Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout301-25 RESOLUTIONPage 1 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 Resolution: 301-25 File Number: 2025-2418 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD RFQ 25-15 AND SIGN A CONTRACT WITH RANIA ALOMAR ARCHITECT, INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY IN THE AMOUNT OF 180,235.00, AND TO APPROVE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT WHEREAS, Shelter Planner of America completed a feasibility study for the Animal Services Division in October 2024; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2025, City Council passed Ordinance 6920 for sales tax improvement bonds that included question 4 – Animal Services Facility Bonds; and WHEREAS, this is a multi-year phased contract with Pre-Bond Phase to include refining of programming, site evaluations and conceptual design of the facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby awards RFQ 25-15 and authorizes Mayor Rawn to sign a contract with Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. for the design of the Animal Services Facility in the amount of $180,235.00. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a budget adjustment, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. PASSED and APPROVED on December 16, 2025 Approved: Molly Rawn, Mayor Attest: Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasurer Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2025-2418 MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 2025 TO:Mayor Rawn and City Council THRU:Steven Dotson, Chief Financial Officer FROM:Waylon Abernathy, Bond Projects & Construction Director SUBJECT: RFQ 25-15 Architectural Contract for Animal Services Facility with Rania Alomar Architect, Inc and Budget Adjustment RECOMMENDATION: Approval of RFQ 25-15 Architectural Contract for design of an Animal Services Facility to Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA. This is a phased contract with the pre-bond Phase in the amount of $180,235.00, and a budget adjustment. BACKGROUND: Ordinance 6920 was passed on October 21, 2025, calling for a special election in March 2026 on the question of issuing Sales and Use Tax Capital Improvement Bonds. One of the bond questions that is going to the voters in 2026 is for financing the design, construction, and equipping of a new animal services facility. This will replace the existing animal services facility that has been in use for over 50 years. In October 2024, Shelter Planner of America completed a feasibility study for the Animal Services Division in order to provide guidance on future animal shelter facility needs. Pre-construction, programming, evaluation of potential sites, and conceptual design work is now needed on this project. DISCUSSION: This is a multi-year phased contract with Pre-Bond Phase to include refining of programming, site evaluations and conceptual design of the facility. Phase 2 services will include Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents, Bidding and Negotiation, and Construction Administration. Phase 2 is contingent on a successful bond initiative. The benefit of starting now is to have conceptual plans that can be presented to the citizens prior to voting. We are also engaging a Construction Manager to assist with cost projections to ensure we stay within the projected budget. If the bond passes, this will expedite the project, allowing us to get started on schematic design once the project is approved. If the bond initiative is not successful, the work product received from this contract will still be needed for replacement of the Animal Services Facility when alternative funding becomes available. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Funding will be allocated from: 25006.2501 Animal Services Facility—Pre-construction 4470.671.8900-5860.02 Capital Prof Services Architectural Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov ATTACHMENTS: 3. Staff Review Form, 4. Budget Adjustment, 5. RFQ 25-15 Animal Services Architectural Services RA-DA, 6. RFQ 25-15 Appendix A, 7. RFQ 25-15, Appendix B - City Issued RFQ, 8. RFQ 25-15, Appendix C - Rania Alomar's Submittal Page 1 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Legislation Text 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 479) 575-8323 File #: 2025-2418 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD RFQ 25-15 AND SIGN A CONTRACT WITH RANIA ALOMAR ARCHITECT, INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $180,235.00, AND TO APPROVE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT WHEREAS, Shelter Planner of America completed a feasibility study for the Animal Services Division in October 2024; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2025, City Council passed Ordinance 6920 for sales tax improvement bonds that included question 4 – Animal Services Facility Bonds; and WHEREAS, this is a multi-year phased contract with Pre-Bond Phase to include refining of programming, site evaluations and conceptual design of the facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby awards RFQ 25-15 and authorizes Mayor Rawn to sign a contract with Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. for the design of the Animal Services Facility in the amount of $180,235.00. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a budget adjustment, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. 0 1 2', 334 54 0 05 6 7 5+8 8 2 8 2 6& 6 9' 7 9' 0 1 9'2',0 1 9' 0 0 1 2 3 4 54 2 6 173 / 0 123 8%1$1 29:3 4 0 73 1 2 3 02 4 1 14:2 13 2 2 4 1 @ 1 2 0 2 A:B 0 2 ,08 2 1 2 A CC>5>D 5 5 A 4 CC>5>D C)5(DD.C A 8%$ CC>5>D C D(C A 8%$E 6 CC>C D C C(C A 8%$E 6 CC>C D C A :% UI %FDFNCFS d. Monthly invoices for each calendar month shall be submitted to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE or such parties as CITY may designate for professional services consistent with Rania Alomar's normal billing schedule. Once established, the billing schedule shall be maintained throughout the duration of the Project. Invoices shall be made in accordance with a format to be developed by Rania Alomar and approved by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. Applications for payment shall be accompanied each month by the updated project schedule as the basis for determining the value earned as the work is accomplished. Final payment for professional services shall be made upon CITY's approval and acceptance with the satisfactory completion of professional services for the Project, e. Final Payment: Upon satisfactory completion of the work performed under this Agreement, as a condition before final payment under this Agreement, or as a termination settlement under this Agreement, Rania Alomar shall execute and deliver to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE a release of all claims against CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE arising under or by virtue of this Agreement, except claims which are specifically exempted by Rania Alomar to be set forth therein. i. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or by State law or otherwise expressly agreed to by the parties to this Agreement, final payment under this Agreement or settlement upon termination of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE claims against Rania Alomar or sureties under this Agreement. 5. Jurisdiction: Legal jurisdiction to resolve any disputes shall be Arkansas with Arkansas law applying to the case. 6. Venue: Venue for all legal disputes shall be Washington County, Arkansas. 7 Changes in Scope or Price: Changes, modifications, or amendments in scope, price or fees to this contract shall not be allowed without a prior formal contract amendment approved by the Mayor and the City Council in advance of the change in scope, cost or fees. 8. Omissions by the Architect: If Rania Alomar fails to include or omits an item from the Contract Documents, which was fully anticipated to be included in the Project, thereby necessitating the need for a Change Order, Rania Alomar will not receive a fee for work associated with the Change Order. 1, Insurance: Rania Alomar shall provide certificates of insurance addressed to the CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, showing coverage for the following insurance which shall be maintained throughout the term of this agreement. Any work sublet to major subconsultants including MEP, Structural, and Civil, Rania Alomar shall require the subconsultant to provide the insurance identified. In case any employee engaged in work on the project under this contract is not protected under Worker's Compensation Insurance, Rania Alomar shall provide and shall cause each Subcontractor to provide adequate insurance for the protection of such of his employees as are not otherwise protected. a. Rania Alomar shall provide to the CITY certificates as evidence of the specified insurance presented in Appendix D within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this agreement and upon each renewal coverage. i. Certificates of Insurance shall list the CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE as an additional insured, except for Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability Insurance. Listing the CITY has a Certificate Holder only is NOT an acceptable substitute. Certificates of Insurance must include the endorsements) showing the CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE listed as an additional insured. b. Subconsultants shall maintain reasonable insurance including but not limited to worker's compensation, auto as applicable, general liability, errors and omissions, etc. 10. Professional Responsibility: Rania Alomar will exercise reasonab!e skill, care, and diligence in the performance of services and will carry out its responsibilities in accordance with customarily accepted professional practices used RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Page 2 of 8 by members of the subject profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE will promptly report to Rania Alomar any defects or suspected defects in services of which CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE becomes aware, so Rania Alomar can take measures to minimize the consequences of such a defect. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE retains all remedies to recover for its damage caused by any negligence of Rania Alomar. 11. Responsibility of the City of Fayetteville: CITY OF FAYE i iEVILLE shall, within a reasonable time, so as not to delay the services of Rania Alomar: a. Provide full information as to the requirements for the Project. b. Assist Rania Alomar by making available all available information pertinent to the assignment including previous reports and any other data relative thereto. c. Assist Rania Alomar in obtaining access to property reasonably necessary to perform the services under this Agreement. d. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, cost opinions, proposals, and other documents presented by Rania Alomar and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto. e. Review all documents and provide written comments to Rania Alomar in a timely manner. f. The City of Fayetteville's Bond Projects and Construction Director is the project representative with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement. The Bond Projects and Construction Director shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems to be used in the Project, and other matters pertinent to the services covered by this Agreement. 12. Cost Opinions and Projections: Cost opinions and projections prepared by the Rania Alomar relating to construction costs and schedules, operation and maintenance costs, equipment characteristics and performance, cost estimating, and operating results are based on Rania Alomar's experience, qualifications, and judgment as a design professional. Since Rania Alomar has no control over weather, cost and availability of labor, material and equipment, labor productivity, construction Contractors' procedures and methods, unavoidable delays, construction Contractors' methods of determining prices, economic conditions, competitive bidding or market conditions, and other factors affecting such cost opinions or projections, Rania Alomar does not guarantee that actual rates, costs, performance, schedules, and related items will not vary from cost opinions and projections prepared by Rania Alomar. 13. Period of Service: This Agreement will become effective upon the first written notice by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE authorizing services hereunder. a. The provisions of this Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly progress of the Project through completion of the services stated in the Agreement. Rania Alomar will proceed with providing the authorized services immediately upon receipt of written authorization from CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. Said authorization shall include the scope of the work authorized and the time in which the work is to be completed. 14. Termination: a. This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party, provided that no termination may be affected unless the other party is given: i. Not less than ten (10) calendar days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate, RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Page 3 of 8 V ii. An opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination. b. This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE for its convenience, provided that Rania Alomar is given: i. Not less than ten (10) calendar days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate, ii. An opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination. c. If termination for default is affected by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this Agreement shall be made, but No amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work ii. Any payment due to Rania Alomar at the time of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE because of Rania Alomar's default whether completed or in process and for which payment from the CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE has been received by Rania Alomar. d. If termination for default is affected by Rania Alomar, or if termination for convenience is affected by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, the equitable adjustment shall include a reasonable profit for services or other work performed. The equitable adjustment for any termination shall provide for payment to Rania Alomar for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by Rania Alomar relating to commitments which had become firm prior to the termination. e. Upon receipt of a termination action, Rania Alomar shall; i. Promptly discontinue all affected work (unless the notice directs otherwise), ii. Deliver or otherwise make available to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by Rania Alomar in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process. f. Upon termination under sections above CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE may take over the work and may award another party an agreement to complete the work under this Agreement. g. If, after termination for failure of Rania Alomar to fulfill contractual obligations, it is determined that Rania Alomar had not failed to fulfill contractual obligations, the termination shall be deemed to have been for the convenience of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. In such event, adjustments of the agreement price shall be made as provided in this agreement. IS. Delays a. In the event the services of Rania Alomar are suspended or delayed by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE or by other events beyond reasonable control, Rania Alomar shall be entitled to additional compensation and time for reasonable documented costs actually incurred by Rania Alomar in temporarily closing down or delaying the Project. b. In the event the services are suspended or delayed by Rania Alomar, CITY shall be entitled to compensation for its reasonable costs incurred in temporarily closing down or delaying the project. The CITY does not agree to waive its right to claim (in addition to direct damages) special, indirect, or consequential damages, whether such liability arises in breach of contract or warranty, tort (including negligence), strict or statutory liability, or any other cause of action. 16. Rights and Benefits: Rania Alomar's services shall be performed solely for the benefit of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE and not for the benefit of any other persons or entities. RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Page 4 of 8 17. Dispute Resolution a. Scope of Paragraph: The procedures of this Paragraph shall apply to any and all disputes between CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE and Rania Alomar which arise from, or in any way are related to, this Agreement, including, but not limited to the interpretation of this Agreement, the enforcement of its terms, any acts, errors, or omissions of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE or Rania Alomar in the performance of this Agreement, and disputes concerning payment. b. Exhaustion of Remedies Required: No action may be filed unless the parties first negotiate. If timely Notice is given as described in this agreement, but an action is initiated prior to exhaustion of these procedures, such action shall be stayed, upon application by either party to a court of proper jurisdiction, until the procedures in this agreement have been complied with. c. Notice of Dispute i. For disputes arising prior to the making of final payment promptly after the occurrence of any incident, action, or failure to act upon which a claim is based, the party seeking relief shall serve the other party with a written Notice. ii. For disputes arising within one year after the making of final payment, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE shall give Rania Alomar written Notice at the address listed in this agreement within thirty (30) calendar days after occurrence of any incident, accident, or first observance of defect or damage. in both instances, the Notice shall specify the nature and amount of relief sought, the reason relief should be granted, and the appropriate portions of this Agreement that authorize the relief requested. iii. Negotiation: Within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the Notice, the Project Managers for CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE and Rania Alomar shall confer in an effort to resolve the dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved at that level, then, upon written request of either side, the matter shall be referred to the President of Rania Alomar and the Mayor of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE or his designee. These officers shall meet at the Project Site, or such other location as is agreed upon within 30 calendar days of the written request to resolve the dispute. 18. Sufficient Funds: The CITY represents it has sufficient funds or the means of obtaining funds to remit payment to Rania Alomar for services rendered by Rania Alomar. 19. Publications: Recognizing the importance of professional development on the part of Rania Alomar's employees and the importance of Rania Alomar's public relations, Rania Alomar's may prepare publications, such as technical papers, articles for periodicals, promotional materials, and press releases, in electronic or other format, pertaining Rania Alomar's services for the Project. Such publications will be provided to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE in draft form for CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE's advance review. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE shall review such drafts promptly and provide CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE's comments to Rania Alomar, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE may require deletion of proprietary data or confidential information from such publications, but otherwise CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE will not unreasonably withhold approval. Approved materials may be used in a variety of situations and do not require additional review or approval for each use. The cost of Rania Alomar's activities pertaining to any such publication shall be for Rania Alomar's account. 20. Indemnification: Rania Alomar shall indemnify , but not defend, and hold harmless the CITY and its employees from and against all liabilities, claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to the extent caused by the negligent act, error, or omission of Rania Alomar, any person employed by Rania Alomar, or anyone for whose acts Rania Alomar is legally liable in the performance of professional services for the City pursuant to this Contract. RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Page 5 of 8 �C�' 21. Freedom of Information Act: CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE contracts and documents prepared while performing CITY contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, the architect will do everything possible to provide the documents in a prompt and timely manner as prescribed in the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. 25- 19-101 et. Seq.). Only legally authorized photo coping costs pursuant to the FOIA may be assessed for this compliance. 22. Debarment Certification: Rania Alomar hereby provides debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order. Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 "Debarment and Suspension" requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub -recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. Rania Alomar hereby attests its principal is not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. 23. Ownership of Documents: a. All documents provided by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE including original drawings, CAD drawings, estimates, field notes, and project data are and remain the property of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. Rania Alomar may retain reproduced copies of drawings and copies of other documents. b. Engineering and architectural documents, computer models, drawings, specifications and other hard copy or electronic media prepared by Rania Alomar as part of the Work shall become the property of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE when Rania Alomar has been compensated for all Services rendered, provided, however, that Rania Alomar shall have an unrestricted perpetual license right to their use. Rania Alomar shall, however, retain its rights in its standard drawings details, specifications, databases, computer software, and other proprietary property. Rights to intellectual property developed, utilized, or modified in the performance of the Services shall remain the property of Rania Alomar. The City's ownership and license under this Agreement extend only to the Project identified herein. The City shall not use or permit the use of the Architect's Instruments of Services, in whole or in part, on any other project or for any purpose other than completion, maintenance, renovation, or expansion of the Project, without the Architect's prior written consent. Any unauthorized use shall be at the City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to the Architect, its consultants, or employees. c. Any files delivered in electronic medium may not work on systems and software different than those with which they were originally produced. Rania Alomar makes no warranty as to the compatibility of these files with any other system or software. Because of the potential degradation of electronic medium over time, in the event of a conflict between the sealed original drawings/hard copies and the electronic files, the sealed drawings/hard copies will govern. 24. Additional Responsibilities of Rania Alomar Architect, Inc.: a. Review, approval, or acceptance of design drawings, specifications, reports and other services furnished hereunder by CITY shall not in any way relieve Rania Alomar of responsibility for the technical adequacy of the work. Review, approval or acceptance of, or payment for any of the services by CITY shall not be construed as a waiver of any rights under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement. b. Rania Alomar shall be and shall remain liable, in accordance with applicable law, for all damages to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE caused by Rania Alomar's negligent performance, except beyond the Rania Alomar normal standard of care, of any of the services furnished under this Agreement, and RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Page 6 of 8 except for errors, omissions or other deficiencies to the extent attributable to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE or CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE-furnished data. c. Rania Alomar's obligations under this clause are in addition to Rania Alomar's other express or implied assurances under this Agreement or State law and in no way diminish any other rights that CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE may have against Rania Alomar for faulty materials, equipment, or work. 25. Audit and Access to Records: a Rania Alomar shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence directly pertinent to performance on work under this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices consistently applied in effect on the date of execution of this Agreement. b. Rania Alomar shall also maintain the financial information and data used by Rania Alomar in the preparation of support of the cost submission required for any negotiated agreement or change order and send to CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE a copy of the cost summary submitted. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, or any of their authorized representatives, shall have access to all such books, records, documents and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit and copying during normal business hours. Rania Alomar will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. c. Records shall be maintained and made available during performance on assisted work under this Agreement and until three years from the date of final payment for the project. In addition, those records which relate to any controversy arising out of such performance, or to costs or items to which an audit exception has been taken, shall be maintained and made available until three years after the date of resolution of such appeal, litigation, claim or exception. d. This right of access clause (with respect to financial records) applies to: i. Negotiated prime agreements: ii. Negotiated change orders or agreement amendments affecting the price of any formally advertised, competitively awarded, fixed price agreement: iii. Agreements or purchase orders under any agreement other than a formally advertised, competitively awarded, fixed price agreement. However, this right of access does not apply to a prime agreement, lower tier sub agreement or purchase order awarded after effective price competition, except: 1. With respect to record pertaining directly to sub agreement performance, excluding any financial records of Rania Alomar; 2. If there is any indication that fraud, gross abuse or corrupt practices may be involved; 3. If the sub agreement is terminated for default or for convenience. 26. Covenant Against Contingent Fees: a. Rania Alomar warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this Agreement upon an agreement of understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or continent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by Rania Alomar for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE shall have the right to annul this Agreement RFQ 2S-15, Animal Services Facility Design Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Page 7 of 8 '(< 1K without liability or at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 27. Gratuities: a. If CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE finds after a notice and hearing that Rania Alomar or any of Rania Alomar's agents or representatives, offered or gave gratuities (in the form of entertainment, gifts or otherwise) to any official, employee or agent of CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, or related third party contractor, associated with this project, in an attempt to secure an agreement or favorable treatment in awarding, amending or making any determinations related to the performance of this Agreement, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE may, by written notice to Rania Alomar terminate this Agreement. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE may also pursue other rights and remedies that the law or this Agreement provides. However, the existence of the facts on which CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE bases such finding shall be in issue and may be reviewed in proceedings under the Remedies clause of this Agreement. b. The CITY may pursue the same remedies against Rania Alomar as it could pursue in the event of a breach of the Agreement by Rania Alomar. As a penalty, in addition to any other damages to which it may be entitled by law, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE may pursue exemplary damages in an amount, as determined by CITY, which shall be not less than three nor more than ten times the costs Rania Alornar incurs in providing any such gratuities to any such officer or employee. 28. Clarification and Understanding of all parties: Rania Alomar shall not assign its duties under the terms of this agreement without prior written consent of the City. Subconsultants identified in Rania Alomar's response shall be permitted as being referenced herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS by and through its Mayor, and RANIA ALOMAR ARCHITECT, INC. DBA RA-DA, by its authorized officer have made and executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS By MOLLY RAWN, MAYOR p�uauruuii� C, Y 0�9SG� ATTEST: - m— _v: FAYETfEVILLE��= ✓%� sgRkANs?y�� By:_ Kara Paxton, City Clerk Date Signed: 12/16/2025 RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Page 8 of 8 By:: � SIGNA INC. DBA RA - OF AUTHORIZED SIGNER RAIVIA ALC�ltA4 , P'0'E(-L1 PRINTED NAME AND TITLE Date Signed: l ( - 11 -'Lo LS RA-DA FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL CARE CENTER 11/18/2025 AE FEE SUMMARY AND BREAKDOWN PER PHASE Based on projected Construction Cost of $15M PHASE 1 : PRE-BOND SERVICES Discipline Firm Name PREDESIGN - SITE SELECTION PROGRAMMING & CONCEPT DESIGN OUTREACH NA NA NA FEE REIMB Architect RA-DA $36,000 $78,240 $9,200 $123,440 $6,000 Outreach Velocity Group $25,000 $25,000 Civil Engineer DCI $2,500 $8,500 $1,000 $12,000 Structural Engineer ECI $4,875 $4,875 MEP Engineer Prigm $2,500 $2,500 Sustainability / LEED Entegrity $2,000 $4,420 $6,420 40,500 $98,535 $35,200 $0 $0 $0 $174,235 $6,000 SUBTOTAL : PHASE 2 : FULL A/E SERVICES Discipline Firm Name SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BID / PERMITTING CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION LEED CA FEE REIMB Architect RA-DA $111,120 $198,800 $238,560 $37,280 $156,000 $29,600 $771,360 $20,000 Renderings (3 - optional)RA-DA $15,000 $15,000 Outreach RA-DA $17,600 $17,600 Onsite support (CA) ECI $25,200 $25,200 Civil Engineer DCI $10,500 $14,000 $28,000 $3,500 $14,000 $8,000 $78,000 $1,000 Landscape Architect DCI $5,250 $7,000 $14,000 $1,750 $7,000 $35,000 Structural Engineer ECI $14,625 $24,375 $29,250 $4,875 $19,500 $92,625 MEP Engineer Prigm $22,425 $44,850 $52,325 $7,475 $22,425 $14,500 $164,000 AV / IT / technology drawings WSP $10,000 $65,000 $5,000 $80,000 Specifications KM Consulting $47,700 $47,700 Sustainability / LEED + USGBC Fees Entegrity $4,560 $15,420 $15,420 $1,800 $38,220 $75,420 $4,825 Sustainability / Fundamental Cx Entegrity $4,620 $8,435 $36,245 $49,300 Sustainability / Modeling (Daylight and Energy) Entegrity $15,120 $10,560 $12,240 $37,920 QA D7 Envelope $3,500.00 $5,500.00 $9,500.00 $29,000.00 $47,500 224,320 $330,505 $520,430 $56,680 $278,125 $126,565 $1,536,625 $21,000 SUBTOTAL : Additional Services Firm Name SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BID / PERMITTING CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION LEED CA FEE REIMB Sustainability / Enhanced Cx Entegrity $1,000 $11,260 $12,260 Outreach (Phase 2) Velocity Group $36,000 $28,751 $64,751 Outreach - Celebration Event (Ribbon Cutting or Grand Opening) Velocity Group $28,751.00 $28,751 $5,000.00 TOTAL, ALL ITEMS :$1,848,622.00 180,235 1,557,625 110,762.00 RA-DA PROJECT: Fayetteville Animal Care Center 11.15.2025 PHASE: HRS TALLIED FEE PREDESIGN - SITE SELECTION 160 $36,000 PROGRAMMING & CONCEPT DESIGN 384 $78,240 OUTREACH (Pre Bond)40 $9,200 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 576 $111,120 OUTREACH (Post Bond)88 $17,600 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 1040 $198,800 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1248 $238,560 BID / PERMITTING 188.8 $37,280 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION (12 Months +1 close out)1040 $156,000 LEED CA 152 $29,600 RA-DA TOTAL FEE $912,400 Summary Breakdown: RA-DA BASE FEE $820,000 RA-DA Supplemental Fee $92,400 RA-DA PROJECT: Fayetteville Animal Care Center PHASE ONE: PREDESIGN - SITE SELECTION Review 3-4 site options with consultant team and client. Prepare preliminary study of each site to analyze pros and cons. Study Code and Zoning requirements Prepare Matrix that grades sites based on agreed upon values. PROGRAMMING & CONCEPT DESIGN PART 1: Review existing program and add any missing uses that need to be included. Diagram scale of different spaces and adjacencies. Look at program diagram against site selections to determine 'front' 'back', entry points, staff and public parking and loading areas (general site approach) for each site in very broad strokes. PART 2: Once site is selected develop 2-3 concepts for approach of building. These may differ in aesthetics and in planning approach. Gather input from consutants on key elements such as sustainability that have a large impact on the design early on. The intent is to study possible solutions to determine an approach that achieves concensus. Prepare zoning adn code analysis for the site and project. Meet with Client Group to determine direction and develop that scheme (or might be a combination of schemes). PART 3: Develop Concept level scheme. This will include site diagram, planning diagram, building sketches of exterior and key spaces if relevant. Gather ideas/ palette image board to show the direction of development. Prepare presentation package that can be used for stakeholders and outreach presentations and materials. Review with consultants for input. Provide preliminary plans for cost estimator to aid in budget allocation. OUTREACH (Pre Bond) Work with Velocity Group and City on crafting message and package for outreach materials. Attend key workshops with community groups. (up to 3) PHASE TWO: SCHEMATIC DESIGN Develop Concept scheme in three dimensions and refine program and planning. Develop Schematic Drawings to depict overall scheme. Coordinate Consutlant input and incorporate building systems such as approach to mechanical systems and structural systems. Design Workshops with Client Group. Study design approach with Sustainability Consutlant. Floor plans, massing studies, and site layouts are refined to illustrate how the shelter will function for staff, animals, and the community. We establish preliminary material palettes, interior design direction, and furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF&E) strategies. Complete Zoning and Code analysis and begin any early submittals (special Permit or CUP). OUTREACH (Post Bond) Work with Velocity Group and City on continuing community outreach. Update package for outreach materials. Attend key workshops with community groups. (up to 3) RA-DA SCOPE SUMMARY PAGE 1 of 2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT We continue to develop the design and work closely with consultants and engineers. In Design Development, the building systems, materials, and details are advanced and coordinated across all disciplines. Interior layouts, finishes, lighting, and custom components are defined, and FF&E selections are refined to support durability, animal welfare, and operational efficiency. Exterior design—including structure, envelope, and site features—is detailed for performance and aesthetics. Also early discussions of signage and branding to support an efficient and welcoming facility. Regular Design Workshops with Client Group. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS During the Construction Documents phase, we translate the fully developed design into a complete, coordinated set of drawings and specifications suitable for bidding and construction. This includes detailed architectural, interior, and engineering information as well as comprehensive FF&E schedules and signage documentation. The focus is accuracy, clarity, and constructability to support competitive pricing and minimize changes during construction. We coordinate with the entire Consultant team including our specifications writer. We prepare presentations and workshops at regular intervals to allow the City and Stakeholders to weigh in on all issues and design decisions. BID / PERMITTING In the Bid and Permitting phase, we assist the City and CM in responding to contractor questions to ensure accurate bids. We update the Contract Documents accordingly. Simultaneously, we coordinate with local authorities to secure all required permits and approvals, responding to agency comments and providing any necessary revisions. Our goal is a smooth, timely path from design into construction. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION During Construction Administration, we remain closely involved to ensure the project is built in accordance with the design intent and contract documents. This includes reviewing submittals, responding to RFIs, performing site visits, and coordinating with the contractor and City representatives. We also review FF&E installation, signage placement, and final interior details to ensure the completed animal shelter delivers the quality, functionality, and experience envisioned from the outset. 12 months construction + 1 month close out) LEED CA Working with Entegrity Group, we will provide the required materials for LEED submission and help coordinante with team input on all LEED points. RA-DA SCOPE SUMMARY PAGE 2 of 2 RA-DA PROJECT: Fayetteville Animal Care Center 11.13.2025 Projected Sheet List - Architectural (To be updated during Design and Documents p Sheet NO. Sheet Name G0.01 COVER SHEET G0.02 SHEET LIST G0.03 BUILDING CODE SUMMARY G0.10 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G0.20 EGRESS SUMMARY & DIAGRAM G0.21 ACCESSIBLE SITE PLAN A0.01 GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION A0.02 TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE DETAILS A0.20 OVERALL SITE PLAN A0.21 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - PARKING A0.22 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - PARKING A0.23 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - YARDS A0.24 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - YARDS A0.25 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - TRASH A0.26 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - LOADING A0.27 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - A0.28 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - A0.29 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - A0.40 SITE SECTIONS A0.41 SITE SECTIONS A0.42 SITE SECTIONS A0.43 SITE SECTIONS A0.50 SITE / FENCE ELEVATIONS A0.51 SITE / FENCE ELEVATIONS A0.52 SITE / FENCE ELEVATIONS A0.53 SITE DETAILS A0.54 SITE DETAILS A0.55 SITE DETAILS A1.00 OVERALL GRID PLAN A1.01 OVERALL ACOUSTICS PLAN A1.02 EDGE OF SLAB A1.03 EDGE OF SLAB A1.04 EDGE OF SLAB A1.10 OVERALL FLOOR PLANS A1.11 OVERALL ROOF PLAN RA-DA ARCH SHEET LIST PAGE 1 OF 4 A1.20 ENLARGED PLAN A1.21 ENLARGED PLAN A1.22 ENLARGED PLAN A1.30 DIMENSION PLAN A1.31 DIMENSION PLAN A1.32 DIMENSION PLAN A1.40 ENLARGED PLAN - 1/4" SCALE A1.41 ENLARGED PLAN - 1/4" SCALE A1.42 ENLARGED PLAN - 1/4" SCALE A1.43 ENLARGED MEDICAL FLOOR PLAN A1.44 ENLARGED SUPPORT FLOOR PLAN A1.45 ENLARGED RESTROOM PLANS A1.46 ENLARGED PREP, PANTRY & GROOMING PLANS A2.00 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.02 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.03 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.04 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - DETAIL A2.15 EXTERIOR COLOR ELEVATIONS / VIEWS A2.20 COMPREHENSIVE MOCKUP A3.00 BUILDING SECTIONS A3.01 BUILDING SECTIONS A3.02 BUILDING SECTIONS A3.03 BUILDING SECTIONS A3.10 ENLARGED BUILDING SECTIONS A3.11 ENLARGED BUILDING SECTIONS A3.12 ENLARGED BUILDING SECTIONS A3.13 ENLARGED BUILDING SECTIONS A3.14 ENLARGED BUILDING SECTIONS A3.15 ENLARGED BUILDING SECTIONS A3.20 WALL SECTIONS A3.21 WALL SECTIONS A3.22 WALL SECTIONS A3.24 WALL SECTIONS A3.25 WALL SECTIONS A3.26 WALL SECTIONS A3.30 EXPANSION JOINT A3.31 EXPANSION JOINT A4.00 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.01 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.02 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS RA-DA ARCH SHEET LIST PAGE 2 OF 4 A4.03 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.04 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.05 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.06 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.07 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.08 CASEWORK SECTIONS A4.09 CASEWORK SECTIONS & FINISH DETAILS A4.10 CASEWORK SECTIONS A4.11 CASEWORK SECTIONS A4.12 ANIMAL CAGE ELEVATIONS A4.20 ANIMAL CAGE ELEVATIONS A4.21 ANIMAL CAGE ELEVATIONS A5.00 PARTITION TYPES A5.10 FLOOR & THRESHOLD DETAILS A5.20 WALL DETAILS A5.21 INT. WALL DETAILS A5.30 DOOR DETAILS A5.31 DOOR DETAILS A5.40 CEILING DETAILS A5.41 CEILING DETAILS A5.50 STOREFRONT/ CURTAIN WALL DETAILS A5.51 STOREFRONT / CURTAINWALL DETAILS A5.52 CAGES, KENNELS - DETAILS A5.53 CAGES, KENNELS - DETAILS A5.54 CAGES, KENNELS - DETAILS A5.55 DETAILS A5.56 DETAILS A5.57 DETAILS A5.58 DETAILS A5.60 ROOF DETAILS A5.61 ROOF DETAILS A5.70 SPECIALITY EQUIPMENT DETAILS A6.00 ROOM & FINISH SCHEDULES A6.10 DOOR SCHEDULE A6.11 GATE SCHEDULE A6.12 HARDWARE SCHEDULE A6.13 HARDWARE SCHEDULE A6.14 HARDWARE SCHEDULE A6.20 FIXTURE & EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE A6.30 WINDOW & GLAZING SCHEDULE A6.31 WINDOW & GLAZING SCHEDULE A6.32 WINDOW & GLAZING SCHEDULE & DETAILS A7.10 OVERALL RCPS A7.11 ENLARGED RCP RA-DA ARCH SHEET LIST PAGE 3 OF 4 A7.12 ENLARGED RCP A7.13 ENLARGED RCP A7.14 SITE LIGHTING PLAN A7.15 ENLARGED EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN A7.16 ENLARGED RCP - 1/4" A7.17 ENLARGED RCP - 1/4" A7.18 ENLARGED RCP - 1/4" A7.19 ENLARGED RCP - 1/4" A8.10 OVERALL FINISH PLANS A8.10 ENLARGED FINISH PLAN A8.10 ENLARGED FINISH PLAN A8.10 ENLARGED FINISH PLAN A8.20 SIGNAGE PLAN A8.21 SIGNAGE PLAN A8.22 SIGNAGE DETAILS A8.23 SIGNAGE DETAILS A9.10 FURNITURE & FIXTURES PLAN A9.11 FURNITURE & FIXTURES PLAN A9.12 FURNITURE & FIXTURES PLAN A9.13 FURNITURE & FIXTURES PLAN A9.20 3D VIEWS A9.21 3D VIEWS A9.22 3D VIEWS RA-DA ARCH SHEET LIST PAGE 4 OF 4 VELOCITY OUTREACH CONSULTANT Phase Strategy/Task Estimated Hrs. Fee Pre Bond= Public Engagement Two public charettes - organize, invite, present, faciitate, follow-up report 40 hrs. $12,500.00 Two surveys/1 targeted audience, 2 general public - design, distribution, analysis 12 hrs. $2,250.00 Identify, engage and facilitate 10 affinity groups includes current and building new ones) to create active advocates 60 hrs. $11,250.00 One-on-one interviews with 25 influencers 75 hours $14,062.50 Campaing Alignment & Strategy 40 hours $9,500.00 Social Awareness & Storytelling Visual branding assets Digital feedback and listening mechanisms online Social media campaigns and monitoring City consulation on practical digital engagement guidance and assets Design, build and manage campaign landing page KPI tracking and reporting $25,000.00 Graphic & Video Production (up to 5-30" videos, posters, flyers, etc.)$25,000.00 Potential Additional Costs Domain registration Webise hosting (campaign duration) Misc. digital subscriptions or one-time purchases Survey software utilization 2,500.00 102,062.50 Velocity - Outreach Consultant page 1 of 2 Post Bond - Public Engagement 3 public charettes 50 hrs. $14,000.00 2 surveys 12 hrs. $2,250.00 Affinity Group activation for feedback and support through builiding 30 hrs. $5,625.00 Coordination with City/Strategy Integration 25 hrs. $7,812.50 Communication with Public on Progress and updates 25 hrs. $6,312.50 36,000.00 Celebration Design, Program, Details 20 hrs. $5,000.00 Strategy and Execution with Stakeholders 10 hrs. $3,125.00 Social Media to generate and maintain support 15 hrs. $2,626.00 Production Costs $18,000.00 28,751.00 Total $166,813.50 Velocity - Outreach Consultant page 2 of 2 800.700.1414 | info@entegritypartners.com | www.entegritypartners.com PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Between Entegrity Energy Partners, LLC and RA-DA Fayetteville Animal Care Center Fayetteville, AR November 12, 2025 CONTACT INFORMATION Corey Keen Vice President - Energy Services corey.keen@entegritypartners.com | 479.799.8160 Meredith Hendricks Vice President - Sustainability meredith.hendricks@entegritypartners.com | 479.466.2826 Page 2 of 13 November 12, 2025 Client: RA-DA Address: 7523 Norton Ave, West Hollywood, CA Attn: Rania Alomar Project: Fayetteville Animal Care Center Project Location: Fayetteville, AR Services: Sustainability, Commissioning, Building Testing, Energy Services PROJECT SUMMARY This Professional Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) is a contract for Entegrity Energy Partners, LLC “Entegrity” to provide services to Client to optimize building performance for the Fayetteville Animal Care Center. Sustainability and resiliency principles will be woven in with the Project goals and will result in an overall product that exemplifies the triple bottom line: equal consideration of people, profits, and the planet. Project Description: The project consists of the design and construction of a new single story ~ 20,000sf Animal Services Building for the City of Fayetteville. Expected Date of completion: Feb, 2027 Project Address: TBD Square footage: 20,000 SF Certification Standard: LEED version 4 or 5 Building Design and Construction for New Construction (LEED v4 – BD&C: NC) Page 3 of 13 PRICING SUMMARY Pre-Bond Post-Bond Pricing is shown divided into “Required services” to achieve LEED, and Optional services”. LEED has prerequisites (required to even qualify for certification), but then all else are credits worth differing numbers of points that we add up to achieve the desired certification level. We will have some choices as to which credits we pursue that make sense and provide the most value for the facility. Based on previous experience with LEEDv4, this project will likely need to do most, if not all, of the optional services to achieve LEED. However, we won’t know that until we start building a checklist, building the energy model, talking to the design team, and determining specific credit achievement paths. Service/Scope PreDesign Programming and Concept Design Outreach LEED Sustainability Consulting 6,470 $0 $0 Building Modeling: Energy/Daylight 0 $5,760 $0 Service/Scope Schematic Design Design Development Construction Documents Bid/Permitting Construction Administration LEED Sustainability Consulting 4,560 $15,420 $15,420 $1,800 $38,220 Third Party Fees & Plaque 1,350 $0 $0 $2,600 $875 Building Modeling: Energy/Daylight 15,120 $10,560 $12,240 Fundamental Cx $4,620 $0 $8,435 $0 $36,245 Optional: Enhanced Cx 0 $0 $1,000 $0 $11,260 Optional: Building Envelope Cx 0 $0 $1,000 $0 $20,350 Page 4 of 13 SERVICES Sustainability Consulting In connection with the Project, Entegrity will provide Client the services needed to meet the requirements of (OR establish the path for) the certification standard and goal named in the Project Summary above OR document the Arc performance score OR improve sustainability for the Project. Sustainability Clarifications Includes: All direct fees to the USGBC/GBCI associated with the LEED registration, design, and construction-phase certification of the Project are included and based on 20,000 SF. Fees are subject to change based on square footage changes and USGBC fee schedule changes. Estimate of $200 to be used toward a LEED sticker or a framed certificate. LEEDv4.1 credits/prerequisites which will be substituted for LEEDv4 credits/prerequisites where appropriate for the project and as allowed per USGBC/GBCI. Registration must be completed by June 01, 2026 to be eligible for certification under LEED v4. LEED v4 to LEED v5 will be evaluated during schematic design. If LEED v5 is pursued service pricing and scope will need to be reevaluated. Documentation in LEED/WELL Online per the construction-phase requirements of the standard named above. Six on-site meetings, to be distributed as is most appropriate for the Project and for which a minimum of one-week advance notice must be given by Client to Entegrity. All other meetings will be joined remotely by Entegrity via phone or webinar, etc. One electronic copy of the Project’s sustainability documentation, if required. Additional fee up to 5% of the contract amount per month via a change order if project extends more than three months beyond original expected date of completion referenced above. In this case, the additional fee will be determined based on the revised schedule. Entegrity will add additional fee via change order if Entegrity has requested construction required information/documentation from any Project team member more than three times and it has been over three months since the initial request. Entegrity will charge Client an additional fee of $1,000 per month that the required information is not received. Excludes: Page 5 of 13 A guarantee of certification achievement. As Entegrity is not the final reviewer, but rather the administrator of the process and documentation, no level of certification can be guaranteed by Entegrity. Additional services which may be determined by the entire team as necessary to meet project sustainability goals. Entegrity may be able to provide some of these additional services. Reviews of any submittal not sent through a third-party submittal management program. If submittals are requested to be reviewed in some other way (email, Dropbox, Sharepoint, etc) Entegrity will charge the contractor an additional $1,500 to manage the sustainability submittal reviews due to the extra time and coordination involved in reviewing. Print copies of sustainability documentation. Building and site area calculations, which will need to be performed by another professional, like an Architect for space square footages or a civil engineer for site square footages. Additional site visits beyond what is stated above. Additional trips required may be attended remotely by Entegrity via phone, webinar, etc. Achievement of a certification level beyond that stated above. Building life-cycle assessments to meet the Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction credit. All credits’ calculations will be run and documentation will be filled out in LEED Online by Entegrity, except the following which must be performed by the design engineers or other team members if these are pursued: stormwater/rainwater calculations, ESC plan, site square footages for Heat Island, Open Space, and landscape areas, Landscape irrigation reduction calculations, Minimum Energy Performance/ASHRAE 90.1 compliance, Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance prerequisite/ASHRAE 62.1 compliance, Thermal Comfort/ASHRAE 55.1 compliance, Interior Lighting spreadsheet and associated modeling, Light Pollution Reduction and associated photometric study, Enhanced Refrigerant Management, and Demand Response. Additional service fees for Entegrity to perform these may be available upon request. Basic LEED Education: Entegrity’s services assume that the specific design and construction team members working on the Project have been involved in at least two LEED Projects. This includes mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and civil engineers, landscape architect, architect, interior designer, and General Contractor. If is determined that they are inexperienced, then a LEED basic education course will be required. An additional service fee for Entegrity to perform this is available upon request. Page 6 of 13 Building Modeling In connection with the Project, Entegrity will provide Client with Building Modeling services based on the requirements of the appropriate credits/prerequisites in the certification standard named in the Project Summary above. The model will be based on current design and subsequent modifications. Building Modeling Clarifications Scope Reference: Appendix E1 “Building Energy Modeling: Scope of Services” Appendix E4 “Building Daylight Modeling: Scope of Services” Includes: Documentation in LEED Online per the requirements of the standard named above. LEEDv4.1 credits/prerequisites which will be substituted for LEEDv4 credits/prerequisites where appropriate for the project and as allowed per USGBC/GBCI. One effort for early-design modeling that compares multiple efficiency paths and results in a final report. If more comparisons are requested after final report, additional fee may be required. This only applied to the prebond phase. One electronic copy of the model report to be provided to Client by Entegrity. Analysis performed utilizing IES VE, Sefaira, LightStanza, or equivalent software. Excludes: All travel. Meetings will be attended remotely by Entegrity via phone, webinar, etc. Life-cycle cost analysis. Exact fee for energy or daylight modeling if they are selected in isolation. There are internal efficiencies if Entegrity executes both scopes together, but if one service is removed, additional fee may be applied. Print copies of modeling documentation. Documentation beyond what is provided in the final model report. There is no guarantee provided, neither stated nor implied, as to actual energy usage/production, utility expenses, and/or actual energy savings for this project. Preparation of design/construction contract documents. Verification of code compliance. Design and/or specification of any of the following building systems: o HVAC, Plumbing, Fire Protection and/or Electrical systems o Civil and/or Site Utility systems o Renewable Energy systems o Building envelope and/or construction methods Page 7 of 13 Commissioning In connection with the Project, Entegrity will provide Client with Commissioning services based on the requirements of the appropriate credits/prerequisites in the certification standard named in the Project Summary above. All commissioning tasks will be conducted in a transparent manner and involve the Owner and Owner’s staff as required. Commissioning Clarifications Scope Reference: Appendix C2 “Commissioning Authority Scope of Services for LEED v4” Includes: Commissioning of the systems and equipment identified in the scope of work reference above. Submission of all commissioning deliverables to the Client and Owner according to the Project schedule. All associated travel. One electronic copy of the Commissioning Final Report and the Commissioning Record will be provided to Client by Entegrity. Documentation in LEED Online for to satisfy the scope of work selected by the Client and described in Appendix C2. LEEDv4.1 credits/prerequisites which will be substituted for LEEDv4 credits/prerequisites where appropriate for the project and as allowed per USGBC/GBCI. Excludes: Additional equipment or system types or commissioning activities. Entegrity’s/Commissioning Agent’s execution of Pre-Functional Checklists. These are to be performed by the subcontractors. Design-phase Commissioning activities. Meeting certification requirements or documentation. Additional trips if Entegrity is summoned to perform functional testing in connection with the Project and the Project is not ready. In this case, Entegrity will charge Client all associated time and travel costs for each additional trip. Print copies of Commissioning Report or other documentation. The following roles to be performed by the General Contractor: Make jobsite available for access, inform Entegrity of subcontractor meetings, participate in a commissioning kick-off meeting, and have the controls subcontractor available for assistance in commissioning the HVAC equipment start-up and sequences of operation. General Contractor shall make available access to equipment consisting of ladder, lifts, etc. along with field personnel to operate equipment including opening access and room doors, remove / replace ceiling tiles, electrical panel cover removal and replacement, etc, provide all utilities for testing, provide labor to make any repairs due to damage from testing. Page 8 of 13 Establishing design concept, design criteria, compliance with codes, design or general construction scheduling, cost estimating, or construction management. The CxA may assist with problem-solving or resolving non-conformance or deficiencies, but ultimately that responsibility resides with the general contractor and the design team. The CxA will report to the owner any deficiencies or discrepancies. Execution or procurement of any other form of building testing other than those specified in the scope reference above as part of Envelope Commissioning. Monitoring-Based Commissioning per the Enhanced Commissioning Credit Option 1 Path 2. Serving as an expert witness on behalf of any entity associated with the Project. DEFINITIONS The following terms used in this document have the meanings set forth below. Client: The entity or person identified as the client at the beginning of this document. Client may be the same entity or person that is General Contractor or Architect. Entegrity: Entegrity Energy Partners, LLC Physical Address: 1403 E. 6th Street, Little Rock, AR 72202 Remittance Address: P.O. Box 2090, Conway, AR 72033 Attn: Michael Parker, President Project: Fayetteville Animal Care Center Owner: The entity or person that owns the building involved in the Project or that will own the building involved in the Project after work is completed. General Contractor: The entity or person that is retained and serves as the general contractor for the Project. Architect: The entity or person that is retained and serves as the architect for the Project. TERMS AND CONDITIONS Marketing Client agrees to allow Entegrity to use its name and logo within the Entegrity website, marketing materials, case studies, and advertisement(s). Client agrees that Entegrity may identify Client, including use of Client’s name(s) and logo(s), as a customer of Entegrity, including but not limited to use in Entegrity’s website(s), newsletters, case studies, emails, or promotional posts in social media; in the event that Client wishes to be excluded from a specific promotion/publication of Entegrity, Client shall notify Page 9 of 13 Entegrity in writing, and Entegrity will cease using Client’s name(s) and logo(s) in such publication, on a going-forward basis, provided that Entegrity will not be required to cease such use in any printed material that has already been printed, ordered, or otherwise published. Client will not be entitled to any compensation as a result of any such publication. Any use of Entegrity’s name and logo, or any form of publicity, inclusive of press release, regarding this Agreement by Client must have prior approval from Entegrity, and approval of which shall not be unreasonably withheld by Entegrity. Appendices All appendices referenced above are incorporated as part of this Agreement. Owner Not General Contractor And/Or Architect If Client is not the same person or entity as General Contractor for the Project, then Client shall cause General Contractor to complete all tasks, responsibilities, and obligations of General Contractor above. Further, if Client is not the same person or entity as Architect for the Project, then Client shall cause Architect to complete all tasks, responsibilities, and obligations of Architect above. Exclusions/Reimbursable 1. Travel and other services beyond the Fayetteville, AR facilities. 2. Plan reproduction or other Project documentation costs. 3. No retainage be withheld. Additional Reimbursables While none are expected, any additional reimbursables will be billed at cost plus 10%. Payment of Services Client shall pay in full for all services provided by Entegrity under this Agreement in the time and manner as set forth herein. The fixed fee amount will be billed based upon statements submitted by Entegrity to Client indicating the proportion of the amount of work accomplished. Payments for services performed will be billed monthly by Entegrity. Client shall pay the amounts set forth in each monthly statement within 30 days of the statement date. Note: The remittance address for Entegrity Energy Partners, LLC is P.O. Box 2090, Conway, AR 72033. Schedule; Revision to Agreement This Agreement is effective as of the signature date or initiation of work applied to the Project and shall terminate upon completion of all attached service scopes of work unless otherwise terminated earlier pursuant to the “Termination” provision below. If Entegrity requests information from Client which is required to perform services under this Agreement and that information is not received within 6 months after the initial request, Entegrity is entitled to revise this Agreement in its sole discretion to appropriately accommodate for the delay in receipt of the requested information. Ownership and Use of Intellectual Property Page 10 of 13 All intellectual property (including, but not limited to, inventions (whether patentable or unpatentable and whether or not reduced to practice), improvements, patents, patent applications, trademarks, service marks, trade dress, logos, and all derivations of and all goodwill associated with each of the foregoing; all copyrightable works, all copyrights and applications; all trade secrets and confidential business information (including ideas, research and development, know-how, formulas, compositions, manufacturing and production processes and techniques, technical data, designs, drawings, and specifications; and any and all other data, results, reports, and information of any kind), pricing and cost information, and business and marketing plans and proposals; all proprietary rights; and all copies and tangible embodiments (in whatever form or medium) of any of the foregoing; remedies against infringements of the foregoing; and rights to protection of interests of the foregoing under any federal, state, local or foreign constitution, law, code, rule, regulation, order, writ, injunction, ruling, judgment, each as amended and in effect, now or in the future) that is made, discovered, created, invented, or generated by Entegrity in any activities or work under this Agreement or the Project is the sole and exclusive property of Entegrity, or it’s subconsultant as applicable. All drawings, specifications, plans, computations, sketches, data, records, photographs, tapes, renderings, models, publications, statements, accounts, reports, studies, and other materials prepared by Entegrity under this Agreement or the Project are the sole and exclusive property of Entegrity, or it’s subconsultant as applicable. Entegrity grants Client a non-exclusive license to use Entegrity Project Property for all purposes consistent with the Project Summary and Scope of Services as referenced above and/or by appendices attached. Entegrity retains the right to publish articles or other works related to the work conducted by Entegrity under this Agreement or the Project. The Client retains the right to utilize the articles or other works for its purpose but does not have the right to publish or promote these articles or other works without the prior express written permission of Entegrity. Termination a) If either party is in default of performance of any material obligation under this Agreement, the party that is not in default may give written notice of the default to the other party and if the party notified fails to correct the default within thirty (30) days or within such period fails to satisfy the party giving notice that the default does not exist, the party giving notice may terminate this Agreement upon expiration of the thirty (30) day period. b) Entegrity may terminate this Agreement immediately in the event of the filing by or against the Client of a petition for relief in bankruptcy or for receivership, or in the event that the Client becomes insolvent. c) The termination of this Agreement shall not affect any right or remedy that has accrued to either party at the time of termination. Venue; Governing law Page 11 of 13 The parties agree that a state court of competent jurisdiction in and for Pulaski County or, if permissible under applicable federal jurisdictional principles, the United States District Court for the District that encompasses such county, are the exclusive venues for commencing an action on or in respect of this Agreement. This Agreement and all of the rights and obligations of the parties hereto and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall be construed, interpreted and applied in accordance with and governed by and enforced under the laws of the State of Arkansas. Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitations on Entegrity’s Liability Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Entegrity provides all goods, equipment, materials, services, personnel, facilities, and other items to Client under this Agreement “as is”, without warranties, guarantees, certifications, or representations of any kind. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement: a) Entegrity expressly and specifically disclaims any warranties of title, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose, as well as all implied warranties, including any implied warranties arising from a course of dealing or performance or usage of trade; and b) Entegrity’s maximum aggregate liability under this Agreement shall not exceed the amounts paid by Client to Entegrity during the immediately preceding contiguous twelve (12) month period during the Term of this Agreement; and c) Entegrity shall not be responsible or liable to Client or to any person or entity claiming through Client for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages, including without limitation lost or anticipated profits, revenues, or savings, even if Entegrity has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Binding Effect This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and their respective heirs, successors, assigns, and representatives and any and all persons and entities seeking to claim through any of them or on their behalf. Entire Agreement The parties hereby agree and represent that this Agreement constitutes their entire agreement and understanding relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings of the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. Amendment, Modification, Waiver Except as permitted by Entegrity in the “Schedule” provision above, this Agreement may be amended or modified only in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and neither this Agreement nor any provision herein may be waived, modified, amended, discharged, or terminated, except by written instrument signed by the party to be charged. Waiver of Breach Page 12 of 13 The waiver by any party of, a breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as, or be construed to be, a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision hereof. Further Assurances and Actions The parties hereby agree to take such other and further actions as may be necessary to implement the intent and purposes of this Agreement, including the execution of any additional documents necessary to effectuate the intents and purposes of this Agreement. Divisions and Headings The division of this Agreement into sections and subsections and the use of captions and headings in connection therewith are solely for convenience and shall have no legal effect in construing the provisions of this Agreement. Execution in Counterparts and/or by Facsimile or Electronic Media For the convenience of the parties, this Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original. This Agreement also may be executed by signatures transmitted by facsimile or other electronic media, which signatures will be deemed to be original and fully enforceable against the party transmitting the signature by facsimile or electronic media. The use of facsimile or electronic signatures will not render this Agreement void, voidable, or otherwise unenforceable. Severability If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be partially or wholly invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, then such provision will be deemed to be modified or restricted to the extent necessary to make such provision valid, binding, and enforceable or if such provision cannot be modified or restricted in a manner so as to make such provision valid, binding, or enforceable, then such provision will be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the validity, binding effect, and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement will not be affected or impaired in any manner. No Third-Party Beneficiary Relationships Created No parties other than the signatories to this Agreement will be entitled to enforce or otherwise rely upon any provision of this Agreement or any other document executed in furtherance of this Agreement. Acceptance For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the terms, provisions, and conditions set forth herein and in each attached Appendix by signing below. The parties further acknowledge and represent that they have carefully read this Agreement and each attached Appendix; understand all of the terms, provisions, and conditions set forth Page 13 of 13 herein and in each attached Appendix; have executed this Agreement voluntarily and as a result of their own best judgment; and agree to be bound by it. Client Entegrity RA-DA Entegrity Energy Partners, LLC By: ______________________________ By: ______________________________ Name: ___________________________ Name: __________________________ Title: _____________________________ Title: _____________________________ Date: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________ APPENDIX B1 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE LEED V4 FOR BUILDING DESIGN + CONSTRUCTION: SCOPE OF SERVICES I. PreBond Phase A. Provide feedback on site selection relative to sustainability goals for the project. This will include basic sustainability requirements as well as possible LEED points for LEED v4 that are available for the differing sites. B. Review LEED v4 and LEED v5 differences at a high level. Deep dive into the differences in these two systems will be completed during schematic design sustainability charrette after the bond vote. C. Provide basic feedback on orientation and sustainability at the site and building level. II. Project Review and Orientation A. Project Mission and Goals 1. Establish and/or review the general project goals and goals related to sustainability, Guiding Principles, and LEED certification. Establish the appropriate members of the LEED team. 2. The project schedule and procurement strategy will also be discussed as well as the need for an “integrated design” approach. B. LEED Registration and Documentation Review 1. LEED registration and LEED-Online setup will be initiated. 2. Entegrity will assign prerequisites and credits to appropriate LEED team members. 3. A multiple page basic requirements by discipline will be provided to orient the team to LEED basic standards. 4. All available documentation will be reviewed. File sharing system will be established if needed. Entegrity will use Monday.com as the main form of communication/project management of credit requirements and documentation collection. 5. All existing LEED Reference Guide Addenda, Reference Guide Supplements, Reference Guide Guidance Documents, Additional Guidance documents, Supporting Documentation documents, precedent setting Interpretations, experiential compilation of GBCI reviewer comments, will be downloaded, reviewed, applied, and relevant information shared with the team. C. Site and Project Review 1. Entegrity will review the site prior to project Orientation meeting. Page 2 of 5 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE 2. Site concerns as they relate to certification and sustainable design will be noted and presented as part of the Orientation Meeting. D. Sustainability Workshop 1. An in-person or virtual meeting of the entire LEED team and ownership will be conducted to review the goals, process, and provide an overview and definition of the sustainability goals for the project. Any incongruities between current project parameters and LEED requirements will be identified. 2. Action items and team member responsibilities will be defined. A checklist will be prepared which will act as the LEED overview and synthesized status report. 3. Impact of the Sustainability Goals and LEED requirements on the various sections of the plans and specifications will determined and noted. 4. A management team report will be prepared to define progress and future plans. III. Design Document Integration A. All plans and specification sections will be reviewed at least twice during design document development to perform an impact assessment of the LEED requirements on the design. 1. Material selection support for specifications drafting will consist of LEED credit requirement interpretation and product research. Management of 4 allotted hours to be coordinated with Architect prior to work beginning. B. Based on the impact assessment/design review, the LEED team will define the preliminary LEED prerequisites and credits that will be included in the project. Credits that have the potential to be included in the project but require further definition will be defined and tasked for clarification. 1. At this time, LEED ID credits will be defined and achievement determined. Templates, plans and policies, and pathways to achievement will be provided for the most commonly pursued Innovation, Exemplary Performance, Pilot Credit, or Interpretation Approved credits. IV. Construction Document Integration A. Based on the results of the design review and LCCA, the LEED team will define the final LEED prerequisites and credits that will be included in the project. B. Credits to be achieved will be defined by Entegrity and integrated in the project plans and specifications by the design team. 1. Additional credits that could be pursued to gain additional points to achieve the target certification goal, or a new higher goal, will be explained and a pathway identified. Any additional services needed will be researched and costs and documentation requirements explained to the team. C. A general LEED specification section, and potentially other supporting sections, will be provided along with language for all other sections to comply with LEED requirements. Page 3 of 5 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE D. The final credit checklist will be formalized and reported to the management team. E. This project will be using the split review LEED certification pathway. After Issued for construction documents are completed, Entegrity will compile all final documents in LEED Online and submit design review credits to GBCI for review. F. Following the review comments on design phase credits, Entegrity will organize any needed responses and finalize the achievement of the design credits. V. Construction Phase Implementation A. Contractor education will be performed at an in -person or virtual meeting before the commencement of any jobsite specific activities through an interactive PowerPoint presentation. The education session will relate the sustainable mission of the project and the basics behind LEED certification requirements. All pertinent sections of the construction documents will be reviewed for conformance as well as general jobsite requirements. 1. Electronic files will be given to the Contractor to be used to understand and track specific LEED credit requirements. These may contain tracking spreadsheets, simplified educational documents on each credit, lists of compliance standards thresholds per product type, schedule integration information, relevant local vendor resources, and draft plans, policies, and signage. B. A separate Sub-contractor education session will be held at a virtual meeting to communicate and review their documentation requirements through an interactive power point presentation. Additional contractor and supplier education to be provided in follow-up calls or emails. Simplified educational documents, tracking spreadsheets, and LEED submittal documentation forms will be provided. C. Submittal review support will be provided to ensure that the required sustainability measures are correctly provided and documented. All submittals requiring LEED compliance will be reviewed at the same time as other design professionals and a Compliant/Not Compliant/Not Applicable/Missing Information status provided back to the contractor. Product information will be retained and uploaded to LEED online as required. D. An open line of communication is extended to contractors, subcontractors, and vendors as they research and submit their anticipated products. Product resources will be provided to find replacements for any products which are determined to not meet LEED requirements. E. Regular conference calls and one monthly OAC meeting will be attended in person or virtually to provide updates to the team in addition to electronically circulated LEED Checklist and Notes. VI. LEED Certification and Documentation A. LEED Documentation Collection Page 4 of 5 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE 1. Dates for final documentation collection will be determined for each team member based on the project schedule and documentation availability. 2. All rooms will be defined according to LEED Space Classification requirements and these consistent classifications provided to appropriate team members and filled out in LEED Online. 3. Guidance to the design team will be provided to ensure that LEED Representative Floor Plans, section views, signage details, mechanical plans, mechanical schedule, plumbing plans, plumbing schedule, and other required LEED documentation all meet LEED requirements. 4. Through phone, email, and guidance documents, a LEED Site Boundary document will be developed with the Civil Engineer to contain all required LEED site information. 5. Project progress reports will be provided in checklist form to maintain continuity and ensure credit achievement. The presentation of the progress checklist and LEED Coordination Notes will be coordinated with the appropriate design professional. a. Consistency in all basic building, site, and occupant data will be defined and maintained throughout all credit submittals. b. All credit documentation will be reviewed by Entegrity and judged on completeness. Any additional documentation/drawings required will be requested from the appropriate team member. c. After qualifying documentation is received from team members, all credit templates in LEED online will be filled out. Only a few specific credits are required to be filled out by other authorized team members and will be communicated through Monday.com project management platform. B. LEED Application 1. The direct registration and certification fees required by the U.S. Green Building Council will be paid as indicated in the Services section of this proposal. 2. Entegrity will submit the project for certification and be the main point of contact for all requests for additional information, clarifications, and questions. a. A “Response to the Review” document with supporting documentation will be provided for any prerequisite or credit requiring further information. 3. Entegrity will provide a report on unachieved credits. VII. Closeout A. Post-LEED Certification Support 1. All post-certification required LEED tasks will be defined and communicated to the owner. 2. Guidance for the following will be provided: Marketing, media, logo, trademark, plaque ordering, LEED Project Directory, case study, reference materials, and future EBOM registration and certification. Page 5 of 5 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE 3. LEED Certificates and sticker will be ordered and provided to the owner. 4. An electronic copy of final LEED documentation will be made by downloading all data from LEED Online and given to the owner upon request. B. Marketing and Education Support 1. Throughout DD’s, CD’s, and project implementation Entegrity will provide marketing support. Once the project is certified all the certification and basic project information will be provided for appropriate marketing efforts. 2. An Educational Program Innovation in Design credit will be encouraged. This will contain a case study, facility signage, and/or tour strategy, any combination of which drafts will be provided. a. Implementation will be discussed throughout the project. Opportunities for involvement by all potential stakeholders will be made available and encouraged throughout the project and via one on-site or virtual contact which might include a tour, meeting, or media updates. APPENDIX C2 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE COMMISSIONING AUTHORITY SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR LEED v4 I. SCOPE OF SERVICE OVERVIEW A. This scope of services outlines the requirements of LEED v4 for both the prerequisite Fundamental Commissioning and Verification (EAp1) and the Enhanced Commissioning credit (EAc1) under the Energy and Atmosphere section for all options and paths outlined in the credit. B. This scope of work describes each of the commissioning services outlined in the LEED v4 reference manual and the specific activities in per phase of the project for each. The actual scope of services and equipment for the project is dependent on the services the Client selects and as shown in the attached proposal. II. SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS A. Fundamental Cx and Verification (FCx): This service meets the requirements of the Fundamental Commissioning and Verification prerequisite, EAp1. The intent of this prerequisite is to support the design, construction and eventual operation of a project that meets the Owner’s Project Requirements for energy, water, indoor environmental quality and durability. Under Fundamental Commissioning and Verification, the following systems are required to be commissioned: 1. Mechanical; including HVAC&R equipment and controls 2. Plumbing; including domestic hot water systems, pumps, and controls 3. Electrical; including service and distribution (through 225A panelboards), lighting and controls, including daylighting controls 4. Renewable energy systems; as applicable B. Enhanced Cx (ECx): This service meets the requirements of the Enhanced Systems Commissioning Option 1, Path 1 (O1P1) outlined under the Enhanced Commissioning credit, EAc1. The intent of this credit is to “enhance” the requirements outlined in the Fundamental Commissioning and Verification prerequisite, EAp1, by including additional commissioning activities to not only add value to the design and construction phases of the project, but also to develop documentation that gives future operating staff the information needed to understand and optimally operate the commissioned systems. Page 2 of 6 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE C. Building Envelope Cx (BECx): This service meets the requirements of Enhanced Systems Commissioning Option 2 (O2) outlined under the Enhanced Commissioning credit, EAc1 for Envelope Commissioning (ECx). The intent of this credit is to extend the requirements of Fundamental Commissioning and Verification prerequisite to cover the building’s envelope, including thermal, air, and vapor barriers, and completing Enhanced Commissioning O1P1 as it relates to the building envelope. It is not necessary to complete the enhanced commissioning for building systems to meet the requirements of this option, however doing so will help to ensure a better-performing building. III. FUNDAMENTAL CX AND VERIFICATION (FCX) ACTIVITIES PER PHASE A. Schematic Design 1. Organize an Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) development charette with the owner and design team. The purpose of this charette is to discuss the owner’s requirements for the following topics and others: mechanical, electrical, plumbing, architectural, structural, lighting, energy consumption, commissioning, building envelope, indoor environmental quality, environmental sustainability, siting, exteriors, landscaping, interiors, functionality for tenants, and budget. 2. Develop the OPR document and submit to the project team for review. B. Design Phase 1. Develop the Commissioning Plan, encompassing the Design, Construction, Acceptance, and Occupancy Phases. The Commissioning Plan shall detail each step of the commissioning process, define roles and responsibilities, and provide samples and outlines of documents to be produced during the commissioning process. Update the Commissioning Plan as necessary throughout the project. 2. Develop Commissioning Specifications for all commissioned systems. Coordinate with the Architect and Engineers to integrate the Commissioning Specifications into the overall project specification package. The Commissioning Specifications shall include a detailed description of the commissioning process, issue resolution processes, and commissioning team member roles and responsibilities. 3. Conduct a Design Review of the construction documents and specifications for commissioned systems, as well as the building envelope, at the mid-CD phase. Review is focused on the commissioned systems constructability, commissionability, maintainability, operability, and the clarity of the drawings. Provide the Design Review Comments Log to the design team for review and response for each phase being reviewed. If necessary, coordinate a meeting with the design team to discuss the identified issues. Back-check the 100% CD set to ensure comments were either incorporated or addressed. Page 3 of 6 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE C. Construction Phase 1. Prior to beginning on-site commissioning activities, organize and conduct a Commissioning Kick-Off Meeting with the design and construction teams to review the goals, expectations, roles and responsibilities and expectations of the commissioning process. 2. Develop equipment specific Pre-Functional Checklists (PFCs). Submit to the commissioning team for review. 3. Perform periodic site visits to observe component and system installations and verify subcontractor completion of PFC checklists. Back-check a sample of contractor completed PFCs to confirm accuracy. Checklists shall be completed prior to equipment startup. Issue a Site Observation Reports after each visit. 4. Attend selected construction progress and coordination meetings to obtain information on construction activities, direct the commissioning process, and advise the design and construction teams. Attendance may be by teleconference or in person, at the CxA’s discretion. 5. Organize and conduct periodic commissioning team meetings necessary to plan, coordinate and schedule activities and resolve Commissioning Issues. The team meeting will coincide with regular jobsite meetings once construction has begun. 6. Develop project specific Functional Performance Test (FPT) Procedures for each commissioned system and component. FPTs will only be developed for dynamic systems. Issue the FPT documents to the commissioning team for review and comment. 7. Coordinate a FPT review and coordination meeting with the commissioning team. Discuss and address any comments regarding the FPT Procedures, review the FPT execution process and schedule the execution of the FPTs. D. Acceptance Phase 1. Direct, witness, and document the execution of the FPTs by the contractors and/or equipment manufacturers. Testing shall include individual component and equipment tests, integrated systems testing, and operation and calibration of all system components including valves, dampers, and sensors. Document any deficiencies in the Commissioning Issues Log. Provide Site Observations Reports periodically throughout the testing process. 2. Develop the Current Facility Requirements (CFR) and Operations and Maintenance Plan (O&M Plan) with the assistance of the commissioning team. The CFR is similar to the OPR and details how the completed building will be operated. The O&M plan provides information, scheduling and documents to properly operate and maintain the equipment. Page 4 of 6 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE 3. Develop the Final Commissioning Report detailing the results of the commissioning process. This report shall provide a summary of the project, discuss any open Commissioning Issues, detail work yet to be completed and make a recommendation of project acceptance. The report shall also include the Commissioning Record, which is the final versions of documents produced during the commissioning process. This report may be provided in two separate files: the Commissioning Final Report and the Commissioning Record. 4. Provide all documentation required for LEED submission associated with the commissioning scope of work. IV. ENHANCED CX (ECX) ACTIVITIES PER PHASE A. The activities listed below must be completed in addition to those outlined in FCx. B. Design Phase 1. Develop the minimum owner training requirements and verify inclusion of operator and occupant training requirements in the contract documents. 2. Outline the scope and format for the project systems manual to include all the information necessary to operate, maintain, and recommission all energy- consuming systems within the building. C. Construction Phase 1. Review selected contractor submittals, concurrent with the design team. Provide review comments to the design team for review, comment, and potential inclusion in the official submittal response. If necessary, review up to one (1) re-submittal to ensure comments have been addressed. D. Acceptance Phase 1. Review the systems manual for achieving the requirements of the OPR and specifications. 2. Review and verify the Owner Training provided by the contractors achieves the contract requirements. Ensure all required personnel and positions receive training and have sufficiently understood the training content. 3. Verify delivery of the postconstruction documents including the Systems Manual, operations and maintenance manuals for all commissioned equipment, documentation of operator training of all commissioned systems, completed FPTs, and an up-to-date issues log detailing closed and open issues. Update the Cx Plan to outline commissioning completed to date, plan for deferred testing, if necessary, plan for 10-month warranty review, and plan for addressing open issues identified after the initial round of commissioning. Page 5 of 6 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE E. Occupancy and Operations Phase 1. If necessary, schedule and verify deferred testing by the contractor. 2. Amend the Cx Report to include any deferred testing results. 3. Return to the site 10 months into the 12-month warranty period. Review the current building operation and the condition of outstanding issues related to the original and seasonal commissioning with facility staff, as well as assist with resolution of previously identified issues pertaining to warranty. 4. Issue a 10-Month Warranty Report to the design and construction team identifying all issues to be resolved by the contractor prior to the expiration of their warranty. 5. Develop and provide the Ongoing Cx Plan for the commissioned systems. V. BUILDING ENVELOPE CX (BECX) ACTIVITIES PER PHASE A. The activities listed below must be completed in addition to those outlined in FCx. B. Pre-Design Phase 1. Review the OPR and BOD documentation as it pertains to the building’s envelope. C. Design Phase 1. Incorporate the BECx requirements and activities into the project’s Cx Plan. 2. Assist design team on defining appropriate acceptance tests to be performed by the construction team for the building envelope. 3. Develop Commissioning Specifications as it pertains to the building’s envelope. 4. Create training requirements specific to BECx and verify inclusion of operator and occupant training requirements in the construction documents. 5. If ECx is pursued, update the systems manual to include all the information necessary to maintain the building envelope. D. Construction Phase 1. Expand the requirements of submittal reviews to include a review of the submittals pertaining to the building envelope, including the thermal, air and water barriers. 2. Develop PFCs specific to the building envelope. 3. Organize and conduct a building envelope commissioning coordination meeting ensuring proper sequencing of materials, as well as an understanding of construction details and building envelope testing requirements. 4. Perform periodic site visits to review the installation of the building envelope and ensure execution of the envelope specific PFCs. Ensure envelope issues are documented in the Commissioning Issues Log and Site Observation Reports. E. Acceptance Phase 1. Document acceptance testing performed by the contractors on the building envelope. Page 6 of 6 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE 2. Expand the requirements of FCx to include building envelope specific information into the CFR and O&M Plan to provide information to properly maintain the building envelope. 3. Expand the requirements of FCx to include building envelope specific information in the Final Commissioning Report. 4. Execute water intrusion testing according to AAMA 501.2 on a sample of fenestrations. 5. Review the systems manual for achieving the requirements of the OPR and specifications as it pertains to the building envelope. 6. Review, recommend pre-approval, and verify the training provided by the contractors for the building envelope systems. F. Occupancy and Operations Phase 1. Return to the site 10 months into the 12-month warranty period. Review the current building operation and the condition of outstanding issues related to the original and seasonal commissioning with facility staff, as well as assist with resolution of previously identified issues pertaining to warranty. 2. Issue a 10-Month Warranty Report to the design and construction team identifying all issues to be resolved by the contractor prior to the expiration of their warranty. APPENDIX E1 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE BUILDING ENERGY MODELING: SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Construct an energy model for the proposed building, comparing the proposed building to a “baseline” building. “Baseline” building shall comply with the minimum requirements of ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2010. B. Energy model results will be provided at various times in the design phase of the project, which may include: 1. An early Schematic Development comparison of baseline systems for the proposed project type, location and ASHRAE assumptions. Review of typical energy profile of similar buildings. Early comments and recommendations for design consideration are provided. 2. An early Design Development energy model comparison of a baseline model to the proposed model at current design state. A set of iterations is provided to consider/compare various building systems to ASHRAE standards, code requirements, and other proposed systems. Model iterations/outputs are limited to a project’s current design, known proposed systems, requested comparisons and other assumptions reasonably made to provide informative comparisons. 3. A final Design Development model that will compare the current proposed design and all proposed assumptions to the ASHRAE baseline for a projected energy costs savings. 4. A Construction Document model that formalizes all previous iterations and reflects any changes from the DD model. Any outstanding model assumptions will be defined and provided to the design team for final consideration. Feedback on various proposed systems energy impacts is provided. 5. A final project energy model report. C. Analysis performed utilizing IES VE, Sefaira, LightStanza, or equivalent software. APPENDIX E4 OPTIMIZING BUILDING PERFORMANCE BUILDING DAYLIGHT MODELING: SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Construct a building daylight model for the proposed buildings, demonstrating the percentage of spatial daylight autonomy300/50% (sDA300/50%) and annual sunlight exposure1000,250 (ASE1000,250). B. Daylight model results and an update report will be provided as specified in the proposal. These may include: 1. An early Schematic Development model to evaluate window placement, window sizes, and building orientation to maximize daylight to regularly occupied areas. 2. A Design Development model to evaluate the building design daylight score for LEED credit points. 3. A Construction Document model that will project LEED credit points for the current proposed daylighting design. Any outstanding model assumptions will be defined and provided to the design team for final consideration. 4. A final project daylight model report including the attempted LEED points. C. A final executive summary report will be provided that summarizes findings. D. Analysis shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of LEED version 4, credit IEQc7, Option 1. E. Analysis shall be performed utilizing IES VE, LightStanza, or equivalent software. Agreement for the Provision of Limited Professional Services Design Professional:Client: Prigm Engineering, PLLC RA-DA Architecture 310 W. Dickson St. Suite 210 Fayetteville, AR 72701 7523 North Avenue West Hollywood, CA 90046 Proposal Writer: Jason Mowrey Prigm Engineering Project No: 25117 Date: November 13, 2025 Project Name: Fayetteville Animal Services Building Location: Fayetteville, AR Scope of Services: MEP/FP Design: Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineering design for the new 20,000 ft² Animal Services Building project located in Fayetteville, AR. This project shall be designed to LEED Silver standards. Electrical Power & Lighting: All power requirements for the building shall be provided by Prigm. Lighting design (including exterior lighting) and fixture selections will be by others under the base contract. Back-of-house lighting and associated code-compliant lighting controls will be provided by Prigm Engineering. Photometrics will be provided by Prigm. All lighting systems will be documented on the electrical drawings. IT/ Low Voltage/ Security: Include drawings/specs showing low-voltage items while working closely with the owner and/or the owner’s low-voltage provider. Show all data boxes, security devices, and server/controller locations and power requirements for all low-voltage equipment on electrical drawings. Construction Administration Typical Construction Administration Services to include RFI responses, submittal reviews, monthly OAC meetings, and a final punch list walk-through at the completion of construction. A 12-month construction schedule is estimated. LEED Certification Assistance (if required) Exterior Photometrics and Documentation for USGBC. ASHRAE 62.1 Calculations and Documentation for USGBC. Assist Commissioning Agent as required during design and construction. Schedule: The Design Professional shall perform its services as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the work. The schedule shall be as mutually agreed to by the Client and Design Professional. Agreement for the Provision of Limited Professional Services Deliverables: Permit Construction Documents in PDF form Bood Specifications in CSI format Stipulations: Client shall provide the Design Professional architectural floor plans in Revit format. Building utilities designed to five feet beyond the building. Client’s civil engineer responsible for site plan. Fire protection documents, if required, shall be delivered as a performance specification and then designed by the Client’s fire protection contractor. Any permitting and review fees are not included in this proposal and if required, shall be billed to the Client as a reimbursable expense. Construction Management services are limited as outlined above. Additional review time, meetings, or site visits, if required, shall be on an hourly rate as outlined below. Fee Arrangement: Design Professional will provide services as outlined below: Phase 1 - $2,500 Phase 2 – MEP/FP Engineering Design Services = $149,500 o SDs – $22,425 o DDs – $44,850 o CDs – $52,325 o Bidding & Negotiation – $7,475 o CA – $22,425 LEED Documentation & Certification (if required) – $14,500 These items above are inclusive of “Expenses” associated with the project, excluding “Building Permit / Plan Review Fees.” Hourly Rates for Additional Services Principal $235/HR Engineer III $195/HR Engineer II $175/HR Administrative $100/HR Special Conditions: This Agreement remains valid for thirty days after which time Design Professional reserves the right to modify or amend the Agreement. Any and all taxes levied on Design Professional for this project shall be considered a reimbursable expense. Offered by: Jason Mowrey, Principal Accepted by: (Client): Printed name / title Printed name / title Signature indicates the authority to bind the company to the terms herein Signature Jason P. Mowrey, Principal 11/13/25 Signature Date The Terms and Conditions that follow are part of this Agreement. Fee Where the fee arrangement is to be on an hourly basis, the rates shall be those that prevail at the time services are rendered. Hourly rates are valid through current calendar year. Billings/Payments Invoices for services shall be submitted, at the Design Professional’s option, either upon completion of the services or on a monthly basis. Invoices shall be payable within 30 days after the invoice date. A service charge of 1.5% (or the maximum legal rate) per month will be applied to the unpaid balance after 30 days from the invoice date. Design Professional shall have the right to suspend/terminate services if payment is not received within 60 days after the invoice date and the Design Professional shall have no liability for any resultant delays or damages incurred by Client as a result of such suspension/termination. Deposits shall be credited on the first invoice. The Client agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney’s fees. Expenses Defined as the actual expense anticipated by the Design Professional in connection with the Project for: travel, parking, meals, express mailing, reproduction of reports/drawings, and similar project-related items. If the project scope changes, if there is schedule change, or a requirement change in the services provided the anticipated expenses for this change will be included in a Contract Amendment. Reimbursable Expenses Defined as expenses associated with any Plan Review Fees. These fees, if incurred by the Design Professional, shall be bill to the Client along with an additional 10% handling fee. Standard of Care In providing services under this agreement, the Design Professional will endeavor to perform in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances. Design Professional will perform its services as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of Design Professional’s part of the Project. Regardless of any other term or condition of this Agreement, Design Professional makes no express or implied warranty of any sort. All warranties, including warranty of merchantability or warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, are expressly disclaimed. Consequential Damages Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, neither the Client nor the Design Professional shall be liable to the other for any incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising out of or connected in any way to the Project or this Agreement. This mutual waiver of consequential damages shall include, but not be limited to, loss of use, loss of profit, loss of business or income or any other consequential damages that either party may have incurred from any cause of action whatsoever. Hidden Conditions A condition is hidden if concealed by existing finishes or is not capable of investigation by reasonable visual observation. If the Design Professional has reason to believe that such a condition may exist, the Client shall authorize and pay for all costs associated with the investigation of such a condition. If (1) the Client fails to authorize such investigation after such due notification, or (2) the Design Professional has no reason to believe that such a condition exists, the Design Professional shall not be responsible for the existing conditions or any resulting damages or losses resulting therefrom. Risk Allocation Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein in recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the project to both the Client and the Design Professional, the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the Design Professional’s total liability to the Client or anyone making claims through the client, for any and all damages or claim expenses (including attorney’s fees) arising out of this Agreement, from any and all causes, to the total amount of the Design Professional’s fee. It is stated that the liability limit applies to any and all liability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless otherwise prohibited by law. Indemnifications The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold Design Professional harmless from and against any and all damage, losses or cost (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and defense costs) caused in whole or in part by its acts, errors or omissions and those of anyone for whom they are legally liable. Subject to Risk Allocation above the Design Professional further agrees to indemnify the Client for damages to the extent arising from its own negligent errors acts or omissions. Termination of Services This agreement may be terminated upon 10 days written notice by either party should the other fail to perform their obligations hereunder. In the event of termination, the Client shall pay the Design Professional for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses, and reasonable termination expenses. Ownership of Documents All documents produced by the Design Professional under this agreement, including electronic files, shall remain the property of the Design Professional and may not be used by this Client for any other purpose without the written consent of the Design Professional. Any such use or reuse shall be at the sole risk of Client who shall defend, indemnify and hold DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and its subconsultants harmless from any and all claims and/or damages arising therefrom. Electronic files are not contract documents and cannot be relied upon as identical to contract documents because of changes or errors induced by translation, transmission, or alterations while under the control of others. Use of information contained in the electronic files is at the user's sole risk and without liability to Design Professional and its consultants. Defects in Service The Client shall promptly report to the Design Professional any defects or suspected defects in the Design Professional’s services. The Client further agrees to impose a similar notification requirement on all contractors in its Client/Contractor contract and shall require all subcontracts at any level to contain a like agreement. Failure by the Client and the Client’s contractors or subcontractors to notify the Design Professional shall relieve the Design Professional of the costs of remedying the defects above the sum such remedy would have cost had prompt notification been given when such defects were first discovered. Construction Activities The Design Professional shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person performing any of the Work or for instructions given by the Client or its representatives to any one performing any of the Work, nor for means and methods or job-site safety. Responsibility for deficiencies during construction not observed by Design Professional is strictly excluded. Dispute Resolution Any claim or dispute between the Client and the Design Professional shall be submitted to non-binding mediation, subject to the parties agreeing to a mediator(s). If the Parties cannot agree upon a mediator the claim or dispute shall be submitted to the American Arbitration Association (AAA) for mediation in accordance with the Construction Arbitration and Mediation Rules of the AAA then in effect. Unless otherwise specified, the law of the State in which the work occurs shall govern this agreement. Relationship of the Parties All services provided by Design Professional are for the sole use and benefit of the Client. Nothing in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the Client or the Design Professional. All items have been fairly negotiated and that the client had the option of altering or foregoing the terms and conditions in exchange for an equitable adjustment in the Design Professional’s fee. DD 77 CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG IINNCC.. November 11, 2025 Rania Alomar, AIA Principal RA-DA 7523 Norton Avenue West Hollywood, CA 90046 Reference: Design Review & Construction Administration Services Animal Care Facility – New Construction Fayetteville, AR Dear Ms. Alomar: Pursuant to your request, D 7 CONSULTING INC. is pleased to provide you with this Proposal for the project referenced above. Please review the following to ensure the services proposed are acceptable. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of a new animal care facility that will be approximately 20,000 SF. We understand the building envelope design concept has not yet been developed, and a specific site location has not yet been selected. The project will be in Fayetteville, Arkansas. D 7 CONSULTING INC. SCOPE OF WORK D 7 will review the Specifications and Details related to the waterproofing component for the project. D 7 will not provide written specifications or details. PHASE I – Drawing/Specification Review: Design / Specification review, written report, and one review meeting will occur during each phase of the document development at Schematic, Design Development, and Construction Document Phase. 1. Review Documents and Specifications prepared by the Architect for the work outlined and provided by our client for content and applicability; 2. Provide written Recommendation/Consultation on systems, means, methods and materials specified by the parties involved for use on the project; 3. Review details prepared by the parties involved and other related items prepared for the project during the overall development for the project. Provide input as to information that is not provided or outlined with the documents; 4. Review the Application methods and techniques outlined in the project Specifications. 5. Develop and provide a written report based upon findings which will include recommendations. 6. Includes one meeting with client to go over the findings and recommendations contained within our report. 44774400 VVoonn KKaarrmmaann AAvvee SSttrreeeett,, SSuuiittee 113300 NNeewwppoorrtt BBeeaacchh,, CCAA 9922666600 PPhhoonnee:: ((994499)) 995555--22777777 wwwwww..dd77ccoonnssuullttiinngg..ccoomm RA-DA Design Review & CA – Building Envelope Animal Care Facility November 11, 2025 Fayetteville, AR Page – 2 DD 77 CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG IINNCC.. PHASE II – Construction Administration: 1. A D 7 Consultant will review Submittals & RFIs and provide response to all waterproofing related material sample submittals for system application, fastening, termination, etc. Review and respond to all shop drawings and subsequent RFIs submitted by the Contractor in regard to the waterproofing application. 2. D 7 will conduct Pre-Job Conference Meetings for Waterproofing. The meetings will include the following: a. Meet at the job site with the Contractor awarded the project along with the Manufacturer's Representative, Owner and all other Subcontractors; b. Review all approved material submittals, application techniques and/or requirements; c. Establish working schedule, staging areas and review all project specific requirements or restrictions; d. Document the minutes of the meetings and issue to all parties. 3. D 7 will attend Progress Site Meetings: a. The Project Consultant shall meet at jobsite to audit ongoing waterproofing installations. D 7 will issue the minutes of the meeting to all parties involved in order to document any modifications, changes or resolution of issues that occur during the ongoing waterproofing project. 4. D 7 will conduct Final Reviews. This includes the following: a. Upon notification from the Contractor, a Final Review is conducted; b. A written Report will be developed noting items unfinished or incomplete prior to final acceptance of the project; c. The Final Reviews will be conducted with all concerned parties i.e., Manufacturer's Representative, Contractor, Waterproofing Contractor, Architect, etc. PRICING FOR EACH PHASE AND TOTAL COST PHASE I – Design Review Schematic Phase: $ 3,500.00 Design Development Phase $ 5,500.00 Construction Document Phase $ 9,500.00 Subtotal Phase I: $ 18,500.00 PHASE II: $ 29,000.00 TOTAL: $ 47,500.00* RA-DA Design Review & CA – Building Envelope Animal Care Facility November 11, 2025 Fayetteville, AR Page – 3 DD 77 CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG IINNCC.. This cost is based on (6) on-site reviews and Twenty (20) hours of Submittal and RFI review during construction. Each site visit is based on one-day on site and one-day travel. This cost does not include Air travel, hotel, ground transpiration and meals. All travel cost will be reimbursed at cost. Thank you for the opportunity to issue this Proposal for Consulting Services. Please contact me at your convenience if you have any questions or would like to discuss this Proposal. RA-DA Design Review & CA – Building Envelope Animal Care Facility November 11, 2025 Fayetteville, AR Page – 4 DD 77 CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG IINNCC.. D 7 NOTES: Note #1: D 7 has included services and fees for exterior wall systems on the building. D 7 has not included any interior systems related to waterproofing. No exterior skin components are included. Note #2: Site Visits shall consist of meetings at the project to review questions, concerns or non-compliant work related waterproofing components on the day of each visit. D 7 will also review and document the work completed at the request of the client, and review mock-up of/or preliminary installations of cleaning or waterproofing components. Note #3: Site Visits or Punchlists do not represent approval or acceptance of installations. Work installed prior to or after the date on which visit occurred cannot be reviewed with regard to substrate conditions, installation procedures or system attachment. Incomplete work, improper work or any component not reviewed prior to the actual day of each visit is not the responsibility of D 7. Note #4: D 7 recommends Full-time Quality Assurance Observation in order to provide complete documentation of work related to waterproofing, if applicable. Note #5: Final Inspections are only performed on work in which D 7 provided Full-time Quality Assurance Observation. RA-DA Design Review & CA – Building Envelope Animal Care Facility November 11, 2025 Fayetteville, AR Page – 5 DD 77 CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG IINNCC.. TERMS & CONDITIONS D 7 must have fully executed proposal or contract for work prior to commencement of services for the project. The D 7 Terms & Conditions must be incorporated into, by reference, or included as an attachment to any contract created by or issued by the client. Payment terms shall be Net Thirty (30) days from DATE OF INVOICE. Any other terms agreed to shall be clearly depicted within a separate contract document and must be agreed to by D 7 prior to commencement of any services on the project. Payments made after requirement listed above or agreed upon shall incur additional cost of 3% of invoice total. Late payment of invoices shall be cause for D 7 to stop services on the project. Work will commence when all payments due are current. D 7 can terminate services on any portion of the project provided we have notified the client in advance no less than 30 days. D 7 is not responsible for any 3rd party dispute. Payment of services is required regardless of client or other party entering into mediation or arbitration during the work or after the completion of the project. D 7 reserves the right to file liens on all projects in an effort to secure payment in a timely manner. Releases or waivers shall be furnished upon payment of services in full. Quality Assurance Observer (QAO) daily rate is based on four (4) hours or more per day. Half (½) day rate will be charged on QAO under four (4) hours. Holidays are billed at two times (2) the daily rate. Holiday Weekends are billed at one and one half times (1 ½) the daily rate. QAO in excess of eight (8) hours per day and/or forty 40) hours per week will be billed at one and one half times (1 ½) the standard rate. A Show Up fee of a quarter (¼) the Daily rate will be incurred for days when the QAO arrives at the jobsite as scheduled and no work is performed. All Consulting services performed for the above referenced project, at the request of the client, and not specifically outlined herein, will be billed at the rate of $275.00 per hour. D 7 reserves the right to increase the fees listed in this proposal based upon any request for insurance certificates or indemnifications above and beyond our standard coverage. D 7 will provide the Client with a breakdown of the cost, if any, and proceed only after receiving written authorization from the Client. The Consultant will not be a constructor, thus will not participate in any construction contracts under the project. The Consultant will work with the Project Team and monitor the Roofing & Waterproofing Contractor that has been retained to perform the specified scope of work. Limitations On Consultant’s Responsibility, Indemnity & Insurance Client acknowledges that Consultant is performing professional services on behalf of Client and in the event claims, losses, damages or expenses are caused by the negligence of Consultant or Client or both, Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, and Consultant’s officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against liability for all Professional Liability claims, losses, damages and expenses whether or not insured, including reasonable attorney’s fees. This Proposal is good for 60 days from date listed above. If after 60 days the Client requests services outlined within this Proposal, D 7 shall review and provide revised pricing as necessary. No changes/modifications may be made to this proposal without prior consent/agreement by both parties. RA-DA Design Review & CA – Building Envelope Animal Care Facility November 11, 2025 Fayetteville, AR Page – 6 DD 77 CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG IINNCC.. Agreed and accepted as of the first date set forth below. Dated: Client Signature Print Name Company Title If signed by entity other than to which the proposal is addressed, please provide address, phone number and email address. Address Phone Number Email Address Dated: Principal’s Signature Joseph Daniels, President Print Name D 7 CONSULTING INC. City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 1 of 16 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Procurement Division – Room 306 113 W. Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 Phone: 479.575.8256 TDD (Telecommunication Device for the Deaf): 479.521.1316 RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design DEADLINE: Thursday, September 18, 2025 before 2:00 PM, local time PROCUREMENT DIRECTOR: Amanda Beilfuss, abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov DATE OF ISSUE AND ADVERTISEMENT: 08/24/2025 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Late qualifications will not be accepted. RFQ’s shall be submitted through the City’s third-party electronic bidding platform or by submitting a sealed physical proposal to the City of Fayetteville, Procurement Division at the below location. City of Fayetteville Procurement Division – Room 306 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the attached City of Fayetteville specifications and documents attached hereto. Each Proposer is required to fill in every blank and shall supply all information requested; failure to do so may be used as basis of rejection. The undersigned hereby offers to furnish & deliver the articles or services as specified, at the prices & terms stated herein, and in strict accordance with the specifications and general conditions of bidding, all of which are made a part of this offer. This offer is not subject to withdrawal unless upon mutual written agreement by the Proposer/Bidder and City Procurement Director. RFQ (REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS) Ap pendixB RFQ 25 15 Anim alServices Fac ilityDesign CityIssued RFQ City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 2 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Advertisement City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Request for Statements of Qualification RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design The City of Fayetteville is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified architectural and engineering (A/E) firms to provide professional design services for a new Animal Services Facility. To be considered, statements of qualification shall be received electronically through the City of Fayetteville, Procurement Division’s online bidding platform by Thursday, September 18, 2025 before 2:00 PM, local time. The solicitation RFQ & addendums can be downloaded from the City’s web site at http://fayetteville-ar.gov/bids. All questions regarding the RFQ process should be directed to Amanda Beilfuss at abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov or (479) 575-8220. Firms submitting a statement of qualification shall be qualified to do business and licensed in accordance with all applicable laws of the state and local governments where the project is located. Proposers shall have a current, valid registration with the Arkansas Secretary of State before recommendation of award to Fayetteville City Council. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to reject any or all statements of qualifications and to waive irregularities therein, and all Proposers shall agree that such rejection shall be without liability on the part of the City of Fayetteville for any damage or claim brought by any Proposer because of such rejections, nor shall the Proposers seek any recourse of any kind against the City of Fayetteville because of such rejections. The filing of any Proposal in response to this invitation shall constitute an agreement of the Proposer to these conditions. City of Fayetteville By: Amanda Beilfuss, Procurement Director P: 479.575.8220 abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (479) 521-1316 Date of advertisement: 08/24/2025 This publication was paid for by the Procurement Division of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. Amount paid: $147.58 Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 3 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design SECTION A: General Terms & Conditions 1. SUBMISSION OF A STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE: Each proposal shall contain the following at a minimum. Proposer must also address detailed requirements as specified in the Scope of Work. a. A written narrative describing the method or manner in which the Proposer proposes to satisfy requirements of this RFQ. The term Proposer shall be in reference to a firm or individual responding to this solicitation. The term proposal is used in these documents as equal to statement of qualification. b. A description of the Proposer’s experience in providing the same or similar services as outlined in the RFQ. This description should include the names of the person(s) who will provide the services, their qualifications, and the years of experience in performing this type of work. Also, include the reference information requested in this RFQ. c. Submittal Instructions: Proposers shall go to www.fayetteville-ar.gov/bids and follow the prompts to submit a statement of qualifications within the electronic bidding platform. All Proposers must register in order to be able to submit online. There is no fee for registration. If submitting a physical statement of qualifications is necessary, contact the City’s Procurement Division. i. SOQ’s (proposals) shall be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of its ability to meet the requirements for the project. Fancy bindings, colored displays, and promotional material are not required. Emphasis should be on completeness and clarity of content. All submittals shall be formatted for standard 8 ½” x 11” size documentation. Exceptions would be schematics, exhibits, one-page resumes, and City required forms. Proposals shall be limited to twenty- five (25) pages or less, excluding one- page team resumes, references, and forms required by the City for completion. d. Proposals will be reviewed following the stated deadline, as shown on the cover sheet of this document. Only the names of Proposer’s will be available after the deadline until a contract has been awarded by the Fayetteville City Council. All interested parties understand proposal documents will not be available until after a valid contract has been executed. e. Proposers shall submit a statement of qualification based on documentation published by the Fayetteville Procurement Division. f. Proposals must follow the format of the RFQ. Proposers should structure their responses to follow the sequence of the RFQ, if provided. g. Proposers shall have experience in work of the same or similar nature and must provide references that will satisfy the City of Fayetteville. Proposer shall furnish a reference list of clients for whom they have performed similar services and must provide information as requested in this document. h. Proposer is advised that exceptions to any of the terms contained in this RFQ or the attached service agreement must be identified in its response to the RFQ. Failure to do so may lead the City to declare any Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 4 of 16 such term non-negotiable. Proposer’s desire to take exception to a non-negotiable term will not disqualify it from consideration for award. i. Local time shall be defined as the time in Fayetteville, Arkansas on the due date of the deadline. Documents shall be received before the deadline time as shown by the atomic clock located in the Procurement Division Office and electronic clock located in the City’s third-party bidding software. 2. WRITTEN REQUESTS FOR INTERPRETATIONS OR CLARIFICATION: No oral interpretations will be made to any firms as to the meaning of specifications or any other contract documents. All questions pertaining to the terms and conditions or scope of work of this proposal must be sent in writing via e-mail to the Procurement Division. Responses to questions may be handled as an addendum if the response would provide clarification to the requirements of the proposal. All such addenda shall become part of the contract documents. The City will not be responsible for any other explanation or interpretation of the proposed RFQ made or given prior to the award of the contract. 3. RIGHTS OF CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS: In addition to all other rights of the City of Fayetteville, under state law, the City specifically reserves the right to the following: a. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to rank firms and negotiate with the highest-ranking firm. Negotiation with an individual Proposer does not require negotiation with others. b. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to select the proposal it believes will serve the best interest of the City. c. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. d. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to cancel the entire request for proposal. e. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to remedy or waive technical or immaterial errors in the request for proposal or in proposals submitted. f. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to request any necessary clarifications, additional information or proposal data without changing the terms of the proposal. g. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to make selection of the Proposer to perform the services required on the basis of the original proposals without negotiation. 4. EVALUATION CRITERIA: The evaluation criterion defines the factors that will be used by the selection committee to evaluate and score responsive, responsible and qualified proposals. Proposers shall include sufficient information to allow the selection committee to thoroughly evaluate and score proposals. Each proposal submitted shall be evaluated and ranked by a selection committee. The contract will be awarded to the most qualified Proposer, per the evaluation criteria listed in this RFQ. Proposers are not guaranteed to be ranked. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 5 of 16 5. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS: All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of proposals to the City, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be borne solely by the Proposer(s). No payment will be made for any responses received, or for any other effort required of, or made by, the Proposer(s) prior to contract commencement. 6. ORAL PRESENTATION: An oral presentation and/or interview may be requested of any firm, at the selection committee’s discretion. 7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: a. The Proposer represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance or services required hereunder, as provided in City of Fayetteville Code Section 34.26 titled “Limited Authority of City Employee to Provide Services to the City”. b. The Proposer shall promptly notify Amanda Beilfuss, City Procurement Director, in writing, of all potential conflicts of interest for any prospective business association, interest, or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Proposer’s judgment or quality of services being provided. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of which the Proposer may undertake and request an opinion to the City as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the City, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Proposer. The City agrees to communicate with the Proposer its opinion via e-mail or first-class mail within thirty days of receipt of notification. 8. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL: A proposal may be withdrawn prior to the time set for the proposal submittal based on a written request from an authorized representative of the firm; however, a proposal shall not be withdrawn after the time set for the proposal. 9. LATE PROPOSAL OR MODIFICATIONS: a. Proposal and modifications received after the time set for the proposal submittal shall not be considered. Modifications in writing received prior to the deadline will be accepted. The City will not be responsible for misdirected bids. Proposers refer to their submission status in the online bidding portal or call the Procurement Division at (479) 575-8220 to ensure receipt of their submittal documents prior to opening time and date listed. b. The time set for the deadline shall be local time for Fayetteville, AR on the date listed. All proposals shall be received in the Procurement Division BEFORE the deadline stated. 10. CONSTITUTIONAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: The laws of the State of Arkansas apply to any purchase made under this request for proposal. Proposers shall comply with all constitutional, state, and federal directives, orders and laws as applicable to this proposal and subsequent contract(s) including but not limited to Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), & OSHA as applicable to this contract. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 6 of 16 11. COLLUSION: The Proposer, by affixing his or her signature to this proposal, agrees to the following: “Proposer certifies that their proposal is made without previous understanding, agreement, or connection with any person, firm or corporation making a proposal for the same item(s) and/or services and is in all respects fair, without outside control, collusion, fraud, or otherwise illegal action.” 12. RIGHT TO AUDIT, FOIA, AND JURISDICITON: a. The City of Fayetteville reserves the privilege of auditing a Contractor’s records as such records related to purchases between the City and said Contractor. b. Freedom of Information Act: City contracts and documents prepared while performing City contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the City of Fayetteville, the (contractor) will do everything possible to provide the documents in a prompt and timely manner as prescribed in the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. §25-19- 101 et. seq.). Only legally authorized photocopying costs pursuant to the FOIA may be assessed for this compliance. c. Legal jurisdiction to resolve any disputes shall be Arkansas with Arkansas law applying to the case. 13. CITY INDEMNIFICATION: The successful Proposer(s) agrees to indemnify the City and hold it harmless from and against all claims, liability, loss, damage or expense, including but not limited to counsel fees, arising from or by reason of any actual or claimed trademark, patent or copyright infringement or litigation based thereon, with respect to the services or any part thereof covered by this order, and such obligation shall survive acceptance of the services and payment thereof by the City. 14. VARIANCE FROM STANDARD TERMS & CONDITIONS: All standard terms and conditions stated in this request for proposal apply to this contract except as specifically stated in the subsequent sections of this document, which take precedence, and should be fully understood by Proposers prior to submitting a proposal on this requirement. 15. ADA REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC NOTICES & TRANSLATION: Persons with disabilities requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in this proceeding/event, should call 479.521.1316 (telecommunications device for the deaf), no later than seven days prior to the deadline. Persons needing translation of this document shall contact the City of Fayetteville, Procurement Division, immediately. 16. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE: The successful bidder shall provide a Certificate of Insurance in accordance with the following guidelines, prior to commencement of any work: $1,000,000 Commercial Liability, Statutory Worker’s Compensation, and General Automotive, if applicable. SUCH CERTIFICATE SHALL LIST THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED. LISTING THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE AS A CERTIFICATE HOLDER ONLY IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE MUST INCLUDE THE ENDORSEMENT SHOWING THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE LISTED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED. Insurance shall remain valid, when applicable, throughout project/contract completion. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 7 of 16 17. PAYMENTS AND INVOICING: The Proposer must specify in their proposal the exact company name and address which must be the same as invoices submitted for payment as a result of award of this RFQ. Further, the successful Proposer is responsible for immediately notifying the Procurement Division of any company name change, which would cause invoicing to change from the name used at the time of the original RFQ. Payment will be made within thirty days of invoice received. The City of Fayetteville is very credit worthy and will not pay any interest or penalty for untimely payments. Payments can be processed through Proposer’s acceptance of Visa at no additional costs to the City for expedited payment processing. The City will not agree to allow any increase in hourly rates by the contract without PRIOR Fayetteville City Council approval. 18. CANCELLATION: a. The City reserves the right to cancel this contract without cause by giving thirty (30) days prior notice to the Contractor in writing of the intention to cancel or with cause if at any time the Contractor fails to fulfill or abide by any of the terms or conditions specified. b. Failure of the contractor to comply with any of the provisions of the contract shall be considered a material breach of contract and shall be cause for immediate termination of the contract at the discretion of the City of Fayetteville. c. In addition to all other legal remedies available to the City of Fayetteville, the City reserves the right to cancel and obtain from another source, any items and/or services which have not been delivered within the period of time from the date of order as determined by the City of Fayetteville. d. In the event sufficient budgeted funds are not available for a new fiscal period, the City shall notify the Contractor of such occurrence and contract shall terminate of the last day of the current fiscal period without penalty or expense to the City. 19. ASSIGNMENT, SUBCONTRACTING, CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS AND/OR MERGERS: a. The Contractor shall perform this contract. No assignment of subcontracting shall be allowed without prior written consent of the City. If a Proposer intends to subcontract a portion of this work, the Proposer shall disclose such intent in the proposal submitted as a result of this RFQ. b. In the event of a corporate acquisition and/or merger, the Contractor shall provide written notice to the City within thirty (30) calendar days of Contractor’s notice of such action or upon the occurrence of said action, whichever occurs first. 20. NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTRACT: Award of this RFQ shall impose no obligation on the City to utilize the Contractor for all work of this type, which may develop during the contract period. This is not an exclusive contract. The City specifically reserves the right to concurrently contract with other law firms for similar work if it deems such an action to be in the City’s best interest. In the case of multiple-phase contracts, this provision shall apply separately to each item. 21. LOBBYING: Lobbying of selection committee members, City of Fayetteville employees, or elected officials regarding request for proposals, request for qualifications, bids or contracts, during the pendency of bid protest, by the bidder/proposer/protestor or any member of the bidder’s/proposer’s/protestor’s staff, and agent of the Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 8 of 16 bidder/proposer/protestor, or any person employed by any legal entity affiliated with or representing an organization that is responding to the request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract, or has a pending bid protest is strictly prohibited either upon advertisement or on a date established by the City of Fayetteville and shall be prohibited until either an award is final or the protest is finally resolved by the City of Fayetteville; provided, however, nothing herein shall prohibit a prospective/bidder/proposer from contacting the Procurement Division to address situations such as clarification and/or questions related to the procurement process. For purposes of this provision lobbying activities shall include but not be limited to, influencing or attempting to influence action or non-action in connection with any request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract through direct or indirect oral or written communication or an attempt to obtain goodwill of persons and/or entities specified in this provision. Such actions may cause any request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract to be rejected. 22. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The City reserves the right to request additional services relating to this RFQ from the Proposer. When approved by the City as an amendment to the contract and authorized in writing prior to work, the Contractor shall provide such additional requirements as may become necessary. 23. SERVICES AGREEMENT: A written agreement, in substantially the form attached, incorporating the RFQ and the successful proposal will be prepared by the City, signed by the successful Proposer and presented to the City of Fayetteville for approval and signature of the Mayor. 24. INTEGRITY OF REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION (RFQ) DOCUMENTS: Proposers shall use the original RFQ form(s) provided by the Procurement Division and enter information only in the spaces where a response is requested. Proposers may use an attachment as an addendum to the RFQ form(s) if sufficient space is not available on the original form for the Proposer to enter a complete response. Any modifications or alterations to the original RFQ documents by the Proposer, whether intentional or otherwise, will constitute grounds for rejection of such RFQ response. Any such modifications or alterations a Proposer wishes to propose shall be clearly stated in the Proposer’s RFQ response and presented in the form of an addendum to the original RFQ documents. 25. OTHER GENERAL CONDITIONS: a. Proposers must provide the City with their proposals signed by an employee having legal authority to submit proposals on behalf of the Proposer. The entire cost of preparing and providing responses shall be borne by the Proposer. b. The City reserves the right to request any additional information it deems necessary from any or all Proposers after the submission deadline. c. This solicitation is not to be construed as an offer, a contract, or a commitment of any kind; nor does it commit the City to pay for any costs incurred by Proposer in preparation. It shall be clearly understood that any costs incurred by the Proposer in responding to this request for proposal is at the Proposer's own risk and expense as a cost of doing business. The City of Fayetteville shall not be liable for reimbursement to the Proposer for any expense so incurred, regardless of whether or not the proposal is accepted. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 9 of 16 d. If products, components, or services other than those described in this bid document are proposed, the Proposer must include complete descriptive literature for each. All requests for additional information must be received within five working days following the request. e. Any uncertainties shall be brought to the attention to Amanda Beilfuss immediately via telephone 479.575.8220) or e-mail (abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov). It is the intent and goal of the City of Fayetteville Procurement Division to provide documents providing a clear and accurate understanding of the scope of work to be completed and/or goods to be provided. We encourage all interested parties to ask questions to enable all Proposers to be on equal terms. f. No oral interpretation or clarifications will be given as to the meaning of any part of this request for qualification. All questions, clarifications, and requests, together with answers, if any, will be provided to all firms via written addendum. Names of firms submitting any questions, clarifications, or requests will not be disclosed until after a contract is in place. g. At the discretion of the City, one or more firms may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking of the firms, which may also include oral interviews. h. Any information provided herein is intended to assist the Proposer in the preparation of proposals necessary to properly respond to this RFQ. The RFQ is designed to provide qualified Proposers with sufficient, basic information to submit proposals meeting minimum specifications and/or test requirements but is not intended to limit a RFQ’s content or to exclude any relevant or essential data. i. Proposers irrevocably consent that any legal action or proceeding against it under, arising out of or in any manner relating to this Contract shall be controlled by Arkansas law. Proposer hereby expressly and irrevocably waives any claim or defense in any said action or proceeding based on any alleged lack of jurisdiction or improper venue or any similar basis. j. The successful Proposer shall not assign the whole or any part of this Contract or any monies due or to become due hereunder without written consent of City of Fayetteville. In case the successful Proposer assigns all or any part of any monies due or to become due under this Contract, the Instrument of assignment shall contain a clause substantially to the effect that it is agreed that the right of the assignee in and to any monies due or to become due to the successful Proposer shall be subject to prior liens of all persons, firms, and corporations for services rendered or materials supplied for the performance of the services called for in this contract. k. The successful Proposer's attention is directed to the fact that all applicable Federal and State laws, municipal ordinances, and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over the services shall apply to the contract throughout, and they will be deemed to be included in the contract as though written out in full herein. The successful Proposer shall keep himself/herself fully informed of all laws, ordinances and regulations of the Federal, State, and municipal governments or authorities in any manner affecting those engaged or employed in providing these services or in any way affecting the conduct of the services and of all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over same. If any discrepancy or inconsistency should be discovered in these Contract Documents or in the specifications herein referred to, in relation to any such law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree, s/he shall herewith report the same in writing to the City of Fayetteville. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 10 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design SECTION B: Scope of Services and General Information 1. PROJECT VISION: The City of Fayetteville envisions the development of a new Animal Services facility that will serve the needs of the city now and in the future. The city is committed to providing a facility consisting of approximately 15,000 interior feet and 5,000 square feet of exterior per the Space Needs Assessment Study prepared by Shelter Planners of America (see Appendix A). 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: a. The City of Fayetteville is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified architectural and engineering (A/E) firms to provide professional design services for a new Animal Services Facility. The selected A/E team shall include Shelter Planners of America as the Animal Services Consultant and provide full design services from Site Selection, Schematic Design through Construction Documents, Construction Administration, and including participation in the General Contractor Construction Management (GCCM) delivery process. b. A space needs study was performed (see Appendix A) and identified a need of approximately 15,000 sq. ft. of interior spaces to include administrative offices, a medical clinic, animal housing, and animal support areas. There is a need for approximately 5,000 sq. ft. of exterior space to include animal housing and animal support areas. Sitework will include parking, storm drainage, drives, and utility infrastructure. 3. BACKGROUND: a. The City’s existing Animal Services Facility was constructed in 1970, with 1989 and 1998 additions. Various upgrades have been done to the facility from 2014 to present day. b. The site for the project has not been selected yet. c. The City will engage a Construction Manager (GCCM) to work with the selected A/E team and will provide input and cost estimates at each design phase. 4. SCOPE OF WORK: a. The selected A/E firm shall provide, but not be limited to, the following services: i. Programming confirmation and refinement (if applicable) ii. Schematic Site and Facility Design (SD) iii. Design Development (DD) iv. Entitlement process through Planning v. Construction Documents (CD) with reviews at 30%, 60% and 90% vi. Cost estimation at each phase in collaboration with GCCM vii. Code and regulatory review and compliance viii. Participation in value engineering and constructability reviews ix. Coordination with the GCCM and City team Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 11 of 16 5. DELIVERABLES: The selected firm will specifically be required to: a. Prepare schematic site plans, facility designs, and coordinate with the GCCM for estimates. b. Prepare design development drawings, detailed specifications, and cost estimate including a review at 50%. Drawings to include: i. Site plans, paving layouts, traffic circulation, lighting, signage and utilities ii. Floor plans, Structural, Civil, Architectural, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), MEP, Data, Security, Access Control, Fire Protection, and landscaping iii. Exterior elevations, rendering, and color palette iv. Building sections and details v. Interior elevations, casework, and millwork elevations vi. Drainage Study and calculations, as required by City vii. Report addressing all City’s Design Criteria and Code requirements c. Coordinate project entitlement through City of Fayetteville Planning process including representing the project at planning meetings through planning approval. d. Prepare full set of bid documents including stamped construction plans and specifications from the final agreed upon design. Drawings will be reviewed at 30%, 60% and 90%. e. The selected firm shall coordinate with selected GCCM for responding to questions that arise during the bidding process and shall be prepared to respond with necessary addendums during the bidding process. The actual bid process will be managed by the selected GCCM and they shall serve as the point of contact and issuer for all bid documentation. f. Coordinate with the selected GCCM to provide construction administration services, including site observations, review of submittals, responses to RFI’s and assistance with final inspection and closeout. 6. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL: Statements of qualification shall NOT include any pricing information. Price will be negotiated with the firm recommended most qualified by the selection committee and shall NOT be included in any firm’s response or statement of qualification. In responding to this request for statement of qualifications, firms should include the following information in addition to other requested information and pertinent company information related to the selection criteria: a. Statements should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description its ability to meet the requirements for the project. Fancy bindings, colored displays, and promotional material are not required. Emphasis should be on completeness and clarity of content. All documents should be typewritten on standard 8 ½” x 11” white pages and bound in one volume. Exceptions would be schematics, exhibits, or other information necessary to facilitate the City of Fayetteville’s ability to Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 12 of 16 accurately evaluate the proposal. Limit proposal to twenty-five (25) pages or less, excluding one-page team resumes and City required forms and requested items. b. A client reference list for which similar work has been performed within the past five (5) years. c. Relevant Animal Services projects completed while serving as the Prime architectural/engineering firm on those projects is preferred. Include a site plan, construction costs, firm’s role and personnel involved in the project, date of completion, and facility contacts including name, email, phone, and address. d. Include any other information that might be helpful to assist the City in understanding the firm’s unique qualifications to perform these services for the City of Fayetteville. 7. CONTRACT FORMATION: If the negotiation produces mutual agreement, the draft contract as a part of this package will be constructed and forwarded to the Fayetteville City Council for approval. If negotiations with the highest-ranking Proposer fail, negotiations shall be initiated with the next highest-ranking Proposer until an agreement is reached. The City reserves the right to reject all offers and end the process without executing a contract. 8. DEMONSTRATION & ORAL PRESENTATION: Following the evaluation of the proposals, the Selection Committee may request that the top-ranking firms make an oral presentation or be interviewed. If presentations are necessary, they will take place in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Notices will be sent by the Procurement Division. 9. SELECTION CRITERIA: The evaluation criterion below defines the factors which will be used by the selection committee to evaluate and score responsive, responsible and qualified proposals. The evaluation factors are as follows: 40 Points – Specialized experience and technical competence of the firm with respect to the type of professional services required. 25 Points – Capacity and capability of the firm to perform the work in question including specialized services, within the time limitations fixed for the completion of the project. 25 Points – Past record of performance of the firm with respect to such factors as quality of work and ability to meet schedules and deadlines. 10 Points – Firm’s proximity to and familiarity with the area in which the project is located. NOTE: Fees shall NOT be included with any statement of qualification. Price shall not be a considered a factor used to select a vendor. Price and fees will not be considered until the negotiating process and will not be a factor in the award of any proposed contract. In the event the City is not able to negotiate a successful contract with the selected vendor, the City reserves the right to cease negotiations with such selected vendor and proceed on to the next selected vendor. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 13 of 16 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: a. Appendix A – Space Needs Assessment Study CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 14 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design SECTION C: Signature Submittal 1. DISCLOSURE INFORMATION a. Proposer must disclose any possible conflict of interest with the City of Fayetteville, including, but not limited to, any relationship with any City of Fayetteville employee. Proposer response must disclose if a known relationship exists between any principal or employee of your firm and any City of Fayetteville employee or elected City of Fayetteville official. i. If, to your knowledge, no relationship exists, this should also be stated in your response. Failure to disclose such a relationship may result in cancellation of a purchase and/or contract as a result of your response. This form must be completed and returned in order for your bid/proposal to be eligible for consideration. PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS, AS IT APPROPRIATELY APPLIES TO YOUR FIRM: 1) NO KNOWN RELATIONSHIP EXISTS 2) RELATIONSHIP EXISTS (Please explain): _______________________________________ b. I certify that; as an officer of this organization, or per the attached letter of authorization, am duly authorized to certify the information provided herein is accurate and true; and my organization shall comply with all State and Federal Equal Opportunity and Non-Discrimination requirements and conditions of employment. c. Proposer agrees that they shall have a current, valid registration with the Arkansas Secretary of State at time of RFQ deadline OR be able to provide proof of registration before recommendation of award to Fayetteville City Council. d. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-503, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-503. If at any time during contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. e. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-1002, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and Ammunition Industries during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-1002. If at any time during the contract the contractor decides to boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and/or Ammunition Industries, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 15 of 16 2. PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION At the discretion of the City, one or more firms may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking of the firms, which may also include oral interviews. NOTE: Each Proposer shall submit to the City a primary contact name, e-mail address, and phone number (preferably a cell phone number) where the City selection committee can call for clarification or interview via telephone. Corporate Name of Firm: ___________________________________________________________________ Primary Contact: ____________________________ Title of Primary Contact: _________________________ Phone#1 (cell preferred): ____________________________Phone#2: ______________________________ E-Mail Address: __________________________________________________________________________ 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDA Acknowledge receipt of addenda for this invitation to bid, request for proposal, or request for qualification by signing and dating below. All addendums are hereby made a part of the bid or RFQ documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein. Proposers/Bidders should indicate their receipt of same in the appropriate blank listed herein. Failure to do so may subject Contractor to disqualification. ADDENDUM NO. SIGNATURE AND PRINTED NAME DATE ACKNOWLEDGED 4. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: b. As an interested party on this project, you are required to provide debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order. Certification can be done by completing and signing this form. c. Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 “Debarment and Suspension“ requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub-recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. d. Signature certifies that neither you nor your principal is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 16 of 16 5. SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL NAME OF COMPANY: _____________________________________________________________________ PHYSICAL ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________________________ MAILING ADDRESS: _______________________________________________________________________ TAX ID #: __________________________ AR. SECRETARY OF STATE FILING #: ________________________ PHONE: _________________________________________ FAX: ___________________________________ E-MAIL: ________________________________________________________________________________ By submitting your response, you certify that you are authorized to represent and bind your company : SIGNATURE: _____________________________________________________________________________ PRINTED NAME: _________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: _______________________________________ DATE: _____________________________________ END OF RFQ DOCUMENT Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 1 of 35 Needs Assessment Study for Fayetteville Animal Services DRAFT October 25, 2024 1000 Texan Trail, Suite 260, Arlington, TX 76051 Phone (817) 265-8522 www.shelterplannersofAmerica.com Appendix A Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 2 of 35 Table of Contents Page Number 1. Purpose and Scope of Study 3 2. Review of Existing Facility 4 3. People and Animal Levels 6 4. Building Space Program 12 5. Site Considerations 13 6. Recommended Features 20 7. Staffing 32 8. Operating Cost 33 9. Opinion of Probable Cost 34 Exhibit A - Current and Projected Human Population and Animal Intake 1 page Exhibit B - Building Space Program 6 pages Exhibit C - Opinion of Probable Cost 1 page Exhibit D - Cost Examples of Other Shelters 9 pages Chatham County Animal Services Facility, NC Lafayette Animal Services, LA Montgomery County Animal Adoption & Care Center, VA Springdale Animal Shelter, AR Tippecanoe County Animal Shelter, IN Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 3 of 35 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY The purpose of this Needs Assessment Study (Study) is for Shelter Planners of America SPA) to provide information to Crafton Tull & Associates, and the City of Fayetteville and their Animal Services Department (FAS) that will guide them regarding their future animal shelter facility needs. The Study was authorized by Mark Owings, Senior Vice President, Architecture for Crafton Tull & Associates, on May 6, 2024, in accordance SPA proposal dated March 14, 2024. Information in this Study was developed from information provided by FAS and observed during our on-site visit on August 5th and 6th, 2024. The Study provides a brief review of the existing facility, looks at people and animal levels, provides a proposed Building Space Program, provides site considerations, recommended features, discusses staffing, operating cost, and Opinion of Probable Cost. It should be understood this Study is the first step in planning a new shelter. The second step will be to develop the Conceptual Site Plan and Building Floor Plan based on the approved Building Program contained in this Study. The third and final step will be development of the working drawings and specifications for constructing your project. The Needs Assessment meeting was held on August 6, 2024, at Facilities Management Office that lasted about 7 hours. The following were in attendance: Name Organization Title Justine Lentz FAS Superintendent Brianna Curry FAS Tech/Programs Administrator Valerie Henley FAS DUM/Veterinarian Wade Abernathy City of Fayetteville Construction Director Yolanda Fields City of Fayetteville Community Resources Director Matthew Cabe Crafton Tull Project Manager Michael Barnard SPA Principal Tracy Cantrell SPA Director of Sales Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 4 of 35 2. REVIEW OF EXISTING FACILITY General FAS started around 1987-1988 and was originally named Humane Society of the Ozark. The Animal Services Superintendent is responsible for the operation of the existing shelter under the governance of the Community Resources Department. The present shelter was constructed in 1970, additions were made in 1989 for the brick building and 1998 for the clinic. The shelter contains approximately 12,400 square feet of indoor space and some storage sheds. Front view of existing shelter Back of existing shelter Side of existing shelter Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 5 of 35 The present shelter facility was built with materials and concepts that are of lower quality materials and finishes than today’s modern shelters. The building does not have good flow and creates additional work for staff. The dog kennels are not ideal for ease of cleaning and maintaining the animals in a healthy state. The staff has done the best job possible of maintaining the building under difficult conditions. They are to be commended for keeping the building clean and presentable to the public. It has already been determined that a new shelter is needed. Therefore, an extensive list of deficiencies has not been provided in this study. Original building and Clinic behind existing shelter Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 6 of 35 3. PEOPLE AND ANIMAL LEVELS The shelter serves the City of Fayetteville with a total people population of approximately 101,543 for 2023. The number of animals received at the shelter in 2023 was approximately 1,314. This total is composed of approximately 887 dogs, 422 cats, and 5 other species (67.5% dogs, 32.1% cats, and .4% others). There are no other animal shelters that serve the City of Fayetteville. The 1,314 animals received at FAS in 2023 is only 1.3% of the human population. Nationally, the number of animals normally received at local shelters annually is 2-3% of the human population. This means the number of animals received per year at FAS is below the range of the national average. While the number of animals received is below national averages there is still an animal over-population challenge. Over the next 10 years, the population of Fayetteville is projected to increase to approximately 130,000, a 28% increase and over the next 20 years, the population of Fayetteville is projected to increase to approximately 172,617, a 70% increase. There is a low cost/high volume spay/neuter program in the community and 100% of the animals leaving the shelter are altered. Preventative programs including low cost and subsidized spay/neuter procedures, public education promoting responsible pet ownership, and developing progressive ordinances is part of the solution to reducing unwanted and stray animals. The underlying overpopulation of pets is caused by irresponsible pet ownership and uncontrolled breeding of pets. Although animal overpopulation is beginning to come down nationwide due to remedial programs, it can be countered by increasing human population and continued irresponsible pet ownership. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 7 of 35 Of the 1,363 dogs and cats dispositioned at the shelter in 2023 the breakdown is as follows: Adoption: approximately 903, or approximately 66.3%, are adopted or transferred. The number of adoptions is fair compared to many modern shelters that have adoption rates of 70-80% but improvements are still needed. Returned to Owner: approximately 398, or approximately 29%, are returned to their owners. The number of returns to owners is high when compared to many modern shelters that have return to owner rates between 10-20%. A high “Return to Owner” rate is an indication that people in the community care about their pets. Euthanized: approximately 62, or about 4.5%, were euthanized which is below the range of many modern shelters that have rates of 10-20%. There is a strong push nationally to move to a 90% live release rate. FAS is to be commended for achieving this good live release rate. Died in Shelter: approximately 0, or about 0%, died in the shelter. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 8 of 35 Projected Animal Housing Need Before we discuss the proposed animal housing for the new shelter, we want to discuss an important question. Will Holding More Animals for Longer Periods of Time Increase the Number of Animals Adopted?” If we hold more animals for longer times won’t more be adopted?” The two following examples can help individuals understand this frequently misunderstood question. Before we examine the questions however, we want to emphasize the importance of all healthy animals being provided a reasonable stay. As long as animals are emotionally and physically healthy, and kennels are not overcrowded, it is reasonable to extend their stay. However, dogs should not be kenneled so long that it adversely affects their behavior, causing neurotic behavior such as pacing, spinning and aggression. This issue often becomes confusing for many people when trying to understand the value (or lack thereof) of building bigger shelters and holding more and more animals for longer periods. The following examples will help facilitate understanding: 1. In the first example, assume the shelter holds animals an average of ONE week each during a one-year period. During the year, 100 people (or pet rescue groups) visit per month with the intention to adopt a pet. How many animals could be adopted in that year? If every visitor adopted, you would adopt 1,200 animals. Now, assume you kept every animal for FOUR weeks (four times longer) during a one- year period. The same 100 people per month visited with the intention to adopt a pet. How many animals could be adopted in a year? If every visitor adopted, you would still adopt 1,200 animals. As you can clearly see, holding the animals longer, by itself, did not affect adoptions. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 9 of 35 It is important that your shelter make an informed decision of how many animals to hold at any given time and how long to hold each animal to provide the best opportunity for adoption and have humane treatment. 2. In this second example the shelter houses about 100 animals available for adoption at all times. The same 100 people visit per month with the intention to adopt a pet. How many will be adopted in one year? If every visitor adopts, you will have 1,200 adoptions in one year. Now, assume the organization builds a shelter to house twice as many animals, holding about 200 animals at all times, how many will then be adopted? If all of the 100 visitors adopted, you would still adopt 1,200 animals. As you can see, holding twice as many animals does not affect the number adopted. The conclusion of these two examples is simply this: The only factor that truly affects the number of animals you adopt is the number of people (or rescue groups) who visit the shelter with the intention of adopting. Holding animals longer and holding many more animals does not significantly increase adoptions. NOTE: (A shelter may hold an animal an extended period of time and finally get it adopted, but other animals are being euthanized to allow that one animal the space to stay longer. This is the scenario that causes people to think incorrectly, If we could just hold all animals longer, they would all eventually be adopted”.) Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 10 of 35 TO INCREASE ADOPTIONS, YOU MUST INCREASE THE NUMBER OF VISITORS WHO WANT TO ADOPT). This is done through a good visible shelter location, visibility of all animals, weekend and evening hours, web-site pet listings, an attractive welcoming shelter, well-groomed and healthy animals, friendly staff, adoption requirements that are not too restrictive, reasonably low adoption fees, promotion of adoptions in all local media, special adoption events, the help of rescue groups and transfer programs. The more effective approach an animal shelter can take rather than warehousing animals is to help get all pets in their service area spayed or neutered and educate their community about responsible pet ownership. This will eventually solve the pet over- population problem in a community. A community simply cannot “shelter their way” out of an animal overpopulation problem. Refer to Exhibit A that shows the summary of Current and Projected Animal Intake in Figure 1, Existing Average Length of Stay (ALS) in Figure 2, and the Projected Animal Housing Need based on ALS in Figure 3. This information is discussed in more detailed below. Dog Housing Capacity The existing shelter has a 19 day Average Length of Stay (ALS) for the approximate 887 dogs handled per year with the present dog housing capacity of 46. For the new shelter, housing for 60 dogs is proposed, which results in an approximate 19 day ALS. We usually recommend planning based on a maximum 14 day average length of stay for dogs to avoid adverse effects of housing animals in shelters but 19 days is reasonable. Please refer to discussion starting on page 9 above that explains why excess lengths of stay do not really increase adoption. The Building Space Program, EXHIBIT B, includes housing for 60 dogs which is an increase of 30% over the existing shelter. Refer to the Animal Housing section of the Building Space Program for the breakdown of the proposed Dog Housing. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 11 of 35 Cats Housing Capacity The existing shelter has a 32 day Average Length of Stay (ALS) for the approximate 422 cats received per year with the present cat housing capacity of 37. Housing for 50 cats is proposed, which results in a 34 ALS. We usually recommend planning based on a maximum of 21 days average length of stay for cats to avoid adverse effects of housing animals in shelters but 34 days is reasonable. Please refer to the discussion starting on page 9 above that explains why excessive lengths of stay do not really increase adoption. The Building Space Program EXHIBIT B includes housing for 50 cats which is an increase of 35% over the existing shelter. Refer to the Animal Housing Section of the Building Space Program for the breakdown of the proposed cat housing. Other Animal Species The shelter received a small number of other animals made up of a wide variety of species such as rabbits, hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs, birds, etc. It is recommended that a separate room be provided to accommodate these animals. This room can also be used for a variety of uses over the life of the building. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 12 of 35 4. BUILDING SPACE PROGRAM The Building Space Program is a detailed listing of each room or space proposed to accommodate FAS’s needs based on a 10-year planning horizon. The net area of each room or space is listed. Net area is defined as the inside dimensions of the space but does not include the wall thickness and corridors. The quantity of each type of room or space is also listed. The rooms are sub-divided into major groupings such as Administrative, Medical, Animal Housing, Animals support areas. The net area totals are listed at the bottom of each section and then a grossing factor is applied to the net area. The grossing factor projects the estimated SF needed to accommodate the wall thickness, corridors and any other unidentified space. This helps to determine the total SF needed. The total SF is critical to developing an Opinion of Probable Cost. Since Fayetteville is in an area of rapid growth, we propose the City consider designing and constructing the project in phases. Phase 1 would accommodate a 10 year growth but be designed to where it could be easily added onto with a Phase 2 if the anticipated new population growth comes as expected. Refer to attached EXHIBIT B dated 10-25-24 for the Proposed Building Space Program. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 13 of 35 5. SITE CONSIDERATIONS The qualifications of a site are very important for the special needs of the shelter. FAS is planning to construct a new shelter on a new site. The proposed site was examined for compliance to the following criteria: A. Visibility: This is a very important concern for an animal shelter; however, it is most often overlooked. In the past, it was customary to locate shelters at out-of-the-way places on the least expensive properties like industrial areas or near sewage treatment plants or landfills. The theory was that if someone wanted to visit the shelter, they could call for directions to find it. Today it is recognized that locating shelters in high-visibility locations not only increases visitors and the number of pets adopted and returned to owners, but also reduces the need for animal euthanasia and helps build public awareness and community goodwill. A good location can increase adoption by 100%. Coupled with an active adoption promotion program, this location and visibility factor can increase adoptions and reduce euthanasia. The proposed site is in a visible location. B. Accessibility: It is important that the animal shelter be centrally located to the area it serves. If the shelter were located in a far corner of the jurisdiction, the driving time may be lengthy and people would be less likely to use the shelter. That long drive would mean people being less likely to come to look for lost pets or visit for adoptions. The service area is the City of Fayetteville is approximately 55 square miles and therefore, the travel distance to the proposed site is reasonable. Access on and off of a major freeway or arterial street is important and the proposed site is suitable. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 14 of 35 Map of Service Area and Location of Existing Shelter Map of proposed new Site. The new site is close to the existing site as seen on the map above but is on South Happy Hollow Road that is more visible. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 15 of 35 C. Suitability: It is very important to check potential sites for the following: 1. Availability of utilities such as water, sewer, gas and electricity. It is understood that utilities are available at the proposed new site as there is other development around the site including a Fire Station next door. 2. Zoning restrictions: Finding a new site with zoning that will allow an animal shelter “by right” can be a challenge. If a special use permit or zoning change is required, these have been a challenge in some cities. Based on our review the zoning is “General Industrial” and the City has the right to construct an animal shelter on this site. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 16 of 35 3. Easements, right-of-ways and setbacks: Each potential site should be carefully examined to make sure there are no restrictions that would prohibit the construction of the new animal shelter. A full survey will be needed to verify if any easement existing that would prevent the use of the proposed site. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 17 of 35 4. Excessive topography or drainage concerns: Each potential site should be examined to make sure the slope across the site will allow for proper drainage and there is a place to drain the water to. However, sites with excess slopes should be avoided if possible. Sites should be checked to confirm they are not in an area that floods. The proposed site has some grade change on it but it is our opinion it should be suitable. A full survey with topography will be needed as the project moves forward. 5. Check for wetland concerns: Each potential site should be examined to make sure it does not have any wetlands or if it does the remaining area is still sufficient for the proposed project. This does not appear to be a concern on the proposed site based on the map below. FEMA Map of proposed new Site. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 18 of 35 6. A rectangular shape. Odd shapes can be used but may require acquiring more land due to inefficiency of the shape. Potential sites may need to be “test fit” to determine everything works before acquiring the property. The proposed site has an irregular shape that we expect will create some challenges but at this time we believe the site should be test fit to be certain. D. Parking: Adequate parking is very important for the success of an animal shelter. The parking needed for the shelter, based on function, is estimated as follows: Public Visitors 40 Staff 25 Volunteers 10 Foster Parking 0 ACO Vehicles 5 Total 80 Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 19 of 35 From our review of the City of Fayetteville’s parking ordinance it is unclear to us at this time that there will be a city that required minimum or maximum number of spaces required. But sometimes a variance is required because the Authority Having the Jurisdiction’s required parking is not appropriate to the functional needs of an animal shelter. Parking should be arranged to provide good visible parking for visitors and located for easy access to the main entrance. Staff parking should be separate and located to the side near a separate staff entrance. Shelter vehicles should be provided with simple to navigate routes with adequate turning radius and concealed from public view in a screened service yard. E. Site Size: The proposed new site is approximately 4.4 acres and at this time we consider it to be of adequate size, but because of the shape we believe an preliminary layout should be prepared to confirm every fits and the proper relationships can be provided. F. Other Outdoor Features: Space for designated areas for outdoor features is also important when considering the site. The following items are requested. 1. Two dog exercise yards with covered bench area for volunteers or staff 2. Three outdoor get acquainted yards 3. Outdoor walking trails 4. 20’ x 40’ covered pavilion 5. One Dumpster 6. Delivery vehicle unloading area for step vans, bobtail trucks, and school buses G. Summary: The proposed site appears suitable from our cursory level review but a full survey is needed and we recommend a “test fit” be performed. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 20 of 35 6. RECOMMENDED FEATURES A. Design Concept The shelter should have low-maintenance, heavy-duty materials. The interior should be brightly lighted and open with pleasing colors and pleasant public spaces. Animal housing areas should provide as much health protection, safety and comfort as possible with today’s new materials and designs. For the new shelter we recommend a one-story building. The structure would be a slab on grade, depending on the soil condition, with masonry and framed walls and sloped truss roof. The exterior should avoid an institutional look, preferring a human scale and welcoming feel. It should be compatible with the community and be attractive and inviting to the public. Natural lighting should be provided to public areas, animal housing areas and staff work areas where possible. Attractive landscaping will be very important to the appearance of the shelter. We recommend that an extensive landscaping plan, be a part of the building project. An example of a welcoming new animal shelter by Shelter Planners of America” of about the size needed for FAS Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 21 of 35 1. Dog Housing – SPA presented several dog housing options to FAS for consideration, and they selected indoor back-to-back kennels for puppies, quick clean kennels for strays, and convertible kennels for adoption dogs. It is important that each dog has two spaces: a primary enclosure where their food, water, and bedding is located and a secondary space where they can eliminate away from their primary enclosure allowing them to live in their normal behaviors. The indoor portion of the kennel will allow the dogs to be comfortable both the summer and winter. DIAGRAM QUICK CLEAN KENNELS FOR STRAY DOGS (NOT TO SCALE) Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 22 of 35 The two-compartment kennel design will allow dogs to be kept safe and dry during the cleaning procedure by moving dogs to the other compartment. This allows for efficient daily cleaning. Floors will be sloped to individual drains thereby eliminating trench drains which are difficult to clean and can cause cross contamination. There should be special sound control materials used in the design to keep the noise level down. Dog Kennels should be arranged where dogs are not looking at each other across the aisle which can cause stress and increase barking. DIAGRAM OF CONVERTIBLE KENNELS FOR ADOPTION DOGS (NOT TO SCALE) Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 23 of 35 Adoption Side of Quick Clean Kennels Staff Corridor of Quick Clean Kennel Photo of outdoor portion of convertible kennels with the doors closed Photo of outdoor portion of convertible kennels with the doors open Photo of indoor portion of convertible kennels Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 24 of 35 2. Puppy areas - Puppies are to be housed separately from the adult dogs for disease control. We recommend all puppies be housed in floor level pens. This is to prevent them from stepping out of an elevated cage with an open door, falling out of cages located several feet above the floor and possibly injuring themselves. Puppies will have individual inside pens to hold litters of puppies separated from adult dogs. 3. Cat Housing SPA recommends two compartment housing for cats which is consistent with recommendations of the Association of Shelter Veterinarians. This allows the cat cages to be spot cleaned on one side while the cat is in the other compartment. This eliminates the need to move the cats out of their cages for cleaning. This reduces the potential transfer of disease and reduces stress for the cats. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 25 of 35 Mason Cat Towers Shor-line Stainless Steel Cat Suite Shor-line “Comfort Suite” with individual exhaust in each litterbox. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 26 of 35 Cat Community Room with free roam cats Catio with free roam cats Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 27 of 35 B. Interior Features Shelters built in the past did not have the advantage of using many of the new innovative materials and equipment available only in recent years. Animal shelters of today are no longer just “warehouse structures” with cages lined down the walls. Shelters are very specialized buildings which are more like hospitals and shopping malls than warehouses in construction. A high level of quality is needed if the facility is to be able to keep animals healthy and to hold up under heavy wear. This is especially important for a shelter that is striving to present an attractive, welcoming image to the public. An attractive, spacious, quiet front lobby is important in a shelter. This improves customer satisfaction and increases adoptions. The goal is to make the shelter a place where employees feel positive and the public enjoys visiting for pet adoption, pet retrieval, pet owner education and other animal services. Most importantly, the shelter must house animals in the healthiest, least stressful manner possible. Today, modern shelters are designed to include central washing equipment, automatic animal watering systems, individual kennel floor drains, fresh air with heat exchangers Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 28 of 35 for economy, heated kennel floors, noise control systems and long-lasting, easily disinfected wall and floor finishes. Special equipment can be utilized in a new shelter. During the preparation of the construction drawings and specifications in Step 3 we will review with you all of the details and choices that are available including performances, features, pros & cons, and the cost implications of the various options. Some of the equipment and finishes are pictured below. The special epoxy on kennel floor finish comes in an attractive array of earth tone colors to make kennels cheerful and bright. It also halts bacteria growth. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 29 of 35 Shelter Planners of America uses special Guillotine doors with an insulated Pet door that prevents loss of heated or cooled air from the kennel. Each dog Kennel is equipped with an automatic waterer so that dogs always have fresh water available with no staff time required refilling bowls. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 30 of 35 Attractive Kennels with bright lighting levels, epoxy floor finishes and sound absorbing ceilings make quiet, inviting public spaces. Professional grooming tub that animals can be walked into through a swinging door. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 31 of 35 C. Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning (HVAC) Heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems must be designed to provide clean, odor free and uncontaminated air throughout all animal housing areas. This is essential to control the spread of air borne disease. The HVAC system will be custom designed to provide a high volume of fresh air to kennels with a specific number of air changes per hour at the proper temperature and humidity range. The system will be designed to provide ceiling air supply above public walkways with a ceiling exhaust above dog runs opposite each supply providing the best odor control for the visiting public and staff. Additionally, the systems will be fitted with heat exchangers to recapture energy before it is exhausted. This helps keep utility bills as low as possible. There could also be supplemental roof mounted exhaust fans (with separate switches on timers, with red lights) to pull out moist air during and immediately following kennel cleaning. The facility should be served by multiple, separate, smaller HVAC systems, each to serve a portion of the facility. This smaller equipment is less expensive to install and service and if a system fails, you still have portions of the building heated and cooled until the system is repaired. Animals can be doubled up until repairs are made. The administrative areas are on a separate air system to prevent odors from entering the staff areas. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 32 of 35 7. STAFFING The present animal shelter staff consists of the following staff positions: Position Number of Staff Accumulated TotalFullTime Part Time 1 Animal Services Superintendent 1 1 2 Staff Vet 1 2 3 Programs Admin 1 3 4 Animal Services Technician 2 5 5 Field Supervisor 1 6 6 Senior Officer 1 7 7 Officer 3 10 8 Attendant 7 17 9 Admin Assistant 1 18 This staffing level is a little above average compared to most shelters across the Country handling approximately the same number of animals. However, FAS has their own veterinarian and has an outstanding live release rate and these factors increase the number of staff needed. FAS should plan to increase over time as the human population increases and the animal intake increases if they intend to keep the current high level of service. In addition, in a new shelter that is a more pleasant environment, it should be possible to increase the number of tasks the volunteers help with. Volunteers can help with a wide variety of activities at the shelter to promote adoption. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 33 of 35 8. OPERATING COST The present annual operating cost is $1,494,087. The average cost per animal handled is approximately $1,137 based on 1,314 animals. Nationally, animal shelter operational budgets run between $350 and $650 per animal. FAS’s operating cost is higher than the normal range. But frequently shelters with a high live release rate such as FAS and they have in-house veterinary services, the cost per animal will be higher. The proposed new shelter will be larger than the present shelter and the cost of utilities will be higher than the existing shelter. However, the maintenance cost of a new building will be generally less than an older building. We anticipate the operating budget should be increased to accommodate the increased utility costs and added staff in the future as the human population and animal intake increases. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 34 of 35 9. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Construction cost of animal shelters vary significantly, based on the national economy, the region of the country they are constructed in, when they are constructed, the individual market factors at that time and the method of project delivery. Other important factors are the size of the shelter, the site conditions such as soil and topography, quality of finishes and materials, HVAC systems included and the quality of animal equipment. Since detailed design drawings and engineering have not been prepared at this time, only estimated costs can be presented. The Opinion of Probable Cost presented is based on actual costs of several good quality shelters we have designed. We have taken those costs and adjusted the cost for Little Rock, AR in 2024 based on the R.S Means cost guide. Refer to EXHIBIT D for examples of shelters built around the country with the estimated cost per sf adjusted for Little Rock, AR. Unfortunately, there is not construction cost data available specifically for Fayetteville, AR. It is possible the costs in Fayetteville could be lower but we are not certain. Also, occasionally we find a community that rallies behind the project and “in- kind” services are donated that reduces the cost. We recommend FAS plan for the worst and hope for the best. Please note that modern animal shelters are more like a combination of a hospital and a shopping mall than a warehouse or other industrial use. The cost of modern animal shelters often surprises people because the cost is actually more than many buildings they may be familiar with. The following are some reasons for this: 1. Animal shelter foundations are complicated because there will be slopes within the animal housing areas to drains and this requires additional labor beyond most buildings like schools or office buildings. 2. The floor finishes in animal housing areas are perhaps 3 times the cost of typical carpet or other floor finishes in most buildings. 3. Animal shelters have animal equipment that can add $30 to $45/SF on top of the cost of most buildings. Occasionally, the costs people hear about other animal shelters Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © Comm # 1357 Page 35 of 35 they do not know if this equipment is included in the price or not. For the estimate in this study we have included the animal equipment. 4. Animal shelters have more walls per SF than most any other building type. For example, dog kennels walls are usually 4 feet to 6 feet apart whereas classrooms in schools are more like 20 feet apart. 5. The Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) systems in the animal housing portions of animal shelters are more expensive than other buildings to reduce disease transmission. 6. The wall finishes in the animal housing portions of animal shelters need to be a non- porous and durable finish to prevent disease transmission and to stand up to the daily washing. Glazed structural tile is a common material but costs significantly more than other materials. 7. Sound control within animal shelters is generally more cost than many building types due to the dogs barking. This requires the walls being extended to the roof deck to prevent sound transmission to other areas and this requires sound absorption materials that cost more than normal materials. Refer to Exhibit C dated 10-25-24 for the Opinion of Probable Cost. We have included Construction Costs including Site Work as well as for soft costs and contingency that should be considered. Please note, the cost of land is not included. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER Date: 10-25-24 FIGURE 1. EXISTING AND PROJECTED HUMAN POPULATION AND ANIMAL INTAKE 2023 YTD 2023 YTD 2023 YTD 2033 2033 2033 2043 2043 2043 Human Actual Intake as a Human Projected Projected Human Projected Projected Population Animal % of Population Intake Animal Population Intake Animal Estimate Intake Population Estimate Ratio Intake Estimate Ratio Intake Dogs 887 0.87% 0.87% 1,136 0.87% 1,508 Cats 422 0.42%0.42% 540 0.42% 717 Other 5 0.00%0.00%6 0.00%8 Total 101,543 1,314 1.29% 130,000 1.29% 1,682 172,617 1.29% 2,234 FIGURE 2. CURRENT AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY (ALS) 2023 YTD Existing Actual Housing Current Intake Spaces ALS Dogs 887 46 19 Cats 422 37 32 Other 5 0 0 Total 1,314 83 FIGURE 3. 2033 AND 2043 PROJECTED ANIMAL HOUSING NEEDS 2033 Number of 2043 Number of Projected Animals Projected Animals Animal Desired to be Animal Desired to be Intake ALS Housed Intake ALS Housed Dogs 1,136 19 60 Dogs 1,508 19 78 Cats 540 34 50 Cats 717 33 65 Other 6 30 1 Other 8 30 1 Total 1,682 110 Total 2,234 144 EXHIBIT A 2033 (10-YEAR PROJECTION)2043 (20-YEAR PROJECTION) Based on Existing Housing Spaces Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q EXHIBIT B BUILDING SPACE PROGRAM - 10 YEAR PROJECTION DATE: 10-25-24 Interior Exterior 5,283 1,994 5,720 4,449 2,395 700 15,392 5,149 20,541 Room or Space No. of Rooms SF of Each Total SF Adjacent to or Near PUBLIC AREAS 1 Adoption Lobby 1 300 300 2 Adoption Lobby Vestibule 1 80 80 3 Intake Lobby 1 150 150 4 Intake Lobby Vestibule 1 80 80 5 Customer Service Counter (5 Customer Service Representatives at counter) 1 350 350 6 Adoption Interview Space 2 80 160 Adjacent to Adoption Lobby 7 Education Center Multi-purpose Meeting Room) 1 750 750 Adjacent to Lobby for after-hours use, including use of toilet 8 Meeting Room Storage 1 80 80 Adjacent to Meeting Room 9 Meeting Room Kitchen 1 80 80 10 Public Toilets 2 180 360 Arrange counter to serve both the Adoption Lobby and the Intake Lobby. Space for 4 staff at Adoption Lobbyand 1 at Intake Lobby and yet be connected to conserve staff time. Glass cubicles with small table where potential Adopters can fill out paperwork and then an Adoption Counselor can come interview them. Seating for 50 in chairs, built-in AV system. FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER Summary: A. Administrative B. Medical Clinic TOTAL SF COMBINED SF SECTION A - ADMINISTRATIVE Equipment / Comments Visitor seating for 6. Retail display alcove viewable from Customer Service Counter. Consider large screen TV. C. Animal Housing (Interior) D. Animal Housing (Exterior) E. Animal Support Area (Interior) F. Animal Support Area (Exterior) Visitor seating for 2, wall to separate from Adoption Lobby. To store tables and chairs when not in use and other materials to support meeting room. Counter with sink, under-counter refrigerator, microwave, and coffee maker. One mens, one womens and one unisex family. Verify code minimum. Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © EXHIBIT B - Page 1 of 6 Ap p e n d i x B RF Q 25 1 5 An i m a l Se r v i c e s Fa c i l i t y De s i g n Ci t y Is s u e d RF Q EXHIBIT B Room or Space No. of Rooms SF of Each Total SF Adjacent to or Near OFFICES 11 Executive Director 1 1 100 100 12 Future Assistant Office 1 100 100 13 Future Volunteer Coordinator Office 1 100 100 14 Group Office for Kennel Staff 1 36 108 15 ACO Supervisor's Office 1 100 100 16 ACO Group Office 1 48 192 OTHER ADMIN. SPACES 17 Workroom 1 100 100 Behind Customer Service Counter 18 Staff Breakroom 1 180 180 Consider access to outdoor space 19 Staff Locker Alcove 1 10 10 20 Staff Toilets 2 60 120 21 Staff Shower Room 1 64 64 22 Volunteer Check-In and Lockers 1 50 50 23 Pet Food Bank Storage 1 200 200 24 Mechanical/ Elec Room 1 150 150 25 Janitorial Closet 1 50 50 26 Data/Phone Closet 1 50 50 Subtotal:4,064 Net to Gross SF Factor 30%:1,219 Departmental Gross Area: 5,283 4 1 1 1 SECTION A - ADMINISTRATIVE - Continued No. of People Equipment / Comments Kiosk Computer for Check-In & name tags. Provide 12 lockers 1'X1'X1'. 3 3 computer workstations for kennel staff. 10 Lockers for staff 1' x1' x3'. Unisex is acceptable. Verify to comply with code. Unisex is acceptable. Copy machine, 12' counter, 2 filing cabinets Counter with sink, refrigerator, microwave, coffee maker, and seating at table for 6. Provide built-in safe. Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © EXHIBIT B - Page 2 of 6 Ap p e n d i x B RF Q 25 1 5 An i m a l Se r v i c e s Fa c i l i t y De s i g n Ci t y Is s u e d RF Q EXHIBIT B Room or Space No. of Rooms SF of Each Total SF Adjacent to or Near 1 Veterinary Office 1 140 140 2 Prep/Treatment Room 1 240 240 3 Pre-Op/Post-Op Holding - Dogs 1 192 192 4 Pre-Op/Post-Op Holding - Cats 1 96 96 5 Recovery Room 1 80 80 6 Feral Cat Holding 1 80 80 7 Surgery Room 1 240 240 8 Work Station for Vet Tech 1 36 36 9 Laboratory/Pharmacy Alcove 1 100 100 11 Medical Supply Room 1 80 80 12 Medical Gas Storage Room 1 50 50 13 X-Ray Room 0 - - 14 Clean Up Area 1 80 80 15 Staff Toilet 1 60 60 16 Medical Laundry 1 60 60 Subtotal:1,534 Net to Gross SF Factor 30%:460 Departmental Gross Area:1,994 12 cages Space for 6 traps on stainless steel shelves. 12 cages and four 4'x4' holding pens Equipment / Comments SECTION B - MEDICAL CLINIC No. of People Two surgery tables, countertop along wall with upper cabinets, view windows to prep area. Unisex type Not required per client. 10' long countertop with 2-compartment sink and space for 2 autoclaves. 1 1 Counter top approximately 12' long with sink and refrigerator with space for microscope, centrifuge and blood analyzer and controlled drug storage 2 peninsula style wet exam tables and full size refrigerator. Space for 2 animal recovering on the floor. Residential washer and dryer. This laundry is Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © EXHIBIT B - Page 3 of 6 Ap p e n d i x B RF Q 25 1 5 An i m a l Se r v i c e s Fa c i l i t y De s i g n Ci t y Is s u e d RF Q EXHIBIT B Room or Space No. of Spaces Animals per Space Animals to be Housed SF of Each SF of Walkway Total SF Adjacent to or Near 1 Adoption Dog - Flex Rooms 4 2 4 8.0 x 8.0 64 40 416 2 Adoption Dog Runs - Standard 36 1 36 5.0 x 6.0 30 25.0 1,980 3 Stray Dog Runs - Jumbo 0 1 0 6.0 x 6.0 36 30 - 4 Stray Dog Runs - Standard 14 1 14 5.0 x 6.0 30 25.0 770 5 Nursing Mother Dogs - Jumbo 0 1 0 6.0 x 6.0 36 30 - 6 Medical Observation Dog Runs 3 1 3 5.0 x 6.0 30 25.0 165 7 Medical Isolation Dog Runs 3 1 3 5.0 x 6.0 30 25.0 165 8 Quarantine Dog Runs 2 1 2 5.0 x 6.0 30 25.0 110 9 Puppy Pens 1 2 2 3.0 x 5.0 15 25 40 10 Transfer Dog Runs - Jumbo 0 2 0 6.0 x 6.0 36 30 - 11 Transfer Dog Runs - Standard 0 1 0 5.0 x 6.0 30 25 - TOTAL DOGS:64 12 Adoption Cat Room - Adult 12 1 12 5 12 204 13 Adoption Cat Room - Kitten 10 1 10 14 Cat Community Rooms (18 SF / cat Free Roam)2 4 8 8.0 x 8.0 64 128 Lobby 14 Cat Condo Rooms (18 SF / cat Free Roam) 2 1 2 4.0 x 4.5 18 36 Lobby 15 Stray Cat Room - Adult 10 1 10 5 12 170 16 Stray Cat Room - Feral 0 1 0 5 12 - 16 Stray Cat Room - Kitten 0 1 0 5 12 - 17 Nursing Mother Cats 0 1 0 5 12 - 18 Medical Observation Cats - Non-Viewable 0 1 3 5 12 51 19 Medical Isolation Cats - Non-Viewable 1 1 3 5 12 51 20 Quarantine Cat Room - Viewable by public 1 1 2 5 12 34 TOTAL CATS:50 21 Other Animals 1 - -8.0 x 10.0 80 80 Subtotal: 4,400 Net to Gross SF Factor 30%:1,320 Departmental Gross Area:5,720 Size Equipment / Comments Dog runs to be a convertible configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run Dog runs to be a convertible configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run Dog runs to be a quick clean configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run Dog runs to be a quick clean configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run SECTION C - ANIMAL HOUSING - INTERIOR Dog runs to be an indoor back to back configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run Dog runs to be an indoor back to back configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run See corresponding Exterior Run Each cat is housed in a 2-compartment cage. Each cat is housed in a 2-compartment cage. Each cat is housed in a 2-compartment cage. Dog runs to be an indoor back to back configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run Dog runs to be an indoor back to back configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run Dog runs to be an indoor back to back configuration. See corresponding Exterior Run. See corresponding Exterior Run Each cat is housed in a 2-compartment cage. Each cat is housed in a 2-compartment cage. Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © EXHIBIT B - Page 4 of 6 Ap p e n d i x B RF Q 25 1 5 An i m a l Se r v i c e s Fa c i l i t y De s i g n Ci t y Is s u e d RF Q EXHIBIT B Room or Space No. of Spaces Animals per Space SF of Each SF of Walkway Total SF Adjacent to or Near 1 Adoption Dog - Flex Rooms Outdoor Portion 4 2 8.0 x 8.0 64 40 416 2 Adoption Dog Runs - Standard 36 1 5.0 x 8.0 40 25 2,340 3 Stray Dog Runs - Jumbo - 1 6.0 x 8.0 48 30 - 4 Stray Dog Runs - Standard 14 1 5.0 x 8.0 40 25 910 5 Nursing Mother Dog Runs - Jumbo - 1 6.0 x 8.0 48 30 - 6 Medical Observation Dog Runs 3 1 5.0 x 8.0 40 25 195 7 Medical Isolation Dog Runs 3 1 5.0 x 8.0 40 25 195 8 Dog Quarantine Runs 2 1 5.0 x 8.0 40 25 130 9 Puppy Runs - 1 2 5.0 x 6.0 30 25 55 10 Transfer Runs - Jumbo - 1 6.0 x 8.0 48 30 - 11 Transfer Runs - Standard - 2 5.0 x 8.0 40 25 - 12 Cat Sun Porch 2 8.0 x 8.0 64 40 208 Subtotal:4,449 Departmental Gross Area:4,449 SECTION D - ANIMAL HOUSING - OUTDOOR COVERED Size Equipment / Comments See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run See corresponding Interior Run Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © EXHIBIT B - Page 5 of 6 Ap p e n d i x B RF Q 25 1 5 An i m a l Se r v i c e s Fa c i l i t y De s i g n Ci t y Is s u e d RF Q EXHIBIT B Room or Space No. of Rooms SF of Each Total SF Adjacent to or Near 1 Animal Receiving 1 250 250 Near Admissions Lobby and Sally Port 2 Dog Intake Holding 1 72 72 Animal Receiving 3 Cat Intake Holding 1 40 40 Animal Receiving 4 Get Acquainted Rooms 2 80 160 5 Photo Room 1 50 50 6 Animal Kitchen 2 120 240 7 Food and Litter Storage 1 150 150 8 Laundry 1 240 240 Centrally located 9 Cleaning Equipment Room 3 80 240 Adoption dogs, medical dogs, cats 10 Grooming Room 1 100 100 11 Euthanasia Room 1 150 150 15 Mechanical Room 1 150 150 Subtotal:1,842 Net to Gross SF Factor 30%:553 Departmental Gross Area:2,395 Room or Space No. of Rooms SF of Each Total SF Adjacent to or Near 1 Covered Truck Area (1 spaces)1 500 500 6 Event Storage 1 100 100 7 Trap Storage 0 - - 8 Crate Storage 0 - - 9 Storage for Animal-Related Items 1 100 100 Subtotal:700 Departmental Gross Area:700 Equipment / Comments To be used for crate wash. Reuse existing storage shed. 2 cat cages Two for dogs. SECTION E - ANIMAL SUPPORT AREA - INTERIOR Equipment / Comments Stainless steel counter with sink, under-counter refrigerator, scales for dogs, scales for cats, exam table, space for computer, and space to photograph animals in separate room. Two 4'x4' pens One room for both cats and dogs. Reuse existing storage shed. Counter with sink, hydraulic exam table, and chest freezer SECTION F - ANIMAL SUPPORT AREA - UNFINISHED SPACE 2 Commercial washers and 2 dryers with folding tables, shelves and space for carts. Cleaning supplies, pressure wash equipment, space for janitor's sink, trash cans, etc. 1 Grooming tub & 1 Grooming table One for cats and one for dogs. Counter with 3- compartment sink, commercial under-counter dishwasher for cats, commercial vertical dishwasher for dogs and upright freezer. Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © EXHIBIT B - Page 6 of 6 Ap p e n d i x B RF Q 25 1 5 An i m a l Se r v i c e s Fa c i l i t y De s i g n Ci t y Is s u e d RF Q OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - 10 YEAR PROJECTION DATE: 10-25-24 Based on New Construction on a New Site: 2032 15,392 5,149 20,541 LOW HIGH New Total Cost at Total Cost at Construction $491.50 $564.00 Fully Enclosed Space Total SF Per SF Per SF A Administrative Areas 5,283 2,596,693$ B Medical Clinic 1,994 980,149$ C Animal Housing - Interior 5,720 2,811,380$ D Animal Support Areas - Interior 2,395 1,176,946$ 15,392 7,565,168$ 8,681,088$ Total Cost at 344.05 $394.80 Exterior Space Total SF Per SF Per SF E Animal Housing - OUTDOOR COVERED 4,449 F Animal Support Areas - Exterior - UNFINISHED SPACE 700 5,149 1,771,513$ 2,032,825$ Building - Sub-Totals:20,541 9,336,681$ 10,713,913$ Low High Site Work & Parking 10%15%933,668$ 1,607,087$ Total Construction Cost 10,270,350$ 12,321,000$ Total Cost / SF 500$ 600$ Consider Budgeting for the following: Soft Costs 15% 1,540,552$ 1,848,150$ Contingency 5%590,545$ 708,458$ Escalation 5%590,545$ 708,458$ Estimated Total Project Cost 12,991,992$ 15,586,065$ Note: 1. This does not include the cost of land. 2. Please note, the Opinion of Probable Cost provided is based on historical costs of other animal shelter projects, but the construction market is extremely unpredictable at this time. EXHIBIT C FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER AE Fees, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Soil Tests, Construction Materials Testing, Air Balancing, Furnishing, Loose Equipment, Computers & Phone System, etc.) Subtotals: Subtotals: Fully Enclosed Space - SF : Exterior Space - SF : Total SF : Shelter Planners of America, Copyright ©EXHIBIT C - Page 1 of 1 Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright ©EXHIBIT C - Page 1 of 1 Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © 1 Chatham County Animal Services Facility Pittsboro, NC Project Information: Publicly Bid Project Delivery Method: CMAR Type of Construction: Steel Frame Dog Kenneling Material: Welded Stainless Steel Flooring in Dog Kennels: Epoxy Resinous HVAC System: 100% of Outside Air for Animals Project Building Size: 15,600 including a 4,000 SF renovation. Developed Area: 3 acres Total Land Area: 10 acres All indoor Quick-Clean dog kennels Quality: High PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST IN 2024, LITTLE ROCK, AR DOLLARS $437/SF This is a County owned and operated animal shelter with housing for 40 dogs and 60 cats. EXHIBIT D Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © 2 Chatham County Animal Services Facility Pittsboro, NC Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Project Size: 21,400 SF Site Size: 4.5 acres Quality: High Project Information: Public Bid Project Delivery Method: CMAR Type of Construction: Steel frame Flooring Type in Dog Kennels: Sealed Concrete Dog Kenneling: welded stainless steel Countertops: Solid Surface Lafayette Animal Shelter & Care Center Lafayette, LA The facility houses 96 Dogs and 80 Cats. PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST IN 2024, LITTLE ROCK, AR DOLLARS $445/SF Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Lafayette Animal Shelter & Care Center Lafayette, LA Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © 5 Montgomery County Animal Adoption & Care Center Christiansburg, VA Project Information: Public Bid Project Delivery Method: Competitive Type of Construction: Wood Frame Flooring in Dog Kennels: Epoxy Resinous HVAC System: 100% of Outside Air for Animals Project Size: 16,733 SF Site Size: 3 acres Quality: High—Medium PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST IN 2024, LITTLE ROCK, AR DOLLARS $341/SF This is a County owned facility that will be operated by a local non-profit. The facility features a clinic for shelter animals that a local non-profit plans to also use for a high volume spay and neuter clinic. This facility is designed to house 69 Dogs and 64 Cats. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © 6 Montgomery County Animal Adoption & Care Center Christiansburg, VA Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © 7 Springdale Animal Shelter – with Clinic and Education Center Springdale, AR Project Information: Public Bid Project Delivery Method: CMAR Type of Construction: Wood Frame Flooring in Dog Kennels: Epoxy Resinous Project Size: 12,780 SF Site Size: 3 acres Quality: High PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST IN 2024, LITTLE ROCK, AR DOLLARS $497/SF Springdale Animal Services is owned and operated by the City of Springdale. This area is experiencing significate population growth. The facility is designed to house 76 Dogs and 72 Cats. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © 8 Springdale Animal Shelter – with Clinic and Education Center Springdale, AR Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q Shelter Planners of America, Copyright © 9 Tippecanoe County Animal Shelter Lafayette, IN Project Information: Public Bid Project Delivery Method: Construction Manager-Advisor Type of Construction: Wood Frame Dog Kenneling Material: Welded Stainless Steel and Porcelain tile walls Flooring in Dog Kennels: Epoxy Resinous 100% of Outside Air for Animals Project Size: 16,062 Site Size: less than 3 acres Quality: Medium/High All indoor/outdoor dog kennels with two-compartment housing. PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST IN 2024, LITTLE ROCK, AR DOLLARS $378/SF The facility houses 68 Dogs and 157 Cats. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility Design City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville,AR RFQ 25 15,Addendum 1 Page 1 1 RFQ 25 15,Addendum 1 Date:Friday,August 29,2025 To:All Prospective Vendors From:Amanda Beilfuss 479.575.8220 abeilfuss@fayetteville ar.gov RE:RFQ 25 15,Animal Services Facility Design This addendum is hereby made a part of the contract documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein.Interested parties should indicate their receipt of same in the appropriate blank of the RFQ.PROPOSERS SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THIS ADDENDUM ON THE DESIGNATED LOCATION ON THE BID PORTAL/RFQ FORM. 1. Clarification The City of Fayetteville anticipates contracting directly with Animal Shelters of America for consulting services.The selected Architectural firm will be the lead on this project and shall coordinate with the City’s consultant,as necessary. 2. Questions The following questions were received and answered by the responsible department: a. Question:Is the City open to working with another shelter consultant other than Shelter Planners of America? i. Answer:The City of Fayetteville anticipates contracting directly with Animal Shelters of America for consulting services.Consultant will be directed to coordinate with the City’s selected Architectural firm. b. Question:Will the City allow a different shelter consultant of equal or better qualifications? i. Answer:The City of Fayetteville anticipates contracting directly with Animal Shelters of America for consulting services.The City of Fayetteville encourages all Architectural firms to submit and not be confined to a consultant. c. Question:On page 10 under Project Description'it states the selected A/E team shall include Shelter Planners of America as the Animal Services Consultant..".Will Shelter Planners of America be able to submit a proposal for this RFQ? i. Answer:All qualified Engineering/Architectural firms are welcome to submit their statement of qualifications to the City for this project. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q City of Fayetteville,AR RFQ 25 15,Addendum 2 Page 1 1 RFQ 25 15,Addendum 2 Date:Monday,September 8,2025 To:All Prospective Vendors From:Amanda Beilfuss 479.575.8220 abeilfuss@fayetteville ar.gov RE:RFQ 25 15,Animal Services Facility Design This addendum is hereby made a part of the contract documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein.Interested parties should indicate their receipt of same in the appropriate blank of the RFQ.PROPOSERS SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THIS ADDENDUM ON THE DESIGNATED LOCATION ON THE BID PORTAL/RFQ FORM. 1. Questions The following questions were received and answered by the responsible department: a. Question:What scope of work is expected or anticipated for Shelter Planners of America to integrate into Proposer’s team? i. Answer:Shelter Planners will serve in a sub consultant capacity,providing input on programing,site analysis,conceptual design,schematic design,recommendation on equipment selections,and shall be available for construction observations. b. Question:Is Crafton Tull eligible to pursue the design services for this project? i. Answer:All qualified Engineering/Architectural firms are welcome to submit their statement of qualifications to the City for this project. Appendix B RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign City Issued RF Q RFQ 25-15 Addendum 2 Rania Alomar Architect Inc Rania Alomar Architect Inc Supplier Response Event Information Number:RFQ 25-15 Addendum 2 Title:Animal Services Facility Design Type:Request for Qualifications Issue Date:8/24/2025 Deadline:9/18/2025 02:00 PM (CT) Notes:The City of Fayetteville is soliciting Statements of Qualifications SOQs) from qualified architectural and engineering (A/E) firms to provide professional design services for a new Animal Services Facility. Any questions regarding this RFQ shall be directed to Amanda Beilfuss, City of Fayetteville Procurement Director at abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov or (479) 575-8220. Contact Information Contact:Amanda Beilfuss Address:Purchasing Room 306 City Hall 113 West Mountain Street - Room 306 Fayetteville, AR 72701 Email:abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov Vendor: Rania Alomar Architect Inc RFQ 25-15 Addendum2Page1of3pages Ap p e n d ix C RF Q 2 5 1 5 A n im a lS e rvice s Fa cility D e sig n Ra n ia A lo m a r s P ro p o sa l Rania Alomar Architect Inc Information Contact:Michael Green Address:7523 Norton Avenue West Hollywood, CA 90046 Phone:(323) 851-4040 Email:mike@ra-da.com Web Address:www.ra-da.com By submitting your response, you certify that you are authorized to represent and bind your company. Michael Green mike@ra-da.com Signature Email Submitted at 9/18/2025 12:54:48 PM (CT) Requested Attachments RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design RA-DA Response R3_Fayetteville Animal Facility.pdf Please attach the signed and completed RFQ form, located in the 'Attachments' tab, along with statement of qualifications. Response Attachments Signed Required Forms RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design.pdf Required signed forms Bid Attributes 1 Check Yes or No: Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-503, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-503. If at any time during contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. Yes, I agree No, I don't agree 2 Check Yes or No: Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-1002, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and Ammunition Industries during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-1002. If at any time during the contract the contractor decides to boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and/or Ammunition Industries, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. Yes, I agree No, I don't agree Vendor: Rania Alomar Architect Inc RFQ 25-15 Addendum2Page2of3pages Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal 3 Addendum Acknowledgement By selecting "I agree", you acknowledge that you have read all addendum(s) that have been issued for this solicitation, if applicable. I agree Vendor: Rania Alomar Architect Inc RFQ 25-15 Addendum2Page3of3pages Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal RA-DA RANIA ALOMAR ARCHITECT, INC 7523 Norton Avenue, West Hollywood, CA 90046 T. 323.851.4040 // www.ra-da.com // rania@ra-da.com PREPARED WITH CARE FOR THE FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL FACILITY DESIGN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS 25-15REQUESTFORQUALIFICATIONS25-15 ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITYDESIGNANIMALSERVICESFACILITYDESIGN City of Fayetteville Procurement Division – Room 306 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 DUE DATE: 2:00 PM CST SEPTEMBER 18, 2025 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 COVER LETTER SECTION 2 METHODOLOGY SPECIFIC APPROACH SCHEDULE ORGANIZATION CHART SECTION 3 EXPERIENCE TEAM EXPERIENCE PROJECT TYPE DISCUSSION CONSULTANT ENGINEERS SECTION 4 REFERENCES SECTION 5 EXCEPTIONS & REQUIREMENTS SECTION 6 APPENDICES RESUMES PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA1COVERLETTER 3 September 18, 2025 City of Fayetteville Procurement Division RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Dear members of the Selection Committee, We are pleased to present you with our response to the Request for Qualifications to provide Architectural & Engineering Services for the Fayetteville Animal Services Facility Design. This submittal contains all required documentation specified in your Request For Qualifications and all Addenda and question responses have been reviewed. RA-DA is an award-winning full service design and architecture firm based in West Hollywood that is one of a small handful of firms that specialize in Animal Shelters and Pet Resource Centers. Paired with our acumen for public architecture and our extensive list of municipal on-call contracts you will find that we are perfectly situated to fulfill your needs for a new animal services facility. As you will see in our submittal we are a leader in providing state-of-the-art thinking and solutions for the care of animals. The consultants we list regularly work with us on our animal facilities and municipal contracts allowing us to create the perfect team for your needs. We look forward to working with Shelter Planners of America and implementing their insights into the design. Together we think we could be a powerhouse team. We, as a group, are well-versed in the processes of municipal planners and stakeholders and can shepherd your project with ease from concept through closeout. Giving you a facility you will be happy to occupy for decades to come. We have recently completed the multiple award winning Pet Resource Center in Bentonville that also functions as a community and animal outreach center. We have designed and built a LEED Silver Animal Shelter for the City of Los Angeles which is the largest in teh region (260 kennels), and our Pet Adoption Center in New York City won Best of Interior Design and NYxDESIGN awards. Recently we constructed the new Porterville, California animal shelter for the Sheriff’s Department, a new surgical suite and isolation rooms for NKLA in Los Angeles, California, and are in the design phase for a new Animal Shelter & Transport Facility in New York State. With our experience in public architecture we have been able to combine thinking toward how animals are cared for and how the building and animal spaces interact with the public. Breaking away from sheltering ideas of the past we can help you design a true community resource that draws in the public and therefore helps more animals find their forever homes. On behalf of our team, we would like to again state our sincere interest in working with you and build a quality working relationship with the City of Fayetteville. We can assure you of our commitment should we be chosen to support this future endeavor. Yours truly, Rania Alomar, AIA Principal and Founder, RA-DA 7523 Norton Avenue West Hollywood, CA 90046 T. 323 851-4040 E. rania@ra-da.com 2025 Proposers must provide the City with their proposals signed by an employee having legal authority to submit proposals on behalf of the Proposer. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 4 The following narrative describes our project specific method for working with you on your new animal facility design. RA-DA is one of a small handful of firms that specializes in this type of facility and our experience is nation wide. We are known for our forward thinking in animal care and adoption center design helping many municipalities and non-profits in the care, treatment, and re-homing of animals. PREDESIGN PHASE Assemble Project Team After being assigned the project by the City, RA- DA shall assemble the project team to review the preliminary program and the scope of the project. Engineers and Specialty consultants shall be included as needed by the project. We shall review the team selection with the City and adjust it as is necessary. For a project of this scope we anticipate the team to be as follows: Architect team MEP Engineers Structural Engineer Civil Engineer Acoustical Engineer Specifications Writer Cost Estimator Constructibility Reviewer (QA/QC) Door Hardware Consultant Land Use Consultant if CUP or zoning variances are required) LEED Consultant Discovery RA-DA and our team members shall conduct a zoning and code analysis of the site / building. We have found that it is important to do this before the kickoff meeting with the client group so that we have a clear understanding of what is possible and what is required by the City and other jurisdictional and utility agencies. At this stage, we will review our team and determine whether a Land Use Consultant is needed for the project. If a CUP or zoning variance (or any other long lead time jurisdictional requirements) is required, this will need to be started immediately in order for the project to meet the anticipated schedule. We will also review in depth the work that may have already been done including the program and topographic survey and soils report. Kick-off Meeting RA-DA shall assist the City to schedule a kick- off meeting with the complete project team that includes the A/E firms, consultants, City’s Project Manager, the User Group, the City’s plan review department representatives and if appropriate, also the construction manager. This meeting will allow all team members to meet and for us to know all the stakeholders of the project. We shall discuss the process, review the budget and the delivery method and scope. We shall review the City’s Delivery Standards and any project specific requirements including LEED goals. We shall review the schedule and confirm its acceptability to the team and stakeholders. We shall establish user information and communication protocols, construction platform, and review owner and agency submittal requirements. RA-DA shall also present our design process for this project, review QA/QC procedures, Value Engineering procedures and explain next steps and how we would like to proceed. Program Review & Preliminary Diagramming You have already done a lot of this work with Shelter Planners of America so you are ahead of the game! We would want to spend some time doing a deep dive into the document and the findings that have already been compiled. We will create diagrams to describe the sizes and needs of the facility and work with you and Shelter Planners of America to create a draft diagram of the spaces identified. This is a starting point for a concept level design and will allow us to start to organize the spaces relative to the site. We do however still want to have a conversation with you about the overall goals of the facility. A big part A written narrative describing the method or manner in which the Proposer proposes to satisfy requirements of this RFQ. The term Proposer shall be in reference to a firm or individual responding to this solicitation. The term proposal is used in these documents as equal to statement of qualification. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 5 of this is an alignment of goals between the Design Team and the Client Team Values to consider: Human: functional, social, physical, physiological, psychological Environmental: site, climate, context, resources, waste Cultural: historical, institutional, political, legal Technological: materials, systems, processes Temporal: growth, change, permanence Economic: finance, construction, operations, maintenance, energy Aesthetic: form, space, color, meaning Safety: structural, fire, chemical, personal, criminal We will expand your program / project description to capture aspirational goals of the project beyond functional details of the space. A well-conceived program leads to high quality design. Site Visit & Preliminary Team Meeting The RA-DA team and key members of the Consultant and Engineer Teams shall visit the proposed site and also the existing facility and review the scope for the project informally with the City Project Manager and Shelter Planners of America. Having reviewed the preliminary findings in the Report prepared by Shelter Planners of America we can study the possiblities for the Site and prepare a series of test-fits’ that explore the possiblities. Concept The concept design phase is the very beginning of the architectural design process. This is where we translate your goals, needs, and vision for the animal shelter into initial ideas and visual concepts. It’s not about detailed drawings yet—it’s about exploring the big picture and setting the direction for the entire project. The organizational solutions developed in the Programming phase are clearly organized into 2 or 3 best schemes that are often significantly different. Aspirational goals are addressed and incorporated into these schemes. The schemes will Clarify relationships: How should animals, staff, and visitors move through the building? What needs to be quiet or private? Where is security or visibility most important? How does the building increase adoptions? What are the best tactics for this? How do we maintain the health and safety of animals and staff. How can we make operations easier and more efficient? They will also Define the feel: Should the shelter feel calm and nurturing? Bright and cheerful? Efficient and durable? And also how will the building Respond to the site: How can we take advantage of natural light, views, wind, slope and landscape? How does the building relate to its surroundings? Pros and cons (including preliminary construction cost review) of each scheme are identified and presented to the Client and User group in a Design Workshop where we will review all options and also have a high-level look at budget, schedule and next steps. J.L. AUDITORIUM 10000SQFT J.L. STAGE & WINGS3600SQFT HOOPSSEATING / COURT 25280SQFT HOOPS AVBOOTH 850SQFT SEATSTORAGE2100SQFT HOOPSLOBBY / FOYERAREA 10000SQFT RESTROOMS 2100SQFT LOUNGE / BAR 500SQFT KIOSKS300SQFT PANTRY250SQFT J.L. BALC. LOBBY 2500SQFT BAR021000SQFTJ.L. AVBOOTH600SQFT RESTROOMS805SQFT PANTRY02 250SQFT J.L. AUDITORIUM10000SQFT J.L. STAGE & WINGS 3600SQFT J.L. TRAPROOM 1500SQFT LOADINGDOCKETC. 1000SQFT RECIEVINGBAY 1300SQFT HOOPSMARSHALLING1000SQFT TRASH 525SQFT CRATESTORAGE1300SQFT HOOPSCREWRM 600SQFT HOOPSHIGH STORAGE900SQFT SHOP 200SQFT J.L. MARSHALLING 1000SQFT J.L. CREWRM600SQFT PLAYERLOCKER 900SQFT HOOPSADDTL. DRESS 2700SQFT 600SQFT HOOPSCOST. DEPT. LAUNDRY150SQFT GUESTDRESS400SQFT J.L. DRESS 250SQFT 1000SQFT JLCOSTUMEDEPT. MEETING / REHEARSAL AREAS 1350SQFT 1540SQFT JLADDTL. DRESSJ.L. MECH480SQFT J.L. ELECTRIC, ETC. 1200SQFT BAR01 1000SQFT CIGARBAR 800SQFT PANTRY01 250SQFT BARSTOR. 300SQFT J.L. MAINLOBBY 2500SQFT RESTROOMS 750SQFT GUESTSERV. 300SQFT STAFF / USHERETC 880SQFT FRONTSTOR. 250SQFT BOXOFFICE 1000SQFT GIFTSHOP600SQFT GIFTSHOP 600SQFT GREENRM. 480SQFT TRAINING 570SQFT J.L. TRAP ROOM 1500 SQFT J.L. BALC. LOBBY2500SQFT BAR021000SQFT J.L. AVBOOTH 600 SQFT PANTRY 02 250SQFT REST ROOMS 805 SQFT HOOPS LOBBY / FOYER AREA 10000 SQFT HOOPS SEATING / COURT25280SQFT SEATSTORAGE2100SQFT LOUNGE / BAR 500 SQFT PANTRY 250SQFTKIOSKS300SQFT RESTROOMS2100SQFT HOOPS AVBOOTH 850 SQFT HOOPS HIGH STORAGE 900 SQFT SHOP200SQFT J.L. BALC. LOBBY 2500 SQFT BAR 02 1000 SQFT J.L. AVBOOTH600SQFT PANTRY 02 250 SQFT REST ROOMS 805 SQFT HOOPS LOBBY / FOYER AREA 10000 SQFT HOOPS SEATING / COURT 20780 SQFT LOUNGE / BAR 500 SQFT PANTRY250SQFTKIOSKS300SQFT REST ROOMS 2100 SQFT HOOPSAVBOOTH 850 SQFT BAR011000SQFT TRAINING 570 SQFT LAUNDRY 150SQFT 600 SQFT HOOPS COST. DEPT. MEETING / REHEARSAL AREAS 1350 SQFT J.L. DRESS 250SQFT GUEST DRESS 400SQFT 1540 SQFT JL ADDTL. DRESS 1000 SQFT JLCOSTUME DEPT.GREEN RM. 480SQFT J.L. AUDITORIUM10000SQFT J.L. STAGE & WINGS3600SQFT J.L. ELECTRIC, ETC. 1200 SQFT J.L. CREWRM600SQFT J.L. MARSHALLING 1000 SQFT HOOPSCREW RM 600 SQFT LOADING DOCK ETC. 1000 SQFT CRATESTORAGE1300SQFT RECIEVING BAY 1300 SQFT HOOPS MARSHALLING 1000 SQFT GIFT SHOP 600SQFT TRASH 525 SQFT PLAYER LOCKER 900SQFT HOOPS ADDTL. DRESS 2700 SQFT CIGAR BAR 800SQFT BOX OFFICE 1000 SQFT GIFTSHOP600SQFT PANTRY01250SQFTBARSTOR. 300SQFT FRONT STOR. 250SQFTGUESTSERV. 300SQFT STAFF / USHER ETC 880SQFT J.L. MAIN LOBBY 2500 SQFT RESTROOMS750SQFT J.L. TRAP ROOM 1500 SQFT BAR011000SQFT TRAINING570SQFT LAUNDRY 150 SQFT 600SQFTHOOPSCOST. DEPT. MEETING / REHEARSAL AREAS J.L. DRESS 250SQFT GUEST DRESS 400SQFT 1540 SQFT JLADDTL. DRESS 1000 SQFT JLCOSTUME DEPT. GREEN RM. 480 SQFT J.L. AUDITORIUM10000SQFT J.L. STAGE & WINGS3600SQFT J.L. ELECTRIC, ETC. 1200 SQFT J.L. CREWRM600SQFT J.L. MARSHALLING 1000 SQFT HOOPS CREWRM600SQFT LOADING DOCK ETC. 1000 SQFT CRATE STORAGE 1300 SQFT RECIEVING BAY 1300 SQFT HOOPS MARSHALLING 1000 SQFT GIFT SHOP 600SQFT TRASH 525SQFT PLAYER LOCKER 900 SQFT HOOPS ADDTL. DRESS2700SQFT CIGARBAR800SQFT BOX OFFICE 1000 SQFT GIFTSHOP600SQFT PANTRY01250SQFTBARSTOR. 300 SQFT FRONT STOR. 250SQFTGUESTSERV. 300SQFT STAFF / USHER ETC 880SQFT J.L. MAIN LOBBY 2500 SQFT REST ROOMS 750SQFT HOOPSHIGHSTORAGE 900SQFT SHOP 200 SQFT TRAINING 570SQFT LAUNDRY 150 SQFT GREEN RM. 480SQFT HOOPSDEVILLE J. LABEROTHEATRE SHAREDPROGRAM VERTICALCIRCULATION HOOPS DE VILLE J. LABERO THEATRE SHARED PROGRAM VERTICAL CIRCULATION HOOPS DE VILLE J. LABERO THEATRE SHARED PROGRAM VERTICAL CIRCULATION sample diagram Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal PUBLIC PARKING, ENTRY COURTYARD STAFF PARKING PUBLIC LOBBY Lobby Public Toilets OFFICES 1 Private Offices 2-/3-person shared work spaces Volunteer Room OFFICES 2 Squad Room Staff Room w Pantry Staff Restrooms w. Showers & Cot MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM Multi-Purpose Room (trainings, staff meetings, etc.) FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Facilities maintenance shop area (excluding storage) MEDICAL EXAM Veterinary Medical Exam MEDICAL SUITE Veterinary Treatment Area Xray MEDICAL ISOLATION Dog Medical Isolation Cat Medical Isolation Feral/Fractious Cat Holding Cat Temperment Testing KENNELS & CAGES Dog Kennels Cat Ward Dog Exercise Areas Dog Temperment Testing Rabbits Pet Bird Holding Small Mammal Holding Exotics Holding Euth. Room Chillroom/ Freezer QUARANTINE AREA Kennels & Cages STAFF ANIMAL INTAKE Animal Intake Animal Transfer Area, Fenced Animal Holding ANIMAL CONTROL VEHICLE AREA Aco Locker Area Animal Control Vehicle Parking (Covered) Vehicle Wash Trap Storage ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR PROGRAM Trash Enclosure Emergency Generator Mechanical Room / Bldg Transformer Pad & Switch Barn Barnyard SPAY/NEUTER CLINIC Lobby/Reception/Clerical work area Pre-surgery examination room Surgery prep & surgery recovery room Surgical suite Equipment sterilization Laundry PUBLIC RECEIVING Client lobby Counter & work area (1 counter, 5 positions) Initial surrender kennels (dogs) Initial surrender exam room (cats & other) Get Acquainted’ rooms Counseling area Animal Holding Owner present euthanasia room FOOD PREP LAUNDRY FOOD STORAGE EUTHANASIA GENERAL LOADING EUTHANASIA LOADING TEMP. WILDLIFE RECEIVING GROOMING direct access required FARMED ANIMAL HOLDING FOOD PREP sample program diagram Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 7 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES’ ARE BROKEN INTO THREE PHASES. THOSE ARE SCHEMATIC DESIGN; DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE Once the program is approved by the Client and the City, we establish a cost model based on it and the project construction budget. We do this working closely with a cost estimator (or construction manager or contractor where applicable) and review it with the City Project Manager. Our wealth of experience in the design of animal care facilities will guide the team greatly in compiling a realistic and successful cost model. Based on the approved concept plan, RA-DA shall develop an approach to the design that coincides with our cost model and the program. We shall develop a design approach to the project that reflects the aspirational goals discovered in the programming phase. Good design is more than just a functional solution to the users’ needs but should also be an expression of the aspirations of the facility. We use this to guide our decisions as we continue to develop the scheme. Much of our work early in this phase is in three-dimensional modeling so that we can clearly communicate the design and approach as it is being developed. If the Client wants to pursue LEED Sustainability goals, our LEED Consultant will develop a LEED checklist that achieves the goals delineated in the Program. We work closely with our engineers and consultants to study and establish an approach to the systems and infrastructure for the project. We will begin to assemble loose materials and color palettes for key components of the design that coincide with our conceptual design approach to the Project. Kennel design is often one of the key factors in this facility type and as such we address this early on. We will work with Shelter Planners of America and with manufacturers to compile a custom catalogue of appropriate solutions for this part of the project. We shall arrange site visits when necessary to review difference kennel designs. An Interim Design Review meeting with the City Project Manager, Construction Management team and User group will allow us to present the design approach and the options for systems, colors and materials for the project. We will solicit feedback from the group and incorporate comments into the scheme. This is often completed in a series of meetings so that updates can be reviewed as we develop the scheme. RA-DA shall complete a schematic design package that will be distributed to the Client group and shall be reviewed by the Construction Manager, the cost estimator, and serve as an internal check set for quality control purposes. Results from the cost estimate shall guide us in any value engineering efforts at this stage. A final design review meeting shall be conducted with the Client group once they have had an opportunity to review the documents. The design of the project and any possible Value engineering will be discussed in detail in this meeting. Our 3D model will be updated and allow us to guide the Client through the building in real-time, allowing them to better understand the spaces. Any changes can be tested immediately in this meeting. Sample SD Deliverables: Architectural Drawings (schematic level) 3-D Concept model of the building Preliminary approach to Color and Materials Outline Specifications MEP Assessment Report Structural Report Civil Report Cost Estimate Updated Program Updated Cost Model Updated Schedule LEED Follow up Basis of Design Report And other items as required per the County) Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 8 From Pet Resource Center, Bentonville Arkansas: Early concept ideation imagery. From South Los Angeles Animal Care Center: A room by room virtual tour of the facility allows the client to review casework, doors, windows, equipment, cages etc. in each space with ease. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE Once the Client has approved the Schematic Design, the Project moves into Design Development. The design and all of its systems will be developed during this phase and critical architectural and technical issues will be identified and resolved so that the Project becomes more buildable. The design team will also schedule meetings with all the pertinent reviewing agencies and the Fire Department to check the design’s conformance to code with a goal of catching any issues early on. RA-DA will compile complete color and materials palettes for the project at this stage and generate a series of renderings that describe key design moments in the project. We will compile the final kennel and equipment solutions into a catalogue for review and also select key lighting fixtures that impact the design and budget. We consider sustainability attributes and review and update the LEED checklist as necessary, making sure we are still on track for achieving the requires points. RA-DA will work closely with our engineers and consultants to design systems and a lighting and HVAC scheme for the project. We shall develop the site design and define the approach to the landscaping. As a team, we shall assemble these designs into a coherent presentation to communicate clearly the design ideas, decisions and options to the client. It is important that the design is clearly communicated to the City Project Manager and the User Group so that we can reach a consensus at this stage and avoid impactful changes later on in the project. We have found that our skill in generating photo-realistic 3-dimensional models of the space have proved invaluable in this effort. Design review ‘workshops’ will be held at 50% and at 100% DD. We see these meetings as collaborative and interactive efforts where we work closely with the client to understand and incorporate their goals. Each of these interim milestones will also serve as an opportunity for the A/E team to conduct an internal check of the drawings and to coordinate the disciplines. In addition to this, the Construction Management Team will perform a QA/QC review of the set will be conducted at approximately 90% DD. This review will be primarily for ‘buildability’ and to check coordination of the set. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 9 At 90% we shall also have the cost estimator conduct Under the CM) a review of the drawings and update the SD estimate. This will lead our efforts in value engineering any aspect of the project if needed. The Client group shall also be given the package at this stage to allow them to review the set prior to the final DD Workshop at 100%. Sample DD Deliverables: Architectural Drawings (Design Development level) 3-D model of building and site Viewpoint sketch renderings of key areas Color and Materials Palette Specifications Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Drawings (Design Development level) Structural Drawings Civil drawings Landscape planting selections and overall approach Cost Estimate Third party QA/QC report Updated Program Updated Cost Model Updated Schedule LEED follow up Basis of Design Report And other items as required per the County) CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE Upon receipt of the Client’s approval to proceed, work will move into Construction Documents Phase and the Project will be prepared in detail in the drawings and specifications for Permitting, Bid and Construction. Additional visits to jurisdictional agencies will be made by RA-DA and our team of consultants and engineers as necessary to resolve any outstanding code issues. The A/E team shall continue to develop the drawings to describe all aspects of the project in detail. We shall finalize the selection of finishes, fixtures and equipment and obtain approval from the Client on all these parts of the project. We shall use interim design review meetings at 50% and 90% to make sure the Client Group is fully aware of all aspects of the project and give the stakeholder an opportunity to affect the design and make decisions along the way. Two internal QA/QC Reviews and two external Construction Manager reviews both at 50% and 90% will be conducted in this phase. We will cross- check our documents and make sure all disciplines are coordinated. All comments from these will be incorporated into the documents. There will be a cost review at 50% and again at 90% document completion, giving us time to adjust aspects of the project if needed. The results of these estimates will be reviewed with the Client and followed by a value engineering effort if necessary. Sample CD Deliverables: Complete Architectural Drawings 3-D model of building Sketch renderings of key areas Final Color and Materials Palette (mounted boards) Complete Specifications Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Drawings and Specs Structural Drawings Civil Drawings Landscape and Irrigation drawings Cost Estimate Third party QA/QC report Updated Program Room by room 3-D sketches indicating finishes, lighting and casework. Schedules of all furniture and equipment as necessary. LEED follow up Basis of Design Report And other items as required per the County) Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 10 PERMITTING Our ‘Plan Check Set’ is formatted and structured with the plan checker’s ease in mind. Since we have completed many of these types of projects, in a variety of different Cities and States, we understand the best way to present the design to the governing agencies and are able complete this process expeditiously. Our early meetings with jurisdictional agencies will have helped prepare us for this. With the Client’s approval, the project will be submitted for Plan Check and the RA-DA Team shall stay involved with the agencies, attending meetings and making changes to the drawings as necessary. The team shepherds the sets through all clearances and will work with the agencies and the City to make sure all issues and paperwork are addressed and completed in a timely fashion. If we need to expedite the design and permitting schedule, we can also submit the drawings to the City at 80% completion. We structure this in such a manner that keeps the drawings easy to review by the plan checker. We avoid making changes to submitted sheets unless required by the plan checker and limit the remainder of our work to adding sheets showing detail or schedules that are not relevant to the plan checker. All plan check comments for all disciplines are incorporated into the set of drawings and clouded for clarity. Finally, all changes are coordinated between the disciplines so that the final ‘Bid Set’ is well coordinated and accurate. BID & CONSTRUCTION Having worked on many different kinds of project delivery methods, this is by far the best outcome. GCCM offers more cost and schedule certainty than traditional design-bid-build, and it fosters collaboration between the architect, client, and builder from the start. It’s especially useful for complex or time-sensitive projects, like an animal shelter that must balance specialized functions, durability, and tight budgets. With the Client’s approval, the project will be issued for Bid. The A/E team will support this effort by responding to RFI’s and distributing Addenda as needed. We shall assist the Client in resolving Bid issues as needed. All Addenda and RFI answers shall be incorporated into the set of drawings and specifications and a Construction Set’ shall be issued. The RA-DA A/E team shall provide full construction administration services including regular site visits, responding to RFI’s, reviewing Shop Drawings, resolving construction issues, reviewing Change Orders if requested and apprehending any potential design or construction conflicts before they occur. Our Construction Administration team always includes the designers that have been on the project since the beginning so that the design intent is followed through upon. We find that this is the best and most efficient way to make sure the outcome is a successful one. We are thorough in our review of the work, providing regular field reports and anticipating any aspects of the project that need extra attention or may be more complex than usual. From the beginning of the Construction Process we identify and discuss long lead time items with the CM group. We work with the CM to make sure the have access to the materials we have specified. We have strong relationships with our representatives for key materials and leverage those to make sure we are getting the pricing and the products that we specified. At substantial completion we will ‘punch list ‘ the project and follow up to make sure all identified items have been addressed fully. At the conclusion of construction, the team shall complete the Record Drawings, assist in Commissioning efforts and conduct the LEED certification process if necessary. POST-OCCUPANCY ADMINISTRATION Once the Client group moves into the facility, the RA- DA team will be available for any issues that might arise or changes or additions that need to be made. We always like to stay involved after completion as issues and changes might affect the design and it is in our interest for this to be a successful building both in product and in experience. Ongoing Support: Over the course of the warranty year, if problems arise—like a door that won’t close properly or a system that isn’t performing as expected—you can reach out to us. We’ll help assess whether it’s a warranty item and coordinate communication with the Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 11 contractor as needed. Documentation: We’ll help document issues and track their resolution to ensure there’s a clear record. 11-Month Review: Before the warranty expires, typically around month 11, we’ll schedule another walkthrough to identify any final concerns. This gives the contractor time to address them before their responsibility ends. While we don’t perform repairs ourselves or enforce the contractor’s obligations, we act as your advocate— helping you interpret what’s covered, navigate the process, and ensure your building is performing as intended. Schedule Administration RA-DA has an impeccable reputation in delivering projects on time. For our Longbeach Animal Emergency Clinic we achieved an almost impossible timeline set by the client, completing design, documentation and permit procurement in less than two months. The resulting facility was successfully built within the budget and on time. Also our work with municipalities has to rigorously adhere to schedule and is always managed to do so using the tools and methods we describe in this section. For our Houghton Park Community Center for the City of Long Beach, we had an abbreviated design phase that was tied to an election cycle and we managed to design a great building for them in the space of three months. We have always taken this seriously and performed to exceed expections. Good planning and rigorous adherence to schedule ensures that we meet the stated project timeline. We start with a realistic project schedule that we review in the kick off meeting with the team. Internal deadlines are set and adhered to by all team members. This schedule is updated throughout the phases of the project so that is is always reflecting any additional meetings or events that take place. We will mitigate any unforeseen issues by planning early meetings with jurisdictional agencies, and performing due diligence on utilities, and the site prior to the start of construction. We will continue to work through the construction phase of the project with the contractor to anticipate any potential issues or conflicts in an effort to avert unforeseen issues that may impact the project timeline. We are savvy on product lead times during the design phase and systematically include this information in our documents so that the contractor is aware of their impact on the critical path and can schedule accordingly. We believe in partnering with the Contractor to achieve the goals of the client, and have a history of working well with contractors. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 1 Notice to Proceed 0 days Tue 10/7/25 Tue 10/7/25 2 AE Team Predesign, Site Visit, Utilites, Jurisdictions etc 2 wks Tue 10/7/25 Mon 10/20/25 3 (Preliminary Estimate of possible LEED points)5 days Tue 10/14/25 Mon 10/20/25 4 Project Kick-Off and introductory meeting 0 days Wed 10/22/25 Wed 10/22/25 5 Programming & Site Analysis / Three Concepts 4 wks Wed 10/22/25 Tue 11/18/25 6 Programming Review & Site Workshop with user group 0 days Wed 11/5/25 Wed 11/5/25 7 Site & Concept - Client review meeting 0 days Thu 11/20/25 Thu 11/20/25 8 Cost review of Program / Concept 5 days Thu 11/20/25 Wed 11/26/25 9 Preliminary meeting with jurisdictional agencies 5 days Thu 11/20/25 Wed 11/26/25 10 Start Process for any CUP or Variances if req'd 8 mons Thu 11/27/25 Wed 7/8/26 11 12 BUILDING DESIGN 85 days Thu 11/20/25 Wed 3/18/26 13 Schematic Design Phase 39 days Thu 11/20/25 Tue 1/13/26 14 SD - Prepare Schem. Layout (include comments)1 wk Thu 11/20/25 Wed 11/26/25 15 SD - Architectural schem. design 4 wks Thu 11/27/25 Wed 12/24/25 16 Structural SD development 15 days Wed 12/3/25 Tue 12/23/25 17 Civil SD development 15 days Wed 12/3/25 Tue 12/23/25 18 MEP systems review and summary 15 days Wed 12/3/25 Tue 12/23/25 19 Outline Specifications, Acoustics & LEED 10 days Wed 12/10/25 Tue 12/23/25 20 Internal decision and coordination meetings 3 days Thu 11/27/25 Thu 12/18/25 21 Interim Design Review meeting w County / User Group 0 days Tue 12/9/25 Tue 12/9/25 22 Cost Analysis 10 days Wed 12/24/25 Tue 1/6/26 23 Value Review & Engineering if Req'd 5 days Wed 1/7/26 Tue 1/13/26 24 AE team QA / QC / LEED Compliance Review 5 days Thu 12/25/25 Wed 12/31/25 25 Submit Schem. Design Package 0 days Thu 1/1/26 Thu 1/1/26 26 County / User Group Review 5 days Thu 1/1/26 Wed 1/7/26 27 County / User Group Design Presentations 0 days Thu 1/8/26 Thu 1/8/26 28 29 Design Development Phase 50 days Thu 1/8/26 Wed 3/18/26 30 DD - Prepare DD layout (include comments)1 wk Thu 1/8/26 Wed 1/14/26 31 DD - Architectural Design Development 6 wks Thu 1/15/26 Wed 2/25/26 32 Structural Design Development 15 days Wed 1/28/26 Tue 2/17/26 33 Civil Design Development 15 days Wed 1/28/26 Tue 2/17/26 34 MEP Design Development 15 days Wed 1/28/26 Tue 2/17/26 35 Landscape Design 10 days Wed 2/4/26 Tue 2/17/26 36 Specifications Development, Acoustics & LEED 10 days Wed 2/4/26 Tue 2/17/26 37 Internal decision or coordination meetings 3 days Tue 1/27/26 Tue 2/17/26 38 Interim Design Review Meeting w County / User Group 0 days Wed 2/11/26 Wed 2/11/26 39 Cost Review 2 wks Thu 2/26/26 Wed 3/11/26 40 Value Engineering if req'd 1 wk Thu 3/12/26 Wed 3/18/26 41 External Constructability Review 2 wks Thu 2/26/26 Wed 3/11/26 42 AE team QA / QC / LEED Compliance Review 2 wks Thu 2/26/26 Wed 3/11/26 43 Submit Design Development Package 0 days Thu 3/5/26 Thu 3/5/26 44 County / User Group Review 5 days Thu 3/5/26 Wed 3/11/26 45 County / User Group Design Presentation 0 days Thu 3/12/26 Thu 3/12/26 46 47 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 60 days Thu 3/12/26 Wed 6/3/26 48 Constr. Documents Phase 60 days Thu 3/12/26 Wed 6/3/26 49 CD - Architectural Construction Documents 9 wks Thu 3/12/26 Wed 5/13/26 50 Structural Cosntruction Documents 35 days Tue 3/24/26 Mon 5/11/26 51 Civil Construction Documents 35 days Tue 3/24/26 Mon 5/11/26 52 Mech. Electrical Plumbing 35 days Tue 3/24/26 Mon 5/11/26 53 Specifications Completed, & LEED 30 days Tue 3/31/26 Mon 5/11/26 54 Landscape Design 30 days Tue 3/31/26 Mon 5/11/26 55 Internal decision or coordination meetings 4 days Tue 3/24/26 Tue 5/5/26 56 County / User Group Review 3 days Fri 3/27/26 Tue 3/31/26 57 County / User Group Design Presentation (at 30%)0 days Wed 4/1/26 Wed 4/1/26 58 External Constructability Review (50%)5 days Wed 4/1/26 Tue 4/7/26 59 AE team QA / QC / LEED Compliance Review (at 50%)5 days Wed 4/1/26 Tue 4/7/26 60 Cost Analysis 10 days Wed 4/1/26 Tue 4/14/26 61 Value Engineering if req'd + meeting 5 days Wed 4/15/26 Tue 4/21/26 62 County / User Group Review 3 days Thu 4/23/26 Mon 4/27/26 63 County / User Group Design Presentation (60%)0 days Tue 4/28/26 Tue 4/28/26 64 Submit CD package for QA/QC 0 days Wed 5/13/26 Wed 5/13/26 65 External Constructability Review 5 days Thu 5/14/26 Wed 5/20/26 66 A/E team final QA/QC updates to documents 5 days Thu 5/21/26 Wed 5/27/26 67 Submit CD package (90%)0 days Thu 5/28/26 Thu 5/28/26 68 County / User Group Review 5 days Thu 5/28/26 Wed 6/3/26 69 County / User Group Design Presentation 0 days Wed 6/3/26 Wed 6/3/26 70 Cost review 5 days Thu 5/14/26 Wed 5/20/26 71 Value Engineering if req'd 5 days Thu 5/21/26 Wed 5/27/26 72 Team to complete LEED Design Credit Documentation 10 days Thu 5/14/26 Wed 5/27/26 73 Submit LEED Design Credits to USGBC 0 days Thu 5/28/26 Thu 5/28/26 74 Early agency submittal if requested 0 days Thu 5/14/26 Thu 5/14/26 75 Agency Plan Review Submittal 0 days Wed 6/3/26 Wed 6/3/26 76 77 AGENCY REVIEW 60 days Thu 6/4/26 Wed 8/26/26 78 Overall Plan Review Process 12 wks Thu 6/4/26 Wed 8/26/26 79 Final Bid Documents preparation 2 wks Wed 8/12/26 Tue 8/25/26 80 Permit 0 days Wed 8/26/26 Wed 8/26/26 81 82 BID AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE START 0 days Wed 8/26/26 Wed 8/26/26 10/7 10/22 11/5 11/20 12/9 1/1 1/8 2/11 3/5 3/12 4/1 4/28 5/13 5/28 6/3 5/28 5/14 6/3 8/26 8/26 27 2 7 12 17 22 27 1 6 11 16 21 26 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 5 10 15 20 25 30 4 9 14 19 24 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 4 9 14 19 24 29 4 9 14 19 24 29 3 8 13 18 2328October2025November2025December2025January2026February2026March2026April2026May2026June2026July2026August2026 Se Task Split Milestone Summary Project Summary External Tasks External Milestone Inactive Milestone Inactive Summary Manual Task Duration-only Manual Summary Rollup Manual Summary Start-only Finish-only External Tasks External Milestone Progress Deadline Page 1 Project:HARNETT COUNTY ADOPTIO Date: Wed 9/17/25 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA2METHODOLOGY 13 Capacity and capability of the firm to perform the work in question including specialized services, within the time limitations fixed for the completion of the project. PROJECT ARCHITECT Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA RA-DA CORE TEAM: PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE Rania Alomar, AIA PROJECT MANAGER / DESIGNER Michael Green, WELL AP SENIOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER Luisana Hernandez DESIGNERS Delara Rahim Hayley Kleeman Aida Shirazi CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ENGINEERING AND CONSULTANT TEAM MEP ENGINEER PRIGM ENGINEERING Jason Mowrey Fayetteville, AR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC Alex Font Lowell, AR SPECIFICATIONS KM Architectural Consulting Kathryn Marek Boise, ID COST ESTIMATING Jacobus & Yuang, Inc Cobus Malan Camarillo, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / CIVIL ENGINEER SURVEY DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INC Jay Young Fayetteville, AR FIRE / LIFE SAFETY / LOW VOLTAGE WSP, Inc Rick Bryzacs Irvine, CA ANIMAL SERVICES CONSULTANT Shelter Planners of America Arlington, TX LOCAL POINT OF CONTACT ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. Alex Font, P.E. Lowell, AR SPECIALTY CONSULTANT SHELTER PLANNERS OF AMERICA Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 14 FIRM BACKGROUND Animal Care Facilities are one of our main areas of expertise. We have completed this project type with great success and continue to do this kind of work for both the private and public sector working with some of the leading animal care groups and non-profits in the country. We have the knowledge base and take this kind of project seriously, assign our top team to it, and strive for design excellence. Our goal is to not only deliver a project that works but one that excels and actually offers you and your staff a facility that can achieve the results that you are seeking and at the same time simplify maintenance and staffing. RA-DA has designed Animal Centers in California, Utah, Arkansas, New York and Texas. Along with animal facilities RA-DA specializes in Community Centers. It is our strong belief that animal adoption and care facilities are first and foremost a type of community center, and we approach the design in this manner. The overarching goal of an adoption center is to engage with the community it serves. Our experience designing the Bentonville Pet Resource Center affirmed this belief. With large areas for people to congregate and interact with the animals we are able to boost adoption rates. Large play rooms for cats allow people to both enter and interact and provide stimulation and well being for the animals. Providing large conference and gathering areas also allows the public to hold events in the space and bring people together in a space they may have not typically visited in the traditional sheltering model. Adding a cafe allows people to linger a bit longer and spend time with the animals. Another of our areas of expertise is being an On-Call Architect for many local Municipalities. Currently we are On-Call with the City of Long Beach, The City of Placentia, Los Angeles County Development commission, and LA County Beaches and Harbors. Through this work we have learned how to successfully work with many different City, County, and State agencies to navigate the complexities of the permitting process. Including such agencies as the California Coastal Commission. We are also very well versed in Title 24 and keep abreast of any changes to ADA, Fire and related codes. Along with our animal and municipal work RA-DA does many large scale tenant improvements for Private Office Clients. This keeps us well informed on needed staffing adjacencies, conference areas, private offices, kitchens, furniture, and technology. All things that tie directly to the needs of an Animal Facility. LOCAL PRESENCE Through RA-DA’s experience we have found it is imperative to maintain a local presence for all of our projects. For this project we have brought together a team of local engineers who are well versed working as a team. Engineering Consultants, Inc. from Lowell, Arkansas will be fulfilling the role of not only the structural engineering but also our local point of contact. They will be available for any immediate needs and also attend the weekly site meetings during construction. RA-DA typically visits the site either twice monthly or monthly, depending upon the phase of the construction. Prigm Engineering from Fayetteville will be our mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineer. And Development Consultants, Inc. from Fayetteville will be our civil engineer, landscape architect, and surveyor. All engineers will be available for site meetings and reviews as needed. Below you will find a brief firm overview for each local engineering firm. PUBLIC FACE AND PUBLIC ACCESS In our goal to heighten awareness and engage the community, we feel it is important to design a facility that has a welcoming entry and facade. Opportunities for public events, such as adoption day or educational seminars or training day, should be easy to implement in public areas that are accessible without necessarily entering the facility. In our Project Experience section you will find a wealth of animal facility projects and accompanying narratives for each. Through our history we have found ourselves on the cutting edge of facility design for the care and adoption of animals. Through our municipal work we realized that the old way of setting up a shelter had become outdated, so we broke from this notion and realized that we needed to combine animal facilities with Community Centers to more fully engage the public and draw them in. This not only helps save animals but ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTERS - A DISCUSSION ON THE BUILDING TYPE A description of the Proposer’s experience in providing the same or similar services as outlined in the RFQ. This description should include the names of the person(s) who will provide the services, their qualifications, and the years of experience in performing this type of work. Also, include the reference information requested in this RFQ. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 15 makes the public more engaged in the facilities goals. For our New York Center one simple thing was to add signage that guides the visitor, teaching them about the goals of that facility, how it works, and better personalized representation of the animals. At our Bentonville Pet Resource Center we designed community rooms for training, outreach, and many general fun ideas for public engagement. Also, with this being located at a central location within a new public park thousands more people will see and interact with the Facility, as opposed to being located in an industrial zone that does not lend to a welcoming feeling. REPOSITIONING THE SHELTER IN OUR CULTURE TODAY. There has been an overarching goal in America and throughout the first world to reduce or eliminate the euthanasia of animals kept in shelters. There are three key tenets to achieving this goal when considering the design of a new facility: 1. Create a safe, healthy and welcoming environment that encourages the adoption of animals. The goal here is to encourage adoptions. In order to do this, it is critical that the experience of the visitor and of the animal is a positive one. Healthy, happy animals are a large factor in the environment of the shelter. Shelters need to transition from fringe facilities to popular centers so that the community connects to them more easily and adopts shelter pets rather than purchasing from breeders etc. The building design and its location and attitude are a large part of this. 2. Educate the public. In many shelters, the percentage of animals housed that have relinquished by their owner is surprisingly high. Factors such as economy or temperament contribute to this but could be mitigated with community programs that offer help and education in aspects such as behavioral training. Also an educational program works to connect the facility to the community, making it potentially a center for school visits or tours. This works again to reinforce the first goal. 3. Spay and Neuter Animals. Spaying and Neutering animals is a widely accepted method and practical solution to controlling pet overpopulation. Shelters serving lower income residents have a higher percentage of shelter impounds, largely due to their limited access to affordable spay and neuter services. Providing this as an affordable service to the community will go a long way to reduce the population of unwanted pets and hence the rates of euthanasia. In addition to and under these three primary tenets to the design of a successful facility are a series of more specific goals: Design a building that meets your functional needs, facilitating the procedures you employ to house healthy animals and adoptions. Make sure the shelter has adequate capacity for the holding animals, as this is inextricably linked to the well-being and health of the animals. Create a positive environment that reduces stress levels for the animals and the visitors and the staff. Create a welcoming environment for the public that encourages and supports all shelter amenities. Provide adequate animal support areas to insure proper care of animals and support for the facility’s programs. Provide adequate staff support areas to ease the stress of caring for the animals and to recruit and retain good staff. Control Disease and prevent disease transfer. STAFFING In our resume and project team section you will find we have accounted for the staff we typically use for a project of this type. RA-DA would also have additional consultants working under our umbrella who are key to fulfilling your project scope as described in your request for qualifications Scope of Services. As the founder of RA-DA, and your primary liaison throughout the course of the contract, I take personal interest and would have direct oversight for the duration of all the associated work. I strongly believe that our acumen for working with complex client groups and previous experience working with animal care services personnel make us a perfect candidate for the role of architect described in this RFQ. If awarded a contract with you we would maintain a high level of client service and quality product with the goal of a long and continued relationship. We have a proven track record in delivering complex project on time and on budget and in achieving consensus amongst client groups as you will hear from our references. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 16 BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY - PET RESOURCE CENTER Location: Bentonville, Arkansas NEW CONSTRUCTION Size: 24,500 SF interior, 24,000SF exterior yards, parking etc) Construction Budget $12M Completion Date: Spring 2024 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez SCOPE: RA-DA provided full A/E services including: Concept Design Programming Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting Construction Administration BEST FRIENDS PET ADOPTION CENTER Location: New York, New York INTERIOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT Size: 5,000 SF Construction Budget $2M Second Renovation: April 2025, Currently in construction documents phase. Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez Hayley Kleeman SCOPE: RA-DA provided full A/E services including: Programming & Concept Design Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting Construction Administration Selection of relevant project briefly presented below - See APPENDIX for more complete information on each. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 17 Location: Los Angeles, California TENANT IMPROVEMENT & NEW CONSTRUCTION Size: 11,200 SF Construction Cost: $15M (4 phases of build-out and additions) Completion Date: Spring 2025 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez Hayley Kleeman SCOPE: RA-DA provided full A/E services including: Concept Design Programming Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting (& Special Permit, CUP) Construction Administration NKLA formerly WEST SIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER Location: Porterville, California EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION Size: 9800 SF of Building Improvements / 3100 SF Dog Park / 40,700 SF of Site Improvements Construction Cost: $7M Completion Date: Fall 2023. Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez SCOPE: RA-DA is providing full A/E services including: Concept Design Programming Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting Construction Administration Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 18 SOUTH LOS ANGELES ANIMAL CARE CENTER II - LEED SILVER Location: Los Angeles, California Size: Indoor Facility Size - 23,000 SF / Outdoor Kennel Area - 40,000 SF / Kennels - 270 Construction Cost: $12M Completion Date: Fall 2010 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar SCOPE: RA-DA is providing full A/E services including: Concept Design Programming Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting (& Special Permit, CUP) Construction Administration N 1:600 DOUBLE KENNEL DOGPARK REST- ROOM REST- ROOM REST- ROOM REST- ROOM VENTURA COUNTY VCAS MASTER PLAN Location: Camarillo, California Size: 5 acres Project Estimated Cost: $28M Completion Date: August 2017 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar SCOPE: Discovery and Needs Assessment Programming / Identify Goals Concept Design & Analysis Master plan Phasing Study Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 19 BEST FRIENDS HOUSTON LIFE SAVING CENTER Location: Houston, Texas Size: 23,200 SF Construction Budget: $15M Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez SCOPE: Programming Concept Schematic Design Project postponed in 2020 due to Covid 19. BEST FRIENDS NEW YORK SHELTER AND TRANSPORT FACILITY Location: Woodbury, New York INTERIOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT Size: 14,000sf Construction Cost: $8M Completion Date: 2026 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Aida Shirazi Hayley Kleeman SCOPE: RA-DA is providing full A/E services including: Site selection Programming & Concept Design Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting Construction Administration Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 20 For individual resumes for the entire team, including consultants, please refer to the Appendices at the end of this document. DESIGN PRINCIPAL Rania Alomar is designated as the Overall Project Executive for the Project. She holds ultimate responsibility on all aspects of the project design and will be dedicated to this project from early phases all the way through to construction. She will oversee the progress, performance and schedule of the project. SELECTED ANIMAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE BENTONVILLE PET RESOURCE CENTER - New Building HOUSTON LIFE SAVING CENTER - Adaptive Reuse BEST FRIENDS PET ADOPTION CENTER - Tenant Improvement NKLA - Adaptive Reuse, Tenant Improvement, Addition SOUTH LA ANIMAL SHELTER I & II - New Building LONG BEACH ANIMAL EMERGENCY - Tenant Improvement VENTURA VCAS - Masterplan PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER - Tenant Improvement ANIMAL WELLNESS CENTER - Tenant Improvement NY ANIMAL TRANSPORT - Tenant Improvement LOS ANGELES KITTEN RESCUE - Tenant Improvement PROJECT MANAGER / DESIGNER Michael Green joined our team in 2017 and has supported our team as Project Manager and construction administration support on several municipal, animal and private client projects. He is currently working on the New Vet Surgical Suite addition at the NKLA facility and assisting with programming phase of the new NY Animal Transport Facility. He is familiar with and has lead the team through the plan check processes of multiple municipalities. As the Project Manager he will remain available and in communication with the entire team and Client. During construction Mr Green will manage the RFIs, submittals and coordination items throughout the project. Mr Green is fluent in project management software such as Procore and is able to adapt to using any proprietary or preferred construction management platforms. SELECTED ANIMAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE BENTONVILLE PET RESOURCE CENTER - New Building NKLA - Surgical Suite & Tenant Improvement PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER - Tenant Improvement BEST FRIENDS PET ADOPTION CENTER - Tenant Improvement NY ANIMAL TRANSPORT - Tenant Improvement SENIOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER Luisana Hernandez joined our team in 2016 and has been designing and working on design and construction documents packages. Her skills in 3D modeling and rendering have served to be indispensable in design phases, helping us communicate design ideas and options to the client and also to the community as needed. SELECTED ANIMAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE BENTONVILLE PET RESOURCE CENTER - New Building BEST FRIENDS HOUSTON - Adaptive reuse of existing structure PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER - Tenant Improvement Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 21 LOCAL FIRMS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER / LOCAL POINT OF CONTACT ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. We are a corporation providing complete structural engineering design services to our clients, which include architects, contractors, owners and other engineers. We have been in practice as a professional service corporation since 1964. Over the years we have consulted on many city municipal projects. Our major field of expertise is structural engineering. We continually design with all of the major structural materials, which include steel, reinforced concrete, wood - both solid and laminated, and masonry. We are experienced in both conventional and “Fast- Track” methods of construction. We pride ourselves in furnishing efficient engineering design and neat, accurate construction documents which are completed within our client’s time requirements. CURRENT WORKLOAD Engineering Consultants, Inc. maintains a steady workload. Our team will work with you to determine a successful working schedule, and we will meet team agreed deadlines. We continue to stay updated concerning the evolution of electronic analysis and drafting tools. Our combination of common-sense design and computer analysis allows us to efficiently analyze our structures. We also continue to upgrade our Computer-Aided-Drafting (CAD) and BIM (Building Information Modeling) as improved software becomes available so that Engineering Consultants, Inc. can best serve our clients. Our firm of experienced engineering design and production talent is available to our clients for their structural engineering design requirements for both new construction and renovations. CIVIL ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / SURVEY DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. Development Consultants, Inc. is a multi-disciplinary fi rm providing professional services for civil engineering, land surveying, land planning, and landscape architecture. We are headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, with a second office located in Fayetteville, Arkansas, and have been in business for over 36 years. All disciplines are staff ed with registered professionals. The fi rm presently has a staff of four engineers, four landscape architects, one registered surveyors, one survey technician, two engineering technicians, four survey crew members, and one administrative/office manager. Our emphasis on every project is to combine design excellence with cost eff ective solutions. We are accomplished at working as project team members, in collaboration with private developers, architects, institutions, realtors, public offi cials and other engineers. We produce design solutions that are specifi cally oriented to client needs and the opportunities presented by each site. DCI specializes solely in land development consulting services. Our projects have ranged from half an acre to over 100 acres in size. We place a great emphasis on detail in our design and construction documents. Our work experience includes commercial, office, universities, institutional, roadway, infrastructure, and multi-family development projects. We have several clients that have been working with us since the start of our company. CURRENT WORKLOAD The workload at DCI continues to be steady. Our firms have experienced/licensed design personnel to help ensure that we have the capacity to meet the needs of this project. We are committed to taking on the workload and determined to exceed your expectations. ANIMAL SHELTER EXPERIENCE Lester C Howick Shelter in Washington County, Arkansas, is a prime example of collaboration between Architect, civil engineering and landscape architect. The Architect team focused on creating a sustainable, durable structure that could support the shelter’s long-term functionality while ensuring a safe, comfortable environment for both animals and staff. At DCI, the civil engineering team focused on durable site features, efficient storm drainage, and a layout optimized for operations such as intake, animal care, and public services. While our landscape architects designed green spaces that provide both aesthetic value and practical benefits, such as outdoor enclosures for the animals and landscaped areas to reduce noise, improve air quality, and enhance the Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA3EXPERIENCE 22 overall atmosphere. The integration of this team results in a shelter that not only meets its immediate functional needs but also prioritizes the well-being of animals and visitors in the long term. MEP ENGINEER PRIGM ENGINEERING Prigm Engineering, PLLC was founded in 2019 by three Professional Engineers who wanted to make a difference in the consulting engineering industry and the local community. After many years in the industry, they realized the vision of many firms did not align with their personal philosophies. They noticed a common theme present in the industry: minimize the quality and amount of time spent on services provided in order to maximize profits. While this may provide short-term financial benefits to the firm, it tends to create a negative environment for employees, which in turn negatively impacts their projects and ultimately, their clients. Prigm Engineering (pronounced “Prime”) was created out of a sincere passion to combat this paradigm. In fact, the name “Prigm” is a combination of the words prime” and “paradigm”. Prigm’s goal is to provide exceptional service and an exceptional product while also fostering an enjoyable, cohesive workplace environment. This philosophy benefits our clients as well as the local community. At Prigm, we are passionate about helping organizations achieve an efficient, comprehensive, and resourceful understanding of their physical assets. Through experience, we have achieved expertise in both the management and execution of higher education, multi-family, commercial, civic, municipal, healthcare, retail, hospitality, correctional, military, and institutional projects. We know the specialized workings involved with these types of projects, know how to engage stakeholders and know how to actively listen to truly understand the client’s needs. Our team has valuable insights that positively impact each of our ventures. Prigm Engineering is led by individuals with strong backgrounds in engineering design and project management. The founding members are Jason Mowrey, John Longinotti, and Jared Watson. John and Jared have worked closely together in the engineering field for more than 17 years. Jason has been working with the team for more than 6 years. We have forged a strong alliance with a common goal of both individual and collective success. Jason Mowrey is a Mechanical Engineer and project manager with over 25 years of extensive leadership and management experience. He received a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering, an MBA with an emphasis in Entrepreneurship, and a Master of Science in Finance from the University of Arkansas. He is a registered Professional Mechanical Engineer who is actively licensed in four states. Along with his 20+ years of engineering and project management experience, Jason also has 15 years of leadership, sales, marketing, and business development experience. He has served as a team leader and project manager on many projects here in Northwest Arkansas as well as projects located throughout the country. John Longinotti is an Electrical Engineer with 17 years of experience in electrical design and project management for institutional, civic, commercial, industrial, hospitality, and residential buildings. He has an Electrical Engineering degree from the University of Arkansas and is a registered Professional Electrical Engineer who is actively licensed in 9 states. Throughout his career, John has worked on almost every type of project and in almost every state. With his wide range of project experience, John has the knowledge and ability to handle almost any engineering problem. Jared Watson is a Mechanical Engineer with 15 years of mechanical and plumbing design and project management experience. He has a Mechanical Engineering degree from the University of Arkansas and is a registered Professional Mechanical Engineer in 7 states. Much like John, Jared’s experience includes almost every type of project in locations across the U.S. Prigm has recently expanded to a total of nine engineers and senior designers (five mechanical and four electrical). This gives us added depth to handle a project of this size. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal RA-DA WORKLOAD CHART CURRENT PROJECTS SEPT 2025 OCT 2025 NOV 2025 DEC 2025 JAN 2026 FEB 2026 MAR 2026 APR 2026 MAY 2026 JUN 2026 JUL 2026 AUG 2026 SEPT 2026 FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL FACILTY CONCEPT SD PHASE DD PHASE CD PHASE PERMITTING BID CA >>> BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ANIMAL TRANSPORT FACILITY DD PHASE CD PHASE PERMITTING CA COMPLETION BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY SOHO ADOPTION CENTER CD PHASE PERMITTING CA COMPLETION HOUGHTON PARK PLAYGROUND CA COMPLETION HOUGHTON PARK PICNIC DD PHASE CD PHASE PERMITTING CA COMPLETION HAWTHORNE SENIOR CENTER CA COMPLETION HAWTHORNE CITY YARDS CA COMPLETION NKLA VET SUITE COMPLETED RA-DA STAFF RESOURCE CHART - COMMITMENT TO THIS PROJECT: RA-DA STAFF:PREDESIGN SD PHASE DD PHASE CD PHASE PERMITTING BID CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION POST OCC Rania Alomar 80% 80%50%30%20%30% Luisana Hernandez 80% 80%80%80%20%30% 50% Delara Rahim 30%70%80%20% Hayley Kleeman 30%70%80%20% Michael Green 10%30%40%80%30% 50%30% Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA4REFERENCES 24 Ventura County Animal Care Facility Ventura County Animal Services 600 Aviation Dr. Camarillo, CA 93010 Jonathan Jacobson / 805.665.0268 Jonathan.Jacobson@ventura.org Master plan Study for the existing animal facility sight located at: 600 Aviation Dr. Camarillo, CA 93010 / Please see Qualifications for a detailed description of services. 2017 Description Client Client / telephone Client email Scope / Size Year Completed Description Client Contact / telephone Client email Scope / Size Year Completed Bentonville Pet Resource Center Best Friends Animal Society 5001 Angel Canyon Rd Kanab, UT 84741 Bart Battista / 435.644.2001 bartb@bestfriends.org New construction of a 24,500 GSF, Two story animal resource center consisting of animal medical facility, animal community rooms, administrative & volunteer rooms, training yards, cat cafe, and exterior landscaping and open patios. March 2023 Description Client Contact / telephone Client email Scope / Size Year Completed NKLA The Ronald and Catherine Gershman Foundation 12300 Wilshire Blvd #310, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Ron Gershman / 310.207.6562 rong@gershmanproperties.com Tenant Improvement and second and third floor additions of an 11,200 SF warehouse located at: 1845 Pontius Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90025. Please see Qualifications for a detailed description of services. Multiple projects since 2012, current TI is in bid phase for new surgical suite. ANIMAL FACILITY REFERENCES Project specific references can also be found in our Appendix listed as the client reference in each narrative. We encourage you to reach out to all of our past clients. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA5EXCEPTIONS & REQUIREMENTS 25 RA-DA has read and understands all of the documents in relation to this RFQ. Including all addendum issued. RA-DA is licensed to practice architecture in the state of Arkansas and will obtain any required licensing set forth by the client group. Per item 13 of the RFQ: RA-DA takes no exception to the service agreement and agrees to indemnify the City and hold it harmless from and against all claims, liability, loss, damage or expense, including but not limited to counsel fees, arising from or by reason of any actual or claimed trademark, patent or copyright infringement or litigation based thereon, with respect to the services or any part thereof covered by this order, and such obligation shall survive acceptance of the services and payment thereof by the City. Per item 16 of the RFQ: RA-DA meets and exceeds the insurance requirements. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLEDBEFORETHEEXPIRATIONDATETHEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER F : INSURER E : INSURER D : INSURER C : INSURER B : INSURER A : NAIC # NAME: CONTACT A/C, No): FAX E-MAILADDRESS: PRODUCER A/C, No, Ext): PHONE INSURED REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. OTHER: Per accident) Ea accident) N / A SUBRWVDADDLINSD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICYPERIODINDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICHTHISCERTIFICATEMAYBEISSUEDORMAYPERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOSONLY NON-OWNED SCHEDULEDOWNED ANY AUTO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?( Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSbelowIfyes, describe under ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH-STATUTEPER LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXP( MM/DD/YYYY) POLICYEFFPOLICYNUMBERTYPEOFINSURANCELTRINSR DESCRIPTION OFOPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, maybeattached if more space isrequired) EXCESS LIAB UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE OCCUR CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG GENERAL AGGREGATE PERSONAL & ADV INJURY MED EXP (Any one person) EACHOCCURRENCEDAMAGETORENTED $ PREMISES (Ea occurrence) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE HOLDER The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HIREDAUTOS ONLY 3/10/2025 91724 HAWTHORNE WEST HOLLYWOOD CACOVINA 917 S VILLAGE OAKS DR STE 101 MILIK & ASSOC INS SERVICES INC Certificate@Hanover.com 855) 265-5457 (866) 828-2424 Citizens Ins Co of America 31534 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 A Y N OB3 D772669 06 02/07/2025 02/07/2026 1,000,000 A N N OB3 D772669 06 02/07/2025 02/07/2026 The City of Hawthorne, etal,its officers, and employees are an Additional Insured on the General Liability pursuant to the terms and conditions by form CG2010. Waiver of Subrogation as provided by form 391-1003 (pg 80 of 81). CA 90046 CA 90250 RANIA ALOMAR DBA RA-DA 7523 NORTON AVE 4455 WEST 126TH STREET THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE, ETAL Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 14 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design SECTION C: Signature Submittal 11.. DDIISSCCLLOOSSUURREE IINNFFOORRMMAATTIIOONN a. Proposer must disclose any possible conflict of interest with the City of Fayetteville, including, but not limited to, any relationship with any City of Fayetteville employee. Proposer response must disclose if a known relationship exists between any principal or employee of your firm and any City of Fayetteville employee or elected City of Fayetteville official. i. If, to your knowledge, no relationship exists, this should also be stated in your response. Failure to disclose such a relationship may result in cancellation of a purchase and/or contract as a result of your response. This form must be completed and returned in order for your bid/proposal to be eligible for consideration. PPLLEEAASSEE CCHHEECCKK OONNEE OOFF TTHHEE FFOOLLLLOOWWIINNGG TTWWOO OOPPTTIIOONNSS,, AASS IITT AAPPPPRROOPPRRIIAATTEELLYY AAPPPPLLIIEESS TTOO YYOOUURR FFIIRRMM:: 1) NO KNOWN RELATIONSHIP EXISTS 2) RELATIONSHIP EXISTS (Please explain): _______________________________________ b. I certify that; as an officer of this organization, or per the attached letter of authorization, am duly authorized to certify the information provided herein is accurate and true; and my organization shall comply with all State and Federal Equal Opportunity and Non-Discrimination requirements and conditions of employment. c. Proposer agrees that they shall have a current, valid registration with the Arkansas Secretary of State at time of RFQ deadline OR be able to provide proof of registration before recommendation of award to Fayetteville City Council. d. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-503, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-503. If at any time during contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. e. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-1002, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and Ammunition Industries during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-1002. If at any time during the contract the contractor decides to boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and/or Ammunition Industries, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 15 of 16 22.. PPRRIIMMAARRYY CCOONNTTAACCTT IINNFFOORRMMAATTIIOONN At the discretion of the City, one or more firms may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking of the firms, which may also include oral interviews. NNOOTTEE:: EEaacchh PPrrooppoosseerr sshhaallll ssuubbmmiitt ttoo tthhee CCiittyy aa pprriimmaarryy ccoonnttaacctt nnaammee,, ee--mmaaiill aaddddrreessss,, aanndd pphhoonnee nnuummbbeerr ((pprreeffeerraabbllyy aa cceellll pphhoonnee nnuummbbeerr)) wwhheerree tthhee CCiittyy sseelleeccttiioonn ccoommmmiitttteeee ccaann ccaallll ffoorr ccllaarriiffiiccaattiioonn oorr iinntteerrvviieeww vviiaa tteelleepphhoonnee.. Corporate Name of Firm: ___________________________________________________________________ Primary Contact: ____________________________ Title of Primary Contact: _________________________ Phone#1 (cell preferred): ____________________________Phone#2: ______________________________ E-Mail Address: __________________________________________________________________________ 33.. AACCKKNNOOWWLLEEDDGGEEMMEENNTT OOFF AADDDDEENNDDAA Acknowledge receipt of addenda for this invitation to bid, request for proposal, or request for qualification by signing and dating below. All addendums are hereby made a part of the bid or RFQ documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein. Proposers/Bidders should indicate their receipt of same in the appropriate blank listed herein. Failure to do so may subject Contractor to disqualification. AADDDDEENNDDUUMM NNOO.. SSIIGGNNAATTUURREE AANNDD PPRRIINNTTEEDD NNAAMMEE DDAATTEE AACCKKNNOOWWLLEEDDGGEEDD 44.. DDEEBBAARRMMEENNTT CCEERRTTIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN: b. As an interested party on this project, you are required to provide debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order. Certification can be done by completing and signing this form. c. Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 “Debarment and Suspension“ requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub-recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. d. Signature certifies that neither you nor your principal is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Rania Alomar Principal 323.851.4040 rania@ra-da.com Rania Alomar Rania Alomar 08/29/2025 09/08/2025 1 2 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 16 of 16 55.. SSIIGGNNAATTUURREE SSUUBBMMIITTTTAALL NAME OF COMPANY: _____________________________________________________________________ PHYSICAL ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________________________ MAILING ADDRESS: _______________________________________________________________________ TAX ID #: __________________________ AR. SECRETARY OF STATE FILING #: ________________________ PHONE: _________________________________________ FAX: ___________________________________ E-MAIL: ________________________________________________________________________________ BByy ssuubbmmiittttiinngg yyoouurr rreessppoonnssee,, yyoouu cceerrttiiffyy tthhaatt yyoouu aarree aauutthhoorriizzeedd ttoo rreepprreesseenntt aanndd bbiinndd yyoouurr ccoommppaannyy :: SIGNATURE: _____________________________________________________________________________ PRINTED NAME: _________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: _______________________________________ DATE: _____________________________________ EENNDD OOFF RRFFQQ DDOOCCUUMMEENNTT Rania Alomar 09/18/2025Principal rania@ra-da.com Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA 323.851.4040 7523 Norton Avenue, West Hollywood, CA 90046 7523 Norton Avenue, West Hollywood, CA 90046 82-1644025 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Education B.A. Hons in Architecture Manchester University, School of Architecture. Manchester, England. 1993 Masters in Architecture SCI-Arc / Southern California Institute of Architecture. Los Angeles, California. 1997 Registration/Certification Registered Architect, State of California. C-29809 Registered Architect, State of New York. 034265 Also licensed in Massachusetts and Arkansas NCARB / National Council of Architectural Registration Boards Professional Affiliations AIA / American Institute of Architects AWA / Association for Women in Architecture Selected Design Awards NBBJ Design award, 2000 AIA Next LA Award, 2002 LA Cultural Affairs Award, 2003 LA Business Council Design Award, 2004 AIA Next LA Award, 2007 LA Business Council Design Award, 2009 Grand Prize Winner, Sustainable Practices Award, 2012 AIA Institute Honors Award for Interior Architecture, 2013 AIA Emerging Professionals, 2013 Vision Awards, Floor Focus, 2013 LA Business Council Los Angeles Architect Awards, 2013 SCI-Arc 40/40, 2013 abbrev. list of Publications The Los Angeles Times The New York Times Interior Design Magazine Architect Magazine Architectural Record Installation Magazine SCI-Arc News Form LA Huffington Post Filter magazine Animal Sheltering Magazine Specs+Spaces B1 Design Arch Daily Archello Soma OnOffice FX Magazine Tile Magazine Floor Focus Design Boom Curbed LA CBS News Blue Ant Studio Los Angeles Magazine W magazine Distinction Magazine Sunset Magazine LA Architect Angeleno Interiors Office Interiors” book by Links Cool Shops Los Angeles” book by teNeues RANIA ALOMAR, AIA, NCARB Principal & Design Lead, RA-DA With a strong and extensive background in public architecture, Rania Alomar has developed acumen and love for civic places. Her first project after graduate school was the Staples Center, a ground-breaking and world renowned arena. She quickly emerged as one of the lead designers recognized for her exceptional ability to work with demanding clients, to tackle difficult construction techniques and resolve challenging design issues. This experience led to a series of prestigious projects where Rania led the design team to innovative and successful solutions. She has worked with a broad base of client types: ranging from private developers and owners to community colleges to cities. In close collaboration with these clients, she has pioneered new prototypes, implemented innovative sustainable design techniques, and worked with tiny budgets and stringent deadlines and still achieved aesthetically, functionally and economically successful buildings. Known for her creativity and vision, Rania’s open-minded approach has led to a widely varied design portfolio, and architectural solutions that have garnered some of the most prestigious awards in her field. Her work has been published in numerous papers and magazines including the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, Interior Design Magazine, LA Architect and more. Ms Alomar will lead our team in the design of all aspects of this project. She will work with you through each phase of the design and will be available during construction for site visits, working with our internal team to find solutions to design issues as they arise. Her primary focus on projects is maintaining design excellence and client satisfaction. KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects Selected List of Previous Experience ANIMAL FACILITIES - SHELTERS, RESCUES, HOSPITALS, WELLNESS CENTERS BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ADOPTION CENTER, New York, NY Project Description: A 5,000 sf renovation of an existing ground level retail space and basement level back of house in a building in Soho, New York. This was a flagship space for the non-profit that not only creatively houses animals for adoption but also serves as a brand and message center, providing the public and opportunity to get involved in their mission. Role: Architect BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY LIFE SAVING CENTER, Houston, TX Project Description: (Unbuilt) An 23,200 sf renovation of an existing steel mill into an Animal Facility. This facility is a new prototype for animal care and rather than following traditional shelter models, it is envisioned as a life-saving center and will be a shelter of the future. Role: Architect WESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE, Los Angeles, CA Project Description: An 11,000 sf renovation of an existing warehouse into a hi-tech Animal Facility. The facility houses 60 kennels, administrative facilities, exam and birthing rooms, a grooming room, laundry facility and large community room adjacent to the lobby. Role: Architect BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY PET RESOURCE CENTER, Bentonville, AR Project Description: A 25,000 sf The ‘PET RESOURCE CENTER’ is a different kind of facility focusing on providing resources as well acting as an adoption center. This facility is a new prototype for animal care, it is envisioned as a life-saving center and will be a shelter of the future and transport hub for relocating at risk animals from kill shelter to other locations that need adoptable animals. Role: Architect VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER, Camarillo, California Project Description: High Level Masterplanning of their current facility to improve the current state of operations and incorporate modernized housing for the animals and a reworking of the site for better flow. The subsequent phasing of this masterplan, breaking it down into manageable phases that cause minimal disruption to the functionality of the facility and the health of the animals. Role: Architectural Designer SOUTH LOS ANGELES ANIMAL SERVICES CENTER 2, CHESTERFIELD SQUARE, L.A., CA Project Description: An award-winning design for a very unique facility for the City of Los Angeles. At one and a half acres and 260 kennels, this is one of the largest facilities in the country. Also a sustainable LEED Silver rated design. RA-DA also developed the signage and branding for this project. Role: Architect Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects Selected List of Previous Experience CIVIC/MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC TIDELANDS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, Long Beach, CA Project Description: A total 6 structures along 2.5 miles of beach front. Project included: 2 New Playgrounds, New Restaurant Building, New Water Play Feature, New Smart Restrooms, New Covered Trash Enclosure, New Rental Facility, 2 Existing Concession Stand Tenant Improvements including Rental Facilities, Master Planning, and Lifeguard Stand Renovations. Role: Architect HOUGHTON PARK COMMUNITY CENTER, Long Beach, CA Project Description: A 6500 sf LEED silver certified new building and the renovation of their existing 25,000 sf building that was built in stages in the 1930s, the 1950s, and the 1980s. The entrance to the main building was relocated to be at the knuckle where the new and the old meet, directly southwest from the parking lot, making it clearly visible to those driving in. A reorganized front plaza creates a drop off zone for buses and visitors. Role: Architect PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD (C.M. AT RISK) U.S.C. JOHN MCKAY CENTER - ALL SPORTS BUILDING, Los Angeles, CA Project Description: Teamed with mega-firm HNTB, RA-DA was the interior design firm for the new USC building: a 100,000sf facility on campus to house a complete athletics program including administrative office, training, lockers for the football team and general classrooms for the students. Role: Lead Architect CITY OF OXNARD YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER, Oxnard, CA Project Description: A 30,000 sf renovation of an existing concrete bunker into a modern community building, housing a variety of activities from video and sound production studios to dance studio and strength and cardio training facility. Role: Lead Architect REDONDO BEACH NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY, Redondo Beach, CA Project Description: A 13,000 SF library and community center. This LEED Gold level building is playful and impactful, delivering a surprising presence for such a modest budget. Role: Lead Architect RIVER RIDGE GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE, CONCESSION, & RESTROOM BUILDINGS, Oxnard, CA Project Description: The River Ridge Golf Course is built on a landfill and owned by the City of Oxnard. RA-DA was engaged to design a series of buildings for the golf course. These ranged from public restroom and concession facilities, maintenance, and storage facilities. Role: Lead Architect UC IRVINE CAMPUS SURGE BUILDING AND PARKING STRUCTURE, Irvine, CA Project Description: Teamed with PCL in a design-build proposal for 60,000 SF Campus Surge building and 1960 space parking structure. Developed into schematic design. Selected as best value proposal. Unbuilt. Role: Lead Architect Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects Selected List of Previous Experience WORKSPACE INTERIORS & MASTERPLANNING DOC MAGIC, Torrance, CA Project Description: A radically forward-thinking design for an 18,000 sf company headquarters. Role: Lead Architect SONOS CAMPUS MASTERPLAN AND CAMBRIDGE STUDIO, Cambridge, MA Project Description: A complete new master plan consisting of three separate buildings linked by outdoor lounges and walkways for the Santa Barbara headquarters of Sonos - the wireless speaker company. Role: Lead Architect GERSHMAN OFFICES, Los Angeles, CA Project Description: Tenant Improvement of 1,800 sf Office suite with and ADA restroom upgrade, including 4 offices, Pantry, Workroom, & Reception/Lounge. Complete modernization and renovation of all finishes & fixtures. Role: Lead Architect BUGABOO HEADQUARTERS, El Segundo, CA Project Description: An elegant and simple 10,000 sf office space for the company’s US headquarters in an old existing warehouse building. Role: Lead Architect RIVER RIDGE GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE RESTROOMS, Oxnard, CA Project Description: The renovation of their existing 4 public restrooms to upgrade the clubhouse facility. Role: Lead Architect 72ANDSUNNY OFFICE #2, El Segundo, CA Project Description: A 10,000sf office space for the growing advertising agency in the heart of Marina Del Rey. Role: Lead Architect ARCHITECTS OFFICE, El Segundo, CA Project Description: A 6700sf open and innovative office space.. Role: Lead Architect 72ANDSUNNY OFFICE #1, El Segundo, CA Project Description: A 5000sf expansion and refurbishment of the hip young advertising agency’s space to house 30 people. Role: Lead Architect THE SPACE AT CHASE, El Segundo, CA Project Description: Situated at the far end of the upper concourse inside the baseball park in Phoenix Arizona, this cutting edge, open and flexible work space maintains incredible views of the park and the game. Role: Lead Architect PPUSA HEADQUARTERS, El Segundo, CA Project Description: A 25,000sf office space for the growing development company in Indianapolis. Role: Lead Architect Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects Selected List of Previous Experience RETAIL SONOS STUDIO, Los Angeles, CA Project Description: A retail space that transforms into a nighttime music venue for Sonos - the wireless speaker company. Quickly becoming a center of music and cultural events in the heart of Los Angeles. Role: Lead Architect KITSON, Various Southern California Locations Project Description: New store concept and planning for 3 new stores in Southern California for this hyper-trendy retail. Role: Lead Architect KLASS PAWN, Santa Monica, CA Project Description: A modern pawn shop in the heart of Santa Monica Role: Lead Architect DEYERMOND BOOKS, Santa Monica, CA Project Description: A new bookstore and gallery on Main Street in Santa Monica. Role: Lead Architect BUGABOO US SHOWROOM, El Segundo, CA Project Description: The only product showroom in the United States. Role: Lead Architect YOGOYA YOGURT, China Project Description: A new franchise of high end yogurt shops in China Role: Lead Architect BUGABOO CONCEPT STORES, Various Locations Project Description: Concept design for extremely high end design boutique stores. Ms. Alomar was invited to design their first and prototype series of stores for America and beyond. Role: Lead Architect WOODFIELD CROSSING, Indianapolis, IN Project Description: A 24 acre retail and entertainment development in Indianapolis to include 500,000sf retail, a 5000-seat performance theatre, a 2000-seat amphitheater, a boutique hotel, luxury condominiums, and parking structure. Role: Lead Architect PLAZA EL SEGUNDO, El Segundo, CA Project Description: A fresh look at retail makes this a unique project. A series of different shopping experiences target different demographics and provide 500,000 sf of lifestyle and youth retail in a contiguous development. RA-DA also developed the signage and branding for this project. Role: Lead Architect EQUATOR COFFEE, Venice, CA Project Description: A new coffee bar and kitchen integrated into the existing bookstore. Role: Lead Architect EQUATOR BOOKS, Venice, CA Project Description: A highly acclaimed design for a green and unique bookstore / gallery that has become a center for culture in Venice, California. Role: Lead Architect Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects Selected List of Previous Experience SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT STAPLES CENTER, Los Angeles, CA Project Description: AA 20,000-seat NBA and NHL state-of-the-art arena with suites, restaurants, clubs, retail and office space. Role: Lead Architect CLIPPERS’ TRAINING FACILITY, Playa Vista, CA Project Description: A 10,000 sf training facility with offices, locker rooms, and court. Role: Lead Architect CITIZEN’S BANK ARENA, Ontario, Canada Project Description: A 10,000-seat arena to cater to sports and entertainment events for the quickly growing city of Ontario. Role: Lead Architect CHICAGO FIRE STADIUM, Chicago, Il Project Description: A 20,000-seat soccer stadium with full stage and capabilities for rock concerts Role: Lead Architect ORANGE COAST COLLEGE FITNESS CENTER, Costa Mesa, CA Project Description: A 30,000 sf facility that included locker rooms for the football team and strength and training rooms for curriculum classes. Role: Lead Architect AL AIN SPORTS CITY, UAE Project Description: A design for an entire new city in UAE dedicated to life and sports. To include a professional soccer stadium, an arena, a natatorium, a tennis stadium, various practice fields and courts, housing, recreation centers and parks, offices and more. Role: Lead Architect ALBUQUERQUE ARENA, Albuquerque, NM Project Description: A 9000-seat arena in the heart of downtown Albuquerque developed from program- ming through schematic design. A variety of sites were studied with a complex and political client group to achieve a design that was both exciting and within the limited budget. Role: Lead Architect WEST COVINA SPORTSPLEX, GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE, West Covina, CA Project Description: A 43-acre development that includes an 18-hole municipal golf course with club house, a ‘Big League Dreams’ venue, with restaurant, volleyball, soccer included and a commercial retail center. Role: Lead Architect PHILADELPHIA EAGLES STADIUM, Philadelphia, PA Project Description: A new 65,000 seat NFL stadium with a variety of high end clubs and restaurants, a number of suites, and full stadium amenities. Role: Lead Architect RIO DE JANEIRO CONVENTION CENTER AND ARENA, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil Project Description: Complete conceptual design for a development group. Role: Lead Architect SALVADOR SOCCER STADIUM, South America Project Description: Complete conceptual design of a 20,000 seat stadium for a development group based in South America. Role: Lead Architect DODGE THEATER, Phoenix, AZ Project Description: A 5000-seat flexible performance theatre with the ability to host a wide range of event types from off-Broadway theatre to boxing to concerts and more. This building is a new prototype in the range of event spaces. Role: Lead Architect Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Education Fine Art Luther College Decorah, IA 1991 Fine Art and Design University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 1996 Registration/Certification WELL AP Mr Green has been with RA-DA since 2017 and has been involved in all aspects of project fulfillment from design to construction administration. His work on projects has made him very familiar with the processes, project coordination, plan check processes of multiple municipalities, and con- struction administration. As the Project Manager he will remain available and in communication with the entire team and Client and manage the schedule, milestones and sub- mittals. Mr Green will manage the plan check submittals and continue through the project into Construction Adminis- tration. Mr Green is fluent in project management software such as Procore. Mr. Green is also WELL AP certified and is available to usher projects through the WELL certification process. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE LONG BEACH HOMEKEY CONVERSION PROJECTS SCHERER PARK COMMUNITY CENTER, City of Long Beach HOUGHTON PARK COMMUNITY CENTER, City of Long Beach - Construction Administration JUNIPERO & GRANADA, CONCESSION BUILDINGS, City of Long Beach - New Building & Construction Adminis- tration JUNIPERO SPORTS COURTS & ROLLER RINK, City of Long Beach LONG BEACH PRIDE TOWER, City of Long Beach ALAMITOS CAFE AND CONCESSION BUILDING, City of Long Beach - New Building BENTONVILLE PET RESOURCE CENTER - New Building DOCMAGIC, City Of Torrance - Tenant Improvement BLUE SPACE, City of Los Angeles- Tenant Improvement NKLA, City of Los Angeles - Tenant Improvement YORBA RANCH SHOPPING CENTER- Tenant Improve- ment PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER- Tenant Improvement GFP REAL ESTATE - Tenant Improvement KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects MICHAEL GREEN, WELL AP Project Manager, RA-DA Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Education B.A. in Architecture Southern California Institute of Architecture Los Angeles 2015 Associates of Architecture Miami-Dade College Miami 2012 Ms Hernandez has been with RA-DA since 2015 and has focused her skills on design and documentation of a variety of different types of projects. She is typically on board early on in a project and works closely with Ms Alomar on design and continues on a project through the construction documents phase to ensure that early design con- cepts are carried through into all aspects of the project. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE SCHERER PARK COMMUNITY CENTER - Tenant Improvement MERCED COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING- New Building BENTONVILLE PET RESOURCE CENTER - New Building BEST FRIENDS HOUSTON - Adaptive reuse of existing structure HOUGHTON PARK COMMUNITY CENTER - New Building HOUGHTON PARK EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION - Renovation ALAMITOS CAFE AND CONCESSION BUILDING & PLAYGROUND - New Building LONG BEACH, BEACH FRONT RENOVATIONS - Renovation DIGITAL OCEAN HEADQUARTERS - Tenant Improvement GFP REAL ESTATE - Tenant Improvement PROJECT HOMEKEY - Tenant Improvement LUISANA HERNANDEZ Architectural Designer KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES RA-DA, Architects Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Engineering ALEX M. FONT, P.E. Consultants, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER, NWA Office Inc. alex.font@ecilr.com EDUCATION University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas B. S. Civil Engineering 2009 M. S. Civil Engineering 2014 LICENSES Registered Professional Engineer Arkansas #16662 Mississippi #33991 AFFILIATIONS Structural Engineers Association of AR Amer. Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) UAMS NWA OSMC Jacksonport State Park Visitor Center Hillary Rodham Clinton Children’s Library Mr. Font will serve as Principal Engineer for the design team assigned to this project. He understands the unique requirements involved in the structural design of corporate hospitality and dining centers and he is well versed in the intricacies of sustainably-sensitive projects, as well as projects that exemplify design excellence. Mr. Font will provide design for the specialized structural systems, standards, specifications and also quality control checks through the successful completion of this project. Mr. Font is accustomed to collaborating with team members on complex projects. His knowledge from past experiences will be utilized in the preliminary project design stages to ensure a cost-efficient structural solution that will support the desired architectural intent. A member of Engineering Consultants, Inc. staff since 2010, Mr. Font has been involved in the structural design of commercial, industrial, institutional and residential construction for over 14 years. He has experience in the design of steel, concrete, wood and most other structural materials. He is very familiar with all phases of the design and construction procedures. The following projects highlight Mr. Font’s relevant experience. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Simmons Care Clinic Siloam Springs, Arkansas in design) UAMS NWA Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center Springdale, Arkansas under construction) Jacksonport State Park Visitor Center Jacksonport, Arkansas completed 2019) Hillary Rodham Clinton Children’s Library Little Rock, Arkansas completed 2013) Bella Vista Firestation #3 Bella Vista, Arkansas completed 2021) 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 305 / Little Rock, AR 72201 P: 501-376-3752 101 Parkwood Street Suite B / Lowell, AR 72745 P: 479-770-5366 www.ecilr.com 9/15/25 Page 2 of 4 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Engineering John Eric Scroggins, P.E. Consultants, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER, NWA Office Inc. eric.scroggins@ecilr.com EDUCATION University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas B. S. Civil Engineering 2005 LICENSES Registered Professional Engineer Arkansas #14519 Alabama #PE54182 Missouri #PE-2024014581 Ohio #PE.91825 Pennsylvania #PE096801 AFFILIATIONS Structural Engineers Association of AR (SEAAR) Amer. Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) American Society of Civil Engineers Bentonville Animal Services Bentonville Adult Recreation Center Little Flock Municipal Building Mr. Scroggins will serve as Principal Engineer for the design team assigned to this project. He understands the unique requirements involved in the structural design of corporate hospitality and dining centers and he is well versed in the intricacies of sustainably-sensitive projects, as well as projects that exemplify design excellence. Mr. Scroggins will provide design for the specialized structural systems, standards, specifications and also quality control checks through the successful completion of this project. Mr. Scroggins is accustomed to collaborating with team members on complex projects. His knowledge from past experiences will be utilized in the preliminary project design stages to ensure a cost-efficient structural solution that will support the desired architectural intent. A member of Engineering Consultants, Inc. staff since 2005, Mr. Scroggins has been involved in the structural design of commercial, industrial, institutional and residential construction for over 20 years. He has experience in the design of steel, concrete, wood and most other structural materials. He is very familiar with all phases of the design and construction procedures. The following projects highlight Mr. Scroggins’ relevant experience. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Bentonville Animal Services Bentonville, Arkansas completed 2022) Bentonville Adult Recreation Center Bentonville, Arkansas under construction) Peace at Home Animal Sanctuary Springdale, Arkansas completed 2023) Little Flock Municipal Building Little Flock, Arkansas in design) 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 305 / Little Rock, AR 72201 P: 501-376-3752 101 Parkwood Street Suite B / Lowell, AR 72745 P: 479-770-5366 www.ecilr.com 9/15/25 Page 3 of 4 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Engineering Steven M. Beggs, P.E., S.E. Consultants, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER, NWA Office Inc. steven.beggs@ecilr.com EDUCATION University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas B. S. Civil Engineering 2008 LICENSES Registered Professional Engineer Arkansas #15390 Utah #12588002-2203 Washington #23003430 AFFILIATIONS Structural Engineers Association of AR (SEAAR) Amer. Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) American Society of Civil Engineers Searcy Community Center Mountain Home Community Center Pinnacle Mountain State Park VC Mr. Beggs is a Structural Principal Engineer who understands the unique requirements involved in the structural design of all building types and is well versed in the intricacies of sustainably sensitive projects. Mr. Beggs will provide structural design for the specialized structural systems, standards, specifications, and quality control checks through the successful completion of this project. He is accustomed to collaborating with team members on complex projects and his knowledge and past experiences will be utilized in the preliminary project design stages to ensure a cost-efficient structural solution that will support the desired architectural intent. A member of Engineering Consultants, Inc. staff since 2008, Mr. Beggs has designed complete structural framing and foundation systems for private businesses, institutions, universities, & State and local agencies for over 16 years. His experience and attention to detail throughout design and construction, provides the owner with efficient, economical structures while keeping Life Safety and Quality as priority #1. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Mountain Home Community Center Mountain Home, Arkansas completed 2025) Searcy Community Center & Aquatics Searcy, Arkansas under construction) Pinnacle Mountain State Park Visitor Center Little Rock, Arkansas completed 2023) Craighead County Courthouse Annex Jonesboro, Arkansas completed 2025) 401 West Capitol Avenue Suite 305 / Little Rock, AR 72201 P: 501-376-3752 101 Parkwood Street Suite B / Lowell, AR 72745 P: 479-770-5366 www.ecilr.com 9/15/25 Page 4 of 4 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES 5 | Page FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES Prigm Engineering Personnel Resumes JASON P. MOWREY, PE – Mechanical Engineer Prigm Engineering, PLLC Employment History: 2019 - Present: Prigm Engineering, Principal 2018 - 2019: K2M Design, Director of Engineering 2010 - 2018: TME, Mechanical Engineer 2004 - 2010: Morse Zehnter & Associates, Mechanical Designer Role & Responsibility: Jason will perform the duties of Mechanical Engineer which will include designing the mechanical systems for the building. He will also develop design specifications and check submittals for the project. Jason consults with product manufacturers and applies applicable codes and criteria to ensure that all mechanical systems are coordinated and function as designed in the most energy efficient manner. Education: Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering 2002 - University of Arkansas Master of Business Administration Finance/Entrepreneurship 2017 - University of Arkansas Master of Science in Finance 2025 – University of Arkansas Active Registrations: Registered Professional Engineer: AR/2012/#14988 MO/2015/#2015001418 UT/2019/#11497104-2202 OK/2019/#31553 Qualifications: Jason has over 20 years of mechanical and plumbing design experience, including more than 15 years of mechanical and plumbing design experience in higher-education and multi-family facilities. His mechanical experience includes engineering of HVAC systems, integrated direct digital control systems, building energy use simulations, major energy plant equipment such as water-cooled chillers, cooling towers, and hydronic and steam boilers, steam system, as well as how these pieces of major equipment interface with all other systems. His plumbing experience includes engineering of medical and dental gas systems, compressed air and vacuum systems, high pressure and clean steam systems, domestic water, sanitary drainage, and storm water systems, fuel gas systems, fire suppression systems, and how all these systems interface with all other systems. Arkansas Children’s Hospital Northwest – Springdale, AR Arkansas Children’s Hospital Northwest is a five-story, 248,000-square-foot facility that eliminates the need for patients to travel to other areas of the state for first-class healthcare. The hospital features a 24-hour pediatric emergency department; five pediatric surgery operating rooms; central sterile processing area; four negative pressure isolation rooms; 24 inpatient beds; 30 outpatient clinic rooms; a chapel with pastoral care; diagnostic and ancillary services; MRI, CT, and routine X-ray imaging capabilities; occupational therapy services; compounding pharmacy; full service kitchen and cafeteria; detached central energy plant for chilled water, heating water, emergency power; helipad and refueling station; play areas; and outdoor gardens and nature trails. 165.0M / 233,000 SF Role: Mechanical Engineer Mercy Patient Tower Addition & Renovation – Rogers, AR The new eight story, 275,000-square-foot patient tower created 68 new patient beds, including 17 neonatal unit beds. It also included a complete renovation of the hospital’s core support services departments: materials management, central sterile processing, environmental services, laboratories and compounding pharmacy. In addition, a two-story vertical expansion above the existing Emergency Department added five new operating rooms to the surgery suite. The building’s lower three levels accommodate an operating room expansion, diagnostic facilities and other hospital support spaces. Patient rooms are housed on the facility’s upper levels, with shelled space on the 6th and 7th floor to accommodate future growth. A mechanical penthouse is located on the facility’s 8th floor. Situated to the west of the existing hospital building, the new tower seamlessly ties in to the original structure at each level. Coordinated construction phasing enabled the building team to minimize disruption during the expansion while enabling the renovation of each core department to increase its overall capacity and enhance patient care. 147.0M / 275,000 SF Role: Mechanical Engineer Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES 6 | Page FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES JOHN LONGINOTTI, PE – Electrical Engineer Prigm Engineering, PLLC Employment History: 2019 - Present: Prigm Engineering, Principal 2015 - 2019: K2M Design, Electrical Engineer 2009 - 2015: Benchmark Group, Electrical Engineer 2007 - 2009: International Paper, Electrical Engineer Role & Responsibility: John will perform the duties of Electrical Engineering which will include designing power system for the build- ing and performing lighting design. He will also develop design specifications and check submittals for the project. John consults with product manufacturers and applies applicable codes and criteria to ensure that all electrical systems are coordi- nated and function as designed in the most energy efficient manner. Education: Bachelor of Science Electrical Engineering 2006 - University of Arkansas Active Registrations: Registered Professional Engineer: AR/2011/#14986 NC/2018/#047049 TX/2015/#119673 FL/2012/#74419 MO/2013/#2013015533 OK/2013/#26517 SC/2012/#29788 UT/2019/#11501403-2202 VA/2012/#0402050983 Qualifications: John Longinotti has over 17 years of electrical design experience in higher education, multi- family, industrial, commercial, and residential buildings. His experience includes electrical engineering of normal and emergency lighting power and photometrics (interior and exterior), power sourcing (interior and exterior), emergency power systems, renewable energy systems, urgent communications systems, cathodic and lightning protection, and sequencing to ensure optimum performance with integrated low voltage systems. Multi- family projects have been a specialty of John’s as he has designed many hotels and multi- family located throughout the eastern US. John has detailed experience with lighting design for functional purposes and for aesthetic purposes as well. He designs emergency systems and understands the best methods to create a reliable system. Kids Spot Therapy Clinic – Springdale, AR Full design of a new three level therapy clinic. Spaces include physical therapy, two-level gymnasium, office, lease, administration, general office, and general support. 4.125 M / 18,750 SF Role: Electrical Engineer 1st Choice Healthcare – Pocahontas, AR Full design of a new medical clinic. Spaces include exam rooms, staff offices, procedure room, lab space, x-ray room, waiting room, nurse stations, breakroom, reception/lobby/waiting room, storage rooms, and support spaces. 5.3 M / 17,000 SF Role: Electrical Engineer Twin Lakes Senior Living Community – Montgomery, OH Three separate areas of the building were expanded and consisted of therapy, fitness, administrative areas, receiving, and memory support area. The memory support area included 16 resident rooms, servery, dining, activities area, nurse’s station, laundry, and lounge. Many spaces of the existing building were renovated and included a new medical clinic, new salon, new administrative areas, new assisted living rooms, and new dining areas. 15.0 M / 61,000 SF Role: Electrical Engineer Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES 7 | Page FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES JARED WATSON, PE – Mechanical Engineer Prigm Engineering, PLLC Employment History: 2019 - Present: Prigm Engineering, Principal 2015 - 2019: K2M Design, Mechanical Engineer 2009 - 2015: Benchmark Group, Mechanical Engineer Role & Responsibility: Jared will perform the duties of Plumbing Engineer which will include designing the plumbing systems for the building. He will also develop design specifications and check submittals for the project. Jared consults with product manufacturers and applies applicable codes and criteria to ensure that all plumbing systems are coordi- nated and function as designed in the most energy efficient manner. Education: Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering 2009 - University of Arkansas Active Registrations: Registered Professional Engineer: AR/2013/#15926 FL/2018/#84623 MD/2018/#52676 NC/2018/#047066 SC/2018/#35250 TX/2018/#129976 VA/2018/#0402058990 Qualifications: Jared has 15 years of mechanical and plumbing engineering design experience. This experience consists of many different project types including higher education, multi- family, civic, correctional, military, office, hospitality, retail, restaurants, convenience stores, transportation, and skilled nursing. His mechanical experience includes engineering of HVAC systems, integrated direct digital control systems, district heating, chillers, cooling towers, and hydronic boilers, as well as how these pieces of major equipment interface with all other systems. His plumbing experience includes the engineering of domestic water, sanitary drainage, stormwater drainage, fuel gas systems, compressed air, and vacuum systems, and how all these systems interface with all other systems. Kids Spot Therapy Clinic – Springdale, AR Full design of a new three level therapy clinic. Spaces include physical therapy, two-level gymnasium, office, lease, administration, general office, and general support. 4.125 M / 18,750 SF Role: Mechanical Engineer 1st Choice Healthcare – Pocahontas, AR Full design of a new medical clinic. Spaces include exam rooms, staff offices, procedure room, lab space, x-ray room, waiting room, nurse stations, breakroom, reception/lobby/waiting room, storage rooms, and support spaces. 5.3 M / 17,000 SF Role: Mechanical Engineer Little Palm Island Resort & Spa – Little Torch Key, FL After being demolished by Hurricane Irma, this private resort island was redesigned and upgraded. The new island design consists of many individual cottages, a two-story restaurant, a two-story spa, a fitness building, an employee sleeping & dining building, and a sewage treatment plant. New power was brought to the island. 45.0 M / 4 acre island Role: Mechanical Engineer Twin Lakes Senior Living Community – Montgomery, OH Memory support / assisted living expansion and renovations. Three separate areas of the building were expanded and consisted of therapy, fitness, administrative area, receiving, and memory support area. The memory support area included 16 resident rooms, servery, dining, activities area, nurse’s station, laundry, and lounge. Many spaces of the existing building were renovated and included a new medical clinic, new salon, new administrative areas, new assisted living rooms, and new dining areas. 15.0 M / 61,000 SF Role: Mechanical Engineer Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES 8 | Page FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES Role & Responsibility: Dan will perform the duties of Project Manager and Electrical Engineering which will include designing power system, lighting design, specifications, and submittal review. Dan consults with product manufacturers and applies applicable codes and criteria to ensure that all electrical systems are coordinated and function as designed in the most energy efficient manner. Education: Bachelor of Science Electrical Engineering 2000 - University of Arkansas Active Registrations: Registered Professional Engineer: AR/2011/#14710 KS/2013/#23163 MO/2013/#2013016219 OK/2011/#25652 TX/2013/#114951 Qualifications: Dan is an Electrical Engineer who has been practicing Consulting Engineering since 2002. Dan has electrical design and project management experience in a wide range of project types, including commercial, educational, food service, government, hospitality, medical, municipal, residential, and retail. His design experience includes, lighting, lighting controls, power systems, emergency power systems, access controls systems coordination, A/V systems coordination, fire alarm systems coordination, low-voltage systems coordination, and security systems coordination. Dan’s lighting designs are based on the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America’s recommendations for lighting levels, along with the visual presence of the light fixtures within the project space. His power systems designs provide for the specific requirements of the project and efficiency of the power distribution system. Shiloh Indoor Sports Complex – Springdale, AR Full design of a new indoor sports complex. Spaces include an indoor practice field, weight room, training room, locker rooms, laundry, film room, wrestling room, and offices. 11.8 M / 43,200 SF Role: Electrical Engineer Kids Spot Therapy Clinic – Springdale, AR Full design of a new three level therapy clinic. Spaces include physical therapy, two-level gymnasium, office, lease, administration, general office, and general support. 4.125 M / 18,750 SF Role: Electrical Engineer 1st Choice Healthcare – Pocahontas, AR Full design of a new medical clinic. Spaces include exam rooms, staff offices, procedure room, lab space, x-ray room, waiting room, nurse stations, breakroom, reception/lobby/waiting room, storage rooms, and support spaces. 5.3 M / 17,000 SF Role: Electrical Engineer The Grand at Willow Springs – Prairie Grove, AR Full design of a new wedding and event venue. Spaces include a grand hall, porch area, bridal suite, groom’s room, prep kitchen, separate Chaple, and support spaces. 5.5 M / 25,000 SF Role: Electrical Engineer DANIEL MILES, PE – Electrical Engineer Employment History: 2021 – Present: Prigm Engineering, Electrical Engineer 2008 – 2021: HP Engineering, Vice President / Electrical Engineer 2006 – 2008: GA Engineers, Electrical Designer 2002 – 2006: Benchmark Group, Electrical Designer 2000 – 2002: Ozark Aircraft Systems, Electrical Designer Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Allen “Jay” Young Principal & Professional Land Surveyor EDUCATION: Sheridan College, Wyoming - A.A.S. University of Wyoming - Land Survey Certi cate Army Corps of Engineers - “Technical Engineering Specialist” Course REGISTRATION: PS Arkansas #1441 PS Mississippi #2899 PS Missouri #2004001337 PS Oklahoma #1638 PS Tennessee #2430 PS Kansas #1484 NCEES #1133 CFEDS #1179 ORGANIZATIONS: Arkansas Society of Professional Surveyors President (Past) Director, District 1 (Past) USGBC-Arkansas Jay Young has been in the eld of land surveying for over 30 years. His surveying career began in the Army National Guard when he graduated as the Honor Graduate of his class at Ft. Leonard Wood, Mo. in 1995. He started working in private practice that summer for Benchmark of Torrington, P.C. in Wyoming and was placed in charge of various survey projects, including Boundary Surveys, Topographic Surveys, Construction Surveys, and Water Rights Surveys. Jay moved to Arkansas in 1999 and joined Development Con- sultants, Inc in January 2002. Jay is a principal of the rm and manages DCI’s Fayetteville offi ce. His responsibilities include project management, supervision of land surveying, planning and platting services, site observations and inspec- tions, and contract management. Jay is committed to provid- ing the highest quality professional services for our clients. INSTITUTIONAL Washington County Animal Shelter Conway Schools, Conway, Arkansas UALR - Little Rock, Arkansas Paris Schools Renovation, Arkansas ATU- Ozark, Arkansas Morrison Elementary, Arkansas Siloam Springs High School, Arkansas University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, Arkansas Football Operations Center North Endzone Expansion Basketball Practice Facility Track High Performance Center Hillside Auditorium Student Success Center Windgate Arts Old Main Senior Walk Plaza Pomfret Dining Library Storage ADOHI Hall Delta Gamma Sorority UREC Playing Fields MEDICAL UAMS at Little Rock, Arkansas Major Development Parking Cedar Street VA Medical Center, Fayetteville, Arkansas Clinical Addition MRI Baptist Medical Centers, Little Rock, Arkansas ICU Study Generators White County Hospital Expansion - White County, Arkansas LRMA Medical Offi ce Building COMMERCIAL The District Retail Development - Rogers, AR Coulson Oil - Various, Arkansas Safe Keepers Self Storage, Springdale, Arkansas Whisenhunt Investment -Various, Arkansas Spring Creek Center, Fayetteville Arkansas Arvest Bank - Various, AR, MO, OK, KS US Beef - Various, Arkansas Jeep Bentonvillle, Arkansas AT&T Store, Springdale, Arkansas Walgreens, Various, Arkansas WalMart, Centerton, Arkansas Pleasant Crossing, Fayetteville, Arkansas RESIDENTIAL Sweet Homes Subdivision, Siloam Springs, Arkansas The Grove Neighborhood - Rogers, Arkansas Tourmaline Urban Lofts - Bentonville, Arkansas The Parc @ Rogers - Rogers, Arkansas The Parc @ Maumelle - Maumelle, Arkansas Clear Creek Apartments - Johnson, Arkansas Holcombe Heights - Little Rock, Arkansas PDC Apartments, Rogers, Arkansas Hill Place Apartments - Fayetteville, Arkansas Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Joey Shawn Luther Principal & Landscape Architect EDUCATION: BLA: University of Arkansas - Fayetteville REGISTRATION: PLA Arkansas #5092 PLA North Carolina #2503 PLA Texas #2090 LEED AP ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Landscape Architects USGBC Shawn Luther has approximately 27 years of experience in the eld of Landscape Architecture. Upon graduation in May 1997, Shawn was hired as a Land- scape Architect at the SWA Group. At the SWA Group Shawn worked on a variety of subdivisions, resort, and commercial projects. Shawn joined Development Consultants, Inc. in August of 2004 as a Landscape Architect. In his duties he has assisted in Landscape design, design, planning and site analysis for numerous projects. His knowledge and expertise in land development are an integral part of the DCI team. INSTITUTIONAL University of Arkansas at Fayetteville ADOHI Hall Faulkner Performing Arts Center Pi Beta Phi Gate & Campus Walk North Extension Hillside Auditorium Fred Smith Football Operations Building Senior Walks Maple Hill, Phase I and Phase II Razorback Stadium - North End Zone Expansion Greek Theater Renovation Tri Delta Phi Mu Fowler House Parking Chi Omega House Founders Hall Basketball Practice Facility Science Building Univeristy of Arkansas Rich Mountain University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Arkansas Coleman Greek Greenway Master Plan/ A&D Design CHI Omega Plaza Reynolds Business MEDICAL Premier Gastroenterolgy, Little Rock, Arkansas UAMS, Little Rock, Arkansas CHRP Courtyard Baptist Health Center , Little Rock, Arkansas Expansion PACU Parkway Village Alzheimer’s Center, Little Rock, Arkansas VA Medical Center, Fayetteville, Arkansas Clinical Addition White County Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas Cancer Treatment Center COMMERCIAL PROJECTS Lexicon Entrance Renovation, Little Rock, Arkansas Gaines Street Plaza, Little Rock, Arkansas FBI Building, Little Rock, Arkansas Capitol Landscape, Little Rock, Arkansas Federal Courthouse, Little Rock, Arkansas South West Power Pool, Little Rock, Arkansas Baldwin Shell Office Building, Little Rock, Arkansas One Banc Site Planning- Little Rock, Arkansas Shackleford Crossing - Little Rock, Arkansas RESIDENTIAL Meyers Apartments, Rogers Arkansas Holcombe Heights, Little Rock, Arkansas Tourmaline, Bentonville, Arkansas RECREATION Burns Park Funland, NLR, Arkansas Coleman Creek Trail - Little Rock, Arkansas Cossatot Interpretive Trail - Howard County Gaines Street Plaza - Little Rock, Arkansas UALR Trail of Tears Park, Little Rock, Arkansas Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Cabrillo Recreation Center Rehabilitation, Santa Barbara, CA [$4.339 Million] City of Lompoc Senior Recreation Center, Lompoc, CA [$4.368 Million] Corona Park Recreation Building, Huntington Park, CA [$.978 Million] Westchester Recreation Center Community Building, Los Angeles, CA [$1.383 Million] Carson Passive Park, Carson, CA [$.642 Million] Charter Oak Park General Improvements, Los Angeles, CA [$.623 Million] Kellogg/Hollister Community Park, City of Goleta, CA [$2.872 Million] Johnny Carson Park Revitalization, Burbank, CA [$3.929 Million] Live Oak Park, Santa Barbara, CA [$.961 Million] Miraloma Park Improvements, Anaheim, CA [$3.524 Million] MLK Fitness Park, Los Angeles, CA [$315,855] Veterans Memorial Regional County Park, Sylmar, CA [$.875 Million] Walnut Creek Habitat & Open Space, San Dimas, CA [7.712 Million] Cobus Malan, Principal Quantity Surveyor As Executive Principal, Cobus Malan has a Bachelor of Science degree in Quantity Surveying (Construction Cost Professional), from the highly accredited University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa. He has acquired at least 37 years in-depth diverse construction costing experience in all aspects of work, from the perspective of a professional Quantity Surveying and estimating practice, as well as working with general contractors, design professionals, design build contractors and developers. In capacity as Quantity Surveyor, Cobus uses his diverse experience in applying first principals to construction cost estimating, by paying particular attention to the multi-trade detailed cost consequential aspects of a project. His consulting experience is supplemented by assisting in evaluation and settlement of Change Orders, helping to keep a finger on the pulse of industry costs. This experience is also enhanced through the research he performs in capacity as Associate Editor for the nationally published SPI Cost Publications. Recreational Center and Park projects furthermore constitute a perfect match in regard to Cobus’ attention to detail matched with his multi-trade experience and the firm’s in-house multi-disciplinary estimating skills. Education Bachelor of Science, in Quantity Surveying University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, 1980 Professinal Affiliations American Association of Cost Engineers (Member No. 2087) American Institute of Architects Member No. 30138264) SUB-CONSULTANT RESUMES JACOBUS & YUANG INC, Cost Estimator SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCEAp pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Kathryn Marek AIA, CSI, CCCA, SCIP, NCARB 275 Windswept Court Naples, ID 83847 Phone: (213) 503-2064 Email: kmarchconsult@earthlink.net Summary: Significant experience in the technical aspects of architectural practice and construction. Extensive experience in administering projects with private, public, and government funding and regulations. Effective manager with ability to create, maintain, and direct systems for complex projects, including long term developments with multiple issues and project teams. Licensed Architect with strong technical background in building materials and techniques. Proven ability to diagnose and troubleshoot building problems during development and construction. Experience and Achievements 2017 -¬ present Principal KM Architectural Consulting, PLLC, Naples, Idaho KM Architectural Consulting specializes in the production of technical specifications for use as Construction Documents. I am experienced with multiple platforms, including BSD Speclink, and SpecsIntact, for the production of documents for both public and private jobs. My work consists of the creation of specifications that delineate the qualitative characteristics needed in materials, equipment, and facility systems for construction, as well as designating product options and installation requirements. Information is drawn from Drawings and meetings, as well as from interviews with the project team. The information is collated, reviewed, and combined with the Owner’s required documentation, operational guidelines, and internal safety standards into technical documents that form part of the Construction Contract documents. 2012 – 2017 Senior Specifier Walt Disney Imagineering, Glendale, California 1998 –2012 Project Architect, Specification Writer, Technical Resource Manager AECOM, Los Angeles, California 1996 – 1998 Project Engineer Del Amo Construction, Inc., Torrance, CA 1995 – 1996 Project Assistant L.A. Young & Associates, Inc., Redondo Beach, CA Accreditation: Registered Architect, State of California – License #C31170, State of Idaho ¬ License AR-986095, State of Florida – License # AR 100882 NCARB Accreditation #64535 CCCA (CSI Certified Construction Contract Administrator) CDT (CSI Construction Document Technologist) Education: Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch) and Bachelor of Science (B.S.) in Environmental Design, Ball State University 1995 SUB-CONSULTANT RESUMES KMAC, Specification Writer Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES RELEVANT FACILITIES BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY PET RESOURCE CENTER, Bentonville, AR BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY PET ADOPTION CENTER, New York, NY NKLA, Los Angeles, CA HOUSTON LIFE SAVING CENTER, Houston, TX PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY, Porterville, CA SOUTH LOS ANGELES ANIMAL CARE CENTER II, Los Angeles, CA -LEED SILVER VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER MASTERPLAN, Camarillo, CA LONG BEACH ANIMAL EMERGENCY SOUTH LOS ANGELES ANIMAL CARE CENTER I - LEED SILVER BentonvillePRCNKLAKennelRuns South LA Kennel Runs Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY - PET RESOURCE CENTER Location: Bentonville, Arkansas Size: 24,500 SF Owner Reference Information: Client: Best Friends Animal Society Contact Name: Rose Molina. Project Manager Contact Information: 5001 Angel Canyon Rd Kanab, UT 8474 T: 435.644.2001 x4384 Project AE Cost: $386k Start Date: November 2019 Completion Date: March 2023 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez SCOPE: RA-DA is providing full A/E services including: Concept Design Programming Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting Construction Administration Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES PHILOSOPHY As the first building of its kind, the Pet Resource Center is a reformed animal-shelter-of sorts. There is one key element intentionally omitted - the kennels. Its function is similar in many ways to an animal shelter, but its fundamental philosophy is the polar opposite. A NEW WAY During Covid many shelters were shut down and as a result, a large network of foster parents emerged. Best Friends capitalized on this and halfway through design, we decided that the kennels had to go: The goal was to build a shelter of the future: People need a place where they can connect with animals in a setting that is un-institutional. We needed a home for community, animals, and nature to come together. So, we designed a village. This was going to be different, and the building would be a model for Cities and Counties Country-wide, and even world- wide. A CUSTOMIZED PROGRAM This meant a different approach to the design of the building. We had to rethink the purpose, the flow and the program. This Center needed to be community-focused, inclusive, and welcoming. We needed to pull the public into the world of Best Friends and get them involved, either to donate, volunteer, adopt or foster. It needed to support its affiliated rescues, foster parents, and the animals. It needed to provide adequate medical care and spay and neuter services. It needed to educate on all aspects of animal care including dog behavior or kitten feeding. It would even provide a community pantry for parents that were in need. The spaces are designed around these functions and creatively support these aspirations. SITE / ENGAGE AND CONNECT PEOPLE TO PLACE: The building is positioned centrally within the future site of 8th Street Gateway Park, a 100 acre park currently being developed by the City. The design team worked with the park designers to integrate BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY - PET RESOURCE & COMMUNITY CENTER internal staff open work space modular community center room public lobby entrance Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES The building’s planning and access into the overall Master plan, making sure it was smartly integrated and directly responding to park-goers and future surroundings. Set back from 8th Street, visitors can access the building either on foot, bicycle or by car. Reminiscent of traditional southern architecture, a wide front porch faces a main green oval “Hillside Meadow” filled with local flora and fauna central to the Park Master plan. Pedestrian and bicycle paths weave through and around the building that is divided into two halves. Park-goers can walk through without entering and glimpse the many functions in the building from weekend adoption events to training seminars in the yards. They pass under the centrally located ‘Volunteer Bridge’, a critical function of the facility and an offer to the public to enter and get involved. THE BUILDING: COMMUNITY AND CONNECTION The building form makes a logical split between the main Community spaces to the north and the more technical Medical and Support spaces to the south. The linking elements are the front porch and courtyard spaces and the Volunteer Bridge. With parking to the south, and pulled away from the building, visitors approach on foot toward the front porch, passing a large dog-themed mural by a local artist. The Medical wing is pulled back so that a clear path to the front door is revealed. This side entry to the main lobby space is intentionally incidental and as such, inclusive to all. Visitors can ‘slip in’ easily without much pomp. The axis of the main community lobby space provides stunning views of the park to the east and west capturing the sunrise in the winter and the sunset in the summer through its high peaked roofs and providing park-goers respite. Interior and Exterior spaces are connected wherever possible with open views and large operable glass doors. The two levels of the Community Wing also visually connected. The openness of the space invites and encourages exploration with access given throughout the facility. Even the administrative space is open to view from the main lobby although most staff is working out in the main space making them easily approachable. Stadium seating and a slide (just for fun) takes guests downstairs to the dog enrichment room and second community room where Best Friends holds Adoption events, Dog Yoga classes amongst other community events. A critical backbone to the success of the non-profit: The volunteer bridge, is held in esteem as it straddles the lower courtyard and is clearly visible from both the Community and Medical Wing Entries. Every space within this wing is highly flexible: almost all spaces are open and furniture movable to accommodate change and the growth of the facility. BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY - PET RESOURCE & COMMUNITY CENTER upper cafe patio seating overlooking dog play yards volunteer bridge Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES BEST FRIENDS PET ADOPTION CENTER Location: New York, New York Size: 3,900 SF Owner Reference Information: Client: Best Friends Animal Society Contact Name: Elizabeth Jensen Contact Information: 307 West Broadway New York City, NY 10013 T: 347 762-3678 Project Cost: $3M Change Orders: 21 Start Date: October 2015 Completion Date: March 2017 Second Renovation: April 2025, Currently in construction documents phase. Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez Hayley Kleeman DELIVERY Early on in the design process we worked closely with the group at Best Friends Animal Society to identify the goals for this adoption center. We knew as a group that the goal wasn’t only to provide storefront that connected people to animals but also an experience that communicated the overarching goals and efforts of Best Friends Animal Society. We wanted to engage people with the message and fold them into the community that Best Friends had created around the adoption and care of animals. With this in mind, priorities surfaced and design goals emerged: We wanted to create what would feel like a sanctuary experience in the middle of Manhattan, referencing the landscape and temperament of the Best Friends Kanab, UT headquarters. We wanted to house the animals in an interesting, humane way and create a habitat that they enjoyed. We wanted to make sure that the space was filled with opportunities to engage the visitors and tell them the story of Best Friends. We also wanted to include some innovative and educational experiences such as a kitten nursery. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES Location: Los Angeles, California Size: 11,200 SF Owner Reference Information Client:The Ronald and Catherine Gershman Foundation Contact Name: Ron Gershman Contact Information: 12300 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 310 Los Angeles, CA 90025 T 310 576-3491 Project Cost: $20M through all phases Start Date: November 2009 Completion Date: Initial construction 2012, Third floor addition 2016/2017, Tenant Improvements 2019, Surgical Suite addition 2023 - 2025 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez Hayley Kleeman DELIVERY METHOD & ROLE This was a Design - Bid - Build project where we worked with one contractor that came on board toward the end of the construction documents phase. RA-DA was the architect on the project. We worked closely with the contractor in the construction documents phase to review the documents and as they started to put together their bid for the project. We continued to work with them throughout the construction of the project. We collaborated with the contractor on some aspects of the design such as the design of the kennels to achieve a solution that was cost effective, code compliant and met the functional requirements of the client. RA-DA provided full services to the client: Concept design : created a series of schemes that studied different configurations of the plan and different approaches to the appearance of the building. Schematic Design Design Development Signage and interiors Fixture and Equipment selection Construction Documentation and Specifications Coordination with our engineers and consultants on all aspects of the project from structural to MEP to civil and off site and utility requirements. Jurisdictional Approvals: We obtained a Conditional Use Permit for the project and shepherded all the drawings through plan check and to obtain a permit for the project. Construction Administration: we worked closely with the contractor and with the client to make sure the documents were being implemented correctly. This included weekly site meetings, review of RFIs and issuing of ASIs whenever necessary. We reviewed submittals and substitutions and worked to apprehend any costly or time consuming errors in construction before they occurred. NKLA formerly WEST SIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES TRAINING CENTER PLAY YARD CAT LOUNGE KE N N E L S 6 1 PUBLIC RESTROOMS AD O P T IO N S AD O P T IO N S AD O P T IO N S AD O P T IO N S AD O P T IO N S AD O P T IO N S AD O P T IO N S FEATURE KENNEL FEATURE KENNEL FEATURE KENNEL FEATURE KENNEL DOG PLAY AREA/ EXTENDED ADOPTIONS SU P P O R T CAT CAFE MEDICAL LOBBY DOG HOLDING PANTRY LAUNDRY FOOD PREP FOOD STORAGE KITTEN NURSERY EXAM ROOM 1 LAB MED STOR. MED LAUNDRY AUTO- CLAVE EXAM ROOM 2 CAT HOLDING VET OFFICE XRAY VET ASSIST. CENTRAL PREP & TREATMENTSURGERY BEACHBEACH WOMENS LOCKERS MENS LOCKERS GENERAL STORAGE CAT ISO. CAT QUAR ANIMAL INTAKE & HOLDING JANITOR STORAGE GROOMING ADOPTIONS DESK SUPPORT CATS WHEELCHAIR LIFT DOG ISOLATION DOG QUARANTINE SUPPORT BEST FRIENDS HOUSTON LIFE SAVING CENTER - POSTPONED DUE TO COVID 19 Location: Houston, Texas Size: 23,200 SF Owner Reference Information: Client: Best Friends Animal Society Contact Name: Jay Garrett Jr. Contact Information: 1414 Bonner St Houston, TX 77007 T: 832.217.8323 Project AE Fee: $365k Start Date: March 2019 Completion Date: Project Postponed due to Pandemic. Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez PROJECT GOALS AND PHILOSOPHY. This facility was designed as a new prototype for ani- mal care and rather than following traditional shelter models, it was envisioned as a life-saving center and shelter of the future. With this in mind, every aspect of the facility was con- sidered with the preface of ‘how should this be done?’ and ‘what is the ideal situation here’. We explored new ways of organizing and housing the animals, integrating the adoptables into the lobby space, connecting the administration space to the front of the building, engaging visitors with cafe and kitten nursery upon entry and designing a branded space. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER Location: Porterville, California Size: 9800 SF of Building Improvements / 3100 SF Dog Park / 40,700 SF of Site Improvements Owner Reference Information: Client: City of Porterville Contact Name: Javier Sanchez / Engineering & Project Management Director Contact Information: 291 N Main St Porterville, CA 93257 T: 559.782.7462 Project Cost: $7M Start Date: October 2018 Completion Date: Fall 2023. Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Michael Green Luisana Hernandez PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Interior Tenant improvement of a single story existing bank building to turn into a new animal care and adoption center, frontage road improvements, dog park, and a new section of the “Rails to Trails” network. RA-DA is providing full A/E services including: Concept Design Programming Schematic Design Design Development Interiors Signage Bid Documents Construction Documents Permitting Construction Administration WH WHWH 1 A3.00 3 A3.00 LOBBY 156 SUPERVISOROFFICE 155 GROOMING 157 HALL 119 ADOPTABLE 142 ADOPTABLE 141 MEET&GREET 151 MEET&GREET 152 ELEC 115 ADOPTABLE 112 ADOPTABLE 111 OVERFLOW 110 TEMP HOLDING 109 CANINE QUARANTINE 131 CANINEISOLATION 132 FELINE ISOLATION 133 EUTHANASIA& COLDSTORAGE 102 FOODSTORAGE 101 SUPPLY 134 D110-3 D110-4 D102-2 D102-1 D154-1 D155-1 D117-1 D115-2 D101-1 D111-1 D112-1 D141-1 D142-1 D151-1 D152-1 D157-1 D112-3 D123-1 D118-1 D119-1 A2.00 1 MEETING 154 2 A3.00 RECORDSTORAGE 158 A B C D E F F 4 2 3 5 JANITOR 116 MEN'S 113 WOMEN'S 114 BREAK RM 153 CORRIDOR 117 PROJECT NORTH TRUE NORTH 2 3 5 4 4 7 7 LAUNDRY 104 DISHWASHING 103 TEMP HOLDING 108 ADA 106 JANITOR 120 8 1314 14 14 28 22 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 13 14 14 23 27 29 13 30 7 4 INTAKE PROCESSING 107 23 14 4 14 14 14 14 D101-2 D107-1 D107-2 D108-1 D108-2 D131-1 D132-1 D133-1 D113-1 D114-1 D116-1 D107-1 D112-2 D117-2 D115-1 D109-1D106-1 CORRIDOR 118 D158-1 D120-1 D110-1 D110-2 D156-1 A6.01 1 1 6 9 106 10 14 11 11 11 11 11 PROJECT NORTH TRUE NORTH 1 A1.21/1 A1.20 1 A1.20/1 A1.21 31 A4.00 2 1 1 DEMOLISHED WALL EXISTING WALL NEW WALL RA-DA RANIA ALOMAR DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE 7523 NORTON AVE WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90046 323) 851 4040 DATE SUBMITTAL RA-DAC N O T F O R C O N S T R U C IT O N DO N O T S C A L E F R O M D R A W IN G S SEAL AND SIGNATURE PROJECT SHEET NAME DWG NO. PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECK BY: PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS CLIENT INFORMATION 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 L K J I H G F E D C B A PL O T D A T E Javier Sanchez Engineering & Project Management Director City of Porterville 11/08/19 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 11/ 12/ 2019 3 3 1: 54 P M A1.10 FLOOR PLAN Porterville Animal Shelter Facility DE S I G N D E V E L O P M E N T Porterville Animal Shelter Facility 185 N D St Porterville, CA 93257 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES - PLAN 17 COMMERCIAL GRADE DISHWASHER. SEE A6.00 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE. 18 ELECTRONIC KEYPAD, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE. 19 WALK-IN FREEZER. SEE SPECIAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE. 20 DOOR WITH SECURED ELECTRONIC ACCESS, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR DETAIL. 21 MOTORIZED ROLL-UP DOOR, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE. SEE ELECTRICAL FOR CONNECTION. 22 STAFF LOCKER. OWNER TO FURNISH. 23 DOUBLE STACKED RAISED KENNEL WITH INTEGRAL DRAINS. MFR: MASON K-9 CABINS. FRP PANELS. STAINLESS STEEL GATE, WIRE GRID. SEE A5.00 FOR TYPICAL SECTION. 27 SOLID COLOR REINFORCED COMPOSITE TOILET PARTITION, TYP. 28 DRINKING FOUNTAIN. 29 FIRE-RESISTANT PLYWOOD BACKBOARD FOR TELECOM AND SERVER. 30 SHELF. OWNER TO FURNISH. 31 DOUBLE HEIGHT CAT SUITE, TYP. MFR: MASON QUIETCOTTAGES FIBERGLASS CAGES. 32 PANEL MOUNTED CROSS DOOR, TYP. 33 GLASS, GL-1. KEYNOTES - PLAN 1 DOUBLE HEIGHT CAT SUITE, TYP. MFR: MASON POWDERCOAT CAT SUITES IN TURQUOISE BLUE. 2 ADOPTABLE 'PLAY PEN'. TO BE FINISHED WITH EPOXY BASED FLOORING, COVE BASE, GLASS HALFWALLS AND GATE AT 4'H 3 EXISTING COUNTER TO REMAIN. PROVIDE NEW PAINT PER FINISH SCHEDULE. 4 EXISTING LOAD BEARING WALL. REMAIN IN PLACE. 5 CASEWORK PER FINISH SCHEDULE. OWNER TO FURNISH REFRIGERATOR AND MICROWAVE. 6 NEW INSULATED GLASS IN EXISTING ALUM. STOREFRONT. SEE ELEVATION. 7 EXISTING DOOR. SEE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR NEW HARDWARE. 8 WATER HEATER ON PLATFORM. SEE PLUMBING FOR DETAIL. 9 EXISTING DOOR. PROTECT IN PLACE. 10 METAL PANEL, PTD., WITH STENCILED GRAPHICS. 3'W X 8'T. 11 NEW GLASS IN EXISTING WOOD-FRAMED STOREFRONT. 13 CASEWORK PER FINISH SCHEDULE. 14 FREESTANDING ABOVE-FLOOR KENNEL, TYP. BASIS-OF-DESIGN: MASON MOLDED ULTRABASE ABOVE FLOOR KENNEL W/ INTEGRATED DRAIN, BUILT-IN FEEDER BOWL AND NELSON AUTOMATIC DOG WATERER. SEE PLUMBING FOR CONNECTIONS. SEE A5.00 FOR TYPICAL SECTION. LEGEND Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY // 185 N D ST, PORTERVILLE, CA 93257 RA-DA // 03.28.19 PHASE I - ORIGINAL PLAN D1 02 1 W102-1W102-2W103-1W103-2W103-3 D1 03 1 D116-1D117-1 D115-1D115-2 W105-1W105-2W105-3 D1041 D1121 D113-1 D110 1 D110 2 D109 1 D1081 D132-1 D109-2D118-2D120-1 D118-3 D120-2 D132-1 D132-2 D121-1D122-1D123-1 W123-1 D120-4 D1 27 1 D1 301 D128-1 D126-1 D126 2 W126-1 HB HB C RA-DA PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY PROJECT: PROJECT ADDRESS: CLIENT INFORMATION: 12345678910111213141516 A B C D E F G H I J K L 12345678910111213141516 Rania Alomar Design & Architecture7523NortonAvenueWestHollywood, CA90046( 323) 851-4040 no t f o r c o n s tr u c tio n DATE:SUBMITTAL: PR INTED PROJECT DATE: PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY PROJECTNo.: DRAWINGBY: CHKBY: DWGNo.: CADOFILENo.: SEAL & SIGNATURE: of 12 4 2018 9 21 AM 185 N DSTPORTERVILLE CA 93257 MICHAEL K. REED PUBLIC WORKSDIRECTORCITYOFPORTERVILLE FLOORPLANA1.10 Ref: - C16 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" FLOOR PLAN A1.10 LOBBY 101 KEYNOTES DOUBLE HEIGHT CAT CONDO, TYP. MFR: MASON RAINTREE CATCONDOS1 2 3 4 5 6 16 17 18 19 20 217 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 SUPERVISOROFFICE 102 SUPERVISORMEETING 103MEET & GREET 116 MEET & GREET 117 HALL 115 BREAKROOM 105 MEN 108 WOMEN 107 CORRIDOR 104 LOCKER & VAULT (RECORDS) 112 JANITOR 113 ELECTIRCAL 111 STORAGE 110 CRATESTORAGE 114LAB & GROOMING 109 ADOPTABLE( PUBLIC SIDE) 118 OVERFLOW 119 INTAKE & TEMP HOLDING( PRIVATE SIDE) 120 FELINEISOLATION 121 CANINEISOLATION 122 CANINEQUARANTINE 123 DISHWASHING 124 ACCESSIBLERESTROOM 127 LAUNDRY 129 INTAKEPROCESSING 130 SALLY PORT/ SECURE AREA 131 EUTHANAISIA & COLD STORAGE 128 FOOD STORAGE 126 SUPPLY 125 2 ADOPTABLE PET OF THE DAY "PLAYPEN". TO BE FINISHED WITH EPOXY BASED FLOORING, COVE BASE, GLASS HALFWALLS AND GATE AT 4'H. 3 EXISTING COUNTER TO REMAIN AND TO BE AMENDED TO MEETACCESSIBILITYREQUIREMENTS . PROVIDE NEW PAINT ANDNEW COUNTERTOP PERFINISH SCHEDULE. 4 5 STAFF METAL LOCKER, 6'H KITCHENETTE. PROVIDE REFRIGERATOR, SINK (W/ DISPOSAL). CASEWORK PERFINISHSCHEDULE 6 FLOOR DRAIN, TYP. PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE TOWARDS FLOOR DRAIN. 6 8 7 8 GLASS STOREFRONT SLIDING DOOR. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE. 9 BENCH SEATING PERFINISH SCHEDULE 25101112 6 GROOMING SINK, STAINLESS STEEL REFRIGERATED STORAGE FOR VACCINE AND SAMPLE EXAM/ GROOMING TABLE UPPER CABINET SHELVES. CASEWORK PER FINISH SCHEDULE. 13 6 6 14 FREE-STANDING ANDRAISED KENNEL. MFR: MASON MOLDED ULTRA BASE ABOVE FLOOR KENNEL W/ INTEGRATED DRAIN. PROVIDE 1FLOOR DRAIN INEVERY 6KENNELS, MAX 24' RUN. KENNEL TO BE 7'-0"H. FRP PARTITION WALL W/ 3'HSTAINLESS STEEL GRID ATTHETOP 1 14 14 78 1414 159 13 11 16 COMMERCIAL-GRADE SINK W/ DISPOSAL DIGITAL SCALE 17618 1517 COMMERCIAL-GRADE DISH-WASHER 25 13 15 13 25 19 14 ELECTRONIC ACCESS KEYPAD 7' x10' WALK-INFREEZER 18 20 20 DOOR WITH SECURED ELECTRONIC ACCESS 22 21 NEW ROLL-UP DOOR PER FINISH SCHEDULE. LEGEND EXISTING WALL. PROTECT INPLACE. NEW WALL LEGEND NEWWINDOWWXX-X DXX-X NEW DOOR 22 NEW STOREFRONT TO MATCH EXISTING PLAYPEN 106 696 23 23 COMMERCIAL GRADE FURNITURE, TYP. 23 23 13 25 BASE CABINET PER FINISH SCHEDULE 26 26 26 ADA STALL - PROVIDE APPURTENANCE PER ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD 27 27 SOLID PHENOLIC TOILET PARTITION, TYP. 6 28 DRINKING FOUNTAIN 28 29 29 FIRE-RESISTANT PLYWOOD BACKBOARD FOR TELECOM AND SERVER CORRIDOR 132 6 6 6 6 6 8'- 0 30 COMMERCIAL SHELVING 30 Type of Occupancy Business Group B Occuapnt Load Factor Business - 100 Gross Occupant Load 11016 SF /100 = 111 GENERAL NOTES 1. NEW HVAC, UNO. ALLNEW DUCTWORK TO BEEXPOSED, ANDPAINTED. 2. NEW LIGHTING AND EXIT LIGHTING THROUGHOUT. 3. PROVIDE FIRE SPRINKLERS THROUGHOUT. 4. PROVIDE WAYFINDING SIGNAGE THROUGHOUT PERACCESSIBILITYREQUIREMENT 34 34 31 HOSE BIB 32 RE-USE EXISTING HVAC 33 COMMERCIAL-GRADE SINK, STAINLESS STEEL 34 PANIC HARDWARE 31 33 31 33 32 32 32 Male Female Unisex Required Provided Required Provided Required Provided Water Closet 2 2 4 4 0 1 Urinal 1 1 0 0 0 0 Lavatories 1 1 2 2 0 1 Required Provided Drinking Fountain 1 1 Service Sink 1 1 ORIGINAL COST ESTIMATE EST QTY UNIT COST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIONCOSTSITEIMPROVEMENTS40,765 SF 6.59$ 268,488$ BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 11,000 SF 374.99$ 4,124,918$ TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 4,393,406$ BASE BID COST ESTIMATE EST QTY UNIT COST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST SITE IMPROVEMENTS, after Value Engineering 40,765 SF 1.79$ 72,800$ BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS, after Value Engineering 6,512 SF 311.45$ 2,028,174$ TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 2,100,974$ PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY // 185 N D ST, PORTERVILLE, CA 93257 RA-DA // 03.28.19 HB HB C RA-DA PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY PROJECT: PROJECT ADDRESS: CLIENT INFORMATION: 12345678910111213141516 A B C D E F G H I J K L 12345678910111213141516 Rania Alomar Design & Architecture7523NortonAvenueWestHollywood, CA 90046 323) 851-4040 no t f o r c o n s t r u c t io n DATE:SUBMITTAL: PR IN TED PROJECT DATE: PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY PROJECT No.: DRAWING BY: CHKBY: DWGNo.: CADOFILENo.: SEAL & SIGNATURE: of 3/ 28 2019 5 27 PM 185 N DSTPORTERVILLE CA 93257 MICHAEL K. REEDPUBLICWORKSDIRECTORCITYOFPORTERVILLE KEYNOTES DOUBLE HEIGHT CAT CONDO, TYP. MFR: MASON RAINTREE CAT CONDOS ADOPTABLE PET OF THE DAY "PLAYPEN". TO BE FINISHED WITH EPOXY BASED FLOORING, COVE BASE, GLASS HALFWALLS AND GATE AT 4'H. EXISTING COUNTER TO REMAIN AND TO BE AMENDED TO MEETACCESSIBILITYREQUIREMENTS . PROVIDE NEW PAINT AND NEW COUNTERTOP PER FINISH SCHEDULE. STAFF METAL LOCKER, 6'H KITCHENETTE. PROVIDE REFRIGERATOR, SINK (W/ DISPOSAL). CASEWORK PERFINISH SCHEDULE FLOOR DRAIN, TYP. PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE TOWARDS FLOOR DRAIN. GLASS STOREFRONT SLIDING DOOR. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE. BENCH SEATING PER FINISH SCHEDULE GROOMING SINK, STAINLESS STEEL REFRIGERATED STORAGE FOR VACCINE AND SAMPLE EXAM/ GROOMING TABLE UPPER CABINET SHELVES. CASEWORK PER FINISH SCHEDULE. FREE-STANDING AND RAISED KENNEL. MFR: MASON MOLDED ULTRA BASE ABOVEFLOORKENNELW/ INTEGRATED DRAIN. PROVIDE 1FLOOR DRAIN INEVERY 6KENNELS, MAX 24' RUN. KENNEL TOBE 7'-0"H. FRPPARTITION WALL W/ 3'HSTAINLESS STEEL GRID ATTHETOP COMMERCIAL-GRADE SINKW/ DISPOSAL DIGITAL SCALE COMMERCIAL-GRADE DISH-WASHER ELECTRONIC ACCESS KEYPAD 7' x10' WALK-IN FREEZER DOOR WITH SECURED ELECTRONIC ACCESS NEW ROLL-UP DOOR PER FINISH SCHEDULE. LEGEND EXISTING WALL. PROTECT INPLACE. NEW WALL LEGEND NEWWINDOWWXX-X DXX-X NEW DOOR NEW STOREFRONT TO MATCH EXISTING COMMERCIAL GRADE FURNITURE, TYP. BASE CABINET PER FINISH SCHEDULE ADA STALL - PROVIDE APPURTENANCE PER ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD SOLID PHENOLIC TOILET PARTITION, TYP. DRINKING FOUNTAIN FIRE-RESISTANT PLYWOOD BACKBOARD FOR TELECOM AND SERVER COMMERCIAL SHELVING Type of Occupancy Business Group B Occuapnt Load Factor Business - 100 Gross Occupant Load 11016 SF /100 = 111 GENERAL NOTES 1. NEW HVAC, UNO. ALL NEW DUCTWORK TO BE EXPOSED, AND PAINTED. 2. NEW LIGHTING AND EXIT LIGHTING THROUGHOUT. 3. PROVIDE FIRE SPRINKLERS THROUGHOUT. 4. PROVIDE WAYFINDING SIGNAGE THROUGHOUT PERACCESSIBILITYREQUIREMENT HOSE BIB RE-USE EXISTING HVAC COMMERCIAL-GRADE SINK, STAINLESS STEEL PANIC HARDWARE Male Female Unisex Required Provided Required Provided Required Provided Water Closet 2 2 4 4 0 1 Urinal 1 1 0 0 0 0 Lavatories 1 1 2 2 0 1 Required Provided Drinking Fountain 1 1 Service Sink 1 1 STACKED KENNELS PHASE II - PROPOSED PLAN Central corridor: Avoid walking through kennels to get to the back-of-house Smaller rooms: less distraction for the dogs, better sound control, also allows project to be split into phases Linear arrangement for kennels: more efficient layout for the plumbing system Potential connection to dog park: rooms can open up directly to the Dog Park Kennel count: total number remains the same, the smaller kennels are stacked PROGRAMMING LOBBY PLAYPEN CRATE STORAGE MEET & GREET LAB & GROOMING JANITOR ELECSTORAGE W LOCKER OFFICEMEETING M STAFF MEET & GREET ADOPTION (16) INTAKE & TEMP HOLDING (23) INTAKE & TEMP HOLDING (18)SALLY PORT LAUNDRY DISHWASHING SUPPLY INTAKE PROCESSING ADA ADOPTION (14) ADOPTION (14) CAT ISO DOG ISO DOG QUARANTINE EUTHANASIA & COLD STORAGE FOOD STORAGE ADOPTION (14) Examples of Client Presentations and Phasing Plan Within this layout we were also able to concentrate on and maintain the comfort levels of the animals by producing a lay out where kennels did not face each other. This not only helps to keep the animals calm but also has the added benefit of mitigating noise from barking dogs. By having a long hall that halves the building we were also able to keep the clinic, isolation, euthanasia, and transport animals separated from the adoption center. This creates a healthier environment for both the animals and the general public who visit looking for animals to re- home. DESIGN In order to make the new facility feel welcoming to the general public, without sacrificing money that is needed for critical equipment, we have pursued simple solutions like fresh paint, engaging signage, and bright graphics to draw people through the facility. Simple solutions such as these end up serving a dual purpose. They don’t only enliven the space but they also help educate the public to the goals of the facility. Rails to Trails” is an 8 mile stretch of railroad land that is being turned into a public park and is included in this project’s scope. As part of the scope we have managed to connect the new dog park directly behind the facility as the entrance to this section of the trail. Also, the main hall within the facility runs directly to the park and gives a direct line of site from the main street. Add Alternatives 1-4 Rails to Trails PORTERVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES SOUTH LOS ANGELES ANIMAL CARE CENTER II - LEED SILVER Location: Los Angeles, California Size: Indoor Facility Size - 23,000 SF / Outdoor Kennel Area - 40,000 SF / Kennels - 270 Owner Reference Information Client: The City of Los Angeles Contact Name: Alan Espiritu Contact Information: T (213) 202-9974 E Alan.Espiritu@lacity.org Project Cost: $12M Start Date: July 2008 Completion Date: March 2013 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Delivery Method & Role This Project was a Design-Bid-Build project for the City of Los Angeles, where the low bid was awarded the project. RA-DA completed all aspects of design and construction administration on the project including: Zoning and Building Code Analysis Program verification Interim Program changes (during design and construction) Concept Design (3 concepts were designed and presented to the client for selection) Schematic Design & Design Development Signage and way finding design Complete Construction Documentation Coordination with all Engineers and Consultants Cultural Affairs Committee presentations and approvals Neighborhood Councils and CRA presentations and approvals Animal Commission presentations and approvals. Permit and Plan check (complex jurisdictional approvals procured) Conditional Use Permit Zoning Variance Support during bid and Negotiation Phase Construction Administration throughout the construction phase (all aspects of CA included within our scope: site visits, RFIs, ASIs, Submittal review, Substitution review etc. Experience & Lessons Learned The South LA facility has a 23,595 SF Indoor Facility and a 40,000 SF Outdoor Kennel Area. It is also rated LEED Silver, allowing us to identify early on which credits to pursue and which will be difficult or potentially costly to obtain. SUSTAINABILITY This facility is highly functional, easy to maintain, and Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES as self-sufficient as possible. A typical commercial building of this size would normally generate up to 55,000 pounds of solid waste during construction. The green building practices applied in this project aimed to substantially reduce the negative environmental impacts that a non-sustainable development would impose on the site. As an added goal and benefit, the design measures incorporated reduce operating costs and create a better working environment for the staff and visitors and a better living environment for the animals. These are some of the other measures we incorporated into the design of this project: reduce power usage with the use of smart day- lighting systems (including tubular skylights), time clocks, lighting controls, thermal controls and natural ventilation in some of the spaces. reduce water demand with the use of low flow fixtures, smart laundry machines, and drought tolerant plants and study the feasibility of reusing grey water for the flushing of trench drains. reduce water pollution with the use of planters and ‘hydrodynamic separators’ that filters the water before it returns into the ground or the storm system. reduce the ‘heat-island’ effect with the use of trees and plant-life to shade any concrete areas. use an ‘energy smart’ roof that reflect the heat away from the building, and consider other ground surfaces that reduce heat build-up in the parking lots and any other outdoor spaces. preserve the ‘Night sky’ by using cut off fixtures in the parking lots and on the exterior of the building and also by locating fixtures such that there is minimal spill off site. use of in-ground radiant heating for the comfort of the animals and the staff as it is a very efficient method of maintaining a comfortable environment. the design provides views to the outside to maintain a healthy environment for the staff and the animals. reduced pollutants in the air with basic provisions such as the elimination of tobacco smoke in and around the building; the design of the heating and cooling system for thermal comfort; and the installation of sensors that monitor the quality of air in the ventilation systems. took measures to keep the air in all animal rooms clean and disease free, also minimizing odors to make these spaces healthy for humans and animals. During construction we put in place an ‘Indoor Air Quality Management Plan’ that protected the environment for the construction workers and the future inhabitants of the building (both human and animal) carefully selected materials so that they are low-emitting for reduced VOC and also regionally procured and containing recycled content. a waste management plan that resulted in a high percentage of waste being diverted from landfills and incinerators. MEDICALAREASPAY & NEUTER CLINIC FIELD ENFORCEMENT CLERICAL COMMUNITY CENTER GROOMING PUBLIC ANIMAL RECEIVING STAFF SUPPORT FOOD PREP, STORAGE, & KITCHEN EUTHANASIA DOG ISOLATION DOG QUARANTINE CAT ISO CAT Q BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT PUPPY PATCH’ LANDSCAPE AREA AVIARY PUBLIC PARKING STAFF PARKING CITY VEHICLE PARKING PUPPY PATCH’ LANDSCAPE AREA CATCAGESCATCAGES TRAINING YARD CATNSMALLANIMALHOLDING ANIMAL TRANSFER AREA TRAP STORAGE EUTHANASIA LOADING GENERAL LOADING GET ACQUAINTED YARD GET ACQUAINTED YARD VEHICLEWASH AREA A C B D GALLERY MAIN BOU L E V A R D KEY FLOOR PLAN 0 5’ 10’ 20’40’80’ N SOUTH LOS ANGELES ANIMAL CARE CENTER II - LEED SILVER Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES N 1:600 DOUBLE KENNEL DOG PARK REST- ROOM REST- ROOM REST- ROOM REST- ROOM VENTURA COUNTY VCAS MASTER PLAN Location: Camarillo, California Size: 5 acres Owner Reference Information: Client: County of Ventura Contact Name: Jonathan Jacobson / Manager Contact Information: 600 Aviation Dr. Camarillo, CA 93010 T: 805.665.0268 Project Estimated Cost: $28M Start Date: October 2016 Completion Date: August 2017 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar SUMMARY RA-DA was retained by the Ventura County Public Works Agency after a Needs Assessment Study was conducted and it became clear to the County and Animal Services Department that the existing facility was failing them and needed an extensive master planning revamp. We studied multiple ways to upgrade the facility and provided them with schemes both for reusing parts of the facility and rebuilding the entire facility. We also studied different sites and the possibility of building an annex adoption center in town where it would create stronger community connection. Our work was broken into 5 phases: Discovery and Data Collection Programming / Identify Goals Concept Design & Analysis Master plan Phasing Study Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES EXISTING ISOLATION EXISTING VET EXISTING HOLDING RM STORAGE CONTAINERS EXISTINGSPAY & NEUTER EXISTING STALL DEMOLISHED BUILDING VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER RA-DA 08/25/2016 CAMARILLO SHELTER OVERALL SITE PLAN 1/64” = 1’-0” RA-DA 06/24/2015 NORTH PUBLIC PARKING ADMIN KENNELS VET BLDG UTILITY QUAR- ANTINE BARN STAFF VEHICLE PARKING STAFF PARKING public entry 1:600 A1 pair with A-R) existing vs new DIAGRAM Site: 600 Aviation Dr., Camarillo Zoning: M-1 Light Manufacturing Site Area: 191,000 SF (4.38 AC) EXISTING NEW DEMOLITION Summary Stay in existing location Keep property size as is Keep and renovate as much as possible, while adding as little new construction as is feasible in order to have a functional facility EXISTING Barn (F) EXISTING Admin (A) DEMOLISHED BUILDING (C) DEMOLISHED BUILDING (B) DEMOLISHED BUILDING (E) DEMOLISHED BUILDING (D) VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER RA-DA 08/25/2016 CAMARILLO SHELTER OVERALL SITE PLAN 1/64” = 1’-0” RA-DA 06/24/2015 NORTH PUBLIC PARKING ADMIN KENNELS VET BLDG UTILITY QUAR- ANTINE BARN STAFF VEHICLE PARKING STAFF PARKING publicentry 1:600 EXISTING NEW DEMOLITION A2 pair with A-R) existing vs new DIAGRAM Summary Stay in existing location Keep property size as is New facility with only Administrative Building and Barn as existing. Site: 600 Aviation Dr., Camarillo Zoning: M-1 Light Manufacturing Site Area: 191,000 SF (4.38 AC) DEMOLISHED BUILDING (C) DEMOLISHED BUILDING (D) EXISTING VET (B) EXISTING Utility (E) EXISTINGAdmin (A) EXISTING Barn (F) VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER RA-DA 08/25/2016 CAMARILLO SHELTER OVERALL SITE PLAN 1/64” = 1’-0” RA-DA 06/24/2015 NORTH PUBLIC PARKING ADMIN KENNELS VET BLDG UTILITY QUAR- ANTINE BARN STAFF VEHICLE PARKING STAFF PARKING public entry 1:600 B pair with B-R) existing vs new DIAGRAM EXISTING NEW DEMOLITION Summary Stay in existing location Increase property size; add 2 acres adjacent Demolish substandard buildings (kennel, quarantine and isolation buildings) New construction to replace demolished buildings and to provide remainder of program Complete interior renovation of remaining buildings Site: 600 Aviation Dr., Camarillo Zoning: M-1 Light Manufacturing Site Area: 191,000 SF + 96,700 SF 287,700 SF (6.60 AC)EX I S T I N G p r o p e r t y l i n e NE W p r o p e r t y l i n e Sample pages from the final master planning document that show different approaches to the master planning of the facility. 6. PHASING PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 NEW AREA OF WORK VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER MASTERPLAN STUDY RA-DA 10/10/2017 22 Therearemanyfactorstoconsiderwhenplanning theconstructionofthisproject. Adrivingfactoristhat thefacilityneedstoremainfullyfunctionalduringthe constructionprocess, andthedisruptionandstressto animalsandstaffneedstobeminimized. Inordertostructureaminimallyinvasiveprocess, we mappedoutaphasedapproachtotherealizationofthe newfacility. Thefollowingpagesexplainthisapproachindetailed diagrams. Eachphaseisfurtherbrokendownintosquare footageofdemolition, newconstructionandrenovation in ordertodetermineprojectedcostperphase. Thecostpersquarefootnumbersareroughandbased on ouroriginalcostestimatefortheproject. Theyaremeant tobeusedasguidelinesonly. 6. PHASING PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 NEW AREA OF WORK VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER MASTERPLAN STUDY RA-DA 10/10/2017 22 Therearemanyfactorstoconsiderwhenplanning theconstructionofthisproject. Adrivingfactoristhat thefacilityneedstoremainfullyfunctionalduringthe constructionprocess, andthedisruptionandstressto animalsandstaffneedstobeminimized. Inordertostructureaminimallyinvasiveprocess, we mappedoutaphasedapproachtotherealizationofthe newfacility. Thefollowingpagesexplainthisapproachindetailed diagrams. Eachphaseisfurtherbrokendownintosquare footageofdemolition, newconstructionandrenovation in ordertodetermineprojectedcostperphase. Thecostpersquarefootnumbersareroughandbased on ouroriginalcostestimatefortheproject. Theyaremeant tobeusedasguidelinesonly. 6. PHASING PHASE3 PHASE 4 PHASE1 PHASE 2 NEWAREAOFWORK VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER MASTERPLAN STUDY RA-DA 10/10/2017 22 Therearemanyfactorstoconsiderwhenplanning theconstructionofthisproject. Adrivingfactoristhat thefacilityneedstoremainfullyfunctionalduringthe constructionprocess, andthedisruptionandstressto animalsandstaffneedstobeminimized. Inordertostructureaminimallyinvasiveprocess, we mappedoutaphasedapproachtotherealizationofthe newfacility. Thefollowingpagesexplainthisapproachindetailed diagrams. Eachphaseisfurtherbrokendownintosquare footageofdemolition, newconstructionandrenovationin ordertodetermineprojectedcostperphase. Thecostpersquarefootnumbersareroughandbasedon ouroriginalcostestimatefortheproject. Theyaremeant tobeusedasguidelinesonly. 6. PHASING PHASE3 PHASE 4 PHASE1 PHASE 2 NEWAREAOFWORK VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER MASTERPLAN STUDY RA-DA 10/10/2017 22 Therearemanyfactorstoconsiderwhenplanning theconstructionofthisproject. Adrivingfactoristhat thefacilityneedstoremainfullyfunctionalduringthe constructionprocess, andthedisruptionandstressto animalsandstaffneedstobeminimized. Inordertostructureaminimallyinvasiveprocess, we mappedoutaphasedapproachtotherealizationofthe newfacility. Thefollowingpagesexplainthisapproachindetailed diagrams. Eachphaseisfurtherbrokendownintosquare footageofdemolition, newconstructionandrenovationin ordertodetermineprojectedcostperphase. Thecostpersquarefootnumbersareroughandbasedon ouroriginalcostestimatefortheproject. Theyaremeant tobeusedasguidelinesonly. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES LONG BEACH ANIMAL EMERGENCY Location: Long Beach, California Size: 3,300 SF Owner Reference Information Client: Jonnie Quantz, President/CEO Animal Emergency Center Contact Name: Jonnie Quantz 3511 Pacific Coast Hwy Suite A Torrance, CA 90275 T (310)325-3000 E JQDVM@aol.com Project Estimated Cost: $100K Start Date: July 2011 Completion Date: November 2011 Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Delivery Method & Role This project is characterized by an extremely efficient and functional design, an extraordinarily fast design and construction schedule and a very stringent budget. Exceeding expectations, RA- DA worked closely with the client and met all three parameters and procured a permit for construction. RA-DA was the architect on the project. The individuals at RA-DA that worked on this project and some subconsultants are the same individuals that will be assigned to your Animal Shelter project adding a higher level of understanding and experience in this facility type. RA-DA provided the following Services: Programming; Design; Construction Documentation; Permitting. Experience & Lessons Learned Although the overall program and square footage is significantly smaller than your Shelter, this project utilized every square inch of space and packed it with all the necessary exam rooms, surgery rooms, labs, kennels, and offices any Animal Hospital or Emergency needs. Efficiency is the experience and lesson learned from this project. Our team will be able to use the experience gained in this low- budget, quick-turnaround project and directly apply it to your facility. We will be able to produce plans and layouts that are as efficient as possible. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal FAYETTEVILLE ANIMAL SERVICES FACILITY RFQ 25-15 RA-DA6APPENDICES SOUTH LOS ANGELES ANIMAL CARE CENTER I - LEED SILVER Location: Los Angeles, California Size: Indoor Facility Size - 27,000 SF / Outdoor Kennel Area - 42,200 SF / Kennels: 225 Outdoor, 50 Indoor Owner Reference Information Client: City of L.A. Bureau of Engineering Contact Name: Kirah Vohra T (213) 485-5971 E kirah.vohra@lacity.org Project Estimated Cost: $22M Start Date: October 2008 Completion Date: Permitted not built Proposed staff for Fayetteville: Rania Alomar Delivery Method & Role This facility was the first that the City commissioned of this size. The resulting design focuses on the development of an outdoor kennel ‘garden’ covered in a canopy of glass photo-voltaic panels to mitigate the energy usage of the building. The Shelter integrates kennels with outdoor landscaped spaces so that every kennel is facing its own outdoor area. In the animal shelter, the solar panel array solved a series of program requirements including shade for visitor and animals, an armature for misting and climate control. The program is compacted into two tightly packed wings, minimizing any circulation for an extremely efficient plan. This is a LEED Silver building. Experience & Lessons Learned Rania Alomar was the Design Lead for this project. And although it was never built, the project did go through all of the design & permitting phases. Ms Alomar took the project from Programming, Schematic Design, Construction Documentation, LEED, & even got final Building Permits. The experience gained helped streamline the second animal shelter she designed and in turn will help streamline the design of your shelter as well. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal THANK YOU FOR YOURCONSIDERATIONAp pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 14 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design SECTION C: Signature Submittal 11.. DDIISSCCLLOOSSUURREE IINNFFOORRMMAATTIIOONN a. Proposer must disclose any possible conflict of interest with the City of Fayetteville, including, but not limited to, any relationship with any City of Fayetteville employee. Proposer response must disclose if a known relationship exists between any principal or employee of your firm and any City of Fayetteville employee or elected City of Fayetteville official. i. If, to your knowledge, no relationship exists, this should also be stated in your response. Failure to disclose such a relationship may result in cancellation of a purchase and/or contract as a result of your response. This form must be completed and returned in order for your bid/proposal to be eligible for consideration. PPLLEEAASSEE CCHHEECCKK OONNEE OOFF TTHHEE FFOOLLLLOOWWIINNGG TTWWOO OOPPTTIIOONNSS,, AASS IITT AAPPPPRROOPPRRIIAATTEELLYY AAPPPPLLIIEESS TTOO YYOOUURR FFIIRRMM:: 1) NO KNOWN RELATIONSHIP EXISTS 2) RELATIONSHIP EXISTS (Please explain): _______________________________________ b. I certify that; as an officer of this organization, or per the attached letter of authorization, am duly authorized to certify the information provided herein is accurate and true; and my organization shall comply with all State and Federal Equal Opportunity and Non-Discrimination requirements and conditions of employment. c. Proposer agrees that they shall have a current, valid registration with the Arkansas Secretary of State at time of RFQ deadline OR be able to provide proof of registration before recommendation of award to Fayetteville City Council. d. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-503, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-503. If at any time during contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. e. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-1002, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and Ammunition Industries during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-1002. If at any time during the contract the contractor decides to boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, and/or Ammunition Industries, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 15 of 16 22.. PPRRIIMMAARRYY CCOONNTTAACCTT IINNFFOORRMMAATTIIOONN At the discretion of the City, one or more firms may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking of the firms, which may also include oral interviews. NNOOTTEE:: EEaacchh PPrrooppoosseerr sshhaallll ssuubbmmiitt ttoo tthhee CCiittyy aa pprriimmaarryy ccoonnttaacctt nnaammee,, ee--mmaaiill aaddddrreessss,, aanndd pphhoonnee nnuummbbeerr ((pprreeffeerraabbllyy aa cceellll pphhoonnee nnuummbbeerr)) wwhheerree tthhee CCiittyy sseelleeccttiioonn ccoommmmiitttteeee ccaann ccaallll ffoorr ccllaarriiffiiccaattiioonn oorr iinntteerrvviieeww vviiaa tteelleepphhoonnee.. Corporate Name of Firm: ___________________________________________________________________ Primary Contact: ____________________________ Title of Primary Contact: _________________________ Phone#1 (cell preferred): ____________________________Phone#2: ______________________________ E-Mail Address: __________________________________________________________________________ 33.. AACCKKNNOOWWLLEEDDGGEEMMEENNTT OOFF AADDDDEENNDDAA Acknowledge receipt of addenda for this invitation to bid, request for proposal, or request for qualification by signing and dating below. All addendums are hereby made a part of the bid or RFQ documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein. Proposers/Bidders should indicate their receipt of same in the appropriate blank listed herein. Failure to do so may subject Contractor to disqualification. AADDDDEENNDDUUMM NNOO.. SSIIGGNNAATTUURREE AANNDD PPRRIINNTTEEDD NNAAMMEE DDAATTEE AACCKKNNOOWWLLEEDDGGEEDD 44.. DDEEBBAARRMMEENNTT CCEERRTTIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN: b. As an interested party on this project, you are required to provide debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order. Certification can be done by completing and signing this form. c. Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 “Debarment and Suspension“ requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub-recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. d. Signature certifies that neither you nor your principal is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA Rania Alomar Principal 323.851.4040 rania@ra-da.com Rania Alomar Rania Alomar 08/29/2025 09/08/2025 1 2 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal City of Fayetteville, AR RFQ 25-15, Animal Services Facility Design Page 16 of 16 55.. SSIIGGNNAATTUURREE SSUUBBMMIITTTTAALL NAME OF COMPANY: _____________________________________________________________________ PHYSICAL ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________________________ MAILING ADDRESS: _______________________________________________________________________ TAX ID #: __________________________ AR. SECRETARY OF STATE FILING #: ________________________ PHONE: _________________________________________ FAX: ___________________________________ E-MAIL: ________________________________________________________________________________ BByy ssuubbmmiittttiinngg yyoouurr rreessppoonnssee,, yyoouu cceerrttiiffyy tthhaatt yyoouu aarree aauutthhoorriizzeedd ttoo rreepprreesseenntt aanndd bbiinndd yyoouurr ccoommppaannyy :: SIGNATURE: _____________________________________________________________________________ PRINTED NAME: _________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: _______________________________________ DATE: _____________________________________ EENNDD OOFF RRFFQQ DDOOCCUUMMEENNTT Rania Alomar 09/18/2025Principal rania@ra-da.com Rania Alomar Architect, Inc. dba RA-DA 323.851.4040 7523 Norton Avenue, West Hollywood, CA 90046 7523 Norton Avenue, West Hollywood, CA 90046 82-1644025 Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal 1 Beilfuss, Amanda From:Meredith Hendricks <meredith.hendricks@entegritypartners.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 22, 2025 12:34 PM To:Beilfuss, Amanda Cc:Rania Alomar Subject:Addendum to RFQ 25-15 Attachments:IMG_3767.JPG CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Fayetteville.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Afternoon Amanda, The company that I work for,Entegrity,has been added to the RA DA team for sustainability consulting expertise.We were added to the team after the initial RFQ response so this form was not completed with our team included.We are submitting this form to disclose that I have a family member that works at the City of Fayetteville.I oversee our sustainability team and our projects but will not be the day to day contact for the project. Best, Meredith Meredith Hendricks,Vice President Sustainability C:479.466.2826 f:501.227.8648 Entegrity www.entegritypartners.com Please excuse the brevity of and any errors within this email as it was sent from my mobile device. The information contained in this communication is confidential,is intended only for the use of the recipient named above,and may be legally privileged or contain trade secret or proprietary information.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please reply to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it. Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal Ap pendix C RF Q 25 15 An im al Services Facility De sign Ra nia Alo m ars Pro posal