No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout171-24 RESOLUTION113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Resolution: 171-24 File Number: 2024-221 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES (CONTRACT AMENDMENT): A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,988.75 FOR A MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM AND NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES SUBMISSION FOR THE UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS AND HASKELL HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOODS WHEREAS, on September 5, 2023, the City Council approved a contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for a historic context statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, Stantec has performed that work, which was funded in part by a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant from the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) and in part by a match approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, on March 19, 2024, the City Council approved a second grant from AHPP in the amount of $30,000.00 with a $10,000.00 City match for the second phase of the project, Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes Mayor Jordan to sign an amendment to the professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $34,988.75 for a Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. PASSED and APPROVED on July 2, 2024 A nnrnvrd- Page 1 `J% Attest: %J1111111/ I/�I l��� FAYETTE.V!I.I.i.;ti _ '= Kara Paxton, 1ty erk Treasurer � �• �„ . ,� CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS MEETING OF JULY 2, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEMO 2024-221 TO: Mayor Jordan and City Council THRU: Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director Susan Norton, Chief of Staff FROM: Britin Bostick, Long Range Planning/Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: Approval of an amendment to a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $34,988.75, for a Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $34,988.75, for a Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: On September 5, 2023 the Fayetteville City Council approved a contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for a historic context statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. Stantec has performed that work, which was funded in part by a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant from the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) and in part by a match approved by the City Council. On March 19, 2024 the City Council approved a second grant from AHPP in the amount of $30,000 with a $10,000 match by the Council for the second phase of the project, A Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission. DISCUSSION: Long Range Planning staff requested proposals for this next phase of the project and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. was selected for phase two of the project based on their scoring the highest on the selection criteria. Stantec has successfully completed two historic preservation projects for the City of Fayetteville, the Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan and a historic context statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: The contract amendment is in the amount of $34,988.75. ATTACHMENTS: SRF (#3), 185-23 RESOLUTION (#4), STANTEC - AMENDMENT #1 (#5) Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 == City of Fayetteville, Arkansas y 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479)575-8323 - Legislation Text File #: 2024-221 Approval of an amendment to a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $34,988.75, for a Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,988.75 FOR A MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM AND NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES SUBMISSION FOR THE UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS AND HASKELL HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOODS WHEREAS, on September 5, 2023, the City Council approved a contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for a historic context statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, Stantec has performed that work, which was funded in part by a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant from the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) and in part by a match approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, on March 19, 2024, the City Council approved a second grant from AHPP in the amount of $30,000.00 with a $10,000.00 City match for the second phase of the project, Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes Mayor Jordan to sign an amendment to the professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $34,988.75 for a Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. Page 1 City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2024-221 Item ID 7/2/2024 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non -Agenda Item Britin Bostick 5/31/2024 LONG RANGE PLANNING (634) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $34,988.75, for a Multiple Property Documentation Form and National Register of Historic Places submission for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. Account Number 32207.2401 Project Number Budget Impact: General Fund Fund AR Historic Pres. Program (CLG Grant) - Univ & Haskell Heights, Multi Prop Doc Form Budgeted Item? Yes Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Does item have a direct cost? Yes Item Cost Is a Budget Adjustment attached? No Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Original Contract Number: Comments: Project Title $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 34,988.75 5,011.25 V20221130 2023-00000757 Previous Ordinance or Resolution # 185-23, 99-24 2023-00000045 Approval Date: 9/5/2023,3/19/2024 113 West Mountain Street Fayettevklle, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Resolution: 185-23 File Number. 2023-%6 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. (SERVICE AGREEMENT): A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A CONTRACT WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., PURSUANT TO RFP 23-07, IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,671.00, TO DEVELOP A HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR THE UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS AND HASKELL HEIGHTS NEIGHBORI IOODS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYE7TEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section : That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes Mayor Jordan to sign a Contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., pursuant to RFP 23-07, in the amount of S24.671.00 io develop a historic wntcxt statement for the University Heights and Ilaskell Heights neighborhoods. PASSED and APPROVED on September 5, 2023 Page 1 Attest: RK / p .,r. and Paxton, City C rrasurc •�J,. > 4 '-tip••?�='����� :•': CITY OF W-I FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 5.2023 CITY COUNCIL MEMO TO: Mayor Jordan and City Council THRU: Susan Norton, Chief of Staff Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director FROM: Britin Bostick, Long Range Planning/Special Projects Manager DATE: 2023-966 SUBJECT: Approval of a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $24,671.00, pursuant to RFP 23-07, for a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $24,671 00, pursuant to RFP 23-07 for a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods BACKGROUND: City Plan 2040 identified a benchmark for short term (2019-2025) action that is directly related to the work proposed for this project: • Work to preserve the historic character and integrity of neighborhoods with multiple approaches including but not limited to: create one or more Local Regulated District(s) in neighborhoods listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and utilize other preservation tools such as overlay districts with the main goal of preserving historic character. Additionally, the Plan's Objective 3.1.7 Encourage protection of community character in established neighborhoods states: "Many of Fayetteville's most vibrant and diverse neighborhoods do not meet the requirements for inclusion on the National Historic Register but are worthy of preservation efforts because they are stable and foster a sense of community among their residents. Many of Fayetteville's neighborhoods built in the 1940's, 50's and 60's in the City's core and in proximity to downtown and the University of Arkansas have seen significant development pressure in recent years." The University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods, located directly west of the main University of Arkansas campus in Fayetteville, are two such neighborhoods. A historic context statement does not add properties to the National Register of Historic Places, nor does it enact any zoning regulations or property protections. It is an organizing structure for grouping information about historic properties that share a common theme, place, and time. A historic context focuses on describing those historical development patterns within which the significance of a resource can be understood. Once the document is written it provides the framework for evaluating a property for historic significance and integrity — Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 the "homework", if you will, prior to nominating a collection or grouping of properties to the National Register of Historic Places, or to being able to consider properties for a local historic district_ The historic context statement is anticipated to be the first phase in a two-phase project. The second phase, proposed to be conducted under a separately funded and defined project, would be the submission of a Multiple Property Documentation Form with at least one property nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. Additionally, this project would potentially implement the newly adopted Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan by furthering work to complete three action items: 3.6 Historic District Outreach: Conduct outreach with property owners in NRHP historic districts to instill community pride, educate them about the difference between NRHP and local historic districts, and encourage the creation of local historic districts. 3.8 Multiple Property Designation Create noncontiguous local historic districts based on a multiple property designation approach. Explore themes like modern architecture, Black history, and other topics. 5.5 Historic Contexts: Diverse Histories: Ensure that Fayetteville's diverse histories, particularly Black, Latino, Jewish, women, and LGBT+ histories, are documented in historic context development. DISCUSSION: Stantec Consulting Services Inc., formerly CoxIMcLain Environmental Consulting based in Austin, Texas, was selected for the project. The project team represents both breadth and depth in multiple aspects of historic preservation work, including work supported by Arkansas Historic Preservation Program grants, historic preservation planning, cultural resource identification, historic property survey and evaluation, and GIS-based analysis. The historic context statement work is expected to kick off in September 2023 and conclude before July 2023 to meet the Certified Local Government grant timeline required by the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program. Long Range Planning staff anticipate working with both historic commissions and residents in the subject neighborhoods throughout the project. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: This project is funded by a 520.000 Certified Local Government grant from the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program and a S5,000 budget allocation approved in 2023. ATTACHMENTS: 23-CLG-02 SRF, RFP 23-07, Contract with Appendices, University Heights -Haskell Heights Project Boundary Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street i Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479)575-8323 Legislation Text File #: 2023-966 Approval of a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $24,671.00, pursuant to RFP 23-07, for a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A CONTRACT WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., PURSUANT TO RFP 23-07, IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,671.00, TO DEVELOP A HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR THE UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS AND HASKELL HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOODS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes Mayor Jordan to sign a Contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., pursuant to RFP 23-07, in the amount of $24,671.00 to develop a historic context statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. Page 1 Britin Bostick City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2023-966 Item ID 9/5/2023 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non -Agenda Item LONG RANGE PLANNING (634) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: 8/18/2023 Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. in the amount of $24,671.00, pursuant to RFP 23-07, for a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. Budget Impact: 1010.090.660.5314.00 General Fund Account Number Fund 32207.2023 AR Historic Preservation Program (CLG Grant) - Historic Context Stmt - University & Haskell Heights Project Number Budgeted Item? Yes Total Amended Budget Expenses (Actual+Encum) Available Budget Does item have a direct cost? Yes Item Cost Is a Budget Adjustment attached? No Budget Adjustment Purchase Order Number: Change Order Number: Original Contract Number: Comments: Remaining Budget Project Title $ 25,000 00 L,",L).U0 $ 24,671.00 V20221130 Previous Ordinance or Resolution # 88-23: 277-22 Approval Date: 4/4/2023,12/6/2022 A ftP- CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Contract — Between City of Fayetteville, AR and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Term: Completion by July 15, 2024 This contract executed this 5 day of September, 2023, between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas (City), of 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, AR 72701 and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) of 8401 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 100, Austin, TX 78757, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: ]. Purpose: The purpose of this Contract is to provide the terms and conditions necessary for the preparation of a Historic Context Statement for the City of Fayetteville (the "Project"). 2_ Contract Documents: The Contract documents which comprise the contract between the City of Fayetteville and Stantec consist of this Contract and the following documents attached hereto, and made a part hereof: a, Appendix A: Scope of Work & Fees b_ Appendix B: City Issued Solicitation for RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement c. Appendix C: Stantec's RFP Submittal d. Appendix D: Stantec's Certificate of Insurance 3. City's Responsibilities: a. The City shall make available to Stantec, all relevant information or data pertinent to the Project which is required by Stantec to perform the Services. Stantec shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of all information and data furnished by the City, including information and data originating with other consultants employed by the City whether such consultants are engaged at the request of Stantec or otherwise. Where such information or data originates either with the City or its consultants then Stantec shall not be responsible to the City for the consequences of any error or omission contained therein. b_ When requested by Stantec, the City may engage specialist consultants directly to perform items of work necessary to enable Stantec to carry out the Services. Whether arranged by the City or Stantec, these services shall be deemed to be provided under direct contracts to the City unless expressly provided otherwise. If the City chooses not to engage specialist consultants, then the Parties will work cooperatively to modify the scope of services to reflect any reductions or additions to the services to be provided by Stantec. c. The City shall give prompt consideration to all documentation related to the Project prepared by Stantec and whenever prompt action is necessary shall inform Stantec of City's decisions in such reasonable time so as not to delay the schedule for providing the Services City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 6 d. When applicable, the City shall arrange and make provision for Stantec's entry to the Project site as well as other public and private property as necessary for Stantec to perform the Services. The City shall obtain any required approvals, licenses and permits from governmental or other authorities having jurisdiction over the Project so as not to delay Stantec in the performance of the Services. e. The City shall acknowledge the support of the National Park Service and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program in the publication of any material based on, or developed under, any activity supported by Historic Preservation Fund 7 grant funds. This acknowledgment shall be in the form of a statement as follows: "This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkansas Heritage. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. 4. Stantec's Responsibilities: a. Stantec shall furnish the necessary qualified personnel to provide the Services. Stantec represents that it has access to the experience and capability necessary to and agrees to perform the Services with the reasonable skill and diligence required by customarily accepted professional practices and procedures normally provided in the performance of the Services at the time when and the location in which the Services were performed. This undertaking does not imply or guarantee a perfect Project and in the event of failure or partial failure of the product or the Services, Stantec will be liable only for its failure to exercise diligence, reasonable care, and professional skill. This standard of care is the sole and exclusive standard of care that will be applied to measure Stantec's performance. There are no other representations or warranties expressed or implied made by Stantec. In particular, but not by way of limitation, no implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose shall apply to the Services provided by Stantec nor shall Stantec warrant or guarantee economic, market or financial conditions, proforma projections, schedules for public agency approvals, or other factors beyond Stantec's reasonable control. b. Stantec will provide one full -color printed final clean copy of the design guidelines and/or preservation plan and attachments and one digital copy of the design guidelines and/or preservation plan and attachments created to the City and one full -color printed copies and one digital copy to AHPP. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 2 of 6 5. Non -Assignment: Stantec shall not assign its duties under the terms of this agreement without prior written consent of the City. 6. Indemnification and Hold Harmless: Stantec agrees to hold the City of Fayetteville harmless and indemnify the City of Fayetteville, but not defend, against any and all claims for property damage, personal injury or death, arising from Stantec's performance under this contract. This clause shall not, in any form or manner, be construed to waive that tort Immunity set forth under Arkansas Law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the total amount of all claims the City of Fayetteville may have against Stantec under this contract or arising from the performance or non-performance of the services under any theory of law, including but not limited to claims for negligence, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract, shall be strictly limited to the lesser of the fees or $500,000. As the City of Fayetteville's sole and exclusive remedy under this contract any claim, demand or suit shall be directed and/or asserted only against the Stantec and not against any of the Stantec's employees, officers or directors. Neither the City of Fayetteville nor Stantec shall be liable to the other or shall make any claim for any incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising, out of or connected to this contract or the performance of the services on this project. This mutual waiver includes, but is not limited to, damages related to loss of use, loss of profits, loss of income, unrealized energy savings, diminution of property value or loss of reimbursement or credits from governmental or other agencies. 7. Insurance: Stantec shall furnish a certificate of insurance addressed to the City of Fayetteville within ten (10) calendar days after contract finalization, presenting insurance which shall be maintained throughout the term of the Contract in compliance with the terms of RFP 23-07. If applicable, Stantec shall require any subcontractor to provide insurance. In the event any employee engaged in work on the project under this contract is not protected under Worker's Compensation insurance, Stantec shall provide and shall cause each subcontractor to provide adequate employer's liability insurance for the protection of such of their employees are not otherwise protected. Worker's Compensation coverage shall be applicable with state law. 8. Price: Cl. Stantec Consulting, Inc. shall perform the services included in this proposal for a flat fee of $24,671.00. Stantec shall strive to make decisions based on what is best for the City. As such, the Stantec compensation is structured as a flat fee, with billing to be completed on a percent -complete basis. Each billing shall be completed at 40%, 80%, and 100% of project completion. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 3 of 6 b. Additional services requested that fall outside the scope of this project shall be provided based on a mutually agreed schedule and price, utilizing the hourly fee schedule provided in Stantec's proposal. 9. Payments: a. Payments shall be made after approval and acceptance of each percentage -completed, itemized invoice, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. b. Unless disputed by the City, payments shall be made 30 calendar days after acceptance of invoice, Electronic delivery to the City is preferred. 10. Terms: All work as required in the Appendix A — Scope of work shall be completed by July 15, 2024. 11. Ownership of Documents: a. All documents provided by the City are and remain the property of the City. Stantec may retain reproduced copies of drawings and copies of other documents- b. All documents and records, whether in physical or electronic format, prepared by Stantec or its subconsultant as part of the Project shall become the property of City when Stantec has been compensated for all services rendered; provided, however, that Stantec shall have the unrestricted right to their use. c. Stantec shall retain its rights in its standard drawings details, specifications, databases, computer software, and other proprietary property. Rights to intellectual property developed, utilized, or modified in the performance of the Services shall remain the property of Stantec. d. Stantec will grant the City, the State of Arkansas, and the United States of America a royalty -free, non- exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement by the contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. 12. Independent Contractor: Stantec is an independent contractor of the City and shall maintain complete responsibility for applicable state or federal law on unemployment insurance, withholding taxes, social security, or other industrial, labor or discrimination law for its employees. Stantec is responsible for its agents, methods and operations. 13. Notices: Any notice required to be given under this Agreement to either party to the other shall be sufficient if addressed and mailed, certified mail, postage paid, delivery, e-mail or fax (receipt confirmed), or overnight courier. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context Statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 4 of 6 14. Freedom of Information Act: City of Fayetteville contracts and documents prepared while performing city contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the City of Fayetteville, the contractor will do everything possible to provide the documents in a prompt and timely manner as prescribed in the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. 25-19-101 et. Seq.). Only legally authorized photo coping costs pursuant to the FOIA may be assessed for this compliance. 1S. Termination: This Contract may be terminated by the City of Fayetteville or Stantec for any reason with thirty (30) days written notice. If either party breaches this agreement, the non -defaulting party may terminate this Agreement after giving seven (7) days' notice to remedy the breach. On termination of this agreement, the City shall pay Stantec for the services performed through the date of termination within thirty (30) days of acceptance of final invoice. 16. Changes in Scope or Price: Changes, modifications, or amendments in scope, price or fees to this contract shall not be allowed without a prior formal contract amendment approved by the Mayor and the City Council in advance of the change in scope, cost or fees. No modification of this contract shall be binding unless made in writing and executed by both parties. 17. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accord with the laws of the State of Arkansas. Venue for all legal disputes shall be Washington County, Arkansas. 18. Contract Administration: The Mayor or their Designated Representative shall be the Contract Administrator for this contract. Stantec's Principal or their Designated Representative shall be the primary contact for all matters pertaining to this contract. 19. Professional Responsibility: Stantec shall exercise reasonable skill, care, and diligence in the performance of services and will carry out its responsibilities in accordance with customarily accepted professional practices. 20. Permits & Licenses: Stantec shall secure and maintain any and all permits and licenses required to complete this Contract. 21. Entire Agreement: These Contract documents constitute the entire agreement between the City of Fayetteville and Stantec and may be modified only by a duly executed written instrument signed by the City of Fayetteville and Stantec. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Contract and the appendices, this Contract and the terms and conditions contained in Appendix B shall control. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context Statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 5 of 6 22. Force Maieure: Any default in the performance of this Agreement caused by any of the following events and without fault or negligence on the part of the defaulting party shall not constitute a breach of contract: labor strikes, riots, war, acts of governmental authorities, unusually severe weather conditions or other natural catastrophe, disease, epidemic or pandemic, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control or contemplation of either party. Nothing herein relieves the City of its obligation to pay Stantec for services actually rendered 23. Severability: In the event that any court of competent jurisdiction shall determine that any provision of this agreement shall be unenforceable, then that provision shall be deemed to be null and void and the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect 24. Debarment Certification: Stantec hereby provides debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order- Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 "Debarment and Suspension" requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub -recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. Stantec hereby attests its principal is not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared Ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. WITNESS OUR HANDS THIS 5 DAY OF September 2023. STANTEC CONSULTING. INC. By: `Z41/11 � Signature fnidi lzCe 4 Pr Printed game & Title ATTEST (Signature) Witness (Printed Nome) Date Signed : 7 1 11 L 3 aty of fayet evrlle. AR RfP 23-07, Historic Context StatemMt Contract: Stantec Consuidng, Inc Page 6 of 6 u g1t1111rrrr,� zj ill , �•. GtT Y O ATTEST: (Signature) ', �f �TFV11 Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasurer'%,�'�; �r��••��, ; �`` zzrrrr.'aiJnti��`•. Date Signed: 09/OS/2023 t, CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement APPENDIX A Scope of Work & Fees 1. INTRODUCTION: Stantec Consulting, Inc. (Stantec) shall provide services in preparing a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods in the City of Fayetteville. 2. SCOPE OF WORK: Stantec shall perform the following: A. Identify and assess the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods' history, including ties to the University of Arkansas and early farrns_ B. Identify key themes and periods of history for both neighborhoods. C. Establish clear neighborhood boundaries to assist with future surveys or policy proposals. D. Conduct research using primary and secondary sources, including resources at the University of Arkansas Special Collections Library, as available. E. Recommend a communications strategy to reach and engage stakeholders. Utilize available and existing resources and organizations focusing on the project neighborhoods. F. In collaboration with City staff, design collateral materials including web and digital resources in support of the project (1 page of website content, 3 social media posts, and content for 3 emails to be distributed by the City of Fayetteville). G. Identify, describe, and implement a comprehensive strategy and methodology for community involvement, including development of a key stakeholder list. H. Develop a list of historic ethnic and cultural influences or individuals associated with the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. I. Attend (virtually) a minimum of four (4) meetings with City staff to update staff on the development of the document. J. Assist the City in submitting content for quarterly reports to the AHPP detailing programmatic and fiscal progress of work. K. The results from items A-D, and H shall be compiled into an approximately 25-30 page historic context report based on a City -approved outline. Stantec shall address one (1) round of reviewed and consolidated comments by the City contact and revise the report to incorporate required revisions. L. Follow the guidance provided in National Register Bulletin 16B. How to Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form in anticipation of the City's completion of the next project phase; the submittal of a Multiple Property Documentation Form. City of Fayetteville, AR and Stantec Consulting, Inc. APPENDIX A — SCOPE OF WORK AND FEES Page 1 of 2 — last Revised 07.28.2023 3. PRICING: A. Stantec shall perform the services included in this proposal for a flat fee of $24,671,00. i. Stantec shall strive to make decisions based on what is best for the City. As such, Stantec's compensation is structured as a flat fee, with billing to be completed on a percent -complete basis. Each billing shall be completed at 40%, 80%, and 100% of project completion. B. Additional services requested that fall outside the scope of this project shall be provided based on a mutually agreed schedule and price, utilizing the hourly fee schedule provided in Stantec's proposal. 4. TIMEFRAME & PROPOSED SCHEDULE: A. Any adjustments to proposed schedule shall be coordinated through City staff: Working Calendar days Days Task Duration Start Date End Date Duration Consultant selection 21 June-23 June 30, 2023 31 Project initiation/contract execution 37 June 30, 2023 August 15, 2023 53 virtual project kick-off meeting 14 August 16, 2023 September 5, 2023 20 Historic District Commission meeting (Stantect to attend virtually) 1 September 14, 2023 September 14, 2023 1 Black Heritage Preservation Commission meeting (Stantec to attend virtually) 1 September 21, 2023 September 21, 2023 1 Prepare Public Communications Plan 15 September 6, 2023 September 27, 2023 21 City review September 28, 2023 October 12, 2023 14 Conduct research and prepare outline 40 September 6, 2023 November 1, 2023 56 Ciry rrv!rw November 1, 2023 November 15, 2023 14 Draft Historic Context 60 November 16, 2023 February 8, 2024 84 HDC/RHPC/AHPP review 25 February 9, 2024 March 15, 2024 35 Final Historic Context 30 March 16, 2024 April 26, 2024 41 City of Fayetteville, AR and Stantec Consulting, Inc. APPENDIX A — SCOPE OF WORK AND FEES Page 2 of 2 — last Revised 07.28.2023 CITY OF #4W _ FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Purchasing Division — Room 306 113 W. Mountain Foyetteville, AR 72701 Phone: 479.575.8256 TDD (Telecommunication Device for the Deaf): 479.521.1316 Request for Proposal: RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement DEADLINE: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 before 2:00 PM, local time Pre -Proposal Conference: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 2:00 P Zoom SR. PURCHASING AGENT: Amanda Bellfuss, abellfuss@fay_etT*�_ Ile-ar.gov DATE OF ISSUE AND ADVERTISEMENT: 04/30/2023 REQUEST RO L�� RFP 23-07 His o" Context St t ment Z No late proposals shall be acce to FP's .sail be sub ted through the City's third -party electronic bidding platform or ittin Baled t{ %al proposal to the City of Fayetteville, Purchasing Division at the below-locati �' .` \C_1 City of Foyetteville Purc osing-Uivision — Room 306 11West Mountain Street O Fayetteville, AR 72701 All proposals s be ubmitted in accordance with the attached City of Fayetteville specifications and docu@Ntached hereto. Each Proposer is required to fill in every blank and shall supply all inforrrrat�, requested; failure to do so may be used as basis of rejection. The undersigned hereby offers to furnish & deliver the articles or services as specified, at the prices & terms stated herein, and in strict accordance with the specifications and general conditions of bidding, all of which are made a part of this offer. This offer is not subject to withdrawal unless upon mutual written agreement by the Proposer/Bidder and City Purchasing Director. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 1 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Advertisement City of Fayetteville, AR Request for Proposal RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, seeks proposals from qualified firms with experience Ninicipal, comprehensive, urban and land use planning, economic analysis, and citizen involvement ipation, to prepare a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighb s in the City of Fayetteville. Any questions concerning this solicitation process should be directed to a Beilfuss, City of Fayetteville Sr. Purchasing Agent, at abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov or by calling (479) Y0. Solicitation documents and addenda shall be obtained at the City of Fayettev C acing Division's electtomc bidding platform at www.fayetteville-ar.gov/bids. All proposals shall be receive uesday, May 23, 2023 before 2:00 PM, Local Time utilizing the electronic bidding softwby subm;,N a sealed physical proposal to the City of Fayetteville, Purchasing Division. All proposals are du fore e stated; no late proposals shall be accepted. Submitting electronically is strongly encouFa The Ci yet Ile shall not be responsible for lost or misdirected proposals, or for failure of propo s.t�chnic N m A non -mandatory pre -proposal conference wil eld Wednesday, M 023 at 2:00 PM virtually via Zoom. Information regarding the pre -proposal c ce is avaiiable o thproject page on the City's electronic bidding platform. All interested parties a ngly e LWaged to trtd. All interested parties shall be qualifie ,to do s�i s and I' d in accordance with all applicable laws of the state and local governments where the pjo �locat firm providing a service shall be registered with the Arkansas Secretary of State. %14N� Registration and good standing the System rd Management (SAM) will be required prior to contract execution. Pursuant to Arkansas CoVen otated §22-9-203 The City of Fayetteville encourages all qualified small, minority and women business estobid on and receive contracts for goods, services, and construction. Also, City of Fayetteville e"raggeneral contractors to subcontract portions of their contract to qualified small, minority and business enterprises. The City eville reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals and to waive irregularities therein, and all parties agre hat such rejection shall be without liability on the part of the City of Fayetteville for any damage or claim brought by any interested party because of such rejections, nor shall any interested party seek any recourse of any kind against the City of Fayetteville because of such rejections. The filing of any Statement in response to this invitation shall constitute an agreement of the interested party to these conditions. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 2 of 21 This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkansas Heritage. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expr sed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department oferior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. nQ O. ev City of Fayetteville By: Amanda Beilfuss, Sr. Purchasing Agent P: 479.575.8220 abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (479) 521-1316 Date of advertisement: 04/30/2023 QN.,This publication was paid for by the Purchasing Division o�thQty of F Ville, Arkansas. Arnount paid: $XXX.XX. �V V- o �C o Cj 4q- Q' o � N� o Cj Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 3 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement SECTION A: General Terms & Conditions SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSAL SHALL INCLUDE: Each proposal shall contain the following at a minimum. Proposer must also address detailed requirements as specified in the Scope of Work. a. A written narrative describing the method or manner in which the Proposer proposes to satisfy requirements of this RFP in the most cost-effective manner. The term Propose& 11 be in reference to a firm or individual responding to this solicitation I b. A description of the Proposer's experience in providing the same or similar v s as outlined in the RFP. This description should include the names of the person(s) who ovide the services, their qualifications, and the years of experience in performing this type rk. Also, include the reference information requested in this RFP. ��► c. The complete fee and cost to the City for all services outlined in this RFP. d. Statement should be no more than twent f:I'v5) pa Ingle sided, standard, readable, print on standard 8.5x11 documents. Prop shall also �a t e (3) page (maximum) executive summary. The following items will t unt to r the efive page limitation: appendix, cover sheet, 3-page executive s ry, r e res hall be no more than 1 page per person), and forms provided b ity fo o letion. a. Submittingarid' e din is RIFoposals shall be prepared simply and economically, in ghtfor a ncise description of its ability to meet the requirementsbr the Fancy gs, colored displays, and promotional material are not require ' asis h e on completeness and clarity of content. All documents ph submitte ould be typewritten on standard 8 %" x 11" white papers an boun in on me. Exceptions would be schematics, exhibits, one resumes, d City �Itn?r rms. Limit proposal to twenty-five (25) pages or less, exclu Me -page n resumes, references, and forms required by the City for cpwt All proposals shall be sealed upon delivery to the City of Fayetteville. Option 1 —Electronic Submittal (strongly encouraged): Proposers can go to Q www.fayetteville-ar.gov/bids and follow the prompts to submit a proposal within the electronic bidding platform. If a proposal is submitted electronically, a physical submission is not necessary. All Proposers must register in order to be able to submit. There is no fee for registration. Option 2 — Physical Submittal: All Proposers shall submit one (1) original copy of their proposal as well as one (1) electronic copy on a properly labeled USB or other electronic media device. The electronic copy submitted shall be contained into on( -- single file. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 4 of 21 (1) electronic file and shall be identical to the hard copies provided. The use of Adobe PDF documents is strongly recommended. Files contained on an USB or electronic media shall not be restricted against saving or printing. Electronic copies shall not be submitted via e-mail to City employees by the Proposer and shall be provided to the City in a sealed manner. FeclEx, UPS, USPS, or other packages should be clearly marked with the RFP number on the outside of the mailingpackage. e. Proposals will be reviewed following the stated deadline, as shown on the cover sheet of this document. Only the names of Proposer's will be available after the deadline until a ntract has been awarded by the Fayetteville City Council. All interested parties under roposal documents will not be available until after a valid contract has been executed. f. Proposers shall submit a proposal based on documentation public the Fayetteville Purchasing Division- x g. Proposals must follow the format of the RFP. Proposers shouldtheir responses to follow the sequence of the RFP. h. Proposers shall have experience in work of hZe or i ature and must provide references that will satisfy the City of Fayettevill ser sh ish ellerence list of clients for whom they have performed similar services ust pro nfor i as requested in this document. i. Proposer is advised that exce 3' to an of he ter tained in this RFP or the attached service agreement must be' eed in response the FP- Failure to do so may lead the City to declare any such term o goti ropos ire to take exception to a non-negotiable term will not disquali co ' a ion fo d. j. Local time shall be defineim i teville, Arkansas on the due date of the deadline. Documents shall be rec iv fore the line time as shown by the atomic clock located in the Purchasing Division Offic r ele��clock located in the City's third -party bidding software. A , 0-0 2. No oral interpretatio w'b� made to any firms as to the meaning of specifications or any other contract documents- All q i n pertaining to the terms and conditions or scope of work of this proposal must be sent in writing via a it to the Purchasing Department. Responses to questions may be handled as an addendum if esponse would provide clarification to the requirements of the proposal, All such addenda shall bec t of the contract documents. The City will not be responsible for any other explanation or interp tl of the proposed RFP made or given prior to the award of the contract. 3. DESCRIP ION OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES: Any manufacturer's narne,,, trade narne, brand name, catalog number, etc. used in specifications are for the purpose of describing and establishing general quality levels. Such references are NOT intended to be restrictive. Proposals shall be considered for all brands that meet the quality of the specifications listed for any items. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 5 of 21 4. RIGHTS OF CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS: In addition to all other rights of the City of Fayetteville, under state law, the City specifically reserves the right to the following: The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to rank firms and negotiate with the highest-ranking firm. Negotiation with an individual Proposer does not require negotiation with others. b. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to select the proposal it believes will serve the best interest of the City. c. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. d. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to cancel the entire request for pr o e. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to remedy or waive technicaaterial errors in the request for proposal or in proposals submitted. f. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to request a ne� sary clarifications, additional information or proposal data without chang1ty terms proposal. g. The City of Fayetteville reserves the ri iwl ke sel�&c,f t oposer to perform the services required on the basis of the original als wit neg tt h. The City reserves the right to a i'a bes jndloina I of one or more Proposers. The best and final offer process is n arante • therefore(op sers shall submit and respond to this RFP on the most favorab t ava \J' V S. EVALUATION CRITERIA: ` o V" The evaluation criterion defines the f at w' I by the selection committee to evaluate and score responsive, responsible and qualif osals. sers shall include sufficient information to allow the selection committee to thorouI hly a luate ore proposals. Each proposal submitted shall be evaluated and ranked by a selection c itt�e. T 4e� t will be awarded to the most qualified Proposer, per the evaluation criteria listed ir(t i P#FP. Pr os rs are not guaranteed to be ranked, I 6. COSTS INCURRED OSERS: All expenses invol aV the preparation and submission of proposals to the City, or any work performed in connection t�with, shall be borne solely by the Proposer(s). No payment will be made for any responses received, ny other effort required of, or made by, the Proposer(s) prior to contract commencement. 7. ORAL TATION: An oral presentation and/or interview may be requested of any firm, at the selection committee's discretion. 8. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The Proposer represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance or services required City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 6 of 21 hereunder, as provided in City of Fayetteville Code Section 34.26 titled "Limited Authority of City Employee to Provide Services to the City". b. The Proposer shall promptly notify Amanda Beilfuss, City Sr. Purchasing Agent, in writing, of all potential conflicts of interest for any prospective business association, interest, or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Proposer's judgment or quality of services being provided. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of which the Proposer may undertake and request an opinion to the City as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the City, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Propo The City agrees to communicate with the Proposer its opinion via e-mail or first-class mail wi �rty days of receipt of notification. 9. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL: A proposal may be withdrawn prior to the time set for the proposal submittal n a written request from an authorized representative of the firm; however, a proposal shall not rawn after the time set for the proposal., 10. LATE PROPOSAL OR MODIFICATIONS: a. Proposal and modifications received after the a set f proposal submittal shall not be considered. Modifications in writing r eiid prior ea" will be accepted. The City will not be responsible for misdirecte Prop efer eir submission status in the online bidding portal or call the P g D vi o (47 - 20 to ensure receipt of their submittal documents prior to og tim an to li b- The time set for the dea all be ime fo teville, AR on the date listed- All proposals shall be rec the sing Di BEFORE the deadline stated. The official clock to determine loc time s the at ock located in the Purchasing Division, Room 306 of City Hall, 113 W. Mohr, ayet AR. 11. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL COM N E RECAIREMENTS: a. The laws of the Ae o� Ark a �jy to any purchase made under this request for proposal. Proposers shal y with II I , state, and federal directives, orders and laws as applicable to this propo al subseque contracts) including but not limited to Equal Employment Opport EO), Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), & OSHA as applicable to this contra . b. ant to Arkansas Code Annotated §22 9 203 The City of Fayetteville encourages all qualified `ZII, minority and women -owned business enterprises to bid on and receive contracts for goods, 4 rvices, and construction. Also, City of Fayetteville encourages all general contractors to `` subcontract portions of their contract to qualified small, minority and women -owned business enterprises. 12. PROVISION FOR OTHER AGENCIES: Unless otherwise stipulated by the Proposer, the Proposer agrees to make available to all Government agencies, departments, municipalities, and counties, the proposal prices submitted in accordance with said City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 7 of 21 proposal terms and conditions therein, should any said governmental entity desire to buy under this proposal. Eligible users shall mean all state of Arkansas agencies, the legislative and Judicial branches, political subdivisions (counties, local district school boards, community colleges, municipalities, counties, or other public agencies or authorities), which may desire to purchase under the terms and conditions of the contract. 13. COLLUSION: The Proposer, by affixing his or her signature to this proposal, agrees to the following: "Proposer certifies that their proposal is made without previous understanding, agreement, or connection with any person, firm or corporation making a proposal for the same item(s) and/or services and is in all respects Lair, without outside control, collusion, fraud, or otherwise illegal action." 14. RIGHT TO AUDIT, FOIA, AND JURISDICITON: a. The City of Fayetteville reserves the privilege of auditing a Contractor's as such records relate to purchases between the City and said Contractor. b. Freedom of Information Act: City contracts and documenty Ted while performing City contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom f Ination Act. If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the t Fayettehe (contractor) will do everything possible to provide the documents in a pr mind ti nner as prescribed in the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. 01 et.'* On�gally authorized photocopying costs pursuant to the FOIA may be a for thir ctpli c. Legal jurisdiction to resolve any tes sh Ell�7Tr��kan Arkansas law applying to the case. 15. CITY INDEMNIFICATION: The successful Proposer(s) agre dem City IN Id it harmless from and against all claims, liability, loss, damage or expense, cludin of (im' counsel fees, arising from or by reason of any actual or claimed trademark, patent or, t infr' nt or litigation based thereon, with respect to the services or any part thereof covere b order, Wch obligation shall survive acceptance of the services and payment thereof by the City. . �� 16. VARIANCE FROM STANDA MS & ONIONS: All standard terms a c tions stat in this request for proposal apply to this contract except as specifically stated i bsequent sections of this document, which take precedence, and should be fully understood by Pr prior to submitting a proposal on this requirement. 17. ADA REQLLAEQNT FOR PUBLIC NOTICE TRANSLATION: Person i disabilities requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in this proceeding/event, should call 4 .1316 (telecommunications device for the deaf), no later than seven days prior to the deadline. Persons eeding translation of this document shall contact the City of Fayetteville, Purchasing Division, immediately. 18. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE: The successful Proposer shall provide a Certificate of Insurance of professional liability insurance in the City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 8 of 21 amount of $1 million US dollars, at minimum. Such Certificate of Insurance shall list the City as an additional insured and not be required unless firm is selected. 19. PAYMENTS AND INVOICING: The Proposer must specify in their proposal the exact company name and address which must be the same as invoices submitted for payment as a result of award of this RFP- Further, the successful Proposer is responsible for immediately notifying the Purchasing Division of any company name change, which would cause invoicing to change from the name used at the time of the original RFP. Payment will be made within thirty days of invoice received. The City of Fayetteville is very credit worthy and will not pay any interest or penalty for untimely payments. Payments can be processed through Proposer's acceptance Visa at no additional costs to the City for expedited payment processing. The City will not agree to allo ncrease in hourly rates by the contract without PRIOR Fayetteville City Council approval. 20. CANCELLATION: a. The City reserves the right to cancel this contract without cause byhirty (30) days prior notice to the Contractor in writing of the intention to cancel o use if at any time the Contractor fails to fulfill or abide by any of the terms or Condit- ified. b. Failure of the contractor to comply with an' e provisi f the contract shall be considered a material breach of contract and shall be au or im a termination of the contract at the discretion of the City of Fayetteville. • Q c. In addition to all other legal rem i vai I t e Fayetteville, the City reserves the right to cancel and obtain fro her s rc any it d/or services which have not been delivered within the pert ime Gm e daof rder as determined by the City of Fayetteville. � d. In the event sufficient dgetexPare n able for a new fiscal period, the City shall notify the Contractor of such oc and c shall terminate of the last day of the current fiscal period without penalty r nse to th� ' Y. _.. X 21. ASSIGNMENT. SUBCONTRACTING. CORKWATRACQUISITIONS AND/OR MERGE a. The Contracto th Nperfor contract, No assignment of subcontracting shall be allowed without pr n consent o the City- If a Proposer intends to subcontract a portion of this work, t ro ser shall disclose such intent in the proposal submitted as a result of this RFP. b. I event of a corporate acquisition and/or merger, the Contractor shall provide written notice City within thirty (30) calendar days of Contractor's notice of such action or upon the currence of said action, whichever occurs first. The right to terminate this contract, which shall riot be unreasonably exercised by the City, shall include, but not be limited to, instances in which a corporate acquisition and/or merger represent a conflict of interest or are contrary to any local, state, or federal laws. Action by the City awarding a proposal to a firm that has disclosed its intent to assign or subcontract in its response to the RFP, without exception shall constitute approval for purpose of this Agreement. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 9 of 21 22. NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTRACT: Award of this RFP shall impose no obligation on the City to utilize the Contractor for all work of this type, which may develop during the contract period. This is not an exclusive contract. The City specifically reserves the right to concurrently contract with other companies for similar work if it deems such an action to be in the City's best interest. In the case of multiple -phase contracts, this provision shall apply separately to each item- 23. LOBBYING: Lobbying, of selection committee members, City of Fayetteville employees, or elected officials regarding request for proposals, request for qualifications, bids or contracts, during the pendency of bid p test, by the bidder/proposer/protestor or any member of the bidder's/proposer's/protector's staff, a xt of the bidder/proposer/protestor, or any person employed by any legal entity affiliated with or re ting an organization that is responding to the request for proposal, request for qualification, bi tract, or has a pending bid protest is strictly prohibited either upon advertisement or on a date e s ed by the City of Fayetteville and shall be prohibited until either an award is final or the protest is esolved by the City of Fayetteville; provided, however, nothing herein shall prohibit a prospectiv /proposer from contacting the Purchasing Division to address situations such as clarificati r questions related to the procurement process. For purposes of this provision lobbying activitie sh clude but not be limited to, influencing or attempting to influence action or non -act connect' ith any request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract through dire t o direct written communication or an attempt to obtain goodwill of persons and/or en t cified > pro n. Such actions may cause any request for proposal, request for qualificati or con ao b e ted. 24. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: O G The City reserves the right to request i ional rvices rel t this RFP from the Proposer. When approved by the City as an amendm t e co and a d in writing prior to work, the Contractor shall provide such additional req is a becomesary. 25. SERVICES AGREEMENT: ��► A written agreement, in substanti I form attincorporating the RFP and the successful proposal will be prepared by the City, signed the s sful Proposer and presented to the City of Fayetteville for approval and signature of tth aygr. 26. INTEGRITY OF REQUEco�LFGRP'ROPOSAL (RFP) DOCUMENTS: Proposers shall us Hego iginal RFP form(s) provided by the Purchasing Division and enter information only in the spaces where sponse is requested. Proposers may use an attachment as an addendum to the RFP form(s) if suf4 i t sll5ace is not available on the original form for the Proposer to enter a complete response. Any mod1t s or alterations to the original RFP documents by the Proposer, whether intentional or othe I or grounds for rejection of such RFP response. Any such modifications or alterations a Prop r wishes to propose shall be clearly stated in the Proposer's RFP response and presented in the form of an addendum to the original RFP documents. 27.OTHER GENERAL CONDITIONS: Proposers must provide the City with their proposals signed by an employee having legal authority to submit proposals on behalf of the Proposer. The entire cost of preparing and providing responses shall be borne by the Proposer. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 10 of 21 b. The City reserves the right to request any additional information it deems necessary from any or all Proposers after the submission deadline. c. This solicitation is not to be construed as an offer, a contract, or a commitment of any kind; nor does it commit the City to pay for any costs incurred by Proposer in preparation. It shall be clearly understood that any costs incurred by the Proposer in responding to this request for proposal is at the Proposer's own risk and expense as a cost of doing business. The City of Fayetteville shall not be liable for reimbursement to the Proposer for any expense so incurred, regardless of whether or not the proposal is accepted. d. If products, components, or services other than those described in this bid ent are proposed, the Proposer must include complete descriptive literature for each. equests for additional information must be received within five working days following t est. e. Any uncertainties shall be brought to the attention to Amanda Beilfuss iately via telephone (479.575.8220) or e-mail (abeilf(iss@fayetteville-ar.gov). It is the,ii and goal of the City of Fayetteville Purchasing Division to provide documents pro vibi a clear and accurate understanding of the scope of work to be completed and/or goods to be provided. We encourage all interested parties to ask questions to en I Propos ski be on equal terms. f. Any inquiries or requests for explan ti trim -regard Ci equirements should be made promptly to Amanda Beilfuss, �f Fa tie, Aurchasing Agent via e-mail (abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov) o 'er ph ( 57 ). No oral interpretation or clarifications will be given as toleanin ro ,y part request for proposal. All questions, clarifications, and requests, iher wiila answers, i y, ill be provided to all firms via written addendum. Names of bmi S�SA ny q clarifications, or requests will not be disclosed until after a W is i e. g. At the discretion of the Ci r mo e ay be asked for more detailed information before final rankingof the fir may ais "rrc ude oral interviews. h. Any information p4videcl herpt ded to assist the Proposer in the preparation of proposals necessary to prop'erl ► respo to is RFP. The RFP is designed to provide qualified Proposers with sufficient si;�ormation to submit proposals meeting minimum specifications and/or test require n s ut is not intended to limit a RFP's content or to exclude any relevant or essential data. i. �psers irrevocably consent that any legal action or proceeding against it under, arising out of or eany manner relating to this Contract shall be controlled by Arkansas law. Proposer hereby xpressly and irrevocably waives any claim or defense in any said action or proceeding based on any alleged lack of jurisdiction or improper venue or any similar basis. The successful Proposer shall not assign the whole or any part of this Contract or any monies due or to become due hereunder without written consent of City of Fayetteville. In case the successful Proposer assigns all or any part of any monies due or to become due under this Contract, the Instrument of assignment shall contain a clause substantially to the effect that it is agreed that the City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 11 of 21 right of the assignee in and to any monies due or to become due to the successful Proposer shall be subject to prior Dens of all persons, firms, and corporations for services rendered or materials supplied for the performance of the services called for in this contract. k- The successful Proposer's attention is directed to the fact that all applicable Federal and State laws, municipal ordinances, and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over the services shall apply to the contract throughout, and they will be deemed to be included in the contract as though written out in full herein. The successful Proposer shall keep himself/herself fully informed of all laws, ordinances and regulations of the Federal, State, and municipal governments or authorities in any manner affecting those engaged or employed in providing these qKvices or in any way affecting the conduct of the services and of all orders and decrees of bod<NNribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over same. If any discrepancy or inconsi 1N should be discovered in these Contract Documents or in the specifications herein referre relation to any such law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree, s/he shall herewith repo me in writing to the City of Fayetteville. x 4Q") Q o � o cj �- Q' o � �C NTINUES ON NEXT PAGE (7t( Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 12 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement SECTION B: Scope of Services and General Information 1. INTRODUCTION: The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as "the City", is requesting proposals from qualified firms with experience in writing historic context statements, performing historic property surveys, and facilitating citizen involvement/participation to prepare a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods in the City of Fayetteville, as described in the following Scope of Work. It is the intent of the City of Fayetteville to select a single fir team to accomplish the services outlined in this Request for Proposals. (J'� �.J 2. COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOOD BACKGROUND: The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is located across the Boston Range of tip i er Ozark Plateau in Northwest Arkansas. It is the county seat of Washington County, The City e to the University of Arkansas, which is located just outside the Downtown area. The City is n 55 square miles in area with a population of 95,230 according to the 2021 American Comm urvey estimations, making it the second largest city in Arkansas. Fayetteville has a rich cultural history. The town as 2uncled 8 on land that had reviousl been Y Y� p Yset aside for the western Cherokee Nation. B Cher he had been hunted by the Osage and Quapaw tribes. During the Civil war Gen r�enja ull �ered Confederate forces under his command to burn all the commercial� i ings,Cw stoINvvacant houses in Fayetteville. Very few structures survived or are prese Today; ver, I ille does have a wealth of historic ro structures from the late 19th cent f�rougrh r20thecen, many representing vernacular materials and styles. Agricultural prod ti sig 1'i� parcal economy from the post -Civil War era through WWII, and the Unive rka htabli1 as the first public university in Arkansas, has also been a significant cont ibutor o theI and to population growth. Faculty in the university's School of Architectur s�gn� or famed alum and faculty member Fay Jones, are well known for residential wo ScularI in e University Heights neighborhood described for this project. N 1 On March 1, 1979 th ric Di ict ommission was created as a group of devoted local citizens concerned with prp g and pro ecting the City's unique historic and cultural resources. The Commission hA a ilitate the identification, evaluation, preservation, restoration, protection, and enhancement bf Vorical, cultural, and archaeological interests. The City of Fayetteville currently has 69 Historic on the National Register and has an array of National Register Historic Districts and neight associations with an eye on preservation. With the Citywide Heritage & Historic Pr on Master Plan underway and expected to be complete by summer 2023, the Commission is :, looilliliI additional projects to meet the plan goals, including the identification and protection of historic properties. The Black Heritage Preservation Commission was established on September 7, 2021. The purpose of this Commission is to recognize, acknowledge, protect and preserve historical Black Structures and Cemeteries in honor of the vision, accomplishment, and perseverance of Fayetteville's early Black families and individuals and the churches and other structures they built. Another Purpose of this Commission is City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 13 of 21 the creation of Black Historical Markers to recognize the struggles and achievements of our Black citizens to promote diversity and equality for all Fayetteville residents and to oppose discrimination against any person in Fayetteville. In June 2023 the Commission will be celebrating the unveiling of a historical marker and street naming honoring Nelson Hackett. The University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods are located directly to the west of the University of Arkansas main campus in Fayetteville. The approximate borders of the neighborhoods are Cleveland/Wedington Drive to the north, Razorback Road and Garland Avenue to the east, Nettleship Street to the south, and Sang Avenue to the west (see Attachment F). The Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, hereinafter referred to as "AHPP", conducted a site visit in 2017 and followed With a letter recommending an architectural survey and noting the potential importance of early far ses and houses with connections to faculty from the University of Arkansas. The neighborhoods rised a total of 414 parcels and 389 structures in 2021, with at least 253 or 65% of the structure greater than 50 years old, according to public records. �1 This project has had strong advocates for the past several years with the rrence of the Historic District Commission. Due to development pressure, low housing sup�tigh demand, and a rapid increase in enrollment at the University of Arkansas, this neighborH09is at risk for redevelopment. Approximately 1,800 additional students were admi to to the Univ, it of Arkansas in 2022, and student housing complexes on available parcels near th n cam Le regularly being submitted for development review. Additionally, homes iri Univer �efght eighborhood are increasingly �G..: becoming investment properties used for sho rent niv f Arkansas athletics and events have become a year-round draw. Large r lal str s are g nstructed between Razorback Road and Markham Hill, putting histo uctur s — ticul I se on large lots — at high risk for redevelopment and removal of the r, ing histo ruct% es, rticularly those owned as investment properties. Compounding that pn is thsl c{ of zonin tections for the historic structures in the neighborhood. �` 3. SCOPE OF WORK: G� J The purpose of this project is t e a fram k for researching and documenting historic resources in two Fayetteville, Arkansas ne bor University Heights and Haskell Heights, in the form of a historic context staters Thi§ do uld serve to support city staff, city commissioners, and property owners in th I f its to en i y and protect historic resources in these neighborhoods. The primary intent of & ,*ect is to begin surveying resources and engaging residents in the process of establishing a 1 I o inance district while supporting the preparation of National Register nominations (one of which, ttyAnderson House, was recently submitted for consideration), including a Multiple Propert fission to the National Register of Historic Places (please see National Register Bulletin 16B, "How omplete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form" at ht w.n s. ov sub ects nationalre ister u load NRB16B-Com lete. df for more information). Thi roject is also intended to help produce knowledge about development patterns, historical trends, and significant architectural features in the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. Without compiling the information needed to establish this historic context statement, individuals would be required to complete their own research and city staff and commissioners would not have a basis for future considerations for such historic neighborhoods. While the final scope of services will be negotiated with the selected consultant, the City's baseline expectations include the following: City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 14 of 21 Identify and assess the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods' history, including ties to the University of Arkansas and early farms. b. Identify key themes and periods of history for both neighborhoods. c. Establish clear neighborhood boundaries to assist with future surveys or policy proposals. d. Conduct research using primary and secondary sources, including resources at the University of Arkansas Special Collections Library, as available. e. Recommend a communications strategy to reach and engage stakeholders. Utilize a ilable and existing resources and organizations focusing on the project neighborhoods. f. In collaboration with City staff, design collateral materials including web an Tal resources in support of the project, g. Identify, describe, and implement a comprehensive strategy an dology for community involvement, including development of a key stakeholder list. h. Develop a list of historic ethnic and cultural i ces or in Nv ua s associated with the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. 4. QUALIFICATIONS: •N+ Q The identified project lead must meet th e etarInter' ofessional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'or rcl}jtectura s ry'. These qualifications, which set specific minimum education ex e nce req ments, can be found online at: https: www.n s. ov/articles se s arcl � uals. Attachment G . Respondents mu,t // P L ►. ) P articulate in their proposal hoNesig>r +ci project l fneets these minimum qualifications. TENTATIVE PROJECT TIMELINE W 7 PP DEADLINES: July 15, 2023 Q rt rly rep dL to AHPP August 15, 2023 ANPP br Consultant to be under contract September 14, 2� Projecate presented to Historic District Commission (HDC) SeptembV23 Project update presented to Black Heritage Preservation Commission (BHPC) 0 vt 15, 2023 Quarterly report due to AHPP em er 1, 2023 AHPP deadline for Consultant to begin work January/February 2024 First draft of context statement reviewed by HDC and BHPC March 11, 2024 First draft of context statement submitted to AHPP April 2024 Final draft of context statement reviewed by HDC and BHPC April 15, 2024 Quarterly report due to AHPP April 29, 2024 Final draft of context statement submitted to AHPP City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 15 of 21 June 3, 2024 Final invoice submitted to City of Fayetteville July 15, 2024 Final report submitted to AHPP 6. PROPOSAL FORMAT: The proposal shall contain all sections listed herein and shall respond fully to all requirements of the RFP. Statement should be no more than twenty-five (25) pages; single sided, standard readable, print on standard 8.5X11 pages. Proposers shall also submit a three (3) page (maximum) executive summary. The following items will not count toward the page limitations: appendix, cover sheet, 3-page executive summary, resumes (resumes shall be no more than 1 page per person), and forms provided Kt e City for completion: -^ Part I — Letter of Interest: Provide a letter of interest signed by an auth 3 consultant representative. Provide the names, offices, email addresses, and phone ers for all key Consultant staff proposed to be involved in the project. The Proposa I identify in which office(s) the majority of the work will occur. Acknowledge all issued a�a. Inclusion of all the items indicated above will constitute a passing score for this sectiN�ege maximum). Part II — Consultant/Staff Qualifications: The Proposal shall incl�a?rief company profile outlining the company's history and philosophy. This secti I also pro e biography of key individuals proposed to be assigned to the project with mphasi designated Project Manager. The Project Manager should be the individuatuctingo -to- y activities on this project. Each individual's proposed position / re� pity �in d. Special emphasis shall be provided to the ind�v�dual's backgrp� , qualifies s, an a ence on related and/or similar projects. The team must meet rofes na l4fialifi andards for Historic Preservation set by the Secretary of the I (Attach D). At least three (3) clie t r e es, i g na cription of past working relationship, and current contact infor Sha listed f h key individual proposed. Any applicable professional licenses or ert�fic hall b for each individual. All known sub- Consultants needed to complete the indi 'd irm) must be identified. Inclusion of all the items indicated above with a I present of each team member's competency and successful past experience with re ed a similar projects, to include at least three positive client references for c key in .� ill constitute a passing score for this section (5-pages maximum). 0 Part III agement Approach. The Proposal shall include a discussion regarding the Consul>i ' tended management approach on this project, including coordination and Finn oof project schedule, cost, scope, communications, quality, resources and other gement issues that the Consultant feels should be addressed (4-pages maximum). I�Frt IV 9 — Related Project Experience: The Proposal shall include up to three (3) profiles of similar rvices in comparable organizations. Past projects must have been completed in the last ten (10) years and shall include: project name, project time frame, client name, and a detailed description that clearly justifies why the Consultant's past experience is applicable to this RFP. For each project, indicate which proposed key individuals worked on the project and describe the role/work they performed and their levels of involvement (5-pages maximum per project/6-pages maximum total). City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 16 of 21 Part V — State and Federal Grant Guidelines: Each Consultant team must familiarize themselves with all grant requirements as required by the CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT and must meet the minimum standards outlined in the appendices listed below in all work product produced. Please note this grant is subject to all rules and regulations pursuant to the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund Manual. See attachments: Attachment A: Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) Grant Agreement i. Attachment B: (Appendix A — Historic Resources Survey and Documentation) ii. Attachment C: (Appendix E - Other Consultant Contracts and Products) iii. Attachment D: (Appendix F - The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Prese Professional Qualification Standards) Part VI — Detailed Draft and Scope of Services: This will form the basis of th of Services to be included in the Contract and be given the most weight in evalua d scoring of the Proposals. The Proposal shall include (6 pages maximum): i. Detailed description of the Consultant's proposed sc rvices (including specific tasks and deliverables) to accomplish the Objectives Pd in Section 3 of the RFP; ii. List any additional documents or reep'Lces neces to complete the Work; iii. Describe your competitive advan age nd valed services and benefits that would be provided to the City. Thi;&eir 1tclud ov v approaches previously utilized to assist communities dev si stor' c xt statements, and any unique challenges and how yo am iv. An optional,erJaise excluded from the Consultant's Y proposed 'Coop ices consi a by the Consultant to be valuable aspects m achieving ectiv '` v. A written su ary i firing th s of information, data, and assistance needed from the City fo a, ssfu� vi. A detailed des ti n of th Co?tsultant's proposed scope of services (including specific P p p ( g p tasks anlional iverables; mplish the Objectives specified in Section 3 of the RFP; +11 vii. List a oc `ents or resources necessary to complete the Work. Part VII — !Et chedule: The Consultant shall provide a project schedule, directly associated with t orltant's proposed Scope of Services (2-pages maximum). All project timelines must me the ms of grant agreement outlined in the CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 (see ment A) and shown in Section B.S, The City will submit quarterly reports to the AHPP to -ng programmatic and fiscal progress of work on forms to be provided by AHPP. e timeline must include the AHPP final deadline of August 01, 2024. 7. PRICE PROPOSAL: Proposers shall provide a Flat Fee Price Proposal. Include a detailed cost breakdown including estimated personnel, exclusions, and all labor costs, expenses, overhead, and profit. Provide a payment schedule based on project milestones/deliverables. These deliverables will be confirmed during contract negotiations with the chosen consultant. The Price Proposal will serve as a basis for scoring. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 17 of 21 The Price Proposal will be scored as follows (1-page maximum): (Lowest Proposal Price/ Proposal Price) x 15 Lowest Price will receive a score of 15 Example: Proposal Price A = $25,000, Lowest Proposal Price = $20,000 ($20,000/$25,000) x 15 = Score of 12 points The City will review all submissions to determine compliance with required elements listed in this RFP. Submissions may be judged non -responsive and removed from further consideration if any of the following occur: a. The proposal is not received on time in accordance with the terms of this RFP. b. The proposal does not follow the specified format. c. The information is incomplete or insufficient. V d. The quality of the proposal contained in the Submittal does not meet the expectations or criteria set forth by the City. 8. SELECTION CRITERIA: The following criteria will be used by the City to evaluate and score esp4jfve proposals. Proposers shall include sufficient information to allow the City ttbeu ghe to and score the proposal. Each proposal submitted is not required to be ranke sel committee. The contract may be awarded to the most qualified firm, per the n crit�ed w, based on the evaluation of the selection committee. Following the eval of the sals, lllection Committee may request that the top-ranking firm(s) make an oral r ntat r int ed. If presentations are necessary, they will take place in Fayetteville, Arks . Notic spin II be see Purchasing Division. 1) 2) 10% Qualifications ' ti n qualifications t e experience and tech complexity of the 20% ific Pro be Performed: Information reflecting f t, pas, and project team. Indicated specialized )mpe of the firm in connection with the type and A bcontractors, if used, shall be listed with information on their organiz n. - Experie Ofte Capacity for Performance: Information reflecting the names, 'tl , and q�ations (including experience and technical competence) of the m�rsonnel assigned to this specific project. Pr osed Method of Doing Work: A proposed work plan (description of how the project would be conducted as well as other facts concerning approach to scope) indicating methods and schedules for accomplishing scope of work. Include with this the amount of work presently underway. 4) 10% Past Performance: Previous evaluations shall be considered a significant factor. If previous evaluations with the City are not available, the professional firm's past performance records with City and others will be used, including quality of work, timely performance, diligence, and any other pertinent information. Firm will provide a list of similar jobs performed and person whom the City can contact for information. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 18 of 21 Sj 30% Cost/Fees: Complete costs and fees as described in this RFP and for delivery of the proposal including fiscal feasibility and financial stability. All fees shall be clearly identified with RFP response and be itemized as much as possible. 9. CONTRACT FORMATION: If the negotiation produces mutual agreement, a contract will be considered for approval by the City of Fayetteville City Council. If negotiations with the highest-ranking Proposer fail, negotiations may be initiated with the next highest-ranking Proposer until an agreement is reached. The City reserves the right to reject all offers and end the process without executing a contract. 10. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION: D'l The following documents are included with this solicitation as additional information- v a. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23 CLG 02 b. Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation (Appe 79 d,of Grant Agreement) c. Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products A A ( pP�� Grant Agreement) ) d- Attachment D: The Secretary of the Interior's storic PreseAati Professional Qualification Standards Information (Appendix F of Grant ment) ��• e. Attachment E: Detailed Information f r ary of erio ' rofessional qualifications standards for performing work in the "of 'His 'fir 'A ctural History' P t � ry f. Attachment F: Maps of Project B R%ryQ'i Attachment G: Secreta of rior's Pion u fications Standards g Secretary V V" Q V CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 19 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement SECTION C: Signature Submittal 1. DISCLOSURE INFORMATION Proposer must disclose any possible conflict of interest with the City of Fayetteville, including, but not limited to, any relationship with any City of Fayetteville employee. Proposer response must disclose if a known relationship exists between any principal or employee of your firm and any City of Fayetteville employee or elected City of Fayetteville official. If, to your knowledge, no relationship exists, this should also be stated in your response. Failure t ose such a relationship may result in cancellation of a purchase and/or contract as a result of your resli . This form must be completed and returned in order for your bid/proposal to be eligible for considtOURFIRM: PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS, AS IT APPROPRIATELY APPLI 1) NO KNOWN RELATIONSHIP EXISTS 2) RELATIONSHIP EXISTS (Please expl4k _•_� k V i1 I certify that; as an officer of this organization, ` he d1� ettthorization, am duly authorized to certify the information provided herein is a and trtd m or ization shall comply with all State and Federal Equal Opportunity and Non-Discr' ion rc2Qi'rQments a�nditions of employment. N vVVV Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated § - 0 e ntract ees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel dur' time' ich they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25- fat aduring contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the c racted u lic entity in writing. 2. PRIMARY CONTACT INFOR , c ,` At the discretion of th4$s, r more fir may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking g of the firms, which minclude oral interviews. NOTE: Each Proposer shall submit to the City a primary contact name, e-mailand phone number (preferably a cell phone number) where the City selection committee can c1Zr clIrrification or interview via telephone. Corporatevy:Qof Firm: Primary Conf'act: Title of Primary Contact: Phone#1 (cell preferred): E-Mail Address: City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 20 of 21 Phone#2: 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDA Acknowledge receipt of addenda for this invitation to bid, request for proposal, or request for qualification by signing and dating below. All addendums are hereby made a part of the bid or RFP documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein. Proposers/Bidders should indicate their receipt of same in the appropriate blank listed herein. Failure to do so may subject Contractor to disqualification. I ADDENDUM NO. I SIGNATURE AND PRINTED NAME I DATE ACKNOWLEDGED v 4. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: As an interested party on this project, you are required to provide debarment/suspen i ification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order- Certification can be done by eting and signing this form. �`�► Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 "Debarment and )SOVension11 r it that all contractors receiving, individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub -recipient tify th rganization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, 0e,&red ineli vol tarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with theXhdkiial Gove t. Signature certifies that neither you nor your prince esen arred p ded, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded froicip on his ion by any federal department or agency. Questions regarding this form shoul c ed tity of eville Purchasing Division. O NAME OF COMPANY: `✓ V PHYSICAL ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX ID #: AR. SECRETARY OF STATE FILING #: PHON F FAX: E-MAIL: SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: TITLE City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 21 of 21 DATE: Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT Grant Number 23-CLG-02 This agreement is entered into between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, hereinafter referred to as AHPP. AHPP agrees to provide a grant in the amount of $20,370 for the purpose of funding consultants' services to complete a context statement of the University -Haskell Heights neighborhood and expensed related to the attendance of approved trainings by HDC officials and staff. THIS GRANT IS NOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE PURPOSE, OBJECTIV ' SCOPE OF WORK HEREIN DEFINED. 1. SCOPE OF WORK 1w 0 TASK A. The City will fund consultants' services for the cona context statement of the University -Haskell Heights neigh S20.000 is designated for this act 1 TASK B. The City will fund approved tr el d t i xpe es for HDC commissioners and staff S370 is designated fort levity. O 11. TIME. FRAME of AGREE This agreement will a Ma �5,'2023 - all extend until September 30, 2024. No grant funds shall b xpen� j he Ci sub -grantees or assigns after September 30, 2024. No w__any g k will be undertaken, continued, or carried out after Septe b -024. III. PAYMENTS • �� A. Payments duds under grant agreement will be made upon receipt of invoices reque*''(eimbursement of expenses paid by the City within the time frame of this agr� invoice received after August 1, 2024, will be processed. �o Payments under this grant agreement are conditioned on successful completion of the tasks described in the scope of work and submission of deliverables as described in section IV. D. The grant award is conditioned on the use of the grant funds to accomplish the tasks described in the scope of work. Funds will only be disbursed to achieve the purposes described in the scope of work. The grantee retains no interest in grant funds for which an invoice has not been submitted to AHPP by August 1, 2024. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 E. The availability of funds under this grant award is dependent on the National Park Service's 2023-2024 Historic Preservation Fund award to the AHPP. IV. MILESTONES A. University -Haskell Heights Historic Context Statement l . The City will be under contract for consultant's services for the context by Augu9k15, 2023. 2. The consultant will begin work on the context by November 1, 2023. 3. A first draft of the context statement will be submitted to AHPP by Mafor 24. 4. The final draft of the context statement will be submitted to AIIPP by29, 2024. 5. Upon AHPP's approval of the final draft, the City will submit an i> the full cost of the task by August 1, 2024. V. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES C6 AHPP staff agrees to make periodic reviews e project ssess practices and products. AHPP reserves the right to enfo ce proce s outlined in this contract. 4*70aAI IPP agrees to make available advi unse ry omplish the objectives nd to render com cnsation u on i ithi a onaframc. P P VI. REPORTING RE UIREMEN G A. The City will su crly • dctai ' grammatic and fiscal progress of work on forms t vid 13PPoott, Period _ •_ �� _ r=✓Date Due March- u 3 July 15, 2023 July -Sep 023 October 15, 2023 be -Dec 3 January 15, 2024 - a h, J _4 Aril 15, 2024 it -June, 2W July 15. 2024 Jul -Sc tcmber, 2024 October 15, 2024 FINAL October 31 2024 qT e report of April 15, 2023, will be accompanied by a timeline for completion of the project and spend down of project funds by the end of the grant term. C. If changes to the grant agreement - e.g.: scope of work, products, budgets, etc. -are required, then the City must submit a written request detailing proposed changes and wait for written approval from AHPP before proceeding. D. No funds will be disbursed if grant reporting is more than two weeks delinquent. E. Failure to submit grant reports within one month of the date required herein shall be Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 Vill grounds for cancellation of the grant at the discretion of AHPP. F. The City will submit a final project report detailing all completed projects and including copies of all publications as per the requirements of this agreement no later than October 31.2024. G. The City will promptly notify AHPP if it will be unable to expend the awarded funds within the grant period. REQUIRED TRAINING Disbursement of funds under this agreement is contingent on attendan designated representative of the City at a training session on grant 'stration requirements held by AHPP. This requirement may be waived a iscretion of AHPP if the City's grants administrator has attended a gran c ' tration training session within the two years prior to the execution of this ggreement. COMPLIANCE A. All products and projects funded Secretary of the Interior's "Stan for Preservation I'lanning, 2 Nards i Standards and Guidelines f aluatio 4 tar Registration, 5) Standard Guid 'nes or III and Guidelines foaA ural gincc Guidelines for Arical entatioAl2 TjUith the applicable ards and Guidelines dentification, 3) Guidelines for Documentation, 6) Standards ncntation, 7) Standards and As for the Treatment of Historic PropertiesV) Stan nd G s for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, and 10) Hi E servat, 'Llkfessional Qualification Standards. See Appendices A-E. B. PROJECT E U ION A NTRACT REQUIREMENTS: All projects, sub - grants and mg co tea unded through this grant agreement must be carried out in accoe with th cedures and standards laid out in the applicable appen to this agreement. All work products funded through this grant must meet thc� ds laid out in the applicable appendices to this agreement. r SEMENTS AND PRESERVATION AGREEMENTS: The City will donate to PP a conservation easement on any property being restored, rehabilitated, or repaired as a part of any project(s) funded in whole or in part by this grant utilizing ten thousand dollars (S10,000) or more of funds awarded by AHPP. On such projects involving private properties, it will be the City's responsibility to secure this easement for donation to AHPP before any grant fiords are released. The City will ensure that the owner(s) of property being restored, rehabilitated, or repaired as part of any project utilizing at least one dollar (S 1) but less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) of Historic Preservation Fund monies awarded by AHPP enters into a five- year preservation agreement concerning that property with AHPP before grant funds Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 are released. On such projects involving City property, the City and any other parties holding an ownership interest in such property must enter into a five-year preservation agreement with AHPP before funds will be released. D. All activities pursuant to this Agreement shall be in compliance with the requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; (78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. §§2000d et seq.); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, (87 Stat. 394; 29 U.S.C. §794); the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 9 Stat. 728; 42 U.S.C. §§6101 et seq.); the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 § 12101); the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. §§4151 et seq); and wit er federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination on grounds of rac , sexual orientation, national origin, disabilities, religion, age, or sex. A. In all hiringor employment made possible b or resulting from hewards, the City Y g (1) will not discriminate against any employee or applicant loyment because of race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin, and (2) a e affirmative action to ensure that applicants are empl9py., and that to ees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, (or, relig' , age, or national origin. This requirement applies to, but is not mtt d to t owi : employment promotion, demotion, or transfer; �1l�ittment o rec t ent advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or o r rms o ens d selection for training, including apprentice The its ntees will comply with all applicable statutes and Exe i a order n quail ett o rtent opportunity and grant awards will be governe he pro tons, as it mented by, but not limited to, Department of the In olici lished ' FR 17. X o IX. MANAGEMENT AND BW GUI S A. Certified Local Gov tnent n are funded by the National Park Service Historic Preservation Ads Grants FDA number 15.904. All policies and procedures h Depa �e�� the Interior, the National Park Service, and all other Federal reg Dons concdh�i g expenditures of Federal funds must be followed by AHP a 'all sub -grant recipients. All grant projects will be administered by AHPP an tIM in accordance with the Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual. The O%anuVrmay be found online here: <Aps://www.nps.L,ov/stib*ects/historicpreservationfLindAiistoric-preservatioii-fLind- I ant-manual.htm The City must maintain efficient and effective accountability and 1 control of all funds received and expended under a sub -grant from AHPP. B. Federal Award Identification Number, total award amount, award date, and a copy of the NPS grant agreement with AHPP will be provided to subgrantee with this signed grant agreement. This subgrant award may be subject to additional conditions as required by the National Park Service. C. A City employee or paid contractor will be responsible for fulfilling all Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 responsibilities assumed by the City under this grant agreement. D. The City will promptly disclose any conflict of interest to AHPP in accordance with 2 CFR §200.112. E. Indirect costs are not eligible for reimbursement under this award. F G The City will maintain all grant -related records at the City offices in accordance v*th its normal recordkeeping procedures. �• A_ The City hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the regulat guidelines and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptan, Federal funds for this federally assisted project. The following Fc to are incorporated by reference into this Agreement (full text canad .r http://ww.ecfr.pov): �.� 2) Administrative Requirements- 2 CPR Pat-1 200 - Uni%rm Admi r ive Rey Audit Requirements Jor Federa A►►- rds, KnQDctcrtnination ofAllow �`sts: 2 CF'R Part 200 - Uni Adnr' t�re Rg Audit Requirements edera ►►ds. Sufi1 3) Audit] 2 CPR Audit 1 ,Wicies, use of attons Cost Principles, and Cost Principles, and I Requirements, Cost Principles, and Subpart F. ftOF 4) Code of Fc ,t ��ulation latory Requirements: 2 CF 2 A 1401 •` iment-wide Requirements for a Drug -Free Wo ak"; ,R 180 & 1400, "Non -Procurement Debarment and Suspension", sIiously located at 43 CFR §42, "Government wide Debarment and uspension (Non -Procurement)"; Q43 tFR 1 art 18,. New Restrictions on Lobbying"; 2 CFR Part 175, "Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000"; FAR Clause 52.203-12, Paragraphs (a) and (h), Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions; and 2 CFR Pa►-t 25, System for Award Management (www.SAM.gov) and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS). Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 H. Cities that expend $750,000 or more during a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program -specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. §§7501-7507) and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F. 1. The City will comply with Federal competitive procurement requirements for professional services and subcontractors and will provide documentation of such compliance upon request. J. The City will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours prov f the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. A_ K. Upon completion of the project, the Secretary of the Interior, the - troller General of the United States, AHPP, and/or any of their duly author' entatives shall have access for the purpose of financial or programmatic a nil examination any books, documents, papers and records of City that a cnt to the grant at all reasonable times during the period of rot t provi CFR §200.334, for at least three (3) years or until all claimer au it ftJ-Mv� ave en resolved. L. The City will comply with the `Tns of C. obbying with Appropriated Moneys, as am� y P I w I Nov. 2, 2002. "No part of the money appropriated b I�enactm t Congr s 11, in the absence of express authorization by Cong a used ' ct y or in buintcd .t to pay for any personal service, advertise ctt(t ram one, I or written matter, or other device, intended o ed t ence in inner a Member of Congress, a jurisdiction, or an icial oove o favor, adopt, or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legisla ie,�� ratifil policy, or appropriation, whether before or after the introdu io ny bilurc, or resolution proposing such legislation, law, ratification, poll or ap o iahon; but this shall not prevent officers or employees ofA U lted St f its departments or agencies from communicating to an?thccr e or , at his request, or to Congress or such official, throuoffciMannels. requests for legislation, law, ratification. policy, or aps which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public bu n making any communication whose prohibition by this section ighnion of the Attorney General, violate the Constitution or interfere th the conduct of foreign policy, counter -intelligence, intelligence, or national 5 curity activities. Violations of this section shall constitute violations of section 1352(a) of title 3 L" In addition to the above, the related restrictions on the use of appropriated funds found in Div. F, §402 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-161) also apply. M. The City will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 113858 "Strengthening Buy American Preferences for Infrastructure Projects" that may apply to the project that is the subject of this award. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 X. PUBLICATIONS, WORK PRODUCT AND PUBLIC INFORMATION A. An acknowledgment of National Park Service and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program support must be made in connection with the publication of any material based on, or developed under, any activity supported by Historic Preservation Fund grant funds. This acknowledgment shall be in the form of a statement as follows: "This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkans� Heritage. Anv opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expr in this material are those of the author(v) and do not necessarily reflect the f the Department of the Interior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. " B. Press releases, publications, and other public dissemination of in ion by the City concerning a project made possible by this grant shall ackn�9 ational Park Service, Department of the interior, Arkansas Historic PreJarY4'�ion Program, and Division of Arkansas Heritage grant sup �� J C. Posters, brochures, program literature nd ubli a 4vill ' elude the following statement: This program receive al if ssist for identification and protection of historic properties n r Titl the hts Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehahilitat ct of.409 d t incrimination Act of 1975, f amended, the U.S. hrtmenWe inter l bits discrimination on the Basis o race, color, not origin isa r1itv or e ih itsfederally assisted programs. If j,ou beli a hav discri d against in anY program, activity, or facilitl rihc• ve, or i esire further information, please write to: Officefor qual pity, al Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 2024 . D_ Drafts of all publics s`repo s udio-visual material, and other material subject to distribution, q4lic4gion, or must be submitted to AHPP for approval prior to production 31Z attiion, u I isplay or general distribution. E. PublZ�V_ , reports, audio-visual material, and other material subject to distribution, pu or display will be made accessible to the widest audience possible in corVhce with Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 12132 et q.). For more information, guidance is available from the Department of Justice, vil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section. . The City grants the State of Arkansas and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement as complied or produced by the City, its contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. Any data, analysis, methodology, or Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 other information that formed the basis of the work product funded by this grant award shall be made available to the AHPP and the NPS on request. The City shall ensure that these rights are secured by any sub -award or sub -agreement funded under this grant award. G. All Geographic Information Systems data produced or collected as a part of this grant funded project must comply with the NPS Cultural Resource Spatial Data Transfer Standards. Please contact the AHPP for more information. XI. DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS A. Any development project funded through this award must obtain appr 'a permits from the City, including approval from the local Historic District ssion, if the project falls within a local ordinance district and the Commissio Jurisdiction. B. Work funded by this grant award cannot be claimed under eral Historic Preservation Tax Incentives Program. C' nd any potbtia ubgrantccs should consult with their attorneys or financial • i • rs abot r other consequences of this award or its conditions on project nan rng.�D' C. Approvals of project work by or this t rvvoj i ndependent of and may not be substituted for the revi ap f an 3 or matter under any other AHPP or National Paervice p r�rn. XI1. LIMITATION OF Ll B n• AHPP assumes no resp nsibili �ii�f respe cidents, illness or claims arising out of any work performed unde rant s d project. The City is expected to take necessary steps to insu i nd its pp ncl and students and to comply with the applicable local, State, o 'e oral s- ty s andards, including those issued pursuant to the National Occupal*al �afety h Act of 1970 (see 20 CFR Part 1910). X11I. PROJECT CA L`LATIQ Appro �ects may be canceled for one or more of the following reasons: �ftc City requests project cancellation. `The City fails to pursue project work in a timely fashion or fails to adequately pursue project objectives in a manner likely to ensure completion of the grant project or substantial spend -down of the grant award within the grant term. D. Project work or project administration is found not to be in conformance with conditions as stated in the grant agreement and appendices. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 XIV. AMENDMENTS This agreement may be amended upon written request and approval by both parties_ XV. APPENDICES The following appendices are hereby incorporated into this agreement by this reference. I O �C o Cj �- Q' o � �C O C jN Q 9 Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 SIGNATURES Scott Kaufman Agency Director, AHPP State Historic Preservation Officer 1100 North Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Lioneld Tordan Name (printed) Ma or Title Q / 3 Date n- CP 04 Da o Cj-* Q ti 10 Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation APPENDIX A: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation The production of surveys of historic structures, sites, etc., funded under this grant agreement will meet the following minimum standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), request for qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contract for su nd documentation services funded under this agreement includes dut' tasks as described in this appendix. �j 2. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RFQ. RFP,r bid solicitation for a project funded under this agreeme prior to publication of the announcement or request for rev approval and will not publish such announcement '�Oicd cst until m nts been received from AHPP. A copy of the final annou-nt or and prof of its publication or transmissiontoojapk nal ill be provided to AHPP. �X 3. The City will submit ay of sed t t and the name and vita of the contractor selec ir servi s t nded u r is agreement to AHPP for review, prior to en of +e contract d ill not execute the contract until approva a. n r from . A copy of the final executed contract wrovi HPP. 4. The City will c e AH anal Register staff to consult on the advisability f He sites y work in the proposed area, proposed boundaries f he suryorfC, etc., prior to engaging a contractor for survey workftde�under �ement. 5. The will cnsuat the contractor responsible for survey and (1 mentation services funded under this agreement meets the Secretary of Wistory lnterior's Professional Qualification Standards (see Appendix F) in and/or Architectural History and/or, when applicable, Archaeology or QHistoric Landscape Architecture. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITES l . Prior to commencing any work under the contract, any contractor who has not attended a training on the required procedures for historic sites surveys taught by the AHPP National Register Survey staff within five (5) years prior to the survey initiation date must attend a training class on the procedures required for historic site survey. This one -day class, at the offices of AHPP, will train the contractor in the proper and thorough completion of Arkansas Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation Architectural Resources Forms, photography requirements, mapping, and compilation of the finished product. 2. Prior to commencing any work under the contract, the Contractor, regardless of the date of his or her last training, must contact the AHPP National Register Survey staff to determine whether changes to required historic site survey procedures have changed since the contractor last attended a training. If the AHPP National Register Survey staff determines that the Contractor attendance at an additional training class is advisable, the contractor m �• attend a training class on the procedures required for historic sites s prior to the initiation of any fieldwork under the contract. 3. The contractor must comply with the standards and proced� forth in the AHPP Survey Manual in carrying out the contract work ompletion of the final product. 4. The contractor must design and c lete the su y produce a survey report in accordance with the Na Park S istoric Preservation Fund Grants Manual Chapter 6 Sec on d 3b and/or d as applicable and the Secretary of the I �t1 i ss tan r Id i cation for Intensive Surveys (see at htt s://tia s. ov/ i /loc -1 ti rch studs O.htm). The survey report shoen.. , t mi ont ' ollowing elements: ,e) • Surv�thodol • stor' �xt sp the area surveyed • ov V of his o ' source es within the area 4ry ye • ing i daries of the area surveyed sting d es or other location information of properties yed, ce numbers supplied by AHPP, and data relevant t;�eval OiNational Register eligibility, such as date of O00const cti , property condition and architectural integrity, vacant lots, etc. • Maps locating properties by resource number and address • Language collected on Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms Qshould be provided with the survey report in an organized, _ sortable, searchable, digital format, such as a database, spreadsheet, GIS data, or similar data file. 5. The contractor must complete an Arkansas Architectural Resources Form and provide site plans for each resource in the field. 6. The contractor must provide, on the Arkansas Architectural Resources Form, information specific to the property for which the survey form is prepared I i• T ,11 I!:1 ill summarizing its history and any obvious changes to the building that appear to have occurred since its construction. 7. The contractor will take color digital photographs of each resource in the field. At the very minimum the photographs should show all facades of each building. In addition, representative strectscape photographs will be provided by the Contractor. These photographs will be submitted with the final survey product in both electronic and print form. R. The contractor will provide UTM coordinates for each property. n� 0�G.J 9. To ensure efficient production of a quality product and to redu eii�►burden of repeated reviews, in projects involving inventory and docu on of more than 30 properties, the contractor will provide drafts of ate 0 completed Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms to the AH Survey staff for review prior to completion and subs Architectural Resources Forms. PP staff wi return comments to the contracto ► in 14 t� draft forms. The contractor will pr information compiled out the historic site archival researc The contra of America t reproduce and limitation, eqcc others, of all phohs, to W i %A!f�ial Register 2of all Arkansas draft forms and days of receipt of the lock product or in the course of carrying Jinpe but not limited to tnAty, t SiaRc of Arkansas, and the United States noe a and irrevocable license to publish, is o any manner and for any purpose without ze fy publication, reproduction or use by maicrial first produced or composed under this its employees or any individual or concern assigned to originate and prepare such material. contractor must be able to adhere to set deadlines and provide initial and pleted surveys by the dates set forth in contract documents. 13. The contractor will provide own transportation and equipment. 14. For resurvey work, a copy of the previous survey form must be attached to the new survey form for each property. 15. The contractor will provide one full -color copy and one digital copy of the final survey report and forms to the City and one full -color printed copy and two digital copies of the survey report and forms to AHPP. Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation C. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES 1. AHPP will provide Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms and Ancillary Structures Forms to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 2. AHPP will provide access to survey files and copies of previous survey work as necessary for project completion. 3. AHPP will provide resource numbers to the contractor as necessary for completion. n. 4. AHPP will provide a one -day training class at the AHPP office itttle Rock on the procedures required for historic site surveys. This cl I train the contractor in the proper and thorough completion of Ark rchitectural Resources Forms, photography requirements, mapp' compilation of the finished product. qW 5. AHPP will provide technical assifi to the ctor as necessary for project completion. • � � �D' ` v O o G �- �Q • o � Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products APPENDIX E: Other Consultant Contracts and Products All other types of projects funded under this grant agreement will meet the following rninlintim standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), reques qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contrac ices funded under this agreement includes duties and tasks as de t in this contract and appendix. 2. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RF or other bid announcement for a project funded under this a ent to AIiPP prior to publication of the announcem or request re ew and will not publish such announcement or reque9holl ppro been received from AHPP or seven (7) businestday hav - d si cc the date on which the proposed announceme t� uest n re t by AHPP. A copy of the final announcem o rcques roo ' ublication or transmission to au pr s I wi vided to AHPP. 3. The City wil u mtt a c o any p se contract and the name and vita of the o t for for funded under this agreement to AHPP ew, exccu the contract, and will not execute the contTectunti val h received from AHPP or seven (7) business da elapse the date on which the proposed contract has bee re by A� copy of the final executed contract will be provided A PP. A 4. %jty%ill ns t at any contractor engaged for work funded under Zgrccmcn cts the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Historic reservation Professional Qualification Standards (see Appendix F) as ,I determined in consultation with AHPP. Q 5. The City will ensure that all project work and work products meet all applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" including: 1) Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2) Standards and Guidelines for Identification, 3) Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation, 4) Standards and Guidelines for Registration, 5) Standards and Guidelines for Historical Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation, 7) Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Documentation, 8) Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, 9) Standards and Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, and 10) Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products Standards. B. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITES 1. The contractor will ensure that all project work and work products meet all applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" including: 1) Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2) Standards and Guideline. or Identification, 3) Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation, 4) Stand and Guidelines for Registration, S) Standards and Guidelines for ical Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for Architectura Engineering Documentation, 7) Standards and Guidelines f Archeological Documentation, 8) Standards for the Tre of Historic Properties, 9) Standards and Guidelines for the Reha n of Historic Buildings, and 10) Historic Preservation Profess] alification Standards. (( 2. The contractor will provide cbloof any ry work product or information compiled or a era b t trac or in the course of carrying out the contr % i uding imi archival research, and photographs, to on 3. The contractor ' ;g ant thit3, the St o Arkansas, and the United States of An i a royaj _free, nonNlu. the and irrevocable license to publis e and di,f in any manner and for any purpos ut li , and t orize or ratify publication, reprodu ion or othe . copyrightable material first produced or compos d its a t by the contractor, its employees or any individ 1 cern sp t ally employed or assigned to originate and I prepare s materi . 4. Act m e able to adhere to set deadlines as set forth in act docutiw+rtS. I The contractor will provide own transportation and equipment. Q 6. The contractor will provide one full -color copy and one digital copy of the work product, as applicable, to the City and one full -color printed copy and two digital copies of the work product, as applicable, to AHPP. 1. AHPP will provide Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms and Ancillary Structures Forms to the contractor as necessary for project completion. Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products 2. AHPP will provide access to survey tiles and copies of previous survey work as necessary for project completion. 3. Al IPP will provide resource numhcrN to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 4. AHPP will provide access to other AHPP tiles to the contractor as necessary for project completion. AHPP will provide technical assistance to the contractor as necessary for project cornpl OS' O �C o Ci �- Q' o � �C O Ci Q 9 Attachment D: The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Information Appendix F: The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional (Qualification Standards The Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards were defined and officially adopted in 1983 (48 FR 44716. September 29) by the National Park Service. Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards were expanded and revised in 1997 (62 FR 33708, June 20) in response to amendments in the National Historic Preservation Act, but were not formally adopted for federal regulatory purposes. See https://www.doi.gov,"pam/asset- management/historic-preservatioLVM for more information. The 1997 revisions update the professional qualification standards written in 1983 and add definiti s ?) seven other historic preservation disciplines that appear in the National Historic Preservation Act Kjsl The 1997 version also provides guidance on how to measure qualifying credentials that ing in the 1983 Standards. In the 1997 version, this information is provided in a standardize hat provides examples of the academic degrees, work and academic products, and professional a sMtltt would qualify a professional in a particular discipline. Because the 1997 Standards give the clearest description of nt under ruing of what a qualified professional is in each of the disciplines described in the N do istoric s ation Act, AI IPP uses them as guidance on judging the qualifications of contractoss sultants i , on •cts funded by AHPP's CLG rant agreements. It is im ortant to i hesc a tend uirements for 8 S P req ALL consultants or contractors working on a pro •c K.N. as wed tt j�-Iry 1 vcr• each project must contain a person in a Iced, responsible project the tc xpcn V �� O i Q 1 Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33708 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR professionally credible historic Historic Preservation Professional preservation work. Qualification Standards National Park Service The Standards are not designed to Archeology identify the best or ideal person for any (A) Prehistoric Archeology The Secretary of the Interior's Historic position. The effective application of (B) Historic Archeology Preservation Professional Qualification Architectural History any of these national Standardswill Conservation Standards require the development of a detailed Cultural Anthropology AGENCY: National Park Service, DOI. job description containing additional Curation ACTION: Proposed renaming of and information to suit a particular situation Engineering and need. These Standards do not apply Folklore revisions to "the Secretary of the to ''entry-level'' applicantsor to Historic Architecture Interiors Professional Qualification Historic Landscape Architecture preeminent professionals in the field. Standards." Rather, they outline the minimum Historic Preservation Planninat Historic Preservation ' �, SUMMARY: The National Park Service education and experience and products History (NPS) proposes to rename and revise that together provide an assurance that Sources of Additional Inf i n "the Secretary of the Interior's the applicant, employee, consultant, or Professional Organi Professional Qualification Standards" advisorwiII beabletoperform which are part of the larger "Secretary competently on thejob and be respected Introduction of the Interior's Standards and within the larger historic preservation Backgroun Gui del i nes for Archeol ogy and H i stori c community. Theid ion, evaluation, Preservation." The statutory authority All responsestothisnoticewill be prot preservation of for the Secretary's development of these summarized as part of the publication of Aron portant historic and can be found in sections 101(g), 101(h), theoff icial issuanceof the"Secretary' s cua properties depends upon the 101(i), and 101(j)(2)(A) of the National Historic Preservation Professional arti ation of all citizens: however, Historic Preservation Act, as amended Qualification Standards;eNI omments ain decisions must involve (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). These Standards will also becomea mattdR blic ividuals who meet nationally and Guidelines (including the record. ( 9 accepted professional standards in order Professional Qualification Standards) DATES: Commen gLlT�icnoticerM to"ecredibility in the practice of were published in the Federal Register received by Au 11997 to �c preservation at the Federal, in 1983 (48 FR44716, September 29) as assured of con e ion. tote, nd local levels, aswell as in the the Secretary's best guidance for historic ADDRESSES:•t� com t o�-rrli r. Jo vate sector. preservation practice nationally. This Wallis, C IY,1Branch St bal he Secretary of the Interior is remains their preeminent function. and L �bgrams. H responsible for establishing standards The Standards are renamed "the Pr at on Services, National for all programs under Departmental Secretary of the Interior's Historic F al Resoykoteward authority. In accordance with this Preservation Professional Qualificationrrship Pr runs, Nation Ir0k responsibility. "the Secretary of the Standards." This change reflects the facte.0 4 rtment QQf terior, Interior's Professional Qualification that the Standards are designed to apply Stee��W., W ih. DC Standards'' were developed by the to each discipline as it is practiced in 202y0. Rnentsm and- National Park Service (NPS) 20 years historic preservation; e.g., in the d 1-11 rover ailed to 800 ago to ensure that a consistent level of identification, evaluation, o pitol Str Suite200, expertisewould beapplied nationally to documentation. registration. and shi gton. DV0002. Comments may the identification, evaluation, treatment of historic properties. be nt by t4J02-343-6004 or by E- documentation, registration, treatment. The proposed rev i si on s u pd ate t fail t/n,b Ili* and interpretation of historic and standards for the five discipline `. FOR F16�RTH��NFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. archeological resources. included in the 1983 publicatior `►' bhn t�ty�d, Branch of State, Tribal, The National Historic Preservation add standards for seven oth Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-665) gave the and Local Programs, Heritage disciplines mentioned in t tonal Secretary authority to set criteria for Preservation Services Division, National Historic Preservation Aqb g State grants, surveys, and plans. The Center for Cultural Resource important to historic pry ion. The National Park Service administratively Stewardship and Partnership Programs, proposed revision ide (for the required State Historic Preservation National Park Service, 202-343-1055, first time) publi 6 uidance on how Officers (SHPOs) to maintain to use and in P4etFAX 202-343-6004. or VeStandards. .bhnRenaud@ips.gov (E-mail). professionally qualified staff (in 1976), These re' sarenecessarybecause and to appoint qualified individuals as the old p f I qualification SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: advisors to serve on State Review standards become out-of-date. did Table of Contents —Applying the Historic Boards (in 1977). The professional not include any disciplines important Preservation Professional Qualification qualification standards have not in the practice of historic preservation, Standards. changed since then. The 1980 and provided no guidance on their use Introduction Amendments to the National Historic and interpretation. This absence of Program Evolution/Current Changes Preservation Act (Pub. L. 96-515) national guidance led to confusion and Applicability statutorily affirmed the previous inconsistency in the application of the How to Use the Historic Preservation regulatory requirement for Standards by Federal. State, Tribal, and Qualification Standards Questions and Answers professionally qualified staff. Congress local government agencies and other also reiterated the regulation's Discipline and Historic Preservation organizations and individuals. The Proficiencies requirement that State Review Boards Standards are designed to be a tool to Recommended Discipline Proficiencies include a majority of members qualified help recognize the minimum expertise Recommended Historic Preservation in oneof theprofessional disciplines generally necessary for performing Proficiencies which met minimum Professional Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. '119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33709 Qualification Standards defined in regulation in 36 CFR part 61 (Architecture, Architectural History. Prehistoric Archeology or Historic Archeology, and History). In addition. the 1980 amendments created the Certified Local Government (CLG) program to recognize the role of local governments in the national partnership, and stipulated that the CLG Review Commission membership needed tobeadequateand qualified. The Congressional Committee Report for the 1980 amendments (H.R. Rept. 96- 1457) called for "professional bodies which can objectively evaluate the historic significance of properties and provide professional advice on historic preservation matters." Finally, States, local governments. Federal agencies, and the private sector often require that proposals from historic preservation contractors or work submitted by them meet these same professional practice Standards. How To use the Historic preservation professional qualification standards provides background and general information in aquestion and answer formal about the three basic components of each Standard: academic or comparable training: professional experience; and products and activities that demonstrate proficiency in the field of historic preservation. Discipline and historic preservation proficiencies consists of a series of 1 general proficiencies (knowledge, skills, and abilities) that are needed by historic preservation program applicants, employees, consultants, and advisors. The first set of proficiencies is related to disciplines: the second, to historic preservation. Following the standard for each discipline is guidance about m tt% standard for that specific disciplI e, including a list of some of M, common "closely related i I within academic degree program I mation on documenting professio experience; and f ty rcal products and a that may be used to document s"r proficiencies in o Nc preservation Finale Professional Organizati �sisincluded to assist users in obtaining additional information about thedisciplines, college and university departments, and publications on the practice of each discipline. Program Evolution/Current Changes In its 1992 amendments to the Act (Pub. L. 102-575), Congress recognized the evolution and growth of the professional practice of historic preservation, and an expanded role for Qualification Standards'' that follow are, in most instances, advisory in nature and may thus be used by anyone hiringpersonnel or consultants or appointing advisory boards or commissions. Because use of the Standards can help ensure appropriate. informed decisions about protecting and preserving our nation's historic and archeological resources. NIPS strongly encourages their adoption and implementation However, under welOde circumstances discussthe Secretary's Historic Pron Professional Qualifi ndards"arerequirements td regulation. In tho i tances, a note is added at thee e required Standard. First, tl Historic Pr r tl Oct, Section 101, requires th�nor sslonally qualified staff be ap employed by State Historic ',,pren Offices. Indian tribesthat tye executed a Memorandum of `Rgreement with NPS and assumed resp sibilities pursuant to Section 1 d f the Act also must employ or AD t with professionally qualified �div ualsin carryingout those onsibilities. The performance and pervision of Historic Preservation soup ionali m i e twe discai�s. Theree of Stan dar e edi Stan defines: • A ca i c rees or arabl e rainin •.Pr nal ex I ; and �Q is an es that s�rat eprof ic In historic p r ation. ese $t s do not apply to ,entry4ev W icants or to preerginer4 ofessionalsin the field. Rather _ outline the minimum education and experience and products that together provide an assurance that the applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will be able to perform competently on thejob and be respected within the larger historic preservation community. The effective application of any of these national Standards will require the development of a detailed job description containing additional information to suit a particular situation and need. Note: In each discipline, themost common method of meeting that Professional Qualifications Standard is discussed first. Less common alternatives follow- Typically, a graduate degree or professional license is listed first. Applicability It should be emphasized that the ''Historic Preservation Professional Indian tribes in implementing the National Historic Preservation Act. Accordingly, the number of disciplines acknowledged as key to the responsible practice of historic preservation has been increased by the Act and therefore by the National Park Service from the five identified almost 20 years earlier to 12, now including Archeology (Prehistoric and Historic), Architectural History, Conservation, Cultural Anthropology. Curation, Engineering, Folklore, Historic Architecture. Historic Landscape Architecture, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, and History Asaresult, NPSconsulted at length with Federal agencies. SHPOs, CLGs, and professional societies involved in historic preservation about issuing updated and expanded Professional Qualification Standardsthat recognize the evolution and development of the disciplines in the field. ''The Secretary of the L^ior's Historic Preservation Pre(#9slpnal Qualification Standar s' designer, to be national mess or deterrt'r * minimum r ui 6(� or professionals p c �tg in the IQoo`f historic prrs� oh. The f or th Standard %v) esa isi�!' yet flexible, t��i�pwork fo stal)lishing Fund grant -assisted work must be performed and/or supervised by professionally qualified staff and/or contractors. In accordance with 36 CFR part 61 and NPS policy, threeof twelve disciplines are required for State program staff and for staff of Tribeswith Section 101(d) status: History. Archeology, and Architectural History. StatesandTribeswith 101(d)statusmay proposean alternative minimum staff composition for NPS concurrence if their historic resources, needs, or circumstances would be better served or met. States and Tribes with 101(d) status are expected to obtain the services of other qualified professionals as needed for different types of resources. Secon d, sect i on 101(b)(1)(B)and section 301(12)of the Act requires that am ajori ty of State Review Board members be professionally qualified. As specified in 36 CFR part 61. this majority must include, but need not be limited. to the required disciplines of History, Archeology, and Architectural History. One person may meet the Standards for more than one required discipline. Third, section 101(c)(1)(B) and section 301(13) of the Act requires that State programs encourage CLG Review Commissions to include individuals who are professionally qualified, to the extent that such individuals are Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33710 Federal Register I Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 I Notices available in the community. The State standards; it is not directed at 6. How are these Standards to be may specify the minimum number of establishing professional qualification used?The Standards are designed to be Commission members that must meet requirements. It is section 112(a)(1)(B) a tool to help recognize the minimum the Standards and decide which, if any, that requires the Federal Office of expertise generally necessary for of the disciplines listed in the Standards Personnel Management (OPM) to devise performing professionally credible need to be represented on the professional qualification requirements historic preservation work. The Commission. for Federal employees and contractors Standards are not designed to identify An accompanying guidance section, in seven disciplines. OPM is required by the best or ideal person for any position Applying the Historic Preservation statute to consult with the National Park or the preeminent practitioners in any Professional Qualification Standards, Service (NPS) and others in creating discipline, nor are they developed to has been prepared to assist the these requirements. When completed, qualify apprentice or entry level consistent application of the "Historic NPS will offer the Professional workers. The Standards are @signed to Preservation Professional Qualification Qualification Standardsand Guidance describe the typical expertj§gttCId by Standards'' when selecting an as its best advice to OPM for their use. credible mid -level journeyfnCkWorking employee, consultant, or advisor. As 3. Are the Standards regulatory or are in historic preservatio , such, the guidance provides additional they advisory?The Standards are not in 7• Do the Standa<o'entry-level­ to ''entry information and recommendations, but and of themselves regulatory. A separate level'' or "technicivel positions? never constitutes requirement. regulation or other official action which Although thewo or How To Use the Historic Preservation references or otherwise adopts part or ''technicia I rsonnel is critical Professional Qualification Standards all of them is necessary to give any force to the succ storic preservation to any language in the Standards. In a projects, rofessional levels are There are three basic components of number of instances. this has occurred, not in the Secretary's each Historic Preservation Professional For example, the Standardsfor St The Standards apply only to Qualification Standard: academic Rehabilitation are regulatory in the th o neyman" professional and degrees or comparable training: Federal Preservation TValal tives efin the minimum level of expertise professional experience; and products ry to provide reliable technical and activities that demonstrate program through 6 CF7. Likewise, the Prof'essi ifica inions relating to historic properties proficiency in thefield of historic (wit ut in-depth oversight or review by preservation. A number of commonly Standards are r alfor Stat I a h professional in the disciptine). asked questions about the design and historic presery ograms, Federal agencies have to meet participatingtri es rough art content of the Standards. as wetl as their se�rofessiooal Qualification application and implementation. are 61. Thegui Aca c ndards?For Federal employees and answered below in order to assist Backgrou "Do m 9 Profperi en �ederal contractors, the Historic e, anyone applying for a position or Preservation Professional Qualification acco ng the f tonal anyonecharged with obtaining the Standards are regulatory only if they are services of a professional in the field of Qu ion Stn ar4s is intend specifically adopted by (1) The Federal historic reservation. a rsin Nel icahon jt�r p Officeof Personnel Management (OPM) 1. Under what authority are these rds: t so4dance is pursuant to its responsibility under Standards developed ?"The Secretary of egulato�j' Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Act; (2) a the Interior's Historic Preservation 4. H these St rds Federal agency in its own agency -wide Professional Qualification Standards d A Who a Ited? regulations, requirements, or policy: or and Guidance" are part of the larger Co lion has tensive over (3) a Federal agency as part of a program "Secretary of the Interior's Standards fo r years tthi roject. Thew i de or project agreement with another party. and Guidelines for Archeology and ra e of c 4nts that use the 9. How are general Standards applied Historic Preservation.'' The statutorpandar t1p a broad consultation in specific situations? General standards authority for the Secretary's proc , w h, not surprisingly, results are intended to define minimum development i in ly ryingopinionsand p professional qualifications for sections 101(g), 101(h), 101 a recomm dations. To date, NPS has identifying, evaluating, registering, 1010)(2)(A) of the Nati onallH nc consulted with: (1) Federal, tribal. State. treating, and interpreting historic Preservation Act, as am ese and local government historic properties nationwide; however, the Standardsand Guidanc (i dingthe preservation programs as well as related best historic preservation professional Professional Qual ion andards) organizations: (2) professional societies for a particular office. program, project, were pubounction. Federal Register and organizationsof professional or property depends upon the situation. in 1983 ae y's best guidance societies: (3) academic programs in Different skills and expertise are needed for historation practice historic preservation and organizations for different geographical areasand nationallmainstheir of such programs; (4) individuals and resource types. In most cases where the preemincompanies in the private practice of Standards areapplied in hiringor 2. Whae requirements in historic preservation as well as related contracting, job descriptions and Section 112 of the National Historic organizations: and, (5) individuals qual i fi cati ons w i I I have to be tai I ored to Preservation Act?Sect ion 112 1s not the working in the public sector as well as specific situations and locations so that statutory authority for the "Secretary of organizations of such people. experience and training are relevant to the Interior's Historic Preservation 5. Why did the National Park Service the needs of the resources and the work Professional Qualification Standards choose the disciplines it did? These to be done. Where there is a need for and Guidance'' (see the preceding disciplines were selected because each specialized expertise in aproject. paragraph). Section 112 splits Federal is specifically mentioned in the application of theStandardswill agency requirements for meeting National Historic Preservation Act. [See necessarily focus upon specialized "professional standards" into two parts. sections 112(a)(1)(A), 112(a)(1)(B), training and demonstrated experience Section 112(a)(1)(A) mandates that 201(a)(9). 301(12)(B), 301(13), and and products. For example, a person Federal ''actions'' meet professional 401(c)(3).) may be highly skilled in restoring Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. '119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33711 particular kind of resource (such as Standards are encouraged to adopt a particular discipline, there is no such covered bridges), but that person would similar approach. national requirement. The hiring, not be an appropriate choice to work on 12. Why aren't the Standards for each choosing, selecting, or contracting office other types of resources. discipline exactly the same?Because must determine for itself how much 10. Do all staff, consultants, and each discipline is different and makes experience, of what sort, and in what appointed advisors need to meet the itsown distinct contribution to historic sequence, is appropriate for thejob or Standards?SHPOs, CLGs, and tribes preservation, the Professional position. hire staff, select consultants, and Qualification Standardsdiffer somewhat 16. How many and what types of appoint advisors to perform historic according to discipline. Each set of products and activities are routinely preservation work. However, it is NPS Standards includes educational and used to document the quality of policy that historic preservation activity experience equivalencies to assure professional experience?The applicant, supported by the Historic Preservation fairness in hiring practices: thus, a employee. consultant, or advf r may Fund must be conducted. supervised. graduate or undergraduate degree, or cite products such as peer-r wed overseen. evaluated, or signed off by other certification, registration, or articlesand publications, isual someone who meets the appropriate professional licenseor trainingisgiven materials, awards, and ilVal Register Professional Qualification Standard. full consideration, when combined with documentation. Acti Is ould include Therefore, NPS requires the use of some differing periodsof full-time teaching the theor r act ices ofa of these Standards in certain professional experience. Documenting a specific discipli inistrative. circumstancesb State Historic record of high quality products and y project revi ervisory Preservation Offices, State Review activitiesduring past employment is experience oric preservation Boards, and Certified Local Government required in every Standard; however, program e; and field or Commissions (see 36 CFR part 61). thetypeof productsand activitieswill lab y rk. In any event, products WDRConsequently, in some offices there necessarily differ within each anf jo 4v es should demonstrate the could be no staff meeting the discipline. ap o ate use of the applicable Professional Qualification Standard s as 13. Why does one have xecretary of the Interior's Standards for demonstrate proficientVho ecific long as there is access somewhere along discipline as well as in �heology and Historic Preservation." the line to the appropriate expertise. For amplesareprovided in the preservation. When d aker offices (e.g., States) required to have Doc enting Professional Experience professionally qualified staff and lack the experti to ma io of the guidance for Applying the Review Board membership. the informed decisi i toric an a and for each discipline. cultural resour beov requirement is usually to have at least 7. determining academic onequalified individual in thethree misidentifi .' eval t lifiCaNOnS. what isa "closely related or lost. P xperti car ust specified core disciplines. States and !d of study?'' To provide flexibility in harmfu her a pe n well - Tribes with 101(d) status are expected to grou i hri re rvationt determining academic credentials, the isto obtain the services of professionals Standards recognize that a graduate or la essiori l isgplineskil , qualified in other disciplines as needed. al ti ely, i h ert in a undergraduate degree may have been It is possible that an individual may ional ine. but attained in either the identified nderst s portant 0 9csPent ofmeet the Professional Qualification disciplineor in arelated discipline. 6tntion toStandardsfor morethan onediscipline. iston ation. I Thus a candidate for the position of Other staff members working in the p 0 experti a Architectural Historian may have an discipline do not have to meet the pr al disci �Innd historic undergraduate degree in aclosely Standards. ation w gr tly improve related field of study, such as Art I 11. What about professionals who re bility f sions affecting our History or Historic Preservation. were hired under the old Standards? or Merely having a degree in a closely nation's h programs administered by the Nati +� 14. a t utes full-time related field does not automatically Park Service. each State staff, 1�,N prof :on l xperience?Full-time meet the Standard. The course work Review Board member and Ceprof I experience generally refers taken to earn adegreein arelated field Local Government Commis" er to experience received after the degree should be weighed against the course approved by the Secretar As tang was awarded or education was requirements in the Standard's "main'' the Professional Qualifi a on andards completed. Full-time professional discipline. For example, a degree in Art will retain that status, reg ssof any experiencecan beacquired in blocksof History doesnot necessarily. on itsown, subsequent chan� the tandards, time that, together, add up to the meet the Standard for Architectural until such time.,# individual no number of years called for in the History, unless course work relevant to longer is empltypd by the State office. Standard. In some disciplines, a portion the Standard can be documented, such serves on t e Review Board, or of this experience must have been as American architectural history. (See serve5o h fied Local earned under the direct supervision of the Academic Background guidance Govern ne Commission with which a recognized professional. It is possible given after each Standard. which that individual wasaffiliated asof the that some education and experience discusses the typical closely related dateof that individual'sapproval. received outside the United States is fields of study for each historic Contractors qualified in a specified relevant to the identification, preservation discipline.) discipline under the old requirements evaluation, documentation, registration, 18. How much and what kind of will bedeemed qualified in that treatment, and interpretation of United course work in a ''closely related field'' discipline by NPS under the new rules States historic and cultural properties. is required to meet the Professional as long as the contract, cooperati ve 15. Does the required experience have Qualifications Standards? There i s no agreement, or other third -party to occur subsequent to obtaining the set amount of credit hours. The office agreement remains in effect. New requisite educational or licensing hi ri ng or selecti ng must make a contractual agreementswould apply the credentials? Although it is preferable to determination that the person with new standards. Other organizations have the practical experience after course work in a closely related field using the Professional Qualification obtaining the academic training in a has enough relevant education to be Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33712 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 1 Friday, June 20, 1997 I Notices equivalent to that necessary for the standard degree in that discipline, and to enable that person to makejudgments about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration. or treatment of historic or archeological properties in the United States and its Territories. 19. When is "exceptional experience" a factor?In general, an applicant, employee, consultant. contractor. or advisor who does not possess a combination of education or training, experience, and products would not meet the Standards. However, in some cases, a person 's experi ence and contributions have been so exceptional that he or she demonstrates the level of expertise that meets the Standards. In particular, this may apply in those situations where persons embarked upon their careers before recognized academic programs were established, and their education or training was thus attained in alternative ways. In such instances, exceptional experiencewould be substituted for an academic degree or other training. It is up to the organization with administrative oversight responsibility for the program or project to determine whether the individual meets the Standards. For example, in a program under the purview of 36 CFR part 61, the State Historic Preservation Office would request an exception from the National Park Service for the person under consideration for a "professional" position on the State staff or Review Board. Otherwise, the organization doing the hiring or selecting of personnel would determine whether the individual meets the Standards. Discipline and Historic Proficiencies The Historic Preservatioryfto�_�ot0*05nal Qualification Standards fn understanding ofti e I pKncipies, procedures, and pr tices e discipline as they re pplied to historic preservation. T s eof expertise is necessary for ri reservation p rogram s^ RV theempIoyee, con suIIaril�edvisor is expected to deal with aNngeof historic resources and issues. Proficiencies in the disciplines and in the practice of historic preservation are outlined below. Recommended Discipline Proficiencies The following discipline proficiencies (knowledge. skills, and abilities) should be possessed by applicants, employees, consultants, and advisors: • Knowledge of the history of the discipline. • Knowledge of current theories, principles, practices, methods, and techniquesof thediscipline. • Familiarity with diverse specializations within thediscipline. • Skills in applying the discipline's techniquesof practice, including critical analysisskills. • Understandingofthediscipline's relationships with other disciplinesand the ability to design and carry out interdisciplinary projects. • Understanding of complex research questions. • Ability to placeaspecific project in a broader context. • Knowledgeof current scholarly research and its applicability to agiven i ssu e. • Familiarity with the processof rigorous professional peer review that occurs before work is published. Historic Preservation Planning Historic Preservation History Archeology: Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Archeology is the study of past human lifeways through the systematic observation, analysis, and protection of the material remains of human activities. Standard for Archeologist (A) Prehistoric The applicant, emplronsultant, or advisor wiII have ate degree in Anthropology ecialization in Prehistoric Arch o , or a graduate degree in Arch with a specializati� ehistoric Archeolo graduate degree in a clo I eCat pd field (see Acad emic B 1JW for Archeology). PLUS a Recommended Historic Preservation MiNissiiiirn of two and one-half (2!/ ) Proficiencies xear full-time professional The followinghistori vation Mperiencein applying the theories, proficiencies (knowl ge, Is, and ethods, and practices of Archeology abilities) should be sled by that 2pables professional judgments to applicants, emp consulta beAa eabout the identification, advisors: tion, documentation, registration, • Familiar' the on d rment of prehistoric archeological develop m f e hi dery " �perties in the United States and its move me rr�tories(at least six months of • eof thefi of his is experi ence must have been acquired in IV 9 pr on asjt i pr cticed in the performance of field and analytical t tes, i g its activities under the supervision of a phie rtes,pr�a�7rds, CWs, professional prehistoric archeologist. egulatio o c es, and and and one year of experience in the study 'elation he discjt¢ja of the archeological resources of the wIn prehistoric period must have been at a _Iw�tSii to ap eral and supervisory level); and products and State a d a historic activities that demonstrate the p rvation La s, regulations, policies, successful application of acquired and standaNhe public and private proficiencies in the discipline to the Sector enFederal, State, and practice of historic preservation (see Local vet agencies, and private Documenting Professional Experience organs ns. for Archeologists). • Ability to apply the appropriate (B) Historical sets) of the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation," and/or the National Register of Historic Places criteria. In consideration of the foregoing, the ''Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards" are proposed to read as fol I ow s: Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Archeology (A) Prehistoric Archeology (B) Historic Archeology Architectural History Conservation Cultural Anthropology Curation Engineering Folklore Historic Architecture Historic Landscape Architecture The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in Anthropology with a specialization in Historical Archeology, or a graduate degree in Archeology with a specialization in Historical Archeology, or a graduate degree in a closely related field (see Academic Background for Archeology). plus minimum of two and one-half (21i:,) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Archeology that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic archeological properties in the United States and its Territories (at least six monthsof experience must have been acquired in Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register I Vol. 62, No. 119 1 Friday, June 20, 1997 I Notices 33713 the performance of field and analytical research. Additional specialized videos that interpret the results of activities under the supervision of a training and experience is also required archeological investigation for the professional Historical Archeologist, for those specializing in, for example, general public. and oneyear of experiencein thestudy underwater archeology, physical • Publications including articles in of t h e arch eol ogi Cal resourcesof the anthropology (human bones and professional journals, monographs. historic period must have been at a burials), forensic archeology, or books, or chapters in edited books, supervisory level); and products and zooarcheology (non -human bones). In related to the preservation of historic or activities that dernonstrate the addition, archeologists typically archeological properties. successful application of acquired sped alizein t he archeol ogi Cal resources • Presentations at regional, national, proficienciesin the discipline to the of a particular time period. geographic or international professional practiceof historic preservation (see region, resource type, or research conferences related to the preservation Documenting Professional Experience subject. of historic or archeological prties. for Archeologists). • Professional serviceon bokrqsor Applying the Standard for committees of regional, n o or (Note: Pursuant to 36 CFR part 61, a person Archeologist —Documenting international profess anizations meeting this Standard (either Prehistoric or P Historic Archeology) isrequired as part of the Professional Experience concerned with the r tion of core staff for each State Historic Preservation A professional archeologist typically historic or archeol 'c properties. Of f i ce (SH PO) and as part of each State has experience in field survey, site • Awards, r c rants, research Review Board. Expertise described by this testing. site excavation, artifact fellowships, oral tionsto teaching standard is also needed for Tribal identification and analysis, documents posts. �J Preservation Office staff or consultants of research, and report preparation. This li comprehensive. tribes that have executed a Memorandum of Furth t is not expected that all Agreement to implement Section 101(d) of Supervised field experience as a P the National Historic Preservation Act. It also graduate student may be counted as part of ducts and activities will may be needed for consultants hired with of the overal 1216 year professional n to e documented in order to meet HPF grant funds and for members of Certified experience requirement., e ndard: rather, a combination of Local Government Commissions.) A PrehistoricArcheof eeting �eral of these products and activities Archeology —Academic Background this Standard would docu t one y `TWould be more typical. However, if the of supervisory exge cein the appI' ant weredocumenting Closely related fields: Anthropology, of prehistoric ar AQ ical sit pr, Tonal experience in one of the with a specialization in Archeology, is Historical Arch iN would . lizations, the majority of products thetypical degree discipline for document o f super a ivities should reflect that archeologists practicing in the United experienc l th stud , s f th ialization. States. One of the usual requirements historic for receiving the degree is completion of Th theologist ializ �ons rchitectural History; Historic an archeological field school in which of ric Aft I gy and Hi Preservation Professional Qualification the student learns about techniques of A h y are rchan �J' Standards survey, excavation, and laboratory entati� o?�how tha ne Architectural History is the study of processing. However, degree programs uali resin rehistor' the development of building practices havealso been established in istoric ogy sh dcludea through written records and design and Archeology, Cultural Resources minim one ad i year of the examination of structures, sites. and Management. Historical Archeology, su' l expet►w n resourcesof objects in order to determine their and Public Archeology. Some Historical specialty,39 a total of 3112 relationship to preceding. Archeology programs are housed In VY10 of ex i ce, with products and contemporary. and subsequent History, Public History, or American activitiesi eclalizations. architecture and events. Studies Departments. For these d , a list of coursestaken should be Prod Lmirs ctivities. Standard for Architectural Historian reviewed to determine if the pro a s Pro nal experience and expertise (a) The applicant, employee, equivalent to that typically ovi ^ or must be documented through "products consultant. or advisor will have a a degree in Anthropology Ait and activities that demonstrate the graduate degree in Architectural History specialization in Arche�l'B ' luding successful application of acquired or a closely related field of study (see course work in archeologi ethods proficiencies in thedisciplineto the Academic Background for Architectural and theory. arch of eographic practice of historic preservation." History), plus a minimum of two (2) region (e.g., Nor erica), and the Products and activities that meet the years of full-time professional field school. appropriate Secretary Standards for experience applying the theories. Discipli ializations. The most Archeology and Historic Preservation methods, and practices of Architectural prevail en p ations in Archeology may include: History that enables professional include Hi rical Archeology or Survey and excavation reports of judgments to be made about the Prehistoric A theology, i.e., the cultural resource management or identification, evaluation, specialization in resourcesof either the Section 106 (or other compliance) documentation, registration, or prehistoric period or the historic period. projects. These reports are typically treatment of historic properties in the These specializations necessarily called "grey literature," they often have United Statesand its Territories; and require expertise in different typesof multiple authors and areusually productsand activities that demonstrate sitesand different sourcesof produced in limited quantities by the successful application of acquired information about past human activities. consulting firms. proficienciesin the discipline to the For example, a prehistoric archeologist • National Register documentation practice of historic preservation (see usually requires a knowledge of resulting in property listings or Documenting Professional Experience environmental sciences, while Deterrni nations of Eligibility. for Architectural Historians): or' historical archeologist needs to • Materialssuch aspresentations, (b) A n u n d ergrad u ate d egree i n understand the techniques of archival booklets, brochures, lesson plans, or Architectural History or a closely Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33714 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 1 Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices related field of study (see Academic Background for Architectural History), plusa minimum of four (4) yearsof full- time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practicesof Architectural History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration. or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and productsand activitiesthat demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians). (Note: Pursuant to 36 CFR part 61, a person meeting this Standard is required as part of the core staff for each State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and as part of each State Review Board. Expertise described by this standard is also needed for Tribal Preservation Office staff or consultants of tribes that have executed a Memorandum of Agreement to implement Section 101(d) of the National Historic Preservation Act. It also may be needed for consultants hired with HPF grant funds and for members of Certified Local Government Commissions.) Architectural History —Academic Background Closely related fields: Professional Architectural Historians typically receive their formal training through Architectural History. Art History, or Historic Preservation programs, which include course work in American Architectural History. Other fields of study may offer relevant training. provided that coursework in American Architectural History istaken. These other fields may includeAmerican Studies, American Civilization, Architecture, Landscape Architre, Urban and Regional Planning, A e a History, Historic Preservation, an Public History. Discipline specializat Architectural Historian t d be generalists, althou peci zations within Architect al istory are typically base a periods (such as 18th centur a p rticular architect ty (such as Georgian or vernacul combination of these (such as pla tation architecture in the antebellum South). Applying the Standard for Architectural Historian —Documenting Professional Experience Products and Activities Professional experienceand expertise must be documented through "products and activitiesthat demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation.'' A theories, methods. and practices of professional Architectural Historian Conservation that enables professional typically has expertise in research, judgments to be made about the survey. documentation, and evaluation, identification, evaluation, of architectural resources, including documentation or treatment of objects buildings, structures, objects, and associated with historic and prehistoric districts. Documentation of such properties in the United States and its experience isdesirable. Productsand Territories; and products and activities activitiesthat meet theappropriate that demonstrate the successful Secretary's Standards for Archeology application of acquired proficiencies in and Historic Preservation may include: the discipline to the practice of historic • Survey reports assessing the preservation (see Documenti significance of historic properties. Professional Experience for • Historic structure reports. Conservators), or' ' ` • National Register documentation (b) An undergraduat in Art resulting in property listings or History, or Natural o cal Science. Determinations of Eligibility. or another closely a field to • Documentation that meets HABS/ Conservation ( c emic HAER standards for recording historic Background f rvation), with an properties. additional of full-time • Publications, which might include enrollme apprenticeship articles in regional. national. or pro a alent to graduate studies international professional journals, in� tion and supervised by a monographs, books, or chapters in pr S ' al Conservator; plusa edited books, related to reservation inir um of three (3) years full-time of historic structures. ofessional experience applying the • Presentations at r io nation �TTleories, methods, and practices of or international pjo ona Con vation that enables professional conferences rel o preser jucj�nts to be made about the of historic stru a ication, evaluation, • Professi ice on or �urRentation, or treatment of objects committees r ional rtsti or ciated with historic and prehistoric inter nati ofessi al o9ganizati operhes in the United States and its conc th the pre fition Territories: and products and activities hiructu�esf"' that demonstrate the successful sNNds, re rants. r application of acquired proficiencies in ships,or tv ationst ing the discipline to the practice of historic o s. preservation (see Documenting This li cor a e. Professional Experience for Furthedkx , it shou rtderstood Conservators). th84 Mql-Vof th cts and Conservation —Academic Background bs are need cdii}}��order to meet t Standard; A4her, a combination of sev6ral pjdNind activitieswould be Tore t applicant were doru enti professional experience in one o pecializations, however, the majority of products and activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Conservation; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Conservation is the practice of prolonging the physical and aesthetic life of prehistoric and historic material culture through documentation. preventive care, treatment, and research. Standard for Conservator (a) The applicant. employee. consultant, or advisor will havea graduate degree in Conservation or a graduate degree in aclosely related field of study with a certificate in Conservation (see Academic Background for Conservation), plusa minimum of three (3) yearsof full-time professional experience applying the Closely related fields: Since Conservators tend to specialize in a particular class of objects, closely related fieldswill bediverse, and could include Art, Art Conservation, Art History, Architecture, Historic Preservation, Museum Studies, Chemistry, Physics, Engineering (or a related scientific field), Archeology, Anthropology, or other fields related to theconservation specialization. If a closely related field is being claimed, the degree in the closely related field should be accompanied by a certificate in Conservation, or the completion of course work equivalent to that typically offered in graduate Conservation programs. Thiscoursework should include examination, documentation, and treatment of objects; history and technology of objects, and conservation science. In addition, such a program should include the completion of atwo- semester internship. Discipline specializations: Professional conservators specialize in the treatment and maintenance of a Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33715 specific class of objects or materi al s, such as archeological artifacts, architectural elements or fragments, or collections, books. ceramics, glass, decorative arts. ethnographic objects. furniture, metals, paintings, paper, photographs, sculpture, and textiles. Some conservators have studied more than one specialty, and have accumulated experiencewhich allows them to practice in several of these specialties (although they areoften closely related, such as books, drawings prints or paper: decorative arts and furniture; sculpture and archeological artifacts). In these cases, the time period that distinguishes the materials is often the specialty. Each of these specialties requires focused training and experience, sinceeach represents unique problems which are not always necessarily shared with other materials or time periods. Hence, a professional conservator should be able to perform accordingto professional standardsof practicewithin theclaimed areaof specialty and should be both capable and willing to recognize his or her limitations. The professional conservator, moreover, should be generally knowledgeable about the issues of other specialties and the benefit of effective communication among the specialties. A broad understandingofthegeneral principles of the conservation discipline is paramount as well, particularly in the areaof technological and philosophical concerns that govern the ethics of the profession. A note on Conservation education: Many professional Conservators received their training by serving apprenticeships with professional Conservators. For some time, how, eJe� graduate conservation programs been established in academic institutions: these require Nin fn ip in recognition of the crit rtance of hands-on train ingan e pcein preparing students f r pro ional p r act i ce. Applying the a d for Conservato cumenting Professional Experien A profe nal Conservator typically possesses specialized technical skills and has experience i n the exami nation, analysis, documentation, treatment, and preventive care of a specific class, or classes, of objects. Productsand Activities Professional experienceand expertise must be documented through "products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation.'' traditional cultural properties in the Products and activities that meet the United States and its Territories; and appropriate Secretary's Standards for products and activities that demonstrate Archeology and Historic Preservation the successful application of acquired may include: proficienciesin thedisciplineto the • A portfolio of current and past practice of historic preservation (see conservation work, including written Documenting Professional Experience and photographic documentation. for Cultural Anthropologists): or " . ' • Reports of examination. condition, (b) An undergraduate degree in or treatment of objects. Anthropology or a closely related field • Publications, which might include (see Academic Background for Cultural articles in professional journals, Anthropology), with aspecia('zation in monographs, books, or chapters in Applied Cultural Anthrop lusa edited books, related to the care and minimum of four 4 treatment of objects. ()year f I -time 1 professional experienc ding at • Presentations at regional, national, least twelvemonths work or international professional supervised by a pr nal Cultural conferences, workshops or other Anthropologi �I ng the theories, educational venues related to the care methods, a ($ices of Cultural and treatment of objects. Anthropol enables professional • Professional service on boards or judgm e made about the committeesof regional, national, or id f t evaluation, international professional organizations concerned with the conservation of d ation, registration, or objects. treat t of historic, prehistoric, or • Awards, research g esearch �a'ditional cultural properties in the fellowships, or invitation�eachin tilted States and its Territories: and posts 1products and activities that demonstrate • the cessful application of acquired This list is no ca�`nEfiensive. Futhermore, it %be and ncies in the preservation S e that not all o>:-t.� roduct cumentr c e of historic preservation (See activitiesare. 4&ded i t meet Cultural A thro ologi Experience the Stan lher,a o��mt)�nation CulturalAnthropologists}. sever cts and acl%A 'fes w Id b Cultural Anthropology —Academic mo al. If th licant wer Background d u ingp* nal exp in thesp I tions, h the a o ty of r is and ti ould ref lectyh� spec;» a V� Cu �81Anthroppflo�y:ltistoric ation P If ssional Qualification Bards. _�� Cult l iN (*ology is the escr tco d analysis of cultural syste ich i ncl ude systems of behaviors (economic. religious, social), values, ideologies. and social arrangements. Standard for Cultural Anthropologist (a) The applicant. employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in Anthropology with a specialization in Applied Cultural Anthropology. or a closely related field (see Academic Background for Cultural Anthropology), plusaminimum of two (2) years of full -time professional experience (including at least six months of field work supervised by a professional Cultural Anthropologist) applying the theories, methods, and practices of Cultural Anthropology that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration. or treatment of historic, prehistoric, or Closely related fields: A degree in Anthropology with a specialization in Applied Cultural Anthropology is the typical degree discipline for Cultural A nthropol ogi sts practi ci ng in the United States. Closely related fields of study may include Sociology, Cultural Geography, Folklife, History, and American Studies. Discipline specializations: Specializations in thisdiscipline include Applied Cultural Anthropology, and Social Anthropology (which may be considered the most closely related to Cultural Anthropology; some academic programs even combine them, referring to Sociocultural Anthropology). Departments of Anthropology typically provide training in Archeology, Physical Anthropology, Ethnography, and Sociocultural Anthropology.. and they may offer Applied Anthropology concentrations in one or more of these fields. Professional Cultural Anthropologists tend to specialize geographically (such as in the Southwest United States, Micronesia or New England) or topically (such as Medical Anthropology or Urban Anthropology), or in working with particular cultural or linguistic groups (such as fishermen, Irish immigrants, or Northwest Coast Indians). Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33716 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices Applying the Standard for Cultural Anthropologist —Documenting Professional Experience A professional Cultural Anthropologist typically has experience in the use of ethnohistoric and ethnographic techniques, including participant observation field work among one or more contemporary ethnic groups. The typical Cultural Anthropologist would also have performed field survey to identify and assess ethnographic resources, which can include, in addition to historic and cultural places of value, environmental features and places that have symbolic and other cultural value for Native American and/or other ethnic communities. A Cultural Anthropologist engaged in substantial ethnographic field work should demonstrate professional experience in the relevant geographic area and/or among the New World peoples, immigrant, ethnic. or minority communities with whom they will work. Productsand Activities Professional experienceand expertise must be documented through "products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation." Products and activities that meet the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Ethnographic field studies and survey reports, oral histories, or social impact assessments. • National Register documentation of ethnographic resources or traditional cultural properties resulting in prop y listingsor Determinations of Eligib t • Publications, which might i articles in regional, national, or international professional j nq monographs. books, or clla t'�In documentation and reser on of historic and arch o' ical esources, and/or traditio I ural properties. • Presenta n a ional, national, or internal' rofessional conferen osia, workshops or exhibits re ed to the documentation and preserva ion of historic and archeological resources, and/or traditional cultural properties. • Professional serviceon boards or committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with the documentation and preservation of historic and archeological resources. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitationsto teaching posts. Museum Science or Museology in another institution. Since Curators often specializein particular disciplines, thosefieldsof study would berelevant provided that theoretical as well as hands-on training was also obtained in museum methods and techniques, i ncl udi ng cot I ections care and management. Examples of relevant fieldscould includeAmerican Studies. Anthropology, Archeology, Art History, Archival or Library Science. �tistory, Biology, Botany, Chemistry P s,ics. Engineering, Geology, Zo o pdnd other similar fields of epending upon the nature of t tions to be curated. Disciplinesp r tions.- Profession&INnt tend to be specialisticular academic disciplinestothecollections het h o'institution or museum, (a) The applicant, employee, w is d include, for example, 19th- consultant, or advisor will havea cen Vr udson Valley School graduate degree in Muse Studiesor �Q,a�intings. Southwest Pueblo pottery, a closely related field of ty�(see Omwil War military uniforms, site - Academic Background fo�/ation), `5ecific archeological materials, or plus minimum of twa (2) years f f nat history specimens. time profession nce appl the theories, m sand pra iC� ng the Standard for Curator— Curation tha profess enting Professional Experience judgments t b ade t� hj professional Curator typically has identificIIi r�, valuati� �+e�Cperiencein managingand preserving docu n, preven are, ` a collection according to professional inter et ion of c e lions asso museum and archival practices. Cultural w#h i rican storicp trainingshould involve experience with th United tNand its�� ries; thechemical and physical propertiesof �An rD oduc activiti �"p material culture, as well as practical and {emonst succelication of apq oficien the d�fessional i he law of historic �tion (see IN enting Ex eriencefor Curators); o (b) r uate degree in u m i es or a cl osd y rel ated field y (see Academic Background for Curation), plus a minimum of four (4) years of full -time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Curation that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation. documentation, preventive care, or interpretation of collections associated with historic and prehistoric properties in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Curator). Curation—Academic Background Closely related fields: A degree program called Museum Studies in one academic institution might be called This list is not comprehensive. Futhermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard, rather. acombination of several products and activities would be more typical. If the applicant were documenting professional experience in one of the specializations, however, the majority of products and activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Curation; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Curation is the practice of documenting, managing, preserving, and interpreting museum collections according to professional museum and archival practices. Standard for Curator legal aspects of health and safety, an understanding of climate control systems, security, and conservation methods. The Curator isdirectiy r responsiblefor the care and academic interpretation of all objects, materials, and specimens belonging to or lent to the museum; recommendations for acquisition, de -accession, attribution and authentication; and research on the collections and the publication of the results of that research. The Curator also may have administrative and/or exhibition responsibilities. Products and Activities Professional experience and expertise must be documented through ''products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation.'' Products and activities that meet the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Exhibit catalogs and other scholarly reports. • Field or laboratory work that demonstrates ability to conserve, document, or interpret archeological, Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33717 archival, or material culture objects or col I ecti ons. • Plans or finding aids for the preservation or documentation of museum collections. • Publications, which might include articles in regional, national, or international professional journals, monographs, books, or chapters in edited books, related to the care and treatment of archeological, archival, or material culture objectsor collections. • Presentations at regional, national. or international professional conferences, symposia, workshops, or exhibits related to the care and treatment of archeological, archival, or material cultural objectsor collections. . Professional serviceon boardsor committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with the care and treatment of archeological, archival. or material culture objects or collections. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitations to teaching posts. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard: rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typical. If the applicant were documenting professional experience in one of the specializations. however, the majority of products and activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Engineering; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Engineering i s the practi ce of applying scientific principlesto the research, planning, design, and management of structures and m n such as roads, bridges, canals, d s, docks. locomotives. and bu in ' including their structural 4 cal, or mechanical systems. Hi-Ir, Ic.. Engineeringinvolvesspec ed training in engin pri ciples, theories, conce thods, and technologies t t, and appropriat odsof i nterpreti ng and preservi r engineered structures machinery. Standard for Engineer (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a State Government -recognized Iicenseto practice civil or structural engineering, plus, a minimum of two (2) years of full- time professional experience applying thetheories, methods, and practicesof engineering that enables professional judgments to be made about the documentation or treatment of historic structures and machines in the United States and its Territories; and products and activitiesthat demonstratethe successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Engineers): or' ' (b)A Masters of Civil Engineering degree with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation, for historic structures rehabilitation, plus minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Engineering that enables professional judgments to be made about the documentation or treatment of historic structures and machines in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Docurenting Profession perience for Engineers): or " (c) A Bachelors of Cvil neerin degreewith at Iea,5t g eyear of gr study in HisIory5 f iology, Preservation, E -1 ing Hist a closely relat (see Ac Backgroun r ngin a minimu o (2) y rso full-tim including design, planning, construction specifications, and contract administration. Although this background is essential, additional training is needed in order to understand and work with historic structures, sites, and machines, with their complex material evolution and treatment problems. Specialized training, to supplement that provided by theprofessional Engineering program, should be acquired in such as as American Architectural an ineering History, History of Techn3i ON Architectural Preservatj6�i % Conservation, Histor �►,'' truction Technologies, His Zicc�uilding Materials, Hist Archeology, and Historic Pr A. Discipli talizalions: Civil Engin lectrical Engineering, M 590ve ngineering, and Structural ErIgOfflWingaretypical specializations rthe broader discipline of sneering. The two specializations st often used in historic preservation projects are Civil and Structural En ring. Occasionally, there may be t for a Mechanical Engineer to issues concerning historic achinery such as locomotives, steam Ines, water turbines, electric Prof experience lying e generators. and similar machines and th gethodsrid,prapctices equipment, or particularly complex E i n th 'aria. �s rof mechanical systems in a historic ents to a abou ? structure. ocume to o treatm t istoric Applying the Standard for Engineer- 6rudur achin United Documenting Professional Experience States Tor rit( ' d products an es tha strate the p%Tul appl cat of acquired rcienciesin hedisciplinetothe practice of tRs c preservation (see gocur wt essional Experience for E ine®r (Note:persons who are I i tensed to practice Engineering in that State may prepare and seal plans and specifications in order to obtain construction permits, authorize payments to contractors, and certify that the work is complete. However. State staff. State Review Board members, and CLG staff or Commission members who are not licensed, but who meet the Standard for Engineer under (b) or (c) above. can review proposed and completed work for compliance with the applicable Secretary's Standards for Tax Act, HPF Grant, or other related programs.) Engineering —Academic Background Closely related fields: The Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree is a five-year degree that is unlikely to include historic preservation course work. The same is true of a Masters of Civil Engineering degree. An Engineer with an Engineering degree is well grounded in all aspectsof engineering practice, To be licensed by a State Government as a professional Engi neer, an individual must pass a written exam and successfully fulfill education, training, and experience requirements. In addition, a professional Historical Engineer has both theoretical knowledge and technical skill associated with preserving historic structures and machines, and with the application of Engineering theories. methods, and practices that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures and machines in the United States and its Territories. A professional Historical Engineer typically has gained experienceon structural preservation projects, which have included research and detailed investigations of historic structures or mechanical artifacts and preparation of recommendations for the treatment of such properties in order to preserve them in accordance with the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation (particularly the Secretary's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties). Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33718 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices Products and Activities Professional experienceand expertise must bedocumented through "products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation." Products and activities that meet the Secretary Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Plans and Specifications for the preservation, rehabilitation, or restoration of historic structures, such as bridges, dams, canal locks, and for the structural rehabilitation or seismic stabilization of buildings. • Adaptive reuse or feasibility studies that make recommendations for preserving or structurally stabilizing historic structures, including bridges. • Historic Structure Reports or Condition Assessmentsof historic structures or machines. • Documentation that meets HAGS/ HAER standards for recording historic structures or machines. • Experience applyingthe Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Propertiesto the review of work on historic structures, sites or machines. • Awards for historic structure preservation, rehabilitation. or restoration received from local, regional, national, or international professional organizations. . Publications, which might include articles in regional, national, or international professional journals, monographs. books. or chapters in edited books about the preservation of historic structures or machines. • Presentations at regional, natiop� or international professional conferences, symposia, workshol exhibitsabout thepreservati n o� historic structures or mach . Professional servic b sor committees or regional,'haf9pal, or international prof nal ganizations concerned with I?enervation of historic strut e achines. This list comprehensive. Further r ouId be understood that not al f these products and activities are eeded in order to meet the Standard; rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typical. Folklore: Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Folklore is the study and documentation of traditional, expressive culture shared within various ethnic, familial, occupational, religious, and regional groups. Standard for Folklorist (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in Folklore, Folklife Studies, Anthropology or a closely related field of study (see Academic Ex ece ri e n for Fo Iko el r) w ith (ethnomusicology), spoken word traditions, material culture, customs, or religiousand belief systems; or specialization may focus on the study of a particular contemporary group (such as the Pennsylvania Amish) or region of the United States (such as Appalachia). a Clo 1 lated fields: Typically, a professi nal Folklonsthas agrad uate degree in Folklore or FolklifeStudies, or from highly specialized study within other disciplinessuch as Anthropology, English, Linguistics, or Sociology, provided that such study included training in theory, research and fieldwork techniques, and in the diverse categories of expressive culture. Discipline specializations: A graduate degree in Anthropology may be combined with a sped al i zati on in Folklore and Folklife Studies. Other specializations may include: English, Cultural Anthropology. Ethnohistory. Ethnobotany. Ethnozoology, Ethnoarcheology, Cultural Geography, Sociology, and Oral History. A professional Folklore specialist, or Folklorist, may specialize in any of the categories of traditional expressive culture, such as music monographs, books, or chapters in edited books, related to assessing the si gn i fi cance of historic or traditional cultural properties. . Presentationsat regional, national, or international professional conferences, symposia, workshops, exhibitions, or other educational venues related to analyzing cultural traditions in evaluating the significance of historic or traditional cultural properties. • Professional serviceon boardsor committees of regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with documenting and analyzing cultural traditions. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitations to teaching posts. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not al I of these products and activities are needed in order to meet Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33719 the Standard. rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typi cal . If the appl i cant were documenting professional experience in one of the specializations, however. the majority of productsand activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Historic Architecture; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Historic Architecture is the practice of applying artistic and scientific principlesto theresearch, planning, design, and management of the built environment with specialized training in the principles, theories, concepts, methods, and techniques of preserving historic buildings and structures. Standard for Historical Architect (a) The applicant, employee, consultant. or advisor will have a State Government -recognized license to practiceArchilecture, plus, a minimum of two (2) years of ful I -time professional experience applying the theories, methods. and practices of Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects): or " ' (b) A Masters of Architecture degree with demonstrable course work in Architectural Preservation, Architectural History, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, or a closely related fiel Academic Background for Histo Architecture), plus a minim o (2) years of full-time profe i experience applying th r4A, methods, and practices ' oric Architecture that Ies professional judgments to b about the evaluation, d u e lion, or treatment of historic resin the United States an i itories: and products and activit that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects); or " (c) A Bachelors of Architecture degree with at least one year of graduate study in Architectural Preservation, Architectural History, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, or a closely related field (see Academic Experience for Historic Architecture), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full -time professional experience applying the theories, methods and practices of Historic A rch i tectu re th at enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures in the United States and its Territories, and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects). Architect has both theoretical knowledge and technical skill associated with preserving historic structures, and with the application of Architecture theories, methods. and practices that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories. A professional Historical Architect typically hasgained experience on structural pre vation projects, which have inclu rch and detailed investigatio o istoric structures and preparatitobt_ (Note: Only personswho are licensed to recommenaanons r [ment of practice Architecture in that State may propertiesinorde Fperve themin prepare and seal plans and specifications in accord ancewit priate order to obtain construction permits, Secretary's j s for Archeology authorize payments to contractors, and and Histor' rvation (particularly certify that thework iscompleted. However. the re( tandardsfor the State staff. State Review Board members, and Tr t Historic Properties). CLG staff or Commission memberswho are not licensed, but who meet the Standard for Pr c and activities Historical Architect under (b or (c) above. can review proposed and c ed work for Professional experience and expertise compliancewith the appliretary's t be documented through "products Standards for Tax Act, H F , or oth and activities that demonstrate the related programs.) • suc ful application of acquired Historic A rchit Academ' � prA i nciesinthedisciplinetothe Background r e of historic preservation." Closely rfield Rear helor �ductsand activities that meet the retary Standards for Archeology and Architectcegree is fiv d , istoric Preservation may include: that d always in ist Plans and Specifications for the pr a on co r rk. Thesapreservation, rehabilitation, or y ueof � �so&1,611r e restoration of historic structures. An Hi k I Archfirst . Adaptive reuse or feasibility studies n rChit a suchthat make recommendations for round aspectsural preserving historic structures. racti din a ural design, P g g •Historic Structure Reports or pl i ?Ionstr,, ti ecifications.n ract ad1tion. Although Condition Assessments of historic t backgrouncisessentiat, additional structures. trai ing �, in order to Documentation that meets HAGS/ rai ing n �rk with historic HAER standards for recording historic struc�res, th their complex material structures. evolu nd treatment problems. • ExperienceapplyingtheSecretary of the Interior's Standards for the Specialized training, to supplement that provided by the professional Treatment of Historic Properties to the Architecture program, should be review of work on historic structures. acquired in such areas as American • Awards for historic structure Architectural History, Architectural Preservation, rehabilitation, or Preservation, Conservation, Historic restoration received from local, regional, Construction Technologies, Historic national, or international professional Building Materials, and Historic organizations. Preservation. • Publications. which might include Discipline specialization: Historic articles in regional, national, or Architecture is a specialization within international professional journals, the broader disciplineof Architecture. monographs, books. or chapters in edited booksabout thepreservation of Applying the Standard for Historical historic structures. Architect —Documenting Professional . Presentations at regional, national, Experience or international professional To be licensed by a State Government conferences, symposia, workshops, or as a professional Architect, an exhibits about the preservation of individual must pass a written exam historic structures. and successfully fulfill education. • Professional serviceon boardsor training, and experience requirements. committeesor regional, national, or In addition, aprofessional Historical international professional organizations Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33720 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices concerned with the preservation of historic structures. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard: rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typical. Historic Landscape Architecture; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Discipline specialization. Historic Landscape Architecture is a specialization within the broader field of Landscape Architecture. Historical Landscape Architects should have completed training in the principles, theories. concepts, methods, and techniques of preserving cultural landscapes. Cultural landscape preservation focuses on preserving landscape's physical attributes, biotic systems, and use (especially j#hen that use contributes to its histor Historic Landscape Architecture is the practiceofapplying artistic and significance). Graduatest y d/or scientific principles to the research, (Note: Only persons who are licensed to professional experienc des the planning, design, and management of practice Landscape Architecture in that Slate specialized training by the both natural and built environments may prep are and seal plans and Historical Landsc hitect. b with naturspecial butrailt environments ning to specifications in order to obtain construction Applyingthe rd for Historical permits, authorize payments to contractors, principles, theories, concepts, methods. and certify that thework iscompleted. Landscape t—Documenting and techniques of preserving cultural However, State staff, State Review Board Professio erience landscapes. members, and CLG staff or commission T 1 sed by a State Government memberswho arenot licensed, but who meet as ional Landscape Architect, the Standard for Historical Landscape an i d dual typically must pass a Architect under m le (c) lGt, an review Xritten exam and successfully fulfill proposed and completed compliancewith theapplretary's-ebtcation, training, and experience Standards for Tax Act, Grant uirements. In addition, an Historical other related program �� Lan ape Architect must have two y s experience in the application of Historic Landsc hitectu ape Architecture theories, Academic ea o d <ar tho s, and practices to the Closet field a e identification, evaluation, y P Architec e sthetyp al ofession cumentation, registration. or Bachr o` eci Ich award IF of historic properties in the of t essful+co pliption of a f ur United States and its Territories. A fNe a radua professional Historical Landscape m. H y r, he Bacl-T r Architect has both theoretical asters n cape Arch to turemay knowledgeand technical skill not alw � ude hist4yel�reservation associated with the preservation of co . Wh le !el`ldard cultural landscapes in accordance with La Architt X�degree program the Secretary's Standards for rises all g eraT'�spects of Archeology and Historic Preservation. landscapeprpWkc-tural practice Cultural landscapes include historic tlncludirfg otplanning, sites, historic designed landscapes, �.,fications, and historic vernacular landscapes, and profe on I practice), additional ethnographic landscapes. trainin needed for Historical Products and Activities Landscape Architects. They may need training in landscape research, documentation, analysis, evaluation, and treatment techniques. This additional training is achieved through additional course work and/or professional experience. Standard for Historical Landscape A rch i tect (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a State Government -recognized license to practice Landscape Architecture, plus. a minimum of two (2) years full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Landscape Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation. documentation. registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline tothe practiceof historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Land scapeArchitects); or (b) A M asters degree i n Land����'l1��ii�� Architecture with demonstrable�puf`e work in the principles, then li �.•.•�� concepts. methods, and ted�es of preserving cultural Ian a lusa minimum or two (2) ye rs ull-time professional exper a ap ying the theories, method pract icesof profession lXments to be made about th d ation, evaluation, document n, registration, or treatment of istoric properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline tothe practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Landscape Architects): or (c) A four-year or five-year Bachelors degree in Landscape Architecture, plus a minimum of three (3) years of full- time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Landscape Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification. evaluation documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the disciplinetothe practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Landscape Architects). Graduate study: The Masters in Landscape Architecture degree is the typical graduate degree, which is awarded after successful completion of a two-year or three-year graduate program. Thisdegreeshould include studies in the principles, theories, concepts, methods, and techniques of p resery i n g cu I t u ral I an d scap es. Cou rse work may include cultural geography; landscape history; archival research techniques: historic preservation theory principles. and practice; and preservation technologies. Professional experience and expertise must be documented through ''products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation.'' Products and activities that meet the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Surveysand inventoriesof cultural landscapes. • Documentation of cultural landscapes that meets the Secretary's Standards for Documentation. • National Register nominations or Determinations of Eligibility for cultural landscapes. • Cultural Landscape treatment and maintenance plans. • Cultural Landscape Reports. Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33721 • Publications, which might include articlesin regional, national, or international professional journals. monographs, books, or chapters in edited books about cultural landscape preservation. • Presentations at regional, national, or international professional conferences, symposia, workshops, or exhibits about cultural landscape preservation. • Professional servlceon boardsor committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with cultural landscape preservation. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitationsto teaching postsassociated with cultural landscape preservation. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not al I of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard; rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typical. Historic Preservation Planning; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Historic Preservation Planning, a specialization within Planning, is the practice of identifying and carrying out particular goals and strategies to protect historic and archeological resources at the local, regional. State, or national i I ev el . Standard for Historic Preservation Planner (a) The applicant, employee, consultant. or advisor will have State Government -recognized certification r license in Land -use Planning, plus, minimum of two (2) yearsof full professional experience applyin h theories, methods, and prat es Historic Preservation Plan at enables professional ju e o be made about the identifi attbp•, evaluation, docu tior-Yregistration, protection, or tr*A4P0fnt of historic and archeological rape es in the United States and � ritories; and products and acti i demonstrate the successful plication of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservation Planner): or (b) A graduate degree in Planning with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation, or a graduate degree in a closely related field of study with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation (see Academic Background for Historic Preservation Planning), plus minimum of two (2) years of full -time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Historic Preservation Planning that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification. evaluation, documentation, registration, protection or treatment of historic and archeological properties in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservation Planner), or (c) An undergraduate degree in Planning with demonstrable course Applying the Standard for Historic, Preservation Planner —Documenting Professional Experience In order to receive a license or be registered or certified as professional Planner, an individual typically must pass a written exam and have completed a specified number of yearsof experience. A professional Historic Preservation Planner typically has gained experience in data collection and analysis: survey and evaluativp of existing conditions; consul 6%-with elected and appointed o and the general public: identifluffrTof al ternati ve strategi e%Nwcement or administration of�[e�9yaht statutes and regulations: a reparation of plannir S. work in Historic Preservation or an Produ is tivities undergraduate degree in a closely related field of study with demonstrable al experience and expertise m ocumented through "products coursework in Historic Preservation (see Acad emicBack grou or Historic nd vitiesthat demon stratethe Preservation Planning), minimum cessful application of acquired of four (4) yearsof full -tin ofessiooficiencies in the discipline to the experience applyine theories,) `Practice of historic preservation.' methods, and p cY e Histor v Pr is and activities that meet the Preservation PI t en NO riate Secretary's Standards for t h�plogy and Historic Preservation professional nts to b about the id�itl atio on, y include: docume R, regisl AQrotecti Preservation plans adopted by or tre f historic government officials; and/or results of arc o cal pcop I In the preservation planning studies S t its T tr,s; and s incorporated into the local tivities t>�emonstr t comprehensive or master plan. ucc f Y I p tion of q • Ordinances for the protection of roficien the di to the historic and/or archeological resources. P • Economic Feasibility Studiesthat praGti toric p v lion (see y DockUN ng Pr Experience make recommendations for preserving InrSkchvir Prae rx i P1nnncrl historic or archeological properties. HINkem Pr ion Planning— Acai't k and CIyr led fields: Professional HistP servation Planners typically receive t eir education through academic Planning programs, although increasingly Historic Preservation programs are offering Historic Preservation Planning as concentration in which degrees are awarded. Other fields that may be closely related, provided that training relevant to Historic Preservation Planning is obtained, include Historical or Cultural Geography, Architecture, Urban Design, and Historic Preservation. Discipline specializations: Historic Preservation Planning is a specialization within the broader discipline of Planning. Other specializations include Urban, City, Town, or Community Planning; Regional Planning: Land Use Planning: Environmental Planning: Recreation Planning: Transportation Planning: and Housing Planning. • Nuoilcauons, wnlcn mlgnt Inciuoe articles in regional, national, or international professional journals, monographs, books, or chapters in edited books, related to preservation planning. . Presentationsat regional. national, or international professional conferences, symposia, workshops, or exhibits related to preservation planning. e Professional serviceon boardsof committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with preservation planning. • Planning awards received from local, regional, national. or international professional organizations. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not al I of these products and activities are needed i n order to meet the Standard; rather, acombination of several productsand activitieswould be more typical. If the applicant were documenting professional experience in one of the specializations, however, the Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33722 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices majority of products and activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Historic Preservation: Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Historic Preservation is the application of strategies that promote the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, protection, treatment, continued use, and interpretation of prehistoric and historic resources. Standard for Historic Preservationist (a) The applicant, employee, consultant. or advisor will have a graduate degree in Historic Preservation or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for the Historic Preservation discipline), plusa minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practicesof Historic Preservation that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic and prehistoric properties i n the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experiencefor Historic Preservationists); or ' ' '. (b) An undergraduate degree in Historic Preservation or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for the Historic Preservation discipline), plusa minimum of four (4) years of full-tim professional experience applying th theories, methods, and practices Historic Preservation that enable professional judgments to b a. about the identification, evton, documentation, registr io oc, treatment of historic and p istoric properties in the St es and its Territories: and�p ctsand activities that demonst Vth uccessful appli 'at io uired proficiencies in the disci e practice of historic preservatio see Documenting Professional perienceforHistoric Presery at i on i st s). Historic Preservation —Academic Background Closely related fields: Various fields of study may be considered closely related to Historic Preservation, such as American Studies, Architecture, Architectural History, Archeology, History, and Historical or Cultural Geography, provided that such programs of study include course work in the history of the designed environment, history and theory of preservation, historic preservation methods, techniques. and legislation (Federal, State and local ), plus a formal supervised practicum or internship for hands-on application of knowledge and technical skillsin thefield. Disciplinespecializations: While most Historic Preservationists tend to be generalists, many specialize in such areas as Architectural, Landscape, and Community Design, Historic Building Technology, Preservation Economics, Preservation Law, Historic Preservation Planning, and Site Interpretation and M an agem en t Applying the Standard for Historic conferences, symposia, workshops, or exhibits related to historic preservation. e Professional serviceon boardsor committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with historic preservation. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitationsto teaching posts. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order• meet the Standard; rather, a corqevMn of several products and actiiru ies would be more typical. If the a C*t were documenting prof i experience in one of the specia ail;ons, however, the majority of rV§and activities would natuect that Preservationist —Documenting sped aliz Professional Experience A professional Historic Hiyter oric Preservation Preservationist typically has experience Prof al Qualification Standards that demonstrates a wellunded Hi ry is the study of the past understanding of the pr , ugh written records. oral history, practices, laws and +uila?i�ss and dmaterial culture and the diverse resourcespfric �o' examination of that evidence within a preservation. ` v c n ogical ortop ical sequencein nterpret its relationship to Products anke iv es contemporary and Professioperie a�icperte0inig, uent events, must be ted I. rou rodu — . _, , , �,- p b�4andard for Historian su V Y ae f acquire p fi ieipline 4 ce of ervaij o R i sloe c r r ices.Productseet the app4o� velar Bards for A and �1�Preservation ude: National RAQister documentation tha hasrjeWin property listingsor Qeter a�iQ oiEligibiIity. • rve imports assessi ng the signifiof historic properties. • Historic Structure Reports. • Adaptive reuse plans or feasibility studies that make recommendations for preserving historic properties. • Written opinions that have been accepted that assess the impact that an undertaking will have on historic or archeological properties. • Historic District Ordinances that have been adopted by a local government. • Documentation that meets NABS/ HAER standards for recording historic properties. • Publications, which might include articles in regional, national. or international professional journals, monographs, books, or chapters in edited books. related to historic preservation. • Presentations at regional, national, or international professional (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for History), plusa minimum of two (2) yearsof full-time professional experience applying the theories. methods. and practices of History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United Statesand its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate thesuccessful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians); or ' ` (b) An undergraduate degree in History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for History), plus a minimum of four (4) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33723 practiceof histonc preservation (see Archeology and Historic Preservation American Institute for the Conservation of Documenting Professional Experience may include: Historic & Artistic Works. 1717 K Street. for Historians). • National Register documentation NW.. Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20006 (Note: Pursuant to 36 CFR part 61 a person that has resulted in property listings or American Institute of Architects, 1735 New meeting this Standard is required as part of Determinations of Eligibility. York Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. thecorestaff for each State Historic • Documentation that meets HAGS/ 20006 Preservation Office (SHPO) and as part of HAER standards for recording historic American lnstituteof Certified Planners. each State Review Board. Expertise described properties. 1776 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., by thisstandard isalso needed for Tribal • Survey reports assessing the Washington, D.C. 20036 Preservation Office staff or consultantsof significance of historic properties. American Planning Association, 122 S. tribes that have executed "Memorandum of Michigan Avenue, Suite 1200, Chicago, IL Agreement to implement Section 101(d) of articles in regional, national, or 60603-6107 the National Historic Preservation Act It also American Society of Civil Engin s, 1801 international professional journals, may be needed for consultants hired with Alexander Bell Drive, Reslorj,_V 0191- HPF grant funds and for members of Certified monographs, books, or chapters in 4400 Local Government Commissions.) edited books. related to documenting American Society of Land architects, History —Academic Background and evaluating the significance of 4401 Connecticut Av i) historic properties. NW..Washington, 8-2302 Closely related fields: For this • Presentations at regional, national American Society anical Engineers. Standard. the professional degree is or international professional P.O. Box 290 Id, NJ07007-2900 typically awarded in History. American conferences, symposia, workshops, or American St�[i ciation, 1120 19th History, or Public History. Relevant exhibits related to documenting and Street, ate 301, Washington, D.C. training can be obtained in programs of evaluating historic properties. 2003� American Studies. American Professional service on boards or A atl r Preservation Technology, Civilization, Historical or Cultural committees of regional, national, or x 3511, Williamsburg. VA 23187 Geography, Anthropology, Ethnohistory, international profession" ganizations Assn on of American Geographers, 1710 and Historic Preservation, providing concerned with docum t rid 16th Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20009 that course work is offered in historical evaluating the significanc istoric ter for Museum Studies. Smithsonian research methods and techniques. properties. Institution, Arts and , W Industries Washington, D.C. Education in the social and cultural •Awards, rea��ij1'ants, r S 2235, MRC, 427, Washington. D.C. historyof countries other than North felIowshi s, or t'aljbns to t c 5 p e stitutefor Electrical and Electronic America may be relevant when dealing posts. 0% ngi eers, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ with the histories of immigrant, ethnic This list Ani compr v 8855-1331 or minority groups in the United States. Further % shout be u rstoo tional Council on Preservation Education. Discipline specializations: that In these pro and c/o Center for Historic Architecture and Professional Historians tend to activ re need in order to Engineering. University of Delaware. concentrate their education and t ard; rdt ombin Newark, DE 19716 experience in one of the many produ activitie qu d be National Council on Public History. 327 chronological, regional, and topical e ypic applic rid a Cavanaugh Hall-IUPUI, 425 University specializations within American History ocume ofessior riencein Blvd.. Indianapolis. IN 46202-5140 (such as colonial history. southern one of ialIzat' owever. the National Society of Professional Engineers, history, community history, women's m o prod lr,Gt� ctivities 1420 King Street. Alexandria, VA 22314- history, military history, history of turally re hat 2794 technology,or industrial history). National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 y). is iZation. Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, Applying the Standard for Historian Sources of �id \{anal I Information— D.C. 20036 Documenting Professional Erperierfce ProfessfonA.Organizations Organization of American Historians, 112 North Bryan Street, Bloomington, IN A professional Historian has Th oll ingorganizationsmay be 47408-4199 experience in archival and prima contact to request additional Society for American Archaeology, 900 2nd documents research, evalu I nd information about the specific Street, NE., Suite 12, Washington. D.C. synthesizing this infor n d disciplines, college and university 20002 preparation of scholarl�ra ive departments, workshops, and Society for Applied Anthropology, P.O Box histories. Historic rc xperience conferences and publications about the 24083, Oklahoma City, OK 73124 in countries oth North America practice of each discipline. Society of Architectural Historians, Charnley- may be relev h researching the American Anthropological Association, 4350 Persky House, 1365 North Astor Street, histories of ' grant, ethnic or North Fairfax Drive, Suite 630, Arlington, Chicago, IL 60610-2144 minority o s the United States of VA 22203-1621 Society for Historical Archeology, P.O. Box America. American Association of Museums, P.O. Box 30446, Tucson, AZ 85751 4002, Washington, D.C. 20042-4002 Society of Professional Archeologists, Products and Activities American Association for State Federal and Department of Anthropology, Southern Professional experience and expertise Local History, 530 Church Street, Suite Methodist University, Dallas. TX 75275 must be documented through "products 600, Nashville. TN 37219-2325 Dated: June 12, 1997. and activities that demonstrate the American Cultural Resources Association, Katherine H. Stevenson, successful application of acquired c/o New South Associates, 6150 Ponce de Associate Director, Cultural Resource proficiencies in the discipline to the Leon Avenue, Stone Mountain, GA 30083 Stewardship and Partnerships, National Park American Folklife Center, Library of Service. practice of historic preservation.' Congress, Washington, D.C.20540-8100 Products and activities that meet the American Historical Association, 400 A [FR Doc. 97-16168 Filed 6-19-97:8:45 am) appropriate Secretary's Standards for Street. SE., Washington. D.C. 20003 BILLING CODE 4310-70-13 �-ems - -� �iZ-..J; JmwEDffz University Heights and Haskel Heights Proposed Historic Districts Proposed District Area Buildings Over 50 Years 000- Iwo • � ARCMEF LOREN CtR MAPLE ST t� EVAN(;EUNE U _.MA 11111. i. A J Am M- i _d 'C F'URLY.:• MwST- .. I ��1■ , PUBLIC • m O 1390 - 1 W - ALLEY22� y7 D cr r , 9 MFAoow r=u�S'CENTERS'01 '� I Malmo PALAMAElk ma's" HIMU ■= ■�i� � � �`'• ��� 0 220 440 880 1V Feet Attachment F= Maps of Project Boundary We--d"' oli I)r T v x i � � r` CJ SS ,. -, Ch urrh� C —_&IevelandSt !t� Dou las maple St P o �az�. fi�tk r N r •`� ar1{ L II Q UN-1Vr.R �i G � . rV Q O� O L] T-V�SIIU 7r_r 'ir �: - doo Blvd Attachment G: Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards National Park Service ARTICLE • SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR ARCHEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION Professional Qualifications Standards Introduction The following requirements are those used by the National Park Service, and have been previously pu in the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61. The qualifications define minimum education and ece required v to perform identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment activities. In some cases, additi reas or levels of expertise may be needed, depending on the complexity of the task and the nature of the I roperties involved. In the following definitions, a year of full-time professional experience need not consist Wntinuous year of full- time work but may be made up of discontinuous periods of full-time or part-timeng up to the equivalent of a year of full-time experience. ✓ History The minimum professional qualifications in history are a gr degr i h t ry or y re ated field: or a bachelor's degree in history or closely related field plus one of the following: vV • �j 1. At least two years of full-time experience r writillehing, int ion, or other demonstrable professional activity with an academic institution. historic or aniz no en RV o o rofessionat institution or 2. Substantial contribution through research and �on to of scholarly knowledge in the field of history. •��Archeology � V The minimum professional qu caUortS in archeology are a graduate degree in archeology, anthropology, or closely related field plus: /1 r 1. At least one ye 1-time professional experience or equivalent specialized training in archeological research, administration, or management', 2. At least four onths of supervised field and analytic experience in general North American archeology. and 3. Demonstrated ability to carry research to completion. In addition to these minimum qualifications, a professional in prehistoric archeology shall have at least one year of full-time professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archeological resources of the prehistoric period. A professional in historic archeology shall have at least one year of full-time professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archeological resources of the historic period. Attachment G: Secretary of the Interior's Professional Architectural History Qualifications Standards The minimum professional qualifications in architectural history are a graduate degree in architectural history. art history. historic preservation, or closely related field with coursework in American architectural history or a bachelor's degree in architectural history. art history, historic preservation or closely related held plus one of the following 1. At least two years of full-time expenence in research. writing, or teaching in American architectural history or restoration architecture with an arademic institution, historical organization or agency, museum, or other professional institution; or 2. Substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the held of Amenca/n�*chitectural history. V Architecture Q1 The minimum profess,onal qualifications in architecture are a professional degree in architectur pl ast two years of full-time experience in architecture: or a State license to practice architecture. KM Historic Architecture . QJ The minimum professional qualifications in historic architectur otessi ree i11�1! ecture or a State license to practice architecture. plus one of the following: %O 1 At least one year of graduate study in arChiteCtu S@rvatio6Qmcian arc eCt I history, preservation planning. or closely related field; or K'i'Z 2 At least one year of full-time professional a perien11tStoric pr on projects Such study or experience shall include detail ' v jgation f hi uric structures. preparation of historic structures research reports. and preparation of plans and sniscifications for ion projects. o � Part of a series of articles t�ecretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation (https:/f gov/articles/series.htm?id-62144687-BO82-538A-AO174FFF26496394) Previous: Histori eseA/ation Projects Guidelines (https:ilwww. M !articles/sec_stds_hist_pres_proj_guidelines.htm) Next: Pre �onTerminology (httpa;!!www.nps:Qov/articles/soc-stds-pros-terminology.htm) � TAGS archeology archaeology professional qualification standards secretary of the interiors standards and guidelines for archeology and historic preservation Attachment G: Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards Last updated: May 13, 2020 Was this page helpful? UYes O No An official form of the United States government. Provided by Touchpoints (https://touchpoints.app.cloud.gov/) CITY OF WOM FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Supplier Response pp� 't. Event Information Number: RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 Title: Historic Context Statement o� Type: Request for Proposal Issue Date: 4/30/2023 Deadline: 5/23/2023 02:00 PM O Notes: . ,—Z The City of Fay le, Arkansas, seeks proposals from qualified firms with experience in municipal. comprehensive, urban and land use planning, economic analysis, and citizen involvement/participation, to prepare a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods in the City of Fayetteville. Any questions concerning thi hcitation process should be directed to Amanda Beilfpss, Cif Wayetteville Sr. Purchasing Agent, at abeilfu s f etteville- ov. O I Contac W mation Cont c Amanda Beilfuss A� Purchasing Room 306 City Hall 113 West Mountain Street - Room 306 Fayetteville, AR 72701 Email: abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov Page 1 of 2 pages Vendor: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Information Contact: Emily Reed Address: 8401 Shoal Creek Blvd. Suite 100 Austin, TX 78757 Phone: 512-831-6204 Email: emily.reed@stantec.com By submitting your response, you certify that you are authorized to represent and bind your company. PW emily.reed @stantec.corn Signature Email Requested Attachments RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Please attach the signed and completed RFP form documents. Bid Attributes V No response located in the 'Attachments' 'A c>! with any additional r 1 1\ Addendum Acknowledgement By selecting "I agree". you acknowledge that you ad all ndum( ave been issued for this solicitation, if applicable. Z I agree (I agree) V Page 2 of 2 pages Venda Stantec Consulting Services Inc. RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 CITY OF WOM FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Supplier Response pp� 't. Event Information Number: RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 Title: Historic Context Statement o� Type: Request for Proposal Issue Date: 4/30/2023 Deadline: 5/23/2023 02:00 PM O Notes: . ,—Z The City of Fay le, Arkansas, seeks proposals from qualified firms with experience in municipal. comprehensive, urban and land use planning, economic analysis, and citizen involvement/participation, to prepare a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods in the City of Fayetteville. Any questions concerning thi hcitation process should be directed to Amanda Beilfpss, Cif Wayetteville Sr. Purchasing Agent, at abeilfu s f etteville- ov. O I Contac W mation Cont c Amanda Beilfuss A� Purchasing Room 306 City Hall 113 West Mountain Street - Room 306 Fayetteville, AR 72701 Email: abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov Page 1 of 2 pages Vendor: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Information Contact: Emily Reed Address: 8401 Shoal Creek Blvd. Suite 100 Austin, TX 78757 Phone: (512) 338-2223 Email: proposals@coxmclain.com By submitting your response, you certify that you are authorized to represent and bind your company. Emily Reed emily.reed@stantec.com Signature Email Submitted at 5/23/2023 01:34-04 PM (CT) Requested Attachments RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement dum 1 Supplier Response.pdf Please attach the signed and completed RFP form. located in Attachmegls' t along with any additional documents. Response AttachmentsXeb; V �1 RFP23-07 Historic Context with Section C completed. d N Signed RFP SOO Stantec RFP 23-07 Fayetteville Hi c Con .p f Stantec SOO RFP 23-07 P oco Bid Attributes G�, Addendum Acknowledgement N By selecting "I agree". you ackno}�'ledge solicitation, if applicable. • ` Z I agree (I agree) at yo read all addendum(s) that have been issued for this Page 2 of 2 pages Venda Stantec: Consulting Services Inc. RFP 23-07 Addendum 1 o� QOROPO A'" HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS AND HASKELL HEIGHTS Prepared For: City of Fayetteville, Arkansas RFP 23-07 (V Stantec Table of Contents PART I LETTER OF INTEREST..............................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVESUMMARY..........................................................................................................................2 PART II. CONSULTANT/STAFF QUALIFICATIONS................................................................................5 CompanyProfile....................................................................................................................................5 Key Project Staff and Resumes.......................................................................................................5 PART III. MANAGEMENT APPROACH................................................................................ . . ...-....10 Team Management Structure .............. Resources for Project Management.. ................................................................. .. . ......................10 QualityControl.............................................................................................��............................11 Communication.......................................................................................I ....................................11 PART IV, RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE ........... C............ ..�........................................... 12 Relevant Experience in Comparable Projects ........ .................. ........ �.............................12 PART V_ STATE AND FEDERAL GRANT GUID ES............�...................................15 PART VI. DETAILED DRAFT AND SCOPE VI ....................................................... 16 Understandingof the Project...........•.. • ............. ............ �.......................................... 16 Competitive Advantage and Valu d Berl \f�....... ... �!......................................................16 Scopeof Services............................................................................................17 PARTVII. PROJECT SCHEDULE.....,.. . ..............................................................................22 PRICEPROPOSAL .. . �...... . 23 v......................................................................... Appendix A: Resumes f Siaff I Q Cover image: City of Fayetteville Stantec is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a historic context statement for the City of Fayetteville Our considerable experience researching and preparing contextual documentation informs our approach. We have a strong understanding of how historic contexts shape understanding as well as aid preservation efforts. CoxIMcLain Environmental Consulting, Inc. (CMEC), was founded in Austin, Texas, in 2007, and established a reputation as a leading environmental and cultural resources management consul ' g firm. As of January 1, 2022, the employees of CMEC joined Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stan firm established in 1954. Stantec's team of cultural resources staff includes historic preservati cialists experienced in context development, historic resources surveys, archival and oral h' research, preservation and survey planning, design guidelines, and eligibility evaluations and no ions for local, state, and national designations. Our project team includes a roster of six Sec of the Interior — qualified professionals, who are not only disciplined and experienced his but who possess extensive knowledge about economic, social, transportation, and populati and their expression in architecture, and community development. Key personnel identified in our proposal are experienced industry ion with a wide variety of relevant cultural resources management experience includin h' al con evelopment, archival research and documentation of twentieth centu orho the' resources_ Our highly skilled team is prepared to mobi ick com completing all work to the satisfaction of the City of Fayetteville in nce o es blish lines. We believe that we are exceptionally qualified to provide the r U ed se S. We have received and reviewe sued eTtdum. 1ve no conflicts of interest and are fully insured. A Certificate of Insuranc listing as a ditional insured will be provided prior to work beginning. +� We would be glad to provide addit Dorm .(e�garding our credentials or speak directly to discuss our proposal. K\ Thank you, Q)l, MM" �� Emily Re U.S. Te eader, Architectural History I Principal 8401 Cre2ek Boulevard, Suite 100 Austl as 78757 512-83 -6204 (mobile) Emily. Reed@stantec.com 1 With 69 historic properties in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHWealong with NRHP districts, we understand that preservation is important to the City of Fayeelt '.and i s citizens. The Citywide Heritage & Historic Preservation Master Plan is ex cted to beeted summer 2023 and the Historic District Commission is looking at addi a'`project s of the Master Plan, including the identification and protection of hist ri ropert Jtkyrepare We understand the City's purpose for tf�i�project (s ramework for researching and documenting historic resources by preparing a historlontext to ment for University Heights and Haskell Heights, two neighborhoods in Eayettevil �rkansas. We�nderstand that the project has strong community and neighborhood support, as we e support of the Historic District Commission due to concerns for the historic neighborhoods b s of development pressure, low housing supply and high demand, and their proximity to the Urtivy of Arkansas. A growing University student body, the purchase of properties as investm -nd u$e as short-term rentals, redevelopment of existing properties, and lack of zoning pro cti ns ar ng historic properties at risk. The historic context produced b this project would provide City 5 commissioners, and property owners support in their P Y P 1 P Y� P P Y PP efforts to identify and protect the historic resou es in these neighborhoods. We understand that the City's goals include beginnin the process of establishing a local ordinance district by documenting significant neighborhood histo eying resources, and engaging with residents, and supporting the preparation of NRHP nomination i.$di ng a Multiple Property Submission. Through this project, knowledge will be gathered on elopment patterns, historical trends, and significant architectural features for the University is and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. The information gathered throughout the course of this t will aid city staff and commissioners not only for decisions on these two neighborhoods, but al 91<w4ature considerations for other historic locales. While we understand the final scope of work will be negotiated by the selected consultant and the City, the historic context will have a holistic scope and will help identify historic resources and promote their value. As part of the development of the context, we will undertake the following tasks: • Identifying and assessing the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods' history, including any ties to the University of Arkansas and early farms; • Identifying key themes and periods of history for the project neighborhoods; • Establishing clear neighborhood boundaries to assist with future surveys or policy proposals; City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) • Conducting research using primary and secondary sources, including available resources at the University of Arkansas Special Collections Library; • Recommending a communications strategy to reach and engage stakeholders, utilizing available and existing resources and organizations focusing on the project neighborhoods; • Collaborating with City staff to design collateral materials to support the project, including web and digital resources; • Identifying, describing, and implementing a comprehensive strategy and methodology for community involvement, including development of a key stakeholder list; and • Developing a list of historic ethnic and cultural influences or individuals associated with the project neighborhoods. ��'�► To fulfill the goals and tasks for the project, we will provide the following services: • Project Management: Project Manager Emily Reed has a proven track recor f verseeing the completion of historic context studies that exceed client expectations a on time and on budget. Our team emphasizes clear and effective communication w tht,7ient, stakeholders, and the public. Our projects are regularly reviewed and accepted,H7 r2 Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs) with little or no revisions. We recognize that each project is different, and our process is well -developed and customized to meet our client " Neds. We'll develop an internal project plan with goals and clear methodologies for accom the goals, along with a detailed project timeline. Our team will facilitate and manage ac I and communications; recommend a communications strategy to reach and;engage stakeh rs; and design collateral materials in collaboration with City staff. including,peo-and dicii I esourc�e,,Nq-upport the project. • Public Engagement: We will w llvlivith the City to develop and impleme rategy ands methodology for comRUQ involy ant. `/'� Historic Stantec's approach to put- c o itr _ the ✓ Contexts Survey and y City of Fayetteville has three p ' goals! Preservation Novo ement distribute information about thjVVct, gat r Planning information about neighborhood Kist promote an appreciation for the ue Sta nteC s histories of University Heights skell Historic Project Heights and foster a sense ddourcr e. Public Surveys Areas of Management outreach is recommended t4,�pe4u a engaging Expertise web and go.cial -media content, and email communications to stakeholder groups at key GranDistrict and point ing project activities. projects Grant -funded ects Resource Designations • Praration of Historic Context: A historic Archival Research ATpewt informs the identification of properties `end districts eligible for local, state, or federal historic designation. To develop the historic context for University Heights and Haskell Heights, we will conduct a general literature review and analysis of historic -period maps and aerial photographs. The context will address growth spurts or declines, years of substantial construction, major architectural movements, known architects and builders, and other important trends or events. The historic context will also serve as the foundation for future NRHP nominations by not only documenting the history of the area, but also analyzing that history within a broader context, an essential component for making NRHP recommendations. For example, a historic context about neighborhood development should City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 3 include a historical narrative of the neighborhood (when it was platted, who developed it, what kinds of houses were built, what the major periods of growth were, etc_), and it should also explain neighborhood development trends of the era in the U.S., how and when those trends emerged locally, and how the proposed district reflects those trends. A neighborhood development context should include explicit reference to evaluation guidance documents established by the NPS and used by professionals to support their recommendations, such as Historic Residential Suburbs: Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places. This analysis informs the neighborhood's Statement of Significance, Area of Significance, Period of Significance, and contributing and noncontributing resources. It also helps reviewers at th4SHPO and NPS understand the neighborhood's place in history. Stantec will identify a,M,apriate contextual themes for the neighborhoods, such as Community Planning and Dev (tent and Architecture, and will develop a historic context that both documents thg(fyry of the neighborhood and analyzes the significance of that history. We have the experience and qualifications to fulfill the City's request for a histori xt to promote and coordinate advancement of the protection, preservation, and develop istoric and cultural resources. Our team are specialists in working with communities to tackle x, multi -faceted historic preservation projects and we bring that experience toGletingthe*Wo f work established by the City. Our team members include agricultural and modm enth i3ti+ts w o would bring the energy and motivation your project deserves. • Qj Each member of our team of historic preservati fessio ets o eds the SOI Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation for in w the ar l istory and/or architectural history. At Stantec, we take great pride i ualitty► &ur w r understand the importance of the historical record we are creating and i can for future projects. In our commitment to excellence, we have develope n into r e thre -pa uality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) process that ensures that our eliver are e and accurate. Our historic contexts are meticulously reviewed by the hist o wrote context, followed by review from two more historians. This means complete, r and ata. Plus, we collaborate with a technical editor with experience with cultural reso a ma gem umentation to ensure the study is complete, accurate, and presented in a clear d noise . Our clients attest to the difference. We are frequently retained by municipal clie r sub At'preservation planning services. I Our team has ext i e miliarity w ing with a variety of grant programs. including Certified Local Government Gra t nd are familiar with the rules, regulations, and schedules that must be met as required by tt atio al Park Service Historic Preservation Fund. Let's get to work! 1q_: City of Fayetteville. Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) Company Profile CoxIMcLain Environmental Consulting, Inc. (CMEC). was founded in Austin, Texas, in 2007, and established a reputation as a leading environmental and cultural resources management consulting firm. As of January 1. 2022, the employees of CMEC joined Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec), a firm established in 1954, adding our environmental and cultural experience to Stantec's team of designers, engineers, scientists, and project managers. Stantec provides professional consulting services iiXiesign, planning, architecture, and cultural resources, among other industries. Stantec's overarchin any philosophy is knowing and understanding the importance of communities. We know co ties are fundamental. Whether around the corner or across the globe, they provide a foundation a of place and of belonging. That's why at Stantec, we always design with community in mind are about the communities we serve —because they're our communities too. This allows us to s what's needed and connect our expertise, to appreciate nuances and envision what's nevel onsidered, to bring together diverse perspectives so we can collaborate toward a shared such Our cultural resources team employs more than 130 fu - archae it isls and more than 20 full-time architectural historians, with the majority located in ' s an outh st region of the U.S. Embracing an interdisciplinary approach, our teas exp pre archaeology, historic archaeology, history, architectural history, mate �dtisery d his �aervation planning. Our team's myriad historic preservation -related ilitie i fife arch' earth: historic resources surveys: historic contexts; oral histories; I ndma an ationa ister of Historic Places (NRHP) nominations; public involvement camp ecti and 4 uations; historic building, bridge, and structure documentation to H HAe t ndar a opment of agreement documents; interpretive displays; and large - dia p ons th�rporate historic context, videos, and/or photographic documentation. All ur sup pe el meet or exceed the Secretary of Interior's Qualification Standards for archaeolog ,( ectur his dry. and/or history. Our architectural historians have p rienc n array of cultural resources investigations relevant to the requested scope of sees. Having ed hundreds of historic resources surveys and NRHP nominations, including th arlio ric contexts, we are eminently qualified to identify the styles, plans, materialrs, app construction dates of historic -period resources; detect significant alteration make loc dmark, NRHP, and historic district recommendations. Our team members possesC')e_xWhsive knowledge about national, state, and regional economic, social, transportation d p"ulation trends in history, architecture, and community development. We regularly use digital y and mapping technologies for an organized and efficient documentation process and our ngo u ity assurance policy ensures that all deliverables are carefully reviewed and will meet expe . Our extensive experience and quality work has led to excellent working relationships with repeat c nts. Key Project Staff and Resumes This section discusses the Stantec team's capabilities for the required services. Stantec team members are experts in historical context development and bring the knowledge gleaned from completing hundreds of projects. Key personnel identified in our proposal are veteran practitioners who have expertise in cultural resources management. Each member of the Stantec historic preservation professional team City of Fayetteville. Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) :) meets or exceeds the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Resumes are provided in Appendix A. Project Manager Degree OL u Q 'n } = C7 t1U C a)X = ` ab a)O .ro Q C C O O1 Cj O Or C W n O Q o @ = a w X N 0- lJ N v O aL.+ n = a v E y > a O O al W L c C ro o UJ U_ C c L U1 tp •j_p �' W cc MS Historic Preservation DeputV Project ManagerProject SandyShannon Master of Heritage Conservation ©�© Team --_-�- Adrienne Vaughan Campbell MS Historic Preservation-, izabella Nuckels MS Historic Preservation Emily Rinaldi -Williams MS Historic Preservation Emily Reed I Project Manager 'NIF Emily Reed, Stantec's national historic p �s atiop-t o I leaf Stantec, will be Principal Investigator. She will orchestrate project i iaiion and all aspects of project management and will be integral to collaborative planning. Ms.-4 d is�a architectura, t i%torian with more than a decade of experience with historic context develdo 6 t f variet o �erty types, including neighborhoods She served as the Principal Investigator/Pro �anafoL&antec's recent historic preservation plan for the City of Fayetteville and has a thgNw, understanding of the city's built environment, unique history, preservation culture, and corxiNjUhity engagement needs and processes. Other Arkansas experience includes multiple historic context and? .,Vey projects for the Cities of Little Rock, Conway, El Dorado, Eureka Springs, and Fort Smith. She has extensive public engagement plan development and community input experience, having led or-v'verseen a variety of historic preservation outreach activities like oral history interviews, website and social media content development, questionnaires, and public meeting presentations. Ms. Reed hasa depth of experience managing grant -funded historic preservation projects and ensures that her clients receive timely and accurate progress reports and deliverables to meet reporting requirements. Referenc , Nam'b: Nicholas Redding, Preservation Maryland Description of Past Working Relationship: Stantec prepared a historic context study documenting the state's educational history and school architecture from the earliest schooling efforts in Maryland through the 1970s to provide a framework for NRHP eligibility evaluations. Current Contact Information: nredding@presmd.org; 410-685-2886, ext. 306 Name: Justin Kockritz, Texas Historical Commission/SHPO Description of Past Working Relationship: Stantec prepared a thematic historic context study of Calhoun County, Texas to guide NRHP eligibility evaluations for a countywide survey. Current Contact Information: Justin. Kockritz@thc.texas.gov; 512-936-7402 City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) Name: Miranda Garrison, Texas Department of Transportation Description of Past Working Relationship: While Ms. Garrison was an Architectural Historian/Environmental Project Manager with the City of San Antonio, Emily coordinated with her on Stantec's on -call historic resources consulting services with the City. Since 2020 (ongoing), Stantec has provided a variety of preservation services to the City, including survey and resource documentation and evaluation for regulatory compliance, archival research and contextual development, and assistance with developing interpretive panels for the general public. Current Contact Information: Miranda.Garrison@txdot.gov; 512-416-3001 Name: Ellen Agee, Planning Administrator, City of Covington, LA Description of Past Working Relationship: Prepared a NRHP historic district update of thoivision of St. John requiring a reassessment of the district's context and significance Prior to A. A -gee 's employment, Stantec conducted a historic resources survey of the district andW76unding neighborhoods that served as the foundation for the formal nomination update. Current Contact Information: eagee@covla.com; 985-867-1214 w Sandy Shannon I Deputy Project Manager Sandy Shannon is a senior architectural historian who specializes in proj�<for municipal clients. She will guide all research, analyses, and syntheses processes, overseeing outline and content development and assembly of the context. Her expertise includes surveying, assessing, an documenting historical resources and evaluating eligibility for the NRHP; archival, research: I Nndmark and NRHP nominations; historic preservation and survey plans: and historic contex��opment. She regularly serves as a project manager for Stantec projects requiring Historic context sfudies. She has participated in projects in multiple states and is a skilled researcher adeptin identifying and documenting the histories of places and the resources that convey those histories. She led development of the statewide education and school architecture context for Maryland. t j�l the FayetteviNe project, the Maryland project was funded and reviewed by the SHPO, used publ'G rigagemefftechniques, and resulted in a practitioner's tool to guide future study and evaluation i also oversaw the development of the context study of Calhoun County, Texas. The complex, n��uthor context supported NRHP recommendations for early farms, mid -twentieth century neighbo , and architect -designed Modernistic buildings among other property types. As Project Managel•' or he City of Austin's survey of North Loop, Hancock, and Upper Boggy Creek, she was responsible for th development of contexts for nine early- to mid -twentieth century neighborhoods; preatlon of �C involvement plan and execution of extensive public engagement activities; acid assessr WaNn&iresources and districts for local and NRHP listing. Ms. Shannon participated in the develop of Fayetteville's forthcoming Heritage and Historic Preservation Master Plan, inclUdirlg authoring the survey plan and the content on the city's mid -twentieth century architects, aTpw ottTer contributions. Other Arkansas experience includes context and survey work in Little RocV hway, El Dorado, Eureka Springs, and Fort Smith. Of additional relevance to the Fayettevilll<roj`ect, Ms. Shannon has a special interest in post -World War 11 modernism and regularly leads paNcipates in projects requiring study of this era References: see references for Emily Reed Adrienne Vaughan Campbell I Project Historian Adrienne Vaughan Campbell is an architectural historian with more than 20 years of experience in cultural resource management, including property assessments, historic preservation, and regulatory compliance. Her current responsibilities include surveying, assessing, and documenting historic properties and determining eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places; Section 4(f) City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) determinations; archival research: and contextual documentation. She was a project reviewer and National Register program staff at the Texas Historical Commission (the State Historic Preservation Office in Texas) from 2005 to 2012, where she reviewed historic resources surveys and NRHP nominations for completeness according to NPS and SHPO standards, accuracy, and sound recommendations. Ms. Campbell has substantial survey and NRHP experience throughout the country requiring historic context development on a range of themes and subthemes. Recently she was one of the lead authors of Stantec's Maryland Statewide Education Context and the countywide context for Aransas County, Texas. Ms. Campbell will provide quality assurance and quality control for the Fayetteville project, ensuring that the context will support future survey and nomination efforts. References: see references for Emily Reed (�'� `V Amy E. Dase I Project Historian With 35 years of cultural resources management experience, Senior Histo y E. Dase has conducted research and prepared historic contexts in more than a dozen stash, d is expert at adeptly preparing accurately reported, well organized, clearly written deliverables, And eteran researcher, Ms. Dase has solid practice with oral, secondary, and prima ocal, state, f`edemf, and international archival sources to develop historic contexts. She has expertis n a�ricultu esource.s, among other property types. Her work includes sole authorship of a seminal field guid �dustric-roperty types, including those associated with grain and cotton processing. and pivotajfribu ''pia the state's agricultural context. She was principal investigator and T'or authort'i a study of Nuns and ranches in Bexar County, Texas with an inclusive ethnic com N�Nt and meticulous property type analyses; sole author of an agricultural context for Calhoun Coun as: and project director'for a statewide study of agriculture for History Nebraska, the state's hist eservatibn office. In Arkansas, she recently led research and contextual development for a gr tt-' e NRHP-,nominadcin-iF`University Park, a Black neighborhood associated with Little Rock's micf+iw eth cerlVry urban renewal efforts. Ms. Dase will provide quality assurance and quality control for the Fayefteole cohtroensuring that document captures necessary content and is well -written. clear, an Xk2e. G References: see references for Emi y Reed 1 Izabella Nuckels I Proj' c storlai% ^- I Izabella Nuckels i 2! fffstoric Prese tion Specialist with over ten years of experience in property assessments, histori preservation, preservation education. research, and related work, including historic architectural aterial analysis, building documentation, and NRHP-eligibility determinations. Her current work incl ujAe surveying, assessing, and documenting historic properties. She has extensive experience researchi nd writing historic context statements and documenting farmhouses, neighborhoods, and other prcty types. Ms. Nuckels worked on fieldwork and historic context development for a survey of Midcentury Modern -style resources across the City of Galveston, Texas. She has also completed survey and contexts for neighborhood surveys including the mid -twentieth century Lydick's First Addition in Norman, Oklahoma, and early twentieth century historic residential districts in Belton, Texas. She will contribute to research and writing the University Heights and Haskell Heights historic context statement. References: see references for Emily Reed City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) Emily Rinaldi-Williams I Project Historian Emily Rinaldi-Williams is an architectural historian with a strong background in archival research and historic context development. She will serve as one of the lead researchers and authors for the University Heights and Haskell Heights study. She has worked in multiple states and has extensive experience in researching and documenting a wide variety of property types. She began her career as a Graduate Student Intern at Columbia University's Avery Architectural & Fine Arts Library where she received in- depth training in primary sources and processing archival collections. Her professional experience includes assisting in the preparation of the Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement devveloped as part of SurveyLA, Los Angeles' citywide historic resources survey. She was the primary au f the Beaux Arts Classicism, Neoclassical, and Italian Renaissance Revival Architecture conte s well as assisted in authoring the African American History of Los Angeles context and ntial and Suburbanization context. She also has substantial experience conducting resea for individual properties using primary and secondary sources, including preparing nominatioc rit e NRHP-listed Ridley & Sons Department Store in New York City, Braddock Junior Hi hool in Braddock, Pennsylvania, Breakers Hotel in Long Beach, California, and Edmund "r " Anderson House in Los Angeles. References: Name: Johnny Amaral, Acting Chief Operati r, Fri Welter bi tt Description of Past Working Relationsh p. ssiste�'► the FT' -ern Canal Middle Reach Capacity Correction Project; Preparation f His oric Prop Treal t Plan; Preparation of Historic American Engineering Record docu 'err Ntion; Coordination-wliji'the United States Bureau of Reclamation; State Historic Prese ti n OfficliSHPO), and local interested parties; Archaeological and historic architectural field ;�� ;Ev 1��iion ofor+cal and archaeological resources for national and state landma ram eparation J Section 106 and CEQA compliance documentation Current Contact Information: jameraf@friantwatef.org; 559-562-6305 Name: Jane Hauptman, Environmental,Specialist — External and Regulatory Affairs, City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power . Description of Past Working Relationship: Projects included more than 150 task orders under four Master Services Agreements since 2008; preparation of Historical Resources Evaluation Reports and Historical Resources' Evaluation Technical Reports; archaeological and historic architectural field surveys; coordirlLgtion with Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service, local interestec(parties, as well as Native American tribes, groups, and individuals Curre,�6ntact Information: jane.hauptman@ladwp.com; 213-367-0968 NaNeaurice Oillataguerre, Environmental Program Manager, Glendale Water and Power Description of Past Working Relationship: Assisted with the Grayson Power Plant Repowering Project, historic architectural field survey; conducted records searches, literature reviews, and archival research; evaluation of historical resources for national, state. and local landmark programs; preparation of Historical Resources Evaluation Report; preparation of a cultural resources section for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR); preparation of response to comments; presented at the Glendale Historic Preservation Commission and Glendale City Council Current Contact Information: moillataguerre@glendaleca.gov; 818-548-3293 City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) Team Management Structure City of Fayetteville Emuy Reeo, Project Manager A_ Sandy Shannon, Deputy I I Adrienne Vaughan I I Amy E. Dase I I Izabella Nuckel : �r��� (j'f�tifly Rinaldi-Williams Project Manager Campbell \_Q'.ITJ Involved with each rack Campbell QA/QC QA/QC Research and wrltln Research and writing rNie Ability to Perform All Aspects of the Project Stantec has the capability and capacity to perfoniiIhEI,`I3roject I die anc3'"Wilf,riot use any subcontractors. V►` O ��►' Resources for Manage Project JG Stantec uses a suite of software m e ent.^l sses. project management and accounting software integrates resource schedali an cation, cont ct compliance, invoicing, and timesheet collection. The system is updated daily, giurrent.detgiled views of project progress and generating useful alerts. Stantec project manag t1,sely track deliverable, task, and work authorization expiration dates, and key stages in expenditures labgr_apd, direct expenses in Oracle. We use this tool across our programs and offices to ac ieve effective NNO unicatlons, tracking, and project management for our clients' benefit. � ^�A Stantec also uses inte rapeading-ed� technologies to support historic preservation work. We use ArcGIS Online (AGOL}id ArcGIS to map and analyze collections of historical resources that allows multiple users to Share an Interface. Our team uses Wi-Fi/cellular tablets during field investigations to record data iIV.�uo atically saved to the cloud. To produce reports, we use Microsoft Office and the Adobe Creative �r expertise with these programs results in handsome deliverables that clearly convey results and'✓,re compatible with client software. With multiple moving parts, historic context studies require accessible and integrated software to organize and track all project components, from research, to developing outlines, and writing and editing deliverables, to tracking project tasks, personnel assignments, and due dates. Stantec hosts draft documents online in Microsoft SharePoint, a collaboration platform that allows multiple users to work simultaneously in the same document. The application automatically stores new versions of working documents and supports editing and quality assurance markups and comments. EndNote is a desktop platform that organizes sources for in -document citations and bibliographies. During research phases, the platform enables the team to capture primary and secondary sources online and manually to a shared City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 10 project library. During the synthesis phase, the platform guides critical thinking to organize ideas and annotate sources. Finally, during the writing phase, Endnote Microsoft Word compatibility pulls citations from the shared library to produce the bibliography. With the EndNote tool, our team promotes development of a project library that organizes and safely stores research sources that can be readily shared. The Stantec team uses collaborative applications —the list -making Trello and the spreadsheet - database hybrid Airtable—to assign and monitor tasks, deadlines, and progress, track deliverables, and communicate. Quality Control ZN0 We take great pride in the quality of our work. We understand the importance of the record w Feating and the foundation it can provide for future projects. We understand that historic contex ents are a long-term investment; our goal is to help the City of Fayetteville fully, accurat nd efficiently document the history of the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighb + to serve as a foundation of future preservation initiatives. We have a three-part quality QA/Q ss that holds three historic preservation professionals accountable for the work we deliver to i s. Work products are self -checked by the primary author and then reviewed by the deputy o ct manager and project manager. We also use our in-house technical editors r� pr{oduce d iK era les with thoughtful content presented in a clear and concise manner. Our clients atA;�,tlo the ce. are frequently retained by municipalities after completing projects for subseq� nt pres I n pla nrvlces_ N1 x'�'� Communication n� o At the project outset, Stantec will co preferences of the City of Fayett communication plan according) Reed will serve as the single p t of City. We will communicate regularly with provide the City with quarterly re project progress for submittal to e accordance with grant requirnts. Int, project team will meet we;if t review, comparison to the deliverche burn rate. Cb �1 co m icatio[l 1911 Colonial Revival • style house in University Heights/Haskell Heights Source: City of Fayetteville City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) Relevant Experience in Comparable Projects The Stantec team brings a wealth of experience relevant to preparation of a historic context of University Heights and Haskell Heights. Selected relevant projects are provided below. STATEWIDE EDUCATION CONTEXT, MARYLAND PRESERVATION MARYLAND (2021-2022) Preservation Maryland retained Stantec to prepare a historic context study documenting the state's educational history and school architecture from the earliest schooling efforts in the state through the 1970s ?UAR. to provide a framework for NRHP eligibility evaluations. The context's focus is on the state's post —World War II school construction boom, identification of Ir _ underrepresented histories, and the impact of school CLIENT CONTACT._: (Nicholas Reddi Preservation Maryland desegregation in the educational built environment. l .,madding@r��I7org I 10) 685-2886x306 Stantec conducted archival research at state a d "+'� Je 1 regional repositories and prepared a detailed I ���' and annotated bibliography approved by the cli1 d S*,.ritical he onsei�9f•n project. The volume of archival material available required expert soni.i'ce anaty thinking, and organizational skills. Stantec's depth of experienced staff was itpperative to handle to review, analyze, and contextualize this mass of information. Our use of the refe ee ce management systertrZotero was critical to our methodical and collaborative effort. Stantec coo ,d with the Mary r& State Department of Education to access and duplicate their historical pho;Rh co Lion, which was the foundation of our analysis. Another creative and participatory strategy was se of dsourcing with stakeholders, scholars, and persons knowledgeable about Mary 8tsta hools and; related Civil Rights history to develop a list of schools that will undergo further d tio�� fecprdation, or preservation. The state-wide education confoxt document^M re than 200 years of educational and school architecture history in Maryland; consf6w.s cultural, goc'ral, political, economic, and environmental influences and regional differences; ndcontrastL,�rends in Maryland with the national experience. It explores educational experien f Black, ferrule, immigrant, disabled and other underrepresented groups of students and describes he contributions of the state's early Black and female school architects, Civil Rights leadeQnd educational leaders. Images, graphs, maps, and tables illustrate the content. The report inc an evaluation guide to help preservation professionals evaluate the NRHP eligibility of schoolsAx state. The major themes and subthemes under which a Maryland school is expected to be eligible for the NRHP are provided with attendant periods, areas, and levels of significance; eligibility standards; character -defining features; integrity considerations; and relevant comments are specified for each theme and subtheme. Emily Reed served as the project's principal investigator and Sandy Shannon was project manager and the lead researcher. Ms. Reed, Ms. Shannon, Amy E. Dase, and Adrienne Vaughan Campbell were co- authors of the historic context. City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 12- CALHOUN, REFUGIO, AND ARANSAS COUNTY SURVEYS AND HISTORIC CONTEXTS, TEXAS TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION/SHPO (2020— ONGOING) Stantec is part of a team selected to conduct countywide y historical resources surveys of three large, rural, coastal counties in Texas that have been minimally documented. The Texas Historical Commission, the state's SHPO commissioned the project, the first of its kind in the state, 1 . through federal grant funding. For each county, project tasks include a comprehensive literature review, identification, and i mapping of known historical resources, development of historic context statements, and a comprehensive survey of resources built before 1973. The contexts are organized thematically to document the architectural, community _ �✓ i' planning and development, economic development, public and private institutional development, and ethnic history of each county. To guide NRHP evaluations under Criteria A, CAL HOUN CO. B, C, and D, each theme and subtheme lists integrity,, —'- considerations, periods of significance, anticipated a eas of significance, and related property types. The are the framework for documenting resources field CO Justin Ko 111exas Historical investigations and will also inform future su jects,. CommisoPo tusti kbtz@thc.texas.gov 1 (512) 936-7402 Of relevance to the Fayetteville proje tec historians researched and documented the hist eighborhIC d development in Calhoun County for the context, ranging from early neighborhoo istori downtowns to post -World War II planned communities. During fieldwork, representative hotogra each neighborhood were taken, capturing the typical building stock and setting. Following fiel6o historical research was conducted on each neighborhood and NRHP recommendations were Emily Reed was the proje is principalkgator and Sandy Shannon was project manager, participating in each task ggd Qyerseein letion of deliverables. Ms. Shannon, Amy E. Dase, and Adrienne Vaughan Camp I ere co-aut s of the historic context. Emily Rinaldi-Williarns conducted research on each neighborhood in the county, wrote neighborhood histories and descriptions, and made neighborhood NRHP recommendations. Q City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 13 HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY AND NRHP NOMINATION OF UNIVERSITY PARK, LITTLE ROCK,ARKANSAS CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, 2020-2023 The City of Little Rock, Arkansas, retained Stantec to conduct a historic resources survey and prepare an NRHP nomination for University Park, a Black neighborhood associated with the city's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts that developed on the heels of Civil Rights victories in Little Rock. The study's historic context documents the neighborhood's developmental, ethnic heritage, and social histories and the contributions of prominent CLIENT CONTACT Black community members who resided in the Hannah Ratzlaff, City of Little Rock neighborhood. Primary sources, archival hratzlaff@littlerock.gov 1 (501) 37 newspapers, oral history interviews with current and former residents, historic period photographs and ma s, and other ress informed the narrative. Like the Fayetteville project, the neighborhood has a he collecti architectural styles, including Modernistic examples. The NPS funded the project ou a Afr r , meri ivil Rights of the 20th- Century Grant Program; the project met the req t s of tht agr and AHPP standards_ Emily Reed was principal investigator for this . Am a led r ark contextual development, and the completion of the NRHP nominat' an ha n parti�d in QA/QC of the survey and contextual development. P o C-0 ry Q City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 14 We have completed numerous projects funded by the NPS' Historic Preservation Fund and administered by the AHPP and are therefore familiar with the grant requirements of the Certified Local Government Program Grant Agreement. We also certify that we meet the standards outlined in the RFP attachments: Historic Resources Survey and Document, Other Consultant Contracts and Products, and The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards. L Our NPS Grant -Funded Projects in Arkansas All completed according to grant requirements Historic Resources Survey of Colony and Retta Brown Nei El Dorado C fn ,a, .,Oammerciat NRHP District �le Conway Historic Resources Survey Update of the Hillcrest NRHP District Little Rock r Update of the NRHP District Historic Resources Survey Update of the Belle Grove NRHP District Fort Smith Historic Resources Survey and NRHP Nomination of University Park Little Rock City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 15 Understanding of the Project We understand that the goal for this project is to prepare a historic context for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods documenting their development patterns, historical trends, and significant architectural features. Located directly adjacent to the University of Arkansas (UofA) campus. these neighborhoods have a rich and unique history, beginning with their agricultural origins and developing into early- to -mid-twentieth century enclaves with buildings by some of Arkansas' elite architts. The study would support City staff, commissioners, and property owners in their efforts to identify aotect historic resources in these neighborhoods. It would provide a framework to evaluaei sources documented in future survey work and serve as the foundation for a local ordinance i nomination and NRHP nominations, including a Multiple Property Submission. We understand a City seeks to involve the community in this important project. Specific project goals are listed .,6, • Identify and assess the University Heights and Haskell Heights n ' ds' history, including ties to the UofA and early farms. • Identify key themes and periods of history for b n ighborh • Establish clear neighborhood boundaries to a si th futeys olicy proposals. • Conduct research using primary and sec ourceding W s at the University of Arkansas Special Collections Library, a ble. • Recommend a communications strat rea a dd ngage olders. Utilize available and existing resources and organizatio using n t pro' borhoods. • In collaboration with City staff, n collateral material ding web and digital resources in support of the project. • Identify, describe, and i nt a ` hensivategy and methodology for community involvement, including dev lopme key sjad;�Polder list. • Develop a list of historic ethni Itural in u nces or individuals associated with the University Heights and Haskell Heig borflo ( We understand that this proAt isAunded ational Park Service Certified Local Government grant administered by the Arka 'storic ation Program (AHPP), and that project deliverables and timelines must meet t e P of t agreement. This project will begin by August 15, 2023 and conclude by Septe , 2024. Competit"aA antage and Value -Added Benefits Below ys our team offers a competitive advantage and value-added benefits. • e know Fayetteville. Our forthcoming Fayetteville Heritage and Historic Preservation Master Plan provides invaluable insight into Fayetteville's history and built environment. Through the project's extensive background research; historical overview of the City, its modernism history, and key Modernistic architects; and communications plan and public outreach, we are already aware of key sources, trends, and stakeholder groups in Fayetteville. The study's limited windshield study even included parts of University and Haskell Heights. Our value -add and advantage is that we will not be starting from ground zero with the context study: we already have many of the sources and knowledge we need to begin work, resulting in time and cost savings City of Fayetteville. Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 16 that can translate to a more robust context study. We also understand the development pressures the city is facing. We know that our study comes at a critical time, and we are committing to preparing a useful and enduring product that will serve as the foundation for future work. • Arkansas is our stomping ground. We have completed nine studies for municipal clients in Arkansas in the last three years. We know the state, the resources and repositories useful for historic preservation work, and the personnel at the AHPP. Our closest employee to Fayetteville is just two hours FAYETTEVILLE HERITAGE & HISTORIC PRESERVATION MASTER PLAN Aprd za3. by car, translating to significant travel cost savings. DRAFT We are context writing experts. We have written innumerable historic contexts for historic resources studies and local/NRHP nominations. including countless neighborhood projects. We understand the content that is needed to support future evaluations, LAAAk and nominations and will provide a thoughtful 'and `t Figufel. antec prepar%O the 2023 Fayetteville well -written, turn -key product. Heritage and Historic Preservation Master Plan, We'll say it, our team is stacked. With dhan 20 making us intimately familiar with the City's history d historic preservation background. historians and architectural historian ff we:c n� select those who are best suite your projedt. Emily Reed is a respected ind fader who expertly guides municipalities through complex historic preservation projects('T1p ding prlor Coordination with City of Fayetteville staff Sandy Shannon skillfully leads teams through project tasks in Arkansas and beyond and is a modernism lover who jumps at the chance to work on projects involving mid -twentieth century architecture. Writers Emily Rinaldi-Williams r& abella Nuckefs have abundant experience documenting the history of twentieth-century, orhoods and the myriad architectural styles they comprise. Seasoned veterans Amy E. Dase andie'nne Vaughan Campbell have extensive knowledge and experience that allows them too� 0 the our products are the best they can be. We invest in the toots and to nfe fogies we need to do a job well. We subscribe to a variety of resources best resea�tlaborate, and organize our context studies. From digitized archival newsfIr, Ancestry, and JStor subscriptions to the reference management system Endnote, we have the tools needed for robust, efficient, and organized research and writing. We'll o t well, on time and on budget. We have a reputation for quality and a track record of coAple'Kng CLG grant projects on time and on schedule. Our repeat clients, like the Cities of San Antonio, Texas, Little Rock, Arkansas, and Slidell, Louisiana, to name a few, are evidence of our success. Scope of Services In this section, we describe the main principles guiding Stantec's approach to developing the neighborhood history and provide a detailed description of the key project tasks and deliverables. Throughout these tasks, Stantec historians will virtually attend a minimum of four meetings with City staff to update staff on the development of the document. Stantec will assist the City in submitting content for quarterly reports to the AHPP detailing programmatic and fiscal progress of work. City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 17 As further described in the following sections. Stantec has identified the following information, data. and assistance needs from the City for a successful project: • AHPP communications regarding the project • Historical material on file with the city (e.g., photographs, maps, permits) • Communications coordination (identification of channels; review of drafts and distribution) • Outline and context review • Review and consolidation of commissioner comments on context Project Initiation NO Upon selection as the firm to complete the neighborhood context, Stantec will participat i a kickoff meeting with the City of Fayetteville. The meeting will be held within 14 days of executitl V the contract. Items to discuss and finalize during this task may include: • Obtain AHPP communications regarding the project ,..l�' • Request access to any digitized historical information the City or outer e6lities may have, such as historic -period photographs, plat maps, and building permits "'e • Identification of neighborhood outreach channels,.arla introd u Lori to no, e hborhood contacts, as applicable • Final schedule development •`� �v �6 Decisions reached during this collaborative h�s will �ented i rk plan and project schedule that Stantec will submit forapproval. ` Public Communications PI utr �l a - Our experience has proven that public owtm is inNAD, ,_,,� -, a,,,.:., ..,. ,,.a,<,�..,.q.o•nt.,.:.�. h'<rcre.•i•CK.'%•-O'tQI `00lslm 100AmapJ.v important for historic preservation projects. The fot)ndation n.•.br. �t�.a •yr+�R e.ae.fua... M<r.y w for community -supported preservation efforts, r /embers 'If'''`���''�" of the community who are well-informed a vided the opportunity to participate in the process. c's approach to public outreach for the City of.ville has three primary goals: distribute informationla he project, gather ,h information about, neighborhood his and promote an ` appreciation for the unique histories of University Heights ~s and Haskell i hts and foster a sense of pride.1. - �► !�t f We wile our community outreach efforts by identifying key p takeholders and institutions and organizations serving each neighborhood and determining appropriate channels for communicating information. Our communications plan will be developed based on this Figure 2. Engaging and varied public engagement, information, our existing understanding of the City's media like this social media post, were part of Stantec's and messaging preferences and methodologies, and the communications strategy for the City's City's preferences for this project. Our team is experienced in forthcoming historic preservation plan. providing engaging and public -friendly content for a variety of platforms. For this project. Stantec proposes to provide draft: - Website content (1 page) City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 18 Social media content (3 posts; at the beginning, middle, and end of the project) Email content (3 emails; at the beginning, middle, and end of the project) The draft communications plan will be submitted to the City for review. After one round of consolidated comments, Stantec will revise and resubmit the final communications plan. If the project commences prior to the September 2023 Historic District Commission and Black Heritage Preservation Commission meetings, Stantec will virtually attend the meetings during staff presentations. The methodology and schedule outlined in the plan will be adhered to over the course of the project. Research K\ Stantec's architectural historian and historians will conduct research to aid the developm a historic context study of University Heights and Haskell Heights. Primary and secondary sourc Wb collected will be published and unpublished materials that relate to the area's early aghPlfural history; the development of the neighborhoods, including the developers, architects, and bu_11ders involved; the architecture of the buildings; and the groups of people who have historically lived in each community. In addition to familiarity with the scholarly publications and primary source materials for major trends in history, architecture, and community development, the Stantec team has identified the following sources as potentially relevant when developing the historic context for the neighborhogds: . � i . 1. Issues of newspapers through our subscrip�ions to X QJ Newspaperarchive.com and Newspaper , including The Arkansas Sentinel, The Arkansas Timm e Fayetteville Democrat, Northwest Arkansas Ti d others. '*. • Sanborn fire insurance maps for elteville. Arkansas frnff� STANTEC ALREADY 1886, to 1955 (Library of Cong �J HAS A PRELIMINARY Historic -period topographic Map. S. Geological COLLECTION OF High resolution historical aerial imagas from 1968 to 21 RELEVANT SOURCES (U.S. Geological Survey, GoogleEarthPro, and on subscription to Historicaerials.cofn) r' FOR DEVELOPING THE Digital collections from the Uruversity of rkansns HISTORIC CONTEXT Arkansas State Archives � a y FROM OUR RECENT osit n Materials available from local rep , including the CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE Fayetteville Public Library, the $hiloh Museum of Ozark HISTORIC History, and the Washington CoUnty Historical Society. University of Arkansas Special Collections Library, including: o Cyrus Sutherland Collection o Fay Jones Collection o S ared History: Fayetteville and the University of Arkansas Oniversity of Arkansas Campus Collection of historical photographs oous identification/documentation: AHPP National Register & Survey Database Fayetteville Heritage and Historic Preservation Plan historical overview o City of Fayetteville resources including the Historic Sites Map and historic preservation program files o Relevant NRHP nominations (list) ■ The Arkansas Designs of Fay Jones Multiple Property Submission (2000) • North Gavin Drive Historic District (2021) • University of Arkansas Campus Historic District (2009) City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) Information obtained during community Input activities described in the previous section will also be incorporated, as appropriate. We will compile an ArcGIS Online map to analyze the study area. It will depict the study boundaries and parcels in the study area categorized by the decade of building activity (Figure 3). We will georeference high resolution historical aerial images and topographic and Sanborn maps to align with current aerial images, providing our team with an understanding of development over time and a comparison with current conditions. Online research will commence initially with onsite research to coincide with field investigations. Limited field investigations will guide the study and property type development. As substantive field survey is outside the scope of this protect, but an understanding of the neighborhood's built envlronme d an understanding of property types is necessary to develop a context, architectural historians uct a windshield survey of each neighborhood, driving each street and noting the general se haracter, and composition, and stopping to take representative overview photographs to be r illustrative purposes in the context. Context Boundary D � � Construction Date ' . IN" s[`` t ,pION G ' Into list v 19,JQ I V29 P o 19401949 `—✓ V 1 r bill 19ia l o5Y 'V00 190V � — OilIWO1010 tMalow K � s Figure 3_ 8%nfkuses technical solutions for an informed historic context As part of our research, we prepare and analyze GIS- based rr4pe depicting the decade of building activity for each parcel in the study area, current and historical aerial images, and historical maps to broadly understand the settlement and development trends of the study area. This map shows the range of construction dales and concentrations of conlernporaneous budding activity in Univeri ity Heights and Haskill Heights. (Date Washington County Assessor's Office). City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) ii Outline Stantec will prepare an outline for the context based on the results of the research. We have preliminary identified major components of the context including an introduction and description of the methodology; themes and subthemes of significance; property types and major architectural styles and trends; historic ethnic and cultural influences or notable individuals associated with the neighborhoods; and a bibliography. In developing the outline, the Stantec team will follow applicable guidance from the AHPP and NPS. The context outline will go through Stantec's rigorous three-part quality QA/QC process. This process ensures accurate, complete, and reliable documentation based on thoughtful and considered consensus. Following our internal review, the Stantec team will submit an outline for the context to the City of Fayetteville for review. t: Historic Context Stantec's draft historic context will synthesize the history of University Heights and Haskill Heights • between inception and current day. The study, :bias- H Heights numbering approximately 25-30 pages, will provide a I _J framework for understanding the key events, patter n'r I �IW►' rrrd In girnl .urd trilrt.+oil frrrnr 'r too . fill at rrn Ihv cu.l iif an a%eraRr and people associated with the development -it t rrlart 11 ich ,tlniti.l tint rarnrn¢ inan t 1 hr r 1 irnl. nff rrrd dnr, nnl rlrnt.ind neighborhoods' built environment. Topics will include „1 ,,;,ix 11 ill rtunt to( niirnrr wnh whir►i to t,r.r -in r It InitI. tlliv nttinunl v of Ihdrrnii the early agrarian history of the area, factorslit fill ,,in�hlr .rirtl 11,r nrrri111r1• ,r . rrrrrri- influencing the development of the neighborhood, 141-1 111, t1. 1 platting and neighborhood st.:;L en , iduals+� id 11;"1, 1't�, "r 1"'1'''`t' i- Inr "ir',I ilr'-rr companies responsible eighbori d development, and the architect al quali f' the neighborhood's buildings. Our report will be of sufficient breadt� complexity to illustrate key information, and the text will eirect, to the point, and easily understood by general public. The report will include relevant", graphs, tables, and maps to supplement the tex). In addition, Stantec will develop an overall map depicting neighborhood boundaries. Before submission, the draft report will .go through Stantec's QA/QC process and technical editing. Following our internal review, the draft report will be submitted to the City of Fayetteville and AHPP for review. Stantec will address one round of reviewed and consolidated comments by the City contact and revise the report to incorporate all required revisions. ovrvawr adlnrt•nl lu Pa%v/lr%lll,. tin() will, 1:- rVRry—lrt.rlutn and t►crtw161111► %houkl appral irr Ihr r r.rrm.ul "hu i1r.Irr% a frtr arrry lu•1 riui•idr rir uir t u � . all rir per u� And 11%tVrluin 111.1 hurt Vital► "ru 11"11t ­rulr utlr toll' Ihr-+• Irmr and al tin v%lernirk Ims prlcr. The Sanford Development Co. I'll 111,110, M 11'1 1" • 4 Ill i I 1'110VE 9h1. Figure 4. A 1934 Fayetteville Daily Democrat advertisement for Haskell Heights. City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 21 We have reviewed the CLG Grant Agreement with the AHPP and will bring our understanding of the grant requirements as well as our extensive prior experience with grants to bear to ensure that the project progresses smoothly and in accordance with all stipulations. The schedule below was prepared accordingly and accommodates completion in advance of the grant deadline of September 30, 2024. This schedule presents our suggestion for best management of the project but could be adjusted as necessary following Stantec's selection as the vendor - Working • 1M •23 Sop-23 Oct-23 Dec-23 Feb-24 Apr.24 Jun-Y. Cons Itant se ction Project initiatioct �lcecuti _ Pr r t c``k-off i 1 . Historic DiInforrimission m g Black Heritage Hres mmission meeting F' a Pu lic Communications Plan <v` City review iduct research and prepare outline City review Draft Historic Context HDC/BHPCIAHPP Review Final Historic Context City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 22 Stantec proposes a budget of $24,671 for the project. A breakdown of labor and non -labor expenses is provided below. The project would be structured as lump sum, to be billed on a percent -complete basis, Should the City request additional services during project initiation or during the project, the hourly fee schedule provided in this budget would be applicable. City of Fayetteville. Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 23 Project Project Senior Senior Hiatorlar► Histonan G1S Admin/Clencall Manager/ Manager/ Hislonan tAstonan 2 1 2 Analyst ,Tech Editor Principal Senior 1 Histonan Totals 8 2 1 1 2 14 2 4 1 1 4 4 16 • • 2 16 3 3 18 60 4 30 4 24 4 8 t02 2 6 3 4 3 25 • 18 58 11 11 t 4 13 217 • $52.52 $43.40 $31. $35.80 $33.84 $22.68 • $945.36 $2,517.2 V.056.94 .28 $ 1 $1.825.80 $135.36 $294.84 $8,133.38 • $1.562.21 1 6 $7 $57 63.17 $3.017.13 $223.68 $48722 $13,440-41 • ' • $250.76 7.69 0 .85 $427.48 $484.29 $35.90 $78 21 a2.157.38 • $940.40 $24,671.57 U ' G?r�ntlty a Total albs RT Night Day 1.00 1.00 2.00 $80.00 $160.00 $4.00 $450.00 $120.00 $450.00 $110.40 $50.00 $110.40 $100.00 $940.40 City of Fayetteville, Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) 24 Appendix A Resumes 1001 N_ Sunset, University/Haskell Heights Andy Shupe, Arkansas Democrat Gazette City of Fayetteville. Historic Context Statement (RFP 23-07) ® Stantec Emily Reed US Technical Area leader. Architectural History 16 years of experience Emily is Stantec's national Technical Leader for Architectural History. She has over 15 years experience in property assessments, historic preservation, and related work, including research, documentation, and regulatory compliance. She manages a team of 10+ historians in four states. Her expertise includes su assessing, and documenting historic properties and determining eligibility for the National Register ofetorric Places in compliance with Section 106 and NEPA; Section 4(f) determinations: archival research; context development. She meets the Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications for A( Ural Historian. eD:,, EDUCATION for City of Little Rock I City offli.Kack Pulaski County, AR - J%. MS, Historic Preservation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 2010 BA, History and Art History, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill- North Carolina, 2006 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Historic Context Study for School Architecture in Maryland I Preservation Maryland I Statewide Park. wt�ro! Unversi a COW; associated with tiel ntury urban renewal efforts riling the rwighboahoud's r social ory, our team will ititions^0111iminent Black members kt4p in the neighborhood tsa be conducted with nts. which will supplement Preparation of a historical context study dacurn LSV N iiO+lRtl ruse project is funded by a grant the state-% educational history and school arch(^M fr the P' ust meet federal and Arkansan from the earliest schooling efforts in the s lbtlgh PO s ar s 2021-present. the 1970s to provide a frarn lit for l9-4bool P . (� s ebgibllity evaluations The context f cu`` V Li P Historic District Survey Update, Coy of documenting the state's post -Wort Li I City of Little Rock I Pulaski County. AR construction boom, identification of duntipr istonc resources resurvey of a portion of the histories, and the role integration pla ed in t N %Vcrest National Register Historic District in evolution of the educational built enviror R r [� preparation for a future NRHP amendment. Tlie team will use crowdsourcing among tak s. V district was usled in the NRHP in 1990 under Criteria scholar,, and other persons knowfe bout A and C in the areas of Community Planning and sc.hoots and Civil Rights history - Mary d to /��, Developmool and Archilecture as an example of a develop a list of resources th II tin ergo furlh�l ` streetcar suburb In Little Rock with a collection of documentation, recordati°'�►�p se to architectural styles popular from the turn of the present V century to World War 11. The survey area comprises Historic Resources or City of I City °f approximately 500 resources, most of which require Graham I Alanan oil . NC incorporation and comparison of previous survey data. The project is funded by a Certified Local Principal lnve ttgatO a locally -Sponsored historic. Government grant through the Arkansas SHPO and resources I I I of a downtown commercial niust be completed in accordance with SHPO and district r m is tasked to conduct historic context NPS standards 2021 resear. . m ete a survey update for the Graham Hi ra;l (listed in the NRHP in IM). and su Atonal proximate properties. The district com _ s the courthouse square and its surrounds. ►nduding mid -nineteenth to early twentieth century commercial, rnstilti6onal, and residential resource. - associated with the early development of Graham that reflect popular architectural styles and building trends of the era. Our tea, will guide the City through an update to the NRHP listing, including consideration of boundary and period of significance changes 2021 present. University Park Survey and NRHP District Nomination Survey and NRHP predominatety Sla like city's mid-t In 4dition to d4, explore I tR Of the ily Oral s, intern c%,"F rid form( Historic Resources Survey of Country Club Colony & Retta Brown Neighborhoods. El Dorado I El Dorado Historic District Commission I Union County. AR Principal investigator for nistorc resources surveys for the City of El Dorado In 2020. the City completed a new preservation plan outlining Country Club Colony and Rolla Brown as two neighborhoods prioritized for eligibility determination Conducted a reconnaissance survey of both neighborhoods in compliance with Arkansas SHPO standards. 2022- present dpnr4es proprrs ra mpAidpd tovib o0wr firs ® Stantec Sandy Shannon MHC Al Architectural Historian 9 years of experience Sandy is an Architectural Historian who specializes in municipally sponsored historic resources surveys and large-scale projects. Her experience includes surveying, assessing, and documenting historical properties and evaluating eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); archival research; local landmark and NRHP nominations; historic preservation and survey plans, historic context development; and creation of digital survey databases. She regularly serves as Project Manager for a variety of project types and clients '%D11 has worked extensively in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and other states. She meets the Secretary �Vke-Snterior's professional qualifications for Architectural History. EDUCATION in the stale through the 1970 ride a framework for future NRHP eligibilit ns. The context Master of Heritage Conservation, University of focuses on documen e's post -World War Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 2014 II school constructi dentification of Bachelor of Science Psychology, University of Illinois, underrepresented his r and the role integration Urbana Champaign, Illinois. 2003 /ed in the ev lion of the educational built eon onment. will e crowdsourcing among SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE eholde oars, aryl er persons Historic Resources Survey of Country Club Colony • knowle �aboit crq%1`Ind Civil Rights history and Retta Brown Neighborhoods El Dorado, Union ` inkax o devel� f resources that will County, AR 1 2021-2022 1 Project Manager a urther do ation, recordation, or � olion. RN In 2020, the City of El Dorado acloptea a preservalbn� plan prioritizing two neighborhoods for NRHP V eligibility determinations: Country Club Col V ` established in the early twentieth centu the • (� El Dorado Golf and Country Club a d ve 1 through the post -World War II yea , etta Brown, a post -World War II develop ent with Q. l school at its center. In 2021, the City etaine�IC to conduct a reconnaissance survey of neighborhoods in compliance with Arkan O Av standards. Deliverables included sur e rts. historic contexts, and Arkansas Architec ral Resources Survey Forms and ciliar�yy Structure Forms. The project was fu t ough a bra the National Park Service d q ired i Arkansas Historic Pre rva rogra v Historic Resource e of Old Town eka Neighborhood I y f eka I Topeka, Shawnee County, KS 1 21- 1 Architectural Historian Intensive- istonc resources survey of approx' a 50 properties in the Old Town Nei od of Topeka, including some of the city's e e lopment. Survey report includes a hist context, architectural analysis, and inventory forms or each property. Project is funded by the Historic Preservation Fund through the SHPO/Kansas Historical Society Historic Context Study of School Architecture in Maryland I Preservation Maryland I MD 1 2021-2022 1 Project Manager Project Manager for preparation of a historical context study documenting the state's educational history and school architecture from the earliest schooling efforts 00vey and NRHP District Nomination °k I Little Rock, Pulaski County. AR ral Historian S NRHP nomination of University Park, a pr o alely Black neighborhood associated with the a v's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts. 7ddition to documenting the neighborhood's evelopmental and social history, Stantec will explore the contributions of prominent Black members of the community who resided in the neighborhood Oral history interviews will also be conducted with current and former residents, which will supplement archival research. The project is funded by a grant from the NIPS and must meet federal and Arkansas SHPO standards Hillcrest NRHP Historic District Survey Update I City of Little Rock I Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR 12021 1 Architectural Historian Historic resources re -survey of a portion of the Hillcrest National Register Historic District in preparation for a future NRHP amendment. The district was listed in the NRHP in 1990 under Criteria A and C in the areas of Community Planning and Development and Architecture as an example of a streetcar suburb in Little Rock with a collection of architectural styles popular from the turn of the century to World War II. The survey area comprises approximately 500 resources, most of which require incorporation and comparison of previous survey data. The project is funded by a Certified Local Government grant through the Arkansas SHPO and was completed in accordance with SHPO and NIPS standards. ® Stantec Adrienne Campbell Senior Architectural Historian 21 yeors of experience Adrienne is an Architectural Historian with over twenty years of experience in property assessments. historic preservation, and related work, including research, documentation and regulatory compliance. Her current responsibilities include surveying. assessing, and documenting histonc properties and determining eligi the National Register of Historic Places in compliance with Section 106 and NEPA: Section 4(f) dete o s; archival research, and contextual documentation. Adrienne has worked on a wide variety of proje Us the state of Texas and United States, including highways, military, transmission lines, communrcati rs, railroads, and public and private development. She meets the Secretary of the Interior's prof/S;14 a1 qualifications for Architectural Historian. 11��,, EDUCATION wu1N SurJay p:�n5, {lubl : i iu+rl, a'A survey and documentat►on �30( properties BA, Anthropology and Art, College of William and constructo0 before 0-present. Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, 1997 oh6stonc Buildin u=)r North Loop, Hancock, and MS, Historic Preservation, University of Texas, Up r Boggy C eighbofhoods. City of Austin 1 Austin, Texas. 2004 of AL s Cou Texas PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Grant t� rvey t 0 reesources Historic Resources Survey of Old Town Topeka ` consl nor t e northeast hall of Neighborhood City of Topeka Shawnee Count , Nu e ial Ausfir� survey and photo 9 I Y pe I y Al Cation i4xlucted on tahlPts using our Kansas g based b-enabled survey database, Project Historian for intensive -level historic res 5 P Iect i urvey documentation of fields on the survey of approximately 150 properties in HC sur historic context development, Town Nerghlwrtwod of Topeka, include of flies• pu r chi oral history interviews. archival city's eartieat development Survey r I es d ` r rid development of recornmendations histonc context, architectural analy vent % reg. g historic distnets, individual landmarks, and forms for each property. Project is 1 Lied by t ` tential heritage tourist destinations. 2019-present Historic Preservation Fund through " S , � stone Resources Reconnaissance Survey of Two Historical Society 2021-present Arkansas Army National Guard Facilities, multiple Historic Context Study for School Ar t I �Ds locations I Arkansas Army National Guard I Arkar►as Preservation Maryland I Maryland v Pnnc>;pa1 Investigator for a historic resources survey Preparation of a historical co stu�y docum and evaluation of two histonc-age resources at the states educational hill n sctibat n; e Arkansas Army National Guard facilities in Marshall from the earliest schooling the igh and North Little Rock Researched the history of the 1910s to provufe �,jta-0 for f 1p these facilities to add to the existing historic context eligibility evaluations T t text focus for the Army National Guard in Arkansas. Recorded documenting the t-World War II school the historic -age resources on Arkansas architectural construction boom, I rfication of underrepresented survey forms and created a report for compliance with histories. a rol integration played In the Section 106 and 110 of the Nalional Historic evolutio educational built environment- CMEC Prr•c4,rvation Ar! (NHPA) 201Fi will us r icing among slakaholders, scholars, naissance Survey of Three arsons knowledgeable about schools and Historic Strictures Recon 0111114JI11givig history in Maryland to develop a list of Arkansas Army National Guard Facilities, multiple resoaVos that will undergo further documentation, locations I Arkansas Army National Guard I Arknnas recordatirxi, or preservation 2021 present. Conducted survey and i?varuatron of three histonc- Historic Resources Surveys of Aransas I JMT I Texas Counrywrde h,Stursu resources Suroeys of threa large, rural counties In Texas that have minimal prior documentation for the Texas Histoical Comm,ssion Project tasks include a comprehensive literature review for each county identification and mapping of known h►atoric resources, development of mintywide historical context statements, preparation of county - age resources at two Arkansas Army National Guard facilities in Ozark and Prescott Researched the history of ti,ese facilities to add to the existing historic context for If►e Army National Guard in Arkansas Recorded the historic -age resources on Arkansas architectural survey forms and created a report for compliance with Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). 2017.2018. ® Stantec Amy Dase MA Senior Historian 38 years of experience Amy is a Senior Historian with more than 35 years of experience managing and producing cultural resources management projects of all types in 14 states that span portions of the Northwest. Southwest, Midwest, Southeast, and Atlantic Seaboard. Her expertise includes surveying, assessing, and documenting historic -age resources and determining their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) for compliance with Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental P tion Act, and state regulations; archival research using local, state, federal, and international sources; or .tbry research, and historic context development. She launched her cultural resources managem awer with seven years in the NRHP Programs Office of the Texas Historical Commission, the state' is preservation office. Amy's historiographical knowledge encompasses multiple areas of significange, Especially agriculture, architecture, historic non -aboriginal archeology, community planning and developmen'h dthnic heritage, industry, military, social history, and transportation. Her extensive research specialties include Onderrepresented communities and their significant fragile resources. She is expert at adeptly p Naring accurately reported, well organized, clearly written deliverables. She exceeds the Sec tf a of the IrttaidTrofes..5ional Qualifications Standards for Historian and Architectural Historian. EDUCATION Shiel i1eih NR4 tion, Travis and Hays a C ries 'Shield Roundation I TX MA, History, Middle Tennessee State University, Se Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1990 al inve I project historian documented PhD, History, Texas ABM University, ColleR RAn,Q2uV hist ources during reconnaissance Texas. 2022 eLRHP hield Ranch for development of a • sunomination that Amy authored. BA, History, Northwestern Universi E` n to , S` Tfficant for historical associations with Illinois. 1985 twry goat and sheep ranching and PROJECT EXPERIENCE otential to yield information through sites associated h nineteenth-century Euro-American settlement, ias 150 contributing resources built between about Statewide Educational History and Sch ` 1870 and 1970. 2018-2020. Architecture NRHP Context far Pres 11laryland Preservation Maryland I MD Interim Analysis Study in Frost Town for TxDOT-ENV ENV DOT- Tliis peer -reviewed historic c t study TxI TX documenting Maryland's e ti al htsto �. Principal investigator/project historian for intensive school architecture. focuse o h pos dr II archival research and analysis of historic era. The study will do ie errep archeological resources in Frost Town for the Elysian histories and the role esegregation ed in Viaduct, Houston, Harris County, Texas, for the changing the boil it ent of Maryland schools Texas Department of Transportation. Environmental Schools and people LVociated with educational Affairs Division, Archeological Resources Branch integration^g ih Civil Rights movement will be 2016. identifie ongoing. Univ ark Historic District NRHP Nomination Ci o Rock I AR Rese h director for survey and NRHP nomination for a predominately Black neighborhood associated with the city's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts CMEC is studying the contributions of prominent Black community members who resided in the neighborhood, which was developed on the heels of Civil Rights victories in Little Rock. Oral history interviews will be conducted with current and former residents and supplement archival research. 2020- ongoing. Reconnaissance Historical Resources Study along Segment B of SH 99 for the Grand Parkway Association, Brazoria and Galveston Counties AECOM I TX Principal investigator/major author supervised the project historian documenting 67 historic -age resources, including the South Texas Water Company Canal, the Briscoe Canal, and the American Canal, all irrigation -related resources. Prepared historic context, assessment of integrity, and made recommendations regarding National Register of Historic Places eligibility for Section 106 compliance. 2013-2016. ® Stantec Izabella Nuckels MSHP, AIC PA Historic Presefvotion SpeciOfist 1 1 yeors of experience Izabella is a Historic Preservation Specialist over ten years of experience in property assessments, historic preservation, preservation education. research, and related work, including historic architectural material analysis, building documentation, and NRHP-eligibility determinations. Her current work includes survey researching, assessing, and documenting historic properties with particular focus on determining m�ions and alterations to plans and rharacter-defining features. She works on a variety of historic presery miects, focusing on the documentation and assessment of individual buildings and their materials. She t the Secretary of the Intenor's professional qualifications for Architectural Histonan. n• EDUCATION included an updated his recommendations for a RHP hokindary Master of Science, Historic Preservation, University of change, identificatio n ' ting and non - Texas at Austin. Austin, Texas. 2016 contributing resour the existing NRHP district, results of the hield survey, and Bachelor of Arts. Urban Studies, Barnard College at Columbia University, New York City, New York. 7.tt07 CcopmmeiWalio or resources that may be eligibleI. stet oral esiynaton. Also assisting PROJECT EXPERIENCE Citywi"! ai upd �6dthe NRHP nomination ♦ � with Ili f� Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey from �` Hist c ource! I City of League City 1 Hopkins Street from Bishop Street to Moore Street' L ity, Ga unty, TX 1 2017-2018 1 Project Austin District I Hays County. TX 1 2018 I t Histori, Project Historian n_ � ` `` Project historian for a TxDOT reoonnaasar survey of over 100 historic -age proforti Hopkins Street in San Marcos. Te s I .t components invotvetl development earCtl ` Design and Historic Resources Su Report Q and documentation, analysis of surve result recommendations for NRHP eligibility. a d` �" • development of survey forms ` ^�,J Historic Resources Survey' I City of C ngton I Covington. St Tammany Paris LA 1120 7-2018� Project Historian � 1 Project historian for a local s nsore resources survey of r P�nd connaT resources. The Cit �n9ton retain EC to develop a comp a sie w0hrid up-to-date inventory of hiStOriCragB p perk ithin the Division of St John National R s r HI oric District. CMEC was tasked with re g resources dmumented in the NRHP nomin. < n surveying resources that reached 1115 a, (built in 1970 or earlier) since the 1982 no The study also involved a windshield sure f surrounding neighborhoods and documentation of select properties with potential historical significance In total, 300 resources were documented using a tablet -based data collection aW reporting system designed in accordance with Louisiana 5HPO methodologies. Information from the NRHP nomination and a previous survey was ►ncorporated into the survey records. Public involvement tasks included public meetings and coordination with local historians Deliverables julect h ri, i` or a locally -sponsored historic 1e11.(10n1e y of 260 residential and wmmarcial re valuated the survey areas fnr additional istoric districts, assigned preservation 3Inno , ►dentified local landmark and NRHP-oIig►ble i�ources, and made recommendations for updates 2Ithe City's existing historic district- Led public involvement, including kickoff meeting and finial recommendations presentation to public. City board and staff Trinity University Histonc District National Register Nomination' I Trinity University I San Antonio, TX 1 2016 1 Historian Collaborated with Architexas staff on developing and submitting a National Register of Historic Places nomination for Trinity University in San Antonio as a historic district. The project involved documentation of the campus buildings; determination of an area and period of significance as well as a statement of srgnifcance. development of a historic context. research on the construction history of the campus, alterations to each building, and the architect; and preparation of a National Register nomination. Due to the continuous evolution of university campus buildings, modifications and alterations to each building were thoroughly researched and documented. The Trinity University Historic district was successfully listed in the NRHP in 2018 ' d ones proprrs ramploNed with other firms ® Stantec Emily Rinaldi-Williams Ms Architectural Historian 8 years of experience - Los Angeles, California As the Architectural Historian at Stantec. Emily's experience encompasses identifying, evaluating, and documenting a wide variety of historic resourcesiproperty types, and preparing evaluations for local. state,ynd national designation. She has worked on numerous project types within the Los Angeles region and has_^"�, prepared historic structure reports, historic resource survey reports. Historic Preservation Tax Credit Certifta-ations and Mills Act applications, historic context statements, condition assessments, local rk applications, National Register nominations, HABSIHAER Documentation, and interpretive Sig ity is experienced in coordinating with clients, state and federal agoncios, and third -party consulta�R o a is also experienced in preparing CEOA and Section 106 environmental compliance docun.----ic-1Z EDUCATION Nationai Register in 2u1 i e Historic Resources Associat tan Americans in Los Master of Science in Historic Preservation, Columbia Angeles Multiple Pr cumentation form. The University. Graduate School of Architecture. Planning. minabon in d c cting archival research and and Preservation, New York City, New York iel such' an architectural descriptwn, and Bachelor of Arts in History and Political Science, cum %vating Ih nce a er NRHP Criterion B laude New York university, New York New York HISTO TE LOPMENT CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING N Sury sidegt+ uburbanization Historic S at me Angeles, California Architectural History. Secretary of the Interior's �i ctural H Co -Author Professional Qualifications. National Park Serv' Washington, D.C., 2017 rved .i r of the histunc wntrsxt white emwoye A Consulting. The itient►fierl theineq Section 106 Training Seminar, National alion , an a ypes were rocxdinated with the Los Institute. San Francisco. California 20 A% . ywide Hrstonc Context Statement that was AWARDS O do-v id for SurveyLA 2020 California Preservation Foundation Pre rveyl-A, Beaux Arts Classicism, Neoclassical, and Design Award in Cultural Resource Stu G lian Renaissance Revival Architecture Context Jay Littleton Ball Park Historic Struct re Statement' I Los Angeles, Calilomia I Architectural Historian. Co -Author 2022 California Preservation Foundab reservatii Design Award for Rehabilitah' Casa de Rosas Served as co-author of a hcslonc context statement Angeles. CA '� ` _ for Beaux Arts Classicism. Neoclassical, and Italian 2022 Los Angeles Cunsei Prew rd. Renaissance architecture in Las Angeles while Casa de Rosas, Los 11�e1 A gn�t'IoyE'd at GPA Consulting The identified themes T and property types were coordinated with the Los PROJECT EXPiERIENCE Angeles Gtywide Historic Context Statement that was NRHP NO ATICWS Edmund ` ster- Anderson House National Regist o i ric Places Nomination' I Private +Jw Angeles, California I Architectural Hi o Author Assis in the preparation of a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) nomination while employed at GPA Consulting The property was the residence of Edmund "Rochestee' Anderson, a radio, film and television actor He began his career In show business as a teenager performing on the vaudeville circuit, and in 1937. became the first African American to have a regular role on a national radio program playing the pan of Rochester on The Jack Benny Program The residence was listed in the developed for SurveyLA, SurveyLA, African American History of Los Angeles. Historic Context Statement' I City of Los Angeles I Los Angeles, California I Architectural Historian, Co - Author Servoo as co-autixu of a his:ofic context statemum for African American history in Los Angeles white employed at GPA Consulting. The identified themes and property types were coordinated with the Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement that was developed for SurveyLA, dr+n iMs prod s comp Wed wWh oOw &ms CITY OF #4W _ FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Purchasing Division — Room 306 113 W. Mountain Foyetteville, AR 72701 Phone: 479.575.8256 TDD (Telecommunication Device for the Deaf): 479.521.1316 Request for Proposal: RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement DEADLINE: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 before 2:00 PM, local time Pre -Proposal Conference: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 2:00 P Zoom SR. PURCHASING AGENT: Amanda Bellfuss, abeIIfuss@fay_g Ile-ar.gov DATE OF ISSUE AND ADVERTISEMENT: 04/30/2023 REQUEST *ROOL.,,v,�RFP 23-07 Histo "Context Statement No late proposals shall be acceptedal FP's K5,11 be subs-VN cd through the City's third -party electronic bidding platform or by submittin �ealedhysjcal proposal to the City of Fayetteville, Purchasing Division at the below locatid ` C Cit ayetteville APurcho iog ivision — Room 306 ', *'est Mountain Street (��etteville, AR 72701 All proposals s be ubmitted in accordance with the attached City of Fayetteville specifications and locum tached hereto. Each Proposer is required to fill in every blank and shall supply all inforrrrat�, requested; failure to do so may be used as basis of rejection. The undersigned hereby offers to furnish & deliver the articles or services as specified, at the prices & terms stated herein, and in strict accordance with the specifications and general conditions of bidding, all of which are made a part of this offer. This offer is not subject to withdrawal unless upon mutual written agreement by the Proposer/Bidder and City Purchasing Director. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 1 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Advertisement City of Fayetteville, AR Request for Proposal RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, seeks proposals from qualified firms with experience r�linicipal comprehensive, urban and land use planning, economic analysis, and citizen involvement jO clpation, to prepare a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighb s in the City of Fayetteville. Any questions concerning this solicitation process should be directed to da Beilfuss, City of Fayetteville Sr. Purchasing Agent, at abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov or by calling (479) =a Sol citation documents and addenda shall be obtained at the City of Fayettev 9asing Division's electtomc bidding platform at www.fayetteville-ar.gov/bids. All proposals shall be receive uesday, May 23, 2023 before 2:00 PM, Local Time utilizing the electronic bidding softwa qror, by subm;,�Na a sealed physical proposal to the City of Fayetteville, Purchasing Division. All proposals are cINJAfore e stat - no late proposals shall be accepted. Submitting electronically is strongly encouca The Ci ye i II not be responsible for lost or misdirected proposals, or for failure of propo hnic �pme�, r) A non -mandatory pre -proposal conference wil e d Wednesday, Ma 23 at 2:00 PM virtually via Zoom. Information regarding the pre -proposal c nE ce is available o e project page on the City's electronic bidding platform. All interested parties a ngly enrage ,tod. S� All interested parties shall be qualifie to dos and I sensed in accordance with all applicable laws of the state and local governments where the pn4,ro lo t a firm providing a service shall be registered with the Arkansas Secretary of State. Registration and good standing the System f rd Management (SAM) will be required prior to contract execution. 'mil Pursuant to Arkansas Co�notated §ZZ- 203 The City of Fayetteville encourages all qualified small, minority and women business dflr ices to bid on and receive contracts for goods, services, and construction. Also, City of Fayetteville e"rag s all general contractors to subcontract portions of their contract to qualified small, minority and business enterprises. The City eville reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals and to waive irregularities therein, and all parties agre hat such rejection shall be without liability on the part of the City of Fayetteville for any damage or claim brought by any interested party because of such rejections, nor shall any interested party seek any recourse of any kind against the City of Fayetteville because of such rejections. The filing of any Statement in response to this invitation shall constitute an agreement of the interested party to these conditions. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 2 of 21 This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkansas Heritage. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expr sed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of %erior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. City of Fayetteville By: Amanda Beilfuss, Sr. Purchasing Agent P: 479.575.8220 abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov nn�. q.! TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (479) 521-1316 Date of advertisement: 04/30/2023 This publication was paid for by the Purchasing Division o thQty of F Ville, nsas. Arnount paid: $XXX.XX. ��G.! �► o G � G � P o City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 3 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement SECTION A: General Terms & Conditions SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSAL SHALL INCLUDE: Each proposal shall contain the following at a minimum. Proposer must also address detailed requirements as specified in the Scope of Work. a. A written narrative describing the method or manner in which the Proposer proposes to satisfy requirements of this RFP in the most cost-effective manner. The term Propose& 11 be in reference to a firm or individual responding to this solicitation I b. A description of the Proposer's experience in providing the same or similar s as outlined in the RFP. This description should include the names of the person(s) who ovide the services, their qualifications, and the years of experience in performing this typ11 rk. Also, include the reference information requested in this RFP. �I► c. The complete fee and cost to the City for all s vices outlined in this RFP. d. Statement should be no more than twent -fiv 15) pa � ngle si standard, readable, print on standard 8.5x11 documents. Prop S gall also a th age (maximum) executive summary. The following items will runt to the tvJ - e page limitation: appendix, cover sheet, 3-page executive s ry, r e resu II be no more than 1 page per person), and forms provided b Lity fo o leti a. Submittingand eQndin is RAP �Afoposals shall be prepared simply and economically, in 'aightforwar incise description of its ability to meet the requirements r the . Faney rugs, colored displays, and promotional material are not required,' asis sh I e on completeness and clarity of content. All documents ph ,, subq i ould be typewritten on standard 8 %z" x 11" white papers an bounM� in one e. Exceptions would be schematics, exhibits, one -page resumes, a d city re forms. Limit proposal to twenty-five (25) pages or less, exclu(rle-p i resumes, references, and forms required by the City for c plVtjTtfi All sals shall be sealed upon delivery to the City of Fayetteville. /Option 1 —Electronic Submittal (strongly encouraged): Proposers can go to Q www.fayetteville-ar.gov/bids and follow the prompts to submit a proposal within the electronic bidding platform. If a proposal is submitted electronically, a physical submission is not necessary. All Proposers must register in order to be able to submit. There is no fee for registration. Option 2 — Physical Submittal: All Proposers shall submit one (1) original copy of their proposal as well as one (1) electronic copy on a properly labeled USB or other electronic media device. The electronic copy submitted shall be contained into on( -- single file. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 4 of 21 (1) electronic file and shall be identical to the hard copies provided. The use of Adobe PDF documents is strongly recommended. Files contained on an USB or electronic media shall not be restricted against saving or printing. Electronic copies shall not be submitted via e-mail to City employees by the Proposer and shall be provided to the City in a sealed manner. FeclEx, UPS, USPS, or other packages should be clearly marked with the RFP number on the outside of the mailingpackage. e. Proposals will be reviewed following the stated deadline, as shown on the cover sheet of this document. Only the names of Proposer's will be available after the deadline until a ntract has been awarded by the Fayetteville City Council. All interested parties under roposal documents will not be available until after a valid contract has been executed. (J. f. Proposers shall submit a proposal based on documentation public the Fayetteville Purchasing Division- g. Proposals must follow the format of the RFP. Proposers should e'their responses to follow the sequence of the RFP. j h. Proposers shall have experience in work of hdQe or, i atur d must provide references that will satisfy the City of Fayettevill ser sh ish a ce list of clients for whom they have performed similar services�St�mt pro nfor requested in this document. i. Proposer is advised that exce to an of he t ained in this RFP or the attached service agreement must be' e fiTied in response t�RFP- Failure to do so may lead the City goti rop ire to take exception to a non-negotiable to declare any such termeDterm will not disquali co a ion for d. j. Local time shall be define4t time i Documents shall be rec iv fore t Purchasing Division Offic r elect oc A , ITteville, Arkansas on the due date of the deadline. line time as shown by the atomic clock located in the located in the City's third -party bidding software. 2. WRITTEN REQUESTS FOR IMPRETATanRLE 1111410 CLARIFICATION: No oral interpretatio w mad firms as to the meaning of specifications or any other contract documents- All q i n pertaining he terms and conditions or scope of work of this proposal must be sent in writing via a it to the Purchasing Department. Responses to questions may be handled as an addendum if esponse would provide clarification to the requirements of the proposal, All such addenda shall bee 2 of the contract documents. The City will not be responsible for any other explanation or interp tl of the proposed RFP made or given prior to the award of the contract. 3. DESCRIP ION OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES: Any manufacturer's narne,,, trade narne, brand name, catalog number, etc. used in specifications are for the purpose of describing and establishing general quality levels. Such references are NOT intended to be restrictive. Proposals shall be considered for all brands that meet the quality of the specifications listed for any items. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 5 of 21 4. RIGHTS OF CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS: In addition to all other rights of the City of Fayetteville, under state law, the City specifically reserves the right to the following: The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to rank firms and negotiate with the highest-ranking firm. Negotiation with an individual Proposer does not require negotiation with others. b. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to select the proposal it believes will serve the best interest of the City. c. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. .(�� d. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to cancel the entire request for pr o P e. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to remedy or waive technical�r�naterial errors in the request for proposal or in proposals submitted. xi:� f. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to request a ne sary clarifications, additional information or proposal data without changi g t terms proposal. g. The City of Fayetteville reserves the ri h ke sel Tddof th��` r to perform the services required on the basis of the or�grnaI �aIs wit Rt negot h. The City reserves the right to a ra bestrid iOnal f one or more Proposers. The best and final offer process is noWante • therefore sers sers shall submit and respond to this a � RFP on the most favorab s av' S. EVALUATION CRITERIA: ` O � The evaluation criterion defines the f at will sby the selection committee to evaluate and score responsive, responsible and qualif- osals. sers shall include sufficient information to allow the selection committee to thorou hly a luate a e proposals. Each proposal submitted shall be evaluated and ranked by a selection c ittge. Th tact will be awarded to the most qualified Proposer, per the evaluation criteria listed i i5� b P. Pr are not guaranteed to be ranked, 6. COSTS INCURRED Y OSERS: All expenses invol a th the preparation and submission of proposals to the City, or any work performed in connection t�with, shall be borne solely by the Proposer(s). No payment will be made for any responses received, ny other effort required of, or made by, the Proposer(s) prior to contract commencement. 7. ORAL TATION: An oral presentation and/or interview may be requested of any firm, at the selection committee's discretion. 8. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The Proposer represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance or services required City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 6 of 21 hereunder, as provided in City of Fayetteville Code Section 34.26 titled "Limited Authority of City Employee to Provide Services to the City". b. The Proposer shall promptly notify Amanda Beilfuss, City Sr. Purchasing Agent, in writing, of all potential conflicts of interest for any prospective business association, interest, or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Proposer's judgment or quality of services being provided. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of which the Proposer may undertake and request an opinion to the City as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the City, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Propo The City agrees to communicate with the Proposer its opinion via e-mail or first-class mail wi �rty days of receipt of notification. 9. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL: A proposal may be withdrawn prior to the time set for the proposal submittal n a written request from an authorized representative of the firm; however, a proposal shall not rawn after the time set for the proposal., 10. LATE PROPOSAL OR MODIFICATIONS: a. Proposal and modifications received after the set f propo I submittal shall not be considered. Modifications in writing rac prior eadl �e accepted. The City will not be responsible for misdirect Prop efer i submission status in the online bidding portal or call the P g D vi o (479 20 to ensure receipt of their submittal documents prior to og tim an to list K.J b- The time set for the dea all be Qime t tteville, AR on the date listed- All proposals shall be re the sing Di� BEFORE the deadline stated. The official clock to determine loc time s the �tQrt�jp clock located in the Purchasing Division, Room 306 of City Hall, 113 W. c r ayetyev'lI'�e�, R. 11. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL COMP% The laws of the Ae o� Arkans Proposers shal Ny with this propo al sub cc Opport EO), Disad taged contra . ENTS: i pip y to any purchase made under this request for proposal. state, and federal directives, orders and laws as applicable to ntract(s) including but not limited to Equal Employment Business Enterprises (DBE), & OSHA as applicable to this b. ant to Arkansas Code Annotated §22 9 203 The City of Fayetteville encourages all qualified 4 all, minority and women -owned business enterprises to bid on and receive contracts for goods, rvices, and construction. Also, City of Fayetteville encourages all general contractors to `` subcontract portions of their contract to qualified small, minority and women -owned business enterprises. 12. PROVISION FOR OTHER AGENCIES: Unless otherwise stipulated by the Proposer, the Proposer agrees to make available to all Government agencies, departments, municipalities, and counties, the proposal prices submitted in accordance with said City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 7 of 21 proposal terms and conditions therein, should any said governmental entity desire to buy under this proposal. Eligible users shall mean all state of Arkansas agencies, the legislative and Judicial branches, political subdivisions (counties, local district school boards, community colleges, municipalities, counties, or other public agencies or authorities), which may desire to purchase under the terms and conditions of the contract. 13. COLLUSION: The Proposer, by affixing his or her signature to this proposal, agrees to the following: "Proposer certifies that their proposal is made without previous understanding, agreement, or connection with any person, firm or corporation making a proposal for the same item(s) and/or services and is in all respects kair, without outside control, collusion, fraud, or otherwise illegal action." 14. RIGHT TO AUDIT, FOIA, AND JURISDICITON: a. The City of Fayetteville reserves the privilege of auditing a Contractor's as such records relate to purchases between the City and said Contractor. b. Freedom of Information Act: City contracts and document y Ted while performing City contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom f Ination Act. If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the ty Fayette he (contractor) will do everything possible to provide the documents in a pr mnd i nner rescribed in the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. 2 01 et. Onl authorized photocopying costs pursuant to the FOIA may be a for th plia c. Legal jurisdiction to resolve any tes sh Ill b(7Trkans i Arkansas law applying to the case. V 15. CITY INDEMNIFICATION: '`C) J' The successful Proposer(s) agre dem h� City a Id it harmless from and against all claims, liability, loss, damage or expense, cludin of H PPHto counsel fees, arising from or by reason of any actual or claimed trademark, patent or t in e4nt or litigation based thereon, with respect to the services or any part thereof covere b� der�•-ch obligation shall survive acceptance of the services and payment thereof by the City. �v 16. VARIANCE FROM STANDA MS & ONS: All standard terms a c tion A s in this request for proposal apply to this contract except as specifically stated i bseque It ions of this document, which take precedence, and should be fully understood by Pr prior to submitting a proposal on this requirement. 17. ADA REQLLAEQNT FOR PUBLIC NOTICE TRANSLATION: Person i disabilities requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in this proceeding/event, should call 4 .1316 (telecommunications device for the deaf), no later than seven days prior to the deadline. Persons eeding translation of this document shall contact the City of Fayetteville, Purchasing Division, immediately. 18. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE: The successful Proposer shall provide a Certificate of Insurance of professional liability insurance in the City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 8 of 21 amount of $1 million US dollars, at minimum. Such Certificate of Insurance shall list the City as an additional insured and not be required unless firm is selected. 19. PAYMENTS AND INVOICING: The Proposer must specify in their proposal the exact company name and address which must be the same as invoices submitted for payment as a result of award of this RFP- Further, the successful Proposer is responsible for immediately notifying the Purchasing Division of any company name change, which would cause invoicing to change from the name used at the time of the original RFP. Payment will be made within thirty days of invoice received. The City of Fayetteville is very credit worthy and will not pay any interest or penalty for untimely payments. Payments can be processed through Proposer's acceptance okvisa at no additional costs to the City for expedited payment processing. The City will not agree to alloncrease in hourly rates by the contract without PRIOR Fayetteville City Council approval. n` _ 20. CANCELLATION: a. The City reserves the right to cancel this contract without cause by leihirty (30) days prior notice to the Contractor in writing of the intention to cancel o use if at any time the Contractor fails to fulfill or abide by any of the terms or Condit- ified. b. Failure of the contractor to comply with any Cto provisi f the contract shall be considered a material breach of contract and shall b+eaL r im a ter ion of the contract at the discretion of the City of Fayetteville. • � �► c. In addition to all other legal rem vai I t e Ci o yetteville, the City reserves the right to cancel and obtain fro her s rc any d/or services which have not been delivered within the peri ime fm a dates order as determined by the City of Fayetteville. � d. In the event sufficient kil�dgete areQ ailable for a new fiscal period, the City shall notify the Contractor of such oc and c r �Lshall terminate of the last day of the current fiscal period without penalty r rise to Vatfy. 21. ASSIGNMENT. SUBCONTRACTING. CORPOBA`KE ACQUISITIONS AND/OR MERGE a. The Contracto(sll rN rf 4�j 'contract, No assignment of subcontracting shall be allowed without pr n co �f the City- If a Proposer intends to subcontract a portion of this work, tT ser shall d ose such intent in the proposal submitted as a result of this RFP. b. I event of a corporate acquisition and/or merger, the Contractor shall provide written notice City within thirty (30) calendar days of Contractor's notice of such action or upon the currence of said action, whichever occurs first. The right to terminate this contract, which shall riot be unreasonably exercised by the City, shall include, but not be limited to, instances in which a corporate acquisition and/or merger represent a conflict of interest or are contrary to any local, state, or federal laws. Action by the City awarding a proposal to a firm that has disclosed its intent to assign or subcontract in its response to the RFP, without exception shall constitute approval for purpose of this Agreement. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 9 of 21 22. NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTRACT: Award of this RFP shall impose no obligation on the City to utilize the Contractor for all work of this type, which may develop during the contract period. This is not an exclusive contract. The City specifically reserves the right to concurrently contract with other companies for similar work if it deems such an action to be in the City's best interest. In the case of multiple -phase contracts, this provision shall apply separately to each item- 23. LOBBYING: Lobbying, of selection committee members, City of Fayetteville employees, or elected officials regarding request for proposals, request for qualifications, bids or contracts, during the pendency of bid p test, by the bidder/proposer/protestor or any member of the bidder's/proposer's/protector's staff, a �t of the bidder/proposer/protestor, or any person employed by any legal entity affiliated with or re ting an organization that is responding to the request for proposal, request for qualification, bi tract, or has a pending bid protest is strictly prohibited either upon advertisement or on a date e s ed by the City of Fayetteville and shall be prohibited until either an award is final or the protest is esolved by the City of Fayetteville; provided, however, nothing herein shall prohibit a prospectiv /proposer from contacting the Purchasing Division to address situations such as clarificati r questions related to the procurement process. For purposes of this provision lobb ing activitie sha elude but not be limited to, influencing or attempting to influence action or non -act n i connect' ith any request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract through dire t o i direct writt communication or an attempt to obtain goodwill of persons and/or en it cified > provi uch actions may cause any request for proposal, request for qualificati or con ao be? 24. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: O CO The City reserves the right to reques a tonal rvices rel�tsd this RFP from the Proposer. When approved by the City as an amendm t e co and in writing prior to work, the Contractor shall provide such additional req is a becomeOssary. 25. SERVICES AGREEMENT: ��ww� ` —J A written agreement, in substanti I form a d, incorporating the RFP and the successful proposal will be prepared by the City, signed the s I Proposer and presented to the City of Fayetteville for approval and signature of th AN 0t 26. INTEGRITY OF RE UE F OP P DOCUMENTS: Proposers shall us e o iginal RFP f (s) provided by the Purchasing Division and enter information only in the spaces where sponse is requested. Proposers may use an attachment as an addendum to the RFP form(s) if suf4 i t s ace is not available on the original form for the Proposer to enter a complete response. Any mod1t s or alterations to the original RFP documents by the Proposer, whether intentional or othe I or grounds for rejection of such RFP response. Any such modifications or alterations a Prop r wishes to propose shall be clearly stated in the Proposer's RFP response and presented in the form of an addendum to the original RFP documents. 27.OTHER GENERAL CONDITIONS: a. Proposers must provide the City with their proposals signed by an employee having legal authority to submit proposals on behalf of the Proposer. The entire cost of preparing and providing responses shall be borne by the Proposer. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 10 of 21 b. The City reserves the right to request any additional information it deems necessary from any or all Proposers after the submission deadline. c. This solicitation is not to be construed as an offer, a contract, or a commitment of any kind; nor does it commit the City to pay for any costs incurred by Proposer in preparation. It shall be clearly understood that any costs incurred by the Proposer in responding to this request for proposal is at the Proposer's own risk and expense as a cost of doing business. The City of Fayetteville shall not be liable for reimbursement to the Proposer for any expense so incurred, regardless of whether or not the proposal is accepted. d. If products, components, or services other than those described in this bid ent are proposed, the Proposer must include complete descriptive literature for each. equests for additional information must be received within five working days following,t est. e. Any uncertainties shall be brought to the attention to Amanda Beilfuss ediately via telephone (479.575.8220) or e-mail (abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov). It is th i� and goal of the City of Fayetteville Purchasing Division to provide documents q?� a clear and accurate understanding of the scope of work to be com leted and/or goods to be provided. We encourage all interested parties to ask questions to ena e I Propos TV be on equal terms. f. Any inquiries or requests for explan n regard City irements should be made to Amanda Beilfuss Hof FZ�(70 t�e chasing Agent via e-mail promptly � g g(abeilfuss@fayetteville-ar.gov) ph .575. No oral interpretation or clarifications will be given as to eanin of ' y part equest for proposal. All questions, clarifications, and requests, o er wit,14 answers, if ill be provided to all firms via written addendum. Names ofubmi' ny clarifications, or requests will not be disclosed until after a t is i e. g. At the discretion of the Ci r more s'Fnay be asked for more detailed information before final rankingof the fir m a more oral interviews. h. Any information p flvidO herei in to assist the Proposer in the preparation of proposals necessary to p l� resp f1is RFP. The RFP is designed to provide qualified Proposers with sufficient siV,W(brma submit proposals meeting minimum specifications and/or test require n s ut is not in ded to limit a RFP's content or to exclude any relevant or essential data. i. �psers irrevocably consent that any legal action or proceeding against it under, arising out of or eany manner relating to this Contract shall be controlled by Arkansas law. Proposer hereby xpressly and irrevocably waives any claim or defense in any said action or proceeding based on any alleged lack of jurisdiction or improper venue or any similar basis. The successful Proposer shall not assign the whole or any part of this Contract or any monies due or to become due hereunder without written consent of City of Fayetteville. In case the successful Proposer assigns all or any part of any monies due or to become due under this Contract, the Instrument of assignment shall contain a clause substantially to the effect that it is agreed that the City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 11 of 21 right of the assignee in and to any monies due or to become due to the successful Proposer shall be subject to prior Dens of all persons, firms, and corporations for services rendered or materials supplied for the performance of the services called for in this contract. k- The successful Proposer's attention is directed to the fact that all applicable Federal and State laws, municipal ordinances, and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over the services shall apply to the contract throughout, and they will be deemed to be included in the contract as though written out in full herein. The successful Proposer shall keep himself/herself fully informed of all laws, ordinances and regulations of the Federal, State, and municipal governments or authorities in any manner affecting those engaged or employed in providing these qKvices or in any way affecting the conduct of the services and of all orders and decrees of bod<NNribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over same. If any discrepancy or inconsi jN should be discovered in these Contract Documents or in the specifications herein referre relation to any such law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree, s/he shall herewith repo me in writing to the City of Fayetteville. M � o � o G � G � P o CO No T.J ES ON NEXT PAGE Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 12 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement SECTION B: Scope of Services and General Information 1. INTRODUCTION: The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as "the City", is requesting proposals from qualified firms with experience in writing historic context statements, performing historic property surveys, and facilitating citizen involvement/participation to prepare a Historic Context Statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods in the City of Fayetteville, as described in the following Scope of Work. It is the intent of the City of Fayetteville to select a single fir team to accomplish the services outlined in this Request for Proposals. (J'� 2. COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOOD BACKGROUND: The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is located across the Boston Range of t i er Ozark Plateau in Northwest Arkansas. It is the county seat of Washington County. The City e to the University of Arkansas, which is located just outside the Downtown area. The City is n 55 square miles in area with a population of 95,230 according to the 2021 American Comm urvey estimations, making it the second largest city in Arkansas. �� Fayetteville has a rich cultural history. The town $28 on that had previously been set aside for the western Cherokee NatioOodayy `�aQsuncled `Cher he I been hunted by the Osage and Quapaw tribes. During the Civil war enja Culloc been Confederate forces under his command to burn all the commercials,V'871 cant houses in Fayetteville. Very few structures survived or are preseZ;ille does have a wealth of historic structures from the late 19th centut t rough r y representing vernacular materials and styles. Agricultural prod ti a sig Pf� onomy from the post -Civil War era through WWII, and the Unive rka �stae first public university in Arkansas, has also been a significant cont ibutor o the�lo�conomy and to population growth. Faculty in the university's School of Architect�Fcula sign, n� qd for famed alum and faculty member Fay Jones, are well known for residential woklqo7e' University Heights neighborhood described for this project.^ On March 1, 1979 thA i'ommission was created as a group of devoted local citizens concerned with prpD 9Aric an ding the City's unique historic and cultural resources. The Commission hilitate the ntification, evaluation, preservation, restoration, protection, and enhancement bf Vtorical, cultural, and archaeological interests. The City of Fayetteville currently has 69 Historic on the National Register and has an array of National Register Historic Districts and neight associations with an eye on preservation. With the Citywide Heritage & Historic Pr on Master Plan underway and expected to be complete by summer 2023, the Commission is :, looilliliI additional projects to meet the plan goals, including the identification and protection of historic properties. The Black Heritage Preservation Commission was established on September 7, 2021. The purpose of this Commission is to recognize, acknowledge, protect and preserve historical Black Structures and Cemeteries in honor of the vision, accomplishment, and perseverance of Fayetteville's early Black families and individuals and the churches and other structures they built. Another Purpose of this Commission is City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 13 of 21 the creation of Black Historical Markers to recognize the struggles and achievements of our Black citizens to promote diversity and equality for all Fayetteville residents and to oppose discrimination against any person in Fayetteville. In June 2023 the Commission will be celebrating the unveiling of a historical marker and street naming honoring Nelson Hackett. The University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods are located directly to the west of the University of Arkansas main campus in Fayetteville. The approximate borders of the neighborhoods are Cleveland/Wedington Drive to the north, Razorback Road and Garland Avenue to the east, Nettleship Street to the south, and Sang Avenue to the west (see Attachment F). The Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, hereinafter referred to as "AHPP", conducted a site visit in 2017 and followed 'th a letter recommending an architectural survey and noting the potential importance of early farfr+` ses and houses with connections to faculty from the University of Arkansas. The neighborhoods co prised a total of 414 parcels and 389 structures in 2021, with at least 253 or 65% of the structure greater than 50 years old, according to public records. This project has had strong advocates for the past several years with the rrence of the Historic District Commission. Due to development pressure, low housing sup�V igh demand, and a rapid increase in enrollment at the University of Arkansas, this neighbor he is at risk for redevelopment. Approximately 1,800 additional students were admit to the Univ.' � it y of Arkansas in 2022, and student housing complexes on available parcels near ther_ n cam re re larly being submitted for development review. Additionally, homes ip tfilip Univer ghts orhood are increasingly becoming investment properties used for sho i ri rent niveC ' rkansas athletics and events have become a year-round draw. Large r ial strueN s are b 'nstructed between Razorback Road and Markham Hill, putting histo uctur s titular cise on large lots — at high risk for redevelopment and removal of the r ing histolmc ructu rticularly those owned as investment properties. Compounding that pr is the of zo ections for the historic structures in the neighborhood. P o G 3. SCOPE OF WORK: G� J J �) The purpose of this project is t e a frarrt� k for researching and documenting historic resources in two Fayetteville, Arkansas ne borho s," niversity Heights and Haskell Heights, in the form of a historic context statemeKI This docu t ould serve to support city staff, city commissioners, and property owners in th i?' f its 1� y and protect historic resources in these neighborhoods. The primary intent of is I t is n surveying resources and engaging residents in the process of establishing a I I o inance dlstifCi while supporting the preparation of National Register nominations (one of which, t VAnderson House, was recently submitted for consideration), including a Multiple Propert fission to the National Register of Historic Places (please see National Register Bulletin 16B, "Howomplete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form" at ht w.n s. ov sub ects nationalre ister u load NRB16B-Com fete. df for more information). Thi roject is also intended to help produce knowledge about development patterns, historical trends, and significant architectural features in the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. Without compiling the information needed to establish this historic context statement, individuals would be required to complete their own research and city staff and commissioners would not have a basis for future considerations for such historic neighborhoods. While the final scope of services will be negotiated with the selected consultant, the City's baseline expectations include the following: City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 14 of 21 Identify and assess the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods' history, including ties to the University of Arkansas and early farms. b. Identify key themes and periods of history for both neighborhoods. c. Establish clear neighborhood boundaries to assist with future surveys or policy proposals. d. Conduct research using primary and secondary sources, including resources at the University of Arkansas Special Collections Library, as available. e. Recommend a communications strategy to reach and engage stakeholders. Utilize a ilable and existing resources and organizations focusing on the project neighborhoods. f. In collaboration with City staff, design collateral materials including web an Tal resources in support of the project. g. Identify, describe, and implement a comprehensive strategy an dology for community involvement, including development of a key stakeholder list. h. Develop a list of historic ethnic and cultural i ences or in iti d a s associated with the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. 4 4. QUALIFICATIONS: The identified project lead must meet th etar �e Interior' �essional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of ' or rc ectu ory'. These qualifications, which set specific minimum education exp . nce requi nts, can be found online at: htt s: www.n s. ov articles s s ards uals Attachment G). Respondents mu,t articulate in their proposal h esi project leieets these minimum qualifications. ,_ ti Cn 5. TENTATIVE PROJECT TIMELINE WJ14QPPDEAMINES: July 15, 2023 CZ rt rly re to AHPP August 15, 2023 A6, AHPP de or Consultant to be under contract September 14, 2Pr }e ate presented to Historic District Commission (HDC) Septemb ol� 3 Proje�( update presented to Black Heritage Preservation Commission BHPC 0 15, 2023 Quarterly report due to AHPP em er 1, 2023 AHPP deadline for Consultant to begin work January/February 2024 First draft of context statement reviewed by HDC and BHPC March 11, 2024 First draft of context statement submitted to AHPP April 2024 April 15, 2024 April 29, 2024 City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 15 of 21 Final draft of context statement reviewed by HDC and BHPC Quarterly report due to AHPP Final draft of context statement submitted to AHPP June 3, 2024 Final invoice submitted to City of Fayetteville July 15, 2024 Final report submitted to AHPP 6. PROPOSAL FORMAT: The proposal shall contain all sections listed herein and shall respond fully to all requirements of the RFP. Statement should be no more than twenty-five (25) pages; single sided, standard readable, print on standard 8.5X11 pages. Proposers shall also submit a three (3) page (maximum) executive summary. The following items will not count toward the page limitations: appendix, cover sheet, 3-page executive summary, resumes (resumes shall be no more than 1 page per person), and forms provided Kt e City for completion: _^ Part I — Letter of Interest: Provide a letter of interest signed by an auth 3 consultant representative. Provide the names, offices, email addresses, and phone ers for all key Consultant staff proposed to be involved in the project. The Proposa I identify in which office(s) the majority of the work will occur. Acknowledge all issued a�a. Inclusion of all the items indicated above will constitute a passing score for this sectiN&ge maximum). Part II — Consultant/Staff Qualifications: The Proposal shall incl company profile outlining the company's history and philosophy. This sectIII lso pro ea rief biography of key individuals proposed to be assigned to the project with phasi desi ated Project Manager. The Project Manager should be the individV4Wducting hO -to- a ities on this project. Each individual's proposed position / re �lbility Ne indi Special emphasis shall be provided to the individual's backg , qualif s, and ence on related and/or similar projects. The team must meet rofes na alifica andards for Historic Preservation set by the Secretary of the I (Attach D). At least three (3) client r e es, i g n "cription of past working relationship, and current contact info sha listed for h key individual proposed. Any applicable professional licenses o ertific hallkd for each individual. All known sub- Consultants needed to complete the rW individ r irm) must be identified. Inclusion of all the items indicated above with a I pre a of each team member's competency and successful past experience with re ed an ilar projects, to include at least three positive client references for c key indw I, will constitute a passing score for this section (5-pages maximum). O !� Part III ,ymageentroach: The Proposal shall include a discussion regarding the Consul tended management approach on this project, including coordination and m on of project schedule, cost, scope, communications, quality, resources and other gement issues that the Consultant feels should be addressed (4-pages maximum). I�Frt IV 9 — Related Project Experience: The Proposal shall include up to three (3) profiles of similar rvices in comparable organizations. Past projects must have been completed in the last ten (10) years and shall include: project name, project time frame, client name, and a detailed description that clearly justifies why the Consultant's past experience is applicable to this RFP. For each project, indicate which proposed key individuals worked on the project and describe the role/work they performed and their levels of involvement (5-pages maximum per project/6-pages maximum total). City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 16 of 21 Part V — State and Federal Grant Guidelines: Each Consultant team must familiarize themselves with all grant requirements as required by the CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT and must meet the minimum standards outlined in the appendices listed below in all work product produced. Please note this grant is subject to all rules and regulations pursuant to the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund Manual. See attachments: Attachment A: Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) Grant Agreement i. Attachment B: (Appendix A — Historic Resources Survey and Documentation) ii. Attachment C: (Appendix E - Other Consultant Contracts and Products) iii. Attachment D: (Appendix F - The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Prese Professional Qualification Standards) Part VI — Detailed Draft and Scope of Services: This will form the basis of th of Services to be included in the Contract and be given the most weight in evalua d scoring of the Proposals. The Proposal shall include (6 pages maximum): i. Detailed description of the Consultant's proposed sc �f_ rvices (including specific tasks and deliverables) to accomplish the Objectives iin Section 3 of the RFP; ii. List any additional documents or re our es neces to complete the Work; iii. Describe your competitive adva age rid valed se s and benefits that would be provided to the City. Thi * ZtM lud ov roaches previously utilized to assist communities deve pheir si storic ��xt statements, and any unique challenges and how yoeu� v iv. Any optional, reco%Wnded se proposed Scop in achievinat% .es of se excluded from the Consultant's co ' e y the Consultant to be valuable aspects y1pes of information, data, and assistance needed isultant's proposed scope of services (including specific plish the Objectives specified in Section 3 of the RFP; nts or resources necessary to complete the Work. II — lEt-Schedt?l+� Phe Consultant shall provide a project schedule, directly associated or ltant's proposed Scope of Services (2-pages maximum). All project timelines must he ms of grant agreement outlined in the CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 (see iment A) and shown in Section B.S, The City will submit quarterly reports to the AHPP ng programmatic and fiscal progress of work on forms to be provided by AHPP. timeline must include the AHPP final deadline of August 01, 2024. 7. PRICE PROPOSAL: Proposers shall provide a Flat Fee Price Proposal. Include a detailed cost breakdown including estimated personnel, exclusions, and all labor costs, expenses, overhead, and profit. Provide a payment schedule based on project milestones/deliverables. These deliverables will be confirmed during contract negotiations with the chosen consultant. The Price Proposal will serve as a basis for scoring. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 17 of 21 The Price Proposal will be scored as follows (1-page maximum): (Lowest Proposal Price/ Proposal Price) x 15 Lowest Price will receive a score of 15 Example: Proposal Price A = $25,000, Lowest Proposal Price = $20,000 ($20,000/$25,000) x 15 = Score of 12 points The City will review all submissions to determine compliance with required elements listed in this RFP. Submissions may be judged non -responsive and removed from further consideration if any of the following occur: a. The proposal is not received on time in accordance with the terms of this RFP. b. The proposal does not follow the specified format. c. The information is incomplete or insufficient. V d. The quality of the proposal contained in the Submittal does not meet the expectations or criteria set forth by the City. 8. SELECTION CRITERIA: The following criteria will be used by the City to evaluate and score include sufficient information to allow the City to hor ughly e proposal submitted is not required to be ranke b e sel awarded to the most qualified firm, per the on crit�e the selection committee. Following the eval of the sals, t that the top-ranking firm(s) make an oral r tatpr inter they will take place in Fayetteville, Ark raj N00 sin II be ;pave proposals. Proposers shall 4te and score the proposal. Each c�om?;e. The contract may be ased on the evaluation of tion Committee may request fQ . If presentations are necessary, he Purchasing Division. 1) 10% Qualifications ' ti n t ific P ao be Performed: Information reflecting qualifications u t, p nef'l and project team. Indicated specialized experience and tech ompekAoof the firm in connection with the type and complexity of the equiOKS)bcontractors, if used, shall be listed with information on their organiz n. 2) 20% Experie AofteSerend Capacity for Performance: Information reflecting the names, tl , an ations (including experience and technical competence) of the mac , rsonnel i ed to this specific project. `Pr^ oJsed Method of Doing Work: A proposed work plan (description of how the project would be conducted as well as other facts concerning approach to scope) indicating methods and schedules for accomplishing scope of work. Include with this the amount of work presently underway. 4) 10% Past Performance: Previous evaluations shall be considered a significant factor. If previous evaluations with the City are not available, the professional firm's past performance records with City and others will be used, including quality of work, timely performance, diligence, and any other pertinent information. Firm will provide a list of similar jobs performed and person whom the City can contact for information. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 18 of 21 Sj 30% Cost/Fees: Complete costs and fees as described in this RFP and for delivery of the proposal including fiscal feasibility and financial stability. All fees shall be clearly identified with RFP response and be itemized as much as possible. 9. CONTRACT FORMATION: If the negotiation produces mutual agreement, a contract will be considered for approval by the City of Fayetteville City Council. If negotiations with the highest-ranking Proposer fail, negotiations may be initiated with the next highest-ranking Proposer until an agreement is reached. The City reserves the right to reject all offers and end the process without executing a contract. 10. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION: D'l The following documents are included with this solicitation as additional information- v a. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23 CLG 02 b. Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation (Appe of Grant Agreement) c. Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products A A ( PP��DR Grant Agreement) ) d- Attachment D: The Secretary of the Interior' storic PreseAati Professional Qualification ant Standards Information (Appendix F of Grrment) ��• e. Attachment E: Detailed Information f ary of erior' sional qualifications standards for performing work in the 'His '�r'Are gal History' P tl rY f. Attachment F: Maps of Project (B�o i ery g. Attachment G: Secretary of l rior's PrairSsiona i ications Standards G P o CO A, No O �i (7t( CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE Q City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 19 of 21 City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement SECTION C: Signature Submittal 1. DISCLOSURE INFORMATION Proposer must disclose any possible conflict of interest with the City of Fayetteville, including, but not limited to, any relationship with any City of Fayetteville employee. Proposer response must disclose if a known relationship exists between any principal or employee of your firm and any City of Fayetteville employee or elected City of Fayetteville official. If, to your knowledge, no relationship exists, this should also be stated in your response. Failure t ose such a relationship may result in cancellation of a purchase and/or contract as a result of your resll�i This form must be completed and returned in order for your bid/proposal to be eligible for considera, PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS, AS IT APPROPRIATELY APPLI�&OUR FIRM: X 1) NO KNOWN RELATIONSHIP EXISTS 2) RELATIONSHIP EXISTS (Please expl n): 1 I certify that; as an officer of this organization, a the1e� letter horization, am duly authorized to certify the information provided herein is a and trJZCAd my ation shall comply with all State and Federal Equal Opportunity and Non.Discr' ion r mPtirnents apci� ditions of employment. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated § - 0 e�ntrac a es and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel dur* time h they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25- f at a ,W during contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the c ratted p Entity in writing. 2. PRIMARY CONTACT INFOR ,� At the discretion of the Cit , o r mo may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking g of the firms, which fill include or terviews. NOTE: Each Proposer shall submit to the City a primary contact name, a -mail s, and phone number (preferably a cell phone number) where the City selection committee can c�Tpr cl rification or interview via telephone. Corporateof Firm: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Primary Con ' ct: Emily Reed Title of Primary Contact Principal Phone#1 (cell preferred): 737-587-5824 E-Mail Address: emily.reed@stantec.com City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 20 of 21 Phone#2: 512-831-6204 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDA Acknowledge receipt of addenda for this invitation to bid, request for proposal, or request for qualification by signing and dating below. All addendums are hereby made a part of the bid or RFP documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein. Proposers/Bidders should indicate their receipt of same in the appropriate blank listed herein. Failure to do so may subject Contractor to disqualification. ADDENDUM NO. SIGNATURE AND PRINTED NAME DATE ACKNOWLEDGED FP 23-07 Addendum 1 yMAIM Emily Reed. Principal 05/19/2023 v 4. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: As an interested party on this project, you are required to provide debarment/suspen i ification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order- Certification can be done by eting and signing this form. �`�► Federal Executive Order (E-0.) 12549 "Debarment and ension" r it that all contractors receiving, individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub-recipien c tify th rga at ion and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, ale red ineli voluc excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the alGove t. � Signature certifies that neither you nor your princi resen arred, ` Lnded, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded fro ' Nicip on his tr on by any federal department or agency. Questions regarding this form shoul ed tTity o tTeville Purchasing Division. NAME OF COMPANY: Stantec Cons ting s In&* Co PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 8401 Shoal CrebtANZI., S4itk4fiD, Austin, TX 78757 MAILING ADDRESS: 8401 Sh 100, Austin, TX 78757 v TAX ID #: 11-2167170 AR. SECRETARY OF STATE FILING #: 100188432 PHONF:512-831- 04 E-MAIL: emil"estantec.com SIGNATURE: (� 4 r PRINTED NAME: Emily Reed FAX- 737-307-8499 TITLE: Principal DA i F : 05/22/2023 City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Page 21 of 21 Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT Grant Number 23-CLG-02 This agreement is entered into between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, hereinafter referred to as AHPP. AHPP agrees to provide a grant in the amount of $20,370 for the purpose of funding consultants' services to complete a context statement of the University -Haskell Heights neighborhood and expensed related to the attendance of approved trainings by HDC officials and staff. THIS GRANT IS NOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE PURPOSE, OBJECTIV ' SCOPE OF WORK HEREIN DEFINED. 1. SCOPE OF WORK TASK A. The City will fund consultants' services for the con a context statement of the University -Haskell Heights neigh S20.000 is designated for this acc) TASK B. The City will fund approved tr el and t ii L�xpens HDC ff commissioners and sta. * , S370 is designated for th vity. O 11. TIME. FRAME of AGREE Cj This agreement will Ma &1 ,'2023, any all extend until September 30, 2024. No grant funds shall b xpen__�he C4tiLA its sub -grantees or assigns after September 30, 2024. No w an) t39k will be undertaken, continued, or carried out after Scptc b 024. III. PAYMENTS �ej A. Payments duds u grant agreement will be made upon receipt of invoices reque 1 Aeimburser of expenses paid by the City within the time frame of this ag e invoice received after August 1, 2024, will be processed. �o Payments under this grant agreement are conditioned on successful completion of the tasks described in the scope of work and submission of deliverables as described in section IV. D. The grant award is conditioned on the use of the grant funds to accomplish the tasks described in the scope of work. Funds will only be disbursed to achieve the purposes described in the scope of work. The grantee retains no interest in grant funds for which an invoice has not been submitted to AHPP by August 1, 2024. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 E. The availability of funds under this grant award is dependent on the National Park Service's 2023-2024 Historic Preservation Fund award to the AHPP. IV. MILESTONES A. University -Haskell Heights Historic Context Statement l . The City will be under contract for consultant's services for the context by Augu 15, 2023. 2. The consultant will begin work on the context by November 1, 2023. 3. A first draft of the context statement will be submitted to AHPP by Mar t924. 4. The final draft of the context statement will be submitted to AIIPP by 1 29, 2024. 5. Upon AHPP's approval of the final draft, the City will submit an i> or the full cost of the task by August 1, 2024. V. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES AHPP staff agrees to make periodic reviews (Mh project ssess practices and products. AHPP reserves the right to enfo ce proce s outlil d in this contract. AI IPP agrees to make available advi • unscl ry t lish the objectives and to render compensation upon i "`L':l ithi a onabl • Me. VI. REPORTING RE UIREMEN G A. The City will sub erly dct ogrammatic and fiscal progress of work on forms t vid PP on: Period _ •_ �+ Date Due 0 March- 3 Jul 15, 2023 Jul -Se 023 October 15, 2023 be -Dece 23 January15, 2024 _4 Aril 15, 2024 it-Ju c Jul 15. 2024 Jul -Sc t er, 2024 October 15, 2024 FINAL October 31 2024 lop , qT e report of April 15, 2023, will be accompanied by a timeline for completion of the project and spend down of project funds by the end of the grant term. C. If changes to the grant agreement - e.g.: scope of work, products, budgets, etc. -are required, then the City must submit a written request detailing proposed changes and wait for written approval from AHPP before proceeding. D. No funds will be disbursed if grant reporting is more than two weeks delinquent. E. Failure to submit grant reports within one month of the date required herein shall be Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 grounds for cancellation of the grant at the discretion of AHPP. F. The City will submit a final project report detailing all completed projects and including copies of all publications as per the requirements of this agreement no later than October 31.2024. G. The City will promptly notify AHPP if it will be unable to expend the awarded funds within the grant period. VI1. REQUIRED TRAINING Disbursement of funds under this agreement is contingent on attendan designated representative of the City at a training session on grant stration requirements held by AHPP. This requirement may be waived a iscretion of AHPP if the City's grants administrator has attended a gran c ' tration training session within the two years prior to the execution of this g�greement. Vill. COMPLIANCE G A. All products and projects funded * rr fund - com the applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Stan The de: 1 ards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2 ards define entification, 3) Standards and Guidelines f luatio 4 tan Guidelines for Registration, 5) Standar Guid 'nes or His Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for A ral * gin cumcntation, 7) Standards and Guidelines for Ar ical entation, tandards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, ) Stan nd G nes for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, and 10) Hi servatfessional Qualification Standards. See Appendices A-E. nn- �GJ B. PROJECT E U ION A TRACT REQUIREMENTS: All projects, sub - grants and in� c unded through this grant agreement must be carried out in accoe wi cedures and standards laid out in the applicable appen to this a nt. All work products funded through this grant must meet the ds laid out in the applicable appendices to this agreement. r SEMENTS AND PRESERVATION AGREEMENTS: The City will donate to PP a conservation easement on any property being restored, rehabilitated, or repaired as a part of any project(s) funded in whole or in part by this grant utilizing ten thousand dollars (510,000) or more of funds awarded by AHPP. On such projects involving private properties, it will be the City's responsibility to secure this easement for donation to AHPP before any grant fiords are released. The City will ensure that the owner(s) of property being restored, rehabilitated, or repaired as part of any project utilizing at least one dollar (S 1) but less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) of Historic Preservation Fund monies awarded by AHPP enters into a five- year preservation agreement concerning that property with AHPP before grant funds Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 IX. are released. On such projects involving City property, the City and any other parties holding an ownership interest in such property must enter into a five-year preservation agreement with AHPP before funds will be released. D. All activities pursuant to this Agreement shall be in compliance with the requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; (78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. §§2000d et seq.); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, (87 Stat. 394; 29 U.S.C. §794); the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 9 Stat. 728; 42 U.S.C. §§6101 et seq.); the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 § 12101); the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. §§4151 et seq); and wit her federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination on grounds of rac sexual orientation, national origin, disabilities, religion, age, or sex. A. In all hiring or employment made possible by or resulting from ards, the City (1) will not discriminate against any employee or applicantployment because of race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin, and (2) a affirmative action to ensure that applicants are emply�and that to ees are treated during employment, without regard to their race o r, relig' , a or national origin. This requirement applies to, but is not imited totVireci owin • loyment promotion, demotion, or transfer; ent aadvertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or of r rms o ensati selection for training, including apprentice i he ' its su ees will comply with all applicable statutes and Exe order n qual ent opportunity and grant awards will be governe be pro ' ions, as imP ted by, but not limited to, Department of the In, n n)rolici * lish �i3JCFR 17. P MANAGEMENT AND BW GUI `LS A. Certified Local Gov Sent gr funded by the National Park Service Historic Preservation Ads Grants in i FDA number 15.904. All policies and procedures Depa the Interior, the National Park Service, and all other Federal reg�hons c Mfg expenditures of Federal funds must be followed by AHP a 'fall sub-gra cipients. All grant projects will be administered by AHPP anAlt � 4 in accordance with the Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual. The be found online here: ��<L a.// W W W.11 J. 'l1V/JLIV L:\.l J/IIIJLVI IL. II L.J{.1 vLiLIVI11UllU/ IIIJLVIIL.- IVJL:I VQLIVII-ILIIIU- ant-manual.htm The City must maintain efficient and effective accountability and control of all funds received and expended under a sub grant from AHPP. q2 B. Federal Award Identification Number, total award amount, award date, and a copy of the NPS grant agreement with AHPP will be provided to subgrantee with this signed grant agreement. This subgrant award may be subject to additional conditions as required by the National Park Service. C. A City employee or paid contractor will be responsible for fulfilling all Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 responsibilities assumed by the City under this grant agreement. D. The City will promptly disclose any conflict of interest to AHPP in accordance with 2 CFR §200.112. E. Indirect costs are not eligible for reimbursement under this award. F G The City will maintain all grant -related records at the City offices in accordance with its normal recordkeeping procedures. ", A_ The City hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the regulat guidelines and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptance* Federal funds for this federally assisted project. The following Fe are incorporated by reference into this Agreement (full text can d http://w.rw.ecfr.pov): 2) Administrative Requirements: 2 CPR Pat-1 200 - Uni%rm Admrr ' tr ive Rey Audit Requirements Jor Feder A►►-ardv, W Q Determination of Allow c bVsts: '�� 2 CF'R Part 200 - Uni dnr' t-e Rey Audit Requirements ' edera ►► s. sub, 3) Audit] 2 CPR J ,Kicies, use of attons ost Principles, and Cost Principles, and Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requhements Iader4 dv, Subpart F. 4) Code of Fc N ulatio QuIatory Requirements: 2 CF 2 & 1401, " o rnment-wide Requirements for a Drug -Free WoZ�l k "; ('R 180 &�"Non-Procurement Debarment and Suspension", "iously located at 43 CFR §42, "Government wide Debarment and uspension (Non -Procurement)"; Q43 tFR 1 art 18,. New Restrictions on Lobbying"; 2 CFR Part 175, "Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000"; FAR Clause 52.203-12, Paragraphs (a) and (h), Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions; and 2 CFR Pa►-t 25, System for Award Management (www.SAM.gov) and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS). Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 H. Cities that expend $750,000 or more during a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program -specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. §§7501-7507) and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F. 1. The City will comply with Federal competitive procurement requirements for professional services and subcontractors and will provide documentation of such compliance upon request. J. The City will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours prov' f the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. A_ K. Upon completion of the project, the Secretary of the Interior, the - troller General of the United States, AHPP, and/or any of their duly autho ' entatives shall have access for the purpose of financial or programmatic a rid examination any books, documents, papers and records of City that a c cnt to the grant at all reasonable times during the period of rot ti provi CFI §200.334, for at least three (3) years or until all claims r au it fi � ave beVl%solved. L. The City will comply with the r vt 'dns of .C. § obbbying with Appropriated Moneys, as am y P I w 107 ov. 2, 2002. "No part of the money appropriated b nactm t Con all, in the absence of express authorization by Cong a used ' ct y or in to pay for any personal service, advcrtisemc ram one, rintcd or written matter, or other device, intended ed t ence in a inner a Member of Congress, a jurisdiction, or an icial ooveWq9q, to favor, adopt, or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legisla ie , ratifi rf, policy, or appropriation, whether before or after the introdu io y bil ure, or resolution proposing such legislation. law, ratification, poll or appron; but this shall not prevent officers or employees ofA UVed Stat of its departments or agencies from communicating to any sue rie or , at his request, or to Congress or such official, through the er o annels. requests for legislation, law, ratification. policy, or ap ations whi ey deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public bu n r from making any communication whose prohibition by this section igh the opinion of the Attorney General, violate the Constitution or interfere th the conduct of foreign policy, counter -intelligence, intelligence, or national 5 curity activities. Violations of this section shall constitute violations of section 1352(a) of title 3 L" In addition to the above, the related restrictions on the use of appropriated funds found in Div. F, §402 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-161) also apply. M. The City will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 113858 "Strengthening Buy American Preferences for Infrastructure Projects" that may apply to the project that is the subject of this award. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 X. PUBLICATIONS, WORK PRODUCT AND PUBLIC INFORMATION A. An acknowledgment of National Park Service and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program support must be made in connection with the publication of any material based on, or developed under, any activity supported by Historic Preservation Fund grant funds. This acknowledgment shall be in the form of a statement as follows: "This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkans No Heritage. A»v opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expr in this material are those of the author(v) and do not necessarily reflect the f the Department of the Interior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. " B. Press releases, publications, and other public dissemination of in ion by the City concerning a project made possible by this grant shall ackn ational Park Service, Department of the interior, Arkansas Historic PreAllion Program, and Division of Arkansas Heritage grant sup ftett.� C. Posters, brochures, program literature nd publi a 4vill in the following statement: This program receive !Erna ssist identification and protection of historic properties. r• Titl the CA its Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehahilitat ct of�9 d the scrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S 'brtmenWe int •dhibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, nat' n origin isa rlih� or its federally assisted programs. If j�ou telioJibu hat, disc d against in amp program, activity, or facilit) rilx• ve, or i y esire further information, please write to: Office for qual nityl%ld nal Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 2024,, n� D_ Drafts of all publica s, repo moo -visual material, and other material subject to distribution, lic lion, or di must be submitted to AHPP for approval prior to production b ration, display or general distribution. E. Publi t. , reports,�o-visual material, and other material subject to distribution, pu iftiwa'f, or display will be made accessible to the widest audience possible in co ce with Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 12132 et q.). For more information, guidance is available from the Department of Justice, vil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section. . The City grants the State of Arkansas and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement as complied or produced by the City, its contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. Any data, analysis, methodology, or Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 other information that formed the basis of the work product funded by this grant award shall be made available to the AHPP and the NPS on request. The City shall ensure that these rights are secured by any sub -award or sub -agreement funded under this grant award. G. All Geographic Information Systems data produced or collected as a part of this grant funded project must comply with the NPS Cultural Resource Spatial Data Transfer Standards. Please contact the AHPP for more information. XI. DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS A. Any development project funded through this award must obtain appr 'a permits from the City, including approval from the local Historic District ssion, if the project falls within a local ordinance district and the Commissio Jurisdiction. B. Work funded by this grant award cannot be claimed under eral Historic Preservation Tax Incentives Program. C'Dd any po tia ubgrantccs should consult with their attorneys or financial •rs aboi rot r consequences of this award or its conditions on project nancing.e) z C. Approvals of project work by r this t rojcc * N'Ccpcndcntofandmay not be substituted for the revi ap f any or matter under any other AHPP or National Pa e ice p r�rn. XIL LIMITATION OF LIA �V AHPP assumes no res nsibili resp( accidents, illness or claims arising out of any work performed unde rants tu project. The City is expected to take necessary steps to insu i nd its nel and students and to comply with the applicable local, State, o 'e oral s- andards, including those issued pursuant to the National Occupatj bal Safety and th Act of 1970 (see 20 CFR Part 1910). XIII. PROJECT CA _ I I A Appro �ects may be canceled for one or more of the following reasons: �ftc City requests project cancellation. `The City fails to pursue project work in a timely fashion or fails to adequately pursue project objectives in a manner likely to ensure completion of the grant project or substantial spend -down of the grant award within the grant term. D. Project work or project administration is found not to be in conformance with conditions as stated in the grant agreement and appendices. Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 XIV. AMENDMENTS This agreement may be amended upon written request and approval by both parties_ XV. APPENDICES The following appendices are hereby incorporated into this agreement by this reference. � o � o Cj � G � P o CO �C No Q 9 Attachment A: CLG Program Grant Agreement 23-CLG-02 SIGNATURES Scott Kaufman V City of Fay iIIZ Signature Agency Director, AHPP State Historic Preservation Officer 1100 North Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 v Lioneld Tordan Name (printed) GMavor%t Title O 04/04/ Date n. Cj Date K.J � G � Q' O NO Q ti to Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation APPENDIX A: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation The production of surveys of historic structures, sites, etc., funded under this grant agreement will meet the following minimum standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), request for qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contract for su nd documentation services funded under this agreement includes dut' tasks as described in this appendix. �j 2. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RFQ. RFP,r bid funded solicitation for a project under this agreeme prior to publication of the announcement or request for rev approval and will not publish such announcement o quest until m nts been received from AHPP. A copy of the final annou er -nt or and roof of its publication or transmission ied p)� nal wi rovided to AHPP. ` 3. The City will submit o of VT sed c and the name and vita of the contractor selec servi s t nded is agreement to AHPP for review, prior to a ion ofe� contract, ill not execute the contract until approva a n fro . A copy of the final executed contractrovi HPP. 4. The City will c �e AH �Nvonal Register staff to consult on the advisability f He sit y work in the proposed area, proposed boundaries f he surve , etc., prior to engaging a contractor for survey work ftde�under th' ement. 5. TheQwill at the contractor responsible for survey and 'fimentatio ices funded under this agreement meets the Secretary of rutl�Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (see Appendix F) in istory and/or Architectural History and/or, when applicable, Archaeology or QHistoric Landscape Architecture. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITES l . Prior to commencing any work under the contract, any contractor who has not attended a training on the required procedures for historic sites surveys taught by the AHPP National Register Survey staff within five (5) years prior to the survey initiation date must attend a training class on the procedures required for historic site survey. This one -day class, at the offices of AHPP, will train the contractor in the proper and thorough completion of Arkansas Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation Architectural Resources Forms, photography requirements, mapping, and compilation of the finished product. 2. Prior to commencing any work under the contract, the Contractor, regardless of the date of his or her last training, must contact the AHPP National Register Survey staff to determine whether changes to required historic site survey procedures have changed since the contractor last attended a training. If the AHPP National Register Survey staff determines that the Contractor attendance at an additional training class is advisable, the contractor m �• attend a training class on the procedures required for historic sites s prior to the initiation of any fieldwork under the contract. 3. The contractor must comply with the standards and proced forth in the AHPP Survey Manual in carrying out the contract work ompletion of the final product. 4. The contractor must design and c lete the su y d produce a survey report in accordance with the Nat na Park S ist is Preservation Fund Grants Manual Chapter 6 Sec ton d 3b r d as applicable and the Secretary of the �Stan r Id on for Intensive Surveys (see at hat s://x,x s. ov/it is /locals11, gj-ch studs O.htm). The survey report sho�KV-mirrii4qNntain Ilowing elements: • Sury t�odol • A itor' xt s the area surveyed • ove of histon source types within the area V rveye • M tng thn aries of the area surveyed • stin a es or other location information of properties su yed, r numbers supplied by AHPP, and data relevant t;�evalu National Register eligibility, such as date of o0const Ma , property condition and architectural integrity, vacant IoP�'r . • ocating properties by resource number and address • Language collected on Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms Qshould be provided with the survey report in an organized, _ sortable, searchable, digital format, such as a database, spreadsheet, GIS data, or similar data file. 5. The contractor must complete an Arkansas Architectural Resources Form and provide site plans for each resource in the field. 6. The contractor must provide, on the Arkansas Architectural Resources Form, information specific to the property for which the survey form is prepared AMm t■nent B: F6ttl W P�o Swvey mW Dototm■enMillion summarizing its history and any obvious changes to the building that appear to have occurred since its construction. 7. The contractor will take color digital photographs of each resource in the field. At the very minimum the photographs should show all facades of cach building. In addition, representative streetscape photographs will be provided by the Contractor. These photographs will be submitted with the final survey product in both electronic and print form. N 8. The contractor will provide UTM coordinates for each property. n� V 9. To ensure efficient production of a quality product and to reducurden of repeated reviews, in projects involving inventory and docu�on of more than 30 properties, the contractor will provide drafts of at�q� 0 completed Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms to the AH �,•,trial Register Survey staff for review prior to completion and su of all Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms. 444PP staff wi cv draft forms and return comments to the contracto it in 14 b da of receipt of the draft forms. +' e) 10. The contractor will provik*P} ics o cilla product or information compiled ncrae c con( r n the course of carrying out the historic site or fo mpl c uding but not limited to archival researc a photohs, to AH request. 11. The cont 11 gr L�vilty, thc of Arkansas, and the United States of America royalt none ive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and dispo f firfany manner and for any purpose without limitation, d orize�(f� fy publication, reproduction or use by others, of all yrightatl _ZCrial first produced or composed under this Agree nt b.Y the co a r, its employees or any individual or concern spe a ' y ehnp assigned to originate and prepare such material. 12 contractoi�t be able to adhere to set deadlines and provide initial and `pleted surveys by the dates set forth in contract documents. Q13. The contractor will provide own transportation and equipment. 14. For resurvey work, a copy of the previous survey form must be attached to the new survey form for each property. 15. The contractor will provide one full -color copy and one digital copy of the final survey report and forms to the City and one full -color printed copy and two digital copies of the survey report and forms to AHPP. Attachment B: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation C. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES 1. AHPP will provide Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms and Ancillary Structures Forms to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 2. AHPP will provide access to survey files and copies of previous survey work as necessary for project completion. 3. AHPP will provide resource numbers to the contractor as necessary for completion. n. 4. AHPP will provide a one -day training class at the AHPP office itttle Rock on the procedures required for historic site surveys. This cl I train the contractor in the proper and thorough completion of Ark rchitectural Resources Forms, photography requirements, mapp' compilation of the finished product. 5. AHPP will provide technical assil &n to the 4tor necessary for project completion. D' O o G 9"9 o Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products APPENDIX E: Other Consultant Contracts and Products All other types of projects funded under this grant agreement will meet the following rnininrurn standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), reques qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contrac ices funded under this agreement includes duties and tasks as de t in this contract and appendix. 2. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RF or other bid announcement for a project funded under this a ent to AIiPP prior to publication of the announcem kor request re ew and will not publish such announcement or reques in1 appro bey received from AHPP or seven (7) busines days hav d sine date on which the proposed announcem ��(guest n reAHPP. A copy of the final announcem fcques roof o 1j�lication or transmission to u . pr s I willided to AHPP. 3. The City wil u mrt a c o any p contract and the name and vita of th o t etor fo funded under this agreement to AHPP ew, execut f the contract, and I not execute the contract unti val ka(� en received from AHPP or seven (7) business da elapse inef the date on which the proposed contract has bee re by copy of the final executed contract will be provided A PP'.. 4. ty�viI `that any contractor engaged for work funded under grce cts the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Historic reservatt ofessional Qualification Standards (see Appendix F) as (� determined in consultation with AHPP. Q 5. The City will ensure that all project work and work products meet all applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" including: 1) Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2) Standards and Guidelines for Identification, 3) Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation, 4) Standards and Guidelines for Registration, 5) Standards and Guidelines for Historical Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation, 7) Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Documentation, 8) Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, 9) Standards and Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, and 10) Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products Standards. B. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITES l . The contractor will ensure that all project work and work products meet all applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" including: 1) Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2) Standards and Guideline. or Identification, 3) Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation, 4) Stand and Guidelines for Registration, S) Standards and Guidelines for ical Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for Architecture Engineering Documentation, 7) Standards and Guidelines f Archeological Documentation, 8) Standards for the Tre of Historic Properties, 9) Standards and Guidelines for the Reha n of Historic Buildings, and 10) Historic Preservation Profess' alification Standards. 2. The contractor will provide c is of any ry w product or information compiled o� erated b t trai e course of carrying out the contr ding imi chival research, and photographs, to on 3. The contractor ,R ant th i , the Arkansas, and the United States of At i a ro -free, non ive and irrevocable license to publish, a an d f in any manner and for any purpo ut li , and t orize or ratify publication, repro lu ion or othT II copyrightable material first produced or compos d is a twit by the contractor, its employees or any individ 1 cem s ally employed or assigned to originate and prepare s materiam 4. ntr%ct he able to adhere to set deadlines as set forth in act S. I The contractor will provide own transportation and equipment. Q 6. The contractor will provide one full -color copy and one digital copy of the work product, as applicable, to the City and one full -color printed copy and two digital copies of the work product, as applicable, to AHPP. 1. AHPP will provide Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms and Ancillary Structures Forms to the contractor as necessary for project completion. Attachment C: Other Consultant Contracts and Products 2. AHPP will provide access to survey tiles and copies of previous survey work as necessary for project completion. 3. Al IPP will provide resource numhcrN to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 4. AHPP will provide access to other AHPP tiles to the contractor as necessary for project completion. AHPP will provide technical assistance to the contractor as necessary for project cornpl OS' • � �o �, � o � o Ci � G � P o CO �C No a, Q 9 Attachment D: The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Information Appendix F: The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards The Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards were defined and officially adopted in 1983 (48 FR 44716. September 29) by the National Park Service. Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards were expanded and revised in 1997 (62 FR 33708, June 20) in response to amendments in the National Historic Preservation Act, but were not formally adopted for federal regulatory purposes. See https://www.doi.gov,"pam/asset- management/historic-preservatioLVM for more information. The 1997 revisions update the professional qualification standards written in 1983 and add definiti s ?) seven other historic preservation disciplines that appear in the National Historic Preservation Act Kjsl The 1997 version also provides guidance on how to measure qualifying credentials that ing in the 1983 Standards. In the 1997 version, this information is provided in a standardize hat provides examples of the academic degrees, work and academic products, and professional a sMtltt would qualify a professional in a particular discipline. Because the 1997 Standards give the clearest description of tILc cuircrit undcrAiftng of what a qualified professional is in each of the disciplines described in the +,sultants tctoric c ation Ac I IPP uses them as guidance on judging the qualifications of contractors i g on p o' dcd by AHPP's CLG rant a reements. It is im ortant to tese agomtend uirements for 8 S P�d� ALL consultants or contractors working on a pru� •c Ic as wel-level. 1� er, each project must contain a person in a lead, responsible project ro the tc xpertisc ` V 'Q G N> K C�i PV.0 ej Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33708 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR professionally credible historic Historic Preservation Professional preservation work. Qualification Standards National Park Service The Standards are not designed to Archeology identify the best or ideal person for any (A) Prehistoric Archeology The Secretary of the Interior's Historic position. The effective application of (B) Historic Archeology Preservation Professional Qualification Architectural History any of these national Standardswill Conservation Standards require the development of a detailed Cultural Anthropology AGENCY: National Park Service, DOI. job description containing additional Curation ACTION: Proposed renaming of and information to suit a particular situation Engineering and need. These Standards do not apply Folklore revisions to "the Secretary of the to ''entry-level'' applicantsor to Historic Architecture Interiors Professional Qualification Historic Landscape Architecture preeminent professionals in the field. Standards." Rather, they outline the minimum Historic Preservation Planninat Historic Preservation ' �, SUMMARY: The National Park Service education and experience and products History (NPS) proposes to rename and revise that together provide an assurance that Sources of Additional Inf i n "the Secretary of the Interior's the applicant, employee, consultant, or Professional Organi Professional Qualification Standards" advisorwiII be abl e to perform which are part of the larger "Secretary competently on thejob and be respected Introduction of the Interior's Standards and within the larger historic preservation Backgroun Gui del i nes for Archeol ogy and H i stori c community. Theid ion, evaluation, Preservation." The statutory authority All responsestothisnoticewill be prot preservation of for the Secretary's development of these summarized as part of the publication of ArpQM portant historic and can be found in sections 101(g), 101(h), the off icial issuanceof the "Secretary's cua properties depends upon the 101 i , and 101 2 A of the National Historic Preservation Professionaljj () �)( )( ) arti ation of all citizens: however, Historic Preservation Act, as amended Qualification Standards.' II comments ain decisions must involve (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). These Standards will also become matt of blic ividu who meet nationally and Guidelines (including the record. ,accept (essional standards in order Professional Qualification Standards) DATES: Comments notice r to a IbiIity in the practi ce of were published in the Federal Register received by Au "it`u9 1997 to W r eservation at the Federal, in 1983 (48 FR44716, September 29) as assured of cons flde�tion. t'Id local levels, aswell as in the the Secretary's best guidance for historic gDDRfiCom veto vlr. bete sector. preservation practice nationally. This Wa�4e' Branch St rlbal, The Secretary of the Interior is remains their preeminent function. andgrams, H e esponsible for establishing standards The Standards are renamed "the PreServices, National Ce for all programs under Departmental Secretary of the Interior's Historic fQ (% al Resblli tewar. I authority. In accordance with this Preservation Professional Qualification a rship Pr r:has, NatiohaFiler responsibility, ''theSecretary of the Standards." This change reflects the fact �e. U �ertment of tha4titerior, Interior's Professional Qualification that the Standards are designed to apply 1849 C S1DW., aton, DC Standards' were developed by the to each discipline as it is practiced in 20240. heenIsm b�.b�&nd National Park Service (NPS) 20 years historic preservation: e.g., in the d r overnigViI t) ailed to 800 ago to ensure that a consistent level of identification, evaluation, o �pitol St�2-343-6004 a.,Suite200, expertisewould beapplied nationally to documentation. registration. and shi gton, 2. Comments may the identification, evaluation, treatment of historic properties. be nt by f or by E documentation, registration, treatment. The proposed rev isionsupdate tt} fail to01� r audQips.gov. and interpretation of historic and standards for the five discipline 1�` FORFORMATIONCONTACT:Mr. archeological resources. included in the 1983 publication �.' The National Historic Preservation •r�ttd, Branch of State, Tribal, add standards for seven oth Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-665) gave the a chLt�cal Programs. Heritage disciplines mentioned in t tonal Secretary authority to set criteria for Preseivation Services Division, National Historic Preservation Aqb g State grants, surveys, and plans. The Center for Cultural Resource important to historic pry ion. The National Park Service administratively Stewardship and Partnership Programs, proposed revision ide (for the required State Historic Preservation ,° National Park Service, 202-343-1055, first time) publi 6 uidance on how Officers (SHPOs) to maintain FAX 202-343-6004. or to use and in P4et*eStandards. bhnRenaud@ips.gov (E-mail). professionally qualified staff (in 1976), These re' S are necessary because and to appoint qualified individuals as the old p f I qualification SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: advisors to serve on State Review standards become out-of-date. did Table of Contents —Applying the Historic Boards (in 1977). The professional not include any disciplines important Preservation Professional Qualification qualification standards have not in the practice of historic preservation, Standards. changed since then. The 1980 and provided no guidance on their use Introduction Amendments to the National Historic and interpretation. This absence of Program Evolution/Current Changes Preservation Act (Pub. L. 96-515) national guidance led to confusion and Applicability statutorily affirmed the previous inconsistency in the application of the How to Use the Historic Preservation regulatory requirement for Standards by Federal. State, Tribal, and Qualification Standards Questions and Answers professionally qualified staff. Congress local government agencies and other also reiterated the regulation's Discipline and Historic Preservation organizations and individuals. The Proficiencies requirement that State Review Boards Standards are designed to be a tool to Recommended Discipline Proficiencies include a majority of members qualified help recognize the minimum expertise Recommended Historic Preservation in oneof theprofessional disciplines generally necessary for performing Proficiencies which met minimum Professional Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. '119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33709 Qualification Standards defined in regulation in 36 CFR part 61 (Architecture, Architectural History. Prehistoric Archeology or Historic Archeology, and History). In addition. the 1980 amendments created the Certified Local Government (CLG) program to recognize the role of local governments in the national partnership, and stipulated that the CLG Review Commission membership needed tobeadequateand qualified The Congressional Committee Report for the 1980 amendments (H.R. Rept. 96- 1457) called for "professional bodies which can objectively evaluate the historic significance of properties and provide professional advice on historic preservation matters." Finally, States, local governments. Federal agencies, and the private sector often require that proposals from historic preservation contractors or work submitted by them meet these same professional practice Standards. How To use the Historic preservation professional qualification standards provides background and general information in aquestion and answer formal about the three basic components of each Standard: academic_ or comparable training: professional experience; and products and activities that demonstrate proficiency in the field of historic preservation. Discipline and historic preservation proficiencies consists of a series of general proficiencies (knowledge, skills, and abilities) that are needed by historic preservation program applicants, employees, consultants, and advisors. The first set of proficiencies is related to disciplines; the second, to historic preservation. Following the standard for each discipline is guidanceaboutm Ig standard for that specific discipl Ze, ind udi ng a I ist of some of mAlP common "closely related itld1N within academic degree program infatmation on documenting professio experience; and a^f ty ical products and a that may be used to document s"r proficiencies in o Nc preservation Finale Professional Organizati �sisincluded to assist users in obtaining additional information about thedisciplines, college and university departments, and publications on the practice of each discipline. Program Evolution/Current Changes In its 1992 amendments to the Act (Pub. L. 102-575), Congress recognized the evolution and growth of the professional practice of historic preservation, and an expanded role for Qualification Standards'' that follow are, in most instances, advisory in nature and may thus be used by anyone hiri ng personnel or consultants or appointing advisory boards or commissions. Because use of the Standards can help ensure appropriate. informed decisions about protecting and preserving our nation's historic and archeological resources. NPS strongly encourages their adoption and implementation However, under welOde circumstances discussthe Secretary's Historic Pron Professional Qualifi ndards"arerequirements td regulation. In tho i tances, a note is added at thee e required Standard. First, tal Historic Pr r t Oct, Section 101, requires th *esslonally qualified staff be ap In or employed by State Historic ',,Pres' ation Offices. Indian tribesthat t%ye executed a Memorandum of `Rgreeme�4, ,with NPS and assumed respon .,ties pursuant to Section 101 t�ibAct also must employ or �ith professionally qualified e ualsincarryingoutthose e onsibilities. The performance and pervision of Historic Preservation sound ionali m i e tweev� and grant -assisted work must be g s.There�ope Stan and f� performed and/or supervised by ilae di vJ professionally qualified staff and/or Stan d ines: contractors. In accordance with 36 CFR a is xpreesor om able part 61 and NPS policy, three of twelve Rrai ni n di sci pl i nes are requi red for State •.Pr nal eie : and program staff and for staff of Tribes with �p���Q, is and a vl les that Section 101(d) status: History. s�rate ro in historic Archeology, and Architectural History. p rvation. States and Tribes with 101(d) status may A7e St r do not apply to propose an alternative minimum staff gentrege -I pplicants orto composition for NPS concurrence if prrofessionals in the field. their historic resources, needs, or outline the minimum circumstances would be better served or d experienceand products met. States and Tribes with 101(d) thprovide an assurance that status are expected to obtain the the applicant, employee, consultant, or services of other qualified professionals advisor will be able to perform as needed for different types of competently on thejob and be respected resources. within the larger historic preservation Second, section 101(b)(1)(B) and community. The effective application of section 301(12)of the Act requires that any of these national Standards will am ajori ty of State Review Board require the development of a detailed members be professionally qualified. As job description containing additional specified in 36 CFR part 61. this information to suit a particular situation majority must include, but need not be and need. limited. to the required disciplinesof Note: In each discipline, themost common History, Archeology, and Architectural method of meeting that Professional History. One person may meet the Qualifications Standard is discussed first. Standards for more than one required Less common alternatives follow- Typically, discipline. a graduate degree or professional license is Third, section 101(c)(1)(B) and section listed first. 301(13) of the Act requires that State programs encourage CLG Review Applicability Commissions to include individuals It should be emphasized that the who are professionally qualified, to the ''Historic Preservation Professional extent that such individuals are Indian tribes in implementing the National Historic Preservation Act. Accordingly, the number of disciplines acknowledged as key to the responsible practice of historic preservation has been increased by the Act and therefore by the National Park Service from the five identified almost 20 years earlier to 12, now including Archeology (Prehistoric and Historic), Architectural History, Conservation, Cultural Anthropology. Curation, Engineering, Folklore, Historic Architecture. Historic Landscape Architecture, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, and History Asaresult, NPSconsulted at length with Federal agencies. SHPOs, CLGs, and professional societies involved in historic preservation about issuing updated and expanded Professional Qualification Standardsthat recognize the evolution and development of the disciplines in the field. ''The Secretary of the rior's Historic Preservation Pr(kessijinai Qualification Standards' design to be national meas"Jor deter minimum requi �_Ior professionalsp c' ginthe f historic pre . The f or th Standard _ vi es a �s yet flexible, r e ork fo sta ishin Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33710 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices available in the community. The State may specify the minimum number of Commission members that must meet the Standards and decide which, if any, of the disciplines listed in the Standards need to be represented on the Commission. An accompanying guidance section, Applying the Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards, has been prepared to assist the consistent application of the "Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards'' when selecting an employee, consultant, or advisor. As such, theguidance provides additional information and recommendations, but never constitutesa requirement. How To Use the Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards There are three basic components of each Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standard: academic degrees or comparable training: professional experience; and products and activities that demonstrate proficiency in thefield of historic preservation. A number of commonly asked questions about the design and content of the Standards. as well as their application and implementation. are answered below in order to assist anyone applying for a position or anyone charged with obtaining the services of a professional in the field of historic preservation. 1. Under what authority are these Standards developed ?"The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards and Guidance" are part of the larger "Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.'' The statutorA authority for the Secretary's development of these can be fou sections 101(g), 101(h), 101(j,� art 1010)(2)(A) of the National ric Preservation Act, as am ese Standards and Guidanc (i ding the Professional Qual' ion andards) were published ' Federal Register in 1983 as th e y's best guidance for histori �vation practice nationall mainstheir preeminen unction. 2. What ab ut the requirements in Section 112 of the National Historic Preservation Act?Section 112 is not the statutory authority for the "Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards and Guidance'' (see the preceding paragraph). Section 112 splits Federal agency requirements for meeting "professional standards" into two parts. Section 11 2(a)(1)(A) mandates that Federal ''actions'' meet professional standards; it is not directed at establishing professional qualification requirements. It is section 112(a)(1)(B) that requires the Federal Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to devise professional qualification requirements for Federal employees and contractors in seven disciplines. OPM is required by statute to consult with the National Park Service (NPS) and others in creating these requirements. When completed, NPS will offer the Professional Qualification Standardsand Guidance as its best advice to OPM for their use. 3. Are the Standards regulatory or are they advisory?The Standards are not in and of themselves regulatory. A separate regulation or other official action which references or otherwise adopts part or all of them is necessary to give any force to any language in the Standards. In a number of instances. this has occurred. For example, the Standards for Rehabilitation are regulator in the Federal Preservation T nc tives program through 36 CF art 7. Likewise, the Professi nal alifica Standards are r I al4ujor Statel I historic presery ograms, participating tri rough art 61. The gui A c Proles i ien m g Professi perien acco p ng the fe ional i ar s i s i a a s rsi Sty n (j>t scats e rds; t geyjdance is no �regu I ato 4. Hgwe these S4ads Rae Who wa 7` suited? lion has tensive over o ryear project. Thew ide of co� s that use the rStandards t abroad consultation proc not surprisingly, results in ryingopinions and r dations. To date, NPS has con ed with: (1) Federal, tribal, State. and ocal government historic preservation programs as well as related organizations; (2) professional societies and organizationsof professional societies: (3) academic programs in historic preservation and organizations of such programs; (4) individuals and companies in the private practice of historic preservation as well as related organizations: and, (5) individuals working in the public sector as well as organizations of such people. 5. Why did the National Park Service choose the disciplines it did?These disciplines were selected because each is specifically mentioned in the National Historic Preservation Act. [See sections112(a)(1)(A), 112(a)(1)(B), 201(a)(9), 301(12)(B), 301(13), and 401(c)(3).] 6. How are these Standards to be used? The Standards are designed to be a tool to help recognize the minimum expertise generally necessary for performing professionally credible historic preservation work. The Standards are not designed to identify the best or ideal person for any position or the preeminent practitioners in any discipline, nor are they developed to qualify apprentice or entry level workers. The Standards are @signed to describe the typical experts Id by credible mid -level journey#CNWorking in historic preservatio , 7. Do the Standa<o'entry-level" to "entry level'' or "technicsvel positions? Although thewo or ''technida I rsonnel iscritical to the succ storic preservation projects, rofessional levels are not adSt in the Secretary's Stfin�theThe Standards apply only to th yman"professioneal and eminimum level of expertise ni;a ar to provide reliable technical inionsNating to historic properties (witho iiepth oversight or review by anpf r essional in thediscipline). • ederal agencies have to meet Trofessional Qualification Bards?For Federal employees and deral contractors, the Historic reservation Professional Qualification Standards are regulatory only if they are specifically adopted by (1) The Federal Officeof Personnel Management (OPM) pursuant to its responsibility under Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Act; (2) a Federal agency in its own agency -wide regulations, requirements, or policy: or (3) a Federal agency as part of a program or project agreement with another party. 9. How are general Standards applied in specific situations? General standards are intended to define minimum professional qualifications for identifying, evaluating, registering, treating, and interpreting historic properties nationwide: however, the best historic preservation professional for a particular office. program, project, or property depends upon the situation. Different skills and expertise are needed for different geographical areas and resource types. In most cases where the Standards are applied in hiringor contracting, job descriptions and qual i fi cati ons w i I I have to betaiIoredto specific situations and locations so that experience and training are relevant to the needs of the resources and the work to be done. Where there is a need for specialized expertise in a project. application of theStandardswill necessarily focus upon specialized training and demonstrated experience and products. For example, a person may be highly skilled in restoring Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. '119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33711 particular kind of resource (such as Standards are encouraged to adopt a particular discipline, there is no such covered bridges), but that person would similar approach. national requirement. The hiring, not be an appropriate choice to work on 12. Why aren't the Standards for each choosing, selecting, or contracting office other types of resources. discipline exactly the same?Because must determine for itself how much 10. Do all staff, consultants, and each discipline is different and makes experience, of what sort, and in what appointed advisors need to meet the itsown distinct contribution to historic sequence, is appropriate for thejob or Standards?SHPOs, CLGs, and tribes preservation, the Professional position. hire staff, select consultants, and Qualification Standardsdiffer somewhat 16. How many and what types of appoint advisors to perform historic according to discipline. Each set of products and activities are routinely preservation work. However, it is NPS Standards includes educational and used to document the quality of policy that historic preservation activity experience equivalencies to assure professional experience?The applicant, supported by the Historic Preservation fairness in hiring practices: thus, a employee. consultant, or advt r may Fund must be conducted. supervised. graduate or undergraduate degree, or cite products such as peer-r wed overseen. evaluated, or signed off by other certification, registration, or articlesand publications, isual someone who meets the appropriate professional licenseor trainingisgiven materials, awards, and ilVal Register Professional Qualification Standard. full consideration, when combined with documentation. Acti Is ould include Therefore, NPS requires the use of some differing periodsof full-time teaching the theor r act ices ofa of these Standards in certain professional experience. Documenting a specific discipli a inistrative. circumstancesb State Historic record of high quality products and y project rev; ervisory Preservation Offices, State Review activitiesduring past employment is experience toric preservation Boards, and Certified Local Government required in every Standard; however, progr m e; and field or Commissions (see 36 CFR part 61). thetypeof productsand activitieswill lab rk. In any event, products Consequently, in some offices there necessarily differ within each a� es should demonstrate the could be no staff meeting the discipline. ap o ateuseof theapplicable 13. Why does one have Professional Qualification Standards as �ecretary of the Interior's Standards for demonstrate proficiency n a ecific long as there is access somewhere along discipline as well as in h or' heolo y and Historic Preservation." the line to the appropriate expertise. For ampl eprovided in the preservation. When isio maker offices (e.g., States) required to have Docu Professional Experience lack the expertisar to ma professionally qualified staff and informed decisi i torican t eguidancefor Applying the Review Board membership. the for each discipline. cultural resour beov requirement is usually to have at least determining academic onequalified individual in thethree or Iostentifi eval t as ifications. what isa "closely related or lost. a pert; ca ust as specified core disciplines. States and harmful t er ape n well - to of study?'' To provide flexibility in Tribes with 101(d) status are expected to grou histori re rvation, determining academic credentials, the la eiongl is Ali obtain the services of professionals 'I Standards recognize that a graduate or ssne qualified in other disciplines as needed. a r ti ely, i ?1 ert in undergraduate degree may have been It is possible that an individual may Tonine, but s attained in either the identified al meet the Professional Qualification understaV s portant.oconntion to disciplineor in arelated discipline. ec Standards for more than one discipline. iston ation.�4n�c+lement of Thus a candidate for the position of Other staff members working in the �G p p expertArchitectural Historian may have an P,i bd h a discipline do not have to meet the pr sal discind historic undergraduate degree in a closely Standards. ation improve the related field of study, such as Art 11. What about professionals who re bility of s affecting our History or Historic Preservation. were hired under the old Standards? or nation's h t Merely having a degree in a closely programs administered by the Natioft •) 14. INIM stitutesfull-time related field does not automatically Park Service. each State staff, St profe�aa xperience?Full-time meet the Standard. The course work Review Board member and Certi�I experience generally refers taken to earn a degree in a related field Local Government Commis-; should be weighed against the course n er t p iencereceived after the degree approved by the Secretar As ting wast arded or education was requirements in the Standard's "main'' the Professional Qualifi a on andards completed. Full-time professional discipline. For example, a degree in Art will retain that status, reg ssof any experiencecan beacquired in blocksof History doesnot necessarily. on itsown, subsequent chan� the tandards, time that, together, add up to the meet the Standard for Architectural until such time.,# individual no number of yearscalled for in the History, unless course work relevant to longer isem y,pd by theStateoffice. Standard. In some disciplines, aportion the Standard can be documented, such serves on t e Review Board, or of this experience must have been as American architectural history. (See serve5o h fied Local earned under the direct supervision of the Academic Background guidance Govern ne Commission with which a recognized professional. It is possible given after each Standard. which that individual wasaffiliated asof the that some education and experience discusses the typical closely related dateof that individual'sapproval. received outside the United States is fields of study for each historic Contractors qualified in a specified relevant to the identification, preservation discipline.) discipline under the old requirements evaluation, documentation, registration, 18. How much and what kind of will bedeemed qualified in that treatment, and interpretation of United course work in a ''closely related field'' discipline by NPS under the new rules States historic and cultural properties. is required to meet the Professional as long as the contract, cooperati ve 15. Does the required experience have Qualifications Standards? There i s no agreement, or other third -party to occur subsequent to obtaining the set amount of credit hours. The office agreement remains in effect. New requisite educational or licensing hi ri ng or selecti ng must make a contractual agreementswould apply the credentials? Although it is preferable to determination that the person with new standards. Other organizations have the practical experience after course work in a closely related field using the Professional Qualification obtaining the academic training in a has enough relevant education to be Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33712 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 1 Friday, June 20, 1997 I Notices equivalent to that necessary for the standard degree in that discipline, and to enable that person to makejudgments about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration. or treatment of historic or archeological properties in the United States and its Territories. 19. When is "exceptional experience" a factor?In general, an applicant, employee, consultant. contractor. or advisor who does not possess a combination of education or training, experience, and products would not meet the Standards. However, in some cases, a person 's experi ence and contributions have been so exceptional that he or she demonstrates the level of expertise that meets the Standards. In particular, this may apply in those situations where persons embarked upon their careers before recognized academic programs were established, and their education or training was thus attained in alternative ways. In such instances, exceptional experiencewould be substituted for an academic degree or other training. It is up to the organization with administrative oversight responsibility for the program or project to determine whether the individual meets the Standards. For example, in a program under the purview of 36 CFR part 61, the State Historic Preservation Office would request an exception from the National t Park Service for the person under consideration for a "professional" position on the State staff or Review Board. Otherwise, the organization doing the hiring or selecting of personnel would determine whether the individual meets the Standards. Discipline and Historic Proficiencies The Historic Preservatio oUtsMrial Qualification Standards �n understanding ofiheg e I nciples, procedures, and pr tices e discipline as they re pplied to historic preservation. T s eof expertise is necessary for ri preservation p rogram s,40N MV theempIoyee, con suIIan edvisor is expected to deal with aNngeof historic resources and issues. Proficiencies in the disciplines and in the practice of historic preservation are outlined below. Recommended Discipline Proficiencies The following discipline proficiencies (knowledge. skills, and abilities) should be possessed by applicants, employees, consultants, and advisors: • Knowledge of the history of the discipline. • Knowledge of current theories, principles, practices, methods, and techniquesof thediscipline. • Familiarity with diverse specializations within thediscipline. • Skills in applying the discipline's techniquesof practice, including critical analysisskills. • Understandingofthediscipline's relationships with other disciplinesand the ability to design and carry out interdisciplinary projects. • Understanding of complex research questions. • Ability to placeaspecific project in a broader context. • Knowledgeof current scholarly research and its applicability to agiven i ssu e. • Familiarity with the processof rigorous professional peer review that occurs before work is published. Historic Preservation Planning Historic Preservation History Archeology: Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Archeology is the study of past human lifeways through the systematic observation, analysis, and protection of the material remains of human activities. Standard for Archeologist (A) Prehistoric The applicant, emplronsultant, or advisor wiII have ate degree in Anthropology ecialization in Prehistoric Arch o , or a graduate degree in Arch with a specializati� ehistoric o�QT%e graduate degree in a close) el M field (see Academic B� for Archeology). PLUS a Recommended Historic Preservation mi of two and one-half (21/ ) Proficiencies .tear full-time professional Thefollowinghistori reservation Apenencein appl yi ng the theori es, proficiencies (knowledge, fls, and ` ethods, Wd practices of Archeology abi I i I i es) sh ou I d Me sled by that en Sprofessional judgments to applicants, emp consulta be, )abut the identification, advisors: wi n, documentation, registration, • Familiar' the on d ment of prehistoric archeological developm ie hi c ervatio erties in the United States and its movem tt ritories(at least six monthsof • geof theft Ft of hist experience must have been acquired in pr on asjt i pr cticed in the performance of field and analytical it ates, i tg its activities under the supervision of a phiie r?es, prac�aws, professional prehistoric archeologist. egulatio o c es, and��SStan ds, and and one year of experience in the study gelation he diifJiRl�asa of the archeological resources of the whole prehistoric period must have been at a to ap eral and supervisory level). and products and Stat a historic activities that demonstrate the p rvation I ulations, policies, successful application of acquired and stand e public and private proficiencies in the discipline to the Sectors, ing Federal, State, and practice of historic preservation (see Iocalent agencies, and private Documenting Professional Experience for A rcheol o i sts) oath ns. !!� lity to apply the appropriate set f the''Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation," and/or the National Register of Historic Places criteria. In consideration of the foregoing, the ''Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards" are proposed to read as fol I ow s: Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Archeology (A) Prehistoric Archeology (B) Historic Archeology Architectural History Conservation Cultural Anthropology Curation Engineering Folklore Historic Architecture Historic Landscape Architecture 9 (B) Historical The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in Anthropology with a specialization in Historical Archeology, or a graduate degree in Archeology with a specialization in Historical Archeology, or a graduate degree in a closely related field (see Academic Background for Archeology). plus minimum of two and one-half (21i:,) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Archeology that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic archeological properties in the United States and its Territories (at least six monthsof experience must have been acquired in Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register I Vol. 62, No. 119 1 Friday, June 20, 1997 I Notices 33713 the performance of field and analytical activities under the supervision of a professional Historical Archeologist, and one year of experience in the study of t h e arch eol ogi cal resou rces of t h e historic period must have been at a supervisory level); and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practiceof historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Archeologists). (Note: Pursuant to 36 CFR part 61, a person meeting this Standard (either Prehistoric or Historic Archeology) is required as part of the core staff for each State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and as part of each State Review Board. Expertise described by this standard is also needed for Tribal Preservation Office staff or consultants of tribes that have executed a Memorandum of Agreement to implement Section 101(d) of the National Historic Preservation Act. It also may be needed for consultants hired with HPF grant fundsand for membersof Certified Local Government Commissions.) Archeology —Academic Background Closely related fields: Anthropology, with a specialization in Archeology, is thetypical degree discipline for archeologists practicing in the United States. One of the usual requirements for receiving the degree is completion of an archeological field school in which the student learns about techniques of survey, excavation, and laboratory processing. However, degree programs 1 have also been established in Archeology, Cultural Resources Management. Historical Archeology, and Public Archeology. Some Historical Archeology programs are housed in History, Public History, or American Studies Departments. For these degr, a list of courses taken should be reviewed to determine if the pro a .s equivalent to that typically ovl or a degree in Anthropology vl it specialization in Arche�Y�y,y�luding course work in archeoIOgy��g�nethods and theory. arch of eographic region (e.g., Nor erica), and the field school. Discipli ializations. The most prevalen p ationsin Archeology include HI rical Archeology or Prehistoric A theology, i.e., the specialization in resourcesof either the prehistoric period or the historic period. These specializations n ecessari I y require expertise in different typesof sitesand different sourcesof information about past human activities. For example, a prehistoric archeologist usually requires a knowledge of environmental sciences, while historical archeologist needs to understand the techniques of archival research. Additional specialized videos that interpret the results of trainingand experience is also required archeological investigation for the for those specializing in, for example, general public. underwater archeology, physical • Publications including articles in anthropology (human bones and professional journals, monographs. burials), forensic archeology, or books, or chapters in edited books, zooarcheology (non -human bones). In related to the preservation of historic or addition, archeologists typically archeological properties. sped alizein t he archeol ogi cal resources • Presentations at regional, national, of a particular time period. geographic or international professional region, resource type, or research conferences related to the preservation subject. of historic or archeological prties. • Professional serviceon bokrqsor Applying the Standard for committees of regional, n o or Archeologist —Documenting international professyo anizations Professional Experience concerned with the r lion of A professional archeologist typically historic or archeol 'c properties. has experience in field survey, site • Awards, r c rants, research testing. site excavation, artifact fellowships, oryl tionsto teaching identification and analysis, documents posts. �J research, and report preparation. This 14101111111 comprehensive. Supervised field experience asa Furth t is not expected that all graduate student may be counted as part of ducts and activities will of the overall 216 year professional n to e documented in order to meet experience requirement. oe' he ndard; rather, a combination of A PrehistoricArcheo*ist tPeeting J Awral of these products and activities this Standard would dociAweftt one `T ould beiuoretypical. However, if the of supervisory exile cein the y applic�/f&Xedocumenting of prehistoricarW0,f i al sit pr f experience in one of the Historical Archwould tions, the majority of products document o uperIvities should reflect that experience 11�t stud s f the lalization. historic �I�,+��^ a }rchitectural History; Historic Th t'l�cheolo ist ializati Preservation Professional Qualification of P i%i ' ric Aft I gy and Hi t Standards h 1�gy are rcha�vv" Jv uuentati o Jhow tha ne Architectural History is thestudy of lTit esin o rehIstor Carl,& the development of building practices Historic ogy s�o��ncludea through written records and design and minim �onead oneNyear of the examination of structures, sites. and su � expen e n resources of objects in order to determine their spe"ial pTa total of 31/1 relationship to preceding. yl so experi*Svith products and contemporary. and subsequent activities pecializations. architecture and events. rod u ct8-W-4 ct i v i t i es. al experienceand expertise rivarbe documented through "products an ivities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation." Productsand activitiesthat meet the appropriate Secretary Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Survey and excavation reports of cultural resource management or Section 106 (or other compliance) projects. These reports are typically called "grey literature," they often have multiple authors and areusually produced in limited quantities by consulting firms. • National Register documentation resultingin property listingsor Determinations of Eligibility. • M ateri al s such aspresentations, booklets, brochures, lesson plans, or Standard for Architectural Historian (a) The applicant, employee, consultant. or advisor will have a graduate degree in Architectural History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for Architectural History), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories. methods, and practices of Architectural History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Architectural Historians): or (b) An undergraduate degree in Architectural History or a closely Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33714 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 1 Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices related field of study (see Academic Background for Architectural History), plusa minimum of four (4) yearsof full- time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practicesof Architectural History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration. or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and productsand activitiesthat demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians). (Note: Pursuant to 36 CFR part 61, a person meeting this Standard is required as part of the core staff for each State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and as part of each State Review Board. Expertise described by this standard is also needed for Tribal Preservation Office staff or consultants of tribes that have executed a Memorandum of Agreement to implement Section 101(d) of the National Historic Preservation Act. It al may be needed for consultants hired with HPF grant funds and for members of Certified Local Government Commissions.) Architectural History —Academic Background Closely related fields: Professional Architectural Historians typically receive their formal training through Architectural History. Art History, or Historic Preservation programs, which include course work in American Architectural History. Other fields of study may offer relevant training, provided that coursework in American Architectural History istaken. These other fields may includeAmerican Studies, American Civilization, Architecture, Landscape Archit re, Urban and Regional Planning, A e a History, Historic Preservation, an Public History. Discipline specializat' Architectural Historian t d be generalists, althou peci zations within Architect al istory are typically base a periods (such a 18th centur a particular architect ty (such as Georgian or vernacul combination of these (such as pla Cation architecture in the antebellum South), practice of historic preservation.'' A theories, methods. and practices of professional Architectural Historian Conservation that enables professional typically has expertise in research, judgments to be made about the survey. documentation, and evaluation, identification, evaluation, of architectural resources, including documentation or treatment of objects buildings, structures, objects, and associated with historic and prehistoric districts. Documentation of such properties in the United States and its experience isdesirable. Productsand Territories; and products and activities activitiesthat meet theappropriate that demonstrate the successful Secretary's Standards for Archeology application of acquired proficiencies in and Historic Preservation may include: the discipline to the practice of historic • Survey reports assessing the preservation (see Documenti significance of historic properties. Professional Experience for • Historic structure reports. Conservators), or ` ` ` • National Register documentation (b) An undergraduat in Art resulting in property listings or History, or Natural o cal Science. Determinations of Eligibility. or another closely a field to • Documentation that meets HABS/ Conservation (sec emic HAER standards for recording historic Background fOri§Servation), with an properties. additional of full-time • Publications, which might include enrollme apprenticeship articles in regional. national. or pro a valent to graduate studies international professional journals, in tion and supervised by a monographs, books, or chapters in pr nal Conservator; plusa edited books, related to tpC�preservation ini um of three (3) years full-time of historic structures. (i1 essio al experience applying the SO • Presentationsat regi nation eories, thods, and practices of or international pjo onal Conser that enables professional conferences rel o preser juc� I o be made about the of historic stru id f%etion, evaluation, • Professi ice on or d1fentation, or treatment of objects committees' regional ti or ciated with historic and prehistoric ienarofessi al o aniza io p operhes in the United States and its cth the pre of erritories: and products and activities htutes that demonstrate the successful re�rant�,T�se�application of acquired proficiencies in o ationsI do ing thedisciplineto the practiceof historic S. •.J preservation (see Documenting Thiss l compressive. Professional Experience for Fui(Lh it shouj,c�be derstood Conservators). th rtq of these rolucts and c 4 are ne order to meet Conservation —Academic Background t Standard, a combination of seAral pro �d activitieswould be rporetyp If he applicant were docuq¢ professional experience in o f't0f ecializations, however, the r6y of products and activities wou✓ naturally reflect that specialization. Conservation; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards s Conservation is the practice of prolonging the physical and aesthetic life of prehistoric and historic material culture through documentation. preventive care, treatment, and research. Applying the Standard for Architectural Historian —Documenting Professional Experience Products and Activities Professional experienceand expertise must be documented through "products and activitiesthat demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the Standard for Conservator (a) The applicant. employee. consultant, or advisor will havea graduate degree in Conservation or a graduate degree in aclosely related field of study with a certificate in Conservation (see Academic Background for Conservation), plusa minimum of three (3) yearsof full-time professional experience applying the Closely related fields: Since Conservators tend to specialize in a particular class of objects, closely related fieldswill bediverse, and could include Art. Art Conservation, Art History, Architecture, Historic Preservation, Museum Studies, Chemistry, Physics, Engineering (or a related scientific field), Archeology, Anthropology, or other fields related to theconservation specialization. If a closely related field is being claimed, the degree in the closely related field should be accompanied by a certificate in Conservation, or the completion of course work equivalent to that typically offered in graduate Conservation programs. Thiscoursework should include examination, documentation, and treatment of objects; history and technology of objects, and conservation science. In addition, such a program should include the completion of atwo- semester internship. Discipline specializations: Professional conservators specialize in the treatment and maintenance of a Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33715 specific class of objects or materi al s, such as archeological artifacts, architectural elements or fragments, or collections, books. ceramics, glass, decorative arts. ethnographic objects. furniture, metals, paintings, paper, photographs, sculpture, and textiles. Some conservators have studied more than one specialty, and have accumulated experiencewhich allows them to practice in several of these specialties (although they areoften closely related, such as books, drawings, prints or paper; decorative arts and furniture; sculpture and archeological artifacts). In these cases, the time period that distinguishes the materials is often the specialty. Each of these specialties requires focused training and experience, sinceeach represents unique problems which are not always necessarily shared with other materials or time periods. Hence, a professional conservator should be able to perform accordingto professional standardsof practicewithin theclaimed areaof specialty and should be both capable and willing to recognize his or her limitations. The professional conservator, moreover, should be generally knowledgeable about the issues of other specialties and the benefit of effective communication among the specialties. A broad understandingofthegeneral principles of the conservation discipline is paramount aswell, particularly in the areaof technological and philosophical concerns that govern the ethics of the profession. A note on Conservation education: Many professional Conservators received their training by serving apprenticeships with professional Conservators. For some time, howeve graduate conservation programs ` been established in academic institutions: these requireVp' In ip in recognition of the crit'rtance of hands-on trainingan ecein preparing studentsf rproal practice.. Applying the a d for Conservato cumenting Professional Experien A profe nal Conservator typically possesses specialized technical skills and has experience i n the exami nation, analysis, documentation, treatment, and preventive care of a specific class, or classes, of objects. Productsand Activities Professional experienceand expertise must be documented through "products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation.'' traditional cultural properties in the Products and activities that meet the United States and its Territories; and appropriate Secretary's Standards for products and activities that demonstrate Archeology and Historic Preservation the successful application of acquired may include: proficienciesin thedisciplineto the • A portfolio of current and past practice of historic preservation (see conservation work, including written Documenting Professional Experience and photographic documentation. for Cultural Anthropologists); or " . ' • Reports of examination. condition, (b) An undergraduate degree in or treatment of objects. Anthropology or a closely related field • Publications, which might include (see Academic Background for Cultural articles in professional journals, Anthropology), with aspecia('zation in monographs, books, or chapters in Applied Cultural Anthrop lusa edited books, related to the care and minimum of four 4 ()year f I -time treatment of objects. 1 professional experienc ding at • Presentations at regional, national, least twelvemonths work or international professional supervised by a pr nal Cultural conferences, workshops or other Anthropologi %,.I ng the theories, educational venues related to the care methods, a ($ices of Cultural and treatment of objects. Anthropol enables professional • Professional service on boards or judgm e made about the corn mitteesof regional, national, or, id f t evaluation, international professional organizations d� ation, registration, or concerned with the conservation of objects. treat t of historic, prehistoric, or • Awards, research gr nts, rch ditional cultural properties in the fellowships. or invitation eachin� ted tesand its Territories: and product activities that demonstrate p°�s' the application of acquired This list is ensive. r es in thedisciplineto the Futhermore, it sh e and q that not all o roduct� r� c of historic preservation (See activitiesar n ed iE?Jeswoui �a:y'meet bmentingProfessional Experience the Stan r they, nation of r Cultural Anthropologists). sever l�dC�cts and b Cultural Anthropology —Academic mor al. If th licant werBackground d tingpr nal e iin the sp I tions, h v , the o ty of r is and activ ' s WvouId n�KJ�r W refl sp aa/t . Cuftur`sl 4nthropot Historic Preservation �0onal Qualification Standards %Cultur It pology is the scr d analysisof cultural syoler ich include systems of (economic, religious, social), val 4W ideologies. and social arrangements. Standard for Cultural Anthropologist (a) The applicant. employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in Anthropology with a specialization in Applied Cultural Anthropology. or a closely related field (see Academic Background for Cultural Anthropology), plusaminimum of two (2) years of full -time professional experience (including at least six months of field work supervised by a professional Cultural Anthropologist) applying the theories, methods, and practices of Cultural Anthropology that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration. or treatment of historic, prehistoric, or Closely related fields: A degree in Anthropology with a specialization in Applied Cultural Anthropology is the typical degree discipline for Cultural A nthropol ogi sts practi ci ng in the United States. Closely related fields of study may include Sociology, Cultural Geography, Folklife, History, and American Studies. Discipline specializations: Specializations in thisdiscipline include Applied Cultural Anthropology, and Social Anthropology (which may be considered the most closely related to Cultural Anthropology; some academic programs even combine them, referring to Sociocultural Anthropology). Departments of Anthropology typically provide training in Archeology, Physical Anthropology, Ethnography, and Sociocultural Anthropology.. and they may offer Applied Anthropology concentrations in one or more of these fields. Professional Cultural Anthropologists tend to specialize geographically (such as in the Southwest United States, Micronesia or New England) or topically (such as Medical Anthropology or Urban Anthropology), or in working with particular cultural or linguistic groups (such as fishermen, Irish immigrants, or Northwest Coast Indians). Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33716 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices Applying the Standard for Cultural Anthropologist —Documenting Professional Experience A professional Cultural Anthropologist typically has experience in the use of ethnohistoric and ethnographic techniques, including participant observation field work among one or more contemporary ethnic groups. The typical Cultural Anthropologist would also have performed field survey to identify and assess ethnographic resources, which can include, in addition to historic and cultural places of value, environmental features and places that have symbolic and other cultural value for Native American and/or other ethnic communities. A Cultural Anthropologist engaged in substantial ethnographic field work should demonstrate professional experience in the relevant geographic area and/or among the New World peoples, immigrant, ethnic. or minority communities with whom they will work. Productsand Activities Professional experienceand expertise must be documented through "products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation." Products and activities that meet the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Ethnographic field studies and survey reports, oral histories, or social impact assessments. • National Register documentation of ethnographic resources or traditional cultural properties resulting in prop y listingsor Determinations of Eligib • Publications, which might i articles in regional, national, or international professional j nos, monographs. books, or cfia ta"Nn documentation and reseron of historic and arch o' ical esources, and/or traditio I ural properties. • Presenta n afNegional, national, or internat' rofessional conferen osia, workshops or exhibits re ed to the documentation and preserva ion of historic and archeological resources, and/or traditional cultural properties. • Professional serviceon boards or committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with the documentation and preservation of historic and archeological resources. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitationsto teaching posts. This list is not comprehensive. Futhermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard, rather. acombination of several products and activities would be more typical. If the applicant were documenting professional experience in one of the specializations, however, the majority of products and activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Curation; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Curation is the practice of documenting, managing, preserving, and interpreting museum collections according to professional museum and archival practices. Standard for Curator Museum Science or Museology in another institution. Since Curators often specializein particular disciplines, thosefieldsof study would berelevant provided that theoretical as well as hands-on training was also obtained in museum methods and techniques, i ncl udi ng cot I ections care and management. Examples of relevant fieldscould includeAmerican Studies. Anthropology, Archeology, Art History, Archival or Library Science. �tistory, Biology, Botany, Chemistry P s,ics. Engineering, Geology, Zo o pdnd other similar fields of epending upon the nature of t tions to be curated. Disciplinesp r tions.- Profession&In tend to be specialisticular academic disciplinesttothecolIections het h institution or museum, (a) The applicant, employee, vv c d include, for example, 19th- consultant, or advisor will havea cen ur udson Valley School graduate degree in Muse udiesor ainlings. Southwest Pueblo pottery, a closely related field of tud (see it Wa military uniforms, site - Academic Background fo ation), ecifi,c a eological materials, or plusa minimum of t (2) years f f naturaly specimens. ;A 0 time profession �clence appl the theories, m d% and pra i 9 he Standard for Curator— Curation tha profe nting Professional Experience judgments b ade h professional Curator typically has identific valuati n {�� periencein managingand preserving docu n, preven are, or a collection according to professional inter et tion of c e tions associ museum and archival practices. Cultural I rican` stori o 2s trainingshould involve experience with United tftand its i ries; the chemical and physical properties of n oduc alactivitiesth material culture, as well as practical and emonstsucc CCam�,,;����pplication legal asp ectsof health and safety, an of apq oficien he understanding of climate control di%iA i o the pr ti of historic systems, security, and conservation esr Vlttion enting methods. The Curator i s di recti y ional cefor Curators); or responsible for the care and academic interpretation of all objects, materials, (b) Aendfor aduate degree in and specimens belonging to or lent to usoraclosdyrelated the museum; recommendations for ff e Academic acquisition, de -accession, attribution uration), plus a and authentication; and research on the mir4LArn of four (4) years of full-time collections and the publication of the professional experience applying the results of that research. The Curator also theories, methods, and practices of may have administrative and/or Curation that enables professional exhibition responsibilities. judgments to be made about the Products and Activities identification, evaluation, documentation, preventive care, or interpretation of collections associated with historic and prehistoric properties in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Curator). Curation—Academic Background Closely related fields: A degree program called Museum Studies in one academic institution might be called Professional experience and expertise must be documented through ''products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation.'' Products and activities that meet the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Exhibit catalogs and other scholarly reports. • Field or laboratory work that demonstrates ability to conserve, document, or interpret archeological, Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33717 archival, or material culture objects or col I ecti ons. • Plans or finding aids for the preservation or documentation of museum collections. • Publications, which might include articles in regional, national, or international professional journals, monographs, books, or chapters in edited books, related to the care and treatment of archeological, archival, or material culture objectsor collections. • Presentations at regional, national. or international professional conferences, symposia, workshops, or exhibits related to the care and treatment of archeological, archival, or material cultural objectsor collections. . Professional serviceon boardsor committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with the care and treatment of archeological, archival. or material culture objects or collections. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitations to teaching posts. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard: rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typical. If the applicant were documenting professional experience in one of the specializations. however, the majority of products and activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Engineering; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Engineering i s the practi ce of applying scientific principlesto the research, planning, design, and management of structures and m n such as roads, bridges, canals, d s, docks. locomotives. and bu in�a, including their structural cal, or mechanical systems. Hi ic...777111 Engi neeri ng i nvol ves sped ed train inginengin pri ciples, theories, conce thods, and technologies t t, and appropriat ods of i nterpreti ng and preservi r engineered structures machinery. Standard for Engineer (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a State Government -recognized Iicenseto practice civil or structural engineering, plus, a minimum of two (2) years of full- time professional experience applying thetheories, methods, and practicesof engineering that enables professional judgments to be made about the documentation or treatment of historic structures and machines in the United States and its Territories; and products and activitiesthat demonstratethe successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Engineers): or' ' (b)A Masters of Civil Engineering degree with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation, for historic structures rehabilitation, plus minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Engineering that enables professional judgments to be made about the documentation or treatment of historic structures and machines in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Prof essionper ience for Engineers): or " (c) A Bachelors of Civi neerin degreewith at lest eyear of gr study in Histor ology, Preservation. E ing Hist a closely relat (see Ac Backgroun rVngine#M, a minimuptf 9va(2)y rso full-ti prole experience lying th ethoosnd ractices f YY E i i n g thqJVs p r ents to vMe about ocume to o 7'treatm it o storic Istrudur achivW e United StatesTerritwfd products an es that d�strate the uz KaouI ap li of acquired pf�rcienciesl iscipiinetothe practiceof preservation (see 9ocume - essional Experience for E she). ( of personswho are licensed to p is Engineering in that State may )r eand seal plans and specifications in order to obtain construction permits, authorize payments to contractors, and certify that the work is complete. However. State staff. State Review Board members, and CLG staff or Commission members who are not licensed, but who meet the Standard for Engineer under (b) or (c) above. can review proposed and completed work for compliance with the applicable Secretary's Standards for Tax Act, HPF Grant, or other related programs.) Engineering —Academic Background Closely related fields: The Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree is a five-year degree that is unlikely to include historic preservation course work. The same is true of a Masters of Civil Engineering degree. An Engineer with an Engineering degree is well grounded in all aspectsof engineering practice, including design, planning, construction specifications, and contract administration. Although this background is essential, additional training is needed in order to understand and work with historic structures, sites, and machines, with their complex material evolution and treatment problems. Specialized training, to supplement that provided by theprofessional Engineering program, should be acquired in such as as American Architectural an ineering History, History of Techn3i ON Architectural Preservatj6�i % Conservation, Histor �►,'' truction Technologies, His Zicc�uilding Materials, Hist Archeology, and Historic Pr A. DisciplipQ talizalions: Civil Engin lectrical Engineering, M qoiicii ngineering, and Structural E i ng are typi cal specializations ,yv i thioo^ebroaderdisciplineof �NQqsneering. The two specializations iffst o taq.used in historic preservation 1 projectsivil and Structural Eng Occasionally, there may be tj r a Mechanical Engineer to issues concerning historic inery such as locomotives, steam gines, water turbines, electric generators. and similar machines and equipment, or particularly complex mechanical systems in a historic structure. Applying the Standard for Engineer — Documenting Professional Experience To be licensed by a State Government as a professional Engineer, an individual must pass a written exam and successfully fulfill education, training, and experience requirements. In addition, a professional Historical Engineer has both theoretical knowledge and technical skill associated with preserving historic structures and machines, and with the application of Engineering theories. methods, and practices that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures and machines in the United States and its Territories. A professional Historical Engineer typically has gained experienceon structural preservation projects, which have included research and detailed investigations of historic structures or mechanical artifacts and preparation of recommendations for the treatment of such properties in order to preserve them in accordance with the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation (particularly the Secretary's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties). Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33718 Federal Register i Vol. 62, No. 119 1 Friday, June 20, 1997 I Notices Products and Activities Standard for Folklorist (ethnomusicology), spoken word Professional experienceand expertise (a) Theapplicant, employee, traditions, material culture, customs, or must bedocumented through "products consultant, or advisor will have a religiousand belief systems; or and activitiesthat demonstratethe graduate degree in Folklore, Folklife Specialization may focus on the study of successful application of acquired Studies, Anthropology or a closely a particular contemporary group (such proficiencies in the discipline to the related field of study (see Academic as the Pennsylvania Amish) or region of practice of historic preservation." Experience for Folklore), with a the United States (such as Appalachia). Products and activities that meet the specialization in Folklore or Folklife Applying the Standard for Folklorist — Secretary Standards for Archeology and Studies, plus a minimum of two (2) Documenting Professional Experience Historic Preservation may include: yearsof full-time professional A professional Folklorist typically • Plans and Specifications for the experience applying thetheories, demonstrates professional krAowledge reservation, rehabilitation, or methods, and practicesof Folklore that P and ski llsin established me sand restoration of historic structures, such as enables professional judgments to be techniques of folklore an o i e bridges, dams, canal locks, and for the made about the identification, research in thecollecti ►uation, structural rehabilitation or seismic evaluation, or documentation of folk documentation, anal dlor stabilization of buildings. culturesor lifeways associated with 9 presentation of gr o sand • Adaptive reuse or feasibility studies historic or prehistoric properties in the traditional cultu a ressi on, that make recommendations for United States and itsTerritories; and indudin f Ik i spoken word. preserving or structurally stabilizing products and activities that demonstrate dance. craft ip and artistic historic structures, including bridges. the successful application of acquired tradition ays, customs, belief • Historic Structure Reports or proficiencies in the discipline to the sys tional foodways, and Condition Assessments of historic practice of historic preservation (see r dlor occupational groups and Documenting Professional Experience structures or machines. co ities. Experience would for Folklorists); or * • Documentation that meets HAGS/ pica ly include fieldwork, with on -site (b) An undergraduate egr in HAER standards for recording historic i rvi s, observation. and Anthropology or a close) ed field structures or machines. ocumen on of contemporary human of study (seeAcadem Experien of r • Experience applying the Secretary I�m cult r ties. of the Interior's Standards for the Folklore), plus of fou Treatment of Historic Propertiesto the years expert f full-ti tonal f� nd Activities experiences PC the Tonal experience expertise review of work on historic structures, P P methods, ar es F kl re that t be documented through ''products sites or machines. �� 9 P • Awards for historic structure enables tonal juytgm to be d activities that demonstrate the made 1; heidentifi successful application of acquired preservation, rehabilitation. or evalu ti or dot entation of fo restoration received from local, regional, proficiencies in the discipline to the c or Iifev) � octal practice of historic preservation.' national, or international professional �c or re stoic prop he organizations. P p P Products and activities that meet the . Publications, which might include t Stat its Terri tori nd appropriate Secretary's Standards for g roduct iviti temonstrate Archeology and Historic Preservation articles in regional, national, or the u applic o acquired may include: international professional journals, pr i in the i plinetothe Field studies and survey reports, monographs. books. or chapters in r of histoIF rvation. (see edited books about the preservation of P oral histories, or assessments of the cu enting ional Experience significance of historic properties. historic structures or machines. foolklori • Publications, which might include • Presentations at regional, natio articles in regional, national, or rolklor demicBack round international professional journals: or international professional0 9 conferences, symposia, worksholated fields: Typically, a monographs, books, or chapters in exhibitsabout thepreservati�noQfo p al Folklorist hasagraduate edited books, related to assessing the historicstructuresormach deginFolkloreorFolklifeStudies,or significance of historic or traditional Professional servic sor from highly specialized study within cultural properties. committeesor regional, i at, or other disciplines such as Anthropology, . Presentations at regional, national, international prof^nal ganizations English, Linguistics, or Sociology, or international professional concerned with I eservation of provided that such study included conferences, symposia, workshops, historic strut e achines. training in theory, research and exhibitions, or other educational venues This list comprehensive. fieldwork techniques, and in the diverse related to analyzing cultural traditions Further r ouIdbeunderstood categories of expressive culture. in evaluating the significance of historic that not at f these products and Discipline specializations: A graduate or traditional cultural properties. acti vi ties are eeded in order to meet degree in Anthropology may be • Professional serviceon boards or the Standard; rather, acombination of combined with a sped at i zati on in committees of regional, national, or several products and activities would be Folklore and Folklife Studies. Other international professional organizations more typical. specializations may include: English, concerned with documenting and Folklore: Historic Preservation Cultural Anthropology. Ethnohistory. analyzing cultural traditions. Professional Qualification Standards Ethnobotany. Ethnozoology, • Awards, research grants, research Ethnoarcheology, Cultural Geography, fellowships, or invitationsto teaching Folklore is the study and Sociology, and Oral History. posts. documentation of traditional, expressive A professional Folklore specialist, or This list is not comprehensive. culture shared within various ethnic. Folklorist, may specialize in any of the Furthermore, it should be understood familial, occupational, religious, and categories of traditional expressive that not all of these products and regional groups. culture, such as music activities are needed in order to meet Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33719 the Standard. rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typi cal . If the appl i cant were documenting professional experience in one of the specializations, however. the majority of productsand activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Historic Architecture; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Historic Architecture is the practice of applying artistic and scientific principlesto theresearch, planning, design, and management of the built environment with specialized training in the principles, theories, concepts, methods, and techniques of preserving historic buildings and structures. Standard for Historical Architect (a) The applicant, employee, consultant. or advisor will have a State Government -recognized license to practiceArchilecture, plus, a minimum of two (2) years of ful I -time professional experience applying the theories, methods. and practices of Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic) preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects): or " ' (b) A Masters of Architecture degree with demonstrable course work in Architectural Preservation, Architectural History, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, or a closely related fiel Academic Background for Histo Architecture), plus a minim o (2) years of full-time profe i experience applying th r4A, methods, and practices ' oric Architecture that Ies professional judgments to b about the evaluation, d u e lion, or treatment of historic resin the United States an i itories: and products and activit that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects); or " (c) A Bachelors of Architecture degree with at least one year of graduate study in Architectural Preservation, Architectural History, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, or a closely related field (see Academic Experience for Historic Architecture), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full -time professional experience applying the theories, methods and practices of Historic A rch i tectu re th at enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures in the United States and its Territories, and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects). Architect has both theoretical knowledge and technical skill associated with preserving historic structures, and with the application of Architecture theories, methods. and practices that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories. A professional Historical Architect typically hasgained experience on structural pre vation projects, which have inclu rch and detailed investigatio o istoric structures and preparatitobt_ (Note: Only personswho are licensed to recommenaanons r [ment of practice Architecture in that State may propertiesinorde Fperve themin prepare and seal plans and specifications in accord ancewit priate order to obtain construction permits, Secretary's j s for Archeology authorize payments to contractors, and and Histor' rvation (particularly certify that thework iscompleted. However. the S r tandards for the State staff. State Review Board members, and Tr t Historic Properties). CLG staff or Commission memberswho are not licensed, but who meet the Standard for Pr tc and activities Historical Architect under (b r (c) above. can review proposed and c ple ed work for Professional experience and expertise compliance with the appli le retary's t be ocumented through "products Standards for Tax Act, H F 014aM, or oth and act that demonstrate the related programs.) Q) succ;es3fy plication of acquired Historic A rchit Acadern' pre es in thediscipline to the Background pr .. cc of historic preservation.'' Closely re f ! ield AQh`elor of star and activities that meet the Architec egree is fiv year degr etary Standards for Archeology and that d always sI histor istoric Preservation may include: pr a on alw 'Wgrk. The m • Plans and Specifications for the y� s preservation, rehabilitation, or ueof I sof I e restoration of historic structures. An Hi ribel Archi�irst Adaptive reuseor feasibility studies n hit a as such, is that make recommendations for round lasp s hitectural preserving historic structures. pracii ding ayc��ral design, Historic c Structure Reports or in lrr�iionstructi'�n lPecifications. Condition Assessments of historic y►4�tract adrntion. Although �backgrouQh6sential, additional structures. trai'?iing is dwin order to Documentation that meets HAGS/ ynderst work with historic HAER standards for recording historic stru . h their complex material structures. eyohu d treatment problems. • Experience applying the Secretary g% ized training, to supplement that of the Interior's Standards for the pro ed by the professional Treatment of Historic Properties to the Architecture program, should be review of work on historic structures. acquired in such areas as American • Awards for historic structure Architectural History, Architectural preservation, rehabilitation, or Preservation, Conservation, Historic restoration received from local, regional, Construction Technologies, Historic national, or international professional Building Materials, and Historic organizations. Preservation. • Publications. which might include Discipline specialization: Historic articles in regional, national, or Architecture is a specialization within international professional journals, the broader disciplineof Architecture. monographs, books. or chapters in edited booksabout thepreservation of Applying the Standard for Historical historic structures. Architect —Documenting Professional . Presentations at regional, national, Experience or international professional To be licensed by a State Government conferences, symposia, workshops, or as a professional Architect, an exhibits about the preservation of individual must pass a written exam historic structures. and successfully fulfill education. • Professional serviceon boardsor training, and experience requirements. committeesor regional, national, or In addition, aprofessional Historical international professional organizations Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33720 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices concerned with the preservation of historic structures. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard: rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typical. Historic Landscape Architecture; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Historic Landscape Architecture is the practiceof applying artistic and scientific principles to the research, planning, design, and management of both natural and built environments with specialized training in the principles, theories, concepts, methods. and techniques of preserving cultural landscapes. Standard for Historical Landscape A rch i tect (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a State Government -recognized license to practice Landscape Architecture, plus. a minimum of two (2) years full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Landscape Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation. documentation. registration, or treatment of historic properties in the I United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline tothe practiceof historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for tHistoric Land scapeArchitects); or (b) A Masters degree in Land_f/�e` Architecture with demonstrableu..' work in the principles, theo concepts. methods, and ted�es of preserving cultural Ian a Musa minimum or two (2) ye rs ull-time professional exper a ap ying the theories, metho practicesof LandscapeAr itec ure that enables profession ments to be made about th d ation, evaluation, document n, registration, or treatment of istoric properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Landscape Architects): or (c) A four-year or five-year Bachelors degree in Landscape Architecture, plus a minimum of three (3) years of full- time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Landscape Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification. evaluation documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the disciplinetothe practiceof historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Landscape Architects). (Note: On l y persons w h o are I i cen sed to practice Landscape Architecture in that State may prepare and seal plans and Discipline specialization. Historic Landscape Architecture is a specialization within the broader field of Landscape Architecture. Historical Landscape Architects should have completed trainingin theprinciples, theories. concepts, methods, and techniques of preserving cultural landscapes. Cultural landscape preservation focuses on preserving landscape's physical attributes, biotic systems, and use (especially j#hen that use contributes to i is hi stor significance). Graduatest y dlor professional experienc des the specialized training by the Historical Landsca i1iiichilect. specifications in order to obtain construction Applyingthe permits, authorize payments to contractors, and certify that the work is completed. Landscape? However, State staff, State Review Board Professio^ members, and CLG staff or commission ��/F� members who are not licensed, but who meet the Standard for Historical Landscape Architect under (b) or (c) abo can review proposed and completed w rk fo compliancewith theapplic le retary's Standards for Tax Act, F 1, Grant other related program Historic Landsc hitectu� Academic Ba o d Closely field a pe Archi tec s the typ al ofessi Bach rI ch pt away after�� essful+co pletion o u y e-y grad t m. Hr, he Bach r r asters n cape Ar itec ure may not al w - ude hiN reservation co . WhilelMst dard La Archi. h Lidegree program � rises all �Xaspects of la�rdscapear ral practice �includin 'planning, construr ecifications, and pr o practice), additional loftrd for Historical t—Documenting eri en ce T I sed by a State Government as ional Landscape Architect, an i d' dual typically must pass a ritten exam and successfully fulfill eftcatioq, training, and experience uirem s. In addition, an Historical Lan s f� chitect must have two y r +13Y.. eriencein the application of L" e Architecture theories, ods, and practices to the tlfication, evaluation, cumentation, registration. or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories. A professional Historical Landscape Architect has both theoretical knowledge and technical skill associated with the preservation of cultural landscapes in accordance with the Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation. Cultural landscapes include historic sites, historic designed landscapes, historic vernacular landscapes, and ethnographic landscapes. ii i ' needed for Historical Products and Activities L d peArchitects. They may need train ngin landscape research, documentation, analysis, evaluation, and treatment techniques. This additional training is achieved through additional course work and/or professional experience. Graduate study: The Masters in Landscape Architecture degree is the typical graduate degree, which is awarded after successful completion of a two-year or three-year graduate program. This degree should include studies in the principles, theories, concepts, methods, and techniques of p resery i n g cu I t u ral I an d scap es. Cou rse work may include cultural geography; landscape history; archival research techniques: historic preservation theory, principles. and practice; and preservation technologies. Professional experience and expertise must be documented through ''products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation.'' Products and activities that meet the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation may include: • Surveysand inventoriesof cultural landscapes. • Documentation of cultural landscapes that meets the Secretary's Standards for Documentation. • National Register nominations or Determinations of Eligibility for cultural landscapes. • Cultural Landscape treatment and maintenance plans. • Cultural Landscape Reports. Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33721 • Publications, which might include articlesin regional, national, or international professional journals. monographs, books, or chapters in edited books about cultural landscape preservation. • Presentations at regional, national, or international professional conferences, symposia, workshops, or exhibits about cultural landscape preservation. • Professional serviceon boardsor committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with cultural landscape preservation. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitationsto teaching postsassociated with cultural landscape preservation. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not al I of these products and activities are needed in order to meet the Standard; rather, a combination of several products and activities would be more typical. Historic Preservation Planning; Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Historic Preservation Planning, a specialization within Planning, is the practice of identifying and carrying out particular goals and strategies to protect historic and archeological resources at the local, regional. State, or national i I ev el . Standard for Historic Preservation Planner (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have State Government -recognized certification r license in Land -use Planning, plus, - minimum of two (2) yearsof full fe professional experience applyin h ;;]] theories, methods, and prac es Historic Preservation Plan at enables professional ju e o be made about the identifi dattup., evaluation, docu tiori4, registration, protection, or try t of historic and archeological rape es in the United States and � ritories; and products and acti i demonstrate the successful plication of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservation Planner): or (b) A graduate degree in Planning with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation, or a graduate degree in a closely related field of study with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation (see Academic Background for Historic Preservation Applying the Standard for Historic, Preservation Planner —Documenting Professional Experience In order to receive a license or be registered or certified as professional Planner, an individual typically must pass a written exam and have completed a specified number of yearsof experience. A professional Historic Preservation Planner typically has gained experience in data collection and analysis: survey and evaluativp of existing conditions; consul 6%-with elected and appointed o and the general public: identifluffrTof al ternati ve strategi e%Nwcement or administration of�[e�9yaht statutes and regulations: a reparation of plannir S. work in Historic Preservation or an Produ is tivities undergraduate degree in a closely related field of study with demonstrable al experience and expertise coursework in Historic Preservation pnd vlocsthat dd through "products he (see Acad emic Back groupd°for Historic nd essfu ties tic ion of acquired e ed Preservation Planning), Ius minimum fide l application ci acquired of four (4) yearsof full-tir�.p�ofessiop��oficie es in the discipline to the experienceapplyiin the theories, (/� Practice hostoricpreservation.' methods, and p e�Histor V Pro c� activities that meet the Preservation PI gthat en aP o e Secretary's Standards for professional nts to b logy and Historic Preservation about the idipti%catioCtion on, nclude: docume tp , regislprot i Preservation plans adopted by or tre t f historivernment officials; and/or results of arc o ical plop i in the U i preservation planning studies t its T rri�s; ono s incorporated into the local �1 gL tivities t 6emonstr comprehensive or master plan. &uCce'ssf I ption of acqutreEi • Ordinances for the protection of tproficienW the dwscl�Oeto the historic and/or archeological resources. praWi toric p;,Qser ion (see Economic Feasibility Studies that D UtV ng Profe io al Experience make recommendations for preserving ohistoric or archeological properties. • Crk?bri c Pre PI an n er).Publications, which might include H ric Pre Planning— articles in regional, national, or Academic c round international professional journals, , Cl bled fields: Professional monographs, books, or chapters in H' Preservation Planners typically edited books, related to preservation r�eir education through planning. acageriic Planning programs, although • Presentations at regional. national, increasingly Historic Preservation or international professional programs are offering Historic conferences, symposia, workshops, or Preservation Planning as exhibits related to preservation concentration in which degrees are planning. awarded. Other fields that may be • Professional serviceon boards of closely related, provided that training committees or regional, national, or relevant to Historic Preservation international professional organizations Planning isobtained, include Historical concerned with preservation planning. or Cultural Geography, Architecture. • Planning awards received from Urban Design, and Historic local, regional, national. or international Preservation. professional organizations. Discipline specializations: Historic This list is not comprehensive. Preservation Planning isa specialization Furthermore, it should be understood within the broader discipline of that not all of these products and Planning. Other specializations include activities are needed i n order to meet Urban, City, Town, or Community the Standard; rather, acombination of Planning; Regional Planning: Land Use several productsand activitieswould be Planning: Environmental Planning: more typical. If the applicant were Recreation Planning: Transportation documenting professional experience in Planning: and Housing Planning. one of the specializations, however, the Planning), plus minimum of two (2) years of full -time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Historic Preservation Planning that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification. evaluation, documentation, registration, protection or treatment of historic and archeological properties in the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservation Planner), or (c) An undergraduate degree in Planning with demonstrable course Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' 33722 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices majority of products and activities would naturally reflect that specialization. Historic Preservation: Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Historic Preservation is the application of strategies that promote the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, protection, treatment, continued use, and interpretation of prehistoric and historic resources. Standard for Historic Preservationist (a) The applicant, employee, consultant. or advisor will have a graduate degree in Historic Preservation or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for the Historic Preservation discipline), plusa minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practicesof Historic Preservation that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic and prehistoric properties i n the United States and its Territories: and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experi ence for H i stori c Preservationists); or ' ' '. (b) An undergraduate degree in Historic Preservation or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for the Historic Preservation discipline), plus minimum of four (4) yearsof full-tim professional experience applying to theories, methods, and practices Historic Preservation that enable professional judgments to b aFje about the identification, ev�on, documentation, registr io oc, treatment of historic and p istoric properties in the St es and its Territories. an ctsand activities that demonst uccessfuI applicatio uired proficiencies in the disci a practice of historic preservatio see Documenting Professional peri ence for H i stori c Presery at i on i st s). Historic Preservation —Academic Background Closely related fields: Variousfields of study may be considered closely related to Historic Preservation, such as American Studies, Architecture, Architectural History, Archeology, History, and Historical or Cultural Geography, provided that such programs of study include course work in the history of the designed environment, history and theory of preservation, historic preservation methods, techniques. and legislation (Federal, State and local ), plus a formal supervised practicum or internship for hands-on application of knowledge and technical skillsin thefield. Discipline specializations: While most Historic Preservationists tend to be generalists, many specialize in such areas as Architectural, Landscape, and Community Design. Historic Building Technology, Preservation Economics, Preservation Law, Historic Preservation Planning, and Site Interpretation and M an agem en t Applying the Standard for Historic conferences, symposia, workshops, or exhibits related to historic preservation. e Professional serviceon boardsor committees or regional, national, or international professional organizations concerned with historic preservation. • Awards, research grants, research fellowships, or invitationsto teaching posts. This list is not comprehensive. Furthermore, it should be understood that not all of these products and activities are needed in order• meet the Standard; rather, a corqevMn of several products and actiiru ies would be more typical. If the a C*t were documenting prof i experience in one of the specia aillons, however, the majority of r(;pAX"§and activities would natulect that Preservationist —Documenting specializ Professional Experience Hiyter1Pric Preservation A professional Historic Profesapnal Qualification Standards Preservationist typically has experience` that demonstrates a wellded k Hi ry is the study of the past understanding of the pri cipl' s, ugh written records. oral history, practices, laws and +ru,1I s,and d matNI culture and the diverse resource�ofric �V exami pf that evidence within a preservation. chiD�p�I or topical sequence in or��((�Tk;nterpret its relationship to Products and Z ies )Nng, contemporary and Prof essio perie apertise U%E:bquent events. must be ented t rou pro u Standard for Historian su appI�cav� of acquir Y p fi iesi ipliryt3T ce of hi ic'preserva is o is r c ogical `r, sous." roducts tivitiek t(^1 t the A 1p velar)ri SPresefdS for A and Hi ri Preservation ude' National documentation tha hasre ti property listingsor Qeterrm sof Eligibility. • assess rig the of hi s of historic properties. tonc Structure Reports. • aptive reuse plans or feasibility studies that make recommendations for preserving historic properties. • Written opinions that have been accepted that assess the impact that an undertaking will have on historic or archeological properties. • Historic District Ordinances that have been adopted by a local government. • Documentation that meets HAGS/ HAER standards for recording historic properties. • Publications, which might include articles in regional, national. or international professional journals, monographs, books, or chapters in edited books. related to historic preservation. • Presentations at regional, national, or international professional (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for History), plus minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories. methods. and practices of History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United Statesand its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate thesuccessful application of acquired proficienciesin thedisciplineto the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians); or ' ` (b) An undergraduate degree in History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for History), plus a minimum of four (4) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the Attachment E: Detailed Information for Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History' Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1997 / Notices 33723 practiceof historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians). (Note: Pursuant to 36 CFR part 61 a person meeting this Standard is required as part of the core staff for each State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and as part of each State Review Board. Expertise describ by this standard is also needed for Tribal Preservation Office staff or consul [ants of tribes that have executed a Memorandum of Agreement to implement Section 101(d) of the National Historic Preservation Act It al may be needed for consultants hired with HPF grant funds and for members of Certifi Local Government Commissions.) History —Academic Background Closely related fields: For this Standard. the professional degree is typically awarded in History. American History, or Public History. Relevant training can be obtai ned in programs of American Studies. American Civilization, Historical or Cultural Geography, Anthropology. Ethnohistory and Historic Preservation, providing that coursework is offered in historical research methods and techniques. Education in the social and cultural history of countries other than North America may be relevant when dealing with the historiesof immigrant, ethnic or minority groups in the United States. Discipline specializations: Professional H i stori an s ten d to concentrate their education and experience in one of the many chronological, regional, and topical specializations within American History (such as colonial history. southern history, community history, women .s history, military history, history of technology, or industrial history). Applying the Standard for Historian Documenting Professional Erperierfce A professional Historian has experience in archival and prima documents research, evalu nd synthesizing this infor hid d preparation of scholarin r Iva histories. Historic rc xperience in countries oth North America may be relev h researching the hIstoriesof ' grant, ethnic or minority o s the United States of A m er i ca. Products and Activities Professional experienceand expertise must be documented through "products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficienciesin the discipline to the practice of historic preservation." Products and activities that meet the appropriate Secretary's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation American Institute for the Conservation of may include: Historic & Artistic Works. 1717 K Street. • National Register documentation NW.. Suite 301, Washington, D.C. 20006 that has resulted in property listings or American Institute of Architects, 1735New Determinations of Eligibility. York Avenue, NW., Washington. D.C. • Documentation that meets HAGS/ 20006 HAER standards for recording historic American Instituteof Certified Planners. American Anthropological Association, 4350 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 630, Arlington, VA 22203-1621 American Association of Museums, P.O. Box 4002, Washington, D.C. 20042-4002 American Association for State Federal and Local History, 530 Church Street, Suite 600, Nashville. TN 37219-2325 American Cultural Resources Association, c/o New South Associates, 6150 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Stone Mountain, GA 30083 American Folklife Center, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540-8100 American Historical Association, 400 A Street. SE., Washington. D.C. 20003 tefor Electrical and Electronic I ears, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 55-1331 tional Council on Preservation Education. c/o Center for Historic Architecture and Engineering, University of Delaware. Newark, DE 19716 National Council on Public History. 327 Cavanaugh Hall-IUPUI, 425 University Blvd.. Indianapolis. IN 46202-5140 National Society of Professional Engineers, 1420 King Street. Alexandria, VA 22314- 2794 National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. 20036 Organization of American Historians, 112 North Bryan Street, Bloomington. IN 47408-4199 Society for American Archaeology, 900 2nd Street, NE., Suite 12, Washington. D.C. 20002 Society for Applied Anthropology, P.O Box 24083, Oklahoma City, OK 73124 Society of Architectural Historians, Charnley- Persky House, 1365 North Astor Street, Chicago, IL 60610-2144 Society for Historical Archeology, P.O. Box 30446, Tucson, AZ 85751 Society of Professional Archeologists, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas. TX 75275 Dated: June 12, 1997. Katherine H. Stevenson, Associate Director, Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships. National Park Service. [FR Doc. 97-16168 Filed 6-19-97:8:45 am) BILLING CODE 4310-70-13 �i L. 1 ARI wE()M1(.• University Heights and Haskel Heights Proposed Historic Districts L�ULIW 1 Proposed District Area Buildings Over 50 Years r _ 'WO 1� l4PLE ST U '• A i. A JJ b m ■':<■7 101L 11a � dc I I r f visA?LAYj VV%I - � W Jf aEvei,�,No sT~ .. 41 . - C SP 11RLY.: j� L It �v I. F•- a' MAPLE ST Bill �o,r �, r low in MEA V CENT � � +� lER Sr _ y ift NMI on go IPL d� "i di •'� - w Q am flail Ar ST- 0 220 440 880 1V Feet Attachment F: Maps of Project Boundary Wcdoti, .Uton l) Dough OMade St Oft Stall' , 7 L) 5t ;J tf 'It 1 I doc Blvd Stc-rip- Attachment G: Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards National Park Service ARTICLE • SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR ARCHEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION Professional Qualifications Standards Introduction The following requirements are those used by the National Park Service, and have been previously pu in the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61. The qualifications define minimum education and ece required v to perform identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment activities. In some cases, additi reas or levels of expertise may be needed, depending on the complexity of the task and the nature of the I roperties involved. In the following definitions, a year of full-time professional experience need not consist Wntinuous year of full- time work but may be made up of discontinuous periods of full-time or part-time 'A ng up to the equivalent of a year of full-time experience. j ✓ V History • -�- �� �► The minimum professional qualifications in history are a g degr i h t ry or cl llelated field: or a bachelor's degree in history or closely related field plus one of the following: • 1. At least two years of full-time experience 'n r�e c wnti l�hing, i e ion. or other demonstrable professional activity with an academic institution. historic or an 0 a en ,�eum, or oth rofessional institution', or 9 9�Q� ` 2. Substantial contribution through research and • on to th oo of scholarly knowledge in the field of history. NOW Archeology A The minimum professional qu c�W in arc are a graduate degree in archeology, anthropology, or closely related field plus: 1. At least one ye I -time professional experience or equivalent specialized training in archeological research, administration, or management', ` 2. At least four onths of supervised field and analytic experience in general North American archeology. and 3. Demonstrated ability to carry research to completion. In addition to these minimum qualifications, a professional in prehistoric archeology shall have at least one year of full-time professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archeological resources of the prehistoric period. A professional in historic archeology shall have at least one year of full-time professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archeological resources of the historic period. Attachment G: Secretary of the Interior's Professional Architectural History Qualifications Standards The minimum professional qualifications in architectural history are a graduate degree in architectural history. art history. historic preservation, or closely related field with coursework in American architectural history or a bachelor's degree in architectural history. art history, historic preservation or closely related held plus one of the following 1. At least two years of full-time expenence in research. writing, or teaching in American architectural history or restoration architecture with an arademic institution, historical organization or agency, museum, or other professional institution; or 2. Substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the held of Amenca/n�*chitectural history. V Architecture The minimum profess,onal qualifications in architecture are a professional degree in architecture p1V ast two years of full-time experience in architecture; or a State license to practice architecture., Historic Architecture `J The minimum professional qualifications in historic architectur ofessi ree ill re or a State license to practice architecture. plus one of the following: O 1 At least one year of graduate study in architectu rvatior3.Am can arc al history. preservation planning. or closely related field; or .[, K`iZ 2 At least one year of full-time professional ex riiee+n oriC ti`on/ projects Y Pr Pe � AtB`� P f Such study or experience shall include detail ' v gatio ci toric structures. preparation of historic structures research reports. and preparation of plans ands ihcations for pr �fion projects. Q)j �� Part of a series of articles t �ecretary of�rterior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation (https:/f yn�pil.gov/arfieles/series.htm?id-62144687-B082-538A-A0174FFF26496394) Previous: Histori eseA/ation Projects Guidelines (https:llwww. /articles/sec_stds_hist_pres_proj_guidelines.htm) Next: Pre on11Te1. 1rminology(https;/Iwww.nps:Qoviarticleslsec-slits-Ares-terminology.htm) � TAGS archeology archaeology professional qualification standards secretary of the interiors standards and guidelines for archeology and historic preservation Attachment G: Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards Last updated: May 13, 2020 Was this page helpful? UYes O No W An official form of the United States government. Provided by Touchpoints (https://touchpoints.app.cloud.gov/) •+ �o � Cp � G � Q' O �O Q ti University Heights and Haskel Heights Proposed Historic Districts Proposed District Area Buildings Over 50 Years t 000 p4 V tmw • ARCF¢F rt !. A.I = r� m, - - r g � f VISTA Z w TP nowIN L so' Q,'No. �r Zoo a . m! HM RO AL milm U --��HORO�R p r r� Cr ��• I. ef r 1� S PwEit+l� IN �a yrll y METTLESHIP$T-' 5 < Uwe 11,. ■ CLEVELANp ST . L al LN V I 4C PURLj7MRI K �I � a fff�fff�1 ei'�` 3�IiY�� _as R1 MAPt EST. _ e' w Z.,—te lb 94 3i ICA sm 1'L1nLIG WTI f Juo 1 �tat- ,t MEADOW , moo r ,N A NTER Sr� r� ICU — IL-`• '� P 0 220 440 N 880 =i Feet AMENDMENT #1 TO THE CONTRACT PURSUANT TO RFP 23-07 WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. WHEREAS, on September 5, 2023, pursuant to Resolution 185-23, the City of Fayetteville and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. ("Stantec") entered into a contract in the amount of $24,671.00 for a historic context statement for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, Stantec is proposing to provide additional services to the City of Fayetteville for phase 2 of this project, which is a multiple property documentation form and submission of an eligible property to the National Register of Historic Places. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT KNOWN TO ALL: That the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., on this 2 day of July , 2024, hereby agree that the Contract dated September 5, 2023, shall be amended by incorporating the additional scope of work for phase 2 entitled "Exhibit A: Amended Scope of Work and Project Allocation" as attached to this Amendment. The parties agree and understand that this Amendment is supplemental to their Agreement of September 5, 2023, and that it does not alter, amend or abridge any of the rights, obligations, or duties of the parties not expressly addressed herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their signatures to be set by their authorized representative effective the date set forth herein above. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. By: EMILV RE , Principal WITNESS: i %U SANDY SHANNON, Associate CITY OF PAYE NELD ATTEST: R •1/L , Mayor `�%K I rRAl FAYF- EVILLL _ CITY OF EXHIBITA ftPP-- FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Exhibit is to provide the terms and conditions necessary for the preparation of a Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) and National Register (NR) Nomination for the City of Fayetteville (the "Project"). 2. Contract Amendment Documents: The documents which comprise the contract amendment between the City of Fayetteville and Stantec consist of the following documents attached hereto, and made a part hereof: A. Appendix 1: Contract with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. pursuant to RFP 23-07, effective September 5, 2023 B. Appendix 2: Solicitation identified as RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) for University Heights/Haskell Heights C. Appendix 3: Certified Local Government Program Grant Agreement Grant Number 24-CLG-03 D. Appendix 4: Stantec RFP response 3. City's Responsibilities: The City shall acknowledge the support of the National Park Service and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program in the publication of any material based on, or developed under, any activity supported by Historic Preservation Fund 7 grant funds. This acknowledgment shall be in the form of a statement as follows: "This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkansas Heritage. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage." 4. Stantec's Responsibilities: A. Stantec shall furnish the necessary qualified personnel to provide the Services. Stantec represents that it has access to the experience and capability necessary to and agrees to perform the Services with the reasonable skill and diligence required by customarily accepted professional practices and procedures normally provided in the performance of the Services at the time when and the location in which the Services were performed. This undertaking does not imply or guarantee a perfect Project and in the event of failure or partial failure of the product or the Services, Stantec will be liable only for its failure to exercise diligence, reasonable care, and professional skill. This standard of care is the sole and exclusive standard of care that will be applied to measure Stantec's performance. There are no other representations or warranties expressed or implied made by Stantec. In particular, but not by way of limitation, no implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose shall apply to the Services provided by Stantec nor shall Stantec warrant or guarantee economic, market or financial conditions, proforma projections, schedules for public agency approvals, or other factors beyond Stantec's reasonable control. B. STANTEC will provide one full -color printed final clean copy of the MPDF and National Register nomination and one digital copy of the MPDF and National Register nomination created to the City and one full -color printed copy and one digital copy to AHPP. 5. Scope of Work & Schedule: The purpose of this project is to prepare a multiple property submission to the National Park Service for eligible properties in two Fayetteville, Arkansas, neighborhoods, University Heights and Haskell Heights. This project is intended to complete the second phase of a two-phase project to document neighborhood development patterns and identify historic properties. Utilizing information from Phase I (historic context statement) of the University Heights/Haskell Heights historic neighborhood project, the consultant will prepare a National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) for the theme Historic and Architectural Resources of the University Heights and Haskell Heights Neighborhoods of Fayetteville, Arkansas, which will establish historic contexts for the aforementioned neighborhoods' post — war development as well as mid-century modern development, and will identify property types that illustrate that context. A. The consultant will work with staff to select one site related to the MPDF for individual nomination to the National Register of Historic Places, of which the consultant will complete and submit an individual nomination form for to the National Register of Historic Places. The properties will be coordinated with City of Fayetteville and AHPP staff based on owner consent/interest, relative historical significance, exterior and interior integrity (an evaluation of which may require site visits), and other factors, and will be subject to preliminary approval by the AHPP (SHPO) staff. B. The work products for Phase II will include: i. Completed and submitted National Register of Historic Places MPDF for the theme "Historic and Architectural Resources of the University Heights and Haskell Heights Neighborhoods of Fayetteville, Arkansas" to include: 1. Statement of Historic Contexts 2. Associated Property Types 3. Geographical Data 4. Summary of Identification and evaluation Methods 5. Bibliographical References ii. A summary of all of the sites related to the MPDF that are recommended for individual nomination to the National Register of Historic Places and the reason for their selection. iii. One completed and submitted National Register of Historic Places Individual Registration Form for which the consultant will conduct fieldwork; take digital photographs; conduct research, as required; prepare an architectural description and statement of significance and create maps. The completed National Register of Historic Places Individual Registration Form shall include: 1. Narrative Description 2. Narrative Statement of Significance 3. Bibliography 4. Geographical Data, including maps 5. Additional Documentation, as required 6. Photographs C. A PowerPoint presentation, for delivery at a public meeting, that summarizes the information in the MPDF, such as historic contexts and associated property types. This presentation may be delivered in person or virtually. D. Submittal of the MPDF and accompanying National Register Nomination to the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program for review and comment from the State Review Board. E. Presentation by Stantec of the MPDF and accompanying National Register Nomination to the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program for review and comment from the State Review Board in Little Rock, Arkansas. F. Complete any required edits and respond to comments from the Arkansas Review Board prior to forwarding the MPDF to the National Park Service. G. PROJECT TIMELINE: July 3, 2024 Consultant under contract with City June 10, 2024 Project coordination meeting with AHPP July 11, 2024 Project Kickoff with Historic District Commission July 18, 2024 Project Kickoff with Black Heritage Preservation Commission August 2, 2024 AHPP deadline for Consultant to be under contract August 8, 2024 Property Owner Agreement for inclusion in MPDF/NR Nomination September 2, 2024 AHPP deadline for project work to begin November 1, 2024 Draft MPDF and individual NR Nomination ready for review by City & AHPP December 6, 2024 City of Fayetteville goal to submit MPDF and individual NR Nomination to AHPP January 3, 2025 AHPP deadline for final draft of all project deliverables/MPDF submittal April 2, 2025 State Review Board meeting in Little Rock, Arkansas June 1, 2025 Deadline for final invoice to be submitted to City August 1, 2025 Final report submitted to AHPP by City. All project invoices must be paid and documented September 30, 2025 All grant project work must be complete 6. Payments: A. Payments will be made after approval and acceptance of monthly itemized invoices. B. Payments will be made 30 calendar days after acceptance of invoice and City prefers electronic delivery of invoices. 7. Term: This Contract shall be effective for sixteen (16) months from the date approved by City Council but may be extended upon mutual written agreement of the Parties. A ftP- CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS City of Fayetteville RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement Contract — Between City of Fayetteville, AR and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Term: Completion by July 15, 2024 This contract executed this 5 day of September, 2023, between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas (City), of 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, AR 72701 and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) of 8401 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 100, Austin, TX 78757, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: ]. Purpose: The purpose of this Contract is to provide the terms and conditions necessary for the preparation of a Historic Context Statement for the City of Fayetteville (the "Project"). 2_ Contract Documents: The Contract documents which comprise the contract between the City of Fayetteville and Stantec consist of this Contract and the following documents attached hereto, and made a part hereof: a, Appendix A: Scope of Work & Fees b_ Appendix B: City Issued Solicitation for RFP 23-07, Historic Context Statement c. Appendix C: Stantec's RFP Submittal d. Appendix D: Stantec's Certificate of Insurance 3. City's Responsibilities: a. The City shall make available to Stantec, all relevant information or data pertinent to the Project which is required by Stantec to perform the Services. Stantec shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of all information and data furnished by the City, including information and data originating with other consultants employed by the City whether such consultants are engaged at the request of Stantec or otherwise. Where such information or data originates either with the City or its consultants then Stantec shall not be responsible to the City for the consequences of any error or omission contained therein. b_ When requested by Stantec, the City may engage specialist consultants directly to perform items of work necessary to enable Stantec to carry out the Services. Whether arranged by the City or Stantec, these services shall be deemed to be provided under direct contracts to the City unless expressly provided otherwise. If the City chooses not to engage specialist consultants, then the Parties will work cooperatively to modify the scope of services to reflect any reductions or additions to the services to be provided by Stantec. c. The City shall give prompt consideration to all documentation related to the Project prepared by Stantec and whenever prompt action is necessary shall inform Stantec of City's decisions in such reasonable time so as not to delay the schedule for providing the Services City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 6 d. When applicable, the City shall arrange and make provision for Stantec's entry to the Project site as well as other public and private property as necessary for Stantec to perform the Services. The City shall obtain any required approvals, licenses and permits from governmental or other authorities having jurisdiction over the Project so as not to delay Stantec in the performance of the Services. e. The City shall acknowledge the support of the National Park Service and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program in the publication of any material based on, or developed under, any activity supported by Historic Preservation Fund 7 grant funds. This acknowledgment shall be in the form of a statement as follows: "This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkansas Heritage. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. 4. Stantec's Responsibilities: a. Stantec shall furnish the necessary qualified personnel to provide the Services. Stantec represents that it has access to the experience and capability necessary to and agrees to perform the Services with the reasonable skill and diligence required by customarily accepted professional practices and procedures normally provided in the performance of the Services at the time when and the location in which the Services were performed. This undertaking does not imply or guarantee a perfect Project and in the event of failure or partial failure of the product or the Services, Stantec will be liable only for its failure to exercise diligence, reasonable care, and professional skill. This standard of care is the sole and exclusive standard of care that will be applied to measure Stantec's performance. There are no other representations or warranties expressed or implied made by Stantec. In particular, but not by way of limitation, no implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose shall apply to the Services provided by Stantec nor shall Stantec warrant or guarantee economic, market or financial conditions, proforma projections, schedules for public agency approvals, or other factors beyond Stantec's reasonable control. b. Stantec will provide one full -color printed final clean copy of the design guidelines and/or preservation plan and attachments and one digital copy of the design guidelines and/or preservation plan and attachments created to the City and one full -color printed copies and one digital copy to AHPP. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 2 of 6 5. Non -Assignment: Stantec shall not assign its duties under the terms of this agreement without prior written consent of the City. 6. Indemnification and Hold Harmless: Stantec agrees to hold the City of Fayetteville harmless and indemnify the City of Fayetteville, but not defend, against any and all claims for property damage, personal injury or death, arising from Stantec's performance under this contract. This clause shall not, in any form or manner, be construed to waive that tort Immunity set forth under Arkansas Law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the total amount of all claims the City of Fayetteville may have against Stantec under this contract or arising from the performance or non-performance of the services under any theory of law, including but not limited to claims for negligence, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract, shall be strictly limited to the lesser of the fees or $500,000. As the City of Fayetteville's sole and exclusive remedy under this contract any claim, demand or suit shall be directed and/or asserted only against the Stantec and not against any of the Stantec's employees, officers or directors. Neither the City of Fayetteville nor Stantec shall be liable to the other or shall make any claim for any incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising, out of or connected to this contract or the performance of the services on this project. This mutual waiver includes, but is not limited to, damages related to loss of use, loss of profits, loss of income, unrealized energy savings, diminution of property value or loss of reimbursement or credits from governmental or other agencies. 7. Insurance: Stantec shall furnish a certificate of insurance addressed to the City of Fayetteville within ten (10) calendar days after contract finalization, presenting insurance which shall be maintained throughout the term of the Contract in compliance with the terms of RFP 23-07. If applicable, Stantec shall require any subcontractor to provide insurance. In the event any employee engaged in work on the project under this contract is not protected under Worker's Compensation insurance, Stantec shall provide and shall cause each subcontractor to provide adequate employer's liability insurance for the protection of such of their employees are not otherwise protected. Worker's Compensation coverage shall be applicable with state law. 8. Price: Cl. Stantec Consulting, Inc. shall perform the services included in this proposal for a flat fee of $24,671.00. Stantec shall strive to make decisions based on what is best for the City. As such, the Stantec compensation is structured as a flat fee, with billing to be completed on a percent -complete basis. Each billing shall be completed at 40%, 80%, and 100% of project completion. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 3 of 6 b. Additional services requested that fall outside the scope of this project shall be provided based on a mutually agreed schedule and price, utilizing the hourly fee schedule provided in Stantec's proposal. 9. Payments: a. Payments shall be made after approval and acceptance of each percentage -completed, itemized invoice, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. b. Unless disputed by the City, payments shall be made 30 calendar days after acceptance of invoice, Electronic delivery to the City is preferred. 10. Terms: All work as required in the Appendix A — Scope of work shall be completed by July 15, 2024. 11. Ownership of Documents: a. All documents provided by the City are and remain the property of the City. Stantec may retain reproduced copies of drawings and copies of other documents- b. All documents and records, whether in physical or electronic format, prepared by Stantec or its subconsultant as part of the Project shall become the property of City when Stantec has been compensated for all services rendered; provided, however, that Stantec shall have the unrestricted right to their use. c. Stantec shall retain its rights in its standard drawings details, specifications, databases, computer software, and other proprietary property. Rights to intellectual property developed, utilized, or modified in the performance of the Services shall remain the property of Stantec. d. Stantec will grant the City, the State of Arkansas, and the United States of America a royalty -free, non- exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement by the contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. 12. Independent Contractor: Stantec is an independent contractor of the City and shall maintain complete responsibility for applicable state or federal law on unemployment insurance, withholding taxes, social security, or other industrial, labor or discrimination law for its employees. Stantec is responsible for its agents, methods and operations. 13. Notices: Any notice required to be given under this Agreement to either party to the other shall be sufficient if addressed and mailed, certified mail, postage paid, delivery, e-mail or fax (receipt confirmed), or overnight courier. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context Statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 4 of 6 14. Freedom of Information Act: City of Fayetteville contracts and documents prepared while performing city contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the City of Fayetteville, the contractor will do everything possible to provide the documents in a prompt and timely manner as prescribed in the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. 25-19-101 et. Seq.). Only legally authorized photo coping costs pursuant to the FOIA may be assessed for this compliance. 1S. Termination: This Contract may be terminated by the City of Fayetteville or Stantec for any reason with thirty (30) days written notice. If either party breaches this agreement, the non -defaulting party may terminate this Agreement after giving seven (7) days' notice to remedy the breach. On termination of this agreement, the City shall pay Stantec for the services performed through the date of termination within thirty (30) days of acceptance of final invoice. 16. Changes in Scope or Price: Changes, modifications, or amendments in scope, price or fees to this contract shall not be allowed without a prior formal contract amendment approved by the Mayor and the City Council in advance of the change in scope, cost or fees. No modification of this contract shall be binding unless made in writing and executed by both parties. 17. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accord with the laws of the State of Arkansas. Venue for all legal disputes shall be Washington County, Arkansas. 18. Contract Administration: The Mayor or their Designated Representative shall be the Contract Administrator for this contract. Stantec's Principal or their Designated Representative shall be the primary contact for all matters pertaining to this contract. 19. Professional Responsibility: Stantec shall exercise reasonable skill, care, and diligence in the performance of services and will carry out its responsibilities in accordance with customarily accepted professional practices. 20. Permits & Licenses: Stantec shall secure and maintain any and all permits and licenses required to complete this Contract. 21. Entire Agreement: These Contract documents constitute the entire agreement between the City of Fayetteville and Stantec and may be modified only by a duly executed written instrument signed by the City of Fayetteville and Stantec. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Contract and the appendices, this Contract and the terms and conditions contained in Appendix B shall control. City of Fayetteville, AR RFP 23 07, Historic Context Statement Contract: Stantec Consulting, Inc. Page 5 of 6 22. Force Maieure: Any default in the performance of this Agreement caused by any of the following events and without fault or negligence on the part of the defaulting party shall not constitute a breach of contract: labor strikes, riots, war, acts of governmental authorities, unusually severe weather conditions or other natural catastrophe, disease, epidemic or pandemic, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control or contemplation of either party. Nothing herein relieves the City of its obligation to pay Stantec for services actually rendered 23. Severability: In the event that any court of competent jurisdiction shall determine that any provision of this agreement shall be unenforceable, then that provision shall be deemed to be null and void and the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect 24. Debarment Certification: Stantec hereby provides debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order- Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 "Debarment and Suspension" requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub -recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. Stantec hereby attests its principal is not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared Ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. WITNESS OUR HANDS THIS 5 DAY OF September 2023. STANTEC CONSULTING. INC. By: `Z41/11 � Signature fnidi lzCe 4 Pr Printed game & Title ATTEST (Signature) Witness (Printed Nome) Date Signed : 7 1 11 L 3 aty of fayet evrlle. AR RfP 23-07, Historic Context StatemMt Contract: Stantec Consuidng, Inc Page 6 of 6 u g1t1111rrrr,� zj ill , �•. GtT Y O ATTEST: (Signature) ', �f �TFV11 Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasurer'%,�'�; �r��••��, ; �`` zzrrrr.'aiJnti��`•. Date Signed: 09/OS/2023 t, This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, and agency of the Division of Arkansas Heritage. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 1 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights SECTION A: General Terms & Conditions 1. RIGHTS OF CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE IN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS: In addition to all other rights of the City of Fayetteville, under state law, the City specifically reserves the right to the following: a. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to rank firms and negotiate with the highest-ranking firm. Negotiation with an individual Proposer does not require negotiation with others. b. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to select the proposal it believes will serve the best interest of the City. c. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. d. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to cancel the entire request for proposal. e. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to remedy or waive technical or immaterial errors in the request for proposal or in proposals submitted. f. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to request any necessary clarifications, additional information or proposal data without changing the terms of the proposal. g. The City of Fayetteville reserves the right to make selection of the Proposer to perform the services required on the basis of the original proposals without negotiation. h. The City reserves the right to ask for a best and final offer from one or more Proposers. The best and final offer process is not guaranteed; therefore, Proposers shall submit and respond to this RFP on the most favorable terms available. 2. EVALUATION CRITERIA: The evaluation criterion defines the factors that will be used bythe selection committee to evaluate and score responsive, responsible and qualified proposals. Proposers shall include sufficient information to allow the selection committee to thoroughly evaluate and score proposals. Each proposal submitted shall be evaluated and ranked by a selection committee. The contract will be awarded to the most qualified Proposer, per the evaluation criteria listed in this RFP. Proposers are not guaranteed to be ranked. 3. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS: All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of proposals to the City, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be borne solely by the Proposer(s). No payment will be made for any responses received, or for any other effort required of, or made by, the Proposer(s) prior to contract commencement. 4. ORAL PRESENTATION: An oral presentation and/or interview may be requested of any firm, at the selection committee's discretion. 5. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 2 of 16 The Proposer represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either director indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance or services required hereunder, as provided in City of Fayetteville Code Section 34.26 titled "Limited Authority of City Employee to Provide Services to the City". 6. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL: A proposal may be withdrawn prior to the time set for the proposal submittal based on a written request from an authorized representative of the firm; however, a proposal shall not be withdrawn after the time set for the proposal. 7. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: a. The laws of the State of Arkansas apply to any purchase made under this request for proposal. Proposers shall comply with all local, state, and federal directives, orders and laws as applicable to this proposal and subsequent contract(s) including but not limited to Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), & OSHA as applicable to this contract. b. Pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated §22-9-203 The City of Fayetteville encourages all qualified small, minority and women -owned business enterprises to bid on and receive contracts for goods, services, and construction. Also, City of Fayetteville encourages all general contractors to subcontract portions of their contract to qualified small, minority and women -owned business enterprises. 8. PROVISION FOR OTHER AGENCIES: Unless otherwise stipulated by the Proposer, the Proposer agrees to make available to all Government agencies, departments, municipalities, and counties, the proposal prices submitted in accordance with said proposal terms and conditions therein, should any said governmental entity desire to buy under this proposal. Eligible users shall mean all state of Arkansas agencies, the legislative and judicial branches, political subdivisions (counties, local district school boards, community colleges, municipalities, counties, or other public agencies or authorities), which may desire to purchase under the terms and conditions of the contract. 9. COLLUSION: The Proposer, by affixing his or her signature to this proposal, agrees to the following: "Proposer certifies that their proposal is made without previous understanding, agreement, or connection with any person, firm or corporation making a proposal for the same item(s) and/or services and is in all respects fair, without outside control, collusion, fraud, or otherwise illegal action." 10. RIGHT TO AUDIT, FOIA, AND JURISDICITON: a. The City of Fayetteville reserves the privilege of auditing a Contractor's records as such records relate to purchases between the City and said Contractor. b. Freedom of Information Act: City contracts and documents prepared while performing City contractual work are subject to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. If a Freedom of Information Act request is presented to the City of Fayetteville, the (contractor) will do everything possible to provide the documents in a prompt and timely manner as prescribed in the Arkansas Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 3 of 16 Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. §25-19-101 et. seq.). Only legally authorized photocopying costs pursuant to the FOIA may be assessed for this compliance. c. Legal jurisdiction to resolve any disputes shall be Arkansas with Arkansas law applying to the case. 11. CITY INDEMNIFICATION: The successful Proposer(s) agrees to indemnify the City and hold it harmless from and against all claims, liability, loss, damage or expense, including but not limited to counsel fees, arising from or by reason of any actual or claimed trademark, patent or copyright infringement or litigation based thereon, with respect to the services or any part thereof covered by this order, and such obligation shall survive acceptance of the services and payment thereof by the City. 12. VARIANCE FROM STANDARD TERMS & CONDITIONS: All standard terms and conditions stated in this request for proposal apply to this contract except as specifically stated in the subsequent sections of this document, which take precedence, and should be fully understood by Proposers prior to submitting a proposal on this requirement. 13. ADA REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC NOTICES & TRANSLATION: Persons with disabilities requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in this proceeding/event, should call 479.521.1316 (telecommunications device for the deaf), no later than seven days prior to the deadline. Persons needing translation of this document shall contact the City of Fayetteville, Purchasing Division, immediately. 14. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE: The successful Proposer shall provide a Certificate of Insurance of professional liability insurance in the amount of $1 million US dollars, at minimum. Such Certificate of Insurance shall list the City as an additional insured and not be required unless firm is selected. 15. PAYMENTS AND INVOICING: The Proposer must specify in their proposal the exact company name and address which must be the same as invoices submitted for payment as a result of award of this RFP. Further, the successful Proposer is responsible for immediately notifying the Purchasing Division of any company name change, which would cause invoicing to change from the name used at the time of the original RFP. Payment will be made within thirty days of invoice received. The City of Fayetteville is very credit worthy and will not pay any interest or penalty for untimely payments. Payments can be processed through Proposer's acceptance of Visa at no additional costs to the City for expedited payment processing. The City will not agree to allow any increase in hourly rates by the contract without PRIOR Fayetteville City Council approval. 16. CANCELLATION: a. The City reserves the right to cancel this contract without cause by giving thirty (30) days prior notice to the Contractor in writing of the intention to cancel or with cause if at any time the Contractor fails to fulfill or abide by any of the terms or conditions specified. b. Failure of the contractor to comply with any of the provisions of the contract shall be considered a material breach of contract and shall be cause for immediate termination of the contract at the discretion of the City of Fayetteville. Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 4 of 16 c. In addition to all other legal remedies available to the City of Fayetteville, the City reserves the right to cancel and obtain from another source, any items and/or services which have not been delivered within the period of time from the date of order as determined by the City of Fayetteville. d. In the event sufficient budgeted funds are not available for a new fiscal period, the City shall notify the Contractor of such occurrence and contract shall terminate of the last day of the current fiscal period without penalty or expense to the City. 17. ASSIGNMENT, SUBCONTRACTING, CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS AND/OR MERGERS: a. The Contractor shall perform this contract. No assignment of subcontracting shall be allowed without prior written consent of the City. If a Proposer intends to subcontract a portion of this work, the Proposer shall disclose such intent in the proposal submitted as a result of this RFP. b. In the event of a corporate acquisition and/or merger, the Contractor shall provide written notice to the City within thirty (30) calendar days of Contractor's notice of such action or upon the occurrence of said action, whichever occurs first. The right to terminate this contract, which shall not be unreasonably exercised by the City, shall include, but not be limited to, instances in which a corporate acquisition and/or merger represent a conflict of interest or are contrary to any local, state, or federal laws. Action by the City awarding a proposal to a firm that has disclosed its intent to assign or subcontract in its response to the RFP, without exception shall constitute approval for purpose of this Agreement. 18. NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTRACT: Award of this RFP shall impose no obligation on the City to utilize the Contractor for all work of this type, which may develop during the contract period. This is not an exclusive contract. The City specifically reserves the right to concurrently contract with other companies for similar work if it deems such an action to be in the City's best interest. In the case of multiple -phase contracts, this provision shall apply separately to each item. 19. LOBBYING: Lobbying of selection committee members, City of Fayetteville employees, or elected officials regarding request for proposals, request for qualifications, bids or contracts, during the pendency of bid protest, by the bidder/proposer/protestor or any member of the bid der's/proposer's/protestor's staff, and agent of the bidder/proposer/protestor, or any person employed by any legal entity affiliated with or representing an organization that is responding to the request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract, or has a pending bid protest is strictly prohibited either upon advertisement or on a date established by the City of Fayetteville and shall be prohibited until either an award is final or the protest is finally resolved by the City of Fayetteville; provided, however, nothing herein shall prohibit a prospective/bidder/proposer from contacting the Purchasing Division to address situations such as clarification and/or questions related to the procurement process. For purposes of this provision lobbying activities shall include but not be limited to, influencing or attempting to influence action or non -action in connection with any request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract through direct or indirect oral or written communication or an attempt to obtain goodwill of persons and/or entities specified in this provision. Such actions may cause any request for proposal, request for qualification, bid or contract to be rejected. Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 5 of 16 20. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The City reserves the right to request additional services relating to this RFP from the Proposer. When approved by the City as an amendment to the contract and authorized in writing prior to work, the Contractor shall provide such additional requirements as may become necessary. 21. SERVICES AGREEMENT: A written agreement, in substantially the form attached, incorporating the RFP and the successful proposal will be prepared by the City, signed by the successful Proposer and presented to the City of Fayetteville for approval and signature of the Mayor. 22. OTHER GENERAL CONDITIONS: a. Proposers must provide the City with their proposals signed by an employee having legal authority to submit proposals on behalf of the Proposer. The entire cost of preparing and providing responses shall be borne by the Proposer. b. The City reserves the right to request any additional information it deems necessary from any or all Proposers after the submission deadline. c. This solicitation is not to be construed as an offer, a contract, or a commitment of any kind; nor does it commit the City to pay for any costs incurred by Proposer in preparation. It shall be clearly understood that any costs incurred by the Proposer in responding to this request for proposal is at the Proposer's own risk and expense as a cost of doing business. The City of Fayetteville shall not be liable for reimbursement to the Proposer for any expense so incurred, regardless of whether or not the proposal is accepted. d. If products, components, or services other than those described in this bid document are proposed, the Proposer must include complete descriptive literature for each. All requests for additional information must be received within five working days following the request. e. At the discretion of the City, one or more firms may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking of the firms, which may also include oral interviews. f. Any information provided herein is intended to assist the Proposer in the preparation of proposals necessary to properly respond to this RFP. The RFP is designed to provide qualified Proposers with sufficient basic information to submit proposals meeting minimum specifications and/or test requirements but is not intended to limit a RFP's content or to exclude any relevant or essential data. g. Proposers irrevocably consent that any legal action or proceeding against it under, arising out of or in any manner relating to this Contract shall be controlled by Arkansas law. Proposer hereby expressly and irrevocably waives any claim or defense in any said action or proceeding based on any alleged lack of jurisdiction or improper venue or any similar basis. h. The successful Proposer shall not assign the whole or any part of this Contract or any monies due or to become due hereunder without written consent of City of Fayetteville. In case the successful Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 6 of 16 Proposer assigns all or any part of any monies due or to become due under this Contract, the Instrument of assignment shall contain a clause substantially to the effect that it is agreed that the right of the assignee in and to any monies due or to become due to the successful Proposer shall be subject to prior liens of all persons, firms, and corporations for services rendered or materials supplied for the performance of the services called for in this contract. The successful Proposer's attention is directed to the fact that all applicable Federal and State laws, municipal ordinances, and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over the services shall apply to the contract throughout, and they will be deemed to be included in the contract as though written out in full herein. The successful Proposer shall keep himself/herself fully informed of all laws, ordinances and regulations of the Federal, State, and municipal governments or authorities in any manner affecting those engaged or employed in providing these services or in any way affecting the conduct of the services and of all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over same. If any discrepancy or inconsistency should be discovered in these Contract Documents or in the specifications herein referred to, in relation to any such law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree, s/he shall herewith report the same in writing to the City of Fayetteville. CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 7 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights SECTION B: Scope of Services and General Information 1. INTRODUCTION: The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as "the City', is requesting proposals from qualified firms with experience in writing multiple property documentation forms (MPDFs), performing historic property surveys, and facilitating citizen involvement/participation to prepare a Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods in the City of Fayetteville, as described in the following Scope of Work. It is the intent of the City of Fayetteville to select a single firm or team to accomplish the services outlined in this Request for Proposals. 2. COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOOD BACKGROUND: The City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is located across the Boston Range of the wider Ozark Plateau in Northwest Arkansas. It is the county seat of Washington County. The City is home to the University of Arkansas, which is located just outside the Downtown area. The City is more than 55 square miles in area with a population of 99,288 according to the 2022 American Community Survey estimations, making it the second largest city in Arkansas. Fayetteville has a rich cultural history. The town was founded in 1828 on land that had previously been set aside for the western Cherokee Nation. Before the Cherokee, the land had been hunted by the Osage and Quapaw tribes. During the Civil war General Benjamin McCulloch ordered Confederate forces under his command to burn all the commercial buildings, military stores and vacant houses in Fayetteville. Very few structures survived or are preserved today; however, Fayetteville does have a wealth of historic structures from the late 19th century through mid-20th century, many representing vernacular materials and styles. Agricultural production was a significant part of the local economy from the post -Civil War era through WWII, and the University of Arkansas, established in 1871 as the first public university in Arkansas, has also been a significant contributor both to the local economy and to population growth. On March 1, 1979 the Historic District Commission was created as a group of devoted local citizens concerned with improving and protecting the City's unique historic and cultural resources. The Commission helps facilitate the identification, evaluation, preservation, restoration, protection, and enhancement of historical, cultural, and archaeological interests. The City of Fayetteville currently has 69 Historic Sites on the National Register and has an array of National Register Historic Districts and neighborhood associations with an eye on preservation. With the City's first Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan adopted in summer 2023, the Commission is looking at projects to meet the plan goals, including the identification and protection of historic properties. The Black Heritage Preservation Commission was established on September 7, 2021. The purpose of this Commission is to recognize, acknowledge, protect and preserve historical Black Structures and Cemeteries in honor of the vision, accomplishment, and perseverance of Fayetteville's early Black families and individuals and the churches and other structures they built. Another Purpose of this Commission is the creation of Black Historical Markers to recognize the struggles and achievements of our Black citizens to promote diversity and equality for all Fayetteville residents and to oppose discrimination against any person in Fayetteville. In June 2023 the Commission celebrated the unveiling of a historical marker and street naming honoring Nelson Hackett, a man who was enslaved in Fayetteville in the 1840s. Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 8 of 16 The University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods are located directly to the west of the University of Arkansas main campus in Fayetteville. The approximate borders of the neighborhoods are Cleveland/Wedington Drive to the north, Razorback Road and Garland Avenue to the east, Nettleship Street to the south, and Sang Avenue to the west (see attached map). AHPP conducted a site visit in 2017 and followed with a letter recommending an architectural survey and noting the potential importance of early farmhouses and houses with connections to faculty from the University of Arkansas. The neighborhoods comprised a total of 414 parcels and 389 structures in 2021, with at least 253 or 65% of the structures being greater than 50 years old, according to public records. This project has had strong advocates for the past several years with the concurrence of the Historic District Commission. Due to development pressure, low housing supply and high demand, and a rapid increase in enrollment at the University of Arkansas, this neighborhood is at risk for redevelopment. Approximately 3,000 additional students were admitted to the University of Arkansas in 2022, and student housing complexes on available parcels near the main campus are regularly being submitted for development review. Additionally, homes in the University Heights neighborhood are increasingly becoming investment properties used for short-term rentals as University of Arkansas athletics and events have become a year-round draw. Large residential structures are being constructed between Razorback Road and Markham Hill, putting historic structures — particularly those on large lots — at high risk for redevelopment and removal of the remaining historic structures, particularly those owned as investment properties. Compounding that pressure is the lack of zoning protections for the historic structures in the neighborhood. A Historic Context Statement for the neighborhood is underway with funding assistance from the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, with the draft document being available as of early March 2024. That document and the neighborhood engagement that took place in fall 2023 will inform the development of the MPDF and the identification of properties that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and can be submitted with the MPDF. For more information visit https://www.fayetteville- a r.gov/4308/Historic-Preservation-Projects. 3. SCOPE OF WORK: The purpose of this project is to prepare a multiple property submission to the National Park Service for eligible properties in two Fayetteville, Arkansas, neighborhoods, University Heights and Haskell Heights. Recent successful National Register nominations in the neighborhoods include a small National Register Historic District (Garvin Drive) and an individually listed property (Anderson House) in the project area, and additional work has been requested by residents and approved by the Fayetteville City Council to submit a Multiple Property Submission to the National Register of Historic Places (please see National Register Bulletin 16B, "How to Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form" at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB16B-Complete.pdf for more information). This project is intended to complete the second phase of a two-phase project to document neighborhood development patterns and identify historic properties. A third phase under consideration is the establishment of a local historic district. While the final scope of services will be negotiated with the selected consultant, the City's baseline expectations include the following: a. Utilizing information from Phase I (historic context statement) of the University Heights/Haskell Heights historic neighborhood project, the consultant will prepare a National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) for the theme Historic and Architectural Resources of the University Heights and Haskell Heights Neighborhoods of Fayetteville, Arkansas, Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 9 of 16 which will establish historic contexts for the aforementioned neighborhoods' post — war development as well as mid-century modern development, and will identify property types that illustrate that context. b. The consultant will work with staff to select at least one site related to the MPDF for individual nomination to the National Register of Historic Places, of which the consultant will complete and submit an individual nomination form for to the National Register of Historic Places. The properties will be selected from those identified in Phase I University Heights/Haskell Heights historic context statement, based on owner consent/interest, relative historical significance, exterior and interior integrity (an evaluation of which may require site visits), and other factors, and will be subject to preliminary approval by the AHPP (SHPO) staff. c. The work products for Phase II will include: i. Completed and submitted National Register of Historic Places MPDF for the theme "Historic and Architectural Resources of the University Heights and Haskell Heights Neighborhoods of Fayetteville, Arkansas" to include: 1. Statement of Historic Contexts 2. Associated Property Types 3. Geographical Data 4. Summary of Identification and evaluation Methods 5. Bibliographical References ii. A summary of all of the sites related to the MPDF that are recommended for individual nomination to the National Register of Historic Places and the reason for their selection. iii. One completed and submitted National Register of Historic Places Individual Registration Form for which the consultant will conduct fieldwork; take digital photographs; conduct research, as required; prepare an architectural description and statement of significance and create maps. The completed National Register of Historic Places Individual Registration Form shall include: 1. Narrative Description 2. Narrative Statement of Significance 3. Bibliography 4. Geographical Data, including maps 5. Additional Documentation, as required 6. Photographs d. A PowerPoint presentation, for delivery at a public meeting, that summarizes the information in the MPDF, such as historic contexts and associated property types. This presentation may be delivered in person or virtually. e. Submittal of the MPDF and accompanying National Register Nomination to the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program for review and comment from the State Review Board. f. Presentation of the MPDF and accompanying National Register Nomination to the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program for review and comment from the State Review Board in Little Rock, Arkansas. g. Complete any required edits and respond to comments from the Arkansas Review Board prior to forwarding the MPDF to the National Park Service. 4. QUALIFICATIONS: Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 10 of 16 Any consulting firm, consulting team, or other organization may respond. The identified project lead must meet the Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications standards for performing work in the areas of 'History' or 'Architectural History'. These qualifications, which set specific minimum education and experience requirements, can be found online at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/sec-standards-prof- quals.htm. Respondents must articulate in their proposal how the designated project lead meets these minimum qualifications. 5. TENTATIVE PROJECT TIM ELINE: May 31, 2024 Consultant under contract with City June 10-11, 2024 Project coordination meeting with AHPP June 13, 2024 Project Kickoff with Historic District Commission June 20, 2024 Project Kickoff with Black Heritage Preservation Commission July 19, 2024 Property Owner Agreements for inclusion in MPDF/NR Nomination August 2, 2024 AHPP deadline for Consultant to be under contract September 2, 2024 AHPP deadline for project work to begin November 1, 2024 Draft MPDF and individual NR Nomination ready for review by City & AHPP December 6, 2024 City of Fayetteville goal to submit MPDF and individual NR Nomination to Arkansas State Review Board/AHPP deadline for draft of all project deliverables January 3, 2025 AHPP deadline for final draft of all project deliverables/MPDF submittal April 2, 2025 State Review Board meeting in Little Rock, Arkansas June 1, 2025 Deadline for final invoice to be submitted to City August 31, 2025 Final report submitted to AHPP by City. All project invoices must be paid and documented September 30, 2025 All grant project work must be complete 6. PROPOSAL FORMAT: The proposal shall contain all sections listed herein and shall respond fully to all requirements of the RFP. Statement should be no more than twenty-five (25) pages; single sided, standard readable, print on standard 8.5X11 pages. Proposers shall also submit a three (3) page (maximum) executive summary. The following items will not count toward the page limitations: appendix, cover sheet, 3-page executive summary, resumes (resumes shall be no more than 1 page per person), and forms provided by the City for completion: Part I — Letter of Interest: Provide a letter of interest signed by an authorized consultant representative. Provide the names, offices, email addresses, and phone numbers for all key Consultant staff proposed to be involved in the project. The Proposal shall identify in which office(s) the majority of the work will occur. Inclusion of all the items indicated above will constitute a passing score for this section (1-page maximum). Part II —Consultant/Staff Qualifications: The Proposal shall include a company profile outlining the company's history and philosophy. This section will also provide a brief biography of key individuals Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 11 of 16 proposed to be assigned to the project with an emphasis on a designated Project Manager. The Project Manager should be the individual conducting the day-to-day activities on this project. Each individual's proposed position/responsibility shall be indicated. Special emphasis shall be provided to the individual's background, qualifications, and experience on related and/or similar projects. The team must meet the Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Preservation set by the Secretary of the Interior (Appendix F). At least three (3) client references, including name, description of past working relationship, and current contact information shall be listed. Any applicable professional licenses or certifications shall be listed for each individual. All known sub -Consultants needed to complete the project (individual or firm) must be identified. Inclusion of all the items indicated above with a clear representation of each team member's competency and successful past experience with related and/or similar projects will constitute a passing score for this section (5-pages maximum). Part III — Management Approach: The Proposal shall include a discussion regarding the Consultant's intended management approach on this project, including coordination and monitoring of project schedule, cost, scope, communications, quality, resources and other management issues that the Consultant feels should be addressed (4-pages maximum). Part IV — Related Project Experience: The Proposal shall include up to three (3) profiles of similar services in comparable organizations. Past projects must have been completed in the last ten (10) years and shall include: project name, project time frame, client name, and a detailed description that clearly justifies why the Consultant's past experience is applicable to this RFP. For each project, indicate which proposed key individuals worked on the project and describe the role/work they performed and their levels of involvement (5-pages maximum per project/6-pages maximum total). Part V — State and Federal Grant Guidelines: Each Consultant team must familiarize themselves with all grant requirements as required by the CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT and must meet the minimum standards outlined in the appendices listed below in all work product produced. Please note this grant is subject to all rules and regulations pursuant to the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund Manual. See attachment: Arkansas Historic Preservation Program Grant Agreement i. Appendix E: (Other Consultant Contracts and Products) ii. Appendix F: (The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards) Part VI — Detailed Draft and Scope of Services: This will form the basis of the Scope of Services to be included in the Contract and be given the most weight in evaluation and scoring of the Proposals. The Proposal shall include (6 pages maximum): i. Detailed description of the Consultant's proposed scope of services (including specific tasks and deliverables) to accomplish the Objectives specified in Section 3 of the RFP; ii. List any additional documents or resources necessary to complete the Work; iii. Describe your competitive advantage and value-added services and benefits that would be provided to the City. This could include any innovative approaches previously utilized to assist communities develop their similar historic context statements, and any unique challenges and how you overcame them; Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 12 of 16 iv. Any optional, recommended services otherwise excluded from the Consultant's proposed Scope of Services but are considered by the Consultant to be valuable aspects in achieving the Objectives; v. A written summary identifying the types of information, data, and assistance needed from the City for a successful project; vi. A detailed description of the Consultant's proposed scope of services (including specific tasks and deliverables) to accomplish the Objectives specified in Section 3 of the RFP; vii. List any additional documents or resources necessary to complete the Work. Part VII — Project Schedule: The Consultant shall provide a project schedule, directly associated with the Consultant's proposed Scope of Services (2-pages maximum). All project timelines must meet the terms of grant agreement outlined in the CLG Program Grant Agreement (attached as Appendix A) and shown in Section 5. The City will submit quarterly reports to the AHPP detailing programmatic and fiscal progress of work on forms to be provided by AHPP. The timeline must include the AHPP invoice deadline of August 01, 2025. 7. PRICE PROPOSAL: Proposers shall provide a Flat Fee Price Proposal. Include a detailed cost breakdown including estimated personnel, exclusions, and all labor costs, expenses, overhead, and profit. Provide a payment schedule based on project milestones/deliverables. These deliverables will be confirmed during contract negotiations with the chosen consultant. The Price Proposal will serve as a basis for scoring. The Price Proposal will be scored as follows (1-page maximum): (Lowest Proposal Price/ Proposal Price) x 15 Lowest Price will receive a score of 15 Example: Proposal Price A = $25,000, Lowest Proposal Price = $20,000 ($20,000/$25,000) x 15 = Score of 12 points The City will review all submissions to determine compliance with required elements listed in this RFP. Submissions may be judged non -responsive and removed from further consideration if any of the following occur: a. The proposal is not received on time in accordance with the terms of this RFP. b. The proposal does not follow the specified format. c. The information is incomplete or insufficient. d. The quality of the proposal contained in the Submittal does not meet the goals, expectations or criteria set forth by the City. 8. SELECTION CRITERIA: The following criteria will be used by the City to evaluate and score responsive proposals. Proposers shall include sufficient information to allow the City to thoroughly evaluate and score the proposal. Each proposal submitted is not required to be ranked by the selection committee. The contract may be awarded to the most qualified firm, per the evaluation criteria listed below, based on the evaluation of the selection committee. Following the evaluation of the proposals, the Selection Committee may request Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 13 of 16 that the top-ranking firm(s) make an oral presentation or be interviewed. If presentations are necessary, they will take place either virtually or in Fayetteville, Arkansas. 1) 20% Qualifications in Relation to Specific Project to be Performed: Information reflecting qualifications of the consultant, partners, and project team. Indicated specialized experience and technical competence of the firm in connection with the type and complexity of the service required. Subcontractors, if used, shall be listed with information on their organization. 2) 20% Experience, Competence, and Capacity for Performance: Information reflecting the names, titles, and qualifications (including experience and technical competence) of the major personnel assigned to this specific project. 3) 30% Proposed Method of Doing Work: A proposed work plan (description of how the project would be conducted as well as other facts concerning approach to scope) indicating methods and schedules for accomplishing scope of work. Include with this the amount of work presently underway. 4) 20% Past Performance: Previous evaluations shall be considered a significant factor. If previous evaluations with the City are not available, the professional firm's past performance records with City and others will be used, including quality of work, timely performance, diligence, and any other pertinent information. Firm will provide a list of similar jobs performed and person whom the City can contact for information. 5) 10% Cost/Fees: Complete costs and fees as described in this RFP and for delivery of the proposal including fiscal feasibility and financial stability. All fees shall be clearly identified with RFP response and be itemized as much as possible. Please provide an itemized cost for the National Register nomination portion of the project. 9. CONTRACT FORMATION: If the negotiation produces mutual agreement, a contract will be considered for approval by the City of Fayetteville Administration. If negotiations with the highest-ranking Proposer fail, negotiations may be initiated with the next highest-ranking Proposer until an agreement is reached. The City reserves the right to reject all offers and end the process without executing a contract. 10. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION: The following documents are included with this solicitation as additional information: a. CLG Program Grant Agreement b. Appendix E: Other Consultant Contracts and Products c. Appendix F: The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 14 of 16 City of Fayetteville RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights SECTION C: Signature Submittal 1. DISCLOSURE INFORMATION Proposer must disclose any possible conflict of interest with the City of Fayetteville, including, but not limited to, any relationship with any City of Fayetteville employee. Proposer response must disclose if a known relationship exists between any principal or employee of your firm and any City of Fayetteville employee or elected City of Fayetteville official. If, to your knowledge, no relationship exists, this should also be stated in your response. Failure to disclose such a relationship may result in cancellation of a purchase and/or contract as a result of your response. This form must be completed and returned in order for your bid/proposal to be eligible for consideration. PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS, AS IT APPROPRIATELY APPLIES TO YOUR FIRM: 1) NO KNOWN RELATIONSHIP EXISTS 2) RELATIONSHIP EXISTS (Please explain): I certify that; as an officer of this organization, or per the attached letter of authorization, am duly authorized to certify the information provided herein is accurate and true; and my organization shall comply with all State and Federal Equal Opportunity and Non -Discrimination requirements and conditions of employment. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-503, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-503. If at any time during contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. 2. PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION At the discretion of the City, one or more firms may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking of the firms, which may also include oral interviews. NOTE: Each Proposer shall submit to the City a primary contact name, e-mail address, and phone number (preferably a cell phone number) where the City selection committee can call for clarification or interview via telephone. Corporate Name of Firm: Primary Contact: Phone#1 (cell preferred): E-Mail Address: Title of Primary Contact: Phone#2: Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 15 of 16 4. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: As an interested party on this project, you are required to provide debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order. Certification can be done by completing and signing this form. Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 "Debarment and Suspension" requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub -recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. Signature certifies that neither you nor your principal is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. Questions regarding this form should be directed to the City of Fayetteville Purchasing Division. NAME OF COMPANY: PHYSICAL ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX ID #: AR. SECRETARY OF STATE FILING #: PHONE: FAX: E-MAIL: SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: TITLE: DATE: Appendix 1: RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights City of Fayetteville, AR Page 16 of 16 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT Grant Number 24-CLG-03 This agreement is entered into between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, hereinafter referred to as AHPP. AHPP agrees to provide a grant in the amount of $40,000 for the purpose of funding consultants' services on the completion of an MPDF for the University -Haskell Heights neighborhood and the completion of a historic context statement for the Spout Spring neighborhood. THIS GRANT IS FOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE PURPOSE, OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF WORK HEREIN DEFINED. SCOPE OF WORK TASK A. The City will fiend consultants' services for Phase II of the University -Haskell Heights MPDF documentation. $30,000 is designated for this activity. TASK B. The City will fund consultants' services for the completion of a historic context for the Spout Spring neighborhood. $10,000 is designated for this activity. II. TIME FRAME of AGREEMENT This agreement will begin on March 15, 2024, and shall extend until September 30, 2025. No grant funds shall be expended by the City or its sub -grantees or assigns after September 30, 2025. No work on any grant task will be undertaken, continued, or carried out after September 30, 2025. III. PAYMENTS A. Payments of funds under this grant agreement will be made upon receipt of invoices requesting reimbursement of expenses paid by the City within the time frame of this agreement. B. No invoice received after August 1, 2025, will be processed. C. Payments under this grant agreement are conditioned on successful completion of the tasks described in the scope of work and submission of deliverables as described in section IV. D. The grant award is conditioned on the use of the grant funds to accomplish the tasks described in the scope of work. Funds will only be disbursed to achieve the purposes described in the scope of work. The grantee retains no interest in grant funds for which an invoice has not been submitted to AHPP by August 1, 2025. E. The availability of funds under this grant award is dependent on the National Park Service's 2024-2025 Historic Preservation Fund award to the AHPP. IV. MILESTONES A. Multiple Property Documentation Form (Phase II) 1. The city will be under contract for consultants' services by August 2, 2024. 2. Work on the project will begin no later than September 2, 2024. 3. A first draft of all project deliverables will be submitted to AHPP by December 6, 2024. 4. A final draft of all project deliverables will be submitted to AHPP by January 3, 2025. B. Spout Spring Historic Context Statement 1. The city will be under contract for consultant's services by August 2, 2024. 2. Work on the project will begin no later than September 2, 2024. 3. A first draft of all deliverables will be submitted to AHPP by February 24, 2025. 4. A final draft of all deliverables will be submitted to AHPP by April 19, 2025. V. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES AHPP staff agrees to make periodic reviews of the project to assess practices and products. AHPP reserves the right to enforce the procedures as outlined in this contract. AHPP agrees to make available advice and counsel necessary to accomplish the objectives and to render compensation upon invoice within a reasonable timeframe. VI. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. The City will submit quarterly reports detailing programmatic and fiscal progress of work on forms to be provided by AHPP on: Period Date Due March -June, 2024 July 15, 2024 July -Sept, 2024 October 15, 2024 October -December, 2024 January 15 2025 January -March, 2025 Aril 15, 2025 April -June, 2025 July 15 2025 July -September, 2025 October 15, 2025 FINAL October 31, 2025 B. The report of April 15, 2025, will be accompanied by a timeline for completion of all tasks and spend down of project funds by the end of the grant term. C. If changes in the grant agreement - e.g.: scope of work, products, budgets, etc. - are required, then the City must submit a written request detailing proposed changes and wait for written approval from AHPP before proceeding. D. No funds will be disbursed if grant reporting is more than two weeks delinquent. E. Failure to submit grant reports within one month of the date required herein shall be grounds for cancellation of the grant at the discretion of AHPP. F. The City will submit a final project report detailing all completed projects and including copies of all publications as per the requirements of this agreement no later than October 31, 2025. G. The City will promptly notify AHPP if it will be unable to expend the awarded funds within the grant period. VII. REQUIRED TRAINING Disbursement of funds under this agreement is contingent on attendance by a designated representative of the City at a training session on grant administration requirements held by AHPP. This requirement may be waived at the discretion of AHPP if the City's grants administrator has attended a grant administration training session within the two years prior to the execution of this grant agreement. VIII. COMPLIANCE A. All products and projects funded by grant funds must comply with the applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards." These include: 1) Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2) Standards and Guidelines for Identification, 3) Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation, 4) Standards and Guidelines for Registration, 5) Standards and Guidelines for Historical Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation, 7) Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Documentation, 8) Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, 9) Standards and Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, and 10) Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards. See Appendices A-E. B. PROJECT EXECUTION AND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS: All projects, sub - grants and consulting contracts funded through this grant agreement must be carried out in accordance with the procedures and standards laid out in the applicable appendices to this agreement. All work products funded through this grant must meet the standards laid out in the applicable appendices to this agreement. C. EASEMENTS AND PRESERVATION AGREEMENTS: The City will donate to AHPP a conservation easement on any property being restored, rehabilitated, or repaired as a part of any project(s) funded in whole or in part by this grant utilizing ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or more of funds awarded by AHPP. On such projects involving private properties, it will be the City's responsibility to secure this easement for donation to AHPP before any grant funds are released. The City will ensure that the owner(s) of property being restored, rehabilitated, or repaired as part of any project utilizing at least one dollar ($1) but less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) of Historic Preservation Fund monies awarded by AHPP enters into a five- year preservation agreement concerning that property with AHPP before grant funds are released. On such projects involving City property, the City and any other parties holding an ownership interest in such property must enter into a five-year preservation agreement with AHPP before funds will be released. D. All activities pursuant to this Agreement shall be in compliance with the requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; (78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. §§2000d et seq.); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, (87 Stat. 394; 29 U.S.C. §794); the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (89 Stat. 728; 42 U.S.C. §§6101 et seq.); the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. §12101); the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. §§4151 et seq.); and with all other federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination on grounds of race, color, sexual orientation, national origin, disabilities, religion, age, or sex. A. In all hiring or employment made possible by or resulting from grant awards, the City (1) will not discriminate against any employee or applicant from employment because of race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin, and (2) will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin. This requirement applies to, but is not limited to, the following: employment promotion, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or other recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The City and its sub -grantees will comply with all applicable statutes and Executive orders on equal employment opportunity and grant awards will be governed by the provisions, as implemented by, but not limited to, Department of the Interior policies, published in 43 CFR 17. IX. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GUIDELINES A. Certified Local Government grants are funded by the National Park Service Historic Preservation Funds Grants in Aid, CFDA number 15.904. All policies and procedures of the Department of the Interior, the National Park Service, and all other Federal regulations concerning expenditures of Federal funds must be followed by AHPP and all sub -grant recipients. All grant projects will be administered by AHPP and the City in accordance with the Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual. The manual may be found online here: https://www.nps. ov/subiects/historicpreservationfund/historic-preservation-fund- grant-manual.htm The City must maintain efficient and effective accountability and control of all funds received and expended under a sub -grant from AHPP. B. Federal Award Identification Number, total award amount, award date, and a copy of the NPS grant agreement with AHPP will be provided to subgrantee with this signed grant agreement. This subgrant award may be subject to additional conditions as required by the National Park Service. C. A City employee or paid contractor will be responsible for fulfilling all responsibilities assumed by the City under this grant agreement. D. The City will promptly disclose any conflict of interest to AHPP in accordance with 2 CFR §200.112. E. Indirect costs are not eligible for reimbursement under this award. F. The City will maintain all grant -related records at the City offices in accordance with its normal recordkeeping procedures. G. The City hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally assisted project. The following Federal regulations are incorporated by reference into this Agreement (full text can be found at http://www.ecfr.gov): 1) Administrative Requirements: 2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, in its entirety; 2) Determination of Allowable Costs: 2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E; and 3) Audit Requirements: 2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F. 4) Code of Federal Regulations/Regulatory Requirements: 2 CFR 182 & 1401, "Government -wide Requirements for a Drug -Free Workplace"; 2 CFR 180 & 1400, "Non -Procurement Debarment and Suspension", previously located at 43 CFR §42, "Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Non -Procurement)"; 43 CFR Part 18, "New Restrictions on Lobbying"; 2 CFR Part 175, "Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000"; FAR Clause 52.203-12, Paragraphs (a) and (b), Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions; and 2 CFR Part 25, System for Award Management (www.SAM.gov). H. Cities that expend $750,000 or more during a year in Federal awards shall have a single or program -specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. §§7501-7507) and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F. I. The City will comply with Federal competitive procurement requirements for professional services and subcontractors and will provide documentation of such compliance upon request. J. The City will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. K. Upon completion of the project, the Secretary of the Interior, the Comptroller General of the United States, AHPP, and/or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access for the purpose of financial or programmatic audit and examination any books, documents, papers and records of the City that are pertinent to the grant at all reasonable times during the period of retention provided in 2 CFR §200.334, for at least three (3) years or until all claims or audit findings have been resolved. L. The City will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 1913, Lobbying with Appropriated Moneys, as amended by Public Law 107-273, Nov. 2, 2002. "No part of the money appropriated by any enactment of Congress shall, in the absence of express authorization by Congress, be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device, intended or designed to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, a jurisdiction, or an official of any government, to favor, adopt, or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation, law, ratification, policy, or appropriation, whether before or after the introduction of any bill, measure, or resolution proposing such legislation, law, ratification, policy, or appropriation; but this shall not prevent officers or employees of the United States or of its departments or agencies from communicating to any such Members or official, at his request, or to Congress or such official, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation, law, ratification, policy, or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business, or from making any communication whose prohibition by this section might, in the opinion of the Attorney General, violate the Constitution or interfere with the conduct of foreign policy, counter -intelligence, intelligence, or national security activities. Violations of this section shall constitute violations of section 1352(a) of title 3 L" In addition to the above, the related restrictions on the use of appropriated funds found in Div. F, §402 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-161) also apply. M. The City will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 113858 "Strengthening Buy American Preferences for Infrastructure Projects" that may apply to the project that is the subject of this award. X. PUBLICATIONS. WORK PRODUCT AND PUBLIC INFORMATION A. An acknowledgment of National Park Service and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program support must be made in connection with the publication of any material based on, or developed under, any activity supported by Historic Preservation Fund grant funds. This acknowledgment shall be in the form of a statement as follows: "This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, an agency of the Division of Arkansas Heritage. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior or the Division of Arkansas Heritage. " B. Press releases, publications, and other public dissemination of information by the City concerning a project made possible by this grant shall acknowledge National Park Service, Department of the Interior, Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, and Division of Arkansas Heritage grant support. C. Posters, brochures, program literature, and publications will include the following statement: This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. D. Drafts of all publications, reports, audio-visual material, and other material subject to distribution, publication, or display must be submitted to AHPP for approval prior to production, publication, public display or general distribution. E. Publications, reports, audio-visual material, and other material subject to distribution, publication, or display will be made accessible to the widest audience possible in accordance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 12132 et seq.). For more information, guidance is available from the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section. F. The City grants the State of Arkansas and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement as complied or produced by the City, its contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. Any data, analysis, methodology, or other information that formed the basis of the work product funded by this grant award shall be made available to the AHPP and the NPS on request. The City shall ensure that these rights are secured by any sub -award or sub -agreement funded under this grant award. G. All Geographic Information Systems data produced or collected as a part of this grant funded project must comply with the NPS Cultural Resource Spatial Data Transfer Standards. Please contact the AHPP for more information. XI. DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS A. Any development project funded through this award must obtain appropriate permits from the City, including approval from the local Historic District Commission, if the project falls within a local ordinance district and the Commission has jurisdiction. B. Work funded by this grant award cannot be claimed under the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives Program. City and any potential subgrantees should consult with their attorneys or financial advisors about tax or other consequences of this award or its conditions on project financing. C. Approvals of project work by AHPP for this grant project are independent of and may not be substituted for the review and approval of any project or matter under any other AHPP or National Park Service program. XII. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AHPP assumes no responsibility with respect to accidents, illness or claims arising out of any work performed under a sub -grant supported project. The City is expected to take necessary steps to insure itself and its personnel and students and to comply with the applicable local, State, or Federal safety standards, including those issued pursuant to the National Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (see 20 CFR Part 1910). XIII. PROJECT CANCELLATION Approved projects may be canceled for one or more of the following reasons: A. The City requests project cancellation. B. The City fails to pursue project work in a timely fashion or fails to adequately pursue project objectives in a manner likely to ensure completion of the grant project or substantial spend -down of the grant award within the grant term. C. Project work or project administration is found not to be in conformance with conditions as stated in the grant agreement and appendices. XIV. AMENDMENTS This agreement may be amended upon written request and approval by both parties. XV. APPENDICES The following appendices are hereby incorporated into this agreement by this reference. SIGNATURES Scott Kaufman V City of aYetteville Signature Agency Director, AHPP State Historic Preservation Officer 1100 North Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Date 10 L10n eld Jordan Name (printed) Maw Date APPENDIX A: Historic Resources Survey and Documentation The production of surveys of historic structures, sites, etc., funded under this grant agreement will meet the following minimum standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), request for qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contract for survey and documentation services funded under this agreement includes duties and tasks as described in this appendix. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RFQ, RFP, or other bid solicitation for a project funded under this agreement to AHPP prior to publication of the announcement or request for review and approval and will not publish such announcement or request until comments been received from AHPP. A copy of the final announcement or request and proof of its publication or transmission to qualified professional will be provided to AHPP. 3. The City will submit a copy of any proposed contract and the name and vita of the contractor selected for services funded under this agreement to AHPP for review, prior to execution of the contract, and will not execute the contract until approval has been received from AHPP. A copy of the final executed contract will be provided to AHPP. 4. The City will contact the AHPP National Register staff to consult on the advisability of historic sites survey work in the proposed area, proposed boundaries for the survey work, etc., prior to engaging a contractor for survey work funded under this agreement. 5. The City will ensure that the contractor responsible for survey and documentation services funded under this agreement meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (see Appendix F) in History and/or Architectural History and/or, when applicable, Archaeology or Historic Landscape Architecture. B. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITES l . Prior to commencing any work under the contract, any contractor who has not attended a training on the required procedures for historic sites surveys taught by the AHPP National Register Survey staff within five (5) years prior to the survey initiation date must attend a training class on the procedures required for historic site survey. This one -day class, at the offices of AHPP, will train the contractor in the proper and thorough completion of Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms, photography requirements, mapping, and compilation of the finished product. 2. Prior to commencing any work under the contract, the Contractor, regardless of the date of his or her last training, must contact the AHPP National Register Survey staff to determine whether changes to required historic site survey procedures have changed since the contractor last attended a training. If the AHPP National Register Survey staff determines that the Contractor's attendance at an additional training class is advisable, the contractor must attend a training class on the procedures required for historic sites surveys prior to the initiation of any fieldwork under the contract. 3. The contractor must comply with the standards and procedures set forth in the AHPP Survey Manual in carrying out the contract work and in completion of the final product. 4. The contractor must design and complete the survey and produce a survey report in accordance with the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual Chapter 6, Section H, 2a-e and 3b and/or d as applicable and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification for Intensive Surveys (see at Identification Guidelines (U.S. National Park Service) (nps.gov)). The survey report should, at minimum, contain the following elements: • Survey methodology • A brief historic context specific to the area surveyed • A brief overview of historic resource types within the area surveyed • Maps outlining the boundaries of the area surveyed • Tables listing addresses or other location information of properties surveyed, resource numbers supplied by AHPP, and data relevant to evaluation of National Register eligibility, such as date of construction, property condition and architectural integrity, vacant lots, etc. • Maps locating properties by resource number and address • Language collected on Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms should be provided with the survey report in an organized, sortable, searchable, digital format, such as a database, spreadsheet, GIS data, or similar data file. 5. The contractor must complete an Arkansas Architectural Resources Form and provide site plans for each resource in the field. 6. The contractor must provide, on the Arkansas Architectural Resources Form, information specific to the property for which the survey form is prepared summarizing its history and any obvious changes to the building that appear to have occurred since its construction. 7. The contractor will take color digital photographs of each resource in the field. At the very minimum the photographs should show all facades of each building. In addition, representative streetscape photographs will be provided by the Contractor. These photographs will be submitted with the final survey product in both electronic and print form. To ensure efficient production of a quality product and to reduce the burden of repeated reviews, in projects involving inventory and documentation of more than 30 properties, the contractor will provide drafts of at least 10 completed Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms to the AHPP National Register Survey staff for review prior to completion and submittal of all Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms. AHPP staff will review draft forms and return comments to the contractor within 14 business days of receipt of the draft forms. 9. The contractor will provide copies of any ancillary work product or information compiled or generated by the contractor in the course of carrying out the historic site survey or form completion, including but not limited to archival research, and photographs, to AHPP on request. 10. The contractor will grant the City, the State of Arkansas, and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this Agreement by the contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. 11. The contractor must be able to adhere to set deadlines and provide initial and completed surveys by the dates set forth in contract documents. 12. The contractor will provide own transportation and equipment. 13. For resurvey work, a copy of the previous survey form must be attached to the new survey form for each property. 14. The contractor will provide one full -color copy and one digital copy of the final survey report and forms to the City and one full -color printed copy and two digital copies of the survey report and forms to AHPP. C. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES 1. AHPP will provide Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms and Ancillary Structures Forms to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 2. AHPP will provide access to survey files and copies of previous survey work as necessary for project completion. 3. AHPP will provide resource numbers to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 4. AHPP will provide a one -day training class at the AHPP offices in Little Rock on the procedures required for historic site surveys. This class will train the contractor in the proper and thorough completion of Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms, photography requirements, mapping, and compilation of the finished product. 5. AHPP will provide technical assistance to the contractor as necessary for project completion. APPENDIX B: National Register of Historic Places Nominations The production of nominations of historic structures, sites, etc., for listing on the National Register of Historic Places funded under this grant agreement will meet the following minimum standards, as applicable: A. OWS RESPONSIBILITIES The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), request for qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contract for services funded under this agreement includes duties and tasks as described in this appendix. 2. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RFQ, RFP, or other bid announcement for a project funded under this agreement to AHPP prior to publication of the announcement or request for review and will not publish such announcement or request until approval has been received from AHPP. A copy of the final announcement or request and proof of its publication or transmission to qualified professional will be provided to AHPP. 3. The City will submit a copy of any proposed contract and the name and vita of the contractor selected for services funded under this agreement to AHPP for review prior to execution of the contract, and will not execute the contract until approval has been received from AHPP. A copy of the final executed contract will be provided to AHPP. 4. The City will contact the AHPP National Register staff to consult on the advisability of preparation and submission of National Register of Historic Places nominations prior to engaging a contractor for preparation of nominations funded under this agreement. 5. The City will ensure that the contractor responsible for survey and documentation services funded under this agreement meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (see Appendix F) in History and/or Architectural History and/or, when applicable, Archaeology or Historic Landscape Architecture. B. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. It is required that the contractor complete a National Register of Historic Places nomination form for the historic property or properties in compliance with all applicable AHPP or National Park Service standards and guidance for nomination form completion. 2. The contractor will take color digital photos of the historic property in the field. In the case of a proposed historic district, representative streetscape photos will be provided by the Contractor. All photographs submitted must meet the National Park Service standards in the "National Register Photo Policy Factsheet." 3. The contractor will label all photographs to be included with the completed National or Arkansas Register of Historic Places nomination according to the National Park Service instructions. 4. The contractor will also need to locate the property on a United States Geological Survey Map and provide UTM coordinates for the historic property or district. 5. The contractor will be responsible for on -site presentation of information sufficient to fully support a recommendation for or against listing of the proposed historic district or property to the AHPP State Review Board at the earliest meeting following completion and staff approval. Any contractor who has not submitted an accepted National Register of Historic Places form in the last five (5) years must attend a training class on completing National or Arkansas Register of Historic Places nomination forms. This one -day class, at the offices of AHPP, will train the contractor in the proper and thorough completion of National Register of Historic Places nomination forms, photography requirements, mapping, and compilation of the finished product. 7. The contractor will provide copies of any ancillary work product or information compiled or generated by the contractor in the course of preparing the nomination, including but not limited to property data, databases, archival research, and photographs, to AHPP on request. 8. The contractor will grant the City, the State of Arkansas, and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement by the contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. 9. The contractor must be able to comply with deadlines and provide initial and completed nominations by the dates set forth in the contract between the City and the Contractor. 10. The contractor will provide his or her own transportation and any equipment necessary to completion of the nomination forms and presentation to the Arkansas State Review Board. 11. The contractor must work outside in extreme temperatures and provide proper attire for the weather conditions. 12. The contractor will perform all services and provide all materials to be produced under the contract in consultation with AHPP. 13. The contractor will conduct meetings with AHPP as required to complete the project. 14. The contractor will provide one full -color printed final clean copy nomination and attachments, including digital photographs, and one digital copy of any nominations created to the City and three full -color printed copies of the final clean copy nomination and attachments, including digital photographs, and two digital copies of any nominations to AHPP. C. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES 1. AHPP will provide access to any previously completed architectural resource forms in its possession for all buildings included in the contract for services. 2. AHPP will provide a one -day training class at the AHPP offices in Little Rock contractor on the proper and thorough completion of National Register of Historic Places nomination forms, photography requirements, mapping, and compilation of the finished product. 3. AHPP will provide technical assistance to the contractor as necessary for project completion. APPENDIX C: Design Guidelines and Preservation Plans Preparation of design guidelines and/ or preservation plans funded under this grant agreement will meet the following minimum standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), request for qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contract for services funded under this agreement include duties and tasks as described in this appendix. 2. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RFQ, RFP, or other bid announcement for a project funded under this agreement to AHPP prior to publication of the announcement or request for review and will not publish such announcement or request until approval has been received from AHPP. A copy of the final announcement or request and proof of its publication or transmission to qualified professional will be provided to AHPP. 3. The City will submit a copy of any proposed contract and the name and vita of the contractor selected for services funded under this agreement to AHPP for review prior to execution of the contract, and will not execute the contract until approval has been received from AHPP. A copy of the final executed contract will be provided to AHPP. 4. The City will submit a draft copy of the design guidelines to AHPP for review, comments, and approval prior to printing, and will not give final approval to the product or proceed with final printing of the document until approval has been received by AHPP. The City will ensure that any contractor engaged to prepare design guidelines funded under this agreement meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Professional Qualifications (see Appendix F) as an Architectural Historian, a Historic Preservation Planner, or a Historic Preservationist with experience equivalent to one or both those professions. Any contractor engaged to prepare a preservation plan must be qualified as a Historic Preservation Planner or a Historic Preservationist with experience equivalent to a Preservation Planner. B. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The contractor will design and complete a preservation plan or plans, when applicable, in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning (see at Preservation Planning Standards (U.S. National Park Service) (nps.gov)). 2. The contractor will draft design guidelines, when applicable, that include, at minimum: a. A summary of the City's ordinances, procedures, and bylaws relating to work regulated by the City's Historic District Commission; b. Maps describing the boundaries of any local or National Register historic districts in which work is regulated under authority of the Arkansas Historic Districts Act, A C.A. § 14-172-201, et seq., and local ordinance. c. A list of addresses within such historic districts; d. A history of the City as it provides historic context for any such local historic districts, National Register of Historic Places districts, or the City as a whole; e. An overview of the architectural styles prevalent in the local historic districts within the period of significance as described in the most recent historic resources survey and/or nomination previously approved by the City's Historic District Commission; f. The text of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as codified at 36 CFR 68. g. Illustrated design guidance addressing appropriate rehabilitation of and additions to historic structures and sites and construction or development of appropriate infill structures and sites that addresses all historic architectural styles, periods, and methods of construction specific to the local districts. 3. The contractor will provide copies of any ancillary work product or information compiled or generated by the contractor in the course of preparing work product on any project funded through this grant agreement, including but not limited to property data, databases, archival research, and photographs, to AHPP on request. 4. The contractor will grant the City, the State of Arkansas, and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement by the contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. 5. The contractor must be able to comply with deadlines and provide initial and completed deliverables by the dates set forth in the contract between the City and the Contractor. 6. The contractor will provide one full -color printed final clean copy of the design guidelines and/or preservation plan and attachments and one digital copy of the design guidelines and/or preservation plan and attachments created to the City and one frill -color printed copies and one digital copy to AHPP. C. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES 1. AHPP will provide access to survey files and copies of previous survey work as necessary for project completion. 2. AHPP will provide access to any nominations or other background research or information relevant to the project as necessary for project completion. APPENDIX D: Rehabilitation Work to Historic Properties Projects for rehabilitation work to historic properties funded under this grant agreement will meet the following minimum standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), request for qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contract for services funded under this agreement includes duties and tasks as described in this appendix. 2. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RFQ, RFP, or other bid announcement for a project funded under this agreement to AHPP prior to publication of the announcement or request for review and will not publish such announcement or request until approval has been received from AHPP. A copy of the final announcement or request and proof of its publication or transmission to qualified professional will be provided to AHPP. 3. The City will submit a copy of any proposed contract and the name and vita of the contractor selected for services funded under this agreement to AHPP for review prior to execution of the contract, and will not execute the contract until approval has been received from AHPP. A copy of the final executed contract will be provided to AHPP. 4. Architects/Engineers/Contractors must have the requisite experience and training in historic preservation or relevant field to oversee investigation, design and project work, as determined in consultation with AHPP. See Appendix F. The City will submit plans and specifications to AHPP for all proposed work that is part of any project funded by this grant that would make any material alteration in any feature of any property listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, either individually or as a contributing feature in a district. The City will not begin any such work until approval has been granted by AHPP. a. A site plan that has the north direction clearly marked b. A city/county map with the site of the property clearly labeled c. Set of plans and specifications for the project d. Photographs (or digital images) of all exterior elevations of the building or site, with views identified and oriented and keyed to the site plan. e. Interior photographs of all major rooms and those involved in the project, labels, and keyed to a floor plan f. Any additional information that will better enable a technical review of the project to be completed like historic photographs, historic structurereports, building studies, etc. 6. The City will ensure that the Contractor performs all work in compliance with the plans and specifications as approved by AHPP. 7. All projects must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Architectural Barriers Act, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 8. All products and projects must comply with the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Standards are: 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration offeatures and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. B. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES The Contract will perform all work in compliance with the plans and specifications as approved by AHPP. 2. All products and projects must comply with the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Standards are: 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 3. The contractor will provide copies of any ancillary work product or information compiled or generated by the contractor in the course of preparing work product on any project fiinded through this grant agreement, including but not limited to property data, databases, archival research, and photographs, to AHPP on request. 4. The contractor will grant the City, the State of Arkansas, and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement by the contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. 5. The contractor must be able to comply with deadlines set forth in the contract between the City and the Contractor. 6. The contractor must erect a project sign acknowledging the assistance of the Department of the Interior, the National Park Service, the Department of Arkansas Heritage, and the AHPP at the project site. This sign will be provided by the AHPP. C. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES AHPP will provide access to any previously completed architectural resource forms or architectural plans in its possession for all buildings included in the contract for services. 2. AHPP will review and approve or comment on all plans and specifications submitted by the City within 14 business days of submission of plans and specifications that allow for a clear and complete understanding of the scope and detail of the project. 3. AHPP will provide technical assistance to the contractor as necessary for project completion. APPENDIX E: Other Consultant Contracts and Products All other types of projects funded under this grant agreement will meet the following minimum standards, as applicable: A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The City will ensure that any request for proposals (RFP), request for qualifications (RFQ), or other bid solicitation and any contract for services funded under this agreement includes duties and tasks as described in this contract and appendix. The City will submit a copy of any proposed RFQ, RFP, or other bid announcement for a project funded under this agreement to AHPP prior to publication of the announcement or request for review and will not publish such announcement or request until approval has been received from AHPP or seven (7) business days have elapsed since the date on which the proposed announcement or request has been received by AHPP. A copy of the final announcement or request and proof of its publication or transmission to qualified professional will be provided to AHPP. 3. The City will submit a copy of any proposed contract and the name and vita of the contractor selected for services funded under this agreement to AHPP for review, prior to execution of the contract, and will not execute the contract until approval has been received from AHPP or seven (7) business days have elapsed since the date on which the proposed contract has been received by AHPP. A copy of the final executed contract will be provided to AHPP. 4. The City will ensure that any contractor engaged for work funded under this agreement meets the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards (see Appendix F) as determined in consultation with AHPP. 5. The City will ensure that all project work and work products meet all applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" including: 1) Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2) Standards and Guidelines for Identification, 3) Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation, 4) Standards and Guidelines for Registration, 5) Standards and Guidelines for Historical Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation, 7) Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Documentation, 8) Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, 9) Standards and Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, and 10) Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards. B. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITES 1. The contractor will ensure that all project work and work products meet all applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" including: 1) Standards and Guidelines for Preservation Planning, 2) Standards and Guidelines for Identification, 3) Standards and Guidelines for Evaluation, 4) Standards and Guidelines for Registration, 5) Standards and Guidelines for Historical Documentation, 6) Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation, 7) Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Documentation, 8) Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, 9) Standards and Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, and 10) Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards. 2. The contractor will provide copies of any ancillary work product or information compiled or generated by the contractor in the course of carrying out the contract, including but not limited to archival research, and photographs, to AHPP on request. 3. The contractor will grant the City, the State of Arkansas, and the United States of America a royalty -free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this agreement by the contractor, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. 4. The contractor must be able to adhere to set deadlines as set forth in contract documents. 5. The contractor will provide own transportation and equipment. 6. The contractor will provide one full -color copy and one digital copy of the work product, as applicable, to the City and one frill -color printed copy and two digital copies of the work product, as applicable, to AHPP. C. AHPP RESPONSIBILITIES 1. AHPP will provide Arkansas Architectural Resources Forms and Ancillary Structures Forms to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 2. AHPP will provide access to survey files and copies of previous survey work as necessary for project completion. 3. AHPP will provide resource numbers to the contractor as necessary for project completion. 4. AHPP will provide access to other AHPP files to the contractor as necessary for project completion. AHPP will provide technical assistance to the contractor as necessary for project completion. Appendix F: The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards The Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards were defined and officially adopted in 1983 (48 FR 44716, September 29) by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards were expanded and revised in 1997 (62 FR 33708, June 20) in response to amendments in the National Historic Preservation Act, but were not formally adopted for federal regulatory purposes. See https•/hvww nps og v/subjects/historicpreservation/upload/standards-izuideiines-arclieolosv-liistoric- preservation.pdf for more information. The 1997 revisions update the professional qualification standards written in 1983 and add definitions for seven other historic preservation disciplines that appear in the National Historic Preservation Act. The 1997 version also provides guidance on how to measure qualifying credentials that was lacking in the 1983 Standards. In the 1997 version, this information is provided in a standardized format that provides examples of the academic degrees, work and academic products, and professional activities that would qualify a professional in a particular discipline. Because the 1997 Standards give the clearest description of the current understanding of what a qualified professional is in each of the disciplines described in the National Historic Preservation Act, AHPP uses them as guidance on judging the qualifications of contractors or consultants working on projects funded by AHPP's CLG grant agreements. It is important to note that these are not intended to be requirements for ALL consultants or contractors working on a project, lead as well as entry-level. However, each project must contain a person in a lead, responsible project role with the requisite expertise. MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM FOR UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS/HASKELL HEIGHTS Prepared For : The City of Fayetteville Stantec April 22, 2024 Table of Contents PART I. LETTER OF INTEREST........................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... 2 PART II. CONSULTANT/STAFF QUALIFICATIONS.............................................................................5 CompanyProfile.................................................................................................................................5 Key Project Staff and Resumes..........................................................................................................6 PART III. MANAGEMENT APPROACH............................................................................................... 10 Team Management Structure........................................................................................................... 10 Resources for Project Management.................................................................................................. 10 QualityControl.................................................................................................................................. 11 Communication................................................................................................................................. 11 PART IV. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE................................................................................... 12 Relevant Experience in Comparable Projects................................................................................... 12 PART V. STATE AND FEDERAL GRANT GUIDELINES..................................................................... 15 PART VI. DETAILED DRAFT AND SCOPE OF SERVICES................................................................ 16 Understanding of the Project............................................................................................................ 16 Competitive Advantage and Value -Added Benefits........................................................................... 17 Scopeof Services............................................................................................................................. 18 PART VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE.......................................................................................................22 PRICE PROPOSAL.............................................................................................................................23 Appendix A: Resumes for Key Staff Cover image: The John G. Williams House #2. Source: John G. Williams House No. 2, Fayetteville, Washington County." Arkansas Historic Preservation Program, 2020. National Register of Historic Places Designation. Stantec is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) for the City of Fayetteville. Our past experience working in Fayetteville and Arkansas and researching and preparing National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) documents informs our approach. We have a deep understanding of the important architectural resources in the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods and how this project will aid the City in ensuring their continued preservation. CoxIMcLain Environmental Consulting, Inc. (CMEC) was founded in Austin, Texas, in 2007 and established a reputation as a leading environmental and cultural resources management consulting firm. As of January 1, 2022, the employees of CMEC joined Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec), a firm established in 1954. Stantec's team of cultural resources staff includes historic preservation specialists experienced in context development, historic resources surveys, archival and oral history research, preservation and survey planning, design guidelines, and eligibility evaluations and nominations for local, state, and national designations. Our project team includes four Secretary of the Interior —qualified professionals based predominantly in our Austin, Texas, office, who are not only disciplined and experienced historians but also possess extensive knowledge about successfully authoring NRHP documents. Sandy Shannon, a seasoned Project Manager and Senior Architectural Historian who served as the Project Manager for Phase I of this study, will serve as the Project Manager and primary point of contact for the project. She is joined by Althea Wunderler-Selby, the primary researcher and author of the Phase I study — she would serve in the same capacity for Phase II — and industry veterans Emily Reed, who will be Project Principal, and Amy E. Dase, who will provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) review. Each project professional has extensive relevant cultural resources management experience, including authoring NRHP registration forms, documenting twentieth-century residences and neighborhoods, and presenting to the public and historic preservation commissions and boards. All have worked in Arkansas and are familiar with the state's built resources and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program's standards. Our highly skilled team is prepared to mobilize quickly and is committed to completing all work to the satisfaction of the City of Fayetteville in advance of established deadlines. We believe that we are exceptionally qualified to provide the requested services. We have no conflicts of interest and are fully insured. A Certificate of Insurance listing the City as an additional insured will be provided prior to work beginning. We would be glad to provide additional information regarding our credentials or speak directly to discuss our proposal. Thank u P Emily Reed U.S. Technical Leader, Architectural History I Principal 8401 Shoal Creek Boulevard, Suite 100 1 Austin, Texas 78757 512-831-6204 (mobile) I Emily. Reed@stantec.com 1 We know the City of Fayetteville is dedicated to preserving its unique historic resources. With its 69 properties listed in the NRHP, numerous NRHP historic districts, and recently completed Citywide Heritage & Historic Preservation Master Plan, it is clear Fayetteville and its citizens value preserving their cultural heritage. We understand the City's purpose for this project is to prepare an MPDF for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods and an associated individual NRHP registration form. Collectively, these documents form a Multiple Property Submission (MPS). From our ongoing work in Phase I of the project, completing a historic context for the neighborhoods, we know the project has strong community support and support from the Historic District Commission. This project is particularly timely, as University Heights and Haskell Heights are experiencing development pressures, a low housing supply with high demand, increased rental properties, and a lack of zoning to protect historic properties. Many of these issues are exacerbated by the neighborhoods' proximity to the U of A. The U of A, however, also played a significant role in the neighborhoods' historic development; they were popular locations for U of A professors and staff to reside and provided the ideal environment for U of A School of Architecture staff to construct cutting -edge modernist homes. The MPDF produced by this project would provide City staff, commissioners, and property owners support in their efforts to identify and protect the historic resources in these neighborhoods. MPDFs are an important tool for streamlining future NRHP nominations as they collect and organize information about related significant properties and outline the registration requirements for properties. We understand that this project will lay the foundation for future NRHP nominations in the neighborhood, a local ordinance historic district, and will outline a potential path to preservation for other historic communities in Fayetteville. While we understand the final scope of work will be negotiated by the selected consultant and the City, the MPS's purpose is to document the unique history and important historic resources in University Heights and Haskell Heights and aid the City in future preservation efforts. As part of the development of the MPS, we will undertake the following tasks: • Utilize information from Phase I of the project to prepare an MPDF for the theme, Historic and Architectural Resources of the University Heights and Haskell Neighborhoods of Fayetteville, Arkansas. City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 2 • Establish historic contexts for the neighborhoods' post-war redevelopment and modernist architecture and identify associated property types. • Identify and summarize all sites related to the MPDF that are recommended for individual nomination to the NRHP. • Collaborate with City and Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) staff to identify one property related to the MPDF for nomination to the NRHP based on owner consent, integrity, and other relevant factors. • Conduct fieldwork, including site visits and research, to prepare an architectural description and statement of significance and create maps in support of the individual property nomination. • Present the MPDF and individual property nomination to the AHPP for review by the State Review Board. • Address and complete required edits from the Arkansas Review Board, facilitating an efficient review process and acceptance by the National Park Service (NPS). To fulfill the goals and tasks for the project, we will provide the following services: • Project Management: Project Manager Sandy Shannon has a proven track record of overseeing the completion of NRHP nominations that exceed client expectations and are on time and on budget. Our team emphasizes clear and effective communication with the client, stakeholders, and the public. Our projects are regularly reviewed and accepted by State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs) with little or no revisions. We recognize that each project is different, and our process is well -developed and customized to meet our clients' needs. We'll develop an internal project plan with goals and clear methodologies for accomplishing the goals, along with a detailed project timeline. • Public Presentations: We are experienced communicators and regularly present projects to the public, reservation professionals, and District and p p p Resource historic preservation commissions and boards. Designations Survey and Community We know how to communicate with these Preservation Outreach audiences, the content that needs to be Planning 4#1 conveyed, and how to build and achieve consensus. Sta nteC s Historic Project • Preparation of the MPS: An MPS comprises Resource Areas of Management an MPDF and one or more associated Surveys individual NRHP nominations. MPDFs are an Expertise important preservation tool; they collect and organize information about related significant Grant -funded Historic properties to support future NRHP projects Contexts nominations. An MPDF also outlines the Archival Research registration requirements for properties and aids in streamlining the nomination process. To develop the MPDF for University Heights and Historic Heights we will incorporate the historic context we are currently finalizing for the City and leverage our experience and knowledge of the neighborhoods to identify associated property types and their significance and registration requirements. The background knowledge we bring to the table will also inform the associated individual NRHP nomination; as part of Phase I, we identified and are knowledgeable of 14 potentially eligible properties in the neighborhoods. With City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 3 site visits, additional research, property owner interest, and consultation with the City and AHPP, we will determine the property with the greatest potential for NRHP listing, and our experienced staff will compile a concise and well -written nomination. Collectively, the MPS will provide a contextual overview of University Heights and Haskell Heights' developmental histories, architecture, significant associations, and significant property types and will provide a roadmap for future preservation efforts in Fayetteville. We have the experience and qualifications to fulfill the City's request for an MPS to promote and coordinate advancement of the protection, preservation, and development of historic and cultural resources. Our team are specialists in working with communities to tackle complex, multi -faceted historic preservation projects and we bring that experience to completing the scope of work established by the City. Our team members include modernism enthusiasts and seasoned expert historians who would bring the energy, motivation, and know-how your project deserves. Each member of our team of historic preservation professionals meets or exceeds the SOI Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation for performing work in the areas of history and/or architectural history. At Stantec, we take great pride in the quality of our work. We understand the importance of the historical record we are creating and the foundation it can provide for future projects. In our commitment to excellence, we have developed an incomparable three-part QA/QC process that ensures that our deliverables are complete and accurate. Our reports are meticulously reviewed by the historian who wrote them, followed by review from two more historians. This means complete, reliable, and valid deliverables. Plus, we collaborate with a technical editor with experience with cultural resource management documentation to ensure the report is complete, accurate, and presented in a clear and concise manner. Our clients attest to the difference. We are frequently retained by municipal clients for subsequent preservation planning services. Our team has extensive familiarity working with a variety of grant programs, including Certified Local Government Grants, and are familiar with the rules, regulations, and schedules that must be met as required by the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund. Let's get to work! City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 4 Company Profile CoxIMcLain Environmental Consulting, Inc. (CMEC), was founded in Austin, Texas, in 2007, and established a reputation as a leading environmental and cultural resources management consulting firm. As of January 1, 2022, the employees of CMEC joined Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec), a firm established in 1954, adding our environmental and cultural experience to Stantec's team of designers, engineers, scientists, and project managers. Stantec provides professional consulting services in design, planning, architecture, and cultural resources, among other industries. Stantec's overarching company philosophy is knowing and understanding the importance of communities. We know communities are fundamental. Whether around the corner or across the globe, they provide a foundation, a sense of place and of belonging. That's why at Stantec, we always design with community in mind. We care about the communities we serve —because they're our communities too. This allows us to assess what's needed and connect our expertise, to appreciate nuances and envision what's never been considered, to bring together diverse perspectives so we can collaborate toward a shared success. Our cultural resources team employs more than 30 architectural historians and historians, with the majority located in Texas and the Southwest region of the U.S. Embracing an interdisciplinary approach, our team has expertise in prehistoric archaeology, historic archaeology, history, architectural history, materials conservation, and historic preservation planning. Our team's myriad historic preservation - related capabilities include archival research; historic resources surveys; historic contexts; oral histories; local landmark, local historic district, and NRHP nominations; public involvement campaigns; Section 106 and 4(f) evaluations; historic building, bridge, and structure documentation to HABS or HAER standards; development of agreement documents; interpretive displays; and large multi -media productions that incorporate historic context, videos, and/or photographic documentation. All our supervisory personnel meet or exceed the Secretary of Interior's Qualification Standards for archaeology, architectural history, and/or history. Our architectural historians and historians have experience with an array of cultural resources investigations relevant to the requested scope of services. Having written hundreds of NRHP nominations, we are eminently qualified to identify the styles, plans, materials, and approximate construction dates of historic -period resources; detect significant alterations; and prepare written summaries. Our team members possess extensive knowledge about national, state, and regional economic, social, transportation, and population trends in history, architecture, and community development. We use digital mapping technologies for an organized and efficient nomination process and our rigorous quality assurance policy ensures that all deliverables are carefully reviewed and will meet expectations. Our extensive experience and quality work has led to excellent working relationships with repeat clients. City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 5 Key Project Staff and Resumes This section discusses the Stantec team's capabilities for the required services. Stantec team members are experts in documenting and assessing historic resources and authoring NRHP forms, and bring the knowledge gleaned from completing hundreds of projects. Key personnel identified in our proposal are veteran practitioners who have expertise in cultural resources management, nomination preparation, and the project area. Key members of our team have a successful history working on City of Fayetteville and Arkansas NRHP nomination projects, and the same individuals involved in the current project's Phase I study will play major roles in the Phase II study, resulting in time and budget savings. They are already up to speed having obtained, reviewed, and synthesized relevant sources; visited the neighborhood and analyzed its architectural qualities; and established working relationships with members of the community, AHPP and City staff, and City commissioners for the Phase I study. Each member of the Stantec historic preservation professional team meets or exceeds the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation. Resumes are provided in Appendix A. Emily Reed I Project Principal Emily Reed, Stantec's national historic preservation technical lead for Stantec, will be Project Principal. She will orchestrate project initiation and will be integral to collaborative planning. Ms. Reed is an architectural historian with more than a decade of experience with cultural resources management. She served as the Principal Investigator/Project Manager for Stantec's historic preservation plan for the City of Fayetteville and as the contract manager for the first phase of the current project, a historic context statement for University Heights and Haskell Heights. Ms. Reed has a thorough understanding of the city's built environment, unique history, preservation culture, and community engagement needs and processes. Other Arkansas experience includes multiple historic context, survey, and NRHP nomination projects for the Cities of Little Rock, Conway, El Dorado, Eureka Springs, and Fort Smith. She has extensive experience presenting projects at public meetings and to boards and commissions. Ms. Reed City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 6 has a depth of experience managing grant -funded historic preservation projects and ensures that her clients receive timely and accurate progress reports and deliverables to meet reporting requirements. References: Name: Justin Kockritz, Texas Historical Commission/SHPO Description of Past Working Relationship: Stantec prepared a thematic historic context study of Calhoun County, Texas in the MPD format to guide NRHP eligibility evaluations for a countywide survey. Current Contact Information: Justin. Kockritz@thc.texas.gov; 512-936-7402 Name: Greg Smith, Texas Historical Commission/SHPO Description of Past Working Relationship: Stantec led a team that successfully prepared 14 NRHP nominations for properties affected by Hurricane Harvey. Current Contact Information: Greg. Smith@thc.texas.gov; 512-463-6013 Name: Ellen Agee, Planning Administrator, City of Covington, LA Description of Past Working Relationship: Prepared a NRHP historic district update of the Division of St. John requiring a reassessment of the district's context and significance. Prior to Ms. Agee's employment, Stantec conducted a historic resources survey of the district and surrounding neighborhoods that served as the foundation for the formal nomination update. Current Contact Information: EAgee@covla.com; 985-867-1214 Name: Hannah Ratzlaff, Urbana Designer, City of Little Rock, AR Description of Past Working Relationship: Conducted a survey and prepared an NRHP nomination for the University Park neighborhood and conducted survey for the Hillcrest neighborhood. Current Contact Information: HRatzlaff@littlrock.gov; 501-371-4789 Name: Lynda Ozan, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, Oklahoma Historical Society/SHPO Description of Past Working Relationship: Conducted a survey of 13 of Oklahoma's All -Black Towns and prepared an NRHP nomination for The Abe Lincoln Trading Company. Subsequently retained for Phase 11 of the project (ongoing). Current Contact Information: Lynda.Ozan@history.ok.gov; 405-522-4484 Sandy Shannon I Project Manager Sandy Shannon is a senior architectural historian who specializes in projects for municipal clients. She will act as Project Manager and be the City's primary point of contact. She will also guide all research, analyses, and syntheses processes, overseeing outline and content development and assembly of the MPDF and individual NRHP nomination form. Her expertise includes surveying, assessing, and documenting historical resources and evaluating eligibility for the NRHP; archival research; local landmark and NRHP nominations; historic preservation and survey plans; and historic context development. She regularly serves as a project manager for Stantec and has worked extensively in Arkansas on context, survey, and preservation planning projects in Conway, El Dorado, Eureka Springs, Fayetteville, Fort Smith, and Little Rock. Ms. Shannon led the development of the historic context statement for University Heights and Haskell Heights, the ongoing first phase of the current project. She also participated in the development of Fayetteville's Heritage and Historic Preservation Master Plan, including authoring the survey plan and the content on the city's mid -twentieth century architects, among other contributions. She began her career working on SurveyLA, a citywide survey of Los Angeles, where she gained valuable experience relevant to the City of Fayetteville project through the survey's MPD approach to identifying and evaluating thematically related historic properties. She contributed to the City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights project's in-depth historic context and became versed in applying the context's eligibility standards to guide the evaluation of the city's extensive array of historical resources. She has applied the MPD methodology in other projects, such as Stantec's countywide survey of Calhoun County, Texas, where she served as project manager. Among Ms. Shannon's NRHP nominations are historic districts with Modernist residences in View Park, California and Little Rock, Arkansas and an NRHP update to the Lake Leatherwood Park Historic District, in Eureka Springs, Arkansas. Her Flatonia, Texas Commercial Historic District nomination was used by the state's SHPO as an exemplary example for future projects. Of additional relevance, Ms. Shannon has a special interest in post -World War 11 modernism and regularly leads or participates in projects requiring study of this era. In addition to her role as Project Manager, she will provide quality assurance and quality control for the MPDF and individual NRHP registration form. References: see references for Emily Reed Amy E. Dase I Project Historian With 35 years of cultural resources management experience, Senior Historian Amy E. Dase has conducted research and prepared historic contexts in more than a dozen states, and is expert at adeptly preparing accurately reported, well organized, clearly written deliverables. As a veteran researcher, Ms. Dase has solid practice with oral, secondary, and primary local, state, federal, and international archival sources to develop historic contexts. Ms. Dase worked for the Texas Historical Commission's NRHP Programs Office from 1989 to 1996, gaining substantial experience with NRHP-driven research, documentation, and evaluation, completing more than 100 nominations, and regularly presenting properties considered for designation to the State Board of Review. She was principal investigator and major author for a study of farms and ranches in Bexar County, Texas with an inclusive ethnic component and meticulous property type analyses; sole author of an agricultural context for Calhoun County, Texas; and project director for a statewide study of agriculture for History Nebraska, the state's historic preservation office. In Arkansas, she recently led research and contextual development for a grant funded NRHP nomination of University Park, a Black neighborhood associated with Little Rock's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts. Ms. Dase will provide quality assurance and quality control for the MPDF and individual NRHP registration form, ensuring that both documents capture necessary content and are well -written, clear, and concise. References: see references for Emily Reed Althea Wunderler-Selby I Project Historian Althea Wunderler-Selby is an architectural historian and historian with five years of professional experience across the Southeast, Midwest, and Pacific Northwest. She has completed a wide variety of project types — from single determinations of eligibility to large-scale architectural surveys documenting and assessing thousands of resources — for various clients, ranging from the public sector to the private sector. Ms. Wunderler-Selby is well -versed in documenting, researching, and assessing historic resources and has successfully authored several NRHP nominations and historic context documents. She served as the lead researcher and primary author of the historic context statement for University Heights and Haskell Heights. Ms. Wunderler-Selby assisted in the development of a historic context in support of an MPDF for the Willamette Valley System of dams in Central Oregon and conducted extensive archival research. With previous employers, she successfully authored NRHP nominations for the Eastside Historic District in Jacksonville, Florida, the Coulter Memorial Academy in Cheraw, South Carolina, and the amended Cheraw Historic District in Cheraw, South Carolina. She will be the primary City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 8 researcher and author of the University Heights and Haskell Heights MPDF and the accompanying individual NRHP nomination form. Name: David Garfunkel, LIFT JAX Description of Past Working Relationship: Althea was the project manager and primary author of a historic resources survey and NRHP historic district nomination for the Eastside neighborhood in Jacksonville, Florida, completed for the non-profit organization LIFT JAX. Current Contact Information: David@Iiftjax.com; 617-935-2791 Name: Emily Foster, City of Lakeland, Florida Description of Past Working Relationship: Althea was the project manager and primary author of a historic resources survey of two residential historic districts in Lakeland, Florida, containing over 1,000 historic resources. Current Contact Information: Emily.foster@lakelandgov.net; 863-834-6094 Name: Rob Wolfe, Town of Cheraw, South Carolina Description of Past Working Relationship: Althea was the co-author of a NRHP historic district amendment and a NRHP historic district nomination for the Town of Cheraw. Current Contact Information: Rwolfe@cheraw.com; 843-537-7283 City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 9 Team Management Structure City of Fayetteville Emily Reed Project Principal Sand Shannon Ame E. Dase Althea Wunderler-Seib Y Y Project Manager I I QAI I I Lead Author Ability to Perform All Aspects of the Project Stantec has the capability and capacity to perform the project in-house and will not use any subcontractors. Resources for Project Management Stantec uses a suite of software management processes. Oracle project management and accounting software integrates resource scheduling and allocation, contract compliance, invoicing, and timesheet collection. The system is updated daily, giving current detailed views of project progress and generating useful alerts. Stantec project managers closely track deliverable, task, and work authorization expiration dates, and key stages in expenditures for labor and direct expenses in Oracle. We use this tool across our programs and offices to achieve effective communications, tracking, and project management for our clients' benefit. Stantec also uses integrated leading -edge technologies to support historic preservation work. We use ArcGIS Online (AGOL) and ArcGIS to map and analyze collections of historical resources that allows multiple users to share an interface. Our team uses Wi-Fi/cellular tablets during field investigations to record data automatically saved to the cloud. To produce reports, we use Microsoft Office and the Adobe Creative Suite. Our expertise with these programs results in handsome deliverables that clearly convey results and are compatible with client software. With multiple moving parts, MPDFs and NRHP nominations require accessible and integrated software to organize and track all project components, from research, to developing outlines, and writing and editing deliverables, to tracking project tasks, personnel assignments, and due dates. Stantec hosts draft documents online in Microsoft SharePoint, a collaboration platform that allows multiple users to work simultaneously in the same document. The application automatically stores new versions of working documents and supports editing and quality assurance markups and comments. EndNote is a desktop platform that organizes sources for in -document citations and bibliographies. During research phases, the platform enables the team to capture primary and secondary sources online and manually to a shared project library. During the synthesis phase, the platform guides critical thinking to organize ideas and annotate sources. Finally, during the writing phase, Endnote Microsoft Word compatibility pulls citations City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 10 from the shared library to produce the bibliography. With the EndNote tool, our team promotes development of a project library that organizes and safely stores research sources that can be readily shared. The Stantec team uses collaborative applications —the list -making Trello and the spreadsheet - database hybrid Airtable—to assign and monitor tasks, deadlines, and progress, track deliverables, and communicate. Quality Control We take great pride in the quality of our work. We understand the importance of the record we are creating and the foundation it can provide for future projects. We understand that the University Heights and Haskell Heights MPDF is a long-term investment and will lay the groundwork for future NRHP nominations and preservation efforts in Fayetteville. Our goal is to help the City of Fayetteville fully, accurately, and efficiently document the history of the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods. We have a three-part QA/QC process that holds three historic preservation professionals accountable for the work we deliver to our clients. Work products are self -checked by the primary author and then reviewed by the project manager and a member of the project team. We also use our in-house technical editors to produce deliverables with thoughtful content presented in a clear and concise manner. Our clients attest to the difference. We are frequently retained by municipalities after completing projects for subsequent preservation planning services. Communication At the project outset, Stantec will confirm the co preferences of the City of Fayetteville and will d communication plan accordingly. Project Manager S Shannon will serve as the single point of contact for t City. We will communicate regularly with City staff an( provide the City with quarterly reports detailing project progress for submittal to the AHPP, in accordance with grant requirements. Internally, the project team will meet weekly to review progress in comparison to the deliverable schedule and budget burn rate. The ca. 1958 E. K designed Worthingtc at 1606 West Center Street. Source: Stantec, 2023. City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 11 Relevant Experience in Comparable Projects In addition to our past experience in Fayetteville, completing the City's Heritage and Historic Preservation Master Plan and our ongoing work for Phase I of the project, the Stantec team brings a wealth of experience relevant to the preparation of an MPS for University Heights and Haskell Heights. Selected relevant projects are provided below. NATIONAL REGISTRATION NOMINATIONS FOR 14 PROPERTIES AFFECTED BY HURRICANE HARVEY TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (2022-2024) The Texas SHPO, the Texas Historical Commission (THC), retained Stantec to complete 14 NRHP nominations. The nominations were prepared on behalf of property owners who accepted federal grant funding for recovery from Hurricane Harvey; listing in the national register was a condition of the grant. The nominated properties are in Aransas, Austin, Bastrop, Caldwell, Galveston, Harris, Nueces, Refugio, and Victoria Counties, Texas. The Stantec team prepared nominations for the ca. 1847 Mary Christian Burleson House, the 1889 Zedler Mill Complex, the 1929 Ritz Theater, the 1932 Congregation Beth Jacob Synagogue (with 1962 addition), the 1935 Rockport School, the ca. 1946 Sills Building and the Rosewood Cemetery. Our teaming partner prepared nominations for an additional seven properties. The nominated properties represented a wide variety of periods and areas of significance, including Architecture, Commerce, Early Settlement, Entertainment/Recreation, Ethnic Heritage, Industry, Military, Politics/Government, and Social History. Stantec reviewed and analysed data from determinations of eligibility coordinated with the NPS, prepared research designs for each property that addressed the anticipated areas and periods of significance and established research questions, conducted fieldwork to obtain current photography to NPS standards, and developed the nomination forms. Stantec worked closely with THC staff and held regular meetings to discuss progress and comments received. Stantec delivered the project on time and on budget. The nominations were listed in the NRHP in 2024. Emily Reed served as the project's contractor manager and a senior architectural historian. Ms. Reed, Sandy Shannon, and Amy E. Dase were co-authors of multiple national register nominations. 06 CLIENT CONTACT Gregory Smith Texas Historical Commission greg.smith@thc.texas.gov 512-463-6013 RELEVANCE TO THE MPS ✓ Successful NRHP nominations ✓ Architecture and early settlement areas of significance ✓ Documentation and nomination of Modernistic resources ✓ Close collaboration with City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 12 ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORICAL SURVEY OF OKLAHOMA'S ALL -BLACK TOWNS OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY (2021-2023) In November 2021, the Oklahoma SHPO retained Stantec to conduct an architectural/historic resources survey of 13 of the 14 extant all -Black towns in Oklahoma. More than 50 all -Black towns were founded, governed, and inhabited by Black Oklahomans starting after the Civil War through the early twentieth century. The purpose of the survey was to document historic resources associated with the 13 towns —Brooksville, Clearview, Grayson, IXL, Langston, Lime, Red Bird, Rentiesville, Summit, Taft, Tatums, Tullahassee, and Vernon —and identify individual resources and districts potentially eligible for the NRHP. As part of the survey methodology, Stantec completed preliminary research to identify locations of historic -age resources within each town; conducted field investigations to document both previously and newly identified historic -age resources within each town's survey boundaries; prepared an Oklahoma Historic Preservation Resources Identification form for each historic -age resource documented; and developed an in-depth historic context to evaluate the historic significance of resources and identify properties for potential nomination to the NRHP. The survey documented a total of 266 resources. Of these, 38 were recommended potentially eligible for the NRHP. An NRHP nomination for The Abe Lincoln Trading Company in Clearview, Oklahoma, was also prepared as part of the project. The nomination was listed in December 2023, and in January 2024, the NPS included the nomination as one of three examples of an excellent NRHP nomination in their Best Practices Review Nomination Properties for Cultural Significance Under Criterion A. The survey was partially funded by the Underrepresented Community Grant program through the Historic Preservation Fund matching grant-in-aid from the NPS, Department of the Interior, and is part of the ongoing Oklahoma Comprehensive Survey Program, supported by both state and federal funds. Emily Reed was the project's Principal Investigator and Amy E. Dase was the project's Research Director and performed QA/QC of deliverables. CLIENT CONTACT Lynda Ozan Oklahoma Historical Society Lynda.Ozan@history.ok.gov 405-522-4484 RELEVANCE TO THE MPS ✓ Identification of NRHP-eligible historic resources through fieldwork and the completion of a thorough historic context ✓ Successful NRHP nomination highlighted by NPS as an example project ✓ Grant funded City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 13 HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY AND NRHP NOMINATION OF UNIVERSITY PARK, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, 2020-2023 The City of Little Rock, Arkansas, retained Stantec to conduct a historic resources survey and prepare an NRHP nomination for University Park, a Black neighborhood associated with the city's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts that developed on the heels of Civil Rights victories in Little Rock. The project's successful NRHP district nomination included a historic context documenting the neighborhood's developmental, ethnic heritage, and social histories and the contributions of prominent Black community members who resided in the neighborhood. Primary sources, archival newspapers, oral history interviews with current and former residents, historic period photographs and maps, and other resources informed the historic context. Like University Heights and Haskell Heights, the neighborhood has a varied collection of architectural styles, including Modernistic examples like the Contemporary style. The University Park Historic District was successfully listed in the NRHP and contains 138 contributing resources. The NPS funded the project through the African American Civil Rights of the 20th-Century Grant Program; the project met the requirements of the grant agreement and AHPP standards. Emily Reed was principal investigator for this project. Amy E. Dase led research, contextual development, and the completion of the NRHP nomination. Sandy Shannon participated in QA/QC of the survey deliverables and preparation of the NRHP nomination. CLIENT CONTACT Hannah Ratzlaff City of Little Rock hratzlaff@littlerock.gov 501-371-4789 RELEVANCE TO THE MPS ✓ Successful NRHP nomination including a neighborhood context ✓ Documentation and nomination of mid -twentieth century historic resources and Modernist styles ✓ Grant funded ✓ Completed to AHPP standards City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 14 We have completed numerous projects funded by the NPS' Historic Preservation Fund and administered by the AHPP and are therefore familiar with the grant requirements of the Certified Local Government (CLG) Program Grant Agreement. We also certify that we meet the standards outlined in the RFP attachments: Other Consultant Contracts and Products and The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards. Some of our NPS Grant -Funded Projects in Arkansas All completed according to grant requirements Historic Resources Survey of Country Club Colony and Retta Brown Neighborhoods El Dorado Historic Resources Survey Update of the Conway Commercial NRHP District Conway Historic Resources Survey Update of the Hillcrest NRHP District Little Rock Historic Resources Survey Update of the Hendrix College Addition NRHP District Conway Historic Resources Survey Update of the Belle Grove NRHP District Fort Smith Historic Resources Survey and NRHP Nomination of University Park Little Rock City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 15 Understanding of the Project We understand that the goal of this project is to prepare an MPDF for the University Heights and Haskell Heights neighborhoods, providing a historical context, identifying associated property types, and establishing significance and integrity requirements for nomination properties to the NRHP. This MPDF will facilitate the nomination of one individual property as part of the project and provide the framework for future nominations in the neighborhoods. From our ongoing work on Phase I of this project, we understand that University Heights and Haskell Heights have a rich and unique history. These neighborhoods began as rural areas on the outskirts of Fayetteville, home to important nineteenth- century settlers and agriculturalists. By the mid -twentieth century, due to their proximity to the U of A, they developed into enclaves for U of A staff and for experimentation in modernist architecture. The neighborhood's hilly terrain and wooded lots provided the perfect playground for U of A's burgeoning School of Architecture faculty and students to explore the Organic design philosophy popularized by Frank Llyod Wright and favored by U of A professors and private architects Fay Jones and John G. Williams. This MPDF would support City staff, commissioners, and property owners in identifying and protecting historic resources in University Heights and Haskell Heights. This project will provide the basis for future NRHP nominations in the neighborhoods, serve as a foundation for a local ordinance district nomination, and its successful completion will outline a framework for preserving other important communities in Fayetteville. Specific project goals are listed below. • Utilize information from Phase I of the project to prepare an MPDF for the theme Historic and Architectural Resources of the University Heights and Haskell Neighborhoods of Fayetteville, Arkansas. • Establish historic contexts for the neighborhoods' post-war redevelopment and modernist architecture and identify associated property types. • Identify and summarize all sites related to the MPDF that are recommended for individual nomination to the NRHP. • In collaboration with City staff and the AHPP, based on owner consent, integrity, and other relevant factors, identify one property related to the MPDF to nominate for the NRHP. • Conduct fieldwork, including site visits and research, to prepare an architectural description, statement of significance, and create maps in support of the individual property nomination. • Attend a public meeting to present the project and summarize the MPDF. • Present the MPDF and individual property nomination to the AHPP for review by the State Review Board. • Address and complete required edits from the Arkansas Review Board, facilitating an efficient review process and acceptance by the NPS. We understand that this project is funded by a NPS CLG grant administered by the AHPP, and that project deliverables and timelines must meet the terms of the grant agreement. This project will begin by August 2, 2024, and conclude by September 30, 2025. City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 16 Competitive Advantage and Value -Added Benefits Below are ways our team offers a competitive advantage and value-added benefits. We know the neighborhoods and the City. Our ongoing work with the City of Fayetteville to complete Phase I of this project, a historic context for University Heights and Haskell Heights, - provides us with unparalleled and invaluable insight into the built environment and significance of the neighborhoods. As part of Phase 1, we have _ ----- - - already completed extensive research, windshield survey of the neighborhoods, and have ` identified significant resources potentially eligible for the NRHP. We have a deep understanding of ` �• the developmental history of the neighborhoods and relevant significance themes. Additionally, we 3stanuc �f " previously completed the Fayetteville Heritage _ and Historic Preservation Master Plan, providing Heights us with insight into Fayetteville's overall history and built environment. Our value -add and advantage is that we will not be starting from ground zero with the MPS; we already have many of the sources and knowledge we need to begin Stantec prepared the draft Historic Context Statement, work, resulting in time and cost savings that will University Heights and Haskell Heights, making us translate to more robust and efficiently completed intimately familiar with the neighborhoods. products. We also understand the development pressures the city is facing. We know that this project comes at a critical time, and we are committed to preparing a useful and enduring product that will serve as the foundation for future work. • Arkansas is our stomping ground. We have completed nine studies for municipal clients in Arkansas in the last three years. We know the state, the resources and repositories useful for historic preservation work, and the personnel at the AHPP. • We are NRHP nomination writing experts. We have written innumerable NRHP nominations for individual properties and districts. We understand the necessary content and are adept at writing compelling and concise NRHP documents. Our record shows we can deliver thoughtful and well -written products ensuring efficient review by the AHPP and NPS. • We'll say it, our team is stacked. With more than 20 historians and architectural historians on staff, we can select those who are best suited for your project. Emily Reed is a respected industry leader who expertly guides municipalities through complex historic preservation projects, including prior coordination with City of Fayetteville staff. Sandy Shannon skillfully leads teams through project tasks in Arkansas and beyond and is a modernism lover who jumps at the chance to work on projects involving mid -twentieth century architecture. Seasoned veteran Amy E. has extensive knowledge and experience that allows her to ensure our products are the best they can be. Writer Althea Wunderler-Selby has abundant experience documenting the history of residential neighborhoods and compiling compelling reporting. City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 17 • We invest in the tools and technologies we need to do a job well. We subscribe to a variety of resources to best research, collaborate, and organize our context studies. From digitized archival newspaper, Ancestry.com, and JStor subscriptions to the reference management system Endnote, we have the tools needed for robust, efficient, and organized research and writing. • We'll do it well, on time and on budget. We have a reputation for quality and a track record of completing CLG grant projects on time and on schedule. Our repeat clients, like the Cities of San Antonio, Texas; Little Rock, Arkansas; and Slidell, Louisiana and the Oklahoma and Texas SHPOs, to name a few, are evidence of our success. Scope of Services In this section, we describe the main principles guiding Stantec's approach to developing the MPDF and individual NRHP registration form and provide a detailed description of the key project tasks and deliverables. Throughout these tasks, Stantec historians will update staff on the development of the project deliverables. Stantec will assist the City in submitting content for quarterly reports to the AHPP detailing programmatic and fiscal progress of work. As further described in the following sections, Stantec has identified the following information, data, and assistance needs from the City for a successful project: • AHPP communications regarding the project • Outline, MPDF, and individual registration form review Project Initiation and Commission Presentations Upon selection, Stantec will participate in a virtual project coordination meeting with City of Fayetteville and AHPP staff. The meeting will be held within 10 days of execution of the contract. Items to discuss and finalize during this task may include: • Confirm the project's goals • Preliminarily discuss the selection of a property for the individual NRHP nomination • Discuss logistics for visiting the property for documentation • Develop the final schedule Decisions reached during this collaborative phase will be documented in a final work plan and project schedule that Stantec will submit for approval. Stantec will virtually meet with the City's Historic District Commission and Black Heritage Preservation Commission to present the project, during either the scheduled June meetings or later to accommodate the project schedule. At these meetings, Stantec will introduce our team and present the project's goals, scope, work plan, and timeline. These meetings will ensure that both commissions are aware of the project, understand the groundwork it lays for future preservation efforts in the city, and have the opportunity to provide feedback. City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 18 Individual NRHP Nomination Selection Our team will work collaboratively with City and AHPP staff to review the properties in University Heights and Haskell Heights with the greatest potential for individual listing in the NRHP and identify a candidate for the individual NRHP nomination. Using the list of 14 properties we STANTEC ALREADY recommended potentially eligible during Phase I of the project, Stantec HAS A COLLECTION OF will compile a summary of each property's reason for potential eligibility. PRIMARY AND This summary document will be provided to the City and AHPP staff to SECONDARY SOURCES help guide the selection process. Next, we will consider owner consent IDENTIFIED DURING to listing, as gathered by the City, and the known exterior integrity and PHASE I OF THE historical significance of each property. In consultation with the City and PROJECT AND IS SHPO staff, Stantec will select three properties with the greatest FAMILIAR WITH LOCAL potential for listing to visit in person to document and assess REPOSITORIES architectural integrity. Fieldwork and Research After finalizing the list of three properties, a Stantec architectural historian will perform site visits. Our team will request that an AHPP representative and a City staff member attend each site visit. This will ensure that the AHPP and the City fully understand the integrity and significance of each property and will streamline the process of selecting the individual property for nomination. Each site visit will be no more than 90 minutes long and will include taking notes on architectural features and photographing the interior and exterior of the buildings. It is paramount that property owner consent is obtained prior to the site visits; Stantec will rely on the City to coordinate property access. To minimize expense, the City will schedule all site visits for the same day. On the same day as the site visits, the Stantec architectural historian and City and AHPP staff will identify the property for the individual NRHP nomination. Following selection of the property for the NRHP nomination, Stantec will conduct research on it at local repositories. Based on our work during Phase I of the project, we are familiar with the repositories in Fayetteville and their potentially relevant sources. Our research will aim to understand the history of the property, such as its association with architects, ownership history, and any alterations or additions. Potential repositories to visit include the U of A Special Collections Department, the Washington County Archives, the Fayetteville Public Library Grace Keith Genealogy Collection, and the Shiloh Museum of Ozark History. The research portion of the trip will be completed in one day. Additional research will be undertaken using digitally available sources, including subscription services, like Newspapers.com, NewspaperArchive.com, Ancestry.com, and FamilySearch.org, and digitized collections, such as the University of Arkansas University Libraries Digital Collections. Multiple Property Submission Outline Stantec will prepare an outline for both components of the MPS, the MPDF and individual NRHP registration form, based on the results of our research, site visits, and consultation with City staff and AHPP regarding the individual nomination. We have already identified the key themes relevant to University Heights and Haskell Heights and understand the necessary components of an MPDF and individual nomination form. The MPDF will include: City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 19 • A sequentially ordered statement of the relevant historic contexts, • A description of associated property types and their significance and registration requirements, • Geographical data, • A summary of the methods used to develop the multiple property listing, and • A bibliography of references in Chicago Manual of Style format. The outline for the individual registration form will include basic information — such as the property name, location, classification, and function — and the components of Section 7 and Section 8. This includes key exterior and interior architectural features, an evaluation of integrity, a historical narrative built upon identified themes of significance, and a statement of significance. The outline will also include a working bibliography of major sources. Both outlines will go through Stantec's rigorous three-part quality QA/QC process. This process ensures accurate, complete, and reliable documentation based on thoughtful and considered consensus. Following our internal review, the Stantec team will submit the outlines to City and AHPP staff for their review. Multiple Property Submission Draft and Final Draft Stantec's draft MPS will include the MPDF and individual nomination. The draft MPDF will integrate the historic context developed during Phase I of the project and identify associated property types and their significance and registration requirements. The MPDF, numbering approximately 40-50 pages, will build upon the current historic context as necessary and provide a framework for assessing the NRHP eligibility of historic properties in University Heights and Haskell Heights. During Phase I of the project, Stantec preliminarily identified three associated property types identified by both associative and physical attributes: (1) Properties associated with an early settler or prominent resident. (2) Properties associated with the earliest period of development in the study area (pre -World War II) or the recreational or social history of Markham Hill. (3) Properties that embody the characteristics of an architectural style from the Victorian, Eclectic, or Early Modern era or the Contemporary or Organic styles. Stantec will expand this preliminary list if research reveals additional associated property types, and each property type will be concisely described and supported with narratives of significance and registration requirements. The MPDF will be prepared in accordance with NIPS standards and National Register Bulletin 16B: How to the Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form. The accompanying individual C ; I r i NRHP registration form, approximately 15-20 pages, will �.. include all the required sections and materials, including =� . the completed registration form, photographs, and figures. Photographs will meet the NPS standards in the "Consolidated and Updated Photograph Policy." Digital An undated rendering of the living room of the Orton color photographs will be provided in JPEG or TIF format House (1641 West Halsell Road) designed by Fay Jones. and properly labeled according to NIPS standards. Each Source: Architectural Record, 2009. digital image will be at least six megapixels (2000 x 3000 pixels) and will be submitted in a ZIP file. The individual nomination will clearly outline the significance of City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 20 the subject property and will follow AHPP standards, NPS standards, and National Register Bulletin 16A: How to Complete the National Register Registration Form. The draft MPS will go through our three-part QA/QC and technical editing, ensuring it is complete, accurate, and well -written. Following our internal review, the MPS will be submitted to the City and AHPP for concurrent review. Stantec will address one round of reviewed and consolidated comments by the City and AHPP and revise the MPDF and individual registration form to incorporate required revisions. A final draft MPS will subsequently be submitted to the City and AHPP. Presentation to Arkansas State Review Board After AHPP staff has approved the final draft MPS, the MPDF and individual nomination will be considered by the Arkansas State Review Board at the next scheduled meeting. An architectural historian from Stantec will present the MPS to the board. We are experienced public communicators with significant experience presenting our projects to other preservation professionals. We understand the key points that need to be relayed and possess the knowledge and expertise to address questions and achieve approval. Stantec will complete required edits and respond to comments provided by the Arkansas State Review Board to facilitate the timely submission of the final MPS to the NIPS. Stantec historian presenting at a public meeting. City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 21 We have reviewed the CLG grant agreement with the AHPP and will bring our understanding of the grant requirements as well as our extensive prior experience with grants to bear to ensure that the project progresses smoothly and in accordance with all stipulations. The schedule below was prepared accordingly and accommodates completion in advance of the grant deadline of September 30, 2025. This schedule presents our suggestion for best management of the project but could be adjusted as necessary following Stantec's selection as the vendor. Task Consultant selection and contract execution Days Duration 27 Start Date Apr-24 End.. Friday, May 31, 2024 CalendarWorking Days 37 Project initiation and kick-off meeting 5 Friday, May 31, 2024 Friday, June 7, 2024 7 Identification of 3 properties 15 Friday, May 31, 2024 Saturday, June 15, 2024 15 Property owner consent obtained by City 15 Saturday, June 15, 2024 Friday, July 5, 2024 20 Historic District Commission meeting 1 Thursday, June 13, 2024 Friday, June 14, 2024 1 Black Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting 1 Thursday, June 20, 2024 Friday, June 21, 2024 1 Fieldwork and in -person research window 10 Friday, July 12, 2024 Friday, July 26, 2024 14 Outline 10 Friday, July 26, 2024 Friday, August 9, 2024 14 City and AHPP review 10 Friday, August 9, 2024 Friday, August 23, 2024 14 Draft 1 MPD + nomination 40 Friday, August 23, 2024 Friday, October 18, 2024 56 City and AHPP review 9 Friday, October 18, 2024 Friday, November 15, 2024 28 Draft 2 MPD + nomination 20 Friday, November 15, 2024 Friday, December 13, 2024 28 Presentation to State Review Board 1 Wednesday, April 2, 2025 Wednesday, April 2, 2025 1 Final deliverables 15 Wednesday, April 2, 2025 Wednesday, April 23, 2025 21 Final invoice 1 Friday, May 30, 2025 Friday, May 30, 2025 1 Apr-24 Jun-24 Jul-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 Consultant selection and contract execution Project initiation and kick-off meeting Identification of 3 properties Property owner consent obtained by City Historic District Commission meeting Black Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting Fieldwork and in -person research window Outline City and AHPP review Draft 1 MPD + nomination City and AHPP review Draft 2 MPD + nomination Presentation to State Review Board Final deliverables Final invoice City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 22 A breakdown of labor and non -labor expenses is provided on the next page. The project would be structured as lump sum, to be billed on a percent -complete basis. Should the City request additional services during project initiation or during the project, the hourly fee schedule provided in this budget would be applicable. Stantec proposes the below milestone payment schedule: Milestone Completion of fieldwork and in -person research Payment Percent 25% Submittal of draft 1 MPD + nomination 50% Submittal of draft 2 MPD + nomination 75% Submittal of final deliverables 100% City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights 23 Task Project Management Kick-off and commission presentations (virtual) Individual NRHP candidate summaries/identification of 3 properties Fieldwork and in -person research MPDF (2 drafts + final) Nomination (2 drafts + final) SRB presentation (virtual) & prep Total Hours Cost Rate Total Cost Overhead (159.477%) Profit (5%) Expenses Expenses Rental Car Fuel for Rental Car Flight (coach) Airport parking/transfers Lodging (GSA rate + taxes) Per Diem Appendix A Resumes The ca. 1956 Fay Jones designed Richard D. Brothers House at 665 North Gray Avenue. Source: Stantec, 2023 City of Fayetteville, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights ® Stantec Emily Reed US Technical Area Leader, Architectural History 16 years of experience Emily is Stantec's national Technical Leader for Architectural History. She has over 15 years' experience in property assessments, historic preservation, and related work, including research, documentation, and regulatory compliance. She manages a team of 10+ historians in four states. Her expertise includes surveying, assessing, and documenting historic properties and determining eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places in compliance with Section 106 and NEPA; Section 4(f) determinations; archival research; and historic context development. She meets the Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications for Architectural Historian. EDUCATION MS, Historic Preservation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 2010 BA, History and Art History, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2006 SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE University Park Survey and NRHP District Nomination for City of Little Rock I City of Little Rock I Pulaski County, AR Survey and NRHP nomination of University Park, a predominately Black neighborhood associated with the city's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts In addition to documenting the neighborhood's developmental and social history, our team explored the contributions of prominent Black members of the community who resided in the neighborhood. Oral history interviews were conducted with current and former residents, which supplemented archival research. Listed 2023. Hillcrest NRHP Historic District Survey Update, City of Little Rock I City of Little Rock I Pulaski County, AR Historic resources re -survey of a portion of the Hillcrest National Register Historic District in preparation for a future NRHP amendment. The district was listed in the NRHP in 1990 under Criteria A and C in the areas of Community Planning and Development and Architecture as an example of a streetcar suburb in Little Rock with a collection of architectural styles popular from the turn of the century to World War II. The survey area comprises approximately 500 resources, most of which require incorporation and comparison of previous survey data. The project is funded by a Certified Local Government grant through the Arkansas SHPO and must be completed in accordance with SHPO and NPS standards. 2021. NRHP Nomination for Country Club Addition, Topeka City of Topeka I Shawnee County, KS Prepared National Register Nomination for the Country Club Addition, an early- to mid -twentieth century neighborhood comprising 53 single-family residences constructed in a variety of architectural styles, including examples from the Revival and Modern eras of architecture. Statement of significance includes a detailed history of the development of the area and the development of the neighborhood relative to the mid -twentieth century expansion of Topeka. The project was partially funded from a grant from the NPS. Listed 2022. NRHP Nomination for Teddy Avenue Residential Historic District, Slidell I City of Slidell I St. Tammany Parish, LA Prepared National Register District nomination for an intact portion of the Brugier Addition, which was platted in 1909 as a railroad -oriented neighborhood. The district encompasses 32 residential properties and 1 site, a public park. The district is characterized by one-story, detached, single-family residences constructed in the early twentieth century and the architecture of the district represents popular trends of the era as well as housing forms that reflect local vernacular influences. Ms. Reed presented in the nomination to the Louisiana State Board of Review, where it was unanimously approved; the district was officially listed in July 2021. 2020-2021. Fayetteville Heritage & Historic Preservation Plan Fayetteville, Washington County, AR The City of Fayetteville retained Stantec to prepare the city's first historic preservation plan. The project involved an analysis of the city's existing preservation program, procedures, codes, and tools. Informed by robust community engagement, including in -person meetings and surveys, and benchmarking against peer cities, Stantec developed a strategic preservation plan with five overarching goals, each with supporting action items. The project also included a historic resources survey plan, which considered prior survey and designations, used GIS to analyze the geographic distribution of historic -age resources, and outlined a phased methodology for implementation. 2022-2023. Sandy Shannon MHC Architectural Historian 10 years of experience Sandy is an Architectural Historian who specializes in municipally sponsored projects. Her experience includes surveying, assessing, and documenting historical properties and evaluating eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); archival research; local landmark, local historic district, and NRHP nominations; historic preservation and survey plans; and historic context development. She regularly serves as Project Manager for a variety of project types and clients, and has worked extensively in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and other states. She meets the Secretary of the Interior's professional qualifications for Architectural History. EDUCATION Master of Heritage Conservation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 2014 Bachelor of Science Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana -Champaign, Illinois, 2003 SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Historic Context Study of Haskell Heights and University Heights I Fayetteville, AR 12023—present Project Manager Project Manager for a historic context of the Haskell Heights and University Heights neighborhoods, first settled in the nineteenth century and later developed into a Modernist enclave. Oversaw creation of the context study and recommendations developed in consideration of the project's Phase II MPDF and future NRHP nominations. Oversaw public outreach material preparation and presented to Black Heritage Preservation Commission. Project is funded by the NPS and administered by the Arkansas SHPO. Currently on schedule and on budget for May 2024 completion, well ahead of Sept. 2024 grant deadline. University Park Survey and NRHP District Nomination City of Little Rock I Little Rock, AR 1 2021-2023 1 Architectural Historian and Co-author Survey and NRHP nomination of University Park, a predominately Black neighborhood associated with the city's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts. Housing styles included Modernist examples. The project was funded by a grant from the NPS and met federal and Arkansas SHPO standards. Listed 2023. Teddy Avenue NRHP District Nomination I City of Slidell I Slidell, LA 12021 1 Project Manager and Co- author Project Manager and co-author of an NRHP nomination for a residential district nominated under Criterion C in the area of Architecture. Project included archival research to develop an overview of the developmental history of the neighborhood and the architecture context and a presentation to the State's NR Review Committee. Listed 2021. Historic Resources Survey of Aransas, Calhoun, and Refugio Counties I Calhoun County, TX 1 2020-2022 Project Manager for Calhoun County Countywide historic resources surveys of three large counties with minimal documentation. Stantec was responsible for Calhoun County. Led development of historic contexts using MPDF format, public presentations, and documentation of thousands of properties assessed using the MPDF framework, among other tasks. The Texas SHPO administered the NPS-funded project. Downtown Flatonia Historic Resources Survey and NRHP District Nomination I City of Flatonia I Flatonia, TX 12017 1 Lead Author Lead surveyor and author of an NRHP nomination for Flatonia's historical late -nineteenth to mid -twentieth century downtown. Nomination used by Texas SHPO as sample for new projects. Listed 2017. View Park NRHP District Nomination I View Park Conservancy I Los Angeles, CA 1 2015-2016 1 Architectural Historian and Co-author Lead fieldworker and co-author of an NRHP district nomination for approximately 1,800 early- to mid - twentieth century residential resources. Required documentation of Modernist residences, including architect -designed examples. The nomination was approved by the California SHPO without edits. Project was the recipient of a 2017 Los Angeles Conservancy Preservation Award. Listed 2016. Citywide Historic Resources Survey for City of Los Angeles (SurveyLA), Northeast LA Phase* Los Angeles, CA 12016 1 Architectural Historian Historian for documentation phase of Northeast Los Angeles survey. Conducted property research; evaluated resources and districts for local, state, and NRHP eligibility using MPDF framework; documented resources; and researched and wrote historic district summaries. Required knowledge and documentation of an extensive array of contextual histories with eligibility standards and associated property types, including Modernist residences and neighborhoods. * denotes projects completed with other firms ® Stantec Amy Dase MA Senior Historian 38 years of experience Amy is a Senior Historian more than 35 years of experience managing and producing cultural resources management projects of all types in 14 states that span portions of the Northwest, Southwest, Midwest, Southeast, and Atlantic Seaboard. Her expertise includes surveying, assessing, and documenting historic -age resources and determining their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) for compliance with Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Protection Act, and state regulations; archival research using local, state, federal, and international sources; oral history research; and historic context development. She launched her cultural resources management career with seven years in the NRHP Programs Office of the Texas Historical Commission, the state's historic preservation office. Amy's historiographical knowledge encompasses multiple areas of significance, especially agriculture, architecture, historic non -aboriginal archeology, community planning and development, ethnic heritage, industry, military, social history, and transportation. Her extensive research specialties include underrepresented communities and their significant fragile resources. She is expert at adeptly preparing accurately reported, well organized, clearly written deliverables. She exceeds the Secretary of the Interior Professional Qualifications Standards for Historian and Architectural Historian. EDUCATION MA, History, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1990 PhD, History, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2022 BA, History, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 1985 SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE University Park Historic District NRHP Nomination City of Little Rock I AR Research director for survey and NRHP nomination for a predominately Black neighborhood associated with the city's mid -twentieth century urban renewal efforts. CMEC is studying the contributions of prominent Black community members who resided in the neighborhood, which was developed on the heels of Civil Rights victories in Little Rock. Oral history interviews will be conducted with current and former residents and supplement archival research. 2020— ongoing. Shield Ranch NRHP Nomination, Travis and Hays Counties I Shield Ranch Foundation I TX Principal investigator/project historian documented 255 historic -age resources during reconnaissance survey on the Shield Ranch for development of a subsequent NRHP nomination that Amy authored. The ranch, significant for historical associations with twentieth-century goat and sheep ranching and potential to yield information through sites associated with nineteenth-century Euro-American settlement, has 150 contributing resources built between about 1870 and 1970. 2018-2020. Mountain Home Air Force Base Bomber Alert Facility NRHP Nomination I Mountain Home Air Force Base ID Principal investigator/project historian prepared a NRHP nomination for the nationally significant Mountain Home Air Force Base Bomber Alert Facility, Elmore County, Idaho. The property has four contributing modernistic resources on 103 acres, all carefully designed to fulfill the Cold War mission of swift defense in the event of attack. The nomination is currently undergoing evaluation for National Historic Landmark Designation. 2011-2012. National Register of Historic Places for the Mesa Water Boosting Station for the TxDOT-El Paso District, El Paso I TxDOT-El Paso District I TX Principal investigator/major author supervised four project historians preparing a nomination for the Mesa Water Boosting Station in El Paso, El Paso County, Texas. National Register of Historic Places for the Temple Commercial Historic District I City of Temple I TX Principal investigator supervised the project historian preparing a nomination for the Temple Commercial Historic District in Temple, Bell County, Texas. National Register of Historic Places for the Old West Austin Historic District I Enfield, Pemberton Heights, and Bryker Woods Neighborhood Associations I TX Co -principal investigator/project historian prepared a nomination for the Old West Austin Historic District in Austin, Travis County, Texas. Althea Wunderler-Selby nns. ® Stantec Architectural Historian 5 years of experience • Jacksonville, Florida Althea has experience in regulatory compliance, preservation planning, advocacy and outreach, and hands-on technical preservation. She has acted as the lead Architectural Historian during the production of technical reporting in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act and state regulations, as well as Architectural Survey Reports, Conditions Assessment Reports, and National Register of Historic Places nominations. Althea has assisted or led the coordination and execution of architectural surveys in Oregon, Alaska, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, and Florida and is familiar with California DPR forms. She is knowledgeable of the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places and has worked with various clients in the public sector, including local governments, Counties, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as well as the private sector. EDUCATION MS, Historic Preservation, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon BS, History, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Historic Context Study of Haskell Heights and University Heights I Fayetteville, AR 12023—present Project Manager Lead author for a historic context of the Haskell Heights and University Heights neighborhoods, first settled in the nineteenth century and later developed into a Modernist enclave. Produced a context study and recommendations developed in consideration of the project's Phase II MPDF and future NRHP nominations and prepared public outreach material Project is funded by the NPS and administered by the Arkansas SHPO. Currently on schedule and on budget for May 2024 completion, well ahead of Sept. 2024 grant deadline. Eastside Historic Resources Survey Update and National Register Nomination* I LIFT Jax I Duval County, FL 1 2021-2023 1 Architectural Historian Althea led fieldwork, reporting, and client communication for an architectural survey of the Eastside neighborhood of Jacksonville, Florida, encompassing approximately 750 historic structures. The Eastside is the most intact historically Black neighborhood in Jacksonville's urban core and has ties to the Gullah Geechee community. In addition to producing a survey report, Althea was responsible for the completion of an NRHP district nomination for the Eastside, which was listed in the NRHP in July 2023. National Register of Historic Places Nominations for the Proposed Coulter Memorial Academy Historic District and Amended Cheraw Historic District* I Town of Cheraw, SC I Cheraw, SC 12021 1 Architectural Historian Althea led fieldwork and reporting for this NRHP nomination and amended nomination. The Cheraw Historic District was originally listed in the NRHP in 1974 with a limited historic context and period of significance. She completed fieldwork in the district and produced an amended section 7 of the NRHP nomination form. The Coulter Memorial Academy is a historically Black educational and religious facility. Althea completed fieldwork in the proposed district and produced all sections of the NRHP nomination form with the exception of Section 8. Both the amended Cheraw Historic District and Coulter Memorial Academy Historic District were approved for listing in the NRHP Willamette Valley Water Project Multiple Property Documentation I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Willamette Valley, OR 12020 1 Staff Architectural Historian The Willamette Valley Water Project Multiple Property Documentation Form documented and determined the eligibility of 13 dams and associated powerhouses, pumping facilities, administration buildings, and recreation facilities in Oregon's Willamette Valley. Althea led the effort to research these properties and create historic context statements. This effort encompassed performing archival research, transcribing oral interviews, and writing contexts considering the history of recreation, hydropower, and forestry in the region. * denotes projects completed with other firms City of Fayetteville RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights SECTION C: Signature Submittal 1. DISCLOSURE INFORMATION Proposer must disclose any possible conflict of interest with the City of Fayetteville, including, but not limited to, any relationship with any City of Fayetteville employee. Proposer response must disclose if a known relationship exists between any principal or employee of your firm and any City of Fayetteville employee or elected City of Fayetteville official. If, to your knowledge, no relationship exists, this should also be stated in your response. Failure to disclose such a relationship may result in cancellation of a purchase and/or contract as a result of your response. This form must be completed and returned in order for your bid/proposal to be eligible for consideration. PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS, AS IT APPROPRIATELY APPLIES TO YOUR FIRM: X 1) NO KNOWN RELATIONSHIP EXISTS 2) RELATIONSHIP EXISTS (Please explain): I certify that; as an officer of this organization, or per the attached letter of authorization, am duly authorized to certify the information provided herein is accurate and true; and my organization shall comply with all State and Federal Equal Opportunity and Non -Discrimination requirements and conditions of employment. Pursuant Arkansas Code Annotated §25-1-503, the Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not currently boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during any time in which they are entering into, or while in contract, with any public entity as defined in §25-1-503. If at any time during contract the contractor decides to boycott Israel, the contractor must notify the contracted public entity in writing. 2. PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION At the discretion of the City, one or more firms may be asked for more detailed information before final ranking of the firms, which may also include oral interviews. NOTE: Each Proposer shall submit to the City a primary contact name, e-mail address, and phone number (preferably a cell phone number) where the City selection committee can call for clarification or interview via telephone. Corporate Name of Firm: Stantec Consulting Services Inc Primary Contact: Emily Reed Phone#1(cell preferred): 737 587-5824 E-Mail Address: Emily. reed a@stantec.com Title of Primary Contact: Principal Phone#2: 512 831-6204 City of Fayetteville, AR RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights Page 15 of 16 4. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: As an interested party on this project, you are required to provide debarment/suspension certification indicating compliance with the below Federal Executive Order. Certification can be done by completing and signing this form. Federal Executive Order (E.O.) 12549 "Debarment and Suspension" requires that all contractors receiving individual awards, using federal funds, and all sub -recipients certify that the organization and its principals are not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any Federal department or agency from doing business with the Federal Government. Signature certifies that neither you nor your principal is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. Questions regarding this form should be directed to the City of Fayetteville Purchasing Division. NAME OF COMPANY: Stantec Consulting Services Inc PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 8401 Shoal Creek Blvd, Suite 100, Austin TX 78757 MAILING ADDRESS: 8401 Shoal Creek Blvd, Suite 100, Austin TX 78757 FEIN 11-2167170 TAX I D #: PHONE: 512 831-6204 AR. SECRETARY OF STATE FILING #: 100188432 E-MAIL: Emilmeed(aDstantec.com SIGNATURE: C%4 PRINTED NAME: Emily Reed TITLE: Principal FAX: 737-307-8499 DATE: City of Fayetteville, AR RFP, Multiple Property Documentation Form for University Heights/Haskell Heights Page 16 of 16 04/22/2024