standards and requirements of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), and the Federal Reserve. This Multi-Purpose Supplemental Addendum is for use with any appraisal. Only those sections and statements which have been marked by the appraiser apply to the property being appraised. PURPOSE, INTENDED USE & INTENDED USER(S) OF APPRAISAL The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the market value as defined herein, or Intended use of the appraisal report: Intended user(s) of the appraisal report (by name or type): This is a federally related transaction. EXTENT OF APPRAISAL PROCESS The appraisal is based on the information gathered by the appraiser from public records, other identified sources, inspection of the subject property and neighborhood, and selection of comparable sales within the subject market area. The original source of the comparables is shown in the Data Source section of the market grid along with the source of confirmation, if available. The original source is presented first. The sources and data are considered reliable. When conflicting information was provided, the source deemed most reliable has been used. Data believed to be unreliable was not included in the report nor used as a basis for the value conclusion. The Reproduction/Replacement Cost is based on: supplemented by the appraiser's knowledge of the local market. Physical depreciation is based on the estimated effective age of the subject property. Functional and/or external depreciation, if present, is specifically addressed in the appraisal report or other addenda. In estimating the site value, the appraiser has relied on personal knowledge of the local market. This knowledge is based on prior and/or current analysis of site sales and/or abstraction of site values from sales of improved properties. The subject property is located in an area of primarily owner-occupied single family residences and the Income Approach is not considered to be applicable. For this reason, the Income Approach was not used. The Estimated Market Rent and Gross Rent Multiplier utilized in the Income Approach are based on the appraiser's knowledge of the subject market area. The rental knowledge is based on prior and/or current rental rate surveys of residential properties. The Gross Rent Multiplier is based on prior and/or current analysis of prices and market rates for residential properties. For income producing properties, actual rents, vacancies and expenses have been reported and analyzed. They have been used to project future rents, vacancies and expenses. FEMA FLOOD HAZARD DATA Flood map is attached Subject property is not located in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Subject property is located in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Zone FEMA Map/Panel #Map Date Name of Community The community does not participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. The community does participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. It is covered by aregular program. It is covered by anemergency program. Analysis/Comments: CURRENT SALES CONTRACT The subject property iscurrently not under contract. The contract and/or escrow instructions were not available for review. The unavailability of the contract is explained later in the addenda section. The contract and/or escrow instructions were reviewed. The following summarizes the contract: Contract Date Amendment Date Contract Price Seller Owner of Record The contract indicated that personal propertywas not included in the sale. The contract indicated that personal propertywas included. It consisted of Estimated contributory value is $ Personal property was not included in the final value estimate. Personal property was included in the final value estimate. The contract indicatedno financing concessions or other incentives. The contract indicatedthe following concessions or incentives: If concessions or incentives exist, the comparables were checked for similar concessions and appropriate adjustments were made, if applicable, so that the final value conclusion is in compliance with the Market Value defined herein. Analysis/Comments: Page 1 of 3 0-3 months 0-3 months NWAMLS 225,000 N/ A County Assessor 3 years County Assessor 1 year None of the comparable sales have transferred within the previous 12 month period. Form MPA4 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE MARKET OVERVIEW Include an explanation of current market conditions and trends. is considered a reasonable exposure time for the subject property at a value range of $to $ Analysis/Comments: is estimated to be the marketing time for the subject property. Analysis/Comments: Marketing Factors: SUBJECT PROPERTY OFFERING INFORMATION According to the subject property: has not been offered for sale in the past:30 days 1 year 3 years. is currently offered for sale for $. was offered for sale within the past:30 days 1 year 3 years for $. Offering information was considered in the final reconciliation of value. Offering information was not considered in the final reconciliation of value. Offering information was not available. The reasons for unavailability and the steps taken by the appraiser are explained later in this addendum. Analysis/Comments: SALE/TRANSFER HISTORY & ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY According to the following data source(s): the subject property: Has not transferred in the past one year.in the past three years.in the past five years. Has transferred in the past one year.in the past three years.in the past five years. All prior sales or transfers occurring in the past prior to the Effective Date of Appraisal are listed below. Date of Sale/Transfer Price of Sale/Transfer Seller Buyer Data Source(s)Effective Date of Data Sources Subject Sale/Transfer History Analysis/Comments: SALE/TRANSFER HISTORY & ANALYSIS OF COMPARABLE SALES According to the following data source(s): all prior sales or transfers occurring in the past prior to the most recent date of sale or transfer are listed below. PRIOR SALE/TRANSFER #COMPARABLE #COMPARABLE #COMPARABLE # Date of Sale or Transfer Price of Sale or Transfer Seller Buyer Data Source(s) Effective Date of Data Source(s) PRIOR SALE/TRANSFER #COMPARABLE #COMPARABLE #COMPARABLE # Date of Sale or Transfer Price of Sale or Transfer Seller Buyer Data Source(s) Effective Date of Data Source(s) Comparables Sale/Transfer History Analysis/Comments: Page 2 of 3 1) The analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report was prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice USPAP''). 2) Their compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. 3) This appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. The appraiser's opinion of value is based on the assumption that the property is not negatively affected by the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions unless otherwise stated in this report. The appraiser is not an expert in the identification of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. The appraiser's routine inspection of and inquiries about the subject property did not develop any information that indicated any apparent significant hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions which would affect the property negatively unless otherwise stated in this report. It is possible that tests and inspections made by a qualified hazardous substance and environmental expert would reveal the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions on or around the property that would negatively affect its value. The highest and best use is single family residential. 03/23/2026 03/23/2026 03/24/2026 Chris Hamaker (479) 251-8600 AR CR2256 06/30/2026 84-1647202 Form MPA4 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATIONS The Appraiser certifies and agrees that: ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITING CONDITIONS HIGHEST & BEST USE ANALYSIS Analysis/Comments: As Vacant: As Improved: EFFECTIVE DATE OF APPRAISAL (if not current, see comments). This appraisal report reflects the following value:Current Retrospective Prospective Effective Date of the Appraisal: Comments on the Effective Date ADDITIONAL COMMENTS APPRAISER'S SIGNATURE & LICENSE/CERTIFICATION Appraiser's Signature Inspection Date Signed Date Appraiser's Name Phone # State License or Certification #Exp.Tax ID # Appraiser is certified under the following CE program(s). CO-SIGNING APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION The co-signing appraiserhas personally inspected the subject property, both inside and out, and has made an exterior inspection of all comparable sales listed in the report. The report was prepared by the appraiser under direct supervision of the co-signing appraiser. The co-signing appraiser accepts responsibility for the contents of the report including the value conclusions and the limiting conditions, and confirms that the certifications apply fully to the co-signing appraiser. The co-signing appraiserhas not personally inspected the interior of the subject property and: has not inspected the exterior of the subject property and all comparable sales listed in the report. has inspected the exterior of the subject property and all comparable sales listed in the report. The report was prepared by the appraiser under direct supervision of the co-signing appraiser. The co-signing appraiser accepts responsibility for the contents of the report, including the value conclusions and the limiting conditions, and confirms that the certifications apply fully to the co-signing appraiser with the exception of the certification regarding physical inspections. The above describes the level of inspection performed by the co-signing appraiser. The co-signing appraiser's level of inspection, involvement in the appraisal process and certification are covered elsewhere in the addenda section of this appraisal. CO-SIGNING APPRAISER'S SIGNATURE & LICENSE/CERTIFICATION Co-Signing Appraiser's Signature Inspection Date Signed Date Co-Signing Appraiser's Name Phone # State License or Certification #Exp.Tax ID # Co-Signing Appraiser is certified under the following CE program(s): Page 3 of 3 Clarification of Scope of Work and Intended Users Intended Users -The intended user of this appraisal report is the client. The intended use is to evaluate the property that is the subject of this appraisal for a Floodplain Buyout, subject to the stated scope of work, purpose of the appraisal, reporting requirements of this appraisal report form, and definition of market value. No additional intended users are identified by the appraiser. The Appraiser does not intend use of this appraisal and appraisal report by other users. Unless otherwise identified by the Client as being an Intended User, all other third parties are considered to be unintended users, including, but not limited to the current owner of the subject property, the borrower in the pending loan transaction, other mortgage lending institutions and other governmental agencies not involved in the mortgage lending process. Specifically, any potential buyers or outside lenders contemplating purchase or mortgage activity on this property are urged to seek a separate opinion of value from a competent and duly licensed/ certified appraiser. Any additional requests in this assignment by third parties must be requested in writing and may either be declined or, if performed, may be subject to additional billing to recover costs associated with such requests. Intended Use – The Intended Use of this appraisal and appraisal reports as stated in the report form is “for the client to evaluate the property that is the subject of this appraisal for personal purposes only.” No other intended uses have been communicated to the Appraiser and none are assumed. Pursuant to USPAP SR1-2.a, this appraisal is developed strictly and solely in accordance with those intended uses communicated to the Appraiser at the time of engagement. If a third party to this appraiser-client relationship desires an appraisal for their own uses, they are urged to seek one developed specifically for their uses from a competent and appropriately licensed/ certified appraiser. The Appraiser in this assignment cannot accept responsibility for uses not otherwise identified at the time of engagement. Therefore, the Appraiser does not intend use of this appraisal report for other purposes. Use – Reading the appraisal report or processing he report does not constitute use. Relying on the appraisal report to understand how the appraiser developed the opinion of value does not constitute use. Use means relying on the appraisal report to make a decision or to take an action. The purpose of the Appraiser’s clarification of the Intended Users and Intended Use is to establish specific expectations for this work-product in compliance with USPAP, as opposed to the additional undisclosed and/ or unknowable expectations as are omitted in the form report. Any criticism of this apparent contradiction should be directed to the weaknesses of the language used in the form, which is considered a vehicle for communicating the results of an appraisal developed and reported by the Appraiser. Adequacy of Scope – The Appraiser has proposed, and the Client has agreed (prior to submission), that the level of development and reporting detailed above is sufficient to address the substantiate criteria of a reasonable Scope of Work within the context of the Intended Users and Intended Use. With the exception of revisions made for the purpose of correction of any errors, the Appraiser does not anticipate further development or reporting requirements for this assignment. Any additional requests from the Client or any third parties may represent a change in the assignment conditions and require the development of a new assignment. With the exception of corrections or any errors or omissions, any additional requests must be made in writing and may be subject to additional billing to recover the costs associated with the additional work. The appraisal is based on the information gathered by the Appraiser from public records, other identified sources, complete visual observation of the subject property, its neighborhood, and selection of comparable sales within the subject’s market area. The original source of the comparables is shown in the Data Source section of the market grid along with the source of confirmation, if available. The sources and data are considered reliable. When conflicting information was provided, the source deemed most reliable was used. Data believed to be unreliable was not included in the report nor used as a basis for the value conclusion. The appraiser is not a home inspector and the appraisal report is not a home inspection. The appraisal report cannot be relied upon to disclose hidden defects that are not apparent from a visual observation of the surfaces of the subject property from standing height. The testing of systems (structural, electrical, mechanical, heating, cooling, plumbing) and components (such as appliances, fixtures, doors, windows, etc.) lies outside the scope of this appraisal assignment. This report is not intended for use by anyone for the purpose of identifying and adverse conditions in the subject’s systems and components that might be revealed by any inspections by licensed professionals in any relevant field. This appraisal does not guarantee that the subject property is free of undetected problems, possible defects or environmental hazards that could exist. Scope of Work 260305 N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Chris Hamaker CR2256 AR 03/24/2026 Form TADD2 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code File No. Signature Name State Certification #State Or State License #State Date Signed Signature Name State Certification #State Or State License #State Date Signed Complete visual observation of the interior area of the subject property: A visual observation from standing height of the accessible areas and unobstructed, exposed surfaces of the living area without removal of personal possessions. It includes the visual observation of attached automobile storage, if any, as well as any attached accessory buildings judged by the appraiser to have contributory value. Complete visual observation of the exterior area of the subject property: A visual observation of the unobstructed, exposed, and accessible perimeter of the residential improvements from standing height. It includes the visual observation of attached automobile storage, if any, as well as any attached accessory buildings judged by the appraiser to have contributory value. Living area: Living area is defined as legal, finished, permanently heated, living space contiguous with other living area and regarded by a typical purchaser as being habitable and as having utility. The visual observation of the attic, the crawl space, any unfinished basement, and below grade storage is based on HUD’s “head and shoulders” requirement. This appraisal report conforms to The American National Standards Institute ANSI Z765-2021. This appraisal utilizes digitized electronic signatures that prevent altering of the appraisal report in any manner without the removal of the Appraiser’s signature. These signatures are secure and irrevocable, binding the Appraiser(s) to the accuracy and completeness of the appraisal report. Additional Comments The comments in this addendum are intended to expand on the information provided on the form appraisal. It is our desire to ensure that the client fully understands the appraisal process and methodology as well as the facts pertinent to the valuation of the subject property. The expanded narrative provided in this addendum is an effort to clarify those areas of the report that we have found to cause the most concern to our clients. In the market grid, ROOM COUNT contains an adjustment for bathrooms. The next line, GROSS LIVING AREA (GLA), contains the adjustment for GLA, total room count and bedroom count as a single adjustment. Note that any extreme in living area and / or room count may result in a functional utility adjustment under the separate line UTILITY. The sketch of the subject property is primarily to assist the reader (reviewer) in visualizing the property as we have seen it from the visual inspection of the subject property. The floor plan provided is not intended to duplicate the builder’s plan to scale, but rather to be a guide to the reviewer in evaluating normal traffic patterns within the property. Areas of limited access (attic, crawl spaces, eaves, etc.) may not necessarily be inspected due to limited access. For the purposes of this appraisal, a condition for any such applicable area is determined after a visual inspection of related/ adjoining parts of the structure. An appraiser is a trained and experienced observer of real estate, but recognizing, detecting, or measuring contamination is often beyond the scope of the appraiser’s expertise. Remediation and compliance cost estimation involves knowledge and experience beyond that of most appraisers. This inspection is not intended to serve as a termite inspection, although any observed problems are noted in the appraisal. The buyer or homeowner should contact a qualified inspectional professional for this service if so desired. In the preparation of this appraisal some or all of the photographs may be digitized. In no case have the photos been altered or manipulated in any manner. All photos are accurate representations of the properties. Opinions or estimates expressed herein represent the Appraiser’s best judgment, but should not be construed as advice or recommendation to act. The Appraiser should be contacted with any questions before this report is relied upon for decision making. This appraisal represents an estimate of value based on analysis of information known to the Appraiser at the time of engagement. The Appraiser and Boston Mountain Real Estate, Inc. do not assume any responsibility for incorrect analysis due to incorrect or incomplete information, which was provided to the Appraiser. If new data or documentation is provided to the Appraiser, the value in this report is subject to change based on the significance of this new data. Soils known to be unstable (shrink or swell) exist in Northwest Arkansas. This type of soil condition causes the soil around the foundation of a dwelling to expand and contract due to changes in its water content. Indications of this problem include: Foundation walls that are buckled or bowed. Doors and window that stick or do not open. Cracks in the foundation walls. Cracks in the exterior walls. Cracks in the interior walls and ceilings. Sunken or buckled interior concrete floors. While the Appraiser has made a diligent observation of the subject property and none of the indicators were noted, the only way to insure that this problem is not present is to have the property tested or inspected by a professional in that field. Scope of Work 260305 N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Chris Hamaker CR2256 AR 03/24/2026 Form TADD2 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code File No. Signature Name State Certification #State Or State License #State Date Signed Signature Name State Certification #State Or State License #State Date Signed Comments on the Sales Comparison Analysis The comparable sales are adjusted for site and location to note differences in estimated market differences between the subject and comparables listed in this report. Quality of construction differences are noted between the subject and comparables based on the workmanship and materials used. The construction differences are noted for interior and exterior quality. The comparables effective ages have been adjusted between the subjects effective age to represent differences in physical depreciation. Since not every subject can be compared to “ideal” comparable sales, the Appraiser has chosen what are believed to be the best comparable sales available from a thorough and extensive search for comparable sales data in the subject’s market. The sales selected for use in the analysis are considered to be the best indicators of value for the subject property. Other sales reviewed would have required excessive adjustments and were not considered to be as reliable as the comparable sales chosen. Adjustments with the Sales Comparison Analysis are based on the market extraction method, generally employing the matched pair process, and not specifically based on cost figures. To the best of the Appraisers knowledge, all comparable sales were sold with no special or creative financing or sales concessions. Closing costs paid by the sellers of the comparable properties are equivalent to typical financing terms offered by third party institutional lenders in the local market. In the Appraiser’s opinion, these sales represent typical market financing transactions. The sales prices are not considered to be inflated due to special or excessive financing concessions. The indicated values of the comparable sales reflect the value of the subject real estate and include only those sellers closing costs normally paid by tradition or law in the market area. Gross living areas shown for the comparable sales are estimates based on information from one or more of the following sources: Northwest Arkansas Multiple Listing Service (MLS), county/ city tax records, real estate agents, homeowners, builders, appraisers, interoffice data bank, or actual measurements. Slight variations in size will have no effect on the estimate of value. Gross living area adjustments are not adjusted for square footage differences of five percent or less. All comparable sales are settled to the best of the Appraiser’s knowledge. Verification is with county records and/ or the Realtor. The appraiser certifies and agrees that this appraisal report was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Title XI of the Financial Institutions, Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989, as amended (12 U.S.C. 3331 et seq.), and any applicable implementing regulations in effect at the time the appraiser signs the appraisal certification. Scope of Work 260305 N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Chris Hamaker CR2256 AR 03/24/2026 Form TADD2 - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code File No. Signature Name State Certification #State Or State License #State Date Signed Signature Name State Certification #State Or State License #State Date Signed Form PIC4x6.SR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Subject Photo Page N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Subject Front Sales Price GLA Total Rooms Total Bedrms Total Bathrms Location View Site Quality Age 2400 W Valley Dr N/ A 1,093 5 2 1.5 Suburban/ Avg Residential/ Avg 16,393 sf Average 59 Subject Rear Subject Street Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Form PIC4X6.SR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Subject Photo Page N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Living Room Sales Price G.L.A. Tot. Rooms Tot. Bedrms. Tot. Bathrms. Location View Site Quality Age 2400 W Valley Dr N/ A 1,093 5 2 1.5 Suburban/ Avg Residential/ Avg 16,393 sf Average 59 Kitchen Dining Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Form PIC4X6.SR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Subject Photo Page N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Bedroom Sales Price G.L.A. Tot. Rooms Tot. Bedrms. Tot. Bathrms. Location View Site Quality Age 2400 W Valley Dr N/ A 1,093 5 2 1.5 Suburban/ Avg Residential/ Avg 16,393 sf Average 59 Bedroom Mechanical Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Form PIC4X6.SR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Subject Photo Page N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Half Bathroom Sales Price G.L.A. Tot. Rooms Tot. Bedrms. Tot. Bathrms. Location View Site Quality Age 2400 W Valley Dr N/ A 1,093 5 2 1.5 Suburban/ Avg Residential/ Avg 16,393 sf Average 59 Bathroom Utility Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Form SKT.BLDSKI - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Building Sketch N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Borrower Lender/Client 26 2 4. 8 20 5. 1 Property Address City County State Zip Code Form PIC4x6.CR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Comparable Photo Page N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Comparable 1 Proximity Sale Price GLA Total Rooms Total Bedrms Total Bathrms Location View Site Quality Age 2227 W Hatfield St 0.16 miles E 224,000 1,128 6 4 1.0 Suburban/ Avg Residential/ Avg 17,424 sf Average 59 Comparable 2 Proximity Sale Price GLA Total Rooms Total Bedrms Total Bathrms Location View Site Quality Age 1119 S Ellis Ave 2.31 miles SE 200,000 984 5 3 1.0 Suburban/ Avg Residential/ Avg 12,632 sf Average 65 Comparable 3 Proximity Sale Price GLA Total Rooms Total Bedrms Total Bathrms Location View Site Quality Age 1224 N Turner Ave 0.34 miles E 255,000 1,021 6 3 1.0 Suburban/ Avg Residential/ Avg 12,632 sf Average 63 Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Form MAP.FLOOD - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Flood Map N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Form MAP.LOC - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Aerial Map N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Form MAP.LOC - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAMODE Location Map N/ A 2400 W Valley Dr Fayetteville Washington AR 72703 City of Fayetteville Borrower Lender/Client Property Address City County State Zip Code Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 X Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5 3/12/2026 | 2:36 PM PDT Docusign Envelope ID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Docusign Envelope ID: 36412BE0-33E6-4F72-80C2-EED94FE8C3D5DocusignEnvelopeID: 30300694-B965-4EAB-9ABB-736CCB2269B1 Additional Information Received Date Received: MM/DD/YYYY 05/05/2026 Time: 00:00 (AM/PM) 12:58 PM From: Name & Title Chris Brown, Public Works Director To: Name & Title City Council Agenda Meeting Date: MM/DD/YYYY 05/05/2026 Civic Clerk Number: Ex. 2025-994 2026-1311 Forwarded to City Attorney’s Office and Department Head Yes TO: Mayor Molly Rawn City Council THRU: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff FROM: Chris Brown, Public Works Director DATE: May 4, 2026 SUBJECT: Purchase of 2400 Valley Drive-Supplemental Information This memo is to provide additional information in answer to City Council questions regarding the purchase of 2400 Valley Drive. Questions received during and after the Agenda Session and answers to those questions are provided below. 1. Why is the purchase of this property recommended? The house on this property is located within the FEMA designated floodway, which is the most restrictive area of the FEMA designated floodzone. Current regulations would highly restrict building within floodways and removal of existing structures in floodways is a citywide goal. In addition, removal of this structure, if paired with purchase and removal of structures on other properties within the floodway, will allow for channel improvements that can help lower flood elevations and reduce flooding on surrounding properties. This is currently under review by the City’s consultant (Olsson) to determine how much of a benefit this will provide. The property owner indicated in writing that they had other offers and would not accept a lower offer; therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the listed price. 2. What other studies and plans are in place in the area? What is the total funding allocated? What about federal funding? What is the long term plan for improvements/purchasing/elevating? The City has performed flood studies for the area looking at many different options to help resolve the flooding issues. Upstream detention, additional culverts, channel improvements, etc. have all been considered, but due to the nature of the flooding and amount of runoff none of these provide a standalone solution to the issues in the area, and all are costly and disruptive. In addition to these structural solutions, we are currently implementing both purchase of properties and well as piloting a project to elevate an existing structure. As discussed above, this purchase could also lead to channel improvements in the future with the additional space it would provide adjacent to the main channel along Porter. Although this is expected to help with the flood elevations, we do not anticipate that it will eliminate the need to elevate houses altogether so both options are being explored. The City has an outstanding FMA grant 2 application with FEMA, however, we have not heard anything regarding that application since the submittal. It was originally intended to help purchase several structures, including the one at 2400 W Valley Drive. 3. What is the status of the West End Project? The project plans are nearing completion and the project will be let to bid in the next two months. The scope of work includes removal of the building foundations and regrading the area to provide additional floodplain storage. The flood study only shows nominal improvements to flood elevations limited to those areas directly adjacent to the improvements. It is not expected to create major impacts in the 100-year event but smaller events should certainly see a benefit to avoid flooding across N West End. Just downstream of W. Wedington there appears to be around half a foot drop in flood elevations between Wedington and Valley Drive. 4. What about the other property that is for sale? Why is it not recommended for purchase? This property is within the floodplain, but is not within the floodway area and has not been identified as a structure that experiences flooding. 5. What is the size of the repetitive loss area? Is the house at 2400 Valley Drive a repetitive loss structure? FEMA regulations preclude the city from disclosing repetitive loss information on this or other properties; however, the disclosure in the offer and acceptance document confirm that the property has flooded and water has been in the crawlspace of the house. The repetitive loss area is as shown in the map below. 3 6. Discuss the flood study and its recommendations The study conducted by Olsson (attached) concluded that localized drainage improvements could provide some benefit, but would not fully remove properties from the regulatory floodplain. However, channel improvements along Porter Road could provide a reduction in floodplain elevations and a corresponding reduction in structure flooding. In order to fully complete these improvements, the structures within the floodway along Valley Drive would need to be removed. 7. What is the decision-making process for the purchases or elevation? What is the long-term plan? The long term plan includes a combination of property purchases, drainage improvements, and elevating remaining structures. Properties in the floodway are recommended for purchase; structures that have experienced flooding and have interested property owners are being considered for elevation. There are three property owners that have expressed interest in elevating their structure to date; staff is developing documents in preparation for accepting bids on the first of these. The total cost for purchase and elevation is unknown and dependent on the number of property owners that wish to participate. The stormwater budget for 2026 includes $200,000 for property acquisition or improvements and we would anticipate extending that program as long as there are willing participants. Fayetteville, AR 2400 Valley Drive 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard SFHA / Flood Zone Boundary FIRM Panels The data contained herein was compiled from various sources for the sole use and benefit of the City of Fayetteville Geographic Information System and the public agencies it serves. Any use of the data by anyone other than the City of Fayetteville is at the sole risk of the user; and by acceptance of this data, the user does hereby agree to indemnify the City of Fayetteville and hold the City of Fayetteville harmless from and without liability for any claims, actions, cost for damages of any nature, including the city's cost of defense, asserted by user or by another arising from the use of this data. The City of Fayetteville makes no express or implied warrantees with reference to the data. No word, phrase, or clause found herein shall be construed to waive that tort immunity set forth under Arkansas law. Created: 5/1/2026 Credits: City of Fayetteville, AR Map Author: 0 0.01 0.020.01 mi 3537 N. Steele Boulevard / Suite 310 / Fayetteville, AR 72703 o 479.443.3404 / olsson.com MEMO Overnight Regular Mail Hand Delivery Other: Email To: Alan Pugh, PE, CFM From: McKenzie Taake, PE RE: Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis Fayetteville, Arkansas Date: July 9, 2025 Project No. 025-00323 PROJECT SCOPE AND BACKGROUND Olsson, Inc. (Olsson), on behalf of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas (Client), was tasked with performing hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, which expanded on previous Hamestring Creek Watershed analyses to evaluate conceptual-level alternatives to reduce flood extents and elevations throughout the Hamestring Creek Watershed in Fayetteville, Arkansas (Project area). Figure 1 shows the Project area is generally bound by Hamestring Creek to the North, North Porter Road to the East, and West Wedington Drive to the South. It consists primarily of established residential neighborhoods with some open space and commercial areas. Many houses throughout the Project area have historically experienced fluvial and pluvial flooding, causing repetitive inundation to residential properties and city streets. According to Client records, the Project area consists of multiple properties that meet Repetitive Loss criteria, which is classified as structures having two or more flood claims of at least $1,000.00 during any given 10- year period. Page 2 of 9 AVAILABLE DATA Olsson obtained existing two-dimensional (2D) hydraulic and hydrologic modeling and structure information (e.g., building type, parcel type, foundation type, and finished floor height) previously developed as part of previous studies in the Project area. To obtain Finished Floor Elevations (FFE) for the properties, Olsson identified existing LiDAR data, gathered in 2015 as part of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) topographic Project for Washington County, Arkansas as best available topographic information. Field reconnaissance data was collected as part of previous studies and utilized for structures in the Project area to determine foundation type and material and height to first floors. Foundation height information was then incorporated into topographic elevations, taken from the centroid for each structure, to estimate FFE. Information on the building footprints, structures, and stormwater network connectivity were collected from the Client Geographic Information System (GIS) data and verified with field reconnaissance. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS Existing Condition Model (ECM) Olsson utilized existing hydraulic and hydrologic modeling previously developed as its base model to compare water surface elevations for existing and proposed conditions. The 20 percent, 10 percent, 4 percent, 2 percent, 1 percent, and 0.2 percent annual-chance (5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year), 24-hour flood event hydrographs were included in the base model. To continue use of the existing 2D hydraulic modeling, Olsson utilized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) HEC-RAS (version 6.6) software program for this analysis. Land cover data for the Project Area was further refined to reflect existing conditions. This land cover data was then combined with soil data from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) for Washington County, Arkansas to create an infiltration layer for lost runoff due to infiltration. Curve numbers were further refined for the Project Area based on the Client’s Drainage Criteria Manual. Additionally, the mesh was refined to 10-feet by 10-feet cells in the Project area to provide more detailed results for ECM. Page 3 of 9 Proposed Condition Model (PCM) The PCM was developed by using the ECM and updating it to include conceptual-level alternatives to evaluate the potential for reducing floodplain depths and mapping extents in the Project area. To determine potential areas of improvement, Proposed improvement scenarios were compared to 1 percent annual-chance (100-year), 24-hour storm event. A total of two improvement scenarios were evaluated. The second scenario was developed as an extension of the first, incorporating additional improvements identified during analysis of the first scenario. • Alternative 1: Subsurface Pipe Network and Open Channel Drainage System o Addition of four 10 feet by 4 feet Reinforced Concrete Box (RCB) between houses along West Valley Drive, West of North Porter Road, and North of West Wedington Drive. This size was chosen as they are the largest standard size box culverts that would fit within the footprint of the existing structures and elevation constraints. o Addition of seven ephemeral 2 feet Reinforced Concrete Pipes (RCP) along the north side of W Wedington Drive and north and south side of W Valley Drive, connecting the four RCB with curb inlets o Retrofit existing ephemeral 1.5 feet RCP along south side of W Wedington Drive o Addition of a linear trapezoidal swale system with bottom widths ranging from 10 to 20 feet and side slopes ranging from 1:1 to 10:1 between the houses West of North Porter Road and North of Wedington Drive in the left overbank of Hamestring Creek to connect the subsurface network from Wedington Drive to Hamestring Creek o Replace existing culvert at W Valley Drive to a 10 feet by 4 feet RCB • Alternative 2: Subsurface Pipe Network System with Channel Improvements o Includes Alternative 1 improvements o Channel improvements for portion of Hamestring Creek, from West Wedington Drive to the confluence of Hamestring Creek Tributary HS3, to a concrete lined channel with 15 feet bottom width and vertical walls o Replace existing culvert at W Valley Drive to a 15 feet by 4 feet RCB Updates to the PCM to represent the proposed scenarios described above, include: • Incorporation of proposed drainage improvements into terrain data using River Analysis System (RAS) Terrain Modification Features • Addition of subsurface pipe networks into the geometry • Land cover value changes to reflect proposed alternatives Page 4 of 9 Figures 2 and 3 display the conceptual plans for Alternatives 1 and 2. Tables 1 through 3 show a tabular summary of the details of the proposed pipe network system. Due to the repetitive losses experienced in the Project area, Client has examined various options to mitigate flooding losses for these properties. Page 5 of 9 Table 1. Proposed Pipe Network Details: Conduits. Structure ID Structure Type Improvement Type Structural Details Length (feet) Upstream Invert Elevation (NAVD88) Downstream Invert Elevation (NAVD88) Number of Barrels Barrel Shape Barrel Span (feet) Barrel Rise (feet) ValleyDr Culvert Upgrade (Alt 1) 35 1230.9 1230.8 1 Box 10 4 ValleyDr Culvert Upgrade (Alt 2) 35 1230.9 1230.8 1 Box 15 4 Conduit 1 Culvert Addition 60 1234.5 1234.3 1 Circular 1.5 -- Conduit 2 Culvert Addition 90 1235.6 1234.3 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 3 Culvert Addition 75 1234.8 1234.5 1 Circular 1.5 -- Conduit 4 Culvert Addition 35 1234.8 1234.8 1 Circular 1.5 -- Conduit 5 Culvert Addition 40 1235.0 1234.8 1 Circular 1.5 -- Conduit 6 Culvert Addition 110 1235.5 1235.0 1 Circular 1.5 -- Conduit 7 Culvert Addition 110 1236.1 1235.8 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 8 Culvert Addition 135 1235.8 1234.3 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 9 Culvert Addition 125 1232.9 1232.0 1 Box 10 4 Conduit 10 Culvert Addition 80 1230.0 1229.9 1 Box 10 4 Conduit 11 Culvert Addition 40 1229.9 1225.9 1 Box 10 4 Conduit 12 Culvert Addition 80 1225.9 1225.0 1 Box 10 4 Conduit 13 Culvert Addition 30 1234.3 1232.9 1 Box 4 3 Conduit 14 Culvert Addition 120 1233.7 1225.9 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 15 Culvert Addition 110 1231.8 1225.9 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 16 Culvert Addition 10 1225.9 1225.9 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 17 Culvert Addition 80 1231.7 1229.9 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 18 Culvert Addition 65 1232.4 1229.9 1 Circular 2 -- Conduit 19 Culvert Addition 10 1229.9 1229.9 1 Circular 2 -- Page 6 of 9 Table 2. Proposed Pipe Network Details: Nodes. Structure ID Structure Type Improvement Type Structural Details Drop Inlet Weir Length (feet) Rim Elevation (feet, AVD88) Invert Elevation (feet, NAVD88) Node 1 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1239.4 1234.5 Node 2 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1239.5 1234.3 Node 3 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1238.8 1234.8 Node 4 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1238.8 1234.8 Node 5 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1239.5 1235.0 Node 6 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1239.2 1235.5 Node 7 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1239.1 1236.1 Node 8 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1239.2 1235.8 Node 9 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1239.6 1235.6 Node 10 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1237.9 1232.9 Node 11 Outfall Addition 4.0 1232.0 1232.0 Node 12 Outfall Addition 4.0 1230.0 1230.0 Node 13 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1234.9 1229.9 Node 14 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1234.5 1225.9 Node 15 Outfall Addition 4.0 1225.0 1225.0 Node 16 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1236.7 1233.7 Node 17 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1234.6 1225.9 Node 18 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1234.8 1231.8 Node 19 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1234.5 1229.9 Node 20 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1235.4 1232.4 Node 21 Drop Inlet Addition 4.0 1234.7 1231.7 Page 7 of 9 Table 3. Proposed Channel Network. Structure ID Structure Type Improvement Type Structural Details Length (feet) Upstream Invert Elevation (NAVD88) Downstream Invert Elevation (NAVD88) Left Side Slope (H:V) Right Side Slope (H:V) Bottom Width (feet) Ditch01 Rectangular Channel Upgrade (Alt 2) 585 1232.0 1230.0 0:0 0:0 15 Ditch02 Trapezoidal Channel Addition 150 1232.0 1230.0 2:1 2:1 10 Ditch03 Trapezoidal Channel Addition 135 1225.0 1224.0 1:1 1:1 10 Ditch04 Trapezoidal Channel Addition 215 1236.3 1231.1 5:1 10:1 20 Ditch05 Trapezoidal Channel Addition 85 1236.7 1231.1 10:1 5:1 15 Page 8 of 9 RESULT AND CONCLUSION Based on results of existing and proposed modeling, each Alternative showed a varying degree of improvement in computed water surface elevations (WSE) for the 1 percent annual-chance event. Differences in WSEs were evaluated at building locations in the Project area to identify the reduction in flood depths. For existing conditions, 7 of the 11 buildings in the Project area had FFEs that were at or below the 1 percent annual-chance flood event WSEs. For PCM Alternative 1, 3 of the 11 buildings’ FFE were at or below the 1 percent annual-chance flood elevations. For PCM Alternative 2, only 1 of the 11 buildings’ FFE was at the 1 percent annual-chance flood elevation. Tables 4 and 5 present maximum WSEs for both Existing and Proposed Conditions Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, at each building. Figures 4 and 5 show a visual comparison between the existing and proposed conditions floodplain boundaries for Alternatives 1 and 2, respectively. Table 4. Maximum 1 Percent Annual-Chance Water Surface Elevation Comparison: PCM Alternative 1. Building ID Finished Floor Elevation (feet) 1 Percent Annual-Chance Water Surface Elevations (feet) Difference (feet) ECM PCM: Alternative 1 1 1236.5 1237.0 1236.6 -0.4 2 1237.0 1237.0 1236.6 -0.4 3 1236.4 1237.0 1236.6 -0.4 4 1237.2 1237.0 1236.7 -0.3 5 1237.3 1237.5 1237.0 -0.5 6 1237.1 1237.6 1237.0 -0.6 7 1237.1 1237.6 1237.0 -0.6 8 1237.5 1237.7 1237.5 -0.2 9 1239.6 1238.1 1237.9 -0.2 10 1239.0 1238.2 1238.0 -0.2 11 1238.6 1238.4 1238.0 -0.4 *Green denotes structure elevations above flood elevations. Page 9 of 9 Table 5. Maximum 1 Percent Annual-Chance Water Surface Elevation Comparison: PCM Alternative 1. Building ID Finished Floor Elevation (feet) 1 Percent Annual-Chance Water Surface Elevations (feet) Difference (feet) ECM PCM: Alternative 2 1 1236.5 1237.0 1236.3 -0.7 2 1237.0 1237.0 1236.3 -0.7 3 1236.4 1237.0 1236.4 -0.6 4 1237.2 1237.0 1236.5 -0.5 5 1237.3 1237.5 1236.4 -1.1 6 1237.1 1237.6 1236.5 -1.1 7 1237.1 1237.6 1236.5 -1.1 8 1237.5 1237.7 1237.4 -0.3 9 1239.6 1238.1 1237.9 -0.2 10 1239.0 1238.2 1238.0 -0.2 11 1238.6 1238.4 1237.9 -0.5 *Green denotes structure elevations above flood elevations. Based on modeling results, both proposed condition scenarios identified reduced water surface elevations for structures in the Project area. Figures 6 and 7 show graphically the difference in flood depths for Alternative 1 and 2, respectively. Alternative 2 produced largest reduction in water surface elevation (1.1 feet) for Buildings 5, 6, and 7. While the two scenarios examined as part of this analysis identify improvements to the overall water surface elevations in the Project area, the combined impacts from both pluvial and fluvial flooding prevent properties from being removed from the 1 percent annual-chance floodplain boundary. Furthermore, no Benefit-Cost Analysis was conducted as part of this Project; therefore, it remains undetermined whether the proposed improvements are economically justifiable for construction. If not constructed, there are opportunities for mitigation through the voluntary acquisition of affected properties and restoring the area to a natural floodplain. FIGURES Description: Date Exported: Project Location: Project Title: Client Name: This map was created byOlsson to visualize generallocation(s) of subject property.Unless otherwise stated, featuresdepicted herein do notrepresent legal or surveyboundaries. Notice of Intent: )M\HPPHYLOOH ILPPOH 5RFN 3LQH %OXII 7H[MUNMQM 0HPSOLV Vicinity: Figure 1. Project Location.Fayetteville,Washington County, AR Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis City of Fayetteville +MPH VPUL QJFUHHN 7 ULNXPMU\ + 6 +MP HVPULQJ FUHHN 0 150 30075US FeetHTRON Streamlines Project Area Buildings Repetitive Loss Area Effective Floodway Effective 1% Annual Chance Flood Event Effective 0.2% Anuual Chance Flood Event Feature Key: 6/18/2025 11:58 AM © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Project Location RI Description: Date Exported: Project Location: Project Title: Client Name: This map was created byOlsson to visualize generallocation(s) of subject property.Unless otherwise stated, featuresdepicted herein do notrepresent legal or surveyboundaries. Notice of Intent: )M\HPPHYLOOH ILPPOH 5RFN 3LQH %OXII 7H[MUNMQM 0HPSOLV Vicinity Figure 2. Alternative 1Proposed Improvements. Fayetteville,Washington County, AR Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis City of Fayetteville +MPH VPUL QJFUHHN 7 ULNXPMU\ + 6 +MP HVPULQJ FUHHN 0 250 500125US FeetHTRON Streamline Project Area Buildings Proposed Culvert Opening Proposed Junction Proposed Curb Inlet Proposed Culvert Improvement Proposed Bioswale Proposed Retrofit 1.5' RCP Proposed 2' RCP Proposed 4'x3' RCB Proposed 10'x4' RCB Feature Key: 6/18/2025 4:18 PM © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Project Location 10' x 4' RCB RI Description: Date Exported: Project Location: Project Title: Client Name: This map was created byOlsson to visualize generallocation(s) of subject property.Unless otherwise stated, featuresdepicted herein do notrepresent legal or surveyboundaries. Notice of Intent: )M\HPPHYLOOH ILPPOH 5RFN 3LQH %OXII 7H[MUNMQM 0HPSOLV Vicinity: Figure 3. Alternative 2Proposed Improvements. Fayetteville,Washington County, AR Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis City of Fayetteville +MPH VPUL QJFUHHN 7 ULNXPMU\ + 6 +MP HVPULQJ FUHHN 0 250 500125US FeetHTRON Streamline Project Area Buildings Proposed Culvert Opening Proposed Junction Proposed Curb Inlet Proposed Bioswale Proposed Culvert Improvement Proposed Retrofit 1.5' RCP Proposed 2' RCP Proposed 4'x3' RCB Proposed 10'x4' RCB Proposed Channel Improvement Feature Key: 6/18/2025 4:23 PM © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Project Location 15' x 4' RCB 15' bottom width with vertical walls RI Date Exported: Project Location: Project Title: Client Name: This map was created byOlsson to visualize generallocation(s) of subject property.Unless otherwise stated, featuresdepicted herein do notrepresent legal or surveyboundaries. Notice of Intent: )M\HPPHYLOOH ILPPOH 5RFN 3LQH %OXII 7H[MUNMQM 0HPSOLV Vicinity: Description: Figure 4. Alternative 1Maximum Floodplain Comparison. Fayetteville,Washington County, AR Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis City of Fayetteville +MPH VPUL QJFUHHN 7 ULNXPMU\ + 6 +MP HVPULQJ FUHHN 0 250 500125US FeetHTRON Buildings Streamline Proposed Conditions Alternative 1: 100-Year Mapping Existing Conditions: 100-Year Mapping Feature Key: 6/18/2025 5:30 PM © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Project Location RI Date Exported: Project Location: Project Title: Client Name: This map was created byOlsson to visualize generallocation(s) of subject property.Unless otherwise stated, featuresdepicted herein do notrepresent legal or surveyboundaries. Notice of Intent: )M\HPPHYLOOH ILPPOH 5RFN 3LQH %OXII 7H[MUNMQM 0HPSOLV Vicinity: Description: Figure 5. Alternative 2Maximum Floodplain Comparison. Fayetteville,Washington County, AR Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis City of Fayetteville +MPH VPUL QJFUHHN 7 ULNXPMU\ + 6 +MP HVPULQJ FUHHN 0 250 500125US FeetHTRON Buildings Streamline Proposed Conditions Alternative 2: 100-Year Mapping Existing Conditions: 100-Year Mapping Feature Key: 6/18/2025 5:31 PM © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Project Location D RI Description: Date Exported: Project Location: Project Title: Client Name: This map was created byOlsson to visualize generallocation(s) of subject property.Unless otherwise stated, featuresdepicted herein do notrepresent legal or surveyboundaries. Notice of Intent: )M\HPPHYLOOH ILPPOH 5RFN 3LQH %OXII 7H[MUNMQM 0HPSOLV Vicinity: Figure 6. Alternative 1 100- Year Depth Difference. Fayetteville,Washington County, AR Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis City of Fayetteville +MPH VPUL QJFUHHN 7 ULNXPMU\ + 6 +MP HVPULQJ FUHHN 0 250 500125US FeetHTRON Streamline Buildings 100-Yr Depth Difference (Ft.) < -1.5 -1.5 - -1.0 -0.9 - -0.7 -0.6 - -0.3 -0.2- -0.1 No Change 0.1 - 0.3 0.4 - 0.7 0.8 - 1.0 1.1 - 2.0 2.1 - 3.0 > 3.0 Feature Key: 6/4/2025 3:22 PM © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Project Location RI Description: Date Exported: Project Location: Project Title: Client Name: This map was created byOlsson to visualize generallocation(s) of subject property.Unless otherwise stated, featuresdepicted herein do notrepresent legal or surveyboundaries. Notice of Intent: )M\HPPHYLOOH ILPPOH 5RFN 3LQH %OXII 7H[MUNMQM 0HPSOLV Vicinity: Figure 7. Alternavite 2 100-Year Depth Difference. Fayetteville,Washington County, AR Hamestring Creek Stormwater Analysis City of Fayetteville +MPH VPUL QJFUHHN 7 ULNXPMU\ + 6 +MP HVPULQJ FUHHN 0 250 500125US FeetHTRON Streamline Buildings 100-Yr Depth Difference (Ft.) < -1.5 -1.5 - -1.0 -0.9 - -0.7 -0.6 - -0.3 -0.2- -0.1 No Change 0.1 - 0.3 0.4 - 0.7 0.8 - 1.0 1.1 - 2.0 2.1 - 3.0 > 3.0 Feature Key: 6/4/2025 3:20 PM © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Project Location RI Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1342 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director Jessica Masters, Planning Director FROM: Wesley Frank, Planner SUBJECT: VAC-2026-0002: Vacation (600 W. MEADOW ST/UA PROPERTIES LLC, 483 & 484): Submitted by MCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS for property located at 600 W. MEADOW ST. in WARD 2. The property is zoned MSC, MAIN STREET CENTER, and contains approximately 0.94 acres. The request is to vacate 0.06 acres of a general utility easement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of VAC-2026-0002 as shown in the attached Exhibits 'A' and 'B' and with the following conditions: 1. Any damage or relocation of any existing facilities will be at the property owner's expense; and 2. Any and all water/sewer lines within the vacated easement shall be granted a 20-foot utility easement centered on the existing utility. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located in central Fayetteville at the Metro District Lofts at the west end of Meadow Street. The subject site is developed with a multi-family development built in 2007, and is located in the Downtown Master Plan area and Downtown Design Overlay District. The property is zoned MSC, Main Street Center. Request: The applicant requests vacation of a portion of an existing general utility easement totaling 0.06 of an acre at the south end of the property at 600 W Meadow St. The vacation request follows utility relocation work done in conjunction with a multi-family, student-oriented project under construction to the south. DISCUSSION: City staff recommends approval of the requested utility easement vacation. According to the applicant, the proposed vacation will allow for additional square footage that would be used in the development of a trash enclosure. The applicant has submitted the required written consent forms from the appropriate utility providers with no objection. Two conditions of approval have been recommended, as outlined above. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Exhibit A, 5. Exhibit B, 6. Request Letter, 7. Petition to Vacate, 8. Survey Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1342 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE VAC-26-02 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 600 WEST MEADOW STREET IN WARD 2 TO VACATE 0.06 ACRES OF GENERAL UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority under Ark. Code Ann. § 14-54-104 to vacate public grounds or portions thereof which are not required for corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the following described portion of general utility easement is not required for corporate purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby vacates the portion of general utility easement as described in Exhibit B attached to the Planning Department’s memo. Section 2: A copy of this Ordinance duly certified by the City Clerk along with the map attached as Exhibit A to the Planning Department’s memo shall be filed in the office of the Washington County Circuit Clerk. Section 3: This vacation approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Any damage to or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/developer’s expense. 2. Any and all water/sewer lines within the vacated easement shall be granted a 20-foot utility easement centered on the existing utility. Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Project Number Budget Impact: FundAccountNumber Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1342 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only VAC-2026-0002: Vacation (600 W. MEADOW ST/UA PROPERTIES LLC, 483 & 484): Submitted by MCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS for property located at 600 W. MEADOW ST. in WARD 2. The property is zoned MSC, MAIN STREET CENTER, and contains approximately 0.94 acres. The request is to vacate 0.06 acres of a general utility easement. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Jonathan Curth DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (630) Division / Department 4/15/2026 Submitted Date No V20221130 Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Adjustment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget No No -$ Oak Ridge Trail F r i s c o T r a i l F r iscoTrail RazorbackGreenwayConnector WE S T A V E SPRING ST CENTER ST UNIVERSITY AVE MEADOW ST SPRING ST P O WERHOUSE AVE A LLEY 451 MOUNTAIN ST G R E G G A V E WHITESIDE ST C-3 RMF-40 NC MSC P-1 DG RPZD Neighborhood Link Institutional Master Plan Urban Center Unclassified Alley Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Shared-Use Paved Trail Design Overlay District Close Up View VAC-2026-0002 600 W MEADOW ST N 0 150 300 45060075 Feet Subject Property 1:2,400 EXHIBIT A PARCEL 765-28103-000 UA PROPERTIES LLC EASEMENT VACATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PER WARRANTY DEED 2012-00002209: UNITS 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, 201, 202, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 301, 303, 304, 306, 308, 309 & 310 OF THE METRO DISTRICT LOFTS HORIZONTAL PROPERTY REGIME TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AS SHOWN AND SET FORTH IN THE MASTER DEED TO THE METRO DISTRICT LOFTS HORIZONTAL PROPERTY REGIME FILED FOR RECORD AS LAND DOCUMENT NO. 2008-00003023 AND AMENDMENT TO MASTER DEED TO METRO DISTRICT LOFTS HORIZONTAL PROPERTY REGIME FILED FOR RECORD AS LAND DOCUMENT NO. 2008-00017322 OF THE RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, SAID HORIZONTAL PROPERTY REGIME BEING FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO-WIT: A PART OF THE SE1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 16, T-16-N, R-30-W, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND A PART OF BLOCK 8 AND A PART OF GREGG AVENUE (ABANDONED), ALL IN THE ORIGINAL TOWN (NOW CITY) OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AS DESIGNATED UPON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF SAID TOWN ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NE CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 8; THENCE N8959'13"W, ALONG THE NORTH I INE OF SAID BLOCK 8, 103.44 FEET TO A CHISELED "X", SAID POINT BEING 8.5 FEET WEST AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE OLD O.& C.C. MAIN TRACT OF THE ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE N8959'13"W, 42.59 FEET TO A CHISELED "X" ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF A VACATED PORTION OF SPRING STREET, AS PER ORDINANCE 1513; THENCE S 0046'15"E, ALONG SAID EAST BOUNDARY, 6.03 F EET; THENCE N8958'40'W, 184.51 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON REBAR ON THE WEST LINE OF GREGG AVENUE (ABANDONED); THENCE N0046'15"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF GREGG AVENUE (A BANDONED), 28.00 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON IN THE CENTER OF SPRING STREET (VACATED); THENCE N8959'13"W, 17.00 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON IN THE CENTER OF GREGG AVENUE (ABANDONED); THENCE S0046'15"E, 24.88 FEET ALONG T HE CENTER OF GREGG AVENUE (ABANDONED) TO AN EXISTING IRON; THENCE N8959'13"W, 17.00 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF GREGG AVENUE (ABANDONED) AND THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF THE ARKANSAS & MISSOURI RAILROAD; THENCE $2550'27"W, ALONG S AID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, 53.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES: S2550'27"W, 64.27 FEET; S2449'28"W, 74.92 FEET; $2246'21"W, 82.43 FEET; S1958'05"W 78.66 FEET; S1637'32"W, 19.29 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON WHICH IS 2.00 FEET SOUTH OF AN EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL; THENCE LEAVING SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND RUNNING PARALIEL WITH AND 2.00 FEET SOUTH OF SAID RETAINING WALL, N8923'28"E, 151.62 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON ON THE WEST LINE OF GREGG AVENUE; THENCE N0046'15"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF GREGG AVENUE 14.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF MEADOW STREET; THENCE N8949'06"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF MEADOW STREET; THENCE N8949'06"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF MEADOW STREET, 59.28 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON REBAR; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF MEADOW STREET N0007'37" E, 184.83 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON REBAR; THENCE N02°20'07"W, 11.90 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON REBAR; THENCE N8806'08"W, 10.37 FEET: THENCE N00°11'55"E, 24.16 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON R EBAR; THENCE N6544'57"W, 35.96 FEET; THENCE N3642 '03"W, 39.62 FEET TO A SET 1/2" IRON REBAR; THENCE N64°16'28"W, 22.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.94 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, IF ANY. SUBJECT TO ALL PRIOR MINCRAL RESERVATIONS AND OIL AND GAS LEASES. SUBJECT TO TAXES AND OTHER LIENS. EXHIBIT B EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION: A VARIABLE WIDTH VACATION OF PART OF A 20’ UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT 2005-53850 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING (POB ESMT VAC) AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WEST MEADOW STREET AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TERMINUS OF WEST MEADOW STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, S02°42'43"W, 7.98 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, S85°35'02"W, 60.44 FEET; THENCE N87°47'07"W, 17.25 FEET; THENCE N01°29'19"E, 20.00 FEET; THENCE S87°47'07"E, 28.77 FEET; THENCE N57°09'47"W, 33.68 FEET; THENCE N01°29'19"E, 22.14 FEET; THENCE N15°32'33"E, 1.15 FEET; THENCE S57°09'47"E, 66.95 FEET; THENCE N02°05'51"E, 8.81 FEET; THENCE S87°21'40"E, 20.42 FEET; THENCE S02°42'43"W, 20.00 FEET; TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (POB ESMT VAC), CONTAINING 2,745 SQ. FT., OR 0.06 ACRES. SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, OR COVENANTS OF RECORD. GIS Approved 03/25/2026 1580 E. Sterns St. Fayetteville, AR 72703 479-443-2377/Fax 479-443-9241 www.mce.us.com February 17, 2026 Development Services RE: 600 W Meadow St. Utility Easement Vacation Development Services, We are pleased to submit our request to vacate a portion of an existing utility easement along the south side of the property. During the development of the new apartment building to the south of this property various underground utilities were relocated. A section of sanitary sewer line was capped and abandoned in place as a part of this reroute. Our request is to vacate the portion of the utility easement that surrounds this abandoned pipe in an effort to build a trash encloser over it. Per city code, this area of easement must be vacated in order to construct the vertical structure of the trash enclosure. After the new trash enclosure is constructed, the existing enclosure that sits further into the site will be demolished. This will provide easier access to the dumpster for the Solid Waste team and cut down on the length that the truck will need to reverse to exit the property. We are committed to ensuring this project aligns with the city’s standards and vision. Should you have any questions or require further information, please feel free to contact us directly. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to working together on this important development for the property at 600 W Meadow St. Sincerely, Eric Bartels, PLA McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc. Land Development Project Manager 479-443-2377 ebartels@mce.us.com EASEMENT VACATION PETITION PETITION TO VACATE A general utility/water & sewer EASEMENT LOCATED IN block 8 of the Metro District Lofts Subdivision, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. TO: The Fayetteville City Planning Commission and The Fayetteville City Council We, the undersigned, being all the owners of the real estate abutting the easement hereinafter sought to be abandoned and vacated, lying in block 8 of the Metro District Lofts Subdivision, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, a municipal corporation, petition to vacate an easement which is described as follows: EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION: A VARIABLE WIDTH VACATION OF PART OF A 20’ UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT 2005-53850 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING (POB ESMT VAC) AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WEST MEADOW STREET AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TERMINUS OF WEST MEADOW STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, S02°42'43"W, 7.98 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, S85°35'02"W, 60.44 FEET; THENCE N87°47'07"W, 17.25 FEET; THENCE N01°29'19"E, 20.00 FEET; THENCE S87°47'07"E, 28.77 FEET; THENCE N57°09'47"W, 33.68 FEET; THENCE N01°29'19"E, 22.14 FEET; THENCE N15°32'33"E, 1.15 FEET; THENCE S57°09'47"E, 66.95 FEET; THENCE N02°05'51"E, 8.81 FEET; THENCE S87°21'40"E, 20.42 FEET; THENCE S02°42'43"W, 20.00 FEET; TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (POB ESMT VAC), CONTAINING 2,745 SQ. FT., OR 0.06 ACRES. SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, OR COVENANTS OF RECORD. That the abutting real estate aHected by said abandonment of the easement are 16-16-30 County Court Plat Subdivision, City of Fayetteville used by the public for a period of many years, and that the public interest and welfare would not be adversely aHected by the abandonment of the portion of the above described easement. The petitioners pray that the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, abandon and vacate the above described real estate, subject, however, to the existing utility easements and sewer easements as required, and that the above described real estate be used for their respective benefit and purpose as now approved by law. The petitioners further pray that the above described real estate be vested in the abutting property owners as provided by law. WHEREFORE, the undersigned petitioners respectfully pray that the governing body of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, abandon and vacate the above described real estate, subject to said utility and sewer easements, and that title to said real estate sought to be abandoned be vested in the abutting property owners as provided by law, and as to that particular land the owners be free from the easements of the public for the use of said easement. Dated this 17th day of February, 2026. Printed Name Signature MitchkWeigel:kPO"kManager ES M T V A C 27 4 5 S Q F T 0. 0 6 A C R/ W R/ W R/ W R/W R/W R/W WE S T M E A D O W S T R E E T AS P H A L T W I D T H V A R I E S R/ W W I D T H V A R I E S U R B A N C E N T E R 3 9 MI N 63 M A X R/ W PE R M S P VACATED GREGG AVENUE PA R C E L I D 7 6 5 2 8 1 0 3 0 0 0 OW N E R U A P R O P E R T I E S L L C MA I L I N G A D D R E S S 5 0 9 W S P R I N G S T ST E 3 1 0 F A Y E T T E V I L L E A R 7 2 7 0 1 DE E D 2 0 1 2 2 2 0 8 2 0 1 2 2 2 0 9 Li n e T a b l e Li n eL1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9L1 0 L1 1 L1 2 Be a r i n g S0 2 4 2 4 3 W S8 5 3 5 0 2 W N8 7 4 7 0 7 W N0 1 2 9 1 9 E S8 7 4 7 0 7 E N5 7 0 9 4 7 W N0 1 2 9 1 9 E N1 5 3 2 3 3 E S5 7 0 9 4 7 E N0 2 0 5 5 1 E S8 7 2 1 4 0 E S0 2 4 2 4 3 W Di s t a n c e 7. 9 8 60 4 4 17 2 5 20 0 0 28 7 7 33 6 8 22 1 4 1. 1 5 66 9 5 8. 8 1 20 4 2 20 0 0 R/W R/ W R/ W R/ W L1 L3 L5 L6 L8 L9 L10 L1 1 L2 L4 L7 L12 WA T E R SE W E R E S M T 20 2 4 1 8 9 0 9 TO R E M A I N PA R T O F UT I L I T Y E S M T 20 0 5 5 3 8 5 0 TO R E M A I N PA R T O F UT I L I T Y E S M T 20 0 5 5 3 8 5 0 TO R E M A I N PA R T O F U T I L I T Y E S M T 20 0 5 5 3 8 5 0 T O B E V A C A T E D PE R T H I S D O C U M E N T PA R T O F UT I L I T Y E S M T 20 0 5 5 3 8 5 0 TO R E M A I N PO B E S M T V A C CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. McCLELLAND D E S I G N E D T O S E R V E HTTP://WWW.MCE.US.COM REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:PROJ. MANAGER: PROJ. NUMBER: REVISION: W:\2024\0-BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT\FAYETTEVILLE\TRINITAS\DUMPSTER EXHIBIT\EASEMENT\TRINITAS EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT.DWG C 2025 1580 E. STEARNS ST. FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72703 479) 443-2377 AS NOTED EB CD 12/16/2025 1 OF 1 EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT PR O P E R T Y L I N E LE G E N D RO A D C E N T E R L I N E EA S E M E N T L I N E RI G H T O F W A Y L I N E R/ W PA R C E L L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E PA R T O F 2 0 0 5 5 3 8 5 0 T O R E M A I N PA R T O F 2 0 0 5 5 3 8 5 0 V A C A T E D P E R T H I S D O C U M E N T 20 2 4 1 8 9 0 9 T O R E M A I N 0 SC A L E 1 2 0 40 20 10 TRINITAS DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE RELOCATION EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1341 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director Jessica Masters, Planning Director FROM: Wesley Frank, Planner SUBJECT: VAC-2026-0001: Vacation (1834 W. KAYWOOD LN/BOLES, 520): Submitted by CONNIE BOLES for property located at 1834 W. KAYWOOD LN in WARD 1. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.26 acres. The request is to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of- way. RECOMMENDATION: City staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of VAC-2026-0001 as shown in the attached Exhibits 'A' and 'B', and with the following conditions of approval: 1. Any damage or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/developer’s expense; 2. Any existing water or sewer line within the vacated right-of-way shall be granted a 20-foot utility easement, centered on the location of the existing line; 3. Any easements required for future development shall be dedicated as necessary. BACKGROUND: The subject area is in west Fayetteville, southeast of Ramay Junior High, and approximately 300 feet southwest of the W. Mitchell St and S. Gabbard Dr intersection. The subject property contains one parcel along W. Kaywood Ln which totals approximately 0.26 of an acre and is undeveloped as of 2022 when a single- family home was demolished. Request: The applicant proposes to vacate a portion of undeveloped street right-of-way totaling 0.05 acres. DISCUSSION: City staff supports the applicant’s request to vacate the subject right-of-way, with conditions. The right-of-way was originally dedicated in 1964 as part of the Valley Vista Subdivision for a potential semi-cul-de-sac, with the condition that it would revert to the property owner if W. Kaywood Ln were ever extended. Following approximately 60 years without extension of Kaywood and with a staff evaluation indicating no anticipated future need for the cul de sac, staff finds that returning the right-of-way does not conflict with the public's interest and may allow for additional development on the site. At the April 13, 2026 Planning Commission meeting, this item was unanimously forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval as part of the consent agenda by a vote of 8-0-1. Commissioner Brink was Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov absent at the time of the vote. Commissioner Brewer made the motion and Commissioner Cabe seconded. No public comment was made. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Exhibit A, 5. Exhibit B, 6. Staff Report Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1341 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE VAC-26-01 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1834 WEST KAYWOOD LANE IN WARD 1 TO VACATE 0.05 ACRES OF RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority under Ark. Code Ann. § 14-54-104 to vacate public grounds or portions thereof which are not required for corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the following described portion of right-of-way is not required for corporate purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby vacates the portion of right-of-way as described in Exhibit B attached to the Planning Department’s memo. Section 2: A copy of this Ordinance duly certified by the City Clerk along with the map attached as Exhibit A to the Planning Department’s memo shall be filed in the office of the Washington County Circuit Clerk. Section 3: This vacation approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Any damage to or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/developer’s expense. 2. Any existing water or sewer line within the vacated right-of-way shall be granted a 20-foot utility easement, centered on the location of the existing line. 3. Any easements required for future development shall be dedicated as necessary. 4/14/2026 Submitted Date No V20221130 Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Adjustment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget No No -$ Project Number Budget Impact: FundAccountNumber Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1341 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only VAC-2026-0001: Vacation (1834 W. KAYWOOD LN/BOLES, 520): Submitted by CONNIE BOLES for property located at 1834 W. KAYWOOD LN in WARD 1. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.26 acres. The request is to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of-way. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Jonathan Curth DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (630) Division / Department Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Approval Date: Original Contract Number: B E ECHWOOD AVESA N G A V E ON T A R I O P L VI N E AV E BLOOMFIELD LOOP NASHVILLE TER WI L M I N G T O N AV E GA B B A R D D R NEPTUNE ST LE W I S A V E VENUS ST MITCHELL ST FARMINGTON ST KAYWOOD LN CAPELLA S T PHILLIP DR M A R T IN L U T H E R K IN G J R B LV D R-O RMF-24 C-2 I-1 C-1 CS UT Neighborhood Link Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Residential Link Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Trail (Proposed) Close Up View VAC-2026-0001 1834 W. KAYWOOD LN N 0 150 300 45060075 Feet Subject Property 1:2,400 EXHIBIT A April 6, 2026 Re: Legal description of a portion of West Kaywood Lane being vacated adjacent to Parcel #765-11672-000 A PART OF THE PLATTED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WEST KAYWOOD LANE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 1 OF VALLEY VISTA SUBDIVISION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, AS PER THE FINAL PLAT THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 1 AT PAGE 153 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX- OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO-WIT: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY WHICH IS S87°04'59"E 75.33' FROM AN EXISTING PIPE MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00' FOR A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S87°04'59"E 86.64', THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N87°04'59"W 86.64' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT B TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Jessie Masters, Planning Director FROM: Wesley Frank, Planner MEETING DATE: April 13, 2026 SUBJECT: VAC-2026-0001: Vacation (1834 W. KAYWOOD LN/BOLES, 520): Submitted by CONNIE BOLES for property located at 1834 W. KAYWOOD LN. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.26 acres. The request is to vacate 0.05 acres of right-of-way. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding VAC-2026-0001 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to forward VAC-2026-0001 to City Council with a recommendation of approval, with all conditions as outlined by staff.” BACKGROUND: The subject area is in central Fayetteville approximately 300 feet south of the W. Mitchell St and S. Gabbard Dr intersection. The subject property contains one parcel along W. Kaywood Ln which totals approximately 0.26 of an acre and is undeveloped as of 2022 when a single-family home was demolished. The subject area does not fall within any overlay districts or Master Plan areas. Surrounding land uses and zoning are depicted in Table 1. Table 1: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning North Single-Family Residential RMF-24, Residential Multifamily, 24 Units per Acre South Two- and Multi-Family Residential RMF-24, Residential Multifamily, 24 Units per Acre East Multi-Family Residential RMF-24, Residential Multifamily, 24 Units per Acre West Two-Family Residential RMF-24, Residential Multifamily, 24 Units per Acre Proposal: The applicant proposes to vacate a portion of developed street right-of-way totaling 0.05 acres. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends approval of the request. The right of way was originally dedicated in 1964 as part of the Valley Vista Subdivision for a potential semi cul de sac, with the condition that it would revert to the property owner if W. Kaywood Ln were ever extended. Staff does not anticipate any future need to extend the street or construct the cul de sac, and vacating this segment will not affect compliance with the Master Street Plan. Returning the right of way to the property owner will also allow additional development on the site. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 1 of 9 Updated w/ meeting results Vacation Approval: The applicant has submitted the required vacation approval forms to relevant city departments and franchise utility companies with the following responses. Utility Response Cox Communications No objections, provided that any damage or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/developer’s expense. AEP/SWEPCO No objections and no comments. Black Hills Energy No objections and no comments. AT&T No objections, but noted that additional easements may be needed dependent on future development. Ozarks Electric No objections and no comments. City of Fayetteville Response Water/Sewer No objections, provided any and all water/sewer lines within the vacated right-of-way shall be granted a 20-foot utility easement centered on the existing utility. Solid Waste & Recycling No objections and no comments. Transportation No objections and no comments. Public Comment: To date, staff has not received any public comment on this item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding VAC-2026-0001 to City Council with a recommendation of approval, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. Any damage or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/developer’s expense; 2. Any existing water or sewer line within the vacated right of way shall be granted a 20 foot utility easement, centered on the location of the existing line; 3. Any easements required for future development shall be dedicated as necessary. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 2 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Date: April 13, 2026 Tabled Forwarded Denied Motion: Second: Vote: BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Project Maps o One Mile Map o Close-Up Map o Current Land Use Map Applicant Exhibits o Applicant Request Letter o Applicant Petition to Vacate o Survey – Right-of-way to be Vacated Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 3 of 9 Brewer Cabe 8-0-1 Commissioner Brink was absent at the time of the vote. This item was placed on consent. RAZORBACK RD HOLLYWOOD AVE SA N G A V E 4 9 F U T R A L L D R RA Z O R B A C K R D S H I L O H D R M A R T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R B L V D 4 9 R-O I-1 RMF-18 I-2 P-1 RMF-24 C-2 UT RSF-4 IPZD CS RMF-12 R-A RI-U CPZD RPZD NS-G Neighborhood Link Institutional Master Plan Regional Link - High Activity Freeway/Expressway Unclassified Alley Residential Link Planned Neighborhood Link Shared-Use Paved Trail Trail (Proposed) Design Overlay District Fayetteville City Limits Planning Area One Mile View VAC-2026-0001 1834 W. KAYWOOD LN N 0 0.25 0.50.13 Miles Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Subject Property Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 4 of 9 B E ECHWOOD AVESA N G A V E ON T A R I O P L VI N E AV E BLOOMFIELD LOOP NASHVILLE TER WI L M I N G T O N AV E GA B B A R D D R NEPTUNE ST LE W I S A V E VENUS ST MITCHELL ST FARMINGTON ST KAYWOOD LN CAPELLA S T PHILLIP DR M A R T IN L U T H E R K IN G J R B LV D R-O RMF-24 C-2 I-1 C-1 CS UT Neighborhood Link Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Residential Link Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Trail (Proposed) Close Up View VAC-2026-0001 1834 W. KAYWOOD LN N 0 150 300 45060075 Feet Subject Property 1:2,400 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 5 of 9 BE E C H W O O D AV E S A N G A V E STONE ST M A R T IN L U T H E R K IN G J R B LV D 2025 Imagery | EagleView Technologies | Surdex Corporation Neighborhood Link Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Residential Link Trail (Proposed) Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Current Land Use VAC-2026-0001 1834 W. KAYWOOD LN N 0 225 450 675900112.5 Feet Subject Property Multi-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Mixed Residential Multi-Family Residential 1:3,600 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 6 of 9 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 7 of 9 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 8 of 9 GI S C o m m e n t 02 1 8 2 0 2 6 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 VAC-2026-0001 (BOLES) Page 9 of 9 Perthevacationchecklist:(2) Metesandboundslegaldescriptionoftheareatobevacated, nottheentireproperty (thismaybeincludedonthesurveyplat). Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1356 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director Jessica Masters, Planning Director FROM: Citlali Samano, Planner SUBJECT: RZN-2026-0009: Rezoning (1660 W PALMER PL/PURYEAR, 521) Submitted by SCOTT PURYEAR for property located at 1660 W PALMER PL in WARD 1. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.38 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE. RECOMMENDATION: City Planning staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of a request to rezone the subject property as described and shown in the attached Exhibits ‘A’ and ‘B’. BACKGROUND: The subject property is in central Fayetteville, approximately ¼ mile west of Bud Walton Arena. The property contains one parcel totaling 0.38 acres which is currently zoned RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre and contains a single-family dwelling constructed in 1978 per Washington County Assessor records. The property is not subject to any overlay districts. Request: The request is to rezone the subject property from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre to RSF-8, Residential Single-Family, Eight Units per Acre. Public Comment: Staff has received one public comment from a neighbor citing water runoff issues as the property lies on an incline. Land Use Compatibility: From a current land use standpoint, the request is compatible with its immediate surroundings. The property is surrounded by residential-zoned districts and is located on W. Palmer Place, designated as a Residential Link Street, which is intended to support neighborhood and low-volume areas outside of downtown. Given this classification, and with consideration for Palmer's current condition, low- to medium-density residential uses represent the most appropriate of the property. The site’s direct access to a minor roadway minimizes traffic impacts on local residential streets and supports safe ingress and egress. A rezone to RSF-8 contains the same uses by right and conditional uses as RSF-4 but allows for smaller lot width and lot area minimums. Land Use Plan Analysis: Staff finds that the request is fully consistent with adopted land use policies, the Future Land Use Map designation (Residential Area) and aligns with certain goals of City Plan 2040. Additionally, given the infill score and the properties proximity to the U of A main campus, the potential for infill Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov development assists in housing development and availability. Allowing this rezoning would strengthen residential options near the university and supports multiple City Plan 2040 Goals by allowing attainable infill housing to discourage suburban sprawl. CITY PLAN 2040 INFILL MATRIX: City Plan 2040’s Infill Matrix indicates a score of 9 for this site. The following elements of the matrix contribute to the score: Adequate Fire Response (Station #6, 900 S Hollywood Ave) Near Sewer Main (6" gravity line, W Palmer Pl) Near Water Main (2.25” main, W Palmer Pl) Near Public School (Ramay Junior High School) Near U of A Campus (Main Campus) Near City Park (Hotz Park, Neighborhood Park) Near Paved Trail (Markham Trail) Near ORT Bus Stop (Lot 56, W Carlson Dr) Near Razorback Bus Stop (Lot 222, S Graham Ave and W Nettleship St) DISCUSSION: At the April 13, 2026, Planning Commission meeting, a vote of 9-0-0 forwarding the request to City Council with a recommendation of approval. No discussion was made by either the Commissioners or the public. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Exhibit A, 5. Exhibit B, 6. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1356 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 2026-09 FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.38 ACRES LOCATED AT 1660 WEST PALMER PLACE IN WARD 1 FROM RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE TO RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone classification of the property shown on the map (Exhibit A) and the legal description (Exhibit B) both attached to the Planning Department’s Agenda Memo from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units per Acre to Residential Single Family, 8 Units Per Acre. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1. Comments: Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Approval Date: Original Contract Number: Project Number Budget Impact: FundAccountNumber Project Title City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2026-1356 Item ID 5/5/2026 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only RZN-2026-0009: Rezoning (1660 W PALMER PL/PURYEAR, 521) Submitted by SCOTT PURYEAR for property located at 1660 W PALMER PL in WARD 1. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.38 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE- FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE. N/A for Non-Agenda Item Action Recommendation: Submitted By Jonathan Curth DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (620) Division / Department 4/14/2026 Submitted Date No V20221130 Budgeted Item? Does item have a direct cost? Is a Budget Adjustment attached? Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget No No -$ Proposed RSF-8 GR A H A M A V E NETTLESHIP ST EA S T E R N A V E LEWIS AVE MEADOW ST GA R V I N D R PALMER PL HA R T M A N A V E PA L M E R A V ECENTERST MAINE ST P-1 RMF-24 R-O RSF-4 Institutional Master Plan Unclassified Residential Link Hillside-Hilltop Overlay District Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Close Up View RZN-2026-0009 1660 W. PALMER PL N 0 150 300 45060075 Feet Subject Property Zone Proposed RSF-4 RSF-8 0.0 0.4 Total 0.4ac1:2,400 Current 0.4 0.0 Legal Description: Lot Numbered Two (2) in Block Numbered Two (2), of Lefiar Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, as per plat of said Addition on flle in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex-Officio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas. SUBJECT to all easements, rights-of-way, protective covenants and oil, gas and mineral reservations of record. TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Jessie Masters, Planning Director FROM: Citlali Samano, Planner MEETING DATE: April 13, 2026 SUBJECT: RZN-2026-0009: Rezoning (1660 W PALMER PL/PURYEAR, 521) Submitted by SCOTT PURYEAR for property located at 1660 W PALMER PL. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.38 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding RZN-2026-0009 to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to forward RZN-2026-0009 to City Council with a recommendation of approval.” BACKGROUND: The subject property is in central Fayetteville and is approximately ¼ west of the Bud Walton Arena. The property contains one parcel totaling 0.38 acres which is currently zoned RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre and contains a single-family dwelling constructed in 1978 per Washington County Assessor records. The property is not subject to any overlay districts. Surrounding land uses and zoning are depicted in Table 1. Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning North Single-Family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre South Multi-Family Residential RMF-24, Residential Multi-Family, Twenty-Four Units Per Acre East Single-Family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre West Single-Family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre Request: The request is to rezone the subject property from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre to RSF-8, Residential Single-Family, Eight Units per Acre. Public Comment: Staff has received 1 public comment from a neighbor citing water runoff issues as the property lies on an incline. At this time no development has been received by staff but water runoff will be evaluated during any development reviews. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 1 of 15 INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Streets: The subject property has frontage to West Palmer Place which is a partially improved Residential Link Street with asphalt paving and open ditches. Any street improvements required in these areas would be determined at the time of development proposal. Any additional improvements or requirements for drainage will be determined at time of development. Water: Public water is available to the subject property. There is an existing 2.25-inch water main along West Palmer Place. Sewer: Sanitary Sewer is available to the subject property. There is an existing 6-inch sewer main along West Palmer Place. Drainage: There are known wet weather sewer capacity issues identified in the City’s 2025 Sewer Master Plan that appear in the system 484 feet southwest of this property. No protected streams or FEMA Floodplain. However, there are hydric soils present in the subject area. Hydric soils are a known indicator of wetlands. However, for an area to be classified as wetlands, it may also need other characteristics such as hydrophytes (plants that grow in water), and shallow water during parts of the year. Hydric Soils can be found across many areas of Fayetteville, including valleys, floodplains, and open prairies. It’s important to identify these natural resources during development, so when these soils are identified on a property, further environmental studies will be required at the time of development. Before permits will be issued for the property a statement/report from an environmental professional must be provided summarizing the existence of wetlands on the property. If this statement/report indicates that wetlands may be present on site, a USACE Determination of Jurisdictional Wetlands will be required at the time of development submittal. Fire: Station 6, located at 900 S Hollywood Ave., protects this site. The property is located approximately 1 miles from the fire station with an anticipated drive time of approximately 3 minutes using existing streets. The anticipated response time would be approximately 5.2 minutes. Fire Department response time is calculated based on the drive time plus 1 minute for dispatch and 1.2 minutes for turn-out time. Within the City Limits, the Fayetteville Fire Department has a response time goal of 6 minutes for an engine and 8 minutes for a ladder truck. Police: The Police Department did not comment on this request. Tree Preservation: The current zoning district of zoned RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre, requires 25% minimum canopy preservation. The proposed zoning district of zoned RSF-8, Residential Single-Family, Eight Units per Acre, requires 20% minimum canopy preservation. CITY PLAN 2040 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: The City Plan 2040 Future Land Use Plan designates the property within the proposed rezone as Residential Neighborhood. Residential Neighborhood Areas are primarily residential in nature and support a wide variety of housing types of appropriate scale and context: single-family, duplexes, rowhouses, multifamily Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 2 of 15 and accessory dwelling units. Residential Neighborhood encourages highly connected, compact blocks with gridded street patterns and reduced building setbacks. It also encourages traditional neighborhood development that incorporates low-intensity non-residential uses intended to serve the surrounding neighborhoods, such as retail and offices, on corners and along connecting corridors. This designation recognizes existing conventional subdivision developments which may have large blocks with conventional setbacks and development patterns that respond to features of the natural environment. Building setbacks may vary depending on the context of the existing neighborhood. CITY PLAN 2040 INFILL MATRIX: City Plan 2040’s Infill Matrix indicates a score of 9 for this site with a weighted score of 11.5. The following elements of the matrix contribute to the score: Adequate Fire Response (Station #6, 900 S Hollywood Ave) Near Sewer Main (6 in gravity line, W Palmer Pl) Near Water Main (2.25”, W Palmer Pl) Near Public School (Ramay Junior High School) Near U of A Campus (Main Campus) Near City Park (Hotz Park, Neighborhood Park) Near Paved Trail (Markham Trail) Near ORT Bus Stop (Lot 56, W Carlson Dr) Near Razorback Bus Stop (Lot 222, S Graham Ave and W Nettleship St) FINDINGS OF THE STAFF 1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: Land Use Compatibility: From a current land use standpoint, the request is compatible with its immediate surroundings. The property is surrounded by residential zoned districts. The site is directly located on W. Palmer Place, designated as a Residential Link Street, which is intended to support neighborhood and low-volume areas outside of downtown. Given this classification, residential uses represent the highest and best use of the property. The site’s direct access to a minor roadway minimizes traffic impacts on local residential streets and supports safe ingress and egress. A rezone to RSF-8 contains the same uses by right and conditional uses as RSF-4 but allows for smaller lot width and lot area minimums. Land Use Plan Analysis: Staff finds that the request is fully consistent with adopted land use policies, the Future Land Use Map designation (Residential Area) and aligns with certain goals of City Plan 2040. Additionally, given the infill score and the properties proximity to the U of A main campus, the potential for infill development assists in housing development and availability. Allowing this rezoning would strengthen residential options near the university and supports multiple City Plan 2040 Goals by allowing attainable infill housing to discourage suburban sprawl. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 3 of 15 Finding: A rezone from RSF-4 to RSF-8 is justified given that both are residential and offer the same by-right and conditional uses. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: Rezoning the property from RSF-4 to RSF-8 would have minimal changes in the allowable density on the site with RSF-4 listing four single-family dwelling per acre whereas RSF-8 allows eight. The lot width and lot area minimums are lowered, with RSF-8 listing 50 feet lot width minimums (25 feet for townhomes) and a 5,00 square feet lot area. However, staff does not find that the ultimate added density would appreciably increase traffic danger or congestion at this location. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: Rezoning the property from RSF-4 to RSF-8 would increase the potential population at the site, but staff does not find that it would be to an undesirable degree; staff finds that given the City’s growth and moderate infill score, this rezoning would be an incremental step in providing more residential housing. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends forwarding RZN-2026-0009 to City Council with a recommendation of approval. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 4 of 15 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Date: April 13, 2026 Tabled Forwarded Denied Motion: Second: Vote: BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Project Maps o One Mile Map o Close-Up Map o Current Land Use Map o Future Land Use Map Unified Development Code o §161.07 District RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre o §161.09 District RSF-8, Residential Single-Family, Eight Units per Acre Staff Exhibits o Long-Range Planning Memo Applicant Exhibits o Request Letter Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 5 of 15 RAZORBACK RD S A N G AVE MARTINLUTHERKINGJRBLVDSANG A V E MAPLE ST STAD I U M D R RA Z O R B A C K R D HOLLYWOOD AVE STADIUM D R C L I N T O N D R P-1 R-OI-1 RMF-24 C-2 UT RSF-4 IPZD RPZD CS RMF-18 R-A RI-U CPZD Neighborhood Link Institutional Master Plan Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Alley Residential Link Shared-Use Paved Trail Trail (Proposed) Design Overlay District Fayetteville City Limits Planning Area One Mile View RZN-2026-0009 1660 W. PALMER PL N 0 0.25 0.50.13 Miles Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Subject Property Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 6 of 15 Proposed RSF-8 GR A H A M A V E NETTLESHIP ST EA S T E R N A V E LEWIS AVE MEADOW ST GA R V I N D R PALMER PL HA R T M A N A V E PA L M E R A V ECENTERST MAINE ST P-1 RMF-24 R-O RSF-4 Institutional Master Plan Unclassified Residential Link Hillside-Hilltop Overlay District Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Close Up View RZN-2026-0009 1660 W. PALMER PL N 0 150 300 45060075 Feet Subject Property Zone Proposed RSF-4 RSF-8 0.0 0.4 Total 0.4ac1:2,400 Current 0.4 0.0 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 7 of 15 RA Z O R B A C K R D 2025 Imagery | EagleView Technologies | Surdex Corporation Institutional Master Plan Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Residential Link Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Current Land Use RZN-2026-0009 1660 W. PALMER PL N 0 225 450 675900112.5 Feet Subject Property Institutional U of A Institutional U of A Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential 1:3,600 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 8 of 15 City Neighborhood Civic Institutional Non-Municipal Government Residential Neighborhood Urban Center RAZORBACK RD MAPLE ST M A R T IN L U T H E R K IN G J R B LVD RA Z O R B A C K R D Neighborhood Link Institutional Master Plan Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Alley Residential Link Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Trail (Proposed) Design Overlay District City Neighborhood Civic Institutional Civic and Private Open Space Industrial Natural Non-Municipal Government Residential Neighborhood Rural Residential Urban Center Future Land Use RZN-2026-0009 1660 W. PALMER PL N 0 610 1,220 1,830 2,440305 Feet Subject Property 1:10,000 Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 9 of 15 161.07 - District RSF-4, Residential Single-Family — Four (4) Units Per Acre A) Purpose. The RSF-4 Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development of these types. B) Uses. 1) Permitted Uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 41 Accessory dwellings Unit 46 Short-term rentals 2) Conditional Uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 12a Limited business Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities Unit 44 Cluster Housing Development C) Density. Single-family dwellings Units per acre 4 or less D) Bulk and Area Regulations. Single-family dwellings Two-family dwellings Lot minimum width 70 feet 80 feet Lot area minimum 8,000 square feet 12,000 square feet Land area per dwelling unit 8,000 square feet 6,000 square feet Hillside Overlay District Lot minimum width 60 feet 70 feet Hillside Overlay District Lot area minimum 8,000 square feet 12,000 square feet Land area per dwelling unit 8,000 square feet 6,000 square feet E) Setback Requirements. Front Side Rear 15 feet 5 feet 15 feet Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 10 of 15 F) Building Height Regulations. Building Height Maximum 3 stories G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot. Accessory ground mounted solar energy systems shall not be considered buildings. Ord. No. 6945, §5(Exh. D), 12-16-25) 161.09 - District RSF-8, Residential Single-Family — Eight (8) Units Per Acre A) Purpose. The RSF-8 Residential District is designed to bring historic platted development into conformity and to allow for the development of new single-family residential areas with similar lot size, density, and land use as the historical neighborhoods in the downtown area. B) Uses. 1) Permitted Uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 41 Accessory dwellings Unit 46 Short-term rentals 2) Conditional Uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 12a Limited business Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities Unit 44 Cluster Housing Development C) Density. Single-family dwellings Units per acre 8 or less D) Bulk and Area Regulations. 1) Lot Width Minimum. Single-family 50 feet Two-family 50 feet Townhouse, no more than two (2) attached 25 feet 2) Lot Area Minimum. Single-family 5,000 square feet Two-family 5,000 square feet Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 11 of 15 3) Land Area per Dwelling Unit Single-family 5,000 square feet Two-family 5,000 square feet Townhouse, no more than two (2) attached 2,500 square feet E) Setback Requirements. Front Side Rear 15 feet 5 feet 5 feet F) Building Height Regulations. Building Height Maximum 3 stories G) Building Area. The area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 50% of the total lot area, except when a detached garage exists or is proposed; then the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total lot area. Accessory ground mounted solar energy systems shall not be considered buildings. Ord. No. 6945, §5(Exh. D), 12-16-25) Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 12 of 15 TO: Citlali Samano, Planner FROM: Kylee Cole, Long Range & Preservation Planner MEETING DATE: April 13, 2026 SUBJECT: Long Range Planning Comments Regarding RZN-2026-0009 BACKGROUND: The applicant requests to rezone approximately 0.38 acres from RSF-4, Residential Single- Family, Four Units Per Acre to RSF-8, Residential Single-Family, Eight Units Per Acre. Four long range planning documents are relevant when evaluating this request: City Plan 2040, the Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan, and University Heights and Haskell Heights Historic Context Statement City Plan 2040 (2020): City Plan 2040 includes several relevant plan goals and objectives: Goal 1 – We will make appropriate infill and revitalization our highest priority. Goal 2 – We will discourage suburban sprawl. Goal 3 – We will make compact, complete, and connected development the standard. Goal 6 – We will create opportunities for attainable housing. o 3.6.1 - Increase housing choices by encouraging a mixture of housing types and sizes dispersed throughout the city and in proximity to transit and active transportation networks. (p.45) On its adoption in early 2020, City Plan 2040 carried forward goals from prior comprehensive plans and organized them into six primary goals. The goals were meant to focus the City’s efforts on appropriate infill that furthers a variety of transportation options, supports the creation of attainable housing, and limits the amount of land consumed by development on the City’s periphery, often termed “suburban sprawl”. Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan (2023): The City’s Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan was initiated by City Plan 2040. Heritage and Historic Preservation Master Plan Relevant Goals and Action Items 1.9 Plan Review Include historic preservation staff in review of proposed major projects and zoning changes to determine impacts to historic resources. 1.10 Demolition Ordinance Pass an ordinance to allow for the review of proposed demolitions for resources forty-five years or older. Staff to evaluate each property for significance. Work with property owner to discourage demolition. Reviews should be taken up by HDC as needed. 4.9 Community Engagement: Transparency Publish information about historic preservation reviews and demolitions of historic properties to increase transparency. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 13 of 15 University Heights and Haskell Heights Historic Context Statement (2023): The subject property was included in the study of the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. The subject property, a single-family contemporary home constructed in 1978, is not of historic age and was not identified as being eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Although the area is identified as a potential location for a local historic district, and petition efforts are underway, nothing has been submitted to Long Range Planning at this time. Since rezoning requests often precede redevelopment plans, the property owner and/or applicant should consult with Long Range & Preservation Planner prior to demolition or alteration of historic-age structures to capture photo documentation. Documentation of historic resources is an effective way to mitigate against the loss of historic structures when regulatory tools are not available. DISCUSSION: Zoning History: Ordinance 1747 approved on June 29, 1970 enacted a new zoning map and set of districts and zoning requirements for the city. This map shows the subject property and surrounding neighborhood as being zoned into the low-density “R-1” zoning district, which was subsequently translated to “RSF-4” with the adoption of the city’s Unified Development Code. City Plan 2040 and Future Land Use Plan: This area is designated as a Residential Neighborhood area, which are “primarily residential in nature and support a wide variety of housing types of appropriate scale and context.” This land use designation also encourages the incorporation of low-intensity non-residential uses intended to serve the surrounding neighborhood, such as retail or offices. 1 The request aligns with this designation by slightly increasing the density of single-family detached housing on the property, while retaining the single-family development patterns in the neighborhood. Additional uses may be considered with a conditional use permit such as two-family dwellings and limited business that would contribute to a complete neighborhood. The request aligns with goals 1, 2, and 6 of City Plan 2040 by creating opportunities for denser development in an area of the center of the city that is already served by infrastructure. 1 City Plan 2040, 128. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 14 of 15 Rezone Request – 1660 W Palmer, Fayetteville 72701 I am requesting a rezone from RSF-4 to RSF-8 for this parcel to support slightly higher density and potential small-scale redevelopment. The subject site currently has unused excess land and has strong potential to add additional single family structures to support infill development near the University of Arkansas campus. Under the current zoning a lot split is not possible despite adequate lot width/street frontage due to the location of the existing home on the site. There are two development scenarios I would consider if a rezone was approved. 1.) Complete a standard lot split keeping the existing home and construct a second lot/home on the excess land to the east, or 2.) Raise the existing home and split the existing lot into 3 new residentials lots for the purpose of constructing 3 new medium sized homes. I believe either scenario would be conforming to both the immediate neighborhood and surrounding area. Higher density development (RMF-24) is located both to the East and South of the subject parcel, however, I don’t believe multifamily zoning or structures would be appropriate for the subject street despite nearby multi-unit developments. Currently I don’t see any adverse effects a rezone could have on surrounding properties. Planning Commission April 13, 2026 RZN-2026-0009 (PURYEAR) Page 15 of 15 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1335 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: Keith Macedo, Chief of Staff Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director Jessica Masters, Planning Director FROM: Donna Wonsower, Senior Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL: RZN-2026-0008: Rezoning (1705 N GARLAND AVE/TRICYCLE FARMS, 365): Submitted by ALLIE WILSON for property located at 1705 N. GARLAND AVE. in WARD 2. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 2.10 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RI-U, RESIDENTIAL INTERMEDIATE-URBAN. RECOMMENDATION: City Planning staff recommends approval and the Planning Commission recommends denial of a request to rezone the subject property as described and shown in the attached Exhibits ‘A’ and ‘B’. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located in north Fayetteville west of the intersection of N. Garland Ave. and W. Sycamore Street adjacent to Midtown Trail. The subject property contains four parcels totaling 2.10 acres, which are currently developed as Tri-Cycle Farm, a nonprofit teaching farm first established in 2012. The property is not subject to any overlay districts but does contain hydric soils. Request: The request is to rezone the subject area from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. Public Comment: Staff received one public comment in opposition to the request prior to the Planning Commission meeting, citing the current role of the property as an urban farm serving food insecurity needs, lack of density restrictions, adjacent single-family properties, lack of urban amenities, likelihood of car users, potential safety hazards, inadequate infrastructure, and need for further studies. Four members of the public spoke against the request at the Planning Commission meeting, citing the property’s history as an urban farm, traffic safety concerns, and the potential intensity of development. Land Use Compatibility: The subject property is primarily surrounded by single-family homes, with mixed- density residential and a church located to the east, across Garland. There are nearby apartment complexes on Mount Comfort and Garland. Other nonresidential services in the area include city parks, a police and fire station, and commercial businesses including grocery and convenience stores. Staff finds the proposed RI-U rezoning compatible with surrounding uses. RI-U permits a mix of low-intensity residential types, including up to four-unit buildings, but maintains a minimum lot width of 18 feet and a maximum building height of three stories. Recent Council approval of upzoning in the area has further incrementally increased the permitted residential density nearby. Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov The applicant has indicated an intent to develop the property with cottage-style cluster housing, a use which is permitted by right in RI-U. Midtown trail is also located along the southern edge of the property, permitting trail- oriented development in line with recent city code changes. RI-U does not permit multifamily structures exceeding five or more units, and staff finds that parking, drainage, tree preservation and other requirements will likely limit the development potential of the subject area. While RSF-4 and RI-U are both limited to residential uses, RI-U permits more housing types with smaller lot size requirements, encouraging compatible infill development without disrupting neighborhood scale. Additionally, RI-U permits limited small-scale commercial uses by conditional use permit, which could further contribute to the nonresidential amenities in the area with appropriate safeguards. Land Use Plan Analysis: Staff finds the proposed zoning to be consistent with the property’s Future Land Use Map designation as Residential Neighborhood Area. The RI-U zoning district would allow a greater variety of land uses in an urban setting, which staff finds to be compatible with the surrounding area. The property has a relatively high infill score of 7, indicating it is a suitable location for infill development. The property also fronts onto the Midtown Trail, a recent public improvement by the city that enables potential residents to utilize alternative means of transportation. Infill in this area could help support Goals 1 and 3 of Fayetteville's comprehensive land use plan, City Plan 2040, by promoting moderate infill in an area that is highly walkable and near transit routes. CITY PLAN 2040 INFILL MATRIX: City Plan 2040’s Infill Matrix indicates a score of 7 for this site. The following elements of the matrix contribute to this score: 1. Adequate Fire Response (Station 8, W. Deane St) 2. Near Sewer Main (8 inch main, N. Garland Ave.) 3. Near Water Main (2 inch main, N. Garland Ave.) 4. Near Grocery Store (Harps) 5. Near City Park (Lewis Soccer Complex) 6. Near Paved Trail (Midtown Trail) 7. Near Razorback Bus Stop (Garland and Sycamore, Inbound & Outbound) DISCUSSION: At the March 23, 2026 Planning Commission meeting, a vote of 2-6-0 denied the request. Commissioner Cabe motioned, and Commission Gulley seconded. Commissioners voting against the request largely cited the uncertainty of intense development that could be permitted by right under the proposed RI-U district and potential hazards associated with increased traffic at the single vehicular entry off of Garland. Several commissioners expressed a desire for a planned zoning district or conditional use permit for cluster housing that would allow for better evaluation of the proposed development’s compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioners Castin and Cabe voted in favor, citing the need for infill in the area and the proximity of the Midtown Trail and transit providing alternative transportation options. Four members of the public spoke against the request, citing the property’s history as an urban farm, traffic safety concerns, and the potential intensity of development. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: NA ATTACHMENTS: 3. Appeal Letter, 4. Exhibit A, 5. Exhibit B, 6. Staff Report Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1335 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 2026-08 FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.10 ACRES LOCATED AT 1705 NORTH GARLAND AVENUE IN WARD 2 FROM RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE TO RI-U, RESIDENTIAL INTERMEDIATE-URBAN BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone classification of the property shown on the map (Exhibit A) and the legal description (Exhibit B) both attached to the Planning Department’s Agenda Memo from RSF-4, Residential, Single-Family, Four Units per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1. ATTN: City of Fayetteville County Clerk’s Office City of Fayetteville Attorney’s Office To whom it may concern, I am writing this letter in response to the denial of the rezoning application, RZN-2026-0008. This letter will serve as our official letter of appeal to the city of Fayetteville Planning Commission’s decision for denial. The current zoning of the 4 parcels of land located primarily at 1705 N. Garland Ave., is RSF-4. According to Fayetteville’s zoning definition, a residential single-family, four single family units per acre, or 7 or less of the two (2) family dwellings per acre. “The RSF-4 Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development of these types.” The permitted uses under the RSF-4 zoning include: city-wide uses by right, single family dwellings, accessory dwellings, short term rentals. There are also conditional uses listed as: Cultural and recreational facilities, government facilities, two-family dwellings, limited business, home occupations, wireless communications facilities, & Cluster Housing Development. We are requesting a rezoning to the RI-U zone which by definition, residential intermediate- urban, where there is no “set” density regulation, however there is a land/lot restriction that will limit the development size base on the lot’s physical size. The bulk and area regulations listed are a lot width minimum of 18 feet, with build to zone located between the front property line and a 25-foot line from the front of the property line. While the code also states: “Building Area- The area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total lot area.” There is also a height maximum of 2-3 stories. This zone’s allowed usages are: City-wide uses by right, Single-family dwellings, Two (2) family dwellings, Three (3) and four (4) family dwellings, Accessory dwellings, Cluster housing development, Short-term rentals. Code sates, “The RI-U Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of detached and attached dwellings in suitable environments, to provide a range of housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes and to encourage a diversity of housing types to meet demand for walkable urban living.” While looking at these two zoning definitions, you can see that these two zonings are quite similar but do have some distinguishing differences. The concerns from the City Council meeting were the increase in traffic from the increased density of a possible development, the lack of Urban amenities, danger to the Midtown trail, the removal of the current residents of the land- Tricycle Farms, & the possibility of demolition of the current structures on the lots. While these concerns can be raised and discussed with the Council, this is not the meeting in which these should be a factor. This meeting is simply for the rezoning of the property to RI-U. These concerns should be addressed once a Large-Scale development plan is proposed to the City. While we do understand these concerns, we would like to make the following points to alleviate any concerns: 1. The traffic finding by the Planning Commission below states that there could be increased associated traffic, but that it is not likely to create or increase traffic danger or congestion. The property sits at the intersection of Garland Ave. and W Sycamore St. where there is already a current traffic light that cycles through. As the owners, we would be willing to pay for the additional lights needed to add in for our new proposed drive on the Large-Scale Development process. We would also be willing to conduct a traffic study to show that the additional lights would not increase the traffic, however it would allow for a safer flow of traffic. We are not planning on having a secondary entry/exit on the property, nor do we plan on attaching to any existing city road. We plan to have a single drive that will meet city code with a turnaround, leaving one controlled entry/exit point at the stop light. Again, we do not have any civil plans in place as this is just a rezoning, however we already have these ideas and associated cost in mind while looking at the land. 2. The lack of urban amenities and safety concerns on the Midtown trail are also something we would incorporate and be able to better elaborate once we start the design process, however we look at the property’s proximity to the bike trail as a added bonus. Being able to incorporate large patios, green spaces, courtyards, nice fencing, bike parking, outdoor dining/lounge areas is the aesthetic we are looking to create. We would like to incorporate as many outdoor community spaces as possible on our property to highlight this city feature. We will also be following all city code restrictions/requirements for all parking and landscaping. Making sure that we are not only meeting bare minimums, but that will create a nice, suitable living space. 3. Tri-cycle Farms is the current owner of the land and has been since 2011, they were once serving the community with the property as a space to grow and learn about food storages. Unfortunately, since the pandemic, they have not been able to regain steam to get the operations fully functional again. The owner of the land and the non-profit organization has since pivoted his business strategy to keep the non-profit functional. He is now working with local grocery stores to come up with solutions for food waste. Since this turn in business, he no longer has the need for the land and frankly does not have the means to sustain this property. Before listing the land for sale, he looked at the possibilities for development and suggested the property be rezoned to RI-U to better the use of the land and bring life back to this property. 4. The structures currently on the property consist of a single-family stone dwelling constructed ca. 1937, located at 1705 N. Garland Ave. And a barn on the property with aerial images as early as 1954. As the Planning Commission reports suggest, we will consult with ‘Long Range & Preservation Planner prior to demolition or alteration of historic-age structures to capture photo documentation. Documentation of historic resources is an effective way to mitigate against the loss of historic structures when regulatory tools are not available.’ The house is not listed on the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program or the National Register of Historic Places list. Again, we do not have final plans on this property that shows the demolition of this structure, however there are some significant issues with the integrity of the foundation of the home. There are multiple significant cracks and settlings that we will have inspected by a structural engineer in order to deem it safe. The Planning Commission recommended forwarding RZN-2026-0008 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. Based on their report the rezoning is consistent with the property’s Future Land Use Map, that there is sufficient justification to rezone the property, it is not likely to create or increase traffic danger and congestion. Their findings also state that given the presence of existing public infrastructure, the presence of Midtown Trail on the southern portion of the property, and proximity to nonresidential services such as grocery stores, transit and parks, and that the proposed rezoning is not likely to increase the load on public services. Based on the property’s physical size placing a limit on the possible development’s size, the overall rezoning request coinciding with all city codes and suggested plans, as well as the additional points made above to respond to the Council’s reasonings for denial, we ask that our appeal is approved for an additional City Council meeting. We plan to make additional adjustments to our application to help alleviate concerns of surrounding land owners/residents. We will be happy to make any additional adjustments suggested by the Planning Commission or City Council or answer any additional questions. I appreciate your time and attention to this matter. Allie Wilson Midtown Trail Midtown Trail Proposed RMF-24 LY N N S P L AD D I N G T O N A V E HICKORY ST JA N I C E A V E G I F F O R D A V E MAXWELL DR MAXWELL DR NOELLE AV E DEANE ST G A R L AND AVE SYCAMORE ST G A RLANDAVE GARLAND AVE GA R L A N D A V E RMF-24 RSF-4 R-A RI-12 RSF-18 RI-U Neighborhood Link Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Residential Link Trail (Proposed) Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Close Up View RZN-2026-0008 1683, 1691 & 1705 N. GARLAND AVE N 0 150 300 45060075 Feet Subject Property Zone Proposed RMF-24 RSF-4 2.3 0.0 Total 2.3ac1:2,400 Current 0.0 2.3 RZN-2026-0008 EXHIBIT 'A' RI-U RI-U RZN-2026-0008 EXHIBIT ‘B’ Legal Description: 1705 N Garland Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 Parcel # 765-13561-000 : PT SE Se, 5-16-39 Fayetteville Outlots, .30 Ac 1683-1691 N Garland Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 Parcels # 756-13562-000, 765-13561-001, & 765-08115-000 PT E/2 SE SE .73ac & PT SE SE 1.26ac. 5-16-30 & PT N 50 FT. LOT 8, Maxwell Addition TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Jessie Masters, Planning Director FROM: Donna Wonsower, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: March 23, 2026 SUBJECT: RZN-2026-0008: Rezoning (1705 N GARLAND AVE/TRICYCLE FARMS, 365) Submitted by ALLIE WILSON for property located at 1705 N. GARLAND AVE. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE- FAMILY, FOUR UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 2.10 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RI-U, RESIDENTIAL INTERMEDIATE-URBAN. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding RZN-2026-0008 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to forward RZN-2026-0008 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval.” BACKGROUND: The subject property is located in north Fayetteville west of the intersection of N. Garland Ave. and W. Sycamore Street adjacent to Midtown Trail. The subject property contains four parcels totaling 2.10 acres, which are currently developed as Tri-Cycle Farm, a nonprofit teaching farm first established in 2012. The property is not subject to any overlay districts but does contain hydric soils. Surrounding land uses and zoning are depicted in Table 1. Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning North Single-Family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre South Single-Family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban East Mixed-Density Residential Religious Facility RMF-24, Residential Multifamily, 24 Units per Acre West Single-Family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, 4 Units per Acre Request: The request is to rezone the subject area from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate-Urban. Public Comment: Staff has received one public comment in opposition to the request, citing the current role of the property as an urban farm serving food insecurity needs, lack of density restrictions, adjacent single-family properties, lack of urban amenities, likelihood of car users, potential safety hazards, inadequate infrastructure, and need for further studies. Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 1 of 17 UPDATED WITH MEETING RESULTS) INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Streets: The subject area has a road frontage along N. Garland Avenue, a fully improved Regional Link with asphalt paving, sidewalk curb and gutter. Any street improvements required in these areas would be determined at the time of the development proposal. Water: Public water is available to the Subject area. Existing 2-inch water main is present along N. Garland Ave. Sewer: Sanitary Sewer is available to the Subject area. Existing 8-inch sewer main is present along N. Garland Ave. There are known wet weather sewer capacity issues identified in the City’s 2025 Sewer Master Plan that appear in the system 577 feet north of the property. Drainage: The property is not within the Hillside-Hilltop Overlay District and does not contain streamside protection zones or and FEMA floodplain. The property does contain hydric soils, a known indicator of wetlands. However, for an area to be classified as wetlands, it may also need other characteristics such as hydrophytes (plants that grow in water), and shallow water during parts of the year. Hydric Soils can be found across many areas of Fayetteville, including valleys, floodplains, and open prairies. It’s important to identify these natural resources during development, so when these soils are identified on a property, further environmental studies will be required at the time of development. Before permits will be issued for the property a statement/report from an environmental professional must be provided summarizing the existence of wetlands on the property. If this statement/report indicates that wetlands may be present on site, a USACE Determination of Jurisdictional Wetlands will be required at the time of development submittal. Fire: Station 8, located at 2266 W. Deane Street, protects this site. The property is located approximately 0.9 miles from the fire station with an anticipated drive time of approximately 2 minutes using existing streets. The anticipated response time would be approximately 4.2 minutes. Fire Department response time is calculated based on the drive time plus 1 minute for dispatch and 1.2 minutes for turn-out time. Within the City Limits, the Fayetteville Fire Department has a response time goal of 6 minutes for an engine and 8 minutes for a ladder truck. Police: The Police Department did not comment on this request. Tree Preservation: The current zoning district of RSF-4 requires 25% minimum canopy preservation. The proposed zoning district of RI-U requires 15% minimum canopy preservation. CITY PLAN 2040 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: The City Plan 2040 Future Land Use Plan designates the property within the proposed rezone as a Residential Neighborhood area. Residential Neighborhood Areas are primarily residential in nature and support a wide variety of housing types of appropriate scale and context: single-family, duplexes, rowhouses, multifamily and accessory dwelling units. Residential Neighborhood encourages highly connected, compact Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 2 of 17 blocks with gridded street patterns and reduced building setbacks. It also encourages traditional neighborhood development that incorporates low-intensity nonresidential uses intended to serve the surrounding neighborhoods, such as retail and offices, on corners and along connecting corridors. This designation recognizes existing conventional subdivision developments which may have large blocks with conventional setbacks and development patterns that respond to features of the natural environment. Building setbacks may vary depending on the context of the existing neighborhood. CITY PLAN 2040 INFILL MATRIX: City Plan 2040’s Infill Matrix indicates a score of 7 for this site with a weighted score of 8. The following elements of the matrix contribute to the score: Adequate Fire Response (Station 8, W. Deane St) Near Sewer Main (8 inch main, N. Garland Ave.) Near Water Main (2 inch main, N. Garland Ave.) Near Grocery Store (Harps) Near City Park (Lewis Soccer Complex) Near Paved Trail (Midtown Trail) Near Razorback Bus Stop (Garland and Sycamore, Inbound & Outbound) FINDINGS OF THE STAFF 1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: The subject property is primarily surrounded by single-family homes to the east, west, and south, with mixed-density residential and a church located to the east across Garland. There are nearby apartment complexes on Mount Comfort and Garland. Other nonresidential services in the area include city parks, a police and fire station, and commercial business including grocery and convenience stores. Staff finds the proposed RI-U rezoning compatible with surrounding uses. RI-U permits a mix of low-intensity residential types, including up to four-unit buildings, but maintains a minimum lot width of 18 feet and a maximum building height of three stories. Several rezonings in recent years have slowly increased the permitted density in the area, with an anticipated increase in the density of the built environment as those areas redevelop. The applicant has indicated an intent to develop the property with cottage style cluster housing, a use which is permitted by right in RI-U. Midtown trail is also located along the southern edge of the property, permitting trail- oriented development in line with recent city code changes. RI-U does not permit multifamily structures exceeding five or more units, and staff finds that parking, drainage, tree preservation and other requirements will likely limit the development potential of the subject area. While RSF-4 and RI-U allow similar uses, RI-U permits more housing types with smaller lot size requirements, encouraging compatible infill development without disrupting neighborhood scale. Additionally, RI-U permits limited small-scale commercial uses by conditional use permit, which could further contribute to the nonresidential amenities in the area with appropriate safeguards. Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 3 of 17 Land Use Plan Analysis: Staff finds the proposed zoning to be consistent with the property’s Future Land Use Map designation as Residential Neighborhood Area. The RI-U zoning district would allow a greater variety of land uses in an urban setting, which staff finds to be compatible with the surrounding area. The property has a relatively high infill score of 7 with a weighted score of 8, indicating it is a suitable location for infill development. The property also fronts onto Midtown Trail, a recent public improvement by the city in the area that would enable residents to utilize alternative means of transportation. Infill in this area could help support Goals 1 and 3 by promoting moderate infill in an area that is highly walkable and near transit routes. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: Staff finds that there is sufficient justification to rezone the subject property at this time. A rezoning to RI-U would establish more flexible allowances for creative redevelopment of the subject property that could ultimately allow for more preservation of existing open space and potentially enable homeownership of smaller, more attainable dwelling units in an area of town with a relatively high concentration of services, amenities, and employment opportunities. A redevelopment of the land under existing entitlements would have less flexibility and likely result in increased impact and costs. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: Rezoning the property from RSF-4 to a RI-U could increase development potential and its associated traffic impact on the site as the proposal would eliminate the current density limitation of four units per acre with no proposed density cap. However, staff finds that rezoning the property to RI- U is not likely to create or appreciable increase traffic danger and congestion since the subject property is relatively small and alternative transportation options are readily available. RI-U would also permit trail-oriented development in line with recent code changes. Any street improvements required in this area would be determined at the time of development proposal. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: Rezoning the property from RSF-4 to RI-U has the potential to alter the population density when considering that RI-U has no set density limitation. However, given the presence of existing public infrastructure, the presence of Midtown Trail on the southern portion of the property, and proximity to nonresidential services such as grocery stores, transit and parks, staff finds that the proposed rezoning is not likely to increase the load on public services to an undesirable degree. While there are known wet weather sewer capacity issues identified in the City’s 2021 Sewer Master Plan that appear in the system approximately 577 linear feet downstream of this property, the Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 4 of 17 relatively small size of the property is also likely to naturally limit development capacity. Any street improvements required in this area would be determined at the time of development proposal. Fayetteville Public Schools did not comment on this request. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends forwarding RZN-2026-0008 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Date: March 23, 2026 Tabled Forwarded Denied Motion: Second: Vote: BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Unified Development Code o §161.07 District RSF-4, Residential Single-Family –Four (4) Units Per Acre o §161.12 Residential Intermediate-Urban Project Maps o One Mile Map o Close-Up Map o Current Land Use Map o Future Land Use Map Long Range Planning Memo Applicant Exhibits o Request Letter Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 5 of 17 X CABE GULLEY 2-6-0 (CASTIN AND CABE IN FAVOR) I move to forward RZN-2026-0008 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. Public Comment 161.07 District RSF-4, Residential Single-Family - Four (4) Units Per Acre A) Purpose. The RSF-4 Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development of these types. B) Uses. 1) Permitted Uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 41 Accessory dwellings Unit 46 Short-term rentals 2) Conditional Uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 12a Limited business Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities Unit 44 Cluster Housing Development C) Density. Single-family dwellings Two (2) family dwellings Units per acre 4 or less 7 or less D) Bulk and Area Regulations. Single-family dwellings Two (2) family dwellings Lot minimum width 70 feet 80 feet Lot area minimum 8,000 square feet 12,000 square feet Land area per dwelling unit 8,000 square feet 6,000 square feet Hillside Overlay District Lot minimum width 60 feet 70 feet Hillside Overlay District Lot area minimum 8,000 square feet 12,000 square feet Land area per dwelling unit 8,000 square feet 6,000 square feet Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 6 of 17 E) Setback Requirements. Front Side Rear 15 feet 5 feet 15 feet F) Building Height Regulations. Building Height Maximum 3 stories G) Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot. Accessory ground mounted solar energy systems shall not be considered buildings. Code 1991, §160.031; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99; Ord. No. 4858, 4-18- 06; Ord. No. 5028, 6-19-07; Ord. No. 5128, 4-15-08; Ord. No. 5224, 3-3-09; Ord. No. 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. No. 5462, 12-6-11; Ord. No. 5921, §1, 11-1-16; Ord. No. 5945, §8, 1-17-17; Ord. No. 6015, §1(Exh. A), 11-21-17; Ord. No. 6245, §2, 10-15-19; Ord. No. 6427, §§1(Exh. C), 2, 4-20-21) Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 6820, §1, adopted December 4, 2024, determines that Ordinance 6427 Sunset Clause), Ordinance 6625 (extending Sunset Clause) and Ordinance 6710 (extending the Sunset Clause) be amended so that Ordinance 6427 and all amendments to Code Sections ordained or enacted by Ordinance 6427 shall automatically sunset, be repealed and become void on July 1, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. unless prior to that time and date the City Council amends this ordinance to repeal or further amend this sunset, repeal and termination section. Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 7 of 17 161.12 District RI-U, Residential Intermediate - Urban A) Purpose. The RI-U Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of detached and attached dwellings in suitable environments, to provide a range of housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes and to encourage a diversity of housing types to meet demand for walkable urban living. B) Uses. 1) Permitted Uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 9 Two (2) family dwellings Unit 10 Three (3) and four (4) family dwellings Unit 41 Accessory dwellings Unit 44 Cluster housing development Unit 46 Short-term rentals 2) Conditional Uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 12a Limited business Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 26 Multi-family dwellings Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities C) Density. None. D) Bulk and Area Regulations. Dwelling all types) Lot width minimum 18 feet Lot area minimum None E) Setback Requirements. Front Side Other Uses Side Single & Two (2) Family Rear Other Uses Rear, from centerline of an alley A build-to zone that is located between the front property, line and a line 25 feet from the front property line. None 5 feet 5 feet 12 feet F) Building Height Regulations. Building height maximum 2 stories/3 stories* Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 8 of 17 A building or a portion of a building that is located between 0 and 10 feet from the front property line or any master street plan right-of-way line shall have a maximum height of two (2) stories. Buildings or portions of the building set back greater than 10 feet from the master street plan right- of-way shall have a maximum height of three (3) stories. G) Building Area. The area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total lot area. Accessory ground mounted solar energy systems shall not be considered buildings. H) Minimum Buildable Street Frontage. 50% of the lot width. Ord. No. 5945, §5(Exh. A), 1-17-17; Ord. No. 6015, §1(Exh. A), 11-21-17; Ord. No. 6245, §2, 10-15-19; Ord. No. 6427, §§1(Exh. C), 2, 4-20-21) Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 6820, §1, adopted December 4, 2024, determines that Ordinance 6427 Sunset Clause), Ordinance 6625 (extending Sunset Clause) and Ordinance 6710 (extending the Sunset Clause) be amended so that Ordinance 6427 and all amendments to Code Sections ordained or enacted by Ordinance 6427 shall automatically sunset, be repealed and become void on July 1, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. unless prior to that time and date the City Council amends this ordinance to repeal or further amend this sunset, repeal and termination section. Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 9 of 17 GARLAND AV E DEANE ST NORTH ST LE V E R E T T A V E GA R L A N D A V E WEDINGTON DR GREGG AVE G A R L A N D AVE SYCAMORE ST G ARLAND AVE C-1 I-1 R-O RMF-40P-1 RMF-24 RSF-4 C-2 R-A CS RSF-18 Regional Link Neighborhood Link Institutional Master Plan Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Alley Residential Link Planned Neighborhood Link Planned Residential Link Shared-Use Paved Trail Trail (Proposed) Fayetteville City Limits Planning Area One Mile View RZN-2026-0008 1683, 1691 & 1705 N. GARLAND AVE N 0 0.25 0.50.13 Miles Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Subject Property Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 10 of 17 Midtown Trail Midtown Trail Proposed RMF-24 LY N N S P L AD D I N G T O N A V E HICKORY ST JA N I C E A V E G I F F O R D A V E MAXWELL DR MAXWELL DR NOELLE AV E DEANE ST G A R L AND AVE SYCAMORE ST G A RLANDAVE GARLAND AVE GA R L A N D A V E RMF-24 RSF-4 R-A RI-12 RSF-18 RI-U Neighborhood Link Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Residential Link Trail (Proposed) Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Close Up View RZN-2026-0008 1683, 1691 & 1705 N. GARLAND AVE N 0 150 300 45060075 Feet Subject Property Zone Proposed RMF-24 RSF-4 2.3 0.0 Total 2.3ac1:2,400 Current 0.0 2.3 Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 11 of 17 RI-U RI-U BEL AIR DR O AKLA N D AVE MELMAR DR GARLAND AVE DEANE ST GA R L A ND AVE SYCAMORE ST GARLAND AV E GARLAND AVE 2025 Imagery | EagleView Technologies | Surdex Corporation Neighborhood Link Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Residential Link Trail (Proposed) Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Current Land Use RZN-2026-0008 1683, 1691 & 1705 N. GARLAND AVE N 0 225 450 675900112.5 Feet Subject Property Multi-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Mixed Residential Single-Family Residential 1:3,600 Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 12 of 17 City Neighborhood Civic and Private Open Space Non-Municipal Government Residential Neighborhood GARLAND AV E DEANE ST GA R L A N D A V E WEDINGTON DR NORTH ST GREGG AVE G A R L A N D AVE SYCAMORE ST G ARLAND AVE Regional Link Neighborhood Link Institutional Master Plan Regional Link - High Activity Unclassified Alley Residential Link Planned Neighborhood Link Planned Residential Link Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Trail (Proposed) City Neighborhood Civic Institutional Civic and Private Open Space Industrial Natural Non-Municipal Government Residential Neighborhood Rural Residential Urban Center Future Land Use RZN-2026-0008 1683, 1691 & 1705 N. GARLAND AVE N 0 610 1,220 1,830 2,440305 Feet Subject Property 1:10,000 Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 13 of 17 TO: Donna Wonsower, Senior Planner FROM: Kylee Cole, Long Range & Preservation Planner MEETING DATE: March 23, 2026 SUBJECT: Long Range Planning Comments Regarding RZN-2026-0008 BACKGROUND: The applicant requests to rezone approximately 2.26 acres from RSF-4, Residential Single- Family, Four Units per Acre to RI-U, Residential Intermediate - Urban. Two long range planning document is relevant when evaluating this request: City Plan 2040 and the Heritage & Historic Preservation Master Plan. City Plan 2040 (2020): City Plan 2040 includes several relevant plan goals and objectives: Goal 1 – We will make appropriate infill and revitalization our highest priority. Goal 2 – We will discourage suburban sprawl. Goal 3 – We will make compact, complete, and connected development the standard. Goal 6 – We will create opportunities for attainable housing. o 3.6.1 - Increase housing choices by encouraging a mixture of housing types and sizes dispersed throughout the city and in proximity to transit and active transportation networks. (p.45) On its adoption in early 2020, City Plan 2040 carried forward goals from prior comprehensive plans and organized them into six primary goals. The goals were meant to focus the City’s efforts on appropriate infill that furthers a variety of transportation options, supports the creation of attainable housing, and limits the amount of land consumed by development on the City’s periphery, often termed “suburban sprawl”. Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan (2023): The City’s Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan was initiated by City Plan 2040. Heritage and Historic Preservation Master Plan Relevant Goals and Action Items 1.9 Plan Review Include historic preservation staff in review of proposed major projects and zoning changes to determine impacts to historic resources. 1.10 Demolition Ordinance Pass an ordinance to allow for the review of proposed demolitions for resources forty-five years or older. Staff to evaluate each property for significance. Work with property owner to discourage demolition. Reviews should be taken up by HDC as needed. 4.9 Community Engagement: Transparency Publish information about historic preservation reviews and demolitions of historic properties to increase transparency. The subject property has not yet been surveyed for historic resources, but a review of the site shows one residential building and one barn structure. The residence at 1705 N. Garland Ave. Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 14 of 17 contains a single-family stone dwelling constructed ca. 1937. The property appears to retain its integrity of materials and design and is potentially eligible for state or national registers or as a contributing feature of an Ozark Giraffe or “rock house” historic district. There is also a log barn on the property. Aerial images as early as 1954 show this structure. Agricultural structures in Fayetteville are becoming increasingly rare due to the loss of farmland and increasing development pressure. Since the applicant indicates there are redevelopment plans, the property owner and/or applicant should consult with Long Range & Preservation Planner prior to demolition or alteration of historic-age structures to capture photo documentation. Documentation of historic resources is an effective way to mitigate against the loss of historic structures when regulatory tools are not available. DISCUSSION: Zoning History: Ordinance 1747 approved on June 29, 1970 enacted a new zoning map and set of districts and zoning requirements for the city. This map shows the subject property and surrounding neighborhood as being zoned into the low-density “R-1” zoning district, which was subsequently translated to “RSF-4” with the adoption of the city’s Unified Development Code. City Plan 2040 and Future Land Use Plan: This area is designated as a Residential Neighborhood area, which are “primarily residential in nature and support a wide variety of housing types of appropriate scale and context.” This land use designation also encourages the incorporation of low-intensity non-residential uses intended to serve the surrounding neighborhood, such as retail or offices. 1 The request aligns with this designation by increasing the variety of housing types permitted from just single-family to include two-, three-, and four-family housing. 1 City Plan 2040, 128. Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 15 of 17 2/24/2026 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to request the rezoning of the 4 parcels at the physical addresses of 1705 N. Garland Ave. & 1683-1691 1705 N. Garland Ave., Fayetteville, AR. We are proposing rezoning from single family residential to RI-U zoning. This property located right alongside the bike trail and at an existing intersection will create an optimal land for a housing development. Our plan is to create a property for When Googled, “Residential Intermediate-Urban (RI-U) in Fayetteville, Arkansas, is a zoning district designed to allow high-density residential development, including single-family, duplex, triplex, and multi-family structures. While specific maximum unit counts per acre can vary by development type, it is considered a "gentle density" zone.” We feel as this is a perfect representation on what we would like to develop the property into. Providing additional units per acre, to create a housing district that will incorporate community and the bike trail to provide optimal multi-family housing options. We propose RI-U zoning that compliments the property just South of the land, currently zoned RI-12 to give us the opportunity of cluster housing with smaller lot lines to maximize the value of square footage of the land. We plan to do cottage style housing that would be trail facing, these would be 3-bedroom cottages. While using the other pieces of land to do 4-plex, 1-2-bedroom cottage style homes photo inspiration is available upon request). We can also provide a preliminary layout of home on our property. We plan to meet all city requirements and hope to make this a desirable place to live. WE are excited to create a community based on what the City of Fayetteville has planned for the long-term development of the City and will be happy to incorporate any creative ideas proposed. We hope this rezoning is considered to provide a great housing opportunity to the people of Fayetteville. Allie Wilson Operations Manager 501-804-1327 Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 16 of 17 N 02°4400 E 174.09 15:6.8.A 2. 1 1 A C R E S E 2. 1 1 A C R E S AD J U S T E D A C R E A G E PT O F SE 1 M S E 11 4 SE C T I O N S P A R C E L 7 6 5 1 3 5 6 2 0 0 0 T O T A L A C R E A G E 2. 2 9 A C R E S Z O N E D R S F 4 5 3 1 35' 8 S 8 N 87 2 0 4 8 W 45 4 84 B A R Y A D J U S 0 3 0 A C R E PA R C E L 7 8 5 1 3 5 8 1 0 PO I N T O F B E GI N N 158.SB. CE 0. 6 6 48 5 0 SU R V E Y I N G N O T E S 50 0 1 6 N 3 0 W 0 0 5 2 2 0 7 2 1 5 3 2 00 1 8 N 3 0 W W 0 0 8 1 1 0 7 2 CO M P L E T E D FI E L D W O R K AP R I L 12 20 1 1 SA S I S O F BE A R I N G A R K A N S A S S T A T E PL A N E N O R T H ZO N E NA D 8 3 R E F E R E N C E D O C U M E N T 1. S U R V E Y PL A T 8 Y BL E W B A T E S AS S O C I A T E S P. L S 1 5 3 2 J O B 0 6 7 5 2 F L O O D C E N O PO R T I O N O F TH I S P R O P E R T Y IS L O C A TE D W TH I N FL O O D Z O N E A O R A E A S DE T E R M I N E D B Y TH E NA T I O N A L P L O O D IN S U R A N C E P R O G R A M F L O O D IN S U R A N C E RA T E MA P F O R W A S H I N G T O N CO U N T Y RK A N S A S M P A N E L 0 5 1 4 3 0 0 2 1 0 F DA T E D 05 1 6 2 00 0 0237-31- W148,94 50.00 O W N E R D E V E L O P E R TI M M O L D E N H A U E R 17 0 5 G A R L A N D A V E FA Y E T T E V I L L E A R 72 7 0 3 28 5 1 1 5 5 1 0 0 0 76 5 0 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 78 5 1 3 5 8 2 0 0 0 ZO N E D R S F 4 CI T Y PL A T PA G E 38 5 40 4 OW N E R S H I P O F T H E RE A L ES T A T E S H O W N A N D DE S C R I B E D H E R E I N D O H E R E B Y DE D I C A T F O R P U B L I C O W N E R S H I P A L L S T R E E T S A N D A L L E Y S A S S H O W N O N TH I S PL A T F O R PU B L I C BE N E F I T A S P R E S C R I B E D B Y LA W TH E O W N E R S A L S O D E D I C A T E T O T H E CI T Y O F F A Y E T T E V I L L E A N D T O T H E P U B L I C UT I L I T Y C O M P A N I E S I N C L U D I N G A N Y C A B L E TE L E V I S I O N C O M P A N Y HO L D I N G A FR A N C H I S E G R A N T E D B Y TH E CI T Y OF F A Y E T T E V I L L E T H E E A S E M E N T S A S S H O W N O N TH I S PL A T F O R T H E PU R P O S E O F IN S T A L L A T I O N OF N E W FA C I L I T I E S A N D T H E RE P A I R OF EX I S T I N G FA CI L I TI ES A L S O E S T A B L I S H E D H E R E B Y IS T H E RI G H T O F I N G R E S S AN D EG R E S S TO SAID ASE ME N T S TH E BI G H T T O PRO H I D I T TH E ER E C T I O N OF BU I L D I N G S ST R U C T U R E S OR FE N C E S WI T H I N SA I D EA S E M E N T S AN D T H E RI G H T T O R E M O V E O R TR I M 8 3 1 1 1 7 0 O W N E R VI C I N I T Y P R E V I O U S DE SC R I P T I O N O F PA R C E L S 7 6 5 1 35 6 1 0 00 4 76 5 1 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 A P A R T O F T H E S O U T H E A S T Q U A R T E R O F T H E SO U T H E A S T Q U A R T E R O F S E C T I O N 5, T O W N S M I P 16 NO R T H R A N G E 30 WE S T WA S H I N G T O N C O U N T Y AR K A N S A S BE I N G M O R E PA R T I C U L A R L Y D E S C R I B E D A S PO L L O W S TO M T n F O R T Y A C R E TR A C T SA I D PO I N T BE I N G A S E T IR O N PI N A N D RU N N I N G T H E N C E N8 7 1 9 1 3 W 15 7 8 2 TO A F O U N D IR O N PI N TH E N C E N8 7 2 0 4 8 W 45 4 8 4 T O A FO U N D S T O N E TH E N C E N 0 2 4 4 0 E 17 4 0 9 TO A FO U N D PI P E THE N CE U ND IR C 56 7 1 9 3 9 E 41 9 5 3 T O A F O U N D IR O N PI N TH E N C E S 0 2 3 2 3 2 W 78 1 0 T O A N E X I S T I N G F E N C E C O R N E R PO S T TH E N C E S8 7 2 1 0 S E 19 2 5C TO A SE T I R O N PIN TH E N C E S0 2 3 7 3 1 W 9 8 9 4 T O TH E P O I N T O F BE G I N N I N G CO N T A I N I N G 2. 1 1 AC R E S M O R E O R L E S S TH E N O R T H 50 O F LO T 8 O F MA X W E L L ADD I T ION TO T H TI O N TO T H E CI T Y OF FA Y E T T E AN S A S A P A R T O F TH E SO U T H E A S T Q U A R T E R O F T H E SO U T H E A S T QU A R T E R O F SE C T I O N S TO W N S H I P 15 N O R T H RA N G E A PA R T O F T H E S O U T H E A S T QU A R T E R O F T H E SO U T H E A S T QU A R T E R O F S E C T BE G I N N I N G A T A PO I N T W H I C H IS N 0 2 3 7 3 1 E 0. 8 8 A N D N 6 8 3 6 0 3 W 48 50 F R O M T H E S O U T H E A S T C O R N E R O F SA I D F O R T Y A C R E TR A C T SA I D P O I N T BE I N G A S E T IR O N PI N A N D RU N N I N G T H E N C E N8 7 1 9 1 3 W 12 8 91 TO A S E T I R O N PI N T H E N C E N 0 3 3 4 5 3 W 99 4 5 T O A SE T IR O N PI N T H E N C E 5 8 7 2 1 0 5 E 13 9 3 7 TO A SE T IR O N PI N TH E N C E 5 0 2 3 7 3 1 W 98 9 4 T O T H E PO I N T OF BE G I N N I N G CO N T A I N I N G 0. 3 0 AC R E S M O R E O R LE S S SU B J E C T T O EA S E M E N T S A N D R I G H T S O F W A Y O F R E C O R D IF AN Y LO T 8 O F M A E 5 1 9 2 0 8 1 3 TH E NO R T H S O OF LO T 8 OF MA X W E L L AD D I T I O N TO TH E CI TY OF PA Y E T T É V I L L E AR K A N S A S BE I N G A PA R T O F TH E TH E SO U T H E A S T QU A R T E R O F SE C T S A S T OU A R T E R OF S E C T I O N A N D A PA R T OF TH E SO U T H E A S T QU A R T E R OF CO U N T Y AR K A N S A S BE I N G M O R E PA RT IC UL AR LY DE SC R I B E D A S FO L L O W S TO W T BE G I N N I N G A T A PO I N T WH I C H N 0 2 37 3 1 E 0. 6 8 A N D N e 6 3 5 0 3 W 48 50 F R O M TH E S O U T H E A S T C O R N E R OF TH E S O U T H E A S T QU A R T E R O F TH E S O U T H E A S T Q U A R T E R O F S A I D SE C T I O N 5 SA I D P O I N T B E I N G A S E T I R O N PI N A N D R U N N I N G T H E N C E S 0 2 3 7 3 1 W T O A S E T I R O N PI N T H E N C E N 8 7 1 4 0 0 W 15 7 8 7 T O A F O U N D I R O N PI N T H E N C E N 0 2 5 4 4 6 E 49 7 6 T O A F O U I R O N PIN T H E N G E N a 7 2 0 4 8 W 45 4 84 T O A F O U N D ST O N E TH E N C E N O 2 44 0D TE 17 4 0 9 T O A F O U N D PI P E TH E N C E 8 7 1 9 3 9 E 4 1 9 53 T O A F O U N D I R O N PI N T H E N C E 0 2 32 3 2 W 75 10' TO A N EX I S T I N G FE N C E C O R N E R PO S T T H E N C E 5 8 7 2 1 0 5 T E 53 1 3 T O A S E T IR O N PI N T H E N C E 5 0 3 34 5 3 E 99 4 5 T O A S E T IR O N PI N T H E N C E S8 7 1 9 1 3 E 12 8 6 1 TO T H E P O I N T O F BE G I N N I N G CO N T A I N I N G 1. 9 9 AC R E S M O R E O R LE S S S U B J E C T T O N D R I G H T S O F W A R E C O R D IF A N Y S T A N D A R D L E G E N D S U R V E Y F E A T AS E M E N T S OU N C A R Y LINE FO R T Y LI N E CE N T E R L I NE OF IN K G R E S BU ILD UT I L ITY UT I L I T Y LI N E S OV E R SA NIT ST A T E PL A N E C O O N: 64 4 6 0 SE C T I O N SE C T I O N P T O F LO T P A R C E L 7 6 5 0 8 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 9 4 5 3 P R O V E D F O R R E C O R U A T I O N E PE D E S ST O R CO N C R E T E PO N O LE P H O N E L G R A V E L FL O O D ZO N E FA Y E T T E V I L L E P L A N N I N G AD M I N I S T R A T I O N By F Date8 Doc ID: 014142930001 pe: RELKind: SURVEY Recorded: 08/04/2011 at 03:08:28 PM Fee Amt: $15.00 Paae 1 of1WashinatonCountv. ARBetteStampsCircuit Clerk F11.2011-00021930 RW RTHGARLANDAVENUR SY C A N O R E S T R E E T 24 W A T E R L I N E S E E 3 0 w T O TH E BE S T OF WY KN O W L E D G E AN D BÉ L I E F 12 T H D A Y OF AP R I L G I S T E R SURURY NO T AN COLOR E AS S U M E D TH A T CO S NO T BE A AN GRIN GI NA L SE A L AN D SI G N A T U R E File Number: 201100021930 Page 1 of 1 S F O R T H E U S E A N D BE N E F I T O F E W 52 4 W S Y FA Y E TTT E V I L L E A R 72 7 0 3 PH 4 7 8 44 3 1 5 F A X 479 58 2 1 8 8 3 T I M M O L D E N H A U E A U E ht l p t e w e w b l e w i n c c o m 0 1 1 0 9 6 D R A W N B Y 8 0 R A N G E 3 0 W E S T S U R V E Y E D Y GD I D A T E 0 GI S A p p r o v e d 02 1 8 2 0 2 6 Planning Commission March 23, 2026 RZN-2026-0008 (TRICYCLE FARMS) Page 17 of 17 1 Wonsower, Donna From:Planning Shared Sent:Wednesday, March 11, 2026 8:15 AM To:Wonsower, Donna Subject:FW: URGENT: Concerns Regarding RZN-2026-0008 (Tri Cycle Farms) - Infrastructure Incompatibility Safety Hazards Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged For you. Thank you Mirinda Hopkins Development Coordinator Planning Division City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 479-575-8267 fayetteville-ar.gov From: Nico Follett <nicofollett@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 12:07 AM To: Wiederkehr, Mike <mike.wiederkehr@fayetteville-ar.gov>; Moore, Sarah <sarah.moore@fayetteville-ar.gov>; Planning Shared <planning@fayetteville-ar.gov> Subject: URGENT: Concerns Regarding RZN-2026-0008 (Tri Cycle Farms) - Infrastructure Incompatibility & Safety Hazards CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Fayetteville. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To the Fayetteville Planning Commission and Ward 2 Council Members, I am a resident of the neighborhood home to the 2.29-acre Tri Cycle Farms property. I want to be clear: I am a supporter of infill and recognize the urgent need for (affordable!) housing in Fayetteville. However, the request for RI-U (Residential Intermediate-Urban) for this specific location is an irresponsible application of "Urban" zoning in a non-urban context. 1. The "Urban" Mismatch RI-U was designed for the downtown core, whereas this property is exclusively surrounded by single-family homes and mature residential infrastructure. 2 The Shock of Density: This proposal trades a historic community green space with mature fruit trees aiding in food insecurity and community programming for an uncapped number of multistory residential units with virtually zero setbacks. o o o RI-U carries no affordability covenant requirement. In a university town, "uncapped" o density near campus (and continuously gentrified homes) historically produces premium student-market units, not the affordable family housing the city actually needs, especially in o this o particular neighborhood – a pocket including some of the highest poverty rates o in Fayetteville. o o o o It feels as though the city would be effectively establishing that "urban" zoning can o be applied anywhere a developer requests it, regardless of context. o Missing Infrastructure: While the proposed zoning claims this is "urban," it lacks the basic amenities that make real urban living functional to the diverse neighborhood in the block confined by Deane, Garland, Wedington, and Porter. My family currently has to drive to reach a public playground for our small children, or bring home any reasonable amount of groceries with preschoolers in tow. o o o If the city is granting high density, it should mandate - at a minimum - Neighborhood o Services (NS-G) like a small pocket park and walkable food access (small grocer, bodega, deli, or a cafe). Without these, you are simply building a "parking-free" commuter colony that adds cars to our neighborhood streets without adding any value to the existing o residents’ lives. o o o o Mass transit, large employers in close proximity, grocery stores and entertainment within o REAL walking distance in every neighborhood, mild weather: these things make a walkable city. Adding housing while removing parking lots does not. o o o o Unlike downtown, there is NOT plentiful commercial parking near this lot for new resident o spillover, and they won’t want to walk twenty minutes next to the cars speeding up Garland to Harp’s one-way just to carry back their week’s groceries either. o Interstate Commuters: 3 Unlike downtown, many residents who choose this particular neighborhood choose it for the quick interstate access: they have cars. 2. Critical Safety Hazard: The Midtown Trail My six home cul-de-sac serves as a literal segment of the Midtown Trail. The Conflict: Under RI-U, the developer will likely seek extreme parking reductions. In a "one bedroom, one car" university town, those cars will inevitably spill into our cul-de-sac (the closest direct connection with street parking opening up to this development without navigating around privacy fences to neighborhoods like Maxwell or traversing further streets). The Danger: Forcing cyclists and pedestrians (including children) to navigate a trail clogged with overflow parking from a high-density development is a massive safety liability for the city. Even before the trail existed, Lynn’s Pl was difficult for a vehicle to navigate if there were cars parked near one another on opposing sides of the street. 3. Documented Infrastructure Failure & Environmental Impact Our street is already at its limit. I have witnessed larger vehicles such as delivery and moving trucks struggle to maneuver the cul-de-sac at times when guests are parked on the street. If guest parking is utilized by even two close neighbors simultaneously, the street can become difficult for recycling/trash vehicles and, more critically, Fire and EMS apparatus. Watershed Concerns: Replacing 2.29 acres of permeable farm soil, hugelkultur beds, and mature trees literally designed for permaculture with "uncapped" hardscape in an area already prone to runoff is an environmental oversight. My yard floods in spite of a small home footprint, rain barrels, and a permeable driveway surface. We need to see a rigorous watershed and drainage analysis before any density increase is considered. Historical Precedent: 4 Even the owner of the farm persistently directed visitors to park at the church across Garland because he knew this site and these streets could not handle the load - which was always far less than this current proposal. Further Studies: o o o Street Traffic: o The Deane to Sycamore turning lane is already crammed. Interstate traffic can back up all the way to the Deane intersection around peak commuting hours. How will uncapped residential units at Sycamore and Garland impact that further? o o o o Residential Parking: o Lynn’s Pl is meant to serve only six homes, but even the existing parking is occasionally not enough. I’ve already had trouble backing out of my own parking space if my across-the-street neighbor has a guest who parks behind my driveway. I’ve unwittingly planned o a birthday party for my child at the same time as a neighbor a few doors down on Deane St. – where there is no street parking, like Garland – throwing their own house party and it already causes issues. o o o o Schools & Utilities: o Has the school board been formally consulted regarding handling an uncapped residential unit development? Have utility capacity studies been run alongside traffic and watershed analyses? o o o o Has o construction o phase impact for such a development been considered, regarding flow of traffic o on Garland as well as damage on fresh city construction nearby residents endured for years for the Midtown improvements? o Requested Action I ask the Planning Commission to deny the RI-U request. Any redevelopment of this site must be handled with a Planned Zoning District (PZD) that includes: 1. 2. 3. A hard cap on units to protect the watershed and neighborhood scale. 4. 5 5. 6. 7. On-site public amenities (e.g., a pocket park/playground) to reduce car dependency and 8. ground-floor Neighborhood Services to make the "Urban" designation functional, 9. not just a density loophole. 10. 11. 12. 13. A Multi-Modal Safety Study specifically addressing the Midtown Trail connection. 14. We want Fayetteville to grow, but it must be done right, with respect for the safety of our trails and the capacity of our infrastructure. I urge you to deny RZN-2026-0008 and direct the applicant toward a Planned Zoning District that protects the Midtown Trail, preserves a portion of the neighborhood’s green space (especially in light of the future development of Lewis), and provides the actual urban amenities that this area lacks to be considered urban zoning. Sincerely, Nico Follett 1239 W. Deane St. Fayetteville, AR 72703 Additional Information Received Date Received: MM/DD/YYYY 05/05/2026 Time: 00:00 (AM/PM) 5:30 PM From: Name & Title Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director To: Name & Title City Council Agenda Meeting Date: MM/DD/YYYY 05/05/2026 Civic Clerk Number: Ex. 2025-994 2026-1335 Forwarded to City Attorney’s Office and Department Head Yes BILL OF ASSURANCE FOR THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS In order to attempt to obtain approval of a request for a zoning reclassification, the owner, developer, or buyer of this property, (hereinafter "Petitioner") Allie Wilson, hereby voluntarily offers this Bill of Assurance and enters into this binding agreement and contract with the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. The Petitioner expressly grants to the City of Fayetteville the right to enforce any and all of the terms of this Bill of Assurance in the Circuit Court of Washington County and agrees that if Petitioner or Petitioner's heirs, assigns, or successors violate any term of this Bill of Assurance, substantial irreparable damage justifying injunctive relief has been done to the citizens and City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. The Petitioner acknowledges that the Fayetteville Planning Comirussion and the Fayetteville City Council will reasonably rely upon all of the terms and conditions within this Bill of Assurance in considering whether to approve Petitioner's rezoning request. Petitioner hereby voluntarily offers assurances that Petitioner and Petitioner's property shall be restricted as follows IF Petitioner's rezoning is approved by the Fayetteville City Council. 1. The use of Petitioner's property shall be limited to single/multifamily housingdevelopment evelopment with no more than thirty (30) total structures. These units are not to exceed two (2) stories in height. 2. Other restrictions, including number and type of structures upon the property, are limited to a maximum of thirty (30) structures, each not exceeding two (2) stories in height. All units must comply with RI-U zoning requirements and may consist of no more than four (4) attached dwelling units per structure. 3. Specific activities will not be allowed upon petitioner's property include 4. (Any other terms or conditions) Fencing shall be designed to maintain visibility along the Midtown bike trail, while privacy fencing shall be installed along all property boundaries adjacent to neighboring lots. A traffic study shall be completed prior to submission of any large-scale development plait to evaluate and confirm the need for installation of a new traffic signal on Garlaizd. Tree canopy preservation reauirements shall be increased from fifteen percent (15%) to twenty percent (20%). The unit Iocated closest to Garland shall be oriented, or designed to appear oriented, with its front facing Garland. 5. Petitioner specifically agrees that all such restrictions and terms shall run with the land and bind all future owners unless and until specifically released by Resolution of the Fayetteville City Council. This Bill of Assurance shall be filed for record in the Washington County Circuit Clerk's Office after Petitioner's rezoning is effective and shall be noted on any Final Plat or Large -Scale Development which includes some or all of Petitioner's property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF and in agreement with all the terms and conditions stated above, 1, Allie Wilson, as the owner, developer, buyer, (Petitioner) voluntarily offer all such assurances and sign my name below. 5- 5- 2024? Date 14 S VYIfl�siun -HIS car Address 72, Printed Name ,0&,qjope-4- /Pe;h+icnar Title (if on behalf of business entity) Signature NOTARY OATH STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON On this, the 5j`' day of May, 2026, before me, the undersigned notary, personally appeared Atka, 1.tsa n , known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the person(s) whose name is/ are subscribed to the above and, after being placed upon his/her/their oath, swore or affirmed that he/she/they were authorized to sign the above Bill of Assurance, agreed with the terms of the Bill of Assurance, and executed the same for the purposes therein contained. -Z NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: 08-28-2034 (Stamp): Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2026-1520 MEETING OF MAY 5, 2026 TO: Mayor Rawn and City Council THROUGH: FROM: Council Member Sarah Moore SUBJECT: A resolution to express gratitude for academic project to explore and provide considerations for crisis response systems RECOMMENDATION: Council Member Moore is sponsoring a resolution to express gratitude for the academic project to explore and provide considerations for crisis response systems, with an appreciation to the University of Arkansas Ph.D. policy students for their contributions and their service to the community. BACKGROUND: Council Member Moore requested this item be included as the last item of New Business on the April 28, 2026 City Council agenda. This item will be followed by a presentation from the University of Arkansas students Dola Flake, Erica Eneks, Travis Wagher, and Larissa Rocha. DISCUSSION: BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 3. City Attorney & Council Member Moore Approval Verification, 4. Email Verification, 5. Crisis Response Opportunities in Fayetteville Presentation Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2026-1520 A RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS GRATITUDE FOR ACADEMIC PROJECT TO EXPLORE AND PROVIDE CONSIDERATIONS FOR CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville values thoughtful, community-driven approaches to responding to individuals experiencing crisis; and WHEREAS, Ph.D. policy students from the University of Arkansas studied and are providing considerations on crisis response systems; and WHEREAS, their work has the ability to help to deepen understanding of how crisis response can serve residents, reduce strain on emergency systems, and promote safer outcomes; and WHEREAS, this collaboration demonstrates the power of local partnerships to bring forward new ideas and practical solutions grounded in research and community needs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby expresses its appreciation to the University of Arkansas Ph.D. policy students for their contributions and thanks them for their service to the community. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby recognizes the importance of continuing to explore innovative and compassionate approaches to crisis response informed by research and collaboration. CivicClerk No.: 2026- AGENDA REQUEST FORM FOR: Council Meeting of May 19, 2026 FROM: Sarah Moore ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION TITLE AND SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS GRATITUDE FOR ACADEMIC PROJECT TO EXPLORE AND PROVIDE CONSIDERATIONS FOR CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEMS APPROVED FOR AGENDA: Council Member Sarah Moore Kit Williams Approved as to form Mayor Molly Rawn Acknowledgement Date `-f - l I -- zc: Date Date A RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS GRATITUDE FOR ACADEMIC PROJECT TO EXPLORE AND PROVIDE CONSIDERATIONS FOR CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville values thoughtful, community -driven approaches to responding to individuals experiencing crisis; and WHEREAS, Ph.D. policy students from the University of Arkansas studied and are providing considerations on crisis response systems; and WHEREAS, their work has the ability to help to deepen understanding of how crisis response can serve residents, reduce strain on emergency systems, and promote safer outcomes; and WHEREAS, this collaboration demonstrates the power of local partnerships to bring forward new ideas and practical solutions grounded in research and community needs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby expresses its appreciation to the University of Arkansas Ph.D. policy students for their contributions and thanks them for their service to the community. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby recognizes the importance of continuing to explore innovative and compassionate approaches to crisis response informed by research and collaboration. From:Moore, Sarah To:CityClerk Subject:FW: Resolution for Tue 04.28 agenda Date:Thursday, April 23, 2026 12:26:15 PM Attachments:image001.png scan.pdfscanscan.pdf image002.png Good afternoon. Please add this item to the agenda as last item of new business per approval to city attorney office of this language on Monday April 20th. This student group will present at agenda session with the request to then place this item on consent agenda for the full council meeting with no presentation at the final city council meeting. Thank you Sarah Moore Fayetteville City Council, Ward 2 sarah.moore@fayetteville-ar.gov 479.263.6629 Report a concern with SeeClickFix: https://www.fayetteville-ar.gov/4233/Report-a-Concern-with-SeeClickFix Speak up on City projects: https://speakup.fayetteville-ar.gov/ Voice your feedback to the entire Council and Mayor by emailing: agendaitemcomment@fayetteville-ar.gov From: Williams, Kit <kwilliams@fayetteville-ar.gov> Date: Friday, April 17, 2026 at 4:28 PM To: Moore, Sarah <sarah.moore@fayetteville-ar.gov> Subject: Re: Resolution for Tue 04.28 agenda Please review and send your approval unless you would like any changes. Kit Williams City Attorney City of Fayetteville AR 479-575-8313 From: Moore, Sarah <sarah.moore@fayetteville-ar.gov> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 1:23 PM To: Williams, Kit <kwilliams@fayetteville-ar.gov> Subject: Resolution for Tue 04.28 agenda Hi Kit. Here is a resolution draft to add the phd policy students to the agenda for the session for 04.28. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or thoughts to what I have provided. Express gratitude for academic project to explore and provide considerations for crisis response systems WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville values thoughtful, community-driven approaches to responding to individuals experiencing crisis; and WHEREAS, Ph.D. policy students from the University of Arkansas studied and are providing considerations on crisis response systems; and WHEREAS, their work has the ability to help to deepen understanding of how crisis response can serve residents, reduce strain on emergency systems, and promote safer outcomes; and WHEREAS, this collaboration demonstrates the power of local partnerships to bring forward new ideas and practical solutions grounded in research and community needs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Fayetteville expresses its appreciation to the University of Arkansas Ph.D. policy students for their contributions and thanks them for their service to the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City recognizes the importance of continuing to explore innovative and compassionate approaches to crisis response informed by research and collaboration. Thank you Sarah Moore Fayetteville City Council, Ward 2 sarah.moore@fayetteville-ar.gov 479.263.6629 Report a concern with SeeClickFix: https://www.fayetteville-ar.gov/4233/Report-a-Concern-with-SeeClickFix Speak up on City projects: https://speakup.fayetteville-ar.gov/ Voice your feedback to the entire Council and Mayor by emailing: agendaitemcomment@fayetteville-ar.gov Crisis Response Opportunities in Fayetteville A Student Research Project Examining Gaps in Fayetteville’s Crisis Response System and Assessing the Feasibility and Cost-Effectiveness of Civilian-Led Mental Health Response Models Erica Eneks, Dola Flake, Larissa Rocha, and Travis Wagher University of Arkansas Public Policy Ph.D. Program The National Problem Up to 15% of police calls involve mental health crises, yet many officers lack specialized behavioral health training 3, 24, 10, 21 Officers may miss signs of mental illness, resulting in arrest instead of psychiatric care 10, 11 People with mental illness are 16x more likely to be killed during police encounters; overrepresented in carceral system 24 Traditional law enforcement response criticized for escalation risk, limited training, and fatal outcomes 21 The Local Problem –Fayetteville, AR FPD has seen rising mental health crisis calls over the past decade 20, 24 CIRT has shown early success through improved outcomes, officer buy-in, reduced patrol workload, and positive community reception, but a more comprehensive mental health response system is still needed 20, 24 CIRT has limited hours of operation and low community awareness 1 Other identified barriers to care include lack of insurance and long waitlists 24 Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) Fayetteville's Crisis Intervention Response Team(CIRT) What is CIRT? Co-response program pairing police officers with social service advocates for mental health-related calls Launched in 2021 in partnership with the University of Arkansas Social Work Department Began with grant funding; now supported by the general budget Program goals 1.Decriminalize vulnerable populations 2. Connect victims to support 3.Community trust building 4. Data driven evaluation Proven Results Increased officer engagement in case management solutions 21 Reduced workload on officers and other city workers 24 Decreased engagement by frequent users 24 Reduced calls related to Intoxicated persons, Welfare Concerns and Suicide Threat 21 Participants reported feeling safer, more supported, and more willing to seek help 24 Challenges and Gaps Limited program availability 24 Low community awareness of program services and systemic barriers 24 No mobile crisis unit No mental health crisis services outside of traditional emergency room settings More comprehensive and expanded mental health services needed Alternative Response Models Alternative Response Models As mental health crisis calls have increased, communities across the U.S. have developed alternative response models to better serve individuals in crisis 20, 21 Each model varies in structure, staffing and approach, but shares a common goal of connecting people to appropriate services rather than defaulting to criminal action 10, 23 Co-Responder Models Civilian-Led Initiatives Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT) Co-Responder Models Multidisciplinary Partners Pairs trained law enforcement officers with mental health professionals such as LCSWs, LPCs, LMFTs, or psychiatrists 22, 12 Positive Public Perception Generally, well received by both law enforcement and the public, showing improved outcomes and crisis management 23, 21 Operational Efficiency Decreases arrests during crisis and reduces the time officers spend on scene, lowering the overall burden on law enforcement 23, 3 Limitations Limited by a lack of standardized protocols and systemic barriers like insurance gaps or long service waitlists 12, 24 Civilian-Led Interventions Multidisciplinary Partners Deploys mobile teams of mental health workers and EMTs, without police, to handle non-criminal call via 911 dispatch triage 6, 11 Positive Public Perception Typically, more accepted by the public and often more effective at managing crises and providing outpatient follow-up 25 Operational Efficiency Reassigning low-risk call can recover police time equivalent to 59 full-time officers, or roughly 9% of patrol personnel 17 Limitations Highly dependent on institutional capacity and the willingness of dispatchers to divert calls despite risk aversion 5, 18 Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT) Multidisciplinary Partners Features 40 hours of specialized police training and inter- agency collaboration between police, clinicians, medical personnel 2, 16 Positive Public Perception Increased collaboration between departments fosters greater community outcomes and higher efficiency for both police and healthcare 2, 13 Operational Efficiency Successfully diverts individuals from the justice system to resources, reducing burdens on healthcare and curbing recidivism 2, 23 Limitations Depends on sustained funding and community support; relies on law enforcement as primary responders 2, 23 Comparative Program Analysis STAR (Denver, CO)- Support Team Assisted Response HEART (Durham, NC) - Holistic Empathetic Assistance Response Teams CORE (Longmont, CO)- Crisis Outreach Response & Engagement STAR: Support Team Assisted Response Denver, CO Proven Growth and Research Launched in 2020 and expanded citywide in 2022 to specifically support Denver's unhoused community Scale of Operations Eight specialized teams manage 4,000 calls annual between 6am and 10pm daily Improved Safety Outcomes STAR interventions successfully reduce future police contact and arrests while increasing long-term program engagement Fiscal Efficiency At less than half the cost of traditional arrest, the program delivers significant savings within its $1.77 million dollar budget STAR - DENVER, CO HEART:Holistic Empathetic Assistance Response Teams Durham, NC Proven Scale and Recognition Since launching in 2022, the program has served 31,000 neighbors and earned the 2025 ICMA Community Health and Safety Award Specialized Crisis Response Four distinct units provide tailored interventions ranging from 911 call diversion to co-response for high-risk behavioral health scenes Extended Care Navigation Dedicated teams ensure long-term stability by providing follow-up support for housing, mental health, and post-incarceration needs Strategic Daily Coverage Multi-disciplinary teams operate throughout the day and night to provide unarmed, clinical, or co-responder support when its needed most HEART- DURHAM, NC CORE: Crisis Outreach Response & Engagement Longmont, CO Established Co-Responder Model Launched in 2018, this multidisciplinary team pairs law enforcement with clinicians and paramedics to improve outcomes Proven Impact The program successfully reduces unnecessary arrests and hospitalizations while strengthening community service connections Demographic Alignment Both cities share similar population sizes, host major universities, and face rising demands for alternative response models Unique Local Challenges While demographics align, Fayetteville's higher poverty rate and larger demographic area require specific considerations for response times and accessibility CORE- LONGMONT, CO Financial Analysis: Average Cost per response for the CORE, STAR, and HEART alternative police response programs Program name Cost per response Type of response model CORE $418.94 Co-responder STAR $470.00 Civilian-led Intervention HEART $522.60 Co-responder Fayetteville police contact, subsequent jail time, and court appearance. $686.83 N/A Possible Next Steps 1. Program Expansion & Staffing Pilot a civilian-led crisis response team in Fayetteville to improve outcomes and reduce per-incident costs Expand CIRT with extended hour coverage Recruit additional social service advocates through the UAF partnership 2. Operations & Dispatch Improvements Train dispatchers to improve call triage and diversion Develop standardized protocols and operational guidelines 3. Community Access & Crisis Services Add dedicated mental health crisis units for post-response stabilization Add mobile crisis units Launch community awareness and communications campaign 4. Accountability & Evaluation Establish data benchmarks to evaluate program effectiveness Questions and Contact Information Erica Eneks: eeneks@uark.edu Dola Flake: gmflake@uark.edu Larissa Rocha: lrochade@uark.edu Travis Wagher: twagher@uark.edu Resources 1.Ba, B. A., Chen, P., Cheng, T., Eies, M. C., and Holz, J. E. (2025). What Is the Best Response? Examining the Impact of Police and Their Response. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w34344 2.Bailey, K., Paquet, S. R., Ray, B. R., Grommon, E., Lowder, E. M., & Sightes, E. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to implementing an urban co-responding police-mental health team.Health & justice,6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352- 018-0079-0 3.Balfour, M. E., Hahn Stephenson, A., Delany-Brumsey, A., Winsky, J., & Goldman, M. L. (2022). Cops, Clinicians, or Both? Collaborative Approaches to Responding to Behavioral Health Emergencies.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.),73(6), 658–669.https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000721 4.Blais, E., Landry, M., Elazhary, N., Carrier, S., & Savard, A. (2020). Assessing the capability of a co-responding police-mental health program to connect emotionally disturbed people with community resources and decrease police use-of- force. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09434-x 5.Blattman, C., Duncan, G., Lessing, B., & Tobon, S. (2023). Civilian alternatives to policing: Evidence from Medellín’s community problem-solving intervention Operación Convivencia. In National Bureau of Economic Research.https://doi.org/10.3386/w29692 6.Brook,G. (2023). A Systematic Review of Non-Police Response Models for Persons in Crisis.Carleton University.https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2023-15672 7.City of Durham. (2024). Adopted Budget for City of Durham. In City of Durham, NC. City of Durham, NC. Retrieved March 31, 2026, from https://www.durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/57292/FY25-COD-Adopted-Budget-Book 8.City of Longmont. (2025). 2025 Adopted operating budget for City of Longmont, CO. In City of Longmont, CO. City of Longmont, CO. Retrieved March 31, 2026, from https://longmontcolorado.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2025- Adopted-Budget_City-of-Longmont.pdf 9.City of Longmont. (2025b, September 16). Crisis Outreach and Response - City of Longmont. https://longmontcolorado.gov/public-safety/community-programs/substance-use-and-mental-health-resources/crisis-outreach-and-response/ 10.Compton, M. T., Bakeman, R., Broussard, B., Hankerson-Dyson, D., Husbands, L., Krishan, S., Stewart-Hutto, T., D’Orio, B. M., Oliva, J. R., Thompson, N. J., & Watson, A. C. (2014). The Police-Based Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) model: i. Effects on officers’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Psychiatric Services, 65(4), 517–522. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300107 11.Dee, T. S., & Pyne, J. (2022). A community response approach to mental health and substance abuse crises reduced crime. Science advances, 8(23). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm2106 12.Eloi, B., Shemin, A., Feinman, A., Yepez-Coello, F., Brown, J., Joseph, R., Schumacher, M., & Bongar, B. (2025). Police and Mental health: Exploring Co-Response Models and Best Practices. International Journal of Police Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.56331/ijps.v3i2.8003 13.Ghelani A. (2022). Knowledge and Skills for Social Workers on Mobile Crisis Intervention Teams.Clinical social work journal,50(4), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00823-x 14.Gillespie, S., Curran-Groome, W., Chen, B., & Hanson, D. (2026). Aligning Crisis Response with Community Needs. In Urban Institute. Urban Institute. https://www.denvergov.org/files/assets/public/v/1/public-health-and- environment/images/cbh/aligning-crisis-response-with-community-needs.pdf 15.HEART Data Dashboard: Power BI Report. (n.d.). https://app.powerbigov.us/view?r=eyJrIjoiMWQ1YzViMGYtYmI1MC00NWM3LTg1NWUtMjdjNzk3NWNlYzU0IiwCI6IjI5N2RlZjgyLTk0MzktNDM4OC1hODA4LTM1NDhhNGVjZjQ3ZCJ9&pageName=ReportSection7606ef27f6ee056e6f9f 16.Marcus, N., & Stergiopoulos, V. (2022). Re-examining mental health crisis intervention: A rapid review comparing outcomes across police, co-responder and non-police models. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30, 1665–1679. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13731 17.Midgette, G., Spreen, T. L., Porter, L. C., Reuter, P., & Hitchens, B. K. (2024). A model to assess the feasibility of 911 call diversion programs.Justice Quarterly,41(5), 619–646.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2023.2300444 18.Midgette, G., & Reuter, P. (2024). Diverting 911 calls: Lessons from early adopting urban jurisdictions. Criminology & Public Policy, 23, 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12680 19.Nick, G. A., Williams, S., Lekas, H., Pahl, K., Blau, C., Kamin, D., & Fuller-Lewis, C. (2022). Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training and impact on mental illness and substance use-related stigma among law enforcement. Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports, 5, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100099 20.Plassmeyer, M., Gute, M., & Stauss, K. (2024). “We need to not fear you”: Essential factors identified by sworn officers and civilian staff for implementation and expansion of a Co-Response program. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 39(4), 865–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09706-6 21.Plassmeyer, M. & University of Arkansas - School of Social Work. (2025). The Effects of a Co-Response Program on Patrol Call Volume for Mental Health Crisis-Related Calls: A Time Series Analysis. In Journal of Forensic Social Work: Vol. 9.1 pp. 22–41) [Journal-article]. 22.Robertson, J., Fitts, M. S., Petrucci, J., McKay, D., Hubble, G., & Clough, A. R. (2019). Cairns Mental Health Co-Responder Project: Essential elements and challenges to programme implementation. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(3), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12679 23.Shapiro, G. K., Cusi, A., Kirst, M., O'Campo, P., Nakhost, A., & Stergiopoulos, V. (2015). Co-responding Police-Mental Health Programs: A Review.Administration and policy in mental health,42(5), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488- 014-0594-9 24.Stauss, K., Plassmeyer, M., & Anspach, M. (2025). “I was Able to Like, Kind of Breathe.” Baseline Perspectives and Lessons Learned from Participants of a Co-Response Program. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 22(4), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2470891 25.Woods, R., & El-Mallakh, R. S. (2025). Managing Community-Based Psychiatric Emergencies: An Integrative Review. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 63(12), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20250930- 02