Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-03-17 - Minutes -City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 1 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov City of Fayetteville Arkansas City Council Meeting March 17, 2026 A meeting of the Fayetteville City Council was held on March 17, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in Room 219 of the City Administration Building located at 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Mayor Rawn called the meeting to order. Present: Council Members Robert B. Stafford, D’Andre Jones DHA, Sarah Moore, Mike Wiederkehr, Scott Berna, Sarah Bunch, Teresa Turk, Minister Monique Jones, Mayor Molly Rawn, City Attorney Kit Williams, City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton, Chief of Staff Keith Macedo, Chief Financial Officer Steven Dotson, Staff, Press and Audience. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor’s Announcements, Proclamations and Recognitions: Mayor Rawn stated there were technical issues with the WIFI and some City Council Members did not have access. There may be a need for a pause. City Council Meeting Presentations, Reports, and Discussion Items: Nominating Committee Report Council Member Stafford read the Nominating Committee Report as presented. Council Member Berna moved to accept the recommendations provided by the Nominating Committee. Council Member Wiederkehr seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed 7-0. Council Member Stafford, Dr. Jones, Moore, Wiederkehr, Berna, Bunch and Turk voted yes. Council Member Min. Jones was absent. Council Member Scott Berna Ward 3 Position 1 Council Member Sarah Bunch Ward 3 Position 2 Council Member Teresa Turk Ward 4 Position 1 Council Member Min. Monique Jones Ward 4 Position 2 Mayor Molly Rawn City Attorney Kit Williams City Clerk Treasurer Kara Paxton Council Member Robert B. Stafford Ward 1 Position 1 Council Member Dr. D’Andre Jones Ward 1 Position 2 Council Member Sarah Moore Ward 2 Position 1 Council Member Mike Wiederkehr Ward 2 Position 2 City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 2 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Agenda Additions: None Consent: Council Member Moore moved to approve the consent agenda as read. Council Member Dr. Jones seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. 2026 USGS Joint Funding Agreement: A resolution to approve a joint funding agreement with the U.S. Geological Survey for stream gauge operation and maintenance and water quality sampling and monitoring at various locations in the City of Fayetteville in 2026 with the amount paid by the City not to exceed $60,700.00. Resolution 68-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Aftermarket Vehicle Parts, Supplies and Services: A resolution to approve the purchase of automotive, heavy duty and off-road aftermarket parts, tools, supplies, equipment, accessories and additional services from multiple vendors as needed within the approved budget, pursuant to a Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Contract through January 10, 2029, and any future renewals. Resolution 69-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Purchase of Replacement Transportation Plow Trucks from Olathe Ford Sales Inc.: A resolution to approve the purchase of two Ford F550 plow trucks in the total amount of $186,789.00 from Olathe Ford Sales Inc., pursuant to a Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Contract, plus any applicable surcharges, freight charges, and delivery fees up to 10% of the original purchase price. Resolution 70-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk 36 North Network Solutions Trailer Bid Award: A resolution to award Bid 26-23 and approve the purchase of standardized low profile trailers as needed within the approved budget for $21,385.00 per trailer, plus any applicable taxes, from 36 North Network Solutions of Arkansas through the end of 2026. Resolution 71-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Drake Field - Garver LLC Master Agreement & Task Order 01: A resolution to authorize a contract with Garver, LLC, pursuant to RFQ 25-26, to provide on-call aviation engineering services for a period of one year with automatic renewals for up to four additional one year terms, and to approve Task Order 1 in an amount not to exceed $20,000.00 per year. Resolution 72-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 3 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Downtown Plan Consultant Contract: A resolution to approve a contract with Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc., pursuant to RFP 25-27, in an amount not to exceed $359,564.00 for services associated with the planning and development of the Downtown Plan, and to approve a budget amendment in the amount of $23,238.00. Resolution 73-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Accept 2026 Certified Local Government Grant Award: A resolution to authorize the acceptance of a Certified Local Government Grant from the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program in the amount of $47,300.00 for Phase 2 of a city-wide windshield survey of historic properties and Historic District Commission training, and to approve a budget amendment. Resolution 74-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Contract Amendment with Hawkins-Weir Engineers: A resolution to approve Amendment No. 4 to the Engineering Services contract with Hawkins-Weir Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $21,520.00 for additional construction services associated with recycling and trash facility improvements. Resolution 75-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Solid Waste Hauling Agreement: A resolution to approve an agreement with Axis Dumpsters, LLC for the hauling and disposal of solid waste in the City of Fayetteville for a period of 2 years with automatic renewals for two additional 2 year terms. Resolution 76-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Cleanup and Site Preparation at Former Police Range: A resolution to award Bid 25-57 and approve a contract with Metals Treatment Technologies, LLC for remediation of lead contamination at the old police shooting range in the amount of $180,719.35, and to approve a project contingency in the amount of $45,179.84. Resolution 77-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Allocation of County Hazmat Response Revenue: A resolution to approve a budget amendment in the amount of $14,634.00 recognizing Hazmat Services Revenue received from Washington County and increasing the related expense budget. Resolution 78-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 4 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Public Hearing: Private Club Application for Khaldi Investments: An ordinance to approve the application of Mohammed Khaldi, on behalf of Khaldi Investments LLC, for a permit to operate the Muse Lounge as a private club in the City of Fayetteville at 7 East Mountain Street. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Fayetteville Police Chief Mike Reynolds explained a new business, Muse Lounge, was proposed to be located at 7 East Mountain Street and the owners requested a private club permit from the Arkansas Alcohol Beverage Control Board. A state law had required that stated the City Council had to approve applications by ordinance before a permit could be issued. The applicant and owner, Mohamed Khalidi, had previously owned and operated Fayetteville businesses over the last twenty years and had received 4 Alcohol Beverage Control violations; he was cited for possessing unstamped or untaxed tobacco, cited for selling tobacco to minors, failing to pay sales tax and for delivering controlled beverages to another retailer after closing. The Fayetteville Police Department had responded to incidents at two of his former business, The Cork and Keg and the Fez Hookah Lounge and Café. Fayetteville Police Chief Mike Reynolds stated that the incidents were typical for bars, mostly business checks, noise complaints, an assault report, violations for afterhours alcohol dispensing and underage tobacco sales. The applicant had been referred to the City Prosecutor for failing to pay Hotel, Motel and Restaurant taxes for the Cork and Keg. He failed to pay them for an eight month period leading up to January of 2022, a two month periods leading up to August of 2023 and a four month period leading up to February 2024. The applicant was present at the meeting and available for questions. Council Member Dr. Jones questioned how the applicant planned to handle interactions with juveniles in the future. Applicant Mohamed Khalid stated many of the violations occurred at the beginning of his career and he has since improved his employees’ training and learned to control situations. Council Member Dr. Jones then questioned what plan the business had in place to prevent violations. Mohamed explained the business would have a door person on Friday and Saturdays and on slow days the bartender would be checking ID’s before serving. Council Member Turk questioned several occasions the application hadn’t paid their Hotel Motel Restaurant taxes on time. Mohamed explained the late payments were due to financial difficulties after the Covid-19 Pandemic but stated he was in a better place financially and could afford paying the taxes. Council Member Moore confirmed this would be the only club the applicant was operating. She shared Council Member Turk’s hesitation around the late tax payments and acknowledged that businesses undergo hardships. She wanted to know how the applicant planned to remit the tax payments on a timely basis as the model for the businesses was similar to his previous locations. Mohamed explained he had learned more from operating the other businesses and they had more funds to sustain the business and be able to pay from savings if they encountered a hard month. Council Member Moore and City Attorney Kit Williams discussed the process of paying Hotel Motel Restaurant taxes. City Attorney Kit Williams stated the taxes were collected by the business and were supposed to be turned over to the city, which was one reason why if the City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 5 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov payment does not happen the owner was prosecuted. The city hadn’t closed a business down for not paying Hotel Motel Restaurant taxes but if an establishment was causing issues, the Alcohol Beverage Control Board could act. Council Member Turk questioned if a business could be shut down due to lack of payment of sales tax and how that process worked. City Attorney Kit Williams stated the state enforced the sales tax and they remit it back to the city after taking their share. Council Member Wiederkehr asked if a business was fined if there was a delay in payment of the Hotel Motel Restaurant tax. City Attorney Kit Williams explained a fine was possible but the main goal was to have the taxes paid. Council Member Wiederkehr followed up asking if there were any current prosecutions for lack of tax payment. City Attorney Kit Williams stated he was not aware of any ongoing prosecutions but did note that many details were fairly confidential. Council Member Wiederkehr commented that four violations over 20 years resembled some driving records, referencing parking or speeding tickets. He wanted to keep the time frame in mind to be fair to the applicant. Adding that the applicant had generated sales tax for Fayetteville by operating his business and he was deeply appreciative of that. Council Member Min. Jones clarified with City Attorney Kit Williams that approving the item was a prerequisite step prior to the Alcohol Beverage Control Board, and they would make the choice to approve or deny, not the City Council. Council Member Berna moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Min. Jones seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed 7-1. Council Member Stafford, Dr. Jones, Moore, Wiederkehr, Berna, Bunch and Min. Jones voted yes. Council Member Turk voted no. Ordinance 6980 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk Unfinished Business: PZD 2025-0005 North Crossover Road & East Zion Road: An ordinance to approve a Planned Zoning District entitled PZD-2025-005 for approximately 9 acres located at North Crossover Road and East Zion Road in Ward 3. At the February 3, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was left on the first reading. At the February 17, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was left on the first reading and tabled to the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was left on the second reading. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 6 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. He went on to review concerns brought up at the last City Council Meeting. In addressing the concern about the design of the crossover at the Zion intersection, he stated staff had been working with the Arkansas Department of Transportation to pursue a more substantial crossing on the eastern portion where Zion Rd. would extend through the property. The design would follow a more standard trail crossing approach versus simple street striping. A traffic study and analysis would be required as part of the development process and the applicant had shared a site plan and drainage exhibits. He presented accident data requested by Council Member Berna, comparing similar intersections. College Ave and Joyce Blvd accounted for 2.2% of injury incidents citywide, 1.7% of vehicle damage incidents and 1.7% of total accidents. Crossover Rd and Mission Blvd showed much lower rates at 0.8% across all categories with no fatalities at either intersection. He then addressed questions about topography and slope, explaining the site was relatively flat but sloped to the north and northeast at roughly 1.5% to 3%. He noted that significant grading had occurred since the original topographic data was collected. He then described how the property related to nearby water bodies. The runoff would enter Hilton Creek about 600feet away, then flow northwesterly toward Lake Fayetteville, about half a mile from the site. Staff had recommended approval of the request and the Planning Commission had forwarded approval to the City Council with a vote of 6-1. Applicant Will Kellstrom stated that since the last City Council Meeting he had several meetings with ESI to create a drainage plan for Chandler Crossing. He noted it was unconventional to have two developers put their drainage plan together for two different developers but he understood the concerns that were brought forward. The drainage plan would be proposed later on in the large scale development; everything was highly conceptual. They were not there to present amended plans or preliminary plats for Chandler Crossing. He wanted to put something together that showed a comprehensive drainage plan. Representative Jonathan Berry explained the plan was focusing on how drainage would work on the full 9 acres. He was coordinating with ESI regarding pond drainage. ESI Representative Josh Haley stated Chandler Crossing had gone through the design process and had an approved drainage report and plan that was currently under grading permit and actively under construction. They had been working together to verify their proposal was not impeding ESI’s design and making flows worse. They were actually reducing their flows further that was proposed. He was available for questions. The City Council received 2 public comments regarding this ordinance. Council Member Moore stated she had struggled with the project. She expressed concern about the strain big box retailers placed on infrastructure. She felt that the original Planned Zoning District had been appropriately scaled and aligned with the city’s future land use plans, supporting walkability and livability in every part of town. She also noted that the original concept envisioned a smaller retailer, not another gas station. She expressed her concern as parent and the safety issues when drivers quickly turn off Crossover Rd into a high traffic gas station area. She could not support the project in its current form and urged the applicant to City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 7 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov reconsider the scale and return with a proposal more consistent with the original Planned Zoning District. Council Member Min. Jones and Jonathan discussed the drainage analysis that was completed into Hilton Creek and if it was unusual for developers to work together on a project. Jonathan did not think it was normal or abnormal. Fayetteville standards apply in Fayetteville and Springdale standards apply in Springdale. The city did not have the ability to require a developer to correct an existing issue, they just can’t exacerbate it. Council Member Wiederkehr appreciated the environmental concern regarding gas stations but he was more concerned about the previous phosphorus from the poultry industry in Springdale being the single greatest environmental concern for Lake Fayetteville. He looked at the project as an opportunity to gain a grocery store that could spark the development of housing in the area. He supported the item. Council Member Berna felt the developer had gone above and beyond to listen to the City Council and community to address concerns. He felt the area was walkable and felt the development was a good tradeoff for the piece of property. He was in support of the project and also supported the neighbors’ concerns and desires for the City Council to scrutinize the project going forward to ensure the area was developed. He cautioned and challenged the developer to continue to listen to the public. He felt it was a good project for the property. Council Member Min. Jones then requested clarification from Jonathan on development standards. Jonathan explained that Fayetteville cannot requirement development in Springdale to follow Fayetteville standards and as a general legal standard, it was difficult to require developers to address existing site issues. They then discussed drainage design concerns and whether the developers would have to fix them. Jonathan stated the developers were proposing to go above and beyond and that the existing Chandler Crossing subdivision had its drainage design based on certain assumptions based on impervious surfaces. Council Member Min. Jones agreed with her other City Council Members that oversight would need to be continued to ensure the neighbors are dealt bad flooding conditions after the developer moves on. Jonathan explained that may not be the case as Fayetteville did not have control over Washington County. Council Member Stafford felt there was a lot of good in the project. The area did not have a grocery store in the northeast corner and he felt it could reduce some traffic down to Mission and Crossover over to Joyce Blvd and College Ave. He believed the project could bring in tax dollars from surrounding areas, benefiting Fayetteville’s tax base. He acknowledged it was not perfectly walkable, but it was somewhat walkable and for those reasons he would be supporting the item. Council Member Turk questioned the process of monitoring a project to ensure it did not exacerbate already existing issues. She referenced the numbers the City Council was provided but stated they were theoretical calculations and not real numbers. Jonathan questioned what would be proposed as an alternative and what made the model numbers illegitimate. Council Member Turk stated the numbers were not necessarily illegitimate, they just weren’t verified. She wasn’t aware of any remote sensing or monitoring of stream levels on projects. She remained very concerned about Hilton Creek. She also thought that having a big box store was City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 8 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov conducive for a walkable community, especially in the project’s location. She did not think Fayetteville’s drainage manual was rigorous enough and since the impacts weren’t monitored she would not be in favor of the item. Council Member Bunch reviewed why 5 years ago she voted on the Planned Zoning District. She never anticipated that the item would come back to the City Council and have a request for a big box store. She acknowledged the walkability and the potential to have business from Springdale residents. She was torn on the issue but stated the project could possibly promote development in the area and provide something for citizens to actually walk to. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed 6-2. Council Member Stafford, Dr. Jones, Wiederkehr, Berna, Bunch and Min. Jones voted yes. Council Member Moore and Turk voted no. Ordinance 6981 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk RZN 2025-0071 South Willow Avenue: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2025-71 for approximately 1.80 acres located at 416 South Willow Avenue in Ward 1 from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to UN, Urban Neighborhood and RI- U, Residential Intermediate, Urban. At the February 17, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was left on the first reading. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was left on the second reading. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. He reviewed the location and shape of the property, adding there was a narrow section connecting a portion along Willow to a larger interior area. The property had been zoned Neighborhood Conservation. The applicant had originally requested rezoning the entire site to Urban Neighborhood. Staff had concerns about that approach and recommended denial. They then suggested a split zoning; Urban Neighborhood for the corner near Willow and Residential Intermediate-Urban for the remainder. The Planning Commission agreed and forwarded that recommendation unanimously. The applicant worked with a surveyor and submitted a modified third option which rezoned roughly half of the property adjacent to Willow to Urban Neighborhood, with the interior portion rezoned to Residential Intermediate-Urban. Staff supported the revised request because it addressed their primary concern about introducing nonresidential uses into the interior of the block. Alternative exhibits had been emailed and attached to the agenda. He asked the City Council to amend the request to match the applicant’s alternative idea. Representative Zara Niederman clarified that when the item was previously presented the developers were called discourteous for not providing the information in advance. He stated that at the February 17, 2026 City Council Meeting he had presented the option they just didn’t have a legal description. He wanted to clarify that they had been doing their best to share with the City Council. City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 9 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Mayor Rawn clarified that Jonathan was seeking an amendment from the City Council. Council Member Berna moved to amend to add ‘Exhibit A’ and ‘Exhibit B’. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 6982 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk RZN 2025-0069 S. Dead Horse Mountain Rd & E. Goff Farm Rd: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2025-69 for approximately 42.31 acres of a 157.05 acre parcel located on South Dead Horse Mountain Road & East Goff Farm Road in Ward 1 from R-A, Residential Agricultural to UN, Urban Neighborhood and NC, Neighborhood Conservation. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was left on the first reading. Council Member Stafford moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Berna seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. He started by reminding the City Council where the property was located and that the request applied to 42 acres; approximately 37.65 acres proposed for Neighborhood Conservation and approximately 4.50 acres for Urban Neighborhood. He spoke on the potential for a traffic signal at River Meadows and Huntsville Rd, due to concerns about flooding on Dead Horse Mountain Rd and the possibility that additional housing could worsen access issues. The city had asked Arkansas Department of Transportation to conduct a warrant analysis, the first step in determining whether a signal was justified and whether spacing requirements were met. If appropriate, the signal could be installed by the city, cost-shared, or installed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation. Because Arkansas Department of Transportation was already widening and upgrading Huntsville Rd, he hoped the signal could be absorbed into that project. The Arkansas Department of Transportation had not completed the warrant analysis. The neighbors north of the property had shared concerns regarding water pressure. Jonathan spoke with the Utility Department Engineer and they found there was no indication there were any systemic water pressure issues in the area. Most the neighborhoods were at 160 PSI, which was very high, but Fayetteville was known for having high water pressure. He did go on to explain there was potential to install an 8 inch water line in the area between subdivisions to the southwest and northeast that could effectively double the existing 6 inch water capacity issue and create an interconnectedness that would allow for more reliable water pressure and water altogether. Staff was recommending approval and the Planning Commission forwarded the item with a vote of 8- 1. City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 10 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Representative Blake Jorgensen stated he was available for questions. Council Member Min. Jones and Jonathan discussed what would cause the flooding and the direction the water flowed. The City Council received 4 public comments regarding this ordinance. Council Member Min. Jones discussed the possibility of a shared cost with the developer. Jonathan explained that would be determined at the time of development. He was not certain that any street improvements would be required with the street improvements. If the scale of development justified it, it would ultimately be the developer’s responsibly to build. Based off of what he read in the traffic study, he did not anticipate there would be offsite street improvements further south along Dead Horse Mountain Rd. Council Member Turk questioned the cost of the streetlight if the state didn’t pay for it. Jonathan believed there would be a three way stop, which would cost at least a quarter of a million dollars. Council Member Turk was surprised that the traffic study determined there did not appear to be an issue as she had experienced traffic backup in the area at certain times of the day. They then discussed what went into a traffic study and how it was executed, adding concern with convergence and development that was impacting Fayetteville streets. Council Member Turk remained concerned about the increased volume, irrespective of what the traffic said. She had experience driving in the area and had heard from residents, stating the traffic was bad. She thought that with improvements, widening and improving the area was important to maintain the quality of life and to develop smartly in the area. Council Member Moore addressed a question from public comment that mentioned the status of the golf course. City Attorney Kit Williams stated the City Council needed to concentrate on the current property now rather than the outside land. He didn’t think it would help much to speculate what would happen to the golf course. Council Member Moore appreciated that the conversation had been about the challenges in the area and she felt that had to be taken under advisement, especially when looking at infrastructure dollars. One thing to consider was that there was pressure of development that would be coming to the east of Fayetteville that was putting pressure on roadways for the Arkansas Department of Transportation and Water and Sewer Infrastructure monies. She stated the city would continue to feel pressure to sprawl. She went over her first thoughts when reviewing the project and felt it was respectful of future land use goals to have different types of housing. She was excited to hear that the townhomes would be built and that there would be accessibly created for a variety of different individuals. She was looking forward to supporting the item but was also expressing caution, knowing the city needed to keep an eye on the flooding and transit in the corridor. She thought it was incredibly important to honor citizens at the edges of Fayetteville. Council Member Stafford was generally supportive of the project. He didn’t think the traffic concerns would be fixed until there was more growth in the area. He felt the project was giving accessibility to those who can’t afford starter homes and giving them access to a public golf City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 11 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov course. He was in support of the item and agreed there were issues but stated the issues wouldn’t be addressed until there was growth that forced correction. Council Member Min. Jones acknowledged a comment from the public, stating they brought up a good point regarding development in Ward One. She encourage thought around community gardens in Ward 1 as it had agricultural potential. She then acknowledged that having neighborhoods around golf course can cause harm to a person or their property with nobody held accountable. She was clear that the build was a food desert, it would be built more than 2 miles away from a grocery that citizens would struggle to access. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed 5-0. Council Member Stafford, Moore, Wiederkehr, Berna and Bunch voted yes. Council Member Dr. Jones, Turk and Min. Jones voted no. Ordinance 6983 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk RZN 2025-0075 East Ash Street: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2025-75 for approximately 0.34 acres located at 900 East Ash Street in Ward 3 from RSF-4, Residential Single-Family, Four Units Per Acre to NC, Neighborhood Conservation. At the March 5, 2026 City Council meeting, this ordinance was left on the first reading. Council Member Moore moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Wiederkehr seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed failed 3-4. Council Member Dr. Jones, Moore and Min. Jones voted yes. Council Member Wiederkehr, Berna, Bunch and Turk voted no. Council Member Stafford was absent. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. He reminded the City Council on the location of the property. During the last discussion of this item, two items had been raised by the City Council. City Council Members had asked about the Midtown Trail’s potential Ash Street segment and how it might interact with the property. He noted that this would likely be the final section of the Midtown Trail, with other gaps still needing to be completed. Due to the possible construction of Ramay Junior High to the west and the existing Old Wire Trail to the east, staff had begun exploring conceptual trail alignments along Ash Street to create a continuous multiuse connection across Fayetteville. The second and more prominent issue had been setbacks. A City Council Member had questioned how much buildable area would remain if the trail connection were added. He described a conceptual diagram showing that rezoning the property to Neighborhood Conservation could allow for a roughly 4,300–4,400 square foot lot, with about 3,300 square feet of it remaining developable. The estimate included the required setbacks and the Fayetteville’s 3 foot shy distance from a trail. This was only a high level approximation without a survey. He reviewed what could be built, stating that the buildable area would shift slightly but remain similar, and the existing house could be demolished, moved, expanded, or paired with an accessory dwelling unit. The neighborhood’s large front yards were City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 12 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov typical, but current setbacks already allowed homes to be rebuilt closer to the street, and no historic protections prevented demolition. From staff’s perspective, concerns about an unusual house placement did not amount to a compatibility issue. He then highlighted that the request aligned closely with long range city plans. The Planning Commission had forwarded it to the City Council with a 5–4 vote and staff recommended approval. He was available for questions. Representatives Wes Bates and Konrad Siemek presented on the item. They explained their intent behind purchasing the property and how they planned to develop the area. After working with their architectural team, they believed the location was optimal and they felt they were helping preserve trees and the architectural character of the existing home. They reviewed the homes surrounding the property, stating the neighborhood shouldn’t experience drastic change. In their opinion, they were revitalizing the original house on the lot. They were committed to building another home on the parcel and asked to allow it on its own lot so it could be sold. Council Member Berna asked what the depth and width was of the buildable area. Jonathan clarified it was approximately 33 feet north to south and 100 feet, east to west. Council Member Turk then asked after the limitations in terms of setbacks and how many accessory dwelling units would be allowed on the property. Jonathan stated the developers could theoretically build two accessory dwelling units on the property as long as it did not exceed 12,000 feet total. Further clarifying that both the existing and proposed zoning district of the lot allowed up to three stories. The City Council received 7 public comments regarding this ordinance. Council Member Moore commented that the applicants sounded like they hoped the item would go to a final vote, prompting her to motion for the item to go to the third and final reading. She felt the applicants and neighbors were hoping for finality at the meeting and hoped the other City Council Members would be supportive of her motion. Council Member Moore moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Min. Jones seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Council Member Moore stated that the applicants could still build something in the front yard and either City Council could rezone the property and do it in a way that allowed for it to potentially be a property becomes buyable on the market or it will have to an accessory development unit absorbed into the project, probably at a much higher cost because of the way it would have to be financed. She had sensitivity and understanding that there continued to be a conversation ab out where the placement was for the unit, but with the current single-family zoning, an accessory dwelling unit could be placed on the property. The current regulations didn’t allow for the City Council to say no about it, it was illegal. She spoke on her experience living in Fayetteville and her neighborhood. She encouraged the neighborhood to be a part of adding needed gentle density to Fayetteville and felt the heart of the community wanted to participate in that. She looked forward to talking to the neighbors further. City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 13 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Council Member Dr. Jones asked Jonathan how many hours staff invested in the project. Jonathan did not have that information available but added that rezonings took variable amount of time to work on. There was no significant amount of discussion suggesting alternatives to the project either. Council Member Dr. Jones then verified the Planning Commission forwarded the item to City Council with a vote of 5-4 and staff was recommending in favor. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed 5-3. Council Member Stafford, Dr. Jones, Moore, Bunch and Min. Jones voted yes. Council Member Wiederkehr, Berna and Turk voted no. Ordinance 6984 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk New Business: Drake Field - OSM Aviation Academy Lease: A resolution to approve a five-year lease agreement with OSM Aviation Academy Ark LLC for the hangar located at 4578 South School Avenue for rent in the amount of $1,900.00 per month and 3,026 square feet of office space in the Airport Terminal Building located at 4500 South School Avenue for rent in the amount of $3,782.50 per month, with an option to renew for an additional five year term. Economic Services Director Devin Howland presented on the item. He started by acknowledging Airport Director Jared Rabren who worked a great deal on the project and would be in attendance to answer any technical questions for the City Council. Devin went on to explain the item. He stated the item did more than authorize a lease but also enable Fayetteville to secure a transformational aviation workforce development project that would allow Drake Field to be an economic driver. The OSM Aviation Academy planned to bring international students to Fayetteville for 9-12 months of training and at the beginning of 2027, Arkansas residents would be able to enroll. The program would create high quality jobs at Drake Field and generate new revenue that would allow the airport to reinvest in its own facilities. OSM Aviation Academy chose Drake Field not only because of the available facilities but because of how welcoming Fayetteville was. Devin projected by the end of 2027, OSM Aviation Academy could expand its training fleet to 25 aircrafts, host up to 192 students annually and create 80-100 full time jobs. The project projected $877,000 in revenue over 5 years, a majority coming from fuels says. He went onto to detail lease terms for hangar, office and ramp space, noting that the office facilities had not generated revenue for over 20 years. There were no new neighborhood impacts expected due to the training aircraft being the most fuel efficient and quietist in the world. He expressed that in his 9 years as Economic Vitality Director he had never seen an opportunity like this and urged the City Council to approve the lease. He then clarified that aircraft movements and flight paths were not controlled by the city or the City Council. He was available for questions. Mayor Rawn thanked Devin and everyone who worked so hard on the project. Council Member Min. Jones questioned if the neighbors in the community were aware of the 25% increase of traffic at the Drake Field airport. Airport Director Jared Rabren stated there City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 14 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov were several open houses with the community regarding the master plan as it was developed. The master plan was in its final draft version but the forecast chapter had been reviewed and approved. Council Member Min. Jones questioned how the program ensured members of marginalized communities had opportunities to apply for tuition and workforce grants. Devin stated his first step was to make sure OMS Aviation Academy became an eligible training provider with Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and the Fayetteville workforce system. He felt there were a lot of opportunities for community and corporate partnerships. Council Member Min. Jones followed up asking if there were opportunities for economic development near the project. Devin stated he had received word that there was a need for restaurants in the area. Council Member Min. Jones’ last question regarded what happened if the academy did not reach their goal in the amount of students expected to enroll. Devin stated at that point there would be a conversation as they would report that to the City Council. He felt confident that the goal would be met and exceeded. Council Member Dr. Jones thanked Devin for his presentation. He went on to discuss with Devin when the aviation classes would begin. Devin stated that if the lease were to pass, jobs would soon be posted for local hiring. He suspended they could potentially see the first round of students from Europe in late April or early May. Council Member Moore appreciated the conversation the item brought forward. She then questioned if the OMS Aviation Academy would be able to use noisier planes since it wasn’t built in their contract to use quieter planes. Devin stated he felt they were going to use the quieter planes as an act of good faith as they want to have further conversations with the City Council. She then questioned what the process looked like for noise complaints from the neighbors. Jared explained there wasn’t a formal process and that most airports didn’t have one. There was a growing trend in West Coast airports called ‘Friendly Skies’, which was more of a voluntary program where base tenants agreed to certain traffic patterns and voluntary hours of operation. Currently, the Drake Field airport received roughly 3-4 noise complaints a year, which was very small. He reiterated that almost any training aircraft from the academy would be on the quieter side of what was used at Drake Field. Council Member Moore clarified with Jared that the academy was pursuing only commercial aviation school. Council Member Min. Jones verified that OMS Aviation Academy would attract more jobs than just pilots. Devin explained the possible job opportunities for the academy. The City Council received 7 public comments regarding this resolution. Council Member Stafford thanked Council Member Moore for pulling the item off the Consent Agenda as it was going to be one of his proudest votes he would make as he served on the City Council. He thanked Devin and Jared for their work on the item and OMS Aviation Academy for considering Fayetteville. He commented on the economic opportunity the project would be and that he considered it a ‘game changer’ for Ward 1. He explained the plane model that would be used for training and the added benefits. He felt the academy would create the potential need or ability for the city to start selling regular unloaded motor gas again. He felt there was a real benefit environmentally and noise wise, as the planes would be quiet. He felt the noise that City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 15 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov citizens mentioned in public comment would not last long. He was happy to vote on the item and stated the need for pilot schools. He was very happy and ready to vote on the item. Council Member Berna was excited about voting yes for the item. He would like to welcome the Fayetteville’s new Norwegian friends. He felt that the academy would offer jobs that could help the wage crisis, which would contribute to fixing the housing crisis. He was excited to vote yes and hoped everyone else would as well. Council Member Wiederkehr was also excited for the item. He welcomed Norwegian citizens to Northwest Arkansas and was thrilled they were in Fayetteville. He felt the sound would be something citizens would acclimate to and that it would eventually become background noise. Council Member Bunch moved to approve the resolution. Council Member Turk seconded the motion. Upon roll call the resolution passed unanimously. Resolution 79-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk Police Department Policies: A resolution to approve amendments to Fayetteville Police Department policies 41.3.8 Body Worn Camera & Digital Mobile Video Recorders and 52.1.1 Office of Professional Standards. Police Chief Mike Reynolds presented on the item. The policy change was for the Fayetteville Police body worn camera and Digital Mobile Video Recorders policy. He acknowledged Deputy Police Chief Tad Scott for his presentation and felt he did an outstanding job answering questions. Police Chief Mike Reynolds was available for questions. Council Member Moore thanked Police Chief Mike Reynolds for his responses to her questions via email. She acknowledged that Fayetteville loved to strive and achieve to do the best work and lead cities in policy. Her and Police Chief Mike Reynolds went on to discuss publishing an annual report on the city website that would include an analysis of operations. He stated it was something the police department could strive for as it was a practice of the police department in 2004. Council Member Wiederkehr moved to approve the resolution. Council Member Berna seconded the motion. Upon roll call the resolution passed unanimously. Resolution 80-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk ADM 2026-0001 East 19th St & East Pump Station Rd: A resolution to approve ADM-2026-01 and amend the Master Street Plan by modifying the alignment of a planned neighborhood link connection between East 19th Street and East Pump Station Road in Ward 1. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. He reviewed the location and history of the item with the City Council. The project was a staff initiated proposal City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 16 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov that involved notifying property owners, who had expressed concerns, clarifying that it was not a designed or funded project. The city intended for the connection to occur only as properties developed or redeveloped. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the amendment as well as the Transportation Committee. He was available for questions, noting that staff was acting as the applicant and had no additional presentations. Council Member Min. Jones questioned the amount of tree removal would occur on the project. Jonathan stated staff only had a high level evaluation of that currently. They did know that the canopy in the former rail bed was relatively new. The trail spur was only removed in recent decades, whereas the canopy was more mature coming off the slope of the hill. Council Member Turk questioned what prompted the conversation for the item and if something else had preceded it. Jonathan explained that when a project came through, his department had to revisit more specific realities of the ground, using wetlands or a sensitive tree canopy as examples. Specifically for the item, a Planned Zoning District was approved at the east end of 19th St and as the item moved through development review, an interest was expressed in removing the connection, which staff would not support, but staff was willing to consider an alternate alignment that may meet the needs of both the developer and the city. Council Member Berna moved to approve the resolution. Council Member Min. Jones seconded the motion. Upon roll call the resolution passed unanimously. Resolution 81-26 as recorded in the office of the City Clerk RZN 2026-0001 W. Martin Luther King Jr Blvd.: An ordinance to rezone the property described in Rezoning Petition RZN 2026-01 for approximately 0.80 acres located at 3513 West Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard in Ward 1 from C-1, Neighborhood Commercial to UT, Urban Thoroughfare. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth presented on the item. He reviewed the location of the property and stated it was roughly 0.8 acres. The request was to rezone the property from Neighborhood Commercial to Urban Thoroughfare. Both staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval. He explained the intent of the Urban Thoroughfare zoning and that it was compatible with surrounding land uses along Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, allowing not only residential uses but also higher intensity nonresidential uses, greater building heights and higher densities where appropriate. Staff finding were more mixes. The city’s long range future land use map designed the property as a natural area due to the site and nearby properties’ history of being in a FEMA floodplain. He stated there were factors that suggested the property was appropriate for redevelopment, including the closeness to a fire station, access to utilities, nearby parks and trail, transit access and grocery stores. Rezoning to Urban Thoroughfare would reduce tree preservation requirements from 20% to 15% and the FEMA floodplain conditions remained relevant. The recent FEMA remapping had removed a signification portion of the floodplain from the half front of the property. He added that Urban City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 17 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Thoroughfare could be beneficial as it required buildings to be placed near the street, which was outside the floodplain. He added that no public comments were received and he was available for any questions. Council Member Moore questioned how the city could consider a natural space down zone when the property had a more intense zoning, like Neighborhood Commercial. City Attorney Kit Williams explained that if the city decided to down zone a property, reducing its value by making it more difficult to develop or not develop at all, the property owner could say the city condemned their property and sue. He cautioned there was danger anytime a down zoning was done. Council Member Moore questioned the available pathways to go towards that future land use, acknowledging she thought it was going to some of the most challenging to execute for future land use. City Attorney Kit Williams stated the City Council had the right to do future land use maps; it didn’t affect the property currently and could be used as a guide. It didn’t give the city any cover from being sued if a decision was made to down zone to make it a natural area. Council Member Wiederkehr moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 6985 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk Amend City Code of Ordinances §§ 33.290, 33.291 and 33.302: An ordinance to amend §§ 33.290, 33.291 and 33.302 of the Fayetteville City Code to transfer paving program approval authority from the City Council to the City Council Transportation Committee and to clarify the committee’s role in the review of transportation division workplans. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Public Works Director Chris Brown presented on the item. There were two primary purposes for the revisions, shifting the responsibility of paving plan review from the City Council to the Transportation Committee while also including the Transportation Committee in reviewing all transportation work plans, including sidewalk trails paving plans. The Transportation Committee and staff recommend approval. Council Member Turk questioned what plans this would effect. Chris stated the only requirement in city code for the staff to present to the City Council was the paving plan. Since the plans they created were of a databased approach, discussion wasn’t needed. The step was removed as they felt it was unnecessary. The paving plan was only for items like paving overlays or surface treatment. They then discussed how often changes were made based off of input from the City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 18 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov Transportation Committee members. Chris stated that approximately 90% of lans were based on their scoring system and the 10% was human decision based. He was confident in the system that was in place. Council Member Stafford questioned if the Transportation Committee and City Council would still be able to review projects and provide input. Christ stated the commitment of the Transportation Committee was to develop better system to report and document the work that was being done. The system would improve the accountability and the ability for the Transportation Committee to keep up with projects. Council Member Wiederkehr thanked and commended not just staff but the members of the Transportation Committee for their work on the item. He recommended the City Council refer as much as possible to the Transportation Committee. He motioned to go to the third and final reading. Council Member Moore appreciated Council Member Turk’s questions. She clarified that a policy was in place that in the event someone had concerns on a plan, there was still an appeal process that would bring them item forward to the City Council. She wanted to inform her fellow City Council Members knew that the item was going to allow the Transportation Committee to administratively move forward. Council Member Wiederkehr moved to suspend the rules and go to the third and final reading. Council Member Stafford seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Mayor Rawn asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously. Ordinance 6986 as Recorded in the office of the City Clerk Amend § 161.38 District CCR, Conservation, Cultural, and Recreation: An ordinance to amend § 161.38 District CCR, Conservation, Cultural, and Recreation to prohibit detention and retention ponds on CCR zoned property. City Attorney Kit Williams read the ordinance. Council Member Turk presented on the item. She provided a brief history of the item. The item was about preserving as much natural and green space as possible. Council Member Stafford questioned if Conservation Culture and Recreation zoning district allowed nature paths. Council Member Turk believed that was the case, only 10% of the zoning was allowed to be a hard surface. Council Member Berna thanked Council Member Turk for bringing the item forward. In reading her amendment, he questioned if implementing the amendment would potentially eliminate the city’s ability to do any wetland or stream side restoration projects. Council Member Turk stated the item was not prohibiting wetland or City Council Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 19 of 20 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www.fayetteville-ar.gov streamside projects. She added if there was an existing retention pond, it would be okay to accept it. The idea of adding a manmade retention pond was the intent of the prohibition. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth stated there had been angst between the Planning and Engineering departments about what could and couldn’t be done with the prohibition in place. There were several allowances in the development code for constructed wetlands and other unconventional tools for detention and retention that projects incorporated into their developments. His fear was that adopting a blanket prohibition on detention and zoning, which was preventing a development standards effectively, cause a friction on whether or not it was allowed. If it was determined the detention was prohibited in a conservation easement, there would be an inclination to not allow it. City Attorney Kit Williams provided history on how the item evolved. When he was approached by Council Member Turk to draft the ordinance, he placed limits on such ponds by including them within the 10% maximum area amount of land in the district that could use for parking/paved trail or impervious ground cover. By that measure, it would have to be a part of that 10% and it wouldn’t have any separate use. Council Member Turk rejected that idea and stated her proposal was “a prohibition of detention retention ponds in the Conservative Culture and Recreation zoning” and asked that he incorporate the prohibitive language. He only approved the agenda item only as to form, which was typical. He cautioned the City Council that if Council Member Turk’s language was adopted, it would make the unified development code for zoning district Conservative Culture and Recreation zoning, internally inconsistent. The Conservative Culture and Recreation zoning district only had permitted use in it as a use by right, and that was a use unit one. Use Unit One expressly authorized conservation flood control project as permitted use by right. He deferred to the Planning Director, who the City Council had granted official authority to interpret that part of the unified development code, but detention retention ponds would appear to be normal parts of a flood control project. If that was correct, the City Council would have said that the Conservative Culture and Recreation district had a use of right of flood control project that was authorized but is was also prohibited. He cautioned about including such internally inconsistent provision within the unified development code. Council Member Moore stated she kept coming back to the original purpose of the Conservative Culture and Recreation district and thought it was supposed to be voluntary and protect natural space. She understood the explanation provided but was struggling as she believed CCR was intended to preserve natural areas as they already existed, even if that meant drawing irregular map boundaries. She didn’t think that Conservative Culture and Recreation was meant to allow full detention or retention ponds incuse the conserved area. She asked what tools the city had to prevent that outcome, since some on the City Council felt Conservative Culture and Recreation wasn’t achieving the conservation goals expected. She suggested the Ordinance Review Committee discuss amendments in a possible workshop. She appreciated the concern brought forward as many thought it needed to be addressed. Council Member Stafford didn’t think the item needed to go to the Ordinance Review Committee; he felt the intention was known. He felt that Council Member Turk and Jonathan could work out the language. He suggested leaving the item on the first reading to ensure the language of the language was correct. City Council Meeting Minutes March 17,2026 Page 20 of 20 Council Member Turk stated she would be happy leaving the item on the first reading, as she wasn't aware there was a conflict. She stated City Attorney Kit Williams did suggest including a l0olo maximum area but they did not have a conversation about possible conflict. Council Member Wiederkehr explained his concem with the item as it came to potential unintended consequences. Development Services Director Jonathan Curth appreciated Council Member Wiederkehr's feedback. He explained that when his staff beings a new code project, one of the first questions they ask themselves was "Are we wanting to encourage something or wanting to discourage something?". The goal was to make something easier. He wanted to share that philosophy with the City Council as the feedback he hears oftentimes when it comes to proposing CCR to applicants was that the conservation easement was one step too complicated. Adding an element of concern was that it may further disincentive the use of the CCR zoning district and the inability to use the land in more flexible ways. He feared they would not see future CCR requests due to making it the hardest route possible rather than a route people would want to take. Council Member Turk felt a broader conversation could be had later as the meeting was running late. She stated the Environmental Action Committee concluded that what was wanted was something that was about preservation and preserving the nature state, not allowing another man made feature or at least limiting. She thanked the City Council for leaving the item on the first reading and would come back and try to have a better answer. This ordinance wos left on the /irst reading. Announcements: None Citv Council Agenda Session Presentations: None Citv Council Tour: None Adiournment: 9:30 p.m. Kara Paxton, City (.). a o arerRawn, 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 www fayetteville-ar gov Nominating Committee Report March 17, 2026 Meeting Date and Time: March 11, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. March 12, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. Members in Attendance: Mr. Robert B. Stafford, Chair (Council Member Ward 1, Position 1) Mr. Mike Wiederkehr (Council Member Ward 2, Position 2) Mr. Scott Berna (Council Member Ward 3, Position 1) Minister Monique Jones (Council Member Ward 4, Position 2) The Nominating Committee recommends the following candidates for appointment. Active Transportation Advisory Committee Hershel Hartford. Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Representative term ending Dec. 31, 2027. Animal Services No applications received for an unexpired Licensed Veterinarian term ending June 30, 2028. Board of Adjustments Husam Ata. Unexpired Public at Large term ending March 31, 2027. Black Heritage Preservation Commission Wendell Huggins. Member at Large term ending Dec. 31, 2028. Neikeita Mitchell. Member at Large term ending Dec. 31, 2028. Civil Service Commission Tommie Flowers Davis. Public at Large term ending March 31, 2032. Peter Reagan. Public at Large term ending March 31, 2032. Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals Ron Lord. Alternate Member term ending March 31, 2031. Jacob Sheatsley. Alternate Member term ending March 31, 2031. Fayetteville Arts Council Bevin Baskin. Arts and Cultural Resident term ending June 30, 2029. William Watson. Working Artist term ending June 30, 2027. Food Commission Maudie Schmitt. Food Retailer Representative term ending March 31, 2029. Emily Stone. Citizen Actively Engaged in Agriculture term ending March 31, 2029. Eleazar Herrera. Hunger Relief Programs Representative term ending March 31, 2028. Planning Commission Fred Gulley. Citizen at Large term ending March 31, 2029. Hugh Brewer. Citizen at Large term ending March 31, 2029. The Nominating Committee forwards the following candidates recommended for appointment by Mayor Rawn: Fayetteville Public Facilities Board Austin Thomas. Public at Large term ending Dec. 31, 2030. Fayetteville Public Library Board of Trustees Rob Qualls. Public at Large term ending April 1, 2031. The Nominating Committee forwards the following candidates recommended for appointment by the Advertising and Promotion Commission: Advertising and Promotion Commission Elvis Moya. Tourism Industry Representative term ending March 31, 2030. Megan Tyree. Unexpired Tourism Industry Owner or Manager term ending March 31, 2028. The Nominating Committee forwards the following candidates recommended for appointment by the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners: Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Alex Brown. Unexpired Public at Large term ending Dec. 31, 2028.