Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-1555 (11) CityClerk From:Thomas Brown <tbrownii@icloud.com> Sent:Saturday, January 13, 2024 11:56 AM To:Wiederkehr, Mike; Moore, Sarah; Bunch, Sarah; D'Andre Jones; Turk, Teresa; Hertzberg, Holly; Berna, Scott Cc:Curth, Jonathan; CityClerk Subject:ADM-2023-0048 an Appeal of VAR-2023-0030 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Fayetteville. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Council Representatives The previous speakers and our appeal effectively addressed the heightened safety hazards associated with operating a high activity auto-centric pedestrian hostile use, like a filling station, at an intersection currently experiencing high levels of vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian accidents. Therefore I want to address an equally disqualifying issue. This is the conflicting nature of the proposed filling station use verses the pedestrian friendly mixed-use urban design objectives of the core of a Tier 2 Center. As a previous Planning Commissioner involved in developing the 2040 City Plan I am aware of eight features of the Growth Concept Map, addressed in Section 2.2 of the Plan, that are relevant to our appeal.  First, the Growth Concept Map depicts in broad graphic terms how Fayetteville should grow over the next 20 years.  Second the Map identifies key growth nodes, corridors and major areas that should be conserved for natural resources and open space.  Third, the Map graphically depicts the location of:  40 Tier 1, 2, 3 and Special Centers.  2 High Activity Corridors.  The North College Transit Corridor.  And the Enduring Green Network.  Fourth, the Plan states that the map reflects city-wide policies to create diverse, efficient, and well- connected communities that are affordable, rich in local employment, and access to transportation, services, and culture.  Fifth, the Plan states that the Map helps form the basis for strategic Planning Policies across the city. An example of this Map feature can be seen in how the Map can be used in guiding future updates to the City’s Zoning Map and Future Land Use Map.  Sixth, the Plan states that the Map is intended to provide a more certain environment for making public and private investment decisions. An example of this Map feature can be seen in its ability to guide the Development Community to where higher density mixed-use project opportunities are available across the City.  Seventh, the Plan states that the Map is a tool to help guide in evaluating development proposals. An example of this Map feature can be seen in its potential to help guide the City Council when considering the compatibility of a rezoning proposal or potentially guide the Planning Commission when evaluating the appropriateness of a variance proposal.  Finally, The Map identifies the intersection of North Street and Garland Avenue as the core of a Tier 2 Center. The 2040 City Plan states that all Tier Centers are intended to be mixed-use nodes that are pedestrian- friendly areas served by current or future transit services. 1 The 2040 City Plan additionally states that Tier 2 Centers are characterized by Commercial uses that are in mixed-use structures or office buildings. The development proposed by the variance applicant is not a pedestrian friendly use proposed in a mixed-use structure or office building. It is an auto-centric filling station that emphasizes vehicles over pedestrians and should therefore be denied. Sent from my iPhone 2