Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-339 (31) CityClerk From:Colene Gaston <colenegaston@outlook.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 6, 2024 4:37 PM To:Agenda Item Comment Cc:Stafford, Bob; Jones, D'Andre; Moore, Sarah; Wiederkehr, Mike; Berna, Scott; Bunch, Sarah; Turk, Teresa; Hertzberg, Holly; Roger Montgomery (rcmontgomerymd@gmail.com) Subject:Agenda Item C.8 RZN-2024-0029 (3179 N. Old Wire Road) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Fayetteville. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Jordon and Members of the Fayetteville Planning Commission: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the appeal of the denial by the Planning Commission of the rezoning request for the 13.65 acres at 3179 N. Old Wire Road. We live approximately three-tenths of a mile east of the subject property. We oppose the requested rezoning from Residential-Agricultural (R-A) to Residential Single-Family, Eight Units per Acre (RSF-8). We recognize that the agenda for tonight’s Council meeting is very full. We hope, however, you have had an opportunity to, at least quickly, review the many comments and signed petitions in opposition to the requested rezoning that were submitted in writing and made in person to the Planning Commission. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no public comments in favor of the requested rezoning. A primary concern expressed in the comments is that the current public infrastructure in the area of the requested rezoning is not sufficient for up to an additional 109 dwelling units. There already are very real traffic safety and water service issues. The proposed development would compound those problems. No less of a concern for many area residents is the incompatibility of the proposed rezoning with the surrounding area. Contrary to the findings of staff in City Memo 2024-339, the proposed rezoning does NOT “provide a logical transition in density from the higher density development to the northwest \[the Ciel Senior Living community\] and the lower density to the south and east.” Please take into consideration the following:  The streets in this area are predominately two-lane rural roads without shoulders. There are no sidewalks or bike lanes. Old Wire Road just southwest of the proposed rezoning has a blind curve. A few tenths of a mile east of the proposed rezoning on Old Wire is another dangerous curve. There have been multiple accidents at these curves.  The intersection of Old Wire and Skillern Roads also is dangerous. Cars approaching from the east on Skillern cannot be seen from Old Wire Road (and often are speeding, as Oakland-Zion Road to Skillern Road to Crossover Road has become a bypass for those wishing to avoid the traffic congestion at the intersection of Mission Boulevard and Crossover Road (Highway 265)).  At peak hours, which are expanding, cars are backed-up in all directions from the intersection of Old Wire Road and Crossover Road. The backup on Old Wire Road at times extends west to the stoplight at the intersection with Old Missouri Road. 1  There have been frequent water line breaks in this area. The most recent break occurred yesterday along Old Wire Road near the subject property and resulted in nearby residences being without water for many hours. We have been without water at our house at least three times this summer. City staff has been commendable in responding to the line breaks, but nonetheless it is a persistent problem.  The issue of insufficient water pressure in the area east of Crossover Road is well- documented. This is not only an inconvenience. It could also be a public health threat. We again acknowledge the professional efforts of City water managers and staff to address the water supply issue, but the fact remains that it will take substantial time and significant resources to solve the problems.  The finding of City staff that the proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding area relies solely on the proximity of the Ciel senior-living facility accessed from Crossover Road. Because of the topography of the area and the current road layout, the senior-living facility isn’t visible from the nearby rural residences and neighborhoods and doesn’t change the character of the area. It also is a quiet and peaceful place with little traffic. The proposed rezoning with a connection through the Ciel facility to Crossover Road would not only disrupt the senior-living community, but it would negatively alter the character of the surrounding area.  The rural character and open space of this area has long provided ecosystem services for the City. That would be lost in a jump from R-A to RSF-8 zoning. The current ecosystem services provided by this lightly developed and agricultural land have a true economic value, which is becoming increasingly rare as Fayetteville continues to grow. Thank you for your consideration, Colene Gaston and Roger Montgomery 3270 N. Rom Orchard Road Fayetteville, AR 72703 2